Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout060192 PC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING June 1. 1992 6:00 PM VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 29915 Mira Loma Drive Temecula, CA 92390 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Hoagland ROLL CALL: Blair, Chiniaeff, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Minutes 2.2 Approval of minutes of May 18, 1992 Planning Commission Meeting. PUBLIC HEARING Case No. Applicant: Location: Proposal: Planner: Conditional Use Permit No. 17 Dr. Bob Thompson D.V.M, 41915 Motor Car Parkway #1 To locate Veterinary Clinic in an existing building in the C- 1/C-P zone. Matthew Fagan Recommendation: Approve NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Case No, Applicant: Location: Proposal: Planner: Conditional Use Permit No. 18 Mobil Oil Corporation Rancho California Town Center, 29500 Rancho California Road. A request to permit the sale of beer and wine. Saied Naaseh Recommendation: Present Findings to support denial as directed by Planning Commissioners. Planning Department Priority List of Projects Next meeting: June 15, 1992, 6:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Planning Director Reoort Plannino Commission Discussion Other Business ADJOURNMENT BEAU DLR\PLANC OMM~AGN6-1 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 18, 1992 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday, May 18, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California, Chairman John E. Hoagland presiding. PRESENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Hoagtand ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Fahey Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Senior Planner Pebble Ubnoske, Associate Planner Saied Naaseh, Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan, and Minute Clerk Gall Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMISSION BUSINESS APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Ford, to approve the agenda as mailed. The motion was carried unanimously with Commissioners Fahey and Chiniaeff absent. 2. MINUTES 2.2 Approve the minutes of May 4, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Ford requested the following revisions to the minutes of May 4, 1992: Page 6, amend first paragraph to read, "Commissioner Ford expressed concerns on the three projects as follows"; and after Planning Areas, reference Campos Verdes. Chairman Hoagland amended Page 2, Item No. 3 with the following statement, "This vacation would be in conformance with the expected General Plan because the original conditions were that the slopes be maintained by the Homeowners Association or by a community services district. PCMINUTESS/18192 -1- 5127192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 19, 1992 It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Blair to approve the minutes of May 4, 1992 as amended. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Fahey NON PUBLIC 3. TCSD 3.1 HEARING ITEMS COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER Proposal of schematic design of proposed Community Recreati'on Center at Rancho California Sports Park for the Commission's comments. Shawn Nelson summarized the staff report. Commissioner Fahey arrived at 6:10 P.M. Bob Mueting, project director with RJM Design Group, introduced the design team as follows: Kevin Sullivan, project designer, RJM Design Group Steve Kendrick, project architect, LPA Wendy Regers, project architect, LPA Rich Valdez, project engineer, Ranpac Engineering Mr. Mueting provided project status and overview. Mr. Sullivan reviewed the site plan'. Mr. Kendrick covered the floor plan and proposed uses. Ms. Rogers provided a slide presentation on the architectural design plan and Rich Valdez reviewed project engineering specifications. Commissioner Fahey questioned how the parking needs at the center are being addressed. Shawn Nelson stated that there is enough parking to meet the requirements of the CRC. However, additional parking will still be required along Margarita and Rancho Vista and at the back of the park near the soccer field off Margarita Road, in the future phases of developing Sports Park. Shawn added that the parking will be enhanced by effectively scheduling programs and activities. PCMINUTESS/18/92 ~2- 5/27192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 Commissioner Ford asked if the consultant was aware of proposed development plans for the hillside. Shawn Nelson stated that those plans were made available to RJM based on the SWAP designation. Therefore, the proposed grade of the recreation center was developed to mitigate drainage impacts associated with severe flooding. Mr. Nelson added that staff is currently awaiting an acoustical engineering study as it relates to the amphitheater to analyze its impact on surrounding residents. Chairman Hoegland declared a recess at 6:55 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 5 4.1 Proposal for color change to building roof and signs. Located on the west side of Front Street, North of lower Highway 79. Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Lou Kashmere, 29115 Front Street, Temecula, applicant, concurred with the staff report. The Commission as a whole expressed their concurrence with staff recommendation. BEST WESTERN INN 5,1 Proposal for revision to block wall and associated landscaping. Located at 27706 Jefferson Avenue. Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Bob Grina, 30305 Via Norte, Temecula, architect representing Best Western Inn answered questions about the landscape design. Commissioner Ford asked if a sound study was performed to show whether a ten foot high or eight foot high wall would be appropriate. Matthew Fagan advised that no sound study had been done. Commissioner Ford stated that he did not see any substantiation for the ten foot high wall. PCMINUTESS/I 8/92 -3- 5/27/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 Jack Wong, co-owner, stated that at the advice of CaI-Trans representatives, they submitted the request for a ten foot high wall to accomplish noise reduction. Commissioner Ford stated that he felt it would be more appropriate to design a six foot high wall and if the noise study required a higher wall, condition the project to build to the recommended height. Commissioner Blair asked the applicant if he would be willing to perform a sound study. Mr. Wong indicated that it would be very costly for him to have the study performed. Chairman Hoagland stated that the applicant has consulted with CaI-Trans and received their recommendation and has presented an acceptable landscape plan and therefore he would approve the applicant's request, Commissioner Fahey expressed her concurrence with Chairman Hoagland. Commissioner Ford and Commissioner Blair indicated that they would not be willing to approve the request without a sound study. Chairman Hoagland suggested that the Planning Director contact Commissioner Chiniaeff on an informal basis and make a decision based on the majority opinion. Commissioner Ford reiterated that he felt the approval of the height would be a precedent setting decision. PUBLIC HEARING m VARIANCE NO. 11, PLOT PLAN 10605 REV. NO. 1 6.1 Proposal is a request to allow a gravel parking lot. Located at 41934 Main Street, Temecula. Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Chairman Hoagland opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M. Tony Terich, To-Mac Engineering, applicant, presented the Commission with a copy of a letter of acceptance for a gravel parking tot for a period of one year, from the Old Town Temecula Historical Review Board. Mr. Terich asked that if the Commission choose not to approve on a precedent setting basis, that PCMINUTES5/18192 -4- 5/27/92 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 they allow the applicant to use the gravel parking lot until a Specific Plan for Old Town has been adopted and if the Old Town Specific Plan does not allow gravel parking lots, then a one year period be granted for compliance. Commissioner Ford questioned Mr, Terich's argument for a gravel parking lot. Mr. Terich referred to ground water absorption. Chairman Hoagland questioned how oil and grease drippings from the cars would be kept from entering the water run-off. Mr. Terich stated that the parking lot would consist of three to four inches of gravel which could absorb the pollutants and then be removed and replaced. Chairman Hoagland stated that he would be opposed to the applicant's request for a permanent gravel parking lot, It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. and AdOpt Resolution No. 92-(next) and Resolution No. 92-(qext) denying Plot Plan No. 10605, Amendment No. 1, Revised Permit No. 1 and Variance No. 11 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report, Commissioner Ford asked if there was a time that could be allowed so that the project is in total compliance with the permit, Doug Stewart advised that the Public Works department is the only department left to sign off and is at the Commissions discretion. John Cavanaugh suggested that the Commission give the applicant a reasonable period of time to pursue completion of the conditions from date of the recommendation, Commissioner Fahey amended her motion to direct staff to work with the applicant on a timely completion of the condition, Commissioner Blair concurring. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff PCMINUTESSI18192 -5- 5127192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 Commissioner Blair added that she would not favor a one year period for completion; however, would find six months more acceptable. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 18 7.1 Proposal is a request to permit the sale of beer and wine at a Mobil Oil gas station, Rancho California Town Center, 29500 Rancho California Road, Temecula. Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. Chairman Hoagland opened the public hearing at 7:45 P.M. Ken Huper, 18634 Lankenshire Way, Los Angeles, representing Mobil Oil, advised the Commission that the gas station operates 24 hours per day; however, beer and wine sales would be limited to restricted hours by the ARC. Sidney Vernon, 30268 Mercy Court, Temecula, expressed his concerns with drinking and driving. Mr. Vernon added that he felt selling beer and wine at a gas station would encourage drinking and driving. Mr. Vernon also noted the location of the church across the street from the gas station. Ken Huper stated that Mobil Oil did not approve of drinking and driving, however the application is in conformance with the ordinance and there are other establishments within the city which currently sell beer and wine in addition to gasoline. The Commission as a whole expressed disapproval of the sale of alcohol at a gas station. John Cavanaugh reminded the Commission that the proposal is a C.U.P. and therefore the Commission would have to set forth specific findings, such as those that relate to health, safety and welfare. Commissioner Blair questioned the church location on Rancho California Road in regards to the request. Saied Naaseh advised that the ARC would not deny the request based on the location of the church; however, thay would place stricter restrictions on the establishment. Gary Thornhill advised the Commission that had the request been located in a residential zone or near a freeway, staff would have recommended denial: however, because this is a built-out shopping center, staff did not feel that this PCMINUTESSI18/92 -6- 5127192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 request posed any conflicts. Mr. Thornhill added that the Commission may find that the location of the church, schools, freeway and the access into and out of this shopping center present a health, safety and welfare concern. Chairman Hoagland stated that although he does not agree with the sale of alcoholic beverages at a gas station, this applicant has complied with all the existing ordinances and therefore it would be unfair to deny his request based upon personal opinion. John Cavanaugh added that since the applicant has complied with the ordinance, findings for denial based on health, safety and welfare would need to be made. It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commission Fahey to close the public hearing at 8:05 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 92-(next} denying Conditional Use Permit No. 18 and direct staff to prepare findings to substantiate the denial as follows: health and safety concerns as they relate to the location, the proximity to the schools in the City of Temecula, the church, the freeway, and the specific intersection as people are driving out into a maior traffic area at that particular shopping center. AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford NOES: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT Gary Thornhill reported the following: Administrative Secretary Unda Beaudoin has been promoted to Planning Technician. On May 14,1992 Staff will be making presentation on the General Plan to the Temecula Town Association. On May 11,1992, the Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee held a kick- off meeting. The approval authority ordinance went before the City Council and they are supportive of giving more authority to staff. Chairman Hoagland stated that he would attend the City Council meeting to discuss the ordinance with the Council. PCMINUTESS/18/92 -7- 5/27192 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 18, 1992 PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION * Commissioner Blair expressed a concern for the City Councils desire to push projects along quickly. * Chairman Hoagland asked that staff bring the Commission up-to-date on pending items at the next meeting. OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Blair to adjourn at 8:20 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held Monday, June 1, 1992, 6:00 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman John E. Hoagland Secretary PCMINUI'ESS/18~92 -8- 5/27/92 ' · ITEM # 3 STAFE REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEiVIECULA PLANNING COM1VIISSION June 1, 1992 Case No.: Conditional Use Permit No. 17 Prepared By: Matthew Fagan RECOMM~.NDATION: ADOPT Resolution No. 92- approving Conditional Use Permit No. 17 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Re~ort and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Dr. Bob Thompson, D.V.M. Termton Corporation, Ken OfiMal PROPOSAL: To allow the operation of a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic in an existing structure in the General Commercial (C-I/C-P) zone. LOCATION: 41915 Motor Car Parkway, gI EXISTING ZONING: General Commercial (C-l/C-P) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: ~gt: West: General Commercial (C-UC-P) General Commercial (C-l/C-P) General Commercial (C-UC-P) General Commercial (C-I/C-P) PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested EXISTING LAND USE: Commercial Center SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Stereo and Alarms Mini-Mart Street Parking Lot PROJECT STATISTICS Total Suke Area: 1200 square feet Waiting Room: 240 square feet Exam Rooms: 81 square feet Pharmacy: 56 square feet Business Office: 72 square feet Cage Areas: 216 square feet Treatment Room: 210 square feet Uncommitted: 325 square feet BACKGROUND Conditional Use Permit No. 17 was submitted to the Planning Department on April 7, 1992. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on April 30, 1992. Them were no significant issues relative to Conditional Use Permit raised at the DRC meeting and therefore the project was scheduled for a planning Commission hearing. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional Use Permit No. 17 is a proposal to locate a 1,200 square foot veterina~ clinic into an existing commercial/retail center (Temecula Plaza). The existing center located at 41915 Motor Car Parkway was appreved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors on May 31, 1988 as Plot Plan No. 10343, Exhibit A, Amended No. 1. This approval included the building in which the veterinary clinic is proposed to be. One hundred and six (106) parking spaces were required under Ordinance No. 348 for Plot Plan No. 10343, Exhibit A, Amended No. 1. The proposed veterinary clinic will require four (4) spaces per Ordinance No. 348. ANALYSIS Noise Staff was concerned with the potential for noise which could emanate from the proposed use. The applicant has stated that, in his present location, no complaints have been received in five years of occupancy (reference Attachment No. 4). A stereo and alarm shop shales a common wall. Parking areas are to the south and west and Motor Car Parkway is to the east. The proposed veterinary clinic will occupy a suite which is at the end of the center. Due to the location of the use within the existing building, no potevtial impacts fwm noise are expected. Health Issues Staff was concerned about the disposal of medical waste. Staff received comments from the County of Riverside Department of Health which requires the applicant to receive a clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch. The project will have to be cleared for Hazardous Waste Generator Service, Hazardous Waste Disclosure and Waste Reduction Management prior to occupancy. These clearances will satisfy Staff's concerns pertaining to medical waste. S\STAFFRFI'xl7CUP.PC 2 EXISTING ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY Zoning on the site is General Commercial (C-l/C-P). Veterinary clinics are permitted uses in the C-1/C-P zone provided a Conditional Use Permit has been granted pursuant to Ordinance No. 348. The proposed use is consistent with the SWAP Commercial designation. As such, it is likely the Conditional Use Permit No. 17 will be consistent with the City' s future General Plan, upon the Plan's final adoption. E,NVIRO~AL DETERMINATION The proposed project is a Class I Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301(e)(1) of the CEQA guidelines. Minor alterations of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that previously existing to include interior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances are Class I Categorical Exemptions. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Conditional Use Permit No. 17 is a proposal to locate a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic in an existing building. No significant impacts from this project are foreseen by Staff. The project as conditioned is consistent with existing zoning, the SWAP, and is therefore likely to be consistent with the City's future General Plan. FINDINGS There is a reasonable probability that Conditional Use Permit No. 17 will be consistent with the City' s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing zoning of General Commercial and the SWAP land use designation of Commercial. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing General Commercial zoning, the SWAP land use designation of Commercial, and the existing development of the surrounding area. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies with State Planning Laws. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size, access, and intensity of use due to the fact that the proposed development complies with the standards of Ordinance No. 348. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include measures which will ensure that public health and welfare will be maintained. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in intensity creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties due to the fact that the proposed developmere is consistent with current surrounding development and Ordinance No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not rapresent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area due to the fact that the surrounding properties are zoned C-1/C-P (General Commercial) which is consistent with the project zoning and proposed use. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the interior circuhtion is suitable and connects with Ynez Road and Motor Car Parkway. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment. The project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines. 10. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as represented on the site plan. STAFF RECOhllWF, NDATION: ADOPT Resolution No. 92- approving Conditional Use Permit No. 17 based on the Analysis and Findings col~tained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. vgw Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Resolution - blu~ page 5 Conditions of Approval - blue page 10 Exhibits - blue page 14 Letter from Dr. Bob Thompson, D.V.M. dated March 19, 1992 - blue page 15 S'iSTAFFRIr~17CUP.PC 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION ATTACH/VlENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 92- A RESOLUTION OF TFHr. PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 17 TO PERMIT OPERATION OF A 1,200 SQUARE FOOT VETERINARY CLINIC IN AN EXISTING BUll,FlING LOCATED AT 41915 MOTOR CAR PARKWAY, WB'F-REAS, Dr. Bob Thompson, D.V.M. fried Condition Use Permit No. 17 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI~,REAS, said Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WltF, REAS, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on June 1, 1992, at which time interested persons had an oppormdity to testify either in support or opposition; WI~.REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heaxing, the Commission recommended appmvai of said Conditional Use Permit; NOW, Tlqlr. REFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIt'F. CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section I. Findings: following findings: That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the following requirements are met: general plan. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency finds, in appreving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted genera/plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requixements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinaher "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: D. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. E. The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each of the following: 1. There is reasonable probability that Conditional Use Permit No. 17 proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. The proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing C-1/C-P zoning for the site and consistent with the SWAP designation of Commercial. 2. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. The proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with existing zoning, SWAP, and the existing development of the surrounding area. 3. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies with State Planning Laws. F. Pursuant to Section 18.26(e), no Conditional Use Permit may be approved unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the community. S\STAFFR_~TXl7CLrP.PC 7 G. The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit, makes the following rmdings, to wit: 1. Them is a reasonable probability that Conditional Use Permit No. 17 will be consistent with the City' s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law due to the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing zoning of General Commercial and the SWAP land use designation of Commercial. 2. Them is not a likely probability of substantial detriment m or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to the fact that the proposed veterinary clinic is consistent with the existing General Commercial zoning, the SWAP land use designation of Commercial, and existing development in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies with State Planning Laws. 4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size, access, and intensity of use due to the fact that the proposed development complies with the standards of Ordinance No. 348. 5. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include measures which will ensure that public health and welfare will be maintained. 6. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in intensity creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining propert'~es due to the fact that the proposed development is consistent with current surrounding development and Ordinance No. 348. 7. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area due to the fact that the surrounding properties are zoned C-1/C-P (General Commercial) which is consistent with the project zoning and proposed use. 8. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the interior circulation is suitable and connects with Ynez Road and Motor Car Parkway. 9. The project as designed and conditioneel will not adversely affect the built or natural environment. The project is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines. 10. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project as represented on the site plan. H. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION hi, the Conditional Use Pennit proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section II. Environmental Compliance. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a Class I Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 1503(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines which peruins to minor alternations to existing structures. Section lu. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 17 for the operation of a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic located at 41915 Motor Car Parkway, #I subject to the following conditions: 1. Attachment No. 2, attached hereW. Section IV. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of June, 1992. JOHN E. HOAGLAND CHAIRMAN I lll~.RERy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Pla_,ming Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of June, 1992 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSF24T: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL s~sTA~m~,n~vc~.~c 10 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Pennit No. 17 Project Description: To locate a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic in an existing building located in the General Commercial (C-I/C-P) zone Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-680-008-2 PLANNING DEPART1VrF. NT The use hereby permitted by this Conditional Use Permit is for a 1,200 square foot veterinary clinic to be located in an existing buffcling located in the General Commero'ml (C-i/C-P) zone. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecuh, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or ks agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concertring Conditional Use Permit No. 17. The City of Temecula wffi promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. This approval shall be used within one (1) year of the approval date; otherwise, it 'shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the one (1) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial u'ulization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Conditional Use Permit No. 17 marked Exhibit "D" and "E" or as amended by these conditions. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine direcfiy upon adjoining property or public tights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. Sx'STAFFRPT~17CUP-PC 11 The applicant shall comply with the Riverside County Fire Department transmittal dated May 4. 1992. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Health Department's transmittal dated April 20, 1992, a copy of which is attached. A minimum of 4 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Four (4) parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit "D" . A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. 10. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. 11. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT It is understood that the applicant has correctly shown on the tentative site plan as submitted for this approval all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvements, constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision prior to certification of f'mal occupancy. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY: 12. No alterations shall be made to the existing improved parking area or drive ways without submitting a site improvement plan to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 13. No obstructions shall be placed within existing drainage swales onsite. BUII,DING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 14. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1988 edition of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and MechaniCal; 1990 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula Code. 15. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to the commencement of any construction work. 16. All existing buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped accessibility regulations. S\STAFFRPTH7CLrP.PC 12 17. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. S~S~AF~P.P'ntTCUP.PC 13 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FraY, DnPARTMENT _ 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERRIS, C~LIFORNIA 92370 ~ (714) 657-3183 GLEN J. NEWMAN FIRE CHIEF MAY 4. 1992 TO; ATTEN; RE; CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT. CUP-17 With respect to the review and/or approval of the above refer- enced project. the Fire Department has no comments or conditions regarding the Conditional Use Permit approval and will address all necessary fire protection meassures when the tenant improve- ment plans are reviewed at the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be re- ferred to the Planning and Engineering Staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Michael E. Gray, Fire Captain Specialist PLANNING DIVISION FI RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th $m~, Pd,~s'side. CA 92501 (714) 275-4777 * FAX (714~ 369-7451 F'l TEMiCULA OFfiCE 41002 Coun~ Center Drive, Suit= Z25, Ta-actula. CA 922 (714) 694-5070 · FAX (714) 694-5076 County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA TO: DATE: AII~ ~at~%~ Faoan FROM:~SS~S~lF,~'~t',~ironmental Health Specialist IV RE: CONDITIONAL ERMIT N0. 17 04-20-92 Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Conditional Use Permit No. 17 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services should be available in this area. Prior to any buildinq plan review for health clearance, the following items are required: 1. "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. A clear&nee letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch, (Mike Shelter, 356-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: Underground storage tanks b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (ln accordance with AB 2185.) d. Waste reduction management SM:dr co: Mike Shelter, Hazardous Materials Branch NOTE: Any current additional regulrements not covered, be applicable at time Of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. ATTACIIbrENT NO. 3 EX!:HRITS S\STAFF1L~t~I7CUP-PC 14 CITY OF TEMECULA SITE CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. 17 EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: June 1, 1992 VICINITY MAP CITY OF TEMECULA / --- "SITE! RAN* SWAP - Exhibit B Designation: Commercial (C) ZONq~NG - Exhibit C Case No.: Conditional Use Permit No. 17 P.C. Date: June 1, 1992 Designation: General Commercial (C-I/C-P) CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. 17 EXI-~RIT: D P.C. DATE: June 1, 1992 SITE PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit 17 EXI-rIRIT: E P.C. DATE: June 1, 1992 FLOOR PLAN ATTACH3V[ENT NO. 4 LETTER FROM DR. BOB THONI~ON, D.V.M. DATED MARCH 19, 1992 $~STAFFRPTHTCUP.PC 1:5 PET CLINIC DR. BOB THOMPSON. D.V.M. March 19, 1992 City of Temecula Planning Department 27443 JEFFERSON AVE, TEMECULA. CA t23R0 TELEPHONE:ITT4) 676-6488 To Whom It May Concern: I am a veterinarian currently operating a small animal cliniz in Temecula. I am presently leca~ed in the grater gro~hezs shopping center at 27443 Jefferson Avenue. I opened my practice in Temecula in 1987 at which time I obtained a Conditionai Use Permit ~ considerable expense and time. I wish to move my bus~ness to 41915 Motor Car Parkway, Suite I, rot which I understand another C.U.P. is required. M~, business consists primarily of out-patien~ services, i.e. vaccinations, administering meditations and surgery. I do not board and I do not groom animals. On the infrequent occasion that an animal is kept overnight it is because that animal is extremely ill and is under 24 hour surveillance. In the five years I have run my business at my present location, no complaints of any kind have been lodged against me. I am simply interested in relocating to a location on the east side of Interstate 15, to better serve my clients. I feel that I should not be subject to excessive fees or t~e delays. Sincerely, Robert Thompson, ITEM # 4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning DATE: June 1, 1992 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 18, Mobil Service Station The Planning Commission at its May 18, 1992 meeting directed Staff to write Findings for the denial of this request. This item was continued to June 1, 1992 to allow Staff an opportunity to make Findings for denying the request for beer and wine sale for the Mobile Service Station. Staff is still working on the Findings with the City Attomey's office and will present them the night of the hearing. vgw S\STAFFRPT~I8CUP-I.PC