Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout061890 PC AgendaAGBNDA ~EMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION AN ADJOURNED RBGULAR MEETING VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ~uSE 1O, 1~'90 = 6:00 PM Chairman Chiniaeff ROLL CALL~ Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMME~S] A,=~/~fIIS~nu~esis provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on the , Aqenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If .'.. you desire to speak to the CommiSsioners about am item DOt listed on the Agenda, a pink -Re~uest to speak,, form should be filled out and filed with the Co~unissioner Secretary. When you are called to spe~k~, please come forward .and state your name and address. items a "Request to Speak" form must be Secretary before Commission gets to There iS a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. 1.1 Approve minutes of June 4, 1990. DISCUSSION RECOMMENDATION| 2.1 Assignment of ownership - general discussion. PrODOSed -Pot,~C~ for and Revised Permits RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Review and consider staff's analysis. Historic District Review Proaedures RECOI~IENDATION: 4.1 Receive etaf~f report on history and status of the TemeculaHis~oric:District andconsider review procedures and development 9uidelines. Property Owner Notification Requirements RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive staff report on the existing public notification standards for projects Which require hearings. Consider alternatives and recommendations for revised requirements. 6. Other commission Business DIRECTORS REPORT COMMISSIONERS REPORTS Next meeting: Monday, July 2, 1990, 6:00 PM, Vail School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California Elementary MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLiaJ4NING COMMISSION HELD JUNE 4, 1990 The first regular meeting of the Temecula Planning Commission was called to order at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California at 6:10 PM. Mayor Ronald Parks presiding. PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were City Manager F. D. Aleshire, City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek, Acting Planning Director Ross Geller and Recording Secretary Anita Durnil. PUBLIC COMMENT None offered at this time. COMMISSION BUSINESS Election of Chairperson Mayor Parks opened nominations for the position of Chairperson of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Ford moved to nominate Dennis Chiniaeff, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Blair. There being no further nominations Mayor Parks declared the nominations closed. It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to approve the election of Commissioner Chiniaeff by unanimous ballot. The motion was carried unanimously. Election of Vice Chairman Mayor Parks opened nominations for the position of Vice- Chairman of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to nominate Steven Ford and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey. Commissioner Hoagland moved to nominate Commissioner Blair. The motion failed for lack of a second. There being no further nominations, the Mayor declared the nominations closed. It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Ford to approve the election of Commissioner Ford by unanimous ballot. The motion was carried unanimously. Drawin~ of Lots to Establish Term of Office Mayor Parks asked each Commissioner to draw a term of office from prepared lots. Commissioner Fahey drew a three-year term, Commissioners Blair and Ford drew two-year terms and Commissioners Hoagland and Chiniaeff drew one-year terms. Mayor Parks then presented Chairman Chiniaeff with an engraved gavel, declared him duly elected and turned the meeting over to him at 6:25 PM. Resolution Adopting Rules of Order City Attorney John Cavanaugh presented a staff report recommending the adoption of a resolution adopting rules of order for the conduct of Planning Commission Meetings. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded Commissioner Fahey to adopt a resolution entitled: by RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PI.%NNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~ ADOPTING RULES OF ORDER FOR THE CONDUCT OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS. The motion was unanimously carried. Resolution Designatin~ Locations for Postin~ of Ordinances and/or Resolutions Planning Director Geller presented a staff report recommending adoption of a resolution designating locations for posting of Planning Commission Ordinances and/or Resolutions. It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Ford to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TRM~UXahDR,glGN'A~ING-LOCi, TIQNfFO~PO2TING OF ORDiNANCES AND/OR RESOLUTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISHED OR POSTED. The motion was unanimously carried. 6. Resolution Establishing Term of Office for the ChairPerson City Attorney Cavanaugh presented the staff report recommending adoption of a resolution establishing the term of office of the Planning Commission chairperson. It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. PC 90-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL~ ESTABLISHING THE TERM OF OFFICE FOR THE CHAIRPERSON. The motion was unanimously carried. DISCUSSION ITEMS 7. Substantial Conformance Policv Ross Geller, Acting Planning Director, introduced the staff report by Senior Planner Sam Reed. Mr. Reed outlined the existing policy and requested that the Commission give direction to staff on any changes they feel are needed in the provisions of County Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.43. He also advised that the County of Riverside has used substantial conformance policies to allow many more changes in specific development plans than the City staff proposes to allow. Commissioner Hoaglandquestioned the workload this will impose on the Commission if each case comes to them. Mr. Geller advised that this would amount to approximately four or five cases per month and they would appear as Consent Calendar items. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested that staff prepare specific guidelines for the Commission to follow in these cases. He also suggested that staff approve proposed substantial conformance requests that are upgrades from the original approved projects, without sending them back through the process. Mr. Geller said staff with put together recommendations and some information from other jurisdictions for the Commission. It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Ford to approve the staff recommendations as presented with the added intent to develop a Consent Calendar to be brought to the Planning Commission for review, and to instruct staff to return with additional guidelines and information. The motion was unanimously carried. 8. Development A~reement No. 4 - Vail Meadows City Attorney Cavanaugh presented a staff report advising that the matter is provided to the Commission as an informational item only and the staff recommendation is to receive and file. After a discussion of the Commission's role in approving or disapproving development agreements the report was received and filed by the Chairman. STAFF REPORT8 Planning Director Geller announced that the Riverside County Planning Commission will be taking the last of the items regarding Temecula at their meeting of June 6, 1990. He said all non-routine items will be referred to the Temecula Planning Commission for their meeting of June 18, 1990 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Fahey, to adjourn the meeting at 7:04 PM, to a regular meeting to be held on Monday, June 18, 1990 at 6:00 PM at the Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, CA 92390. The motion was unanimously carried. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman ATTEST: Ross E. Geller, Secretary LAW BURKE, ~NILLIAMS 8~ SORI]NSI~N May 24, 1990 ' MAY 2 Mr. F. D. Aleshire City Manager City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92390 Re: Development Agreement No. 4 - Vail Meadows Dear Frank: I have been asked by Dennis O'Neil, attorney for Bedford Properties, to approve as to form an agreement permitting sale of all or part of the property subject to Development Agreement No. 4, which was executed between Bedford and the County on November 7, 1988. Pursuant to the Development Agreement, no property may be conveyed unless the purchaser agrees to assume all obligations of the Agreement. To date, the City Council has not had the opportunity to review any of the development agreements the County executed prior to incorporation. These agreements present a number of advantages and disadvantages to the City. For example, they permit the City to impose new impact fees, even as to properties with vested maps. On the other hand, they also exempt the property from any future growth control measures. Regardless of its advantages and disadvantages, it is doubtful the City could repudiate any Agreement if it desired, although it may modify or suspend it on the basis that the failure to do so would endanger the public health or safety (Gov. C. §65865.3(b)). And, importantly, if the City wishes to challenge the Agreement in court, it must do so promptly. At this time, the statute of limitation period for challenging development agreement is ambiguous. Mr. Frank Aleshire May 24, 1990 Page 2 However, if either AB391 or AB3674 is enacted, the limitation period would either be 120 days or i year, respectively. (See, enclosed legislative updates.) In the meanwhile, I have approved as to form the enclosed Assignment Form, subject to the caveat that neither the City Council or Planning Commission have taken any formal action to validate or repudiate the Agreement. In this way, development may continue without impairing the City from later reviewing the Agreement. Please notify me if this approach is acceptable. Sincerely, Scott F. Field City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA sff/LTR12004:bjj cc: Ross Geller DRAFT May __, 1990 TO: FROM: RE: Development Agreement Representatives Scott F. Field City Attorney City of Temecula Assignment of Interest Attached are new forms for assignments of interest under development agreements. Please use these forms for all future assignments. Please note that at this time, neither the Temecula City Council or Planning Commission has reviewed any Agreements, nor taken action to approve them. Consequently, approval of these forms may not be construed as City ratification of any development agreement. attachment SFF/bjj sff/LTR12004 DRAFT City Clerk City of Temecula 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 Re: Development Agreement No. Assignment of Interest Gentlement: Pursuant to Section 2.4.1(b) of Development Agreement No. , enclosed is a copy of the assignment and acceptance of interest in Development Agreement No. Very truly yours, cc: City Manager, City of Temecula Director, Planning Department, City of Temecula city Attorney, city of Temecula sff/LTR12004 DRAFT Recording requested by and when recorded return to: ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. W]{EREAS, the City of Temecula incorporated on December 1, 1989, and its jurisdiction includes, in whole, the property that is the subject of Development Agreement No. 4; WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.3, the City is the successor-in-interest to the County of Riverside and assumes all rights and obligations of the County pursuant to Development Agreement No. ; WHEREAS, this Assignment is not a Release, as described at Section 2.4.2 of said Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Development Agreement No. , recorded , 1988, as Instrument No. , which is hereby incorporated herein by this reference, and for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agree as follows: 1. The assignment and assumption provided for under this agreement is made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property subject to Development Agreement No. The property sold, transferred or assigned together with this assignment and assumption agreement is described in Exhibit "A#, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2o Assi~r~r hereby grants, sells, transfers, conveys, assigns and delegates to Assignee all of its rights, title, interest, benefits, privileges, duties and obligations arising under or from Development Agreement No. __ as Owner of the property described in Exhibit "A" hereto. sff/LTR12004 DRAFT 3. Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and unconditionally assumes and agrees to perform all of the duties and obligations of Assignor arising under or from Development Agreement No. as Owner of the property described on Exhibit "A" hereto. 4. The sale, transfer or assignment of the property described in Exhibit "A" hereto, and the assignment and assumption provided for under this agreement are the subject of additional agreements between Assignor and Assignee. Notwithstanding any term, condition or provision of such additional agreements, the rights of the City of Temecula arising under or from Development Agreement No. __ and this assignment and assumption agreement shall not be affected, diminished or defeated in any way, except upon the express written agreement of the City of Temecula. DATED: ASSIGNOR: ASSIGNEE [ALL SIGNATURES SHALL BE NOTARIZED. EXECUTION ON BEHALF OF ANY CORPORATION SHALL BE BY TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS.] Approved as to Form By: Scott F. Field City Attorney City of Temecula sff/LTR12004 DRAFT DRAFT 04/27/90 CA AB 391 Page I AUTHOR: Brown D T~TLE: Development agreements ZNTRODUCEDz 01/30/89 LAST AMEND: 04/24/89 LOCATZONt Senate Judiciary Committee CODE SECTIONS: An act to amend Section 65009 of the Government Code, relating to development agreements. SUMMARY Prohibits, with certain exceptions, any action or proceeding challenging the decision of the legislative body to adopt an ordinance approving a development agreement, 120 days after the decision, except that for development agreements recorded prioz~ 120 days after January 1, 1990. AB 391, as amended, D. Brown. Development a~reements. Existing law permits cities and coun~iea ~o enter into development agreements with any person having an interest in real property for the developmen~ of the property after a public hearing. This bill would prohibit, with certain exceptions, any action or proceeding challenging the decision of ~he legislative body to adopt an ordinance approving a development agreement, 120 days after the decision, except ~hat for development agreements~ recorded prior to Janual7 1, 1990, actions or proceedings would be required to be commenced and service made on the legislative body within 120 days after January 1, 1990. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. STATUes 08/22/89 From SENATE Committee on JUDXCIARYX Failed passage. VOTZSx 04/12/89 Assembly Local GOvernment Committee P 9- 05/01/89 Assembly Floor P 57- 05/31/89 Senates Local Coverraw~Committee P 8- 08/22/89 Senate Judiciary Committee F ~- PAIN --- CA AB 3674 04/27/90 AUTHOR: TZTLE: ZNTRODUCED: COMMITTEE: HEARING: Coresee Land use: deveZopment agreements 03/01/90 Assembly Local Government Committee 05/09/90 2900 pm CODE $ECTIONSz An act to amend Section 65009 of the Government Code, relating to land use. SUMMARY: Page 2 Requires any action or proceeding ~o attack, review, set aside~ void, or annul the decision of a legisla~ive bod~ to adopt an ordinance approving or amending a development agreement and the development agreement or amendment which is being adopted by the ordinance, for development agreements or amendments adopted on January 1, 1991, or later, be commenced and service made on the legislative body within one year oZ the adoption or amendments. AB 3674, as introduced, Cottess. Land use: development agreements. Existing law permits cities and counties ~o enter into a development agreement with any person having an interest in real property for the development of the property, after a public hearing, as speci~ied. This bill would require any action or proceeding ~o attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of a legislative body to adopt an ordinance approvtng or amending a development agreement and the development agreement or amendment which is being adopted by the ordinance, for development agreements or amendments adopted on January 1, 1991, or later, be commenced and service made on the legislative body within one year of the adoption or amendments. Votes majority. Appropriation= no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local pro~ramt no. STArUSa 03/~2/90 To ASSEMBLY COmmittee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT. END OF REPORT Recorded at request of Clerk. Board of Supervisors County of Riverside When recorded return to Riverside County Planning Director 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor Riverside. CA 92501 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 4 A development agreement between COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows SECTION 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.2 1.1.3 114 115 116 117 118 119 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4.1 2.4.2 2.4.3 2.4.4 2.4.5 2.5 2.6 2.7 Development Agreement No. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADING PAGE RECITALS DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS 3 Definitions Agreement COUNTY Development Development Approvals Development Exaction . Development Plan . Effective Date Existing Development Approvals Existing Land Use Regulations Land Use Regulations OWNER Mortgagee Project Property ......... Reservations of Authority Subsequent Development Approvals Subsequent Land Use Regulations Exhibits 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 ..... 5 GENERAL PROVISIONS 5 Binding Effect of Agreement Ownership of Property Term Assignment .... Right to Assign Release of Transferring Owner Subsequent Assignment Partial Release of Purchaser. Transferee. or Assignee of Industrial or Commercial Lot Termination of Agreement With Respect to Individual Lots Upon Sale to Public and Completion of Construction Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement Termination Notices 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 SECTION HEADING pAGE 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.6.1 3.6.2 3.6.3 3.6.4 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 3.11 4.1 4.2 4.2.1 4.2.2 4.2.3 4.2.4 4.2.5 4.3 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 7.1 7.2 7.3 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY 10 Rights to Develop . 10 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations 10 Timing of Development . 10 Phasing Plan . 11 Changes and Amendments . . 11 Reservations of Authority 11 Limitations. Resarvations and Exceptions 11 Subsequent Development Approvals 13 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law 13 Intent . 13 Public WorKs . 13 Provision of Real Property Interests by COUNTY ....... 13 Regulation by Other Public Agencies 14 Tentative Tract Map Extension 14 Vesting Tentative Maps 14 PUBLIC BENEF1TS 14 Intent Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee . Amount and Components of Fee Time of Payment Reduction for Low-Occupancy Annual Fee Adjustment Credits Continuation of Fees 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 17 REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE 17 Periodic Review 17 Special Review . 17 Procedure 17 Proceedings Upon Modification or Termination . 18 Hearing on Modification or Termination 18 Certificate of Agreement Compliance 18 1NCORPORAT1~Z~N AND ANNEXATION . 19 Intent . . . Incorporation Annexation . 19 19 19 ii SECTION 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 10. 11. 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 11.6 11.7 11.8 11.9 11.10 11.11 11.12 11.13 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 11.18 11.19 11.20 HEADING DEFAULT AND REMEDIES Remedies in General Specific Performance Release ........ Termination or Modification of Agreement for Default of OWNER Termination of Agreement for Default of COUNTY THIRD PARTY LITIGATION General Plan Litigation . Third Party Ligitation Concerning Agreement Indemnity . Environment Assurances Reservation of Rights Survival MORTGAGEE PROTECTION MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Recordation of Agreement Entire Agreement Severability Interpretation and Governing Law Section Headings Singular and Plural ..... Joint and Several Obligations Time of Essence Waiver ........... No Third Party Beneficiaries Force Majeure Mutual Covenants Successors in Interest Counterparts . . Jurisdiction and Venus . . . Project as a Private Undertaking Further Actions and Instruments Eminent Domain . . Agent for Service of Process Authority to Execute . Signatures PAGE 19 19 · 20 · 20 2O 21 21 21 22 21 22 22 23 23 24 24 24 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 27 27 27 iii DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 4 This Development Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is entered into effective on the date it is recorded with the Riverside County Recorder (hereinafter the "Effective Date") by and among the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (hereinafter "COUNTY"). and the persons and entities listed below (hereinafter ',OWNER"): KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. a California corporation. RECITALS WHEREAS. COUNTY is authorized to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. pursuant to Section 65864. et seq. of the Government Code: and, WHEREAS. COUNTY has adopted rules and regulations for consideration of development agreements. pursuant to Section 65865 of the Government Code: and. WHEREAS. OWNER has requested COUNTY to enter into a development agreement and proceedings have been taken in accordance with the rules and regulations of COUNTY; and, WHEREAS. by electing to enter into this Agreement. COUNTY shall bind future Boards of Supervisors of COUNTY by the obligations specified herein and limit the future exercise of certain governmental and proprietary powers of COUNTY: and. WHEREAS. the terms and conditions of this Agreement have undergone extensive review by COUNTY and the Board of Supervisors and have been found to be fair. just and reasonable: and. WHEREAS. the best interests of the citizens of Riverside County and the public health. safety and welfare will be served by entering into this Agreement: and. WHEREAS, all of the procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act have been met with respect to the Project and the Agreement: and. MHEM~AS, this Agreeseat and the Project are consistent with the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan and any Specific Plan applicable thereto; and. -1- WHEREAS. all actions taken and approvals given by COUNTY have been duly taken or approved in accordance with all applicable legal requirements for notice. public hearings. findings. votes. and other procedural matters: and. WHEREAS. development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement will provide substantial benefits to COUNTY and will further important policies and goals of COUNTY: and. WHEREAS. this Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning and provide for the orderly development of the Property. ensure progressive installation of necessary improvements. provide for public services appropriate to the development of the Project. and generally serve the purposes for Which development agreements under Sections 65864. et seg. of the Government Code are intended; and. WHEREAS. on June 28. 1988. Special Assessment District No. 159 was formed by County Resolution No. 88-192 pursuant to a petition. executed by OWNER. requesting the District to be formed and consenting to said District being formed to provide a financing mechanism to pay for the construction of certain public facilities that would benefit the Property and OWNER advanced those monies needed to pay all costs associated with forming said District and retained and paid civil engineers to design and engineer the public facilities to be constructed. and said public facilities were designed to benefit the Property and certain of the facilities may have been oversized to benefit adjacent properties and the public at large: and. WHEREAS, OWNER has incurred and will in the future incur substantial cost in order to assure development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement: and, WHEREAS, OWNER has incurred and will in the future incur substantial costs in excess of the generally applicable requirements in order to assure vesting of legal rights to develop the Property in accordance with this Agreement. III III III III III III III III -Z- COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS. 1.1 Definitions. The following terms when used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 Agreement. "Agreement" means this Development 1.1.2 "COUNTY" means the County of Riverside, a political subdivision Of the State of California. 1.1.3 "Development" means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project including, but not limited to: grading: the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of buildings and structures: and the installation of landscaping. "Development" does not include the maintenance. repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction and completion thereof. 1.1.4 "Development Approvals" means all permits and other entitlements for use subject to approval or issuance by COUNTY in connection with development of the Property including, but not limited (a) Specific plans and specific plan amendments: (b) Tentative and final subdivision and parcel maps: (c) Conditional use permits, public use permits and plot plans; (d) Zoning: (e) Cradin~ anti buildin~ ~ermizs. 1.1.5 "Development Exaction" means any requirement of COUNTY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation or Development Approval for the dedication of land, the construction of improvements or public facilities, or the payment of fees in order -3- to lessen, offset. mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on the environment or other public interests. 1.1.6 "Development Plan" means the Existing Development Approvals and the Existing Land Use Regulations applicable to development of the Property. 1.1.7 "Effective Date" means the date this Agreement is recorded with the County Recorder. 1.1.8 "Existing Development Approvals" means all Development Approvals approved or issued prior to the Effective Date. Existing Development Approvals includes the Approvals incorporated herein as Exhibit "C" and all other Approvals which are a matter of public record on the Effective Date. 1.1.9 "Existing Land Use Regulations" means all Land Use Regulations in effect on the Effective Date. Existing Land Use Regulations includes the Regulations incorporated herein as Exhibit "D" and all other Regulations which are a matter of public record on the Effective Date. 1.1.10 "Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of COUNTY governing the development and use of land, including, without limitation, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use. subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes. and the design. improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the property. "Land Use Regulations" does not include any COUNTY ordinance, resolution. code, rule, regulation or official policy, governing: (a) The conduct of businesses. professions, and occupations; (b) Taxes and assessments: (c) The control and abatement of nuisances: (d) The granting of encroachment permits and zhe conveyance of rights and interests which provide for the use of or the entry upon public property: (e) The exercise of the power of eminent domain. 1.1.11 "OWNER" means the persons and entities listed as OWNER on page 1 of this Agreement and their successors in interest to all or any part of the Property. -4- and 1.1.12 "Mortgagee" means a mortgagee of a mortgage. a beneficiary under a deed of trust or any other security-device lender. and their successors and assigns. 1.1.13 "Project" means the development of the Property contemplated by the Development Plan as such Plan may be further defined. enhance8 or modified pursuant to the provislons of this Agreement. 1.1.14 "Property" meant the real property described on Exhibit "A" and shawn on Exhibit "B" to Agreement. this 1.1.15 "Reservations of Authority" means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER under this Agreement and reserved to COUNTY under Section 3.6 of this Agreement. 1.1.16 "Subsequent Development Approvals" means all Development Approvals required subsequent to the Effective Date in connection with development of the Property. 1.1.17 "Subsequent Land Use Regulations" means any Land Use Regulations adopted and effective after the Effective Date of this Agreement. 1.2 Exhibits. The following documents are attached to. by this reference made a part of. this Agreement: Exhibit "A' -- Legal Description of the Property. Exhibit "B" -- Map showing Property and its location. Exhibit "C" -- Existing Development Approvals. Exhibit "D" -- Existing Land Use Regulations. Exhibit "E" -- Fee Credits. 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 2.1 Bindina Effect of Agreement. The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement. Development of the Property is hereby authorized and shall be carried ou~ only in accordance with the terms of this Agreemenl. 2.2 Ownership of Property. OWNER represents and covenants that it is the owner of the fee simple title to the Property or a portion thereof. -5- 2.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of ten (10) years thereafter unless this term is modified or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. Assignment. 2.4.1 Right to Assign. OWNER shall have the right to sell, transfer or assign the Property in whole or in part (provided that no such partial transfer shall violate the Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66410, et seq., Or Riverside County Ordinance No. 460) to any person, partnership, Joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement; provided, however, that any such sale, transfer or assignment shall include the assignment and assumption of the rights, duties and obligations arising under or from this Agreement and be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: (a) No sale. transfer or assignment of any right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale. transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property. (b) Concurrent with any such sale, transfer or assignment, or within fifteen (15) business days thereafter, OWNER shall notify COUNTY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide COUNTY with an executed agreement, in a form reasonably acceptable to COUNTY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee and providing therein that the purchaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the duties and obligations of OWNER under this Agreement. Any sale. transfer or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by Owner under this Agreement. Notwithstanding the failure of any purchaser. transferee or assignee to execute the agreement required by Paragraph (b) of this Subsection 2.4.1, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such purchaser, transferee or assignee, but the benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such agreement is executed. 2.4.2 ~elemse oT Transferring Owner. Notwithstanding any sale, transfer or assignment, a transferring OWNER shall continue to be obligated under this Agreement unless such transferring OWNER is given a release in writing by COUNTY, which release shall be provided by COUNTY upon the full satisfaction by such transferring OWNER of the following conditions: -6- (a) OWNER no longer has a legal or equitable interest in all or any part of the Property. (b) OWNER is not then in default under this Agreement. (c) OWNER has provided COUNTY with the notice and executed agreement required under Paragraph (b) of Subsection 2.4.1 above. (d) The purchaser. transferee or assignee provides COUNTY with security equivalent to any security previously provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations hereunder. 2.4.3 Subsequent Assignment. Any subsequent sale. transfer or assignment after an initial sale. transfer or assignment shall be made only in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of this Section. 2.4.4 Partial Release of Purchaser. Transferee or Assignee of Industrial or Commercial Lot. A purchaser. transferee or assignee of a lot. which has been finally subdivided as provided for in the Development Plan and for which a commercial or industrial plot plan for development of the lot has been finally approved pursuant to the Development Plan. may submit a request. in writing. to COUNTY to release said lot from the obligations under this Agreement relating to all other portions of the property. Within thirty (30) days of such request. COUNTY shall review. and if the above conditions are satisfied shall approve the request for release and notify the purchaser. transferee or assignee in writing thereof. No such release approved pursuant to this Subsection 2.4.4 shall cause. or otherwise affect. a release of OWNER from its duties and obligations under this Agreement. 2.4.5 Termination of A~reement With Respect to Individual Lots UPon Sale to Public and Completion of Construction. The provisions of Subsection 2.4.1 shall not apply to the sale or lease (for a period longer than one year) of any lot which has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement. this Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot and such lot shall be released and no longer be subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions: (a) The lot has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in "bulk") sold or leased (for a period longer than one year) to a member of the public or other ultimate user; and. (b) A Certificate of Occupancy has been issued for a building on the lot. and the fees set forth under Section 4 of this Agreement have been paid. 2.5 Amendment or Cancellation of A~reement. This Agreement may be amended or cancelled in whole or in part only by written consent of all parties in the manner provided for in Government Code Section 65868. This provision shall not limit any remedy of COUNTY or OWNER as provided by this Agreement. 2.6 Termination. This Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further effect upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Expiration of the stated term of this Agreement as set forth in Section 2.3. (b) Entry of a final judgment setting aside. voiding or annulling the adoption of the ordinance approving this Agreement. (c) The adoption of a referendum measure overriding or repealing the ordinance approving this Agreement. (d) Completion of the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement including issuance of all required occupancy permits and acceptance by COUNTY or applicable public agency of all required dedications. Termination of this Agreement shall not constitute termination of any other land use entitlements approved for the Property. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to any obligation to have been performed prior to such termination or with respect to any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement which has occurred prior to such termination or with respect to any obligations which are specifically set forth as surviving this Agreement. Upon such termination. any public facilities and services mitigation fees paid pursuant to Section 4.2 of this Agreement by OWNER to COUNTY for residential units on which construction has not yet begun shall be refunded to OWNER by COUNTY. 2.7 Notices. (a) As used in this Agreement, "notice" includes, but is not limited to, the communication of notice, request, demand, approval, statement, report, acceptance, consent, waiver, appointment or other communication required or permitted hereunder. -8- time, (b) All notices shall be in writing and shall be considered given either: (i) when delivered in person to the recipient named below: or (ii) on the date of delivery shown on the return receipt, after deposit in the United States mail in a sealed envelope as either registered or certified mail with return receipt requested, and postage and postal charges prepaid, and addressed to the recipient named below: or (iii) on the date of delivery shown in the records of the telegraph company after transmission by telegraph to the recipient named below. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to COUNTy: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of Riverside 4080 Lemon St., 14th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 with copies to: County Administrative Officer County of Riverside 4080 Lemon St., 12th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 and Director Planning Department County of Riverside 4080 Lemon St., 9th Floor Riverside, CA 92501 County Counsel County of Riverside 3535 Tenth St., Suite Riverside, CA 92501 300 If to OWNER: Kaiser Development Company c/o Rancho California Development Company 28250 Ynez Road Rancho California, CA. 92390 with a copy to: Dennis D. O'Netl, E~q. Pettis, Tester, Kruse & Krinsky 18881 Won Karman, 16th. Floor Irvine, CA. 92715 (c) Either party may, by notice given at any require subsequent notices to be given to another person or -9- entity, whether a party or an officer or representative of a party. or to a different address. or both. Notices given before actual receipt of notice of change shall not be invalidated by the change. 3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. 3.1 Rights to Develop. Subject to the terms of this Agreement including the Reservations of Authority, OWNER shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Development Plan. The Project shall remain subject to all Subsequent Development Approvals required to complete the Project as contemplated by the Development Plan. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings. and provisions for reservation and dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Development Plan. 3.2 Effect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement including the Reservations of Authority, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to development of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations. In connection with any Subsequent Development Approval, COUNTY shall exercise its discretion in accordance with the Development Plan, and as provided by this Agreement including, but not limited to, the Reservations of Authority. COUNTY shall accept for processing, review and action all applications for Subsequent Development Approvals. and such applications shall be processed in the normal manner for processing such matters. 3.3 Timing of Development. The parties acknowledge that OWNER cannot at this time predict when or the rate at which phases of the Property will be developed. Such decisions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of OWNER, such as market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court held in Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal.3d 465, that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later adopted initiative restricting the timing of development to prevail over such ~arties' agreement. it is the parties' intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that OWNER shall have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such times as OWNER deems appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment, subject only to any timing or phasing requirements set forth in the Development Plan or the Phasing Plan set forth in Section 3.4. -10- 3.4 PhasinQ Plan. Development of the Property shall be subject to all timing and phasing requirements established by the Development Plan. 3.5 Chan~es and Amendments. The parties acknowledge that refinement and further development of the Project will require Subsequent Development Approvals and may demonstrate that Changes are appropriate and mutually desirable in the Existing Development Approvals. In the event OWNER finds that a change in the Existing Development Approvals is necessary or appropriate. OWNER shall apply for a Subsequent Deve!opment Approval to effectuate such change and COUNTY shall process and act on such application in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulationso except as otherwise provided by this Agreement including the Reservations of Authority. If approved. any such change in the Existing Development Approvals shall be incorporated herein as an addendum to Exhibit "C". and may be further changed from time to time as provided in this Section. Unless otherwise required by law. as determined in COUNTY's reasonable discretion. a change to the Existing Development Approvals shall be deemed "minor" and not require an amendment to this Agreement provided such change does not: (a) Alter the permitted uses of the Property as a whole; or. (b) Increase the density or intensity of use of the Property as a whole; or, (c) Increase the maximum height and size of permitted buildings; or, (d) Delete a requirement for the reservation or dedication of land for public purposes within the Property as a whole; or, (e) Constitute a project requiring a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. 3.6 Reservations of Authority. 3.6.1 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the following Subsequent Land Use Regulations shall apply to the development of the Property. (a) Processing fees and charges of every kind and nature imposed by COUNTY to cover the estimated actual costs ~o COUNTY of ~rocessin~ applications for Development Approvals or for monitoring compliance with any Development Approvals granted or issued. -11- (b) Procedural regulations relating to hearing bodies. petitions. applications. notices, findings. records. hearings. reports. recommendations. appeals and any other matter of procedure. (c) Regulations governing construction standards and specifications including. without limitation, the County's Building Code. Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code, Fire Code and Grading Code. (d) Regulations imposing Development Exactions; provided, however. that no such subsequently adopted Development Exaction shall be applicable to development of the Property unless such Development Exaction is applied uniformly to development, either throughout the COUNTY or within a defined area of benefit which includes the Property. No such subsequently adopted Development Exaction shall apply if its application to the Property would physically prevent development of the Property for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the Development Plan. In the event any such subsequently adopted Development Exaction fulfills the same purposes. in whole or in part. as the fees set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement. COUNTY shall allow a credit against such subsequently adopted Development Exaction for the fees paid under Section 4 of this Agreement to the extent such fees fulfill the same purposes. (e) Regulations which may be in conflict with the Development Plan but which are reasonably necessary to protect the public health and safety. To the extent possible. any such regulations shall be applied and construed so as to provide OWNER with the rights and assurances provided under this Agreement. (f) Regulations which are not in conflict with the Development Plan. Any regulation. whether adopted by initiative or otherwise. limiting the rate or timing of development of the Property shall be deemed to conflict with the Development Plan and shall therefore not be applicable to the development of the Property. (g) Regulations which are in conflict with the Development Plan provided OWNER has given written consent to the application of such regulations to development of the Property. -12- 3.6.2 SubseQuent Development Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent COUNTY, in acting on Subsequent Development Approvals, from applying Subsequent Land Use Regulations which do not conflict with the Development Plan, nor shall this Agreement prevent COUNTY from denying or conditionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on the basis of the Existing Land Use Regulations or any Subsequent Land Use Regulation not in conflict with the Development Plan. 3.6.3 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or regulations, enacted after the Effective Date of this Agreement, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, such provisions of this Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. 3.6.4 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that COUNTY is restricted in its authority to limit its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations. reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to COUNTY all of its police power which cannot be so limited. This Agreement shall be construed. contrary to its stated terms if necessary. to reserve to COUNTY all such power and authority which cannot be restricted by contract. 3.7 Public Works. If OWNER is required by this Agreement to construct any public works facilities which will be dedicated to COUNTY or any other public agency upon completion. and if required by applicable laws to do so. OWNER shall perform such work in the same manner and subject to the same requirements as would be applicable to COUNTY or such other public agency should it have undertaken such construction. 3.8 Provision of Real Property Interests by COUNTY. In any instance where OWNER is required to construct any public improvement on land not owned by OWNER, OWNER shall at its sole cost and expense provide or cause to be provided, the real property interests necessary for the construction of such public improvements. In the event OWNER is unable, after exercising reasonable efforts. including. but not limited to. the rights under Sections 1001 and 1002 of the Civil Code. to acquire the real property interests necessary for the construction of such public improvements. and if so instructed by OWNER and upon OWNER'S provision of adequate security for costs COUNTY may reasonably incur. COUNTY shall negotiate the purchase of the necessary real property interests to allow OWNER to construct the public improvements as required by this Agreement and. if -13- necessary. in accordance with the procedures established by law, use its power of eminent domain to acquire such required real property interests. OWNER shall pay all costs associated with such acquisition or condemnation proceedings. This section 3.8 is not intended by the parties to impose upon the OWNER an enforceable duty to acquire land or construct any public improvements on land not owned by OWNER, except to the extent that the OWNER elects to proceed with the development of the Project, and then only in accordance with valid conditions imposed by the COUNTY upon the development of the Project under the Subdivision Map Act or other legal authority. 3.9 Requlation bY Other Public A~encies. It is acknowledged by the parties that other public agencies not within the control of COUNTY possess authority to regulate aspects of the development of the Property separately from or jointly with COUNTY and this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other public agencies. For example, pursuant to Government Code Section 66477 and Section 10.35 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 460, another local public agency may provide local park and recreation services and facilities and in that event, it is permitted. and therefore shall be permitted by the parties. to participate jointly with COUNTY to determine the location of land to be dedicated or in lieu fees to be paid for local park purposes, provided that COUNTY shall exercise its authority subject to the terms of this Agreement. 3.10 Tentative Tract Map Extension. Notwithstanding provisions of Section 66452.6 of the Government Code, no tentative subdivision map or tentative parcel map, heretofore hereafter approved in connection with development of the Property, shall be granted an extension of time except in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. the or 3.11 Vestinq Tentative Maps. If any tentative or final subdivision map. or tentative or final parcel map, heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with development of the Property, is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410, e~ se~.) and Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 and if this Agreement is determined by a final judgment to be invalid or unenforceable insolaf as it grants a vested right to develop to OWNER, then and to that extent the rights and protections afforded OWNER under the laws and ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede the provisions of this Agreement. Except as set forth immediately above, development of the Property shall occur only as provided in this Agreement, and the provisions in this Agreement shall be controlling over any con£1icting pzovision of law or ordinance concerning ves~in~ maps. 4. PUBLIC BENEFITS. 4.1 ~ntent. The parties acknowledge and agree that development of the Property will result in substantial public -14- needs which will not be fully met by the Development Plan and further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers substantial private benefits on OWNER which should be balanced commensurate public benefits. Accordingly, the parties intend provide consideration to the public to balance the private benefits conferred on OWNER by providing more fully for the satisfaction of the public needs resulting from the Project. by 4.2 Public Facilities and Services Mitigation Fee. 4.2.1 Amount and Components of Fee. OWNER shall pay to COUNTY a public facilities and services mitigation fee in the total amount of $4277.00 for each residential unit constructed on the Property, which fee shall be comprised of the following components: Ca) Public Facilities Fee $1891 per Residential Unit (b) Regional Parkland Fee $350.00 per Residential Unit with $50.00 allocated for recreational trails (c) Habitat Conservation and Open Space Land Bank Fee $260.00 per Residential Unit (d) Public Services Offset Fee $1776.00 per Residential Unit The amount mitigation Subsection of the public facilities and services fee shall be adjusted annually as provided in 4.2.4. 4.2.2 Time of Payment. The fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 shall be paid to COUNTY prior to the issuance of building permits for each residential unit. No fees shall be payable for building permits issued prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement, but the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 shall be paid prior to the re-issuance or extension of any building permit for a residential unit for which such fees have not previously been paid. 4.2.3 Reduction for Low-Occupancy Residential Units. The lees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 shall be reduced by 33.3 percent for low-occupancy residential units. For the purposes of this Subsection, low-occupancy residential units shall be limited to the following: (a) One bedroom and studio apartments rooms, dens, and any similar room shall be considered to be bedrooms): (family (b) Mobilehomes: (c) Residential units in developments that are legally restricted to occupancy by senior citizens pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 Or state law. 4.2.4 Annual Fee Adjustment. The fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 shall be adjusted annually during the term of this Agreement on the anniversary of the Effective Date in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Area (hereinafter CP1) published monthly by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The annual adjustment shall be calculated in the following manner: (a) Divide the CPI for month and year of the Effective Date into the CPI for the month immediately preceding the anniversary in which said fees are to be adjusted. (b) Multiply the quotient obtained by the calculation in Paragraph (a) above times said fees. (c) The result of the multiplication obtained in Paragraph (b) above shall constitute the fees payable during the succeeding year. If the CPI specified herein is discontinued or revised during the term of this Agreement, such other government index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain substantially the same result as would have been obtained if the CPI had not been discontinued. In no event shall the fees be less than the fees set forth in Subsection 4.2.1. 4.2.5 Credits. OWNER shall be entitled to credit against the fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2.1 for the dedication of land. the construction of improvements or the payment of fees as specifically set forth in Exhibit "E". To the extent that Subsection 4.2.4 results in an increase in the fees payable pursuant to 4.2.1(a). then the credit provided in this Subsection for Public Facilities as specified in Exhibit "E" shall be likewise increased by the same percentage. No increase in the credits set forth in Exhibit "E" shall be allowed for any item which is not specifically identified as a Public Facility Credit on Exhibit "E". 4.3 Continuation of Fees. Should all or any portion of Property become part of a city or another 9ounty. the fees payable pursuant to Section 4.2 shall remain and still be payable to COUNTY on the following basis: -16- (a) Fees under 4.2.1(a) shall be payable at the rate of five and three tenths percent (5.3%) thereof to COUNTY and the remainder to such city or other county. (b) Fees payable under Subsections 4.2.1(b) and (c) shall be fully payable to COUNTY. (c) Fees under Subsection 4.2.1(d) shall be payable at the rate of one-third (1/3) thereof to such city or other county and the remainder to COUNTY. 5. FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. If deemed appropriate. COUNTY and OWNER will cooperate in the formation of any special assessment district. community facilities district or alternate financing mechanism to pay for the construction and/or maintenance and operation of public infrastructure facilitles required as part of the Development Plan. COUNTY also agrees that. to the extent any such district or other financing entity is formed and sells bonds in order to finance such reimbursements. OWNER may be reimbursed to the extent that OWNER spends funds or dedicates land for the establishment of public facilities. Notwithstanding the foregoing. it is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring COUNTY or the COUNTY Board of Supervisors to form any such district or to issue and sell bonds. 6. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE. 6.1 Periodic Review. The Planning Director shall review this Agreement annually. on or before the anniversary of the Effective Date. in order to ascertain the good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of the Agreement. OWNER shall submit an Annual Monitoring Report. in a form acceptable to the Planning Director. within 30 days after written notice from the Planning Director. The Annual Monitoring Report shall be accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the Agreement during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. 6.2 Special Review. The Board of Supervisors may order a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time. The Planning Dizector shall conduct such special reviews. Procedure. (a) During either a periodic review or a special review. OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. -17- (b) Upon completion of a periodic review or a special review. the Planning Director shall submit a report to the Board of Supervisors setting forth the evidence concerning good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of this Agreement and his recommended finding on that issue. (c) If the Board finds on the basis of substantial evidence that OWNER has complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the review shall be concluded. (d) If the Board makes a preliminary finding that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Board may modify or terminate this Agreement as provided in Section 6.4 and Section 6.5. Notice of default as provided under Section 8.4 of this Agreement shall be given to OWNER prior to or concurrent with, proceedings under Section 6.4 and Section 6.4 Proceedings Upon Modification or Termination. If, upon a finding under Section 6.3, COUNTY determines to proceed with modification or termination of this Agreement. COUNTY shall give written notice to OWNER of its intention so to do. The notice shall be given at least ten calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing and shall contain: (a) The time and place of the hearing; (b) A statement as to whether or not COUNTY proposes to terminate or to modify the Agreement; and. (c) Such other information as is reasonably necessary to inform OWNER of the nature of the proceeding. 6.5 Hearing on Modification or Termination. At the time and place set for the hearing on modification or termination, OWNER shall be given an opportunity to be heard. OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The burden of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER. If the Board of Supervisors finds. based upon substantial evidence. that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms or conditions of the Agreement. the Board may terminate this Agreement or modify this Agreement and impose such conditions as are reasonably necessary to protect the interests of the County. The decision of the Board of Supervisors shall be final. subject only to judicial review pursuant to Section 1094.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 6.6 Certificate of Agreement Compliance. If, at the conclusion of a Periodic or Special Review, OWNER is found to be in compliance with this Agreement, COUNTY shall, upon request by OWNER, issue a Certificate of Agreement Compliance ("Certificate") to OWNER stating that after the most recent -18- Periodic or Special Review and based upon the information known or made Known to the Planning Director and Board of Supervisors that (1) this Agreement remains in effect and (2) OWNER is not in default. The Certificate shall be in recordable form, shall contain information necessary to communicate constructive record notice of the finding of compliance, shall state whether the Certificate is issued after a Periodic or Special Review and shall state the anticipated date of commencement of the next Periodic Review. OWNER may record the Certificate with the County Recorder. Whether or not the Certificate is relied upon by assignees or other transferees or OWNER, COUNTY shall not be bound by a Certificate if a default existed at the time of the Periodic or Special Review. but was concealed from or otherwise not known to the Planning Director or Board of Supervisors. 7. INCORPORATION AND ANNEXATION. 7.1 Intent. If all or any portion of the Property is annexed to or otherwise becomes a part of a city or another county, it is the intent of the parties that this Agreement shall survive and be binding upon such other ]urisdiction. 7.2 Incorporation. If at any time during the term of this Agreement. a city is incorporated comprising all or any portion of the Property. the validity and effect of this Agreement shall be governed by Section 65865.3 of the Government Code. 7.3 Annexation. OWNER and COUNTY shall oppose, in accordance with the procedures provided by law. the annexation to any city of all or any portion of the Property unless both OWNER and COUNTY give written consent to such annexation. 8. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. 8.1 Remedies in General. It is acknowledged by the parties that COUNTY Would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under this Agreement. or with respect to this Agreement or the application thereof. In general. each of the parties hereto may pursue any remedy at law or equity available for the breach of any provision of this Agreement. except that COUNTY shall not be liable in damages to OWNER, or to any successor in interest of OWNER, or to any other person, and OWNER covenants no~ to sue for damages or claim any damages: (a) For any breach of this Agreement or for any cause of action which arises out of this Agreement; or -19- (b) For the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or provided under or pursuant to this Agreement; or (c) Arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement. 8.2 Specific Performance. The parties acknowledge that money damages and remedies at law generally are inadequate and specific performance and other non-monetary relief are particularly appropriate remedies for the enforcement of this Agreement and should be available to all parties for the following reasons: (a) Money damages are unavailable against COUNTY as provided in Section 8.1 above. (b) Due to the size. nature and scope of the project. it may not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun. After such implementation. OWNER may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property or portions thereof. OWNER has invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Project in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement. and it is not possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts. 8.3 Release. Except for nondamage remedies, including the remedy of specific performance and judicial review as provided for in Section 6.5, OWNER, for itself, its successors and assignees, hereby releases the COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind or nature arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, including, but not limited to, any claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage. whatsoever. upon the COUNTY because it entered into this Agreement or because of the terms of this Agreement. 8.4 Term~nation or Modi[ica~on o~ A~r~ement Default of OWNER. Subject to the provisions contained in Subsection 6.S herein. COUNTY may terminate or modify this Agreement for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under this Agreement. or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default"): provided. however. COUNTY may terminate or modify -20- this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to OWNER of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions. if any. required by OWNER to cure such default and. where the default can be cured. OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such default within 60 days after the effective date of such notice or. in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 60 day period but can be cured within a longer time. has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such 60 day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. 8.5 Termination of Agreement for Default of COUNTY. OWNER may terminate this Agreement only in the event of a default by COUNTY in the performance of a material term of this Agreement and only after providing written notice to COUNTY of default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions. if any. required by COUNTY to cure such default and. where the default can be cured. COUNTY has failed to take such actions and cure such default within 60 days after the effective date of such notice or. in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 60 day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such 60 day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. 9. THIRD PARTY LITIGATION. 9.1 General Plan Litiqation. COUNTY has determined that this Agreement is consistent with its Comprehensive General Plan, herein called General Plan, and that the General Plan meets all requirements of law. OWNER has reviewed the General Plan and concurs with COUNTY's determination. The parties acknowledge that: (a) Litigation is now pending challenging the legality. validity and adequacy of certain provisions of the General Plan; and. (b) In the future there may be other similar challenges to the General Plan: and. (c) If successful, such challenges prevent the performance of this Agreement development of the Property. could delay or and the COUNTY shall have no liability in damages under this Agreement for any failure of COUNTY to perform under this Agreement or the iuability of OWNER to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan of this Agreement as the result of a judicial determination that on the Effective Date, at any time thereafter. the General Plan, or portions thereof, are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law. or -21- 9.2 Third Party Litigation Concerning Agreement. OWNER shall defend. at its expense. including attorneys' fees. indemnify. and hold harmless COUNTY. its agents. officers and employees from any claim. action or proceeding against COUNTY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Agreement or the approval of any permit granted pursuant to this Agreement. COUNTY shall promptly notify OWNER of any such claim. action or proceeding. end COUNTY shall cooperate in the defense. If COUNTY fails to promptly notify OWNER of any such claim. action or proceeding. or if COUNTY fails to cooperate in the defense, OWNER shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless COUNTY. COUNTY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such claim, action or proceeding. 9.3 Indemnity. In addition to the provisions of 9.2 above. OWNER shall indemnify and hold COUNTY, its officers. agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of OWNER, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors, for property damage, bodily injury, or death (OWNER's employees included) or any Other element of damage of any kind or nature, relating to or in any way connected with or arising from the activities contemplated hereunder, including, but not limited to, the study, design. engineering, construction, completion, failure and conveyance of the public improvements, save and except claims for damages arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of COUNTY. OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, COUNTY. its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions. COUNTY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any such legal action. 9.4 Environment Assurances. OWNER shall indemnify and hold COUNTY, its officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from any liability, based or asserted, upon any act or omission of OWNER, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, predecessors in interest, successors, assigns and independent contractors for any violation of any federal, state or local law. ordinance or regulation relating to industrial hygiene or to environmental conditions on, under or about the Property, including, but not limited to, soil and groundwater conditions, and OWNER shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, COUNTY, its officers, agents and employees in any action based or asserted upon any such alleged act or omission. COUNTY may in its discretion participate in the defense of any-suchaction. 9.5 Reservation of Rights. With respect to Sections 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 heroin, COUNTY reserves the right to either (1) approve the attorney(s) which OWNER selects, hires or otherwise engages to defend COUNTY hereunder, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. or (2) conduct its own defense. provided, however. that OWNER shall reimburse COUNTY forthwith for any and -22- all reasonable expenses incurred for such defense. including attorneys' fees, upon billing and accounting therefor. 9~6 through 9.6. Agreement. Survival. inclusive. The provisions of this Sections 9.1 shall survive the termination of this 10. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit OWNER. in any manner. ~t OWNER'S sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any mortgage. deed of trust or other security device securing financing with respect to the Property. COUNTY acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request. from time to time. to meet with OWNER and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modificstion. COUNTY will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: (a) Neither entering into this Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat. render invalid. diminish or impair the lien of any mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value. unless otherwise required by law. (b) The Mortgagee of any mortgage or deed of trust encumbering the Property. or any part thereof. which Mortgagee. has submitted a request in writing to the COUNTY in the manner specified herein for giving notices. shall be entitled to receive written notification from COUNTY of any default by OWNER in the performance of OWNER'S obligations under this Agreement. (c) If COUNTY timely receives a request from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Agreement. COUNTY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure ~eriod allowed such party under this Agreement. (d) Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property. or any part thereof. pursuant to foreclosure of the mortgage or deed of trust. or deed in lieu of such foreclosure. shall take the Property, or part thereof. subject to the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary. no -23- Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform any of OWNER'S obligations or other affirmative covenants of OWNER hereunder. or to guarantee such performance; provided, however, that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by OWNER is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by COUNTY the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to COUNTY's performance hereunder. and further provided that any sale. transfer or assignment by any Mortgagee in possession shall be sub]err to the provisions of Section 2.4 of this Agreement. 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 11.1 Recordation of AQreement. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation thereof shall be recorded with the County Recorder by the Clerk of the Board Supervisors within the period required by Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. 11.2 Entire A~reement. This Agreement sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements which are not contained or expressly referred to herein. No testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. 11.3 Severability. If any term. provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provision of the Public Benefits set forth in Section 4 of this Agreement, including the payment of the fees set forth therein, are essential elements of this Agreement and COUNTY would not have entered into this Agreement but for such provisions, and therefore in the event such provisions are determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable, this entire Agreement shall be null and void and of no force and effect Whatsoever. 11.4 InterPretation and Governin~ Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole eccordin~ to its fair language and common meaning to achieve the objectives and purposes of the parties hereto. and ~he rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in interpreting this Agreement, all parties having been represented by counsel in the negotiation and preparation hereof. -24- 11.5 Section Headings. All section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 11.6 Singular and Plural. As used herein. the singular of any word includes the plural. 11.7 Joint and Several Obligations. If at any time during the term of this Agreement the Property is owned, in whole or in part, by more than one OWNER, all obligations of such OWNERS under this Agreement shall be joint and several, and the default of any such OWNER shall be the default of all such OWNERS. Notwithstanding the foregoing. no OWNER of a single lot which has been finally subdivided and sold to such OWNER as a member of the general public or otherwise as an ultimate user shall have any obligation under this Agreement except as provided under Section 4 hereof. 11.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 11.9 Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 11.10 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have any right of action based upon any provision of this Agreement. 11.11 Force Maieure. Neither party shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond the party's control. (including the party's employment force), government regulations. court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions). or other causes beyond the party's control. If any such events shall occur. the term of this Agreement and the time for performance by either party of any of its obligations hereunder may be extended by the written agreement of the parties ~or the ~eriod of time that Bush events prevented such performance. provided that the term of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years. 11.12 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited party. -25- 11.13 Successors in Interest. The burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon. and the benefits of this Agreement shall inure to. all successors in interest to the parties to this Agreement. All provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land. Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act hereunder with regard to development of the Property: (a) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property; (b) runs with the Property and each portion thereof; and. (c) is binding upon each party and each successor in interest during ownership of the Property or any portion thereof. 11.14 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed the parties in counterparts. which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if all of the parties had executed the same instrument. by 11.15 Jurisdiction and Venus. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by an party hereto for the purpose of enforcing. construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside. State of California. and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for the filing. removal or change of venus to any other court. 11.16 Proiect as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between'the parties hereto that the development of the Project is a private development. that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder. and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement. No partnership. joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Agreement. The only relationship between COUNTY and OWNER is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such property. 11.17 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time. the other party shall promptly execute. with acknowledgemerit or affidavit if reasonably required. and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Agreement to carry out t~e intent-and to Gulfill the ~rovisions of this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 11.18 Eminent Domain. shall be construed to limit or its power of eminent domain. No provision of this Agreement restrict the exercise by COUNTY of -26- 11.19 Aaent for Service of Process. In the event OWNER is not a resident of the State of California or it is an association, partnership or joint venture without a member, partner or joint venturer resident of the State of California. or it is a foreign corporation, then in any such event, OWNER shall file with the Planning Director, upon its execution of this Agreement, a designation of a natural person residing in the State of California, giving his or her name, residence and business addresses, as its agent for the purpose of service of process in any court action arising out of or based upon this Agreement, and the delivery to such agent of a copy of any process in any such action shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. If for any reason service of such process upon such agent is not feasible, then in such event OWNER may be personally served with such process out of this County and such service shall constitute valid service upon OWNER. OWNER is amenable to the process so served, submits to the Jurisdiction of the Court so obtained and waives any and all objections and protests thereto. 11.20 Authority to Execute. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he/they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of his/their corporation, partnership or business entity and warrants and represents that he/they has/have the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year set forth below. Dated: ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY ( SEAL ) ~/rOFm~an, Board of Supervisor~~TM 3806LIT 9-25-88 -27- Dated: October 21, 1988 OWNER: By: / ~/,.~ Its: Assistant Secretary State of California ) ) County of Contra Costa ) ss On this 21st day of October, 1988, before me, the undersigned, personally appeared PETER B. BEDFORD and MAUREEN DROTLEFF, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as PRESIDENT and ASSISTANT SECRETARY, respectively, on behalf of KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ary Public (ALL SIGNATURES SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC. EXECUTION ON BEHALF OF ANY CORPORATION SHALL BE BY TWO CORPORATE OFFICERS.) -28- Development No. 4 EXHIBIT A Page 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION VAIL MEADOWS BOUNDARY That certain parcel of land in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, lying partly within the Rancho Temecula granted by the Government of the United States of America to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 18, 1860 and recorded in Book 1, Page 45 of Patents in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California, and partly within the Rancho Pauba granted by the Government of the United States of America to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 19, 1860 and recorded in Book 1, Page 45 of Patents in said Office of the San Diego County Recorder, and partly within Parcel Map No. 16681 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 100, Pages 18 and 19 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of Margarita Road with Pauba Road as shown on Parcel Map No. 6607 filed in Book 21, Pages 61 through 67 of Parcel Maps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder; thence along said center- line of Pauba Road as defined by documents recorded April 28, 1971 as Instrument No. 44142 of Official Records, Parcel Map No. 7155 filed in Book 24, Page 72 of Parcel Maps and Parcel Map No. 22514 filed in Beok 145, Pages BO through 85 of Parcel Maps, all in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder, through the following courses: North 55°21'56" East 226.46 feet to the beginning of a tan- gent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 5000.DO feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 300.10 feet through a central angle of 3°26'20"; thence tangent from said curve North 58'48'16" East 663.57 feet to the beginning Of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 493.58 feet through a central angle of 23'34'00"; thence tangent from said curve North 82°22'16" East 489.16 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1600.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 403.53 feet through a central angle of 14'27'02"; thence tangent from said curve North 67°55'15'. East 1327.41 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and hav- ing a radius of 3000.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 1055.48 feet through a central angle of 20°09'2g"; thence tangent from said curve North 47"45'45" East 261.98 feet to the beginning of 8 tangent curve concave southeasterly and having 8 radius of 3000.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 788.08 feet through a central angle of 15°03'04"; thence tangent from said curve North 62°48'49" East 626.86 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 396.42 feet through a central angle of 18~55'40"; thence tangent from said curve North 81"44'30" East 679.16 feet to the beginning Of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; 'r'WMTRTT A EXHIBIT A Page 2 thence along said curve northeasterly 504.33 feet through a central angle of 24°04'49"; thence tangent from said curve North 57°39'41'' East 379.91 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve northeasterly 304.01 feet through a central angle of 14°30'56" to the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road as shown on said Parcel Nap No. 22514; thence leaving said centerline of Pauba Road, along said centerline of Butterfield Stage Road as defined by Tract No. 12005-1 filed in Book 121, Pages 50 through 57 of Naps and said Parcel Nap No. 16681 filed in Book 100, Pages 18 and 19 of Parcel Naps, both in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder, through the followlng courses: South 4°25'05" East 1626.75 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of 3000.00 feet; thence along said curve southerly 548.76 feet through a central angle of 10e28'50"; thence tangent from said curve South 14°53'55'' East 1380.24 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius. of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve southeasterly 895.83 feet through a central angle of 42°46'22"; thence tangent from said curve South 57°40'17" East 785.15 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve southeasterly 727.42 feet through a central angle of 34°43'54"; thence tangent from said curve South 22°56'23.. East 3021.56 feet to the southerly line of said Parcel Nap No. 16681; thence leaving said centerline of Butterfield Stage Road, along said southerly line South 73°23'21'' West 828.28 feet to the southeast corner of Parcel PW4 per document recorded April 20, 1967 as Instrument No. 34389 of Official Records in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder; thence along the boundary line of said Parcel PW4 North 16°36'39" West 100.00 feet, South 73°23'21'' West 100.00 feet and South 16°36'39" East 100.00 feet to said southerly line of Parcel Nap No. 16681; thence along said southerly line South 73°23'21" West 6321.61 feet to an angle point therein; thence along the boundary line of said Parcel Nap No. 16681 through the following courses: North 61°46'07'' West 49.38 feet; thence North 16e56'07" West 856.14 feet; thence North 73°03'54" East 261.70 feet; thence North 16°33'25'' West 491.54 feet to an angle point therein; thence leaving said boundary line, along the boundary line of Tract No. 3752 filed in Book 59, Pages 53 through 55 of Naps in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder, through the following courses: North 16°33'25' West 527.76 feet; thence South 73°03'54" West 268.42 feet; thence North 16°56'06" West 39.64 feet; thence South 73°03'54" West S5.00 feet to a point on the centerline of Hargarita Road as shown on said Tract No. 3752, said point being the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of '1200.00 feet, a radial line of said curve from said point bears South 73°03'54" West; thence leaving said boundary line of Tract No. 3752, along said centerline of Hargarita Road as defined by Tract No. g833-3 filed in Book 120, Pages 86 through 91 oft laps and said Parcel Hap No. 6607 filed in Book 21, Pages 61 through 67 of Parcel Maps, both in said Office of the Riverside County Recorder. through the following courses: along said curve northwesterly 1145,56 feet through a central angle of 64°41'46"; thence tangent from said curve North 71037'53' West 660,70 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 1200.00 feet; thence along said curve northwesterly 1270,94 feet through a central angle of 60°40'58"; thence tangent from said curve North 10'56'54" West S66.77 feet to the beginning of a -2- EXHIBIT A Page 3 tangent curve concave westerly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet; thence along sa~d curve northerly 606.30 feet through a central angle of thence tangent from sa~d curve North 28e|g'04" Nest 829.67 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly and having a radius of %?00.00 feet; thence along said curve northwesterly S7~.64 feet through a central angle Z7°ZO'Zg"; thence tangent from sa~d curve North S5°39'34' Nest 4%7.66 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of 2000.00 feet~ thence along said curve northwesterly %74.46 feet through a central angle of 4°6g'52" to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Lot 25 of Tract No. 3752, in the County of Riverside, State of California, as per map filed in Book 59, Pages 53 to 55 of Maps, records of Riverside County Excepting therefrown that portion conveyed to the T~,~.~ula Union School District per deed recorded November 12, 1987 as Instrurent No. 324399. -3- EXHIBIT B Page 2 ~\ Development Agreement No. 4 EXHIBIT C EXISTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS SPECIFIC PLAN Specific Plan No. 219. ZONING 1. Ordinance No. 348.2919 (Zone Change No. 5140) The development approvals listeft above incluae the aperoved maps and all conditions of approval. COPIES OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS LISTED ABOVE ARE ON FILE IN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Development Agreement No. 4 EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS 1. Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan as amended through Resolution No. 88-485. 2. Ordinance No. 340. 3. Ordinance No. 348 as amended through Ordinance No. 348.2857. 4. Ordinance No. 448 as amended through Ordinance No 448.a. Ordinance No. 458 as amended through Ordinance No 458.8. 6. Ordinance No. 460 as amended through Ordinance No 460.92. 7. Ordinance No. 461 as 461.6. 8. Ordinance No. 509 as 509.2. 9. Ordinance No. 546 as 546.7a. 10. Ordinance No. 547 as 547.5. 11. Ordinance No. 555 as 555.15. 12. Ordinance No. 617 as 617.1. 13. Ordinance No. 650. 14. Resolution No. 87-525 Establishing Procedures and Requizemen~s ~or the Consideration of Developmen~ Agreements. as amended by Resolution No. 88~39 and Resolution No. 88-119. COPIES OF THE EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS LISTED ABOVE ARE ON FILE IN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. amended through Ordinance No amended through Ordinance No amended through Ordinance No amended through Ordinance No amended through Ordinance No amended through Ordinance No Developmen~ Agreemen~ No. EXHIBIT E FEE CREDITS 4 None. CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 12, 1990 Proposed Policy for Substantial Conformance and Revised Permits On June 8th and 11th staff contacted seven (7) cities and was able to obtain sufficient information regarding minor modifications from four of those jurisdictions. They are Corona, Riverside, Rancho Cucamonga, and Moreno Valley. The seven cities are somewhat comparable to Temecula in that they encourage growth and the majority are in Riverside County. The following information details each city and the process used to approve minor modifications. CORONA - Staff contacted a Steven Pasarow in the Planning Department. He indicated that the City has two options it can use to process a modification depending on the size of the change. If the modification involves a residential use or a minor expansion, less than 10%, then it can be approved by staff with the planning director's approval. (There are no fees if the modification is very minor. ) However, if the modification is considered by staff to be substantial, then it is sent to a Development Plan Review { DPR ). The fee for a DPR is $1,000. The applicant must resubmit two (2) site plans which are reviewed by all responsible City departments and commented upon. No findings are required to approve the modification. If the project requires an architectural review then it must go to public hearing, however, this only applies to certain specific locations within the City. RIVERSIDE - Staff contacted Beverly Williams in the Planning Department. She indicated that if a modification is done to a development that is principally permitted in that zone use then it is not required to go to the Planning Commission. Instead it goes to a Development Review Board which consists of Council appointed lay people. This board is mostly concerned with the aesthetics of a project. If it passes the board then it can be approved by staff. However, the code does not state what very minor is. The rule is that if the addition concerns a residential use or an addition of less than 10% then it is generally approved by staff. RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Staff contacted Steve Ross in the Plannin9 Department who said that a modification can either go through a Minor Development Review or formally through a modification procedure. The Minor Development Review is a staff approval procedure that allows up to a 10% change in the square footage of an approved structure or other very minor changes. Staff must make findings that indicate that the project will not have a significant impact on the surrounding area including traffic. The City Planner makes the final approval. The other option is through a formal modification procedure which goes to the Planning Commission. MORENO VALLEY - Staff contacted a Tim Hults in the Planning Department. He said that the City is using the Riverside County Code and that it uses the Substantial Conformance and revised permit procedures as written in the code. However, the City is much more liberal with the procedures than the code seems to indicate. The largest Substantial Conformance completed to date involved a 328 unit apartment complex in which the developer was allowed to move several buildings, a recreation room, and the layout of the parking under this procedure. The unit count and open space figures did not change. The approval process consisted of taking the project to a Project Review Committee which is made up of the following departments: Engineering, Building, Planning, Fire, Traffic and Schools. The project is then approved by this committee and no findings are required. If the revisions are considered "major" then the project does go before the Planning Commission. Mr. Hults could not give me any information on the revised permits process because he said that in the several years that he has been project coordinator there have been none. It is possible that all revisions have been done through the Substantial Conformance procedure. The fee is $225.00. All four cities are similar in that a modification is reviewed by a committee or board that involves the responsible department. They also have some type of criteria or findings that must be met in order to process the application administratively. The City of Moreno Valley is the best example for the City of Temecula to use because both have adopted the County of Riverside Land Use Ordinance and both use the substantial conformance and revised permit procedure. To ensure that the process works efficiently and effectively, staff is recommending the following procedure be implemented for the approval of a substantial conformance: Each application received will be set for hearing at the next available Development Review Committee {DRC) meeting. Each item will be presented to all the responsible departments during the DRC meeting and all comments will be addressed. Prior to the approval of the substantial conformance, the fol Iowing findings must be made: The proposed project does not effect the intent of the original approval. The proposed modification does not intensify the original approval in excess of 10%. The proposed project does not have a detrimental effect on neighboring properties (existing or proposed ). d. The proposed modification does not effect the percentage of approved open space, parking, and originally proposed amenities. The proposed changes do not affect any other required minimum zoning standards. The proposed modification does not additionally affect the traffic conditions on the surrounding roadway network. If an application does not comply with these findings then the modification can be processed through the revised permit procedure which involves a formal review by the Planning Commission along with the DRC. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission REVIEW and CONSIDER staff's analysis and recommendations and PROVIDE DIRECTION for any policies or ordinance changes determined to be appropriate. CITY OF TEHECUL~ PL~,NNING DEPlsd~TMENT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: June 14, 1990 City of Temecu Planning Commission Ross Gelle~lanning Director OLD TOWN HISTORICAL DISTRICT At the Commission's request, Staff has investigated the procedures and criteria which have been utilized by the County to review and evaluate development proposals in Temecula's Old Town District. In addition, recommendations have been formulated for incorporating similar procedures into the City's Development Review Process. In the late 1970's, members of the Temecula Historical Society and other local citizens urged County officials to establish some development controls which would help ensure the historic character of the Old Town area. In response, the County initiated a study of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the purpose of establishing a historic preservation program for Temecula. The County's first action was the adoption of a Historic Preservation Element for the General Plan in early 1979. The Historic Preservation Element established a detailed policy framework for subsequent actions aimed at preserving historical resources throughout the County. In late 1979, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 578 which provided for the establishment of historic preservation districts and set up a process for local review of development proposals in such districts. The Temecula Historic District was established by the County in 1980. The historic district encompasses a 15-block area in downtown bounded by 6th Street to the north, River Street to the west, 2nd Street to the south, and Interstate 15 to the east. Originally, a much larger area was proposed to be included in the historic district, however, local opposition prevented this. Ordinance No. 578 states that if property owners of more than one-half of the total assessed valuation within the proposed district are opposed to the district, then the district may not be established. In order to overcome opposition from property owners outside the downtown core, the area of the historic preservation district was reduced. Ordinance No. 578 provided for the establishment of a local review board to oversee preservation activities and review development proposals in the historic preservation district. Page Two June 14, 1990 The local review is intended to be composed of five (5) members appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The board members are to serve staggered two-year terms without pay. One member is required to be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. The board is required to hold regular meetings and is responsible for establishing its own rules and procedures. Specifically, Ordinance No. 578 provides the local review board with the following duties: Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the district. Recommend implementation guidelines and standards to be used in the review of the applications. 3. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of significant historic resources within the district. Serve as an advisory resource to County agencies in matters pertaining to the district. Render advice and guidance, upon request, to property owners and occupants within the district. Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique heritage of the community. The local review board does not have the authority to approve or deny proposed development projects or other property alterations. Instead, they serve in an advisory capacity to the planning director, who has the responsibility for issuing Certificates of Historic Appropriateness. Without such a Certificate, projects may not move forward. Applicants pay a fee to have their projects reviewed for historic appropriateness by the planning director. The planning director seeks advice from the local review board and other agencies or departments, who have 30 days to respond in writing. The planning director's decision may be appealed to the area planning council. Temecula's local review board refers to itself as the Historical Review Board. The original membership of the board has never been changed, although resignations, including two very recently, have left the Board with only two acting members, which is not enough for a quorum. In its ten-year history, the Board has reviewed an average of only one or two cases per year (according to one of its members), the most recent being earlier this year. It appears that neither the Board nor the County ever adopted any detailed design guidelines or evaluation Page Three June 14, 1990 criteria to guide its decisions on development proposals, although this is still being researched. The Board has worked to make projects conform to an 1890s theme of southwest architecture. The Board has worked to make projects conform to an 1890s them of southwest architecture. The Board has kept its procedures and meetings fairly informal. It appears that pre- application conferences with applicants, as described in Ordinance No. 578, rarely occurred. With the incorporation of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Historic Preservation District remains intact and Ordinance No. 578 is still technically in effect. The County's zoning and development standards are also still in effect. The County's development standards have always presented some difficulties in Old Town because they have not been customized to address the unique situations in this area and have not been designed to promote the historic preservation objectives of the district. In conclusion, staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the following recommendations to the City Council. Review of development proposals and property alterations within the Temecula Historic Preservation District for historic appropriateness should be incorporated into the City's development review process as soon as possible. The City should immediately establish its own historical review board for the Temecula Historic Preservation District. The Planning Commission may choose to take on these responsibilities itself or recommend the appointment of a separate board or committee advisory to the Commission and Council. The City should establish interim review procedures evaluation criteria for use in reviewing proposed projects in the Historic Preservation District. The possibility of expanding the boundaries of the Historic Preservation District should be investigated. The City should initiate the formulation of design guidelines and special development standards for the Historic Preservation District. The City should prepare a comprehensive, long-range strategy for the preservation and development of the Old Town area addressing such issues as land use, circulation, parking, public improvements, economic development and urban design. CITY OF TEMECULA DIRECTOR~S MEMORANDUM TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Public Notice Requirements Pursuant to Discretionary Actions DATE: June 14, 1990 BACKGROUND The City Council has requested that the Planning Commission consider the Public Notification procedures for discretionary actions scheduled before the Planning Commission and the City Council. The Planning Staff has reviewed the provisions of Ordinance No. ~s 3L~8 and q60 and found similar provisions for notification procedures for a wide array of application types. The following excerpts of each application type detail existing notification requirements. ORDINANCE NO. General Plans and Specific Plans Ordinance No. 3~,8, Section 2.5 a. states: The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the matter. Notice of the time, date, and place of hearing shall be given at least 10 days prior to the hearing by all the following procedures: 1. Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. Mailing to all owners of real property which is located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the proposed project, as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed exceeds 1000, as an alternate to this mailed notice, notice may be shown by publication of a one-quarter page display advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. A display advertisement so published shall also satisfy the publication requirement of subsection a 1 of this section. Variances and Conditional and Public Use Permits Ordinance No. 3~8, Section 18.26 states: NOTICE OF HEARING. Notice of time, date and place of the hearing, the identity of the hearing body and a general description of the location of the real property, which is the subject of the hearing, shall be given at least 10 days prior to the hearing of the following procedures: 1. Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. Mailing or delivering to the owner of the subject real property or the owner~s duly authorized agent, and to the project applicant. Mailing or delivering to each local agency expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the project whose ability to provide those facilities and services amy be significantly affected. Mailing or delivering to all owners of real property which is located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property, as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any update. Mailing by first class to any person who has filed a written request with the Planning Department and has provided that Department with a self-addressed stamped envelope for that purpose. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to paragraphs 2 or ~ herein is greater than 1,000, in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, notice may be provided by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation at least 10 days prior to the hearing. The Planning Director may require that additional notice of the hearing be given in any other manner'he deems necessary or desirable. Second Unit Permits Ordinance No. 3q8, Section 18.28 b. states: HEARINC AND NOTICE OF DECISION. Upon acceptance of an application as complete, the Planning Director shall transmit a copy of the application to the members of the Land Division Committee and the Sewer and Water District having jurisdiction over the property for review and comment. Not less than 30 days after an application is received as complete, the Planning Director shall schedule the time and date made. Not less than 10 days prior to the date on which the decision is to be made, the Planning Director shall give notice of the proposed use by mail or delivery to all owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any updates as owning real property within a 300 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the proposed project. Notice of the proposed use shall also be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. The notice shall include the statement that no public hearing will be held unless a hearing is requested in writing before the date scheduled for the decision to be made. No public hearing on the application shall be held before a decision is made unless a hearing is requested in writing before the date scheduled for the decision to be made. No public hearing on the application shall be held before a decision is made unless a hearing is requested in writing by the applicant or other affected person, or if the Planning Director determines that a public hearing should be required. The Planning Director shall give notice of the decision to the applicant and to any other person who requests notice of the decision. The decision of the Planning Director shall be considered final unless within 10 days of the date of mailing of decision to the applicant an appeal therefrom is filed. If a public hearing is required under the provisions of this subsection, notice of time, date and place of the hearing before the Planning Director, and a general description of the location of the real property which is the subject of the hearing, shall be given at least 10 days prior to the hearing as follows: Mailing or delivering to the owner of the subject real property or the owner~s duly authorized agent. Mailing or delivering to all owners of real property which is located within a 300 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the subject property, as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any updates. The Planning Director may require that additional notice be given in any other matter the Director deems necessary or desirable. Plot Plans Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.30 states: ACTION ON PLOT PLANS Plot Plans Not Requiring Public Hearing. The Planning Director shall approve, conditionally approve or disapprove a plot plan based upon the standards in subsection (c) within 30 days after accepting a completed application and give notice of the decision, including any required conditions of approval, by mail, to the applicant and any other persons requesting notice. Plot Plans Requiring Hearing. The Planning Director shall hold a public hearing on all plot plans for which a negative declaration or an EIR is prepared pursuant to the Riverside County Rules Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act. Notice of the time, date and place of the public hearing shall be given as provided in Section 18.26 (c) . Plot Plans for Large Commercial Developments. Notwithstanding any other provision in this subsection to the contrary, a noticed public hearing shall be held on a plot plan for a commercial development of 30 acres or larger. Plot plans that are within the area jurisdiction of the East Area Planning Council shall be heard by the Planning Commission. Notice of the time, date and place of the hearing shall be given as provided in Section 18.26 |c) . Any appeal of the Council or Commission decision shall be to the Board of Supervisors as provided in Section 18.30 (el. Notwithstanding any provision in this ordinance to the contrary, the hearing on a plot plan application which requires the approval of a zone change shall be heard in accordance with the provisions of Section 20.3 a, and all of the procedural requirements and rights of appeal as set forth therein shall govern the hearing. APPEALS. An applicant or any other interested party may appeal from the decision of the Planning Director by the following procedure: Appeal to Planning Council. Within 10 calendar days after the date of the mailing of the decision by the Planning Director, an appeal in writing may be made on the form provided by the Planning Department and which shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in Ordinance No. 671. Upon receipt of a completed appeal the Planning Director shall set the matter for hearing and mail notice thereof to the applicant and the appellant if the plot plan did not require a public hearing. If the plot plan required a public hearing, notice of the appeal shall be given in the same manner that notice was given for the original hearing. All appeals that are within the area jurisdiction of the East Area Planning Council shall be heard by that Council; all other appeals shall be heard by the Planning Commission. Appeal to the Board of Supervisors. Within 10 calendar days after the date of the mailing of the decision of the Commission or Council. the appellant may appeal that decision, in writing, to the Board of Supervisors, on the forms provided by the Planning Department, which shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $25.00. Upon receipt of a completed appeal, the Clerk of the Board shall set the matter for hearing before the Board of Supervisors not less than five days nor more than 30 days thereafter and shall give written notice of the hearing to the appellant and the Planning Director. The Board of Supervisors shall render its decision within 30 days following the close of the hearing on the appeal. Change of Zone Applications Ordinance No. 348, Section 20.3 a. states: 1, 8, The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment. Public notice of the hearing shall be given including all the following information: 2. 3. 5. 6. The time, date and place of the hearing. A general explanation of the matter to be considered. A general description of the area affected. Specification of the type and magnitude of the changes proposed. The place where copies of the proposed changes may be obtained. The right to appear and be heard. Public notice of the hearing shall be given at least 10 days prior to the hearing by all the following procedures: Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. Mailing or delivering to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's duly authorized agent, and to the project applicant. Mailing or delivering to each local agency expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services may be significantly affected. Mailing or delivering to all owners of real property which is located within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property, as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any update. Mailing by first class mail to any person who has filed a written request with the Planning Department and has provided that department with a self-addressed stamped envelope for that purpose. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to paragraphs 2-4 herein is greater than 1,000, in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, notice may be provided by placing a display advertisement of at least one- eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the County at least 10 days prior to the hearing. The Planning Director may require that additional notice of the hearing be given in any other manner he deems necessary or desirable. If the Planning Commission has recommended denial of an amendment to change property from one zone to another, or denial of an amendment to impose, remove or modify one of the above-listed regulations, the Planning Commission's recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, who shall place the decision on the next agenda of the Board held 5 or more days after the Clerk receives the decision. -6- The decision of the commission is considered final and no action of the Board is required unless the applicant files an appeal, accompanied by the fee set forth in Ordinance No 671, within 10 days after the decision of the Commission appears on the Board~s agenda, or the Board orders the matter set for public hearing. If the Board of Supervisors so orders, or if the applicant appeals, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at the earliest convenient day and shall give notice of the time and place of the hearing in the same manner as is provided for giving notice of the hearing before the Planning Commission. ORDINANCE NO. ~60 - SECTION 6.~ OF ARTICLE VI Tentative Tract Maps and Commercial Parcel Maps 1. Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. Mailing or delivery to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's duly authorized agent, and to project applicant. Mailing or delivering to each local agency expected to provide water, sewage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the project whose ability to provide those facilities and services may be significantly affected. Mailing or delivering to all owners of real property which is located within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of the subject property, as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll and any update. Mailing by first class to any person who has filed a written request with the Planning Department and has provided that department with a self-addressed stamped envelop for that purpose. In the case of a proposed conversion of residential real property to a condominium project, community apartment project, or stock cooperative project, such notice shall also be given by mail to each tenant of the subject property, and, in addition to notice of the time and place of the public hearing, shall include notification of the tenantes right to appear and the right to be heard. If the number of owners to whom notice would be mailed or delivered pursuant to paragraph u, herein is greater than 1,000, in lieu of mailed or delivered notice, notice may be provided by placing a display advertisement of at least one-eighth page in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the County at least 10 days prior to the hearing. The Planning Director may require that additional notice of the hearing be given in any other manner he deems necessary or desirable. 9. Any interested person may appear at the hearing and shall be heard. B. After closing the hearing, the Advisory Agency shall: Approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the proposed tentative map. Notice of the decision shall be filed with the clerk of the Board of Supervisors and a copy thereof mailed to the land divider or his authorized agent and any interested party requesting a copy. Parcel Maps Not less than 10 days prior to the date on which the decision will be made on the application, the Planning director shall give notice of the proposed use by mail or delivery to all owners, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owing real property within a 300 foot radius of the exterior boundary of the property in question within a 300 foot radius of the exterior boundary of the property in question and publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the area affected by the proposed project. No public hearing on the application for a permit issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be required unless such a hearing is requested by the applicant or other affected person or the Planning Director determines that a public hearing is required in the best interest of the community's health, safety and welfare. The notice of proposed use shall include the following information: a. A brief description of the project and its proposed location. The officer or body which will consider approval of the project and the address where comments or request for a public hearing should be sent. A statement that the decision-makin9 officer or body will not act on the project for a period of 10 days and will consider written comments received durln9 that period as to whether the determination of the Plannin9 Director that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment is appropriate. A statement that a copy of the completed Negative Declaration is available for inspection at the Planning Department. Public Hearing. If a request for a public hearing is made, it shall be held within 21 days after the first request is made by the Riverside County Planning Director~s hearing body. Not less than 10 days prior to the date on which the hearing will be held, the Planning Director shall give notice of the proposed hearing by mail or delivery to all owners, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property within a 300 foot radius of the exterior boundary of the property in question, and all others who received notice of the proposed use. The hearing body shall hear relevant testimony from interested persons. Summary of Existinq Code Requirements Generally, the City codes require that notices be sent to newspapers of general circulation, the applicant and representative, and property owners within a 300 foot radius. -7- Gummed labels of the surrounding property owners are submitted with application packages. A title company prepares the labels for the applicant. The cost of mailing out the notices is borne by the applicant indirectly through the application fee. The newspaper currently used by the City of Temecula is the Press-Enterprise, although this may change once The Californian becomes a daily paper. The Council has requested the Planning Commission make recommendations as to the adequacy of the public notice requests as set forth in Ordinance No. 348. ALTERNATIVES I. Increase the Radius of the Mailout The radius of the mailout could be increased from the current 300 foot radius to a larger radius. This will add substantially to both the cost of the notification procedure and to staff time in completing the mailout, but it will yield a greater public awareness in the immediate vicinity. San Bernardino County, for example, increases the radius with larger project proposals. II. Require that Project Notification Siqns be Posted on Sites At a certain point in the review process, a standard city sign can be posted on the property in question with a description of the project and the hearing date on it. This process is utilized by several cities, including, Agoura Hills, Moreno Valley, and Santa Monica. The program requires an initial investment in standard signage, but is refunded through an additional signage fee. The applicant can be required to post and maintain the sign until the project is acted on. Ill. Increase the Size of the Notice in the Newspaper This method would increase the visibility of the public notice to the general public but would probably not result in a dramatic increase of awareness for persons living in the immediate vicinity of a proposed project. The cost of advertising would increase significantly. RECOMMENDATION Should the Planning Commission determine that additional measures should be taken to inform the public of pending land use decisions, staff recommends: That Alternative No. I I, Postinq of Pendin.q Land Use Decision Siqns be required as the most effective way to supplement notification procedures, and D IR ECT the staff to prepare the necessary ordinance revisions to present for public hearing. People Pride Progress June 12, 1990 Ross Geller, Planning Director City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 300 Temecula, CA 92390 City Hill P.O. Box 1440 23119 Cottonwood Building C Moreno Valley, CA 92388-9664 (714) 243-3200 · Fax: (714) 243-3009 Subject: Planning Commissioners Forum in the City of Moreno Valley Saturday, July 14, 1990 (10:00 A.M.-I:00 P.M.) Dear Mr. Geller: On behalf of the City of Moreno Valley Planning Commission, I would like to invite you to attend a Planning Commissioners Forum on Saturday, July 14, 1990, from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. which includes a buffet luncheon. This forum will involve, in addition to Moreno Valley, the Planning Commissions of the Cities of Perris, Hemet, Beaumont, Banning, Riverside, San Jacinto, Temecula, and the County of Riverside. In Moreno Valley, the Planning Commission regards this as an initial opportunity for the Planning Commissions in the central Riverside County area to become familiar with each other and also receive input on issues directly relating to us as Commissioners and individuals. We have arranged for Mr. Mike Jenkins, a California League of Cities Seminar Leader, to present several items, such as the Brown Act and the State's Fair Political Practices Commission Regulations (enclosed is an Agenda). We invite you to attend this no charge forum and luncheon here in Moreno Valley and join with us in planning Riverside County to benefit everyone by ensuring sound communication. Please R.S.V.P. to Trish Smith of the Moreno Valley Planning Department by telephoning (714) 243-3200 by Monday, July 2, 1990. Thank you in advance for your support and interest in this initial effort. A directional map to the Moreno Valley City Hall is attached to assist you in locating the city Hall. Ve~ tr%l Q ' S, Moreno Valley Planning Commission SS:ps Attachment: July 14, 1990 Agenda Directional Map AGENDA CITY OF MO~XNO VXM~'Z BPO NBO~D PLMIFI!iG COM!tlBBZON~~" FOROM BA'I'T~.DAY, ~ITLY 14, 1990 10:00 A,M. - 1:00 23110 Cottonwood Avenue Building B (Council Chambers) Moreno valley, california 92388 Introduction - Stanley Steele, Chairman Moreno Valley Planning Commission 2peaker - Mike Jenkins (City Attorney for Several Cities of in the Los Angeles Area and League California Cities Seminar Leader) Commission Brown Act (Open Meeting Law) Conducting Public Meetings Difficult People Fair Political Practices Observations Regulation and 3. Buffet Luncheon 4. Adjournment 060890/ps/rls pubform.age IRONWOOD VALLEy AV HEMLOCX AV  ~\ FWY ;'o Beaue'n~ I Banning -~, + SUNNYMEAD BL 4' EUCALYPTUS AV ~' COTTONWOOD AV 4CITY HALL u, ALESSANDRO 4' BL CACTUS ~ AV MARCH AIR FORCE BASE City of Moreno Valley Planning Department Directions FROM THE EAST OR WEST: Take State Route 60 to the Pigeon Pass/Frederick Street exit. Head south on Frederick Street. Cross Cottonwood Avenue and make an immediate left turn into the Bel Air Plaza parking lot. The Council Chambers is located in Building B. *FROMTI"E'SOO'T~: Take ~e~ ~ie Highway 215'non'~ to Alessandm Be ulev'a'rd. Turn ~ht on Alessandro Boulevard and left on Frederick Street. The City Council Chambers, located on the southeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Frederick Street, is in Building B of the Bel Air Plaza. Telephone (714)) 243-3000 CITY OF TEMECULA ZONING DESIGNATIONS R-R ZONE (RURAL RESIDENTIAL) R-A ZONE (RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL) R-1 ZONE (ONE-FAMILY DWELLING) R-2 ZONE (MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS) R-3 ZONE (GENERAL RESIDENTIAL) R-4 ZONE (PLANNED RESIDENTIAL) R-5 ZONE (OPEN AREA COMBINING ZONE-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS) C-1 AND C-P ZONE (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) C-T ZONE (TOURIST COMMERCIAL) C-P-S ZONE (SCENIC HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) C-R ZONE (RURAL COMMERCIAL) C-O ZONE (COMMERCIAL-OFFICE) I-P ZONE (INDUSTRIAL PARK) M-SC ZONE (MANUFACTURING - SERVICE COMMERCIAL) M-M ZONE (MANUFACTURING - MEDIUM) M-H ZONE IMANUFACTURING - HEAVY) A-1 ZONE (LIGHT AGRICULTURAL) A-2 ZONE (HEAVY AGRICULTURAL) W-1 ZONE (WATERCOURSE, WATERSHED F, CONSERVATION AREAS) W-2 ZONE (CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENT AREAS) W-E ZONE (WIND ENERGY RESOURCE ZONE) SP ZONE (SPECIFIC PLAN)