HomeMy WebLinkAbout070290 PC Agenda JULY 2, 1990 - 6:~ PM """" .:".
ROLL CALL: ~lai~, Fahe~, Fo~d, Hoag~and, Chlniaeff
PUBLIC CO~ENTS ......
A totat of ~S m~nu~es is pFov~ded so membeFs of the pub)ic can addFess the
~ommlsslone~s on i~ems that are not isted on the A9enda. ~peakers a~e
~:~..... ~.~. ~ ~ ~ '~t ?':~ 'e 3 '. '~ ::~ ~ac~~;. If ~oU ~esi'~e to'~S~ea~ 'to the COmmissioners
When you are called to spea~~ p~ease come forward aad s~ate your name and
address.
For all other agenda items :a 'R~Uest to Speak~! form mUSt be-filed w!th the
Planning Secretary befer~e CommiSSion getS!to that:item:. There
(3)minute time limit ~ivi~iual speal<'~rs.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve minutes of June 18, 1990.
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
2. Tentative Tract No. 23209
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Review and consider the Tentative Tract and the Staff Analysis and
make a recommendation tothe City Council.
RECOMMENDAT ION:
.3~1 Revised pemitfor Plot Plan 11222 (Pair
· bU. iFlin~L~p.,.th....,,,.':...'~,..'''
k
COIIAISSI~)NERS REPORTS
Next meeting: Monday 16, 1990, 6:00 PM, Vail Elementary School,
DriVe, Tm~cula, CalifOrnia
-2-
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DIRECTORS MEMORANDUM
TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 2, 1990
Planning Commission
Ross Caller, Planning Director
Tentative Tract No. 23209
On June 19, 1990, the Temecula City Council directed Staff to present the above
referenced project to the Planning Commission.
The County Planning Commission has tentatively approved the project and
recommended that the City receive and file the project. The direction of the City
Council is that the Planning Commission review Tentative Tract No. 23209 and
make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the project.
RG:ks
· , CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
AB#:
HTG:
DEPT:
TZTLE:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209
DEPT HD
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council DENY Tentative Tract No. 23209, based
on the analysis and findings contained in this staff report.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Owner:
Applicant:
Engineer:
Proposal:
Location:
Area Plan:
Zoning:
Surrounding
Zoning:
Surrounding
Land Uses:
Laverda Edmond
Alba Engineering. InC.
Alba Engineering, Inc.
To subdivide an 80 acre site into 257 parcels with a minimum
lot size of 8,000 square feet.
West of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, and
approximately 1.25 miles north of Rancho California Road.
2-0, dwelling units per acre
RT-Mobile Home Subdivision (also permits conventional
dwelling units)
North:
South:
East:
West:
RA-5 and RA-2 1/2, Residential Agricultural
S-P. Specific Plan (Margarita Village)
A-1-10, Light Agriculture and R-R, Rural
Residential
R-T, Mobile Home Subdivisions and Mobile Home
Parts
North:
South:
East:
West:
Scattered single family residential
Vacant - Masterplan undergoing grading
Vineyards
Single family residential. undergoing grading
with some construction underway.
Project
Information:
Density: 3.21 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 80 acres
No. of Units: 257
ANALYSIS
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Tentative Tract Map No. 23209 was continued from the County Planning
Commission Hearing of December 20, 1989, at the request of the applicant and the
City of Temecula. The Coemty Planning staff was concerned that the proposed
subdivision was incompatible with the vineyards east of the site and was not
consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan design policy, requiring
buffers to minimize land use conflicts between agricultural land uses and other
land uses. -
County staff pointed out that the Margarita Village Specific Plan south of the site
stipulates densities of one (1) dwelling unit per acre and 0.7 dwelling units per
acre adjacent to the vineyards. County staff also requested that the applicant
redesign the project with lots of at least 10,000 square feet, gradually
transitioning to 20,000 square feet adjacent to the vineyards east of the site.
The applicant refused to redesign the project, and County staff prepared a
recommendation of denial.
Subsequent to the continuance from the hearing of December 20, 1989, the
applicant met with County planning staff. The applicant agreed to incorporate
sloped landscaped buffers 20 to ~0 feet wide along Butterfield Road and 20 to 50
feet wide along the portion of La Serena way which is visible from Butterfield
Stage Road. Block walls are included at the tops of the landscaped slopes.
These provisions satisfied the County staff, and a recommendation was made at
the Planning Commission hearing of February 7, 1990, to adopt the Negative
Declaration, to approve a waiver of the required lot length to width ratio for Lots
76, 102, 103, 136, 137, and lu, 1, and to approve Tentative Tract No. 23209,
Amendment No. ~. The County Planning Commission recommended that the City
of Temecula adopt the Negative Declaration, approve the waiver of lot length to
width ratio, and approve the Tentative Tract.
AREA SETTING
The 80 acre site lies in hilly terrain containing steep slopes in several areas and
is traversed by several well-defined washes. There is an existing single family
residential development and another development under construction west of the
site. The easterly site abuts vineyards. There are scattered residences on large
lots north of the site, and the Margarita Village Specific Plan is south of the site.
The site is near a designated Stephen~s Kangaroo Rat habitat and areas of
sensitivity for archaeological and paleontological resources.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposal is to subdivide an 80 acre site into 257 single family residential lots.
The minimum lot size is 8,000 square feet. Lot sizes range from 8,000 square feet
to 16,000 square feet.
As a buffer between the proposed project and the vineyards east of the project
site, the proposed map shows landscaped slopes 20 to ~0 feet wide along
Butterfield Stage Road and 20 to 50 feet wide on both sides of La Serena Way.
The map indicates a six foot block wall at the top of the landscaped slopes.
Portions of q3 of the proposed lots are contained in the landscaped slopes which
are to become a landscape easement maintained by a homeowner~s association.
A waiver from the subdivision design standard that lot depth shall not exceed 2
1/2 times the lot width for lots of 18,000 square feet or less is requested for six
of the proposed lots. One of the six lots is located on a cul-de-sac. The others
abut straight or slightly curved streets.
-3-
SITE AND AREA CONDITIONS
ACCESS
Access to the site from paved and maintained streets is taken from La Serena Way
on the westerly side of the site, and from Butterfield Stage Road on the easterly
side of the site. The nearest major arterial street with freeway access is Rancho
California Road.
TRAFFIC IMPACT
A traffic study was not submitted to the County for the project in question.
Therefore, information is not available regarding estimates of project generated
traffic and traffic impacts on the levels of service of streets in the vicinity. The
Southwest Area Community Plan suggests a target Level of Service C and a target
peak level of Service D. The project could be inconsistent with the Area
Community Plan on the basis of project generated peak hour traffic impacts on
Rancho California Road at Highway 15. The County Road Department specified
a fee of $150 per lot for traffic signal improvements. A traffic study is still
needed in order to determine the distribution and volumes of existing traffic.
projected future traffic, and traffic generated by the proposed subdivision.
GRADING
Tentative Tract Map No. 23209, Amendment No./4, indicates that the project as
designed would require over two million cubic yards of excavation on the site.
There would be 2,158,759 cubic yards of cut, 2,037,969 cubic yards of fill, and
120,790 cubic yards of earth exported from the site. An average of approximately
7,900 cubic yards of earth per lot would be moved on the site, and an average of
approximately/470 cubic yards of earth per lot would be exported from the site.
This amount of excavation constitutes a substantial alteration of the existing
terrain. Staff suggests that topographic alteration to this extent substantially
alters the character of the site and diminishes the character and flavor of the
community as a whole.
DRAINAGE
Several drainage courses traverse the property, and the site is subject to storm
run-off from several small watersheds. The developer proposes to intercept off-
site runoff and convey it through the site in a storm drain system. The tract is
located within the Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley and Temecula Valley
Area Drainage Plan. Drainage fees must be paid to the County Road
Commissioner at the time of recordation of the final map. Drainage easements
must be obtained from affected property owners for off-site drainage facilities.
Said easements must be recorded prior to recordation of the final map. Proposed
parcels 160 through 171 are located downslope from several parcels of Tentative
Tract No. 221/48. This will likely require cross lot drainage and recordation of
drainage easements on lots 16/4 through 170. Future drainage problems could
then be the responsibility of the City.
KANGAROO RAT HABITAT
A biological survey revealed that the Stephens Kangaroo Rat occupies parts of
the site. Prior to issuance of grading or building permits for the site, the
secretary of the interior must have approved the Stephens Kangaroo Rat Habitat
Conservation Plan and issued a Section 10 (a) permit for incidental taking of
Stephens Kangaroo rats. A report documenting the amount and quality of the
species habitat subject to disturbance or destruction by the proposed tract must
be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. Any disturbance to the site
requires appropriate federal permits, including grading, disking, clearing, and
construction.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT
The proposed density of 3.2 units per acre is consistent with the Southwest Area
Community Plan (S.W.A.P.) designation of 2-u, residential units per acre. All of
the proposed lots contain at least 8,000 square feet of total area and conform to
the minimum lot width and depth requirements of the RT zone. However, the
usable area of q3 of the proposed lots is reduced by the landscaped slope
easement and the block wall. Fifteen of the lots have less than 7,200 square feet
of usable area. Some parcels have as little as 6,000 square feet of usable area.
Eight of the proposed lots do not have 100 feet of usable lot depth. Lots with less
than 7,200 square feet of usable lot area are not consistent with the intent of the
SWACP designation of 2-u, units per acre. This intensity of development may not
be consistent with the Future General Plan given the natural topography and
adjacent vineyard.
PROJECT NOT CONSISTENT WITH SWACP POLICIES
SWACP General Design Policy states that adequate buffers shall be encouraged
in order to minimize land use conflicts between agricultural operations and other
land uses. The vineyards east of the site are part of the citrus/vineyard/rural
policy area. One of SWACP goals for this policy area is to preserve the rural
lifestyle and wine making atmosphere of the area. A landscaped slope 20 to u,0
feet wide and a block wall are inadequate as a buffer between a rural vineyard
area and the proposed 257 lot subdivision which would generate a substantial
amount of traffic on Butterfield Stage Road adjacent to the vineyards.
PROJECT NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN
The proposed tract is not compatible with the Margarita Village Specific Plan
south of the site. The Margarita Village Specific Plan stipulates densities of 0.7
to 1.0 unit per acre adjacent to the vineyards.
-5-
LAND USE
The proposed intensity of residential development is inappropriate for the
property in question. The hilly terrain of the site and the proposed amount of
excavation in excess of two million cubic yards of cut and fill indicate that
residential development of a substantially lower density than that proposed would
be more appropriate. The location of the site adjacent to a vineyard also
suggests a lower intensity of development pursuant to SWACP policies
encouraging buffers between agricultural operations and other land uses and
preservation of the rural life style and wine making atmosphere of the vineyard
areas,
FINDINGS
Due to its hilly terrain and the adjacent agricultural use, the site is not
physically suitable for the proposed density of development.
The proposed intensity of development is inconsistent with Southwest Area
Community Plan (SWACP) policies encouraging adequate buffers between
agricultural uses and other land uses and preservation of the rural
lifestyle and wine making atmosphere of the adjacent vineyard area.
The proposed tract is not compatible with the Margarita Village Specific
Plan south of the site in that the specific plan stipulates densities of 0. 7 to
1.0 dwelling unit per acre adjacent to the vineyards.
The proposed subdivision is technically consistent with the requirements
of the R-T zone regarding lot area and dimensions and conforms to the
density of 2-4 units per acre as designated in the SWACP. However, the
landscape easement along Butterfield Stage Road and La Serena Way
reduces the usable lot area of fifteen lots to less than 7,200 square feet of
lot area and the usable depth of eight lots to less than 100 feet. A total of
18 lots do not have adequate usable lot area and/or usable lot depth to
satisfy the minimum requirements for lot area and dimensions in the R-T
zone. Said 18 lots are not in conformance with the intent of the SWACP
land use designation of 2-u, units per acre.
Six of the proposed lots do not conform to subdivision design standard that
lot depth shall not exceed 2 1/2 times lot width.
There is a possibility that the proposed subdivision will be inconsistent
with the policies and land use designations of the City's General Plan when
it is adopted. The City has 30 months from the date of incorporation to
adopt a General Plan. There is a possibility that the proposed subdivision
could constitute a substantial detriment to or interfere with the City~s
General Plan.
-6-
Since no traffic study was conducted for the project. the volumes.
distribution, and impacts of project generated traffic on the streets in the
vicinity are undetermined. It is possible that cumulative traffic impacts
could result in levels of service inconsistent with the requirements of the
Southwest Area Community Plan and/or the new City General Plan when it
is adopted. It would be inappropriate to adopt a Negative Declaration and
approve Tentative Tract No. 23209 in the absence of a traffic study.
The location of lots 160 through 171 downslope from parcels of an adjacent
tentative tract could cause drainage problems and could constitute a legal
liability for the City.
Tentative Tract No. 23209 is consistent with the State Subdivision Map Act
regarding passive use of solar energy that the proposed lots have
significant southern exposure which allows for passive heating
opportunities.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council DENY Tentative Tract No. 23209 based
on the analysis and findings contained in this staff report.
~f EtICfi ~ ~
SITE
."' Sch.' ..............
~, ¢'~, ' ~'~ Callawsy
'" THE .~ w~ql Vineyards
~ VINEYARD
SERENA
~LIFORN
~s~ ~,~'
V/C' /AI ~T F NAP
ITR 23209
/~ ~GRADED ~
-, ~'~ ,c ~ VINEYAR
~; ~ ILL y~
" ~, EYARDS
' AC
' ~,.~ . - ~ ~ ~ ' LL Y
'; ~' ~/~ ' ~,s ,'.,"~'~"~'"
~.. s~~; ' ~',. /LL~~
""~'~': "' · ~ ~'~ ~a~ir
~' GRADE~
~, ALBA '~S~TFNG
i ~ AC. INTO 257 LOTS
'~ SKINNER LAKE
~"'UrrER~L_ leo' Z~ ~o.
800' RNERSIQE COUNTy NING ~~NT
NO 8¢ALE
I
,~ II11
SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF TEMECULA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FROM: Riverside County Planning Department SUBMITTAL DATE:ADril 6, i990
SUBJECT:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
First Supervisorial
257 Lots -Schedule
23209, AMENDED NO. 4 - Alba Consulting -
District - Skinner Lake Area - SO Acres -
A - R-T Zoning.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
RECEIVE AND FILE the above referenced case acted on by the Planning
Commission on February 7, 1990.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ADOPTED the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No.
33254 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental
assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not
have a significant effect on the environment; and
APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209, AMENDED NO. 4 subject to the
attached conditions and based on the findings and conclusions
incorporated in the Planning Commission minutes dated February 7,
1990.
Director
PROJECT LOCATION:
The project is located west of Butterfield Stage
Road and north of Rancho California road in the City
of Temecula.
BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amended No. 4 is a proposal to
subdivide 80 acres into 257 lots. The property in question is zoned R-
T. Surrounding zoning is A-1-10, R-R, R-A-5, R-A-2 1/2, R-T, and
Specific Plan No. 194 (Margarita Village). The property in question is
currently vacant. Surrounding land uses include vineyards, scattered
large lot residential, residential under construction, and Specific Plan
No. 194. The proposed project design is compatible with the existing
vineyards adjacent to the east, and the project design is consistent
with the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan Land Use Policies
and the General Design Considerations of the Southwest Area Community
Plan which call for adequate buffering between agricultural land uses
and residential land uses. All environmental concerns outlined in the
environmental assessment can be mitigated through the conditions of
approval.
Zontng Area: Sktnner Lake
Supervlsorla] DIstrict: Ftrst
E.A. Number: 33254
Ragtonal Team No.: One
TENTATZVE TRACT RAP NO. 23209
ANENDED NO. 4
Planntn9 Commission: 2-7-90
Conttnumd from 12-20-89
Ageride Ztem No.: 1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT
STAFF REPORT
1. Applicant:
2. Engineer/ReD.:
3. Type of Request:
4. Location:
Extsttng Zontng:
Surrounding Zontng:
SIte Characteristics:
Area Characteristics:
Comprehensive General Plan
I)estgnation:
10. Land Dlvtston Data:
11. Agency Recommendations:
12. Letters:
13, Sphere of Znfluence:
Alba Consulting
Alba Consulting
Subdivide 80 acres tnto 257 lots
West of Butterfield Stage Road and northerly
of Rancho California Road
R-T
R-A-5, R-A-2 1/2, R-R, A-1-10, R-T, and SP
199
Hilly vacant land traversed by several
washes,
VIneyards, vacant 1and and an approved tract
under construction
Land Use: Category IZ
Density: 3,8 dwelllng untts per acre
Total Acreage: 80
Total Lots: 257
DU Per Acre: 3.8 d~elltngunltsperacre
Road: 01-24-90
Health: 01-22-90
Rood: 01-22-90
FIre: 01-22-90
Bldg, & Safety:
Land Use: 01-24-90
Gradtrig: 01-23-90
Opposing/Supporting: None
Not wtthtn a ctty sphere
Protect Descrtotton:
Tract Nap No, 23209, Amended No. 3 proposes to subdivide 80 acres tn 257 lots, The
proposed project ts located west of Butterfield Stage Road and north of Ranch
California Road tn the newly Incorporated Ctty of T~mecula.
Land Use/Zoning:
TheproJect stte ts presently vacant. Surrounding land uses tncluclevtneyardsad~acent
to the east, scattered large lot residential to the north, residential under
construction to the vest, and Spectftc Plan No. 194, Nargartta Vtllage, to the south,
southeast and southwest.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23209, AND. NO.
Staff Report
Page -2-
The stte ts currently zoned R-T. Surrounding zontng to the east ts A-1-10 and R-R,
to the north R-A-5 and R-A-2 1/2, to the west R-T, and SP zontn9 to the south,
southeast, and southwest.
Denera1 Plan Consistency and Ares Cemoattb111tv:
The pro3ect stte as of December 1, 1989 lies wtthtn the newly Incorporated Ctty of
Temecula. The project also 1tee wtthtn the approved Southwest Area Community Plan.
The SWAP cleslgnatlon for thts stte ts 2 to 4 dwe111ng untts per acre. The proJect's
proposed denstry ts 3.8 dwelltn9 units per acre ts consistent wtth the SWAP designated
denstry for the slte.
The proposed project ts zoned R-T whtch allows mobilehome subdivisions and mobilehome
parks as us11 as stngle famtly residential development. The project site ts adjacent
to vineyards to the east whtch are designated a Citrus/VIneyard/Rural Policy Area on
the Southwest Area Community Plan. The northern boundary and the northwest corner of
the proposed project are bounded by land zoned R-A-5 end R-A-2 1/2. Spectftc Plan No.
194, Iirgartta Vtllage, 1tee adjacent to the proposed project to the south, southwest
and southeast. Elements of thts Spectftc Plan are adjacent to the vineyards to the
east. These elements have denstry designations of one (1) d~elltng untt per acre and
(.7) dwelllng units per acre. Clearly, these lo~ denstry designations tn Spectftc
Plan No. 194 are designed to buffer the htgher denstry elements of SP No. 194 from the
vineyards to the east.
The General Destgn Considerations sectton of the Southwest Area Community Plan states
that, 'Adequate buffers shall be encouraged In order to mtnlmtze land use coofltcts
between agricultural operations and other land uses." Staff has requested that the
project be destgned wtth buffers along the boundary adjacent to the vineyards. Staff
has also requested the project be destgneq wtth larger lots of 10,O00 square feet tn
the~esternporttons of the project, trenslttonln9 to 20,000 square feetoo the eastern
boundary of the pro3ect ad3acent to the vineyards and the I(N denstry element of SP
So. 194. The project applicant has refuse to destgn the proposed project to meet
these concerns and as such the proposed project ts Incompatible wtth the extsttn9
vineyards adjacent to the east.
Staff ftnds that the proposed project has a density whtch Is cooslatent wtth the Land
Use Element of the Southwest Area Community Plan, but the destgn of the proSect ts not
cooslatent wlth the element of the Southwest Area Coemuntty Plan whtch cells for
adequate buffering hatesen agriculture1 land uses and residential land uses, and that
the proposed project as destgned ls Inconsistent wlth the compatibility requirements
of the Southwest Area Coeeuntty Plan, Therefore, Staff ftnds thts project to be
Inconsistent wtth the Comprehensive General Plan and Incompatible wtth area
development,
TENTATIVE TRACT RAP NO. 23209, AND. NO. 4
Staff Report
Page 3
Envtror -ntal Analysts:
An tntttal study for Environmental Assessment No, 33254 was done for the pro3ect,
The Environmental Assessment 1denttried the following concerns: Stephens' Kangaroo
Rat Habitat (SKR), slopes, vegetation, energy resources, paleontological resources,
and schools,
BIological report No, 361 was prepared for the project stte. Thts report identified
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat on the project stte, Conditions have been drafted end
approved by County Counsel for cases where Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habttat has been
1denttried in areas outside established Stephens' Kangaroo Rat study areas. The
conditions of approval for thts case tnclude the applicable SKR conditions. These SKR
conditions requtrea habitat conservation plan be established prior to the tssuance
of butldtn9 or grading permits, and that the project comply wtth the provisions of thts
habttat conservation plan. Exhibit D 1denttries the areas of the proposed project
whtch has Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Habitat.
The project proposes significant cut and f111 slopes, Thts concern can be addressed
through the recommendations outltned in the County Geologtst's letter. All other
environmental concerns w111 be mitigated through the conditions of approval.
FINDINGS:
Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amended No. 3 Is a proposal to subdivide 80 acres tnto
257 lots.
2. The property tn questton ts zoned R-T,
Surrounding zoning tsA-1-10, R-R, R-A-5, R-A-2 1/2, R-T, end Spectftc Plan No.
194.
4. The property tn questton ts currently vacant,
5. Surrounding land uses Include vineyards, scattered large lot residential,
residential under construction, and Specific Plan No, 194.
6. The project 1tea wtthtn the newly Incorporated Ctty of Temecula.
The propose project denstry of 3.8 dwe111ng untts per acre Is consistent wtth
the Southwest Area Community Plan clestgnatton of 2-4 dwe111ng untts per acre.
8. The proposes project destgn ts Incompatible wtth the existing vineyards adjacent
to the east,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23209, AMD. NO. 4
Staff Report
Page 4
The proposed project design is inconsistent wtth the General Land Use Policles
and General Design Considerations of the Southwest Area Cofflnunity Plan which call
for adequate buffering between agricultural land uses and residential land uses.
10. All environmental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amended No. 3 is Incompatible wtth Area Development.
Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amended No. 3 is inconsistent with the compatibility
requirements of the Southwest Area Co~nunity Plan and therefore Is inconsistent
with the Comprehensive General Plan.
RECONHENDATIONS:
DENIAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209, AHENDED NO. 3 based on the ftndlngs and
conclusions as found in the staff report.
RW:lgg
12-11-89
FURTHER PLANNING CONSZDERATIONS:
Date: February 7. 1990
Tentative Tract Map No.23209 was continued from the Decemher 20, 1989 Planning
Commission Hearing at the request of the City of Temecula. The applicant had met with
staff prior to the December 20, 1989 Planntn9 Commission Hearing to request a
continuance and a meeting with staff to address staff's concern about the project
deslgn. Staff and the applicant have met, and as a result, the applicant has
Incorporated landscape buffers and block walls into the project design to address
etaff's concerns about project compatibility with the vineyard area adjacent to the
east. Staff finds that the project design now meets tts concern about compatibility
with area develol~mnt. The redeslgned tract (Tract No. 23209, Amd, No. 4) reflects
these changes.
Therefore, staff now ftnds the project to be consistent with the compatibility
requirements of the Southwest Area Community Plan. The design of the project ts
consistent with the elmnt of the Southwest Area Coawnunlty Plan calltrig for adequate
buffers between agricultural uses and residential land uses, and that the project is
consistent wtth the Comprehensive General Plan and compatible with area development.
The conditions of approval have been amended In order to reflect amended project
design.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23209, AMD. NO. 4
,taff Report
Page 5
Tentative Tract Nap No. 23209, Amended No. 4 is a proposal to subdivide 80 acres
into 257 lots.
2, The property In question Is zoned R-T.
Surrounding zoning is A-1-10, R-R, R-A-5, R-A-2 1/2, R-T and Specific Plan No.
194.
4, The property in question is currently vacant.
5, Surrounding land uses include vineyards, scattered large lot residential,
residential under construction, and Specific Plan No. lg4.
6, The project lies within the newly incorporated City of Temecu~a.
7. The proposed project density of 3.8 dwelling units per acre is consistent with
the Southwest Area Community Plan designation of 2-4 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed project design is compatible with the existing vineyards adjacent
to the east.
The proposed project design is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Policies
andGeneral Design Considerations of the Southwest Area Community Plan which call
for adequate buffering between agricultural land uses and residential land uses.
10. All environmental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval,
1·
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the
General Plan proposal being considered or studied by the City of Temecula, or
which will be studied within a reasonable time by the City of Temecula. (Adde~
by Staff 2-7-90)
There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the City of Temecula's future adopted General Plan if the project is
ultimately inconsistent with the Plan. (Added by Staff 2-7-90)
The project complies with all other applicable requirements of State Law and
local ordinances. (Added by Staff 2-?-90)
CONCLUSIONS:
1, Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amd. No.4 is compatible with area development.
Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amd. No. 4 is consistent with the Southwest Area
Community Plan, and the Comprehensive General Plan.
3. The environmental concerns can be mitigated through the conditions of approval.
.ENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23209, AMD. NO. 4
Staff Report
Page 6
RECDNHENDATION$:
ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 33254 based on the
conclusion that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and,
APPROVAl of the waiver of the lot length-to-width ratio for Lots 76, 102,103, 126,
137, and 141; (Added by Staff 2-7-g0); and
APPROVAL of TENTATIVE TRACT 23209. AMD. NO. 4, subject to the conditions of approval.
RW:!gg;csf
1/24/90
RZVERSZDE COUNTY PLANNTNG DEPARTNENT
SUBDZVZSZON
CONDZTZONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATTVE TRACT NO. 23209
AMENDED NO. 4
DATE:
EXPZRES:
STANDARD CONDTT:ZONS:
1. The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Tract No. 23209, Amended
The subdivider shall defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
RIverside, tts agents, officers, and employees from any clatm, actton, or
proceeding against the County of RIverside, tts agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set astde, void, or annul an approval of the County of RIverside, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Tentative Tract
No. 23209, Amended No. 4, whtch actton is brought wtthtn the ttme pertodprovicled
for tn California Government Code, Section 66499.37. The County of RIverside
wtll promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, actton, or proceeding
against the County of Riverside and wtll cooperate fully In the defense. Zf the
County fatls to promptly nottry the subdivider of any such claim, actton, or
proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully In the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of
Riverside.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, Schedule A, unless
modlfted by the conditions ltsted belud.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County
of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provtded by
Ordinance No. 460.
The ftnal map shall be prepared by a 11cansad land surveyor subject to all the
requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and Ordinance No,
460.
The subdivider shall submit one copy of a oolls report to the RIverside County
Surveyor's Offtce and t~o coptea to the Oepartment of Butldtng end Safety. The
report shall address the sotls stability and geological conditions of the stte.
Zf any gradtng if proposed, the subdivider shall eubmtt one prtnt of
comprehensive grading plan to the Oepartment of Butldtng and Safety. The plan
shall comply wtth the Untform Building Code, Chapter 10, es amended by Ordinance
No. 457 end as may be additionally provided for tn these conditions of approval.
A grading parmlt shall be obtatned from the OepartJeent of Butldlng and Safety
prtor to commencement of any grsdtng outside of County maintained road right-
of-way.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23209
AHENDED NO. 4
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16,
16.
Any delinquent proHrty taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
The subeivtder shall comply with the street improvement recoemmndatlons outlined
in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated Sel~embef-ar-tee~,
January 24, 1990, a copy of which Is attached. (Amended by Staff 2-7-90)
Legal access as requtred by Ordinance No. 460 shall be provtded from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the publtc and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road
Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Road
Commissioner.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map tf they are located wlthtn the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted
and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor.
Water and sewage disposal facilities shall be installed tn accordance with the
provisions set forth tn the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated
Aetest-~eT-teee;,January 22, 1990, a copy of which ts attached. (Amended by Staff
2-7-90)
The subdivider shall comply wtth the flood control recoewnendattons outltned by
the Riverside County Flood Control Distrtct's letter dated SelYeeeebef-~)r-t~,,
January 22, 1990, e copy of which ts attached. If the land dtviston lies wtthin
an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Sectton 10.25 of Ordinance
No. 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area dratnage facilities shall
be collected by the Road Commissioner. (Amended by Staff 2-7-90)
The subdivider shall camply with the fire Improvement recoemendattona outltned
tn the County Fire Marshal's letter dated A~ltlst-e8T-4HeT, January 22, 1990, a
copy of whtch is attached. (Amended by Staff 2-7-90)
The sulxItvtder shall comply with the recommendations outllned tn the Butldtng
Ind Safety Depart4ment - Land Use Sectton's transmittel dated 6=pteRber 6T-~ree~,
January 24, 1990, · copy of whtch is attached.
The subdivider shall comply wtth the recommendations outlined in the Building
end Safety Department - Grading Sectlon's transmittel dated ~el~embef-)T-4eeeT
January 23, 1990, a copy of which Is attached. (Amended by Staff 2-7-90)
'ENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209
~MENDED NO. 4
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
19.
20.
The subdivider she1! comply with the recommendations outltned in the County
Geologist's transmittel dated April 28, 1989, a copy of which Is attached.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement
phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planntn9 Department approval. Any
proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each
phase, and shall substantially conform to the tntent and purpose of the
subdivision approval.
21. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
All lots shall have a minimum s~ze of 8,000 square feet gross.
All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C
of Ordinance No. 460 with the exception of lots ?6, 102, 103, !36, 137,
and 141. {Amended at Planning Commission 2-7-g0)
Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional
area pursuant to Section 3.88 of Ordinance No. 460 and so as not to contain
less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through
lots.
D. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the R-T zone.
E. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall
have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of
the utility easement.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition
and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other
erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and
Safety.
Trash bins, loading areas, and incidental storage areas shall be located
away and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block
walls and landscaping.
'ENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23209
AMENDED NO, 4
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
22.
23.
24.
Prior to the RECORDATION of the final map, the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that
all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from
the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department County Health Department
County Flood Control County Planning Department
County Parks Department County Airports Department
Santa Ana Regional WateF Quality Control Board
Prior to the recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constrsints Sheet
(ECS} shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified
environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the
County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning
Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with
copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department
of Building and Safety.
The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
"County Slope Stability Report No. 115 was prepared for this property and
is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department." (Renumbered by
Staff 2-7-90)
The landscape easements shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 23209, Amd. No.
4 shall be delineated on the environmental ;onstraints sheet. (Added by
Staff 2-7-90)
The notice appearing in Section 6.a of Ordinance No. 625, the Riverside
County Right-to-Farm Ordinance, shall be placed on the Environmental
Constraints Sheet, with Lots No 110-134, 242-255, and 6-10 1dentilled
therein, in the manner provided in satd Section 6,a., as being located
partly or wholly within, or within 300 feet of, land zoned for primarily
agricultural purposes by the County of RIverside. (Added by Planning
Commission 2-7-g0)
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
'ENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209
ANENDED NO. 4
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through Hatch.
Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase,
25.
26.
27.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceed ten (10)
feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following
grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii
designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where
drainage and stability permit such rounding.
Where cut and/or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length,
the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence
to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufacture~
slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities
have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to,
parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard
landscaping.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices
shall be permitted with Planning Department approval.
C. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic
irrigation.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23209
AI4ENDED NO. 4
Conditions of Approval
Page 6
ge
9 ·
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERNITS, the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prtor to the ftnal buildtrig Inspection approval by the Butldtng and Safety
Department a 6 feet high block wall shall be constructed along the
landscape easement as shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 23209, Amd. No. 4,
and a 6 feet high block wall shall be constructed along the perimeter of
the project on all lots and portions of lots along the perimeter of the
pro_iect not covered by the landscape easements. (Amended by Staff
2-7-90)
B. All landscaping and irrigation shall be Installed tn accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planntng Department field
Inspection.
C. Development Nlttgatlon fees shall be paid tn accordance wtth County
Ordinance No. 659.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision In
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461.
Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance No. 460,
Prior to tssuance of gradtrig permtts a Paleontological Study shall be performed
and submitted to the Planntng Department for approval. If the potential for
paleontological resource are identified prior to the tssuance of gradlngbermtts,
a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation
and comment on the proposed gradtn9 wtth respect to potential paleontological
impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential ts high for impact to
significant resources, a pre-grade meettng between the paleontologist and the
excavation and gradtrig contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the
paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily dtvert,
redtract or helt grading acttvtty to a11o~ recovery of foastls.
30. Prior to the Issuance of gradtng or butldtng permtt:
The Secretary of the Intertot must have epproved the Stephens' Kangaroo
Rat Habttat Conservation Plan end any proposed taktng of the SKR must be
tn compliance wtth the approved plan.
The Secretary of the Intertot must have tssued to the County, the Section
lO(a) Permtt redutredby the Endangered Spectes Act of 1973 and satd Pemtt
must be tn effect; end
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209
N4ENDED NO. 4
Conditions of Approval
Pap 7
lee
32.
A report, prepared by a biologist permittad by the U.S. Ftsh and Wtldltfe
Servtce to trap the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat for scientific purposes,
documenting the amount and quality of occupted Stephens' Kangaroo Rat
Habitat subject to disturbance or destruction must have been submitted to
and el}proved by the Planning DIrector.
Prior to the issuance of a grading or buildtng permit, the applicant shall comply
with the provision of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth
in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of
a Habttat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance
No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee requtred by the Habitat Conservation
Plan as Implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
Prior to the recordatlon of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall
submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, whtch
documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Offtce of
the County Counsel:
1. A declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions; and,
A sample document conveying tttle to the purchaser of an Individual
lot or untt which provides that the declaration of covenants,
conditions, and restrictions ts incorporated therein by reference.
The declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions submitted for
revtew shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provtde for
the establishment of a property o~ners' association comprised of the udners
of each individual lot or untt as tenants tn common, and (c) contatn the
following provisions verbatim:
'Notwithstanding any provision tn thts Declaration to the contrary,
the folludtng provision shall apply:
The propertyo~ners' association eatabltshed heretn shall manage and
continuously maintain the 'common area', mareparticularly described
on "Tentative Tract Nap No. 23209, Amd. No. 4", attached hereto, and
shall not sell or transfer the 'common area' or any pert thereof,
absent the prior wrttten consent of the P18nntng Otrector of the
County of Riverside or the County's successor-In-Interest.
The property o~ners' association shall have the right to assess the
o~ners of each Individual lot or untt for the reasonable cost of
maintaining the 'coalson area' end shall have the right to 1ten the
property of any such o~ner who defaults tn the payment of a
maintenance assessment. As assessment 1ten, once created, shall be
prtor to all other 1tens'recorded subsequent to the nottce of
assesssent or other document creattng the assessment 1ten.
TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 23209
ANENDED NO, 4
Conditions of Approval
Pege 8
Thls Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property
deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planntng DIrector
of the County of RIverside or the County's successor-~n-tnterest. A proposed
amendment shall be considered 'substantial' ~f tt affects the extent, usage, or
maintenance of the 'common area'.
Zn the event of any confltct between thts Declaration and the Articles of
Zncorporatton, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and
Regulations, if any, thts Declaration shall control."
Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be
recorded at the same ttme that the final map ts recorded. (Added by Staff 2-7-90)
RW:CSf,lgg
12/11/89
1/25/90
OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR
Januaz7 24, 1990
Riverside County Planning Commission
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Tract 23209 ~ Amend #4
Schedule A - Teem i - SMD #9
AP #111-111-111-9
With respect to the conditions of approval for the
referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department
recommends that the landdivider provide the following street
improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road
Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the
tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations,
all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with
appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptability may
require the map to he resubmitted for further consideration.
These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts
and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though
occurring in all. They are intended to be complementary and to
describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement.
All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall
be referred to the Road Coe~nissioner's Office.
The landdivider shell protect downstream properties from
damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns,
i.e., concentration of d/version of flow. Protection
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/
or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shell be shown on the final map and noted as
followst 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions,
or encroachments by land fills are allowed-. The
protection shall be as approved by the Road Department.
The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all
offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site· In the
event th~ Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for
drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed
the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for
drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate
drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department.
COUNTY ADNINISTRATW~ CENTER * 4080 LE. HON STRIEi~" R/V]EX.~D[, CAL!IrORN]A 92501
lract 23209 - Amend ~4
January 24, 1990
Page 2
Major drainage is ~nvolved on this landdivision and its
resolution shall be as approved by the ~ad Department.
Streets *A", *B", *C", "D", "E", 'G", "H", "J", "L" and "M"
shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in
accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A.
(40'/60')
Streets 'F" and "I" shall be improved within the dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 105,
Section A. (36'/60')
La Senna Way shall be improved within the dedicated right
of way in accordav=e with County Standard No. 102, Section
A. (66'/88', including 32'/44' along APN 914-310-006)
Butterfield Stage Road shall be
dedicated right of way in accordance
No. 100, Section A. (43'/55')
improved within the
with County Standard
Walcott Lane shall be improved with 32 feet of asphalt
concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated
right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 103,
Section A. (22'/33')
Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805
shell be shown on the final map and offered for dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerlipa profile
extend/ng a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at a grade and alignment as approvedby the
Riverside County Road Coasnisstoner. Cumpletion of road
hnprovesmnts does not imply acceptance for maintenance by
County.
Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs
shall be constructed throughout the landdivision.
Aspheltic emulsion (fog seal) shell be applied not less
than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt
surfacing and shell be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon par
square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37,
39 and 94 of the State Stanas~d Specifications.
3.
The landdivider will provide east and west bou~ left turn
lanes on La Serena Way at the intarsectiona with Street
'B', Str%et 'J' and Butterfield Stage Road as approved by
the Road Depazlunent.
Tract 23209 - Amend #4
· January 24, 1990
Page 3
0e
21a,
The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Rancho
California Water District prior to the recordation of the
final map.
The maximum centerline gradient and the nttnimum centerline
radii shell he in conformance with County Standard #114 of
Ordinance 461.
All centerline intersections shall be at 90° with a minimum
50' tangent measured from flow line or as approved by the
Road Commissioner.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and
401 (curb sidewalks).
The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 35 feet.
All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside
County Standards. A minimum of four feet of full height
curb shell be constructed between driveways.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from
the face of curb.
The landowner/developer shell provide/acquire sufficient
public offsite rights of way to provide for primary and
secondary access road(s) to a paved and maintained road.
Said access road(s) shell be constructed in accora*nce with
County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade
and alignment approved by the Road Commissioner.
Said offsite access road shall be the westerly extension of
La Serens Way to the paved and maintained portion of La
SerenaWay or as approved by the Road Commissioner.
Said offsite access roads shall be the southerly and
easterly extensions of Butterfield Stage Road to Rancho
California Road or as approvedby the Road Commissioner.
Prior to the recordetion of the final map, or the granting
of a waiver of the fins1 map, the developer shell deposit
with the PuLverside County Road Department, a cash sum of
$150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts.
Sheuld the developar choose to defer the time of palmrant, a
written agreement may be entered into with the County
deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
Tract 23209 - Amend ~4
.January 24, 1990
Page 4
3e
24.
25.
6e
2'7.
8.
9e
Electrical and con~unications trenches shall he provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Lot access shall he restricted on Butterfield Stage Road
and La Serena Way and so noted on the final map.
Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shell provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope easements as approved by the Road
Department.
When blockwalls are required to he constructed on top of
slope, a debris retention wall shall he constructed at the
street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as
approved by the Road Commissioner.
If the existing right of way along La Serena Way exceeds
that which is required for th/s project, the developer may
submit a request for the vacation of said excess right of
way. Said procedure shell he as approved by the Board of
Supervisors. If said excess or superseded right of way is
also County owned land, it may he necessary to enter into
an agreenent with the County for its purchase or exchange.
The applicant by design is requesting a vacation of the
existing dedicated rights-of-way along South General Kear~y
Road and the 66 foot road easements as shown on the
underlying P.M. 1/44-46. Said vacation shall be applied
for by the applicant and approved by the Board of
Supervisors prior to the recordation of the final map or
any phase thereof.
The street design and improvement concept of this project
shall be coordinated with PM 1/44-46, PM 14/93-95, PM
88/49-50, Tentative TRS 23101, 23103, 22148 and 20761.
Street lighting shall be required in accordance with
Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The
County Service Area (CSA) AdnuLnistrator determines whather
this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment
district or not. If not, the land owner shall file, after
receiving tentative approval, for an application with LAFCO
for annexation into or creation of a "Lighting Assessment
District' in accordance with Governmental Code Section
56000.
All private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this pro~ect shall be coordinated with this
project and s~wn on the street improvement plans.
lract 23209 - Amend #4
January 24, 1990
Page 5
3e
A striping plan is required for La Serena Way and
Butterfield Stage Road. The removal of the existing
striping shall be the responsibility of applicant. Traffic
signing and striping shall be done by County forces with
all incurred costs borne by the applicant.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act any
subdivision which is pan of an existing Assessment
District must comply with the requirements of said Section.
Road Division Engineer
Jw
ITR '23209
UIC.
AN'0
GRADED
I. tle 80 AC. IfrO 25? LOTS
kll SKINNER LAKE
.18,,R. iW, Asaes~t's Bk.
1%
.d4R~. ALBA CQNSULTING
Ue eO aC. Wro
LOTS
Nei IKINNER LAKE
._~EXIBIT D
ROAI:
SKR IF
· DISTRIBUTION OF STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT (SKR)
01t TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23209
:'...:'..'-:. ;. ,~[-;., · '~: DIVISION OF ENVIROIqHENTAL IIEALTII
:-. "l:~.Z::.~:Z,:!iZ~i~&':~..:'~'].... :-:'~'..'- LAI~D USE SECTION
"'!~.-:~,!:"'z'~,:~i~i',:~'.:...'-i','-.'-'. :' ' . · ....... ,: .~:.',,:o... -.' '
~!t~ii~!!!f:i:!!i~;,~ii!~:~!i!~.-. :.:;, :..:. !..............~...:.:..!.:~! .,.... ....
i:"::!'~:!~i'~:!-]ZG~!:!'!:-::'::""-: .- "i '~c~/P^I~cEL"~A~', f~ ~ -~.~, ~ "
Date
C unty of Rivers,de
TO: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: August 16, 1989
FROM: AM MARTINEZ, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST IV
*'~C~M~ 23209, AMENDED NO. 3
RE:
Environ~ental Health Services has reviewed Amended No. 3 dated
August 15, 1989 . Our current connents will remain as stated
in our letter dated January 26, 1989.
SH:tac
GtN, FORM 4, (l~v.
January 26, 1989
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PL~J~NING I~PT.
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92502
ATrN: Al em am
BE; TI~CT M~ 23209: All that certain real property
situated in the unlncorporated area of the County of
Riverside, State of California, described as Parcels 1, 2,
6, 19, 20, 31 and 50 as shown in document recorded
June 27, 1986 as Instrument No. 15005 of Riverside County
Records, all in the Nurrieta portion of the Tamecull Ranthe.
as show~ by map of the Tamecull Land and Water Company. on
fXle in Book 8, Page 359 of maps, records of San Diego
County, California
(304 Lots)
Gentlemen:
The Department of Public Health has revzewed Tentative Map
No. 23209 and recosussnds that:
A water system shall be installed according to
plans and specification as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent
prints of the plans of the water system shall
be submitted in triplicate, with a minim~ scale
not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with
the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter,
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the size of the main
at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shell comply in
all respects with Div. S. Part l, Chapter 7 of
the California Health and Safety Code, California
Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General
Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Cosmission of the
State of California, vhen applicable.
Riverside County Planning Dept.
Pegs Two
Attn: Alex G·nn
January 26, IS89
· he plans shell be signed by a registered engineer
water company with the following certification: "1
certify that the design of the vetfir system in Tract
Hap 23209 is accordance with the water system expansion
plans of the R·ncho California Voter District
end that the water service,storage end distribution
system viI1 be adequate to provide water service to
such tract, This certification does not constttute
guarantee thet it v~ll supply v·ter to such tract
· ny specific quintities, flovs or pressures for f~re
protection or any other purpose". T~is certification
shall be s~gned by · responsible official of the rarer
This Department has · statement from R·ncho California Water
District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every
lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory
financial arrangements are completed with the subd~vider.
It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be
made pr~or to the recordsties of the final map.
This Department has · statement from the Eastern Municipal
Water District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage
system to be connected to the levers of the District. The
sever system shall be installed according to plans and
Ipecxfic·tions as approved by the District, the County
2urveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sever system shall be submitted in triplicate,
along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The
prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of
manholel0 complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications
and the size of the severl at the ~unction of the new system
to the exilting system. A single plat indicating location
of sever linel and water lines shall be a portion of the
Icyage plinl &rid profiles.
The plans shall be signed by · registered engineer and the
sewer district with the following certification: "I certify
that the design of the sever system in Tract Map 23209 is in
accordance with the sever system expansion plans of the
~astern Municipal Water OiltrioS and that the waste disposal
system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated
wastes from the proposed tract."
RZverside County Pl,nninG Dept.
Page Three
Attn: Alex G,nn
January 26, 1989
It will be necessary for financZal arrangements to be
completely finalixed prior to record,tion of the Final m,p.
rill be necess,ry for annex, tZon proceedings to be
completely fin,lized prior to recordation of the fxn, l map.
Environmental Health Services
SM:t,c ~
KENNETH L EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County
P1 anning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Regional Tea No
Pla,.er le,.r.
At..:
We have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
Re:
Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the
property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard.
However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc-
tion should comply with all applicable ordinances.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water-
courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be
kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural
drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports.'
This project is in the
drainage plan fees shall be paid
regulations.
Area
in accordance with the applicable rGles and
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
implied density.
The District's report dated ~e ~27/Iq81 is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
This project ts a part of The project will he
free of ordinary storm flood hazard when improvements have been constructed ;,,
accordance with approved plans.
The attached coments apply.
3~H. ICASHUBA
lentor Civil Engineer
DATE: J. ~ 1if IR iO
KENNI'tH I., El)WARnS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
September 27, 1989
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, Celifornia
Attention: Regional Team No. i
ladies and Gentlemen=
Re: Tract 23209
Amended No. 3
This is a proposal to divide 80 acres in the Rancho California
area. The site is located on both sides of La Serene Way west of
Butterfield Stage Road.
The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and
natural watercourses which traverse the property. The site is
subject to storm flows from several watersheds. The developer
proposes to intercept these offsite flows and convey them through
the tract in a storm drain system. Oneits flows are proposed to
be conveyed through the street system and into storm drain sys-
tems- The diversions being created by the storm drein picking up
flow between Lots 119 and 120, and Lots 163 and 164 is acceptable
since Tract 23101 has accounted for these flows.
Following are the District's reconunendations:
This tract~s located within the limits of the
Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley and Temecula Valley
Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been
adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as let
forth under the provisions of the 'Rules and Regulations
for ~-~nistration of Area Drainage Plans', amended
February 16. 1988:
Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Conenissioner
as part of the filing for record of the subdivision
final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a
final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be
paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording
a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of
the parcel map~ or
Riverside County
Planning Department
Rez Tract 23209
Amended No- 3
-2- September 27, 1989
At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re-
quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment
of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Build-
ing Director at the time of issuance of a grading
permit or building permit for each approved parcel,
whichever may be first obtained after the recording
of the subdivision final map or parcel map= provided
however, this option to defer the fees may not be
exercised for any parcel where grading or structures
have been initiated on the parcel within the prior 3
year period, or permits for either activity have been
issued on that parcel which remain active.
Oneits drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be re-
corded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet-
The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the
curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained
within the street right of way. When either of these
criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities
should be installed.
The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the releese of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re= Tract 23209
Amended No. 3
-3- September 27, 1989
Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
{mmediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage
facilities.
8. If the tract is built in phases, each phase shall be pro-
tected from the I in 100 year tributary storm flows.
A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to iszuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith
of this office at 714/787-2333.
cz Alba Engineering Inc.
I rX tru!y yo r ,
' r Civil Engineer
ZS=mcy
I~lmmin~gEnlime~jnSOftce
,46-20 9 Oasis Slree, Suite
indjo, CA 92201
(619) 342~86
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
tIRE DEPARTMENT
IN COOPERATION WITH THE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
GLEN J. NEWldAN
1-22-90
PhnnlnS & r. nSin~ring Ot~ce
4080 Lenon Stred, Suite IlL
Riveaide, CA 92501
(714) 787-6606
TO:
ATTN:
KE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ALEX GANN
TRACT 23209 - AMENDED
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division,
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
FIRE PROTECTION
Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4'ex2{") located
one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant.
Hinimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire
Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be
signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with
the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system is
in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire
Department."
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be Installed and accepted
by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being
placed on an individual lot.
MITIGATION
Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation
for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of
payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
Subject: Tract 23209
Page 2
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the
Planning and Engineering staff.
BAYHOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist
Administrative Center · 17'77 Atlanta Avenue
Riverside, CA 9250?
June 2, 1989
R~vers~de County Planning Department
Attention: Dave Wahlgren
County Administrative Center
4080 Lemon Street A,q~'~t~If//= Y/2
~adles and ~entleme~
The Land Use Division of the Depertment of Buildlng end Safety
has the to]~o.lng comments end oondltlons:
Prior to t~e Issuance o~ bui~dln9 permlt$~ t~e ~e~eloper s~e~
obtain Plannlng Department lpprova~ for at1 on-site end
site signage advertisi~9 t~e sale o~ t~e subdi~islon pursuant
to Section ~9.6 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard
setback.
Mechanical equiDment may not be located in required minimum 5'
side yard setback.
Very truly yours,
A{:lministration (714) 682-8840 · (714) 787-2020
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENt
GRADING SECTION
TO: PLANNING / RANDY WILSON
FRONt TONY HARHON
DATE: January 23, 1990
RE: TRACT 23209 AHENDHENT ~4
APN 914-310-016, 018, 032
The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual graqing plan for this site.
The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends
approval of this project if the following condition:~ are included.
Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50
applicant shall obtain a grading permit and aPProval
the Building and Safety Department.
cubic yaros, the
to construct frcm
Prior to approval of this use/subdivision a grading permit and approval
of the rough grade shall be obtained from the Building and, Safety
Department.
Plant aria irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal to 3' and/or cut
slopes greater than or equal to 5' in vertical height with grass or
ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are to be
prcvnaed with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see f~rm 284-
Landscape plans are ;o be signed by a registereo landscape architect and
bonqed per the requ3rements of Ordinance 457, see form 284-47.
Grsolng in excess of 199 cubic yards will require performance security
to be posted with the Building and Safety department.
In instances where a grading plan i~volves import or export, prior to
obta.ining a grading permit, the applican~ shall have obtained approval
for the import/export location from the Building and Safety Department -
this may require a written clearance from the Planning Department.
A noraflied letter of permission, from the affected property owners, is
required for any proposed offsite grading.
A recorded drainage easement is required for the proposed lot to lot
drainage.
The proposed block wall appears to run parallel to and at the top of a
slope. A Registered Civil Engineer shall mitigate the slopes effect on
the wall'e footing. The Wall will require a separate permit.
NOTE: For the final grading plan, please provide the applicable information
form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21,284-86,
and 284-46. Thank you.
8I;~:,iTIRoDEIwARTMENT'L L. ETTIIPl
' COUNTY OF RIVERBIDE
~_~ PLANNING DEPARTHENT
, 1989
11): KtB Johnson - Tee 1
FROIt $teven A. ICupfeman - Engineering kologlst
IrE: ,~eetatlee Tract U~09
Slope Stability Report No. 115
The following report has been revtewed relattve to s]ope stability at the
subject stte:
"Preltmtnar~ Geotechnlcal Znvestlgstlon of Tentative Tract ~p 23209, Rancho
Coltfornta, RIverside County, CA," by Lelghton and Associates, Znc., dated
~rch 22, 1989.
Thts report determined that:
1. Ftll and cut slopes on the order of 25 feet and 20 feet htgh,
respectively, at an Inclination of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) are
proposed for the development.
Proposed slopes should be stable sgatnst beth the deep-seated fatlure
end the surftctal fatlure provtded no adverse geologic conditions extst
tn the cut slope.
3. Cut slope excavation could expose adverse beddtng (out-of-slope) whtch
mlY have a potential for sltd~n9,
4. The slopes my be subject to erustve rt111ng,
Thts report recommended that:
1. Cut slopes should be geotechnlcally rappod by the project geologist
d
during gra trig.
2. Itemdtal measures such as flattening slopes or construction of earthen
bettresses wtll be protided If adverse geologtc ,conditions ere
encountered during gradtrig.
3. Cut and ftli slopes sheuld be protided which aPPropriate dretnage
fatam eel landscaped vtth drought-tolerent, slope-stabilizing
vegaratios as soon as posstble after gradtrig.
4. krms should be protided at the top d Ill sTopes, aml lot dretnage
dtrected such that suffice rueoff oe the slope face ls mtnamSzed.
Thts report suttsfles the 6erietel Plan requlreaen~ for I slopo stability
report. The recoamendattons tn thts report shall be adhered to tn the destgn
and construction of thts project.
$AK:al
~T~: October 21, 198~
iV DE-COUnC¥
PL rlrlilxE DEPA C Efi
· TO: Assessor
8utldtng and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Laths
Fire Protection
Flood Control Dtstrfct
FISh i GiBe
U.S. Postal Servtca- Ruth E. hvtdson
: Commissioner Jack Bresson
C. J. Crot~nge~
Rancho CA racer
Southern CA Edtson
Southern GA Gas
General Telephone
CAL TRANS 18
Temecula Elementary
Temecula Union School Dtst.
U. C. R.-Archo.
DCT ,2. G 1988
RIVERS:D:. COLir;TY
PLAr~NING DEPA~ r;/.ENT
TRACT 23209 - (Tm-1) - E.A. 33254 - Alba
Consulting - Nax Harrtson- Sktnner Lake
Area -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct -
of f Road - R-T Zone - 80
Acres into 304 lots Nod 119 A.P.
914-310-016,914-310-018o032
Please review the case described above, along wtth the attached case map. A Land
Dfvfsfon Comtttee meeting Ms been tentatively scheduled for November 17, 1988. If ft
clears, tt wtll then go to publlc heartrig.
Your consents and recommnd~tfons aft requested prfor to November 17, 1988 tn order that
n sly Include the tn the staff report for this particular case.
$hould~ou ave any questions regarding thts Irma, please do not hasttale to contact
Alex inn at 787-1363.
The Elsinore Unton Htgh School Dlstrtct facilities are overcrowded and our
educational pro rams seriously impacted by increasing student population caused
by new rostdentTal, comeertcal and industrial construction. Therefore,
purSuant to California Government Code Section S3080 of AB 2926 end SB 327, thts
district levies a fee against lll new dovelopment projects rithtn its boundaries.
BATE: 10-25-88 SIMATURE
PLEASE print sam and tttle Dr. Larry Hew, Superintendent
4060 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR
RIVERtlI~ CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 717.,6181
48-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(61 g) 3424277
IMIm A. GnF
!Udmml D. 6RIley
s~.v,--rmmk
JmA, Dmrby
Jom A. Lmmdim
December 17, 1987
Riverside County Division of
lnvirormen~al Bealth
land Use Section
Post Office Box 1370
Riverside, California 92502
Subject: Water Availability
Reference: Trac~c 23209
Gentlemen:
Please be advised ~hat the above-referenced
property As located within the boundaries of Rancho
California Water District. Water service, therefore,
would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD sad the proper~y owner.
water availability would be contingent upon the
property owner signing an Agency Agreement which
assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
Sites for additional water production facilities may
be required within the proposed development depending
upon the level of increased demand created by the
proposal.
Xf RCWD can be of further service to you, please
contact this office.
Ver~ truly yours,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Senga P. D~herty
Engineering Services Representative
F011/dpth244
L
RANCH
O C,AL1
FORNIA
WATER DISTRIC~
DATE: October 21, 1988
:IEVE:-t)iDE coun;,u
KAnNinG DEPA:t;GtEN;
TO: Assessor
Building and Safet~
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
FIe Protection
Flood Control Dfstrtct
FIsh & Game
-~.S. hitS1 Setrice - luth E. Ikvtdson
Coeentsstoner Jack Dresson
C. J. Crottnger
OUT ~
Rancho CA Mater
Southern CA Edison
Southern GA Gas
General Telephone
CAL TRANS #8
Temecula Elementary
Temecula Unton School D(st.
Elsfnore Union Ittgh School
Neadowview Coneunity Assoc.
U. C. R.-Archo.
TRACT 23209 - (Tm-Z) - E.A. 33254 - Alba
Consulting - flax Harrtson o $ktnner Lake
Area - FIrst Supervtsorlal Dtstrtct- i1~
of Butterf4eld Stage & La Serena Way Nly
of Rancho California Road o R-T Zone - 80
Acres Into 304 lots Nod 119 - A.P.
914-310-016,914-310-018,032
Please revtew the case descHbed above, along wtth the attached case map. A Land
O~vfs~on Comettree mettng has been tentatively scheduled for November 17, 1988. If tt
clears, tt wtll then go to public hearing.
Your ants and recoemendattons are requested prior to November 17, 1988 tn order that
me mO, tnclude the In the Staff report for this particular case.
Slmuld Jmu have any questions regarding this Item, please do not besttare to contact
Alex 6inn at 787-1363.
Planner
4080 LEMON 8TIIEET, 9TM FLOOR
RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501
CJ'14) 7874181
46-209 OASIS STkEET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
DATE: October 22, Z988
TO:
Assessor
But]ding and Safety
Surveyor - Dave Duda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
FIre Protection
Rood Conire1 District
FISh &Game
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. hvtdson
Com, lsstoner Jack Dresson
C. J. Crotlnger
RiVErSiDE coun ,v
PL&nni116 DEP RaTIEn
RECIXVID IN RIVER:~IUE COUNTY
ARU PLANNING DEPARTMENT
OCT 24 1988
Rancho CA Mater
SOuthern CA Edison
SOuthern GA Gas
General Telephone
CAL TRAN5 t8
Temecula Elementary
Temecula Union School Dist.
Elstnore Union Illgh 5chool
Meadowview Connuntty Assoc.
U. C. R.-Archo.
.- TRACT 23209 - (Tm-1) - E.A. 33254 - Alba
Consulting - Max Harrtson* Skinner Lake
Area -Ftrst Supervisorlal Dtstrtct-
of Butterfield StaTe & La Senna May Nly
of Rancho Celiforn a Road - R-T Zone - 80
Acres Into 304 lots Nod 1Z9 A.P.
914-310-016,914-310-018,032
Please revtw the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Ohhton Comlttne emettng has been tentatively scheduled for November 17, 1988. Xf tt
clears, tt will then go to public haartng.
TOur comments and recommmlattons are rlquested prtor to November 17, 1988 tn order that
al my tnclude them tn the staff report for this particular use.
Should you have any questions roprdtng thts 1tam, please do not hesitate to contact
Alex ken at 787-1363.
Planner
kr~'K
· ,~: ,./,./,.
REASE print nee and tttle
EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER
AmhHebOicaf Research Unit
IMivtrSilly el California
IIINflMi CA 9;521
40~OLEMONaTREET. PFLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA92601
(/14)187-6181
48-209OA818 SlT.,IEET. ROOM304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619)342-8217
DATE: October 2], 1988
T0:
Asl/ssor
Buildtrig and Safety
~rveyor - Dave Ouda
Road Department
Health - Ralph Luchs
Ftre Protection
Flood Control DIstrict
FIsh i GiBe
U.S. Postal hrvlce - Ruth E. Davidson
Comtsstoner Jack 8resson
C. J. Crottnger
:liVi , iDE councY
PLAnninG DEPA ClTIEnC
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
=LANNING DEPARTMENT
Rancho CA Jater
Southern CA Edison
Southern GA Gas
General Telephone
CAL TRANS #8
Temecula Elementary
Temecula Union School Dist.
Elstnore Union IHgh School
flaadowvtew Coranuntty Assoc,
U, C, R,oArcho.
TRACT 23209 o (Tm-1) o E.A. 33254 - Alba
Consulting - flax Harrison - Skinner Lake
Area - FIrst SupervtsorIal Dtstrtct -
of Butterfield Stage & La Serena May Rly
of Rancho California Road - R-T Zone - 80
Acres Into 304 lots Nod Zlg- A.P.
Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land
Division Coeetttae meeting has been tentathely scheduled for November 17, Z988. If tt
clears, it will th~n go to public heartng.
Your cements and recommndattons apt requested prior to November 17, 1988 tn order that
t m~y Include them In the staff report for this particular case.
Should ~ou have any questions regarcltng this Item, please do not hesitate to contact
Alex ~nn at 787-~363.
Plan~r
CIIIiENTS:
ITJTBIt
DATE: SI6NATIME
FLEASE print nero end tttle
CHleMAP m
4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR
FUVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 7874181
48-20~ OASIS STREET, ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201
(619) 342-8277
ITAI~ OF ~ y M~, e,e---s, ~A*nON ~ NOUII~G AOENL'Y
OEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1988
Development Review
08-Riv-79-8.23
Your Reference:
TTH 23209
~lanntng Department
Attention Nr. Alex Germ
County of Riverside
~080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Dear Mr. Gann:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed Tentative
Tract Map 23209 located westerly of Butterfield Stage and
northerly of lancho California Road in Temecula Ranch.
This proposal is somewhat removed from an existing or proposed
state highway.
have no specific comment on this proposal.
If additional information is desired, please call Nr. Thomas J.
Neville at (71~) 383-"38q.
Very truly yours,
H. . LEWANDOWSKI
Dlstrlct Permlts Engineer
SaChem C411Fornle Edl$on ComNn. y
Riverside County
Road Department
P, O. Box 1090
Riverside, CA 92502
attention: Subdivision Section
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Nap No. 23209
November 9,
1988
Please be advised that the division of the property shown on
Tentative Tract Nap No. 23209 will not unreasonably interfere
with the ~ree and complete exercise o~ any easement(s) held by
Southern California Edison Company within the boundaries of said
tentative tract map.
This letter should not be construed as a subordination of the
Company's ti;hts, title and interest in and to said easement(s),
not should this letter be construed as a waiver O~ any of the
provisions contained in said easement(s) or a waive= of any costs
Go= telocation of a~fected ~acilities.
In the event that the development requires relocation of ~acil-
ities, if any, on the subject property by right o~ easement or
otherwise, the owner/developer will be requested to bear the cost
o~ such relocation and provide Edison with suitable replacement
rights. Such costs and replacement tights ate required prior to
the performance o[ the telocation.
I~ additional in~oraation is requited in connection with the
above mentioned subject, please call Dennis C. Eazant at (213)
491-2644.
RRLOCaTION ~ DISTRIBUTION
DCB/bJw
14609-36WPC
ec: Riverside County Planning Department
ALBA ENGINEERING, INC.
PLANNING · ENGINFERING · SURVEYING
AuSust 11, 1989
1012-00
County of Riverside
Planning Department
~080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, California 92501
Attention: Randy Wilson
Subject: Tract 23209
Dear Nr. Wilson:
Transmitted herewith is Amendment No. 3
amendment was requested by Flood Control
changes in the drainaBe patterns.
of Tract 23209. This
and consists of minor
We hereby request variances to Ordinance ~60 for the followin8
lots:
Lots 76, 102, 103, 136, 137, 141
Please schedule L.D.C. as soon as possible.
If you have any questions, please call.
President
cc: LaYerda E'Nond
Mike Lundin
~68 H~en ~, Sure 100 · San Degc CA 92131 , TNphore (619) 54~3303
41~0 En~q~le C~e South. Se 230, Rancho Cahforn,a, CA 92390 · T~lphone (h4) 6167282
ALIA ENGINEERING, INC,
PLANNING * ENGINEERING · SURVEYING
AuBust 14, 1989
1012-00
Connt~ of Riverside
PlsnninS Department
&080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
liverside, California 92501
Attention: Rand~ Wilson
Subject: Tract 23209
Dear Nr, Wilson:
This p~oJect proposes slopes in excess of 10 feet in heiSht.
These slopes are necessary in order to maintain drainaBe patterns
and to prevent drainaBe from flowinS across propert~ lines. In
addition, some slopes are necessary due to county desiBn
requirements for major roads i.e. La Serena and Butterfield StaSe
load.
Respectfully,
ILC/Js
9e68 Nitart St.. Sge 100 · Sin D~ego CA 92131 · Telef}hone (619) 549-3303
41890 Erqlerpr~le C~tcle So.lh. Stt 230 · Rlncho C&¥orn~a. CA 92390 · TelcOhort· (114) 676-1282
=.iVE:BiDE coUn w
iq. Annffi,: BEPAq-d IEn
IAPPLICA TIOII FOR LAID I/IE AllIll DEIf!LOBMIIENT
D~TE: IC- IJR-~
"CHANGE C~ ZONE NO
r- CONDITIONAL USE
I~RMfT NO
~ PARCEL MAP NO
I- PLOTPLANNO
D PU~,IC USE F~RMrT NO
),:~,c.,.,,.o 2"""3'20:'t
D TEMPOR4RY USE F~RMff NO.
(~ VN~AN~E NO F C ~
INCOMI~Lr/E APPLICATIONS MI.L NOr IE I~,,CEPTED.
A iIILJCANTINFQIIMATION
1. RINiCeN'I Name
ling A~ImU
TNel~me NO:
20emets Name
Tem~ NO
Te~ NO
OCT 19 J"'~
L=,ueer~c~ ~
t ) (8 · m - 5 ELm.)
F~OJECT INFORMATION
Purpose of Request (aescr,iPe ;rolect) (Orchr~lnce 349 re! no) ~-'~
C F~RT~ INFOIMIATION
· e,,qf-,
4010 lEMON STREET. I"" FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, C,N.,.IFOftNIA 92501,3657
(TI4) 111-6181
41,.200 OAeli il'FIEET. ROOM 304
INDIO, CALIFOIINIA 9220'~
(619) .)42-8277
AII~t, ICA~ONS FO~: PARCEL MAPS
ZONE CHANGES
CONDrr~ONA~. UR KRMI~
~ ~ ~RM~
~ACE MINI~ K~i~
~ND ENEMY ~ 8~M
·
1L30 PLOT IBI,,AN$ IllQui~tB Environmental
TEMPORARY UII:
l. t~O~LANDDIV1SlON~41ISONLY:AeI~"XIl"iII,.,,.~.,OfthetOetI~ImiD,
PROPIRTY OWIIERI G~TI~I'ION
,,
'ITILE/II!IITI~TI~N:
~:)O¢IEIS:
Ill/n.,llll~J
ENifiRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Numtef el feel or mllel
ECONOMIC AND HOUSING LOANS
Riverside County
t
IIPPI~X]NATELy $3.5 NZLLIOII HAS BEEN NAD[ AVAILABLE FOR EEllimBO: D[VtrT OP~:h'I' A~
Eli LOal5 IN IMS. ltPLICATIONS CAN IE FILED IIITH THE RIVERSIDE
DEPARTHENT OF ECONONIC: ARD C~It~JN]Ty DEVELOI~ENT LOC:ATED AT 3499 TENTH
P.O. IOX ]IBO, RIYEP=~IOE, CALIFOBIIA, IBSOZ.
COlllJN]TY DEV~LOF'HENT I.OCK GRAP,'TS [CI~G) FROI~ THE U.S. D[PARTtiENT OF HDUS],N'-
,tied U~!~ DEVELOPI~NT ARE USED TO CREATE AND SAVE ,.lOBS )lied HOUSINr. FOR lO,. A:~'-
NODECiTE I'lJ&~t~[ COUNTY RESIDENTS. THE LOANS HAVE BEEN USED FOR ClX4[RC:iAL,
.....
IIBUSTRIAL, ICBU$II~ MO INF'RA,fr!~C'TUF.[ PID3ECTS.
E~'/'IER~]~ ~J,/D INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS WHICH SAVE OR CREATE JOSS FOR
~S]OENTS. CAN RECEIVE LOU iNTEREST. PARTIAL FIHAN:IN~-. UP TO 33
THE TOTA.. PROJECT CAN BE FINAN;CO. THE NAIZfT',,'H, LOAN ]S
C&P O~ SIS,ODD LOANED PER JOB CREATED OR R[TA;NCD. THE HOU$1N
LOali UP TO SD PERCENT Or THE COST FOR CONSTR~J=TZD.',, OR RE~ABZ;,.]TAT]OI,
]NC:ON,E NDUSZN~. FUNDS I,~$T BE FULLY SECURED BY REAL PROPERTY AKD
DEVELOPER EQUITY ]$ REQUIRED.
TI~ LDjV¢ FlEe |S OFFERED JOINTLY BY THE COUNTY AND $[VENTEE~ OF ITS C]T;[S.
fOR FURTHER INFO/ffiATIOt~, CONTACIT YOUR a)Bg AREA IEPRESENTATIV[ OR 3;~!
$TRODTBEC:K AT (734) 788-B770.
Z/8 U
RZVERSXDE COUNTY PLANN/NG DEPARTIqENT
COUNTY ADIqZNZSTRATXVE CATER, NZNTH FLOOR
4080 LE/eO~ STREET
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501-3657
Roger S. Streeter, Planntng Dtrector
A FUSLICIEARIIIG has been scheduled before the FUWIIIIG aXlZSSlOII to
constder the application(s) described below. The Plsnntng Department has
tontathely found that the proposed project(s) will have no significant
environmental effect and has tontathely coBpleted negethe declaration(s).
The Plsnntng Ca,mtssfon ~111 constder ~hether or not to adopt the negethe
declaration along ~lth the proposed project at thfs hearing.
Place of Hearing: Bean Roam, 14th floor, 4080 Lama Street, RIversfde, CA
Date of Heartng: li~ESDAY, DECBIB
The tlee of hearing ts Indicated wtth each application listed below.
Any person m~y submtt wrttten caements to the Planning Department before the
hearing or may appear and be heard In suppert of or opposition to the adoption
of the negative declaration and/or approval of thts project at the time of
hearing. Zf you challenge any of the projects In court, ~ou my be limited to
ratstng only those tssues you or someone else raised at the publlc hearing
described tn this notice, or tn written correspondence delivered to the
Planning Cotmission at, or prior to, the publlc heartng. The environmental
ftndtng along wtth the proposed project application may be vtewed at the public
Information counter Nond~y through Frtday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m.
TRACT NAP NO. 23209, AIRENDED NO. 3, EA 33254 Is an appllcatton submitted by
Albe Consulting for proport, y located In the Sktnner Lake Area and
Ftrst Suporvlsortal Dtstrtct and generally described as betng West of
Butterfield Stage Road and La Serena We,y; north of Rancho California
Road and whtch proposes to dtvtde 8C~ acres tnto 257 lots
TIRE OFHEARI!IG: g:30
· ' I I
~ tN ki. POOLE, ETAL
L STATE NIDE DEVELOPERS
5122 KATEL~ A':E. t202
LOS ALAN]TOS, CA. 90720
914-310-005, 007, 009
KE]TH & SAleM DAY
5283 ORXNDA AVE.
LAS VEGA$, NV 89120
914-310-006
MER:
CARLTON I BARBARA FRENCH
31131 ALMARA LANE
LGUNAHILLS, CA. 92677
914-310-016, 018
D~IER:
LAVERDA EDOND
1011N. ffi)ODS
FULLERTON, CA. 92635
914-310-019 thru 032
ROBERT & LARRAINE (:)CANNA
r ' BOX 615
~ .ZETA, CA. 92362
914-310-046
PETER & 6ABRIELLA GIOVANNONI
1784 N. ALCOMAR AVE.
ANAHE]M,CA. 92804
914-310-047
GEORGE T. STARCEVICH
39865 NICHOLAS RD,
NURRIETA, CA. 92362
914-300-052
CARROLL ANDERSON
JOHN MOORE
P 0 BOX 324
NURRZETA, CA. 92362
914-300-055, 058
DUANE & RENEE FRZEL
31235 CANINO DEL ESTE
TEMECULA, CA. 92390
914-300-056
TRIPLE J INVESTMENTS
P 0 BOX 806
FALLBROOK, CA. 92028
943-020-006
BURTON & MARGARET CLEVIDENCE
MATT &FRANC]S ANDREWS
9621 CARNAT]ON AVE.
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA. 92708
943-040-001,002, 003
CALLAMAY VINEYARD & MINERY
32720 RANCHO CALIFORNIA
TEMECULA, CA, 92390
943-070-001,002
L K. JONES
1540 t~. 8th ST. t21
UPLAND, CA. 91786
914-310-049
RANCHO CALIF DEVELOPMENT CO
P 0 BOX 755
TEMECULA, CA. 92390
g23-200-009, 010 I 923-210-001
923-210-008, 014
6EORGi~ T. STARCEVICH
39865 NlCl413LJ~ RD.
NIP, R/ETA, CA. 92362
~300.-051
:tiVEq iDE councv
PLAII!lilIG DEPARCfilEnC
ENVIRONMENTAl, A~IEIIMENT FORM:
ENVI~CNI4ENTAL )))E~e,k~NT e,A) NUMBER: 33254
RiOJEer CASE l~F4e) AND MJMIERB(a): Tract No. 23209
~ NAME: Alba Consulttnq
OF Im!ERSON(I) FREPAIII,~ EA.: Randy Wilson
P~OJEC'r INFORMATION
Subdivide 80 acres into 257 lots
ITANDARD EVALUATION
MODUt, E NUIdBER(m): ] 19
I. I~)TN. PR~ NRF. A~ ACRES Rn · or l~E E~
C. i)'S ~CEL ~.(m): 914-310-D16, q14-310-013. 019. Q2n. rip1. q22. 023. 024.
025, ~26, 0?7. ~?R. ~?q. NtN. NIl, Nt~
D. EXISTING ZONING: RT
PRO~:)~ED Z(~tlNG: RT
F. ITREET REFERENCES:
B ~ PR~ IN CONFORMNICE? ..
B Tt P~I) N CX3NFC)RMN~CE?
West of Butterfield Staqe Road, North of Rancho Cali~nrnia Road
MCTiON, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DF, SCRIPTION OR AIIACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Section 29, Townskip 7 South, Ranae 2 He.~t
Vacant land traversed bv drafnaoes.. SPecific Plan #199 to the west and south v~ith
vineyards to the east,
~ I It INVIIONMIIfrN. HAZARDI AND RIWO4,.~.CII ;,9tslfMglfr
I. Iakaawmayee(Y)ereo(N|manye,',hi,,,,vr,'dahazm. eand/araeoumelamas~~~~
hltei,,'~,~,Gii. Mllkfeh0KlfigufllilomllifmdihlheC//llxi'~i.lh.~sGImemllqlrL RxlfP/llmamlrkedm(Y)v, Ttle
ekdeihemlendummullmbalty~-memeplmbaeyme~O($). NdeenleonmmMeomolgWelmOe).
HAZARD8
l-N N~et,PdeoSpec~eexeao~CountyFeutt
Hea~Z~eeS(F;O.W.~)
NA PS U R {Fe. VL3)
2,,U_ LkauefeceoeNemsiZom(F~g.W,~)
NA 8 PS U e (F;. W.4)
3...~LU 0rounCahak~Zo~(FeW.1)
NA S PS U R (F;.
4__Y 8ksm(Riv. Co. e00ScaamopeMaps)
6__N tandee Risk Zone (R,v. Co. e00 Scae
NA 8 PS U R (Fig.
a N Mocktmml Hm (On~
?N F. xptMive Sere (U.S,D,A.
e Y FJmlon(U.8.D.A. lollC4Mewath~
Om. 4eo, let 14.2 & Oet484)
la N Dim~AmlFig. VI.'7)
N& U n (Fl0. vl.8)
12. ,,[~AimortNoiN(Fig. n.18.5,.,18.11
· Vt.12 & 198a NCUZ Report, M.A.F.B.)
NA A B C D ~ig, VLll)
13. ~N RaHroBd Noiee (FiO. VL13- V1.16)
NA A g C D (Fig. Vtll)
14. hi Highwly N011e (Fig. %/1.17 - V129)
NA A B C D (F;, W.11)
NA A B C D (Fig, v1.11)
16. N_.~ Pmlecl Genefa~l NoiM Afiecting
Nols knSUve Laes(Fig. Vl.ll)
17,_H_ NoaekMlevePmlect(Fe.W.~)
18. N NrQullilylmpactsFmmProject
19...~L_ PfotlctBenBItivetoAirQullity
22.,N..~_
23. ..L Humlous Rm Am(Fe. WJ0-V~.3~)
REIOURCE8
mY, Z_
~ Hi.k~cRmouea(Re. tn-VL33)
fle. vLI2-v!33&vla-vla)
D, tfinmras for Land Use lultablaty and Noise MamptabmtW Ratings
NA - NotAepamta · - ememayBumlm P8 - Promkan.aymm.b~
U-lknsdyUnedU~ n-Rmmmd s-MAmme~e
1. OF~NBPACiAND(X)NBERVATIONMAPDESKiNATION(m): Not desianated as nnPn ~Dace.
~ Lel)UBEPLAMI~AREk Southwest Terrace
~ IUBARFj~IFAIff: Rancho Californta/Temecula
& CN:)MMUNffyImI,AI~FANY: ~outhwe~t Ar~R Cnlun~ty Pl,n
~ ~CNddtX~IyImt~DEBKiNAllCX~I(IXF)wNy: ?-4 d~ll~ng mmn~t~ n~r
IUI~YOfKXJCIESAFFECimI(31~ P~Ject is considered Cateqorv II which
requires a full ranqe of Dublie services. Adequate transitinn with surroundinn
aorroved and existino land uses is necessarv. The Southwest Area Con~unitv Plan
designation for this site is 2 to 4 dwellin~ units per acre.
I. ~x~j~ts~ini~ew~hmy~(Y)orno(N)whether~ny~d34i~f~d~tie~mrg~/oe.~erv~e~ue~y~~
WlaWlOCtedlWU'e~L AJI mllwlnoKlfigumsmmcmntlirmedlnthe)lve(hnerlll~n. Fotlnyil~ue
PUBLIC FACIUTIES AND IERVICES
lJl_ CWcuk~n(F~N. lW.il. CXmcummm
Ir.,.VF..mm~.P'enmd&RmqummdRamm)
9 N IieT~Is(R;N.12-N.13)
~ N WeW(AgencyLeeere)
~ N lever(AOenWLaaes)
~ ImimmeinimmOm)g-N-11-N.18)
I,,eL. ItellendoBiRON. l?-N.18)
T,Z.
L.L Iced Wee (ne. W.~T . N.~e)
LL. I,Ve ed eeawaeon FG N.~e . W20)
12. N
14_~,_
i Trsb (FI9. N.19. N24/
Iiv. Co. e00eaM Equeef~T~i MaDs)
Ullle (FiI. N25 . N26)
Ubeldee (IRg. N.11. N.18)
~ &mdoel (Fig. N.11. N.18)
Nilera (Iml6- IL1U · ILIIA,
I111 - Llil0 & N2/- N36)
1~,.N DimmamrR., eek,_m
1L,~L,. GIVli~mmofllmmme
I?-Y bt~ithin the ne~ city of
Tenecul a
G. Idorlm~dlMimmJmcIklmllMIn"kJol~dBImcIGb','ME!dAP'or'MmmcemVIlemGomnwnMYPoicY
1. Iltlmltemk~Mlmmdmml~ '~ ' im~
O. Ifelorlwtofthmfm:imemimin"AmmrmeDemmgnmduOl~nkeo('.mndimm~a~~,~e
madom l,~,a. Oencl l'. Comple4e quemkms 4. 6. Omncl?l lt im in aGonmu'dty Pimn.
1. LlndmGmlmgoqt(iN) ne~lDmulN~lhel~me(lix~imct N~lndic~leimn~k~eiype
tL~ ~, (m~ it.) Category II
~ ~ ~mln~ ~.) Cateqorv II
3. ID.l dllem immn D2. dgm dlkenm be meem:hecl mtM dm,,a1.4n~d dage? Emilin:
4. C~xmunlbyFimnem):~-4 dwellinq units oer acre
I m~explmin:.NDTh~.l)J~t is con~i~tent_w.i.th the densi_C~. ~-~n~+~on of P-~ DU/a.
h~ever, the pro)ect desion is not comoatible with th~ vtneyard~ tn th~
R~e~lm~: No. land uses to the east a~e vfn;va~d~ and ~n ~h~ ~.,,~hea~__t;p~oved
Specific Plan #lgq has ~ dwe~ltn~ unit ~er acFe.
I ~ m ~ ~N~~k~~mTmk 4~mm: No. Land use
matibility Review, Cat~ory II Land ~e )attbilitv. -A o~sed land use mv
e p~Ject desiqn. ?he destqn of the DroDosed nrO.t~t does not
~. ki~mimmmmm~mim~m~hm~mdm~.
~0.
III B 4
III B 8
III B28
III B29
mFORMATK)N
REQUml;D
Slope Stability Report
Slope Stability Report
Biology Report
Biology Report
DATE DATE ADEQUACY
IdleORMAllC)N IFORMAI~ON DETBM~ATION
REQUESTED RECEN~D (YESNO~ATE)
3-Z3-89 Yes
3-23-89 Yes
3-23-89 Yes
3-23-89 Yes
l, ~r~r e~:f~ ~ue meked ye~ ~Y) uekder ~ect~n~ ~LB ~nd N~ ~emr~ t~ ~ct~ ~nd iMue n~mber ~n~ a~ ~
IOIOwi~,lnthelOmmeleho~mbNow:
2, Blade Ill findings of lace flglrdinO Invtronmentll conowns,
· M Iplci~c f~ eelmarie, If Idlnttfiible without flQuirkl9 In environmental impact report (E.I.R.)
4, II Idl:llliOnN Irdomitjoe il mclulred before the environmental luN4me~t can be compietecs, refer to
IA.
~. ~dd~t~h~t~F~n~d~(~t~thi~Ct|~Ck~1~t~x~t~h~Um~ctk)n~ett~ch
Ill B4
III B8
III B28
III B35
80URCES, AGENCESCONSULTED. FINDINGSOFFACT, MffIGATION MEASURES:
A Slope Stability Report was done on the project's Proposed grading.
!titigation measures for the proposed grading are outlined in the County
Geologist's letter dated 4-28-8g,
A Slope Stability Report was done on the proJect's proposed qrading,
~ttgatton measures for erosion due to the oroposed grading are outlined in
the County 6eologtst's letter dated 4-28-8g,
A. Biological Report was performed to survey the biological resources of the
project site, ST&phens' Kangaroo Rats were found to occuoy part of the site.
lettgatten measures to he taken are the participation of the developer in the
liebiter Conservation Plan and Ordinance 663 as outlined in the conditions of
approval,
A BtOloQtP:I reuort wm~ nefforBed on the Protect site, No tmoacts to flnra
deemed sensitive or endangered weee located on the site, No mitigation
measures are required,
The potential for Peleontolootcal resources on the project site exists, The
conditions of approval renutre a Paleonloqtcal study be performed prior to
the site betrig graded, If Paleonlogtcal resources are 1dendeified as likely
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
ABi:
HTG:
DEPT:
TITLE:
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
DEPT HD
CZTY ATTY
CZTY MGR
DATE:
CASE NO.:
RECOMMENDATION:
JULY 2,1990
PLOT PLAN NO. 2, A REVISED
PERMIT FOR PLOT PLAN NO.
11222, AMENDED NO.~
APPROVAL
PROJECT INFORMATION
1. Applicant:
2. Representative:
3. Proposal:
u,. Location:
5. Zoning:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Surrounding
Land Uses:
8. Project Statistics:
Bedford Properties
Gre9 Erickson
Revise an approved u, 13,228 square foot
commercial project on ~1 acres to include:
a) An additional 13,812 square feet retail
building.
b ) Reconfigure building square footages with
a total net gain in square footage of 16,658
square feet.
c) Request for Special Review of parking.
Southwest corner of Winchester Road and Ynez
Road.
C-P-S Scenic Highway Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
CPS - Scenic Highway Commercial
MM - Medium Manufacturing
Mostly CPS - Scenic Highway
Commercial
Across Interstate 15 - Commercial
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial Center
Manufacturing
Cardlovascular)
Vacant {Speclfic
pending)
Interstate 15
|Advanced
Plan submittal
Approved Total
Square Footage:
Proposed Total
Square Footaeje:
No. of Acres:
0,13,228 sq.ft.
0,29,878 sq.ft.
0,1 acres
No. of Approved
Parking Spaces:
No. of Proposed
Parking Spaces:
Percent Increase of
Building Square Footage:
No. of Driveways
on Winchester: 0
No. of Driveways
on Ynez: 3
No. of Driveways
on Apricot alignment: 0
2,511
ANALYSIS
Project Description and Background
This commercial project was originally approved by Riverside County on
November 6, 1989. It consisted of a 0,13,228 square foot commercial project on a
0,1 acre site. The major anchor tenant for the site is a Mervyn~s Department
Store, which is now under construction. The project is located at the Southwest
corner of Winchester and Ynez Roads. Three driveways service the center from
Ynez Road. The project has 1-15 frontage, which plays a major role in the project
design and marketing strategy.
The site is currently being graded under permit from Riverside County. The
grading plan is based on the originally approved plot plan. Differences between
the approved plot plan and proposed revised permit do not affect the grading
substantially.
The revised permit application seeks approval for an additional 13, 812 square foot
building which the applicant has indicated will be a furniture showroom.
Construction of that building will impact the parking allocation both in terms of
creating additional demand for parking and losing parking spaces to construct
the building. The applicant has requested that the parking allocation be
reviewed pursuant to provisions of Ordinance No. 30,8 titled "Request for Special
Review of Parking". A Parking analysis is contained in this report as is the
justification provided by the applicant. Additionally, the developer seeks shifts
in building configurations which adds approximately 3,210 square feet {0.8%
increase exclusive of the furniture showroom)of space to the site. The total
proposed increase is 16,668 square feet of additional retail area.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
An initial study was conducted for this project and has been attached for review.
Staff identified the following imports as potentially significant:
1. Location of the project within 100 year flood zone boundaries,
Traffic impacts associated with the entire development as revised and
expanded.
Staff concluded that with proper health and safety mitigations, the project was
not likely to create significant or unavoidable impacts. The initial study and
Notice of Determination have been attached which describe potential harmful
effects and mitigation measures. The Planning Staff is recommending adoption
of a Negative Declaration for the project.
BUILDING CONFIGURATION CHANGES
Building, No.'s 10 through 22
This major building segment backs up to Interstate 15 and is comprised primarily
of the Mervyn~s Department Store, a theatre complex, a supermarket/warehouse
store, a Pier 1 Store and a mix of smaller shops and restaurants. A net gain of
9311 square feet would be realized in this building grouping if the revised permit
application is approved. The only significant footprint change is the shift in the
theatre building which improves its frontage on Interstate 15. The change in
elevations for building No.'s 10, 11, 17, and 22 have not been described or
depicted in the application.
Building No. I
This 13,812 square foot building constitutes the bulk of the proposed changes.
It replaces area previously allocated for parking. The architecture is acceptable
and compatible with the rest of the center. The additional square footage
constitutes approximately a 0,96 increase of building area for the project. Staff
finds the proposed increase acceptable and without significant impact.
Building No,:s 2 through 9
This building grouping lies along Ynez Road. It is comprised of a K-Mart, two
savings and loans, two restaurants { not drlve-thru~s) and three small commercial
buildings. The approved site plan did have two drive-thru restaurants, but
those are no longer part of the application. A net gain of 2,3~0, square feet would
be realized for this building grouping if the revised permit is approved. The
proposed increase is not significant.
Building No, ~s 23 through 27
This centrally located building grouping is proposed for a total 68 square foot
reduction in space. It is comprised of mostly small merchant shops and a Music
Plus audio/video store. The proposed changes to this section of the site plan are
not significant.
CIRCULATION
Circulation on-site is adequate. Three driveways service the project from Ynez
Road. Two driveways are right-in, right-out only. The central major driveway
has 2 lanes turning in, and 3 lanes turning out; all controlled through a traffic
signal the developer is required to construct.
Two additional traffic signals have been required to be constructed on Winchester
Road prior to the project opening, although not at the developer's direct
expense.
Improvements to the west side of Ynez Road will be constructed at the applicants
expense rather than through the area assessment district.
The traffic study was reviewed and accepted as adequate by the Engineering
Department. Mitigation measures arising from the impacts of this project are
attached in the Conditions of Approval.
PARKING ANALYSIS
On May 4, 1990, the applicant submitted a Request for Special Review of Parking
{see attached information dated May u,) . Ordinance No. 3u,8 allows for shared use
of facilities when it can reasonably be projected that parking needs will occur at
different times of the day. The theatre use would occur primarily at night and
requires space for 627 cars. 50% of those spaces would be equivalent to 31u,
required spaces, which is the permitted maximum parking reduction allowed by
the code. The furniture store is primarily a day use. As detailed in the request,
the parking reduction appears reasonable.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE SOUTHWEST AREA
COMMUNITY PLAN
The Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) has been adopted as a policy guide
for land use decisions by the City Council. This project is consistent with the
land use designation suggested by the plan. The project is consistent with the
Goals contained in SWAP, with the exception of Goal E, which suggests that open
space be retained in areas subject to seismic impacts | liquefaction ) and flooding.
The original Plot Plan No. 11222 has been previously approved, however, and the
site is most appropriately utilized in a commercial capacity given its proximity to
major roads and the freeway. The project is basically consistent with the Scenic
Highway policies contained in SWAP, in terms of design, use, and setbacks.
PROBABLE CONSISTENCY WITH
THE FUTURE GENERAL PLAN
Due to the level of consistency that this project maintains with SWAP Goals and
Policies, and based on previous determinations made for Plot Plan No. 11222 by
the County of Riverside, Staff finds that Plot Plan No. 2, a revised permit for
Plot Plan No. 11222, is likely to be consistent with the City~s Future General Plan
when it is adopted by the City of Temecula.
FINDINGS AND SUPPORTING FACTS
1. Finding
The site for the proposed use is suitable in size to accommodate the
proposed project.
Facts in Support of Finding
A. Adequate area is provided for all proposed structures.
B. Area for adequate landscaping is provided along the projects public
and private frontages.
The internal circulation/parking plan should not create traffic
conflicts as design provisions include driveways and parking areas
in conformance with adopted City standards. The Special Review of
Parking indicated adequate parking will be provided.
2. Finding
The proposed intensity of use will not have a substantial adverse impact
on adjacent properties.
Facts in Support of Finding
The proposal is similar in intensity both to the original plot plan
approval and to surrounding properties. A regional mall is
proposed across Ynez Road. A u,-story manufacturing facility is
proposed immediately to the south.
Adequate area and design features provide for siting of proposed
facilities in terms of landscaping, parking and internal traffic
circulation.
3. Finding
The project as conditioned will not have an adverse impact on traffic
circulation.
Facts in Support of Finding
The proposal is a large project conditioned to provide an
infrastructure level commensurate with its size. Winchester, Ynez
and Apricot Roads will all be appropriately improved to avoid
adverse impact.
Reference potential off-site circulation impacts and recommended
mitigation measures contained in the Conditions of Approval and
noted above and discussed further in the text of the project
Analysis.
u,. Finding
The proposed use will not likely generate excessive noise, vibration, or
other disturbance resulting from use of the site.
Fact in Support of Finding
The project does not propose any use that would create any extreme
noise or disturbance. The surrounding properties include
commercial, manufacturing, and transportation uses.
5. Finding
The project is considered consistent with the current zoning of the subject
site.
Fact in Support of Finding
The proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "Allowed"
within the project site's existing CPS {Scenic Highway Commercial )
land use designation.
6. Finding
The project will not have a significant adverse affect on the environment.
Fact in Support of Finding
A Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption. Impact
mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions
of Approval.
7. Finding
There is a reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with
the City's General Plan Development Standards once adopted, based on
analysis contained in the staff report.
Fact in Support of Finding
The project is consistent with existing site development standards
in that it proposes articulated architectural features and site
amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated commercial
development standards.
8. Finding
There is not a probability of detriment to, or interference with the future
General Plan if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the new
General Plan.
F~ct in Support of Finding
The project is in substantial conformance with existing and
anticipated land use and design guidelines and recommendations as
discussed in the project Analysis.
9. Finding
The project should not inhibit or restrict future ability to use active or
passive solar energy systems.
Fact in Support of Finding
Adequate structural exposure exists for passive solar heating and
landscaping, and architectural features are provided for
shading/cooling during summer months.
10. Finding
The site of the proposed use is provided adequate access.
Fact in Support of Finding
A. The project currently proposes three independent driveways
accessing Ynez Road which has been determined to be adequate by
the City Engineer.
11. Finding
The lawful conditions stated in the approval are deemed necessary to
protect the public health, safety and general welfare.
Fact in Support of Finding
A. The conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation
measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts
of the project as discussed in the above Findings, Facts, body of the
Staff Report, and initial Environmental Study.
12. Finding
That findings stated above are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits,
correspondence and environmental documents associated with this project
and hereln incorporated by reference.
Fact in Support of Finding
A. Reference the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Initial Study and
Conditions of Approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 2, and APPROVE Plot
Plan No. 2 based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report
and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
S JR/ks
Attachments:
1. Exhibits
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Initial Study
N
uii |ll! lil;iiz ~ii
MAP COMPILED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
'~LANNING DEPARTMENT, JANUARY 1982
t,k:/+ ';
..;r--
LEGEND
ISTING AREA DRAINAGE PLANS
INUNDATION AREAS
APNqOXrMATE SCALE; ONE INCH TO 4.75 MILES
RIVERSIDE COUNTY I:q, ANNING DEPARTMENT
COMPARISON OF SQUARE POOTAGE
PALM PLAZA
BLDG~ APPROVED PP #11222
REVISED PERMIT #2 CHANGE
i -0-
2 86,887
3 7,500
4 4,050
5 3,400
6 3,793
7 7,600
8 2,500
9 6,000
10 10,000
11 52,826
12-16 44,292
17 76,500
18-23/18-22 65,389
24-28/23-27 33,291
13,812 +13,812
86,479 408
7,855 + 355
4,050 -0-
3,400 -0-
4,450 + 657
7,600 -0-
5,000 + 2,500
5,240 - 760
10,020 + 20
52,826 -0-
44,377 + 85
76,186 - 314
66,532 + 1,143
33,223 ' 68
TOTAL 404,028 sq. ft. 421,050 sq. ft. +17,022
PARKING RATIO: 6.21/1000
5.72/1000
Overall increase in area
One. Building One use
parking.
is 4%. Increase is .8% without Building
is home furnishings, requiring 1/750
Note:
Building numbers shifted by one digit due to elimination
of a building number on the revised permit.
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
Hay 4, 1990
Mr. Sam Reed
Planning Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
BGBJBCT: I~IVISED PERMIT CITY PP J2, PALM PLAZA
Dear Sam:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me this morning. We
have an application and fee paid for Plot Plan #2. However, based
on our conversation, we are now requesting an alternate program for
parking in accordance with Ordinance #348.
The specific portion of the alternate program is the shared parking
section. Under this section, we can request up to a 50% reduction
in requirements based on night and day uses.
- Nighttime use is a 29,650 sq. ft., 1880 seat cinema requiring
627 cars (1/3 seats).
- Daytime use is a home furnishing retail user (Interior
Surroundings) for 13,812 sq. ft.
Overall center parking is 2408 stalls, 2,495 are required.
The center is 87 cars short or 3.5% overall.
Based on the 50% reduction of the cinema requirement to 313.5 cars,
the center would exceed the overall parking required by 226.5 cars.
The 226.5 excess parking figure is computed as follows: 50%
reduction of cinema adds 313.5 cars to the 2,408 spaces provided
to 2,721.5 cars. SubtraCting the parking required of 2,495 from
2,721.5 leaves 226.5 excess spaces.
The above shared parking analysis closely matches the parking
assessment provided by Linscott, law & Greenspan Engineers dated
April 20, 1990. In their report, they determined that the shopping
center, with the addition of Building 1, would still have 250
excess parking stalls.
Bedfsr3 Proyerties Inc
A Dr,'erslzied Real Estate
De;'dopmeT. t and
?',lanag~z-,~nt C~.mpan}
Ma~mg Address
P.O Box 9016
T~mecuh Califom~5
~23Q9-073~
287~5 Single Oak Drive
Smte 200
Terncould, California
923%
Tel=F' .
71
Mr. Sam Reed
Planning Department
CITY OF TEMECULA
May 4, 1990 - Page 2
Finally, if the total project square footage of 421,050 is compared
to the 2,408 spaces provided, the parking ratio is 5.72/1,000.
According to the ULI parking requirements for shopping centers,
projects with 400,000-600,000 square feet require an average of
4.5/1,000. This provides an excess of 513 cars.
I look forward to hearing the results of the staff meeting on
May 17, 1990 regarding the project.
Sincerely,
G A. Erickson
Area Manager
aE/dh
(4) Shared pa~Jng Requirerants:
The Plannlng Dlrector
may, upon application by the owner or lessee of any
property, authorize shared use of parktrig
fact Ilttes under. the conditions specified heretn:
lip to fifty percent {SO~) of the requlrod parking
cl,ttI.s ,or. us. sId., to
allytim use.Ely be I)r~)vtcled I)y the
flctlltles of a use ~oesldlrld to be prllerlly a
nighttime use;. led lip to fifty percent (50S) of the
mlqulrld plrktng facilities for I use conslderod to
be prlmri I~ I nighttiEs use E~y be provided by the
farking facilities of · use considered to be
prlmrl iJr · tit, fillS use; provided, however, that
such reciprocal perking arrangements shall be
subject to the conditions set forth In Paragraphs
a, b and c below of this subsection.
The following uses are typical prlBarlly daytim
uses: banks, business offices, professional
offices, mdlcal cllnlcs, servlce stores, rotatl
stores (wlth Itmlted hours), mlnufacturor/wholesale
stares (with Ilmlted hours), grade schools, and
htgh schools.
The fol Iowlng uses are typical primarily
nighttime uses: bowling alleys, dance hal Is,
thoutars, restaurants (with Ilmltad hours), bars,
nightclubs, auditoriums, and meeting hal Is. Other
uses, such as churches, schools and gymnasts or
offices combined with recreational flct!ltles, my
allow use of shared parking facilities.
Conditions reelaired for Shared parklng are:
a. The bulldln9 or use for which an application Is
being made shall be located within Z50 feet of
the existtrig Off-street parking facility.
b. Sufficient evidence she11 be presented to the
Planning Department demonstrating that no
substantial confllct In the principal hours or
periods of peak demand of the structures or
uses for which the :lolnt use Is proposed wl11
exist.
c. Parties concerned In the use of shared use of
off-street parking facilities sba11 evidence
agreement for such Joint use a proper legal
Instrument recorded to the office of the County
Recorder wtth two copies thereof fl led with the
klidtng and Safety Deparlaent.
Request for Special Review of Parking.
Parking reductions Or mdtftcstlons exceeding the
IixllNm specified tn hctlon 18. Z2 (e) (i), (Z),
(3) and (4) my he granted as part of I roylaw of a
develolxnent plan, plot plan, subdivision,
cundltlona] use permit , public use perrote, surface
+182
/~PR ~ 3 ~990
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING * TRAFFIC ENGINEERING · PARKING
8885 RIO SAN DIEGO DRIVE, SUITE 247+ SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108 · (619) 299-3090
April 20, 1990
Mr. Greg Erickson
Bedford Properties
P.O. Box 9016
Temecula, CA 92390-0736
PHILIP M LINSCOTr P E
JACK M GREENSPAN, PE
WILLIAM A LAW, PE
PAUL W, WILKINSON PE
LEON D. WARD, PE
DONALD W BARKER. P.E
Subject: Palm Plaza Assessment, Temecula, California
Dear Greg:
Per your request we have prepared the following assessment of the parking needs for the
430,000 square foot Palm Plaza project, located in the southeast quadrant of 1-15/
Winchester Road in Temecula. The project is proposing to provide 2,408 parking spaces.
You indicated that the parking calculations prepared by others for your project did not
take into account the characteristics of specific project land uses. You are correct in
assuming that theaters complement retail uses, not compound the parking demand, as
outlined below.
SHARED PARKING CONCEPT
A shared use parking demand analysis was performed by time-of-day for weekdays and
Saturday. The shared parking concept considers the fact that in a multiple-use
environment, not all of the land uses experience their peak parking characteristics at the
same time. For example, planned retail uses traditionally have daytime parking peaks,
while theater and restaurant uses generally peak during the evening hours. Rather than
simply adding the peak parking need of each land use, as is usually done in a typical code
parking computation, the demand generated by each use has realistic demand pattern
which illustrates the most probable number of parking spaces needed to support the
planned mix of uses throughout the day.
The Urban Land lnstitute's (ULI) Shared Parking* hourly demand factors represent a
methodology for determining parking need which takes into account differing demand
patterns as they occur in real operations. The extent of shared parking depends on the
type, size and character of the land uses involved, as well as other factors such as location,
surrounding land uses, social/economic environment, and availability of alternative modes
of transportation.
*Shared Parking; the Urban Land Institulc; Washington. D.C., 1983: pg. 47.
OTHER OFFICES · COSTA MESA: (714} 641-1587 · PASADENA (213) 681-2629
AN LG2WB COMPANY
Bedford Properties
April 20, 1990
page two
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
The shared use concept was incorporated into this analysis but only the theater parking
accumulation percentages have been modified to reflect the results of similar parking
studies undertaken by Linscott, Law & greenspan (LLG). ULI shows that the theaters are
at 70% of the maximum parking demand between 1:00 and 6:00 PM, every day of the
week. This does not seem reasonable and is not supported by local studies.
MIXED-USE CONCEPT
The mixed use parking concept considers the fact that when two or more complimentary
land uses are located close to one another (i.e. within walking distance) they ten to
support one another. Persons patronizing one land use may also patronize a second out
of convenience without generating any additional parking demand. Consider the example
of a hotel located adjacent to a retail/restaurant development. ULI studies of this
situation show that greater than 75 percent of the hotel guests are likely to patronize the
adjacent retail/restaurant uses during their hotel stay with out creating any additional
parking demand.
The mixed-use parking effects for the Palm Pkiza project are considered to be potentially
significant between the theater or restaurant and the smaller retail shops. However, the
exact magnitude of these effects is hard to determine without very specific and detailed
research. The effects of mixed-use parking demands have not been included in this
analysis with the intention of generating a conservative estimate of the peak parking
demand.
PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
The parking demand analysis is based on the following assumptions:
1) The land uses consist of the uses outlined on the Site Plan prepared by SGPA
dated April 5, 1990.
2) Parking demand was derived using a "shared use" analysis.
3) The parking demand rates are from ULI and ITE, without adjustment.
4) The accumulation curves are based on data derived by the ULI, however, the
theater accumulation percentages have been modified to better reflect LLG's
experience on similar projects and the specific uses of this project.
Bedford Properties
April 20, 1990
page three
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
5)
The project will experience a "mixed-use" parking demand to some degree.
However, mixed-use characteristics were not accounted for in this analysis in order
to obtain a conservative parking demand estimate.
The enclosed Tables 1 and 2 show the gross parking demand for each individual planned
land use for a weekday or Saturday, respectively. The number of spaces shown in the
fight-hand column reflects the cumulative parking demand by time-of-day for both
weekdays and Saturdays. Table 3 contains the hourly accumulation percentages used to
calculate peak demand. The following paragraphs summarize the parking demand
characteristics for each of the proposed land uses on a Saturday, which is the worst case.
Retail Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for the combined retail uses is estimated to be 1,869
spaces at 2:00 PM. In the evening, the demand for the retail uses is expected to drop
significantly. The Saturday demand rate uf 5 spaces/KSF is conservative and ULI indicates
the 4.2 space/KSF would be appropriate. The higher rate used allows for better customer
service during the holiday season.
Financial Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for this use is estimated to be 31 spaces from 11:00 AM
to 1:00 PM. The parking generation rate is 2.1 spaces/KSF. Banks and Savings and
Loans are busiest on weekdays, especially Friday. Saturdays traditionally have had a very
low parking demand, but this has been changing recently. Parking accumulation rates are
assumed to be the same as for office uses, since ULI does not specifically identify financial
uses.
Restaurant Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation is projected to be 233 spaces from 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM.
Friday and Saturday nights are typically the busiest. Parking accumulation rates were
taken directly from ULI and have not been modified.
Bedford Properties
April 20, 1990
page four
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Movie Theater Parking Demand
Maximum parking accumulation for this use is estimated to be 564 spaces at 9:00 PM.
The parking generation rate of 0.30 space/street is from ULI for both Friday and Saturday.
The other days of the week are typically much lower. This rate is higher than the rate
derived from parking surveys conducted by LLG over the past ten years. Our studies
show that the "newer generation" of multi-p]ex theaters have about 60% occupancy due
to the staggering of movie start times and that all of the theaters in the complex are not
full simultaneously or all showing block buster movies.
COMBINED PARKING ACCUMULATION
The total parking accumulation has been calculated by hour of day for Saturday. It is
anticipated that a maximum combined demand of 2,139 spaces will occur at 3:00 PM. The
parking lots will provide 2,408 spaces. The supply will typically exceed the anticipated
demand by over 250 spaces.
We would be pleased to provide you with supporting documentation as necessary and call
us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN
Senior Transportatk~n Engincer
JPK/pb
3-900392
TABLE 1
WEEKDAY PARKING ACCUMULATION BY HOUR
PRO~]ECT:
PALM PLAZA, LLG CINEMA ACCUMULATION, 4119/90, 592B.WK1
USE FINANCIAL RETAIL RESTAURANT CINEMA
SIZE 14.69 KSF 575.88 KSF 11.65 KSF 1880 SEATS
PARKING RATE 4.2/KSF 5.8/KSF 20/KSF 0.5/SEAT
GROSS SPACES 62 SPACES 1421 SPACES 255 SPACES 564 SPACES
HOUR OF DAY
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
TOTAL
NET
SPACES
6:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2
7:00 AM 12 114 5 0 131
8:00 AM 59 256 12 0 506
9:00 AM 58 5~7 25 0 678
10:00 AM 62 966 47 0 1075
11:00 AM 62 1256 70 17 1585
12:00 Nn 56 1578 117 17 1568
1:00 PM 56 1421 165 25 1662
2:00 PM 60 1578 140 59 1618
5:00 PM 58 1350 140 59 1587
4:00 PM 48 1236 117 59 1440
5:00 PM 29 1125 165 75 1588
6:00 PM 14 1165 210 203 1592
7:00 PM 4 1265 253 299 1801
8:00 PM 4 1256 255 412 1885 ,
~:00 PM 2 867 255 508 160~
10:00 PM 2 455 210 564 1250
1I:00 PM 0 185 165 544 692
12:00 Md 0 0 117 505 421
PARKING NEED WITH SHARED USE: 1885
PARKING NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE: 2280
TABLE 2
SATURDAY PARKINS ACCUMULATION BY HOUR
PROJECT: PALM PLAZA, LLG CINEMA ACCUMULATION, 4/19/90, 392B.WK1
USE FINANCIAL RETAIL RESTAURANT CINEMA
SIZE 14.69 KSF 573.88 KSF 11.65 KSF 1880 SEATS
PARKING RATE 2.1/KSF 5/KSF 20/KSF 0.3/SEAT
GROSS SPACES 51 SPACES 1869 SPACES 235 SPACES 564 SPACES
HOUR OF DAY
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
NET SPACES
TOTAL
NET
SPACES
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 6 56 5 0
8:00 AM 19 187 7 0
9:00 AM 25 561 14 0
10:00 AM 25 841 19 0
11:00 AM 31 1564 25 17
12:00 Nn 51 1589 70 85
1:00 PN 25 1776 105 107
2:00 PM 19 1869 105 155
3:00 PM 12 1869 105 152
4:00 PM 12 1682 105 169
5:00 PM 6 1402 140 243
6:00 PM 6 1215 210 316
7:00 PM 6 1121 221 344
8:00 PM 6 1028 255 406
9:00 PM 0 748 233 564
10:00 PM 0 710 221 519
11:00 PM 0 245 198 254
12:00 Md 0 0 165 205
0
67
212
884
1436
1774
2012
2128
2159 ,
1969
1790
1747
1673
1545
1450
695
366
PARKINS NEED WITH SHARED USE:G
PARKINS NEED WITHOUT SHARED USE: 2697
TABLE 3
SOURCE:
MODIFIED?
6 AM
7 AM
8 AM
9 AM
10 AM
11 AM
12 Nn
1PM
2 PM
5 PM
4 PM
5 PM
6 PM
7 PM
8 PM
9 PM
I0 PM
11PM
12 Md
*** P E R C E N T A G E S ***
OFFICE RETAIL RESTAURANT
ULI ULI ULI ULI ULI ULI
NO NO NO NO NO NO
WKDY SAT WKDY SAT WKDY SAT
3% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
20% 20% 8% 3% 2%
63% 60% 18% 10% 5%
93% 80% 42% 50% 10%
100% 80% 68% 45% 20% 8%
100% 100% 87% 7~ 30% 10%
90% 100% 97% 85% 50% 30%
90% 80% 100% 95% 70% 45%
97% 60% 97% 100% 60% 45%
95% 40% 95% 100% 60% 45%
77% 40% 87% 90% 50% 45%
47% 20% 79% 75% 70% 60%
23% 20% 82% 65% 90% 90%
7% 20% 89% 60% 100% 95%
7% 20% 87% 55% 100% 100%
5% 0% 61% 40% 100% 100%
3% 0% 32% 38% 90% 95%
0% 0% 13% 13% 70% 85%
0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 70%
CINEMA
LLG LLG
WKDY SAT
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
0% 0%
5% 5%
3% 15%
4% 19%
7% 24%
7% 27%
7% 30%
13% 43%
36% 56%
55% 61%
75% 72%
90% 100%
100% 92%
61% 45%
54% 36%
*** P
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLOT PLAN NO. 2
(REVISED PERMIT FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 11222, AMENDED NO. ~)
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE:
EXPIRATION DATE:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the original County
approval date; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no affect
whatsoever. By this approval within the two (2) year period which is
thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 2, or as amended by these conditions.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one ( 1 )
year or more, this approval shall become null and void.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-d-way, and shall comply with
Ordinance No. 655.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an
entry or exist driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty {3)
inches.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a phasing plan for the shopping
center must be submitted and approved to coincide with the approved
landscape plan.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall
submit seven (7) copies of an 18.12 parking, landscaping, shading and
irrigation plot plan to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by
a filing fee as set forth in Section 18.37 of Ordinance No. 3u,8.
A minimum of 2583 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 30,8. The parking area shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of three (3)
inches on four (u,) inches of Class II base.
-2-
10.
11.
13.
1~,.
A minimum of 25 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
the approved plot plan. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped
shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorlzed sign constructed of
porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol
of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area
and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum of
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, st each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 inches in size with lettering not less than one { 1 ) inch in height,
which clearly and conspicuously states the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed
away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at __
or by telephoning "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have surface identification sign duplicating the symbol of accessibility in blue
paint of at least three 13) square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Road Department
Environmental Health
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department
Written evidence of compliance shall be presented to the Land Use Division of
the Department of Building and Safety.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Eighteen (18) trash enclosures which are adequate to enclose a total of 18 bins
shall be located within the project, and shall be constructed prior to the
issuance of occupancy permits. Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and
shall be made with masonry block and a gate which screens the bins from
external view. lAinended per Director's Hearing on 11/6/89)
Landscape screening shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height
of six {6) feet.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of the specimen canopy trees
along the freeways, streets, and within the parking areas.
This project site is within a significant groundshaking zone. Mitigation shall
be the application of the proper Uniform Building Code standards in the
development of this project.
-3-
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
This project is located within a Subsidence Report Zone. Prior to issuance of
any building permit by the Riverside County Department of Building and
Safety, a California Licensed Structural Engineer shall certify that the
intended structure or building is safe and structurally integrated. This
certification shall be based upon, but not limited to, the site specific seismic,
geologic and geotechnical conditions. Where hazard of subsidence or fissure
development is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be
demonstrated.
Twelve Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations to
facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
Prior to issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to
be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the
installation of plantings, walls and fences in accordance with the approved
plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year shall be filed with
the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting and
irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Plot Plan No. 2, a land division
shall be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No./460 and
any other pertinent ordinance.
For use on projects located outside SKR study areas which contain occupied
SKR Habitat:
1. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit:
The Secretary of the Interior must have approved the Stephens~
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and any proposed taking
of the SKR must be in compliance with the approved Plan:
The Secretary of the Interior must have issued to the County,
the Section 10(a) Permit required by the Endangered Species Act
of 1973 and said Permit must be in affect; and
A report, prepared by a biologist permitted by the U .S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to trap the Stephens~ Kangaroo Rat for scientific
purposes, documenting the amount and quality of occupied
Stephens~ Kangaroo Rat Habitat subject to disturbance or
destruction must have been submitted to approved by the
Planning Director.
22.
Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall
comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate
fees set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by
the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee
required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by
the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above referenced plot plan.
the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection
standards:
23.
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance No. 5u,6.
The existing water system per water improvement plan approved for Plot Plan
No. 11222 will provide sufficient fire protection for the proposed project.
25.
install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
flow 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building|s). A statement that the buildingl s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
26.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code.
27.
In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building{ s) must be area separated into
square foot compartments, approved by the Fire Department, as per Section
505 {a) of the Uniform Building Code.
28.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code.
29. Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
30.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
31.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $q13.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
32.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of $.25 per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount
must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
33.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning
and Engineering staff.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT
The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 2 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. Prior to
building plan submittal, the following items will be requested:
3~. "Will-serve" letters from the water and sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted,
including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in
order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities
Law.
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
This is a proposal to construct a shopping center in Rancho California between Ynez
Road and the freeway south of Winchester Road.
The site is on relatively flat terrain between Santa Gertrudis Creek to the north and
a large unnamed wash to the south. Santa Gertrudis Creek is contained by newly
constructed facilities. The unnamed wash has capacity for perhaps a third of its 100
year peak flow rate of 1259 cfs. The reinforced concrete box where the wash crosses
North General Kearny Rood is undersized. Large amounts of runoff from this wash
will spill over onto an open field to the northeast of the subject property and join
with runoff from a local watershed of 300 acres. These combined flows sheet across
Ynez Road onto the subject property. Water ponds on the property as it seeks
enough energy to pass through an existing 7~ wide x 3~ high reinforced concrete box
beneath Interstate 15. As the pond gets higher, some flow will outlet in a CalTrans
interceptor channel toward more freeway culverts to the south.
This project proposes to intercept the sheet flows with a temporary offsite along the
east side of Ynez Road and carry them to the box culvert under Ynez Road to the
channel along the south side of this project.
The applicant indicates that the ponding elevation upstream of the freeway is 100,3.7,
and their project would not decrease the existing pond volume and that all new
buildings would be flood proofed to at least that elevation.
-6-
The County Board of Supervisors has adopted the Murrieta Creek/Temecula Valley
Area Drainage Plan for the purpose of collecting drainage fees. Those fees are used
to construct needed flood control facilities within the particular area. The Area
Drainage Plan fees apply to new land divisions and other types of development.
Virtually all new development causes increased storm runoff. These increases are
particularly troublesome in those watersheds where an Area Drainage Plan has been
adopted. In order to mitigate the downstream impacts brought about by increased
runoff, the District recommends that Conditional Use Cases, Plot Plans and Public
Use Cases be required to pay a flood mitigation charge. Mitigation charges, where
appropriate, will be similar to the current Area Drainage Plan fee rate.
Following are the District~s recommendations:
36.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
new development in this case includes a total of ~ acres. At the current fee
rate of $1,970.00 per acre, the mitigation charge equals $86,680.00. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
37.
The preservation of the 10u,3.7 pond elevation should be proven with
appropriate hydraulic and topographic information.
38.
The proposed interim channel on the east side of Ynez Road should be
constructed with the first phase of this project. The channel should have
capacity to carry the storm runoff from the 300 acres. The 8u,0 cfs breakout
should also be carried unless upstream facilities have been approved.
Maintenance should be provided.
39.
The RCB under Ynez Road and the channel along the south boundary of the
project should have capacity to carry the 100 year peak runoff from its
tributary area with full development assumed. If they do not have capacity
they should be enlarged or other measures should be taken.
The onsite channel should be constructed to District standards including
those relating to design, alignment and access. If the District is to maintain
the channel, the applicant will have to pay a maintenance charge.
Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be
contained within drainage easements. Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions.
Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage
easements obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should
be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to the issuance of
permits.
-7-
A copy of the improvement plans and grading plans along with supporting
hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the District for
review and approval to the issuance of grading or building permits.
COUNTY GEOLOGIST
We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled "Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation, 41 _+ Acre winchester Plaza Shopping Center, SWC of
Winchester Road, and Ynez Road, Temecula, CA," dated April 14, 1989, and your
response letter, dated, August 10, 1989.
Your report determined that:
There is a moderate liquefaction potential at the site for soils at depths
between 20 and 40 feet,
Approximately 1 to 3 inches of liquefaction-induced settlement might occur at
the subject site.
Your report recommended that:
To mitigate the liquefaction potential of the site, the near-surface soils within
proposed building areas should be removed to a minimum depth of 5 feet below
the existing ground surface or 4 feet below the deepest footing, whichever is
greater. Deeper localized removals to competent soils should be anticipated.
Overexcavations should extend a minimum lateral distance of 5 feet beyond the
outer edges of exterior footings.
Prior to fill placement, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 6 to
8 in and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction {ASTM D 1557).
A 1-foot layer of gravel (1-1/2 in maximum size) should then be placed in the
bottom of the excavations and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction
ASTM D 1557).
To mitigate the potential effects of liquefaction, continuous footings should be
used for all proposed structures. Square footings may be considered but
should be constructed as a combined or continuous footing. Two #4
reinforcing bars placed in the top and 2 in the bottom of the continuous
footings are recommended to provide uniform support of the foundation
system. A Structural Engineer should evaluate configurations and
reinforcement re_quirements for combined footings, structural loads,
shrinkage and temperature stresses, with special consideration given to the
possible effects of liquefaction.
The design structures should comply with the requirements of the governing
jurisdictions and standard practices of the Structural Engineers Association
of California.
-8-
Foundation and grading plans should be reviewed by the Getechnical
Engineer to assure conformance with the intentions of the recommendations
contained in this report.
It is our opinion that the report was prepared in a competent manner and satisfies
the additional information requested under the California Environmental Quality Act
review and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Final approval of the
report is hereby given.
The recommendations made in your report for mitigation of liquefaction potential shall
be adhered to in the design and construction of this project.
It should be noted that the recommendations for liquefaction mitigation made in this
report supersede those made in County Geologic Report u,18, prepared by Leighton
and Associates on October 16, 1985.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DRAINAGE
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City Engineer based
on the recommendations of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
The Development shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage
flowing onto or through the site. In the event the City Engineer permits the
use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of
Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the
shall provide adequate facilities as approved by Engineering Department.
All lots shall drain toward the street unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through undersidewalk drains.
A detailed drainage study will be required to be submitted to the City
Engineer for review end approval. The study shall be prepared by a
Registered Civil Engineer end shall include existing interim and proposed
conditions, including Hydrolagy and Hydraulic Calculations.
GRADING
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit four (u,)
copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall
address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site.
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit four
copies of a comprehensive grading plan to Enginering Department. The plan
shall comply with the Uniform Building Cede, Chapter 70, and as may be
additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. The plan shall be
-9-
drawn on 20? x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City maintained road right-of-
way.
The developer shall provide bonds and agreements, clearances from all
applicable agencies, and pay all fees prior to the approval of the plans.
The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments, including median cuts.
Street improvements for Winchester Road and Ynez Road shall be completed
prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING
Prior to the issuance of building permits the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum based on the current fee schedule as
mitigation for traffic signal impact.
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
II
I Backaround
1. Name of Proponent:
BPdfnrd Develonment
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
P.O. Box 9016, Temecula, CA 92390
(714) 676-5641
3. Date of Environmental
Assessment: May 8, 1990
4. Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CI~ OF TEBC~
N~ of Proposal,
if applicable:
Palm Plaza P.P. Revision
6. I~=ation of Proposal:
Southwest corner of Winchester
and Ynez
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are provided on
attached sheets. )
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compac-
tion or overcovering of the soil?
Substantial change in topography
or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
Any substantial increase in wind or
water erosion of soils, either on or
or off site?
-1-
BLANKIES/FORMS
Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any b~y, inlet or lake?
Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality?
The creation of objectionable
odors?
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, whether locally
or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
ae
Substantial changes in currents, or
the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or
fresh waters?
be
Substantial changes in absorption
rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or
in any alteration of surface water
quality, including, but not limited
to, temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or rate
of flow of ground waters?
Yes Maybe N_9o
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -2-
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount
of water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as flood-
ing or tidal waves?
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any native species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare, or endangered species
of plants?
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the
normal replenishment of existing
species?
Substantial reduction in acreage
of any agricultural crop?
Animal Life. Will the proposal result
in:
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including rep-
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects)?
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
Yes.
X
Maybe
No
X
X
X
__x
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -3-
Yes .Maybe No
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b, Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce substantial new light or glare?
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result in:
Substantial increase in the rate of
use of any natural resources?
Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
11.
12.
13.
A risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances l including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticicles,
chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
Possible interference with an emerg-
ency response plan or an emergency
evacuation plan?
Population. Will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density, or
growth rate of the human population of
an area?
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing or create a demand for
additional housing?
Transportation/Circulation. Will the
proposal result in:
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
X
X
X
X
X
B LA N K I ES/FOR MS -4-
b. Effects on existing parking facili-
ties, or demand for new parking?
c, Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase jn traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
lu,. Public Services. Will the proposal have
substantial effect upon, or result in a
need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. Energy. Will the .proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel
or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in
a need for new systems, or substantial
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
Yes
Maybe
N_9o
.X
.X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -5-
17.
18.
19.
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
Recreation. Will the proposal result in
an impact upon the quality or quantity
of existing recreational opportunities?
20. Cultural Resources.
Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building,
structure, or object?
Does the proposal have the potential
to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural
values?
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe
No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BLANKIES/FORMS -6-
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels. threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long*term. environ-
mental goals? {A short-term
impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well into
the future. )
Does the project have impacts which
are individually limited, but cumu-
latively considerable? I A project's
impact on two or more separate
resources may be relatively small,
but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment
is significant. )
Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substan-
tial adverse effects on human beings.
either directly or indirectly?
Yes
Maybe
X
No
X
BLA N K I ES/FORMS -7-
Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
BLANKIES/FORMS -8-
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets and in the Conditions of approval
have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
6-11-90
Date
For CITY OF TEMECULA
BLANKIES/FORMS
-9-
Earth
1 .a.-f.
1.g.
Air
2.a.-c.
Water
3.a.
3.b.-c.
3.d.-e.
3.f.
3.g.
3.h.
3.i.
No. the proposed addition of a 13,812 square foot building and 2,80,8
square feet of additional floor space will not involve significant
additional amounts of grading to approved Plot Plan No. 11222.
No. The project site is identified on the Riverside County General Plan
Seismic Geological Map as being located within a fault zone, liquefaction
or subsidence area, and appropriate building design will be required
to mitigate potential impacts.
No. The additional square footage of commercial space adds
incrementally to the deterioration of air quality locally and regionally.
Temecula's rate of growth regionally is significant. This individual
project~s impact is not significant.
No. There are no marine or fresh waters on the site.
No. Sheet flow will continue to be channeled into the streets and
drainage facilities. Development activities on open land generally
decreases water absorption by the installation of concrete structures.
Construction activities also compact soil which affects absorbability.
This impact is not deemed significant and will not be increased if the
revised permit application is approved.
The closest intermittent body of water to the site is Tucalota Creek.
The proposed project will not affect the amount of Tucalota Creek~s
surface water or alter the surface water quality.
Yes. See Flood Control letter dated June 18, 1990. Conditions to avoid
significant impact have been attached.
No. The proposed project is an amendment to the approved Plot Plan
No. 11222 and would not additidnally affect the quality of flow of ground
waters.
No. The proposed project will not affect the public water supply.
Yes. See Flood Control letter dated June 18, 1990. The project site is
located within a dam inundation area and is subject to 100 year storm
flow. Development on the site is subject to the land use standards for
floods implemented through the Riverside County Ordinance No. 0,58 -
Flood Plan Management. See Flood Control letter dated June 18, 1990.
Mitigations will prevent significant impact.
-2-
Plant Life
No. The proposed project is to add additional square footage to an
already approved Plot Plan No. 11222. The proposed project will not
additionally affect the existing plant life.
No. There are no agricultural crops on the site to be affected.
Animal Life
5,a.-c.
No. Since the proposed project is an amendment to an approved Plot
Plan No. 11222, there will be not additional impacts to animal life.
Noise
6,a,
Maybe. the proposed additional commercial space may increase traffic
volumes to the site during certain times of the day resulting in possible
increased traffic noise. This potential impact is not considered
significant.
6.b.
No. The proposed project will not expose people to severe noise levels.
Light and Glare
No. The proposed project will not produce additional substantial light
glare as will already be produced by Plot Plan No. 11222. The project
site is located within the Mt. Palomar Observatory Street Lighting
Building Area which recommends the use of low pressure sodium vapor
(LPSV) light to avoid interference with the Mt. Palomar Observatory
telescope.
Land Use
No. The southwest Area Plan designates the site as commercial. Plot
Plan No. 11222 has previously been approved for this site.
Natural Resources
No. The proposed 13,000 square foot commercial building will not
substantially increase the rate of use or depletion of any natural
resource,
Risk of Upset
10.a.
No. The proposed project will not require the closure of any hazardous
substances.
10.b. No. The proposal will not involve the closure of any streets.
-3°
Pol~ulation
11.
No. The addition of 13,000 square feet will not allow the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of human population within the
area.
Housing
12.
No. The addition of 13,000 square feet of commercial space will not
create a significant number of jobs which would affect the area's
housing demand.
Transport~tion/Circulation
13.a.,
c.,f.
Maybe. There may be an increase in traffic during peak hours. The
transportation related conditions of approval for Plot Plan No. 11222
shall apply.
13.b.
No. Approved Plot Plan No. 11222 provides 2,L108 stalls. By allowing
a shared parking reduction, due to the nighttime use of the theater and
daytime use of the retail store, Palm Plaza will have adequate parking.
13.d.-e.
No. The proposed additional commercial space will not alter the present
patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods. There are
not waterborne or rail facilities within the vicinity of the project.
Public Services
lq.a.-f.
No. The proposed addition of 13,000 square feet of commercial space
will not generate a need for additional public services.
EnercJy
15.a.-b.
No. The proposed project will not result in the substantial use or
increase a demand of fuel or energy.
Utilitlu
16.a.-f. No. The proposed project will not generate a need for additional
utilities.
Human Health
17.a.-b.
No. the proposed 13,000 square feet of commercial space will not create
a health hazard or increase human exposure to hazardous materials.
Aesthetics
18.
No. The proposed will not present an impact to any scenic vistas.
Recreation
19.
No. The proposed project will not affect the area's recreational
opportunities.
Cultural Resources
20.a.-d.
No. All cultural resource impacts will be addressed by Plot Plan No.
11222.
Mandatory Findings of Slgnifi,"-,ncs
21 .a.-c.
No. The proposed 13,000 square foot commercial building will not
impact the biological environment, achieve short term goals to the
disadvantage of long term environmental impacts, or have cumulative
impacts.
21 .d.
No. The traffic study for Plot Plan No. 11222 has been analyzed to
determine if the additional 16,668 square feet of commercial space will
have a significant impact on the transportation system in the immediate
area. No significant impacts are expected from the additional retail
area.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Planning Co, mi ion
Ross Gell~ning Director
Appeal of Condition of Approval No. 27,
Items 1 and 3, Tentative Tract No, 24232
June 26, 1990
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Appellants APPEAL and
WAIVE Condition of Approval of No. 27, Items 1 and 3, of Tentative Tract 24232.
BACKGROUND
Dix Development, Inc., owner of Tentative Tract 24232 wishes to appeal Condition
No. 27, Items 1 and 3, of the Condition of Approval as adopted by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on January 2, 1990.
These conditions state the following:
27.1 "Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit:
The Secretary of the Interior must have approved the Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan and any proposed taking of the
SKR must be in compliance with the approved Plan;
The Secretary of the Interior must have issued to the County, the
Section 10{a) Permit required by the endangered Species Act of 1973
and said Permit must be in effect; and
A report, prepared by a biologist permitted by the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to trap the Stephens~ Kangaroo Rat for scientific
purposes, documenting the amount and quality of occupied Stephens~
Kangaroo Rat habitat subject to disturbance or destruction must have
been submitted to and approved by the Planning Director.'
Condition 27.3 issues the exact same condition prior to recordation of the final map.
It is the project's proponents belief that these conditions no longer apply to the
project and should be deleted for the following reasons:
-2-
Prior to November 1987, when the Stephens~ Kangaroo Rate was listed as an
endangered specie, grading activities commenced on tracts adjacent to this project.
Under the County approved grading permits for Tracts 221u,8, 23220, and 23q83, this
project (Tract 2q232) was used as a stockpile area which disturbed approximately
two-thirds of this site.
Tentative Tract 2q232 was formally filed for County review on February 3, 1990. As
part of the County review process, the attached Biological Survey (PB-316) dated
April 5, 1989, was conducted by Howard Lea that determined a potential Stephens'
Kangaroo Rat presence on this site. Further investigation identified a potential
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat burrow on the eastern boundary of this site. Under the
conceptual grading illustrated on the Tentative Map, the identified burrow would be
destroyed.
As part of the County~s interim habitat conservation program, conditions were
drafted and approved by County Counsel for cases such as this where potential K-
rats are found on a site which are not located in a study area. In this case, K-rat
mitigation conditions were developed and applied as Condition 27 ( 1 ) end {3) to this
tract and were approved by the County Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors.
Prior to tentative map approval of Tract 2~232, further grading activities commenced
on the adjacent Tract 23220. Under Tract 23220, requirements were issued by the
County Road Department and Eastern Municipal Water District for a secondary access
and a sewer main to be extended through Tract 2u,232 and tie into Tract 23u,83. The
road extension was graded as a part of Tract 23220 offsite. Because Tract 2~232 was
a "balanced dirt" site, dirt had to be taken from the lot areas and put into the road
extension fill. This grading was monitored by our biologist at the direction of the
Department of Fish and Wildlife so as no portions of the potential K-rat habitat would
be disturbed. It was then determined that a minor change to the grading plan would
allow the ultimate grading for Tract 2q232 to be performed without disturbance to the
potential K-rat habitat. We requested a letter from the Department of Fish and
wildlife giving us clearance for the ultimate grading of Tract 2q232. The Department
of fish and Wildlife responded with the attached correspondence dated January 23,
1990.
The project proponent now wishes to complete the final grading activities on the lot
areas created as a pert of the road construction in accordance with the Fish and
Wildlife requirements. Since this grading can be performed without disturbing the
potential K-rat habitat, Condition 27(1 ) and (3) no longer apply.
Standard County K-rat mitigation feas still apply to the project and will be paid prior
to issuance of a grading permit.
At the time this issuance was first brought to stafPs attention, we immediately
contacted the City Attorney's office for direction as the City's actual authority on
the Stephens: Kangaroo Rat issue. The City Attorney*s office felt the condition
could be waived if circumstencea have changed over a perled of time.
-3-
The applicant understands that the presentation and thoroughness of the biological
information provided is the applicants responsibility and not that of the City. To
further assure that the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat {SKR ) do not exist on the subject
site, planning staff directed the applicant to 1, retain a Department of Fish and
Wildlife (DFW) authorized biologist and 2, re-examine the project site since it was
over a year since this previous study. The applicant conducted the required study
and therefore staff feels confident that the SKR does not exist on site.
RECOII~ENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission uphold the Appellant~s APPEAL and
WAIVE Condition of Approval No. 27, Items 1 and 3, of Tentative Tract 2u,232.
qiVg;,:dDE counff
m, LAnnine DiP ¶gfftFJlC
lATE:
January 2, 1990
TENTATIVE .TItACT HAP N0,
E. A. liLHBBt: 3354g
I!I!0NAL TFA4 NO, One
JAN 10 1990
24232
liar 4i~llcaet:
he Ihermtde taunt loan of bMrvtsor; hem taken tJe/olledng actlm en the above
fifeFenced tentative (tact mp at its tinnier leering of ~anuary 2, 1990 .
XX MPIt0VED tentative lip BahJeer to the attached credittons.
OBix[O tentative lap bled cn attached findings.
· ,/LeNDVEt} vltMraull Of tenUtlvl
The tract lip Ms bile route to be tenstalent vtth lll larttneet elements of the
liverSide Ccun bnerll Plan and h in compliance vtth the California EJIvir0nmentl)
Qilllt Act of 31~70. . w~dt't v111 MOt hive a significant effect m the e~vtrNnt
_led e Ge~cittve Declared'trudges , opted, n ' ' ' r f
w ~"~'~VeP~, truly yaMrim
lIVERSIDE COUItrY PtANNIN6 II(PAI~MENT
Icier S, Itmtmr, Plan~tni Director
z.
LC:lgg
fiLE- elITE
RICIRT - CNM, RV
4I.IGe OA~I ITRIET, tIOOM IN
INDIO. GALIFORNIA 92201
(I 1 I) 24H277
IUBMITTAL TO THE BOARD OF $UpERVISORS~
~ .- ' *~'COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA .~.~,~.
FROM: THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~JIMITTALDATE: November 21, 1989
SUBaECT: CHANGE OF ZONE N0. 5392. TENTATIVE TRACT N0. ~423; - Dtx
Development -Ftrst Supervisortel Dtstrtct -Sktnner Lake Area
· 4.91 Acres - I - Schedule A - REQUEST:
E
, The Plenn~ng C~ntsston end S~aff Reco~eend:
PT of the Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment
~9 based on the findtngs ~ncorporlted In the environmental
assessment and the conclusion thee the proposed project wtll not
have a significant effect on the envlronment~ end,
APPR VA of CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 5392 from RoA-2~ to R-~ in
~nce with [xhtbtt 2. based upo, the findings end
incorporated in*the Planning Commission minutes*dated October 4,
1gag; and
APPROVAL of TENTATZVE TRACT NO, 24232, sub3ect to the attached
con"~a'~T~ns, based on the findings and conclusions incorporated
in the Planntq Commission minutes dated October 4, 19~9,
11)21/89
DIpIs. C4Hnmentt DIM.
AGENDA NO.
MVERS~D~ COUNTY PLANNZN6 CO!4NX$S|0N HINUTES
OCTOBER 4, 1989
Staff ricemended approval of the sebJict extensions of ttme. Upon mot4on by
Cmntsstoeer Turnart sKon~ by titSsigner ~rvlance, end unintmousl~
carried, the ~tsston Sprayed t~ second extension of time for C~lrc~a~
ae~l~ Pike1 HI h. i~38~ tO Hitch ~, ll~, end ta fl~t UteMtOn Of
~|[N~ lTEN Z-2 - Tee 2A)
ANG! OF ZONE CASE S~ Ski fleet
gZ * ~ 33649 - Otx hvelo~ent, leg. - Lake Arel
- Ft~t ~plr~lOfill DtltrtCt - 4.9~s K~i. SOuth Of NtGoIQI Rd, let of
Calla ~si - R-A-E~ to R-~, e~. ~th T~CT; N0. ~423E - ZZ ~ts -
4.91: Icrn - Sche~le A
HeirinS vii gained It g;S6 i.e. and wls closed it
STAFF R~CGIqNEI~D&TZON; Ad~pt4on of the Negattve Declaration for EA 33549,
approve1 Of ChinDe of ZoN 6392, eprovtl of t~ witvet of' lot lee' $h to ~dth
propose ~ chln~ the Z~ne of 4.91 ac,s f~ R-A-I~ to R-I end ~ d4v~, the
arcs1 !nag ~ lots. The ISle Is lOCated s~t~ of N~COllI Road and east of
~811e ne~sl. ~r~n~n9 zoning ts R-A-I~, R-A-S led R-T. The s~te ~s vlcent
led ~rtta11~ aountltnws. The ~rr~h~ng
Soltiered slanting. T~ sttl Is.located ~th4n the
end ts conestent ~th t~ SeneFal Pla~ led
k~t~ ~uld ~ cOns4sbnt ~th the Si~ astlnit~on of ~-4. Ml14n9 untie ~r
T
~. a tntt~al s~ for EA 33549 teetered Several C~ncerni, the mete
coece~ ~t~ tM h4stortc biblast rln~ ~r tbl Stepheel tieOleO-Bit.
hn~tto~ hie ken ~lfted led tpp~vid by
th(s 0~ ~0r0 K-Rats I~ fNnd on I lltl not located 4n I I~ I~l. Thit
Con~tton Nqutru that 0 hub(tat celeryalton plan ~ tn place pr4or to
issuance of I ~t1~ng or 9rl~ Hilt.
TESTINI)NY OF PIOPORENT:
CemteeteNr Tear eMd that mrs and Ere ~ro~ects ere taint through with
ev~dlnce ef ~bl~tlon ~ ~0 I~ns ~ b~. ~ u~ tf ~0 antsale
Cemiaslonar Pewfence said that the tpecl u hu been allglared endangered, Bed
ire mid to 11819 tim flemnctltg to prlslrvt semi portton of thltr tiresent range
RZVERS?DE COUNTY PL~N|NG C(~SS[ON 14?NUTES
OCTOBER 4, Z989
so that tt wt31 not disappear antere1 . In other tmrds, th~s 18 a mochsnesm to
alle the County tomtit Fearel regular(los and set up an area ~hern the K-Ra~
can be preserved.
TIm bearing as closed at 10;01 I.m.
FINOIlS AND CONCLUSIONS: Change of Zone No. 4392 4s a request to change the
~on 4.IX ~cres free R-A-Z~ to R-~; Tract 24232 reposes I aub~aeon ~ech
d
~OU Create ~Z lots ~dth a tealmum Iot ltzo of 7Z~ aware hot; the site ts
feelted tn the Ranthe California area south of NtcolU bed end list of Calla
Redoeel the prefect ltto (a vacant; lurroun~n9 land uses Ire also vacant; the
poHy lies adjacent to the north Of Tentative Tract 23220, vhech calls for
~lots on 9.8 acres, ~th a meritawe lot 1tll of 7100 fee%; Iontog on
the site ts located ~rJlt~tn the RiocOo Celtfornll/Teecu~e Subaria of the
Southvest TerrttOF~ Lend Ull Pliantrig Ares; the tentatively U roved Sou~h~es~
Territory Ares Camuntty Plan designates the s(te for resldentFel,
untts r acre; anytraceries1 concerns tnclude elope stability, erosion,
biological resources, Irchaeolog(Cs~ resources end paleOntoloOtce~ resources;
and, all envtrereontal concerns can be me~tgitad b~ the condeaCons of approval.
The propHale Ire tn Cantomince etth the Cceprehens~ve Gentre1 Plln and the
tentat~val~ IF roved Southeat Area Plln; ts consistent ktth Ordnance 348;
ind~ ~11 not ~ave 8 significant effect on the lovefoment.
NOTION: Upon moteon b~ Cmmtsstonir Turner, seconded by Ccee~sstonar Danahoe,
an: u:entmOuSl~ car~ed, the Cmetssto~ recmmended to the Board Id~teon of
t~ Nqltte Pecllret(on for EA 33549, eprovl~ of COlhOe of Zone 5392
t-A-2~ to R-l, tn KenraKe ~th [xhtbtZ 2~ ~p~vl~ of the wJeer of lot
le it b ~dth Tittle on Lots 8, 9 end ~, end eproval of Tentative Tract
I4Z3Z, subject to the COn~ttons of opprevel end based upon the above ftnd~ngs
end conclusiOnS.
lOLL CALL VOTE RESULTED AS FOLI. OUS:
AYES: heelsallure Turner, Donshen, haftng, Purrtahoe and Smtth
lOW:
MSBIT: bus
4
Zoning Area: Skinner Lake CNRIIE OF I I0, 6392
rvisorlal District: First TBfTATZVE TRACT 14232
Number 33549
I IK COIITT PLAItlieS DLe~
~ppTtcant: Otx Dlvelopeent Inc.
Engineer/Rap: CN Engineering Associates I;c.
Tpe of Request: Subdhtston of 4.91 ac ea 1nag
reels change of zone R-A-2;i to
Locirage: ~aouth of NJcoIis Road, east o Calle
S, Exlstlng iontrig:
6. Surrounding Zoning:
7. Site Characteristics:
8. A~ea CharacteHst~cs:
9. Comprehensave bnerll Plan
Ooslgnatton:
10. Land Dlvqsto~ Data:
Nedusa
R-A-2~, R-A-S and R-T
Vlclnt, plrtqllly mountainous
VlCant
Land Use: Clt ory Zl
Density: 2-leg; per acre
Open Space/Cons: Areas not Designated
as open spice
Tot~l Acreage: 4,9Z
Total Lots:
DU Per Acre:
Proposed Ntn. Lot $ It: 7,200 square
feat
11. Agency Recommendations:
12, Letters:
13, Sphere of influence:
See Letter Detedl
TR 24232 CZ 6392
Road: 3306-89 6-01-89
Health: 3323-8g ~-Ol-B9
Flood: 3-13389 3309-89
FIre: 2-2~-89 3-21-89
Ildg, i Safe~y:
Lend Use: 333Z-89
Iradang: 3330-19
O~pos(ng/Supporttng: None received as
of thte etatrig
Not witheR a ct1~ sphere
Tract No./4ZiZ ts In application to subdivide 4,93 acres Into 11 residential
Parcels. Change of ZOne NO. gig! ts en application to change tM tOM O~ the
Sme property f~em R-A*lsi to R-~.
a OF SOil[ IlO.
11afTATZVE 1tACT IIO.
Staff
hg~ !
Additional1 the applicant has requested a vatvet of the lot lee th to width
ratio _a.rt~reents on lo~ 8, g, sad ~ d~ ~ t~ slopes i~Jecent ~ the
~t~11an kbr DIStrtct rtght of W. h project Stte 43 located south of
fiSCalIS e~ a~ eat of h111 ~dusl, th t~ hncho Cel(~o~tl Arl~.
The pr~ect stte 13 currently vaCant, ~th ~ha east portion of the property
he1 hfily terrain. Surrounding Tllld uses ere stag vacant. Further to the
aoutn~ Tract No. 22148 Ipproved b the Board of S~pervisorl on r41 Zg, 1988.
calls for 167 lots on lO acres of Ta,d, w(th a Mnim~ 1ot sale ~ 7,200 squire
feet. The stte Is currently ~ned R-A-2~ and R-A*5. All other directions, to
the east, south end wit are zoned R-T.
The project stte ts located in the liencOo CalJforntl/Temecule subarea of
T
Southwit errttO~y Land Use Planntng Ares. Peltclue cell for generally
Categor~ ! end Z[ land uses with Category Ztl lend use tn the gullytog
The project, Tract [4232 lJes north of three ray ously Ipproved tracts (Trsc~
23220, Tract 22148, and TR 186~8) M11ch Ca~? for Category ZZ densities.
Services and fectl(ttes for improvements nece:saQ, to suplx)rt Citegory Z!
devilgNat either ex(st or w111 he provided to the s(te. Therefore tt would
be app rtate to clll tots I Category Z! stte. The proposed denally Which ti
2.24 dPwrleTlng units per acre, ts vqthl I Categor~ Z! density, so therefore the
n 1 and compatible with
proposal tm consistent with the Coeprehmnsivl Genera Plan
area developeeoC.
The pro3eCt slte else falls vtthtn the tentatively sppreved Southwest Area
CanehuntS Plan. The SitAP~ designation for the sub3ect site ts for residential
.ere. Tha', o3.ct ...t,, 't.
The le~ttal study completed for Environmental Asseeknent No. 3239 Identified
tle f0118e1 concerns; Slepe stability erouJon, biological resources.
archeonlo91c~ resource, end Peleontologtce( Resources.
TM stta 1tee within the historical habitat range for Stephens' be roe Rat, a
fade a11~ listed endangered geetea. A MelOglcal survey (P~-3H) as
cond:clalrb~ Heterd L: to detemtne the spaclue presence, on Aprtl Bth, 1989
and agate i one loeb, ef 1989. From the lecOnd survey acttun Inlrro~s tn
lettable liabltet for Stepheel' lean ran rat Ire identified. The.v Ire located
en t~e no th-eilterl~ quarter of ~e site. A conditions has been drifted end
re Cove C~u I 1 for casee such IS tots ,here K-rib Ire found en e
tots case'e conditions of approve1 'and reqglres this a hubtieS conservation
plan he in place or to the issuance
this project comp~;'lvrlth the HCP. of butldlng or grading per~tts end that
CRANE OF }ONE IlO. 1392
1T)ITATIIE TIACT I0. 14~2
Staff lil~rt
Pap 3
Ali of the other teens of concern shall be mitigated as per the envtronmenta~
1. Change of Zone No. 5392 tsa requests to change the zone on 3.92 acres
fro~ R-A-~l to R-L Tract 24232 proposes i subdlv4s~on v 4ch kmuld create
l] lots vtth e etntmum lot slzl of 7,200 square felt,
2. The sate Is located In the Ranthe CiTtfornta Areas south of fitcOlas Road
lad east of CalTey Nedusa.
3. The prO]act ?s vacant. SurroundSnO Tend uses are else
4. The properu ](ne adjacent to the north of Tentative Tract 23220.
celts for 29 lots on e.8 acres. vtth a ~tnfmum lot s~ze of ?.2GO square
feet.
5. Zon4ng on the s4tt Is R-A-2~. Surreund~ng zoning 4ncludes, R-A-S. R-A-2~
and R-T.
6. ~e pro]act has, been des4gned ~ be ~n cOn~oance v4th Ord~nefiCe 348
~0.
7. T~ s4te ~s located vlth~n the bathe Ca~l~ornla/Temculs subarea o~ the
bt~st Terr~tor~ Lind Use Plann4ng Area.
8. ~e ~n~t?vely approved huthesS Tsrrttor~ Area ~nlty Plan
estgnates the I(h for residential, 2-4 delllog untie ~r acre.
g. EnvironmentAl concer~s lnclude, slope' stabSlit, y,' erOSion, b4olog4ca]
resources, ercheeoTog~cel resources and Palegargle 1ca1 resources. All
eev~rcnnlntal concerns can be ,dtigatld by the condltfoos of ipproval.
The proposals are In confereerice wtth the Comprehensive hnerel Plan and
the to tatfvel~ approved touth~mst area plan. n
~. The pro~ect ts canslatent w4th Ordinance 348.
3. TM pro3ect v111 not hen e a~gntffcant effect on the environment.
OWBE OF ZONE n0. 5392
TENTATIVE 11UICT II0. f4Z32
Page 4
Z0g of e He ttve hclirltton for Environmental Assessment No. 33549 based
~ conclusions that the project v111 not hive i SIgnifiCant effect on the
env(ronmeht; Ind,
~.~findCI,L,~Ii, E OF ZOIIE IO. ~gZ,fro(~ RoA-2I: to R-~ tn accordance 2
~ of the j~g~of the lot length to vtdth rattoe on lo. 8, 9 and
~ o~ ~ATI~ ~ E. lO32 sub:let to the conditions Of approve1,
nn dftndIngs and conclusions Incorporated qn thts sgff ~port.
LC:bc&sc
9126189
ItlVEISIK I3)UlfTY KJUIIIII6 OEPM]14DIT
SUtO/VZSIOK
' '" e ClIDITIOfiS OF APPMVAL
lYE ~ N.
;__ : conditions Of approve1 I~ for Tract No. 24232.
~ iV claim, action,
pr~eed~ng a~nst the ~un~ o~ R(ve~ide or 4~ i~nts, off(cers~
~ attack, fit aside, votd or innu~ ;n approve1 of the Coun~
~1 ovens
o~ Rhers(de, its advisory e9e~e~; ap ,1 ~ards or le 4slathe body
concerning Tract No. Z4232 vh~ch action (s ~rou ht ebou~ ~t~n the
~r4od provided hr 4n CIl~o~4i kvernmnt ~e hctton ~49~.37. The
Coun~ or Rhers~de ~(11 pr;ptly notify the su~lv~der of any such
act(on. or proceeding e a~nst the Coun~ o~ R4vers~de and w~11 cooperate
~u11~ ~n the defense. ~f the ~un~ fltll ~ Or~tly no~ the
su~v~der o~ I~ such cll~m, ectlon, or proceeding or ~111s to
fu11~ ~n the defense, the subd4v(der shall not, the~lPtlr, H ~lponstble
h de~end, ~nden~, or hold himless the Coun~ o~ Rivers(de,
The tentative aubd4vts~on shall comply v~th the State of CIltfornfa
$~bdtvtston Nap Act end to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modtfted by the conditions itsted below.
4. Thts conditionally approved tontat(ve mP vtll exptre be ~ears after the
County of R~verside hard of Supervicars approval date, unless extended as
provtded by Ord~nlnct 460.
The fine1 map shall be prepared by I licensed lend surveyor subject to ali
the requireNets of thl State of Caltforn~l Subdivision Nap Act and
Ordinance 460.
6. The subdivider shell aubmtt one copy of a aotla report to the Rheratde
Count~ Surveyor's Office led be coptie to the Dep~rmnt of Building and
hflV. The report shall address the $olls stability and geological
t
cond etariB of f,M site.
e
If aKY Fading ta pro;oaed, the subdivider shall Idanit one print of
~; Ordinance ~7 lad as Wbe edditiona11~ preyteed for in these
conditions of lpprovel.
Conditions of Aeprovel
8. A riding permit sial1 be obtained from the Department of Bulldtn9 end
$a~et~ rtor to commencement of o~y gradtng outstda of county mintsteed
road rtg~t of May.
9. Any dellNuent propmr~ taxes shell be pltd~prlor to rtcordatton Of the
flnal rap.
10. The subdivider abel1 comply ~tth the street lapPevent rocOmlntndatlona
I Rivertide Coon~ ~ld hplr~fit'5 letter aletad 3.6-89,
outl n~ tn ~e
copy of ~htch ti it~ched.
Legal access is rtqulred by Ordlnlnce 460 Shill be provtded fro~ the tract
amp boundary to I COnflay mtntatned road.
All ned easements shall be offered for dedication to the publlc and shall
conttnue tn force until the ~verning I~dy accepts or abandons such
offers, All dedications shsql be free from all encumbrances as approved
~ the Road Commissioner. Street names Shall be subject to approval of
et Road COw~tsstoner,
helmants, vhen required for rNdway Slopes, dpelnage facilities,
utilities, etc,, shell be ahow~ on the ftnll IMp If they aPe located
vtthtn the land dhtston ~undery. All offers of dedtclttOn
conveyances shall ~ submitted and ~corded Is dt~cted by the County
SurviVor.
14. llater end aware ·dtspossl facilities shall be Installed in accordance
with the provisions let forth tn the Riveraide COunty Health Depsrtment*$
letter dated 3-23-89, I copy of vhtch t$ attached,
The subdivider shell comply vtth the flood control reconwMndsttons
outltfied by the Rhlretda County Flood Control Dtstrtct's letter dated
3-13-89, o copy of whtch is attached. If the land dtvtston ltea withtn an
adopted flood control dretnige area pursuant to hotton 10,25 of Ordinance
460 mpproprtmte fees for the cOnstructlee of eros dratnage fmctltttas
shell be colleCted by the Road Commissioner.
16, The subdivider Shill COmply with the fire Improvement rocmmmndattons
~ r
outlined tn abe COu ty Ftre Nitshe1 's lease dated 2=22-8g, m copy of
~tch ta attached.
The subdivider shell comply with the rocommmfattons outltned In the
Rotld189 arid bfety Dmartaent~ Lend Dee kctton's trinemitts1 dated
th
3-31-89, I COpy of ~ C tl attacked,
18. Tbe aubdhtder shill compl~ with the rocomendetloes outltned tn the
Butldtng end Slflt~ Department: aridtrig $ectton*s transmittel dated
3-30-8g, I copy of uhtch ts attacbed,
TElTATS!rE 11ACT II0. Z4fl!
Coalitions of/4;rovel
Page 3
Zg. Subdhtston phistag, tncludtn any proposed comeart open space ares
tep~ovement pbestn , tf applicable, shill be subject to Pllnntng
De relent approvlt. Any proposed phistag shell provtde for Idaquote
vascular access to 811 lots tn each pale, and shill Substenteally
contom to the Intent and purpose Of the subdivision approval,
Lots created by thts subdivision shill cogply weth the followenD:
a, All lots she11 have a mtn~edm stze of 7,~00 square feet gross.
b. Al1. lot length to wtdth reteos shall be tn conferminCe vtth Sectton
3.6C of Ordinance 460.
Corner lots end through lots, tf any, shill be provtded vlth
additional ares pursuant to Sectton 3.88 of Ordinance 460 end so as
not to conDtn less net area then the least amount of net ares 4n
non-corner and through lots,
d. Lots created by thls aubdhlston shell be In conformnee with the
development standards of the R-~ Zone.
e. kken lots ire crossed by mJor public ut411ty easenests, each lot
shall hive, s not ussble ires of not less thin 3,600 squire feet,
exclusive of the uttl(ty esslfent,
f. Graded but undeveloped land shell be maintained tne ned-free
~1. Prtor to RECNkDAT|0K of the ftnal map the following condlteons shill be
SatiSfied:
a. Prior to the retardation of the final tip the applicant the11 subtle
unitton claireaces to the Riveraide County bed and Survey DeNrant
thiS all pertinent requlremnts outTtned tn the allached approval
'lettore fan the fellertag egenctes hie been let:
County Ftre DeNtine County Health De Pint
CoMely flood Control Gee t~y Plannln0 ~gertmnt
County Perks Deperbnent el Cou~ty Atrporto Departmet
Santa ks DeStOM1 itor Qu tty Central Ioerd
b. Prtor to the recordattun of the final map, Change of ZOne No, 5392
shell be approved by the Board of SuperViSors end shall he effecthe,
Lots created by thts lend dtvtlton shill hi In conformrice wtth the
development standards of the zone ulttmtely eppleed to the property.
TENTAtiVE TItACT IS. 14232
Gem!lttms ef AFprenal
Prior to recordalton-of the ftnal map, a~ Environmental ConStraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared In conjunction wtth the final mp to delineate
Identified eevtromenbl COnCerns and shell be rmnentl ftled wtth the
offlee Of the CountY Surveyor. A copy of the fiS shill ~e t insrattled to
r
the Pllnntng Department for review and approve1. The ipproved EC$ She11
ha liMPdid vtth copies of the recorded ftnSl nap to the Pllnntng
Delartaent and the Dipstheist of Buildleg and Safety,
The following note shall he placed on the Envtrenmntal Constraints
Sheet: "Cogfit/SloStabilitY Report No. 127 was rips ed for thts
p.,..tY ..d t. o..t t,. ,tv.rstd. Cou.t
The follwlng note sha~1 be placed on the~Envlronmntel Consti'stnts Sheet:
"Thts property ta located within thirty (3D} rotlea Of Nount PaTsmar
OI}servatory. All proposed outdoor lighting SyStems shall be from
h
pressure sodium 1t htlng systems that are s Illdid end oftented so is not
to shine above the ~rtzontal plane peas trig through the laminate".
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERNffS the following conditions shall be
IltlSfted:
27. For use On projects locmted outside SKR mtu~y areas which contain occupi~¢
SICR habitat.
3. Prtor to the tssuance of a grading or bufid4ng permit:
e. The Secretary of the :ntertor must have Ipproved the Stephens'
lOseOutgo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan led any prOpOsed taking Df
the SKR must he tn compTiance vtth the approved Plan;
b. The Secret4,ry of the intertot must have 1lined to the County, the
Section lO(a) Permit required b7 the Endangered Species ct of
f A
1973 and letd Pemlt mult he In e fact.; and,
c, A reFort, prepared b/I bloio 1st permitted by the 'U.S Ftsh and
i11d11pe krvlce to trip the lisphens' Fan rio Rat for scientific
trolls, documenting the Imunt led qu111~ of occupied Stephens'
~ngareo Rat hebttet iub3ect to disturbance or destruction must
haw been luketiled toemS ippreved by the Pllnnteg DIrector,
Z. Prtor to the Issuenee Of t grading or butldte pemlt, the applicant
shell uep1~ vlth the prevtatono of Ordinance 663by pa~tng the
appropriate fee set forth Io that ordinance, Should Ordinance No. 663
be aulmreeded iff the prevtltons of I Habitat ConservatIOn Flirt prtor
to the paymet of the fee required bY Ordinance NO, H3, the ipplaclnt
shell Is7 the fee re tred b~ the Habitat Conservation Plan as
tml~lemeted by County o~nance or resolution,
TENTAtiVE TIACT NO. Z4232
Coattimes ef Approval
3. Prior to the recordalign of the ftnil rap:
a. Thesecretary of the Interior must hive approved thl Stephans'
brigerie bt-Hlbitat Censervie(on Plan end I~Y propolld taking of
the SKI( must be tn compliance with thl approved Plan:
b, The Secretary of the Interlot must have lssued t~ the CounV, the
Sectton lO(e) Pereta required bY the Endangered Spectes Act of
1973 and sitd Permit must be in effect; and,
A report, prepared by I blolo 1st pemltted by the U,S. FIsh and
c. wtldlife Service to trip the Ztephens' Ka 91 oo
Rat for scientific
n r
purposes, documenting the Imount ind qualt~y of occupied Stephens'
rdngaroo Rat habitat aubJect to disturbance or destruction must
hive bean submitted to Ind Ipproved by the Pllnntng Director.
28. Prtor to the tssulnce of gridtrig permtta, i quiltfled paleontologist shall
be retained by the developer for consultation end comment on the proposed
Bradin w~th res oct to potentIll peleontOTogtcal tmplcts, Should the
poleon~ologtst f~nd the potenttel
IS high for tmpict lmplct to stQnlftcint
resources, a pre-gridl meeting between the plleontoTogtst ind the
excavation and grading contrlctor shill be arranged. When necessity, the
plllOn~OIOgiSt Or representative ahall hive the luthortf, y to temporarily
divert, redlrect or halt gridtrig actlvtty tO 1119 recovery of fosstls.
Grading plans shill conform to Baird idapied Ht1151dl Development
Standards: All cut and/or f111 slopes, or Individual cOmbtrillions
thereof, which exceed ten feet in vlrttct3 hal ht shall be modtfted by in
e proprlito combination of i spectll terrectn9 ?benchlug) plans increase
slope ratio if,e,, 3:1), retAinin wills, or/or slope pllnting combined
irlth Irrigation. A11 driveways Shill not exceed i fifteen percent grade.
30. All cut slopes Ticlied IdJacent to un reded nature1 terretn end exceed ten
10 feet tn vertical height
IhalF be contour graded 1ricerperiling the
n
31. 1) The angle of the Flded slope shall be gredullly adjusted to the
angle of the MtOrll tarrata,
f) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded fore Ihi11 reflect
the Mtorel rounded terreln.
3) The ms and tops of elopes shall be reindad with curves etth radii
deS4gMHt 4n proportion to the tote1 height off the slopes uhere
dralnmge end stability permit such roundfag,
TENTAtiVE TRACT 10. ~4~
Conditions ef Mrovol
Page 6
4) Where cut or f111 slopes exceed S00 feet tn horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved tne continuous.
undulatle9 feintart.
~ Prtor to the tseuence of ktldtng Pomtts, composite landscaping end
Ire(gallon plans shall' be subelated for Planning Departmet epprovil. The
plans she~l address all ereas end aspects the tract requiring landsca trig
end irrigation to be teltilled Including, but not ltmtted to, ~srCway
lanSIng. street tries, slope planting, end Individual front yard
~tndscaptng.
33. All d~e~ltngs to be constructed ~tthtn thts subdlvts(on $ha~l be designed
and constructed vtth fire retlrdent (Cllss A) roofs as ipproved by the
County Fire Harshel.
34. 6vtldtng separation beheen all halTdingo t~cludln9 fireplaces shall not
be less theft ten (30) feet. -
All Street side yard setbacks Ihell be e mtntmum of ten (10) feet.
DJroctor of lulldtq and Safety.
39. Prtor to the tssulnco of Oredin perutea, the applicant shell c
Ordinance No, H3 by I)lYtq ~ ~un requtm by that ordlancl Ix~tch
based on the gross ecrea Of the pergels proposed for developlent/the
number of steele fuetly restSella1 untie on lots whtch ere e ,tintBum
uneohllf (in) gross left In etze, Should 0rdtnanco No. g43 by SUperceded
by the provtelees efe Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
The funs required by 0rdtnlnce no, E63, the applicant $hali KY the fee
requtred under the kbttot ConservlttOh Flirt Is 1Balemeted by Count~
ordinance or resolvetun,
40. All of the foregoing conditions ehe~l be camp~led wtth prtor to occupancy
or I~ use ellmad by thts poteta.
37. Prtor to the tiM1 butldtng InSpectton o prove1 by the Butlding and Safety
Department, I stx foot hi h decorative b~ock yell shall be constructed
alan north and HIt ~rders and the south borders of P&rce~ 8. The
required un11 abel1 be subject tO thl I prove1 of the DIrector of the
Departmet Of klldtng led SlfltJf and ~e Planning Director.
.38~ All landscaping led (rriptlon shall be tnstel~ed tn accorcbnce vtth
"~ e~proved plans prIOr to the lOsvance of occupanc~ pormtts. If saloons1
conditions do not porm(t planting, tritetie landscaping led erosion control
measures ebe~l be uttllzed el ipproved by the Planning Director and the
front yards shall be provided wtth ]andscap~ng and automatic
Irrigation.
TENTATIVE TRACT llO. :4FJ2
Conditions of ~tpprovsl
Pap 7
LC:bc3sc
Parch 6, 1989
liverside County Planning Commission
4080 beach Street
Riverside, CA 9250~
IUVERIIDE COt INT"
PtaqNm~ DIP,~' ~'tr
eel TR 24232
Schedule A - Team 1 - SMD#9
Ladies and Gentlemen:
With respect to the conditions of approval for the'referenced tentative
land division map, the Road Delmrtment recommends that the landdiv~der
provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedicat~ons ~n
accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road rmprovemen~
Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map
traveled ways, end drainage courses with appropriate that their
(MullSion or unscCeptability may require the map to be relubmitted for
further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are
essential parts and a requirement Occurring in ONE is as binding as
led
though occurring in all. They are intend to be cam lamentdry a~d to
describe the conditions for a complete deskS, o~-the ~;
· All
provemane
questions regarding the true mean~ng of the conditions shall be re~erred
to the Road Commissloner'l Office.
l. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from
damages caused b alteration o~ the drainage patterns,
l,e., concentration of diversion of flay. Protectio~
shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage
facilities including enlarging existing ~scil~ties and/
Or by securing a drainage easement. All drainage
easements shall be sl~own on the final map and noted as
.....,- no .lldin, o.truc.o..,
led fills are sliDvet". The
a
protection shall be as a~roved by the Road ~partment.
The landdivider Shill Icespa and properly disuse o~
&ll offsets drainage fleeing onto or through the site.
In the event the load Commissioner permits the use of
streets for dralMge urposes, the provisions el Article
XI of Ordinanae No. dlO will el)ply. Should the
.....d t...tr..t capacity o. t..... o,
i
prlSib ted lot arelnaee purposes, the
subdivider shall provide adequate drainage lac~litiea
as epproved by the Road Department.
P&Pe .2
e
XaJor drainage it involved on thl· landdivision and Its
resolution shall be Is approved by the Road Department.
Cells Katetins shall be improved within the dedicated ri ht
DE way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, lectYon
A- (40'/60')
Klaren LIne shall be Improved with 32 Eeet of asphalt
concrete pavement wLthin a 45 fOOt part width dedicated
rleht Of way in accordance vith County Standard No. 104,
Section A. (20'30')
Corner cutbacks Ln Centersante with County Itandard No. e05
shall be shown On the final nap and offered for dedication.
Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile
extendin9 a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project
boundaries at · eradeas ap roved the
.Iv.r.,. c..ty .o.d by
road Improvements does not imply acceptance for main-
tenance by County.
Itandard knuckles shall be constructed throughout the
landdivisiOn.
Aspbaltic emulsion (foe seal) shell be applied not less
than fourteen days followin lacemeet oE the asphalt
sur~talng and shall be applieS eta rate Of 0.05 Vailon
par square yard. Asphalt emulsion Shall COnform to
Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifi-
cations.
The lenddivider shall provide utility clearance from
i
liethe CalifOrnia Water District prior to the recordat on
of the final nap.
The landdLvider shall post a deposit end execute an
1
agreement with the Notrepc lean Water District prior to the
recurdatSun of the amp,
The amxJsus centerline gradient and the minimum centerline
radii shall be in aonfotamnoe with County Standard Ilia
Ordinance 461.
Hitch 6, 1leg
Page 3.
All centerline intersections shall be et 90m with a minimum
SO' tangent measured from flov line.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the
landdivision in accordance with County Standard No. 400
and 401 (curb sidewalk).
· he minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and
knuckles shall be 3S her.
All drivers · lhsll ~onform to the applicable Riverside
County Stan~ards. A minimum of four feet of ~ull height
curb eh~ll be constructed between driveways.
The minimum garage setback shall be 30 her measured from
the face oJ curb,
The landowner/developer shall provide/acquire sufficient
public OEESite righam of way to provide for
primary/secondary access road(s) to a paved and maintained
road. Said access road(s),shsll be- constructed
accordance with County Standard He. 106, Section
R
()2'/60') It s grade and alignment epproved by the cad
Comnlsstoner. ~his is necessary for circulstiCn.
Prior to the recordarSon oE the final map, the developer
Shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department,
a cash sum o~ $1S0.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic
signal impacts. Should the developer choose to de~lr the
time of payment, a written agreement may be entered into
with the Count deferring said payment to the time of
issuance of a guildlng permit.
ElectriCal and communications trenches shall be provided in
accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817.
Lenddivisions OreSting cut or fill slopes adjacent to the
streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance
control and slope assants as approved by the Reed
Deperusent.
The street design and improvement coneopt of this project
shalx be ~oordtnated with iel 11e/77-72,
23, ~ent TR 23220 and Tent TI 23493.
all private and public entrances and/or intersections
opposite this project Shall be coordinated with this
project and shown on the street improvement plans.
.Pegs 4
Should th~l project lie Within any assessment/benefit
district, the ai)))lcsnt ihall ~riot to tecotdation make
appliCet~on for and pay ~or the~ tea portionmerit ~f the
assessments or pay the unit ~eem in t~a benefit distri=t
unless maid fees mrs deferred t~ building permit.
t
Subdivision Eng near
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
f EALTH
MAR ~ 8 '1~
4080 Lemon Street ~E~ ~: ~'
Riverside, CA OBSOI ~~p, ....
JiBs TRIG? MAP 14311s X portion of Parcel lO of asp filed for
record ira Rook P-l, Pages 44, 45 and 4e of Parcel Haps ~n
the Office of the County Recorder, County of Jhversxde State
of California.
tit Lots)
~e Department st Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap
No. 04232 and recokaend8 that:
A water system shall be instolled acCordxng to
plans and specification so approve~ by the water
company and the Health E)epartmenL. Permanent
primal OF the plans of the valor eyetee shall
be submitted in triplicate, vtth a miniBum Scale
not lees than One inch equals lO0 feet, along vxth
the original drawing to the County Surveyor.
The primal shall show the internal pipe diameter.
location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and
joint specifications, and the Sill of the main
et the juneLion of the nov system to the
mciltinI ayetom. The plans shall comply in
raspsets with Dlv. I, Part l, Chapter tef the
Califmrnis Hsalth and lafity Cede, Callferhia
Adsthis%retire Code, Title I~, Chapter 11, and Oeneral
Order No. lOIef the Public Utilities Cmission sf the
leaks of California, when applicable.
PalaTes
Arts: Den CaLron
Hatch Ja. 1t99
Thl plus lhalX be signed by a registered engineer end
vatlr cupguy with the following Certification: "l
earLlay that the dotl0n of the eater eyetam in Tract
Nap a4al~ it accordance with the eater system expansion
plans of the Ranthe California eater Dillrice
and that the valor service, storage and distribution
system vial be adequate to provide water IgrvSce to
such Tract map. Thee certification dell not ConeLiters
s gnarlntis that it vil~ supply valet to luch tract
map at any iplcttSc qulntSties,/lows Or proseurea for
fire proLocates or any other purpose".This
Certification Iha~2 be Bighid by · responsible otficl&~
of the valor Company. ht,BJt01_la!$_bt,lU~lAiAId,Ag
~t9~l.gt~e£-~e_~be_ZlgUll~.~g£.~bl.glSgtdsXAga. O~.~bl
District sOresing to larva dolllaSt valor to each sad every
lot in the cubdivision on demand providing lat~s/actory
ttnanci&l arr,ngements are IompAetedvith the-subdivider.
it vtlA be necessary for financial arrangements to be made
prior Lo the recordsfish of the final lip.
Thil Department hoe a statement from the hltorn Hu~icipa!
Hueitem&2 Damtrice agreesfig to silly the lubdiviliOn sewage
lyltem tO be cormoGled to the severs of the Digtrice. The
liver system lhall be ifigtalled according to plane &rid
Ipectficationl el approvod by the Destrice, the County
Surveyor sad the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
pJ~e or the sever lyetel tht~ be submitted ~ triplicate,
slug with the original driving, to the eo~Ly BurroFor. ~o
prints shall Obey the internal pipe d~ueter, locitin or
a~ole,, caplots profiles, pipe ~d ~oint
~ the mime of the gOverg It tam 3~ctiu of the nov gymtom
go tam eMilLing IF/tom. A SIngle )~Jk indies&aug location
of sever lines ~ user lines ohlXl be t portinn of the
le~ge plus ~ Fretlime,
I~ivorsids County Pl&nning
P&ge g
&~tn: Din Citron
The pleas mh&li be signed by t registered engineer end the
sever district with the to~ov~hg certificittoAz "Z certify
that the design ot the sever system In Tract Map 34232 ~s zn
record&nee with the mover ly$tem expe~ssioh pL~o Or the
dispossl eyelet is &doqueke &t this tire to trees the
intic&p&tOd viatot trot the proposed trice Nip." hl,lliDI
completely tin&~ttod prior LD record&~ion of the rznsl asp.
SHetic
RIVIRSID[ COUNTY !eLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONIERVATION DISTRICT
Narch 13o 1909
I~i. ve~eide, Om~Llc~n~
24232
Following ere the ~Lmt~i~'m
II-xLn~e INs s~all be pa~d to the ~ Qzzttsm~ am Ft ol
the filing Ix record at the mul~:Lv;Lmi.=c~ ~ ma~ ~ parcel re.p,
c~ if 'U~ z'eem'd,t~ olm ~ ~ mp ~- v~vad, dz"&L,~m hem
eer,/Saa~e of emet:Lmme evLdar, e~i tlm ,--~v~ of tim preel map:
-2~
prior t~ rscords~an of ~hs ~1 nip. Gred~r~ l:lsns s~ul8 be
Ouest/ons ar~ernl~ ~is rotvat my be re~errsd ~o Bob Culle~ of this of~/ce
714/787-2333.
Very t2-uly ~s,
m, ~ m~q:~mmr~n~ kmee.h~mm
m~,~p
GLZH J. NEk~4AN
2-22-89
evesk. CA S2~O1
i'll,ACT 2&232
Mlth respect to the conditions of cpprovcl for the above referenced lend division,
the rite ~spsrtmant racemeends the following fire protection measures be provided
in accordance with Itivsrcide County Ordinencos and/or recognized fire protection
standards'-
Schedule "A" fire protection appro~sd standard fire hydrants, (6'a4"xSt'') located
one It each street intersection and spaced no mete than 330 feat apart in any
direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more then 165 feet from a hydrant,
Nlntms tire flay shall be 1000 GPN for 2 hours duration at 20 FSI.
&pplicantldevsloper shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department tar review. Flail shall contort to fire hydrant types, laceties
and spacing, and, the system shall meet the tire fie requirements. Plans shell
be stlnsd/cppro~ed by I relistarcd civil engineer and the local water company
with the following certifications *'l certif7 that the design of the water system
is in accordance vith the requirements proscribed by the liverside County Firs
Dept,"
The raqutred water system including firs hydrants shall be installed and accepted
by the appropriate ester lieicy prior tO any combustible building material being
Fiecod on an individual lot.
The laud division is located in the "hsardou~ tire igco"'of liverside County
as shown on a nap on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Any
buildin2 constructed uu lots created by this land division shall oaRply with
the special construction provisions ~outaluad iu kLvcrsida CountF Ordinance
ell buildings shs~l be emiracted with fire :etardemt toofin2 material as
described in section 3203 of the Uniform kilding ~ode. &iF ~ shingles
or u~kss shall ~vo a Cbss el" tactus and shall be applied b7 the Firs
bpartmut prior to tutallatiu.
IX: Tt 2A232 Pap 2
Prior to the teesedation of the final
th· Rivereid· County life Department ·eaah a~m of liD0.00 pet Zot/~ni; as metelation
~td paymnt to the t~e of tgeu,nc, of , buildinS pe~t.
All questtoni rulerdinI the meanInI of the eouditiopl IhalZ be referred is the
rife bpaFtmeut lla~ninl and latinearthS ·tuff.
t
aarch 32, Xga9
Adminlltrltlve Center · 1777 Atlanta Avenue
Riveaide, CA 92S07
RLverside County Planning Department
Attentions Den Citron
County Administrative Center
4050 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Tract 24232
Ladies and Gentlemeat
The ~and Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety
has the following comments and conditions:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall
obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off-
site signage advertising the sale of the subdivis~on pursuant
to section 19.6 of Ordinance 348.
Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' I~de yard
Setback,
Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum
aide yard satbaok,
Very truly yours
Mmlnletmlk}n r/141 88~840 · ('/141 ?174020
CQUNTY DF RiVERSiDE
Department of tuiZding end lafety
TO: P]mnnlnO - !rile
FRDH: 8radir,;I lectien
the owner of that property shall' Obtain · gra=inQ permit
~rom the Department of BuildS.rig end Bafety
Prior to approval ·f this u·e/eubdivis|on a grading
ebtai,ed from the Building end Safety Department.
Prior to ls·uance of m,y building permit, the property
owner ·haXi obtain I grading per·it end approval to
tOnitruer from the Building end iafety Department.
_ _d. CamstruttinG · road, where Greater than Be cubic yards
of material iS pieced mr moved, require· · ~radtng
permit.
__._.The Grading Beetion hoe no comment an thie ·its
. 2B4-21
284-120
284-46 (A.C. leev~g)
T~A~T
OAT(: February 8, 1989
TO: Assessor
Building end Safety
Surve or - Dave Dude
liDsdEpartment
Health - Ralph Luchs
FIre Protection
FTood ControT District
U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson
U,S, Fish & Wildlife Services
qiVEq3iDE COUnC.u
PLAnninG DEPAqCITIErlC
Rancho Calif Water CO
Southern Californil EdisOn
SOuthern California Gas
General Telephone
Col Trans #8
[1sinGre Union Htgh School District
Temecula UniOn SChool DiStrict
£ommlsstoner Breslon
Eastern Municipal Water District
Vmllmywt~ Perk & Rmc
C.J. Cmtin mr
Cmntty PVmnm
TRACT 24232C~HANGE OF ZONE 53~'~
(Tm-1) - E,A. 3Jb4g uqg b. valOpment
Inc. C. M Engineering AsiDe -$ktnner
Lake APem - FIrst Supervisortel DIStrict.
- S of Ntcolms Rd E. of Calla ~duom -
R-A-2 1/2 Acres - 4,91 Acres into 11 lots
- Schedule A - No 1liver - CONCURRENTLY
CZ-5392 - REQUEST Divide 4.91 Acres into
11 parcels - Nod 119 - A,P, 914-310-04B
~'A*Z~ '~e ~-I ~- ~* '~: .' -, ~'~
Please revlme the else described above, Ilon v~th the ltttche~ case rap, A Land
f
oi,is,o. c.-,... ---.g h.s .....te..1, ,cR.,ul., for .;.~. ~,-. z ,~
clears, it wtll then go tO public helping. 9 mll-J~
Your Cements and racemeeditions Ire requested prior to lab, h,# ~J; 1~89 in order this
we mY Include the In the Staff rNmrt for this particular case,
$heuld 3mu have a~y asStons regarding this 1tea, please do. eat Mitteta to contact
DATE: SlNIATUR[
,~,,,L ,.iwl .... ~1 klih
. 4080 LEMON STREET, I
TM FUOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 9~01
4e-209 0A818 8TF~EET, ROOM 304
INDIO. CALIFORNIA ~2201
DATE: Februar~ 8, 29H
TO: ASSessOr
Butldtng end Slflty ~
Surve or * Dave Oudl
ROed~)~Ipertment
Health - RalDh Luchs
Ftre Pro~ectton
FIOOa COntrol DtStrtc~
F~sh I Geme
U,S, Postal hrvIce .- Ruth E, Didlion
U.S, Ftsh I Wtldltfe Servtces
iVEq iDE CO UnC.v
PLAnnirK DEPAqC EnC
Rancho Cal~f Water Ca
Southern California Edtson
Southern Cs]tfornie Gas
General Telephone
Ca1Trens ~8
EIsinore Union Nigh School District
Timecull Union School District
f~lellSloner B~eslon'
Eastern Hunttips1Wltlr District
Valleyvide Perk & Rec
C,J. Cretin er
Coeeunit~ PYens
Please revle~ the cise described Ibeve, aloe vtth the attached case map, A LAnd
clears, it w111 then gO to public hearleg,
v.. ~-...t...d ..;....d.tio......q.,.t., ~,,o.. r.,.T;;;o~,, t. or,.. th.t
el ely lnclMde them t~ thO Itlff lipOPt fur this ilart, tculer cell.
TRACT 24232 GE OF ZONE 53
,,.
C. N Engineering AIsOC -Sktnner
Lake Area · First Supervisortit OfstHct.
- $'of Ntcoles Rd E, of Calla fieduos -
R-A-2 X/2 Acres - 4.9X Acres into ~ lots
- Schedule A - No k(ver - CONCURRENTLY
CZ-$3g2 - REQUEST Ofv(de 4,9! Acres tnto
X~ parcels - NOd ~tg - A,P, g~4-3~0-046
DRTE: lieNATilt
J~E :! ,. 1.4 ..k . _ .' tlt1_.
4010 LIMON 8TREAT, l~ FLOOR
RiVIROIOE, CALIIORNIA .92501
(714) 7874181
4e.209 OAIIII IrkEaT, ROOM 384
INDIO. CALIPORNI& 9220
':":."' ::.. Count.y of Riverside
:. IZ~:~BIDE COUNTY I~LANIIIN,G DEPT. P. srch 1. 1989
DAT£=
e Znv;~q~mentll Health Bpee~aZ(-t III
c~s~z or zoNE
bvitonmenta~, Haalth Services him reviewed this chtnis
of tone ease and hmm no objections, Smnfcmr7 sever end
1IIM ~ b, MtJ
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Riverside County mvm.e,D., ~.~,.o.~~..m.
P1 ann ~ ng Department
County Admtntstrattve Center
Riverside. Col tfornta
Attention,' Regional Team No; / ' Re:,
No have reviewed this case and have the following comments:
53
Except for nut~ance nature local 'runoff ~htch
property the project is considered free from ordinary Storm Fl~,nd hazard.
However. a storm of unusual magnitud~ could cause seine d~mago. N.~ co;struc-
tion should comply with all applicable o?dinances.
The topography of the area consists of welt defined ridge.~ and natural
courses which traverse the property. There ts adequate ^tea outside of the
natural watercourses for building sites. The natu,'al w~-tercourses .~ho','ld
kept free oF buildings end obstructions tn order to ma~ntaln the natural
drmln~De patterns of the area and to p,'event flood d~'~ge to ne~./buildings.
A note should be placed on an environmental constraint shoot stating, "All ne~:
buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floor~ a minir.:!- nf
18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided
for mobile home supports."
This prOJect is in the
drainage plan fees shall be ~m~ accordance witht'i'E~"app"~'~TTEa'BT~'~lesA~
regulations. and
The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood
control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the
tmp! i,ed det~sity
co:
The Dtstrict's report dated
is still current for this project.
The District does not object to the proposed minor change.
The attached cements apply.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH'L. El)WARDS
~~[!!Civil [ngir~oer
DAT£: ~v~ ~ |~ ~_~
Assessor
9ulldlng and Safety
- D~ve buds
allh.- ~alp~ Lnch~
rtPe'PreteCUOh
flood Control Dtstrlct
FIsh & SI,
U.$. Postal Service - Ruth [. Davidson
U.S, FIsh & Wildlife Services
RiVE )iDE cOunc,u
PLAnninG DEPARE EnC
Re,the Cllif Water Co
Southern Ca t t h~r, I a [.Ht~on
Southern r. ll t h)rlHa (jig
Ge.e ra i I e I ulmu.w
liSt,Ore Uniu, Iltgh Sd~oul U~s~rlct
Te~cula IlnlOt~ %cRuel DiStrict
~mhstoner Brigson
Vslleyw4de Park & Rsc
tTRACT 24Z32/CHANG[ OF ZONE 539Z
(Tm-l) - E,A. 33549 - DIx Development
[no, - C. H Engineering Asset -'Skinner
Like Area - FIrSt Supervisorill IThtrict
- S of Nicelag Rd [, of Calls Nednee -
R~A-Z 1/2 Acres - 4.9l Acres into It lots
- Schedule A ~ No Waiver * CO~CURRENTLY
CZ-S39Z - REQUEST ghtde 4.91 Acres into
II pirclls - Nod It9 - A,P, 914-3lO-048
Plelse review the case described Ibove, lion with the attached case mp. A Land
Division Committee ,sting has been tentatively sc[eduled for
clears, It will then go to public hearing.
Your cements and recomendltlons ire requested prtor to r~..u..~ El, tg8g tn order that
we may Include them in the Itlff riporS for thh particular
Should you h~ve any questions regarding this 1tie, pleau do not hasttits to contact
~roe It Z67-1363.
C TSs
I'lt.lil. ':"f ~.~
The Riverside Gount7 Fits hpmrt~
bll no dIRt Ot anndie/one.
I Lil
Rc.t;EIVEEi
BATE: 2-21-89
40 eC) LEMON -siTflEET. 9"' FLOOR
RIVeRRIDE, CALIFORNIA 99601
(7141781,6111
'"" """'"' Vi'' "'U'2":'ei"'._
48.209 OA818 IT;4EET. nOOM 3Od
INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201
(Oa9l 341.8217
iNTERoDEla&IliTMmNT&L
0,: ,,,,,,,,-,=..
,tu ,.r .. PLANNING DEPARTNENT
1089
TO:
FI~:
RE:
Johnson - Team 1
$teven A. ~pferoan -
Tentative Tract No,
Slope Stability Report NO. 117
The follmeln report has been revSeved relative to slope stability at the
subject trac~:
"OeotechnScal Report for Pro osed SubdiviSion Cons(st(nO of 11 SIngle Family
HOmeS, vathen the 4.gl Acre ~arcel Described as Tentative Tract 24232," by
South Coast Biologic Services, dated Apt11 24, 1989.
This report determined that:
1. Cut led fill Mopes are pTlnned it ratios of 2:1 (hOrlzOn~sl:verttca~)
Idth mxtwke proposed slope heights on the order of 32 and 30 feet
respoctivel~.
2. Factors of safety of at least 1.6 for static conditions and 1.1. for
seiSmic loads mre dellmined for proposed Mopes. These are
cmnl$ acc~pnled factors of setitS IDeSnit tnitobillty.
3. Cut Slopos tn older allaytam with favorable 9eolo tc conditions are
expected to be stable mOsSfist delp seated and selects1 teStability.
4. The alluvial soils ere subject to eroston.
This report rataided that:
enDtheir prior to
aspects.
1. FIll slelas amy k graded It 2;1 or less. The kelly te be conStrueCad
et the tee ef sIepes shell be at least lS fat dale ! feet dee at the
fee, led 3 fat feet dee at the heel of the k . ~h~ k is to be
excavated Into fine eider alleyturn el epprOvedeg~ the p~ee~ec~
geologist.
Ktm 3ohnson - TIm. 1 -2- Nay S, 198;
FIll slopes shall be eTther over-filled It least 6 feet end trtmmed
back to I rim surface or shall be c acted at des4 n grade dot/rig
construction, The outer 10 feet of fIOTT1 slopes IhalY constat of e
cohesive sot1.
4. Proposed permanent cut slopes may be graded at 2:1 and shall be made
under Observation Of the project geologlst,
Terrace drains shall be provide r the latest Untform 8utldln Code.
A campacted fill berm shill be p~ced at the toP of oll fill sVopes
Drains e shall be d~rected,avly from the slopes. A plved terrace drain
sell ~
lll cut stores.
provided
6. Nrdly constructed slopes or existing slopes ~here vegetation is not
sufficient or has been damaged due to construction shill be planted as
soon Is pesslble vtth I deep rooted ground cover requlring a minimum of
lrrtgltlon. Burrowing rodents shall be actively discouraged.
This report satlsf$es the General Plan requirement for e slope stability
report. The recomlndltlons made In th$s report shall be adhered to tn the
design and construction of this pro~ect.
SAK:i1
Valley-Wide Recreation end Park District
P.O.~7
Parch 13o 1989
Riverside County Plsnntng Department
lOB0 Lemon Street. 9th Floor
Rhers~de, CA 92501
Attention: Dan Catro~
RE: Tract 242321Change of Zone 5392
RIVEF~IDE. CC,.'..,~T,,
PLANNING. DEpAt~,.ip.,r7
We would 11ke to call your attention to the following w~th respect
to the above referenced parceq/tract number:
"Pr(or to ISSuance of bufid~ng permitS, the fee of $ T B{ D Semined
per dwelltrig unit must be pe~d to
Park Dtstr~ct."
In the event the buffetrig pem~ts have al ready been ~ssued, please
f h
do not tasue the occupancy plrm4t unt~l these des ave been pa4d,
we appreciate your ell(stance (n helping us receive the requtred feei,
SIncerely,
$WG:ps
co: ray Centceros
Joe Trontt. Riverside County Butldtng Debt.
Moo. 3, 4, t d 5 n
Its. 1347+00 to 1365,00
RIM 142-3-I (fee)
R/W iDA-9-3 13 (easement)
W.O.
C, H. Briginciting Alscclates, Znc.
)oil Office BOX 6087
San Bernardins, California 92412
Attention Mr. T~ T. Fujiwere
Tentative Tract Me~t NOS, 23220, 23483 and 24232
Thank you for your Transmittel Form dated November 23,
1988, your letter dated December 14, 1988, end Transmittel Form
dated January 6, 1989, sending one set of prints of the P~ugh
Grading Pleas, 8heats I end 2 for Tract No. 23220 and insets 1
· hrough 4 for Tract No. 22483s Storm Drain Plens~ Sheets 1
throu h 6 for Treat He. 23220 and Sheets I through 3 for Trac~
No. 2~483! an exhibit shooing the location of the proposed
Itreet crossing in Tract No. 23483~ and a oheck in the emoun~ of
$3,000 from J. s L. Properties to apply tooerda the aost of
engineering review of our plans. Me acknowledge receipt of two
foz~ letters fram Continental Land Title Cc~pany dated October
3 1968, and Janmar 4~ 1919, concerning Tracts Nee. 23220 and
2 63. Also, we at[now edge receipt of one set of prints of the
Sewer Plens~ Sheet 4 for Treat No. 23220 and Shee~ 4 for Tract
No. 23220, and Mater PXans, Iheet 4 for ~act 23220 and lhaet S
for Tract He. 23483~ durin erecting between Messrs.
Fujiwere of C. M. gnatnearing, Irene Dlx of Dix Begincoring,
Xnc., and Nuc Meinherger and non Redd of Metropolitan on
february 14,
· be locations of Meets litan*s rights-clayey is shown
on Vesting ~n~ative Treat Maps ~os. 23220 end 23413 ere sub-
gainaiRily Ln agreement with our records. lobevet, on Tract Nap
23483, our right-of-way along the easterly beandefy of the
truer must be identified ea being Metropolitenes efee property,'
7heMetropolbnWamrD~ad.~ou~emCali~mla
Co R. tngineezing
Xssooistes# Znc. - 2 -
lIAR 3 ~ I!1!
and the official record data most be shown. Further, Tract Nap
Re. 23220 must show the northwest and southwest corners of the
parcel tied to the mOnuments let par survey of Parcel 10 st
Parcel Map 1/44-46 per records of Riverside County, copy attache .
o d
Xllo, reoord data must be thorn on the map, and our 70-f st-wide
right-of-way must be shown as being *fee propltty.* we require
that Metropolitan's full nee be written on both tract maps as
'The Metropolitln Water District of Southern Califotnia.*
Attached for youz use are Nottopolitants ti ht-ofoway Maps
Mot. 142-3 and SDA-P-3, and · co y of P.M. Y/44-46. We require
that both final tract maps be l~ltted for our review and
approval prior to recording.
Also, the location of Metropolitan's rights-of-way as
shown Oh Tentative Tract Rap No. 24232 is substantially in
agreement with our records. However, both our 70-foot-wide fee
property and our SO-foot-vide easement should be identified by
their book and pegs numbers. Enclosed for your use is a copy of
our light*of-Way Nap No. 142-3. AlsO, our right-c~-way should
be sho~n continuing throu h Calls Katerind Lane. Please submit
We have reviewed the improvement plans and find that
they are acceptable to Metropolitan subject to the following
cc~s~ents and requirementst
1. The street crossing o'f'Nstropoli~an"s rights-
of-wa as shown On the Street Zm toysmeat Plans for Tracts
Nol. ~3220 and 23483 Is acce tab~e, However, we require
that Sheet ? of the letoct P~ans for Tract He. 23220 show
and clearly label our fee property and easement,
2. Metropolitan's San Die · PApalines 3, 4, and 5
are adequate for ~,SITO 1-20 loa~ing provide that d
sever ~s not less than 4 feet or grea~er than 15 feet.
lowover, if the contractor lane to use any equipment over
Metropolitan's pipelines ~h~eh viII impose loads greeter
than AASHTO n-20, it wall be neceisary to* Submit'the
specifications of eueh equipeat for out review and
approval at least one week prior to its use.
3. We require tARt 16-foot-vide soNmartial-type
driveway approaches be sonstrusted on beth Sides of all
streets crossing Motropolttan's rightBeef-way. Access
~smps, if notesset , BUSt be at least 16 feet wide, Grades
of Ramps are nox~ua~ly not allo~od to exceed 10 percent. If
The ~lilan Water Districl of Sm,'~ern Ca~fomia
Co No Znglneering
Aasoolates, Znc° - 3 -
the slope o$ an aocess ramp must exceed l0 percent due to
the topography, the ramp must be paved, we rewire s
~0-{oot-wids level area on the driveway approach to access
ramps where the ramp meets the street.
4. Your plans show that storm water as well es
Animuses water fren landsoaping, irrigation, car washing,
end other outdoor domestic water uses will flow into the
storm drainage a Ite~ and onto Metropolitan'S right-of-way,
resulting not on~y in erosion but also in weed abatement,
insect in{estetion, obstructed anneal, and other problems.
Storm Drain Plans {or Tract No. 23220, is unacceptable.
However, to iccce~odate our requirements, Mr. Fujiware
proposed to continue the stor~ drain across our right-c{-
way in a closed conduit pipe, which is acceptable to
Metropolitan. We re,mira that revised plans be submitted
{or our approval. Further, we require that the ?2-inch ~CP
storm Drain, am ahow~ on Sheet 6 of B of the Storm Drain
Plans {or Tract No. 23483, be extended across our
property and eaaement.
5. COncrete drainage awelos, designed {or a minimu~
capacity of 35 c{s shall be constructed to convey the water
dischar ad {ro~ Metropolitan's blow-o{{ structures to the
propose~ stot~ drains located in Tract No. 23483. However,
since Metropolitan must maintain access along its rights-
of-way and its pipeline {acllities, to ensure their safety
and proper maintenance, we require that the swales be
designed to a~cctmodate Netropoliten'l patrol road crossin
and that the swells at the crossings be designed for AASHTg
H-20 loading.
6. Two toe drains, as shown on Iheet i o{ your Rough
3
Grading Plea {or Tract No. 2 220, will discharge water onto
our right-SToRmy in two locations. First, at the northerly
boundary of the tract in Lot 29, and leoend, near the down
drain in Lot 24. If ater must be discharged onto
Motropolitan*e fee property and easement, Metropolitan will
insist that plans for eveleSsens provide that it be
carried across our rig t-or-way in a closed conduit or
lined · n channel approvod in writing b Near Olitan.
Also, ~ drains · facilities must be ma[ntaino°~by others.
further, us r Yre that the toe drain be located outside
o{ our right-o~u-~xaY.
~. Net: liteR requires that the dowels r construct
a concrete line°Fbrov ditch and/or toe drain a~ong the
boundary o{ Tract No, 33493 and Metropolitan's fee property
TlteMetmpo~enVi~rD~tHddJourlmmCallbmla
C. N. v-nglneerlng
Associates, Znc. - 4 -
RAW 3 I IIII
to intercept any drainage flow from our property and
discharge it into the storm drain system.
we require a splash block be located on the toe
drainl~t the b~ttom of the emergency drainage ovals shown
On Sheet 2 of the Rough Grading Plan for Tract No, 23220,
l. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23220 indicates
storm drain within a 20-foot-wide easement between I4ts 23
and 24. R~wever, Sheet S of the 2torn Drain ~lans and
Sheet 2 of the Rough Grading Plans indicate a storm drain
within a 24-foot-wide easement between Lots 24 and 25.
Please revise the plans to show the actual location cf the
storm drain and its easement.
10. The Water and Sewer Plans for Tracts Nee. 23220
and 23483 are acceptable mince Sheet 4 of your Water Plan
for Tract No. 23220 indicates that the proposed e-inch
wets:line will cross over our Sen Diego Pipelines ~o, 3, 4,
end 5 with approximately B, 1, and 5 feet of vertical
sewer will cross over our pipelines with approximately 5,
2, and 3 fpet of vertical clearance, respectively. We note
that the sewerlAne at the overcrossing of our pipelines
will b~ encased in concrete.
i1. Mr. S. N. Chavez, Director of Netropolitan's
RIght oZ Way and Land Division, must be contacted concerning
the rights for the street and storm drain facilities across
Metropolttan's property. Naps and legal descriptions of
the required sailmeet must be submitted, along with written
evlden=e that the County vIII accept the easement for
street and gellit t m~d Itorm armin proposes into its
public eyetam. TIe grant of the memomerit will be mu~Ject
to Natropolitan'a rights to umm its land for water piplines
and relatmd purposes to tam mmme extent as if much grant
had not been made. Also, there will be a charge for the
easement. Please note that an entry rmit muat be
obtained for any rmding purpomes or ~or any construction
Of the strut, utTlity, or mtoxqm drain imupr~mmenta before
iliaante of the easemats,
ll~eMun~>oli~nW~tD~tfi~d$outhemC~ll~m~
C. N. engineering
Associates, Inc. - S -
Facilities oonatruoted within MetropoZiten*s easements
shall be subJeer to the paramount right of 14stropslatin to use
the easements for the purpose for which they were Required. 2f
It any time Netr~politen or its liSagAS should, in the exercise
of their rights, find it necessary to remove shy of the facilities
from the easements, such removal ea.,d replacement shall be at the
expense of the owner of the facility,
We re eat that a stipulation be added to the plans or
specifications ~r notification of Ms. 3ulie Lie of our
Operations Barvices Iranob, telephone (213) 250-6727, st least
two working days prior to any work in the vicinity of our
facilities.
We advise you that this tea onse is bleed upon
information eveliable to the Metropolitan Water District which
wee prepared by or on behalf of Metropolitan for fenere1 record
purposes Only. luch information may not be sufficiently
detailed or accurate for your purposes. No warranty of a~y
kind, either express or implied, is satechad to the information
herein conveyed es to its accuracy, and no inference should be
drawn from Metropolitan'a failure to conu~ent on any aspect o!
your project. You are therefore cautioned to mike such surveys
and o~her field investiga~ions es you may deem prudent to assure
yourself that any plans for your pro~ect are correct.
Should you require additions1 information, please
contact Mr. Ran Redd, telephone (213) 250-6025.
Very truly yours,
Chief Engineer
Incl.
Dlx Developant, Inc.
3286S Take Forest Drive
11 Tots, Californie 92630
a~tentionMr, kent Dlx
Riverside County
Planning CoffinleSion
4080 Lemon Itreet
Ninth Floor
Riverside, California
12501
Riverside County
Road Department
Cce~issioner and Surveyor
~alle of Roeerda
~ost Office Box 1090
Riverside, California 92501
· iverside County
Flood Control and
Water Conservation District
Post Office Box 1033
Riverside, California 92502
Continental Land Title Company
1605 Spruce Street
Riverside, California 92507
Attention Ni. Pebi Sright
Ms. Xathy Liftman
APPLIDA TI~N FOR LAND UII AN~ ~II~L.OPMEN'I'
~ll kVlllllll~t.
I. IdeeimeMeeeemafmielj A leftlee if leCttee M, 17l, IgV..4oted oe Celh
~ lel Lm frolee ill esd Sissies trod, Is IMllebe f, ltfermio.
· Immm II ~eeeele ,t W m,e ,,,.
& Aeeemllellmkmlee:
dJ1 mess '
IL~IABK"I&I'aL first ",llOW
1. tlllbllllllllllll~ . 4.11 meWIts.
I IEmmmmlllllelulmlm~ 1119 NOB
IIMmlmlmmmelllel~'mmmmmlmlmmmllmMillmMimmlmmmmml
l/WmemmemmmmmmmlmmmmmsmlwNmmWmmmmhmmmma'; MID ~I
emmmmleUllemGlmlmmmemlmmlam
wwmmmmedmmmimmmNmmNmmmmMMmmem. mulmmmlmmwmMmmmmemmmmmmmmimm~mmmWmkehmAsm ~
mmOmmaee.~ewmmadmmmmmmm~mmmmmmmmmm~
blmlmmmmIMmmmmmMmmm-mlmmmm~
semi ~ wlm mfmmmmmmmmflmmmmlmmmmmmhmmmmmmmmmmmm.
tmtlllllmlltllmiMlmlmllMimmlmMiiiMmmlt)lmlmwEw
~liVt~i[ ] faunl:v
-m. anmnl
'. IreIll'. I'~ Iml, l(Mm
· m. eNWm Ill~,lllt
INflIIONIIENTAL INFORMATION POIIII
;iimmimimmref(eelmmilimm
MIW'm:kNmmellmldlll
- m~ee. mmmmPe
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT
COUNTY N)NINISTRATIVE CENTER, NINTH FLOUR
4080 LE!eIt STREET
RIVERS/DE, CALXFOI~IA ~2501-3H7
Roger S, $trnetlr, Pllnntng Dtroctor
A PUBLIC HEAliNG has .been scheduled before the PLANNZNG CONUSSZON to
.- -consider the application(a) ascribed below. The Pllnntng Departsent has
tentattvel~ found that the proposed proJect(s) k~11 have no significant
InCremental effect and hu claretton(s).
tentatively cmpleted negltlvl 4i
The Pllnn~ng ConaetSS~on wtll consider whether o ~ot to id pt the negative
r o
declaration along with the proposed project at this hearing.
PTace of Iksrtng: herd Item. 14th Floer~4OeO Lmas Street. Itlverslde. CA
Date of Heartrig: MEDNESDAY. O~TOBER 4, 1989
The ttme of hearing ts Indicated ~th each application 1tiled below.
of the negattve declaration and/or i provalet thls project at the time of
halHag. If u challenge Iny of t~e pro acts tn court, ~ou e&y be limited to
ratstrig onl~ t~se (Isues ~ou or ;useone e~se ratsad at the Pub~tc hear(rig
described ~n th~s notice, or tn written correspondence delivered to the
Plinntng Conetslion at, or prior to, the public hearth The env~romental
finmug along ~th the proposed protlCt application m~y ~ it the public
tnfomlt~on counter Nond~y through rida~ fr~ 9:00 s.m. until 4:00 p.m.
CHANGE OF ZONE CASE 5392 WXTH TRACT NAP NO. 24232, EA '33549 ts in application
sakeIliad by D(x Development, TnC, for proper~y lOCated ~n the Skinner
Like Area and FIrst SupervisorIll DIstrict lad genere]l~ described as
south of Ntcolu Road, east of Cilli Neduse to userid Ordtnince No.
348, Riverside CounV Land Use Ordinance. $etd asendaent k~uld chinDe
R-Ao~i (Residential Agriculture vAth a 2~ Acre mintam lot size) to
R-I ($~nfle Fairly Resldentill) Or Other such zones as the Plannlng
Caratssloe Ely find appropriate to d~vtde 4.91, acres into 11 lots
TX OF HFdi/NG: 9:36
914-300-058
',re1 Anderson
. d. kx 3~4
durrJet4, CA 92362
114-300-058
Coral Anderson
John floere
P, 0. Box 324
14urrleta, CA 92362
114-300-060
114-)00-H0
6490 NHtova
Long beach, CA
1011S
Leonard triobe
6410 floelevi
Ling bach, CA 90815
914-300-058
Carol Anderson
John Moore
P. O. Box 324
14urrleta, CA 92362
914-300-060
Leonard Viebe
6490 Hintova
Long beech, CA 90815
114-310-01! 914-310o012 914-310-012
· & L P. ropert4es
~2865 Lake.Forest Orhe
E1 TOre, CA 92630
~ i L P~operttes
22HS Lake Forest Drive
E] Toro,'~ 92630
914-310-O06
914*31Q*Q46
Robert end Lsrra4ne
P. O. Box
Harriers, CA 92362
Robert led Littithe OCanns
P. O. hx 615
llurrJeta, CA 92362
914-310-047
914-310-547
Peter and bUrtells 61ovennont
1784 Vo AlCoasr Ave
Anshetm, CA 92804
Peter and kbrta110 61ovannont
· "4 I. AlcoarAve
4ta, CA 92804
114-310-M9
914-310-00g
~ & L Properties
22865 Like Forest Drlve
[1 Taro, CA 92630
:~ L L Properties
2~865 ,LikeTome Drive
'[1 Tore, CA 92630
C N ENSINEEBING ASSOCIATES, INC. Dlx bvelolm^t, Inc.
P. O. bee 6087 2~865 Lake Forest Ortve
bee bernardins, CA IZ41B El Taro, CA 92630
3 L L PrOpert4es
22865 Lake Forest Drive
:1 Tore, CA 92630
914-310-046
Robert and Lifts(he 0Canna
P. 0. Box 615
Hurtfete, CA H362
114-310-047
Peter end bbHalls G(ovsnnon'
1714 M. Alesmar Ave
Anaha~m, CA 92804
914-310-049
~ G L Properties
'22865 Lake FOrest Drtve
E~ Tore, CA 92630
C g faring Associates, Mx bevelelmer, Inc.
P, O,b~xlel7 lec IllIS Lake Feast Drive
San beardim, CA H41! El Taro, CA fiSH
fan bereardiM, CA H412
bevelolmRt, IRe
Lake ForeIt Dr.
Taro, CA If630
Engineering Alloctite;, Sac
· O. lax 6067
be beardim. CA 92412
el~ bevilopmnt, Inc.
counc
FLAnnin DE A:ICmEnC
ENVIRONMENTAL AIIE_mlMENT FORM: ITANDARD IVALUATION
ENVmOetaENTAL AIIImENT (E~.) NUMbly,: ',,5,~ ~/
-- Im2(xx~ NUMIEIq(i):
NAME OF PERION(i) PRIIIMINQ E,A.: ,.~-,4"~v' ~ ~ ~, .../,,, //,,..t,(~ .,,L /',:.,
I, TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRE8 ; ~' 8(XL4,RE FEET
C. AB,tESSOR'S PARCEL NO,(I): ''~ "' '
D. EXISTING ZONING: t''~' ' ": ' ? ' L ' 18 THE I1~ IN CONFORMANCE? ..... .;
E. PRC)!~OBED ZC~NING:
F. $T~IEET REFERENCES:
'- j ' ~ q. .~ '"'.c. ~' ':
G. BECq'ION, TOWNSHIP, RANQE DESCRIPTION OR A'fi'ACH A LE{~IJ,, DEBORIPTIQN:
K
IL OOMPREHENIIVl eINIRAL ~ OFIN IPAGE AND CONIERVATION DIllSNATION
C2 All m' DM( I~ me Ixolm ~ k In "ACiOimCl 61mlfiG PImp," "REMAP' ~ "Renc~ WllW Community
Pob Amu". Cemplm Beakm l, lV(B,ma CofiM, vm~i Vl.
C~. AlOr pld ef llm lXOilCt lli ll ln'Ama Nol Deeigrm~l ll Open lploe". C4mf~eb BeGttofii lll, tV
(A. imvl Deni~Vana VI.
Mere.
ViJ(P.,amMOfi). 11gleflelolll~tOdlbrmffieltlmllttuleauabiltyflUnglk~k|oe~lfi. I.
NA - NIX ~ (XiIJ IllenkJ e lllk Iklon~d.Low RiSk
I. ~ndii~v~y~(Y~rf~(N~w~h~r~my&~1~4yMz~rd~/wmB~mi~m~w/~ky~&~
Ikythepmll M~liFfmamimqllMdl~lMQom~'li~ ,~ %,llmmillt~ !fOfIPlyIIIiIW yes(Y)~Iti
I.,.._ Lm~dBllde RIik Zlme(RIv. CQ. IQQ kale
NA 8 P8 U n
e...~/ R,~,~,~e Hazard (Oreere Inap,cUan)
?~...~_ F. xpmeke Io~ (U,I,D,A.
CoeeeP4eo~ leMoe k41 lufveys)
I,~/IF, foe~ (U.e.D.A. kll
8efvloelotfBwveys)
BA,~_/Wtnd fmoalo,&liewend(Pse. Vl.t,
Oed. 410, k. la.~&Ofd. 414)
10~.,.~_~
ll._'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.~L elkodm~(Fm, Vl,Y)
M U R ffl~. V1J)
(1~. w,e)
NA A I C D (Fig. VLI
It.~,~L PrQilet(34reedN01ee&Hectjng
llta lelltive IX4e (;le. Vl.'l l)
~7.--' Nllee tenlittve_ll;'ml~(Fjg. Vt.11)
11" Al'QMliltyhllpMIFromPfoj~t
19,'. klNCt~w~lltivetoAIrQuilty
JO. _,,.. ~ O~dlty Impletl From PrOject
81,.~_ Pl~4filltlvtloWItlrQullity
II. 'L I,~ Materills imd Wiltel
23.*- ~FlelAfel(Ftg. VI30,Vt,3
Mmmllke~umatPl~,VL41
~ N,tod= m,e,ma (l~ W.U.W.33)
(PIg, kt31-vtll&vi,4e-v~)
Map)
fiN, land Use lulfablty sfid Noise Aeoeptablllty RmUnge
U - (lenemllya It · ikstrleld A · ~eeefaltyAeoepeble
· - ~AoeelSlXe C · 6enmdlyUrVoir, "Is O - LandUeeOieooursOecS
7. IUIdM~YC)FPCXJCESAFFICllNGFROPC)eA~
B. Fr~d~m~m`~nicr~M~w~(Y/~rn~N)whe~r~ypub~f~nd/~r~i~u~m~y~i~t~kt
Or be sfieQid by the l~rol)olaJ. Nl~lt'eNldl~JrollmQonltitdlnthl~GenerNPir~. Fo4'm~yilsue
, FUIUC I~ClLJll~ AND O~W]CEO
I~_ FQdmlMRIdmBImpIrN.1I,N, I0)
F,.Quelr~ ~ (FI; IV. It - IV.B4/
Iqlv. CO, 10 Q ~ EQuetdan TmH M~p:)
~ (Fig. IVJI -
Llxeda (Fie. N.I?.
I. Ili~8f,vlli/(Pig. IV.1)'.lV.ll)
Nmortw (FIg, N.tI.I · ILI1.4,
IL1U - LI1.10 A N2/· N.Ie)
1. lllietaale~miledded~VVd",a~(e):
I. ~d~N~k~d~ey~t~w~~mtw~h~he~Q~eddNdg~M~N~p~t~p~e~cum~nt~
m'i,i,~,Send T. Oo~m qgeeaP~ 4, 8, lind TIf lt lm aGommun~tmin.
the ~ be / Id I~t dl~lk)l~l~t Illel? E]IMBJn:
,,.
4. CommunUy Rmn dee~8): ~ '/ .;' "/J;': "~--'- ' "C
7. kind an m~ Wt~ mu~y, k ~, pmgeed mt w~ ~'~ C~weemlve'Wt Pin?
II ~ adeenm by kclionlndliiueNumberfiMekmueel~~:
E, ~p~d~.~d~nimC)p~p~nd~4n~M~km~gn~t~n~Mmp~the`f~win~:
I nee. ~ IW ~ ~ml ~ Mmmr ~ R Idemlfi~ng
Y. ~I~F'JNIIATION IDUI~GII. IqNIXI~31 OF FACT AND UrrlGiTION MEAIUI~EI
1..M)DmOfUJ. $1FC4~MKnON REQUIRED IEFOflE IENVIlIONMENTII. ,llBE~bkl(hrr CAN BE C0MPI,,ETED:
~ DKI"E AI~UACY
,,"- e, '- -3 .'~.~,-,.z ,- ,. ~.: ~ -~. .~
eli M~
If k:k:llttonld eheetl ere needed to =oral:dire this section, CheCk the box It Ihe emil of the section end a~tlCh
the neCee~ry sheets.
IICTION/
I V. INFORMATION I~BI, P!d)ldG8 OF PA~I' AND MffIGATION MIAIJRKI (oemmued)
IfeTION/
IOURCI& ~NCIE8 CONIJI3TD. FINDtNGI OF FACT, MrrK~k'rloN MEASUfiES:
lffvlk~kO!IP~lTAL liPArt Ik~C~!dT L~.'rION: ~
11w ~ ldll tit live a Illlilt ~ In IN ir~k_n,,,_.d INt $ ~ I my be
INNel.
let)
!"11N leNect my hav~ · ~ efiec~t Oe the ~vi.,~.A~sr.t end ~ rmvk~r, miNal Impe~t Rel~rl
le~Nleecl.
O'FARRELL BIOLOGICAL CONSULTING
2912 N. Jones Boulevard
1~ Vegas, NV 89108
TEL: (702) 658-5222
1 June 1990
Howard Lee
Consulting Biologist/Horticulturist
13552 Laurinda Way
Santa Aria, CA 92705
RE: STEPHENS' KANGAROO RAT SURVEY - TENTATIVE TRACT #24232
As per your request, S.P. Boland and I surveyed the Tentative Tract #24232 site (Bachelor
Mountain Quadrangle, SBBM; T7S R2W N 1/2 Sec. 29) on 30 May 1990 to verify
occurrence of Stephens' kangaroo rat (SKR), Dipodornys stephensi. The project site was
surveyed for biological resources but no SKR sign was identified (Lee 1989). The initial
survey in April was followed up in June by an additional survey which identified 2 active
SKR burrows. These two burrows at the fringe of the project site were isolated and the
remainder of the site developed for housing. The purpose of the current survey is to
document existing conditions with respect to SKR at the portion of the site avoided by
construction. A thorough search was made for diagnostic surface sign of SKR (i.e., burrows,
scat, runways, tracks, dust baths).
The entire project site, except for the identified SKR area, has been graded, prepared, and
housing is currently being built. The area avoided is bordered by cut slopes on the west,
rural housing on the south, and disturbed vacant land immediately to the remaining
directions. Vegetation is Riversidian sage scrub with a dense ground cover of non-native
grassland.
Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) and California ~
ground squirrels permophilus
beecheyi) were found on and adjacent to the project area. No sign of SKR as found on
and adjacent to the site. Several burrows of the congener Pacific kangaroo rat (D. agilis)
were found wjthln the sage scrub. No evidence was found of past potential for occupation
by SKR.
Mr. Howard Lee
1 June 1990
Page 2
Thank you for the opportunity to perform the survey. If I may provide further assistance
or information please contact me.
Michael J. O'Farrell, Ph.D.
Principal/Terrestrial Ecologist
CC:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
California Department of Fish and Game
\Li
BACHELOR HTN. QUADRANGLE
Riverside Co., CA
U.S.G.S. 7.5' Topographic Nap
k
Howard Lee
Consulting Biologist/Horticulturist
13552 Laurinda Way
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714-966-6456
June 20, 1989
Brent Dix
Dix Development
22865 Lake Forest Drive
E1 Toro, CA 92630
714-951-4951
Dear Mr. Dix:
This letter is an addendum to my April 5, 1989 letter regarding
the visible indications of kangaroo rat activity on your five
acre parcel known then as parcel 3 and now identified on the
enclosed tentative tract map as tentative tract no. 24232.
I have conducted another field survey with Jack Easton and Steve
Gardner. A copy of the field report is attached. We found two
active burrows in suitable habitat for Stephens' kangaroo rat on
the north-easterly quarter of the site on the old graded pad.
Both of these burrows are identified on the attached map. These
were the only kangaroo rat activities noted and both were
identified by type of burrow and indicative scat. There were no
signs of tail drags nor dust baths. The was no further
indication of kangaroo rat on the property.
MITIGATION
The activity was observed in open flat habitat similar to the
expected habitat of the stephens' kangaroo rat; however, the
habitat was man made years ago in a habitat similar to that
expected for the Pacific kangaroo rat. It can not definitively
be identified species specific without tapping. The burrows were
not observed in April. This parcel is within a larger scope of
development that will isolate these two burrows that are within
50 feet of each other on less than 1/4 of an acre.
It is possible to isolate the north-east portion of this parcel
and not completely grade lot 3 and a portion of lot 4. This will
allow for the continuation of the development through the primary
stages. The 10A plan is projected by the county to ready in
August and this will allow for program participation in the
kangaroo rat conservation. Trapping could be done to identify
the specific species living in the burrows.
Sincerely,
How~ar~~
2
~ano E~q96E~.')
.//
~'/t C f
,)
,,,,
VICINITY
~'AI61NEEt~' OF lYORK
Howard Lee
Consulting Biologist/Horticulturist
13552 Laurinda Way
Santa Ana, CA 92705
714-966-6456
April 5, 1989
Brent Dix
Dix Development
22865 Lake Forest Drive
E1 Toro, CA 92630
714-951-4951
Dear Mr. Dix:
I have completed the walk-over of your property known as Parcel 3
on the enclosed map. This is a 5 acre site with one corner on
Klarer Lane. I walked the project and inspected the site for
visible indications of kangaroo rat activity, specifically the
Stephensi.
INTRODUCTION
This a report on the physically inspection of the property to
verify the presence or absence of kangaroo rats on the property.
The property is approximently 5 acres of partially developed
property located east of Temecula and north of Rancho California
Road approximently 4 miles east of Interstate 15. This report is
only to identify the presence of Dipodomys stephensi (SKR) by
checking the habitat and traits associated with the SKR and the
Dipodomys agilis.
METHODOLOGY
A literature review was conducted to identify the biological
resources which are known to occur in the vicinity of the project
site. Environmental documents prepared for nearby projects were
reviewed for information regarding the general biological
conditions and for specific information regarding sensitive
flora and fauna. The Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan
was also reviewed for known locations of biological conditions
regarding sensitive flora and fauna.
The California Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) was reviewed
for sensitive element and specifically the Stephens kangaroo rat
in this specific area. The specific sites identified by Thomas in
1973 are within the Bachelor Mountain Quad and were presumed
extant at that time. The 1987 site identified by Meyers were
also presumed extant. This area appears to be along the San
Diego Aqueduct in a similar setting and in similar dirt
conditions. Meyers observations were to the south.
A field survey was conducted by Howard Lee on April 5, 1989. The
site consists of a 5 acre parcel on Klarer Lane. This site is
undeveloped; however, 2/3 of the property is covered with the
grading from the adjacent property. The site was observed for
signs of kangaroo rat activity. This included the presences of
scat, burrows, tail drags, dust baths, forb storage and trail
indications in the sandy/granular soils in the sparse regions
between the brush area and grass areas, along roadways, and areas
where SKR are often observed. It was a clear day and hot. There
had been no rain for several weeks and the soil was dusty. There
were no tracks in undisturbed sandy loam where the kangaroo rats
would be expected. Photographs of the area were made and the
photograph locations mapped.
FIELD OBSERVATIONS
There are not SKR activities on the property and this is probably
due to the presence of domestic and feral animals from the
adjoining properties. The adjacent farming and horse properties
have developed the area to the point that recovery of SKR habitat
would not be expected. The San Diego Aqueduct runs on the north
side of the property with extensive development occurring across
the aqueduct. The western side has just been graded in the past
year and existing homes are on the other sides. Both of these
homes have large dog populations that roam this parcel and the
only mammals observed was one ground squirrel that appeared
injured. Extensive dog tracks were on the property.
The road and pad cuts have used
extensive bike trails were observed.
kangaroo activity on the parcel.
by off-road vehicles and
There were no indication of
2
DISCUSSION AND MITIGATION
This property has no remarkable or unusually flora or fauna. The
adjacent properties have adversely effected the natural habitat.
The spill of the grading has covered a portion of the site, the
neighborhood dogs run wild on the property, motorcycle activity
has blemished the hillside, the road and pad cut has altered the
natural setting, and now two sides are major home developments.
There is minimal representation of the buckwheat/chamise plant
community and minimal animal activity. There were no kangaroo
rat activities observed.
The following pictures indicate the conditions described.
sinc rely,
H Le
PHOTO #1, NORTH
PHOTO ~2 NORTH AND NORTHWEST
PHOTO 3 SOUTH
PHOTO 4 EAST
PHOTO 5 MOTORCYCLE RUNS & OLD ROAD
PHOTO 6 EAST, WILD DOGS
6
PHOTO 7 EAST & OLD ROAD
PHOTO 8 PAD & OLD ROAD
7
..'.;;
· o,,s a,
/
SELECTED REFERENCES
American Ornithologists' Union(AOU). 1983 Checklist of North
American birds. 6th edition. Am. Ornithol Union, Washington,
D.C.
American Ornithologists' Union, Committee and nomenclature. 1986
Thirty-fourth Supplement to the AOU. Checklist of North
American Birds. The Auk99(3).
Barbour, M.G. and J. Major, eds. 1977. Terrestrial vegetation of
California. John Wiley and Sons.
Bleich, V.C. 1977. Dipodomys stephensi. Mammalian Species 73:1-3
Bontrager, David R. Rodent Ecology of the Santa Rosa Plateau
Master Thesis 1973, Long Beach
Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1976 A field guide to the
mammals, third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
California Department of Fish and Game. 1987. Special Animals.
Natural Diversity Data Base.
California Department of Fish and Game. 1985. Designated
endangered or rare plants. The Resources Agency, June 19.
California Division of Mines and Geology. 1966. Geologic Map
of California: Santa Ana Sheet. San Francisco.
Cooper, W.S.
ornia.
No. 319.
1922, The broad-sclerophyll vegetation of Calif-
Carnegie Institution of Washington. Publication
Garcia, Doris, and E.W. Lathrop, 1984. Ecological studies on the
vegetation of an upland grassland range site in Cuyamaca
Rancho State Park, San Diego County, California. Crossosoma
9:5-12.
Hall, E.R. and K.R.Kelson, 1959. The mammals of North America.
The Ronald Press Co., New York.
Heady, Harold F. 1957. The management and value of plant height
in study of herbaceous vegetation. Ecology 38(2).
1
Heady, Harold F. 1958. Vegetation changes in the California
annual type. Ecology 39(3): 402-416.
Hufstader, R.W. 1976. Precipitation, temperature, and the
standing crop of some Southern California grassland species.
Journal of Range Management 29(5):433-435.
Ingles, Lloyd G., 1988 Mammals of the Pacific States.
Stanford Press, Stanford.
Jennings, M.R. 1983 An annotated check list of the amphibians
and reptiles of California. California Department of Fish
and Game, 69:151-171.
Jones, J.K., Jr., D.C. Carter, H.H. Genoways, R.S. Hoffman,
and D.W. Rice North American Mammals north of Mexiqo, 1982.
Occas. Papers Mus., Texas Tech Univ. 80:1-22.
Kopecko, K., and E.w. Lathrop. 1975. Vegetation zonation in the
vernal marsh on the Santa Rosa Plateau, Riverside County,
California, Aliso 8:281-288.
Lackey, J.A. 1967. Growth and development of Dipodomys
stephensi. J. Mammal., 48:624-632.
Lathrop, E.W., 1976. Vegetation and soils of vernal pools on
the Santa Rosa Plateau, Riversdie County, California.
A Symposium, Vernal Pools, Their Ecology and Conservation.
Instit. of Ecology Pub. 9. Univ. of Calif., Davis. pp 22-27
Lathrop, E.W., and B. Martin, 1982. Fire ecology Of deergrass
in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, California. Crossosma 8:1-10
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Thorne, 1976a. Vernal Pools of Mesa de
Burro on the Santa Rosa Plateau of the Santa Ana Mountains,
California. Alsio 8:433-445.
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Thorne, 1976b. Vernal Pools of the Santa
Rosa Plateau, Riverside County, California. Fremontia 4:9-11
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Thorne, 1978, A flora of the Santa
Ana Mountains, California. Alsio 9: 197-278.
Lathrop, E. W., and R.F. Thorne. 1968. Flora of the Santa
Rosa Plateau of the Santa Ana Mountains, California.
Aliso 6(4):17-40
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Thorne. 1983. A flora of the nernal pools
on the Santa Rosa Plateau, Riverside County, California.
Aliso 10: 449-469.
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Throne. 1985. A new preserve on the
Santa Rosa Plateau. Fremontia 13:15-19.
Lathrop, E.W., and R.F. Thorne. 1985. A flora of the Santa
Rosa Plateau, Southern California. Southern California
Botanists, special Publication No.1.
Lathrop, E.W., and H.A~ Zuill.
of the santa Rosa Plateau,
Aliso 10:603-611.
1984. Southern oak woodlands
Riverside County, California.
Liacos, Leonidas G. 1962. Soil moisture depletion in the
annual grass type. Journal of Range Management 15:67-72.
Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of Southern California.
California Press.
University of
Pequegnat, W.E. 1951 The biota of the Santa Ana Mountains
J. of Entomol. and Zoology., 42:1-84.
Raven, Peter H., 1966 Native Shrubs of Southern California,
University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Thorne, R.F., and E.W. Lathrop. 1969. a vernal marsh on the
Santa Rosa Plateau of Riverside County, California. Aliso 7:
85-95.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985a. Endangered and
threatened wildlife and plants: Review of plant taxa for
listing as endangered or threatened species: Notice of review
Federal Register, 50(188): 39526-39527, September 27.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985b. Endangered and
threatened wildlife and plants: Review of vertebrate
wildlife; Notice of review; Federal Register, 50(181):
37958-37967, September 18.
Vogl, R.J. 1976. An introduction to the plant communities of
the Santa Ana and San Jacinto Mountains. pp. 77-98.
Symposium of Proceedings, Plant Communities of Southern
California. California Native Plant Society
Special Publication No.2. Riverside, California.
3
United States Depart nent of the Interior
FISil AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
FISH AND WILDLIFE ENHANCEMENT
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FIELD STATION
Laguna Niguel office
24000 Avila Road
Laguna Niguel, California 92656
In Reply Refer To:
FWS/FWEFS (1-6-90-TA-089)
January 23, 1990
Howard Lee
Consulting Biologist
13552 Laurinda Way
Santa Ana, California 92705
Dear Mr. Lee:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is providing the
following comments as an aide to you and the company you are
representing in an attempt to avoid any negative impacts to the
federally endangered and protected Stephens' kangaroo rat
(Dipodomvs stephensi) which occurs adjacent to tract 24232.
As discussed in our office, the slopes adjacent to occupied
habitat should be revegetated with native forbs and shrubs
endemic to this region. Special attention needs to be paid to
slope aspect, soil type and species composition in selecting the
species for revegetation.
The rational for'selecting native endemic vegetation is that
irrigation of typical landscape plants will alter the habitat
adjacent to the slope, to such an extent, as to exclude the
Stephens' kangaroo rat from .its use. An increase in annual grass
biomass can be expected if irrigation includes the area occupied
by the Stephens' kangaroo rat.
Conversion of this animal's habitat and thereby its displacement,
would be a violation of Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act
(Act). Section 9 specifically deals with prohibition of "take"
of protected species. "Harass" in the definition of "take" in
the Act means an intentional or negligent act or omission which
creates the likelihood of injury to wildlife by annoying it to
such an extent as to significantly disrupt normal behavioral
patterns which include, but are not limited to, breeding, feeding
or sheltering.
Howard Lee
As for continuing construction within this development site,
based on information provided to the Service, it appears that no
Stephens' kangaroo rats will be taken. However, if future
construction needs require grading, extreme care needs to be
taken to avoid impacting adjacent habitat or undisturbed habitat'
on site.
If we can be of any further assistance, please contact Arthur
Davenport at (714) 643-4270.
Sincerely,
Brooks Harper
Acting Office Supervisor
Pictures 1A and 1B are looking South
fr~n the East side of Lot 3.
Picture 2A looking West from the East
side of the adjacent parcel.
Picture 2B looking Southwest from the
West side of adjacent parcel.
Pictures 3A and 3B are looking South-
east from the West side of Lot No. 2.
Pictures 4A and 4B are looking
Northeast from Lot No. 5.
Pictures SA and SB are looking
Northeast from Lot No. 4.
Picture 6A is looking Northeast from
the ~est side of Calle Katerine from
Lot No. 11.
Picture 6B is looking East from Lot
No. 3.
Picture 7A is looking Northeast from
Lot No. 4.
Picture 7B is looking East from Lot
No. 3.
Picture 8A is lookinS North from the
East side of Lot No. 4.
Picture 8B is looking North from the West
side of the adjacent parcel.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Ross Gell~?l~annlng Director
SUBJECT: Old Town Historic Preservation Ordinance
DATE: June 27, 1990
Pursuant to the Commission request last meeting, attached hereto is a copy of the
above referenced ordinance and accompanying map.
The Commission~s recommendations are scheduled to be presented to the City Council
on Tuesday, July 3, 1990.
RG:ds
ORDINANCE NO, 57S
AN'~ ORDINANCE OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
men~s o 9~e counlry's
(g) FACADE means the
(hi HISTORICAL CaM-
(() HISTORIC PRESERVA-
TION DISTRICT means any
ERVATION DISTRICTS,
a nonce o) Iqeor)n and shall
f
SO~al~i~'ach historic preserva-
~rs Initially1 aooointed to
I~ 0 d hence:
~lOrlC l~rese vatlots
dudlng, but not limit-
cvIfurol heritage.
(S) Render advice and
~re, natural Ye~sture,
teared, construct, or clause to
.v o }?l..g f. of st0~. sJco
nlng DIrector shah transmit
which shall hove 30 days to
within 30 gays after the exai-
forth In the H;storlc Proset-
District In which the pro-
f~o2{~tded. construction
hal decision at the Planning
days a~ter t~e Planning Direc.
~*~e costs I?nvolved.c~he Arecl
lowing ,he close of the hearing
?lditv Or unconsthutlonalltv
VIOLATION.
(o) Any building or struc-
ture consfruded or altered
lhe some ~shereby declared
forney shall Immediately
and enlolnment thereof, In
the manner grovlded by law;
Ond shoII take such other
have urlsdidfon to rant
such re et as wall ~Te or
remove such build.no struc-
such bu Idl g or
from the resPonsibilitY of
correcting prohibited condi-
thereof shall be punishable
b a fine not to exceed
~Y00.00 Or by im rlsonment
In the County Jol~nat to ex*
Section 10.
OF THE COUNTY QF RIV-
ATTEST:
DONALD D. SULLIVAN
Deoutv
I HEREBY CERTIFY that
o, o re ulor meeting of the
board o? uDervlsors of sold
AYES: Supervisors Record
ABSENT: $uDervlsor
Temecula
Historic
District'
June 28, 1990
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: City Manager f
SI.TB.IECT: Sign Ordinance
At the City Council meeting June 26th, a recommendation to amend the sign ordinance was
made by a local group of business people (The Temecula Commerce Committee).
The City Council referred the proposed amendments to the City Planning Commission for
recommendation. The Council also voted to adopt an interim permit procedure to flow specific
balloons as temporary signs.
The Council further requested that the Commission receive input from the public on the
proposed amendments.
The following persons have been asked to serve as an Ad Hoc Sign Committee to review the
proposed amendments:
John Bell, Temecula Commerce Committee
Ed Morell, Temecula Commerce Committee
Bob Kirlq~atrick, Rancon Real Estate
Nancy Jones, Temecula Board of Realty
Leigh Engdahl, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Steve Sander, Citizen
Sydney Vernon, Citizen
FDA:jsg
Attachment:
Agenda Bill 6/26/90
CITY OF TE1VIECULA
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
AB# |9 TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION
SIGNS- BALIOONS
DEPT HD. ~
CITY ATTY
CITY MGR~"
It is recommended the City Council consider a proposal of the Temecula
Commerce Commifiee to change advertising sign regulations; and
(1) nffer to City Attorney to prepare amendments, or
('2) m~er to City Manager for further study, or
(3) x~ject request and direct City Manager to enforce current
ordinance.
BACKGROUND
County Ordinance 348 and 457 regulate advertising disphys in Temecuh.
Ordinance ~48 prohibits any advertising sign without a permit. It prohibits any
disphy above the roof line of a building. It pwhibits moving signs.
Temporary signs are not specifically mentioned except for political signs,
subdivision signs and for sale signs, which are allowed under limited conditions.
On May 15, 1990, the County Department of Building and Safety sent letters to
businesses d~ph~ng balloons being used for advertising. Owners were asked to
On May 16, 1990, the City acted to remove illegal signs within the public right-
of-way.
On May 29, 1990, a delegation known as the Temecuh Commerce Committee
met with the City Manager to pwtest enforcement of the sign ordinance and
i~licated their intention to request City Council action to change the ordinance.
On May 29, 1990, the City Manager requested the County to suspend further sign
enforcement activities in order to allow the Temecula Commerce Committoe to
make a presentation to the City Council.
'lk Temecuh Commerce Committee has filed a report for Council sgenda June
25, I~)0. After conskiering the Committee's request, Council needs to give
The City now has a Code Enforcement Officer employed as city staff, and he will
be directed to enforce whatever ordinance the Council endorses.
TEMECULA COMMERCE COMMITTEE
June 19, 1990
Mr. Frank bahira
City Manager, CIty of Temecule
P.O. Box 3000
Temecula, CA 92390
Delr Mr. Aleshire,
Attached you will find our proposal for an amendment to
Temecula's interim sign ordinance which allows for ambient
balloons as a temporary form of on-site outdoor advertlelng.
I believe you will find our proposal to be quite reasonable In
scope and rationale.
We quest that our presentation of this proposal be presented
before the City Council on Tuesday, June 26. Please place this
topic of discussion on your schedule agenda for this particular
Your assistance on our behalf is much appreciated.
ff you have any further questions please give me a call at 676-
5611.
(~hn C. Boll
P.O. BOX 564
TEMECULA, CA 92390
DEDICATED TO MOLDING A CITY OF PROSPERITY
PS ~/Ikm'~l'meT ~ ,~u~ 8'rGN ORDZIMICZ
ZIIC01II~IirZIG llel'l~ ~LT, Z,OCI8 kS ~ JLCC~"J]I3I,Z !'ONI Or OUTDOOR
P~l~x~d by: Tseacula Ccmmm~ce Committee (TCC)
Date: ~'une 19, 1990
· o Is 9~msmntmd kfox~ City Council: ~une 26,
1990
INTRODUCTION:
With the advent of Temecula's Balloon and Wine Festival
and the growing popularity of hot air ballooning as a
recreational sport In our valley, the words Temecula and
hot-air balloons have become almost synonymous.
As a result, Temecula has unofficially been labeled, by
many, as 'The Balloon Capital of Southern California".
Merchants have capitalized on Temecula's festive lmage
by tastefully incorporating colorful balloons into their
business logos, billboards, brochures, and on-site
advertising.
With the exception of subdivision signs, political signs
and wfor sale lease or rent signs", Temecula's interim
sign ordinance does not provide a vehicle in which
merchants can apply for temporary forms of outdoor
advertising.
Note: Temecula's current codes pertaining to
wOutdoor Advertising Displays" are being
administered and enforced using the guidelines
set forth in Riverside County's Ordinance 348.
Ordinance 348 was adopted by the City of
Temecula as an interim ordinance, and will
remain in force and amended until such time
Temecula's long range General Plan is
developed and approved. A material part of
the General Plan will be criteria used to
regulate all forms of signage within the City
of Temecula.
Given the existing ordinance, the City currently has no
choice but to disallow balloons as a permissible form of
advertising.
As merchants and residents of Temecula, we do not believe
that our city's ordinance should be an "all or nothing"
situation when it comes to balloon advertising.
Therefore, it is our objective to propose a reasonable
amendment to County Ordinance 348. An amendment that
maintains Tamecula's balloon image andbeautiful skyline
while at the same time providing an affectlye and
tasteful form of on-site advertising.
Baokoound to Pz~oeal
Upon researching several southern California cities said to allow
balloons in their signage ordinances, we found the following local
cities to permit the same:
1. San Marcos
2. Escondido
3. Vista
4. Oceanside
5. Corona
6. City of Industry
In each of the above examples, we found that "ambient balloons"
were defined as "temporary signs" and were regulated under "special
provisions" of each city's particular master sign ordinance (refer
to Appendix A).
In addition, we found that the regulations per%aining to balloons
varied with respect to time and size limitations, amount of
required fees, the number of inflatables used, and the materials
from which the balloons are to be constructed from.
Fozm~lation off Pro~osal
In formulating our proposal, we used the ordinances of the
aforementioned cities as our amending guildline. By incorporating
these guildlinesand definitions into Temecula's current ordinance,
we derived the following draft as a basis for our amendment
proposal:
ARTICLE XZX
ADVERTISING REGULATIONS
SECTION 19.1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. Because RIverside County ts a large,
diverse and roptdly expanding 3urtsdtctlon the Board of Supervisors finds that
proper slg~ control is necessary to provide for the preservation and protection
of open space ind scenic areas, the many nit&ira] and man-made resources, and
established rural cemmunttles ~thtn Rivers(de County. It is the intent of
this ordinance to provide standards to safeguard life, health, property and the
public ~elfare, to profide the means for adequate identification of businesses
an~ other sign users by prohibiting, regulating and controlling the destgn,
location and maintenance of signs, end to provide for the r~oval and
limitation of use of stgns w~thtn the unincorporated area of Riverside County.
All outdoor advertising displays and on-site advertising structures and signs
in the unincorporated area of the County of Riverside shall conform to the
~ppltcable prorlstons of this arttcle. If any specific zontng classification
w~thin this ordinance shall impose more stringent requirements than are set
forth ~lthtn this arttcle, the more stringent provisions shall prevail.
keendad Effective:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
SECTION 19.2. DEF/NITIONS. For purposes of this ordinance, the followin;
-.words or phrases shall have the following definitions.
· Outdoor Advertising Dt splay" means outdoor advertising structures and
outdoor advertising signs used for outdoor advertising purposes, not
Including on-site advertising signs as hereinafter elfned. An
outdoor advertising dispqay may he c~,,~only known or referred to as an
"off-site" or an off-prmises" billboard.
"Outdoor Advertising Structure" means a structure of any k~nd or
character erected or maintained for outdoor advertising purposes, upon
which any poster, bill, printing, painting or other advert~sment of
any ~nd whatsoever may be placed, tncludlng Statuary, for outdoor
upon a permanent foundation
permanent foundation.
"Outdoor Advertising Sign" means any card, cloth, paper, metal,
painted, plastic or wooden stgn of any character placed for outdoor
advertising purposes, on or to the ground or any tree, wall, bush.
rock, fence, building, structure or thfng, either privatel.v or
publicly owned, other than an advertising structure.
d. The words "Outdoor Advertising Structure" and "Outdoor Advertising
Sign" as defined in subsections (b) and (c} do not include:
1. Offictal notices issued by any court or public body or officer;
242
~l~ng S~g~ necessary for the o~rat4on and safety of public
uttllty uses.
A st~ctu~e e~cted nea~ a city or c~nt~ ~unda~, ~tch contains
t~ nee of such ctt~ o~ coun~ and the n~es of, o~ an~ other
fnfomatton ~ardtng, ctvtc, fraternal or religious organizations
located t~tn.
e. "On-~tte Advertts?ng Structure end StUns" means any structure,
housing, stun devtce, flgu~e, statuary, painting, display, message
placard, or other contrivance, or RY part thereof. w~tch fs designed,
constructed, crested, engineered, intended, or used to advertise, or
to I;rofide data or tnfomatton tn the nature of advertising, for any
of the folTovfng purposes:
(1) To designate, Identify, or tndicate the name of the busthess of
the o~ner or occupant of the prmlses upon which the Structure or
Sign Is located.
(2) To advertise the busrheas conducted, serfices available or
rendered, or the goods produced, sold, or available for sale,
upon the prmlses where the structure or stun ts located.
fe
f. "EiEpo=iry CM-eite ad~er~LmJ~g 8~z~a~u:e ud 8i;e'
~y ~ o~ ~, ~s, light
~, ~~, ot ~t light ~teti~s, ~ o: ~t
· Fre~a~ sea~ a divtded arte~al htg~ for thigh trsfftc
full cont~l of Kcess and ~th grade Separatto~ at tnte~ecttons.
· Htghuay" means roads, streets, boulevards, lanes, courts, places,
croons, tratls, rays or other tlghts-ofovay or easements used for or
lard out and intended for the publlc passage of vehtcles or of
vehtcles and persons.
· Edge of a RIght-of-way" means a measurament from the edge of a
right-of-way hortzontalTy along a Ttne no,a] or perpondicular to the
Centerltne of the freeway or h~ghway.
~laxtmum Height' means the htghest potnt of the structure or stun
measured from the average natural ground level at the base of the
suppurring structure.
· Free Standing StUn" means any stun which ts supported by one or more
columns or uprlghts 1,bedded tn the ground, and whtch ts not attached
to any butlding or structure.
· Suffice Area* means that area of ~utdoor advertising stgns and
on-Site advertiSIng signs is measured by the smallest geometric foe
such as a square, rectangles triangle, or ctrcle, or combtnatton
thereof, whtch ~11 encmpass the face of the sign on whtch the
message ts displayed.
243
*For Sale, Lease or Rent Sign' means a stgn advertising that the
property or structure upon which the sign ts located ts for sale,
lease, or rent.
m. *Sbopptng Center* means a parcel of land not less than 3 acres tn
stze, on whtch there extsts 4 or more separate business uses that have
mutual parking facilities.
· Directforte1 Sign* means I stgn used to dtrect and control vehicul ar
or pedestrian traffic that ts located upon the si~e parcel of land as
the use that ttts tntended to serve.
· SIgnificant Resources* means any county, state or federal st te ~ntch
has significant or potentially significant soctal, cultural,
historical, archaeological, recreational or scentc resources, or ~tch
plays or imtenttally could play a significant role tn promoting
tourtim. For the purposes of this arttcle, the tam significant
resources shall tnclude, but not be 11mtted to, the following:
]. RIverside Nattonal Cemetery. A str~p, 660 feet tn ~dth, measured
fra~ the edge of the right-of-way line on both sides of ZoZ]5 fro~
the ~ntersectton of Van Buren Boulevard southe~y to Hence Road,
and on both stdes of Van Buren Boulevard frern the intersection
]-2Z5 westerly to tood Road.
2. Scenic
3. A corridor 500 feet ~n width adjacent to both sides of all
f
highways wtthtn three-tenths (3/]0) o amtle of any Regional,
State or Feelera1 pork or recreation area.
· Scenic High~aymmeans any offlctally designated state or county
scenic htghuay as defined in Streets and Highway Code Sections Z54 an~
Z6~ et seq.
· Illegal O. tdoor Advertising Display* means any of the following:
An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising st gn
erected without first camplying vrlth all applicable county
ordinances and regulations In effect at the time of 1as
construction, erection or use.
(2) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign that
was legally erected but whose use has ceased, or the structure
upon which the advertising ~lsplay is pleced has been aban®ne~
by its ovnero and not maintained or use~ for a period of not less
than one (%) year.
(3) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertlit ng sign that
was legally erected which later becme nonconforming as a result
of the adoption of an ordinance; the e~orttzation period for the
dtspl~ provided by the ordinance rendering the dlspla~
nonconfomtng has exptree; and conromance has not been
accmpltshed.
(4) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
whtch does not cmply with the Nottce of Decision or the approved
plot plan.
Z44
(5) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which iS e danger to the public or is unsafe as may be determined
by the Director of the Building and Safety Department.
(6) An outdoor advertising structure or outdoor advertising sign
which is a traffic hazard as may be dotemined by the Director of
the kt I c~ng and Safety Departaent pray1 ded sal d traffic hazard
was not created by the relocatton of streets or highways or by
acts of the County.
r. "illegal On-Site Advertising Structure or Sign" means any of the
fol 1 owl ng.
(3) An on-stte advertising structure or stgn erected without first
cmplytng with all applicable County ordinances and regulations
tn effect It the time of tts construction, erection or use.
(2} An on-site advertising structure or sign that was legally
erected, but whose uses hu ceased, or the structure upon which
the advertising titsplay ts placed has been abandoned by tts
owner, 8nd not maintained or used to 1denttry or advertise an
ongotng business for e pertad of not less than ninety (90) days.
(3) An H-site advertising structure or sign that was legally erected
which later beeline nonconforming as a result of the adoptton of
an ordinance; the morttzatton period for the display provided by
the ordinance rendering the display nonconforming has expired;
and conromance has not been accomplished.
(4) An on-site advertising structure or sign whtch is e danger to the
public or is unsafe as may be determined by the DIrector of the
Butldtng and Safety Department,
(5) An on-site advertising structure or sign which tS a traffic
hazard as may be determined by the Director of the Building and
Safety Deparment provided said traffic hazard was not created by
the relocation of streets or highways or by acts of the County.
· Abandoned" means either:
(]) Any outdoor advertising display that is ellawed to continue for
more than one (1) year without a poster, bt11, printing,
painting, or other fom of advertisement or message; or
(2) Any outdoor adverttstn titsplay that does not appear on the
inventory required by Eection 19,3.a.(15); or
(3) Any on-site advertising 's+.ructure or sign that is ellawed to
continue for more than ninety (g0) days ~dthout a poster, bill,
printing, painting, or other form of advertising or message for
the purposes set forth in Section 19.2,e hereof.
Mended Effectt
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
06-20-89 (Ord. 348.2989)
SECTION 19.3. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING DISPLAYS. No person shall erect or
mathlath an outdoor advertising titsplay in the untncorporated area of the
County of Riverside, except in accordance with the following provisions.
245
The changtrig of an advertising message or customary maintenance of a
legally existing outdoor advertising display shall not require ~permit.
pursuant to this section.
Standards.
I, Zoning. Outdoor advertising titsplay are permitted only In the
C-1/C-Pk.B:J.~!~.N and H-H zones and providing only that the
display meets all of the other requirements of the zoning
classification and this article. Outdoor advertising displays are
expressly prohibited in all other zones.
2. Spactng. NO outdoor advertising display shell be located writbin
five I~ndred (500) feet in any direction from any other outdoor
advertising display on the see stda of the highway; provided,
however, that if in a particular zone a different interval shall
be stated, the spactng tnterval of the parttcula~ zone shall
preyat1, No outdoor advertising display shall be erected within
the boundary of any significant resource as defined tn Section
Ig.2.o. of this ordinance. No outdoor advertising display shall
be located w~thtn one INndred fifty (150) feet of property for
which the zoning does not allow advertising displays provided;
Nowever, that an outdoor advertising display may be placed within
one hundred (150) feet of property for ~htch zoning does not .allow
displays, if at the time an application for an outdoor advertis1 ng
display punnlt is epplled for, there is no existing residential
structure or an mpproved building permit for a residential
structure within one hundred fifty (150) feet of the location of
the proposed outdoor advertising display.
Hat ht. The maximum hetght of an outdoor advertising display
sha~l not exceed a height of twenty-five (25) feet free the
roadbed of the adjacent freeway or highway to which the display is
oriented, or a maximm height of twenty-five (25) feet frm the
grade on which it is constructed, whichever is pater.
4. Poles. A maximum of t~o (2) steel poles are allowed for support
of an outdoor advertising display.
5. Roof Mounts. No outdoor advertising display shall be affixed on
or over the roof of any bullding end no. display shall be affixed
to the woll of a building so that it projects above the parapet of
the pull dang, For the purposes of this section, a mansard style
roof shall be considered a parapet.
6, Humher of Dtspla s, No than (1) proposed outdoor
Idverttstng dis;~ay more one
per application shall he permitted.
7, Setbacks, No outdoor advertising display Shall be erected within
an established setback or building line, or within road
right-of-way lines or future road right-of-way lines as shown on
any Specific Plan of Hi hways. A mintmum setback
property line of one (1t foot s all be required. frum the
h
8. lmmber of Display Faces. No mere than two (2) display faces per
outdoor advertising disple shall he permitted. Back-to-back and
V-type displays shall he mY owed provided that they Ire on the
sane outdoor advertising stLcture and provided that the V-type
246
displays have a separation between dtsplay faces of not more than
avenay-five (25) feet,
Lighting and Ilium(nation of Dtspllys. An outdoor advertising
dlspla m~y be illuminated, unless othendse ,provtded
filesent, or similar source of (1hatnation (s vtsible be~nd the
dtspla~ face, Display making use of lights to convey the effect
of moment or flashing, intermittent, or variable intensity shall
not be permitted, Display shall use the most edvanced methods to
insure the most erie efficient methods of dtspl~y illumination,
ii(thtn the Palemar Or~servator~ Special Lighting Area, all displays
shall cmply ~tth the requireaortas of Rtve~stcle County Ordinance
NO. 655.
Display Novasent, NO outdoor advertising titsplays shall move or
rotate, to ~!spl~ any movtng end/or rotating parts. No
propellers, flags, or other noise creating devices, end no
architectural embelltslsgents vhlch utilize mochanice1 or natural
forces for motion, shall be permitted, Use of claylight reflective
materials or electronic message boards using flashing,
intermittent or mort rig light or 11ghts ts prohibited, provided,
however, that electronic message boards dtspla~ng only time
and/or te~peratoro for periods of not less thin thtrty (30)
seconds ts germtired,
Dtsplay Face Size. No outdoor advertising dtsplay shall .have a
total surface' area of more than three hundred (300) square feet
Outdoor Advertising Dtsplay Peneta Required. No person shall
erect, alter, repair, or relocate any outdoor Idvertistng dtsplay
wttheut first obt·tntn in outdoor edverttstn dtsplay permit
pursuant to RIvers(de ~ounty Ordinance NO. 45~. No outdoor
advertising o~splay permit shall be issued unless and until the
Butl~ng I)trector determines that the proposed acttvtty ts in
accordance ~dth this Article and Riverside ts in accordance
1.hts Arttcle and Rivers(de County Ordinance NO. 457, end that the
8ooHcant his obtained a valid State Outdoor Advertising permit.
lcle~ttftcatton, No person shall place, e~ect, or maintain an
outdoor advertising titsplay and no o~tdoor advertising display
shall be placed, erect, or maintaining anywhere ~tthtn the
untncor~orated are· of RIverside County unless there ts securel~
fastened thereto and on the front display face thereof, the n~ne
of the outdoor advertising crisplay meet tn such a manner that the
nee ts vtstble frm the htghway. Any dtspl~ placed, erected, or
maintained ~thout this Identification shall be dee~ed to be
placed, erected, and maintained tn violation of this section.
Nobtle Displays, No person shall place maintain, or othen~ise
a11o~ · mobile vehicle, trailer, or other advertising ~splay not
permanently affixed to the ground, as defined in Sectton tg.2,b.
of thts ordinance, to be used as in outdoor advertising d~splay.
IHsplay Inventory. In order to evaluato. and assess outdoor
advertising crisplays d thin the untncorpor·ted area of Rt verst de
County, v~thtn One hundred eighty (~80) days of the effective date
247
of this Orcrinance ind on each fifth (5) anniversary after the
effective date of this ordinance, each ~sp3ay company ~th
Outdoor ·dverttstng dtspTays wtthin the unfncorporated ·re· of
Riverside County she1] sulx~lt to the Oeparl~ent of Building and
Safety, e current [nventor~ of the outdoor advertising displays
they currently o~n and/or m·tnt·tn ~dthin the untncorpor·ted ·re·
of RIverside County. Failure to submtt· current or ·ccurate
Inventory shill be deemed to he · separate violation of this
ordi hence.
b. Process,Jag Procedure.
1. &pplication. In addition to all other applicable Federal,
State, and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances, no
outdoor adver~ising. display or test~ozlzy outdoor advertisi~g
display shall be placed or erected until a permit therefore has
been issued by ~he City of Tesscain, on the form provided by the
planning Department accompanied by the filing fee set forth in
Ordinance No. 671 and meeting the Requirements of Section 18.30 of
t_h~s ordinance. Fees and application foe ~or use of temporary
m~-site advertising signs ~azx be fou~d in Section 19.8 of this
ozdhmnoe.
S·td'~llcstlon shall also consist of ton (10) copies of · riot Pla~ draMn to scale, containing the nee. address or tolephone member
of the applicant, a copy of the current valtd State OUtdoor
i end ageneral description of the prOperty upon
Advert sTng PemJ t,
which the cutdoor advertising display Is proposed to he placed.
In addition, the applicant shall prod de sufficient number of
address 18hels es deemed appropriate by the Plinnlnt~ D~rector for
all Wopor~ o~ners ~thtn · five h~ndrod foot (500) radius of
any proposed cutdoor advertising dispTay. The Plot Plan shall
sho~ the prectse location, t~e, and stze of the proposed outdoor
advertising displays. ell property lines. zontng, end the
dimensions, Totelion of end distance to the nearest advertising
determined by the ordinance, publlc and
rights-of-ray, building setback lines, and specifically planned
future road right-of-way lines, and any end all other Infonaation
required by the Planntng DIrector tn such a manner that the
proposed ~splay may be readily ascertained, identified, and
evaluated.
2. Hearing and Notice of Oecfston. Upon acceptance of in application
for an outdoor advertising display as complete, the Planning
Director shall transmit e copy of the application to the
De ·r~ent of BulT~lag end Safety for raytaw end cement.
(·~ Not less than thtrt~ (30) days after Keeptent· of the
the Planning DIrector's decisfon on the oppltcitton is to be
made. Rot less then ten (~0) days prior to the Gate on which
the doctsion ts to be made. the PTannlng Dtrector shall give
notice of the proposed outdoor advertising disphy. by mail
or deTfvery. to all o~ners shove on the last equalized
assessment ro11. end any updates, ms owning real propert~
248
(b)
(c)
w~thtn a five hundred (500) foot radius of the exterior
boundaries of the parcel upon ~hich the proposed outdoor
advertising display is to be located. Rotice of the proposed
outdoor advertising d~splay shall also be given by
publication In a newspaper of general circulation w~thtn
Riverside County, The Notice shall tnclude the statment
that no public hearing ~11 be held unless a hearing is
requested, tn writing, and delivered to the Planning Director
st least two {2) days before the date scheduled for' the
dealston ts to be made. No Iwbltc bearing On the application
for an outdoor advertising dtspl~ shall be held before a
decision ts made by the Planning Director, unless a hearing
is requested, tn writing, by the appltclnt or other
interested person, or tf the Planning Director datemines
that a public hearing should be required. If no public
hearing Is requested or required, the Planning Director shall
give the.Notice of Decision to the applicant and any other
person who has made a written request for a copy Of the
Notice of Decision. The decision of the Planntng Director
shall he considered final unless v4thln ten (ZO) days of the
date of matltng of the Nottce of Decision to the applicant,
an appeal therefrom is filed.
if a pebltc hearing is required under the proYfston of this
subsection, notice of the time, date, and place of the
hearing before the Planning Director end a general
description of the location of the real property vhJch is the
subject of the hearing, shall be gtven at least ten (20) days
.,or to th. he.r,.:v.
.antng ,rs of rea property
or t 1
vhich !s located v(thtn a 500-foot radtus of the
extertor boundaries of the pe~cel upon ~htch the
proposed Outdoor advertising display ts to be located
as, such owners are shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and any updates.
(2) The Planning Director may require that additional notice
be ghen in any other matter the Director deoms
necessary or dest rabh.
if a public hearing is required, the PTanning Director shall
hear relevant testimony from laterested persons and make a
decision ~thtn a reasonable time after the dose of the
public hearing. A Notice of Dectston sha~1 be filed by the
Planning Director w~th the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors,
not more than fifteen (15) da after the decision. A copy
of the Nottee of Deciston Sh:~11 be mailed to the applicant
and to any person who has made a written request for a copy
of the decision. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors shall
place the Notice of Decision on the next ageride of the Board
of Supervisors held five (5) or more days after the Clerk
receives the Rotice of Dectston fra~ the Planning Director.
249
Appeals. The decision of the Planning DIrector shall be
considered ftnal unless an appeal therefrom ts filed.
(a) Appeals to Planning Cgamtsston. The applicant or any
triterest person may file an appeal, accempanted by the fee
set forth tn Ordinance No, 671 of this oro'lnance, and on the
form provided by the Planning Department within ten (10) days
after the Rottce of Dectston fs mailed for those matters
where a public hearing was not requested or required or
vtthtn ten (10) days after the Notice of Decision appears on
the Board of Superv(sor's agende. The appeal shall state the
reasons why tt ts believed the actton of the Planning
Dtrector ts Improper. Upon receipt of a ceapleted appeal and
fee, the Plennln DIrector shall set the matter for hearing
before the Plann~ on
ng Cm~tsston, Notice of the the
hearing
appeal s. ha11 he given in the some manner that notice was
,.. the s., ,.nn, r th.t notic.
) The Planning Commission shall render its decision on
the appeal within ten {10) days of the closing of the
hearing. A Notice of the Dectston of the Planntn Car~ts'ston
shall he filed by the Planning Dtrector with the go of
Supervisors, not more than fifteen (15) days after the
decision. A copy of the Notice of Decision shall he mailed
to the Ippltcant, appellant and to any person who has made a
written request for a copy of the decision. The Clerk of the
Board of Superrisers, shall place the Notice of Decision on
the next ageride of the Board of Supervisors, held five (5) or
more days after the Clerk receives the Notice of Decision
from the Planning Director. The decision of the Planntn;
Commission shall be considered final unless an appeal
therefrom is ftled.
(b) Appeals. to Board of Supervisors. The decision of the
Planning Commission shall he considered ftnal unless an
appeal therefrom is ftled. The applicant or an interested
person m~y ftle an appeal, accompanied by the fee set forth
tn Orefinance No. 671 of this ordinance, and on the form
provided by the Planntng Department withtn ten (10) days
after the Notice of Decision of the Planning Cabmission
appears on the Board of Supervisors's
agenda. The appeal shall state the reasons why it is
believed the action of the Planning Commission is improper.
Upon receipt of a completed appeal and fee, or if the Board
of Supervisors assomes Jurisdiction by ordering the matter
set for public hearing, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
shall set the matter for public hearing before the Board of
Supervisors. not less than five (5) days nor more than thirty
(30) days thereafter, and shall give notice of the time and
f
place o the hearing tn the some manner as notice of the time
and place of the hearing in the some manner ms notice was
~;er~ for the bearing before the Planning Cmmtsslon. The
of Supervisors shall render its decision within thirty
25O
Ce
(30) days follo~ng the close of the hearing on the ap
The decision of the Board of SuperviSors shall be f na~. '
Revocation. An.V outdoor advertising display permit ~ch has
been tssued as a result of I eaterill etarepresentation of fact
by the applicant or his agent, ~hether or not a crlmtnal
prosecution ts Initiated therefor, e~y be sunmartly revoked by
- the Planntng I)trector ~ho shall forthwith gtve w~ttten NOtice of
Revocation to the applicant. ~thtn'thirt.v (30) days after
eattee ts given, an). outdoor advertising display inthortzed by
said outdoor advertising displa.v pemtt shall be moved st the
appltcant's expense. Fatlure to move the display vtthtn said
tMrty (30) cl~s shell be domed a separate violation of thts
ordinance. Notht tn th¶s ordinance shall authorize the
1natallet · or effetehence 1
tn
of any outdoor advertising crisp ay
vhlch Is tn violation of any State or Federal law or regulation.
Enforcement, Nherever the officials resix)nslble for the enforcement
of administration'of the Land Use Ordinance or their dostgnated
agentS, have cause to suspect a violation of thtS article, or ~henever
necessary to Investigate etther an application for the granting,
modification, or in), action to suspend or revoke an outdoor
advertlain display pemtt, or ~nenever necessary to Investigate a
posstble ~lolatton, satd agents nay lawfully gain access to the
appropriate parcel of land upon ~htch sa~d violation ts belteyed to
f
exlst. The folioring proviseons shall apply to the violations o this
arttcle:
]. All violations of. thts article cmmttted b.v any person, ~hether as
a nt, employee, officer, pMnctpal, or other~Se, shall be a
mfide~eanor.
2. Every person uho kno~ngly preridas false (nfomatton on an
outdoor advertising displa,y pemlt application shall be gutlty of
a misdemeanor.
Every person ~ho fatls to step work on an outdoor advertistng
e
dtsplay, ~hen so ordered by the DIrector of Butldtng and Safe~y or
f
the Planntng DIrector, shall he Ftlty · a misdemeanor.
Ever.v person uho, having received Notice to Appear tn court to
answer a related charge, k~llfull.v falls to appear, shall be ~utlt~
of a mi sdmeanor.
A mtsdmeanor may be prosecuted by the County tn the na~e of the
Peop]e of the State of California, or e~y be redressed by dvil
action. Each v~olatton ts punishable by a fine of not more than
One thousand dollars (1,000.00), or by tmprtsoment tn the County
.1at1 for a tam of not more than $tx (6) months, or by both fine
and lmp~isoment.
Every person found guilty of a violation shall be deemed guilty of
a separate offense for every day during a portion of wt~tch the
violation Is comttted, continued, or permitted by such person.
7. Every illegal outdoor advertising display (pexsiaeat or
teeForay) and every abandoned outdoor advertising eLisplay is
hereby declared to be a public nuisance and shall be subject to
abatement by repair, rehabilitation, or removal in accordance with
the procedures contained in Section 3 of l~Lverside County Ordinance
No. 457.
251 ' ' ~
ee
Nonconforming Signs. Every outdoor advertising display which does not
Confore to this ordinance shall be doeaed to be 8 nonconforming sign
end shall be reaoved or altered in accordance with this ordinance as
fol 1 ows:
2. Any outdoor advertising dtsplay which was lawfully tn existence
prtor to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
48.2496 (July 16, 1985) shall be abeted or brought into
conromance wtth these provisions by July 17, 1990.
2. Any outdoor advertising ~splay which was lawfully tn existence
t to the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No.
pr or
348.2856 (June 30, 1988) but after the effective date of the
enactment of Ordinance No. 348.2496 (~uly 36, 1985) Shall be
abeted or I~ought into conformante w~th these provisions by ~luly
1, 1993.
3. Any outdoor advertising crisplay whtch yes lawfully in existence
prior to the effective date of Orefinance No. 348.2989 but after
the effective date of the enactment of Ordinance No. 348.Z856
(3une 30. 1988) shall be abated or brought into conromance
these provisions wtthtn eleven (11)years of the effective date
Ordinance No. 348.2989.
If federal or state law requires the County of Riverside to pay
,tust compensation for the tomoval of any such lawfully erected
nonconforming outdoor advertising crisplay, it may remain in place
until ~ust cmpensation as defined in the Eminent Domain Law
(Title 7, of Part 3 of the Code of Chtl Procedure) is paid.
Illeg81 and Abandoned Outdoor Advertising Displays, All 111e al
outdoor advertising displays and all abandoned outdoor advertising
displays shall be removed or brought into conromance with this
ordinance tmmediately.
Mended Effecttve:
07-16-85 (Ord. 348.2496)
06-20-89 : 348 Z98g)
252
SECTION 19.4. ON-SITE ADVERTISING STRUCTURES AND SIGNS.
NO person shell erect an on-site advertising Structure or stgn in the
enlncor~orated area of the County of RIverside that is tn violation of the
prOvisionS contained ~thin any spectfic zoning classification in thts
ordinance or that is !n violation of the following prodstons-
Free-standing St ns
· ' 1, Located within 660 feet of the nearest edge of a freeway right of
line.
The mextmum height of e st n shell not exceed 45 feet.
The axtmm surface area oYa slgn shall not exceed
square feet.
2. All Other Locations.
(a) The maximum hetght of estgn shall not exceed 20 feet.
(b) The maxfern surface area of ·stgn shall not exceed 50 square
feet,
3. Shopping Centers - All Locations,
Notvithstand(ng the provisions of sub-paragraphs 1 and 2, an
alternate standard for free standtng on-stte advertising stgns for
shopptng centers ts established as follows:
(a) the maxteum surface area of a sign shall not exceed 50 square
feet of .25 percent (1/4 of iS) of the total extsttn
building floor area in a shepptng center, whichever Is
greater, except that tn any event, nO sign shall exceed 200
square feet in surface area.
b. The maxtma~ hetght of astgn shall not exceed 20 feet.
4. Number of Free-standing Signs - All Locations. NOt more than one
free-standlng sign shall he perutired on · parcel of land, except
ho
that if a s pptng center has frontage on 2 or more streets, the
shopping center shall be petaltied 2 freeostand~ng signs, provided
that the 2 signs are not located on the sine street; are at least
100 feet ·part and the second sign does not exceed 100 square feet
in surface area and ZO feet in height.
Signs Affixed to buildings - Ail Areas
1. NO on-site advertising stgn shall he affixed on, above or over the
I advertising sign she 1 he
roof of anY IwtleHng, end no on-s te 1
affixed to the Nil1 of · building so that it pro;leers above the
parapet of the building. For the purposes of thts Section, a
mensard style roof shall he considered a parapet.
2. The maxtm~ surface ·re· of signs ·fftxed to a building shall be
as follows:
(e) Front vall of buildtng -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed ~0~ of the
surface area of the front face of the building.
(b) Stale walls of e building -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed %0S of the
surface area of the side face of the builtring.
(c) Rear 411 of · butle~ng -
The surface area of the sign shall not exceed 5~ of the
surface area of the rear face of the building.
2S3
Directtonal Signs o Directtonal signs to adrlse patrons of locattono
distance or purpose shall be pemttted on a parcel of land as follows:
1. The maxtm~ Might of such signs shall not exceed 3 feet.
Z. The laXtBUm rf f
Su ace area o such signs shall not exceed 6 square
feet.
de
On-stte Identification Slgns- On-site Identification signs affixed to
the surface of val]s, v;ndows, and doors of peruanent structures,
~tch do not exceed 4 inches tn letter hetght and d~ not exceed 4
square feet tn area ere pemitted in addition to any other sign
pemttted tn this ordinance.
SECTION 19.5. FOR SALE, LEASE OR RENT SIGNS. For sale, lease or rent
signs shall be bemitted to be placed tn a11 zone classifications subject to
the following regulations.'.
]. For one and tvo flatly residential uses - one stgn not exceecling 4
square feet In surfice area and not more than 4 feet In height.
2. For multiple fmtly residential uses - one sign for each separate
frontage on a street, each sign not to exceed 16 square feet in
surface area and not more than 8 feet tn height.
3. For c~-~erclal uses - one sign for each separate frontage on
street, each sign not to exceed 24 square feet In surface area and
not more than 8 feet tn hetght.
4. For tnclastrlal uses - one sign for each separate frontage on a
street, each stgn not to exceed 32 square feet in surface area and
5. For C n
st,at, each stgn not to exceed
not more than 8 feet tn
19.6 SUBDIVISION S;GNS.
On-site subdivision signs, advertising the original sale of a
subdivision are permitted w~thtn the boundaries of a subdivision, upon
approval of a plot plan pursuant to Sectton-~18.30 of this ordinance
and subject to the followtn~ mtntm~ standards:
]. No st9n shall exceed 100 square feet in area.
2. No sign shall be ~thtn 100 feet of any existing residence that ts
outst de of the su bdt vt st on boundart es.
3. No more than two such signs shall be bemitted for each
subtit rl ston.
4. No stgn shall be artificially lighted.
Off-site subdivision signs advertising the original sale of a
subdivision, shall be pemttted in ell zone classifications, except
the C-P-S, R-A, end ~-1 Zones, provided e concfittonal use permit is
granted pursuant to the I~'_ovtstons of Section 18.28 of this ordinance,
and subject to the folloWIng minimEn standards:
1. No sign shall exceed 100 square feet tn area.
2S4
2. No sign shall be utthtn 100 feet of any existin residence.
3. No more than t~o such signs shall be pemttted Vor each
subdtvtston.
4, The maximum period of time a sign may re~atn in place shall be two
~ears.
5. No sign Shell be artificially lighted.
6. An agreement, secured by a $100 cash bend, sha]l be executed wtth
the County for each sign, assuring the ranoval of the sign wlthtn
the a]]oted time period. The bond and agreenent shall be filed
vlth the Deparlaent of Buildtrig and Safety.
Added:
09-13-73 (Oro. 348.1201}
Mended [ffectt re:
03-20-77 (Ord. 348.~.540)
07-16-85 : 348.2496)
SECTION 19.7. TDiPORARY POLITICAL SIGNS.
For the purpose of this ordinance, a temporary polttlc~ sign shall
mean a sign, not otherYlse pemttted by this ordinance, which
encourages a particular vote tn a scheduled election.
he
Not~thstanding any other provision of this ordinance, tarapurity
politics1 signs are permitted tn all zoning classifications subject to
the following limitations:
1, No such sign shall exceed 16 square feet (n surface area,
2. No free-stano~ng t~nporary political sign shall exceed 6 feet in
height.
3. No lot shall contain tmporary political signs having an aggregate
surface area tn excess of 80 square feet.
4, No such sign shall be artificially lighted.
5, No such stgn shall be erected or placed more than 90 days prior to
the scheduled election to which it pertains,
6. All such stgns shall be removed ~thin 10 days after the scheduled
election to which they pertatn, except that a stgn erected or
placed for I clncridate who prevatls in a primary election may be
maintained unttl 10 days after the final election,
7. No such sign shall be erected, placed or maintained upon any
private property ,Hthout the consent of the owner, lessee, or
person tn l~ful peasession of such property.
8. No temporary political stgn shall be erected, placed, or maintained
On any publtciy owned tree or shrub or upon the traproved portion of
any street or highway right of way which is used for traffic or
perkt rig.
g. No temporary political sign shall he erected, placed or maintained
so that it does any of the following:
(a) Nars, d~faces, disfigures or clamages any publtc butlcrlng,
structure or other property.
(b)Endangers the safety of persons or property.
(c) Obscures the ~tew of any fire hydrant° traffic sign. traffic
signal, Street sign, or ~ublic tnfomattonal sign,
(d) Blocks motorists' 1tries of sight to areas of ~htcular or
Ndestrtan trafftc.
c. by tmporary political sign erected, placed or maintained tn
1
vio atton of any provisions of this sectton may be rmoved by the
County 5 days after notice of the violation ts given to the concerned
candidate or sponsor, and to the o~er, lessee or potson tn lawful
possession of the property. Any tmporary political sign whtch
c~nstttotes an immediate danger to the slfet~ or persons or property,
eruhich has not been removed ~tthtn 10 days after the scheduled
election as provided in subsection (b)(6), may be rmoved by the
County summarily and vrithout notice. The County may bring as Ictton
to recover the reasonable cost of sign tenor81 under this subsection.
Added [ffectt re:
04-ZI-83 (0rd. 3Q.Z126)
I~"'X'XOIi 19.8.
a. Jiat~Lent ii: BslZoons
Defiaitioa: lmbieat /~lt BslXoons
t~EpOrary S~z~S supported by ~oz~ed
sit (noa-helim), ooastru~ed
ssterisis, ~d fixed to ~he gz~mad o~ ~ t~p
~siag steel a~bie ~horiag systess.
be lll~sizm~ed st sight ~siag
lightlag systems.
· astri~ioas: /roblear sir balloons sha~l be
siXmind oaly la c~me:olal ud l~dustrial
sonms s~b~e~c to ~mpliu~e wl~h ~he ~ollc~J~g
p:ovisions:
1. ~he saximm 811mmbXe size o£ uy balZoon
silo~ed by ~k4 s ,e~l~ s~11 ~ l~ted to no
~ ~ 1,500 8~,re ~eet, as masu~d at
~ o~ss seaion of ~e hZZ~ ~sed. (City
of 8~ ~s O~ce).
2. /~IX ballooas shall be grouad m~onted o:
roof smu~ed. b ~X~le ~ight ~1 not
~ ~y (30) f~t, as ms~ ~ ~
~. (~ o~ ~ ~s ~~).
256
3. Balloons may not be free-floating
(tethered) nor ~onstzu~ced Ja a shape
d~fferJag from the "hot-air belleon shape"
typically pertrayed in Teme~ula' s annual
ballon lad w~ae festival. Izample, balloons lu
t~e shape of blimps, ~artoou ~hara~egs etc.
shall mot be pezmLttted (TCC re~_ -Ddatiou)
4. ambieut balloons shall be pezmitted to be
d~splmyed for a period no~ to ezoeed fifteen
(15) oouseont~ve days w~+h4- amy stz~y day
(60) ooase~utive day period (City of Vista
Oz~Lnanoe). Zn ad~Ltion, · 30 ~oueeont/ve day
pezm~t my be issued b~ the City during
mo~b of Teme~ula's annual BalZoon and Wine
,estival. (TCC zec: -n4-t~on)
5. The number of balloous used for
advert/sing purposes shall be :estrl~ced,
alZowing for no more than ~h~ee (3) at any one
site during any allowed t/me period (~ity of
San Mar~os Ozdinanon). Xn addition,
spao/mg of such be/loons shall be suffiXant
eAough as to pzeve/lt zubbinV, oveEleppinV,
antangleaemt of one amothe: (TCC
Director and ~he Director of PlanuJa~.
appzoval skall be obUlaed by ~be s~Lt~al of
an eppliution and payment of required fees
(to be establisbed by ~he Direo~or of
I 1
Plam~ag). The epp1 ont/on sbal be
acu_ t, ~,~4ed wi~h · d_--swing, utllising ~ site
~o ~ a~ ~ ~ PlUg ~ ~l~g
set ~ ~ ~ ~ for ~1 p~sed
~l~s. (~ a~liutl~ p~ for
t~ra~ si~s).
7. Any violet/on of the adopted regulation
shall be mubJe~ ~o a ~fa~t ~t for ea~
s~te effuse. h~ ~y of violation or
~ as 8 se~e offuse ~ s~e~ ~o
es~ll~ ~ ~ ~y ~1. (~y of ~
~s O~).
APPENDIX A
CURRENT CITY ORDINANCES THAT INCORPORATE AMBIENT AIR BALLOONS
JL~--1l~-'90 1~:45 ID:CITY O~ SAN M~OS TS, ~:B19~5~5 ~591 PS~
AMBIENT AIR BALLOON APPLICATION
(and other inZlatables)
Aceopted by:
Date:
Receipt
Refundable Amt
Approved:
Denied:
Date:
APPLICANT:
BUSINESS NAME:
ADDRESS:
PHON~ NUMBER:
SIGN COMpANy:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:,
DATE BALLOON(S) TO BE INSTAL~ED:
DATE BALLOON(S) TO BE REMOVED:
NUMBER OF BALLOONS:
SIZE OF BACH (S)
MATERIAL USED:
(b) (c)
INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT
Filin9 fee: $50.00 for application plus S200.00 for deposit fee.
(The despenis fee is refundable after the removal of the inflatable.
This fee will be used to deZEey cost of removal upon any villas!on
of City regulations.)
Submit:
One (1) folded site plan illustrating the location6 of
the balloon(s) on the site.
Ons (l) sisration drawing to scale, showing the
location o[ balloon(s) on the building.
One (1) drawing o~ photograph oZ the balloon with a
description of the balloon. Include the balloon
material, attachment method and air source.
I have read Ordinance No. 84-637 pertaining to inflatable balloons.
I agree re comply with the requirements stated therein.
(signature)
13:46. ID:CITY.O
OIDINAMCE NO. It*el?
AM OItDtNJU~ (W THZ CiTY COUNCIL or M CIT~' Ot~
SJU4 NABCOS AJ4BMDIJ4Q THg lOllING ORDIMAfG. IY
XXXVZII. IRONS, pEIT&TMXMG TO kqlll~&ll lAbbOONS
AND SIHXtAI IMttATIILE$
The City ConneLl ot C~e City of lab Marcus DOeS ClaDAIM as
Soottoe r. Thc Jan Marcus Nuniatpci Coda is haccby amended by.
addle4 nov prOViSions to SectLeo Vii, Jkrttcte LXICVXIX of thc ZoALnV
OrdtnaA~a am reXlOPs:
lostton 924.
KmPfJDlX &
f, OllilO OIDZMANCS
lie O~ the (oZXowt~ stlnt. er~ept to~ C~&eo~l oC Pvbtic me(Icy:
Z. Governsent stVms Cur tcst~ta safety purposes o~ othe~
pubErr notechiLi much as toad tivoc aM SatICy beacons.
erected by Loderat. sure. or to~aX slamtins,
2. pubtie service ttma aM tesPscat,,,e glens or cloaks.
I. bEtday deeotsttoms that 4o mot advertise a pondlot service
nf aetsbliehmmnt. ~o~ up CO forty {40) dave batore ·
~ holiday snd~mn (XO) dsyI a~tat.
4, Nabtent gig beliemAc elid other SLatEar tn~Zmtibtes I~ail bc
nllovld only tn coametttal am4 Lndmstctal loGat subject tO
Compliance pith Cam foXloving Pcovtstons,,~
a) Such deviOca (cUbtout atr balloons and nine:
infLatEbloc) sitatE be otlm~ed tot a pectod ot mot nero
tun te attendmr days utcktn any one calendar Flat.
b} Art lUCK tmfllctktea utilized vtt~tn tam City must
first obtain the approval of the luLldine DiceCLOt cod
the Director Of Piann~ne, Approval abeiX be obtained
·_ .TLI4-1~-'9~ 15:47 ID:CITY OF S°dq ('IA~COS TEL N0:619~475~3 ~391 PS~
·
Z~OZA
requited £ees (to be established bf t~e Dieonset of
Planning). The application s~slZ be c0comp~nied vtch
· Acevine. hiltS:tap a 6iC0 ;la~. opectOting the
~ocacton fit the .tatlit/bin to be ap~:eved br the
Planning and Building IMpacthours vtth the OpectRied
Cbli be no longer tun: Up C0 14 a0pacat0 6eye to a'
All allo~$d lug~sc/bic8 egocities bf ~htc ne~Cloa
4)
c)
iAflattblea. Mai~On~IIy. all allwed
TAm uumbe~ st/n~Zntiblcs used fo~ &dyestiling
c~ne such tntisttb%es it say one site durt~p
siXeyed time pe~lwd.
bF thin ancGtcn Shall bo listLed ~o no note than l. JO0
In adminlstcstivo eGOiOn by the Cl~y. t~0 ~e/mtc mule
be tarloved by .the huitdtng and Plannine
tout COmes the perut~ tee (deposited with the CitY)
~tch ~ould be used to deScoy cost st tenoval upon any
default st violation of Cl~y togulaCtonS, The
13:47 ID:CITY OF ) ~ T~ N0:61~7447c~3 ~391 g~5
paqa 3
Ordinance d4-637
day notice to tA· permittee and to r. he property ovnec,
the [L~hc r.o enter the premises to ~enev·
in(isgLble dispity, provided the/'c VCS · dacechimed
violation.
~he ~ectiZ, used viII no~ ~lde. ~OaC. rip or
installation. t~ 6ucA detJ~lindtioQ finnst be made.
then the City uy.no~ taBUS t~e toquestad poetiC.
dtwn to ,ale t~ica~t~ tn a ~taa am ateracism
view, C~, t~ftact~le co be used: g~e areas tn
de~agtCea~gate established ~y g~ CIty Council.
thirty (30~ days a~tec t~e date of its PatsaVe. ~nd cam city
published a~d posted In the ainuor required by
ID:CITYOF ~I:~N~A~"O~
T.~I, NiZ}:619744~3 ~391P~6
~c~obe: 23,
AYES: C~UNClLMBQaERil MAR!IS, liltiONS. SMITH, hut'ION
IlOEl: IlK:lIDS: MCM4S
/
11104
sip, and in additiou, deposit cash. certified check, or
instrument of credit in the amount of five hundred
dollars (iS00,00) with the city as security to .ensure
the removal el each such siln. Upon'failure t~ so r~
move same elba' writurn notice thereef from the city
upon expiration el tim mlncf use permit, such sum
mXy be utlliled by the city to pay f~r such na~-val and
mmt remmml.
vii, Jiltat fallfie, illper, oldbard, wallboax~ mr other
~ matefil~ with mr lithmxt frames, intended to be
(b) Permitted song O-P, C-l, C-2, C=8, C*T and M-I soneft.
(~). Location. Shall mot be kegted or project into any public
(d) Number permitted, lie !imltat~on~
(e) Area.
~ area of all such signs shall not exceed accumu-
lative total of one hundred (10O) square feet.
Sips made of riZid materials shall not exceed
twenty-four (24) square feet.
Copy areIt. No IJnlitatio/m.
(f) Height, Signs made of rigid material and placed upon
the ground shall not exceed a height of ix (6) feet.
All other ternSrotary signs shall not exceed the follow-
ing height ijmJ~ationa: :.
A-72~24
Post-tt 'brand tax transmittat memo 7671 I,.nm...,~
APPENDIX A--ZONING { It~04
1. 0-PzoMa. Tw~ty (20) feet.
~ C-Z, C-2. C~, C-T and M-I lone. Thirty (~0)
f~t-
did events, public holidays and outdoor exhibitions or
1. Temporary ~ ~ll advertise only the ~ a~d
,er~u available on the preml~e~ w~e~e the sign
k~ated.
Ii~ mli:~L.~l fo!l~141_tJ~. p_hn-
k A written ducriptiou ot the d~pl~y;
S. ~siinsshalllxPermittsdf~aim'iod'~t
to ucetd turin (15) coa~cut~v, day~ within any
~ (60) ~onsk-utiv~ day
(92) 2'rans~ shelter e~Br~s.
(I) Deft-it:ion. Any eil~ paiated on. atticheal to or
coultn~cted ~u a transit ,heltor.
(b) Pitted zonin~ dist~|ct- Transit d21ter sign, may
be permitted i all commercial or indtutrlal districts
or in raidtntial distrtcte. subject to minor use
(c) Louti~. Si~ may b~'placed upon. attached to or
conltructed in any vertical surface oa the interior of
a traasit ,heher.
1. ~ area shall be considered to be the interior
,urfm area of any vertical
Notification of Slgn Ordinance Enforcement
Page 2
Teml:~rarlr Signs:
Temporar~ signs are defined as "any portable sign, banner,
balloon, pen~ant, valance, or advertising display
constructed Of cloth, canvas, light fabric, paper,
cardboard, wallboard, or other light materials, with or
without frames. intended to be displayed for a limited
period of time only."
may only be posted subject to the following
(a) Temporary slgns may advertise only the goods end
services available on the premises where the sign
10~ate~.
(b)
Temporary slgns wtll be permitted for a period not to
exceed fifteen (15) consecutive days within any slxty
(60) consecutive day period-
Temporary signs w111 only be permitted if the party
responsible for the sign submlts the follc~elng
information to the Code Enforcement Office for
approval prior to posting of any temporary sign:
Name, address and phone number of the
responsible party-
(2) A brief, written description of the dlSplay.
(3) The date on whlch poSting iS to commence.
(4) The date on which the sign(s) are to removed.
Off-site Real Estate St~:
Off-site reel estate signs may be displayed only on weekends,
beginning S:O0 p.m. on Friday and endlng at mldnlght the
following Sunday. Off-slte real estate signs may also be
displayed on any legal holiday observed by the City of Vista.
~aly Signs ~ioh are posted or maintained in violation of these
provisions may result ~n the issuance of the citation (Notice to
Appear An Court). Additionally, any sign which is posted in the
public right-o~-way w~ll be summarily removed by the City's Code
Enforcement Division.
V~ur cooperation in adherence to these regulations w111 be
greatly sppz~clated. If =ou have an~ questions or would like
additional Information regarding enforcement of the Slgn
Ordinance, please feel free to contact the City of Vista Code
Enforcessent Division st 726-1340, Extension 405-
18:82 ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO ~EL N0:6197414699
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET
DOCUMENTS 'rRANSMrrTED:
**Fa~ trammtttal ink is not permanmt.
CITY OF ESCONDIDO
~01 N. BROADWAY
Eseoodldo. CA 9207.S
(SlgJ 7411-4699 (FAX)
,I~18-'98 10:e2 ID:CITY OF ESC~IDO
,:T.~_i,j~: 61974 1 4699
~618
/ AI'II~LI:
il41.1t. llJl it lidIlll ~M. JIll, II. h e!iliLive l/tl/Iol.
o 11 -
JLN-18-°ge 10:~ ID:CITY OF ESCONDIDO TEL H0:~19~14699
DE?AILSOFIF, QUZSt
rreestandin2
laZZ-lmmted
Identification
liens
Well-~ounted
Sllns to Identify
Zlbdividual Depts.
Proposed
s~n
Standards
One ant
per dealership
or 2 for
dealerships
with lye
franchises and
27S' of ~rontole
One 200 SF alert
per deelerehipJ
or, for dealerships
o~con~re or with
larZe expanses of
buildin2 vail. mare
than,me with ms
~llle ILKt~ tO
exceed 200 SF end
the total area not
to exceed &O0 SF
Iny uusber with
letters nor to
exceed 2&° in
heiSht
Direrlionel Any number of
Siena 8 SF siena
Temporary Banners
Four times per
year for lO-day
special events
Four thaws per
year for 3o
days each the
Previously
Approved
212~ Standards
per dealership
One 200 IF si2n per
dealership
Pot elleyed
CG fens
S/an
Standards
One per loc
or parcel
In7 number
at I 2F per
floor area
or lO0 SF
of site
area with s
maximum
a2areSate
area of 300
(Zncluded
In above
standard)
Vere not expressly ~ny nabor
allowed. but were of 6 2F
shoeuonlxh/b/t D-I s~ns
Noc allowed
Not allowed
Other Temporary Suall helium Moc siXeyed
Displays ballssue on
weekends
C~T'/i~:: if:-:* .;;-]NK;,Z>.:
';; iiiDRAFT (OPY
· ~:;'-:, '*
! f" JUii 1 ~ 1999
~'-:' :'~": e- 'i . sale
Not allowed
For two
30-day
periods per
year
Alloys any
sl~nor
device
which moves
with breeee
for special
events not
to exceed
10 da~s
J'LH-~G-'cje ~0:83 ID:C|TY Dr ESC_DND]DO TEL NO:6:lcJ?41469Q t~6;Z8 F'~4
SBOPPIMG C~TgR$
Freestanding
same'
Mall-Mounted
Si~s
femporaq
Sg/eg-3& -PD/9- 3
Froposed Previously
Siin Approved
Standards SIgn Standardl
One X96 SF
LqtenalZy illumi-
nated plexilZes~
i~lon alp lot Some
Depot Center. One
extantally LZlumi~
hated wood elin fat
Butler ginlCenter
One externally
illuminated wood
sifn for each center
(size per CA]
requirements)
plextSlass for
Boas Depot Center
(one for each
Zinc shop, eve for
outpads and ~n-lina
rich rear to a
street).
lit wood for Burger
King Center. Sise
mud number per CG
standards
~se 6 Sr olin in
vacant shop wilder
plus one 50 SF sign
along street
Small helium
balloons, banners
and pot~able starts
to advertise grand
openings
One 20 SP or 30 SF
vood mrquee sign
on building front
(depending on lenKth
Not expressly
allowed
Mot allseed
DRAFT COPY
FOR STUDY ONLY
C~ Zone
SIgn
Standards'
One 100 SF
siin fat
each center
end one 60
;F monument
for each
sniped on a
separate
parcel
Any nusber
with area
lisited to
I SF sign
per 50 SP
floor area
withmax/-
mamagate-
gate o{ 300
SF
Two 16 SF
s/Ins per
parcel or
gmmlerl and
s/4nsor
oUaer
devices
which. move
vAth breeze
to adver-
tise special
evenil not
exceedXn2 lO
days
10:84 ID:CITY ~ ESCONDIDO TEL 1'40:6197414699
'* (
COIIDXTIONS
gg-:4-PD
~618 P~5
& copy of the revised CC&l's shall be submitted to and opproved by the
ply--inI Department prior to approval of any sign permits within the
Bacondido Auto Park. The submitted CC&R's shall be consistent with
attachment with the followha exceptionst
Small helium laXloons referred to in Section XI.K.2.O.X shall be
allowed only In conjunction with an issued City permit for temporary
dispXmy of a lanner sign.
bauer si_ees mentioned In SeepIon ILg.2.e,2 shall be limited to two
30-day periods within any 12-month period and to 100 SF Xn area and
require a City permit.
The use of lar8e hot-air balloons mentioned in SectAsh XX.g.2-e.3
shall be limited to two 10-day periods within any 12-month peeled
and requires a City permit.
D. Section II.Z.3.a.3 Shell stipulate that 'Monument sllns shell not
exceed S 1/2' wide by 4' tall at sixova in ~r_~lbit D-I.'
2. The heedIng for Section II.X.S.c shall read *For any site being used
for 2eneral commercial purposes other than auto dealerships. ·
P. Section lI.g.3.c.4 shall state that it applies to the Home Depot
Center at the northwest corner of Valley FaFkvsy and Auto Park May.
Section lI.E.:.c.5 shall read ·Special signs which vary from this
elan criteria must first be approved by the Owner, D.R.C., and
obtaIn PiannIn2 COmmission concurrence.
Sect/on ll.g.3.c.8 shall be revised so as not to allow the postIng
of s temporary freestanding sl2u aloq Valley Parkway.
This approval is subject to all applicable conditic~s of Tract 477 and/or
IO-X73-PD.
All future requests for signals within the Auto Park shall be epproved by
the Auto Park Design brier Committee, City Design Review Committee or
Dellin itsview Board. Pillulna Department. and BUlldimS Department.
Applications shall be submitted to the Plminl Department and shall
include three sets of plans and the approval of the A~to Park DesBin
Review Committee. The City Design bylaw Committee or Design Savior
kard shell review the request for conformunce with the Clty*s desinn
review $uidelInes to ensure adequate separation between sling and
............ epp. EDJxrl~te sire Of Sling tO pre~ent siin clutter.
...... i.>.>/fOR STODY ONLY
SI/Om-3.PD/9-3 I C,