HomeMy WebLinkAbout041591 PC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
April 15, 1991 6:00 PM
VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
29915 Mira Loma Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Chairman Chiniaeff
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Chiniaeff
Hoagland,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are
limited to three ~ 3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners
about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the Commissioner Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three ~3)
minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Minutes
2.1 Minutes of April 1, 1991 Planning Commission Meeting.
NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
First Extension of Time for Public Use Permit 660
Kinder Care
East Side of Lyndie Lane North of Rancho California Road
Extension of time for approved Day Care Center
Approval
Scott Wright
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 231o,2. First Extension of
Time
Costa Group
Bonny Road, North of Zinfandel Avenue
First Extension of Time for a 20 lot single family
subdivision
Approval
Scott Wright
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 (TPM 26723)
Devadutt Shaw
South Side of Santiago Rd., Approx. 3/4 mile West of
Margarita Rd.
Residential Subdivision of Approx. 10.7 gross into ~
parcels.
Approval
Charly Ray
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1090 Revised No. 1
Vedder Park
South General Kearny east of La Serena Way
Addition of seven 17) mobile home spaces to an existing
mobile home park.
Approval
Steve Jiannlno
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Plot Plan 155, Amd. #1
Tomand Properties
Terminus of Bedford Court
Construction of an 11,500 square foot retail building and
a u,500 square foot freestanding restaurant pad.
Approval
Steve Jiannino
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1
Palmilia Associates
Northwest Corner of Rancho California Road and Lyndie
Lane
Revise the building area of a previously approved Plot
Plan, on a 5.1 acre site, from u,6,613 to u,7,~,12 square feet.
Approval
Oilvet Mujica
10.
11.
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Plot Plan No. 228
El Torito Restaurants, Inc,
Northwest Corner of Rancho California Road and Lyndie
Lane
Construct a 7,203 5quare Foot Restaurant within a
shopping center on a 5.1 acre site
Approval
Oilvet Mujica
First Extension of Time Vesting Tentative Map 23102
Marlborough Development Corporation
West of Butterfield 5rage Rd., North of La Serena Way
First Extension of Time for 37 lot Res. Subdivision.
Approval
Richard Ayala
First Extension of Time Vesting Tentative Map 2:3103
Marlborough Development Corporation
West of Butterfield Stage Rd., between La Serena Way and
Rancho California Road
First Extension of Time 18 lot Res. Subdivision
Recommend Approval
Richard Ayala
12o
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
Change of Zone No. 12
Advanced Cardlovascular Systems, Inc.
West of Margarita Rd., No. of Solana Way
Change of Zone from A-2-20 to IP F, R-5 on L~2.00 acres.
Recommend Approval
Mark Rhoades
Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance
City of Temecula
City Wide
Ordinance establishing regulations for the use of ambient
air balloons and other similar inflatables.
Recommend Approval
Oliver Mujica
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
WESTERN RIDGELINE POLICIES
City of Temecula
City Wide
Develop interim Hillside and Open 5pace Policies to be used
as the City of Temeculats Western Ridgeline Policies until
the General Plan is adopted.
Continue to May 20, 1991
Oilvet Mujica
15o
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Recommendation:
Case Planner:
First Extension of Time-Vesting Tentative Map 23125
Sterling Builders
Northeast corner of Deportola and Butterfield
First Extenstion of Time, 215 lot Residential Subdivision
Continue off Calendar
Richard Ayala
Planning Director Report
Planninq Commission Discussion
Other Business
ADJOURNMENT
Next meeting: May 06, 1991, 6:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma
Drive, Temecula, California
SJ/Ib
pc/agnq/15
ITEM #2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL It 1991
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was
called to order Monday, April 1, 1991, 6:00 P.M. at Vail Elementary
School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting
was called to order by Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff.
PRESENT: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Acting
Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Engineer Doug
Stewart, and Minute Clerk Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
PIA OLIVER, 27919 Front Street, Temecula, representing the owners
of the building referenced in Item No. 7, which was withdrawn from
processing by the applicant. She thanked the Commission and staff
for all of the support and efforts and apologized for the last
minute withdrawal of the item from the agenda.
CHRI8 MARTINELLI, 30255 Corte Cantania, Temecula, representing
Neighborhood Coalition 25603, extended an invitation to the
Commissioners and Planning staff to a meeting on April 6, to
informally discuss Tentative Tract Map 25603 with the citizens and
the developers.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF requested a comment from the Assistant City
Attorney.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised Chairman Chiniaeff and the Commissioners
that no more than two (2) of them could attend.
DENNIS SENNETT, 32381 Corte Las Crucas, Temecula, clarified that
Item No. 7, C.U.P. 6, had been withdrawn from consideration.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission of the following changes
in the Agenda:
Item 6 continued to the regular Planning Commission meeting
of April 15, 1991.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 1, 1991
Item 7 withdrawn from processing by the applicant.
Item 11 to be taken out of order and heard as first item
under "Public Hearing Items".
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to approve the agenda as modified,
seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
COMMISSIONERS: None
1. MINUTE8
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 18, 1991 Planning Commission
Special Meeting.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND amended page 7, vote on the motion
amended to read "NOES: i COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland".
COMMISSIONER FORDamended page 5, fifth paragraph, to read
"Gary Koontz concurred with Commissioner Ford's
suggestion."
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to approve the minutes of
March 18, 1991 as amended, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD.
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Ford, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Blair
NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
None
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
11. VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC ORDINANCE
11.1 Proposal for the Commission to recommend adoption of the
revised Vehicle and Traffic Ordinance.
PCMIN4/01/91 -2- April 4, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 1, 1991
JIM DOMENOE, City of Temecula Police Sergeant, provided
the staff report.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved that the Planning Commission
recommend to the City Council that the revised ordinance
be adopted, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
2. CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5
el
Proposal for change of zone for 221.1 acres from R-R
to R-3, R-4, and R-5. Located on Highway 79 between
Pala Road and Margarita Road.
RICHARD AYALA provided the staff report on Items 2, 3,
and 4 at this time.
DOUG STEWART modified Condition No. 37, page 22, of Item
No. 3, VTTM 23267, to read "or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted."
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M.
RAY CASEY, 12120 Via Milano, San Diego, representing
Presley of San Diego, concurred with the recommendations
by staff and welcomed questions by the Commission.
ALEXANDER URQUBART, 5650 E1 Camino Real, Suite 200,
Carlsbad, offered to answer any questions by the
Commission.
COMMISSIONER FAREY moved to close the public hearing at
6:30 P.M. and recommend Adoption of the addendum to EIR
No. 281 for Change of Zone No. 5; and Adopt Resolution No.
91-(~eXt) recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 5,
seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND.
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Ford
PCMIN4/01/91 -3- April 4, 1991
PLANNING COMMIBSION MINUTES APRIL 1, 1991
REVISED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT RAP NO. 23267
Proposal to revise Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267
for the development of 601 residential lots. Located on
Highway 79 between Pala Road and Margarita Road.
CRAIRMANCHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 6:30 P.M.
RAY CA~EY, 12120 Milano, San Diego, representing Presley
of San Diego, discussed various issues relating to the
parks within the project. Mr. Casey stated that if the
Commission choose to not accept park "B", then the HOA
would like that designated a private park. He added that
there had been recent discussion with the CSD regarding
the Quimby Fees; however, he requested to postpone final
commitment of those fees to prior to recordation of the
map.
COMMI88IONER FORD asked various questions of Mr. Casey
regarding the parks, etc.; however, he had a specific
question if the applicant would be willing to accept
the design and approval of the Pala Road bridge by the
240th unit.
RAY CASEY stated that he would agree to a condition
requiring the design and approval of the Pala Road bridge.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF sugqested the following wording for
Item No. 2, "prior to the occupancy of the 240th unit,
the plans for the Pala Road Bridge will be updated,
checked and in place".
GARY KING, City of Temecula CSD, answered some of the
Commission's concerns regarding the City's position on
the park areas in this project.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF questioned if going back to a HOA
project would pose any problems for the Fire Department.
MIKE GRAY, Riverside County Fire Department, advised the
Commission that they would not have any problem in
dealing with a HOA. He added that he would like to see
the Commission condition any dissolving of the HOA has
be go through the City of Temecula Planning Director.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmOVed to close the public hearing at
7:25 P.M. and recommend Adoption of the addendum to EIR
No. 281 for Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267;
and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) recommending approval
of Revised Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23267, with
PCMIN4/01/91 -4- April 4, 1991
PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 1, 1991
modifications to Condition 20E and recommend that the City
not accept any of the parks within this project because
they are sub-standard, and that Condition 61(B-2) stating
that the plans for the Pala Road and bridge realignment
will be designed, reviewed and approved by the City of
Temecula and other appropriate agencies. Plans shall be
prepared in a format that is approved by the City
Engineer, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
COMMISSIONER FORD requested regional park "A" be available
for future consideration to be incorporated in a City park
system.
COMMISSIONER HoAGLANDamended his motion to recommend that
the City may want to consider accepting park "A" as an
easement if it demonstrates standards to be included in
a City park system, COMMISSIONER FAHEY concurred.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
4. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26861
Proposal to plan for the development of 147 detached
condominium project. Located on Highway 79 between Pala
Road and Margarita Road.
CMAIRMANCHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M.
RAY CASEY, 12120 Milano, San Diego, representing Presley
of San Diego, gave a brief description of the revisions
that were worked out with staff on this item.
At the last hearing for this item, the City Attorney was
requested to make an opinion on the apparent conflict
of the Temecula zoning ordinance, section 18.5 and 18.11.
Assistant City Attorney JOHN CAVHNAUGH advised the
applicant and the Commission that the intent of the
ordinance was to require that these condominium units
have to have 1,000 square feet of ground area.
Mr. Cavanaugh advised the Commission that, because it is
the City Attorney office's legal opinion that the 1,000
minimum square foot requirement applies, the applicant
could possibly apply for a variance to the square footage
requirement.
PCMIN4/01/91 -5- April 4, 1991
PLANNIN~
COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 1, 1991
QARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that, because the
applicant is pres~ating a "detached" unit as opposed to an
"attached" unit, there may be some justification for a
variance; however, staff would have to come back to the
Commission with a report and prepared findings.
COMMI88IONER BOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing
at 7:50 P.M. and continue Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
26861 off-calendar, seconded by CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF.
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 25981
Proposal to subdivide 3.01 acres into three residential
lots. Located south of Pauba Road and east of Showalter
Road.
RICHARD AYALAprovided the staff report.
COMMISSIONER FORD requested that Condition No. 43(B) be
modified to read "and to Pauba Road".
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:55 P.M.
WILLIAM KOUVELIS, 30675 Pauba Road, Temecula, presented
the Commission with pictures of Pauba Road at his property
and advised the Commission that he did not concur with the
Conditions by staff for improvement of Pauba Road. Mr.
Kouvelis argued that the improvements to Pauba Road that
were being requested of him were not practical.
MIKE BENESH, Benesh Engineering, 28991 Front Street,
Temecula, concurred with Mr. Kouvelis's comments and
requested clarification of Condition No. 21.
COMMISSIONER FORD questioned if staff could condition
the project to grade Pauba at the right-of-way at this
time.
DOUQ STEWART stated that staff could condition the
applicant to grade at this time, and take a bond for
complete improvements.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF declared a five minute recess at 8:10 P.M. to
allow staff to prepare a condition for the applicant's approval.
PCMIN4/01/91 -6- April 4, 1991
PLANNIN~
COMMISSION ~INUTE8
APRIL 1, 1991
DOUG STEWART advised that staff requests to modify
Condition No. 27 read "prior to issuance of Building
Permits"; and Condition No. 45(a) amended to read
"A cash bond may be posted to the City of Temecula
in lieu of construction and improvements of Pauba Road.
The amount of the cash bond should be approved by the City
Engineer.
MIKE BENESH concurred with the amendments to the
Conditions of Approval. Mr. Benesh also stated that
the Conditions of Approval referenced sidewalks and
that Mr. Kouvelis preferred not to provide sidewalks.
DOUG STEWART advised Mr. Benesh that the requirement
for sidewalks was county code.
COMMISSIONER FAREY moved to close the public hearing at
8:20 P.M. and Adopt a Negative Declaration for Tentative
Parcel Mao No. 25981 and AdoPt Resolution No. 91-[next)
approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 25981, including the
modifications to Condition No. 27 and Condition No. 45(a)
as requestedby staff, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND.
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26723
Proposal for residential subdivision of approximately 10.7
gross acres into a first extension of time for the
development of 284 condominium units. Located on the
south side of Santiago Road, approximately 3/4 mile west
of Margarita Road.
This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting
of April 15, 1991.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 6
Proposal to request to convert 101,984 square feet of an
existing industrial/warehouse structure for use as a
commercial meeting/seminar venue including provision of
food services.
This item was withdrawn from processing by the applicant.
PCMIN4/01/91 -7- April 4, 1991
PT~ANNING COIO!ISSION NIllUTES ~PRIL 1, 1991
8. VESTING TENTATIVE TI~CT NO, 23142, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIHE
8.1 Proposal for first extension of time for a 20 lot single
family subdivision. Located at Bonny Road, North of
Zinfandel Avenue.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report. Mr. Jiannino
stated that staff had received various letters from area
residents pertaining to previous grading and drainage
problems.
CHAIRMAN CNINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:30 P.M.
TERRY BECKER, 1784 La Costa Meadows Drive, San Marcos,
representing Costa Group, advised the Commission that the
applicant had seen the damage caused by the drainage
problems and would be repairing those damages.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the
request for a First Extension of Time and advised the
Commission of the problems they were having getting the
Costa Group to repair the damages to their properties
caused by the grading and drainage problems:
RALPH BROWNELL, 41487 Zinfandel Avenue, Temecula.
THOMAS BENTLEY, 41473 Zinfandel Avenue, Temecula.
KEVIN DAVIS, 32058 Merlot Court, Temecula.
MAUREEN HUBERT, 41412 Chenin Blanc Street, Temecula.
TERRY BECKER stated again that the developer intended
to rectify all damages incurred by the residents.
DOUG STEWART advised that there were county standards
for erosion control and added that he would have a
City inspector go out immediately and investigate the
site.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF requested an explanation of the
Commission's alternatives from the City Attorney.
JOHN CAVARAUGH advised the Commission that they could
deny the extension based on the issue of public health,
safety and welfare or condition the extension to require
the applicant to clean-up the damages with a bond
requirement and a time frame for completion of clean-up;
however, added conditions to the approval of the request
would have to be accepted by an authorized representative
PCMIN4/01/91 -8- April 4, 1991
PLM~IN~
COMMIBBION MINUTE8
~PRI~ 1, 1991
of Costa Group. Mr. Cavanaugh added that the Commission
could deny the item as presented or continue the item to
allow Mr. Becker time to provide authorization to act on
behalf of the Costa Group.
DOUG STEWART advised that Commission that the County
had not conditioned the developer to post bonds for
erosion control. He added that if the requirement for
bonds were placed on the project at this time, the City
could then go in and rectify the problems.
COMMISSIONER FAREY moved to close the public hearing at
9:05 P.M. and continue Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142,
First Extension of Time to April 15, 1991, seconded by
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF added that he would like the motion
to direct staff to immediately enforce any action they
have against the developer.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
9. PLOT PLAN 11339
Proposal to construct a 9,216 square foot automotive
service center. Located on the northwesterly side of
Rio Nedo Street, approximately 720 feet southwest of
Diaz Road.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 9:10 P.M.
ANTHONYPOLO, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester Road,
Temecula, concurred with the staff report and answered
questions by the Commission.
The Commission as a whole expressed their non-support of
the project, as presented, due to the inadequate site and
building architectural design.
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to continue Plot Plan 11339 to
the regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning
Commission on 5/6/91 and direct staff to address the
Commission's concerns regarding building design and site
lay-out issues, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
PCMZN4/01/91 -9- April 4, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
APRIL 1o
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
None
1991
10. CHANGE OF 2ONE NO. 9, SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE NO. 11
10.1
Proposal for a request for substantial conformance and
change of zone to allow duplex and fourplex units in
Planning Area 37 of Specific Plan 199. Located north
of Rancho California Road, east of Margarita Road.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 9:25 P.M.
No one was present to speak either for or against or to
represent the applicant.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF advised that since there was no one
present representing the applicant, to answer questions by
the Commission about the project, he would prefer to not
go further with the item, but to continue the item and
have staff advise the applicant to ensure a representative
is available to answer questions.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to continue Change of Zone No. 9,
Substantial Conformance No. 11 to May 6, 1991, seconded by
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
GARY THORNHILL updated the Commission on the following issues:
Combined study session between the Planning Commission and
City Council scheduled for 4/29/91. He requested suggestions
from the Commission for Agenda items.
General Plan Committee has narrowed the field down to two firms.
Will be meeting again on 4/18/91 to try and make a final
decision.
PCMIN4/01/91 -10- April 4, 1991
PLANNIN~ COMMISSION MINUTES
COMMISSION REPORT
APRIL 1, 1991
,
,
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF requested that the Commission only receive
updated materials on continued items.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND requested "Approval of Agenda" be a
permanent Agenda feature.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND requested double sided copying on the
Agenda packages.
ADJOURNMENT
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF adjourned the meeting at 9:45 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning
Commission will be held Monday, April 15, 1991, 6:00 P.M., Vail
Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula.
Chairman, Dennis Chiniaeff
Secretary
PCMIN4/01/91 -11- April 4, 1991
ITEM ~3
r',TAPF REPORT - PLANNING
CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15. 1991
Case No.: Public Use Permit No. 660
First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Scott Wright
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
approving an Extension of Time
for Public Use Permit No. 660
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc.
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc.
To construct a one story building with 6,260 square
feet of gross floor area for use as a child care
center for up to 138 children with up to 15
employees.
The easterly side of Lyndie Lane approximately 200
feet north of Rancho California Road.
C-P ( General Commercial )
North: R-3-4,000
South: C-P
East: A-2-20
West: C-P
General Residential )
General Commercial )
Heavy Agriculture)
General Commercial )
Not requested.
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Multiple Family Residential
Commercial
Church
Vacant, Approved Plot
Commercial Uses
Plan for
A:PUP660 1
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Site Area:
Building Area:
Max. No. of Children:
Max. No. of Employees:
Parking Spaces:
Landscaping:
34,600 s q. ft.
6,260 sq.ft.
138
15
21
7,090 sq.ft.
BACKGROUND:
Public Use Permit No. 660 was Approved at the
County Planning Director's Hearing of January 25,
1989 and Received and Filed by the Board of
Supervisors on March 14, 1989. At the time of
approval, the applicant also requested a Special
Review of parking, and the number of required
spaces was reduced from u,2 to 21. This reduction
was based on 138 children and 15 employees. On
February 19, 1991, the applicant submitted a
request for an Extension of Time.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The project is to construct a one story building with
6,260 square feet of gross floor area for use as a
child care center with up to 15 employees and up to
138 children. Twenty-one (21) parking spaces are
provided. There will be substantial landscaping at
the front and rear of the site and on the easterly
side.
ANALYSIS:
Parkin9
Ordinance 3u,8 requires one space per employee and
one space for every five children for child care
centers. The proposed child care center will have
up to 15 employees and up to 138 children. The
parking requirement per Ordinance 348 would
normally be u,2 spaces. The site plan shows 21
spaces. The applicant has indicated that customer
parking occurs during two-hour peak periods in the
morning and in the late afternoon and that typical
time period that a customer occupies a space is from
3 to 5 minutes. The applicant has submitted data
showing that arrivals and departures of customers
are distributed relatively evenly over the two hour
peak periods. Assuming that each of the six spaces
not occupied by employees could accommodate 12
customers per hour, 6 spaces could accommodate 144
customers over a two hour peak period and should
be adequate to serve customers bringing up to 138
children to the facility.
A:PUP660 2
Compatibility With Adjacent Land Uses
The building in the commercial center adjacent to
the site faces away from the subject property. The
back wall of the building, a wall with no windows,
faces the subject property. The proposed child
care center will have no noise or visual impact on
the businesses within the commercial building. The
church east of the site is over two hundred feet
from the location of the proposed building and is too
distant to be impacted by the child care center.
The only comment from the owner of the adjacent
apartments noted in the County Staff Report was a
preference to delete a block wall which had been
proposed along the boundary between the two
properties.
Traffic
The impact of project-generated traffic on the
intersection of Lyndle Lane and Rancho California
Road would consist of 69 automobiles entering and
leaving Lyndie Lane per hour during peak periods.
The intersection will be signalized in conjunction
with construction of a recently approved commercial
project at the northwest corner of Lyndie Lane and
Rancho California Road.
Access and Internal Circulation
The driveway and interior drive aisles are adequate
to accommodate two-way traffic.
Architecture
The design of the proposed structure includes a hip
roof with half-round Iouvers and a covered entry
way with two columns. The entry way is capped by
a covered bell mounting. Building materials include
wood roof shingles, stucco walls, metal roofing for
the covered entry, and wood trim and fascia. The
walls and wood trim will be grey and the wood trim
and metal roofing will be red,
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The site is designated for commercial land uses.
Ordinance 31~8 permits child care centers in any
zone subject to approval of a Public Use Permit.
A: PUP660 3
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
The project will not result in any environmental
impacts which cannot be mitigated to a level of
insignificance. The County adopted a Negative
Declaration in conjunction with the approval of
Public Use Permit No. 660 in 1989.
FINDINGS AND
SUPPORTING FACTS:
5.
6.
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time in that the
proposed child care center will be compatible
with existing and approved land uses in the
vicinity.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan
in that child care centers are permitted in
any zone subject to approval of a Public Use
Permit.
The project will not result in any significant
environmental impacts.
The site takes access from a public street,
Lyndie Lane.
The project will be compatible with existin9
land uses adjacent to the site.
The site is adequate for the proposed use in
that all applicable requirements can be
satisfied, parking is adequate, and
landscaping is substantial.
The project will not pose an undue burden on
streets in the vicinity in that it will only
generate 69 arrivals and departures per hour
during peak period, and the nearest
intersection will be signalized in conjunction
with construction of a commercial project.
The proposed use will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community.
A: PUP660 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approvlng an
Extension of Time for Public Use Permit No.
660 subject to the Conditions of Approval in
the attached County Staff Report and the
attached City Conditions of Approval.
SW: ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
5.
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
County Staff Report
Supporting Parking Data
Exhibits
A. Vicinity Map
B. Site Plan
A: PUP660 5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVI NG AN EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 660 TO PERMIT
OPERATION OF CHILD CARE CENTER LOCATED ON THE
EASTERLY SIDE OF LYNDIE LANE APPROXIMATELY 200
FEET NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD.
WHEREAS, Kinder Care Learning Centers filed an application for an
extension of time for PUP No. 660 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use,
Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference;
WHEREAS, said PUP extension was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said PUP extension on
April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said PUP extension:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECT ION 1. Findin.qs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state )aw that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
{1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
12) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A: PUP660 6
a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state taw and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, ( hereinafter "SWAP" ) was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed PUP is consistent with the SWAP and meets
the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to
wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that PUP No.
660 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
A: PUP660 7
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.29(d), no PUP may be
approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any PUP approved shall be subject to such conditions as
shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of
the community.
( 2 ) The Planning Commission, in approving theproposed
PUP extension, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time in that the
proposed child care center will be compatible
with existing and approved land uses in the
vicinity.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan
in that child care centers are permitted in
any zone subject to approval of a Public Use
Permit.
c)
The project will not result in any significant
environmental impacts.
d)
The site takes access from a public street,
Lyndle Lane.
e)
The project will be compatible with existing
land uses adjacent to the site.
f)
The site is adequate for the proposed use in
that all applicable requirements can be
satisfied, parking is adequate, and
landscaping is substantial.
g)
The project will not pose an undue burden on
streets in the vicinity in that it will only
generate 69 arrivals and departures per hour
during peak period, and the nearest
intersection will be signalized in conjunction
with construction of a commercial project.
A: PUP660 8
h)
The proposed use will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, or general welfare of the
community.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the PUP proposed
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves an
extension of time for PUP No. 660 for the operation and construction of a child care
center located on the easterly side of Lyndie Lane approximately 200 feet north of
Rancho California Road subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the day of , 1991 by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:PUP660 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO: 660
Project Description: Child Care Center
Assessor's Parcel No: 921-310-010
Plannlnq Department
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Public Use
Permit 660. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in
the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within one year of approval date; otherwise, it
shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the one ~1) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on March 1L~, 1992.
Enqineerlnq Department
The following are the En9ineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PR)OR TO ISSUANCE OF CRADING PERMITS:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
A: PUP660 10
10.
11.
12.
13.
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
The developer shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
The developer shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Englneer's Office.
Existing city roads shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate
detours during construction.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Onsite and offsite improvements, including, but not limited to:
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, signing,
striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
A: PU P660 11
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
15.
Drainage calculations shall be submitted to and approved by the City
Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City
Engineer.
16.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
17.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
18.
Protection of the offsite cribwall from erosion along the northwesterly
boundary shall be provided by designing a concrete brow ditch or similar
drainage device as approved by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
19.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
20.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
21.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V.
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V.
Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
22.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard u,00 and ~t01 {curb sidewalk).
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~&61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. ~,00 and u,01.
A: PU P660 12
25.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the ElR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
26.
All improvements shall be constructed and complete as shown on the approved
plans.
Buildinq and Safety Department
27.
All plans and specifications will be subject to the most recently adopted model
building codes adopted for use by the City of Temecula.
A: P U P660 13
SUBMFITAL TO THE BOARD OF SUPER~SORS
COUNTY OF RWERSIDE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTRENT SUBMFrFALDATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1989
SUBJECT: Notice of Declston of Permits Acted on by the Planning
Cc~4ssion on January 25, 1989
RECOMMENDED MOllON: ~
RECEIVE AND FILE the Notice of Decision for the cases acted on
by the P3a~tn8 Commission on January 25, 1989.
THE I~ING COMMISSION '
ADOPTED the NegZtive Declaration for. E.A. Number 33384 based on
the findingo incorporated in the environmental assessment and
the conclusion that the proposed project ~r$11 not have a
significant efect on the environment; and, '
ed{,n the Planx~g Co~ission ~nutes dated Januax~ 25, 198.~
CJC:gn
.?.
Prey. Ago. re[. Depts. Cammeats D|st.
AGENDANO.
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING CONNISSZON NINUTES
JANUARY 25, 1989
PEI (AGENDA ITEN 7-1 - Tape 1'~14, Stde I -*Tape 3A)
r
PUBLIC USE IT 660 - EA 33384 - Kinde Care Learning Center - Nurrteta Area
- First Supervtsortal District - 0.8~ acre, east of Ltndy Way, north of Rancho
California Rd - Day Care Center
Hearing was opened at 2:16 p.m. and was closed at 2:25 p.m.
The applicant proposed a day care center for 8 maxtmm of 138 children with a
maximum of 15 employees on'0.8 acre located at the northwest corner of Llndy
Way and Rancho California Road. Zontng on site ts C-1/C-P and the stte Is
currently vacant. Surrounding zontng is C-l/C-P, R-3-4000 and A-2-20.
Surrounding land uses are a church, a proposed shopping center, apartments and
vacant property. A six foot high concrete block wall along the wastefly
property 1the was originally proposed as a condition for thts project, but the
applicant received comments from the adjacent property owner tndtcatlng that
they did not want a block wall at that location. Therefore, staff did not
include the wall as a condition of approval. Clearance has been received from
the Fish and Wildlife Service and the Grading Section of Building and Safety,
and therefore umended the following:
Delete Finding No. B
Add a new Finding No. 8: Clearance has been given from Building and
Safety, Grading Section.
Delete Conclusion No. 5
Condition No. 10: Delete old date, add new date of January 24, 1989.
Condition No. 25:. "Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant
shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee
required by that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee
.required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County Ordinance or Resolution."
Condition No. 25: Renumber as Condition No. 26.
In answer to Conmnisstoner Bresson, staff noted that the block wall was to be
installed between the Ktnder Care Center and apartment complex. He distributed
letters which requested the deletion of the block wall. Staff advised that
landscaping is being proposed along the parking lot.
: TESTIHONY OF PROPONENT:
Elliot Urich, Diversified Engineering, re resenting the 'applicant, located on
the exhibit an existing retaining wall aVong the rear and half way down the
northerly boundary of the site. He also indicated the grade differential and
located where the site would be landscaped and fenced. He noted that a chain
link fence would be installed around the play area. The apartment's developer
installed the existing retaining wall with landscaping, and Hr. Urtch said that
22
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 25, 1989
they ~ul d landscape an eight foot area over that. Mr, Urtch said that the
have no objections to the amended conditions. There was no one else who wished
to speak on the mtter.
The heating was closed at 2:25 p.m.
FINDINGS N~D CONCLUSIONS: Day care centers are rmitted in any zone under a
public use pemtt; the existing zoning is C-1/C-~; a shopping center/car wash
plot plan was approved in 1988for the adjoining site to the east; a biological
survey reveals no indication of a Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat; clearance is
needed from the U.S. Fish and Wildliferegarding the viabtlity of the Stephens
Kangaroo Rat habitat on the site; Category I and II uses are designated for the
Rancho-Temecula Subarea of the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area;
there is not substantial evidence that the proposed project will result in any
significant environmental effects; and, clearance has been received from the
Building and Safety Grading Section. The proposed project is consistent with
County Ordinances, including Ordinances No. 348 and 460; is consistent with the
Comprehensive General Plan; there is sufficient parking to meet the use
demands; the proposed project, as condittoned, will be compatible with adjacent
land uses, both existing and planned; and, will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
MOTION: Upon motion by C~m,isstoner Bresson, seconded by Commissioner Beadling
and unanimously carried, the Commission adopted the Negative Declaration for EA
33384 and approved Public Use Permit No. 660 subject to the conditions of
approval as amended (above) and based on the above amended findings and
conclusions.
23
Zontng Area: lqurrleta
Supervtsortal District:
E.A, Number 33384
Regfonal Team No. V
First
FAST TRACK PUBLIC USE PERlET NO. 660
P!annlng Commission: 1-25-89
Agenda Ztem No.: 7-1
!~ Trig ne~r/R epre entattve:
: ~ Diversified Engineering
Publlc Use Permit for a day care center
NorthNest corner of Lindy llay and
Rancho Calt fornia Road
Extsttng Zoning: C-1/C-P
~l~inq~ Surrounding Zoning: C-l/C-P, R-3-4000, A-2-20
Stte Characted sti cs: Vacant semi -at1 d
8. Area Characteristics: Developing Area - North: ChurCh,
south: vacant, east: proposed shopping
center, currently vacant, west:
apartments
9. Comprehenstve General
Designation:
10. Land Dtvts(on Data:
Plan
11. Agency Recommendations:
Letters:
Sphere of Znfluence:
12.
13.
Land Use: Category ZI Cammarcia1
Total Acreage: .8
Total Lots: 1
Proposed Ntn. Lot Size: .8
See letter dated:
Road: 1-05-89
Health: 12-20-88
Flood: 1-06-89
Ftre: 1-05-89
Building & Safety:
Grad(rig: 12-30-88
Land Use: 1-06-89
Opposing/Supporting: None
Not within a dry sphere
ANALYSIS:
PP~!ect IMsc~tpUon
The proposed project is for a day
children with a maxtmum of 15 employees,
t~ack revtew.
care center houstng a maxtmum of 138
The project was authorized for fast
PUBLIC USE PERHZT NO. 660
Staff Report
Page 2
Area Coepattbfitt~y and Zontng
The surrounding land uses are cempatIble wtth ~e project. A 6 foot htgh
concrete block wall on the west property line of the project side wtll
provide protection for the extsttng apartments as well as for the Da.v Care
Center. The land to the east of the project stte ts presently vacant
· however, Plot Plan No. 10694 was recently approved on the vacant stte. Plot
Plan No. 10694 proposes a shopptng center and car wash at the Intersection of
Rancho California Road and Ltndy Iday. An ~11ustratton of this project ts
shown on the D~y Care Center plot plan.
Consistent7 ~th the Cmprehensfve General Plan
The project 11es wtth the boundaries of the Southwest Land Use Planntng Area
and wtthtn the Rancho CalIfornIa-Temecula Subarea. Land Use Poltdes
tndtcate that Category Z and Z! land uses are to be uttlIzed wtthtn thts
subarea.
The project ts consistent with Category Z! land uses whtch fndtcate that land
uses be located where water and sewer Is available, served at least by
secondary highwayS, and be prowtried wtth a full range of public services.
The day care use ts a permitted use fn a C-1/C-P zone wtth a publtc use
permtt.
Envfrormental Assessment
Environmental Assessment No..33384 Indicates there are no major or'
significant environmental tssues associated wtth the development. A
biological survey (PD~B-No. 205) was performed wtth Plot Plan No. 10694 and
tncludes the day care center stte. The survey concluded that the stte had
11rotted habit value for wtldllfe Including sensitive spectes and that the
Stephens Kangaroo Rat does not tnhabtt the stte. Stnce the Stephens Kangaroo
Rat ts a faderally 11steal endangered spectes, staff ts awattlng clearance
from the U.S. Ftsh and litldllfe Servtce.
Forty parktrig spaces are required per Ordinance No;~348. Twenty one are
provided Ntth the appllcant's submission of a Request for t of
Spec al Review
~he Staff concurs with the appllcant's need for fewer parKlng spaces
nature of the use and the drop off and pick up of chlldren durtng
a limited time period fn the morning and afternoon.
The Butldtng Department Gradtng Soctton has not received a conceptual gradtng
plan as of thts date. Staff cannot recemaend approval unttl clearance ts
recetved free the Gradtrig Soctlon.
PUBLIC USE PE:RliZT'IIO..660
Staff Report
Page 3
FXNDXNGS:
1. Day care centers are permitted tn any' zone under a Publlc Use Permit.
2. The extst~ng zoning Is C-l/C-P.
3. A shopptng center/car wash plot plan was approved tn 1988 for the
adjoining site to the east.
4. A btolog4cal survey reveals no Indication of a Stephens Kangaroo Rat
habt tat.
5. Clearance ts needed from the U. S. Ftsh and t441dl~fe regardtng the
vtabtltty of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habttat on the stte.
6. Category I and TI uses are designated for the Rancho-Temecula Subarea of
the Southwest Terrltory Land Use P]anntng Area.
7. There ts no substantial evidence that the proposed project wtl1 result
tn any stgnt ticant environmental effects.
8. The applicant has not submitted a conceptual gradtng plan. Clearance ts
needed from the Butldtng and Safety's Gradtng Sectton.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The proposed project
0rd~nances 348 and 460.
is consistent wtth County Ordinances, Including
The proposed p~oJect ts consistent wtth the Comprehensive General Plan.
There Is sufficfent porf. fng to meet the use demands.
4. The proposed project, as condttloned, wtll be compatible wtth
land uses, both extsttng and planned.
5. All necessary staff clearances have not been recehed.
REC01eEIEIATZ0N:
C(X(TINUANCE of PL~i. IC USE:PE3U4ITII). 660.
a~acent
NGB:aea
1-12-89
Addendure.
Th~s fore ~s complementary to the appltcaMon for land use and
development.
Request for Special Revtew of Parktnq,
Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, Parking and Landscaping ~upplement
The current liarking and landscaping ordinance offers alternative program for
I~rktng, parking reductions and bicycle parking exemptions, The follo~dng
tnfomatton ts necessary to detemtne reductions and/or exemptions,
JL PTease indicate the' type of us~:
~/~ Y- ~-~ ~E U'~ Fx~/z
1. Number of required regular Check where appropriate:
car-parkipg spaces --=:-* --,---~-~.,:- ,,No. of Rooms
'2. Nu~er of compact car spaces No. of Rooms" D 2BR
3, Total parking'spaces required ~L~ No, of Rooms D 3BR
Alternative Programs for Parktng. . .
1. Private van pool/car operations:
Honetary incentive or fl~;ibl~ working hours to promote van pool/car
operation. Yes
Number of parking spaces after 2f*reduction tn required parking
spaces
2. Hass transtt Yes No ~
Indicate distance of the project with respect to mass transit entry
~ay or bus stop-
Number of parking spaces after 2~ reduction in required parking
3.. BicYcle Parking
Number of'required b~cycle parking spaces
Number of proposed bicycle parking spaces
Number of required parking spaces after 2% .reduction in required
parking
Total reduction in parking spaces deducted from, item 1, 2 and 3
C. Planned Residential Development for Senior Citizens.
A proposal for planned residential development for sen~or c~tfzens may
have a 20 percent reduction tn parking; as specified tn Section 18.5 of
Ordinance No, 348, An additional five percent reduction in parking spaces
(s allowed tf the applicant proposes alternaUve senior citizen
transportation programs; however, (n no case will the reduction of parking
spaces exceed 25% of the total spaces required by Section 18,12 of this
ordinance,
1. Describe the aTternathe progrm as ~ndicated on ~tmnB.2. of this.
2, Number of required parking spaces
3, Number of proposed parking .spaces
D. Bicycle parking exemption,
1. Type of use. Z>Aj. c~ C/-~2'~
2. ihjrpose of r~est. hscr~be ~n~P'~est(ng b~cycle p~rk~n~'
ex~pt~on, Ex~Uons frm b~c~le pa~k~ng my ~ granted depending
upon the locaUon of the s~te ~th respect to the urban area, the
na~re and hours of the operation of the proposed use, the
accessibility of the s~te b~ bicycle at present and ~n the future,
3. Description of pro~sal. ~c ~/~ ~ ~ ~
~y ~~.
Shared Parking Requirement,
1. Describe the type and number of daytime uses.
Number of required parking spaces
Number of proposed parking spaces
Describe the type and number of nighttime uses:
· Number of required parking spaces
Number of proposed parking spaces
State the distance between the proposed use and the off-street parking
facility. (lhe project should be located less than 150 feet from the
off-street parking facility.)
State and expla?n reasons demonstrating that there ~s no substantial
conflict ?n the pr?nc~pal hours or periods of peak danand of the
structures or uses for which the ~o~nt use ~s proposed ~o exist.
5. Describe and submlt floor plans that sho~s that the floor area
devoted to ~stomer and employee use ts less than t~ptcal for the stze
oft he bufidtng proposed.
6. Submit to the Planning Oepartaent a copy of the Legal Instrument of
Agreement betmen the parties involved in the Joint or shared use of
the off-street parking facility. In addition submit one copy of the
Legal Instrument of Agreement to the County Recorder's Office and tNo
cop~es to the. Department of Building and Safety. .._
F. Hod~ficat~on to ~he c~rculat~on, landscapSng and park?rig la3mut.
The Plann~ng'D~rector my pem~t modSficat~ons ~rithout notice of hearing
to the c~rculat~ono landscaping and parking_layout where topographic or
other physical conditions make ft't~ract~cal'to require strict eo~p~an~
~ith thes~ requirements. Please ~nd~cate below which are the topographic
or physical conditions that hinder the develol~ent of3rour project.
-* *~
FAST TRACK NJTHORIZATION
APPLICANT Ktnder C~re Leat'aing Centere (Diverallied]PHONE
ADDRESS 27715 Jeffereon Ave. #105D CITY Temecula
CONTACT pERSON Elllott 13hrtch
676-568~
STATE 'CA' ZIP9½390
TYPE OF BUSZNESS: .C~ERC/AL , '/NIXISTR/AL, OTHER Cblld Care Center
LOCATZON OF PROJECT lUmc~, C~t~or~ta.Area* '
EI'TIHATED NUleER OF ENPLOYEES a(A, ESTZNATED PROJECT COST $N/A -
l~ia proJeCt'viI1 beaeftt th~ cou~un:t~y b:y'o~ertns 'a needed servlce
As Supervisor of +the latSupervisor~al 'DIstrict, I hereby acknowledge that the
above referenced'deve'T~'pment warrants*special consideration relattve to the
permit processing* as required b~* the County of. Rivers(de,.and encourage the Planning
Department to fn~ed~atel~ Institute "FAST TRACK~ p.rocedures. to enable the project
to proceed as soon as.possible,
%t ts mY understanding that the Planning Departmen~.wi.11, ~f necessary, schedule
a Public Hearing w(th~n 45 da~s of receipt of a-completed application and a
cop~ of th(s author~zat(on, and that a Special Land Development Comettee meeting
w~11 .be hel~ ~th~n 15 d~ys from receipt of:same,
Date October 17, 1988
~L.
] PU 660
O
O
TR 15458
,AND USE
//\
22593: ./'LF~
A TR 20882
VAC.
,.GRADFD
· 'VAC.
TR 23160 r_,, ..~
k.
,i ~ VAC.
TR 21606
VAC.
VAC. ~
SHOPPIN(
*' CENTE
VAC.
APTS.
_APTS.
,C:
HILLY
800'
HORSE
VAC.
· ! PU 660
- R-1
4
800'
~000
R-2-3000
C-1/
R-3
R-2
R-1
. it R-A-5
App. IGNDER CARE LEARNING CENTER INC. LOO,~r#OWAL N,~;~
Ule ~Y ~RE CENTER ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~RIETA ~p~t. I ~ ~c,~ ~' ~
~. 35T.7~ 3W ~'s ~ 921 ~. 31 * S~E
~ ~ ~WAY V~- .
~ ~CHO ~MF ART* 110' ' ~ ~
I ~* ~-55C~ 12119188 ~ ~ DGT BGS
~~ ~ ~NING ~R~ENT
RIV!~SIOE COt~FY PLANNING
C~tfl)ITIO~ OF ,APPROYAL
PUBLIC USE PERNIT NO. 660
ProJect Description: Day Care Center
Assessor's Parcel No. 921-310-010
Are8~ Hurrieta
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, actton,
or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the County
of Riverside, 1is advtsory agencies, appeal boards, or leglslattve body
concerning Publlc Use Permit No. 660. The County of RIverside w111
promptly notify the permittee of any such clatm, action, or proceeding
agatnst the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully tn the defense.
If the County fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such clatm,
action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or
hold harmhss the County of RIverside,
Thts approval shell be used within two (2) years of approval date;
otherwise it shall become null and votd and of no effect whatsoever. By
use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval wtthtn the two (2) year period whtch is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contomplated by this approval,
3. The development of the promises shall confom substantially wtth that as
shown on plot plan marked Exhibit A, or as mended by these conditions.
4. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases o~eratton for a period of
· one (1) year or more, thts approval shall become nu 1 and void.
5. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shtne
directly upon adjoining property or publlc rights-of-way.
6. The applicant shall comply wtth the street improvement recommendations
outltned fn the Counl;y Road Departaent transmtttal dated January 5, 1989,
a copy of which 1s attached.
later and seerage disposal facilities shall be Installed tn accordance
with the provisions set forth fn the Rherstde County Health Department
transmfttal dated December 20, 1988, a copy of which is attached.
PUBLZC USE PERlET NO. 660
CondtMons of Approval
Page 2
0.
1.
3.
4.
5.
Rood protection shall
County Flood Control
of whtch ts attached.
be provtded tn accordance wtth the RIverside
District transmtttal dated January 6, 1989, a copy
Ftre protection shall be provtded tn accordance wtth the appropriate
sectton of Ordinance 546 and the County FIre Narden's transmittal dated
january 5, 1989, a copy of whtch ts attached.
The applkant shall comply with the Building and Safety Grading Sectlon
transmlttal dated 9eeember-38~-~988~ January 24, 1989, a copy of which ts
attached. (Amended at Plannlng Commission 1-25-89)
The applicant shall comply vrlth the Building and Safety Land Use Section
transmtttal dated January 6, 1989, a copy of which ts attached.
All landscaped areas shall be planted tn accordance with approved
landscape, Irrigation and shading plans prior to the Issuance of
occupancy permfts. An automatic sprinkler system shall be Installed and
all landscaped areas shall be maintained tn a viable growth condition.
Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be
permitted to grow htgher than thtrty (30) tnches.
Prtor to the Issuance of gradtng or butldtng permtts, stx (6) coptes of a
Shadtrig, Parktng, Landscaping and ZrrtgaMon Plan shall be submitted to
the Planntng Department for approval. The location, number, genus,
spectes and.container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall
meet all requirements of Ordinance 348, Sectton 18.12.
A mtntmum of 21 parktng spaces shall be provtded tn accordance wtth
Sectton 18.12, RIverside County Ordinance No. 348. 21 parktng spaces
shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A. The parktng area
shall be surfaced wtth aspbaltic concrete pavtng to a minimum depth of 3
tnches on 4 tnches of Class Z! base.
A mintmum of taro (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as
shown on Exhlbtt A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped
shall be -Identified by a permanently affixed' reFlectortzed stgn
constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the
Znternattonal' S~nabol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller
than 70 square tnches In area and shall be centered at the Interior end
of the parking space at a mtntmum hetght of 80 tnches from the bottom of
the sign to the parktrig space finished grade, or centered at a minimum
height of 36 Inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or
sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted tn a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 Inches by
22 clearly and conspicuously states the following:
PUBLIC US~ PETlilT NO. 660
Conditions of .q~val
Page 3
18.
lg.
21.
22.
· Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons my be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed
at or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place
shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of
accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain
clearance and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use
Division of the Department of Building and Safety.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown
on Exhibit B.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view.
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Screening
One trash enclosure shall be located within the project, and shall be
constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permtts. Each enclosure
shall be six feet in height and shall be made with either masonry block
and a gate or chain ltnk fencing and landscaping which screens the bins
from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees
along streets and within the parktng areas.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Department of Butldtng and Safety for plan check
approval and shall comply wtth the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655 and the RIverside County Coeprehenstve General Plan.
PUBLZC USE PERIgT MO. 660
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
Thts project stte ts wtthtn a significant groundshaking zone. Mtttgatton
shall be the application of the proper Uniform Butldtng Code standards tn
the development of thts project.
24. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kV or greater, shall be
installed underground.
25. "Prtor to the tssuance of gradtng permlts, the applicant shall comply
with Ordinance No. 663 by paytng the fee requtred by that ordinance.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habttat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall paY the fee requtred under the Habttat
Conservation Plan as Implemented by the County Ordinance or Resolution."
(Added at Planntng Commission on 1-25-89)
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied wtth prtor to ~ccupancy
or any use allowed by thts permit.
IvIGB: aea
1-11-89 & 1-17-89
OR:ICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
January 5, 1989
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92051
(Kinder Care)
Re: PU 660
Team 5 - S~ID #9
FTA 073-088
Ladies and Gentlesen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced item,
the Road Department has the following recommendations:
Prior to issuance of a building pennlt or any use allowed by this permit, the
applicant shall complete the following conditions at no cost to any government
agency:
No additional right of way shall be required on Lyndie Lane since
adequate right of way exists.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, or any use allowed by this
permit, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road
Department the sum of $2,150.00 towards mitigating traffic
impacts for signal requirementS. This amount represents the .86
acres at $2,500/acre = $2,150.00. The remaining 5.45 acres is
not subject to mitigation at this time.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
construct the following at no cost to any government agency:
3. Lyndie Lane shall be improved with 32 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way in
accordance ~th County Standard No. 111, Section A. (28'/45')
Hodifled.
shall
Six foot ~de concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along
Lyndte Lane in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401
(curb sidewalk).
COUNTY Al)~N'lba kAllVl: (::[N iLa~ · 4080 L[NON STIUZT · RIYEI~!D[, CAIJ'ORNIA 92-1;01
PU 660
January 5, 1989
Page 2
C)e
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at
a grade and al fgnment as approved by the Riverside County Road
Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
Drainage control shall be as per Ordinance 460, Section 11.1.
All ~ork done within County right of way shall have an encroach-
ment permit.
The single driveway shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement
plans.
When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope,
a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right
of way line to prevent silting of sidewalk asapproved by the
Road Conmntsstoner.
Asphalttc emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 3g and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
Projects creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall
provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope ease-
merits as approved ,by the Road Department.
The 'single entrance driveway shall be channelized with concrete
curb and gutter to prevent back on parking and interior drives
from entering/exiting driveways for a minimum distance of 35 feet
measured from face of curb.
lhe street design and improvement concept of this project shall
be coordinated with PP 10694, PP 6990, P.N. 47/41-42, Amended
PI'I 135/40-41 and P/P 874-X, ~
PU t60.
January 6, 1989
Page 3
The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient public
offsite rights of ways to provide for primary access road{s) to
a maintained road in accordance with Riverside County Standard
No. 106, Section B. (32'/60'} at a grade and alignment as
approved by the Road Commissioner.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite
this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown
on the street t~orovement plans.
A striping plan is required for Lyndie Lane and Rancho California
Road· lhe removal of the existing striping shall be the respon-
sibility of the applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be
done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the
applicant·
The applicant shall provide a left turn pocket on Rancho Calif-
ornia Road at Lyndte Lane as approved by the Road Commissioner.
The applicant shall construct an interim median barrier on
Rancho California Road to physically prevent any left turn
movements in or out of the proposed driveway easterly of Lyndie
Lane all as approved by the Road Commissioner.
The applicant shall make a cash deposit to the County Road
Department for the future construction cost of the ultimate one
half width median on Rancho California Road adjacent to this
project.
La:lh
Ver. truly you~,
Principal Eng. Technician
46-209 O~sls Se~d. Suite 405
lnd~,, CA '9220l
(619)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
fiRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND rll'~E I:~01ECIION
GLEN J. NEk~iAN
I'IRECIIIFI
1-5-89
PL'mnln~ & [nSlneednS Off,re
4080 Lemon 5teeet, S,ilc | I L
Rivesside, CA 9250|
(714) 787-6606
ATTN:
PLANNING DEPARTBENT
NIKE BACON
PUBLIC USE 660
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot
plan, the Fire Department reconnends the following fire protection measures
be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized
fire protection standards:
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established
in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the Job site.
The required fire flaw shall be available from asuper fire hydrant,
(6"x4"x2½x2½), located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from
any portion of the building as measured along vehicular travelways.
Applicant/developer shall be responsible to submit written certification
fro~ the water company noting the location of the existing fire hydrant and
that the existing water system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a water
system currently does not exist, the applicant/developer shall be responsible
to provide written certification that financial arrangements have been made
to provide them.
The required fire flow my be adjusted at a later point in the permit
process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation
or built-in fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a
fire flow of 1500 CPN or greater. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement
that the building(a) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be
Included on the title page of the building plans,
~ubJect:
Public Use 660
PaRe 2
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plnns mast be
submitted to the Flre Department for approval prior to installation, as
requlred by the Uniform Bullding Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated
into square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per
Section 505 (e) of the Unlform Bulldlng Code.
9. A statement that the buildlag will be automatically fire sprinklered
must appear on the title page of the building plans.
10. Comply with Title 19 of the California Administrative Code.
11. Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
12. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
13. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC.
Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system. Contact a certified fire
protection company for proper placement. Plans must be approved by the
Fire Department prior to installation.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $345.00 to
the Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
16.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit
~ith the Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling
the sum of 25¢ per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
This amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
Applicant/deVeloper shall be responsible to Install a fire alarm system.
Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to
installation.
18, Final conditions wiII be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Bulldlng and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYNOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire' Safety Specialist
aa
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
T0: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.' 1ATE:
ATTN: Mike Bacon
12-20-88
Jim 6illis. St. Sanitarian. Environmental Health Svcs
Publ i Permit 660 - ,FAST TRACK
]'he Environmental Health Services has reviewed Public Use
Permit 6S0 and has no objectionS. Sanitary sewer and water
services are available in this area. Prior to buildlng plan
approval. the following items will be submitted:
1. "Wi]l-serve" letters from the water and
sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food
establishment will be submitted including a
fixture schedule~ a finish schedule. and a
plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance
with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities
Law.
JG:tac
TOm
DEPARTMErIT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
GRADING BUILDING AND SAk~IY
PRIO~ TO APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION, PLEASE PROVIDE THE BUILDING AND SA~i;~
DEPAR~4ENT WITH A ~TUAL GRADING PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT.
PLEASE ADDRESS 3~E FOLLC~FiNG ll~MS.
Sh~w the existing contours and the proposed elevations for this project.
Show the adjacent street ~des and elevations.
Show any dra/nage facility intended as a par~ of th/s project.
Show adjacent existing offsite topography sufficient to illustrate this
projects compatibility with its neighbor~. ~~,~/~
Show a pad location on the plan.
Show driveway location, grades, and elevations on the plan.
Provide a vicinity map.
Indicate al I slopes to scale
Cbserve slope setbacks per section 7012 of the UBC and County Ordinance 457.
Show Q100 y~r flow~ at the inlet and outlet of property and al 1 drainage
facilities.
Provide foot prints ~r t~31latng envelopes ~n the plan.
No obstruction or diversion of natural k~ter courses is pennitted.
January 6, 198~
Adrninistrative Center, '1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA g2507
Riverside County Planning Department
Attentions Mike Bacon
County Administrative Center.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
REs PU 660, Exhibit A, FTA 073-88
APN 921-310-010
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions=
An additional plot plan or an approved exhibit for on-site
signage will be required. Signage will not be allowed until
project is under separate parcel. Parcel map recordation is
required.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, written clearance
is required from the followings
· Elsinore Union High School District
· Temecula Unified School District
Engineered plans are required for any walls or fences over six
feet in height. An approved setback adjustment from the Planning
Department is required for walls or fences over six feet in height
found in required setback areas.
If approved elevations are required from the Planning Department
the approved plans must be submitted to the Lan~ Use Division
concurrently with submittal of structural plans for review.
Prior to acceptance of structural plans for Building and Safety
review. one complete set of approved conditions from Planning
Department must be attached.
Administration (714) 682-8840, (714) 787-2020
Planning Department
PU 660
January 6, 1988
Page 2
Prior to issuance of building permits, proposed lighting must
be in conformance with Mount Palomar Lighting Plan, Zone B,
per Ordinance 655.
Very truly yours.
Thomas H. Ingram, Director
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
.lfL;JI I%1 ~y
Eastern ] unicipa[ Water District
Riverside Co. Planning Dept.
4080 Lemon. St., 9th Floor
Riverside, Ca 9Z501
SUBJECT:
The District is responding to your request for comments on the subject project
relative to water and/or sewer service. lhe items checked below apply to this
project review.
The subject project:
/Is not Within EMWD's:
water service area
sewer service area
~/~Will be required to construct/provide
be served by ENWD:
the following facilities if to
!
'Sewer Service
A~y and all necessary regionally sized onsite and offsite gravity sewers and
appurtenant works that might include monitoring manholes, lift stations, force
mains, and effluent disposal/use. Sewers will not be allowed along lot
lines/private land. Fee payment and participation in regional sewers,
treatment, and,effluent disposal must be met..Only wastes acceptable to EMWD
regulations will be allowed.
EASTERN MUNICIPAL ~TER DISTRICT
Planning Depar~ent
~'n4% ~ .~n l:cinm Sirerr · Pj"~s,t Office l~.x R~,O0 · S:sn ]:=clnso. C31ih~rnin q2?,83-1 )DO · Telcph.nc (.714)
~., :liVE:BiDE COUnt.u
PLAnnine DEP,~:ICfilEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E,A.) NUMBER:
PROJECT CASE TYPE(s) AND NUMBERS(S):
APPIJCANI"S NAME: "~|Yl~J~_..~'
NAME OF PERSON(a) PREPARING E.A.:
STANDARD EVALUATION
MODu,; Nuh, sER<,>: I Iq
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot size end uses as applicable):
B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES
C. ASSESSOWS PARCEL NO.(a):
; or SQUARE FEET
D. EXISTING ZONING: C.2'~/r.,,',~ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? __
E. PROPOSED ZgNING: IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE?
.....~ .E~E.E.cEs: ~-~ L~v w,~, ~0 .~ ~,.~o/~. ~
G. SECTION, TOVVNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIFTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIFTION:
H.' BRIB: DESCRFrlON OF THE EXISTING EN~qRONMENTAL SETtING OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ITS SURROUNDINGS:
II. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PlAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check Eta m option(a) below and Foceed accordingly.
r'1 All or pa,-t of the project mite is in "Adopted Specific Rims," "REMAP" or "Rencho Villages Community
Policy Areas". Complete Sections III, N (B and C only), V and VI.
AI or pert of 1he project site is in "Areas Not Designated as Open Space". Complete Sections III, IV
{A, B end D only), V and
All or Ix.l of the project 81re has an Open Space end Conservation designation other than those mentioned
8bore. Complete SecUon8 III, N (A, B, and E only), V end
J'~ll. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
A. ~ndicate~henature~the~:~.~p~ed~nduse~sdeterm~nedfrom~hedescr~pU~n~sf~und~nC~m~rehens~veGeneralP~anFigure
VL3 (Circle One). This InfonTsUon is necessary to determine the appropriate land use suitability ratings in Section II|.B.
Not Applicable
Critical E~sentlal Noi'rnal-High Risk Normal-Low Risk
B. In(kate v/ith a yes (Y) or no (N) whether any environmental hlzard and/or rssource issues may significantly affect or be affected
by lhe przXxaal. All eelerenced figures are cc,~iained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y) write
additional data sources, agertcles consulted, findings of fact and any mitigation measures under ,Section V. Also, where indicated,
ckde the am land use solability or noise acceptability rating(s). (See definitions at bottom of this page).
HAZARDS
Aiquist-Prioio Special Studies or County Fault
Hn~rd Zones (Fig. V1.1 )
NA PS U R {Fig. %/1,3)
~ Lk:luefaction Potential Zone (Fig. V1.1)
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI,4)
3 "'1f Grotmdshaldn0Zone(FigVL1)~_,,,
10. Id
13.
14.
NA 8 PS U R (Fig. VI.5)
sop, (Ray. Co. 800 Scale S[ape Maps) 15.
Landslide Risk Zone (Ray, Co. 800 Scale
Seismic Maps or On-site Inspection) 16. ~
NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.6)
Rockfall Hazard (On*site Inspection) ; ;: ~
Expansive SOIls (U.S.DA. Soil
Consenmtion Service Soil Surveys) ;90:
Erosion (U.S.D.A, Soil Conservation
Service Soll Surveys) 21.
wi,d F. mo~n & Sowsand (F~. ~.1, 22;: ~
Oral. 460, Sac. 142 & Ord, 484)
Dam Inundation Ares (Fig. VI,7) 24, ,
Floodplains (Fig. VL7) 25.
NA U R (Fig, 'Vl.8)
.. Airport Noise (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11
& %/I,12 & 1984 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11)
Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - V1.16)
NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11)
Highway Noise (Fig. VI.17 - VI.29)
NA A B C D (Fig, V1.11)
Other Noise
NA A B C D (Fig, V1,11)
· . Project Generated Noise Affecting
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VI.11 )
Noise Sensitive Project (Fig. VL11 )
Air Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Air Quality
Water Quality Impacts From Project
Project Sensitive to Water Quality
Hazardous Materials and Wastes
Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - VI.31 )
'Other
Other
RESOURCES
36.
37,
Wakelife 0r~, VI~6 - VI,q7)
VegetaUon (fig. Vt,18 - V1AO)
MineraJ Resource Fig. VIA1 - VTA2)
Energy ~ (FIg. V1.43 - VI.44)
Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.45)
Historic Resources (Fig, VI.32 - Vl.33)
Archaeological Resources
(Fig. %/!.32 - VI.33 & VI.46 - %/I.48)
Paleontologlcal Resources
(Paleontologlcal Resou.mes Map)
Other
Other
Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable
U - Generally Unsuitable R * Restricted A - Generally Acceptable
B - Conditio~ Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged
IV. LAND USE DE'rERMNATION
k C~mpkito~hisp~r~unisss~he~r~~ec~ia~~c~~~d~n"Ad~ptadSpec~~cP~an~~~``REMAP"~r~Ranch~
Vtltage~ Co. nmunlty Policy Areas."
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIG.NATION(S):/~DAr)~
2, LAND USE PLANNING ARE~ ~IATH WF-~I'
3. SUBARF. AIFANY:
4. COMMUNITY POLICY AREA, IF ANY:
5. COIV!dUNITY PLAN, IF ANY:
6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(S), IF ANY:
B. F~ra~pr~jects~inidcatewithayes(Y)~rn~(N)whetheranypub~cf~c~itias~nd/~rservicesissuesmaysignificant~ya~t
or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained In the Comprehensive General Ran. For any is'
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V.
PUBUC FACILITIES AND SERVICES
q~ 1- J~J Circulation (Fig. IV.1-IV.11. Dicusain 10,.LL.
sac. V Existing, Ranned & Required Roads)
Bike Tmas (Fig. N.12 - N,13)
Sewer (Agency letters)
Fame Sen4ce8 (FIG. N.16 - N.18)
~N 12.1d
;' 13--kL
5. N 14,J Z.
~ llheriff.~mAces0:igN.17-N.18)
7. N Schods(Fig. N.17-N.18)
8- Jd So~id Waste (Fki. N,11- N,18)
9._~ PaW. sandRecmation(Fig. N.19-N.20)
15. 'N
16.
17.
Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV.19 - IV24/
Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Maps)
Utilities (Fig. N.25. IV.26)
Libraries (Fig. N.17 - N.18)
Heal~ Sewices (Fig. N.17 - N.18)
Airpods (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4,
11.18.8 - 11.18.10 & N.27. N.36)
Disaster Preparedness
Other
C, If Idl or pert of the Icx'oject b Iotaled in "Adopted Specific Plans", "REMAP" of "Rancho Vlliages Community Policy
Areas", ~ in detail Ihe 8pecic poictes spptying to the proposal, and complete the following:
1. State Ihe relevant land use dens):
2. Based on this initial study, is ItS pml:x}sa] cormllnt with the policies and designations of the appropriate docun~
and Iherefore consistent with the Com~lve General Plan? If not, explain:
· N. LAND USE DETERMINATION (continued)
D. If el or part of the project site IS in "hess not Designated e8 Open Space", and i not in · Community Plan, complete
queslions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questions 4, 5, 6 and 7 if it is in a Community Plan.
1. Land use catagorytiss) necessm'y to suppod the proposed I~oject. Also indicate land use type
o.o. -
Current land use category(is) for the site based on existing conditions.
Also indicate land use type
3. I D.1 diffm from D.2, will the dierence be resolved at the development stage? Explain:
4. Community Plan designation(s):
5. Is the proposed project consistant with the Ix~icles and designations of the Community Plan?
6. l,s the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses?
If not, explain: ~
7. Based on this initial study, is ~e proposal consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
ff not, reference by ~ and le~ue Number those issues identifying inoonslstencies:
E, ff all or part of the project site Is h an Opera Space and Conservation designation, complete the following:
1. Stale the designatio~(s)c
2. Is the ixopold c~,-sistent with the designation(s)? If not, explain:
3. Based on this initial study, is Ihe ~ consisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section and Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
· V. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF.A~URE8
A. ADDrT1ONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
~ECTION/ INFORMATION INFORMATION INFORMATION I)t~i:ka~llON
I~SUE NO. REQUIRED ~EQUESTED RECEIVED WF.S~IO~DATE}
B. For each leeue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and N.B, Identify the Section and Issue number ancl do the
foilowing, inlheformalasshown below:
1. List 811 additional Te~evant data I)taoes, including Igencle~ consulted.
2. State all Ikx:lings ol lact regarding envkonmantaJ concerns.
3. State specific mitigation measures, If identifiable without requiring an environmental impact report (E.I.R.)
4. If Klditional ;,,;~,~nation is required before the environmental e__~_u_~t can be completed, refer to
Stabsection A.
5. If~dd~t~na~heeta~reneededt~mnpleta~h~8ec~n~checktheb~x~theend~fthe~cti~nand~ttach
SECTION/
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
V. IIFORMATION SOURCES, IqNDINGS OF FACT .~dD MITIGATION MEASURES (continued)
SECTION/
ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
/~~ wl not have a e~gnlficant effect on the environment and · Negative Dec. J~tio. may be
!'l 1he I~Ned could h~ve I ltgnlf~ effect on the environment; however, Ihem will not be · significant
ekinthbceeebeclueelhemltigiJonmealuresdelc~lnSectk3nVhevebeeneppliedtothe
pe~ect and · Negative Decimatkm my be Wepared.
I'1 The project my have a ignI~cant ef~ct on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report
is required.
EVepared by
KinderCar!
Kinder*Care Learning Centers, Inc. · 23832 Rockfield Boulevard, Suite 225 · El Toro. CA 92630 · (714) 455-4040
April 1, 1991
Planning Commission/Planning Staff
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, California 92390
Dear Staff & Commission Members:
This submittal is in response to a requirement to justify the number of parking spaces
provided on a site plan previously approved by Riverside County as PUP660.
Please find, attached, the sign-in/sign-out logs for the following centers:
#470 2560 E. La Palma
Anaheim, CA
32 spaces
#605 3661 Michelson
I~ine, CA
18 spaces
#608 25261 Paseo De Alicia
Laguna Hills, CA
18 spaces
These centers are comparable in size to the one proposed at the subject site. The
average time it takes to sign in a child and escort that child to the classroom is less than
5 minutes.
Most Kinder Care Learning Centers are designed with between 20 to 30 parking spaces.
Since the critical minimum area to achieve is playground, the parking area is usually taken
from the remainder of the site or whatever spaces can fit into the width of the site. In
most municipalities, Kinder Care provides more spaces than required.
I believe that 21 parking spaces are adequate for this project. I have been building Kinder
Care Learning Centers for six years and I am responsible for these facilities after
construction. I visit centers at all times of the day during business hours and have never
experienced a parking problem. Also, I can not give you percentages, but many of our
employees do not drive automobiles to work. In some cases they are driven to work, in
others they use public transportation or live in the neighborhood and walk to work.
"Child Care Parents Trust"
KinderCar
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc,, 23832 Rockfield Boulevard, Suite 225 · El Toro, CA 92630 · (714) 455-4040
April 1, 1991
City of Temecula
Page Two
As shown in the attached logs, since the children arrive at varied times the staff members
also have varied shifts.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this information.
dames R, Kent
Division Construction Manager
"Child Care Parents Trust"
KinderCar
Kind°r-Care Learning Centers, Inc. · 23832 Rockfield Boulevard, Suite 225 · El Toro, CA 92630 · (714) 455-4040
SIGN-IN/SIGN-OUT SHEET
Center # 470
2560 E. La Palma
Anaheim, CA
"Child Care Parents Trust"
Age or Grade
)ER-CARE SIGN-IN / SIGN-OUT (DAILY)*
Date V~''~' '~/~//
Emergency Signature of Child's
: Time In
Pick-Up Signature of Child's
Person ic - ersonTime Out
M hn~- ~: "~7 ,,;~-,~ "Is"
OP-O285 (10-89)
* * * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * *
USE SIGN-IN*S~GN*OUT VERSION APPLICABLE TO YOUR STATE REQUIREMENTS
Age or Grade
KINDER-CARE SIGN-IN / SIGN-OUT (DAILY)*
Child's Name
F'dc, ol
Emergency Signature of
Phone No. Drop-Off Person
Child's Pick-Up Signature of Child's
Time In Person Pick-Up Person Time Out
~)
i'D'/
{ ,.z'~
Mooms303
Age or Grade r.2 I:~j
~._,.H's Emergency
( Z /d' Phone No.
KINDER-CARE SIGN'IN / SIGN'OUT (DALLY)*
Date '-.-.-31,'~5""
Signature of
Drop-Off Person
Child's Pick-Up Signature of Child's
Time In Person /~ick-Up Person Time Out
,,:,,, gX.?,l;;r;,. ~,,.-~;,/.,',.
KINDER-CARE SIGN-IN / SIGN-OUT (DALLY)*
Age or Grade
Date
~'l',,, ,~,Z
0~-0285 I I0 89) · · · IMPORTANT NOTICE ~ **
USE SIGN IN-SIGN-OUT VERSION APPUCABLE TO YOUR STATE REQUIREMENTS
KINDER-CARE SIGN'IN / SIGN-OUT (DALLY)*
.: ._ Emergency Signature of Child's Pick-Up Signature of Child's
'~"' Child's Name Phone No. Drop-Off Person Time In Person Pick-Up Person Time Out
KINDER-CARE SIGN-IN / SIGN-OUT (DALLY)*
Date
Emergency Signature of Child's Pick-Up
Signature of Child's
Time In Person Pi~::)Person Time Out
Age or Grade ~
i's ame Phone No. Drop-Off Person
KINDER-CARE SIGN-IN / SIGN-OUT (DALLY)*
',~, Emergency Signature of
Child's Name Phone No. Drop-Off Person
Date
Child's Pick-Up Signature of Child's
Time In Person Pick-Up Person Time Out
,. - .
KinderCarl
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc, · 23832 Rockfield Boulevard, Suite 225 · El Toro, CA 9~,',',',',',',','~) · (714) 455-4040
SIGN-IN/SIGN-OUT SHEET
Center # 608
25261 Paseo De Alicia
Laguna Hills, CA
"Child Care Parents Trust"
KinderCar
Kinder-Care Learning Centers, Inc. · 23832 Rockfield Boulevard, Suite 225 · El Toro, CA 92630 · (714) 455-4040
SIGN-IN/SIGN-OUT SHEET
Center # 605
3661 Michelson
Irvine, CA
"Child Care Parents Trust"
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
LOCATION MAP
CASE NO. p.~.?.~c,~
C.C. DATE
I
I
F'.r, ~ Rl.e. O0
PAX) ELEV
40'
ITEM
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City of Temecula Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
April 15, 1991
First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 231Ll2
The above referenced case was continued from the April 1, 1991 Planning Commission
meeting to the April 15, 1991 Planning Commission meeting. The project was
continued to allow the Engineering Department to develop conditions of approval
regarding the grading of the site and erosion control of the existing graded slopes.
These conditions were to include bonding for grading repair and erosion control of
existing slopes with time limits set for the bonding and for the completion of the
grading.
The applicant was also requested to appear or to have a representative present with
the authority to accept additional conditions of approval.
First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142 is a proposal to
subdivide 6 acres into 20 residential lots. The site has been previously mass
graded. The neighbors attended the April 1, 1991 Planning Commission meeting to
protest the extension because of the existing unsafe condition of the site.
The Staff Report and draft Planning Commission minutes dated April 1, 1991 are
attached and incorporated into this report by reference. An update on the grading
and erosion control concerns and conditions will be presented at the Commission
Hearing. If the issues have not been addressed to Staff's satisfaction, Staff will
request a continuance of the project to May 6, 1991.
GT:ks
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb
PLi~,'NIN3 COi~.fi~ISSION HINUTES ~PRI~ 1, 1991
8. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23142, FIRST EXTENSION O}1 TIML
Proposal for first extension of time for a 20 lot single
family subdivision. Located at Bonny Road, North of
Zinfandel Avenue.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report. Mr. Jiannino
stated that staff had received various letters from area
residents pertaining to previous grading and drainage
problems.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:30 P.M.
TERRY BECKER, 1784 La Costa Meadows Drive, San Marcos,
representing Costa Group, advised the Conunission that the
applicant had seen the damage caused by the drainage
problems and would be repairing those damages.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the
request for a First Extension of Time and advised the
Commission of the problems they were having getting the
Costa Group to repair the damages to their properties '
caused by the grading and drainage problems:
RALPH BROWNELL, 41487 Zinfandel Avenue, Temecula.
THOMAS BENTLEY, 41473 Zinfandel Avenue, Temecula.
KEVIN DAVIS, 32058 Merlot Court, Temecula.
MAUREEN HUBERT, 41412 Chenin Blanc Street, Temecula.
TERRY BECKER stated again that the developer intended
to rectify all damages incurred by the residents.
DOUG STEWART advised that there were county standards
for erosion control and added that he would have a
City inspector go out immediately and investigate the
site.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF requested an explanation of the
Commission's alternatives from the City Attorney.
JOHN CAVANAUGE advised the Commission that they could
deny the extension based on the issue of public health,
safety and welfare or condition the extension to the
clean-up of the damages with a bond requirement and a
time frame for completion of clean-up; however, added
conditions to the approval of the request would have to be
accepted by an authorized representative of Costa Group.
PCMIN4/01/91 -8- April 4, 1991
PLANNING
COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 1o 1991
Mr. Cavanaugh added that the Commission could deny the
item as presented or continue the item to allow Mr. Becker
time to provide authorization to act on behalf of the
Costa Group.
DOUG STEWART advised that Commission that the County
had not conditioned the developer to post bonds for
erosion control. He added that if the requirement for
bonds were placed on the project at this time, the City
could then go in and rectify the problems.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
9:05 P.M. and continue Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142,
First Extension of Time, seconded by CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF added that he would like the motion
to direct staff to immediately enforce any action they
have against the developer.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
9. PLOT PLAN 11339
Proposal to construct a 9,216 square foot automotive
service center. Located on the northwesterly side of
Rio Nedo Street, approximately 720 feet southwest of
Diaz Road.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 9:10 P.M.
PCMIN4/01/91
ANTHONY POLO, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester Road,
Temecula, concurred with the staff report and answered
questions by the Commission. ~O~-~. ~-
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to continue Plot Plan 11339 to
the regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning
Commission on 5/6/91 and direct staff to address the
Commission/s_~regarding design and ~ issues,
-9- April 4, 1991
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 1, 1991
Case No.: Vesting Tentative Tract No. 231~2, Extension of Time
Prepared By: Scott Wright
Recommendation: ADOPT the Resolution approving the extension of time for
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Costa Group
ALBA Engineering
The applicant requests an extension of time for a 20
lot R-1 subdivision.
Bonny Road north of Zinfandel Avenue
R-1 and R-5
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-R
R-1
Specific Plan 199, 2-5 du/ac
Specific Plan 199, 2-5 du/ac
Not requested
North: Vacant
South: Single family residential
East: Vacant, graded
West: Vacant
No. of Acres: 6 acres
No. of Lots: 20 single family lots, 2
open space lots
Min. proposed
lot size:
7,611 square feet
The applicant requests an extension of time for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 231~2. The
project is to create a 20 lot single family subdivision
on a 6.0 acre site. The lots range in size from 7,611
square feet to 18,183 square feet. The landscaped
slopes on both sides of the street at the entrance to
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb I
BACKGROUND:
the site are designated as open space lots to be
maintained by a landscape assessment district or a
homeowners association.
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors
approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2310,2
and Change of Zone 5115, from R-R to R-1 and R-5,
on October 25, 1988. On the recommendation of the
County Planning Staff, the Board of Supervisors
added the stipulation that the landscaped slopes at
the entrance to the site, lots 21 and 22, should be
zoned R-5. The site has been graded for street
improvements and building pads, and concrete lined
bench drains have been installed along the
southerly and easterly boundaries of the site. The
City received the request for a time extension on
October 5, 1990.
ANALYSIS:
Lot Size and Dimensions
The lots are between 7,611 square feet and 18,183
square feet in area and conform to the
standards requiring a minimum of 7,200 square feet,
60 feet of average width, 35 feet of street frontage
on knuckles or cul-de-sacs, and 100 feet of depth.
Site Access
Each lot takes access from Bonny Road which
provides access to the site from Zinfandel Avenue.
The proposed single means of ingress and egress is
consistent with County Fire Department policy
which only requires a second access where there are
35 lots or more, or the street exceeds 1,320 feet in
length. Vesting Tentative Tract 2310,2 contains 20
residential lots, and Bonny Road is 60,0 feet long.
Drainaqe and Slope Stability
Lots 10 through 17 have tops of slopes which are not
at the property line resulting in areas which slope
downward toward adjacent properties. Concrete
lined bench drains have been installed along the
property line abutting said lots in order to prevent
impacts to adjacent properties due to water runoff
from the site. County Condition No. 5 requires
submittal of a soils report addressing soils stability.
County Condition No. 6 requires compliance with
Ordinance 0,57 which stipulates that all slopes
greater in height than three feet must have erosion
control planting.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 2
Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses
Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142 is compatible
with the existing R-1 development south of the site
and with anticipated future development at a
density of 2-5 dwelling units per acre east and west
of the site. The R-R parcel northwesterly of the
site contains a steel tank water reservoir.
Archaeoloqical and Paleontoloqical Resources
The Archaeological Report prepared for this project
stated that no artifacts were found on the site. The
site is located in an area known to contain fossil
resources. Condition No. 19{e) requires that the
developer retain a qualified paleontologist to
evaluate the impacts of grading and implement
measures necessary to recover and preserve any
fossil resources found on the site.
Additional Facts Not Included in the Oriqinal
Conditions of Approval
The original Conditions of Approval did not include
provisions requiring the developer to satisfy the
requirements of the Quimby Act or to agree to pay
public facility fees. Staff has recommended that the
developer agree to pay these additional fees not
originally included in the Conditions of Approval for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23142.
Kanqaroo Habitat Conservation Fee
Pursuant to Condition of Approval No. 19{a) in the
attached County Staff Report, Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Conservation fees were paid prior to the issuance of
grading permits by the County.
Processinq Time
This staff report was completed in draft form and
set aside because recordation of the map seemed
imminent, and recordation of the map would make
action on the extension of time unnecessary.
However, after several weeks the final steps
required for recordation have still not been taken.
Therefore, 5taft is proceeding with the time
extension request.
Staffrpt\VTM2 3 142\rob 3
ZONING AND GENERAL
PLAN CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
The size and dimensions of the lots are consistent
with the requirements of the R-1 Zone, and the
proposed density of 3.3 units per acre is consistent
with the Southwest Area Community Plan
designation of 2-4 dwelling units per acre.
On October 25, 1988 the County adopted a Negative
Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32354
in conjunction with the approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract No. 23142.
Extension of Time for Vestinq Tentative Tract No.
23142
The proposed density is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan land use designation.
The proposed density of 3.3 units per acre is
within range of the SWAP designation of 2-4
units per acre.
Vesting Tentative Tract 23142 is compatible
with the surrounding zoning and adjacent
existing land uses.
Adequate public street access will be
provided to every lot. The legal owner of
record has offered to make all required
dedications.
Staff finds that site access will be adequate.
A second means of access is not required for
subdivisions of 35 lots or less.
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the City's
General Plan once adopted, in that the
proposed density is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan land use designation,
and the revised map is compatible with
surrounding zoning, existing land uses in the
vicinity, and approved subdivisions.
It is unlikely that the proposed revised
tentative map will constitute a substantial
detriment to the future General Plan if the
proposed subdivision is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan. Surrounding
zoning, existing land uses, and approved
subdivisions are all residential.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The project will not have a significant
adverse affect on the environment. The
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors
adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction
with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract
2310,2.
The site is physically suitable for the type
and density of the development proposed.
The proposed project makes adequate
provision for future passive or natural solar
heating opportunities in that all proposed
parcels have adequate southern exposure.
10.
The project meets the requirements of
Ordinance 3u,8 and 0,60 in that all lots conform
to the minimum size and dimension
requirements of the zoning code and abut
upon dedicated street.
11.
The lawful conditions stated in the project's
Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary
to protect the health, safety, and welfare.
12.
These findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
associated by reference.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution 91 - approving a first
extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract No.
2310,2 through October 25, 1991 based on the
analysis and findings contained in this report
subject to the Conditions of Approval in the
attached County Staff Report and the attached City
of Temecula Conditions of Approval.
SW:mb
Attachments:
2.
3.
R esol ution
Conditions of Approval
County Staff Report
Exhibits:
Vicinity Map
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2310,2
Fee Checklist
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A FIRST EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23142
TO SUBDIVIDE A SIX ACRE PARCEL INTO 20 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED ON BONNY ROAD
NORTH OF ZINFANDEL AVENUE AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 946-060-004
WHEREAS, Costa Construction, Inc. filed a time extension request for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23142 in accordance with the Riverside County Land
Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference;
WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time
for Vesting Tentative Tract Map on April 1, 1991, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission Hearing, the
Commission approved said Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
{2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
Staffrpt\VTM231 ~,2\mb 6
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~C)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, l hereinafter "SWAP" ) was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the
SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with-a
preparation of the general plan.
12 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
There is reasonable probability that Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 231~,2 will be
consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~C)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No.
460, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are
made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 7
b)
That the design or improvement of the
proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of
development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density
of the development.
e)
That the design of the proposed land division
or proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildllfe or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
g)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division.
A land division may be approved if it is found
that alternate easements for access or for use
will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsection
shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgment of a court
of competent jurisdiction.
{ 2 ) The Planning Commission in approving the Extension
of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 231u,2, makes the following
findings, to wit:
The proposed density is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan land use designation.
The proposed density of 3.3 units per acre is
within range of the SWAP designation of
units per acre.
Vesting Tentative Tract 231L~2 is compatible
with the surrounding zoning and adjacent
existing land uses.
Staffrpt\VTM231 ~,2\mb 8
10o
11.
Adequate public street access will be
provided to every lot. The legal owner of
record has offered to make all required
dedications.
Staff finds that site access will be adequate.
A second means of access is not required for
subdivisions of 35 lots or less.
There is a reasonable probability that the
project will be consistent with the City's
General Plan once adopted, in that the
proposed density is consistent with the
Southwest Area Plan land use designation,
and the revised map is compatible with
surrounding zoning, existing land uses in the
vicinity, and approved subdivisions.
It is unlikely that the proposed revised
tentative map will constitute a substantial
detriment to the future General Plan if the
proposed subdivision is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan. Surrounding
zoning, existing land uses, and approved
subdivisions are all residential.
The project will not have a significant
adverse affect on the environment. The
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors
adopted a Negative Declaration in conjunction
with the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract
231~,2.
The site is physically suitable for the type
and density of the development proposed.
The proposed project makes adequate
provision for future passive or natural solar
heating opportunities in that all proposed
parcels have adequate southern exposure.
The project meets the requirements of
Ordinance 3L~8 and ~,60 in that all lots conform
to the minimum size and dimension
requirements of the zoning code and abut
upon dedicated street.
The lawful conditions stated in the project~s
Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary
to protect the health, safety, and welfare.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 9
12.
These findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with these applications and hereln
associated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative
Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
SECTION 2. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves a First
Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 231o,2 for the subdivision of
a 6 acre parcel into 20 single family residential lots located on Bonny Road north of
Zinfandel Avenue and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 946-060-004 subject to the
following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION 3.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 1st day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNINC COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planninq Department
Prior to recordation, the subdivider shall satisfy the requirements of the
Quimby Act by payment of fees and/or contribution of land or shall provide
an agreement approved by the City Council providing for payment of fees
and/or contribution of land.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negatlve Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which the developer requests its building permits
for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the
Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been
provided to the Developer. The developer understands that said agreement
may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming
benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its
right to protest such increase.
The first extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 231~,2 shall
expire one year from the expiration of the original approval unless extended
as provided by Ordinance ~,60. The expiration date shall be October 25, 1991.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmltted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~,60.
PRIOR TO ANY OTHER SUBMITTAL:
The Tentative Map shall show a concrete drainage swale at the base of this
slopes for Lots 10-17 and Lot 20.
Staffrpt\VTM~31 ~,2\mb 11
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
7. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
The following perimeter landscaped parkways are required to be annexed into
the landscape maintenance districts:
Lots 21 and 22.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvement_s
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
Sewer and domestic water systems.
10.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
11. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
12.
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2LP x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
13.
The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by
alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow.
Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities,
including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 12
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City~s CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
15.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
16.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
17.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights, including the extension of Bonny Road to Zinfandel Avenue.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
18.
A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer for Bonny Road and shall be included with the street
improvement plans.
19.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
20. All signing shall be installed per the approved signing plan.
Staffrpt\VTM23142\mb 13
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23142
DATE:
AIMENDED NO. I
EXPIRES:
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. ~rhe subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of
= :iverstde, its agents, officers, and employees frun any claim, action, or
~ ~ >roceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
~f Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
Tentative Tract ,o. 231,2. ,,.nded ,o. 1. w, ich .trio.
within the time period provided for in California
Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly
notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
County fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action,
or roceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider
sha~l not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
hamless the County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and
Ordinance 460.
5. The subdivider shall submit one copy of m soils report to the Riverside
County Surve~or's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and
i stability and geological
Safety. The report shall address the so ls
conditions of the sit~.
6. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building end Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Unifom Botlding Code, Chapter 70, Is amended
by Ordinance 457 end as maybe additionally provided for in these
co ditions of approval. n
VESTING TE)ITATIVE TRACT I0. 23142, Jtld. !1
Condttimts of Alaliroval
Page 2
JOe
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to c~.,4ncenent of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvoment recg~nendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 3-23-BB, a
copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
b the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval qf
~e Road Coernissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc.. shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
Water and s~rage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Depar~ent's
letter dated 4-0~-8B, a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
3-29-88. a copy of which is attached. Xf the land division lies within an
d
a opted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
460 appro riate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be coVlected by the Road Coninissioner.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Narshal's letter dated 3-23-88, a copy of
which is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval, Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
17. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
~rl~iIgG TENTATIVE TPJ4CT NO. 23142, Amd. l1
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
a. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3,8C of Ordinance 460,
Graded bet undeveloped lind shall be maintained
condition and shall be either planted with interim
provided with other erosion control measures as
Director of Building and Safety.
in a eed-free
landscaping or
approved by the
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department County Health Department
County Flood Control County Planning Department
Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5115
shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective.
Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property.
c. Prior to recordation, the subject property shall be annexed into CSA
143.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall convey to
the County fee simple title, to all common or c~,~,~n open space areas,
free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and
unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which in the sole
discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to
the County accepting title to such areas, the subdivider shall submit
the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which
documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the
Office of the County Counsel:
1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
A sample document conveyinq title to the purchaser of an
individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of
covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by
reference.
qfESTXNG TE)TTATZVETIIACTIO. f1X42, kid.
Conditions ofA~proval
Page 4
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions su~itted
for review shall (a) provide for a term of 60years, (b) provide for
the 1 property owners' association comprised of the
estab ishment of a
owners of each Individual lot or unit and (c) contain the followin9
provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the
contrary, the following provision shall apply:
The property owners' association established herein shall, if
dormant, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the
request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners'
association shall unconditionally accept from the County of
Riverside, upon the County's demand, title to all or any part of
the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'A'
attached hereto. The decision to require activation of the
property owners' association and the decision to require that t~e
association unconditionally accept title to the 'common area'
shall be at the sole d~scretion of the County of Riverside.
In the event that the common area, or any pert thereof, is
conveyed to the property owners' association, the association,
thereafter shall own such 'common area*, shall manage and
continuously maintain such 'common area' and shall not sell or
transfer such 'common area' , or any part thereof, absent the
prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of
Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property
owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of
each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the right to lien
the property of any such owner who defaults in the pa~nnent of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, shall
be prior to all other l~ens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This Declaration shall not be temtnated, 'substantially' amended
or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent
of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the
County's successor-in-Interest, A proposed amendment shall be
considered 'substantial' tf it affects the extent, usage or
maintenance of the 'conanon Irel:,
Zn the event of any confqtct between this Declaration and the
Articles of Zncorporation, the Bylaws, or the pro arty owners'
association Rules and Regulations, tf any, this Declaration shall
control,"
IT_STZIIG TERTATIVE TIACT !10. 23142, Jmd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Pige S
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and
restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map ~s
recorded.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as
those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved
by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constramnts
Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to
delineate identi lied environmental concerns and shall be permanently
filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall
be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded f~nal
map tq the Planning Department and the Department of Building and
Safety. -
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: 'County Biological Report No. 18g was prepared for thas
property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Deparl~ent.
The applicant shall participate in a fee program and shall pay the
ultimate fee imposed for mitigation of impacts to the Stephens
Kangaroo Rat. Prior to final map approval or issuance of grading
permits, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall enter into a
deposit agreement with the County and shall deposit monies based on a
rate of $750.00 per residential lot to be used towards payment of the
fee, or if an ordinance implementing the fee is in effect, the
applicant shall pay the fee.
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERleITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the biological mitigation
found in Conditionlah shall be c0mpleted. (Amendet.)a_~lnninq Co~issiono
b. Prior to the issuance of grading permits ~etailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
1 1
be certified by a andscape architect, and shall provide
for the following.
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
2...Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque
up to a minimum height of six {6) feet at maturity.
VESTZIIG TEXTATZVE TItACT liO. 23142, Rmd. 11
Conditions of Approval
Page 6
&11 utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened fro~
view with landscaping end decorative barriers or barge
treabnents, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed undert~ound.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and roJect arkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shaV1 be pVanted outside of the road
right-of-way.
5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plaQs
and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
7. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall
incorporating the following grading techniques:
natural terrain and
be contour-graded
Vraded s, ope s..,, ,. gr. dua,,y .d usted to t.e
terrain.
2) Angular foms shall be discouraged. The graded fom shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
3)
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability pomit such rounding.
4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slopo shall be curved in e continuous,
undulettng fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading pomits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that ell adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation end comment on the
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
VESTING TDITATIVE TItACT IlO. ~3142o ~ilSd. ill
- Conditions of Apprmral
Page 7
Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to
significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist
and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the
authority to temporaril divert, redirect halt grading activity to
allow recovery of fossils. or
Prior to the issuance of BUILDZNG PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
am
No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's
successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public
facility financin measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100)
per lot/unit shal~ be deposited with the Riverside County Department
of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library development.'
A plot plan shall be submitted to the Pl anning Department pursuant to
Section t8.30 of Ordinance No. 348 accompanied by all applicable
filing fees, as a plot plan that is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act and is not transmitted to any governmental
agency other than the Riverside County Planning Department. The plot
plan shall ensure the conformance of the final site development with
the tract's approved Design Manual (Exhibit M), and shall contain the
follow!ng ehments:
1. A final site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all
setbacks, fences and/or walls, and floor plan and elevation
assignments to individual lots.
2. One (1) color and materials sample board (maximum size of 8 X 13
inches by 3/8 inch thick) containin precise color, texture and
material swatches or photographs (whic~ my be from suppliers'
brochures). indicate on the board the name, address and phone
numbers of both the sample board preparer and the project
applicant, tract number, and the manufacturer and product numbers
where possible (trade names also acceptable),
3. One (1) copy of the architectural ehvattons colored to represent
the selected color combinations, with slmbols keyed to the color
and materials board. The written color and material descriptions
shall be located on the elevation.
4. Six (6) copies of each of lossy photographic color prints (size 8
X 10 inches' of color and board and colored
) both materials
architectural elevations for permanent filing, hearing body review
and agency distribution. All writing must be legible.
VESTZlIG TEXTATIVE 111ACT IlO. 2)142, Mid. Ill
Conditio~s of Approval
Page 8
C?
Said plot plan shall require the approval of the Planning Director
prior to the issuance of any building pemits for lots included within
of;
the plot plan. The submittal ~lot 1 prior the issuance of
pans to
building pemits my be phased p~ovided:
A separate plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning Deparbnent
for each phase, which shall be accompanied by appropriate filing
fees,
2. Each individual plot plan shall be approved by the Planning
Director prior to the issuance of building permits for lots
included within that plot plan.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning DepartTnent approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited
to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual
front yard landscaping.
All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be
designed and constructed with fire retardant (Class A} roofs as
approved by the County Fire Hatshal.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be pemitted with Planning Department approval.
f. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic
irrigation.
g. A fencing plan shall be submitted for Planning Department approval..
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
GN:sc
9/13/88
Wall and/or fence locations shall confom to approved plans.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy pemits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMIL(IO~ER 6 COL'~,'TY -(L'RL'EYOR
March 23, 1988
Riverside County Planning Comission
4080 L~non Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Re: Tract Map 23142 - Amend
Schedule A - Team 1
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions Of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Deparlunent recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedicaUons in accordance With
Ordinance 460 and RIverside County Road Zmprovement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It ts understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, 811 existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses wtth
appropriate Q's, and that their omtSston Or unacceptabtlity may require the rap
to be resulynitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commissioner*s Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
easements sha~l be shown on the fin81 map
and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachmerits by 1~nd ftlls are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the R~ad Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the stte. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, t~e provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Iract Hap 23142 - Anmmd #1
· March 23, 1988
Page 2
3. Mmjor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department.
'A" Street (including any offsite right of way) shall be improveG
within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County
Standard No. 105, Section A. (36'/60').
5. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructe~ throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 4DO and 401 (curb sidewalk}.
kn access road to the nearest paved road maintained by the County
shall be constructed within the public right of way in accorOance
· rith County Standard No. 106, Section Bo (32'/60') at a grade ant
alignment as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall
~eposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. 5nouLa
the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter
into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment
to the time of issuance of a building permit.
I~provement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at
a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road
Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply
acceptance for maintenance by County.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be appl'ieo not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and
shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard.
Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39' and 94 of the
State Standard Specifications.
Standard knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be constructed
throughout the division.
Corner cutbacks in conformante with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Trac-t Nap 23142- Amend
Patch 23, 1988
P,a~.e 3.
13. Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance and slope easemen;s
as ippr~d by t~e Ro~d Oepartment.
14. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance fro~ Rancho Calif.
Water Company prior to the recordatton Of the final map.
15. The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed
16. The mtnimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs shall be 35 feet.
17. Street trees shall be planted in conformance with the provisions
of Article 13a of Ordinance 460.53 and their location(s) shall be
shown On Street improvement plans.
18. All driveways shall confom to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
19. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face
of curb.
20. All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum 50'
tangent measured from flow line.
21. The street ~$ign and improvement concept of this project shall De
coordinated with NB 169/16-19.
22.
Street lighting snalt be required in accordance with Ordinance 400
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA)
~Oministrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner
shall file an applir~tion with LAFCO for annexation into or
creation of a "Lighti ng Assessment Distrio{" in accordance with
Governmental Code Section 560C0.
Very truly yours,
· Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
GH:lh
EVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
TRACT ~ 23142. Al=ended No. 1
Dm,~-I~, Avril 4, 1988
Environmental Health Services
Environmental Healch Services has reviewed Tract Map 23142,
Amended No. I dated March 21, 1988. Our current comments will
remain as stated in our letter dated February 18, 1988.
SM:tac
~' APF', 0 5 1988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
pLANNING DEPARTMENT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
ATTN: Greg Neal
RE; Tract Map 23142: Being a subdivision of k portion of the
Rancho Tamsouls, which was granted by the government of the
United States to Luis Vignes by Book 1, Page 37 of patents
dated January 18, 1860 recorded in the Office of the_County
Recorder of San Diego, State of California.
(20 Lots)
Gentlemen:
T~e Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Mar
No. 23142 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the pAIns of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not Ames than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
3oint specifications, and the size of the main
at the 3unction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. S. Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California,when applicable. The plans shall
be zigned by a registered engineer and water company
with the following certification: "I certify that the
design of the water system in Tract Map 23142 zs xn
accordance vith the vatmr system expansion plans of the
Rancho California Water District and that the water
service,storage and distribution system will be
adequate to provide water service to such tract.
~emem:
R~vers~de County Planning Dept.
Page Tvo
Attn: Grog Neal
February 18, lgSS
This certification does not constitute I guarantee that
it will supply water to such tract at any specific
quantities, flows or pressures for f~re protectZon or
any other purpose". This certific,tion sh,11 be s~gned
by & responsible official of the water company.
This Department has a statement from the Ranthe California
Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It will be necessary ~or the financial
arrangements to be made prior to the recordatzon of the
final map.
This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal
Water Distr~ct agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the severs of the District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
pl,ns of the sever system shell be submitted in tr~plXc,te,
along with the origin,l dr,wing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe d~ameter, locltion ot
manholes, complete profiles, p~pe and 3o~nt specifications
and the size of the severs at the 3unction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sever lines and water lines sh~ll be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans sh~ll be szgned by
registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certitic&tion: "I certify that the design of the
sever system in Tract Hap 23142 is in accordance with the
sever system expansion plans of the Kastern Nunicipal Water
District ~nd that the v~ste disposal eyetom is adequate ~t
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract."
Riverside County Plmnning Dept.
A~'~N: Grag Nea!
February18, 1988
It rill be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior to the recordation of the final map.
vii/be necessary for the annexation proceedings to
completely/in&lized prior to recordation of the
~i~cerely,
EnvironmentlZ Health Services
SM:t&c
IkINNrrH I,_ I13MfARDI ll31 MARKrt rrREri.
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
APR 0 6 1988
^ttentto.: ,egional
Area:
RIVERSLIE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Me have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural wa~er-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
]8 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project ts tn the Area
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable riles and
regulations.
The proposed zontng is consistent with
control facilities or floodproofing may
tmplied denstry.
I,/ The 0tstrtct's report dated ~-2-~
existing flood hazards. Some flood
be requtred to fully develop to the
is stt11 current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached comments apply.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDMARDS
jZiHN~A
KENNETH I,, EDWARDI 'teem MARKleT ITRlrr
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Hatch 2, 1988
RIverside County
Planntr~ Department
County Administrative Center
Rlverslde, California
Attention: Reglonal Team No. 1
Greg Neal
Ladies and Gentl~en:
Re: Vesting Tract 231.2
This is a proposal to divide 6 acres in the Temecula Valley area. The proper-
ty is beta=on South General Kearny Road and Rancho California Road about 2000
feet West or Butterfield Stage Road.
The property is located at high Found and receives very little offsite storm
runoff. Onsite storm runoff would be conveyed by the proposed Bonny Road and
discharged at the atte's southwest corner through an offsite storm drain
system.
Following are the Dtstrlct's reco~nendatlons:
This vesting tract map is located within the limits of the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have
been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth
under the provisions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administratio~
of Area Drainage Plans", amended July 3, lgBq:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road ~x~nissioner as part of
the fillrig for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map,
or If the recording of a final parcel map is waived, drainage fees
shall be paid as a condition of the walver prior to recording a
certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map;
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a required af-
fidavit requesting defermerit of the payment of fees, the drainage
fees shall be pald to the Rutldlng Director at the time of is-
suance of a grading permlt or building permlt for each approved
parcel, whichever may be first obtained af~cer the recording of the
subdivision final map or parcel map; however,
Dralnage fees shall be paid to the Road C~xn~lssioner as a part of
the flltng for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map,
or before receiving a walver to record a land division, for each
lot within the land dlvlslon where construction activity as evi-
denced by one of the following actions has occurred since Hay 26,
1981:
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Vesting Tract 23142
-2- March 2, 1988
(a) a grading permit or building permit has been obtained.
(b) Grading or structures have been initiated.
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicat-
ed drainage easements obtalned from the affected property owner(s).
The doc~t(s) should be recorded ~ a copy submitted to the
Dlstrlct prior to recordatton of the final map.
3- ill lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an sde-
quate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the lO0
year storm flow should be contained within the street right of ~ay.
When either of these criteria Is exceeded, additional drainage facili-
ties should be installed.
A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property
owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A
copy of the recorded dralnage easement should be submitted to the
District for review prior to the recordatton of the final map.
Evidence of a viable maintenance mechanlsn should be submitted to the
District end County for review and approval prior to recordation of
the final map.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map alon~
with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be sub-
mitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval
prior to recordatton of the final map. Grading plans should be ap-
proved prior to issuance of Fading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chtang of this of-
fice a~ 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
oc: lancho Pacific Engineering Corp.
lC:pln
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
HRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFO;INIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
RAY HEBRARD
RRI CHIEF
3-23-88
PLanNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: TF~M I
TR 23142 - AMENDED tl
Pbnnlnl & EnlineeHnl Office
~ Lemon S~,eet, Suite | I
Riverside. CA 92~0|
(714)
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recon=nends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PP~OTECTZO~
Schedule 'A' fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6*x4"x2}') located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant.
Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire
Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
eigned/a~proved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with
the followiDg certification: el certify that the design of the water system is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Department.e
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sma of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection lmpscts. Shoula the developer choose to defer the time of
payment, he/she my enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
all ~uestions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering Staff.
Coun~ Adm~n~strag~ve Office
April 27, 1988
Mr. Richard MacHott, Supervising Planner
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
SUBJECT: Vineyards Vesting Tentative Tract
Map Number 23142
Dear Mr. MaCHOtt:
The following summarizes our findings regarding the fiscal
impact analysis for the project identified above. The
appendix attached summarizes the basic assumptions used in
the analysis. Please note that these results reflect the
current levels of service provided by the County based on
F~scsl Year ~986 - 1987 actual costs (per capita factors)
and Departmental and Auditor-Controller review of operations
and facility costs for services reviewed using case study
analysis. Staff to the Growth Fiscal Impact Task Force and
Departments are currently reviewing service levels provided
and the need to increase the levels of service. Current
findings are that existing levels of service are not
adequate in most cases. Should the desired level of service
be utilized in the fiscal analysis performed, it would
significantly increase the costs associated with this
development.
COUNTY FUND
(Operations snd
Maintenance)
FISCAL IMPACT
AFTER BUILDOUT
CUMULATIVE FISCAL
IMPACT AT BUILDOUT
county General ($1,336) 21,414
Fire ($554) ($554)
Free Library ($71) ($71)
SUBTOTAL COUNTY {$1,961)
2789
nosd Fund ($421) ($421)
GRAND TOTAL ($2,382) $368
The following specie1 circumstances apply to this project:
1. The developer assumptions included a factor of
persons per dwilllng uni~. CAO staff utilized a factor of
2.69 persons per household, which is closer to the
countywide average for this type of unit.
2. Please note the attached letter, dated March 28, 1988,
from =he Riverside City and County Public Library concerning
this pro3ect.
3. Flood Control staff has indicated that flood control
facilities constructed within Zone 7 are unlikely to be
sufficiently funded for maintenance costs. Current
estimates indicate that funding shortages should occur far
the next ten years. Suggested mitigation measures include a
cash deposit by the pro~ect developer or use of an
assessment mechanism. The amount of deposit would be
determined by a present value analysis and project timing.
The cost of maintaining flood control facilities' will
not be known until final design phases, when facility needs
have been fully identified. Flood Control staff will,
therefore, condition pro3ect approvals to identify a mean~
of financing facility maintenance and operation
necessary) prior to recordation of subdivisions.
Based on the analysis and assuming that the average sales
price of the units will be $1250000, overall Vineyards
(Vesting Tentative Tract Map Number 23142} will have a
positive fiscal impact at buildout of $368. After buildout,
~his pro3ect will have an annual negative fiscal impact to
=he County of $2,382 at current ~evels of service.
Initial Review By: ~
Review Approved By:
Riverside City and County Public Library
arc 28, 1988'
Mr. Kevin Hughes
Rancho Pacific Engineering
27447 Enterprise Circle West
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr, Hughes:
SUBJECT: VESTZNG TENTATIVE TRACT 23142-RANCHO CALXFORNIA AREA
X am writing in response to your request for information re-
garding the impact of a proposed project upon library service.
The proposed project would adversely affect existing library
services, The increase in population to be served would require
an increase in funding to the County Library to maintain the
current level of service.
However, the current level of service has been recognized as
substantially inadequate. The attached charts show how the
current number of volumes per capita and the current square
feet per capita are inadequate and have declined during the
last decade due to the impact of rapid ~ulation growth
throughout the County. See attached charts A ,endix C and D).
The fiscal impact of an additional 42 persons (20 dwelling
units) is stated below in 1988 dollars in amounts needed to
1)maintain the current, inadequate level of service only and to
2)provide the desired level of service. The desired level is
inclusive of the current level.
Facilities
(one time cost only)
Collection (volumes)
(one time cost only)
Maintain Current
Level of Service
Provide Desired
Level of Service
~ 2,982
$ 964 $ 1,377
Subtotal for Facilities
and Collection
(one time cost only)
$ 1,918 $ 4,359
Services $ 386 $ 794
(annual ongotng cost)
Lands M Wood, Director
P,O, Box 468
Riversi0e. California 92502-0468
Letter to RANPAC, Tract e23142, 3/28/88, Page 2.
These costs might be mitigated by:
The assessment of a library facilities and collections fee
in 1988 dollars at a cost of $96 per residential unit to
maintain the current level of service, or 2218 per residen-
tial unit to provide the desired level of service.
be
The determination that the project's estimated assessed
valuation will provide at least $386 per year in 1988
dollars to the County Library District to finance ongoing
expenses at the current level of service, or $794 per year
to finance ongoing expenses at the desired level o£
service.
Feel free to contact me at (714)782-5213, if you have further'
questions.
Sincerely yours,
Billie E. ~nc '
Head of Branch Services
BED:mjb
Enclosures: Appendix C and D Linda Wood, Library Director
Norm Caouette, Senior Administrative Analyst
.1201B/eg
JamraN Im~u.J,
Im~mmdSkwn~
April Z1, 1988
Land Development Committee
RIverside County Planntng Departn~nt
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501
~.F
SUBJECT: VESTING TRACT 23142/ZONE CHANGE 5115
The District ts responding to your request for conwnents on the subject
project(s) relaUve to the provision of water and sewer service. The items
checked below'apply to this project review.
The subject project:
X
Is not within EHWD's:
X water service area
sewer service area
__ Hust be annexed to this District's Improvement District No. in order
to be eligible to receive domestic water/sanitary sewer servi~.
X Will be required to construct the following facilities; if serviced by EMWD:
a.) Water Service
b.) Sewer Service Onstte/offsite regionally sized gravity sewers
and parUcipate in regional sewer facilities. No sewers allowed now or future
along lot lines.
Very Truly Yours,
EASTERN HUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Planning Department
March 9, 1988
I AR 1 O 1988
RIVERSIDE CO'JNTY
PLANNING DEPARTi,,';-'~';T
Officers:
Start T. Milk
Genersl Msns~r
Pbillip L. Forbes
D~ct~r of F~ns~ce -
Norman L. Thomas
DL, K~' of En~neennK
Thomas R. McAlieater
Disctot of Operations
& ~zt~t~nanee
Barbara 3. Reed
Distri~
Ruta~ and Tadmr
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501-3657
Subject: Water Availability
Reference: Vesting Tract 23142
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the above-referenced
property is located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service, therefpre,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
water availability would be contingent upon the
property owner signing an Agency Agreement which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If RCWD can be of further service to you, please
contact this office.
ver~ truly yours,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
$enga P. Doherty
Engineering Services Representative
FOZZ/Jk'vOTS
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
RiVE=I)iDE counc,v
PLAnninG DEPARClTIEnC
DATE: January ]5, ]988
TO: Assessor
Building and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Ouda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
' FIre'Protection .....
Flood Control Dtstri~t
Fish & Ga~e
LAFCO, S Paisley
U,S, Postal Service - Ruth E, llavtdson
Rancho California Water Co
Eastern Municipal Water District
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
General Telephone
Temecula Union School Dist
Elsinore Union High School Oist
Temecula Chamber of Commerce
Mt. Palomar Observatory
Sierra Club
County Parks Department
Con~issioner Bresson
CHANGE OF ZONE 511~ - (Tm-1) - E.A, 32354
- Costa Construction Inc. - Rancho
Pacific EnqIneertng - hncho Califro~ta
Area - First Supervisortal ~lstrict -
North of Rancho Calfornia eoad and Fiest
of Butterfield Stage - 6 acres - Request
Zone Change from R-R to R-1 - Concurrent
Case Tract 23142 - Mod 119 - A.P.
923-210-n15
Please review the case described above, along wlth the attached case map. A Land
Division Connittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled forM arch 3, lo88. If it clears,
tt will then go to public hearing.
Your connents and recommendations are reouested prior to February 18, 19RR in order that
w~ may include then in the staff report for this particular case.
Should you have any auesttons re.eardln.q this item, please do not hesitate to contact
Greg Neal at 787-1373
Planner
COIltENTS:
The Fire Department hal no
comments or conditions.
3-1-88 SIGMATImE
PLEASE print name and title
RECEIVED
GEORGE S, tATUH, Planning Officer
dOE0 LEMON STREET, 9'" FLOOR 46'209 OAS S STREET, ROOM 304
n,~,r~e,t-~r ,'~,m ,c~'%e)kll& G,')Knt INDI~ (~,AI II:r)RNIA 92201
Riverside County Planning Department
February 17, 1988
Attn: Greg Neal
i . 5anitarian, Environmental Health Services
Change of Zone 5115
The Environmental Realth Services has reviewed this change of
zone case and has no objections, Sanitary sewer and water
services are available in this area.
SH:slw
WORld&, ~SS
PINKS
SUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF S'UPERV1SORS
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,~,,
FROM: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL DATE: ~'/~L ~'
SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 5115 - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 23142 -~;,
Costa Construction - First Supervisorial District - Rancho California
Area - 6.0 Acres -.22 Lots - Schedule A - REQUEST: R-R to R-1
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
The Planning Coamnission and Staff Reco~mnend:
ADOPTION of the Negative Declaration for Enviro~ntal Assessment
~sed on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have
a significant effect on the environment; and
DENIAL of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5115 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with
Exhibit 2, but
APPROVAL of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5115 from R-R to R-1 and R-5 in
accordance with Exhibit 4, based upon the findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated September 28, 1988;
APPROVAL of VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23142, AMENDED NO. 1 subject
tO the attached conditions, based on the'findings and conclusions'
incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated September 28, 1988.
~G::sc
1/88
I~e~. Ag~. tel. Deplm. Comments Dist.
AGENDA NO
Zoning Area: Rancho California
First SuperviSortel District
E.A. Number: 32354
Regional Team No. I
CI~MIGE OF Zl)IE I10. 5115
VIESTIIIG TE)ITATIVE TIj~CT II0, 23142
ll~gl)rnllO. 1
Planning Conm~ission: 9-28-88
Agenda Item No. 3-5
lIVERSIDE 13XIITV N, ARMING DEPARIlIEXT
STAFF NE~ORT
Applicant:
Engineer/Rap.:
Type of Request:
Location:
Existing Zoning:
Surrounding Zoning:
Existing Land Use:
Surrounding Land Use:
g. Comprehensive General Plan
Designation:
10. Land Division Data:
11. Agency Recommendations:
12. Letters:
13. Sphere of Influence:
ANAJ. YSZS:
Coste Construction, Inc.
RanPac Engineering
S h man and zone
c edule subdivision
change from R-R to R-1.
North of Rancho California Road and
West of Butterfield Stage R~ad.
R-R
R-R, R-l, R-2o R-5, C-l/C-P, A-1-10
Vacant
Vacant land, single family homes
under construction, vineyards and
horse ranches.
Land Use: Category II
Density: 2-8 DU/acre
Total Acreage: 6.0
Total Lots: 20 single family lots,
2 open space lots.
DU Per Acre: 3,3
Proposed Nin, Lot Size: 7200 sq.
ft.
See letters dated:
CZ 5115 VTR 23142
Road: l~nt 3-23-88
Health: 2-17-88 4-04-88
Flood: No Comment 3-29-88
Fire: 3-01-88 3-23-88
Opposing/Supporting: None received
Not within a City Sphere
ProJect Description
Change of Zone No. 5115 end Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23142
d
chan· the zoning on 6.0 acres of la. in the Rancho California :rr:eare~lur~tsR-t~
to E-! and to create 20 single family lots. The proposed project will have an
average density of 3,3 dwelltng units per acre with a minimum lot size of 7200
square feet.
GINIGE OF Z011E i0. 513.5
VESTING TDI'TA'IIVE 11LqL'T I0. 23142
,411El)El)NO. i
Staff Report
Page 2
The project site is located north of Rancho California Road and wast of
Butterfield Stage Road. The project site is surrounded by, but not a part of,
the Mergerite Village Specific Plan (S.P. 199). The project site also lies
adjacent and north of Tentative Tract No. 20879, which was approved on November
26, 1985 by the Board of Supervisors and which created 140 R-1 lots on 45 acres
of land.
The project site is presently vacant. Surrounding land uses include single
family houses under construction on Tract No. 20879 to the south, a ~eter tank
to the northwest, and vineyards and a horse ranch to the east. The remaining
surrounding area is vacant.
Zoning on the property is currently R-R. Surrounding zoning includes R-1 to
the south, A-1-10 in the vineyard area to the east and R-R, R-2, R-l, R-5 and
C-1/C-P zoning in the area encompassed by the Mergerira Village Specific Pla~.
Design Considerations
The proposed project has been designed in accordance with the R-1 single family
residential development standards, and all other pertinent standards of
Ordinance 348 and 460.
Oue to the tracts vesting status, additional materials ware submitted for
revie~ in accordance with Ordinance 460. A drainage plan, a hydrology study,
and a grading plan ware submitted and found to be adequate. These plans will
be implemented through the conditions of approval.
As is the applicant's option, a design manual addressing architecture,
landscaping and irrigation, and fencing was submitted and reviewed. These
development guidelines will be implemented through an Ordinance 348, Section
18.30 plot plan which will need to he submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Pro~ect Consistency/CompatibilitY
The project site lies within the Rancho California/Temecula Subarea of the
Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area. Land use policies for this area
state that future development shell generally he Category I and II, with
Category III development in the outlying areas. The project site lies adjacent
to an R-1 subdivision (TR 20879) with a density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre,
end is surrounded by the Mergerira Village Specific Plan, with adjoining
property designated for Medium density development (2-S dwelling units er
acre). The area therefore can be designated a Category II area. Oue to ~he
proposed density of the project and with the availability of all the necessary
services and facilities, the project is considered consistent with the
ib
Comprehensive General Plan and is compat le with area development.
CRNIGE OF/lIE I0. 5115
VESTIRG TE)ITATIVE TItACT I10. 23142
/IIEIeE/)IO. 1
Staff Report
Pale 3
The applicant is proposing R-1 zoning for the entire tract, Because two open
sl~mce lots are being created with this tract, staff feels it would be more
a~ropriate
to p ace R-5 zoning on these two lots. Therefore staff would
rec~nd a change of zane from R-R to R-I end R-5.
Ftscal Analysts
IJnder current policy regarding prieSsing of vestin tentative mps, a fiscal
analysis is required to be sut~itted to the Caunty ~or reviw. l~e fiscal
aMlysis prepared for this proeject sh~d a net ~nefit to the County of
$368.00 upon trolldour of the project, and a net annual deficit of $2,382.
These figures were reached by using an assumed average selling price of
$125,000 per house.
Environmental Assessment:
The initial study for Environmental Assessment No. 32354 indicated these
..viro..nt.1 co.c.r.s: 1..ros,on pot.nt,.1; 2. ..cts to Stephens
Rat; 3. Paleontological Resources; 4. Nt, Palomar Impacts; 5. library
impact.
The biological report prepared for this pro~ect found that Stephens Kangaroo
Rats were inhabiting portions of the project site. Since this report was
prepared, the County has established an interim Stephens Kangaroo Rat
mitigation program. The applicant is conditioned to participate in this
program, with participation to include payment of $750 per unit toward
establishment of habitat area, so therefore the impacts are considered
mitigated.
Erosion impacts will be mitigated through erosion control landscaping and
adherence to pro r Count grading standards. Paleontological resources will
be mitigated t~rough ~e conditions of approval which will require that a
qualified Paleontologist be consulted prior to grading and any recunmendations
be adhered to. let. Palomar impacts will be mitigated by adherence to County
Lighting Ordinance No. 655. Any impacts to library services will be mitigated
through payment of a $100.00 per unit library mitigation fee.
FINDINGS:
The applicant proposes changing the zoning on 6.0 acres of land in the
Rancho California Area from R-R to R-1 and to divide the property into 20
single family lots and two open space lots,
2. me project will have a density of 3.3 dwelling units per acre.
C]!NGE 0f ZJOIIE IIO. 5115
VESTING TBITATIVE TIACT II0. 23142
NIE]IDEDII0. I
Staff Report.
Page 4
The project is located adjacent to Tract No. 20879 (Board of Supervisors
approved November 26, 1985) which crested 140 single family lots on 45
acres.
4. The project is surrounded by the Pargarita Village Specific Plan (S.P.
199 . Adjacent areas are designated for medium density residential (2-5
B. Surrounding land uses include single f~mily homes, vineyards, s horse
ranch and vacant land.
6. Surrounding zoning includes R-R, R-l, R-2, R-S, C-1/C-P and A-1-10.
7. The project is located within the Rancho Callfornia/Temecula Subarea ~f
the Southwest Territory Land Use P1 anning Area, -
8. The t~ open space lots are proposed to have R-1 zoning.
The fiscal analysis indicates a financial net benefit to the county of
$368.00 at buildout and a net annual deficit of $2,382 every year
thereafter.
Environmental concerns include erosion, biological impact, Paleontological
resources, Mt. Palmr resources and library impacts. All environmental
concerns can be mitigated by the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The project is consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan.
2. The proposal is compatible with area development.
3. R-5 zoning is e more appropriate zone for the tw~ Open Space lots.
4. The project wtll not have a significant effect on the environment.
RECOI~(ENDATIONS:
ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32354,
~'i~the conclusion that the proJec~ will nDt have e significant effect on
the environment; and,
DENIAL of CIE OF ZOME NO. 5115 from PPRta 11-1, in accordance with Exhibit
CRN~E OF ZI)RE RO. 5115
YESTIE TEMTATIVE TRACT M). 23142
Ml~'l)rnRO. 1
Staff Report
Page 5
APPROVAL of CRNIGE OF 2))RE I10. 5115 from R-R to R-1 and R-5 in accordance with
~4; and,
APPROVAL of VDmIIIG TEITATZVE litACT RO. 23142, subject to the conditions of
~, and based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated in this
staff report.
GN:sc
9/13/88
HORSE
RANCH
· cz 4gez . VAC
· :App. COSTA CONSTRUCTION. ,IIIC. /.OC,,T~OWAL mAP'
';Uee R-R TO R-I
' 'lAres RANCHO {3ALIFORNIA Sup.Dist. lst
:iSec. 3E T.7..q:~R.,2W.A.gesa w's ! 911 .~ r..."'
;Ciroub. tionRANOHO.OAL;tR;RD. NTTERIAL I10'
~Eiement~BUTq'E:RF. IELD STAGE RI). ARTERIAL I10'
*lkL Ik. ~.55C Dele 8/29/a8 Brawn 8V Ice .~.,r.
KX)' NVF. RSIDE G(~.INTY PLANNING DF, JtUtTMENT .o .c.~.
"1CZ 5115 ITR ~r].t4,~2 I PROPOSED ZONING d 2 ,
· ~r/%~\ k ""T. -' "" " ' ~'
.j"~-,,~ ~j ~ ~ A-I-IO
R -R ' \"R-R~
~App. COSTA GONS"FRLdCTI4:)N, INC.
iUee R-R TO .R-,-,I
;Area RANCHO CALI~IA Sup.DisLIIt
iSec.~ T. TS.~R:2W. Assesaa,'$ gk. 923 PO. EI "
:~on,RANGHO CALF. ~ ARTERIAL I10'
;!Eimnent!UTTERFIELI) SlXGE RD. ARTERIAL I10'
'IRgL Ik. t1~.55C Date 1/29188 Drawn By
eeo' IIiVE~ CO'~INIT'Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT
iCZ 51151TFI 23'1,42 ItEmMENDED' ZONING ~[ 4
R-1
':'.lm lit-Ill I0 Ill-I & R-S
"" _/If'~~ C, RLIF. II. ARTERI-~,,. I10'
9meant BUTT'B~IBJ} S'IIlliE lID. AR'rB~IAL I10'
~ e, I~. ~ Om eJ2~/ee 13tee el Ice
:FVE::DiDE COurlC¥
PLYfir:dIG DEPA:ICITErlC
APPLICATION FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
DATE~ December 17, ~987
CHANGE 04: ZONE NO.
PARCEL MAP NO,
P~OT PLAN NO
INCOMPLETE A~ICA~ONS W~U, NOT BE aCCEFTED,
A A/NNJCANT INFORMATION
1. A~o4e~nrsName:
M~il~g
2, (~mefsName:
Tele~qo~eN~:
3 Re~eee~atwe:
TeeDhone NC~:
JAN 12 1988
Pi,ANNING DEPA,m~FMENT
COSTA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
~80 CAMZNO VIDA RUBLE, SUITE A, Carlshad, CA 92008
(619 ) 438-3833
Same as ibove.
Rsncho PeciZic Bnqineerinq Corp.
,,~]780 Frcn= Street, Suite 9, Temecula, CA
( 714 ) 676-4024 (8&m-S~m.)
92390
B F~OJECTINFORMATION
,...,.....=C=:p,o,..,,: ,o..,_., ,.,
Subdiwid! into 20 single family lots.
C PROP~R'TY INFORMATION
I. MaaeuarsPm~e~NN,). 923-210-002
= General I~ltm {street Id~rela, I~.)
iort~ of lancho California Road end Nest of Buttefrigid Stage Roa~
aancho-Te/eculm Portion
A,....,dmeeGmeeAcf~ege: 6 Acres
Legst ~ BMI exact le~ll ~elcf~p~b'q u ~ ~ N ~a ~ ~ ~n~ Rer). May ~
8. ThoNsBro~Pa~No. end~rdia: Page 126-C-1
· G~~ _JIg ATTACHED L~TTER Of AUTBORZZ. ~ 12-17-87
~.4NxRy~m~mpplcat~ ie hereygiven:
~I~NATURE O~ PROPfRTY OWNERS)
4080 LEMON STREET, eTM FLOOR 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(714) 181-6181 i,.Fil~l 342-8277
Ca~,E NQ
! I0.
~FF USE ONLY
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
PART h General Infm'mat~n
PART II: En~mnn~l Queltlonnlinm
5, Is lee leNce 8vldliYMe at the Nte? Y~U NO f~
If "No," how/If must the water line(I) be exten~ecl to Imwi~e MN~O?
PART IIh Addltlonll Mitedab
The following ~ mull be Idimittl~ eh'th thil form:
1. At leeit ~ (3) benotlmic pftolngrllDhl (cekx Foil; oi the ;toiect litt Ix In levi{ p/~4o oi the Me If coior ;holo~rlDhs
erie utilixe~ ie~Ju~e · ms~
2- A clear 1=4~,_~::_%~y (Xerox ~' Similar CIXM oi the IDIxG~ale Ixxlion oi N U.S. Ge~iqic/I Survey Quid tangle
%iVE2. iDi COUnt
R.iFIrKi DEP, ulCfilEI
APPLICATION FOR lIND UIE AND DIVELOPMENT
INOOMPtFF[ AN~WATIONS WILa lOT Ii N:~tleTID
a NaFUCaWT IklF~IMaI1QI/
1. Ae~maefeNem8: COSTA CONSTRUCTION, XNC.
JAN 12 W988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
R.ANNING D~'PARTMEHT
MNml An~mM
Teemmane N~'
P4snmematm:
kie,..~ Ue~u:
Tales 1~.:
2380 ~AK}NO YZDA ROBLE, SUITE A, CARtSBAD, CA
( 714 ) 676-4024
9203e
9239C
8. FIIOJECT INFORMATION
1. Purpose0~Reque$1(etlcribeprolecl):(OrClmlnc$148rltno.)
Change of Zone from R-R to R-I
1. Asse~ee'iF~elNe(s~ 923-210-002
I. liceion lancho Temecul~T~on
d. A. pDfOUMIeGmMACaNe: 6 acres
· G~TU~~ _ See ~etter of Authorization ~ 1-12-88
~JGNATURE Of PROI~RTY OWNERS)
I08OLEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR 46-20~ OASIS STREET ROOt,' 3c
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501-3657 INDI0. CALIFORNIA 922;
{T14) 7&74181 {6~9, 342.62 '
ENVI. RONIIENTAL INFORMATION FORM
IllltolenllillllFbelwqgl)lelrtmlNat(?¼)?l?,$lll.
III, RTi:~IIIItIIIdOl
CAJEN~ t~ 22473
twent T~I R;,~,-,~?
OFFICIAL HEARING NOTICE
COUNTY ADM/NISTRATIYE CENTER, NZNTN FLOOR
4080 LENON STREET
R/VERSZDE. CALZFORNZA 92501-3657
Roger S. Sireater, Planning Olrector
A PUBLIC W. ARIIIG has been scheduled before the PLANNING D3144ISSION to
constder the application(s) described belw. The Planning Departanent has
tentatively found that the proposed proJect(s) =ill have no significant
environmental effect end has tentatively completed negative declaration(s).
The Planning Conntsston will consider vhether or not to adopt the negettve
declaration along rlth the proposed project at this hearing.
Place of Hearing: Board R~m, 14th Floor, 44380 Lemon Street, RIverside, CA
Date of Hearing: iiEDNESDAY, SEPTEXBER 28, 1988
The ttme of heartng ts indicated vtth each appqtcatton 11sted below.
Any person may submtt wrttten con~ents to the Planntng Department before the
heartrig or may appear and be heard ¶n sup oft of or opposition to the adoption
of t~e negative declaration and/or approva~ of thls
project at the time of
hearing. If you challenge In~ of the pro ects in court, you my be limtted to
ratsing only those issues you or someone etse ralsed et the public hearing
described In this notice, or ~ written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Con~tsston at, or prior to, the publ¶c hearing. The environmental
finding along with the proposed project application may be viewed at the publlc
Information counter Nonda~ through Friday fr~n 9:00 s.m. until 4:00 p.m.
CHANGE OF ZONE 5115, E.A. 32354, located In the Rancho California Area and
First $upervtsorlel Otstrict ls an application submitted to amend
Ordinance NO. 348, Riverside County Lend Use 0rdlnance. hid amendment
would change Zone R-R (Rursl Residential) to R-1 (Single Family
Owellfng) or other such zones as the Planntng Commission ma~ find
appropriate for property generell. y described as north of Rancho
Caltfornla Road, west ofJutterfteld~fage Road.
AND
VESTING
TRACT HAP 23142, E.A. 32354, Is in application submitted by Costs
Construct. ton, Inc.~ for property located tn the Rancho California Area
end FIrst SuperviSorIll Dtstrfct vhtch proposes to dtvtde 6.0~ acres
tnto 20 lots on property generally descrtbid is north of Rancho
California Road, west of biterfield Stage Road.
I'TNE OF HEARINg: 10:00 a.m.
RANCHO CALIF- DEV. CO.
P.O. BOX 755
TEMECULA, CA 92390
923-210-O08
923-210-014
VINEYARDS TRACT NO 20879
% COSTA CONSTRUCTION
2380 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE A
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
~:~8:8~a
RANCHO CALIF. DEV. CO.
P.O. BOX 755
TEMECULA, CA 92390
923-210-008
923-210-014
VINEYARDS TRACT NO. 20879
% COSTA CONSTRUCTION
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
923-210-012
923-210-016
:liVE:biDE colJrlcu.
PLAIIlli!I DEPak:IClTIErlC
Amended E.A. 9-2-88
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: STANDARD EVALUATION
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (ELL) NUMBER: )2154 MODULE NUMBER(s): 119
I=ROJECT CASE TYPE(s)AND NUMBERS(a): VPsting Trart Nn. ?t147 ~nr{ rhange o~ Zone No, 5q15
APPLIC~ ~La, ME: rn~ta Construction, Inc,
NAME OF PERSON(s) PREPARING E.A.: r-v-e0 Weal
I. PROJECT INFORMATION
A.
DESCRIFTION (include Droposedminimum lot size and uses umpplicable): ~uh~ivi~inn oF A
acres into 20 lots with a minimum of 7200 square feet. Chanqe of Zone from
Rural - Residential (R-R} to one family dwelling residential (R-l) units
B, TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES F; 0
C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): q?l-?l rl~01 5
D. EXISTING ZONING: R-R B THE PROpOSed. iN CONFORMANnE? N~
E. PROPOSED ZONING: R-q IS THEPROpOSALIN CONFORMANnE? YFS
F. STREET REFERENCES: North o~ R~ncho California Road and Wcst of
Butterfield Stage Road,
G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Rancho Temecula
H. BREFDESCRIFTION OF THE EXISTINGENV1RONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECTSITEAND ~S SURROUNDINGS:
Vacant property in native grassess and brush. Surrounding area i~ currently
vacant, but with rapid development occurrino to the west.
IL COMPREHENSNE GENERAL PlAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION
Check ~te ~oproprtate option(a) below and proceed accordingly.
}'1 All or part of the project site is in "Adopted SpeclfK; Pins," "REMAP" or "Rencho Villages Community
Policy Areas". Complte Sections III, IV (B and C only), V Incl VI.
rrl All or part of fie project site Is in "Arias Not Designated Is Open Space". Complete Sections Ill, IV
(A, B anti D only), V and Vi.
[] NI or part of the project site has an Open Space and Conservation designation other than those mentioned
above. Complete Sectlonl Ill, N (A, B, and E only), V and
IlL ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD~ AND FIESOURCES A,S,SESSMENT
A. Indic~henetu~thepr~ndu~c~terminK~fr~m~he~leK~p~q~n~f~undi~~~Figure
Vt.3 (Clrci One). ~ kltormatjo~ II necessary to citerains Itm Ipprorffilte lind ule suitability ritings in ~ectio~ III.B.
NA - NOt A4~ Crtticsl Ellentj/ Norrosa-High Risk ( Nonnil-Low Risk )
B. Indicie wffi~ · yes Cf} or no (N) whether any environrnent~ hlzard end/or remource irasues rnly signlfr..lnUy Iffect o~ be affected
by 1he proOolaJ. All referenced figures art {x~t~ined in ~he Comprehef~vt Genersl PMn. For any tuue mm~ed yes Of) write
~ dlta _~,__"OBL mger~:i~s Oonsulted, findings of fact Ind any mltigitio~ measures under Section V. AJso, where indicated,
ciegle the m,Opr',4,,~-ato lind u~e sul~lbilffi/or ~dle ~X~pt~Dility rlting(s). (~ee definitions 8t bottom of tail pigs).
HAZARDS
1- N Aiqui~-Pricto Special Studies or County Fault
Hazard Zone~(Fig. Vl.1)
( NA ) PS U R (Fig. %/I.3)
2, N Lk;luefactionPotentjalZone(Fig. Vl.1)
(NA) S PS U R (Fig. VL4)
3 N Groundehaking Zone (Fig Vl.1} CLASS IT
(NA) S PS U R (Fig. VI.5)
4, N Slcq)es (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps)
5- N Lindslide Risk Zone (Ray. Co. 800 Scale
Seismic MIp· or On-mite Inspection)
(NA) S PS U m (Fig. ~.6)
6. N Rockfill H~zerd (On-its Inspection)
7. N Expansive Soils (U.S.D,A. ~oil
Conservation Service ~oil Surveys)
a. Y Erosion (U.S.D.A. Soil Conservltion 501LS
Sen~ce Soil Sjrveys) ArC2
S- N Wind Erm~ion & Blowsand (Fig. VI.1.'RHE3
Oral. 460, Sec. 142 & Oral. 484)
10. I! Dam lnundmtion Aml(Fig. Vl.7)
11- N moodp~r~ (Fig. VI.1)
(NA) U R (Fig. m~)
RESOURCES
12. N Airport NOIse (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11
& V1.12 & 1984 AJCUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
(N/I) A B C D (Fig, %/1.11)
13. N Railroad Noise (Fig. V1.13 - %/I.16)
( NA ) A B C D (Fig, VI.11}
Highway Noise (Fig. Vt.17 · Vt.29)
14. N (NA) A S C D (Fig. Vl.11)
15. Other Noise
NA A B C D (Fig, V1.1~)
16. ~4 Project Generated Noise Affecting
Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. VL11 )
17. y Noise Sanaitiva Project (Fig. Vl.11)
18. N Air Quality Impacts FrOm Project
19. Y Project Sensitive to Air Quality
20. Jl Water QuNity Impacts From Project
21..1t Project Sensitive to Water Quality
22. N Hazardous Materials and Wastes
23. H Hazardoua Fire Area (Fig. VI.30-VI.31)
24. Other
25. Other
26- N Agriculture (F'mg. Vl.34 - Vl.35) 3t- N
21'. N In of Nee an Agricultural Prelen~ 3,3. Y
(Ray. Co. Agmicultural Land Conversation :$4. y
Contract Malx)
28. Y Wiidllfe(Fig. VI.36-VI3/) Stephen 's K-Rat 35. Y
2~. y VegetaUon(F~Q.~q38-V1~O) Potential
30 N Minered Remource~ (F~. Vt.41 - VI.42) 36, V
31- N_ Enemy Resoume~ (Fig. Vt.43 - VI,44) 37.
Scenic Highways (Fig. %/!.45)
Historic Resources (Rg. VI.32 - )/I.33)
ArchleoiogicN Resour;es
(Fig. Vt,32 - VI.33 & VI,46 - VI.48)
Peleontological Resources
Oaaleo~toiogiCat Resources Map)
Definitions for land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings
NA - NOt Applicable S - Generllly Suitable PS - Proviaionafiy Suitable
U - Generllly Unlultlble R - Reltrictecl A - Generally Acceptable
B - Condltior~lly A4~eptlble C - Ge~erllly Unlcceptlble D - Land Use Discouraged
N. lAND USE DETERMINATION
1. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION MAP DESIGNATION(S): Not designated as ODen Spare
2. LAN~ USE PLANNING ARF. k Snuthw~t TPrri tnry
3. SUBAREA~ IF ANY: l)~nrhn P,lifnrn(~/T~m~rula
4. COMMUNR'Y POLICY AREA, IFANY: Mt Palnmar r)h~rvatnry
street lighting policies
5. COMMUNTTY PLAN, IF ANY:
6. COMMUNITY PLAN DESIGNATION(S), IF ANY:
SUMMARY OF POUCIESAFFECTINGPFIOPOSAL: Futurp land II~p~ gpn,rally ratpgnry l
or II with Category Ill in the outer portions.
Ht. Palomar Observatory Policies apply as the property lies within their
30-mile radius. Low pressure sodium lighting and appropriate shielding should
be implemented.
B. For ~ll projects, inidcate with a Y~s (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or services issues may significantly affect
or be affected by the prOpOSal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. FOr any issue
marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V.
PUBLIC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES
1. N Dmutat~n(1r~.lV.l'lV.11.Di~ssin lO.N
Sec. V Existing, Ptanned & Required Roads)
2. N BkeTrazls(Fig. N.12-1V.13) 11.N
3. N Wat~ (Ag~cy Leftre) 12. Y
4. N Sewer (Agency Lm) 13. N
5. N FireServ'._,c,_-_.___(F't.N.16-N.18) 14. N
6 N ShedlfServicesOr~lV.17-N.18)
7, Y SchoalsOr~g,N.17-N.18) 15, N
8- N SolidWa~e(F'~B,N,17-N.18) 18-N
9- N PartsandRecreetionF~g.N. lg-N20) 17,
Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV.19 - IV.24/
Riv. Co. 800 Scaje Equestrian Trail Maps)
Utilities (Fig. IV.25 - N.26)
Libreriss (Fig. IV.17 - N.18)
Health Services (Fig. IV.17 - IV.18)
Airports (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4,
11.18.8 - 11.18.10 & IV2.7 · IV.36)
Disssler Preparedness
City Sphere of Inituence
Other
C. ff Ill Or part ol the projec~ is located in "Adopted SpeclfK:; Plans", "liEMAP' ~' "Rlnche Villages Commun~ Policy
Aleas", review in detail the specific policies ipplying to the proposal, and complete the following:
1. Slate the relevant land use designation(N:
2. Based on this initial study, is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate document,
8nd therefore cortsistent with the Comprehensive General Ran? ~ not, explain:
:' 'I N. I.i~lD USE Dr.~r, nMINAT!ON (¢ontlnued)
D. ~}~1he~i8ct8~tei8in~z~8sn~tD~ign~ed~s~;~n~}~ce~ndi~n~t~m~~p~te
queelions l, 2, 3, 6 and T, CcYnpiete Queettons4,5,6and71f it is in eCOmmunlty Ran,
1. Lind use c~ms) ._ne~__uny Io support Itm pf~ pmiect A~o Indicate land use bype
{L~ fe~ideniiaJ, (xnnme~, elc.) C~t~gnry iT - R~iH~ntiA1
Cunant land use cstegory(ies) fe~ e~e ate based on exisUng conditions.
(Le. residen~.,:m. com'nme~jak etc.) Category II -
Also indicate land use type
3. It D.1 differs fTOm D.2, will U~e difference be resc4ved at ~e development stage? Explain:
5. Is the proposed project consistent ~ the Ix~icies and designations of the Community Plan?
ff no(, explain:
6. Is the prowl ccxnpatible with existing end proposed surrounding land uses?
If not, explain: Y;~
7. Based on this hltill study, Is N proposal consistent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
If not, reference by Section Ind Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
Yes
E If Ill o~ m of the project role is b an Open Space and Co~s~vation designation, complete the following:
1. $hd,. the designation(m):
2. Im ~e ~ ~-4ilenl wit ~e design,atk:~(m)? ff not explajn:
3. Based on this inl'6~l study, Is the prof~ consisent with the Comprehensive General Plan?
ff not, reference by SecDon end Issue Number those issues identifying inconsistencies:
v. INFORMATION 8OURCES, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES
ADDITIONAL INFO RMAllON REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL I~SMENT CAN BE COMPLETED:
DATE ADEQUACY
III B-28
llI B-34
SECTION/ INFORMATION NFONMATION INFOOMAllON
IS~JE NO. REQUIRED REQUESTED RECEIVED
Biological Report
Archaeological Report
2-5-88 4-88
2-5-88
B. For each issue marka<l yes (Y) under S~-'tions III.B sad IV.B, identify the Section sad t~.ue number and clo the
lollowing, in the format as shown below:
1. List all add~ relevant data tooureas, including agencies consulted.
2. State ell findings of fad regarding environmental cormcame.
3. State specific mltigatjon measures, tf identifiable without requiring sa environmental impact report (E.I.R.}
4. If edditionl information i~ required before the environmental assessment can be completed, refer to
Subsaction A. '
5. If additional ~heets are needed to complete this section, check the box It the end of the section and attach
the necesaany shmm"tS.
SECTION/
ISSUE NO.
III B-B
III B-17
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OFFACT, MITIGATION MEASURES:
Mitigation for erosion shall occur throuqh slope landscaoing and DroDer
erosion control technique during grading.
There are no existing noise produces which will impact the site, some
mitigation is proposed.
III B-28&29
III B-33&34
III B-35
IZI B-36
IV
IV B-12
Biological Report No. 189 prepared for this project found that Stephens
Kangaroo rats inhabit the site. Development of the Site would result in
the loss of this habitat, so therefore the project may have a sianificant
effect on the enviroment.
Requested information concerninq an archaeoloqical report has not been
submitted for review.
Potential Paleontolgical resources will require a Daleontoloqist be on
site during gradfng activity.
Mr. Palomar impacts mitigated by utilization of low pressure sodium lighting.
Impacts to schools mitiqated thoruqh school fees.
This project will be required to Day library mitigation fees.
V. INFORMATION SOURCES, IqNINNG8 OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES (~ontlnued)
8ECllON/
*III B- 28 & 29
*IIIB- 33 & 34
L
SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MfflGATION MEASURES:
After this E.A. was found to have a positive declaration, a focused
EIR was requested to address Stephens Kanqaroo Rat impacts. Since the
N.0.P. was issued. the County has established an interim nrogram for
the mitigation of impacts to Stephens. Because the applicant will be
required to participate in this program, including payment of $750 Dec
dwellinq unit, it is determined that this project has mitiqated the
potential impacts and that a negative declaration may be prepared.
The Archaeoloqtcal Report orepared for this pro.iect was submitted for thi~
project. This report indicated no resource~ were found. so therefore
no mitigation is necessary.
See attached
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION:
The project will not have a lignlfiC, lnt effect on ~ environment end a Negmive Declaration may be
The ~ could have 8 aignirr~nt effect On ~he environment however. them will not be a significant
effect in them Case because the mitigation measures clemcribed in Section V have been applied to the
pro~ end · Negative Declarltion my be prepared.
CITY OF TEMECULA )
IT
E
VICINITY MAP )
r
CASE NO.vl'r~'~,,-,z-
P.C. DATE '~'~/~l
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Vesting Tentative Tract 231q2
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
(K-Rat) Paid in conjunction with
underlying PM 19580.
Parks and Recreation
{Quimby)
Public Facility
( Traffic Mitigation )
Public Facility
( Traffic Signal Mitigation )
Public Facility
( Library )
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 18h
Condition No. 1
I City )
Condition No. 2
( City )
Condition No. 7
( Roads Division)
Condition No. 20a
Condition No. 15
Condition No. 14
Staffrpt\VTM231 ~2\mb 1 u,
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 (TPM 26723)
Prepared By: Charly Ray
Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723
based on the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Devadutt Sawh
REPRESENTATIVE:
Mr. Richard Heffner
PROPOSAL:
Residential subdivision of 10.7 gross acres into 4
parcels, approximately 2.5 acres each.
LOCATION:
South side of Santiago Road, approximately 3/4
miles west of Margarita Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
R-R ( Rural Residential )
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: R - R
South: R-R
East: R-A-2 1/2
West: R - R
Rural Residential )
Rural Residential )
ResidentialAgricultural,
1/2 Acre minimum Parcel
Size)
Rural Residential )
PROPOSED ZONING:
As existing.
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant/Native Scrub
STAFFRPT\PM26723 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant/Low
East: Vacant
West: Vacant/Low
Density Residential
Density Residential
Total Area:
Average lot Size:
Largest Parcel:
Smallest Parcel:
Existing Improvements:
Access:
Domestic Water:
Electricity:
Sewage Disposal:
10.7 gross acres+/-
2.5 gross acres+/-
2.9 gross acres+/-
2.5 gross acres+/-
Rough-graded adjacent
right-d-way ( Santiago
and Lolita Roads)
Rancho California Water
Southern California
Edison
On-site septic system
proposed
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 (TPM 26723) was
submitted to the City of Temecula Planning
Department for consideration and processing on
November 19, 1990. The proposal was initially
reviewed by the City~s Development Review
Committee ( DRC ) on December 20, 1990. Significant
comments and concerns voiced at that time are as
presented in the Project Analysis.
The applicant proposes subdivision of 2 existing
parcels totaling 10.7 acres into ~ parcels averaging
2.5+ acres each. The subject property is situated
in the relatively rural southeastern portion of the
City. Existing development in the project vicinity
consists primarily of low density residential estate
development. Much of the surrounding acreage is
currently vacant.
On-site vegetation is largely comprised of native
grasses. A single mature tree exists on proposed
Parcel No. u,. The site has been historically
disturbed by human activity, as evidenced by
vehicle trails adjacent to, and traversing the
subject property. As such, it is unlikely the
project site functions as significant vegetative or
wildlife habitat. Beyond evident scrub vegetation,
such sites are typically host to small populations of
common rodents, lizards and insects.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 2
ANALYSIS:
Site topography consists primarily of a
northeasterly facing slope, the toe of which
terminates in a defined natural drainage course
running parallel to the site~s Santiago Road
frontage. Santiago Road itself constitutes the
project site northern boundary. To the east the
project site is bounded by Lolita Road. Neither the
Santiago nor Lolita Road rights-of-way are improved
adjacent to the proposed parcel map. Santiago Road
is paved to 1/2 width standards within 0.6 mile of
the project site.
Development Review Committee concerns regarding
this proposal, as referenced in the project
"Background" were as follows:
As initially designed, proposed Parcel No. 1
realized public access directly from the
Santiago Road right-d-way. This right-d-
way is planned for eventual improvement to
secondary arterial status. As such,
individual residential drive cuts accessing
this road are incompatible with the intended
traffic conveyance functions of the road,
requiring elimination of the proposed Parcel
No. 1 driveway. Map redesign was
suggested, including provision of
centralized, internal access to each parcel
proposed.
Redefinition of the 100-year inundation levels
originally outlined on the tentative map was
requested. Actual inundation subsequent to
construction of Lolita Road as proposed will
likely result in storm drainage ponding on the
property immediately adjacent to the east.
Ponding easement agreement( s ) from affected
property owneris) will be required.
Based on the map design currently proposed,
off-site grading will be necessary to
construct Lolita Road and Santiago Road. As
with pondlng that affects adjacent properties
(No. 2 above), easement(s) allowing off-site
grading will also be required. Further, in
compliance with City Engineering
Specifications, a total of 66' utility road
right-of-way dedication is required vs. the
60~ width initially proposed.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 3
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
As with all "Schedule H" maps proposed in
outlying and currently rural areas of the
City, supporting improvements iparticularly
road improvements) necessary to effect this
subdivision may require substantial capital
commitments from the applicant.
Applicant responses to the concerns listed above
are reflected primarily in the map design currently
proposed (Exhibit D). The map, as presently
conflgured, together with supporting
documentation, notably requested off-site
ponding/grading easement agreements, are included
in the project staff report. Specifically,
responding to Staff Comment No. 1 the map was
redesigned to provide centralized common access to
all proposed parcels via a public cul-de-sac (Road
"A") connecting to Lolita Road. Lolita Road itself
has been designed in concert with City Engineer
concerns stated in Comment Nos. 3 and u,; additional
right-of-way dedication ~66' total width is now
proposed). Requested easement agreement{s)
allowing necessary off-site grading and anticipated
ponding on adjacent properties are presented in
Attachment Nos. 5.1 and 5.2. ~
In summary, the proposed parcel map, tagether
with the mitigation measures specified in the project
Conditions of Approval, provide for development
compatible with City land use and subdivision
standards, ordinances and policies. Further, the
Initial Environmental Assessment conducted for the
project has determined its compliance with
applicable sections of the California Environmental
Quality Act {C.E.Q.A. ).
As discussed in the preceding portions of this Staff
Report, Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 complies
with applicable State and City land use and
subdivision ordinances/policies currently in effect.
Further, the map is compatible with the 5outhwest
Area Plan ISWAP) guidelines for the subject
property, which recommends residential
development of 2 1/2 acre minimum parcels (Exhibit
C) . Such guidelines will likely comprise the basis
utilized in the currently developing City General
Plan.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 ~
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Accordingly, it is likely that TPM 26723 will
substantially conform to the City~s General Plan
goals, objectives, and directives upon that plan's
formal adoption.
An Initial Environmental Assessment has been
prepared for Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 (TPM
26723); the analysis of which concludes with the
finding that "although the proposed use could have
a significant effect on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in the case under
consideration because the measures specified in the
project's Conditions of Approval mitigate significant
potential adverse impacts."
The proposed Parcel Map will not have
significant negative impact on the
environment, as determined in the Initial
Environmental Assessment prepared for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723. A Negative
Declaration is recommended for adoption.
There is a reasonable probability that this
proposal will be consistent with the General
Plan being prepared at this time. The project
is consistent with applicable subdivision and
land use ordinances, and conforms with the
City~s Southwest Area Plan (SWAP)
guidelines affecting the subject property.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to, or interference
with, the future adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The project is consistent with
surrounding development, and does not
logically have the potential to generate
significant adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed use or action complies with City
and State planning and zoning laws.
Reference local Ordinances No. 3~,8, L~60,
California Governmental Code Sections 65000-
66009 (Planning Zoning Law), and
Government Code Title 7, Division 2.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of parcel configurations, access, and
STAFFRPT\PM26723 5
10.
density. The project has access to public
rights-d-way, and is designed with
sufficient parcel acreages allowing
appropriate building pad sltings.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the initial study
prepared for this project. Reference the
attached Initial Environmental Study and
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 26723.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project as
conditioned. Easement dedications are not
evident in grant deeds describing the
property. Further, off-site easement
agreements necessary to realize this project
are provided as discussed in the project Staff
Report, and evidenced in Attachments 5.1
and 5.2.
The site for the proposed use is provided
legal access via Santiago and Lolita Road
public rights-of-way. Development of these
roads shall comply with City Engineering
Conditions of Approval contained herein.
The proposed project will not inhibit or
restrict future ability to use active or passive
solar energy systems. Adequate lot areas
and exposures are provided for these
alternatives.
The proposed use will not have a substantial
adverse affect on abutting properties or the
permitted use thereof. The proposed map
provides for residential development similar
in character and densities evident on adjacent
properties. Any necessary off-site
construction activities affecting adjacent
properties will occur only in concordance with
easement agreements outlined in Attachments
5.1 and 5.2. Land use incongruities and
associated adverse affects arising from
implementation of this proposal are unlikely.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 6
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
11.
The lawful conditions stated in the approval
are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare. The
Conditions stated in Attachment No. 2 are
based in mitlgative measures necessary to
reduce the severity of, or entirely eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
12.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with this application and herein
incorporated by reference.
Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723 based on the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached Conditions
of Approval. ~
CR:ks
Attachments: 1.
2.
3.
5.1 and 5.2
6.
R esol ution
Conditions of Approval
Environmental Assessment
Exhibits
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. SWAP Land Use Designation
D. Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723
Off-site Grading/Ponding Easement Agreements
Development Fee Checkllst, TPM 26723
STAFFRPT\PM26723 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 26723
TO SUBDIVIDE A 10.7+/- ACRE PARCEL INTO ~,
RESIDENTIAL PARCELS. THE PROJECT~S GENERAL
LOCATION BEING: SOUTH SIDE OF SANTIAGO ROAD,
APPROXIMATELY 3/u, MILE WEST OF MARGAR ITA ROAD.
WHEREAS, Mr. Devadutt Sawh filed Parcel Map No. 26723 in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Parcel Map application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Parcel Map on April
15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commissidn
approval of said Parcel Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. That theTemecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
STAFFRPT\PM26723 8
a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, ( hereinafter "SWAP" ) was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Parcel Map is consistent with the SWAP an~d
meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
~2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Parcel
Map No. 26723 proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 9
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. {1 ) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No.
~60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are
made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the
proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of
development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density
of the development.
e)
That the design of the proposed land division
or proposed improvements are not likely ~o
cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
g)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division.
A land division may be approved if it is found
that alternate easements for access or for use
will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsection
shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgment of a court
of competent jurisdiction.
(2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval
of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map, makes the following findings, to
wit:
STAFFRPT\PM26723 10
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
The proposed Parcel Map will not have
significant negative impact on the
environment, as determined in the Initial
Environmental Assessment prepared for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723. A Negative
Declaration is recommended for adoption.
There is a reasonable probability that this
proposal will be consistent with the General
Plan being prepared at this time. The project
is consistent with applicable subdivision and
land use ordinances, and conforms with the
Cityis Southwest Area Plan ~ SWAP )
guidelines affecting the subject property.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to, or interference
with, the future adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. The project is consistent with
surrounding development, and does not
logically have the potential to generate
significant adverse environmental impacts.
The proposed use or action complies with Cit~/
and State planning and zoning laws.
Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460,
California Governmental Code Sections 65000-
66009 {Planning Zoning Law), and
Government Code Title 7, Division 2.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of parcel configurations, access, and
density. The project has access to public
rights-of-way, and is designed with
sufficient parcel acreages allowing
appropriate building pad sitings.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the initial study
prepared for this project. Reference the
attached Initial Environmental Study and
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 26723.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 11
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project as
conditioned. Easement dedications are not
evident in grant deeds describing the
property. Further, off-site easement
agreements necessary to realize this project
are provided as discussed in the project Staff
Report, and evidenced in Attachments 5.1
and 5.2.
The site for the proposed use is provided
legal access via Santiago and Lolita Road
public rights-of-way. Development of these
roads shall comply with City Engineering
Conditions of Approval contained herein.
The proposed project will not inhibit or
restrict future ability to use active or passive
solar energy systems. Adequate lot areas
and exposures are provided for these
alternatives.
The proposed use will not have a substantial
adverse affect on abutting properties or the
permitted use thereof. The proposed map
provides for residential development similar
in character and densities evident on adjacent
properties. Any necessary off-site
construction activities affecting adjacent
properties will occur only in concordance with
easement agreements outlined in Attachments
5.1 and 5.2. Land use incongruities and
associated adverse affects arising from
implementation of this proposal are unlikely.
The lawful conditions stated in the approval
are deemed necessary to protect the public
health, safety and general welfare. The
Conditions stated in the attached Staff
analysis are based in mitigative measures
necessary to reduce the severity of, or
entirely eliminate potential adverse impacts of
the project.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 12
I)
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Parcel Map
proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on
attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project.
A Negative Declaration will be prepared.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Parcel
Map No. 26723 for the subdivision of a 10.7+/- acre parcel into ~, parcels generally
located on the south side of Santiago Road, approximately 3/u, mile west of Margarita
Road, subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
SECTION
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT\PM26723 13
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No: 26723
Project Description: Proposed residential
subdivision of approximately 10.7 qross
acres into ~ parcels, averaqinq 2.5+/- net
acres each.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 9~5-140-006/007
Planninq Department
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule H, unless
modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request,
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~,60. The expiration
date is April 26, 1993.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance u,60 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road.
A copy of the final grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical
height of thirty (30) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of slopes shall
be a minimum of one-half the slope height.
b. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 14
10.
11.
12.
13.
The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations of the
Riverside County Flood Control District contained herein. If the project lies
within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of
City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance ~,60, appropriate fees for the
construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the City prior to
issuance of Occupancy Permits.
The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined
by the County Fire Department as referenced herein.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the City
Building and Safety Department Conditions of Approval contained herein.
All proposed construction within the tentative map boundaries shall comply
with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor
Lighting Policy, as outlined in the Southwest Area Plan.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the City
Engineering Department Conditions of Approval referenced herein.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-A-2 1/2 zone district.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all proposed
slopes and landscaped areas until such time as those operations are the
responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten
(10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the
following grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle
of the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the
natural rounded terrain.
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage
and stability permit such rounding.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 15
15.
16.
17.
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulatlng fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence
to the City Director of Building and Safety and/or City Engineering
Department that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes and proposed
ponding area{ s) have recorded slope/ ponding easements and that maintenance
responsibilities for such areas have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety and/or City Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontologlcal impacts. Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or
representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt
grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential
lot/unit within the project boundary until the developeris successor'~-
in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars I$100) per
lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivision~s approved fire protection plan as
approved by the County Fire Marshal.
Rod-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding
property.
Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall not
be less than ten {10) feet.
e. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten {10) feet.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 16
18o
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director an agreement with TCSD
which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land divider has
provided for the payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with
Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~,60. The agreement shall be approved by the
City Council prior to the recordat/on of the final map.
The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 26723, which action is brought within the time period provided
for in California Government Code Section 66~,99.37. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire any off-site property
interests which may be required, and if he or she should fail to do so, the
developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for
approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to
Government Code Section 66u,62 at such time as the City acquires the propertY/
interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for
payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-
site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security
of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount
given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developer~s
cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provlder. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired
in the residence.
All existing specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved
wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated
or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director.
The applicant shall comply with the project Conditions of Approval specified
by the Riverside County Environmental Health Service Division IEHSD)
contained referenced herein.
The applicant shall comply with the project Conditions of Approval contained
in the requirements of the City Community Services District contained
referenced herein.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 17
25.
Within forty-eight (~,8) hours of the approval of the project, the
applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand,
Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One
Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711. ~( d) ( 2 ) plus the Twenty-
Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152
and 1~ Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (u,8) hour
period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section
711 .~(c).
Riverside County Fire Department
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the
Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in
accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
26.
Schedule "H" fire protection. An approved standard fire hydrant (6'x~,"x2
1/2" ) shall be located so that no portion of the frontage of any lot is more than
500 feet from a fire hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours
at 20 PSI.
27.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil
engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans
are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Department for Signature.
28.
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
material being placed on an individual lot.
Mitiqation
29.
Prior to the recordat/on of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
City of Temecula, a cash sum of $~,00.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire
protection impacts.
All questions ragarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning
Division Staff.
City Buildinq and Safety Department
30.
Submit approved map to Building and Safety Department for addressing prior
to Structural Plan review.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 18
31. All building pad drainage shall comply with Ordinance u,57.57, Section 1.
32. Obtain clearances from Landuse and from Building and Safety Departments.
Riverside County EHSD
33.
The Environmental Health Services Division (EHSD) has reviewed the above
Parcel Map and while we are not priviledged to receive any preliminary
information relative to subsurface sewage disposal or connection to sewers or
domestic water supply, it is our considered opinion that the soils that might
be encountered in this area may not be conducive to the effective subsurface
sewage diposal systems and because of soll characteristics in the area. there
may be a requirement for extensive grading compaction, cutting, etc. Prior
to recordation of the final map, an acceptable soils feasibility report shall be
submitted for reiveiw and and approval by the Environmental health .Services
Division. ( Sol Is percolation required )
When grading is required, the soils engineer must assume theoretical cuts,
fills, compaction, etc. and perform the tests and borlngs at the necessary
subsurface sewage disposal system depths. Prior to any qradinq, the soils
engineer must provide a grading plan for review and approval which shall
include and address the following:
The proposed cuts and/or fills in the areas of subsurface sewag_e
disposal system.
The sewage system and it~s 100% expansion area placed in a
natural undisturbed soil.
The elevation of the individual building pads in reference to the
elevation of the disposal system.
On those projects where the grading plans are prepared by other than the
person preparing the soils feasibility report, a statement must be included on
the grading plan submitted for review and approval with the soils engineer's
signature and seal as to the appropriateness of the grading with regard to the
conclusions and recommendations set forth in the soils engineer's estimate by
more than two feet, additional reports may be required.
35.
A copy of the final grading plan, on a scale not smaller than ln=l.iO' maximum
with detailed subsurface sewage disposal data to include 100% expansion. shall
be submitted for review and approval.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 19
City Community Services District
36.
Subdivisions containing less than five ~5) parcels will be subject to the
following condition:
Upon request of a building permit for construction of residential
structures on one or more of the parcels within four years following
approval of a tentative map, parcel map, or planned development, real
estate developmment, stock cooperative, community apartment project
and condominium for which a tentative map or parcel map is filed, a
predetermined Quimby Act Fee in the amount equal to the fair market
value of required acreage (plus 20% for offsite improvements) shall be
paid by the owner of each such parcells ) as a condition to the issuance
of such permit as authorized by Riverside County Ordinance No. u,60 as
amended through Ordinance No L~60.93.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, travel .ed
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
38.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
39.
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative,
the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 20
u,6.
LI-7.
q.8.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to
the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
Santiago Road shall be improved with q3 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or
bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-
of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 100 { 110'/861 ). Santiago Road
improvements shall be extended offsite to connect with existing improvements
tothe northeast of the project location. Transition paving shall be as directed
by the City Engineer. Existing barricade shall be relocated to the
northwesterly boundary line.
Street "A" shall be improved with 36 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or
bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-
of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section A (601/36').
Lolita Road shall be improved with 22 feet of half street improvement plus one
12~ lane within a dedicated right-d-way in accordance with County Standard
No. 103, Section A (66V~u~). Alternatively, performance bonding for
required street improvements may be posted. Such bonding shall be reviewed
and approved by the City Engineer.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Santiago road and so noted on the final
map with the exception of Public Street Intersections as approved by the City
Engineer.
Street "A" shall terminate in a cul-de-sac per Riverside County Standard No.
800.
Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall
be delineated or noticed on the final map.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
The developer, or the developeris successor, shall execute a current Public
Facilities Agreement with the City of Temecula which provides for the payment
of the sum of money per residential unit then established by Resolution of the
City Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual
lots.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 21
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping (street and parks).
d. Domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. L~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigatidn
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
Street names shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineering
Department.
The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the City
Engineer.
All street centerllne intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as appr ~ved by the
City Engineer.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as approved by the City Engineer.
A minimum centerllne street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard 400 and 401 Icurb sidewalk).
STAFFRPT\PM26723 22
60.
61.
62.
63.
6~.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property
line.
The subdivider shall submit two ~2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
The subdivider shall submit two ( 2 ) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-d-way, shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions."
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners fc~r
the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent
property. A copy of the recorded drainage easement shall be submitted to the
City for review prior to the recordation of the final map.
The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the
use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance No. ~,60 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity, or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
subdivlder shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Engineering
Department.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
The subdivlder shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by
alteration of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow.
Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities,
including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 · 23
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
70.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
71.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
72.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
73.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The
final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough
grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
75.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
76.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
77.
Asphaltic emulsion {fag seal) shall be applied not less than 1L) days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
9L~ of the State Standard Specifications.
78.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Nagative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
STAFFR PT\PM26723
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assumlng benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Tansportatlon Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
79.
An interim signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for Lotita and Santiago Roads
and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 25
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CiTY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
2. Address and Phone
Number of proponent:
5.
6.
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Location of Proposal:
Devadutt Sawh
2961 Landscape Drive
San Diego, CA 92139
December 6, 1990
CITY OF TEMECULA
Tentative Parcel Map {TPM) No. 26723
II
Environmental Impacts
Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 26
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 27
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life, Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ( including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
Ibirds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 28
Yes Maybe No
10.
11o
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
5ubstantlal depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
i n vol ve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existin9 housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 29
Yes Maybe No
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? __ X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? __ X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __ __ X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? __ __ X
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X __
b. Police protection? X __
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X __
f. Other governmental services: __ __ X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __ __ X
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __ __ X
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __ __ X
5TAFFRPT\PM26723 30
17o
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 31
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildllfe
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? {A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? I A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? __
Yes Maybe N._9o
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PM26723 32
III Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
1.b.
1.C.
1.d.
1 .e,f.
1.g.
2.a-c.
3.a,b.
No. Unstable earth conditions are not present on the project site.
Activities are not proposed at sub-grade depths that could logically
affect geologic substructures.
Yes. Approval of this Tentative Map and eventual subsequent
construction of additional residences will entail grading of the subject
property. Proper mitigative measures are mandated as a requirement
of building permit issuance, and will be addressed at that time. Limited
scale of this project precludes significant impacts.
No. Site-specific cut and fill activities are proposed. Preliminary
grading plans indicate residential pad construction which respect
hillside limitations. Proposed offsite grading shall comply with
easement provisions specified by the City Engineer and/or City
Building Official.
No. Unique geologic/physical features are not present on the project
site.
No. Activities are not proposed that would logically result in
significant modificationis) of onslte or offslte soil erosion patterns;
including any possible erosion/deposition that might effect beach sands
or siltation of local stream beds and/or lakes.
No. The referenced hazards, e.g., earthquakes, mudslides, and
ground failures, have neither currently nor historically been identified
as relevant considerations potentially affecting development of the
subject site.
No. Residential subdivision resulting in potential construction of ~,
single family dwellings is proposed. Logically, significant air quality
impacts are not anticipated.
Maybe. Development effect/rig localized drainage patterns is proposed,
and site specific runoff patterns will likely change subsequent to
development. Such development is subject to drainage mitigation
measures in conjunction with the issuance of building permits and
certificates of occupancy should construction of necessary
improvements/residences be effected. Proposed offsite ponding shall
comply with provisions specified by the City Engineer and/or City
Building Official.
Further, the applicant is required to comply with all relevant City
Conditions of Approval referencing drainage studies, analyses and any
necessary improvements effecting reoordation of the final map.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 33
3.c.
3.d.
3.e.
3.f,g.
3.h.
3.i.
I.I..b,d.
5.a.
5.b,c.
Yes. The proposal includes drainage improvements and easement
agreements adequate to convey and detain 100 year storm inundations
as specified in the proejct Conditions of Project Approval. { Reference
also Item 3.i. )
No. The project does not propose elements affecting standing surface
water bodies.
Maybe. As a result of eventual residential development of this
subdivision, turbidity of offsite drainage may increase nominally.
Incrementally, regional development of a similar nature may eventually
adversely affect on surface water qualities to a noticeable degree.
However, affects of this individual project will likely be unnoticed given
its limited potential for residential development.
No. Withdrawals or additions of significance, which might potentially
affect ground waters is not proposed.
No. Typical residential water consumption rates are expected assuming
eventual buildout of this project. The four additional residences which
may eventually be realized will not significantly affect regional water
resource consumption nor overall availability of public water supplies.
Maybe. The map is affected by an identified flood hazard potential,
reference areas indicated as "subject to 100 year storm inundation."'
However, as currently designed, lots are provided adequate area for
siting of homes in locations not subject to these hazards. Further,
proper conveyance of drainage is effected by City Conditions of
Approval referencing drainage studies/improvements and offsite
ponding easement agreements required of this proposal.
Maybe. Eventual residential construction on the subject property will
include grubbing of the site with the potential for introduction of
foreign landscaping elements. Such improvements will likely contribute
to overall visual project aesthetics with no discernable impact on
regional vegetation.
No. No rare vegetative species nor agricultural crops of significance
are currently present on the subject property.
Maybe. Common species (small rodents, insects and reptiles) which
currently inhabit the project site may eventually be displaced with no
impact on regional fauna populations.
No. Unique animal species, nor habitat of significance are evident on
the property in question. However, as with virtually all construction
within the City, this project is subject to Kangaroo Rat Habitat
mitigation fees as specified in the project~s Condition of Approval.
STAFF R PT\ PM26723
6.b.
10.a,b.
11,12.
13.a,d.
13.b,c.
Maybe. Should additional residences eventually be constructed,
localized ambient noise levels should increase nominally, with no
significant impact on area-wide aural qualities. Of greater significance
will be noise generated during construction activities. These too,
however, should have little or no impact beyond the immediate project
confines.
No. Elements generating intense noise levels are not proposed.
No. Eventual construction of ~, residences which may result should
contribute only nominally to existing levels of light and glare with no
identifiable additional impacts. Further, any building permits issued
will be conditioned to conform with applicable City lighting standards,
regulations, and ordinances.
No. Subdivision of the subject property is the logical precursor to
residential construction activities, which represents a significant
change in the site's currently vacant state. Limited scale of this
proposal, and its compliance with applicable land use/zoning ordinances
and building codes, precludes land use impacts of significance.
No. Project approval has the potential to result in only 4 additional
residences. Typical residential consumption rates for each new home
is a logical assumption of eventual project buildout, with insignificant
impacts on regional assets. ~
No. Storage and use of hazardous materials is not proposed; nor does
the proposal lie within identified emergency response plan/evacuation
movement corridors.
No. As the project may result in eventual construction of 4 additional
residences, strictly speaking, population density/distribution and
regional housing assets will be altered, with no identifiable impacts.
No. Eventual limited residential construction potentials cannot be
considered a significant traffic generator. No impacts of import are
anticipated which might logically affect existing regional transportation
systems. Minor road realignments and improvements required are not
considered significant on a regional scale.
Maybe. Eventual construction of additional residences which may occur
necessitates provision of additional off-street parking assets of nominal
proportions and impacts. Further, proposed access indicated requires
additional construction of improved roadways where currently none
exist. Mitigation proposed includes roadway configurations respecting
terrain limitations, e.g., gradient allowances appropriate vehicular
design speeds and right-d-way improvements necessary to adequately
convey auto traffic within and around the project site.
STAFFRPT\PM26723 35
13.f.
1LLa-e.
lq.f.
15.a,b.
16.a-f.
17.a,b.
18.
19.
20.a-d.
21 .a-d.
Maybe. Potential increase in vehicular and pedestrian traffic at the
project site may result in additional traffic mishaps. Accident
potentials should not be noticeably affected on a regional basis.
Yes. All development proposals, regardless of scale, potentially
generate additional demands on public services. in this instance
services most notably impacted are police and fire protection, public
education, recreation facilities, and City road maintenance operations.
Such impacts are largely mitigated through formation of assessment
districts, developer fees, property taxes, and user fees. Fees
required of this project prior to final approval are identified in
Attachment No. 5.
No. Other governmental services potentially impacted have not been
identified at this time.
No. Reference Item nos. 9.a. and b.
No. Should residential construction eventually occur, nominal service
line extensions for the utilities referenced will be required, with no
impact of significance in area-wide utility capabilities.
No. The project does not propose introduction of hazardous elements,
nor is the proposal affected by existing, identified health hazard
potentials.
No. Typical, generic residential development, compatible with area-
wide architectural and site design characteristics may eventually
result. As such, no discernable impacts on City aesthetic qualities is
anticipated. However, eventual residential construction may affect
localized skyline/ridgeline features due to residential construction on
proposed Lot Nos. 2 and 3. The scale of potential construction does not
indicate visual impacts of significance.
Maybe. Potential residential construction and occupancy may
eventually contribute nominally to regional demand on recreation
resources, which is partially mitigated by Quimby Act fees specified in
the project~s Conditions of Approval.
No. No project elements are proposed that would logically impact the
referenced historic/cultural resources, nor are these assets currently
present on the property in question.
No. Reference Item Nos. 1-20.
STA F F R PT\PM26723 36
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NECATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
December 6, 1990
Date
For
CITY OF TEMECULA
STAFFRPT\PM26723 37
ATTACHMENT NO.
EXHIBITS
STAFF R PT\ PM26723 38
CITY OF TEMECULA )
CiTY OF TEMECULA )
ZONE MAP )
CITY OF TEMECULA )
II
SWAP MAP
r, "-C
CASE
P.C. DATE
( CITY OF TEMECULA )
r
CASE
EXHIBIT NO.
~..c. DATE
ATTACHMENT NO. 5.1 AND 5.2
OFF-SITE GRADINGIPONDING EASEMENT AGREEMENTS
STAFFRPT\PM26723 39
ATTACHMENT NO. 5.1
Roy Kee
12062 Spencer Drive
Garden Grove, CA 92641
March 14, 1991
Mr. Charly Ray
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
43180 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92390
RE: TPM 26723
Dear Mr. Ray:
This letter is in response to correspondence I received from your office
regarding a public hearing that is scheduled for April 1, 1991, in
consideration of Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723.
I am the owner of the parcel of land located directly East (Parcel 4 of PM
8595 PM44/53-54) of the property being considered. I have spoken with Mr.
Richard Herrnet (the representative for Devadutt Sawh) and reviewed the
Tentative Parcel Map-that has been submitted for your review.
~leas~ be advised that, while I agree in principle with the proposed project
being submitted, I do have a number of concerns regarding specific points of
the proposal.
I will be submitting my own proposal for building a single family
residence on my parcel very soon. This proposal will be submitted with
the intent of building a home with minimum or no improvement of Lolita
Road (if approved). Access to my property would be gained by
utilization of John Warner transitioning to Lolita Road, then East to my
parcel. (See enclosed)
2. Enclosed is a copy of one of the early proposals submitted by Richard
Heffner to your office for TPM 26723,
I have two overriding concerns with regard to the proposal:
Because I will be utilizing only the upper portion of Lolita Road
for access to my parcel of property, I will not require improvement
of Lolita Road as it comes off Santiago Road. Therefore, if Mr.
Sawh seeks to improve that portion of Lolita Road, it should be at
his expense.
Mr. Charly Ray
Page Two
March 14, 1991
I am concerned with the degree my parcel of property must be cut
hack to accommodate such a road. In the event Mr. Sawh elects to
improve Lolita Road, and the City of Temecula deems it necessary to
cut hack the area of my property in question (see highlighted
portion of attached), I should not be required to plant and/or
irrigate, at my expense, this sloped area for any purpose such as
erosion control, aesthetics, etc. Any expense should be incurred by
Mr. Sawh.
I very much appreciate your consideration in this matter. If I can answer any
questions, please don't hesitate to call me:
(714) 539-7934 Residence
(?14) 449-1161 Work
Sincerely,
Roy Kee
cs
Enclosures
ATTACHMENT NO. 5.2
( Unavailable As Of u,/8/91 )
Clarification, as necessary, re: Off-site easements
affecting adjacent property owner ( APN 9U,5-1Lffi-009) to be
provided at time of Public Hearing.
STAFF R PT\PM26723
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 26723
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this
project.
Fee
Habitat Conservation Plan
IK-Rat)
Parks and Recreation
{ Qu imby )
Public Facility
( Traffic Mitigation )
Public Facility
{ Traffic Signal Mitigation )
Public Facility
~ Library )
Fire Protection
Flood Control
(ADP)
Condition of Approval
Condition No. 17
Condition No. 18, 36
Condition No. u,9
Condition No. 53
Condition No. 16.a.
Condition No. 29
Condition No. 6
STAFFRPT\PM26723 q. 1
ITEM #6
Case No.:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Revised Conditional Use Permit No. 1090
Prepared By: Steve Jiannino
Recommendation:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
The Planning Department Staff
recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration
for Revised Conditional Use
Permit No. 1090; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
approving Revised Conditional
Use Permit No. 1090 based on
the analysis contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the
attached Condtions of Approval,
Vedder Park Management
Engineering Ventures
7 unit addition to an existing mobile home park.
Eastern terminus of South General Kearny Road.
R -R ~ Rural Residential )
North: SP 199
South: SP 199
East: SP 199
West: SP 199
Same.
(Specific Plan No. 199)
(Specific Plan No. 199)
(Specific Plan No. 199)
(Specific Plan No. 199)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
A: CUP1090 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
North: Existing Mobile Home Park
South: Golf Course
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
Site:
Additional Developed Area:
No. of New Units
Total No. of Units
Total Dwelling Units/Acre:
Current Dwelling Units/Acre:
SWAP Designation:
38.8z~ acres
1.5 acres
7 units
191 units
~,.97 DU/AC
~,.85 DU/AC
2-~ DU/AC
The County approved Conditional Use Permit No.
1090 in 1969. The project approval required the
half-width dedication of South General Kearny Road
of ~,u, feet. The Buie Corporation has requested the
vacation of South General kearny Road in
conjunction with development of Specific Plan No.
199. The vacation of South General Kearny Road
gives the previously dedicated 44 feet back to the
mobile home park. The park is requesting to revise
the approved Conditional Use Permit No. 1090 to
develop the area being vacated.
The proposed project is for the addition of 7 mobile
home units within an existing mobile home park.
The construction area will involve approximately 1.5
acres which includes the vacated area of South
General Kearny Road. The area is currently graded
with the existing slopes being landscaped. The
construction of the internal park's boundaries must
conform to Title 25 requirements with inspection
being completed by the State.
The project has been reviewed at both the Pre and
Formal Development Review Committees (DRC). The
project was originally designed for 8 units, but to
address the concerns of Staff, a unit was eliminated
to provide a cul-de-sac at the end of the private
street.
The project has been conditioned to provide the
street improvements on South General Kearny to
provide a full cul-de-sac at the terminus of South
General Kearny Road.
A: CUP1090 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
CONCLUSION:
FINDINGS:
The existing mobile home park is developed at a
density of u,.85 dwelling units per acre. The new
proposal will increase the density to LL97 dwelling
units per acre. The Southwest Area Community
Plan {SWAP) designated the site as 2-4 DU/AC
which is inconsistent with the current established
land use. It appears that a General Plan density of
2-5 DU/AC would be appropriate to show the
existing condition. The proposed project conforms
to a land use density of 2-5 DU/AC.
The current mobile home park is a senior complex
and the required impact fees have been established
to reflect the senior requirement for park
residents.
The project is consistent with the current
development of the site and should therefore be
consistent with the future General Plan under
consideration by the City. The R-R {Rural
Residential) zoning allows mobile parks provided a
Conditional Use Permit is approved for the project.
Thus, the proposed project is consistent with the
zoning for the site. ~
An initial environmental study has been complete for
the project and no significant impacts are
anticipated with development of the site and a
Negative Declaration is being recommended for
adoption.
The proposed project conforms to the existing
mobile home project and has been designed to meet
Staffis concerns. Staff is therefore recommending
that the Planning Commission approve Revised
Conditional Use Permit No. 1090.
There is a reasonable probability that
Revised Conditional Use Permit No. 1090 will
be consistent with the City's future General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law due to
the fact that the proposed development is
consistent with the existing zoning and
surrounding development.
A:CUP1090 3
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future Ceneral Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed mobile home park
expansion is consistent with the existing
zoning, and the permitted uses of the
surrounding area.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 3~,8 with the Conditional Use
Permit approval, and the action complies with
State Planning Laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use due to
the fact that the proposed development
complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
30,8 and Title 25.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare due to the fact that the project is
consistent with surrounding development and
has been conditioned to provide the
necessary infrastructure for public health
and welfare.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the
proposed expansion is consistent with the
current mobile home park development and
Specific Plan No. 199.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area due to the
fact that the surrounding properties are also
zoned residential or specific plan.
A:CUP1090 4
10.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact
that the vehicular improvements of the
proposed development has been approved by
the Traffic Engineering Staff.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the initial study
performed for this project.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Revised
Conditional Use Permit No. 1090; and
T
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approvin9
Revised Conditional Use Permit No. 1090
based on the analysis contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached Condtions
of Approval.
SJ:ks
Attachments:
R esol ution
Conditions of Approval
Environmental Assessment
A:CUP1090 5
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING REVISED CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 1090 TO PERMIT THE ADDITION OF 7
MOBILE HOME UNITS TO AN EXISTING MOBILE HOME
PARK LOCATED AT THE EASTERN TERMINUS OF SOUTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD.
WHEREAS, Vedder Park Management filed Revised CUP No. 1090 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Revised CUP application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Revised CUP on
April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commissioh
approved said Revised CUP;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C)TY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECT ION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
{1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A:CUPI090 6
a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, I hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Revised CUP meets the requirements s~t
forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
( 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
e)
There is reasonable probability that Revised
CUP No. 1090 proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
A: CUP1090 7
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.26(e), no CUP may be
approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any CUP approved shall be subject to such conditions as
shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of
the community.
( 2 ) The Planning commission, in approving the proposed
Revised CUP, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that
Revised Conditional Use Permit No. 1090 will
be consistent with the City~s future General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State law due to
the fact that the proposed development is
consistent with the existing zoning and
surrounding development.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed mobile home park
expansion is consistent with the existing
zoning, and the permitted uses of the
surrounding area.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 3~,8 with the Conditional Use
Permit approval, and the action complies with
State Planning Laws.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use due to
the fact that the proposed development
complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
3~8 and Title 25.
e)
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare due to the fact that the project is
consistent with surrounding development and
has been conditioned to provide the
necessary infrastructure for public health
and welfare.
A: CUP1090 8
f)
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the
proposed expansion is consistent with the
current mobile home park development and
Specific Plan No. 199.
g)
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area due to the
fact that the surrounding properties are also
zoned residential or specific plan.
h)
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact
that the vehicular improvements of the
proposed development has been approved by
the Traffic Engineering Staff.
i)
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the initial study
performed for this project.
j)
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3. the CUP proposed
is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the city of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Revised
CUP No. 1090 for the addition of 7 mobile home units to an existing mobile home park
located at the eastern terminus of South General Kearny Road subject to the
following conditions:
A. Attachment 2.
A: CUP1090 9
SECTION 4.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A: CUP1090 10
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Revised Conditional Use Permit No: 1090
Project Description: Addition of 7 mobile
home units to an existinq park
Assessor's Parcel No.: 923-200-006
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this conditional use permit is for the addition of
seven 17) mobile homes.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Revised
Conditional Use Permit No. 1090. The City of Temecula will promptly notify
the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of
Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to
cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the baginnlng of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Conditional Use Permit No. 1090 marked Exhibit A, or as amended
by these conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
A:CUP1090 11
10.
11.
12.
13.
1~,.
15.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section
of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated March
20, 1991, a copy of which is attached.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Environmental Health
Rancho Water District
School District
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Eastern Municipal Water District
No building permits shall be issued for any residential Iot/unlt within the
project boundary until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-
interest, provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing
measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be
deposited with the City of Temecula Department of Building and Safety as
mitigation for public library development.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on {the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) Ithe
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one-
half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay to the City all
applicable Quimby Act fees or shall provide land in lieu of fees.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
Within forty-eight {48) hours of the approval of the project, the
applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand,
Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One
Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ( $1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4( d) ( 2 ) plus the Twenty-
Five Dollar {$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the
A:CUPI090 12
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152
and lu, Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight {~8) hour
period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section
711 .q.(c).
16.
No grading or building activity shall take place until the vacation of South
General Kearny Road is completed and approved by the City Council.
Enqlneerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
17.
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: ~
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
18.
The developer shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~"x36" mylar and approved by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
19.
The developer shall submit two { 2 ) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and gsolegical
conditions of the site.
20.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
A: CUP1090 13
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
Prior to any work being performed on the private streets or drives, fees shall
be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's
Office.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
The subdlvider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall I~e
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping ~street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for
the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent
property. A copy of the recorded drainage easement shall be submitted to the
City for review.
A: CUP1090
31. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
32. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
33.
Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall
be required for review and approval by the City Engineer.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard 400 and qO1 Icurb sidewalk).
35.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~,61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
36.
improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as approved by the City Engineer.
37. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
City Engineer.
38. Construct street improvements including but not limited to curb and gutter,
A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights.
39. Private streets shall be improved with 25 feet of asphalt concrete pavement.
An offset cul-de-sac using Riverside County Standard No. 800A as a guideline
shall be designed and constructed at the terminus of the private street as
approved by the City Engineer. The minimum design turning radius shall be
38 feet.
General Kearny Road shall be improved with half street improvement plus one
12' lane within a dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard
No. 800A. Developer shall be reimbursed for these improvements by Tract
No. 23371-8. A copy of the reimbursement agreement shall be provided to the
City Engineer.
Dedicate a 25 foot easement for public utilities and emergency vehicles access
for all private streets and drives.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
A:CUP1090 15
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Buildinq and Safety Department
Heritage Mobile Home Estates lies within the Jurisdiction of Housing and
Community Development, 2038 Iowa Avenue, Riverside, CA 92507. Submit
plans on lot site preparation showing underground utilities and complete plot
plan to Housing and Community Development {HCD). All future mobile home
installations will need permits for site preparation and set up. Permits will be
issued out of the HCD office.
Provide state clearance form signed by the City Engineer prior to issuance or
installation of mobile homes.
A:CUP1090 16
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
510 WEST SAN JACINTO AVBNUE · PBRR/S, CALIFORNIA 92370
0LBN L NEWMAN
March 20, 1991
TOt City of Tamerule
Plannin~ Department
RE I CUP ~O~O Revise~ Amend #1
With respect =n =ha conditions of approval =ale=din8 the above referenced
ploc plan, the Fire Department race~m'nends ~hs followin~ fire protection measures
be prpvidad in accordance with Rive=aids county Ordinannes and/or recognized
~ire protection sCanaardel
The water mains shall be a minimum oE 5" diameter and shall be capable
of providi~ a pe~sn=£al ~ire flow QE 500 GPM ~or 2 hours ~uzation at
20 PSi residual operatin8 pressure.
approved standard fare hydrants {6'x~'ex2~') shell be Located at alternate
st=eeU inca=sections and spaced not more Char 330 feet apart i= any
dlre~cion wi~h us p~ion of ~n7 lot frontage =ore char 165 ~eet ~rom
a fire hyd:ant.
Ap~llcan;/devcloper shall furnish one espy of the water sysCem plane
c~e ~lre Dens=amen= for review. P~ans sh&11 c~uform to the ~ire hydrant
types, Ices=Ion and spaclni, and, ~he system shall meet =he fire flow
req~$remen=s. Plans a~sll be sl~ned/approved by a registered civil
en~lnesr sn~ the local ware= company wl=h ~he followln~ ce=cifica~ion;
"I car~l£y =ha= the des~Bn of the warm= system is in accordance wiuh
zhe requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Departmarc."
ApplicanC/dsveloper shall be responsible to provide or show zhere exists
conditions set forth by :he Fire Department.
Prior to the issuance of buil~ln~ permits, the developer shall deposit
with the CiCy of Tamsouls, · check or money order etual~n~ ~he sum of
$~00.00 per unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount
mus~ be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
Blue-deC reflectors shall be mounted in privaue streets and driveways to
indicate location of fire hydrants. They shell be mounted in Che middle
oE the street directly in line ~ich fire hydrants,
1090 Revised Amen~ #l
condominlums, RV perks e~d mobile home parks will be al ~ollo~st ~T~_t~pL!!
=ech co~ple~ shall have an illum~nete~ d~Sr4xmati~ representation O~ =he
actual loTout which show~ name o~ ~om~l~x, all sates=l. ~uildi~ aislecaters,
uni= numbers, and [ire hydrant !eeocions ~ithin the complex. Thlea
directories shall be · miuimu~ ~'x4' in ~{mensio~ and loca~ma nex~ :o roadway
access.
All quaaLiens reSe=dlnX :he meaninS of cun~ic~one a~all be referred ~o
~he Planning an~ Enilneerln~
RAYI~O~D H. XEO13
Chief [l=e Department Flenne=
AI . t
C.a. .P No. Io
/~R~. ~2. s-2oo-oo6
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
QUIMBY ORDINANCE
/,/,9,ec,V / ~
The amount of land to be dedicated, or fees paid, shall be based on the residential density of the subdivision.
The residential density shall be determined by multiplying the number of dwelling units by the number of
persons per unit by the ratio of the number of acres of park land required for each 1,000 persons (i.e.,. 005).
Credits given for proposed parks will be under the discretion of the Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) Director.
Whenever the actual amount of land to be dedicated is less than the amount of land required to be dedicated,
the subdivider shall pay fees for the fair market vaiue of any additional land that otherwise would have been
required to be dedicated plus 20% for offsite improvements.
For subdivisions containing 50 parcels or less only the payment of fees may be required; provided however,
that when condominium project, stock cooperative or community apartment project exceeds 50 dwelling units,
the dedication of land may be required even though the number of parcels may be less than 50.
Less than 5 Parcels
Subd'Msions containing less den five (51 parcels wll be subject to ~he following condRions: Upon the request of a
budding permit for construclion of residential structures on one or more of the parcels within four years following
approval of a tentative map, parcel map, or planned development, real etate dmm/opmmC slt~ck cooperaffve,
community apartment proiect and condominium for which a tenta~ve map or parcel map is fled, a predetermined
Quimby Act fee ~ ~he amount equal to the fair market value of requlred acreage (Plus 20% for offsite improvements)
sha/I be paid by b~e oviner of each such parcel(s) as a cond'b to the issuance of such pern~t as aub~orized by
P.~verside Comely Ord'a?ance No. 460 as amended f~rough b No. 460.93.
The following chart has been prepared to assist staff in calculating requirements of the existing Quimby
Ordinance:
Dwellin~,s T__vpe Acres Required*
l(ea) Single Family (Detached Garage) .01490
l(ea)
l(ea)
2(ca)
Single Family (Attached Garage)
Mobile home
Dwellings Units Per Structure
.01295
.01320
3 or 4(ea)
Dwelling Units Per SU'ucture
.01240
5 or More
DweLling Units Per Structure
.01170
Plus 20% for offsite improvements.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
Heritaqe Mobile Homes Estates, Ltd.
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
31130 South General Kearny Road
Temecula, CA 92390
(714) 676-5113
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
March 15, 1991
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
CUP No. 1090, Revised No. I
6. Location of Proposal:
South General Kearny Road
east of La Serena Way
Environmental Impacts
Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
A: CUP1090 17
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes Maybe N._9o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A: CUP1090 18
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ( including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
{birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildllfe habitat?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A: CUP1090 19
10.
11.
12.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existin9 noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A: CUP1090 20
15.
16.
Yes Maybe No
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? __ X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? __ __ X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __ __ X
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, b/cyclists or pedestrians? __ X
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? __ X
b. Police protection? __ X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? __ X
f. Other governmental services: __ X
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __ __ X
b. Substantial increase jn demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __ __ X
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __ __ X
A:CUP1090 21
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A: CUP1090 22
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? {A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? |A project~s
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? __
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
A: CUP1090 23
I II Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
1.8.
1 .c,d.
1.e.
1.f.
1.9.
2.a.
2.b.
3.a.
3.b.
No. The site has been mass graded under a previous permit. No
unstable earth conditions are known to exist on site.
Yes. Construction and development causes the compaction and
overcovering of the soil. Due to the relatively small scale of the
project, it will not be a significant impact on the overall community.
The project development will have to conform to City and State
standards and will be inspected for compliance with grading and
building permits which will be required prior to any construction.
No. The site has been graded and no substantial additional impact will
OCCUr,
Maybe. Grading and construction activities can increase water and
wind erosion. impacts will be mitigated by adherence to grading and
building permits.
No. No bodies of water are within close proximity to this site.
Therefore, no erosion should take place in any bodies of water due to
this project.
No. The site is relatively flat and has been graded. There are rfo
known geologic hazards on the site.
Maybe. During grading and construction activity dust, dirt and
vehicle exhaust will increase. This increase will be for a limited period
of time and will also be mitigated by adherence to proper grading and
construction activities. Grading and building permits must be obtained
prior to any construction activities to monitor compliance with City and
State standards.
No. The proposed project is for the addition of 7 mobile spaces to an
existing mobile home park and no activities are anticipated that would
cause objectionable odors.
No. The type and scale of the project is such that it should not affect
air movement.
No. The site has been previously graded and appropriate drainage
facilities have been incorporated in the design.
Maybe. The absorption rate and drainage pattern will be altered due
to development, however, the size and scale of this project will not
cause a substantial impact to the overall drainage pattern of the area.
The site has been mass graded and the current pattern will be
maintained.
A: CUP1090 24
3.c,d,e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
q-.a,b.
u,.c.
5.a,b,c.
6.b.
7.
No. The project has been designed to maintain the current existing
drainage pattern. No bodies of water are within close proximity to the
site and will not be affected by this development.
No. The project has been graded and no major additional grading is
anticipated. There should be no change in the direction of ground
water flow.
Maybe. Construction will cause overcovering of the soil which will
affect absorption rates which will affect the quantity of ground water.
This impact should be mitigated by the addition of irrigated landscaping
which should add to ground water absorption.
No. The project as proposed will not cause a major demand on the
available water supply.
No. The project is not within any known flood hazard zone.
No. The site is already graded and non-native slope planting currently
exists on site.
Maybe. The project has been designed with landscape areas. The
landscaping includes some drought tolerant native plants. The relative
small area of the project will not cause any substantial impacts to the
community.
No. The site is not currently in agricultural production and has been
graded. The site is surrounded by residential uses and golf course and
does not have a potential agricultural use.
No. The site has been previously graded which effectively eliminated
any nati~/e species on the site. The area is within the K-Rat study area
and the project will be conditionad to pay the appropriate K-Rat
mitigation fees for the accumulative impacts to the endangered species.
Maybe. Noise levels will increase for a limited time during construction.
The small scaled the project and the limited time frame of noise activity
would make this a non-significant impact.
No. The project is a proposed small addition to an existing mobile home
park and no severe noise levels are anticipated.
Yes. The project will incorporate outside lighting. The project will be
conditioned to have the lights hooded and directed away from adjoining
properties. The project shall conform to the requirements of the
Palomar Observatory regarding lighting. The required Conditions of
Approval will mitigate any impact to non-significance.
A: CUP1090 25
9.a,b.
10.a,b.
11.
12.
13.a.
13.b.
13.c,d,e.
13.f.
14.a-f.
15.a,b.
16.a-f.
17.a,b.
18.
No. The area is zoned and guidelined by the General Plan for
residential use. The project conforms to the planned uses and adjoining
development.
No. The project is a relatively small residential project and should not
cause a substantial increase in use or depletion of natural resources.
No. There is no anticipated use of materials which would cause an
explosion or release of hazardous materials. The project is at the end
of a cul-de-sac and should not cause any interference with emergency
response.
No. The project is a small residential proposal and will not affect
population distribution.
No. See Item No. 11.
No. The project is a small residential proposal and therefore will not
cause a substantial increase in vehicular movement.
Maybe. The project will require increased parking demand. The site
is designed to provide the necessary parking, as required by code, for
the proposed use.
No. See Item No. 13.a.
Maybe. Most new development causes an increase in traffic which
causes an increase in traffic hazards. These hazards will be mitigated
by the project being constructed to City and State standards as
approved by the City Engineer.
Maybe. All new development causes impacts to City services and
streets. These impacts will be mitigated by doing required
improvements and paying fees where appropriate.
No. This project is a small residential proposal and will not have a
substantial effect on energy use.
No. All required utilities are currently available within the area, This
project will only have to connect to the existing improvements.
No. The project is a small' residential proposal and will not pose a
health hazard.
No. The project does not block any designated view sheds and is
designed to meet current City standards. The project is architecturally
compatible with the adjacent existing mobile home park.
A: CUP1090 26
No. The project is a small residential proposal and will not impact
current recreational sites. The site is not designated as open space/
recreation on the SWAP.
20.a-d.
No. The site has been graded and no cultural or historical material has
been observed on site nor is there any indication that they would have
ever existed on this site.
21 .a-d.
No. This project will not have a significant environmental impact either
short or long term due to project design and the Conditions of Approval
being required for project approval.
A: CUP1090 27
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NECATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
March 15, 1991
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
A:CUP1090 28
CITY OF TEMECULA
ZONE MAP ) CASE NO. CU~ iO~
P.C. DATE/""/-i-~"; ~[
CITY OF T'!~tECULA )
VICINITY MAP
r
CASE
P.C. DATE
ITEM ~7
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: Plot Plan No. 155 and
Administrative Plot Plan No. 125 {PPA 125)
Prepared By: Steve Jiannino
Recommendation: 1. DIRECT Staff to approve PPA 125;
ADOPT Negative Declaration for
Plot Plan No. 155; and
ADOPT Resolution 91- approving
Plot Plan No. 155 based on the
Findings contained in the Staff
Report and subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Tomond Properties
Markham & Associates
16,000 square foot retail center.
Southern terminus of Bedford Court.
C-P-S
(Scenic Highway Commercial )
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-P-S (Scenic Hi9hway
Commercial )
R-2-~000 ( Multiple Family Dwellin9,
min. of ~,,000 square feet
per dwelling unit)
C-P-S (Scenic Highway
Commercial )
Interstate 15
Same
Vacant
A:PP155 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Retail Center
Condominiums
Vacant, approved
Interstate 15
Site Area:
Building Area:
Retail Area:
Restaurant Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Load Zones:
Handicapped Parking:
Mobile Gas Station
1.8 acres
16,000 sq.ft.
11,500 sq.ft.
~,500 sq.ft.
110 spaces
116 spaces
2
3 spaces
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
Plot Plan No. 155
The project site was originally approved for a motel.
The motel use is no longer being pursued. The
applicant therefore is requesting a new plot plan for
a retail center on the site.
The project was submitted to the City on August 30,
1990. The project was reviewed by the Development
Review Committee {DRC) on October 11, 1990. The
applicant was requested to provide additional
information and to redesign the project by
eliminating the dead-end parking being proposed.
The applicant redesigned the project and submitted
the additional information for a Formal Development
Review Committee meeting of March 14, 1991. The
redesigned project addressed Staff's major concerns
and is being forwarded to the Planning Commission
as a Public Hearing Item. The applicant has also
submitted the monument signs proposed for the
center in compliance with Planning Commission
request to review freeway orlentated monument
signs.
This project proposes the construction of a 16,000
square foot retail center on a 1.8 acre site located at
the southern terminus of Bedford Court, south of
South Highway 79. The site is vacant and is
surrounded by developed parcels to the north and
south with the freeway to the west and an approved
commercial project to the east.
The site is designed with a retail building of 11,500
square feet backing up to a condominium
development along the southeast portion of the site.
A:PP155 2
The building is from 10 to 12 feet from the property
line along the condominium site. This area of the
building has no windows or doors and is a maximum
height of 20, feet. With no openings in the building
along the south side, this elevation will keep all
activity out of the area between the building and the
residential project to the south. The buffer area
between the retail building and the residential
development is one of Staff's concerns. StaffIs
concerns can be mitigated by planting shrubs which
will discourage people from loitering in the area.
Staff is recommending that Kei Apple, Pyracantha,
or some other suitable shrub be planted in the area
between the retail building and the residential
development. The site also contains a free-standing
4,500 square foot restaurant that backs up to
Interstate 15. The majority of the parking is in
front of the two buildings.
The site is impacted by a drainage easement and
sewer easement that cross the site. This issue has
been addressed by relocating the sewer easement
from the southern property line to the center of the
site in order to allow the proposed retail building to
be located closer to the property line. The site
currently drains toward Interstate 15. The project
has been conditioned to receive CalTrans approvals
for any work done within their right-d-way or to
increase drainage onto the CalTrans site.
The Southwest Area Plan I SWAP) requires that the
setback along scenic highways be 50 feet. This
project proposes a building setback of only 25 feet.
This site is the only remaining developable land
between the residential development and Interstate
15 interchange with South Highway 79. The 25 foot
setback is consistent with the setback established
on the existing retail center to the north. It is
Staff's opinion that the 25 foot setback would be
sufficient in this case due to the circumstances
stated above.
Architecture
This project is designed with the contemporary
Spanish/Mediterranean theme. The building
materials consist of stucco, roof tile, ceramic tile,
exposed wood rafters, glass, and walkways. The
architecture is consistent with the existing retail
center to the north.
A:PP155 3
ANALYSIS:
Administrative Plot Plan No. 125
Administrative Plot Plan No. 125 is an application
for two free-standing monument signs for the retail
center. One of the proposed signs is a freeway
orientated sign. The Planning Commission has
requested to review all freeway orientated signs.
The freeway sign is 35 feet high and contains a sign
area of 178 square feet. The sign has been
designed with materials to match those used in the
construction of the retail center. The sign has a 20
foot high base with a 12 foot high sign area and a 3
foot top.
Staff conducted a flag test for the proposed height
and concluded that 35 feet would be an appropriate
height. The sign would be very visible when
heading south on Interstate 15, but the sign would
be barely visible when heading north on Interstate
15 due to existing landscaping and the freeway off-
ramp design. The current sign proposes a sign face
of 178 square feet. The code allows a sign of a
maximum height of 45 feet with a 150 square foot
maximum sign area. The current sign panels would
need to be a maximum of 3'6" instead of the u,'0" as
shown. The current u,'0" is probably only 3'10" due
to the spaces designed within the sign face. The
project will have to be changed to increase the
spacing to have a sign area of 3'6" per panel or a
Variance application will need to be processed for
the increased sign area. Staff is conditioning the
sign so that the sign area is a maximum of 150
square feet, thus conformance to code
requirements.
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The proposed project is consistent with the SWAP
designation and the current zoning for the site of
C-P-S. The project is consistent with commercial
development to the north and the recently approved
project to the east. Therefore, Staff finds it
probable that the project will be consistent with the
future General Plan being prepared by the City.
A:PP155 4
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
An Initial Environmental Study was performed for
this project which determined that no significant
impact would result to natural or built environment
in the City because of the Conditions of Approval
added to the project and a Negative Declaration has
been recommended for adoption.
FINDINGS:
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 155 will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law due to the fact that the proposed
commercial center is consistent with the
existing zoning and the SWAP land use
designation of Commercial.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed commercial center
is consistent with the existing zoning, the
SWAP land use designation of Commercial
and the existing development to the north.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 3L~8 and the action complies
with State Planning Laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use due to
the fact that the proposed commercial
development complies with the standards of
Ordinance No. 3~8.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval require improvements to protect the
public health and welfare.
A:PP155
5
10.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the
proposed commercial development is
consistent with the zoning ordinance and the
existing adjoining commercial development.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area due to the
fact that the surrounding properties are
developed and the project is consistent with
a development to the north.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact
that the vehicular improvements for the
proposed commercial center has been
approved by the Traffic Engineering Staff
and direct access exists to Bedford Court.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for this project due to
the fact that Conditions of Approval have
been included for this project to mitigate
against possible impacts.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project in that the easements have been
provided for as shown on the site plan
marked Exhibit A.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
DIRECT Staff to approve Administrative Plot
Plan No. 125 subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval;
A:PP155 6
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan
No. 155; and,
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approvin9 Plot
Plan No. 155, based on the analysis and
findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
OM: ks
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
Resolution
Conditions of Approval (PP 155)
Conditions of Approval ( PPA 125)
Environmental Assessment
Exhibits:
Site Plan
Exterior Elevations - Retail
Exterior Elevations - Restaurant
Landscaping Plan
Elevations - Signs
Location Map
A:PP155 7
ATTACHMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING OF PLOT PLAN NO. 155
TO CONSTRUCT A 16,000SQUARE FOOT RETAIL CENTER
ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 1.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF BEDFORD COURT AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-210-0~2
WHEREAS, Tomond Properties flied Plot Plan No. 155 in accordance with
the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances,
which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
pertaining to said Plot Plan on April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOE5 RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findin,c/s. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
~2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A:PP155 8
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
Ib)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, l hereinafter 'ISWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP an~l
meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving of
projects and taking other actions, including the issuance
of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 155 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
A: PP155 9
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30~c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
a)
The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The overall development of the land is
designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare; conforms
to the logical development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future logical
development of the surrounding property.
12) The Planning Commission, in approving of the
proposed Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 155 will be consistent with the City~s
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law due to the fact that the proposed
commercial center is consistent with the
existing zoning and the SWAP land use
designation of Commercial.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed commercial center
is consistent with the existing zoning, the
SWAP land use designation of Commercial,
and the existing development to the north.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 3~,8 and the action complies
with State Planning Laws.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use due to
A:PP155 10
e)
f)
g)
h)
j)
the fact that the proposed commercial
development complies with the standards of
Ordinance No. 3~8.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval require improvements to protect the
public health and welfare.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the
proposed commercial development is
consistent with the zoning ordinance and the
existing adjoining commercial development.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area due to the
fact that the surrounding properties are
developed and the project is consistent with
a development to the north.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact
that the vehicular improvements for the
proposed commercial center has been
approved by the Traffic Engineering Staff
and direct access exists to Bedford Court.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for this project due to
the fact that Conditions of Approval have
been included for this project to mitigate
against possible impacts.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project in that the easements have been
provided for as shown on the site plan
marked Exhibit A.
A:PP155 11
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the
proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the
Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration.
therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 155 to construct a 16,000 square foot retail center located at the southern
terminus of Bedford Court and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 922-210-042 subject
to the followin9 conditions:
A. Attachment 2.
SECTION ~,.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:PP155 12
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 155
Project Description: 16,000 square foot
retail center includinq a ~,,500 square foot
restaurant.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-210-042
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for a 11,500 square foot retail
building and a 4,500 square foot free-standing restaurant pad.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, it;s
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 155. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two ~2 ) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two |2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 155 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-d-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
A:PP155 13
11.
12.
13.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal
dated October 9, 1990, a copy of which is attached.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section
of Ordinance No. 5u,6 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated March
7, 1991, a copy of which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the CaITrans
transmittal dated March 12, 1991, a copy of which is attached.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three (3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted tothe
Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species,
and container size of the plants shall be shown. The irrigation plans shall
include separate drip or hubbier system for trees and large shrubs. Plans
shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 3~,8, Section 18.12, and shall be
accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. The landscape plans shall include
5 gallon shrubs that will discourage loitering in the area between the retail
building and the residential development, i.e., Kei Apple or Pyracantha.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten {10) feet of ah
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
A minimum of 116 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. 116 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltlc concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on ~
inches of Class II base.
A minimum of three {3) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as
shown on Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall
be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol
of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a
conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less
than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
A:PP155
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at __
or by telephone "
in addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Environmental Health
Rancho Water District
School District
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Eastern Municipal Water District
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit B and Exhibit C.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B {Color Elevations) and Exhibit G
{Materials Board).
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety
Department, a six foot high decorative block wall from the highest grade shall
be constructed along the southern boundary of the site. The required wall
and/or berm shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department
of Building and Safety and the Planning Director.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
A:PP155 15
23.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is
based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development) (the
number of single family residential units on lots which are a minimum of one-
half (1/2) gross acre in size). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
Four (~,) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as
approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project
area.
25.
Prior to the issuance of buildin9 permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Building and Safety.
26.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
27.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
28.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
29.
Within forty-eight {118) hours of the approval of the project, the
applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand,
Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One
Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711 .~,( d )(2 ) plus the Twenty-
Five Dollar l$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152
and 1~, Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (~,8) hour
period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Plannin9 Department
the check required above, the approval for the project 9ranted heroin shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section
711 .~(c).
Department of Buildinq ~, Safety
30.
Provide for a two-hour area separation wall with parapet or equal on Building
"A" retail stores.
A:PP155 16
31. Lighting on site and located on structures shall comply with Mount Palomar
Lighting Ordinance No. 655.
32.
Submit a Geological Report with structural plans at time of Plan Review
process.
School fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School District prior to permit
issuance.
Provide clearance to the City for utilities which encroach across proposed
sewer, easement or provide separate path for utilities out of easement on plot
plan.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
35.
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
36.
The developer shall submit four I~) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2~,"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
37.
The developer shall submit four {~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A:PP155 17
38.
3~.
40.
41.
42.
43.
u,5.
46.
47.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially
complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
A permit shall be required from CalTrans for any work within the following
right-of-way.
Interstate 15
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping {street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A:PP155 18
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
49.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
50.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains as determined by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
51.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
5oils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
52.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
53.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City~s C.A.T.V.
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V.
Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
55.
Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall
be required for review and approval by the City Engineer.
56.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard 400 and ~,01 (curb sidewalk).
57.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
58.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along all public street frontages in
accordance with Riverside County Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
59.
Existing sewer easement shall be vacated and relocated as directed by the City
Engineer.
60.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Nagative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. if an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
A:PP155 19
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
A:PP155 20
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Administrative Plot Plan No. 125
Planning Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
1. The appearance of the sign shall conform substantially with that shown in
Exhibit A, except the sign display area shall be a maximum of 150 square feet.
2. The applicant shall obtain required building permits from the Department of
Building and Safety.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be
approved by the Planning Department around the base of the sign.
This approval shall be used within one year of the approval date; otherwise
it shall become null and void, and a new application will be required.
A:PP155 21
Backqround
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
ATTACHMENT ~
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Location of Proposal:
Tomond Properties
P. O. Box 2159
Escondido, CA 92025
(619) 489-0123
March 15, 1991
CITY OF TEMECULA
Plot Plan No. 155, Terminus of
Bedford Court, South of Hiqhway 79
II
Environmental Impacts
( Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
A:PP155 22
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltatlon, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslldes,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A:PP155 23
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ( including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A:PP155 24
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticldes,
chemicals or radiation ) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Ceneration of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A:PP155 25
Yes Maybe N__o
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? __ X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? __ __ X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __ __ X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? __ X
lu,. Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? __ X
b. Police protection? __ X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? __ X
f. Other governmental services: __ X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __ __ X
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __ __ X
16. Utilities, Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __ __ X
A:PP155 26
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard ( excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A: PP155 27
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? ( A project~s
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? __
Yes Maybe No
X
X
A:PP155 28
Ill Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation - Plot Plan No. 155
1o8.
1 .c,d.
1.e.
1.f.
1.g.
2.a.
2.b.
2.c.
3.a.
3.b.
No. The site has been mass graded under a previous permit. No
known unstable earth conditions are known to exist on site.
Yes. Construction and development causes the compaction and
overcovering of the soil. Due to the relatively small scale of the project
it will not be a significant impact on the overall community. The project
development will have to conform to City and State standards and will
be inspected for compliance with grading and building permits which
will be required prior to any construction.
No. The site has been mass graded and no substantial additional impact
will occur.
Maybe. Grading and construction activities can increase water and
wind erosion. Impact will be mitigated by adherence to grading and
building permits.
No. No bodies of water are within close proximity to this site.
Therefore, no erosion should take place in any bodies of water due to
this project.
No. The site is relatively flat and has been mass graded. There are n'o
known geologic hazards on the site.
Maybe. During grading and construction activities; dust, dirt and
vehicle exhaust will increase. This increase will be for a limited period
of time and will also be mitigated by adherence to proper grading and
construction activities. Grading and building permits must be obtained
prior to any construction activities to monitor compliance with City and
State standards.
No. The proposed project is for a relatively small retail center and no
activities are anticipated that would cause objectionable odors.
No. The type and scale of the project is such that it should not effect
air movement.
No. The site has been previously graded and appropriate drainage
facilities have been incorporated in the design.
Maybe. The absorption rate and drainage plans will be altered due to
development. The size and scale of this project will not cause a
substantial impact to the overall drainage pattern of the area.
The site has been mass graded and the current pattern will be
maintained.
A:PP155 29
3.c,d,e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
q..a,b.
q..c.
5.a,b,c.
6.8.
6.b.
No. The project has been designed to maintain the current existing
drainage pattern. No bodies of water are within close proximity to the
site and will not be affected by this development.
No. The project has been mass graded and no major additional grading
is anticipated. There should be no change in the direction of ground
water flow.
Maybe. Construction will cause overcovering of the soil which will
affect absorption rates which will affect the quantity of ground water.
Any impact should be mitigated by the addition of irrigated landscaping
which should add to the ground water absorption rate.
No. The project, as proposed, will not cause a major demand on the
available water supply.
No. The project is not within any known flood hazard zone.
No. The site is already mass graded and no plants currently exist on
site.
Maybe. The project has been designed to add landscape areas. The
landscaping will include some drought tolerant native plants. The
selective small scale of the project will not cause any substantial impacts
to the community. ~
No. The site is not currently in agricultural production and has been
mass graded. The site is surrounded by residential and commercial
uses and does not have a potential agricultural use.
No. The site has previously been mass graded which effectively
eliminated any native species on the site. The area is within the K-Rat
Study Area, and the project will be conditioned to pay the appropriate
K-Rat Mitigation Fees for the accumulative impacts to the endangered
species.
Maybe. During construction activities, noise levels will increase for a
limited time. The retail center is designed to provide a ten {10) foot
buffer of only landscaping between the center and the residential use
to the south. The back of the building will provide an adequate noise
buffer.
No. The project is a proposed small retail center and no severe noise
levels are anticipated.
A:PP155 30
9.a,b.
lO.a,b.
11.
12.
13.a.
13.b.
13.c,d,e.
13.f.
l~,.a,b,c.
e,f.
14.d.
15.a,b.
16.a-f.
Yes. The project will incorporate outside parking lot lighting. The
project will be conditioned to have the lights hooded and directed away
from adjoining properties. The project shall conform to the
requirements of the Palomar Observatory regarding lighting. The
required conditions of approval will mitigate any significant adverse
impacts.
No. The area is zoned and indicated on SWAP as a Commercial use.
The project conforms to the planned uses.
No. The project is a relatively small retail center and should not cause
a substantial increases in the use or depletion of natural resources.
No. There is no anticipated use of materials which would cause an
explosion or release of hazardous materials. The project is at the end
of a cul-de-sac and should not cause any inteFference with emergency
response.
No. The project is a small retail center and will not effect population
distribution.
No. See No. 11.
No. The project is a small retail center and therefore will not cause a
substantial increase in vehicular movement.
Maybe. The project will require increased parking demand. The site
is designed to provide the necessary parking, as required by code, for
the proposed use.
No. See No. 13. a.
Maybe. Most new developments cause an increase in traffic which
causes an increase in traffic hazards. These hazards will be mitigated
by the project being constructed to City and State standards as
approved by the City Engineer.
Maybe. All new developments causes impacts to City services and
streets. These impacts will be mitigated by doing required
improvements and paying fees where appropriate.
No. This project is a commercial project and will not impact parks or
recreational uses.
No. This project is a small retail center and will not have a substantial
effect on energy use.
No. All required utilities are currently available within the area. This
project will only have to connect to the existing improvements.
A:PP155 31
17.a,b.
18.
19o
20.a.b.
21 .a-d.
No. The project is a small retail center and will not pose a health
hazard.
No. The project does not block any designated view sheds and is
designed to meet current City standards. The project is architecturally
compatible with the adjacent existing commercial center.
No. The project is a small retail center and will not impact current
recreational sites. The site is not designated as Open
Space/Recreational on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP).
No. The site has been mass graded and no cultural or historical
material have been observed on site nor is there any indication that any
materials would have ever existed on this site.
No. This project will not have a significant environmental impact either
short or long term due to project design and the conditions of approval
being required for project development.
A: PP155 32
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
March 15, 1991
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
A:PP155 33
II VZV']d/S~IH~ IdVd ~ l i ,"
II VZV'~d IS~1:10
II VZV~d IB3BO BVd .....
/
CITY OF TI~IECULA )
VICINITY MAP
CASE ,0. PP
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA )
ZONE MAP )
CASE NO. PP I
P.c. oAT,: zl'l~
ITEM &~8
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1
Prepared By: Oilvet Mujica
Recommendation: 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
approving Plot Plan No 18,
Revision No. 1.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Palmilia Associates
Coombs-Mesquita, Inc.
Construct a L~7,~,12 square foot shopping center on
a 5.1 acre site.
Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and
Lyndie Lane.
C-1/C-P ICeneral Commercial/Restricted
Commercial )
North: R -3-~000
South: R -3-~000
East: C-1/C-P
West: C - P
Not applicable
Vacant
General Commercial
No. of Buildings
No. of Building Pads
No. of Acres
Total Square Feet
No. of Parking Spaces
Building Height
1
3
5.1
47,412
289
45 feet
A:PP18-A
BACKGROUND:
On November 19, 1990, the Planning Commission
approved Plot Plan No. 18, which was a proposal to
develop the subject 5.1 acre site with 0,6,613 square
foot shopping center, as follows:
Building "A" - Restaurant (Pad)
Building "B" - Bank (Pad)
Building "C" - Retail
6,500 sq.ft.
0,,831 sq.ft.
35,282 sq.ft.
On March 11, 1991, the applicant submitted Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 requesting to increase
the total square footage of the shopping center from
~,6,613 to 0,7,0,12.
On April 0,, 1991, Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1,
was reviewed by the Formal Development Review
Committee (DRC); and, it was determined that the
project, as designed, can be adequately conditloned
to mitigate the DRC's concerns. The DRC has
forwarded a recommendation of approval subject to
conditions.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Location
This project is located on the northwest corner of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane, which is
between Ynez and Moraga Roads.
Project
Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 is a proposal to
develop the subject 5.1 acre site with a 0,7,0,12
square foot shopping center, as follows:
Building "A" - Restaurant (Pad)
Building "B" - Restaurant (Pad)
Building "C" - Retail
7,203 sq.ft.
6,300 sq.ft.
33,909 sq.ft.
The proposed development has been designed in
accordance with the standards of the C-1/C-P
( General Commercial/Restricted Commercial ) zone.
Staff has noted that under this request {Plot Plan
No. 18, Revision No. 1 ), Buildings "A" and "B" are
proposed as building pads only at this time.
Therefore, Staff recommends that an approval for
Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 should be for the
site plan design (including Building pads "A"
and"B" ) and the construction of Building "C" only;
A:PP18-A 2
and that Buildings "A" and "B'' should be required
to file a separate plot plan application for approval
by the Planning Commission, in order to provide a
means of review of the actual buildings.
ANALYSIS:
Traffic Impacts
The Transportation Engineering Staff has reviewed
and accepted the findings and mitigation measures
as specified in the Traffic Analysis prepared for
Plot Plan No. 18; and has determined that the
proposed project will have a minimal impact to the
existing road system and given the proposed
mitigation measures, there will be no adverse
unmitigable significant traffic impacts resulting
from the development of this project. The
Engineerin9 Staff has also determined that the
proposed revision does not substantially increase
the traffic impacts identified for Plot Plan No. 18.
Access and Circulation
Access into the proposed development from Rancho
California Road is provided with a forty (40') fodt
wide driveway; and from Lyndie Lane with a thirty
(30') foot wide driveway.
An internal, twenty-eight ~28~ ) foot wide driveway
will provide access to the required off-street
parking, as well as the proposed twenty-four (2Lt')
foot wide driveway isles.
Parkinq
Two hundred, eighty-nine (289) parking spaces are
provided, which exceeds the required 284 parking
spaces under the Development Code I Section
18.12), as follows:
Buildin9 "A" (Restaurant):
Building "B" (Bank):
Building "C" I Retail):
75
65
lu,4
Total Parking Spaces Required:
284
A:PP18-A 3
Project Desiqn
The proposed revision does not include
modifications to the previously approved building
architecture, colors or materials.
Landscapinq
The proposed revision does not include
modifications to the previously approved landscape
design.
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The proposed project is consistent with the SWAP
Land Use Designation of Commercial, which includes
retail and restaurant uses. )n addition, Staff finds
it probable that this project will be consistent with
the new General Plan when it is adopted.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
An Initial Study was performed for Plot Plan No. 18
which determined that although the proposed
project could have a significant effect on th~
environment, no significant impact would result to
the natural or built environment in the City because
the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and a
Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning
Commission. Since Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No.
1 will not result in additional impacts to the
environment, the Planning Department Staff has
determined that the project is exempt from CEQA
under Section 15061 (b) {3).
FINDINGS:
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 will be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which
will be completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State law, due to the fact
that the proposed commercial center is
consistent with the existing zoning and the
SWAP land use designation of commercial.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due
A:PP18-A 4
to the fact that the proposed commercial
center is consistent with the existing zoning.
the SWAP land use designation of commercial,
and the permitted uses of the surrounding
area.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed uses comply with
Ordinance No. 3q8 and the action complies
with State planning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed commercial
center complies with the standards of
Ordinance No. 30,8.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that the
proposed commercial center is consistent with
Ordinance No. 3u,.8.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed use is compatible with
the surrounding land uses.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the Conditions of Approval include
mitigation measure relative to traffic.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for Plot Plan No. 18.
A: PP18-A 5
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
10.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
11.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No 91 -
approving Plot Plan No. 18, Revision
No. 1 subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
OM:mb
Attachments:
R esol ution
Conditions of Approval
Exhibits
A. Site Plan
B. Elevations
C. Floor Plans
Planning Commission Staff Report
Idated November 19, 1990)
Planning Commission Minutes
(dated November 19, 1990)
Large Scale Plans
A:PP18-A 6
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 18,
REVISION NO. 1, TO DEVELOP A 47,412 SQUARE FOOT
SHOPPING CENTER CONTAINING A 33,909SQUARE FOOT
RETAIL BUILDING AND BUILDING PADS FOR A 7,203
SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT AND A 8,500SQUARE FOOT
RESTAURANT ON A 5.1 ACRE 51TE LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND LYNDIE LANE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-310-011.
WHEREAS, Palmilia Associates filed Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. I in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Plot Plan;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Plot Plan on April
15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WH EREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission Hearing, the Commission
approved said Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECT ION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
A:PP18-A 7
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
~a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
~C)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
{1 ) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
( 2 ) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 18, Revision No. 1 proposed will be
consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
A:PP18-A 8
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
a) The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The overall development of the land is
designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare; conforms
to the logical development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future logical
development of the surrounding property.
(2) ThePlanningCommission, inapprovingtheproposed
Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 will be consistent
with the City~s future General Plan, which
will be completed in a reasonable time and ih
accordance with State law, due to the fact
that the proposed commercial center is
consistent with the existing zoning and the
SWAP land use designation of commercial.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due
to the fact that the proposed commercial
center is consistent with the existing zoning,
the SWAP land use designation of commercial,
and the permitted uses of the surrounding
area o
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed uses comply with
Ordinance No. 3L~8 and the action complies
with State planning laws.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
A:PP18-A 9
to the fact that the proposed commercial
center complies with the standards of
Ordinance No. 3u,8.
e)
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval include mitigation measures.
f)
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that the
proposed commercial center is consistent with
Ordinance No. 3L~8.
g)
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed use is compatible with
the surrounding land uses.
h)
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the Conditions of Approval include
mitigation measure relative to traffic.
i)
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for Plot Plan No. 18.
j)
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
k)
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
A:PP18-A 10
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for Plot Plan No. 18 indicates that although
the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in
the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 19, 1990. Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 will not result in additional impacts to the environment.
Therefore, the project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15061(b)(3).
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Resolution.
SECTION ~,. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:PP18-A 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 18, Revision No. 1
Project Description: ~,7,~,12 Square Foot
Shoppinq Center on 5.1 Acres
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-031-011
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a 1~7,u,12
square foot shopping center containing a 33,909 square foot retail building;
and building pads only for a 7,203 square foot restaurant l Building "A" ) and
a 6,300 square foot restaurant (Building "B") on a 5.1 acre site.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 18, Revision No. 1. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City df
Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to
cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two J 2 ) years of the original approval date
(November 19, 1990); otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is
meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval
within the two J2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to
completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval. This approval shall expire on November 19, 1992.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 marked Exhibit A, or as amended
by these conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
A:PP18-A 12
10.
11.
12.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three (3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department of approval. The location, number, genus, species. and
container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements
of Ordinance No. 3~,8, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
A minimum of 289 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3L~8. 289 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on ~,
inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 5 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit A. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain
on steel. beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of
Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height
if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional plans shall
be submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
A:PP18-A 13
13.
1~,.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit B.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B {Color Elevations ).
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
No outdoor storage or trash, except the designated trash containers, shall be
permitted. All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of
occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be
made with masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external
view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with
Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which i's
based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should
Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation
Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the
applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
18 Class III bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as
approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project
area.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
A:PP18-A 1~
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
25.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests. and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal for building permit, enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section
66~,62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer
of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the project. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal
report obtained by the developer, at the developer's cost. The appraiser
shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
26.
A plot plan application for the development of Buildings "A" and "B" shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission prior to the
issuance of any building and/or grading permit.
27.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
28.
A minimum of four ~4) loading spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 18.13, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348.
Riverside County Fire Department
With respect to the Conditions of Approval regarding the above referenced plot plan,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
29.
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 5~6.
30.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2,250 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
31.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system
16"x~"x2 1/2x2 1/2), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet
from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular
travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrantis) in the system.
A:PP18-A 15
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
4O.
41.
u,2.
43.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types,
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of
the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the
Riverside County Fire Department."
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
of 1,500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the buildingl s) . A statement that the building{ s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building{ s) must be area separated into
square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section
505(e) of the Uniform Building Code.
A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must
appear on the title page of the building plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code. Low-level exit signs, where exit signs are required by
Section 3314l A ).
Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This
amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design. construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
A:PP18-A 16
Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system. Contact a certified fire
protection company for proper placement. Plans must be approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning
and Engineering Staff.
Health Department
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 6 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. Prior to
building plan submittal, the following items will be requested:
"Will-serve" letters from the water and sewering agencies.
If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the
Environmental Health Services Hazardous Materials Management Branch (Jon
Mohoroski, 358~5055), will be required indicating that the project has been
cleared for:
Underground storage tanks.
Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185).
Waste reduction management.
Buildinq and Safety Department
The applicant shall fill out an application for final inspection. Allow two (2)
weeks processing time to obtain all required clearances prior to final
inspection.
Enqineering Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer, or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
A:PP18-A 17
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
Street improvement plans including parkway trees and street lights prepared
by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be
required for all public streets prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit.
Final plans and profiles shall show the location of existing utility facilities
within the right-of-way.
The developer shall provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of plans.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
Concentrated dralnageflows shall not cross sldewalks. Under sidewalk drains
shall be installed to City Standards.
The developer shall submit four (4) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
The developer shall submit four ~4) prints of a comprehensive grading plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of
building permits.
A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City
Engineer for review and approval. This study shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and shall include existing, interim, and proposed
conditions, including hydrolegy and hydraulic calculations. The drainage
study shall also address the capacity of existing downstream systems within
Parcel Map No. 23687, and a secondary overland drainage escape route.
Provide a letter from the property owner of Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 23687
that they will accept the proposed drainage into their property or provide a
storm drain system along the northeast property line that will discharge the
site drainage onto Lyndie Lane.
A:PP18-A 18
58.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
if the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
59.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
60.
As determined from the drainage study, the developer shall construct or
enlarge offsite drainage facilities to mitigate any increase or diversion of
existing flows from the project site into adjacent downstream properties.
Adequate drainage easements shall be secured if needed. Mitigation shall be
as directed by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
61. All work done within the City right-of-way shall have an encroachment permit.
62.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
63.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
65.
Lyndie Lane shall be improved with a minimum 37 feet of part width street
improvements within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County
Standard No. 111 156'/78').
66.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the ElR/Nagative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
A:PP18-A 19
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated lassuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
67.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
68.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for Lyndie Lane and Rancho California
Road with transitions, and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
69.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Lyndie Lane and shall be included in the street improvement plans
with the second plan check submittal.
70.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer and shown on the street
improvement plans along Rancho California Road from Lyndie Lane east t'o
Moraga Road.
71.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
72.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved signing and striping plan.
73.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane shall be installed
and operational per the City requirements, special provisions, and the
approved traffic signal plan.
All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the City requirements
and the approved plan.
75.
The developer shall be responsible for constructing the raised median on
Rancho California Road from Via Las Coilhas east to Lyndie Lane.
76.
No median break for the main driveway on Rancho California Road shall be
provided.
A:PP18-A 20
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
The eastbound to northbound left turn pocket on Rancho California for Lyndie
Lane shall be designed and constructed to provide a 120 foot transition and
200 feet of storage capacity.
The center line of the driveway access from Lyndie Lane shall be 285 +/- feet
from the center line of Rancho California Road.
The developer shall design and construct half width street improvements
including but not limited to curb, gutter, center median and asphaltic
concrete paving for the south side of Rancho California Road west of Lyndie
Lane from existing improvements easterly through the intersection, providing
an adequate transition to match existing improvements as approved by the
City Engineer.
In the event that the improvements on the south site of Rancho California Road
from existing curb and gutter easterly through the intersection with Lyndie
Lane are not already constructed by the Margarita Villages Benefit District
prior to occupancy, the developer shall construct these required off-site
improvements on Rancho California Road as approved by the City Engineer.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the
full cost of the design and construction of these road improvements.
The developer shall design and construct the signal at the intersection of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane and may enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the City for ~8% of the total cost of this signal from the future
development of the 6.12 acre parcel to the south of this intersection which may
utilize this signal for access as specified in the addendum to the Traffic Study
dated October 9, 1990 prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain and Associates.
A:PP18-A 21
It
j, jl i
I I iI
Case
Prepared
Recommendation:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
November 19, 1990
Plot Plan No. 18
Lot Line Adjustment No. 9
Oilvet Mujica
1. Adopt Negative Declaration
2. Approval
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Palmilia Associates
Coombs-Mesquita, Inc.
Construct a 0,6,613 square foot shopping center on
a 5.1 acre site.
Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and
Lyndie Lane.
C-I/C-P (Ger~eral Commercial/Restricted
Commercial )
North: R -3-~000
South: R -3-qO00
East: C-1/C-P
West: C - P
Not applicable
Vacant
General Commercial
No. of Buildings:
No. of Building Pads:
No. of Acres:
Total Square Feet:
No. of Parking Spaces:
Building Height:
1
3
5.1
0,6,613
286
0,5 feet
STAFFRPT\PP18 1
BACKGROUND: Status
Plot Plan No. 18 was submitted to the City of
Temecula on April 27, 1990.
On June lu,, 1990, this project was reviewed by the
Preliminary Development Review Committee t Pre-
DRC) in order to informally evaluate the project and
address any concerns, as well as suggesting
posslbie modifications. The comments by the Pre-
DRC included the following:
1. Traffic impacts
2. Circulation
3. Off-Site Improvements
~,. Grading
5. Building Pads A and B
6. Loading
Subsequent to the Pre-DRC meeting, Staff met with
the applicant to discuss possible design .
modifications in order to address the Pre-DRC's
concerns.
On September 27, 1990, Plot Plan No. 18 was
reviewed by the Formal Development Review
Committee {DRC); and, it was determined that the
prc~ect, as designed, can be adequately conditioned
to mitigate the DRC's concerns. The DRC has
forwarded a recommendation of approval subject to
condFtlonS.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Location
This project is located on the northwest corner of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane, which is
between Ynez and Moraga Roads.
Proiect
Plot Plan No. 18 is a proposal to develop the subject
5.1 acre site with a u,6,613 square foot shopping
center, as follows:
Building "A" - Restaurant
Building "B" - Bank
Building "C" - Retail
6,500 sq.ft.
u,,831 sq.ft.
35,282 sq.ft.
STAFFRPT\PP18 2
The proposed development (site plan and Building
"C") has been designed in accordance with the
standards of the C-I/C-P (General
Commercial/Restricted Commercial) zone.
Staff has noted that under this request (Plot Plan
No. 18), Buildings "A" and ."B" are proposed as
buiidlng pads o~ly at this time. Therefore, Staff
recommends that an approval for Plot Plan No. 18
shouki be for the site plan design (including
Building Pads "A" and "B" ) and the construction of
Building "C" only; and that Buildings "A" and "B"
should be required to rite a separate plot plan
application for approval by the Planning
Commission, in order to provide a means of review
of the actual bultdlngs.
ANALYSIS:
Traffic Impacts
The Transportation Engineering Staff has reviewed
and accepted the findings and mitigation measures
as specified in the Traffic Analysis prepared for
Plot Plan No. 18; and has determined that the
proposed project will have a minimal impact to the
existing road system and given the proposad
mitigation measures, there will be no adverse
unmitigable significant traffic impacts resulting
from the development of this project.
Access and Circulation
Access into the proposed develepment from Rancho
California Road is provided with a forty (t0') foot
wide driveway; and from Lyndie Lane with a thirty
130' ) foot wide driveway.
An internal, twenty-eight ( 28' ) foot wide driveway
will provide acc~ to the required off-street
parking, as well as the proposed twenty-four (2~,')
foot wide driveway isles.
Although both the Engineering and Traffic
Engineering Staff have determined that the
applicant~s proposed acc~ and circulation are
accept-hie, the Planning Staff is concerned with the
proposed drive-thru for future Building Pad
due to its potential conflict with the driveway from
Lyndie Lane and the proposed loading dock for
Building "C".
STAFFRPT\PP18 3
Parking
Two hundred, eighty-six 1286)parking sparP~ are
provided, which exceeds the required 260 parking
spaces under the Development Code { 5ectlon
18.12), as follows:
Building "A" I Restaurant):
Building "B" ( Bank ):
Building "C" (Retail):
77
18
165
Total Parking Spaces Required:
260
Loading
According to Section 18.13 of the Development
Code, based on the total square footage of q6,613,
the proposed project is required to provide four
loading spaces. However, the appllcant~s proposal
provides only one I1 ) loading space. Therefore,
the appllcant must provide three 13) additional
loading spaces.
This issue was discussed at the DRC meeting; at
which time, the applicant indicated that since most
of the deliveries are provided with utility type
vehicles li.e., UPS, Federal Expr~, etc.) that
can adequately park in the standard parking
spaces, the project did not warrant additional
designated loading spaces.
In addition to the fact that the Development Code
specifically requires four I u, ) loading spac~ for this
project, Staff is concerned with the potential
number of delivery vehicles that could occupy the
customer designated parking spacE, at one time, in
which Staff has noted the potential for twenty-
seven 127 ) different tenants on the site.
Therafore, Staff would suggest that the applicant
should provide three (3) additional loading spaces,
this could be accomplished by converting six i6) of
the standard parking spaces.
Gradinq and Landform Alteration
The subject property slopes down towards the north
from Rancho California Road with a grade
differential of approximately forty J ~,0* ) feet. The
existing grade, along Rancho California Road, is
approximately ten ~10t) fee above the street.
STAFFRPT\PP18 ~
As proposed, the project requires a ma~ grading of
the subject property in order to provide a level
site. With this, the proposed floor elevation are
between approximately twenty ( 20' ) to thirty ( 30' )
feet above the adjoining northeast and northwest
properties. As a result of the proposed grading, a
twelve 112') foot high crib wall is proposed along
Lyndie Lane.
Erosion Control
All graded slopes are proposed to be planted with
Disneyland ice Plant, at 12" on centers, or another
approved ground cover. In addition, twenty-eight
~28) 15 gai|on red ironbark trees will be planted, as
well as the following shrubs: Indian Hawthorn
{17), Mock Orange 922) and Xylosma 168). All
slopes wlil have permanent irrigation systems.
Crib Wail Plantinq
The applicant proposes the following:
Plant every other crib wall cell with two (2) rooted
cuttings of Lonlcera Japonica - Japanese
Honeysuckle from fiats along the entire crib walls.
In .addition, p|ant at top and bottoa~ of crib wails
with one (1) gallon Ficus Pumila - Creeping Fig at
8'-0" on center spacing. Crib wall planting will
have permanent irrigation systems.
Project Desiqn
The contemporary architectural style of Building
"C" features a multi-level roof and panpat design,
along with a pedestrian arcade which is provided
through the use of arches and columns.
The proposed building utilizes the following
materials:
Exterior Stucco - light l Pebble) and medium
{ Desert Wind) tan.
2. 2-Piece Mission Tile - Custom Blend.
3. Natural Stone.
Mexican "Mission" Wall Tile.
STAFFRPT\PP18 5
5. Accent Wall Tiles Aquamarine and
Lavender.
6. Aluminum Storefront - White Finish.
7. Wood French Doors - P.ainted White.
8. Fabric Awnings - Aquamarine.
After reviewing the applicant~s exterior elevations.
Staff has determined that the proposed project
design is compatible with the surrounding
commercial developments and will not be visually
detrimental to the neighboring residential
properties.
Landst. ape
Landscaping is provided throughout the site. in
which the proposed 29~ |andscaping for the site
exceeds the required 10% under the Development '
Code. Staff has determined that the proposed
landscape design is acceptable. Staff has noted
that Building Pads "A" and "B" will be hydroseeded
with turf until such pads are developed. in
addition. a detailed |andscape plan will be submitted
for approval by the Planning Department prior to
the issuance of building permits.
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The proposed project is consistent with the SWAP
Land Use Designation of Commercial. which includes
retail. bank. and restaurant uses. In addition.
Staff finds it probable that this project will be
consistent with the new General Plan when it is
adopted.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
An Initial Study was performed for this project
which determined that although the proposed
project could have a significant effect on the
environment. no significant impact would result to
the natural or built environment in the City because
the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project. and a
Negative Declaration has been recc,,,,ended for
adoption.
STAFFRPT\PP18 5
FINDINGS:
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 18 will be consistent with the City's
future General Ran, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
The proposed use or action compiles with
State planning and zoning laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, acc-~% and intensity of use.
The project as designed and condltioned will
not adversely affect the pubilc health or
welfare.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties.
The proposal Will not have an adverse affect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area.
The project has acceptable acc*~ to a
dediceted right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic.
10.
The project as designed and condltloned will
not adversely affect the built or netural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for this project.
The design of the pro}oct and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
STAFFRPT\PP18 7
11.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
Lot Line Adjustment No. 9 Discussion
During their review of Plot Plan No. 18, the
Engineering Department Staff noted a discrepancy
in the westerly property boundary, in which a lot
line ad}uslu~ent approval is required by the
Planning Commission prior to the Commission's
approval of Plot Plan No. 18.
Lot Line Adjustment No. 9 has been reviewed by the
Engineering Department Staff and has been
determined to comply with the Subdivision Map Act.
In addition, the Planning Departnent Staff has also
reviewed Lot Line Adjustment No. 9 and has
determined that it meets all the requirements set
forth in Ordinance u,60, Section 18.1.
Environmental Determination
According to Section 15305(c) of the California
Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA ), Lot Line
Adjustment No. 9 is Class 5 Categorically Exempt.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for
Plot Plan No. 18, and
Adopt Resolution No. 90-
Approving Plot Plan No. 18 and Lo~
Line Adjustment No. 9; based on the
analysis and findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
OM: ks
Attachments:
1. Resokrtion
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Environmental Assessment
u,. Exhibits
A. Site Plan
B. Exterior Elevations
5. Large Scale Plans
STAFFRPT\PP18 8
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
Palmilia Associates
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
41530 Enterprise Circle South, Ste. 206
Temecula, CA 92390
(71q) 676-7177
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
May 21, 1990
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
5. Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Plot Plan No. 18
6. Location of Proposal:
Northwest corner of R ancho Cal iforr~ ia
Road and Lyndie Lane
Environmental impacts
Explanations of all answers are provided on attached Sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
'changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 1
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslide,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or reglonally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbldity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 2
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species-of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 3
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
Exposure of people to severe noise '
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances ~ including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticicles,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a denand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 q
15.
16.
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __ __
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, b/cyclists or pedestrians? X
Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? X
b. Police protection? X
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? X
f. Other governmental services: __ __
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __ __
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __ __
Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
aRerations to the following utilities:
a. Power or' natural gas? __ __
Yes Maybe
X
No
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFR PT\PP18 5
17.
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d, Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard l excludlng
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 6
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
'to degi'ade the quality of the
environment, substantlaily reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? I A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively briof,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may .be relatively small,
but where the offect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse offects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
STAFFRPT\PP18 7
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
Earth
1.a,c.
1.b.
1.d.
1.f.
1.g.
Air
2.b.c.
No. However. development on the site will require a substantial amount
of grading and an overall change in topography will occur. Cut and fill
slopes will occur as a result of the extensive grading. This impact is
not considered significant. Manufactured slope will have to be properly
Iandscaped.
Yes. All development disrupts the soil profile to some degree and
results in soil displacement. compaction and overcovering. Further
analysis will determine if additional analysis will determine if mitigations
are required.
No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the site.
Maybe. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the
construction phase and remain high until disturbed areas are
replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and significant ·
but will be mitigated through replanting vegetation and use of watering
trucks and hydro-seeding disturbed areas after grading. After
construction of the project, water run-off is likely to increase due.to
the addition of impermeable surfaces. Appropriate drainage control
devices will have to be approved through the Engineering Department
and will have to be designed in accordance with Temecula~s standards
and the conditions of approval.
No. The subject site is not located near any channel, lake or ocean that
would be impacted by deposition or erosion.
No. the subject site is not located within a fault hazard zone.
liquefaction or subsidence area according to the Riverside County
General Plan Geologic Map.
Yes. The addition of approximately 1&6,613 square feet of commercial
space will generate a significant amount of new vehicle traffic to the site
and area. The vehicle traffic will increase the amount of carbon
monoxide and particulete emissions in the area. The proposed project
will not by itself deteriorate the local areais or regional air quality, but
will add to the cumulative impact on air quality due to the substantial
growth in the area.
No. The proposed project will not create any objectionable odors or
alter the areams climate.
STAFFRPT\PP18 8
Water
3oa,d*e.
3.b,cj.
3.f.
3.h.
3.i.
Plant Life
~,.a-d.
Animal Life
5.a-c.
Noise
6.a.
6.b.
No. The proposed project will not impact any body of water.
Yes Development of the subject site will increase the amount of
impermeable surfaces which will decrease the amount of water absorbed
into the ground which will reduce the amount of ground water. Due to
the vast amount of existing ground water in the area, this impact is
considered insignificant.
No. Flood waters will continue to be directed to the streets and flood
channels. Drainage plans for the site will have to meet the
requirements of the City~s Engineer.
No. The proposed project will not alter the rate of flow of cjround
water.
No. The proposed project will not significantly affect the public water
supply.
No. The Riverside County General Plan Flood Management Map does not .
designate the site in a hazardous area.
No. Although the development of the site will remove any of the plant
species that currently exist on the site, no unique, rare or endangered
species should be affected. New species of plants will be introduced to
the site as part of the lands~,ne requirements for the projecL The
addition of the new species 'is not considered a negative impact. The
site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes.'
No. The proposed project is located in an area that has been
experiencing urbanizatlon for a number of years. It is anticipated that
the only animal llfe on or in the vicinity of the site includes squirrels,
rabbits, lizards and other common animals. It is highly unlikely that
an endangered specie habitaces the site.
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during
construction. Long-term noise impacts will occur due to increased
traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since
the surrounding land uses are not noise sensitive.
No. Severe noise will not be generated by the proposed project.
STAFFRPT\PP18 9
Liqht and Glare
Maybe. The proposed project is located within the Mt. Palomar
Observatory Street Lighting Policy Area which recommends the use of
low pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lights to help avoid interference
with the Mt. Palomar telescope known as "skyglo.w". The use of LPSV
lights will reduce the light and glare produced by the proposed project.
Land Use
No. The Southwest Area Plan designates the subject site for commercial
development.
Natural Resources
No. The proposed commercial use will not increase the consumption rate
of any natural or non-renewable natural resource.
Risk of Upset
10.a-b.
No. The proposed commercial uses on the subject site will not require '
the use of any hazardous substances. During construction, it should
not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with
emergency vehicles.
Population
11.
No. The proposed 46,613 square foot commercial facility will generate
some jobs but not a significant amount to alter the area~s population.
Housing
12.
No. The proposed 0,6,613 square foot commercial facility will not
generate a significant number of jobs to create a demand for additional
housing.
Transportation / C i rcu lation
13.a,d,f.
Yes. The proposed project will generate a substantial amount of vehicle
traffic to the site. This impact is considered significant due to the
current traffic problems which exist in the vicinity of the site.
Through traffic on Rancho California Road, with one lane in each
direction, is congested due to the traffic turning into the neighboring
commercial facility and vehicle volume. Until Rancho California Road is
widened to four lanes at the subject site, traffic will continue to be
bottle necked and traffic hazards will incre~e. A traffic study dated
April 26, 1990, was conducted by Kunzman Associates. The study
recommends widening Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane in
conjunction with development of the project; a 200 foot left turn pocket
in Rancho California Road; limited access to site and participation in
STAFFRPT\PP18 10
traffic signal fees. With these recommendations, it is anticipated that
1991 traffic at the site will operate at LOS~D% However, it is not clear
if the future traffic includes the new residential developments east of
the site and weekend traffic to the wineries. If not, the traffic study
should be reevaluated.
13.b.
Yes. The proposed project will require the addition of parking spaces
which should be consistent with the adopted parking cede for
commercial uses. The proposed plot plan is consistent with the parking
code except that the handicapped spa~_-s should be designated along
with the additional three loading spaces for the project.
13.d-e.
No. The proposed project will not effect the present pattern or
circulation of goods or people.
Public Services
1Ll.a,b,e.
Yes. The proposed ~6,613 square foot conmercial facility will require
public services in the areas of police, fire and maintenance of roads and
public facilities. This impact is not considered signifk4,t. The
incremental impact should be evaluated and the appropriate fees.
assessed. Property taxes should mitigate the impact and continuing
need for services over the long term.
Enerqy
15.a-b.
No. The proposed project will not result tn the substantial use or
increase in demand of fuel or energy.
Utilities
16.a-f.
No. The proposed project requires the use of utilities but will not
require substantial alteration to the existing systems.
Human Health
17 .a-b.
No. The proposed project will not create a health hazard or increase
human exposure to hazardous materials.
Aesthetics
18.
No. Development of the subject site will not obstruct any scenic vista
or view that is open to the public.
Recreation
19.
No. The subject site is not currently used for re. reational uses.
STAFFRPT\PP18 11
Cultural Resources
20.a.
Maybe. The proposed project may impact an unknown cultural resource
site. If a site is discovered during grading, an archaeologist or
paleontologist should be called on site to supervise the digging and
determine if ,the site is significant.
20.b-d.
No. The proposed project will not impact any building of historic
significance, affect unique ethnic cultural values or restrict sacred
uses,
Mandatory Findlnqs of Siqnlfica~ce
21 .a-c.
No. The proposed project will not have a significant impact of the
quality of the area's natural environment nor will the project achieve
short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term goals.
In addition, the project does not cumulatively considerable impacts.
21 .d.
Yes. The proposed project has the potential of exposing human beings
to increased traffic hazards. The location of the project is at the top
of a blind hill and a bottle-neck where traffic is already a concern. The
additional traffic generatad by the proposed project will significently
increase the potential for accidents st the subject location unless the
mitigation measures as recommended in the supporting traffic study are
implemented.
STAFFRPT\PP18 12
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~vill be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I flnd the proposed project MAY have a significant effec~ on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required. >//~
Date ~OO
For CI F ULA
STAFFRPT\PP18 13
1'
_[,
:,')NI 'V/IFlbS']~
: .g_3:LI_IH]MV
i, il l~, 11. :llil '~
[ii~ ljJl
SJO]LIf-DISV ..
PLANNIN~ COIOilHHION MINUTE2 NOVEMBER 19, 1990
PLOT PE~%N 18 AND LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 9
Proposal to construct a 46,613 square foot shopping center
on a 5.1 acre site located at the northwest corner of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report on this item.
He indicated that the proposal is for the construction
of the retail site (Building C) and the building pads for
the bank (Building B) and the restaurant (Building A).
The recommendation would be for the approval of the site
design layout and the construction of Building C. Staff
also recommends when the development for Building A and
B is submitted, the applicant file a Plot Plan application
so that they can be reviewed. He stated that although
the Traffic Engineering Department has indicated they have
no problems with the drive-thru facility at the proposed
bank, staff sees some potential problems and would like to
review the detailed plans of the building along with a
traffic study. He added that the code requires four
loading spaces for the overall development and the
applicant is proposing one loading space. After
discussion with the applicant about the type of deliveries
they will be receiving, staff has determined that th~
four loading spaces should be provided, possibly using
some of the other parking spaces.
KIRK WILLIAMS stated that Transportation Engineering has
reviewed the site and determined that there is no major
reason for concern with the access/egress of the proposed
drive-thru location. They do concur that when the plot
plan is submitted, they would like to look at it to ensure
there is no problem. He added that the location of the
loading docks does not appear to propose any problems.
COMMISSIONER BOAGLAND questioned the requirements of
Condition No. 29.
JOHN MIDDLETON stated that this was a standard condition.
off-site requirements. GARY THORNHILL indicated that
he didn't believe there were any off-site improvements
required and this condition could be deleted. KIRK
WILLIAMS stated that there would be some additional
off-site work required on Rancho California Road, as
a result of the Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road
intersection, engineering is requiring a operational
signal resulting in off-site improvements on the south
side of Rancho California Road.
DOUG STEWART added that this site was in the benefit
pcminll/19/90 -8- 11/28/90
PLANNIN~
COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19~ 1990
reimbursement district for Margarita Village Development
Company would be doing the street improvements and the
applicant would be constructing the signals.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF questioned if the project was
conditioned to construct a landscape median.
KIRK WILLIAMS stated that there was a Engineering
Department condition that a median be constructed.
CBAIPa4~NCHINIAEFF questioned if the applicant was paying
any mitigation fees for the ramp signals at Highway 15
and Rancho California Road.
KIRK WlLLIAMS stated that they would be paying signal
mitigation fees. DOUG STEWART stated that the Margarita
Village Development Company was already conditioned to
complete those improvements; however, they were
conditioned to pay signal mitigation fees and capital
improvement fees.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M.
MARK ASPENSON, Winchester Development, 41530 EnterprEse
Circle South, Suite 206, Temecula, developer of the
project. He stated that they were building the median
on Rancho California Road and they were designing and
improving the signal at Lyndie Lane and Rancho California
Road. He addressed some concerns about the height of the
wall behind the project and indicated that they had
planned extensive landscaping for this area. He stated
that they are willing to work with staff to address any
concerns they have.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND asked if the area behind the retail
building was a walk way.
MARK ASPENSON stated that this was a loading area.
COMMISSIONER FORD questioned the lighting and landscaping
proposed for the back side of the walls and the
irrigation. He expressed a concern for run-off and
suggested a drip system.
MARK ASPENSON stated that they had submitted a conceptual
landscape plan and would be willing to work with staff.
GARY THORNHILL added that the applicant will be required
to submit a final landscape plan.
pcminll/19/90 -9- 11/28/90
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19~ 1990
COMMISSIONER FORD also questioned a lighting plan for the
back side of the building so as not to interfere with the
nearby residential area.
MARK ASPENSON stated that they would be required to use
low pressure lights due to the Palomar Observatory
Ordinance.
GARY THORNHILL suggested enhancing Condition No. 7
indicating all lighting will be hooded or directed away
from neighboring residents.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF stated that he would like the applicant
to utilize some taller specimen trees along the back side
of the building to softer the height of the building. He
also questioned their sign proposal.
MARK ASPENSON again stated that they were willing to work
with staff to address all of the Commission's concerns and
that a sign program would be coming under a separate
proposal.
COMMISSIONER FORD expressed a desire to see the wording om
Condition No. i to read "for a proposed 6,500 square foot
restaurant and a proposed 4,831 square foot bank".
GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that there are no
approvals for the proposed buildings A and B and the
applicant will have to come back to the Commission with
the Plot Plans.
MARK ASPENSON indicated that they had not received a copy
of the Conditions of Approval.,
GARY THORNHILL asked if the agent or the applicant had
received a copy of the Conditions. MR. ASPENSON stated
that they had not received them.
The Commission agreed to take a ten minute recess to allow
the applicant to review the Conditions of Approval.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF declared a ten minute recess at 7:50
P.M. The meeting reconvened at 8:00 P.M.
MARK ASPENSON expressed concurrence with the Conditions of
Approval as presented.
GARY THORNHILL stated that while the applicant is
providing 286 parking spaces on the site plan there is a
condition to provide four loading spaces, which allows
them flexibility to convert six of those spaces into
pcminll/19/90 -10- 11/28/90
PLJ~NIN~ COW~ISSION HINUTES
NOVEI4BER lgs lgg0
three loading spaces; also, he recommended amending
Condition No. 18 to not allow outdoor storage as follows:
Add a sentence stating no outdoor storage or trash except
in the designated containers provided on the site plan.
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing at
8:10 P.M. and adopt Negative Declaration for Plot Plan
No. 18 and adopt Resolution No. 90-(next) approving
Plot Plan No. 18 and Lot Line Adjustment No. 9 including
modifications of Condition No. I to read "proposed 6,500
square foot restaurant and proposed 4,831 square foot
bank" and Condition No. 18 to include a statement
indicating no outdoor storage or trash except the
designated trash containers, seconded by COMMISSIONER
FAHZY and carried unanimously.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
~ Hoagland, Chiniaeff d
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
,,,Y._Z', ,,,,,,-
o r ir u~e lo¢ 27415 Jefferson Avenu~in
the inch ter ~are~/hoppfng center. '
. ..,, ;~o '~..,. ,~....,, ~.,.o,,,, o. ,,,,,.
t s~f's'reco~unendation is for overhea~
doo limited t the~ear of the 'building. He sta~ed
t wi re-d "ign/~he applicant could utilize stacking.
opened the public hearing at 8'15 P
J H R,~,~O W. Klameda Avenue, Burbank, represen~kn~
of re Company requested the Commission approval
of t prOJect as proposed which includes two overhead
do s a~'the f~ont of the building. He stated that th
~' 'opp~ 'ition to Condition No. 10 which restricte[
e~hPPM~ddoors to the back of the building. He saic~
th limiting.. {the access to the rear of the building would
r~t}7~'ir efficiency by 30%.
~,."~"~"""V,"' ""'~ ""T """ ""'~"""""' """ /
pcminll/19/90 -11- 11/28/90
ITEM #9
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: Plot Plan No. 228
Prepared By: Oliver Mujica
Recommendation: 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
approving Plot Plan No. 228
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
BACKGROUND:
El Torito Restaurants, Inc.
Lee G Sakahara Associates, AIA
Construct a 7,203 square foot restaurant.
Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and
Lyndie Lane.
( General Commercial/Restricted
Commercial )
C-I/C-P
North: R-3-4000
South: R-3-4000
East: C-1/C-P
West: C-P
Not applicable.
Vacant
General Commercial
On November 19, 1990, the Planning Commission
approved Plot Plan No. 18, which was a proposal to
develop the subject 5.1 acre site with a Li6,613
square foot shopping center, as follows:
6,500 sq.ft.
4,831 sq.ft.
35,282 sq. ft.
Building "A" - Restaurant
Building "B" - Bank
Building "C" - Retail
A:PP228 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
On March 11, 1991, the applicant submitted Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1 requesting to increase
the total square footage of the shopping center from
46,613 to 47,412 square feet, as follows:
Buildin9 "A" - Restaurant( PAD )
Building "B" - Restaurant(PAD)
Building "C" - Retail
7,203 sq.ft.
6,300 sq.ft.
33,909 s q o ft.
On April 4, 1991, Plot Plan No. 228 was reviewed by
the Formal Development Review Committee ( DRC );
and, it was determined that the project, as
designed, can be adequately conditioned to mitigate
the DRC's concerns. The DRC has forwarded a
recommendation of approval subject to conditions.
On April 15, 1991, the Plannin9 Commission will
consider Planning Staff's recommendation of
approval for Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1.
Location
This project is located on the northwest corner of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane, which is
between Ynez and Moraga Roads.
Project
Plot Plan No. 228 proposes to Construct a 7,203
square foot restaurant (El Torito) on building pad
"A" of Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1. The
proposed restaurant provides a total of 225 seats.
The proposed development has been designed in
accordance with the standards of the C-1/C-P
(General Commercial/Restricted Commercial) zone.
Project Desiqn
The proposed "Spanish" Mediterranean
architectural style is consistent with the previously
approved overall project design of the commercial
center. The proposed building utilizes the
following colors/materials, which are consistent with
the colors/materials of Plot Plan No. 18:
Roof - "Blended" Mission Clay
Tile
Walls - "Light" Tan Stucco; and "Light"
Tetra Cotta
A:PP228 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
Trim - Tetra Cotta; and Turquoise
Awnings - "Light" Tetra Cotta; and
Turquoise
Shutters - Turquoise
Door/
Window Trim - Turquoise
Landscapinq
Landscaping is provided along the perimeter of the
proposed building, in which the proposed
landscaping is consistent with the planting pallet of
the overall commercial center.
Parking
The overall commercial center provides a total of 289
parking spaces, in which 75 spaces were allocated
for Building "A" (the subject building).
Based on the total of 225 seats provided for tJ~
proposed restaurant, 75 parking spaces are
required (1 parking space per 3 seats). Therefore,
the proposed restaurant complies with the parking
requirements.
The proposed project is consistent with the SWAP
Land Use Designation of Commercial, which includes
restaurant uses. In addition, Staff finds it
probable that this project will be consistent with the
new General Plan when it is adopted.
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
An Initial Study was performed for Plot Plan No. 18
which determined that although the proposed
project could have a significant effect on the
environment, no significant impact would result to
the natural or built environment in the City because
the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and a
Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning
Commission. Since Plot Plan No. 228 will not result
in additional impacts to the environment, the
Planning Department Staff has determined that the
project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15061
(b)(3).
A:PP228 3
FINDINGS:
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 228 will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law. Due to the fact that the proposed
restaurant is consistent with the existing
zoning and the SWAP Land Use Designation of
Commercial.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due
to the fact that the proposed restaurant is
consistent with the existing zoning, the
SWAP Land Use Designation of Commercial ,
and the permitted uses of the surrounding
area.
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws, due to tJ~
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 348.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed restaurant
complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that the
proposed restaurant is consistent with
Ordinance No. 348.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
A: PP228 4
fact that the proposed use is compatible with
the surrounding land uses.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-d-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the Conditions of Approval include
appropriate mitigation measures.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for Plot Plan No. 18.
10. The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
11. That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving Plot
Plan No. 228, subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval.
OM:ks
Attachments:
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Exhibits
A. Site Plan
B. Exterior Elevations
C. Landscape Plan
D. Floor Plan
Large Scale Plans
A:PP228 5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 228 TO
CONSTRUCT A 7,203 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT
(BUILDING PAD "A") ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 5.1
ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND LYNDIE LANE AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-310-011.
WHEREAS, El Torito Restaurants, Inc., filed Plot Plan No. 228 in
accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
pertaining to said Plot Plan on April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report
regarding the Plot Plan;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission Hearing, the Commission
approved said Plot Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty {30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
( 2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A: PP228 6
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(C)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
5outhwest Area Community Plan, {hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP_.~
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and
meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government
Code, to wit:
(1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan
No. 228 proposed will be consistent with the
general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
A:PP228 7
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be
approved unless the following findings can be made:
a)
The proposed use must conform to all the
General Plan requirements and with all
applicable requirements of state law and City
ordinances.
b)
The overall development of the land is
designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare; conforms
to the logical development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future logical
development of the surrounding property.
(2) The Planning Commission, inapprovingtheproposed
Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit:
a)
There is a reasonable probability that Plot
Plan No. 228 will be consistent with the City~s
future General Plan, which will be compl;itt~
in a reasonable time and in accordance
State law. Due to the fact that the proposed
restaurant is consistent with the existing
zoning and the SWAP Land Use Designation of
Commercial.
b)
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed use
is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due
to the fact that the proposed restaurant is
consistent with the existing zoning, the
SWAP Land Use Designation of Commercial ,
and the permitted uses of the surrounding
area.
c)
The proposed use or action complies with
State planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with
Ordinance No. 30,8.
d)
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed restaurant
complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
30..8.
A: PP228 8
e)
f)
g)
h)
j)
k)
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of
Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding
land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a
compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that the
proposed restaurant is consistent with
Ordinance No. 3~,8.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property, because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed use is compatible with
the surrounding land uses.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the Conditions of Approval include
appropriate mitigation measures.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the expanded
initial study performed for Plot Plan No. 18.
The design of the project and the type of
improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or
use of the property within the proposed
project.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan
proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and
is compatible with the present and future development of the
surrounding property.
A: PP228 9
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for Plot Plan No. 18 indicates that although
the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in
the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission on November 19, 1990. Plot
Plan No. 228 will not result in additional impacts to the environment, therefore, the
project is exempt from CEQA under Section 15061 (b)(3).
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Plot
Plan No. 228 to construct a 7,203 square foot restaurant( Building Pad "A" ) located
on the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane and known as
Assessoris Parcel No. 921-310-011 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION ~,. ~,
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:PP228 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No: 228
Project Description:
Assessor's Parcel No.:
7,203 square foot
restaurant
921-031-011
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a 7,203
square foot restaurant( Building Pad "A" ) within a 5.1 acre site known as Plot
Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1.
The permittee shall defend. indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula/-is
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or lagislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 228. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two ~2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the baginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on April 15, 1993.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 228 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
A:PP228 11
10.
11.
12.
13.
1~,.
15.
16.
17.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three (3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted tothe
Planning Department of approval. The location, number, genus, species, and
container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements
of Ordinance No. 3u,8, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional plans shall
be submitted for Planning Department approval:
Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Buildin9 elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit B.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B (Color Elevations) and Exhibit E
(Materials Board).
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of grading permits, the
applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by
that ordinance which is based on the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for
development. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of
a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat
A:PP228 12
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
18.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Building and Safety.
19.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
Prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit, this approval shall
comply with all conditions of Plot Plan No. 18, Revision No. 1.
21.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
Riverside County Fire Department
22. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 5u,6.
23.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2250 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants, on a looped system
(6"x~,"x2 1/2x2 1/2), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet
from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular
travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system.
25.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
26.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review, Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types,
location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements.
Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local
water company with the following certification: "l certify that the design of
the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the
Riverside County Fire Department."
A:PP228 13
27.
Install a complete restaurant fire sprinkler system in all building{s). The
post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the
front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the
buildingis). A statement that the building{s) will be automatically fire
sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans.
28.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as per
UBC.
29.
A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must
appear on the title page of the building plans.
30.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
31. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
32.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
33.
Install a hood duct fire extinguishing system. Contact a certified
protection company for proper placement. Plans must be approved by the Fire
Department prior to installation.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
35.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit, with the
City of Temecula, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25 cents per
square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be
submitted separately from the plan check review fees.
36.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
Riverside County Department of Health
Prior to any building plan submittals, the following items will be required:
37. "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
38.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted,
including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in
order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities
Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at
(714) 358-5172.
A:PP228 14
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
39.
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
The developer shall submit two ~2 ) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2u,"x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
The developer shall submit two {2 ) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A 9radin9 permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans for Plot Plan No.
18 being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval
by the City Engineer.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street
improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans.
A:PP228 15
~,6.
~7.
q.8.
50.
51.
52.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
If construction for street, on-site parking, grading and drainage
improvements for Plot Plan No. 18 has not begun, the subdivider shall
construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing
the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping (street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to and approved by
the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the
City Engineer. This study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer
and shall include existing, interim, and proposed conditions, including
hydrology and hydraulic calculations. The drainage study shall also address
the capacity of existing downstream systems within Parcel Map No. 23687, and
a secondary overland drainage escape route.
As determined from the drainage study, the developer shall construct or
enlarge off-site drainage facilities to mitigate any increase or diversion of
existing flows from the project site into adjacent downstream properties.
Adequate drainage easements shall be secured if needed. Mitigation shall be
as directed by the City Engineer.
A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will be required along the
northwesterly property line to protect downstream properties by diverting
sheet runoff to Lyndie Lane, or to a storm drain.
A:PP228 16
53. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
55°
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
56.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
57.
Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V.
Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V.
.Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
58.
In the event that the improvements per the Margarita Villages Benefit District
have not been initiated, the developer shall construct half-width street
improvements for Rancho California Road including but not limited to curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on the public street.
59.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated lassuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
60.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for Rancho California Road with
transitions, and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
A:PP228 17
61.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Traffic Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Lyndie Lane and shall be included in the street improvement plans
with the second plan check submittal.
62.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer and shown on the street
improvement plans along Rancho California Road from Lyndie Lane east to
Moraga Road.
63.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the City requirements and the
approved signing and striping plan.
65.
66.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Lyndle Lane shall be installed
and operational per the City requirements, special provisions, and the
approved traffic signal plan.
All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the City requirements
and the approved plan.
67.
The developer shall be responsible for constructing the raised median on
Rancho California Road from Via Las Colinas east to Lyndie Lane.
68.
No median break for the main driveway on Rancho California Road shall be
provided.
69.
The developer shall design and construct the signal at the intersection of
Rancho California Road and Lyndie Lane and may enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the City for a percentage of the total cost of this signal, as
determined by the City Engineer, from the future development of the 6.12
acre parcel to the south of this intersection which may utilize this signal for
access as specified in the addendure to the Traffic Study dated October 9,
1990 prepared by Robert Kahn, John Kain and Associates.
A:PP228 18
zl~
o.4~
zz zz
ITEM #10
Case No.:
Recommendation:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102
Prepared By: Richard Ayala
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving the
First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval,
based on findings contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Marlborough Development Corporation
Marlborough Development Corporation
First Extension of Time
West of Butterfield Stage Road and north of La
Serena Way.
Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village)
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-A-1/2 ( ResidentialAgricultural )
Specific Plan No. 199
R-R I Rural Residential)
RoT { Mobile Home Subdivision
and Mobile Home Park)
Not requested;
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single Family Residential
Graded Lots ( SingleFamily Residential )
Single Family Residential
School
A: VTM23102 I
PROJECT STATISTICS:
Total Acreage:
Total Lots Proposed:
Proposed Density:
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
16.4 acres
37 lots
23 DU/AC
7,200 sq.ft.
BACKGROUND:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 was
recommended for approval on September 28, 1988 by
the Riverside County Planning Commission in
conjunction with Tract Nos. 23100 Amendment No.
1; 23101; and 23103 Amendment No. 1. All four
tracts implement Village B of the Margarita Village
Specific Plan (SP 199 Amendment No. 1) which was
previously approved by the Board of Supervisors
on September 13, 1988. Subsequently all four
tracts i23100 Amd. 1, 23101, 23102, and 23103 Amd.
1 ) were approved by the County Board of
Supervisors on November 8, 1988.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 is a proposal
~ subdivide approximately 16.u, acres into 37 sirl~le
family residential lots with a minimum )or size of
7,200 square feet and an average lot area of 12,385
square feet. The subject site is located west of
Butterfield Stage Road and north of La Serena Way.
ANALYSIS:
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed subdivision has been designed in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance Nos.
3u,8, u,60 and Specific Plan No. 199. The main access
to the project is La Serena Way. The project has
been designed to provide increased land use and
circulation efficiency.
Density
The proposed subdivision {Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23102) is consistent with the density
designation for Specific Plan No. 199 of 2~5 DU/AC.
The actual proposed subdivision density is 2.3
DU/AC.
Grading
The subject site is currently vacant and
undisturbed. The proposed subdivision will entail
approximately 89,000 cubic yards of raw cut and
A:VTM23102 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
approximately 69,000 cubic yards of raw fill in order
to provide for adequate building pads. The
proposed grading is consistent with existing
surrounding residential developments.
The proposed density of 2.3 DU/AC is consistent
with the Southwest Area Community Plan and
Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village). In
addition, Staff finds it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
Environmental Assessments have been prepared on
all four tracts (23100 Amd. No. 1, 23101, 23102,
23103 Amd. No. 1). Environmental impacts were
assessed in EIR No. 107 and EIR No. 202 prepared
for the Rancho Village Specific Plan and the
Margarita Village Specific Plan. Additional
environmental evaluations have been provided by
the reports prepared for the specific plan
amendment and the acoustical studies prepared for
three tracts. No significant environmental impacts
have been found. Therefore, Staff is not
requesting any further environmental
determination.
There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law, due to the fact that the project is
consistent with existing site development
standards in that it proposes articulated
design features and site amenities
commensurate with existing and anticipated
residential development standards.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
A: VTM23102 3
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project site's existing Specific Plan No. 199
(Low Density Family Housing) land use
designation.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed residential structures; adequate
landscaping is provided along the project's
public and private frontages; and the
internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health--ar
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and
coveracJe creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to
the fact that the proposal is similar in
compatibility with surrounding land uses;
and adequate area and design features
provide for siting of proposed development in
terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
(Specific Plan No. 199), and also consistent
with the adopted Southwest Area Community
Plan (SWAP) designation of Specific Plan.
A: VTM23102 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project currently proposes an
independent access point from La Serena Way
which has been determined to be adequate by
the City Engineer.
10.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in~J~e
site plan and the project analysis.
11.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- approving the
First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 23102 subject to the attached
Conditions of Approval, based on findings
contained in the Staff Report.
RA:ks
Attachments:
Resolution
Conditions of Approval
Exhibits
A. Site Plan
A:VTM23102 5
ATTACHMENT I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
23102 TO SUBDIVIDE A 16.u· ACRE PARCEL INTO 37
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LOCATED WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NORTH OF LA SERENA
WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 923-200-
019.
WHEREAS, Marlborough Development Corporation filed Extension of
Time in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time
on April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
approved said Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNINC COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findin.qs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
{2 ) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A: VTM23102 6
(a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a tirmdy
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Extension of Time is consistent with the
SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of
building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the
following:
~a)
There is reasonable probability that First
Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23102 proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
A: VTM23102 7
(C)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. I1 ) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No.
~,60, no subdivision or extension of time may be approved unless the
following findings are made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the
proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of
development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density
of the development. ~,
e)
That the design of the proposed land division
or proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
g)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division.
A land division may be approved if it is found
that alternate easements for access or for use
will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsectlon
shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgment of a court
of competent jurisdiction.
{ 2 ) The Planning Commission in approving the proposed
Extension of Time, makes the following findings, to wit:
A:VTM23102 8
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law, due to the fact that the project is
consistent with existing site development
standards in that it proposes articulated
design features and site amenities
commensurate with existing and anticipated
residential development standards.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to~e
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project sirens existing Specific Plan No. 199
ILow Density Family Housing) land use
designation.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed residential structures; adequate
landscaping is provided along the project's
public and private frontages; and the
internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
A: VTM23102 9
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and
coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to
the fact that the proposal is similar in
compatibility with surroundin9 land uses;
and adequate area and design features
provide for siting of proposed development in
terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
(Specific Plan No. 199), and also consistent
with the adopted Southwest Area Community
Ran (SWAP) designation of Specific Plan.
The project as designed and conditloned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project~s
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project currently proposes an
independent access point from La Serena Way
which has been determined to be adequate by
the City Engineer.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
A: VTM23102 10
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative
Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning commission hereby determines that
the previous Environmental Determination {Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 3253L~) still applies to said tract map. An Initial
Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could
have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described in EIR Nos. 107 and 202 and
in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves*~l~e
First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 for the
subdivision of a 16.~, acre parcel into 37 single family residential lots located west of
Butterfield Stage Road and north of La Serena Way and known as Assessor's Parcel
No. 923-200-019 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNINC COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNINC COMMISSIONERS
A: VTM23102 11
ATTACHMENT I I
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23102
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution. -4~
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section
10.35 of Ordinance No. ~,60 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and
recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. L~60.
Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of
occupancy.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per Iot/unlt shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23102 will expire one (1) year after the original expiration date,
unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~,60. The expiration date is
November 8, 1991.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of Approval for
Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 lsee attached) except as amended herein.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
A:VTM23102 12
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the 5tale of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. u,60.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the
developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Metropolitan Water District:
Rancho California Water District:
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department:
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to
the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
10.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
11.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC~,R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CC~,R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CC[,R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CC[,R's shall be prepared at the developer~s sole cost and expense.
A: VTM23102 13
The CCF, R~s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CCF, R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CCF, Rts shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CCF, R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CCBR's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCF, R~s, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CCF, R's or the City ordinances. The property shaltNbe
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
12.
13.
The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further
subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or
numbered lots.
ii.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently
maintained by homeewner~s association or other means acceptable
to the City. Such prod of this maintenance shall be submitted
to the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of
building permits.
The developer, or the developer's successor, shall execute a current Public
Facilities Agreement with the City of Temecula which provides for the payment
of the sum of money per residential unit then established by Resolution of the
City Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual
lots.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate.
A: VTM23102 14
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping (street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two {2) feet from the property
line.
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
The subdlvider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-d-way, shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions."
A: VTM23102 15
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District for review.
25.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
26.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
27.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
28°
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
29.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. T~lle
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
30.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
31.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The
final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough
grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
32.
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A .C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
A:VTM23102 16
Asphaltic emulsion Ifo9 seal) shall be applied not less than 1~, days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
9q of the State Standard Specifications.
35.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in affect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
36. A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer for Streets "A" through "D" and shall be shown on the
street improvement plans.
37.
Condition No. 5 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988
shall be deleted.
38.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
39.
Condition No. 27 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988
shall be modified to read: A signing and striping plan shall be designed by
a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for La Serena
Way and shall be included with the street improvement plans.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plans.
A: VTM23102 17
Building F, Safety Department
0,2. Submit approved tract map to the Department of Building and Safety for
addressing prior to submittal for Structural Plan Review.
0,3. Obtain Land Use and Building Department clearance.
0,0,. School Fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School District prior to issuance
of permits.
A:VTM23102 18
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 23102
DATE: 9-28-8B
STANDARD CONDITIONS
The subdivider shall defend, lndemnlfy, and hold hamless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees fran any claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tentative Tract 23102, which action is brought about within the
time perlod provided for tn California Government Code Section 66499.37.
The County of Riverside wt11 promptly notify the subdivider of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify
the subdivider of any such claim, actlon, or proceeding or fails to
' e
cooperate fully In the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, ~b
responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold hamless the County of
Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision ~p Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 46D, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of Call fornia Subdivision ~p Act and
Ordinance 46D.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
If any grading ls proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
plan shal) cemp]y with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 2
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prio? to recordation of the
final mmp.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 7-22-BB a
copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and s~u~
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 4-19-88 a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
6-17-B8 a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an
adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Commissioner.
The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Harshal's letter dated 5-3-BB a copy of which
is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 3
18.
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a All lots shall have a minimum size of 7°200 square feet net
b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformante with Section
3.BC of Ordinance 46D.
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as
not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in
non-corner and through lots.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1
Zone. ~
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,60D square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be
located away and visually screened frem surrounding areas with the use
of block walls and landscaping.
Prior to RECORDATION of the.final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordatton of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requl ramants outlined in the attached approval
letters from the loll owing agencies have been mat.
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Parks Department
Rancho Water District
County Health Department
County Planning Department
Eastern ~ntcipal Water Dtst.
Prior to the recordatton of the final map, General Plan Amendment No.
150, Specific Plan No. lg9, Amendment No. 1, Oevelopment Agreement No.
S, and Change of Zone No. 5107 shall be approved by the Board of
Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land
divi ston shall be in conformance with the development standards of the
zone ultimately applied to the property.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 4
A11 existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to
recordatton of the final map.
Impacts to the Temecula Elementary and Elstnore Union High School District
shall be mitigated at the development application stage in accordance with
the district policies.
The contmon open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final
map and shall be managed by a master property owners association or CSA.
{Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
22. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions: --k
1).
Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall file an
application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a
parkway maintenance district for Tentative Tract No. 23102 in
accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the
project is within an existing parkway maintenance district.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County
Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans
and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable
for permanent filing with the County Road Department.
3)
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance
bonds, quaranteeing the viabtlity of all landscaping which will be
installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by
the district.
4)
The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaplng maintenance until
such time as maintenance is taken over by the district.
Prior to reCordatton of the final map, clearance shall be obtained from
Netropolttant Water District relative to the protection of applicable
easements affecting the subject property.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation system until such time as those
operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the
Planning Director.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 5
Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
1)
2)
3)
4)
Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed
street light layout first from the Road Deparbnent's traffic engineer
and then from the appropriate utility purveyor.
Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting
district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the
site is within an existing lighting district.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secu~
conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO,
unless the site is within an existing lighting district.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
1)
2)
I, 3)
4)
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, detailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide
for the following.
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up
to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity.
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view
with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as
approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed
underground.
Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of
the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 6
27.
2g.
covert shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering
sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenittes w~ere appropriate as
approved by the Planning Department and Specific Plan No. 199
Amendment No. 1.
s)
s)
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees
at key visual focal points within the project.
Where streets trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior
streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way,
they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way.
7) Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants
where appropriate.
B). All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on~t'~he
subject property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plans and
shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
9} All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing
trees shall be steel staked.
All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be
preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be
relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning
Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans.
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits,
an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for
subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and
shall include the following:
1)
2)
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentatton
during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of january
through )4arch.
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding
ten (10} feet in vertical heights shall be contour-graded incorporating
the following grading techniques:
Conditions of ~proval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 7
1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle
of the natural terrain,
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the
natural rounded terrain,
3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded wtth curves with tad11
designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where
dratnage and stability permit such rounding.
4) Nhere cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations
thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical heights .shall be modified by an
a propflare combination of a speclal terracing (benthing) plan increase
s~ope ratio (i.e. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined
wtLh irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope
maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
With to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety the developer will demonstrate compliance with the
acoustical study prepared for Tract 2310D which established
appropriate mitigation measures to reduce ambient interior noise
levels to 45 Ldn and exterior noise levels below 65 Ldn.
b. Buildin separation between all 'buildings including fireplaces shall
not be Tess than ten (10) feet.
c. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devtces shall be permitted with Planning Department approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 8
In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County
of Riverside. a copy of which is on file. and in furtherance of the
agreement between the developer and the County of Riverside. no
building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any
parcels within the subject tract until the developer. or the
developer's successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance
with the terms of said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing
of public facilities.
33r--PF~eP-to-the-Peee~datlen-ef-the~-flna)--subdivhien--Pap~--~e--subdiv4der
9ha)~--~ubmft--the--fo))emfn~--~oc=ments--to--the--P)enn+ng-~epertment-for
Peview;--wh+eh--doeuments-~sha))--be--subject--to--the--approval--of--th~t
~epari=nen~--a~d--the--efffee--~-the~eonnty-£o~nse):- (~ended by Planning
Commission 9-2B-B8)
~)~-A-dee~a~atieR-ef-sevenaRtsreendttiens-and-Fes~Pletie~st-and- (Amended
by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
2)--A--samp~e--deeument--eenveyiR§-tit)e-te-the-~uwehaser-ef-am-individua~
~o~--er--un+t--which--prov+~e~--that--the--dee~ara~+on--of--cevenan~;
eenditlens--a~d--Pes~rie~h~--is--inee~pera~ed--there~n-by-referenee=
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
~he-dee~a~a~h~-ef-eevenantsv-eendit+e~s-and--Pes~riet~e~s--sub~+~te~--~er
Pev~ew--s~a~---Fa~--p~evHe-~er-a-m~n~m-~erm-of-Be-years;--~b~--prov+~e
fe~-the-esta~is~ent-af-a-p,epeFty-ew~eFS~-asseeiatlea-eemp~ised--e(--the
ew~e,s--ef-eaeh-i~vi~'a~-let-e,-un~tr--~e}--p,ovide-fe.-ew~e~s½+p-ef-~he
e~e.-aFea-by-ei~heF-the-p,epe~ty-e~e~s~-asseelatien-e~--the--e~ers--e(
fe~ewtRg-p,evisieRs-ve.ba~+mt (Amended by Planning Commission 9-2~88}
tNetw~tk&ta~dt~-eRy-pPevtsien-~n-~hts-gee~aPa~hR--te*-tke--eeR~Pa~yT
the--(e;~ew$Rg-pPavlsien-sha~)-app)ye- (Amended by Planning Commission
9-28-88)
;he-pFepePty-ew~ers~-asseelathn-esta~)hhed-hePe~n-shalt--manage--aRd
6e~t~ws)~-H~atnta~--~he-~eenm~n-aFea~r-me~e-paPtSee)a~ty-dese~ibed
on-Exhibtt--%~-7~4f-the-speeifie-p~an-attaehed~here~e;-aRd-shaT~--ne~
$e~--ep--~r~sfe~--l~e-~smme~-a~ea~r-eF-any-pa~-~kePee~r-abseR~-~he
pcto~-w~ttte~-GoaseRt-e(--the--P~anRSmff--9$FeeteF--ef--the--GeuRty-~ef
Rtvm~$ie--eF-the-C,~*~y~)-s~c-c-e)s~F-tR-$RtePestr- (Amended by Planning
Commission 9-28-88)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page g
~ste~~ioG~m~N~l~-r.~i~-t~4$s4sime~t---tta~. (Amended
by Planning Cc.,.,~isston 9-2B-BB}
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
sha;;-be-;eee~ded-a~-tke--same--~ime--~ha~--the--fiRa~--map--is--Peeerded;
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
33.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall convey to
the County fee simple title, to all common or common open space areas,
free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and
unrecorded} and eassnents, except those easements which in the sole
discrition of the County are acceptable. As a conditions precedent to the
County accepting title to such areas, the subdivider shall submit the
loll owing documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents
shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the
County Counsel: (Amended by Planning Commission g-28-B8}
1} A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and (Amended
by Planning Commission g-2B-BB)
A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual
lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants,
conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-2B-BB}
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for
review shall {a) provide for a term of 6Oyears, (b) provide for the
establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of
each individual lot or unit and (c) contain the following provisions
verbatim: {Amended by Planning Commission 9-2B-B8}
'Nothwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary,
the following provision shall apply: {Amended by Planning Commissin
9-2B-BB)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23102
Page 10
The property owners association established herein shall, if dormant,
be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the
County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall
unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the County's
demand, title to all or any part of the 'common area', more
particularly described on Exhibit ' ' attached hereto. The decision
to require activation of the property owners' association and the
decision to require that the association unconditionally accept title
to the 'c~nmon area' shall be at the sole discretion of the County of
Riverside. (Amended by Planning Commission 9-2B-B8}
In the event that the common area, or any part thereof, is conveyed to
the property owners' association, the association, thereafter shall
own such 'common area', shall manage and continuously maintain such
'common area, or any part thereof,absent the prior written consent~
the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have
the right to assess the owners of e~ch individual lot or unit for the
reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and shall have the
right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the
payment of an maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once
created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the
notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
{Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amend~ or
property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the
Planning Director of the County of Riverside of the County's
successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage of maintenance of the
'common area'. (Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-BB)
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles
of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association
Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control."
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88}
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions
shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded.
{Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall
be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontologist impacts. Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant
resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the
Condlttons of Approval
Tentative Tract No, 23102
Page 11
36°
excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. ~en,necessary, the
paleontologist or representative shall have the authority t~ temporarily
divert. redtrect or halt grading actlvlty to a11(~ ~covery of fossils.
Prior to the Issuance of OCCUPANCY PERNITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
~tor to the final tetldtng Inspection approval, by the ~tldlng and
~fety Depar~nt, walls shall be constructed along La ~rena Way per
Spectftc Plan 199 Amendment No, 1. The Required wall1 shall be
subject to the approval of the DIrector of the Department of Building
and Safety and the Planning Director,
b. Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially conform to attached
Figure III-28 of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1.
c..A11 landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance jt~h
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal
conditions do not permit lantlng, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be uttVtzed as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety.
d. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field
inspection.
e. Not withstanding the preceding conditions,the heights of all required
walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No.
199 Amendment No. 1.
Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 199
Amendment No. I
Development of Tentative Tract No. 23102 conform shall comply with the
rovtstons to Specific Plan No,* 199 Amendment No. I and Development
~greement No. 5. (Amended by Planning Commissin 9-28-88)
KG:mp
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
July 22, 1988
LeRoy D, Smoot
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA gZSOl
Re: Tract Nap 23102
Schedule A - Team SP
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461).
It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerit~e
profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate O's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map
to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commissioner's Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns~ i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachmerits by land fills are allowed". The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdlvider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Tra~t Nap 23102
July 22, 1988
Page 2
3. Na3or drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department. '
4. La Serena Way shall be improved within the dedicated right of way
in accordance with County Standard No. 102, (32'/44').
Streets "A" thru 'D" shall be improved within the dedicated right
of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section A. (36'/
60').
5. The landdivider will provide a left turn lane on La Serena Way at
the intersection with "A" Street as approved by the Road Department.
6. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance fro~ Rancho Calif.
Water District prior to the recordation of the final map.
The landdivider shall post a deposit and execute an agreement wit~l~
the ~tropolitan Water District prior to the recordation of the
final map.
8. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Department.
10.
11.
l~ne minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a
debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of
way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road
Commissioner.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face
of curb.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 {curb sidewalk}.
lra~ I~ap 23102
July 22° 1988
Page 3
14,
20.
22,
Primary and secondary access roads to the nearest paved road main-
tained by the County shall be constructed within the public right of
t
way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Sect on B, (32'/60')
at a grade and alignment as approved by the Road Conwnissioner.
This is necessary for circulation purposes.
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into
a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the
time of issuance of a building permit.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending
a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and
alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Connissioner.
Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Drdinance 461, Standard 817.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State
Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed
throughout the landdivision.
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on La Serena Way and so noted on the
final map.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope
easements as approved by the Road Department.
All centerline intersections shall be at gO° with a minimum 50'
tangent measured from flow line.
Tract Nap 23102
July 22, 1988
Page 4
4.
6e
71
81
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be
coordinated with TR 23101, TR 22148, and SP 199.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA)
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall
file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of
a 'Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental
Code Section 56000.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this
project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the
street improvement plans.
A striping plan is required for La Serena Way. Traffic signing and
striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs
borne by the applicant.
The landdivider shall comply with this department's recommendatie&s
for SP 199 as outlined in our letter dated June 2, 1988.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
Gus Hughes
Road Division Engineer
TO: PLANNZNG DEPARTMENT
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
RAY HEBRARD
FIRE CHIEF
5-3-88
Plannlnl & Enlineerinl Office
4080 L~mon Sireel, Suhe ] 1
Rlverllde, CA 9250!
(714) 787.6606
ATTN: TEAM
RE: TR 23102
Ntth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,*
the Fire Department Recomends the following fire protection measures be provided
In accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule A fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2~")
located one at each street intersection and spaced no mere than 330 feet
apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more tha&
. 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be IODO GPH for 2 hours
duration at20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to
the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant
types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow
requirements. Plans Shall be signed/approved by a registered civil
engineer and the local water company with the following certification:
"I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with
the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any conbustible building
material being placed on an individual lot.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
George Tatum, Fire Department Planner
jhw
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California 92501
Attention: Specific Plan
Kathy Gifford
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Tract 23102
This is a proposal to divide about 16 acres in the Temecula
Valley area, The site is at the northwest corner of the
intersection of La Serena Way and Butterfield Road.
Our review indicates that the area consists of well defined
ridges and natural watercourses that traverse the property. The
applicant proposes to drain all the onsite flows to La Serena Way
with streets and storm drain systems. Some onsite diversion at
the site's northeast corner was shown on the tentative map and
this should be corrected.
Following are the District's recommendations:
1. This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which
drainage fees have been adopted by the BOard. Drainage
fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of
the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area
Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner
as part Of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map Or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map; or
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map; provided
however, this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
have been initiated on the parcel within the prior 3
year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 23102
- 2 - June 17, 1988
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of ~oad right
of wBy should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
All lots sbould be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage
facilities.
Development of this property should be coordinated with
the develo[~nent of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercouTses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or
offsite construction and grading.
A copy o[ ~he improvement plans, grading plans and final
map alon~ wi~h supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Depez~nent for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 23102
- 3 - June 17, 1988
Questions concerning this matter may be referred %o Robert Chiang
Of this office at 714/787-2333.
cc: Community Engineering
Services, Inc.
RC:sef
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
OHN H. KASHUBA
· r Civil Engineer
COUNTY oF RIVERSIDE '
DEPARTMENTof HEALTH
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside. CA 92502
APR i 1988
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attn: Kim Gifford
RE; Tract Map 23102; Being a portion of the Rancho Temecula
9ranted by the government of the United States of An, erT~a to
Luis Vignes by patent dated January 18, 1860 and recorded
the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County.
California in Book 1 of Patents at Page 37 and a portion of
the Rancho Pauba granted by the government of the United
States of America to Luls Vlgnes by patent dated January 19
]860 and recorded in the Office of the San Diego County
Recorder in Book 1 at Page 45.
(37 Lots)
Gent 1 emen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap
No. 2310~ and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed accordIn9 to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the vater system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
3oint specifications, and the size of the main
at the 5unction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of t~
State of California, when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Klm Glfford
April 19, 1988
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certification: "I
certify that the design of the water system in Tract
Map 23102 is in accordance with the water system
expansion plans of the Rancho California Water Dlstrlct
and that the water service,storage and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to
such tract. This certification does not constitute a
guarantee that
any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire
protection or any other purpose". This certification
shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
company.
This Department has a statement from the Rancho California
Water District agreeingto serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the
subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial
arrangements to be made prior to the recordatlon of the
final map.
This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal
Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
specifications as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and 3olnt specifications
and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines-shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a
registered engineer and the sever district with the
following certification: "I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Map 23102 is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this tlme to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract."
~iv~rsid.~ County Flannxn~ Dept,
Pa~ Thr~
ATTN: Kxm 6ifford
April 19, 1988
It will be necessary for financial arran.~ements to be made
prior to the recordatlon of the f~nal map.
SM:tac
Must provide adequate rights-of-way.
EMWI)' s Right-of-Nay Department.
The proponent should contact
Must provide a site for the construction of:
sewer lift station
water pumping station
water storage reservoir
Will be required to use reclaimed water in the greenbelt areas.
Is within the Assessment District. Conditions must be
included that the tract cannot be recorded until the assessment has been
paid in full or an a~m~ended assessment district has been 'recorded.
Requires major master planning and the District cannot coherent until
the master plan is completed.
Can be provided with water service since the District has existing water
facilities in the area. {does not consider fire flow}
Can be provided with sewer service since the District has adequate sewer
facilities.
All above comments are subject to revision during submittal of tracts for
approval.
Should you have questions on any of the above comments, please call me.
Very Truly Yours,
EASTERN ~UNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
Planning Department
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
VICINITY MAP )
CASE NO.
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA )
R,~ SP ZCNE
/
AJ, i-IOA
\
cZ~
/
ZONE MAP
r
CASE NO.
P.C, DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA )
G MIN
ITA 9;LLAG
SWAP MAP
r
CASE NO. yT"/vf z~/oz
P.C. DATE '/-
ITEM #11
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103
Prepared By: Richard Ayala
Recommendation:
ADOPT Resolution 91-
recommending approval of the
First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23103 subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval,
based on the Findings contained
in the Staff Report
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCAT I ON:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Marlborough Development Corporation
Marlborough Development Corporation
First Extension of Time
West of Butterfleld Stage Road between La Serena
Way and Rancho California Road.
Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village)
North: R-T IMobile Home Subdivision
and Mobile Home Park)
5outh: SP ISpeclfic Plan No. 199,
Margarita Village)
East: A-1-10 ILight Agriculture 10
Acres Minimum)
West: SP (Specific Plan No. 199,
Margarita Village)
Not requested.
Vacant (Rou9h Graded)
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
North: Vacant
South: Single Family Residential
East: Agriculture
West: Vacant
Total Acreage:
Total Lots Proposed:
Proposed Density:
Proposed Minimum Lot Size:
29.2 acres
18 lots
0.6 DU/AC
1.0 acre
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 was
recommended for approval on September 28, 1988 by
the Riverside County Planning Commission in
conjunction with Tract Nos. 23100 Amd. No. 1;
23101; and 23102 Amd. No. 1. All four tracts
implement Village B of the Margarita Village Specific
Plan (SP 199 Amd. No. 1) which was previously
approved by the Board of Supervisors on September
13, 1988. Subsequently all four tracts (23100 Amd.
1, 23101, 23102, and 23103 Amd. 1 ) were approved
by the County Board of Supervisors on November 8,
1988.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 is a proposal
to subdivide approximately 29.2 acres into 18 single
family residential lots averaging approximately
51,~,00 square feet (1.18 acre) with a minimum lot
size of one acre. The subject site is located west of
Butterfield Stage Road between La Serena Way and
Rancho California Road.
Desiqn Considerations
The proposed subdivision has been designed in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance Nos.
3~,8, ~,60 and Specific Plan No. 199. The main access
to the project is Butterfield Stage Road. The
project has been designed to provide increased land
use and circulation efficiency.
Density
The proposed subdivision (Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23103) is consistent with the Density
Designation for Specific Plan No. 199 of .~-2
DU/AC. The actual proposed subdivision density is
0.6 DU/AC.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Grading
The subject site has been partially rough graded
and yet needs to be fine graded. The proposed
subdivision will entail approximately 95,000 cubic
yards of raw cut and approximately 210,000 cubic
yards of raw fill which will be imported from Tract
23100. The finished grading will be consistent with
adjacent existing residential developments.
The proposed density of 0.6 DU/AC is consistent
with the Southwest Area Community Plan and
Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village). In
addition, Staff finds it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
Environmental Assessments have been prepared on
all four tracts 123100 Amd. No. 1, 23101, 23102,
23103 Amd. No. 1). Environmental impacts were
assessed in EIR No. 107 and EIR No. 202 prepared
for the Rancho Village Specific Plan and the
Margarita Village Specific Plan. Additional
environmental evaluations have been provided by
the reports prepared for the specific plan
amendment and the acoustical studies prepared for
three tracts. No significant environmental impacts
have been found. Therefore, Staff is not
requesting any further environmental
determination.
There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law, due to the fact that the project is
consistent with existing site development
standards in that it proposes articulated
design features and site amenities
commensurate with existing and anticipated
residential development standards.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan, if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
5TAFFRPT\VTM23103 3
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project sirens existing Specific Plan No. 199
(Low Density Family Housing) land use
designation.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed residential structures; adequate
landscaping is provided along the project's
public and private frontages; and the
internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and
coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to
the fact that the proposal is similar in
compatibility with surrounding land uses;
and adequate area and design features
provide for siting of proposed development in
terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
(Specific Plan No. 199), and also consistent
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 4
with the adopted Southwest Area Community
Plan (SWAP) designation of Specific Plan.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project currently proposes an
independent access point from Butterfield
Stage Road which has been determined to be
adequate by the City Engineer.
10.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
11.
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and herein
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution 91 - recommending
approval of the First Extension of Time for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103
subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval, based on the findings contained in
the Staff Report.
RA:ks
Attachments:
Resolution 91-
Conditions of Approval
Exhibits
A. Site Plan
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 5
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
NO. 23103 TO SUBDIVIDE A 29.2 ACRE PARCEL INTO 18
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOCATED WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD BETWEEN LA SERENA WAY
AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 923-210-010.
WHEREAS, Marlborough Development Corporation filed a Extension of
Time in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Tract
MaD on April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Extension of Time;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty ~30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
{1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
{2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
STAFFRPT\V:FM23103 6
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
[b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(C)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances,
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP" ) was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Extension of Time is consistent with the
SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Covernment Code, to wit:
{1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending
approval of projects and taking other actions, including
the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title,
each of the following:
There is reasonable probability that First
Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23103 proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 7
~C)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (1) Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No.
L~60, no subdivision or extension of time may be approved unless the
followin9 findings are made:
a)
That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
b)
That the design or improvement of the
proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans.
c)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of
development.
d)
That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density
of the development.
e)
That the design of the proposed land division
or proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
f)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
9)
That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at
large, for access through, or use of,
property within the proposed land division.
A land division may be approved if it is found
that alternate easements for access or for use
will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsection
shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgment of a court
of competent jurisdiction.
(2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval
of the proposed Extension of Time makes the following findings, to wit:
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 8
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the City's
future General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with
State law, due to the fact that the project is
consistent with existing site development
standards in that it proposes articulated
design features and site amenities
commensurate with existing and anticipated
residential development standards.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future and adopted general plan. if the
proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact
that the project is in conformance with
existing and anticipated land use and design
guidelines standards.
The proposed use or action complies with
state planning and zoning laws, due to the
fact that the proposed use conforms with
those uses listed as "allowed" within the
project site's existing Specific Plan No. 199
{Low Density Family Housing) land use
designation.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation
patterns, access, and density, due to the
fact that; adequate area is provided for all
proposed residential structures; adequate
landscaping is provided along the project's
public and private frontages; and the
internal circulation plan should not create
traffic conflicts as design provisions are in
conformance with adopted City standards.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the conditions
stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate
potential adverse impacts of the project.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 9
f)
g)
h)
j)
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103 is
compatible with surrounding land uses. The
harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and
coverage creates a compatible physical
relationship with adjoining properties, due to
the fact that the proposal is similar in
compatibility with surrounding land uses;
and adequate area and design features
provide for siting of proposed development in
terms of landscaping and internal traffic
circulation.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect
on surrounding property because it does not
represent a significant change to the present
or planned land use of the area, due to the
fact that the proposed project is consistent
with the current zoning of the subject site
(Specific Plan No. 199), and also consistent
with the adopted Southwest Area Community
Plan (SWAP) designation of Specific Plan.
The project as designed and conditioned will
not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the Negative
Declaration adopted by the County for the
project, due to the fact that impact mitigation
is realized by conformance with the project's
Conditions of Approval.
The project has acceptable access to a
dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact
that the project currently proposes an
independent access point from Butterfield
Stage Road which has been determined to be
adequate by the City Engineer.
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed projects, due to
the fact that this is clearly represented in the
site plan and the project analysis.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 10
k)
That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps, exhibits and environmental documents
associated with these applicants and hereln
incorporated by reference, due to the fact
that they are referenced in the attached Staff
Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment,
and Conditions of Approval.
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Tentative
Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that
the previous Environmental Determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for
Environmental Assessment No. 32535) still applies to said tract map. An Initial
Study prepared for this project indicates that although the proposed project could
have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described in EIR Nos. 107 and 202 and
in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted. --
SECTION 3. Conditions.
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends
approval for the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103
for the subdivision of a 29.2 acre parcel into 18 single family residential lots located
west of Butterfield Stage Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road
and known as AssessoPs Parcel No. 923-210-010 subject to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
SECTION
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 11
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
STAFFRPT' VTM23103 12
ATTACHMENT 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23103
Commission Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Planninq Department
Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the
applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution. '~
The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section
10. 35 of Ordinance No. u,60 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and
recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~,60.
Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of
occupancy.
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit
within the project boundary until the developeris successor's-in-interest
provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A
cash sum of one-hundred dollars ~$100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with
the City as mitigation for public library development.
This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 23103 will expire one ~1 ) year after the original expiration date,
unless extended as provided by Ordinance u,60. The expiration date is
November 8, 1991.
The subdivider shall comply with the original Conditions of Approval for
Tentative Tract Map No. 23102 Isee attached) except as amended herein.
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
STAFF R PT\VTM23103 13
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or ragistered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. u,60.
Submit letter from adjacent property owner that the proposed drainage on
their property is acceptable to them.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative the developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
10.
All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to
the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
City Engineer.
11.
Vehicular access shall be restricted on Butterfield Road and so noted on the
final map.
12o
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
13.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City
Engineer and City Attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CC&R's shall be subject to the following conditions:
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 14
a. The CC~,R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
The CC~,R~s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CCSR's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation.
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CC~,R's shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC~,R~s shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CC~,R~s, then the City, after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice. may enter the property ar~!
perform, at the ownerrs sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CC~,R~s or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a llen in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
The declaration shall contain language prohibiting further
subdivision of any lots, whether they are lettered lots or
numbered lots.
ii.
All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently
maintained by homeowner~s association or other means acceptable
to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted
to the Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to issuance of
building permits.
The developer, or the developer~s successor, shall execute a current Public
Faci litles Agreement with the City of Temecula which provides for the payment
of the sum of money per residential unit then established by Resolution of the
City Council, prior to the issuance of any building permits for any individual
lots.
15.
The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteelng the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb
and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 15
16.
17.
18.
19.
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities.
c. Landscaping {street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 0,61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
20.
21.
22.
23.
2q-,
All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property
line.
The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to
the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions
of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 20? x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil
Engineer.
A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check.
The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 16
25.
On-site drainage facilities, located outside of road right-d-way, shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions."
26.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map, along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District for review.
27.
Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
28.
Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City"s CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
29.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
3O.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior te
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
32.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The
final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough
grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 17
35.
Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
Asphaltic emulsion Ifo9 seal) shall be applied not less than 1~, days following
placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and
9~, of the State Standard Specifications.
37.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
38.
A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the City Engineer for Chenin Cllnet and Placer Loudeaonne and shall be
included in the street improvement plans.
39.
Condition No. 7 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988
shall be deleted.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
Condition No. 28 in the County of Riverside Road letter dated July 22, 1988
shall be modified to read: A signing and striping plan shall be designed by
a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for Butterfield
Stage Road and shall be included with the street improvement plans.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour
or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plans.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 18
Bui)dinq ~, Safety Department
Submit approved tract map to the Department of Building and Safety for
addressing prior to submittal for Structural Plan Review.
~,5. Obtain )and Use and Building Department clearances.
~,6. School fees shall be paid to Temecula Unified School District.
STAFFRPT\VTM23103 19
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23103
DATE: 9-28-88
A~ENDED NO. I
STANDARD CONDITIONS
The subdivlder shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Tentative Tract 23103, Anended No. 1, which action is brought
about within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
B, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision t~p Act and
Ordinance 460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Deparbnent of Building and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
%f any grading ts proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
~an shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Mended No. 1
Page 2
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to cc,,,;~ncement of any grading outside of county maintained
f
road right o way.
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
3.
The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 7-22-B8 a
copy of which is attached.
Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County netntained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons s~h
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by*the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 6-23-B8 a copy of which is attached.
The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control Oistrtct's letter dated
6-)~-8~ g-27-BB a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies
~rithtn an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of
Ordinance 460, appro rtate fees for the construction of area drainage
facilities shall be coVlected by the Road Con;~tsstoner. (Amended by
Planning Commission 9-2B-BB)
lhe subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Harshal's letter dated 9-29-BB a copy of which
is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed conmnon open space area
improvement phasin , if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 3
Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a All lots shall have a minimum size of I acre gross.
b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section
3.8C of Ordinance 460.
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with
additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Drdinance 460 and so as
not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in
non-corner and through lots.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in confonnance with the
development standards of the Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1
ZOne,
When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot
shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet,
exclusive of the utility easement.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be
located away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use
of block walls and landscaping.
Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
"satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met.
County Fire Deparbnent
County Flood Control
County Parks Department
Rancho Water District
· County Health Department
County Planning Department
Eastern ~nicipal Water Dtst.
Prior to the recordatton of the final map, General Plan Amendment No.
150, Specific Plan No. 199, Amendment No. 1, Development Agreement No.
5, and Change of Zone No. 5107 shall be approved by the Board of
Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. I
Page 4
division shall be in conformance with the development s~andards of the
zone ultimately applied to the property.
19. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to
recordation of the final map.
Impacts to the Temecula Elementary and Elstnore Union High School District
shall be mitigated at the development application stage in accordance with
the district policies.
21. The common open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final
map and shall be managed by a master property owners association or CSA.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88}
9-28-88}
].~_Jl~[ar.~ar~t.t~N~,~f-~x~r~.~:~KH-t-t~)n~,~4x~t;t~')c-t-i~,n)n~L- (Amended
by Planning Commission 9-28-B8)
a~-~-~yt~k~-ion~- ic -~~GL<~iIy~y~l~. (Amended by
Planning Commission 9-28-88)
4~i~ertvt4ie-er-4~he-~,~t~y-'~-~es~r4~-i,~t~4:~ (Amended by Planning
Commission 9-28-88)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 5
22.
ev~ers-ef-eaeh-4~4v4elue4-qet-er--w~4(--ier--(~-rea~e~ab~e--c~s(--4~f-
:cemmee-eree~- (~nded by Planntng C~ss~on 9-28-88)
~~-~,-~~~-~ (Amende~ by
Plannlng C~m~ss~on 9-28-88)
(~ende~ b~ Planning Commission 9-28-88)
Prior to the recordatlon of the f~nal mp, the subd~v~der shal~ convey to
the County fee s~mple t~tle. to all colon or common open space areas.
free and clear of a~l l~ens, taxes. asses~nt, leases (recorded and
unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which ~n the so~e
d~scret~on of the County are acceptabl.e. ~ a conditions p~ecedent to the
County accepting t~tle to such areas, the subd~v~der sha~l su~ t the
following documents, to the Planning Depar~nt for review. whtch
documents shall be subject to the approval of that depar~ent and the
Offtce of the County Counsel: (~ende~ b~ Planntng C=Isston 9-28-88)
1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and (~ended
by Planning C~tsston 9-28-88)
2) A sable docu~nt conve~ng t~tle to the purchaser of an Individual
lot or unit whtch provtdes that the declaration of covenants,
conditions and restrlcttons ts Incorporated there~n by reference.
(~nded by Planntng C~tsston 9-28-88)
~e declaratlon of covenants, conditions and restrictions su~tted for
rev~ shall (a) provide for a te~ of 60 ~ars, (b) provide for the
establishment of a propert~ ~ers' association c~prlsed of the o~ers of
each ~nd~v~dual lot or untt and (c) contatn the following provisions
verbatim: (~ended by Planning ~ss~on 9-2~88)
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 6
'Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the
1 i
following provision shall apply: {Amended by P ann ng Con~isston
9-28-88)
The property owners association established herein shall, if dormant,
be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the
County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall
unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the County's
demand, title to all or any part of the 'common area', more
particularly described on Exhibit ' ' attached hereto. The
decision to require activation of the property owners' association and
the decision to require that the association unconditionally accept
title to the 'con~non area' shall be at the sole discretion of the
County of Riverside. (Amended by Planning Conelesion 9-28-B8)
In the event that the common area, or any part thereof, is conveyed to
the property owners' association, the association, thereafter shall
own such 'common area., shall manage and continuously maintain such
'common area', of any part thereof, absent the prior written consent
of the Planning Di rector of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. The property owners' association shall have
the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the
reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and sahll have the
right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the
paJnnent of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once
created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the
notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or
property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the
Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the
'common area'. (Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-88)
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles
of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association
Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control."
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-2B-BB)
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions
shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded.
(Amended by Planning Commission 9-28-B8).
Condttlons of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103. Amended No. 1
Page 7
23. The developer shall comply with the following parkwa~ landscaping
conditions and Specific Plan No. lgg, Amendment No. 1:
24.
25.
1)
2)
3)
Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an
application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a
parkway maintenance district for Tentative Tract No. 23102 in
accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the
project is within an existing parkway maintenance district~
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County
Road and Planntng Depart=ant. All landscaping and irrigation plans
and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable
for permanent ftllng with the County Road Department.
The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance
bonds, quaranteeing the viabiltty of all landscaping which will be
installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by
the district.
4)
The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until
such time as maintenance is taken over by the district.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those
operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the
Planning Director.
Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
1)
Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed
street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer
and then from the appropriate utility purveyor.
2)
Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting
district, or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the
site is within an existing lighting district.
3)
Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO,
unless the site is within an existing lighting district.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 8
4)
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Deparbnent of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County
Comprehensive General Plan.
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERNITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, detailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Deparb~ent approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide
for the following. d
1). Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
2) Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up
to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity.
3)
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view
with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as
approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed
underground.
4)
Parkways and landscaped bull ding setbacks shall be landscaped to
provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of
the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground
cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering
sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as
approved by the Planning Department and Specific Plan No. 199
Amendment No. 1.
s)
6)
7)
8)
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees
at key visual focal points within the project.
Where streets trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior
streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way,
they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants
where appropriate.
All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the
subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and
shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page g
28.
2g.
30.
9) All trees shall be minimum double staked.
trees shall be steel staked.
Weaker and/or slow growing
All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be
preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be
relocated or replaced writh specimen trees as approved by the Planning
Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans.
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits,
an overall conceptual rading plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for
subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and
shall include the following:
1)
2)
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through ~rch.
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
PriDr to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope
maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations
thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical hei hts shall be modified by an
appropriate co~inatton of a special terraclng (benching) plan increase
slope ratio (i.e. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined
with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding
t.n PoV) l'. tn v.rttc.1 h. ights ,hall b. co.tour-gr. ded incorporating
the grading techniques:
1) Re angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle
of the natural terrain.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No, 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 10
2.
33.
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the
natural rounded terrain.
3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where
drainage and stability permit such rounding.
4)
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
With to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety the developer will demonstrate compliance with th~
· acoustical study prepared for Tract 23103 Amended No. I which
established appropriate mitigation measures to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 Ldn and exterior noise levels below 65 Ldn.
b. Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall
not be less than ten {10} feet.
c. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet.
In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County of
Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement
between the developer and the County of Riverside, no building permits
shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the
subject tract until the developer, or the developer's
successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms of
said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing of public facilities.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. Wall and/or fence locations shall substantially conform to attached
Figure III-2B of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. {Amended by
Planning Commission 9-28-B8) -
All landsca ing and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved pV prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If
ans
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of Building and Safety.
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amended No. 1
Page 11
35.
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance wit~
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Oeparbnent field
inspection.
Not withstanding the preceding conditions,the heights of all required
walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No.
199 Amendment No. 1.
Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 199
Amendment No. I
Development of Tentative Tract No. 23103 Amended No.1 conform to shall
comply with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 and
Development Agreement No. 5.
KG:mp
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regtonal Team No. Re: 'T'r~c~
Area:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This project is in the
drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea
and
regulations.
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The Distrtct's report dated ~r. Ke 1'7, (lti'is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached comments apply.
Very truly yours,
CO:
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
Chief Engineer
JOHN H. KASHUBA
Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: ~er~ . ~?,
KL~NNrrH L.. [DWARDI rises NA.KICT 8TRIter
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
June 17, 1988
Riverside County
Planning Department
County ~ministrative Center
Riverside, California 92501
Attention: Specific Plan
Kathy Gifford
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re: Tract 23103
This is a proposal to divide about 29 acres in the Temecula
Valley area. The site is along the west side of Butterfield
Stage Road. This tract is within Specific Plan 199 for which
the drainage plan has been approved.
Our review indicates that the area consists of well defined
ridges and natural watercourses that traverse the property from
the east to the west. The applicant proposes to accept these
offsite flows across Butterfield Stage Road with culverts and
daylight the flows in their natural paths on the property.
Onsite flows would be drained with streets.
Following are the District's recommendations:
This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta
Creek/Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which
drainage fees have been adopted by the Board, Drainage
fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of
the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area
Drainage Plans", amended February 16, 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner
aB part Of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map; or
At t~ option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
o~ fees. the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing ~irector at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map; provided
however. this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 23103
- 2 - June 17, 1988
have been initiated on the parcel within t~e prior 3
year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active.
Adequate inlets and outlets should be provided to the
proposed culverts under Butterfield Stage Road. The ap-
propriate capacity of the culverts should be provided.
Erosion protection should be provided along all the
slopes which are exposed to the potential erosion
hazards.
fill
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown On the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free4
of buildings and obstructions".
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be re-
corded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria is exceeded. additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Tract 23103
June 17; 1988
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage
facilities.
Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or
offsite construction and grading.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter msy be referred to Robert Chiang
of this office at 714/787-2333.
Very truly yours,
cc:
Community Services
Engineering, Inc.
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
· r Civil Engineer
RC:sef
R 335-146-50
June 7, 1988
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
Attention: Mr. RonGoldman:
Reference: Tentative Tract No. 23103 - LOt 18
Variance for Lot Depth to Width Ratio
Dear Mr. Goldman:
We are requesting a variance from the County of Riverside in regardato
Ordinance 460, Section 3.8.C. for LOt 18 of Tentative Tract No. 23103, Amend
Map No. 1. This section requires that the lot depth shall not exceed 2 1/2
times the lot width.
Upon reviewing the proposed tentative, the County of Riverside Road Department
has stated that no vehicular access will be allowed from private property onto
Butterfield Stage Road. We can only provide access to the area previously
known as Lot 19 by combining Lots 18 and 19. This single lot has its access
only from Street "C".
By not combining these two lots, the area previously kno~ as LOt 19 becomes
inaccessable and virtually lend locked. Based on these conditions and
requirements, we therefore, request a variance from aforementioned section of
Ordinance 460.
Thank you for your help in expediting this matter.
Very truly yours,
7INE~, INC.
Bill U~
BU/em
co: Rick Niec, Marlborough Development
Bob Brink, Turrini and Brink, Planning Consultants
,9
Riverside County Planntng Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER 6 COUNTY ,~URI/EYOR
July 22, 1988
Re: Tract Map 23103 - Amend
Schedule A - Team SP
Ladies and Gentleman:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land
division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the
following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards {Ordinance 461).
It is -understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline
profiles, all existing easemants, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate O's, and that their omission or unacceptability may require the map
to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following
conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding
as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions
regarding the true maaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road
Commissioner°s Office.
The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages
caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra-
tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by
constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging
existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by
beth. All drainage easemants shall be shown on the final map
and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building,
obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed'. The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite
drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the
Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage
purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ordinance No. 460
will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage
purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage
facilities as approved by the Road Department.
Tract.Nap 23103 - Amend
July 22, 1988
page 2
10.
11.
13.
NaJor drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution
shall be as approved by the Road Department. ~
Butterfield Stage Road (including RCWD site) shall be improved
within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard
No. 100, (43'/55').
"C" Street shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. {44'/66').
'B" and mS" Streets shall be improved within the dedicated right
of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/
The landdivider will provide a left turn lane on Butterfield Stage
Road at the intersection with 'C" and "S" Streets as approved by
the Road Department. ~
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho Calif.
Water District prior to the recordation of the final map.
The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%.
The minimum centerline radii shall be 300' or as approved by the
Road Department.
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall
be 35 feet or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County
Standards.
When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a
debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of
way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road
Commissioner.
Tract I~ap 23103 - Amend
Juqy 22, 1988
Page 3=
15.
16,
21.
22.
23.
4e
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face
of curb.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision
in accordance with County Standard No. 4OD and 401 (curb sidewalk).
Prior to the recordatton of the final mep, the developer shall
deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot'as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should
the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into
a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the
time Of issuance of a building permit.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending
a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and
alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Comissioner.
Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for
maintenance by County.
Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than
fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall
be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt
emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and g4 of the State
Standard Specifications.
Standard cul-de-sacs and off-set cul-de-sacs shall be constructed
throughout the landdivision.
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall
be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Lot access shall be restricted on Butterfield Stage Road and so
noted on the final map.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets
shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope
easements as approved by the Road Department.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum 50'
tangent measured from flow line.
Tract Nap 23103 - Amend
Ju~y 22, 1988
Page 4
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be
coordinated with TR 23100, TR 23101 and SP 19g.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460
and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA)
Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifies under an
existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall
file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of
a 'Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental
Code Section 56000.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this
project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the
street improvement plans.
28. A striping plan is required for Butterfield Stage Road. Traffic
signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all
incurred costs borne by the applicant.
29. The landdivider shall comply with this department's recommendations
for SP 199 as outlined in our letter dated June 2, 1988.
GH:lh
Very truly yours,
~e s~/~ ~'/;
Road Division Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPART!v[ ENT
IN COOPERATION WTTH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
RAy HEBRARD
FIRE CHIEF
9-20-88
PLANNING DEPARTI. fXNT
TEA~ I, KATHY GIFFORD
TR 23103
Planning & EnlineerlnI Office
~4080 Lemon Strzet, Suite I |
R|venide. CA 9250!
(714) 7874606
j
~lth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division.
the FIre Department recommends the following flre protection measures be provlded
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized flre protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule "C" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2t") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 660 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 330 feet from'a hydrant.
Minimum fire flo~ shall be 500 GPN for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall
be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the water system
is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Dept."
The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION FEES
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with
the Riverside County Fire Department a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring
said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the
Flre Department Planning and Engineering staff.
KAYt4OND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
By
George Tatum, Deputy Fire Barshal
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
RIVERSIDE COUNTy
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attn: Kathy Gifford
RE; Tract Map 23103; Being a portion of the Rancho Teme~la
granted by the 9overnment of the United States of America to
Luis Vignes by patent dated January 18, 1860. and recorded
in the Office of the County Recorder of San D:ego County,
California in Book I of patents at Page 37 and a portion of
the Rancho Pauba Government of the United States of America
to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 19, 1860 and recorded
in the office of the San Diego County Recorder in Book 1 at
Pape 45.
(19 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map
No. 23103 and recommends that:
A water system shall be installed accordxng to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prindts of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a mlnimum scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in
all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the
State of California, when applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Page Two
Attn: Kathy Gifford
April 18, lg88
The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and
water company with the following certzficatzon: "I
certify that the deszgn of the water system z~ Tract
Map 23103 is in accordance with the weter system
expansion plans of the Rencho California Water Distr~ct
and that the water service,storage and distrzbution
system will be adequate to provide water servzce to
such tract. This certification does not constitute
guarantee thet it will supply water to such tract at
any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire
protection or any other purpose". This certzfication
shall be signed by a responsible official of the water
company.
This Department has a statement from the Rancho California
Water Dastrlct agreeing to serve domestic water to each and
every lot in the subdivision on demand providlnG
satisfactory f=nancial arrangements are completed w~th the
subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial
arrangements to be made prior to the recordat=on of the
final map.
Th~s Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal
Water District agreeing to allow the subd~vlsion sewage
system to be connected to the se~ers of the D~strict. The
sewer system shall be installed according to plans and
speclf~catlons as approved by the District, the County
Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submltted in trlpl=cate,
along wlth the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications
and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system
to the existing system. A single plat indicating location
of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the
sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a
registered engineer and the sewer district with the
following certification: "I certify that the design of the
sewer system in Tract Map ~3~03 is in accordance with the
sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water
District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at
this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed
tract."
Riverside County Pl&nning Dept.
Page Three
AT~N: Kathy Oifford
April 18, 1988
It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior to the recordatlon of the final map.
~~tll,Y~a~ni~tarian
Environmental Health Services
SM:tac
Bo~n] of Directx~:
Ricb~d D. Steffey
Jsmes A, Derby
8r. Vice Pz~sideut
Ralph Daily
Dons Kulberg
Joe A. Lundiu
Jfffrey L. MilsHer
T.C. Rowe
Officers:
Start T. Mills
General Manager
Phill~p L. Forbes
D~rec~or of Finance o
~easurer
Norman L, Thomas
DL~ct~r of Eng~neenng
Thomas R. McAliester
Di~c~or of Operations
& Ms~n~nence
B~rbara J. Reed
Disctot of Administration -
Rutan and ~cJ~er
Le~t Counsel
June 16, 1988
Riverside County Planning Department
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501~3657
Subject: Water Availability
Reference: Vesting Tract 23103
Gentlemen:
Please be advised that the above-referenced
property is located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the
property owner signing an Agency Agreement which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If RCWD can be of further service to you, please
contact this office.
Very truly yours,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Senga P. Doherty
Engineering Services Representative
F012/jkw169f
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRIC
28061 DIAZ ROAD · POST OFFICE BOX 174 · TEMECULA, CA 92390-0174 · (714) 676-4101 · FAX (714J 676-0~
April 15, 1988
Riverside County Planntng Deparlunent
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501
WatGAk~M~
Oaaer C Gimen
.... 5 "~ '
g C. 1S88
SUBJECT: VESTING TRACT 23103 (Gtfford)
The District ts responding to your request for conwnents on the subject
project(s) relattve to the provision of water and sewer service. The-items
checked below apply to this project review.
The subject project:
Is not within EHWD's:
X water service area
sewer service area
Must be annexed to this Distrtct's Improvement District No. in order
to be eligible to receive domestic water/sanitary sewer service.
__ Will be required to construct the following facilities:
a.) Water Service
b.) Sewer Service Comments were submitted to Riverside Co. (Feb.,
15, 1988) regarding SP 199 - Am #1. This is to reiterate those comments that
sewers are to be gravity, regionally sized and no sewers will be allowed on
private lands, or along lot lines. They are to be in streets.
24550 San Jeclnto SLeet · Poet OfTice Box 858 · Hemet, CeiLfort, is 92343 · Telephone (TI4) 925-TG76
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
// t /'
C
VICINITY MAP
CASE NO.
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
'2
\ R-T L~
\
AJ~i-IO
SP ZCNE.
R-I
R
ZONE MAP
CASE NO. Y~
P.C, DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA ~
/
~, RI TA ~'1LLAGE
SP 19'9
SWAP MAP
CASE NO. ~ ~:/~3
P.C. DATE
)TEM N:12
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 15, 1991
Case No.: Change of Zone No. 12
Prepared By: Mark Rhoades
Recommendation: The Planning Department Staff recommends
that the Planning Commission:
RECOMMEND ADOPTION of the
Negative Declaration for
Change of Zone No. 12; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
recommending approval of
Change of Zone No. 12.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems. Inc.
REPRESENTATIVE:
Markham F, Associates
PROPOSAL:
Change of Zone from A-2-20 ( Heavy Agriculture) to
I-P (Industrial Park) and R-5 IOpen Area Zone) on
L~I. 6 acres.
LOCATION:
Northwest corner of Solana Way and Margarita
Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
A-2-20
Heavy Agriculture)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North: A-2-20
South: R-3
East: R -2
West: C-1/C-P
Heavy Agriculture)
General Residential )
Multi-FamilyResidential )
General Commercial )
PROPOSED ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Park), R-5 (Open Area Zone)
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
A:CZ12 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Multi-Family Residential
Sin91e Family Residential/Vacant
Automotive Sales/Retail
No. of Parcels:
No. of Acres:
2
~1.6~ (gross)
Change of Zone No. 12 was submitted to the City of
Temecula Planning Department on February 20,
1991. The applicant's original request was for a
change of zone on approximately 41 acres from A-2-
20 (Heavy Agriculture) to M-SC (Manufacturing-
Service Commercial). The applicant was informed
by Staff that the SWAP land use designation for the
proposed site is commercial, which is not compatible
with any industrial zoning designations. However,
the applicant decided to pursue an industrial
designation and altered the request to I-P
(industrial Park). The applicant decided to
proceed with a light-industrial zone such as I-P
because it affords the City stricter development
standards, The request for R-5 zoning is for areas
adjacent to Margarita Road and Solana Way in order
to further buffer the proposed I-P zone from
existing and approved residential uses.
Location
The proposed change of zone is located on the
northwest corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way.
East of the site across Margarita Road is a 28z~ unit
approved multi-family residential development.
South of the site across Solana Way is an existing
high density multi-family residential development.
East of the proposed site are existing auto
dealership pads and a retail center. Northeast of
the site is a proposed specific plan for commercial
development which extends north along Ynez Road
to Winchester Road. Northerly of the subject site is
the proposed Campos Verdes Residential Specific
Plan which extends north along Margarita Road.
ChanqeofZone
The existing zoning of the subject site is A-2-20
which is heavy agriculture with a twenty (20) acre
minimum lot size. The site consists of two (2)
parcels of just over twenty acres each. The
proposed change of zone is a request for i-P
A:CZ12 2
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
I Industrial Park) zoning on both parcels. Staff's
concern is that I-P zoning is not compatible with any
of the adjacent zoning designations. The project is
surrounded by R-2 and R-3 zoning to the east and
south, C-1/C-P {General Commercial) to the west,
and current A-2-20 zoning to the north of the site.
The residential areas to the south and east are of
greatest concern because of the potential impacts of
an industrial use. The I-P zone requires a 50 foot
setback where residential or commercial zones are
adjacent. This would include the project site
perimeter. As a result of Staff's concern regarding
residential buffering the applicant has proposed an
R-5 strip which will provide open area buffering.
The R-5 zone will be shown on the zoning map as a
seventy-five {75) foot wide strip along Margarita
Road and Solana Way wherever the subject site is
adjacent to the subject City rights-of-way.
Improvements to the R-5 portion of the site would be
considered concurrently with any development plans
in the proposed I-P portion of the site. At that time
Staff would review the R-5 area relative to par~
type improvements.
The proposed change of zone is not consistent with
the current SWAP designation of Commercial. The
Commercial designation for SWAP does not allow any
industrial-type zoning.
However, the proposed industrial zoning will be
buffered by an R-5 open area strip adjacent to
Margarita Road and Solana Way. The I-P zone
development standards also insure additional
buffering where the project is adjacent to
commercial and residential zones. For this reason
Staff has determined that the impact of future
development on adjacent sites under the proposed
zoning would be minimized.
Currently, there is a project with existing M-SC
{ Manufacturing-Service Commercial ) zoning across
Ynez Road to the northwest. The existing SWAP
designation at that site is Restricted Light
Industrial. The proposed I-P zoning would
facilitate the future development and expansion of
the applicant's existing use.
A:CZ12 3
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
The Southwest Area Community Plan has not been
adopted by the City of Temecula, however, it is
used as a general guideline.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates
that the proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment.
The most significant impacts the proposed change of
zone might incur would be relative to
traffic/circulation and adverse impacts to adjacent
USeS ·
Because of the intensity of uses allowed in the I-P
zone, traffic impacts could be substantial. The
SWAP designation for Margarita Road is Major
Arterial which calls for an ultimate right-of-way of
10 feet. Solana Way has an ultimate right-of-way of
88 feet. This would facilitate the movement of
traffic from the proposed site. The applicant has
also indicated that access will be partially taken
from Ynez Road which will also relieve impacts on
Margarita Road.
Potential impacts to adjacent uses from future
development will be mitigated through the
enforcement of development standards. The I-P
zone requires a 50 foot setback when adjacent to
commercial or residentially zoned areas. In
addition, the applicant proposes an R-5 open area
buffer zone along Margarita Road and Solana Way.
This will further separate the existing and future
residential uses from the possible future impacts of
light industrial development. Staff recommends that
a Negative Declaration be adopted.
The proposed zone change will not have a
significant adverse effect on the
environment, as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
There is a reasonable probability that the
zone change from A-2-20 to I-P will be
consistent with the future General Plan.
Further, zoning proposed are similar to
existing zoning in the vicinity of the project
site.
A:CZ12 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
MR:ks
Attachments: 1.
2.
3.
There is not a reasonable probability of
substantial detriment to, or interference
with, the future and adopted General Plan, if
the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan due to the fact that
the proposal is substantially buffered from
surrounding land uses.
The proposed change in district classification
will likely be consistent with the goals,
policies and action programs which will be
contained in the General Plan when it is
ultimately adopted.
The site of the proposed change in district
classification is suitable to accommodate all
the land uses currently permitted in the
proposed zoning district as it is of adequate
size and shape for any proposed use.
Possible land use conflicts are not likely to
arise as the project proposes building
setbacks to buffer uses exittin9 in th~
general vicinity of the subject site.
Adequate access exists for the proposed
change of zone from Solana Way and Margarita
Road. Additional internal access and
required road improvements to proposed lots
will be designed and constructed in
conformance with Riverside County
standards.
That said findings are supported by analysis,
minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application
and herein incorporated by reference.
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
RECOMMEND ADOPTION of the Negative
Declaration for Change of Zone No. 12; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91- recommending
approval of Change of Zone No. 12.
Resolution
Environmental Assessment
Exhibits
A:CZ12 5
ATTACHMENT I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ZONE CHANGE NO. 12 TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON 41 ,6~
ACRES OF LAND FROM A-2-20 IHEAVY AGRICULTURE)
TO I-P (INDUSTRIAL PARK) AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SOLANA WAY AND MARGARITA ROAD AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-090-007, 008.
WHEREAS, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. filed Change of Zone
No. 12 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Change of Zone application was processed in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Change of Zone on
April 15, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommend approval of said Change of Zone;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findin,qs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty {30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A:CZ12 6
a)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
c)
The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, ( hereinafter "SWAP" ) was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a time~
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Change of Zone is consistent with the SWAP
and does meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
~1 ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
~2) The Planning Commission finds, in recommending
approval of projects and taking other actions, including
the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title,
each of the following:
a)
There is reasonable probability that Change
of Zone No. 5 proposed will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
b)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
A:CZ12 7
c)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. { 1 ) Pursuant to Section 6.5, no Change of Zone may be
approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not
be detrimental to the health safety and welfare of the community, and
further, that any Zone change approved shall be subject to such
conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
{2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval
of the proposed Change of Zone, makes the following findings to wit:
a)
The proposed zone change will not have a
significant adverse effect on the
environment, as determined in the Initial
Study for this project.
b)
There is a reasonable probability that the
zone change from A-2-20 to I-P will be
consistent with the future General P)an.
Further, zoning proposed are similar to
existing zoning in the vicinity of the project
site.
c)
There is not a reasonable probability of
substantial detriment to, or interference
with, the future and adopted General Plan, if
the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan due to the fact that
the proposal is substantially buffered from
surrounding land uses.
d)
The proposed change in district classification
will likely be consistent with the goals,
policies and action programs which will be
contained in the General Plan when it is
ultimately adopted.
e)
The site of the proposed change in district
classification is suitable to accommodate all
the land uses currently permitted in the
proposed zoning district as it is of adequate
size and shape for any proposed use.
Possible land use conflicts are not likely to
arise as the project proposes building
setbacks to buffer uses existing in the
general vicinity of the subject site.
A:CZ12 8
f)
Adequate access exists for the proposed
change of zone from Solana Way and Margarita
Road. Additional internal access and
required road improvements to proposed lots
will be designed and constructed in
conformance with Riverside County
standards.
g)
That said findings are supported by analysis,
minutes, maps, exhibits, and environmental
documents associated with this application
and herein incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3.
That the City of Temecula Plannin9 Commission hereby recommends
approval of Zone Change No. 12 to change the zoning on ~,1.64 acres of land from A-
2-20 to I-P at the northwest corner of Solana Way and Margarita Road.
SECTION 4.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:CZ12 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
Backqround
1. Name of Proponent:
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
26351 Ynez Road
Temecula, CA 92390
(714) 694-2400
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
March 4, 1991
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Change of Zone No. 12
6. Location of Proposal:
Northwest Corner of Solana Way and
Marqarita Road
Environmental Impacts
( Explanations of all answers are provided on attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
X
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
X
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
X
The destruction, coverin9 or modi-
fication of any unique 9eologic or
physical features?
X
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on
or off site?
X
A:CZ12 10
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes. landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
Water. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow or ground waters?
Yes
Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A:CZ12 11
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants ( including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(blrds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
A:CZ12 12
10.
11.
12.
13.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
Yes Maybe No
a. Increases in existing noise levels? __ X
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? X
Li9ht and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
X
X
X
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticicles,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
A:CZ12 13
Yes Maybe No
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking? __ __ X
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? __ X
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? __ X
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, b/cyclists or pedestrians? __ __ X
1~,. Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? __ __ X
b. Police protection? __ __ X
c. Schools? X
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? __ __ X
f. Other governmental services: __ __ X
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy? __ __ X
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? __ __ X
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __ __ X
A:CZ12 1~,
17.
18.
19.
20.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard ( excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A:CZ12 15
Yes Maybe No
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environ-
mental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? ( A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly? __
X
X
X
X
A:CZ12 16
III Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
1 .a-g.
2.a,b,c.
3.a-i.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts caused by grading concerns
will not be increased by a change in the zoning classification.
Maybe. A change in land use from agriculture to industrial instead of
the planned commercial could have potential impacts relative to air
quality and odors. However, no development is proposed at this time.
At such time that development is proposed an initial Study will be
prepared addressing specific concerns. There will be no significant
impacts because of this project.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to water movements, drainage,
flooding, water quality or availability will not be increased by a change
in the zoning classification.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time th~
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to plant life will not be
increased by a change in the zoning classification. The site is not
currently used for agricultural purposes.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The potential impacts to animal diversity, wildlife
habitat, or reduction in endangered species will not be increased by a
change of zone.
Maybe. A change in land use from agriculture to industrial instead of
commercial could have potential impacts relative to increased noise
levels. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. Potential noise impacts will not be increased by a
change in zoning classification.
Maybe. The proposed change of zone would allow a project that could
have an impact on existing levels of light and glare. However, no
development is proposed at this time so there will be no impact. An
initial Study will be prepared when development is proposed,
Yes. The present land use is vacant and the planned land use is
commercial. The proposal for industrial zoning is a significant change
for both planned and present designations. Issues relative to adjacent
uses have been addressed with a buffer zone and building setbacks.
The industrial zoning will allow uses which have a greater intensity
A:CZ12 17
9.a,b.
10.a,b.
11.
12.
13.a,b,
e,f.
13.c,d.
14.a-f.
15.a,b.
than commercial or agricultural zoning. However, no development is
proposed at this time. When development is proposed an Environmental
Assessment will be prepared that specifically identifies impacts. The
current impact is not considered significant.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. There will be no impacts at this time.
Maybe. A change in zoning classification from agriculture to industrial
could increase the potential for explosion or hazardous substance
release. With the possible intensity of use, an emergency plan could be
interfered with. Hazardous substance and emergency plan potential
impacts will not be increased by a change in zoning designation.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to population will not be
increased by a change in zoning designation.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The potential impacts to housing will not be
increased by a change in zoning designation.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to vehicular movement,
parking, traffic and pedestrians will not be increased by a change in
zoning designation.
Maybe. Impacts to transportation and circulation could be significant
because of the intensity of permitted industrial uses. Margarita Road
has an ultimate right-d-way of 110 feet, and Solaria Way has a right-d-
way of 88 feet. Specific impacts will be evaluated when development is
proposed. The impact is not considered significant as a result in a
change of zoning designation.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to public services will not be
increased by a change in zoning designation.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The potential impacts to fuel and energy sources will
not be increased by a change of zone.
A:CZ12 18
16.a-f.
17.a,b.
18o
19.
20.a-d.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to utilities will not be increased
by a change in zone classification.
Maybe. Industrial uses have the potential to create health hazards
which may be exposed to people. However, no development is proposed
at this time so the impact is not considered significant.
Maybe. Industrial zoning allows uses which have the potential to create
offensive sites or that could be housed in structures massive enough to
create visual obstruction. However, no development is proposed at this
time so there is no impact. When development is proposed, an
application will be made through the standard review process.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressing
specific concerns. The possible impacts to recreation will not be
increased as a result of this application.
No. No development is proposed at this time. At such time that
development is proposed an Initial Study will be prepared addressin~
specific concerns. The potential impacts to cultural resources will not
be increased by a change in zoning classification.
A:CZ12 19
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of Approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
X
March 4, 1991
Date
FOr
CITY OF TEMECULA
A:CZ12 20
CITY OF TEMECULA )
C,7.-.1Z
LOCATION 'MAP
CASE NO. (:.,."Z..
P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA )
./
CASE NO. &.'Z.. t?--.''~
EXHIBIT NO."~
~.,P.C. DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA
./
CASE NO. C-Z.-I~
EXHIBIT NO. ~
~,P.C. DATE ur*lS~l j
CITY OF TEMECULA )
C.'/,. IZ
ITEM #13
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Case No.:
Recommendation:
April 15, 1991
Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance
Prepared By: Oliver Mujica
1. ADOPT Resolution No. P.C. 91-
recommending adoption of the
Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
BACKGROUND:
ANALYSIS:
City of Temecula
An Ordinance establishing regulations for the use of
Ambient Air Balloons and other similar inflatables.
City Wide
On June 26, 1990, the City Council directed the
Planning Department Staff to prepare an Ordinance
establishing regulations for the use of Ambient Air
Balloons and other similar inflatables, which shall
include the time limit to read not to exceed fifteen
(15) consecutive days of use within a ninety (90)
day period.
This direction was based on a proposal by the
Temecula Commerce Committee requesting that
Ordinance No. 348 be amended to include
advertising sign regulations for ambient air
balloons.
Ordinance No. 348 currently has the following
advertising regulations:
Section 19.3(b)(1)
..."No outdoor advertising display shall be placed
or erected until a permit therefore has been
issued. ,."
A:AirOrd. -1-
CONCLUSION:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
Section 19.4(b)(1)
"No on-site advertising sign shall be affixed on,
above or over the roof of any building, and no on-
site advertising sign shall be affixed to the wall of
a building so that it projects above the parapet of
the building."
Temporary signs are not specifically mentioned
except for political signs, subdivision signs and
For-Sale signs. which are allowed under limited
conditions.
Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, the
City Attorney has prepared the attached ordinance,
which includes: A maximum size of 1,500 square
feet (as measured at the cross section of the balloon
used); a maximum height of 30 feet (as measured
from the point of anchor to the highest portion of
the balloon ); and a time period not to exceed fifteen
(15) consecutive calendar days within any ninety
(90) consecutive calendar day period.
The project is exempt from CEO A under Section
15061 (b) (3). This project does not have a
potential for causing a significant affect on the
environment.
The proposed Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance
is necessary to bring about eventual
conformity with the Cityis Land use plans.
There is reasonable probability that the
proposed Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance will
be consistent with the City~s future General
Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with the goals and/or
policies of the City~s future General Plan.
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with
the future General Plan, if the proposed
policies are ultimately inconsistent with the
plan, due to the fact that policies will be
adopted for the new General Plan. therefore,
it is likely that the City will consider these
policies during their preparation of the
General Plan.
A:AirOrd. -2-
GENERAL PLAN AND
SWAP CONSISTENCY:
The proposed Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance is
consistent with SWAP. In addition, Staff finds it
probable that this Ordinance will be consistent with
the new General Plan when it is adopted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. P.C. 91 -
recommending Adoption of the Ambient Air
Balloon Ordinance.
OM:ks
Attachments:
Resolution
"Draft" Ordinance
City Council 5taft Report
(Dated June 26, 1990)
City Council Minutes
(Dated June 26, 1990)
A :AirOral. -3-
RESOLUTION NO. P.C. 91-
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OFTEMECULA RECOMMENDING THECITY COUNCIL
ADOPT THE AMBIENT AIR BALLOON ORDINANCE.
WHEREAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain
portions of the non-codified Riverside County Ordinances. including Ordinance No.
348 ("Land Use Code"); and
WHEREAS, such regulations do not contain provisions for the use of
ambient air balloons and other similar inflatables for on-site advertising; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to regulate the use of ambient
air balloons and other similar inflatables for on-site advertising and to protect the
health, quality of life, and the environment of the residents of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, public hearing was conducted on April 15, 1991, at which
time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
and
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall,
County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula
Valley Chamber of Commerce;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECT ION 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby finds that the proposed Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance will provide for the
establishment of regulations for the on-site use of ambient air balloons and other
similar inflatables in a fair and equitable manner.
SECT ION 2. That the Plan n ing Commission of the City of Temecu la
further finds that the proposed Ambient Air Balloon Ordinance is necessary to bring
about eventual conformity with its land use plans.
SECT ION 3. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby recommends to the City Council adoption of the proposed Ambient Air Balloon
Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference and
marked Exhibit "A" and dated April 15, 1991 for identification.
A:AirOrd. -4-
PASSED APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1991.
DENNIS CHINIAEFF
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held
on the 15th day of April, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS
A:AirOrd. -5-
ORDINANCE NO. 91-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO.
90-04PERTAININGTOADVERTISINGREGULATIONSAND
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE USE OF
AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS AND OTHER SIMILAR
INFLATABLES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findin.qs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes
the following findings:
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(a) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
(b) The planning agency finds, in approving projects
and taking other actions, each of the following:
(1)
There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
(2)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
(3)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as
A:AirOrd, -1-
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
The proposed land use regulations are consistent with the
SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code, to wit:
|a ) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
|b) The City Council finds, in adopting land use
regulations pursuant to this title, each of the following:
There is reasonable probability that
Ordinance No. 91- will be consistent with
the general plan proposal being considered or
studied or which will be studied within a
reasonable time.
(2)
There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
{3)
The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
SECTION 2. City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference
certain portions of the Non-Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including
Ordinance No. 348. Article XIX of the Ordinance No. 3~8 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"SECTION 19.8. TEMPORARY AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS AND OTHER SIMILAR
INFLATABLES.
a. For the purpose of this Section, a temporary ambient air balloon or
other similar inflatable shall mean a sign, not otherwise permitted by Article
XIX, which is a temporary structure supported by forced cold air (non-
helium ), constructed of fabric materials, and affixed to the ground or roof top
using steel cable anchoring systems. Such signs may be illuminated at night
usin9 electrical lighting systems.
b. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Section, temporary
ambient air balloons and other similar inflatables are permitted only in
commercial and industrial zones subject to the following limitations:
A:AirOrd. -2-
1. The maximum allowable size of any such sign shall be limited to
no more than 1500 square feet, as measured at the cross section of the
balloon used.
2. All such signs shall be ground mounted or roof mounted. The
allowable height shall not exceed thirty (30 } feet, as measured from the
point of anchor to the highest portion of the balloon.
3. All such signs shall not be free-floating {tethered) nor
constructed in a shape different from the "hot-air balloon shape"
typically depicted in the City of Temecula's Annual Balloon and Wine
Festival. For example, such balloons in the shape of blimps or cartoon
characters shall not be permitted.
u,. All such signs shall be permitted to be displayed for a period of
not to exceed fifteen (15) consecutive calendar days within any ninety
(90) consecutive calendar day period. A thirty (30) consecutive
calendar day permit may be issued by the City during the month of the
Ternecula Annual Balloon and Wine Festival.
5. The number of signs proposed to be used shall be limited to no
more than three (3) at any one site during any allowed time period as
set forth in subparagraph o,. Spacing of such signs shall be sufficient
so as to prevent rubbing, overlapping, or entanglement of any other
permitted sign.
6. No such sign shall be erected, placed or maintained unless first
approved by both the City Building Director and the City Planning
Director. Approval shall be obtained by the submittal of an application
and payment of required fees {to be established by Resolution). The
application shall be accompanied with a drawing, utilizing the Site Plan,
specifying the location of the sign to be approved with the specified
dates of the proposed set-up and take down of the sign(s).
7. All such signs shall be removed no later than the last day
permitted in the approved application.
8. No temporary ambient air balloon or similar inflatable shall be
erected, placed or maintained so that it does any of the following:
Mars, defaces, disfigures or damages any public building,
structure or other property; and
(b) Endangers the safety of persons or property.
9. Any temporary ambient air balloon or similar inflatable erected,
placed or maintained in violation of any provision of this Section may be
removed by the City five (5) days after notice of the violation given to
the owner, lessee or person in lawful possession of the property. Any
temporary ambient air balloon or similar inflatable which constitutes an
A :AirOrd. -3-
immediate danger to the safety or persons or property or which has not
been removed within ten (10) days as provided in subsection b. 7., may
be removed by the City summarily and without notice. The City may
bring as an action to recover the reasonable costs of sign removal under
this subsection."
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that
the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of
competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this
Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
parts of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force
and effect tl~irty (30'~ days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three
designated posting places.
PASSED· APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
· 1991.
RONALDJ. PARKS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
A:AirOrd. -4-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
SS.
I, June S. Greek· City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Ordinance No. 90- was duly introduced and placed upon its
first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of
· 1991, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted
and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
· 1991, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
JUNE S. GREEK
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
A:AirOrd. -5-
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION
SIGNS - BALLOONS
DEPT HD. '
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR~"
It is recommended the City Council consider a proposal of the Temecula
Commerce Committee to change advertising sign regulations; and
(1) refer to City Attorney to prepare amendments, or
(2) refer to City Manager for further study, or
(3) reject request and direct City Manager to enforce current
ordinance.
BACKGROUND
County Ordinance 348 and 457 regulate advertising displays in Temecula.
Ordinance 348 prohibits any advertising sign without a permit. It prohibits any
display above the roof line of a building. It prohibits moving signs.
Temporary signs are not specifically mentioned except for political signs,
subdivision signs and for sale signs, which are allowed under limited conditions.
On May 15, 1990, the County Department of Building and Safety sent letters to
businesses displaying balloons being used for advertising. Owners were asked to
abate the balloons.
On May I6, 1990, the City acted to remove illegal signs within the public right-
of-way.
On May 29, 1990, a delegation known as the Temecula Commerce Committee
met with the City Manager to protest enforcement of the sign ordinance and
indicated their intention to request City Council action to change the ordinance.
On May 29, 1990, the City Manager requested the County to suspend further sign
enforcement activities in order to allow the Temecula Commerce Committee to
make a presentation to the City Council.
The Temecula Commerce Committee has filed a report for Council agenda June
26, 1990. After considering the Committee's request, Council needs to give
direction to staff.
The City now has a Cede Enforcement Officer employed as city staff, and he will
be directed to enforce whatever ordinance the Council endorses.
TEMECULA COMMERCE COMMITTEE
June 19, 1990
Mr. Frank Aleshire
City Manager, CIty of Temecula
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Dear Mr. Aleshire,
Attached you will find our proposal for an amendment to
Temecula's interim sign ordinance which allows for ambient
balloons as a temporary form of on-site outdoor advertising.
I believe you will find our proposal to be quite reasonable in
scope and rationale,
We request that our presentation of this proposal be presented
before the City Council on Tuesday, June 26. Please place this
topic of discussion on your scheduled agenda for this particular
date.
Your assistance on our behalf is much appreciated.
ff you have any further questions please give me a call at 676-
5611,
n,,~l~. ~
~Jon~n C. Bell
Chairmen
P.O. BOX 564
TEMECULA, CA 92390
DEDICATED TO MOLDING A CITY OF PROSPERITY
Pz~paz~d b~: Tem~cula Ccemerce Committee (TCC)
Date: ~tme 19, 1990
To k Presented Before City Council: ~une 26, 1990
INTRODUCTION:
With the advent of Temecula's Balloon and Wine Festival
and the growing popularity of hot air ballooning as a
recreational sport in our valley, the words Temecula and
hot-air balloons have become almost synonymous.
AS a result, Temecula has unofficially been labeled, by
many, as "The Balloon Capital of Southern California".
Merchants have capitalized on Temecula's festive image
by tastefully incorporating colorful balloons into their
business logos, billboards, brochures, and on-site
advertising.
With the exception of subdivision signs, political signs
and "for sale lease or rent signs", Temecula's interim
sign ordinance does not provide a vehicle in which
merchants can apply for temporary forms of outdoor
advertising.
Note: Temecula's current codes pertaining to
"Outdoor Advertising Displays" are being
administered and enforced using the guidelines
set forth in Riverside County's Ordinance 348.
Ordinance 348 was adopted by the City of
Temecula as an interim ordinance, and will
remain in force and amended until such time
Temecula's long range General Plan is
developed and approved. A material part of
the General Plan will be criteria used to
regulate all forms of signage within the City
of Temecula.
Given the existing ordinance, the City currently has no
choice but to disallow balloons as a permissible form of
advertising.
As merchants and residents of Temecula, we do not believe
that our city's ordinance should be an "all or nothing"
situation when it comes to balloon advertising.
Therefore, it is Our objective to propose a reasonable
amendment to County Ordinance 348. An amendment that
maintains Temecula's balloon image and beautiful skyline
while at the same time providing an affective and
tasteful form of on-site advertising.
Baakuound to Proposal
Upon researching several southern California cities said to allow
balloons in their signage ordinances, we found the following local
cities to permit the same:
1. San Marcos
2. Escondido
3. Vista
4. Oceanside
5. Corona
6. City of Industry
In each of the above examples, we found that "ambient balloons"
were defined as "temporary signs" and were regulated under "special
provisions" of each city's particular master sign ordinance (refer
to Appendix A).
In addition, we found that the regulations pertaining to balloons
varied with respect to time and size limitations, amount of
required fees, the number of inflatables used, and the materials
from which the balloons are to be constructed from.
Formulation of ProPosal
In formulating our proposal, we used the ordinances of the
aforementioned cities as our amending guildline. By incorporating
these guildlines and definitions into Temecula's current ordinance,
we derived the following draft as a basis for our amendment
proposal:
ARTICLE XZX
ADVERTISING REGULATIONS
SECTION 19.1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. Because Riverside County is a large,
diverse and rapidly expanding Jurisdiction the Board of Supervisors finds that
proper sign control is necessary to provide for the preservation and protection
Of open space and scenic areas, the many natural and man-made resources, and
established rural cc~munities within Riverside County. Zt is the intent of
this ordinance to provide standards to safeguard life, heal th, property and the
public welfare, to provide the means for adequate identification of businesses
and other Sign users by prohibiting, regulating and controlling the design,
location and maintenance of signs, and to provide for the rmoval and
limitation of use of signs within the unincorporated area of Riverside County.
All outdoor adverUstng displays and on-site advertising structures and signs
in the unincorporated area of the County of Riverside shall confom to the
applicable provisions of this article. If any specific zoning classi ftcation
within this ordinance shall impose more stringent requirments than are set
forth within this article, the more stringent provisions shall prevail.
A~ended Effective:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
SECTION 19.2. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this ordinance, the followin;
~ords or phrases shall have the following definitions.
"Outdoor Advertising Display" means outdoor advertising structures and
outdoor advertising signs used for outdoor advertising purposes, not
including on-si te advertising signs as hereinafter ~efined. An
outdoor advertising display may be cortnonly known or referred to as an
'off-site" or an off-prenises" billboard.
"Outdoor Advertising Structure' means a structure of any kind or
character erected or maintained for outdoor advertising purposes, upon
which any poster, bill, printing, painting or other advertisement of
any kind whatsoever may be placed, including statuary, for outdoor
upon a permanent foundation a e c g
a permanent foundation.
"Outdoor Advertising Sign' means any card, cloth, paper, metal,
painted, plastic or wooden sign of any character placed for outdoor
advertising purposes, on or to the ground or any tree, wall, bush,
rock, fence, building, structure or thing, either privately or
publicly owned, other than an advertising structure.
The words *Outdoor Advertising Structure' and *Outdoor Advertising
Sign" as defined in subsections (b) and (c) do not include:
1. Offtotal notices issued by any court or public body or officer;
242
~J
~l~ding sJg~ necessa~ for ~he o~ratton and safet~ o~ Public
utility uses.
A structure erected near a city or c~nty ~undary, ~ich contains
the n~e of such city or coun~ and the n~es of, or any other
! nfomati on regardtng, ct vt c, fraternal er tel i gt ous organt zati ons
located therein.
'On-~tte Advertising Structure and Signs' means any structure,
housing, sign device, figure, statuary, painting, display, message
placard, or other contrivance, or any part thereof, which is designed,
constructed, created, engineered, intended, or used to advertise, or
to provide data or tnfomatton in the nature of advertising, for any
of the following purposes:
(1) To designate, identify, or indicate the name of the business of
the owner or occupant of the premises upon which the Structure or
Sign is located.
(2) To advertise the business conducted, services available or
rendered, or the goods produced, sold, or available for sale,
upon the premises where the structure or sign is located.
fe
f. 'Teqx>ra--'y O,,-site Jldve~cis~zxg Str~c"cu~e mad 8~s" sus uy
~Ze sly, ~ez, ~Z~n, ~t, uZuce, o: adve~s~ng
~lay c~st~ of ~, ~s, light f~ric, ~r,
~~, ~~, or ~r light ~teri~s, ~ or ~out
f~s, ~t~ to ~ ~Xayed for a l~ted ~ri~ of t~ only.
'/reewa~' means a divided arterial ~g~a~ for though traffic ~b
ful~ c0ntrol of access and ~t~ grade separaUons at ~nte~ect~ons.
"Highway" means roads, streets, boulevards, lanes, courts, places,
cogeons, trails, ways or other rights-of-way or easments used for or
laid out and intended for the public passage of v~hicles or of
vehicles and persons.
'Edge of a Right-of-way' means a measurement from the edge of a
right-of-way horizontally along a line normal or perpendicular to the
centerline of the freeway or highway.
"Maximum Height" means the highest point of the structure or sian
measured frcmg the average natural ground level at the base of tie
suppurti ng structure.
"Free Standing Sign" means any sign which is supported by one or more
columns or uprights irabedded in the ground, and which is not attached
to any building or structure.
"Surface Area" means that area of outdoor advertising signs and
on-site advertising signs as measured by the smallest gec~netric form
such Is a square, rectangle, triangle, or circle, or combination
thereof, which will encompass the face of the sign on which the
message is displayed.
243 ' ~
no
'For Sale, Lease or Rent Sign' means a sign advertising that the
property or structure upon which the sign is located is for sale,
lease, or rent.
'Shopping Center' means a parcel of land not less than 3 acres in
size, on which there exists 4 or more separate business uses that have
mutual parking facilities.
'Dtrectional Sign' means a sign used to ·rect and control vehicular
or pedestrt an traffic that is located upon the same parcel of 1 and as
the use that it is intended to serve.
'Significant Resources' means any county, state or federal site which
has significant or potentially significant social, cultural,
historical, archaeologtcal, recreatton~ or scenic resources, or which
plays or potentially could play a significant role in promoting
tourism. For the purposes of this article, the tem signi fieant
resources shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Riverside National Cemetery. A strip, 6GO feet in width, measured
from the edge of the right-of-way line on both sides of 1-215 fra~
the intersection of Van Buren Boul everd sourbeVy to Nance Road,
and on both sides of Van Buren Boulevard from the intersection of
1-215 weste~y to Wood Road.
2. Scenic Highways.
3. A corridor SDO feet in width adjacent to both sides of all
highways within three-tenths (3/10) of a mile of any Regional,
State or Federal park or recreation area.
"Scenic Highway" means any officially designated state or county
scenic highway as defined in Streets and Highway Code Sections 154 and
261 et seq.
· Illegal Outdoor Advertising Display' means any of the loll owl ng:
{1) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
erected without first complying with all applicable county
ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of its
construction, erection or use.
(2} An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
was legally erected but whose use has ceased, or the structure
upon which the advertising ~splay is placed has been abandoned
by its owner, and not maintained or used for a period of not less
than one (1) year.
(3) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
was legally erected which later became nonconfoming as a result
of the adoption of an ordinance; the amortization period for the
display provided by the ordinance rendering the display
nonconforming has expired; and conformance has not been
acccmpltshed.
(4) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which does not camply with the Notice of Decision or the approved
plot plan.
244
iS) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which is a danger to the public or is unsafe as may be determined
by the Director of the Building and Safety Deparbnent.
(6) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which is a traffic hazard as may be deten,qined by the Director of
the Building and Safety Department provided said traffic hazard
was not created by the reiDcarton of streets or highways or by
acts of the County.
· Illegal On-Site Advertising Structure or Sign" means any of the
fol 1 owl ng.
(1) An on-site advertising structure or sign erected without first
complying with all applicable County ordinances and regulations
h
in effect at t e time of its construction, erection Or use.
(2) An on-site advertising structure or sign that was legally
erected, but whose uses has ceased, or the structure upon which
the advertising display is placed has been abandoned by its
owner, and not maintained or used to identify or advertise an
ongoing business for a period of not less than ninety (90) days.
(3) An on-site advertising structure or sign that was legally erected
which later became nonconforming as a result of the adoption of
an ordinance; the amortization period for the display provided by
the ordinance rendering the displ ay nonconforming has expired;
and conformante has not been accomplished.
(4) An on-site advertising structure or sign which is a danger to the
public or is unsafe as may be determined by the Director of the
Bull dang and Safety Department.
(S) An on-site advertising structure or sign which is a traffic
hazard as may be determined by the Director of the Building and
Safety Department provided said traffic hazard was not created by
the relocation of streets or highways or by acts of the County.
'Abandoned" means el ther:
(1) Any outdoor advertising display that is allowed to continue for
more than one (1) year without a poster, bill, printing,
painting, or other form of advertisement or message; or
(2) Any outdoor advertising display that does not appear on the
inventory required by Section 19.3.a.(15); or
(3) Any on-site advertising structure or sign that is allowed to
continue for more than ninety (90) days without a poster, bill,
printing, painting, or other form of advertising or message for
the purposes set forth in Section 19,2.e hereof.
A~ended Effecti re:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
06-20-89 (Ord. 348.2989)
SECTION 19.3. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS. No person shall erect or
maintain an outdoor advertising display in the unincorporated area of the
County of Riverside, except tn accordance with the following provisions.
245
The changing of an advertising message or customary maintenance of a
~ega]]y existing outdoor advertising disp~a~ sha~] not require a~ peanit
pursuant to thts section.
Standards.
1. Zontng.
Outdoor advertising display are pemttted onl~ in the
C-I/C-P,.J~H-M and N-H zones and providing only that the
display meets all of the other requirements of the zoning
classification and this article. Outdoor advertising displays are
expressly prohibited in all other zones.
2. Spaclng. No outdoor advertising display shall be located ~thin
ftve hundred (500) feet tn any direction frm any other outdoor
advertising dtspla~ on the sme side of the htghuay; provided,
however, that if in a particul ar zone a different interval shall
be stated. the spactng Interval of the parttcula~ zone shall
preyat1. No outdoor advertising display shall be erected ~ithtn
the boundary of any significant resource as defined in Sectton
19.2.o. of this ordinance. No outdoor advertising display shall
be located ~thtn one hundred fifty (150) feet of properU far
which the zontng does not allow advertising displays provt dad;
however, that an outdoor advertising display may be placed Nitbin
one hundred (150) feet of property for ,htch zoning does not .allow
displays, if at the time an application for an outdoor advertising
display pemtt is applied for, there is no existing residential
structure or an approved building pemtt for a residential
structure ~ithtn one hundred fifty (1SO) feet of the location of
the proposed outdoor advertising display.
3. Height. The maximum hetght of an outdoor advertising display
shall not exceed a height of twenty-five (25) feet from the
roadbed of the adjacent freeway or highway to which the dtspla~ is
oriented, or a maximum height of twenty-five (25) feet from the
grade on which it is constructed, whichever is greater.
4. Poles. A maximum of two (2) steel poles are allowed for support
of an outdoor advertising display.
S. Roof Mounts. No outdoor advertising display shall be affixed on
or over the roof of any building and no display shall be affixed
to the wall of a building so that it projects above the parapet of
the hufl dtng. For the purposes of this section, a mansard style
roof shall be considered a parapet.
6. Number of Otsplays. No more than one (1) proposed outdoor
advertising display per application shall be pemitted.
7. Setbacks. No outdoor advertising display shall be erected w~thin
an established setback or building line, or ~thin road
right-of-way lines or future road right-of-way lines as shown on
any Specific Plan of Highways. A mintmum setback frun the
property line of one (~) foot shall be required.
8. leather of Display Faces. No more than t~o (2) display faces per
outdoor advertising di splay shall be permitted. Back*to-back and
V-type displays shall be allowed provided that they are on the
same outdoor advertising structure and provt dad that the V-type
246
displays have a separation between display faces of not more than
twenty-five (25) feet.
9. Lighting and Illumination of Displays. An outdoor advertising
display may be illuminated, unless otherwise specified, provided
that the displays are so constructed that no light bulb, tube,
filament, or similar source of illumination is visible beyond the
display face. Display making use of lights to convey the effect
of movament or flashing, intermittent, or variable intensity shall
not be permitted. Display shall use the most advanced methods to
insure the most erie efficient methods of display illumination.
Within the Palomar Or~servatory Special Lighting Area, all displays
shall cureply with the requtraments of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 655.
10. Display Hovament. No outdoor advertising displays shall move or
rotate, to display any moving and/or rotating parts. No
propellers, flags, or other noise creating devices, and no
architectural ambelllshments which utilize mechanical or natural
forces for motion, shall be permitted. Use of daylight reflective
materials or electronic message boards using flashing,
intermittent or moving light or lights is prohibited, provided,
however, that electronic message boards displaying only time
and/or temperature for periods of not less than thirty {30)
seconds is permitted.
11. Display Face Size. No outdoor advertising display shall .have a
total surface' area of more than three hundred (300) square feet
12. Outdoor Advertising Display Permit Required. No person shall
erect, alter, repair, or relocate any outdoor advertising display
without first obtainin an outdoor adverttstn display permit
pursuant to Riverside ~ounty Ordinance No. 45). No outdoor
advertising display permit shall be issued unless and until the
Building Director determines that the proposed activity is in
accordance with this Article and Riverside is in accordance with
t.~is Article and Riverside County Ordinance No. 457, and that the
aooHcant has obtained a valid State Outdoor Advertising permit.
1-3Z lotm~ttftcatton. No person shall place, erect, or maintain an
outdoor advertising display and no outdoor advertising display
shall be placed, erect, or maintaining anywhere within the
untncorporated area of Riverside County unless there is securely
fastened thereto and on the front display face thereof, the n&~e
of the outdoor advertising display owner in such a manner that the
name is visible from the highway. Any display placed, erected, or
maintained ~thout this identification Shall be deemed to be
placed, erected, and maintained in violation of this section.
~4. Mobile Displays. No person shall place maintain, or otherwise
allow a mobile vehicle, trailer, or other advertising display not
permanently affixed to the ground, as defined in Section 19.2.b.
of this ordinance, to be used as an outdoor advertising display.
H. Display Inventory. In order to evaluat, and assess outdoor
advertising displays within the untncorporated area of Riverside
County, within one hundred eighty (180) clays of the effective date
247
of this ordinance and on each fifth (5) anniversary after the
effective date of this ordinance, each display canpany with
outdoor advertising displays within the unincorporated area of
Riverside County shall submit to the Department of Building and
Safety, a current Inventory of the outdoor advertising displays
they currently own and/or maintain within the untncorporated area
of Riverside County. Failure to submit a current or accurate
inventory shall be dee~ed to be a separate violation of this
erda hence.
16. %~m~ora~y On-site/~ivertis~ng Signs. Unless otherwise
spaallied under Section 19.8 of ~_h~s ordinanam, the above St~dards
will apply to nil on-site tempormry signs.
b. Processing Procedure. I
1. 3~plication. zn addition to all other applicable Federal,
State, a~d local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, no
outdoor advertising. display ot temporary out(loot adveztieing
d~spla) shall be placed or erected until a pezmit therefore has
been issued by the Clt) of feeegZm~ on tl~e ~OZTa provided by the
Plan~ing Degaztment accompanied by the Eiling ~ee set ~ozth in
Ozdina~ce No. 671 a~d meeting the Requirements o~ Section 18.30 o~
this ordinance. Fees and appZi~ation forms for use of temporary
on-site advertising signs ~an be found in Seation 19.8 of this
ordiaan~e.
Said'~licatton shall also consist of ten (10) copies of a Plot Pla~'
drawn to scale, containing the na~e, address or telephone number
of the applicant, a copy of the current valid State Outdoor
Advertising Permit, and a general description of the property upon
which the outdoor advertising display is proposed to be placed.
In addition, the applicant shall provide sufficient number of
address labels as deemed appropriate by the Plannin~ Director for
all property owners within a five hundred foot (500) radius of
any proposed outdoor advertising display. The Plot Plan shall
show the precise location, type, and size of the proposed outdoor
advertising displays, all property lines, zoning, and the
dimensions, location of and distance to the nearest advertising
displays, building, business districts, significant resources as
determined by the ordinance, public and private roads, and other
rights-of-way, building setback lines, and specifically planned
future road right-of-way lines, and any and all other information
required by the Planning Director in such a manner that the
proposed display may be readily ascertained, identified, and
evaluated.
2. Hearing and Notice of Decision. Upon acceptance of an application
for an outdoor advertising display as canplate, the Planning
Director shall transmit a copy of the application to the
,o: Building .nd S.f. ty for re . ,nd
e than thirty (30) days after acceptance of the
~pltcation for outdoor advertising display as complete, the
annin9 Director shall schedule the time and date on which
the Planning Dtrector's decision on the application is to be
made. Not less than ten (10) days prior to the date on which
the decision is to be made, the Planning Director shall give
notice of the proposed outdoor advertising display, by mail
or delivery, to all owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll, and any updates, as owning real property
248
(b)
(c)
~thtn a five hundred (500) foot red(us of the exterior
boundaries of the parcel upon which the proposed outdoor
advertising d(splay is to be located. Notice of the proposed
outdoor advertising titsplay shall also be given by
publication in a newspaper of general circulation within
Riverside County. The Notice she11 include the statement
that no public hearing wtll be held unless a hearing ts
requested, in writing, and delivered to the Planning Director
at least two (Z) days before the date scheduled for the
decision is to be made. No public heartng on the application
for an outdoor advertising dtsplay shall be held before a
derision is made by the Planning Director, unless a hearing
is requested, tn writtrig, by the applicant or other
interested person, or if the Planning Director determines
that a public hearing should be required. If no public
hearing is requested or required, the Planning Director shall
give the.Notice of Decision to the applicant and any other
person who has made a written request for a copy of the
Notice of Decision. The decision of the Planning Director
shall be considered f(nal unless within ten (%0) days of the
date of mailing of the Notice of Decision to the applicant,
an appeal therefrom is filed.
If a public hearing is required under the provision of this
subsection, notice of the time, date, end place of the
hearing before the Planning Director end a general
description of the location of the real property ~htch is the
subject of the hearing, shall be given at least ten (%0) days
yrtor to the hearing as follows:
1) Nalllng or delivering to all owners of real property
which is located vrithtn a 500-foot radius of the
exterior boundaries of the parcel upon which the
proposed outdoor advertising crisplay is to be located
as, such owners are sho~ on the last equalized
assessment roll end any updates.
(2) The Planning Director may require that additional notice
be given in any other matter the Director dams
necessa~/or dest table.
If a publtc hearing is required, the Planning Director shall
hear relevant testimony from Interested persons and make a
decision ~tthin a reasonable time after the close of the
public hearing. A Notice of Decision shall he filed by the
Planning Director wtth the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,
not more than fifteen (%5) days after the decision. A copy
of the Notice of Decision shall be mailed to the applicant
and to any person who has made a written request for a copy
of the decision. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall
place the Notice of Decision on the next agende of the Board
of Supervisors held five (5) or more days after the Clerk
receives the Notice of Decision fr~a the Planning Director.
249
Appeals. The decision of the Planning Director shall be
considered final unless an appeal therefram is filed.
{a) Appeals to Planning C~,,Ission. The applicant or any
- interest person may file an appeal, accompanied by the fee
set forth tn Ordinance No. 671 of this ordinance, and on the
form provided by the Planning Deparl~ent within ten {10} days
after the Notice of Decision is mailed for those matters
where a public hearing was not requested or required or
within ten (10) days after the Notice of Decision appears on
the Board of Supervtsor's 8genda. The appeal shall state the
reasons why tt is believed the action of the Planning
Director is improper. Upon receipt of a completed appeal and
fee, the Planning Director shall set the matter for hearing
before the Planning Commission. Notice of the hearing on the
appeal s. hall be given in the some manner that notice was
ln the s,, ,,nn, r th,t riotic, .,s giv, n u,der 19.3.b
) The Plannlng Commission shall render its decision on
the appeal within ten (10) days of the closing of the
hearing. A Notice of the Decision of the Planning Commission
shall he filed by the Planning Director with the Board of
Supervisors, not more than fifteen (15) days after the
decision. A copy of the Notice of Decision shall he mailed
to the applicant, appellant and to any person who has made a
written request for a copy of the decision. The Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors, shall place the Notice of Decision on
the next ageride of the Board of Supervisors, held five (5) or
more days after the Clerk receives the Notice of Decision
from the Planning Director. The decision of the Plannin;
C~mmission shall be considered final unless an appeal
therefrom is filed.
(b) Appeals to Board of Supervisors. The decision of the
Planning Cammission shall be considered final unless an
appeal therefrom is filed. The applicant or an interested
person may file an appeal, accompanied by the fee set forth
in Ordinance No. 671 of this ordinance, and on the form
provided by the Planning Deparl~ent within ten {10} days
after the Notice of Decision of the Planning Commission
appears on the Board of Supervlsors's
agenda. The appeal shall state the reasons why it is
believed the action of the Planning Cammission is improper.
Upon receipt of a completed appeal and fee, or if the Board
of Supervisors assumes jurisdiction by ordering the matter
set for public hearing, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
shall set the matter for public hearing before the Board of
Supervisors, not less than five iS} days nor more than thirty
(30) days thereafter, and shall give notice of the time and
place of the hearing in the same manner as notice of the time
and place of the hearing in the same manner as notice was
~ioXer~ for the hearing before the Planning Cam~ission. The
of Supervisors shall render its decision within thirty
250
(30) days following the close of the hearing on the appeal.
The decision of the 8oard of Supervisors shall be final.
Revocation. Any outdoor advertising display pemit which has
been issued as a result of a material misrepresentation of fact
by the applicant or his agent, whether or not a criminal
prosecution ts initiated therefor, may be marfly revoked by
- the Planning Director who shall forthwith give ~ritten Notice of
Revocation to the applicant. Ifithtn' thirty (30) days after
notice is given, any outdoor advertising display authorized by
said outdoor advertising display pemit $hall be moved at the
appltcant's expense, Fatlure to rmove the display v~thtn Said
thirty {30) days shall be deemed a separate violation of this
ordinance, Nothing (n this ordinance shall authorize the
Installation or maintenance of any outdoor advertising titsplay
which is in violation of any State or Federal law or regulation.
Enforcement. ~herever the officials responsible for the enforcement
of edntntstratton'of the Land Use Ordinance or their designated
agents, have cause to suspect a v~olatton of this article, or whenever
necessary to investigate either an application for the granting,
modification, or any action to suspend or revoke an outdoor
advertising display permit, or whenever necessary to investigate a
possible v~olatton, said agents may lawfully gain access to the
· pproprtate parcel of land upon which said violation is believed to
exist. The folloW rig provisions shall apply to the v~olations of this
article:
]. All v~olattons of- th~s article committed by any person, whether as
a nt, employee, officer, principal, or othen~ise, shall be a
m~sde~eanor,
2, Every person who knowingly provtdes false information on an
outdoor advertising dtsplay pemtt application shall be guilty of
a misdemeanor.
3. Every person who fails to stop work on an outdoor advertising
display, when so ordered by the Director of Building and Safety or
the Planning Director, shall be guilty of 8 misdemeanor,
4 Every person ~ho, haytrig received Notice to Appear in court to
answer a related charge, willfully falls to appear, shall be guilty
of a mt sdemeanor.
5 A misdemeanor may be prosecuted by the County in the nine of the
. People of the State of California, or may be redressed by civil
action. Each v~olatton ts punishable by a fine of not more than
one thousand dollars (1,O00.O0), or by imprtsoment in the County
3at1 for a tern of not more than six (6) months, or by both fine
and tmprtsorrnent.
6. Every person found guilty of a violation shall be deemed guilty of
a separate offense for every day during a portion of ~hich the
violation ts committed, continued, or pemitted by such person.
7. Every illegal outdoor advertising display (permanent or
temporary) and every abandoned outdoor advertising display is
heraby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to
abatement by repair, rehabilitation, or removal in accordance with
the procedures contained in Section 3 of Riverside County Ordinance
No. 457.
Nonconforming Signs. Every outdoor advertising display which does not
confom to this ordinance shall be dee~ed to be a nonconforming sign
and shall be removed or altered in accordance with this ordinance as
follows:
1. Any outdoor advertising display which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
348,2496 (July 16, 1985) shall be abated or brought into
conromance with these promstons by July 17, 1990,
2, Any outdoor advertising dlsplay which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
348,2856 (june 30, 1988) but after the effective date of the
enactment of Ordinance No, 348.2496 (july 16, 1985) shall be
abeted or brought into conromance ~th these provisions by July
1, 1993.
Any outdoor advertising display which was lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 348.2989 but after
the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No. 348.2856
(June 30, 1988) shall be abeted or brought into confonaance with
these provisions within eleven (11) years of the effective date of
Ordinance No. 348.2989.
If federal or state law requires the County of Riverside to pay
just compensation for the removal of any such lawfully erected but
nonconforming outdoor advertising display, it may remain in place
until ~ust conpensation as defined in the Eminent Domain Law
(Title 7, of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure) is paid.
Illegal and Abandoned Outdoor Advertising Displays. All illegal
outdoor advertising displays and all abandoned outdoor advertising
displays shall be removed or brought into conromance with this
ordinance immediately.
~nended Effective:
07-16-B5(Ord. 348.2496)
06-30-883,8.28s6)
06-20-89: 348 2989)
252
SECTION 19.4. ON-SITE ADVERTISING STRUCTURES AND SIGNS.
No person shall erect an on-site advertising structure or sign in the
untncorporated area of the County of Riverside that is in v~olation of the
provisions contained ~thin any specific zoning classification in this
ordinance or that ts In violation of the following provisions.
Free-s tandtng St gns
1. Located ~thin 660 feet of the nearest edge of a free~ay right of
way 1the.
;he .xi.u. height o, a si n sha,, not exceed,, feet·
he maximum surface area oY a stgn shall not exceed 150
square feet,
2. All Other Locations.
(a) The max(mum height of a sign shall not exceed 20 feat,
(b) The maximm surface area of a sign shall not exceed 50 square
feet,
Shopping Centers - A11 Locations,
Notv~thstand(ng the provisions of sub-paragraphs } and 2, an
alternate standard for free standing on-stte advertising signs for
shopping centers is established as follows:
(a) the maximum surface area of a stgn shall not exceed 50 square
feet of ,25 percent (1/4 of 1:) of the total existing
building floor area in a shepp~ng center, vhtchever is
greater, except that in any event, no sign shall exceed 200
square feet in surface area,
b. The max~mm height of a sign shall not exceed 20 feet·
Number of Free-standing Signs - All Locations. Not more than one
free-standing sign shall he petaltied on a parcel of land, except
that if a shopping center has frontage on 2 or more streets, the
shopping center shall be perutired 2 free-standing signs, provided
that the 2 signs are not located on the s~ne street; are at least
100 feet apart and the second sign does not exceed 100 square feet
in surface area and 20 feet tn height.
Signs Affixed to buildings - A!1 Areas
1. No on-site advertising sign shall be affixed on, above or over the
roof of any building, and no on-site advertising sign shall be
affixed to the wall of a building so that it projects above the
parapet of the building. For the purposes of this section, a
mansard style roof shall be considered a parapet.
2. The maxamen surface area of signs affixed to a building shall be
as fol 1 ows:
(a) Front ~all of building -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed ZO$ of the
surface area of the front face of the building.
(b) Side valls of a building -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed 10S of the
surface area of the side face of the building.
(c) Rear wall of a bJildtng -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed 52; of the
surface area of the rear face of the building.
253
Dt rectional Stgns- Dtrectional signs to ad~se patrons of location,
distance or purpose shall be permitted on a parcel of land as follows:
1. The maximum height of such signs shall not exceed 3 feet.
2. The maximum surface area of such signs shall not exceed 6 square
feet.
de
On-site identification Signs - On-site Identification signs affixed to
the surface of walls, ,lndows, and doors of pemanent structures,
which do not exceed 4 inches in letter height and do not exceed 4
square feet tn area are pemitted in ad~tion to any other si gn
pemftted tn this ordinance.
SECTION 19.5. FOR SALE, LEASE OR RENT SIGNS. For sale, lease or rent
signs shall be permitted to be placed in all zone classifications subject to
the fol 1 owl ng regul ati ons .'
1. For One and two feaily residential uses - one sign not exceeding 4
square feet in surface area and not more than 4 feet in height.
2. For multiple f~ntly residential uses - one sign for each separate
frontage on a street, each sign not to exceed 16 square feet in
surface area and not more than 8 feet in height.
3. For commercial uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 24 square feet in surface area and
not more than 8 feet in height.
4. For indostrial uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 32 square feet in surface area and
not more than 10 feet in height.
5. For agriculture uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each sign not to exceed 16 square feet in surface area and
not more than 8 feet in height.
SECTION 19.6 SUBDIVISION SIGNS.
On-site subdivision signs, advertising the original sale of a
subdivision are penaitted within the boundaries of a subdivision, upon
approval of a plot plan pursuant to Sectlon. 18.30 of this ordinance
and subject to the following minim~m~ standards:
1. NO sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
2. No sign shall be within 100 feet of any existing residence that is
outside of the subdivision boundaries.
3. No more than two such signs shall be permitted for each
subdi vision.
4. No sign shall be artificially lighted.
Off-site subdivision signs advertising the original sale of a
subdivision, shall be permitted in all zone classifications, except
the CoP-S, N-A, and W-1 Zones, provided a conditional use permit is
granted pursuant to the provisions of Section 18.28 of this ordinance,
and subject to the following minimum standards:
1. No sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
254
2. No sign shall be within 100 feet of any existing residence.
3. No more than two such signs shall be permitted for each
suball viston.
4. The maximum period of time a sign may remain in place shall be two
years.
5. No sign shall be artificially ]tghted.
6. An ogreanent, secured by a $100 cash bond, shall be executed with
the County for each sign, assuring the ranoval of the sign within
the allowed time period. The bond and agreement shall be filed
with the Deparbnent of Building and Safety.
Added:
09-13-73 (Oro. 348.1201)
/mended Effect( ve:
01-20-77 (Ord. 348.1540)
09-25-80 [ 348.1856)
07-16-85 (Ord.)48.2496)
SECTION 19.7. TENPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS.
For the purpose of this ordi nonce, a temporary political sign shall
mean a sign, not otherwise permitted by this ordinance, which
encourages a particular vote in a scheduled election.
Notwi thstandi ng any other provi si on of this ordi nonce, temporary
political signs are permitted in all zoning classifications subject to
t he fol 1 owl ng l tmi tat( ons:
1. No such sign shall exceed 16 square feet in surface area.
2. No free-standing temporary political sign shall exceed 6 feet in
height.
3. No lot shall contain temporary political signs having an aggregate
surface area in excess of 80 square feet.
4. No such sign shall be artificially lighted.
5. No such sign shall be erected or placed more than 90 days prior to
the scheduled election to which it pertains.
6. All such signs shall be removed within 10 days after the scheduled
election to which they pertain, except that a sign erected or
placed for a candidate who prevails in a primary election may be
maintained until 10 days after the final election.
7. No such sign shall be erected, placed or maintained upon any
private property without the consent of the owner, lessee, or
person in lawful possession of such property.
8. No temporary political sign shall be erected, placed, or maintained
On any publicly owned tree or shrub or upon the improved portion of
any street or highway right of way which is used for traffic or
parking.
9. No temporary political sign shall be erected, placed or maintained
so that it does any of the following:
{a) Hers, defaces, disfigures or damages any public building,
structure or other property.
{b} Endangers the safety of persons or property.
255
Ce
(c) Obscures the view of any fire hydrant, traffic sign, traffic
signal, street sign, or public informational sign.
(d) Blocks motorists' lines of sight to areas of vehicular or
pedestrian traffic.
Any tmporary political sign erected, placed or maintained in
violation of any provisions of this section may be removed by the
County S days after notice of the violation is given to the concerned
candidate or sponsor, and to the owner, lessee or person in lawful
possession of the property. Any tmporary political sign which
constitutes an imme~ate danger to the safety or persons or property,
or which has not been removed within 10 days after the scheduled
election as provided in subsection (b)(6), may be removed by the
County summarily and without notice. The County may bring as action
to recover the reasonable cost of sign removal under this subsection.
Added Effective:
04-21-B3 (Ord. 348.2126)
~CTIO~ 19.e. ~2N~OPA~Y ON-SITE aDV2RTISING
a. lmbient lit Balloons
Definition: A-~tant ~tr Balloons are
temporar~ st~uctms supported ~ forced ~ld
~r (non-hell~), construed of f~ric
mterials, ~d fix~ to ~e g~d or ~f top
using steel ~le ~oring s)stm. ~e) N)
~ ill ~ ~ted at ~ght using ele~ri~l
lighting s~st~.
bstrictiOns: ~mbisnt air balloons shall be
allowed ooly ~n ce-m~rcial and industrial
zones sub~mctto compliance with the following
p~ovisions:
1. The max~nnn allowable size of any hallcon
allowed l~tlLts section shall be l~ted to no
more than 1,500 square feet, as measured at
th~ c~oss section of the balloon used. (City
of San Marcos Ordinance).
2. all balloons shall be ground mounted or
~oof mounted. The allowable height shall not
exceed flU. try (30) feet, as ~asu~d f~ ~e
~int of u~or to ~ heighest ~ion o~ ~e
MIlan. (City of S~ ~rcos O~nuce).
256
3. Balloons may nc.~t be free-floating
(tethered) nor oonstru,:ted in a shape
differing ~z'ym the "hot-air belleon shape"
typlca/ly portrayed in Temeeula' s
ballon and wine festival. Example, balloons in
the shape of blimps, cartoon characters etc.
shall not be permitted (TCC recommendation)
4. Ambient bellcons shall be permitted to be
displayed for a period not to exceed fifteen
(15) consecutive days wt~h4n any sixty day
(60) consecutive day period (City of Vista
Ordinance). In addition, a 30 consecutive day
permit may be issued by the City during the
month of Temeoula's annual Balloon and Wine
Festival. (TCC recc~mendation)
5. The number of bellcons used for
advertising purposes shall be restricted,
allowing for no more than three (3) at any one
site during any allowed time period (city of
San Marcos Ordinance). In addition, the
spacing of such bellcons shall ha sufficient
enough as to prevent rubbing, overlapping, or
entanglement of one ·nether (TCC
recommendation).
most first obtain the approval of the
Director and the Director of Plsm-ing.
Approval shall be obtained b~ the s-~m4 ttal' of
an eppliontion and peameat of required fees
(to be established b~ the Director of
PInning). The appliontion shall be
accompanied with · drawing, utilizing the site
plan, specifying the loeatiou of the bellcon
to be approved b~ the Plt~n4-g and Building
Departments with the specified dates of the
set up and take down for all proposed
bellcons. (Standard application procedure for
temporary signs).
violation of the adopted regulation
subject to a default amount for each
separate offense. Bach day of violation or
non-compliance with these regulations shall be
deemed as a separate offense and subject to
the penalties and payment of default amounts
estublishad b~ the City Council. (City of San
Marcos Orda. nan~e).
APPENDIX A
CURRENT CITY ORDINANCES THAT INCORPORATE AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS
JLhN-14-'St~ 13:45 ID:C1TY OF SAN MARCOS TEL NO:61,cr?447543 t~391 P02
r
all Fco8
· · 105 W, RICHMAR AVENUE . SAN MARCOS CALIFORNIA
61g/744.,40~0
AMBIENT AIR BALLOON APPLICATION
(and other inflatables)
CASE
Acae~ted by:
Date:
Receipt ~o.
ReZundable Amt
Approved:
Denied:
Date:
APPLICANT:
BUSINESS NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
SIGN COMPANY:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:_
DATE BALLCON(S) TO BE INSTALLED:
DATE BALLOON(S) TO BE REMOVED:
NUMBER OF BALLOONS:
SIZE OF EACH (a)
MATERIAL USED:
(b) (c)
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
Filing fee: 250.00 for application plus $200.00 for deposit fee,
(The desposit fee is refundable after the removal of the inflatable.
This fee will be used to defray cost of removal upon any violation
of City regulations.)
Submit: 1. One (1) folded site plan illustrating the locations of
the balloon(s) on the site.
2. One (1) elevation drawing to scale. showing the
location of balloon(s) On the building.
3. One (1) drawing or photograph of the balloon with a
description of the balloon. Include the balloon
material. attechment method and air source.
I have read Ordinance No. 84-637 pertaining to inflatable balloons.
X agree to comply with the requirements stated therein.
(signature)
JUN-!4-'_qO 15:46 ID:CITY OF SAN MAFJ, COS TEL NO:61B?44~45
m ,
OBDINANCg NO. sm-63~
AN OR0iNANCE OF THE CETY COUNCil
XDDING HeW P~OVZS[~5
~XVZZZ. OZONe, pE~TAZHZNQ TO ~at~AtR ~N$
~D SZ~t~i INF~X~ZI~BS
The City Council el the City of SinNercos DOES OtOXTN am
~ollove:
~occ~on [. The San Kitcol Muninipei COme is heceby suefide4
addinq nov ~COVtSIOns to Sectlo~ 924, X=ticLe 7.XXVIII ot the
Ordinance as totlove:
ZONINg ORDINANCE
AI~ZCTA ~ZZZ
use o~ the toZ~ovtu~ sign. except Cot commons of ~blic saCerr:
eta;ted bY lodetel, 8ta~e. ot local e~e~cte..
2. Public Ittv~cl time aM tee~etit~te 8tVn: ot clocks.
3. bitamy decorations tMt do Ao~ advertise a ~toduct sacvise
Of elteb~LlMent, foe UP to ~otty (40) days before i
~ haZeamy Boa .ten (~0) daft a~tet.
Compliance ~tth cue foliocrag D/OV~GLOQI.~
tAftatLbZel) I~iXX be allovid ~Ot a peCtOd mE ~o~ mo~e
b) Ate 6UO~ tnitactbtes uztitted vtt~Ln cue City musc
che Diteccof o[ Ptann~ng. ApproviX shilX be obca~ned
..... JUN-td-'9~ 15:47 ID:CITY 0~ SAN MARCOS TEL NO:G19~447545 ~591 P~4
·
o
3.
1701&
requited £aal (to be
Planning). The application ·hall
a drawLug. us//LoinS a ·lea plan. ·peEl(ring the
location ot the .lneZarib~e to
PllmAin~ and lolldLn~ DeplEte·mrS VICh the SpeCified
dagel o~ the let up and sake dovm Car RXX proposed
/h£latibZue. The gibe period Illwed Cot SUCh usa
shall be no longer Chart: up
cRZendac yORE or us BOre Chart s uximum st X4
$
consecutive days 'tm a Calendar year.
ln~laCl~iee. ldditlonally. all alleyed indian/bIB·
· hall be Vcound flaunted oc :oot-aoun~ed, Toe
alloyable htigh~ shall mot exceed · height o~ ~bi~cr
(30) ~na~, as measured tram
~ ....
d) The number st i~Xatibles used for advertising
,~;oses lhAl~ be castriOted alloyinS ~oc no so~e
tMee such tnZZlCtbXem 'as
e) The maximum aL~wab~e size Ot any in~lacibte illsred
by chis section ·ball be limited ~o no more ~hao l,SOO
Iquate ~aec, 11 measur·d at the 'cross sect[on oC che
inflazibla(·) used.
· n admlnl·t/a~lve action by CAm C~cy. The pecnl~ muse
be carlowad by .the BuiZdLnV and PLanning
and muse be accompanied by · CaSh dSpOSiC equal
gout tiBeR the permit See (deposited with the City)
~hich would be u·ed to defray cost of removal upon any
default or vLolaKton o~ Cicy cegulacions. The
J~]-14-'~ 18:42 ID:CITY ~ S~ MARCOS TEL N0:619744~45 ~]91Pg5
,~_
faqo 3
O~d/nance 14-637
Octoboe 23. ~914
day notice ~o t~s pecr~tccee and ~o ~he ;copeccy ownec.
~he ~ ~u e~ec ~he poemlees
g. ~e petmiaSma o: thmiC agen~ lhall mPe~i{y
u~ecial~ to be used ~o~ eaaA in~la~ible Installed.
the materials ~sed VLI1 ~o~ (ado. come. tip or
Oghecvile become u~slg~Cly dueLrig'
~hen ohm City may.nee issue the cwq~osced permit.
~Oapiy vt~h the Building Diceecoc,s
b) In addition ~o providing cue in(ocuc~on on the
plan, She lOea~ioaal lntoc~clon shall be a dta~cam
d~ovn ~o scale t~icaCtn4 tn a
view. ~he tAftlegible co be used: ~0 aceas tA which or
on Vhich the/ASiaethics age located. at veil as
Close et~gl~ a~ta and i.ndic&cl~g
ot time '{oc v~tch the petaLe 10 issued.
i) ~Y violacLeft O~ c~o adopted gegut/cion s~all be
6u~Jec~ co a detjut~ amo~c ~o~ each sepi~ace
dotcult ,amounts estab&ishod by C~e City Council.
~ljN'-14-'c3g 1]:48
ID:CITY OF SAN MARCOS
TEL N0:619744'?54~ ~391 ~
t
:~d~hance 14-637
Oocobe~ 23. ~911
its tequt&c mmettnq herd o~ the 23gd day o~ Occobec,
[ottertrig colt catX vote:
eXl"f OF i~ HA~CO5
sign, and in addition, deposit cash, certified check, or
instrument o~ credit in the amount of five hundred
dollars ($500.00) with the city as security to ensure
the removal of each each sign. Upon failure to so re-
move same after vrdtttn notice thereof from the city
upon expiration of the minor use permit, each sum
may be utilized by the city to 9ay for such removal and
any unused portion shall be refunded or rel-_~i after
such removal.
(90) Temporary sign.
(a) Def'mitieu~ A~V pro-table sign, banner, belleon, pennant,
vatsace, or advertisiq display amstructed of cloth. c~-
vas, light fabric. paper. cardboard, wattboard, or other
light materials, with or without fr~me~, intended to be
displayed for · limited period oft~,~e only.
(b) Ptrmitt~[ z0ne~ 0-P, C-l, C-2. C-8, C-T and M-I zones.
(c) .Location. Shall not be located or project into any public
right-of, way or private road es~ment.
(d) Number permitted. No Hmitation~
(e) Ares.
Sign area of ~11 such signs shall not exc__m~_ accumu-
lative total of one hundred (100) Mute feet.
8igu made of rigid materials shall not exceed
twenty-four (24) square feet.
2. Copy area. No limitations.
(f) Height. Signs made of rigid material and placed upon
the ground shall not exceed a height of alx (6) feet.
All other temporary s~gns shall not exceed the follow-
ing height limitations: ;.
SupS. No. 29
A-72.24
.Post-It - brand fax transm,ttal memo 7671
i"'(:~[.'~ ) (c q g -qq ~i
AJsPENDIX A--ZONING
(,)
(b)
(C)
(d)
1, O-P zolel. Twenty (20) feet.
2, C-l, C-2, C-8, C-T and M-I ~ones. Thirty
feet.
gpecial provisions. Temp~.___ar~ .sj~,__s_ha__~.~e limi.t~ed to
mivs~t~sing ~ _openIbm., sl~..'.al promotions, sales, s~e.
pet ormiz s on the remises subject these iindtationa:
1, Temporary tigris sh~ll advertise o~ly the gco~s and
le~'iess avaiinble on the pr~misee where the sigl~ is
locaf~d.
2. Tempomy signs shall be.~ermi..t~i. 0nJy :zf the party
refpoxt~b~e for the po~i/xg axed ma!~trn,n~'~ Of sllch
a. Name, address snd telephone number of the re-
sponsible party;,
b. A written description of the dispiXy;
c. The date on which postinK is to C0mmeDce;
d. The date on which the sign(s) are to be removed.
S. Temporary signs shall be permitted for a period not
to exceed ~Pveen (15) consecutive days within any
sixty (60) consecutive day perio~L
Definit[on. Any siZn palnred on, attached to or
constructed in a transit shelter.
Permitted zon[n2 district. Transit shelter signs may
be permitted in all commercial or industrial districts
or in residential districts, subject to minor use
permit.
Locazion. SiKr~s may b~'placed upon. attached to o~
constructed in any vertical surfrace on the in~erlor cf
a ~ransi~ shelter.
Ares,
1. Sign area shall be considered to be the interior
surface area of any vertical panel(s) placed to
A-72.25
Notification of Sign Ordinance Enforcement
Page 2
Temporary Signs:
Temporary signs are defined as "any portable sign, banner,
balloon, pennant, valance, or advertising display
constructed Of cloth, canvas, light fabric, paper,
cardboard, wallboard, or other light materials, with or
without frames, intended to be displayed for a limited
period of time only."
Tam orary signs may only be posted subject to the following
con~itions:
(a) Temporary signs may advertise only the goods and
services available on the premises where the sign is
located.
(b)
Temporary signs will be permitted for a period not to
exceed fifteen (15) consecutive days within any sixty
(60) Consecutive day period.
TempOrary signs will only be permitted if the party
responsible for the sign submits the following
information to the Code Enforcement Office for
approval prior to posting of any temporary sign:
(1)
Name, address and phone number of the
responsible party.
(2) A brief, written description of the display.
(3) The date on which posting is to commence.
(4) The date on which the sign(s) are to removed.
Off-site Real Estate Sig~:
Off-site real estate signs may De displayed only on weekends,
beginning 5:00 p.m. On Friday and ending at midnight the
following Sunday. Off-site real estate signs may also be
displayed on any legal holiday observed by the City of Vista.
Any signs which are posted or maintained in violation of these
provisions may result in the issuance of the citation (Notice to
Appear in Court). Additionally, any sign which is posted in the
public right-of-way will be summarily removed by the City's Code
Enforcement DiviSiOn-
Your cooperation in adherence to these regulations will be
greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or would like
additional lnfor~ation regarding enforcement of the Sign
Ordinance, please feel free to contact the City of Vista Code
Enforcement DiviSion at 726-1340, Extension 40S.
JUH-18-'g8 10:82 ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO TEL N0:6197414699
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
P
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET,
.- TOTAL PAGES( INCLUDING.TRASMITTAL FORM):
**Fax tranmittal ink is not permanent.
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
201 N. BROADWAY
Eseondldo, CA 9202S
(6~9) 'ut-~6w ~AX')
JUII-18-'SQ 10:02 ID:CITY OF ESC, ONDIDO T~_IJ~j6197414699 ~618 P02
JUN-18-'9~ 10:03 ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO
TEL NO:E,197414~cj9
$~618 P~3
AUTO DEALERSFlIPS
Freestanding
Ms l l -Mounted
Ident ification
Signs
Vall-Nountad
Signs to Identify
Individual Depts.
D/rectional
signs
~'Hot-air Balloons
Temporary Large
Temporary Banners
Proposed Previously CG Zone
Sign Approved Sign
Standards Siam Standards ~tandards
per dealership
or 2 for
dealerships
with tvo
franchises and
275' mE frontqe
One 200 $F main
per dealership;
or, .for dealerships
on corners or with
large expanses Of
building wail, more
than one with no
single elan to
exceed 200 2F and
the total area not
to exceed 600 $F
Any nunbeE with
letters not to
exceed 2~' in
heliht
Any number
8 SF signs
Four times per
year for 10-dey
special events
Pour times per
year foc 30
days each time
One monument
per dealership
One 200 $F olin per
dealership
Not elloved
One per lot
or parcel
Any nunher
at 12F per
50 $F Of
floor area
or 100 SF
of site
area with a
maximum
aggregate
area mE 300
SF
(Included
in above
standard)
Other Temporary
Displays
Small helium
b$lloons on
reekends
Were not expressly Any number
allowed, but were of 6 2F
$hoeu on Exhibit D-1 signs
Noc allowed
Not allowed
Noc allowed
DRAFT COPY
FOR - TIJDy ONe Y
Not allowed
For tVO
30-day
periods per
year
Alloys any
sign or
device
which moves
with breeze
Eor special
events not
to exceed
10 days
JUN-18-'B8 10:0~ ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO TEL.NO:8197~14699 ~618 PO4
SHOPPING CENTERS
Freestanding
Signs'
Proposed Prsvlously C6 Zone
Sign Approved Si~n
Standards SIin Standards Standards'
One 196 SF
internally illumi-
nated plexiglae~
pylon sign for Hone
Depot Center. One
exte~n~ll7 lllut~
hated wood el2n for
Burger King Center
One externally
illuminated wood
sign for each ceuter
(size per CC
requirements)
Wall-Kotmted
Signs
~easin8
Signs
Temporary
Signs
lntetmally lit
plexiSlass for
Home Depot Center
(one for each in-
l~ne shop, two
outpads end
with rear to a
street). Externally
lit mood for Burger
King Center. Size
and number per C~
standards
Oue 6 SF sign in
vacant shop eindov
plus one 50 SF sign
along street
Ssall helium
balloons, banners
and portable signs
to advertise grand
openings
One Z0 SF or 30 SF
rood marquee sign
on building front
(depending on length
Not expressly
allowed
Not allowed
DRAFT COPY
FOR STUDY ONLY
One 100 SF
each center
and one 60
SF monument
for each
outpad on a
separate
parcel
~ny number
with area
limited to
1 SF sign
peg 50 SF
floor area
vlthmazt-
mumaggre-
gate o~ 300
SF
Two 16 SF
signs per
parcel or
lot
Banners and
signs or
other
devices
ehich. nove
with bEeeze
to adver-
tise special
events not
exceeding 10
days
SR/SS-36-PD/S-3 ~/
JLIN-18-'9~ 10:~4
ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO
CONDITIONS
89-54-PD
EXHIBIT
TEL N0:~19~,~1,~699
(
~6i8 P05
A copy of the revised CC&R's shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Department prior to approval of any sign permits vithln the
Escortdido Auto Park. The submitted CC&R's shmll be consistent with
Attachment with the fellsrift8 exceptionst
Small helium balloons referred to in Section II.Z.2.e.1 shall be
allowed only in conjunction with mn issued City permit for temporary
display of a banner sign.
Banner signs mentioned in Section ll.E.2.e,2 shall be limited to two
30-day periods within any 12-month period and to 100 SF in area and
require a City pelvis.
The use of large hot-air balloons mentioned in Section lI.E.Z.e.3
shall be l~mited to two 10-day periods within any 12-month period
and requires a City permit.
D. Section II.E.3.s.3 shall stipulate that 'Monument signs shall not
exceed S 1/2' vide by 4' tall as shore An Exhibit D-I.'
E. The heading for Section II.E.3.c shall read *For any sate being used
for general commercial purposes other than auto dealerships.*
Section II.E.3.c.4 shall stare that it applies to the aome Depot
Center at the northwest comer of Valley Parkway and Auto Park gay.
Section II.E.Lc.S shall read 'Special signs which vary from this
sign criteria must first be approved by the Owner, D.E.C., and
obtain Planning Commission concurrence.
Section II.E.3.c.8 shall be revised so as not to alloy the posting
of a temporary freestanding sl2n along Valley Parkway.
This approval is subject to all applicable conditions of Tract ~77 and/or
80-173-PD.
All future ~equests for signa2e vAtbAn the Auto Park shall be approved by
the Auto Park Design Keviev Committee, City Design Review Committee or
Design Eeviev Board, Planning Department, and Building Department.
Applications shall be submitted to the Planning Department and shall
include three sets af plans and the approval of the Auto Park Design
aevieg Committee. The City Design Review Committee or Design Eeview
Board shall review the request for conformance vi~h the Ci~y's design
review 2uAdel~nes to ensure adequate separation between signs and
.appropriate size of signs to prevent sign clutter.
DR FT CO Y
FOR STUDY ONLY
City Council Minutes
June 26. 1990
I was red by Co~a~cilmem Bit 11, econde~ b
cil er ndema to epprO .staJ' - o - dation. ie
uphol he a;~/a~, subject to.-~he reco~unendations of the City
Tra c En~neer, based on ~ndings and analysis~dcontaine
t County report. 2) Approve Plot Plan No. 11499, base
~s and findings contained in the County aff
Repo[[, subject to the conditions of approval revised
t was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall,
Mu~oz, Parks
None
Lindemans~
/ Moor~
Report bv Temecula Commeroe Committee on Suaaested Sian
Orfiinance/Umenfiments
City Manager Aleshire reported he received a recommendation
from the Temecula Commerce Committee founded to consider
amendments to the sign ordinance. He suggested taking the
suggestions from the committee and having the City Attorney
prepare an ordinance. Mr. Aleshire stated these amendments
deal directly with the use of balloons as an acceptable form
of advertising. He introduced John Bell, spokesperson for the
Commerce Committee, to make a presentation.
John Bell, 27711 Diaz Road, gave a presentation to Council
stating Temecula has unofficially been labeled "The Balloon
Capital of Southern California" and stated many merchants have
capitalized on Temecula's festive image by using balloons as
a form of advertising. He said the present sign ordinance
does not provide a vehicle in which merchants can apply for
temporary forms of outdoor advertising. He reported that on
July 1, 1990, all balloons must come down without an amendment
to this ordinance. He said the committee has included in its
report a draft proposal which was formulating using other
cities as a guide including: San Marcos, Escondido, Vista,
Oceanside, Corona and City of Industry.
Councilmember Birdsall stated she would like the period not to
exceed fifteen consecutive days within any 90 day, not 60 day
period.
Councilmember Mu~oz stated he would like stricter limits, and
asked Council if it is willing to accept the fact that
everyone could have a balloon.
Nlnutes\6\26\90 - 13- 0~'/10/90
City Council Minutes June 26. 1990
Ed Morale, Commerce Committee, spoke regarding an informal
survey taken. Of 200 people, only one objected to the use of
balloon advertising in Temecula, and that person was in
opposition to a tethered balloon which could be a hazard.
City Attorney Fields said that all zoning ordinances must
first go to the Planning Commission for Public Hearings and
then would be brought back to the City Council. Me stated
this is a rather lengthy process taking anywhere from six to
nine months. He suggested adopting a moratorium amending
standards for up to one year period of time, while planning is
reviewing the Ordinance.
It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by
Councilmember Birdsall to direct staff to prepare a moratorium
ordinance permitting use of specific balloons as suggested by
the committee and incorporating changes suggested by Council
to raise the time limit to read not to exceed fifteen
consecutive days of use within a 90 day period.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindema~s,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
Councilmember MuBoz moved, Councilmember Birdsall
motion to instruct staff to continue to enforce
provisions of the County Sign Ordinance.
seconded a
all other
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Mu~oz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore
', >*.'f.
on Ynez a~ Rancho C iforn~ Ro~/ woul4 like~ ha~e a
Mi~te$\6\26\90 - 14- 07/10/90
ITEM
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE;
SUBJECT:
Plannin9 Commission
Oliver Mujica
April 15, 1991
Western Ridgeline Policies
On March 12, 1991, the City Council directed Staff to develop Hillside and Open
Space Policies to be used as the City of Temecula's Interim Western Ridgeline Policies
until the General Plan is adopted. This direction was in response to a development
proposal (Change of Zone No. 5748 and Tentative Tract Map No. 25980) on the
Western Ridgellne currently under review by the County of Riverside.
Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, the Western Ridgeline Policies was
advertised for the Plannin9 Commission Public Hearing date of April 15. 1991.
However, the representative for Change of Zone No. 5748 and Tentative Tract Map
No. 25980 requested that this item (Western Ridgeline Policies) be placed on the City
Council agenda for reconsideration.
On April 9, 1991, the City Council continued the Western Ridgellne Policies to their
meeting of April 23, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission CONTINUE the Western Ridgeline
Policies to May 20, 1991.
OM:ks
STAFFR PT\WESTR I DG
ITEM #15
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Planning Commission
Gary Thornhill, Planning Director
April 15, 1991
SUBJECT: First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125, is currently being reviewed by Planning
Staff in order to clarify Change of Zone No. 5122 which was approved by the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors concurrently with the subject Tract Map, but
never adopted by Ordinance to be come effective. Thus, causing a new Change of
Zone Application to be approved and adopted.
Both the Planning Staff and applicant are currently working together to resolve the
Change of Zone issue.
It should be noted that Public Hearing Notices will be sent to the surroundln9
property owners advising them of the rescheduled meeting.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission CONTINUE First Extension of
Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23125
"Off-Calendar".
A:23125\lb