HomeMy WebLinkAbout071993 PC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993 6:00 PM
VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
29915 Mira Loma Drive
Temecda, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Fahey
ROLL CALL:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland and Fahey
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address,
For all other agenda items a 'Request to Speak' form must be filed with the Planning
Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
2.1 Approval of minutes from the June 7, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
2.2 Approval of minutes from the June 21, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
NON-PUBLIC HEARING
3. Case No.:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA93-0009, 1st Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel
Map No. 25059
Preferred Equities Development Group, Inc.
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet
southerly of Rancho California Road
A four lot subdivision of a 5.51 acre site in the Industrial
Park (I-P) zone
Re-affirm previously adopted Negative Declaration
Craig Ruiz
Approve
4. Case No.:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
6. Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:~
PA93-0010, Extendon of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Preferred Equities Development Group, Inc.
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet
southerly of Rancho California Road.
To construct a seven-story office building (102,243 s.f.)
two restaurants and (7,872 s.f. and 7,000 s.f.), on s
four-level paring structure (134,933 s.f.) on 5.51 acres.
Re-affirm previously adopted Negative DeclaraTion
Craig Ruiz
Approve
PA93-0104, Plot Plan
John Kupka
Northerly aide of McCabe Court, approximately 300 feet
westerly of Madison Avenue.
The construction of a 17,342 square foot
office/warehouse building in the Manufacturing Service
Commercial (M-SC) zone.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Craig Ruiz
Approval .
PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
Rancho California Development Corporation
28231 Ynez Road
To locate an AM/PM self-service gas station and mini-
mart on a .68 acre parcel in the General Commercial (C-
1/C-P) zone.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Craig Ruiz
Approval
Caaa No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposeh
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA93-0124, Plot Plan
Professional Hospital Supply
East side of Business Park Drive between Rancho
California Road and Rancho Way.
Approval of s 43,000 square foot tilt-up industrial building
for sterilization, warehouse, and distribution for new
medical products.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Salad Naaseh
Approval
ReviedJuNlS. 1993 vgw 2
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA93-0125, Conditional Use Permit
Shoemaker Productions Incorporated
Temecula Showgrounds, west of Diaz and south of
Temecula City limits.
A Conditional Use Permit allowing the use of the
Temecula showgrounds for motacross end off-road
events including practice and races.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Saied Naaseh
Approve
Next meeting: August 2, 1993, 6:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Lama Drive,
Temecula, California.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
OTHER BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM #2
JUNE 7, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 7, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on
Monday, June 7, 1993, 6:25 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive,
Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Linda Fahey.
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
COMMISSIONERS: None
Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh,
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner John Meyer and Recording Secretary Gall
Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Aooroval of Aoenda
it was moved by Commission Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
approve the agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
Minutes
2.1
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
None
Approval of Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of March I, 1993.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff
to approve the minutes of the March 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
PCMIN06/07193 -1- 6/13/~3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
JUNE 7.1993
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland,
Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
2.2
Approval of Planning Commission minutes for the meeting of April 5, 1993.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaaff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland
to approve the minutes of the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission meeting.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland,
Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
3. Director's Hearina Cases Update
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
receive and file the report.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
None
4. Landscape Plan for Ynez Car Care Center (CUP No.2)
Proposed landscape plan for Ynez Car Care Center, abutting the west side of Ynez
Road and the east side of Interstate 15, approximately 200 feet north of the
intersection of Ynez Road and Solana Way.
PCMIN06/07193 -2- 6/13/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7. 1993
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he feels four to five additional fifteen gallon trees
should be placed along the southerly boundary of the applicant's property, between
the trees of the abutting property.
Commissioner Hoagland stated he feels additional trees are necessary along the
southerly and northerly boundary of the property.
The overall consensus of the Commission was to require the applicant to plant an
additional four or five trees along the northerly and southerly property lines.
Commissioner Blair stated that she would like to see additional trees along the back
of the property adjacent to the freeway.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoegland to
approve the Landscape Plan for the Ynez Car Care Center (Conditional Use Permit No.
2) with the stipulation that twelve to fifteen additional fifteen gallon trees will be
placed along the northerly, southerly, and rear property lines.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fehey
None
None
PUBLIC HEARING ITF~MS
Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2. Variance No. 13
Proposed Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee - A seventy-three (73) foot high sign
with a three hundred-ten (310) square foot electronic message board. Located at
26631 Ynez Road, the rear portion of Toyota of Temecula.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. Mr. Fagan advised the
Commission of a modification to Condition No. 9 of the Conditions of Approval as
follows:
All members of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall who choose to advertise on the
electronic message board portion of the sigh shall submit an agreement with
the City of Temecula which will be recorded with the County Recorder. The
agreement shall stipulate that all members and future members will forego
PCMINO6/O7193 -3- 6/I 3/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
requesting any additional free standing freeway oriented signage as long as the
Temecula Valley Auto Mall Marquee is erected. The addition of any future
advertisers on the electronic message board of the Temecula Valley Auto Mall
Marquee will cause the agreement to be amended. No additional advertisers
will be permitted to be displayed upon the Marquee until the amended
agreement is recorded.
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern regarding .~he height of the sign and
questioned why the applicant was proposing a 75' high sign.
Mr. Fagan explained that for the top portion of the sign, the hot air balloon, to be in
proper proportion, it was necessary for the sign to be 75' in height.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 6:50 P.M.
Duane Contento, Ad Art Signs, Inc., 19603 Figuoroa Street, Los Angeles, explained
the design concept of the sign.
Steve Palmar, representing the Temecula Valley Auto Dealers Association, provided
a summary of the proposal for the auto mall marquee.
Dan Atwood, 26631 Ynez Road, Temecula, General Manager of Toyota of Temeculs,
expressed his support for the auto mall marquee.
Phyllis Barton, 42031 Main Street, Temecula, questioned the use of Redevelopmerit
funds for the sign and asked if funds were available for a similar sign advertising Old
Town Temecula.
Bonnie Corbin, 225 Avenue D, Redondo Beach, Old Town property owner, stated she
is in support of anything that will assist the local business economy.
Commissioner Blair questioned why the sign was designed with a reader board and
stated she felt that a Cal Trans sign advertising the auto mall would be sufficient.
Commissioner Blair also questioned the number of cities,having similar auto mall
marquees, that funded the signs.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the concept is the individual dealerships would
advertise on this one sign as opposed to having individual free-standing signs along the
freeway.
Commissioner Hoagland stated he feels the size of the sign will have a negative impact
on the community and will be aesthetically unpleasing.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated he feels the auto mall marquee is warranted, however,
he questioned the need for the 75' height and the longevity of the hot air balloon as
a image for the City of Temecula.
PCMIN06/07193 -4- 6/I 3/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7. 1993
Chairman Fahey expressed concern that there is not sufficient evidence to grant a
variance and the City may be setting a precedent by approving the sign.
Commissioner Ford stated he is concerned about the height of the sign and suggested
that the proposal be sent back to staff to investigate whether the Cal Trans sign could
be moved and if the sign could be decreased in height and dimension.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the public hearing at 7:15 P.M. and recommend Denial of Negative Declaration for Plot
Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2; and ]p~ny Resolution No. 93-(next) recommending
Approval of Plot Plan No. 249, Amendment No. 2, and Denv Resolution No. 93-(next)
recommending Approval of Variance No. 13, based on the findings that the sign is too
large and is aesthetically displeasing and will have a negative impact on the community
because of its size, bulk and intensity.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES:
2 COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Ford
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
6. Old Town Soecific Plan
Proposal to adopt a Specific Plan adopting Land Use standards and design guidelines
in and around the Old Town area.
Senior Planner John Meyer and Associate Planner David Hogan presented the staff
report.
Mark Brodeur, owner and principal of Urban Design Studios, land use and design
consultant, provided an overview of the Old Town Specific Plan process, highlighting
the circulation element and the Shoot-Out Zone.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M.
John Moramarco, P.O. Box 906, Temecula, expressed his support of the Old Town
Specific Plan. Mr. Moramarco suggested that the proposed wood plank boardwalks
are not the most practical and an alternative design should be considered.
Bonnie Reed, 42050 Main Street, Temecula, owner of Country Cellar Antiques and
member of the Old Town Steering Committee, expressed her support of the plan.
PCMIN06/07/93 -6- 6/13j93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
Bonnie Corbin, 225 Avenue D, Redondo Beach, Old Town property owner (Mercedes
and 3rd Street), expressed support of the Old Town Specific Plan.
Ira Dixon, 2016 Gird Road, Fallbrook, Old Town property owner (Mercedes and Main
Street) expressed support of-the Old Town Specific Plan and asked that the
Commissioner consider allowing automotive repairs as a permitted use in the "Tourist
Retail Core".
Donald Martin, 12132 Woodlawn Avenue, Santa Ana, Old Town property owner (Front
Street and Felix Valdez) expressed his support of the Old Town Specific Plan.
Charles March, Old Town property owner, (Main Street and Front Street) expressed
his support of the Old Town Specific Plan.
Jo Hansen, 42251 Sixth Street, Temecula, expressed support of the Old Town
Specific Plan however, she expressed opposition to the extension of high density
housing along Pujol. Ms. Hansen suggested that prior to approving more high density
housing, the City should research the impacts with fire, police and emergency services.
Bill Harker, 31130 North General Kearney Road, Temecula, representing the Temecula
Town Association and a member of the Old Town Steering Committee, expressed the
Association's support of the plan.
Planner David Hogan advised the Commission that letters were received from Evelyn
Zinn, Robert Dawes and Marion Raish, all Pujol Street property owners, requesting
that their properties be excluded in the Old Town Specific Plan and as part of the
historicaldistrict. Staff received a letter from Robert Lord asking that the Commission
support the plan and that the plan be implemented as soon as possible. A letter was
received from U.R.G.E. asking that the Old Town Specific Plan address the flood
control problems of the Murrieta Creek.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that a resolution would be more appropriate in
adopting the Financial Marketing Strategy. Planning Director Gary Thornhill concurred.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close
the public hearing at 8:15 P.M. approving the Negative Declaration and approving the
Adooti0n of Resolution No. 93-11 recommending that the City Council approve the Old
Town Specific Plan and amend the Official Zoning Map City Zoning Ordinance, and
referring the implementation of the financial marketing strategy as an appendix so that
it is not part of the Ordinance.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
FCMINO6/O7193 -6- 6/13/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Planning Director Gary Thornhill thanked and recognized the following members of the Old
Town Specific Plan Ad-Hoc Committee:
Helga Berger
Susan Bridges
Carlena Danielsen
Linda Fahey
Christina Grina
Bill Harker
Larry Markham
Former City Councilmember Peg Moore
Laverne Parker
Bonnie Reed
Steve Sander
The staff reports for Items No. 7, 8 and 9 were presented in consecutive order.
Environmental Imoact Renort No. 340
Environmental Impact Report for Specific Plan No. 263, a Specific Plan proposing a
1,375,000 square foot commercial core, 298,000 square feet of general retail,
810,000 square feet of office/industrial and possible multi-family residential uses on
201.3 acres. Located on the southeast corner of Winchester and Ynez Roads.
Planner Steve Jiannino presented the staff report. Mr. Jiannino advised the
Commission that after mitigation of the project specific impacts, significant impacts
remain as to noise, climate and air quality, agriculture and circulation. Mr. Jiannino
stated that on a cumulative basis, the two other specific plans proposed in the area
and the ultimate build-out for the year 2000 on all three projects and other City
projects will have a significant impact on 13 issues identified in the E.I.R.
ChanQe of Zone No. 93-0043, Plot Plan No. 243, Amd. No. 4. end Variance No. 9
Change of Zone from R-R (Rural Residential) to C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial),
a 340,400 square foot commercial center (Wal-mart) and a Variance to reduce the
number of loading zones from seven to two. Located on the southeast corner of
Winchester and Ynaz Roads.
Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report.
PCMINOeI07193 -7- 18/13/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7. 1993
9. Parcel MaD No. 27323, Amd. No. 4
Planner Steve Jiannino presented the staff report.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised the Commission that subsequent to the staff
reports being mailed out, staff met with the applicant with respect to assigning off-site
improvements to the mitigation monitoring program. Director Thornhill suggested to
the Chairman that the public hearing be opened to allow for public testimony and the
item continued to a date specific to allow staff to resolve this issue.
Commissioner Hoagland stated that he was very concerned about the staff analysis
of the cumulative impacts. Commissioner Hoagland stated that the E.I.R. for the
Regional Center Specific Plan is satisfactory regarding the significant impacts of this
project, however, the staff report also refers to thirteen areas which cannot be
mitigated.
Douglas Wood, Douglas Wood & Associates, responsible for preparing the E.I.R. on the
Regional Center, Winchester Hills and Campos Verdes, explained the cumulative
significant impacts were obtained from the Campos Verdes Specific Plan which looked
at impacts associated with all three urban core projects.
Chairman Fahey opened the public hearing at 8:55 P.M.
Douglas Wood, principal of Douglas Wood & Associates, the firm responsible for the
preparation of the E.I.R. for the Regional Center, Winchester Hills and Campos Verdes,
said that continuing the item will allow time to address the concerns expressed about
the E.I.R.
Greg Erickson, 43164 Corte Colanda, Temecula, representing Bedford Properties,
asked for modification of the following conditions of approval:
Plot Plan Condition 13/Parcel Map Condition 56
Ray Casey advised that a letter was received from the applicant's traffic engineer
supporting deletion of this condition.
Plot Plan Condition 12 (d), 100/Parcel Map Condition 64 - there is a memo to staff
correcting all these.
Plot Plan Condition 90/Parcel Map Condition 73 - request for deletion of this condition.
Plot Plan Condition 89/Parcel Map 79 - request for deletion of this condition.
Plot Plan 88, 89, 90 - request for deletion of these conditions.
Commissioner Chiniaeff asked that staff look at alternative trees for the parking lot.
PCMIN06/07/93 -8- 6/13/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he would like to see more canopy type trees.
Vince DiDonato of the Alhambra Group, 27412 Enterprise Circle West, representing
the applicant as the landscape architect, advised the Commission that there was not
a good selection of canopy trees suitable for Temecula's climate. Mr. DiDonato agreed
to offer some alternatives to the tree scape.
Commissioner Chiniaeff asked if the applicant is required to provide seven loading
docks or parking for seven trucks and suggested that if the applicant is only required
to provide parking for seven trucks, the variance could be deleted.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill stated the seven truck parking spaces are sufficient
and concurred with deletion of the variance.
Commissioner Ford questioned the recommendation regarding the cross drive aisles.
Bob Davis of Wilbur Smith Associates, 43103 Corte Colante, Temecula, representing
the applicant as the traffic engineer, advised the Commission that in terms of cross
aisles, it was determined that introduction of a cross aisle would result in a lot of
turning movements and vehicle vs. vehicle and vehicle vs. pedestrian movements.
Planning Director Thornhill suggested that landscape islands could be spaced every five
parking spaces.
Commissioner Fahey expressed a concern that the parking lot needed to be shielded
more and suggested that the landscape around the perimeter be enlarged.
Barry Burnell of T & B Planning Consultants, 3242 Haloday Street, Santa Ana,
representing the applicant, advised the Commission that there is currently 30' of
landscaping proposed for the perimeter of the project.
Commissioner Hoagland asked that staff address the impacts of the future
transportation corridor along Winchester Road when the item is brought back to the
Commission.
Commissioner Blair requested that the Commission be provided a rendering of the Wel
Mart building.
It was the overall consensus of the Commission to have staff address their concerns
regarding dividing the parking lot with the use of trees, landscape islands, etc.; and
eliminate the request for variance. Additionally, Commissioner Blair asked that staff
investigate the possibility of double stripping the parking lot.
Russell Rumansoff, architect for the applicant, reviewed the proposed construction
materials.
FCMINO6/O?/93 -9- 6/13/i3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
Commissioner Blair asked that staff monitor the use of quality products in the
construction of this project.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
continue Items No. 7, 8 and 9 for two weeks to allow staff to address the concerns
expressed by the Commission and continue the public hearing.
The motion was carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised that he has had several property owners on the
northeast end of Temecula request annexation into the City. Director Thornhill asked if the
Commission preferred to have the projects brought forward for full Commission review or
appoint two Commissioners to serve on an ad-hoc committee.
Commissioner Chiniaeff and Commissioner Hoagland volunteered.
Planning Director Gary Thornhill advised the Commission that the Old Town Specific Plan has
received the Inland Empire Design Institute Award of Distinction. Director Thornhill added that
the design has also been submitted for an APA award.
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS
None
OTHER BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner Ford, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to adjourn at
10:00 P.M.
PCMIN06/07193 - 10- 6/13/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 7, 1993
The next meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on June 21, 1993, 6:00 P.M. at
Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Linda Fahey
Secretary
PCMIN06/07193 -11- 6/13/93
.]~VE 21, 1993
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 21, 1993
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on
Monday, June 21, 1993, at 6:00 P.M., 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. The
meeting was called to order by Chairman Linda Fahey.
PRESENT: 5
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
COMMISSIONERS: None
Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh,
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske and Recording Secretary Gall Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Aoproval of Aoenda
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff to
approve the agenda as mailed.
The motion was carried as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
None
Environmental Impact Report No. 340
Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske presented the staff report.
Commissioner Hoagland stated that he did not understand how a commercial project
has a negative impact on schools and libraries as shown in the E.I.R.
Debbie Ubnoske explained that the impacts to schools and libraries are a cumulative
result of the three projects.
PCMIN06121/93 -1 - O7/O1/03
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 21, 1993
Commissioner Blair questioned the E.I.R.'s reference to insignificant impacts on police
services.
Planner Ubnoske explained that the additional revenues generated by the Regional
Center will provide funds for required police protection services.
Chairman Fahey re-opened the public hearing at 7:25 P.M.
Barry Burnell, T & B Planning Consultants, 3242 Halladay Street, Suite 100, Santa
Ana, representing the applicant, had the following concerns regarding the Conditions
of Approval:
Plot Plan Condition No. I refers to 125,584 square feet for the Wal Mart store
and should read "approximate square footage".
Plot Plan Condition No. 2, requested it be amended to reflect the condition
would apply except for claims or action caused by the negligence of the City
of Temecula.
Plot Plan Condition No. 92, referring to bus bays, requested it be amended to
read "....shall be provided as shown on the site plan, the exact location being
subject to approval by the Riverside Transit Authority."
Plot Plan Condition No. 95, he stated their attorneys are not certain about some
of the language for this Condition and are currently working with the City
Attorney on these conditions.
It was moved by Commissioner Chiniaeff, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to 1 .)
Adopt Resolution No. 93-12, Adopting Environmental Impact Report No. 340 and
recommend Adoption of The Statement of Overriding Considerations proposed,
including statements to the effect that, in terms of libraries and school facilities, the
Plannning Commission feels there may not be significant impacts on schools and
libraries due to the revenues generated by this type of facility. 2.) Further, relating to
Sheriff services, revenues generated by this type of facility will be available to l~rovide
for the services at the discretion of the City Council and 3.) Approve the Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PCMIN06/21/93 -2- 07/01/93
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 21, 1993
Chanae Of Zone No. 93-0043, Plot Plan No. 243. Amd. No. 4 and Variance No. 9
Director Thornhill stated that staff feels the Variance is no longer required and
requested that the applicant withdraw the request.
Barry Brunell concurred with withdrawal of the Variance on behalf of the applicant.
Commissioner Ford suggested that Condition 25 (c), Page 17, be moved to "Prior To
Occupancy".
The Commission and the applicant's representative concurred with the modification.
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Ford to 1 .)
Recommend to the City Council Adoption of Resolution No. 93-14 approving Change
of Zone No. 93-0043, subject to modification of Condition No. 25 (c) end subject to
the addition of the Alhambra Group's recommendations on the landscape plan, and
modifications to Conditions No. 1, No. 2 and No. 95 (see page 2 of these minutes) as
requested by the applicant; and 2.) To recommend to the City Council Adoption of
Resolution No. 93-13 epproving Plot Plan No. 243 and the attached Conditions of
Approval.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
None
Parcel Mao No. 27323, Amd. No. 4
It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded. by Commissioner Ford to
recommend to the City Council Adoption of Resolution No. 93-15 approving Parcel
Map 27343, Amendment No. 4, subject to the change of any condition so that they
agree with the Change of Zone and Plot Plan conditions and to close the public hearing
at 7:00 P.M.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
0 COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Chiniaeff, Ford, Hoagland, Fahey
None
None
PCMIN06/21/93 -3- 07/O1
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
PLANNING DIRECTORS REPORT
None
JUNE 21.1993
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that after reviewing this project, he feels that there should be
a stated policy regarding street trees and suggested that staff bring the issue forward to the
City Council.
Director Thornhill advised that staff is currently working on a RFQ for design guidelines.
Commissiner Blair asked for discussion of agenda package materials ~rovided by applicant,
placed on the next agenda for discussion.
OTHER BUSINESS
None
ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Fahey declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on
Monday, July 19, 1993, 6:00 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive,
Temecula, California.
Chairman Linda Fahey
Secretary
PCMIN06/21193 -4- 07/01
ITEM #3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First
Extension of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of
Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A request for a one year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map
25059, a four lot subdivision of 5.51 acres.
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rencho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial ProfesSional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING
LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
Vacant
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Plot Plan No. 34.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar Items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is for the subdivision of 5.51 acres into four parcels. The proposed parcels will
accommodate one office building, two restaurants and a four level parking structure. The
building pads have previously been mass graded as part of the underlying map.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been the adding off a new condition of approval relevant
to the Western Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a
written offer to participate in, and waive ell rights to object to the formation of an Assessment
District, a Community Facilities District, or · Bridge end Major Thoroughfare Fee District for
the construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney." All new and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned Industrial Professional (I-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, no
further environmental assessment on PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First
Extension of Time is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval
will mitigate potential impacts which will be created by the project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged from that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
The proposed project is consistent with the present and future zoning and General Plan Land
Use Designations. All potential environmental impacts were addressed during the previous
approval and mitigations were incorporated into the conditions of approval.
FI:',S~ST~gPA93.PC 7114/93 kib 2
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059 are found
to remain valid except as amended herein.
No subsequent changes am proposed in the project which would require revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previously approval of this project.
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension
of Time will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft General Plan Land
use designation for the site is Business Park. The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the Proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348 and Ordinance 460.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed use is compatible proposed land use designation of Business Park.
10.
All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic 8s evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive.
11.
Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments:
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 4
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8
Exhibits - Blue Page 9
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059
Project Description: First one-year extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map
No. 25009, a subdivision 5.51 acres into 4 parcels.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-003
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25059, First Extension of Time shall comply with all
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The Developer shall comply with all the Condition of Approval set for the Tentative Parcel Map
25059 as approved by the City of Temecula City Council on January 15, 1991. The following
are the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this proiect, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A Grading Permit for precise (including all on-site flat work and improvements) grading
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
R:%S\STAFFRPT%gPA93,PC 7/12/93 klb 5
6. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board,
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent-(NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
10.
An erosion control plan in accordance with the City Standards shall be prepared by a
registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
11.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
12.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
13.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP
14. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
15.
The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public/private improvements within 18
months in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the
Department of Public Works.
A. Erosion control and slope protection.
16.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
17.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable 'IV standards.
18.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to
object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or
a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed
"Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of
the City Engineer and City Attorney.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
19.
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential
for more than 1 O0 people to be employed at this site.
20.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
21.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
22.
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICESAGENCY
RECEIVED
FEB 0 8
CITY OF TEMECULA DATE:
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
PLOT PLA/q NO. 34, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME (PA-93-0010)
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot plan No. 34.
Our comments of 10-09-9- will remain as stated with the
change in name for the contact person in Hazardous Materials
to Mike Daly.
We have no objections to extending this Plot Plan.
GD:dr
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICESAGENCY
TO:
FROM:
RE:
CITY OF TEMECULA DATE:
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
02-01-93
~REG DELLEMBACH, Environmental Mealth Specialist
PLOT PLAN NO, 34, 1ST EXTEM~ZON OF TIME (PA-93-0010)
The Department of Environmen%a1 Mealth has revieWe~ Case
PA93-00ZO~ 1st Extension Of Time for Plot plan NO. 34.
Our comments of 10-09-9- will remain ~s etated with the
change in name for the contact person in Hazardous Materials
to Mike D~ly.
We have no objections to extending this PlOt Plan.
GD:dr
RECEIVED
FEB ~ 1
Ans'd ............
CiL of Temecula
Planning Department
RECEIVED
D~OPIVI~-NT REVEEV~ CO~I1VItEi'~-H,
PROJECT TRANSIVul-EAL
FEB 18 1993
Ans'd .........---
The attached project has been scheduled for the Development Review Committee Meeting
of February 4, 1993.
Your written comments or attendance is requested. Please transmit written comments prior
to February 1. 1993.
The meeting will be held at:
City of Temecula
planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
If you have any questions regarding this project, please contact Craig Ruiz at (909) 694-6400.
Project Information:
Case No.:
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Applicant:
Proposal:
Location:
Intended
Environmental Action:
A.P.N.:
Case Planner:
Status:
Comments:
Preferred Equities
A proposed 276,000 square foot office/restaurant development of
5.5 acres.
West side of Ridge Park Drive, south of Rancho California
Road
Re-certify previously adopted Negative Declaration
940-310-033, 034, 037
Craig Ruiz
X New Project
Resubmittal: Previous DRC Date:
This project was first approved January 15, 1991.
The Riverside County Fire Department recommends
approval on the extension of time on PP 34 PA
93-0010. Please refer to the original letter
of condition dated 10/09/90.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Parcel Map No: 25059
Project Description: Four |4) Lot Industrial
Subdivision
Assessor's Parcel No.: 940-310-033, 034
and 037
Plannincl Department
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E, unless
modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request,
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration
date is January 15, 1993.
The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the
requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance
u,60,
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
Legal access as required by Ordinance ~60 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road.
All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers.
All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the City
Engineer. Street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be
submitted and recorded as directed by the City Engineer.
Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shal. I be subject to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular
to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and
purpose of the subdivision approval.
STA FFR PT\PP34
32
10.
11.
12.
An Association shall be established for maintenance of Lot u,. Open
Space/Common Area and the developer/applicant shall pay for all costs
relating to establishment of the Property Owners Association.
A copy of the final grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1 and a maximum vertical
height of thirty (30) feet. Setbacks from top and bottom of slopes shall
be a minimum of one-half the slope height.
b. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
All slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated
according to the City Development Code. A detailed landscaping and
irrigation plan, prepared by a qualified professional, shall be submitted to the
City Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of grading
permits.
All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan.
13. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
15.
Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the I-P {Industrial Park) zone.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes,
landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations
are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director.
Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be
forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department
and the Department of Building and Safety.
STAFFRPT\PP3u, 33
16.
Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the issuance of grading permits detailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall 'be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for
the following:
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be
opaque up to a minimum height of six {6) feet at maturity.
All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a
transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape
elements shall include earth betruing, ground cover, shrubs and
specimen trees. Front yards shall be landscaped and street trees
planted.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
Where street trees cannot be planted within right-d-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-
way.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
All exiating specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading
plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or
retained.
All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 3~
If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted ~ '
the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as
guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual
phases of development and shall include the following:
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of
areas which may be graded during the higher probability
rain months of January through March.
3. Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
b,. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-
graded incorporating the following grading techniques:
The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted
to the angle of the natural terrain.
Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form
shall reflect the natural rounded terrain.
The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves
with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the
slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal
length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be
curved in a continuous, undulating fashion.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall
provide evidence to the Director of Buildin9 and Safety that all
adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope
easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been
assigned as approvad by the Director of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontolagiet shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleentolagicel impacts. Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the palecntolaglst or
representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt
grading activity to allow recovery of fossils.
STAFFRPT\PP3u, 35
18.
19o
20.
21.
Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn.
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivision~s approved fire protection plan as
approved by 'the County Fire Marshal.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to,
parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front
yard landscaping.
Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shi!~
be satisfied:
All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. )f seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety.
landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection.
Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be datermined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
The subdlvider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employ:----
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Tentative
Parcel Map No. 25059, which action is brought within the time period provided
STAFFRPT\PP3u,
36
for in California Government Code Section 66u,99.37. The City of Temecula w~
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceed'
against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If
City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action. or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense. the subdlvider shall nat,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify. or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests. and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66~62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests
required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by
the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property
interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the developerrs cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
23.
All utility systems including gas, electric. telephone. water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provided. Telephone. cable TV, and)or security systems shall be pre-wired
in the residence.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater. shall be installe~
underground.
Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions/Reciprocal Access Easements:
25.
The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions {CCSR's) shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract
maps. The CCS R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining
the open space. recreation areas, parking areas, private roads. and exterior
of all buildin.~s.
26.
No le, dr dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation.
a-~'-ociation. property owner~s group, or similar entity has been formed with
the right to assass all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet
the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain. all of said mutually available features of the developmont. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CCF, R*s which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and)or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services.
Recorded CCS R ~s shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required
by the City as Conditions of Approval. The developor shall submit evidence
STAFFRPT\PP3~, 37
of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior
to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to
the City for public purposes.
27.
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either 11 ) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or {2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association, owning the common areas and facilities.
28.
Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. shall be
provided for in the CC~;R~s.
Enqineerincl Deloartment
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no coat to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements. traveled
ways. and drainage courses. and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
29.
The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act,
and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions.'
The fina) map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered
Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. u,60.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
31. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district:
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department: and
CATV Franchise.
CalTrans
STAFFRPT\PP3o, 38
33.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions |CCZ;R's) shall be
prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning,
Engineer and City Attorney. The CCSR~s shall be signed and acknowledge
by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed,
shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City.
The CCI;R~s shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The
CCSR~s shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. The CCSR's shall be prepared at the developer~s sole cost and expense.
The CCSR~s shall be in the form and content approved by the Director
of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials
deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents.
The CCSR~s and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner~s
Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent
with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC~;R~s shall provide for the effective establishment, operal. lon,
management, use. repair and maintenance of all common areas and
facilities.
The CCSR~s shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the
condition required by the CCE, R~s. then the City. after making due
demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and
perform, at the owner"s sole expense, any maintenance required
thereon by the CC~,R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be
subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
Street lights shall be provided along street_~ a~joining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. u,61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
Prior to recordation of the fina~ map, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal imoa,.~cs. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffi~ signal mitigation fee. he may enter into a written
agreement with tho City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit
~.rAFFRPT\PP3~
39
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
35.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in affect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thered, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineerincl
PRIOR TO RECORDATION:
36.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
37.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300' of laft turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
38.
Credit shall be given toward the developers signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
39.
The developer shall contribute 46 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
40.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the
remaining percentage of the construction costs, above his pro rata share, for
the signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
41.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
42.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
STAFFRPT\PP34 40
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing ant
striping plan.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions and the approved tr .rr~c
signal plan.
qS. All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3~
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:\S%STAFFRPT%9PA93.PC 7/12193 klb 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
VIC~[N~[TY flAP
CASE NO.: PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: A VICINITY MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19. 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT\gPA93.PC 7/12/93 Idb 1 C)
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: B SWAP MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
CITY OF TEMECULA
L F
CASE NO.: PA93-0009, Tentative Parcel Map 25059, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: C ZONING MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:~S\STAFFRPT\gPA93.PC 7/12/93 kJb 12
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, Rrst Extension of Time
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPROVE PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension
of Time Subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Preferred Equities
REPRESENTATIVE:
Anthony Polo
PROPOSAL:
A request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34, ·
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a
7,872 square foot restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure
containing 134,933 square feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres.
LOCATION:
Westerly side of Ridge Park Drive, approximately 70 feet south
of Rancho California Road.
EXISTING ZONING:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
I-P (Industrial Professional)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Business Park
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
BACKGROUND
The proposed project was previously approved by the Temecula City Council on January 15,
1991. The project was processed and approved concurrently with Tentative Parcel Map No.
25059.
Pursuant to the recently modified Approval Authority Ordinance, all extensions of time are
now heard by the Planning Commission as Consent Calendar items.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34 which includes a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot restaurant,
a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 scluare feet, and a building pad for a
proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acres.
ANALYSIS
The primary issue for this project has been adding · new condition relevant to the Western
Bypass Corridor. Condition No. 18 states "The Developer shall record a written offer to
participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a
Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the
construction of the proposed "Western Bypass Corridor." The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. All new and previously
approved projects subject to City approval that may impact the Western Bypass Corridor have
been required to meet this condition.
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned Industrial Professional (I-P) and adjacent parcels are also zoned I-P.
The proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. The SWAP
designation is Restricted Light Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the
requirements of the I-P Zone and Ordinance No. 348.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
For the original approval of this project a Negative Declaration was issued under the CEQA
guidelines. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved. Therefore, no
further environmental assessment on PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
is required. Mitigation measures contained in the conditions of approval will mitigate potential
impacts which will be created by the project.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project was previously approved by the City of Temecula. The project before
the Commission is unchanged from that which was previously approved. Minor changes to
the Conditions of Approval have been made to comply with new laws and City ordinances and
to protect the general health and safety of the citizens of Temecula.
FINDINGS
The findings for the original approval for Plot Plan No. 34 are found to remain valid
except as amended herein.
No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would recluire revisions to
the previously certified Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant
environmental impacts not considered in the previous approval of this project.
3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available.
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of
Time, will be consistent with the City's Draft General Plan, which will be completed
in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Draft General Ran Land
use designation for the site is Business Park. The proposed development is consistent
with the Business Park zone.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The
proposed use complies with City of Temecula Ordinance No. 348 and Ordinance 460.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due
to the fact that the proposed subdivision complies with the standards of Ordinance No.
348 and Ordinance 460.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures.
The project is compatible with surrounding proposed land uses. The harmony in scale,
bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties, due to the fact that similar uses are proposed for properties in the
vicinity of this project. :
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the area, due to the fact
that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed land use designation of
Business Professional.
10.
All lots have acceptable access to existing and proposed dedicated right-of-ways which
are open to, and are useable by, vehicular traffic as evidenced on the Tentative Parcel
Map showing access to Ridge Park Drive.
11. Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated
with these applications and herein incorporated by reference.
Attachments;
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
Previously Adopted Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 10
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
R:~SLqTAFFRF~IiIPA93.PC 7114/93 lrJb 4
A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 1
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First One Year Extension of Time
Project Description: A request for a one year time extension for Plot Plan No. 34, a
seven (7) story office building totaling 102,243 square feet, a 7,872 square foot
restaurant, a four (4) level parking structure containing 134,933 square feet, and a
building pad for a proposed 7,000 square foot restaurant on 5.51 acre site.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-130-O03
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
1. PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time shall comply with all previous
Conditions of Approval for Tentative Map No. 25059 (copies of which are attached)
unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following ere the Department of Public Works additional Conditions of Approval for this
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person
of the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
2. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
3. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
4. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guarantaeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
5. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
6. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
7. All required fees shall be paid.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
A Transportation Demand Management Program will be required if there is a potential
for more than 100 people to be employed at the site,
9. The underlying Parcel Map 25059 shell be recorded.
10. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards.
11.
The Developer shall show proof of a recorded written offer to participate in, and waive
all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities
District, or e Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the
proposed "Western Bypass Corridor". The form shall be subject to the approval of the
City Engineer and City Attorney.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
12.
All existing improvements damaged or broken due to the construction of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced as directed by the Department of Public
Works per current City Standards.
l~ST/b~1~J~T~l~tmA93.l~ 7/14/93 k~ 7
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
County rJ.-~ Chief
TO: CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CRAIG RUIZ
RE: PA93-0009 PARCEL MAP N0.25059
1st. EXTENSION OF TIME
February 8, 1993
'r'he Fire Deoartment has a objections, comments or conditions for
the granting of the extension of time.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be re-
~erred to the Planning and Engineering Staff.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Michael E. Gray,
Fire Captain Specialist
~trg ~ DIVT. SION
RECEIVED
FEB 16 1993
4~"dL_. ......
City of Temecula
Planning Department
DRVELOPNn~N'r REV~W CO.~
PROJECT TRANSPHTTAL
The attached project has been scheduled for the Development Review Committee Meeting
of February 4, 1993.
Your written commcnts or attendan~ is requested. ~iea~e transmit written comments Drier
to February 1. 1993.
The meeting will be held at:
City of Temecula
Planning Depaxtmcnt
43174 Business Park Ddve
Teme~ula, CA 92590
you have any questions regarding this project, plcase contact Craig Ruiz at (909) 694-(~00.
Project Information:
Case No.:
PA93-0010, 1st Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 34
Applicant:
Proposal:
Locstion:
Intended
Euvironrnenml Action:
A.P.N.:
Case Pla_rmer:
Status:
Comments:
Prdexred Equities
A proposed 276,00G square foot office/restaurant development of
5.5 acres.
We~ side of Ridge Park Dfivc, zu~ of Ranthe California
Road
h-cerdfy previously adopted Negative Declaxatton
940-310-033,034, 037
Cmlg Rub
New Project
ResubmivAl: Prcvlous DRC Date:
Th.h project was fn'st approvcd January 15, 1991.
The giverside County Fire Department recommends
approvalon the extension of time on PP 34 PA
93-0010. Please refer to the original letter
of condition dated 10/09/90.
February 3, 1993
RECEIVED
FEB D 8 1993
hns'd ............
Board of DIrectors:
John F. Hezznigar
Philllp L, Forbes
Kenneth C. J)-aly
Linda 1%1, Fregoso
Jennings, Engstrand
Mr. Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Water Availability, Parcel Map 25059
PA93-0009, First Extension of Time
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the properly owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, ff any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P. E.
Manager of Development Engineering
$E:SD:aj30/F18&
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY FEB 0 8 1993
TO:
CITY OF TEMECULA
ATTN: Craig Ruiz DATE:
02-01-93
~-GREG DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
FROM:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25059, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME
RE: PA93-0009
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0009, 1st Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
NO. 25059.
This Department has approved this map on 08-20-91. The
sewer "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal Water
District dated 05-09-90 required "the developer to complete
all necessary financial and other arrangements...as
determined by the District by November 1991o"
The Department of Environmental Health will, therefore,
require a current "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal
Water District at time of issuance of a Building Department
application.
Other than this requirement, we have no objections to the
Tentative Parcel Map from being extended.
GD:dr
County of Riverside
HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
TO:
CITY OF TEMECULA DATE:
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
02-01-93
~-GREG DELLENDACII, Envlronmental Mealth Speclalist ZV
FROM:
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 25059~ 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME
RE: PA93-0009
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Case No.
PA93-0009t 1st Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map
NO. 25059.
This Department has approved this map on 08-20-91. The
sewer "will-serve" letter from Eastern Municipal Water
District dated 05-09-90 required "the developer tO complete
all necessary financial and o~her arrangements...as
determined by the District by November 1991."
The Department of Environmental Health Will, thereforet
require a current "will-serve" letter from =astern Municipal
Water District et time of issuance of a Building Department
application.
Other then this requirement, we have no objections to the
Tentative Parcel Map from being extended.
GD:dr
ns'd ............
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S~STAF~P, PT\10PA93,PC 7/12/93
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No:
Project Description: 276,312.5 Square Foot
Office/Restaurant Development
Assessoris Parcel Nos.: 9~0-310-033, 034,
and 037
Planninq Department
The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for the development of a
276, 312.5 square foot office/restaurant development containing one ( 1 ) seven
17) story office building 1102,2~,3.5 square feet and 91 feet high); one {1)
7,872 square foot restaurant; one |1) four (b,) story parking structure
(13u,,933 square feet); and a future building pad only for a proposed 7,000
square foot restaurant on a 5.51 acre site.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees
to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecula, its
advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan
No. 34. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate
fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any
such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold
harmless the City of Temesula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. By use is meant the baginning of substantial
construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of
substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall
expire on January 15, 1993.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as
shown on Plot Plan No. 3~ marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-d-way.
The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Departmentis Conditions of
Approval which are included herein.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 18
10.
11.
Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three [3) copies of a
Parking, Landscaping, irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to ~'"
Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, speciL
and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all
requirements of Ordinance No. 3~8, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied
by the appropriate filing fee.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An
automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten |10) feet of an
entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty 130)
inches.
A minimum of 571 parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 3~8. 571 parking spaces shall be
provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit B. The parking area shall be
surfaced with aspbaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on u,
inches of Class II base.
A minimum of 8 handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit B. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be
identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain
on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of
Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height
if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade,
or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
pi;ce, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17
inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for physically
handicapped persons may be towed away at owner~s
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at
or by telephone "
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall
have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in
blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size.
Prior to the issuance of building permits° the applicant shall obtain clearance
and/or permits from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Engineering Department
Environmental Health
School District
Riverside County Flood Control
Fire Department.
STAFFR PT\PP3~ 19
12.
13.
1~,.
15.
16.
17,
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by
the Planning Director prior to occupancy.
Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit C.
Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit C {Color Elevations) and Exhibit D
{Materials Board), with the exception of the green rnonolithic 91azing ( Item
"B") which shall be non-reflective.
Rod-mounted equipment for the two {2) proposed restaurants shall be
shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning
Department approval.
No roof-mounted equipment shall be permitted for the proposed seven story
office building and four story parking structure within the project site.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy
permits. Each enclosure shall be six feat in height and shall be made with
masonry block and a steal gate which screens the bins from external view.
Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along
streets and within the parking areas.
All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval
and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No.
655.
This project is located within the vicinity of a subsidence zone. Prior to
issuance of any building permit by the Department of Buildin9 and Safety, a
letter of clearance from the Riverside County Geologist shall be submitted or
a California Licensed Soils Engineer or Goologiat shall submit a report to the
Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for subsidence.
Where hazard of subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation
measures must be demonstrated.
If determined to be within the Habitat Conservation Plan Study Area, prior to
the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance
No. 663 by paying the fea required by that ordinance which is based on the
gross acreage of the parcels proposed for development. Should Ordinance No.
663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to
the payment of the leas required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall
pay the lea required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by
County ordinance or resolution.
23 Class I bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved
by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area.
STAFFRPT\PP3~,
20
Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts
to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee
installation of plantinge, walls, and fences in accordance with the approw
plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filecl
with the Department of Building and Safety.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, all required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have ben installed and be in a condition acceptable to the
Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed
and in good working order.
25.
All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater. shall be installed
underground.
26.
Prior to the sale of any structure as shown on Exhibit D, a land division shall
be recorded in accordance with Riverside County Ordinance No. l~60 and any
other pertinent ordinance.
27.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or building permit, the developer
or his successorts interest shall submit a mitigation monitoring program which
shall describe how compliance with required mitigation measures will be mat
and the appropriate monitoring timing of the mitigation. The applicant shall
reimburse the City for all monitoring activity cost.
All of the foregoing conditions Shall be complied with prior to occupancy or
any use allowed by this permit.
29.
The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests. and if he or she should fall to do so. the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal for building permit. enter into an
agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Covernment Code Section
66~t62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the
improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer
of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests
required in connection with the project. Security for a portion of these costs
shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal
report obtained by the developer. at the developer~s cost. The appraiser
shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
30.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, a certificate of Parcel Merger or Lot
Line Adjustment shall be approved by the Engineering Department.
Riverside County Fire Department
The Fire Department is required to sat a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in
Ordinance 51~6.
STAFFR PT\PP3~
21
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
42.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM
for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be
available before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants { 6"x~l"x2 1/2x2 1/2 ),
will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feat from any portion of
the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required
fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant~ s) in the system.
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process
to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in
fire protection measures.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings requiring a fire flow
of 1500 GPM or greater. The post indicator valve and fire department
connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building{ s). A statement that the building J s) will
be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the
building plans.
install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as
required by the Uniform Building Code,
A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinklered must
appear on the title page of the building plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of the Uniform
Building Code. Low-level exit signs, where exit signs are required by
Section 3314{a).
Certain designated areas will be required to be maintained as fire lanes.
install portable fireextlnguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-10BC. Contact
a .certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be
responsible to submit a check or money order in the amount of $558.00 to the
Riverside County Fire Department for plan check fees.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall deposit with the
Riverside County Fire Department, a check or money order equaling the sum
of 25 cents per square foot as mitigation :for fire protection impacts, This
amount must be submitted separately from the plan check review fee.
Bui Iding "C" must meet hlghrise life safety requirements per Riverside County
Ordinance 5~6, Section 801, parking garage install Class I I I standpipe system.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the
Building and Safety Office.
STAFFRPT\PP3u,
22
Enqineerinq Department
The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for tl
project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering
Department.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
u,5. The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control district;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Engineering Department;
Riverside County Health Department; and
CATV Franchise.
The developer shall submit four |1~) copies of a soils report to the Engineering
Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to
commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-d-
way.
If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion
control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be
submitted and approved by the Engineering Department.
Prior to any work being performed in public right-d-way, fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office.
50, The developer shail provide clearance from all applicable agencies and pay all
fees prior to the approval of plans.
51. All work done within the City right-d-way shall have an encroachment permit.
52.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
STAFFRPT\PP3~
23
53. A drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted
through the undersidewalk drains.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
55.
A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for
review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil
Engineer for location and elevation, and the 5oil Engineer shall issue a Final
Soils Report addressing compact(on and site conditions.
56.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the
Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for
traffic signal impact.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
57.
Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the
City Engineer.
58.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee, If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally
established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for
the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement
for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to
Developer. Developer understands that said agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest
such increase.
Transportation Enqineering
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS:
59.
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California Road
and Ridge Park Drive.
60.
A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Ridge Park Drive. Based on the Traffic Study, these plans shall be
designed to provide for 300~ of left turn storage capacity on westbound
Rancho California Road to southbound Ridge Park Drive.
STAFFRPT\PP3u,
2~
61.
The developer shall contribute 0,6 percentage for the construction costs of the
signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
62.
The developer may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the City for the
remaining percentage of the construdtion costs, above his pro rate share, for
the signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive.
63.
Credit shall be given toward the developeris signal mitigation fees for the
design and construction of the signal at Ridge Park Drive and Rancho
California Road.
Plans for traffic signal interconnect shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the City Engineer along Rancho California Road
from Diaz Road to Ridge Park Drive.
65.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering
for the design requirements.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
66.
All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
67.
The traffic signal at Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive shall be
installed and operational per the special provisions, and the approved traffic
signal plan.
68. All traffic signal interconnects shall be installed per the approved plan.
STAFFRPT\PP3~ 25 '
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
R:~S\STAFFRPT~IOPA93.1~'C 7/12/93 klb 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
VICINITY NAP
~:IT TO SCALE
CASE NO.: PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: A VICINITY MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:%S\STAFFRPT',IOPA93.1P'C 7/12/93 kt
CITY OF TEMECULA
A
pLA;
CASE NO.: PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: B SWAP MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~IOPA93.lK: 7112193 LIb ]. ],
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0010, Plot Plan No. 34, First Extension of Time
EXHIBIT: C ZONING MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRFB10pA93.PC '7112193 klb 12
ITEM #5
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0104, Plot Plan
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-_ approving PA93-0104, Plot
Plan based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the
Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval; and
ADOPT Negative Declaration for PA93-0104, Plot Plan.
Basics Etc. Corporation
Jeff Hardy & Associates
A request for approval of a 17,342 square foot tilt-up
commercial/warehouse building for warehousing and distribution
of car accessories.
Northerly side of McCabe Court, approximately 300 feet westerly
of Madison Avenue.
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
North:
South:
East:
West:
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC - City of
Murrieta)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M~SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area: 44,001 square feet
Building Area: 17,342 square feet
Landscape Area: 7,709 square feet
Paved Area: 18,561 square feet
Parking Required: 39 spaces
Parking Provided: 39 spaces
Standard: 30 spaces
Compact: 7 spaces
Handicap: 2 spaces
Building Height: 26 feet
BACKGROUND
The proposed building is located on parcel 16 of Parcel Map 23561-2. The building pad has
previously been mass graded as part of the underlying map.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is proposed on a 1.01 acre parcel. The proposed project is a single story concrete
tilt-up commercial/warehouse building. It will be used by Basics Etc. for the storage and
distribution of car accessories which use is currently conducted at their existing location on
Business Park Drive. Access to the site is provided by an existing curb-cut to McCabe Court.
ANALYSIS
The proposed building will be the first to be constructed in this vicinity. A primary concern
of staff is that the building be adequately screened from the I-15 freeway to the east and to
future construction in the area.
Landscaping along the easterly property line is sufficient to provide screening to the I-15
freeway and to future buildings. Staff and the applicant have worked together to
architecturally enhance the westerly elevation of the building by adding more articulation to
this area. The loading area in the front has been screened by increasing the vegetation along
the screen wall to effectively screen the trucks when they are loading and unloading.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0104, Plot Plan, will likely be consistent with the
City's future General Plan due the fact that the proposed commercial/warehouse building is
consistent with the Draft General Plan Land Use Designation of Service Commercial.
R:\S\STAFFRPT\104PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb 2
This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the requirements for this zone.
This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) since it is designated as Light
Industrial on the plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Initial Study was prepared for PA93-0104, Plot Plan, and it revealed no significant impacts
that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. The building pad has previously been
mass graded as part of the underlying map. Environmental concerns relative to this parcel
were mitigated under the previously adopted Negative Declaration for the underlying Parcel
Map No. 23561-2. Therefore, Staff recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project as proposed meets all the requirements of Ordinance No. 348. The landscaping
has been designed to adequate screen the parking lot and the loading area in the front of the
building. All environmental impacts have been reduced to insignificant levels by the mitigation
measures contained in the conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0104, Plot Plan, will likely be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and
in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the proposed commercial/warehouse
building is consistent with the existing Manufacturing Service Commercial zoning and
the Draft General Plan Land Use Designation of Service Commercial.
This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) since it is designated
as Light Industrial on the plan.
This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the requirements for
this zone.
This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since all the impacts
have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the structures,
the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
Attachments:
1. Resolution - Blue Page 4
2. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
3. Initial Study - Blue Page 18
4. Exhibits - Blue Page 19
5 A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S%STAFFRv'r%104PA93,PC 7114/93 klb 4
ATrACttMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
TITE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PA93-0104, PLOT
PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 17,342 SQUARE FOOT TILT-UP
COMMERCIAL/WAREHOUSE BUILDING FOR
WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION OF CAR
ACCESSORI~-S ON A PARCEL LOCATED ON ~
NORTHERLY SIDE OF MC CABE COURT,
APPROXIMATRI,Y 300 FEET WEST OF MADISON
AVENUE AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-
202-045.
W'HRREAS, Jeff Hardy fried PA93-0104, Plot Plan, in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, winch the City has adopted
by reference;
WtlEREAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WtlRREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
application on July 19, 1993, at winch time interested persons had opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition to said application and;
WI~.REAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said application;
NOW, .TFrEREFORE, TITE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following fmdings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb 5
a. Them is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. Them is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest potion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The City is proceeding in atimely fashion with a preparation of the general
plan.
2. The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this rifle, each
of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that the said application will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time since the project is consistent with the existing SWAP and zoning
designation.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since the project is compatible with surrounding development.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the foliowing
findings can be made:
1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO4PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb 6
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Plot Plan,
makes the following f'mdings, to wit:
1. There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0104, Plot Plan, will likely
be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time
and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the proposed commercial/warehouse
building is consistent with the existing Manufacturing Service Commercial zoning and the Draft
General Plan Land Use Designation of Service Commercial.
2. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) since it
is designated as Light Industrial on the plan.
3. This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the
requirements for this zone.
4. This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since
all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the
structures, the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Adoption of the Negative Declaration for PA93-
0104, Rot Plan is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves PA93-0104, Plot Plan to construct a 17,342 squaxe foot ~t-up industrial building and
known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-202-045 subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, AlPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 1993.
LINDA L. FAHEY
CHAIRMAN
R:\S\STAFFRPT%'IO4PA93.pC 7113193 klb 7
I FI~.R!~.Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of July,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOP_,S:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNI-m
SECRETARY
R:\S~STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7113/93 klb 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S\STAFFRPT%lO4PA93.pC 7/13/93 klb 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA93-0104, PLOT PLAN
Project Description: A request for approval of a 17,342 square foot tilt-up
warehouse building for the distribution/storage of car accessories.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-202-045
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning PA93-0104, Plot Plan. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the
permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and
will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of
any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the
permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
PA93-0104, Plot Plan, marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
4. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B.
Monument signage elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on
Exhibit A. This approval does not include any wall mounted signs.
Colors and materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B (material board).
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.pC 7/13/93 klb 10
Materials: Walls Colors:
Accent Trim
Windows
Window Trim
Igloo (Frazee 5510W)
Blue Diamond (Frazee 508W)
Greylite 14 Glazing
Black Aluminum
m
A minimum of thirty-nine (39) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with
Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Thirty-nine parking spaces shall
be provided as shown on the Approved Exhibit A.
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shalJ be provided as shown on
Exhibit A.
9. Three (3) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided as shown on Exhibit A.
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
10.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Three
Hundred Dollars ($1,300.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred and
Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollar ($50.00) County administrative fee to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources
Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning
Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
11.
The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that
ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for
development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the
applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
12.
The applicant shall make an application for a consistency check with the Department
of Building and Safety and shall pay the appropriate filing fee. The applicant shall pay
the appropriate Landscape Inspection Fee to the Building and Safety Department.
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans consistent with the
approved Conceptual Landscape Plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety
Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
14. All roof top equipment shall be architecturally screened from ground view.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13193 klb 11
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
15.
All roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground
view.
16.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation
plans.
17.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at
least 3 square feet in size.
18.
Performance securities, in the amount equal to the total cost of landscaping and
irrigation including labor and material to guarantee adequate maintenance of the
landscaping for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Planning.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
20.
The applicant shall provide additional landscaping to screen various components of the
project if deemed necessary by the Planning Director.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~104PA93 .PC 7/13/93 kJb 12
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
21.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
22.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
23.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
contiguous to the site.
plans shall be
improvements
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
24.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
25.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
26.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval.
27.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
28.
An erosion control plan in accordance with the City Standards shall be designed by a
registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
29.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO4PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb 13
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
Adequate provision shall be made for the acceptance and disposal of surface
drainage entering the property from adjacent areas.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans and/or
precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No.
207A.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO4PA93.PC 7/13193 klb 14
37. All required fees shall be paid.
38.
Handicapped ramps shall be provided within the public right-of-way. The existing street
light may have to be relocated for provision of the handicapped ramps.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
39.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department;
Planning Department; and
Department of Public Works.
41. All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
42. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works.
43.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report a. ddressing compaction
and site conditions.
44.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
45.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of
Occupancy.
46.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building p~rmits for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
$10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.pC 7/13/93 klb 15
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY:
47.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison;
Southern California Gas;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works; and
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
48.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights.
49.
There are existing and adequate dedicated right-of-way and improvements along
McCabe Court. However, the improvements shall be reviewed and if damaged or
broken due to construction of this project, those facilities shall be repaired or removed
and replaced as directed by the Department of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
50.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Code.
51.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with
Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
52. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
53.
All existing buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped
accessibility regulations.
54.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior
lighting, fire alarm systems.
55.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
56.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R:%S%STAFFRPT\lO4PA93,pC 7/13/93 klb 16
57. If bullpen area contains any product storage, provide other means of exit from the
office area.
OTHER AGENCIES
58.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated June 3, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
59.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated June 7, 1993 a
copy of which is attached.
60.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated June 7, 1993 a copy of which is attached.
61.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control District transmittal dated June 16, 1993 a copy of which is attached.
62.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated June 4, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13/93 kib 17
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA
~omllental
PLOT PLAN NO. PA93-0104
Health Specialist IV
DATE: June 3, 1993
C~l~~' ~
RECEIVED
J U N 10 1993
Ans'd ..............
Depaa hnent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA93-0104 and
has no objections. PRIOR TO BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL, the following are
required:
1. Itqll-serve letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
2 If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department
of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (358-5055)
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
a. Underground storage tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185.1).
d. Waste reduction management.
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
jUN-07-93 MON 14:09 P. 06
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
June 7e
TO,- City of Temecula
ATTN: Craig Ruiz
PA ~5-0104
RECEIVED
J U N O 8 1993
s'd ..........
With respect to the Conditions of approval regarding the above
referenced plans th~ Fire Department reCc~nmends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
CGunty Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The firs Department is required to set a minimum fire flow
for the remedel or construction of all commercial buildings
using the procedure established in Ordinance 546,
Provide or show there exists a water system capable. of
delivering ,'q)OO BPM for a 3 hc~Jr duration at 20 PSI residual
operating pressure, which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the job site,
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 112"X2 1/2"), located not less than 25 feet
or mere than 165 feet from any portion of the building as
measurL~d alonq vehicular travel ways.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to submit written
Certification from the water company noting the location of
the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water
system is capable of delivering 3000 GPM fire flow for a 3
hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, If a
water System currently does not exist, the applicant/de-
veloPer shall be responsible to provide written certifica-
ti~ that financial arrangements have been made to provide
them,
fiRE pREVRNllON DIVISION
PLANNING ~'ECTJION
O IND%O O~ICE
79-733 C,x)o~lwy Caub I)~v~ ~l R ~ CA f2201
(619) g634SS6 · PAX (619) 163-7072
JUN-07-93 HON 14:10 P, 07
RE: PA ~5-0104 Page 2
91ue retroreflective pavement markers shall be mounted on
private streets, public streets end driveways to indicate
locatio~ of fire hydrants. Prior to ins~llation, placement
of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire
Department.
Applicent/Developer shall separately submit t~o copy of
the water system plans to the Fire I~partmefit for review,
Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and the ~ystem shalZ c==t the fire flow require-
ments, Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil
engineer and the local water company with the foliowing
certification= 'I certify that the design of the water
system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by
the Riverside County Fire Department',
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings
requiring a fire flow of 1500 6PH or greater, The post
indicator valve and fire department cennecti~n shall be
located to the frmts within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 23 feet from the building(s). A statecot that
the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must
be included on the title page of the building plans.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to install a U.L.
Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System. That monitors
fire sprinkler system water flow, P.I.V,'s and all control
valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval prior to installation.
Applicant/Developer shell be responsible to install a manual
and automatic fire Rlarm System. Plans must be submitte~
to the Fire Department f~r approval prior to installation,
A statement that the building will be automatically fire
sprinkled must appear on the title page of the building
plans,
10,
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter ~ of
the Uniform Building Code. All illuminated exits shall be UL
e24 Listed. Low-level Exit Signs, Where exit signs are
required by Section 914 (a).
FIRE LANES
11.
The applicant shall prepare and suOmit to the Fire Depart-
ment for approval, a site plan designating required fare
lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs.
JUN-07-93 NON 14:10 P, 08
RE,' P~ 9-~--0104
Page
Install portable fire extinguiGhef"s with a minimum rating of
2A--IOBC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public
areas shall be in recessed cabinets m~Jnted 48" (inches) to
center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch) projection
from the wall. ~ontact Fire Department for proper placement
of equipment prior to installation.
[~LIILDING(~) .~PCESS
Knox Key lock boxe~ shall be installed ~ all buildings/
suites. If building/suite requires Hazardous
Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the
Knox HAZ MAT Data and key ~torage cabinets shall be
installed. If buildings/suites are protected by a fire
or burglar alarm system, the ~xes will require "Tamper"
monitoring. Plans must be submitted to the Fire
Deparbaent for approval prior to installation.
Prior to issuance of building permitsm the applicant/de
Voleper shall be responsible to submit a check or money
order in the amount of $558.00 to the Riverside County Fire
Department for plan check fees.
Final conditions will be addres~d when building plans are
reviewed in the Building and Safety Office,
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be
referred to tP~ Riverside County Fire department Planning
division staff.
MA:ma
RAYMOND H. RESIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Fire Safety Specialist
Board of Directors
Doug Kulberg
Jeffrey L IV[inkier
Richard D. StelTey
John F. Hennlgar
Phillip L. Forbes
Ken,eth C. Dealy
Linda 51. Fregoso
June 7, 1993
RECEIVED
Mr. Craig D. Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
SUBJECI': Water Availability
Parcel Map 23561-2, Lot 16
J U N 0 8 1993
hns'd ........... :
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~St
Manager of Development Engineering
Sll:SO:el:~:$-1/F18~5
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
KENNETH L EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Ladies artd Gentlemen:
RECEIVED
dUN 18
CiTY OF TEMECtJL/~
The District does not normally recommend conditiorls for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not
plan chec~ city land use Cases, or provide State Division of Rest Estate letters or other Itood hazard reports for such cases. District
commemsJrecommendatio{,,s for such cases are normally limited to items of apecific intwe~t to the Dimriot including District Maater D'ainage Plan
radiities, other regional flood contrd and drainaee facilities which could de {;o~sidored a logical component or extef~Ion of a master plan system,
and DisTrict Area Dtsinage Ran fe~s (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed Ixoject in detail ~ The following checked comments do not in 8ny way constitute or imply District
8pprovsi or endorseme~ of the proposed pro~ect with respect to flood hazard, pul~ic heath and safety or any other such issue:
[~'t'~is project would not de impacted by District Master Drainage Ran facilities nor ate other facilities of regional intarest proposed.
['~This pto~ec~ involves District Master Plan facilities. The Dislrict will accept ownership of such facilities on wrffi[en request of ~ City. Facilities
mum de constructed to District standards, and District plan chec~ and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Ran
inspection and administrative fees will de required.
['~This pro~ect proposes chartntis, storm drsins 36 indrms or larger in diameter, or other facilities That could be conaldered regional in p
and/or a logical extension of ~e adopted Master Drainage Ran. The District would mnsider ~
ownership of such facilities on written request of the C,~y. Facilities must be cot~stnjcted to District standards, and District plan chec~ and
."2::: ::::. o"' ,.
of a parcel map or subdivision prior to recordation of The finsi map. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the Tim of recordation,
or if delerred, ~T the Time Of issuance of The actual permit.
GENERAl INFORMATION
This !~oied may require a NaTionsi PdlutanT Disoharge Biminstion System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources C~mtrol Board.
Clearance for grading, rec~x'dation, or other finsi approval, should not be given unTil the City has detarmined that the FojecT has bee~ granted a
permit or is shown to be exempt.
If This project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agar~cy (FEMA) maplad flood plsin, Thort the City should require ~e applicant to
provide all sludies, caJcuiations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that The applicant
dotsin ·CoP, diTional Letter Of Ma,o Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recorda~on or other final approvsi Of the pro~ect, and 8 I..a~ar of Map
Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural waterc~Jrse or mapped flood plain is impacted by This projet1 The City should require The adplicatIT TO Obtain a Section 1601/1603
Agreement from The California Depa/lment Of Fish and Game end a Clean Water Act Section 404 IXk"mit from The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, or wTffian cctrespondence from These ageP. oes indicating the Ixoject ts exempt from These requirements. A Clean Water Acl Sealion
404 Water Quality Certification may de required from the local California Regional Water Quality Cofltrd Board p~or to issuance of The Corps
404 permit.
Very truly yours,
DUSTY WILLIAMS
Senior Civil Engineer
Oat,: (,, ' I G,
Easter'. Municipal ater District
June 4, 1993
RECEIVED
V~Craig Ruiz, Case Planner
Temecula Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: PA 93-0104 (Basics Etc. Corporation)
J U N 0 9 lS93
Ans'd ...........
t:22
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project.
Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed office/warehouse facility located on the
northerly side of McCabe Court, approximately 150 feet west of Madison Avenue.
The subject project is located within the District' s sanitary sewer service area. However, it must
be understood the available service capabilities of the District' s systems are continually changing
due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement.
As such, the provision of service wil/be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the
timing of the subject project, the stares of the DisU'ict's permit to operate, and the service
agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project.
The developer must an'ange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan
of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels
of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909)
925-7676, extension 409, as follows:
Written request for a "plan of service"
Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive
development projects or projects located in difficult to serve geographic areas.
Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, Sanjacimo · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hemer, CA
Craig Ruiz
City of Temecula
June 4, 1993
Page 2
Hans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project.
Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans.
Sanitary Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water
Reclamation Facility.
The nearest existing and available Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation sanitary sewer
facilities to the subject project are as follows:
Gravity-flow sewer pipeline aligned along McCabe Court, approximately 350 feet west
of Madison Avenue.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office
at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
Very truly yours,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
David G. Crosley 7
Senior Engineer /
AB 93-653 t
DGC/clz
(wp-ntwk-pa930104.clz)
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PAg3.PC 7/13/93 klb 18
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
II.
Name of Project:
Basics Etc.
Case Numbers:
PA93-0104, Plot Plan
Location of Project:
The northerly side of McCabe Court, approximately 300' westerly of
Madison Avenue
Description of Project: The construction of a 17,342 square foot office/warehouse building
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
June 22, 1993
Name of Proponent:
John Kupka
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
43300 Business Park Drive, Suite B-1
Temecula, California 92591
(909) 699-9997
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
I. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? __ __ __X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil? X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? __ __ X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? _ _ __X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? X
f. Changes in siltatinn, deposition or erosion? __ __ __X
g The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? X
Ye~ Maybe No
R:~S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.1ES 6122/93 tjs
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
Maybe No
X
X
X
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~304PA93.1ES 6122193 t~
Yes Maybe
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatenS, or
endangered species of plants? _ __
c. Introduction of new species of plants inw an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? __ __
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __ _
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthie organisms, and/or insects)? _ __
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals? __ __
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? _ __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __ _
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? __ __
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _ _
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations? __ __
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? X
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? .X. _
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? _ _
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? __ _
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _ _
N,_,q
R:\S%STAFFRPTV04PA93JES 6122193 tjs 3
YeS Maybe
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesficides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)? __ __
b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticicles, chemicals,
or radiation)? __ __
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan? __ __
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area? __ _
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing? __
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation? __ __
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods? __ __
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? __ __
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities7
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~SXSTAFFRPT~104PA93JES 6/22/93 tjs 4
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services:
15, Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __
b. Communications systems? __
c. Water systems? __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? _
e. Storm water drainage systems? __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
YeS
Maybe
19.
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? _
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __
X
R:'~S\STAFFRPTH04PA93.1ES 6/22/93 t~ 5
20.
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleQ. ntologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe
R:%S~STAFFRPT%104PA93.1ES 6122/93 t~ 6
III. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONS, H~NTAL IMPACTS
Earth
l.a.
No. Although the proposed project will result in minimal grading there will not be changes in the
base geologic substructures. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
l.b.
Yes. All development disrupts the soil proffie to some degree and results in soil displacement,
compaction and over-covering. A grading plan w~l be certified by the Engineering Department
which will mitigate any potential impacts.
1.C.
No. The proposed site is currently graded and further development of the proposed project will
not require substantial grading and as a result will not alter the existing topography. Therefore,
no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.d.
No. There are no unique geelogic or physical features on the site. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.e.
Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the construction phase and remain
high until disturbed areas are replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and significant
but will be mitigated through minimal grading and use of watering trucks and hydro-seeding
disturbed areas after grading.
1.f,
No. There is no body of water near the project site which could be affected by the proposed
project. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.g.
No. There will be no modification of water course or body of water. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
l.h
No. The project site is not located in an area identified in the City's Draft General Plan as having
potential for liquefaction and subsidence. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
1.i. No. The project is not within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
Air
2.a.
Yes. This project will have a short term impact due to construction related activkies and a
cumulative impact on the overall air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. This impact is not
considered significant since the air emissions from this project are not expected to exceed the South
Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) CEQA handbook thesholds of significance.
2.b. No. The proposed project will not result in the creation of objectionable odors.
No. The proposed project will not result in an alteration of air movement, temperatures, or
moisture or any change in climate either locally or regionally.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs 7
Water
3.a.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the
project will not have a significant effect on any body of water.
3.b.
Yes. The proposed project will increase the amount of impermeable surfaces on the site which will
reduce the amount ofwater absorption. Ahydrologystudy prepared for the project has determined
that existing drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the increased surface runoff.
Therefore, it is not anticipated that the project will not have a significant effect on any body of
water.
3.c.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated due to the fact that the project will not result in changes to the course or flow of flood
waters.
3.d.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts resulting
in changes in the amount of surface water in any water body are anticipated as a result of this
project.
3.e.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated due to the fact that the project will not result in discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality.
3 .f,g.
No. The proposed project, as designed, will not interfere with the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters or ground water quantities.
3.h.
No. Due to the small size of the project, it is not anticipated that there will be a significant effect
on the public water supply or system.
No. The project is not located in the 100-year flood plain or in a area that is subject to flooding.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated due to the fact that the project will not expose
people or property to water related hazards such as flood.
PlantLife
4.a.
No. The project site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants
on the site. Therefore there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
4.b.
No. The project site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants
on the site. Therefore there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
4.c.
No. While this project will introduce new species of plants through the addition of landscaping,
the site has been previously graded and there are no native species on this site. Therefore there
will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
4.d.
No. This property is not currently used as farm land and is not identified in the Draft General Plan
as an area of agricultural significance. Therefore there will be no significant impacts as a result
of this project.
R:%SXSTAFFRPT%104PA93.11~S 6122/93
Animal Life
5.a,c,d,e. No. The proposed project is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a number of
years. The site is currently graded and there is no indication that any wildlife species exists at this
location. Therefore there will be no significant impacts to animal life as a result of this project.
5.b.
No. The site is currently graded and is in an area that has been experiencing urbani:,ation for a
number of years. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area.
Habitat Conservation fees have been paid as part of the underlying parcel map to mitigate the effect
of cumulative impacts.
Noise
6.a.
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporar'~y during construction. Construction related
impacts will be mitigated through the standard conditions of approval for construction activities
which will be imposed by the Public Works Department. Long-term noise impacts will occur due
to increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since the surrounding
land uses are not noise sensitive.
6.b,c.
No. Severe noise and severe vibrations will not be generated by the proposed project. Therefore
there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
Light and Glare
Yes. The project site is located within the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District.
The lighting standards within this district require that only low pressure sodium street and security
lights be installed and all other lighting must be oriented or shielded to reduce the glare in the night
sky near the observatory. The impact of the additional light and glare will be mitigated by
following the standards of the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District (Ordinance No.
655) and through the appropriate design of the lighting system.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. This site is currently vacant. However, the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan designates the
subject site as Service Commercial. The surrounding land uses are also designated Service
Commercial. The current zoning is Manufacturing Service Commercial. The intensification of the
proposed use is not anticipated to be significant due to the fact that the proposed project is
consistent with current and future land use designations.
8.b.
No. The proposed development will be consistent with the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan
designation of Service Commercial and the current zoning designation of General Commercial.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Natural Resources
9.a,b.
No. This project, due to its' small size and nature, will not result in an increase in the rate of use
of any natural resource or the depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource.
R:~S\STAFFRPT~104PA93,1ES 6/22/93 tjs 9
Risk of Upset
lO.a,b.
No. It is not anticipated that this project will use or store hazardous materials. However, prior
to any on-site storage, transport, or disposal of any hazardous substances, clearance shall be
obtained from the Riverside County Health Department and the Riverside County Fire Department.
The project will be conditioned to insure that the project complies with all recommendations of
these agencies. The mitigations proposed by these agencies will reduce the potential impacts below
a level of significance.
lO.c.
No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with
emergency vehicles. If street or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City and
Sheriff Department.
Population
11.
No. The proposed use will generate some jobs. The project may have a cumulative impact on the
regions population but is not considered to be significant due to the small size of the project.
Housing
12.
No. The small size of the proposed project will not generate a significant number of jobs to create
a demand for additional housing. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this
project.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.
No. This project will generate additional vehicular movement. However, a traffic study prepared
for this project determined that increases in traffic volume are not considered to be significant. The
previous improvements to the streets for the underlying parcel map will be sufficient to handle the
increased traffic. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b.
Yes. The project will create a need for additional parking spaces. The project has been designed
to meet the City's requirements for parking. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a
result of this project.
13.c.
No. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to and from the site. However, the
traffic study prepared for this project has determined that this increase will not be significant. The
traffic that is generated by the project may add an incremental impact to the 1-15 interchanges
which are currently operating at capacity during peak hours. This potential impact will be
mitigated by a transportation improvement mitigation fee. There will not be a significant impact
upon existing transportation system due to the small size of the project.
13.d.
No. The project has been designed so that there will not be alterations to present paRems of
circulation or movement of people and/or goods. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts
as a result of this project.
13.e.
No. Due to the small size and nature of the proposed project, there will be no impacts to
waterborne, rail or air traffic.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO4PA93.1ES 6~22~93 tjs
13.f.
Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or
pedestrians. The previous improvements to the streets for the underlying parcel map will be
sufficient to reduce the impact to a level of non-significance.
Public Services
14.a,b,e.
No. The project will require public services in the areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and
public facilities. The project has been eonditioned to pay impact fees to help mitigate any potential
impacts.
14.c,d,f. No. Due to the small size of the proposed project, there will be nO substantial effects on these
public services.
Energy
15.a,b.
No. Due to the small size of this project, the project will not result in the use of substantial
amounts of fuel or energy or substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts
as a result of this project.
Utilities
16.a,b,c,
d,e,f,g.
No. Adequate utilities exist for this project. The project has been conditioned to meet the
requirements of all utilities to insure that any impacts will be mitigated to below a level of
significance.
Human Health
17.a,b.
No. The proposed project, as designed, does not pose a potential health hazard. The project is
not located near a sensitive receptors. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
Aesthetics
18.a,b,c.
No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open to the public. The elevations of
the proposed project are consistent in architectural materials to the surrounding buildings.
Therefore there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
Recreation
19.
No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses nor will the project create the need
for additional facilities. Therefore there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%104PA93.1ES 6/22/93
Cultural Resources
20.a.
No. The City's Draft General Plan does not identify this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for
Archaeological Resources". The site is currently graded. Therefore, there will be no significant
impacts as a result of this project.
20.b.
No. The project site is vacant and does not contain any known prehistoric buildings, structures or
objects. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
20.c.
No. The project site is vacant and its' development is not expected to significantly impact any
known unique ethnic values. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this
project.
20.d.
No. The project site is vacant and is not known to have any existing religions or sacred uses.
Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
R:%S\STAFFRPT%104PA93.1ES 6/22/93
12
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Yes Maybe No
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Ye~
N__o
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93,1ES 6~22~93 tie 13
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I fred that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the envkonment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I fred that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Craig D, Ruiz, Assistant Planner
Name and Ti~e
lune 22. 1993
Date
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\S\STAFFRP'r%104PA93,PC 7/13/93 klb 19
CITY OF TEMECULA
~ .
CASE NO.: PA93-0104, Plot Plan
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
VICINITY MAP
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.pC 7113193 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0104, Plot Plan
EXHIBIT: B
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
SWAP MAP
R:\S\STAFFRPT~lO4PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NO.: PA93-0104, Plot Plan
EXHIBIT: C
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
ZONING MAP
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93,PC 7/13193 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
/ILDING ~"' ~.
/
CASE NO.: PA93-0104, Plot Plan
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
SITE PLAN
R:\S\STAFFRPT~104PA93.PC 7/13193 klb
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
1. ADOPT The Negative Declaration for PA93-0089,
Conditional Use Permit; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 93- approving PA93-0089,
Conditional Use Permit based on the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval; and
RECOMMEND to the City Council Changing of the Draft
General Plan Land Use Designation for the Subject Site
from Office Professional to Highway/Tourist Commercial.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Rancho California Development Corporation
REPRESENTATIVE:
Markham & Associates
PROPOSAL:
A request to construct an Arco AM/PM self-service gas station
and a 2,796 square foot mini-market on an approximately .79
acre parcel in an existing commercial center.
LOCATION:
28231 Ynez Road in the Tower Plaza shopping center.
EXISTING ZONING:
C-P (General Commercial)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
C-P (General Commercial)
C-P (General Commercial)
C-P (General Commercial)
C-P (General Commercial)
PROPOSED LAND USE
DESIGNATION:
Professional Office
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Freestanding Bank
Vacant
Commercial/Retail
Freestanding Restaurant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area Calculation
Use Square feet % of site
Building Area 2,796 8%
Landscaping 2,018 6%
Paving Area 29,658 86%
TOTAL 34,472 100%
BACKGROUND
The proposed project is located in the Tower Plaza Shopping Center and is located on a
previously abandoned gas station site.
The project was submitted to staff on April 29, 1993. Subsequently, the project was
reviewed at the May 13, 1993 Development Review Committee meeting. At this meeting
several issues were raised regarding the site design, building elevations, and signage.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project consists of a 12 pump self-service gas station, 10 on-site parking
spaces, and an approximately 2,800 square foot mini-market. The building pad has previously
been mass graded as part of the underlying map. The project site is one of two remaining
vacant parcels in the shopping center. If this project is constructed, the remaining vacant
parcel will be directly to the south of this project site on the northwest corner of Ynez Road
and Rancho California Road.
ANALYSIS
General Plan Consistency
The site is currently zoned General Commercial. The Draft General Plan Land Use Designation
for this site is proposed to be Office Professional. The Commission has previously, through
the General Plan process, recommended to the City Council that an adjacent parcel's Land Use
Designation be changed from Office Professional to Highway/Tourist Commercial. The
Council has supported this change to the Draft Land Use Map. Based on this prior action
taken by the Council, staff recommends the Commission make a similar recommendation
changing the subject site to Highway/Tourist Commercial designation. Assuming the Council
takes such action, approval of this project would likely be consistent with the future adopted
General Plan.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 2
Site Desjan
The applicant's proposal locates the mini-market building in the southwest corner of the site.
In staff's opinion, the preferred location for the mini-market building is adjacent to Ynez Road,
along the eastern property boundary where it would provide a more aesthetically pleasing
design as it relates to the adjoining shopping center. However, since there are no ordinance
provisions to require the applicant to place the building in this location staff is not
recommending denial'of the project.
Moreover, staff acknowledges that this option does have its' drawbacks. While the view from
Ynez Road may be preferable to the applicant's proposal, it may not be the best design when
viewed from the interior of the shopping center. Also, this design would not be the preferred
alternative of the Police Department. The Police Department generally prefers to have the
front of a building oriented to the street for better visibility. Finally, the applicant contends
that staff's alternative would not be as readily accessible to tanker trucks as would the
applicant's preferred alternative.
A second issue related to site design is that the project is located on two (2) parcels. The
applicant has been conditioned to record a Lot Line Adjustment prior to the issuance of
building permits in order to make the parcels conform to the project site.
Circulation
Ingress and egress to the site is provided from a 25 foot drive aisle on the westerly and
southerly property lines. The driveway connects with a 36 foot drive aisle that provides
access to Ynez Road.
LandscaDina
The landscaping along Ynez Road is consistent with the improvement work currently under
construction for Assessment District 88-12. The interior landscaping has been designed to
be consistent with the adjacent shopping center. The plan provides for 5 London Plane trees,
7 African Sumac trees. The plant palette also includes Fortnight Lily, Escallonia, Day Lily,
Jack Evans Hawthorn, Scarlet Meidiland Rose and Evergreen Pear. Landscaping will provide
for 6.8% coverage of the site.
Architecture
During the review of the project, staff expressed concerns about the proposed elevations,
specifically the incorporation of two 35 square foot signs on the front elevations and the use
of stucco for the exterior walls. The applicant has removed the signs and has changed the
stucco to plaster.
The materials used in the proposed building consist of a slate gray tile for roofing materials,
white and gray plaster for the walls, and orange, red, purple and blue accent tile for the front
entrance of the building. The proposed elevations and materials will match the colors and
materials of the center.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93,PC 7/14/93 klb 3
ZONING, FUTURE GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
The project site is zoned C-P (General Commercial) as are all adjacent parcels. The proposed
project is consistent with the requirements of the C-P Zone and Ordinance 348. The proposed
Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is Office Professional. The current SWAP
designation for the proposed site is "C", Commercial. It is anticipated that the subject parcel
will likely be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project which determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant impact
would result to the natural or built environment in the City because the mitigation measures
described in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project and a Negative
Declaration has been recommended for adoption.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project conforms with Ordinance No. 348 and 460, the SWAP designation of
Commercial, and will likely be consistent with future General Plan. Should the project
ultimately be inconsistent with the future adopted General Plan, it is not anticipated that the
project will pose a threat to public health and welfare due to the fact that the project is
consistent with the adjacent commercial uses in the shopping center.
All potential environmental impacts have been mitigated to a level of non-significance by the
project's design and Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
There is a reasonable probability that PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit will likely be
consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable
time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the proposed service
station and mini-market is consistent with the existing General Commercial (C-P)
zoning and will likely be consistent with the future General Plan.
There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the
future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed use is consistent with the existing zoning and existing
commercial development in the surrounding area.
The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws due to the
fact that the proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies
with State Planning Laws.
The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use due
to the fact that the proposed development complies with the standards of Ordinance
No. 348.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93,pC 7/14/93 Idb 4
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or
welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include measures which will
ensure that public health and welfare will be maintained.
The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk,
height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the proposed development is consistent with
current surrounding development and Ordinance No. 348.
The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area due
to the fact that the surrounding properties are zoned General Commercial (C-P) which
is consistent with the project zoning and proposed use.
The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and
useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the interior circulation is suitable and
connects with Ynez Road.
The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural
environment as determined in the initial study performed for this project due to the fact
that the Conditions of Approval provide for the necessary mitigation for the project.
10.
The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in
conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project as represented on the site plan.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution - Blue Page 6
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
Initial Study - Blue Page 20
Exhibits - Blue Page 21
A. Vicinity Map
B. SWAP Map
C. Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-_
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14193 klb 6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PA93-0089,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ~
CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARCO AM/I'M MINI-MARKET
AND S!~,L~-SERVICE GAS STATION LOCAT!~I} AT 28:231
YNEZ IN ~ TOWER PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER;
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 921-270-041.
WI~,RFAS, Markham & Associates fried application for PA93-0089, Conditional Use
Permit in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WI~.REAS, said Conditional Use Permit application was processed in the time and
manner prescribed by State and local law;
WltF. REAS, the proposed Draft General Plan Land Use Designation is anticipated to be
changed to Highway/Tourist Commercial subsequent to the approval of this project;
W!tF. REAS, the Planning Commission considered said Conditional Use Permit on July
19, 1993 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
said Conditional Use Penit;
NOW, T!tF~REFORE, ~ PLANNING COIVIMI,qSIO N OF ~ CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. That the Temecuh Planning COmmission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incoq~orated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
B. The planning agency fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14193 klb 7
1. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will
be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time.
2. There is litfie or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan.
3. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances.
C. The Riverside County General plan~ as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecnla as
the General Plan for the southwest potion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
D. The proposed Conditional Use Penit is consistent with the SWAP and meets the
requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
E. The Planning Commission fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following:
F. There is reasonable probability that PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit as
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time due to the current SWAP designation of "C",
Commercial.
1. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan because the project is surrounded with commercially designated parcels and is located
within the Tower Plaza Commercial Center.
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances, in that the project is consistent with Ordinance Nos. 348.
3. Pursuant m Section 18.26(e), no Conditional Use Permit may be approved
unless the applicant demonstrates the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety
and weftare of the community, and further, that any Conditional Use Permit approved shall be
subject to such conditions as shall be necessary to protect the health, safety and general weftare
of the community.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 8
G. The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed Conditional Use Permit,
makes the following findings, to wit:
1. Them is a reasonable probability that PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
will likely be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the proposed service
station and mini-market is consistent with the existing General Commercial (C-P) zoning and
will likely be consistent with the future General Plan.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference
with the future General Plan, ff the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the plan due to
the fact that the proposed use is consistent with the existing zoning and existing commercial
development in the surrounding area.
3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws
due to the fact that the proposed use complies with Ordinance No. 348 and the action complies
with State Planning Laws.
4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the
size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation paRems, access, and intensity of use due to
the fact that the proposed development complieS with the standards of Ordinance No. 348.
5. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public
health or welfare due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include measures which wffi
ensure that public health and welfare will be maintained.
6. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in
scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with
adjoining properties due to the fact that the proposed development is consistent with current
surrounding development and Ordinance No. 348.
· 7. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property,
because it does not x~present a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area
due to the fact that the surrounding properties are zoned General Commercial (C-P) which is
consistent with the project zoning and proposed use.
8. The pwject has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open
to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the interior cireuhtion is suitable and
connects with Ynez Road.
9. The project as designed and condifioned will not adversely affect the built
or natural environment as determined in the initial study performed for this project due to the
fact that the Conditions of Approval provide for the necessary mitigation for the project.
10. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they
are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed
project as represented on the site plan.
R:\S\STAFFRP"F~89PA93,pC 7114193 klb 9
H. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Conditional Use Permit proposed is
compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study was performed for this project
which determined that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, no significant impact would result to the natural or built environment in the City
because impacts will be mitigated by adherence to the attached Conditions of Approval which
have been added to the project, and a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a Arco AM/PM mini-
market and serf-service gas station located at 28231 Ynez Road in the Tower Plaza Shopping
Center, also known as Assessor Parcel Number 921-270-041.
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 1993.
LINDA L. FAHEY
CHAIRMAN
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of July,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PIANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORN'IqlIL
SECRETLY
R:\S\STAFFRPT%89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 10
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.pC 7/14193 kJb 11
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
Project Description: Construction of anARCO AM/PM Mini-Market and Service Station
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-270-041
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The use hereby permitted by this Conditional Use Permit is for the operation of an
AM/PM mini-market and self-service gas station.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify
the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or
hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. An automatic
sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a
viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall
not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 12
A minimum of ten (10) parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with Section
18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. These parking spaces shall be provided
as shown on the Approved Site Plan Exhibit A~
7. Signage shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit C.
8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit C.
Colors and materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibit B.
Materials: Walls (Smooth Plaster) Colors:
Roof (Slate)
Window Trim
Dupont Arco White
Blue Gray
Black Aluminum
10.
Roof-mounted equipment shall be architecturallyshielded from ground view. Screening
material shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
11.
All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Each enclosure shall be six feet in height and shall be made with masonry block and
a steel gate which screens the bins from external view.
12.
Four (4) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved by
the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. These racks shall
be shown on the landscape plans.
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT
13. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two
Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,300.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two
Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollar ($50.00) County
administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under
Public 'Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If
within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to
the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted
herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c).
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
14.
The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that
ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for
development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the
applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 13
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
15.
The applicant shall make application for a consistency check with the Department of
Building and Safety and shall pay the appropriate filing fee.
16.
The applicant shall pay the appropriate Landscape Inspection Fee to the Building and
Safety Department.
17.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans consistent with the
approved Conceptual Landscape Plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety
Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
18.
The applicant shall receive City approval and record a Lot Line Adjustment necessary
for the construction of this project.
19. All roof top equipment shall be architecturally screened from ground view.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS
20.
All roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected by the Planning Department to ensure
it is shielded from ground view.
21.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation
plans.
22.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
23.
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at
least 3 square feet in size.
Performance securities, in the amount equal to the total cost of landscaping and
irrigation including labor and material to guarantee adequate maintenance of the
landscaping for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Planning.
R:\S~STAFFRPT\89PA93,pC 7/14/93 klb 14
24. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit,
25.
The applicant shall provide additional landscaping to screen various components of the
project if deemed necessary by the Planning Director.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
26.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
27.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
28.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
29.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
30.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as additionally required in these Conditions of
Approval.
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb
31.
32.
33.
34,
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
An erosion control plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by a
registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department, the Community Services District, and the Department of Public Works for
review (Including the parkways and medians in addition to private landscaping).
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
recorded by separate instrument as directed by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The adequacy of the capacity of existing downstream drainage facilities shall be
verified. Any upgrading or upsizing of those facilities, as required, shall be provided as
part of development of this project.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to
be submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0°5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All required fees shall be paid.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the following improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A. Landscaping (slopes, medians, and parkways).
B. Erosion control and slope protection.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 16
PRIOR
42.
TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT:
A lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Planning Department. Planning
Department and Department of Public Works approval is required. Upon approval the
lot line adjustment shall be recorded.
43. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Riverside County Fire Department;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works; and
The Community Services District.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of
Occupancy.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
$10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 17
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY
50.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison;
Southern California Gas;
Planning Department; and
Department of Public Works.
51.
All onsite improvements and improvements along Ynez Road, adjacent to the project
site shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards,
including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all public streets, signing, striping, and
landscaped medians.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
52.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Code.
53.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with
Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
54. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
55. All existing buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped
accessibility regulations.
56.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior
lighting, fire alarm systems.
57.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1991 edition of the uniform plumbing code, Appendix C.
58.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
59.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
60.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting
shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 1 R
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655.
OTHER AGENCIES
61.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Geologist transmittal dated June 21, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
62.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated May 5, 1993, a copy of which
is attached.
63.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated May 6, 1993 a
copy of which is attached.
64.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated May 6, 1993 a copy of which is attached.
65.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control District transmittal dated March 28, 1993 a copy of which is attached.
66.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated May 5, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 19
j. Andrew khlange
May 5, 1993
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43174 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
SUBJECT: AMIPM Gas Station & Minl-nmrt - (PA 93-0089)
Assessor Parcel No. 921-270-041
RECEIVED
MAY I 0 1993
Ans'd .......... ..-_:
To Whom It May Concern:
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the subject project.
Our comments are outlined below:
General
It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed AM/PM Gas Station and Mini-mart
located at 28231 Ynez Rd.
The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must
be understood the available service capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing
due to the occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement.
As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the
timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service
agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project.
The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan
of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the
developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels
of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit
information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909)
925-7676, extension 409, as follows:
Written request for a "plan of service"
Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive
development projects or projects located in difficult to serve geographic areas.
Maid To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, liemet, CA
City of Temecula
PA 934]089
May 5, 1993
Page 2
Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project.
Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans.
Sanitary Sewer
The subject project is considered tributary to the Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation
Facility.
The nearest existing and available Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation sanitary sewer
facilities to the subject project are as follows:
8-inch diameter sewer aligned along Ynez Rd. north of Rancho California Rd. for a
distance of approximately 450 feet, at which point the sewer flows westerly across the
Tower Plaza property towards the 1-215 Freeway.
Other Issues
The developer's representative must contact the District's Customer Service Department to
arrange for the necessary (Source Control Unit) review of onsite plumbing plans to ensure
conformance with District standards for discharge to the sanitary sewer system.
Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office
at (909) 925-7676, extension 468.
Very truly yours,
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
David G. Crosley
Senior Engineer
AB 93-553
DGC/clz
(wp-ntwk-PA930089 .clz)
TO:
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA
TTN: lannin De t.
on
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA93-0089
DATE: May 5, 1993
RECEIVED
NAY 12 1993
Ans'd .............
Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0089
and has no objections. PRIOR TO BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL, the following are
required:
I. ltrdi-serve letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
2. Ifthere areto be anyfood establishments, three complete sets ofplans for each food
establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a
plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail food
Facilities Law.
3. If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (358-5055) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
Underground storage tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
c. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185.1)
d. Waste reduction management.
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
cc: Hazardous Materials Branch
.,., RIgERS!DE COUNTY
DE
;" / FIRE PARTMENT
RIVERSIDE
¢~ J M HARRIS 210 WEST SAN JACI]~O A~ * PE~5, C~O~ 92570 * (~) 65741~3
ATTN:
RE:
CITY of TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Craig Ruiz
Planning Application No. 95-0089
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above
referenced plan~ the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow
for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings
using the procedure established in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of
delivering 1500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual
operating pres~ure~ which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the lob site.
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2"x2 1/2"), located not less than 25 feet
or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building a__s
measured alonq vehicular travel ways
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to submit written
Certification from the water company noting the location of
the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water
system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for a 2
hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a
water system currently does not exist, the applicant/de-
veloper shall be responsible to provide written certifica-
tion that financial arrangements have been made to provide
them.
71 RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12th Street, Rive~ide, CA 92501
(909) 2754777 * FAX (909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PLANNING SECTION
[3 INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072
RE: 93-0089
Page 2
The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in
the permit process to reflect changes in design, construc-
tion 'type, area separation or built--in fire protection
FIRE LANES
The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Depart-
ment for approval, a site plan designating required fire
lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of
2A-IOBC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public
areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounted 48" (inches) to
center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch) projection
from the wall. Contact Fire Department for proper placement
of equipment prior to installation.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible for obtaining
underground and aboveground fuel and waste oil tank permits
from the Riverside County Fire Department and Environmental
Health Departments. Plans must be submitted for approval
prior to installation.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are
reviewed in the Building and Safety Office.
If you should have any further questions, please feel free to
contact the Riversid~ County Fire Department Planning Division.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Wes Alston
Fire Captain Specialist
P. ancho
Water
Nancy tL Hughes
Csaba F. Ko
Richard D. Steffey
John F. Henriigor
Phillip L Forbes
Kenneth C. Dealy
Linda M. Fregoso
& Henr~kson
RECEIVED
May 6, 1993
MAY J 0 1993
Ans'd ............
Mr. Craig D. Ruiz
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
SUB~/~CT: Water Availability, APN 92i-270-041
PA 93-0089, AM/PM Gas Station and Mini-Man
Dear Mr. Ruiz:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
S8:8j86/F186
cc: Senga Doherty, Engineering Technician
INTER-DEPARTMENTAl, I,.E'rTER
COUNTY OF
May 10, 1993
RIVERSIDE
RECEIVED
r.l~v 1 ~ lgg3
Ans'd ............
T0: Craig Ruiz - City of Temecula, Planning Department
FROM: Steve Kupferman - Engineering Geologist
Riverside County Planning Department
RE: Geologic/Seismic Hazard
Temecula Planning Application No. 93-0089
AM\PM Mini Mart
2S231 Ynez Road
City of Temecula
The subject project is located within an Al~uist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone for active earthquake faults and within a Liquefaction
Hazard Zone..
A geotechnical report to satisfy Alquist-Priolo requirements for
the hazard of surface fault rupture and investigate the hazard of
liquefaction should be prepared relative to the proposed project.
This report should be submitted for review and approval prior to
project approval.
Please call me at (909) 275-3211 if you have any questions
concerning this requirement.
KENNETH L EDWARDS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Ladies and Gentlemen:
RECEIVED
J U N O 4 1993
Ans'd ............
..:
The Disffict does not normally recommend co(xlitjo~s for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporaed cities. The District also does not
plan check city land use ~ases, or provide State Divisio~ of Real Estate letters or othar flood hazard reports for =c,c~ cases. Distric~
cor~reo~nmendatiop4; for such cases are normally limited to items of adecifi¢ interest to the Dist~OT including Distr~ot Master Drainage Ran
facilities, Other regional flood control and drNnage facilHies which could be considered s logical compl:ment or exter~sion of a master plan sy~em,
and District Area Drainage Ran fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, informalion of a general na~'e is provided.
The Disthct has not reviewed the proposed Ixoject in detail and the fallowing ched(ed comments do not in any way cotblithe or imply District
approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, pubic health and safety or any othe~ such issue:
["'~s projeot would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Ran facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.
"]This projeot involves District Master Ran facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities
must be constructed to District standards, and District plan ~ and inspection will be required for District _,v!~_ptance. Ran ched~,
inspection and administrative fees will be required.
"]This projeot propuses Channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in r
and/or · logical extension of the adopted Master Drsinage Plan. The District would cuteider acce~
ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be conatructed to District standards, and District plan check and
ins~eotion will be required for District N.~qptance. Ran Ched(, inspectio~ and administrative fees will be required.
of a parcd map or subdivision prior to recordation of the final map. Fees to be paid should be it the rate in effect at the lime of rec~datlon,
or if deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
GFNFRAI INFORMATION
Thic project may req~re · Natio~aJ Pdlutant Discharge EJimination S.vstem (NPDES) pernut from the State Water Resources Co~trd Board.
Clearance for grading, reco~dation, or other final approval, should not be 9iven until the City has determined that ~e project has been granted a
permit or is shown to he exempt.
If this project tnv~ves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, thart the City should require the applicartt to
provide all studies, caJcuiations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requiremar~s, and should furth~ require that the applicant
obtain · Colxlitional Letter of Mop Revision (CLOMR) I~or to grading, re(x)rdatlon or other final app~'oval of the project, and a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) pdor to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applicaztt to obtain a Section 160111603
Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water ACT Section 404 permit from the U.S. Azmy Corps of
Engineers, or written co~'respondence from these agerides indicating the projeot is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water ACt Section
404 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prier to issum of ~e Corps
404 permit.
Very truly yours,
DUSTYWIIIIAMS
Senior Civil Engineer
DEE. COUNTY PLANN.. 4G DEPARTMENT
' =' Ke~ D. Downs, A.I.C.P., ~istant Director
Juale 21, 1993
SEACOR
1180 Nevada Street, Suite 200
Redlands, CA 92374-2843
Attention: Kevin K. Miskin
Nicholas Selmeczy
RE: Liquefaction Hazard
Job Number 40007-049-01
CU 93-089
APN: 921-270-041
County Geologic Report No. 858
City of Temecula
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the liquefaction aspects of your report entitled
"Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed ARCO
AM/PM Facility, Ynez Road and Rancho California Road, Temecula,
CA," dated June 4, 1993.
It should be noted ~hat this report has been reviewed as an update
and supplement to County Geologic Report No. 629, previously
prepared by Lockwood-Singh & Associates for an office building and
parking structure on this site.
Your report determined that:
1. The recent alluvial soils
susceptible to liquefaction.
underlying the site are highly
2. Surface manifestation of soil liquefaction in the form of cracks
and/or sand boils is probable.
3. Surface subsidence of existing soils as a result of liquefaction
is expected to be in the range of 2.5 to 5 inches.
Your report recommended that: :
1. Removal and recompaction of the near-surface soils shall be
required as follows:
Main Office
4080 LEMON STREET. 9th FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501
(714) 2-75-3200
FAX (714) 275-3157
79733 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, SUITE E
BERMUDA DUNES. CALIFORNIA c72201
(619) 863-8277
FAX (619) 863-7062
County Geologic Report No. 858
page 2
a. Alluvial deposits shall be removed and recompacted to a
depth of eight feet below the bottom of the footing elevation
in the area of each proposed foundation structure.
b. The base of the exposed excavation shall be scarified to a
depth of eight inches and recompacted to the minimum relative
compaction specified in Appendix C of your report.
c. In the event that soil pumping occurs during the
application of compactire effort, an approximate 18-inch
course gravel mat shall be placed in the excavation base.
d. The areal extent of removals shall extend 10 feet beyond
the building footprint in plan view.
2. Shallow spread footings shall be structurally connected by tied-
foundations or grade beams. The footings shall be embedded a
minimum depth of 18 inches with respect to lowest adjacent grade.
Footing reinforcement shall consist of at least four #4 rebars, two
on the top and two on the bottom. Alternatively, structures shall
be constructed on structural mat or raft foundations.
3. Underground tanks shall be anchored to resist uplift. A massive
concrete hold-down pad shall be used to anchor the tanks. Tanks
shall be installed with flexible pipe connections and automatic
shut-off valves.
It is our opinion that your report was prepared in a competent
manner and satisfies the additional information requested by the
City of Temecula. Final approval of your report is hereby given.
This report now supersedes the conclusions and recommendations made
in County Geologic Report No. 629, previously prepared for the
subject parcel.
county Geologic Report No. 858
page 3
The recommendations made in your report relative to liquefaction
shall be adhered to in the design and construction of this project.
Very truly yours,
SK:al
cc: Craig Ruiz - City of Temecula
Ida Sanchez - Markham & Associates
Yon M. Carpenter - ARCO Products Company
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 20
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
I. Name of Project:
2. Case Numbers:
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
II.
Name of Proponent:
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
Arco AM/PM Gas Station and Mini-Mart
PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
28231 Ynez Road
To locate a self-service gas station and 2,800 square foot mini-market
on a .68 acre parcel in the General Commercial (CP) zone.
June 22, 1993
Markham and Associates
41750 Winchester Road, Suite N
Temecula, California 92590
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section IID
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures? __ __ X
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil? __X __ __
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? __ __ X
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features? __ __ X
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site? X
f. Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion? __ __ X
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake? __ __ X
Yes Maybe N_._Qo
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 8122/93 tjs 1
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
mount of surface runoff?.
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
B:~S\STAFFRPT~89PA93,1ES 6/22/93 t~ ~,
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants?
Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop?
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, bkds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic orgasms, and/or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area?
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
YeS Maybe
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? X
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? __
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? _
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? X
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan7 __
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? __
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? __
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6122/93 tjs 3
Yes Maybe N_,Q
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oH or radiation)? _ __
b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticicles, chemicals,
or radiation)? __ __
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan? __ __
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area? __ __
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing? __ __
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation? __ __
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods? __ __
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? __X __
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6122193 tjs 4
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental service,s:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial mounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? _
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __
b. Communications systems? __
c. Water systems? __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? __
e. Storm water drainage systems? __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive reeeptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic poilutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
Yes
Maybe
N__o
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
19.
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? __
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? _
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __
X
X
X
X
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs 5
20.
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Maybe
X
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22193 tjs 6
IlL DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONIVIENTAL lMPACTS
Earth
1,a.
No. Although the proposed project will result in minimal Fading there will not be changes in the
base geologic substructures. Therefore, no algni~eant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
l.b.
Yes. All development disrupts the soft profile to some degree and results in soil displacement,
compaction and over-covering. A grading plan will be certified by the Engineering Department
which will mitigate any potential impacts.
1.C.
No. The proposed site is currently graded and further development of the proposed project will
not require substantial grading and as a result will not alter the existing topography. Therefore,
no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
l.d.
No. There are no unique geologic or physical features on the site. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
l.e.
Yes. Wind and water erosion potentials will increase during the construction phase and remain
high until disturbed areas are replanted. The wind erosion impact is considered high and significant
but will be mitigated through minimal grading and use of watering trucks and hydro-seeding
disturbed areas after Fading.
1.f.
No. There is no body of water near the project site which could be affected by the proposed
project. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
l.g.
No. There will be nO modification of water course or body of water. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
l.h.
Yes. The project site is located within a liquefaction area. A Geotechnical Report was prepared
for the underlying parcel map. The project is conditioned to comply with the recommendations set
forth in that report. The conditions placed upon this project will reduce this impact below a level
of significance.
1.i. No. The project is not within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
Air
2.a.
Yes. While this project will have a cumulative impact on the overall air quality of the South Coast
Air Basin, this impact is not considered significant. This impact is not considered significant since
the air emissions from this project are not expected to exceed the South Coast Air Quality
Management District's (SCAQMD) threshold of significance.
2.b.
Yes. The fueling operation of this project will result in objectional odors through the release of
reactire organic gases. The proposed use is regulated by the SCAQ1ViD. The requirements of the
SCAQMD will reduce these impacts below a level of significance.
R:\SXSTAFFRPT~89PA93,1ES 6122/93 t~ 7
2.c. No. The proposed project will not result in an alteration of air movement, temperatures, or
moisture or any change in climate either locally or regionally.
Water
3.a.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, it is not anticipated that the
project will not have a significant effect on any body of water.
3.b.
Yes. The proposed project will increase the mount of impermeable surfaces on the site which will
reduce the mount of water absorption. A hydrology study prepared for the project has determined
that existing drainage facilities have adequate capacity to handle the increased surface runoff.
Therefore, it is not anticipated that the project will not have a significant effect on any body of
water.
3.c.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated due to the fact that the project will not result in changes to the course or flow of flood
waters.
3.d.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated due to the fact that the project will not result in significant changes in the mount of
surface water in any water body.
3.e.
No. The project is not located near any body of water. Therefore, no significant impacts is
anticipated due to the fact that the project will not result in discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality.
3 .f,g.
No. The proposed project will not interfere with the direction or rate of flow of ground waters.
The proposed project,will not interfere with the present ground water conditions.
3.h.
No. Due to the small size of the project, it is not anticipated that there will be a significant affect
the public water supply or system.
3.i.
No. The project is not located in the 100-year flood plain or in a area that is subject to flooding.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated due to the fact that the project will not expose
people or property to water related hazards such as flood.
Plant Life
4.a.
No. The project site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants
on the site. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
4.b.
No. The project site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants
on the site. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
No. While the project will introduce new species of plants through the addition of landscaping,
the site has been previously graded and there are no native species on this site. Therefore, there
will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs 8
4.d.
No. This property is not currently used as farm land and is not identified in the Draft General Plan
as an area of agricultural significance. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result
of this project.
Animal Life
5.a,c,d,e. No. The proposed project is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a number of
years. The site is curren~y graded and there is no indication that any wildlife species exists at this
location. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts to animal life as a result of this project.
5.b.
No. The site is currently graded and is in an area that has been experiencing urbanization for a
number of years. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area.
Habitat Conservation fees have been paid as part of the underlying parcel map to mitigate the effect
of cumulative impacts.
Noise
6.a.
Yes. On-site noise levels will increase temporarily during construction. Construction related
impacts will be mitigated through the standard conditions of approval for construction activities
which will be imposed by the Public Works Department. Long-term noise impacts will occur due
to increased traffic volumes. This impact is not considered to be significant since the surrounding
land uses are not noise sensitive.
6.b,c.
No. Severe noise and severe vibrations will not be generated by the proposed project. Therefore,
there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
Light and Glare
No. The project site is located within the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District.
The lighting standards within this district require that only low pressure sodium street and security
lights be installed and all other lighting must be oriented or shielded to reduce the glare in the night
sky near the observatory. The impact of the additional light and glare will be mitigated by
following the standards of the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting District (Ordinance No.
655) and through the appropriate design of the lighting system.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. This site is currently vacant. However, the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan designates the
subject site as Highway/Tourist Commercial. The surrounding land uses are also designated
Highway/Tourist Commercial. The current zoning is General Commercial. The surrounding
developed parcels are commercial and office uses. The intensification of the proposed use is not
anticipated to be significant due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with current and
future land use designations.
8.b.
No. The proposed development will be consistent with the Draft Preferred Land Use Plan
designation of Highway/Tourist Commercial and the current zoning designation of General
Commercial. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~SXSTAFFBPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs 9
Natural Resources
9.a.
No. This project, due to its' small size and nature, will not result in an increase in the rate of use
of any natural resource. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
9.b.
No. The primary use for this project is the selling of gasoline. The increased availability of
gasoline will result in an increase its' consumption. The proposed use will not result in a
significant depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource. Therefore, there will be no significant
impacts as a result of this project.
Risk of Upset
lO.a,b.
No. Prior to the on-site storage, transport, or disposal of any hazardous substances clearance shall
be obtained from the Riverside County Health Department and the Riverside County Fire
Department. The project will be conditioned to insure that the project complies with all
recommendations of these agencies. The mitigations proposed by these agencies will reduce the
potential impacts below a level of significance.
lO.c.
No. During construction, it should not be necessary to close any streets which would interfere with
emergency vehicles. If street or land closure is necessary, it shall be coordinated with the City and
Sheriff Department.
Population
11.
No. The proposed commercial building will generate some jobs. The project will have a
cumulative impact on the regions population but is not considered to be significant due to the small
size of the project.
Housine
12.
No. The proposed commercial building will not generate a significant number of jobs to create a
demand for additional housing. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this
project.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.
No. This project will generate additional vehicular movement. However, a traffic study prepared
for this project determined that increase in traffic volume is not considered to be significant. The
current improvements being constructed by Assessment District 88-12 on Ynez Road will be
sufficient to handle the increased traffic. The applicant has been conditioned to complete the
improvements if the Assessment District does not complete the improvements.
13 .b.
Yes. The project will create a need for additional parking spaces. The project has been designed
to meet the City's requirements for parking. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a
result of this project.
13.c.
No. The proposed project will generate additional traffic to and from the site. However, the
traffic study prepared for this project has determined that this increase will be significant. The
R:~S~STAFFRPT~89PA93AES 6/22193 tjs
traffic that is generated by the project may add an incremental impact to the 1-15 Interchanges
which are currently operating at capacity during peak hours. This potential impact will be
mitigated by a transportation improvement mitigation fee. There will not be a significant impact
upon existing transportation systems due t6 the small size of the project.
13.d.
No. The project has been designed so that there will not be alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or goods. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts
as a result of this project.
13.e.
No. Due to the small size and nature of the proposed project, there will be no effect on
waterborne, rail or air traffic.
13.f.
Yes. Any increase in traffic will increase the potential hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or
pedestrians, however the street improvements that are currenfiy under construction will reduce the
impact to a level of non-significance.
Public Services
14.a,b,e. No. The project will require public services in the areas of police, fire, maintenance of roads, and
public facilities. This impact is not considered significant although it will have slight incremental
impact on public facilities.
14.c,d,f. No. Due to the small size and nature of the proposed project, there will be no substantial effects
on these public services.
Energy
15.a,b.
No. Due to the sin,all size of this project, the project will not result in the use of substantial
amounts of fuel or energy or substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or
require the development of new sources of energy. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts
as a result of this project.
Utilities
16.a,b,c,d,
e,f,g. No. Adequate utilities exist for this project. The project has been conditioned to meet the
requirements of all utilities to insure that any impacts will be mitigated to below a level of
significance.
Human Health
17.a.
Yes. The project has the potential to store hazardous materials on the project site. Prior to the
storage of any hazardous materials at the site, a plan for their use and disposal shall be submitted
to the City, County Health and County Fire Departments which will mkigate this impact to below
a level of insignificance.
17.b.
No. The project is not located near sensitive receptors. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:%S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs l 1
Aesthetics
18.a,b,c.
No. The proposed project will not obstruct any scenic vista open to the public. The elevations of
the proposed project are consistent in architectural materials to the surrounding buildingS.
Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
Recreation
19,
No. The subject site is not currently used for recreational uses nor will the project create the need
for additional facilities. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
20.a.
No. The City's Draft General Plan does not identify this area as an "Area of Sensitivity for
Archaeological Resources". The site is currently graded and has been used for commercial
purposes in the past. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
20.b.
No. The project site is vacant and does not contain any known prehistoric buildings, structures or
objects. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
20,c.
No. The project site is vacant and its' development is not expected to significantly impact any
known unique ethnic values. Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this
project.
20,d.
No. The project site is vacant and is not known to have any existing religious or sacred uses.
Therefore, there will be no significant impacts as a result of this project.
R:~S~STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22193 tjs
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
'1.
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species. cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Yes Maybe No
_ _ X
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long ten, environmental
goals? (A short ten impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long ten impacts will endure well into the
future.)
X
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
Does the project have. environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
X
R:\S~STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6122193 tjs 13
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERIVIINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I fred that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have be~n added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by: "-
Craig D. Ruiz. Assistant Planner
Name and Title
June 22. 1993
Date
R:~S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.1ES 6/22/93 tjs 14
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:~S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.pC 7/14/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
EXHIBIT: A VICINITY MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT\89PA93.PC 7/'}4/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
4
t-2-3000
R-3-4~00
'/ I-3
R'4 -s
CASE NO.: PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
EXHIBIT: B
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
SWAP MAP
R:\S\STAFFRPT~89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
RAN
PLAZ.,.,,
C ~
SP 180
CASE NO.: PA93-0089
EXHIBIT: C
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
ZONING MAP
R:~S\STAFFRPT\89PA93,PC 7/14/93
CITY OF TEMECULA
\.
CASE NO.: PA93-0089, Conditional Use Permit
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
SITE PLAN
B:\S\STAFFRPT\89PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb
ITEM #7
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
Case No.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. I
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-__ approving Plot Plan No.
PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 based on the Analysis
and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to
the attached Conditions of Approval; and
ADOPT Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. PA93-
0124, Amendment No. 1.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Professional Hospital Supply
REPRESENTATIVE:
Lusardi Construction Company
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of a 41,925 square foot tilt-up industrial
building for sterilization, warehousing, and distribution for new
medical products.
LOCATION:
East side of Business Park Drive between Rancho California Road
and Rancho Way.
EXISTING ZONING:
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
PROPOSED ZONING: N/A
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
R:\S\STAFFRPT~124PA93.PC 7/14193 kJb
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Light Industrial
PROJECT STATISTICS
Site Area: 130,852 square feet
Building Area: 41,925 square feet
Landscape Area: 35,027 square feet
Paved Area: 53,831 square feet
Parking Required: 6 spaces
Parking Provided: 70 spaces
Standard: 59 spaces
Compact: 9 spaces
Handicap: 2 spaces
Building Height: 30 feet
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted this project on June 1-8, 1993 as Plot Plan No. PA93-0124. The
project was scheduled for Development Review Committee (DRC) on July 1, 1993. The
issues discussed at DRC included architecture, landscaping and screening of the loading areas.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is proposed on a 6.59 acre parcel which the applicant desires to subdivide in the
future to create an approximately three (3) acre parcel for this project and a 3.55 acre parcel.
The proposed project is a single story concrete tilt-up industrial building. It will be used by
Professional Hospital Supply for the sterilization of medical equipment. This operation is
conducted at their existing location on Business Park Drive. The new facility will have a larger
capacity since it will be fully automated. Access to the site is provided by two curb-cuts on
Business Park Drive. A mounded landscaped area will provide a large set back from the
street. The landscaping in the rear will provide a screen for the equipment pad in the rear of
the building.
ANALYSIS
Architecture
Staff and the applicant have worked together to architecturally enhance the front elevation
of the building by adding glass areas, increasing the size of the reveals and providing color
contrast. The loading areas in the rear have been screened by increasing the vegetation along
the screen walls to effectively screen the trucks when they are loading and unloading. The
ventilation stack on the roof, which will be eight (8) feet higher than the building, is required
by the Air Quality Management District (AQMD), The height of the stack is mandated by
AQMD to reduce the impacts of air quality to insignificant levels. initially, staff was
concerned about the visibility of the stack; however, it has been placed at the rear of the
R:%S~STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 2
building to minimize the visual impacts from the street. It is staff's opinion that an effort to
screen the stack will defeat the purpose of screening, since the screen itself would be very
bulky and aesthetically unpleasing.
Parkinq
The applicant is proposing seventy (70) parking spaces for this project. Ordinance 348
requires one parking space for every two (2) employees on the largest shift which for this
project is twelve (12) employees. Therefore, only six (6) parking spaces are required for this
project. Staff encouraged the applicant to convert some of the parking spaces to landscaping
to reduce the pavement area, but the applicant felt strongly about providing the additional
spaces. They expressed concerns about building a project that does not contain the
appropriate number of parking spaces in the event of the future sale of the property. It is
unusual for an industrial use to have only twelve (12) employees and if the project was
approved with only six (6) parking spaces, there will be a definite shortage of parking spaces
once the use is changed as a result of a future sale. It should be noted that the project meets
the standards of Ordinance No. 348 for landscaping of parking areas.
LandscaDino
The landscaping was increased to screen the parking lot, the rear of the building and the
loading area. Furthermore, planters were added to provide more dimension to the north and
south elevations, since these elevations will be visible from Business Park Drive. Thirteen
Eucalyptus trees are massed in groups in front of the building along with masses of shrubs
including Silver Berry (Elaeagnus Pungens) and Dwarf Coyote Bush (Baccharis Centennial),
Both sides of the two entrances are planted with Swan Hill Olive.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it is located within an
existing business park and the Draft General Plan currently designates the site as Business
Park. This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the requirements for
this zone. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates
the site as Light Industrial.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Initial Study was prepared for Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 and it revealed
no significant impacts that have not been mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff
recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project as proposed meets all the requirements of Ordinance No. 348. The quality of the
architecture of the proposed building is consistent with existing buildings within the Business
Park. The landscaping has been designed to adequately screen the parking lot, the equipment
area in the rear of the building and the loading areas. All environmental impacts have been
reduced to insignificant levels by the mitigation measures contained in the conditions of
approval.
FINDINGS
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it is located
within an existing business park and the Draft General Plan currently designates the
site as Business Park. The draft preferred Land Use Map shows the project site as
Business Park.
This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates the
site as Light Industrial.
This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the requirements for
this zone.
This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since all the impacts
have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the structures,
the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
PC Resolution - Blue Page 5
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Initial Study - Blue Page 19
Exhibits - Blue Page 33
R:\S~STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:%S%STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 5
ATI'ACHlvI~-NT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO.
PA93-0124, AMENDIVIF. NT NO. 1 TO CONSTRUCT A 41,92S
SQUARE FOOT TtLT-UP INDUSTRIAL BUH.nING FOR
STEI~H.IZATION, WAIVEHOUSING, AND DISTRIBUTION
FOR NEW 1V~.rHCAL PRODUCTS ON A PARCEL
LOCATED ON ~ EAST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK
DRIVE BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND
RANCHO WAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-020-060.
WltEREAS, Lusardi Construction Company fried Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment
No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County I~nd Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WItF. REAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
application on July 19, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition to said application and;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THY. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findines. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Cede Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state hw that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
R:%S\STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 $db 6
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as mended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general
2. The Planning Commission finds, in recommending approval of projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each
of the following:
a. There is reasonable probability that the said application will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time since the project is consistent with the existing SWAP and zoning
designation.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since the pwject is compatible with surrounding development.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348.
D. Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no plot plan may be approved unless the following
findings can be made:
1. The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and
with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances.
R:%S\STAFFRPT\124pA93+pC 7/14/93 klb 7
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and
is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property.
E. The Planning Commission, in recommending appwval of the proposed Plot Plan,
makes the following findings, to wit:
1. This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it
is located within an existing business park and the General Plan wffi most likely designate the
site as Business Park. The draft preferred l~nd Use Map shows the project site as Business
Park.
2. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which
designates the site as Light Industrial.
3. This project is consistent with the M-SC zone since it meets all the
requirements for this zone.
4. This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since
all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the
structures, the necessary parking, landscaping and circulation for the site.
F. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Adoption of the Negative Declaration for Plot
Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 to construct a 42,925 square foot tilt-up
industrial building and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-020-060 subject to the following
conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of July, 1993.
LllqDA L. FAHEY
CHAIRMAN
R:~S\STAFFF!FT\124PA93.PC 7/14193 idb ~
I HEREBY CERTIF/that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of July,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNHII ,l ,
SECRETARY
R:\S~STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 kJb 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~S\STAFFRPT~124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. I
Project Description: Approval of a Plot Plan to construct a 42,925 square foot
tilt-up industrial building.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-020-060
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General ReQuirements
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1. The City of Temecula
will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the
City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly
notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully
in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify,
or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2} year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval,
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1 marked Exhibit D, or as amended by
these conditions.
4. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit E.
Colors and materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial
conformance with that shown on Exhibits H and I (color elevations and material board).
Materials Building, Tilt-up Concrete Colors
Ventilation Stack, Metal
2" Reveals, Concrete
Windows, Aluminum Frames
Windows, Reflective Glass
Off-white
Off-white
Dark Blue
Black
Silver
R:%S~STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 11
A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on
Exhibit D.
7. Three (3) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided as shown on Exhibit D.
An Administrative Plot Plan application for signage or a Sign Program shall be
submitted and approved by the Planning Director.
Within fortv-eiaht (48) hours of the aoDroval of this project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Three
Hundred Dollars ($1 ,300.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred and
Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game
Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Fifty Dollar ($50.00) County administrative fee to
enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources
Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning
Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
Prior to the Issuance of Gradina Permits
10.
The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that
ordinance which is based on (the gross acreage of the parcels proposed for
development). Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the
applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as
implemented by County ordinance or resolution.
11.
The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Geotechnical Investigation and
Grading Plan Review (Schaefer Dixon Associates, Inc., July 7, 1989) mitigation
measures.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
12.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans consistent with the
approved Conceptual Landscape Plans (Exhibit F) shall be submitted tothe Building and
Safety Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
13. All roof top equipment (except the ventilation stack) shall be architecturally screened
from ground view.
14. The applicant shall provide a Permit To Construct from AQMD.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15. All roof-mounted equipment (except the ventilation stack) shall be inspected to ensure
it is shielded from ground view.
R:\S\STAFFRFT\124PA93,pC 7/14/93 Idb 12
16.
17.
18.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape,
irrigation, and shading plans.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at
least 3 square feet in size.
Performance securities, in the amount equal to the total cost of landscaping and
irrigation including labor and material to guarantee adequate maintenance of the
landscaping for one year, shall be filed with the Department of Planning.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
20.
The applicant shall provide additional landscaping to screen various components of the
project as determined by the Planning Director.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
R:\S%STAFFRPT%124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 13
General Reouirements
21.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
22.
23.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
Prior to Issuance of Gradino Permits
24.
25.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
26.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered civil engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building
Code Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval.
27.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered soils engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
28.
An erosion control plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by a
registered civil engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
29.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%124PA93.PC 7/14/93 klto 14
30.
31.
32.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
33. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
34. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
35.
36.
37.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans and/or
precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Be
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Noso
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
R:\S%STAFFRFT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 15
38.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation, The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan,
Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permits
39.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works,
40.
A Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, and approved
by the Department of Public Works. Where construction on existing City streets is
required, traffic shall remain open at all times and the traffic control plan shall provide
for adequate detour during construction.
41. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Issuance of Bulldine Permits
42.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department;
Planning Department; and
Department of Public Works.
43.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
44. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
45.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
46.
The Developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as
established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
47.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of
Occupancy.
48.
Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed
upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as
required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall
be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final
public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on
which the Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy
R:\S\STAFFRFT~12~-PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 16
of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility
fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed t~ 10,000.
The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in
excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such
fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest
the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact
fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact
fee for this project; orovided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
49.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison;
Southern California Gas;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works; and
50.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping,
traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals.
51. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
52.
The existing improvements and appurtenances along Business Park Drive shall be
reviewed. If the improvements are damaged or broken due to construction activities
of this project, they shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the
Department of Public Works.
53.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to
object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or
a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for.the construction of the proposed
"Western Bypass Corridor". The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of
the City Engineer and City Attorney.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
54.
Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All street lights and other outdoor lighting
shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety
for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County
Ordinance No. 655.
R:\S\STAFFRPT\124PA93,PC 7/14/93 Idb 17
55. This project is located within a subsidence or liquefaction zone. Prior to issuance of
any building permit by the Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed
Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and Safety Department
identifying the potential for liquefaction or subsidence. Where hazard of liquefaction
or subsidence is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be
demonstrated.
56. A Consistency Check application shall be filed with the Building and Safety Department
prior to issuance of building permits.
57. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecula
Code.
58. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan in compliance with
Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
59. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
60. All existing buildings and facilities must comply with applicable handicapped
accessibility regulations.
61. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior
lighting, fire alarm systems.
62. Restroom fixtures, number and type, shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1991 edition of the uniform plumbing code, Appendix C.
63. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
64. The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
65. The applicant shall provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
66. Complete plans with energy documentation are required to expedite plan review.
OTHER AGENCIES
67. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July
7, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
68. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated June 28, 1993,
a copy of which is attached.
TO:
FROM
RE.'
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEAI,TH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT..
virolnncntal Hcnlth Specialist IV
PLOT PLAN NO. PA93-0124 / PHASE OF PA93-0099
DAI'E: JuDy 7, 1993
Depm't,xlent of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA93-0124 / Phase
of PA93-0099 and has no objections. PRIOR TO BUILDING PlAN APPROVAL. the
following are required:
1. Will-serve letters from the appropriate water and sewerlug districts.
2. If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Depm'tment
of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Managemere Branch (358-5055)
will be required indicating that {he project has bc~n cleared for:
a, Underground storage tanks.
b. Hazardous Waste Generator Services.
~. H~rdous Waste Di~losm'c (in ac~o~tan~c with AB 2 i g5.1 ).
d. Waste reduction management.
SM:dr
(909) 275-8980
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT _
HARRIS 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (909) 657-3183
i(2HEI::
June 28, 1993
TO: City of Temecula
ATTN: Saied Naaseh
RE: PA 93-0124
With respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above
referenced plan, the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The fire Department is required to set a minimum
for the remodel or construction of all commercial
using the procedure established in Ordinance 546.
fire flow
buildings
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of
delivering 2500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual
operating pressure, which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2"x2 1/2"), located not less than 25 feet
or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as
measured alonq vehicular travel ways.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to submit written
Certification from the water company noting the location of
the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water
system is capable of delivering 2500 GPM fire flow for a 2
hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a
water system currently does not exist, the applicant/de-
veloper shall be responsible to provide written certifica-
tion that financial arrangements have been made to provide
them.
B RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 121h Sireel, Riverside, CA 92501
1909) 275-4777 * FAX (909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PLANNING SECTION
~l INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072
prmttd on recycled paper ~
RE: PA 93-0124
Page 2
Blue retroreflective pavement markers shall be mounted on
private streets, public streets and driveways to indicate
location of fire hydrants.. Prior to installation, placement
of markers must be approved by the Riverside County Fire
Department.
Applicant/Developer shall separately submit two copy of
the water system plans to the Fire Department for review.
Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and
spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow require-
ments. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil
engineer and the local water company with the following
certification: "I certify that the design of the water
system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by
the Riverside County Fire Department".
install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings
requiring a fire flow of 1500 GPM or greater. The post
indicator valve and fire department connection shall be
located to the frontm within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a
minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that
the building(s) will be automatically fire sprinkled must
be included on the title page of the building plans.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to install a U.L.
Central Station Monitored Fire Alarm System. That monitors
fire sprinkler system water flow, P.I.V.#s and all control
valves. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for
approval prior to installation.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to install a manual
and automatic fire Alarm System. Plans must be submitted
to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
A statement that the building will be automatically fire
sprinkled must appear on the title page of the building
plans.
Install panic hardware and exit signs as per Chapter 33 of
the Uniform Building Code. All illuminated exits shall be UL
924 Listed. Low-level Exit Signs~ where exit signs are
required by Section 3314 (a).
FIRE LANES
11.
The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Depart-
ment for approval, a site plan designating required fire
lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs.
RE: PA 93-0124 Page 3
BUILDING(s) ACCESS
12.
Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildings/
suites. If building/suite requires Hazardous
Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the
Knox HAZ MAT Data and key storage cabinets shall be
installed. If buildings/suites are protected by a fire
or burglar alarm system, the boxes will require "Tamper"
monitoring. Plans must be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to installation.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant/de
veloper shall be responsible to submit a check or money
order in the amount of $558.00 to the Riverside County Fire
Department for plan check fees.
14.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of
2A-10BC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public
areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounted 48" (inches) to
center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch) projection
from the wall. Contact Fire Department for proper placement
of equipment prior to installation.
15. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are
reviewed in the Building and Safety Office.
All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be
referred to the Riverside County Fire department Planning
division staff.
MA:ma
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire Department Planner
Fire Safety Specialist
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:\S'~STAFFRPT%124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb I 9
City of Temecula
P!annin Department
Initial Environmental Study
I. BACKGROUND INFORMA~ON
1. Name of Project:
Professional Hospital Supply
2. Case Numbers:
Planning Application No. PA93-0124
3. Location of Project:
Located on the east side of Business Park Drive between Rancho
California Road and Rancho Way
4. Description of Project:
A request for approval of a 41,925 square foot industrial building to
be used as a sterilization plant.
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
June 20, 1993
6. Name of Proponent:
Professional Hospital Supplies
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
43225 Business Park Dr.
Temecula, CA 92590
(909) 699-3902
H. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
Yes Maybe N__Qo
Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil?
X
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
X
Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
X
Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion?
X
g. The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
X
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i, Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface runoff?.
c, Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Yes Maybe
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants? __ __
c. Introduction of new species of plants inW an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species? X
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop? __ __
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthie organisms, and/or insects)? X
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals? __ __
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area? __ __
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals? __ __
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? __ __
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? __ __
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare? __X __
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area? X
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area as described
in a community or general plan? __ __
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
N__o
X
X
X
X
R:\SXSTAFFRPT\124PA93.PC ?/14/93 klb ~)2
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)?
b; The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
YeS Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 kib 23
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy?
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water systems?
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage systems?
f. Solid waste disposal systems?
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above?
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard?
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive receptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions?
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public?
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view?
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area?
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities?
Yes
Maybe
X
N._9.o
X
X
X
X
X
__x
X
20.
Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site7
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
c. Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
d. Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Yes
Maybe
N__Qo
R:\S\STAFFRPT\124PA93,PC 7114/93 klb ~15
IH. DISCUSSION OF THeE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Earth
1 .a.d.
No. The project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures,
destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features since the site has
already been mass graded. No impacts are anticipated.
1.b.
Yes. The project will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of soil,
however, the impacts are considered insignificant since the site has already been graded and
additional grading will be for foundation and drainage.
1 .c.g.
No. The project will not result in change in topography or ground surface relief features, or
modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake since the project site has already been
graded, the building pad is ready for construction and the fact that the site is not near a water body.
Even though the project will incrementally add run off to Murrieta Creek, this impact is not
considered significant.
1 .e.f.
Yes. The project will result in an increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the
site and changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. These impacts are mainly short term as a result
of construction. The City will require the use of appropriate best management practices to reduce
and mitigate onsite erosion and offsite deposition. Long-term erosion and deposition from the
project site is expected to decrease as a result of the project because of the required paving and
landscaping. No significant impacts are anticipated.
1.h.i.
Yes. The project will result in exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, liquefaction and development near an Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone as specified
in the General Plan EIR. However, these Impacts are not anticipated to be significant since the
project will be conditioned to comply with all the recommendations in the Geotechnical
Investigation and Grading Plan Review (Schaefer Dixon Associates,Inc., July 7, 1989) which
identifies the site outside of the Special Study Zone and provides mitigation measure for foundation
and structure design.
Air
No. The construction of the project will not result in the local deterioration of air quality.
However, it will result in some short-term construction related increases in air emissions and
particulate matter; however, these impacts are not considered significant, since dust control measure
mitigation measures such as watering will be performed at the time of grading. In addition, some
long-term air pollutant emissions from increased automobile usage could occur as a result of the
use of the facility; however, this impact is not anticipated to be significant since the project size
(42,000 square feet) does not exceed the threshold set by AQMD for industrial projects. This
project is an sterilization plant which will produce toxic gases and will require a permit from
AQMD prior to construction and operation to emit these gases to the air. Telephone conversations
with the applicants project engineer and AQMD officials have indicated that the screening process
required by AQMD will reduce the impacts of this project from producing toxic gases to
insignificant levels.
R:\S%STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 26
2.b.c.
No. The project will not create objectionable odors or cause alteration of air movement,
temperature or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally because of the
nature and location of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Water
3.a.c.d.
e.f.g.h.
i.
No. The project will not cause changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters, alterations to the course or flow of flood waters, change in the
amount of surface water in any waterbody, discharge into surface waters or in any alterations of
surface water quality, alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters, change in the
quantity of ground waters, reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water
supplies, or exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding because of
location and size of this project and the facts that the site has already been graded and is not near
any water body. No significant impacts are anticipated.
3.b.
Yes. This project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount
of surface runoff since impervious surfaces will be created. This impact is not anticipated to be
significant since the storm water is directed to improved drainage facilities.
Plant Life
4.a.b.d.
No. This project will not change the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plant,
reduce the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants or reduce the
acreage of any agricultural crop since the site has already been graded. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
Yes. This project will introduce new species of plants as a part of the new landscaping. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Animal Life
5.a.
Yes. The project will cause a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals, since the site has previously been completely graded and no discernible animal
communities or species reside on the site.
5.b.c.
d.c.
No. The project will not cause a reduction in numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals, introduction of new wildlife species into the area, a barrier to the
mitigation or movement of animals or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat since the site
is already graded and is located in a relatively developed area. Applicable Stephens' Kangaroo-Rat
fees will be paid, since the project is within the fee area. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S%STAFFRPT%124PA93.PC 7/1q./93 Idb 27
Noise
6.a.b.c.
No. The project will not increase the existing noise levels, expose people to severe noise or
vibrations because of the light industrial nature and the location of the project within an industrial
park. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Light and Glare
,
Yes. The project will cause an increase in light and glare mainly from the parking lot lights.
However, this impact is not considered significant since the project has to meet requirements of
Ordinance No. 665.
Land Use
Yes. The project will cause an alteration of the present land use of the area since it will change
it from vacant to an industrial complex which is consistent with the General Plan designation of
Business Park. This change is not anticipated to have a significant impact since the area is mostly
developed with industrial uses and this use will be consistent with zoning and General Plan land
use designation of the area.
8.b.
No. The proposed project will not cause alteration to the future planned land use of this area as
described in the draft General Plan which designates the site as Business Park. Since this project
is consistent with the draft General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated.
Natural Resources
9.a.b.
Yes. The project will result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resources and depletion
of any nonrenewable natural resources, since it will use aggregate materials for construction and
petroleum for construction and use. However, since these materials are commercially available,
no significant impacts are anticipated.
Risk of Unset
10.a.b.
Maybe. The project may result in a risk of explosion and/or, the release of hazardous substances,
since hazardous substances will be stored on site. However, the Health Deparunent will regulate
the project to practice safe storage of these materials; therefore, any impacts will be reduced to
insignificant levels.
10.c.
No. The project will not result in any interference with an emergency response plan, since proper
circulation has been provided on site and adequate access has been provided to publicly maintained
streets. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated from this project.
Population
11.
No. The project is of an industrial nature and will not cause alteration to the location, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human population of this area. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated.
R:\S%STAFFRPTX124PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 28
Ho~in~
12.
Yes. The project will affect existing housing and create a demand for new housing because of the
an industrial nature of the project and potential for new employment. However, the impact is not
considered significant since housing is readily available in this area.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.b.
f.
Yes. The project will generate approximately 168 dally trips, will create additional demand on
parking and will increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists o~ pedestrians. However, the
number of trips generated are not significant since the project abuts Business Park Drive and the
number of access points are restricted for efficient flow of traffic. Additional parking will be
available to accommodate the demand generated by the project. All projects increase traffic
hazards; however, this project and previous projects have been conditioned to reduce these hazards
to an insignificant level (i.e. restricted access). Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
13.c.d.
e.
No. The project will not cause substantial impact on existing transportation systems, alterations
to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods and alteration to waterborne,
rail or air traffic because of location of the site. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Public Services
14.a.b.c.
d.e.f.
No. The project will not have substantial effect on fire protection, police protection, schools, parks
and other governmental services since these services are already available for the project area. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Energy
15.a.b.
No. The project will not result in substantial use of fuel or energy or substantial increase in
demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy
because of the small nature of the project and the commercial availability of these resources. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Utilities
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.g.
No. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to any of the
following: power or natural gas, communication system, water systems, sanitary sewer systems
or septic tanks, storm water drainage systems, solid waste disposal systems and will not result in
a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above
because of the project location and its proximity to the utilities and the availability of these utilities.
No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT%124PA93.PC 7/14/93 kJb 29
Human Health
17.a.
Maybe. The project may create potential health hazards; however, the impacts are not considered
significant since the AQMD requirements and permit processes will reduce the impacts to an
insignificant level.
17.b.
No. The project will not expose people to potential health hazards, including the exposure of
sensitive receptors such as hospitals and schools to toxic pollutant emissions because of the nature
and location of the project which is not in close proximity to these sensitive receptors. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Aesthetics
18.a.b.c. No. The project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or in a detrimental visual impact
on the surrounding area because of the natore and location of the project and the fact that the
elevations of the proposed building are consistent with the existing buildings within the business
park. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Recreation
19.
No. The project will not result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
resources or opportunities since the project is of an industrial nature. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.
d.
No. The project will not result in alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archeological or historic site, adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object, any potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values, or restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact
area since the project site has already been Faded and the General Plan does not designate the site
as sensitive in regards to archaeological and paleontological resources. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
R:~S\STAFFRFT\124PA93.pC 7/14193 )db ,~0
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Yes Maybe No
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future. )
x__
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
_ x__
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians. and related ecological communities, including the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued:
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
N._9_o
X
R:\SXSTAFFRPT\124PA93,PC 7F4/93 Idb ~1
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the artached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Signature
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
Name and Ti~e
July 19. 1993
Date
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:%S\STAFFRPT\124PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 33
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
L
CASE NO.:
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. I
VICINITY MAP
R:\S~S~AFFRPT\124PA93,FC 7/13193 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124
EXHIBIT: B ZONING MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
B:~S\STAFFRPT~124PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
S
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1
EXHIBIT: C SWAP MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:%S\STAFFRPT%124PA93,PC 7/13/93 Mb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124
EXHIBIT: D SITE PLAN
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT\124PA93,PC 7/13/93 Mb
CITY OF TEMECULA
WEST ELEVATION
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124, Amendment No. 1
EXHIBIT: E
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
ELEVATIONS
R:\S\STAFFRFT\124PA93.PC 7/13193 kJb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124
EXHIBIT: F
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:%S\STAFFRFT\124PA93PC 7/13/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: Plot Plan No. PA93-0124
EXHIBIT: G
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
FLOOR PLAN
R:XS\STAFFRPT~124PA93.PC 7/13/93 klb
ITEM #8
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 19, 1993
Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
RECOMMENDATION: 1.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING
ZONING:
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh
ADOPT Resolution No. 93-__ approving Conditional Use
Permit No. PA93-0125 based on the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
ADOPT Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit
No. PA93-0125.
Shoemaker Productions Incorporated
Don Shoemaker
A request for approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing the
use of the Temecula Showgrounds for Motocross and off-road
events including practice and races.
Temecula Showgrounds, west of Diaz Road and south of
Temecula City Limits.
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
North:
South:
East:
West:
City of Murrieta
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
Manufacturing-Service Commercial (M-SC)
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
N/A
Vacant
R:\S\STAFFRFI~12SPA~s~.PC 7114193 Idb 1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Project Site: 40.00 Acres
BACKGROUND
On April 20, 1993, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. 93-0039, a Minor
Outdoor Event Permit (MOE) to conduct four Motocross events. These events were approved
on the 40 acre parcel owned by the City and the property to the west of the City's property
(Mr. Dendy's parcel). The applicant and the City have entered into a lease agreement for a
period of two years commencing on March 9, 1993 subject to two one-year renewals on the
40 acre parcel (refer to Attachment No. 5). The lease agreement required the applicant to
apply for a Conditional Use Permit for the events beyond the first four events approved by the
MOE. After the first event, the City became aware of the archaeological significance of the
site. Riv. 237 is a registered archaeological site located on the site.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Access to the site is provided by the unimproved portions of Diaz and Winchester Roads.
Parking is available on a dirt lot to the south of the race track. Concession stands will be
located behind the grandstands to serve food, gift items, soft drinks and beer.
The project consists of three tracks, grandstands, concession stands, and parking areas (refer
to Exhibit D). All three tracks are located on City property in order to avoid environmentally
sensitive areas. The existing track is located on the easterly portion of the site which has
been used for the Tractor Races in the past. The new main track is located on the westerly
portion of the site and will have man made jumps as depicted on the Site Plan and will be
used for practice, races, riding schools and factory test days. The third track will be a new
oval track and is located to the east of the main track.
The races are scheduled once or twice a month on Sundays until the end of 1994 and
possibly 1995 and 1996, if the lease is extended. Practice sessions will be every Saturday
and on the Friday and the Saturday before the races. Riding schools are conducted on the
Thursday prior to the races and the factory test days are on the Monday following the races.
Attachment No. 6 includes the confirmed dates for the 1993 races and tentative dates for the
1994 races. It should be noted that these dates are subject to change and the Planning
Director has the authority to approve any changes (refer to Condition No, 11 ).
ANALYSIS
According to the applicant, the expected number of spectators is estimated to be between
3,000 and 12,000. The applicant will provide private security guards to ensure public safety
and the Police Chief has the authority to require Police Officers to patrol the site, if deemed
R:\S\STAFFRFI'~I25pA93,I~C 7/15/93 Idb 2
necessary. The applicant might be required to pay for these services at the discretion of the
Police Chief (refer to Condition No. 37).
Furthermore, the applicant will be required to prepare a Traffic Control Plan prior to the
commencement of the operations. This plan will show the off-site circulation for the project.
Since the track, the parking lot and the access roads are dirt, dust control measures and the
maintenance of the roads will be the responsibility of the applicant (refer to Condition No. 17).
A Noise Study was conducted to determine the impacts of the project on the distant
residential uses on the hillsides. This analysis was performed on the July 11,1993 race. The
results of this analysis indicated that the highest noise reading of 67.2 dBA was taken about
50 yards from the track edge. The study also indicated that the race track noise was almost
completely obscured by ambient noise levels and when race noise was occasionally audible,
it was extremely faint at the nearest residential use. The average noise level at this location
was 46 dBA.
A Phase II archeological analysis of the site has been completed at the direction of the City.
As a part of the Phase II analysis, over fifty (50) trenches were dug on the site to determine
the extent and exact location of Riv. 237. The Phase II analysis recommended a 100 foot
buffer zone to the east of the 1,030 foot contour line to avoid Riv. 237. A fence will also be
required to preserve this buffer area, thereby completely avoiding the potentially sensitive
areas (refer to Condition No. 12). The remainder of the property is not environmentally
sensitive and is available to the activities of this project and any other future development of
the site.
A Phase Ill analysis will be conducted at a later date on the City property to mitigate the
impacts of any future use and development of the area. The Phase III mitigations could
include three scenarios: complete avoidance of the resources, complete collection of the
resources, or a combination of the two. The preliminary results from the Phase II analysis
indicates that the recommended Phase III mitigation will be collection of the resources.
A paleontological analysis was also completed, which revealed no impacts from this project
or any other future developments.
FUTURE GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND SWAP CONSISTENCY
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since the Draft General Plan
designates the site as Public institutional. The site is owned by the City and a recreational
use will be a likely permanent use of the site.
The proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed for uses
requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the M-SC zone (refer to attachment No. 7).
This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates it as Light
Industrial on the plan. This designation is applied to areas that have been committed to the
M-SC.
3
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Initial Study was prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125 and it revealed no
significant impacts that cannot be mitigated to an insignificant level. Therefore, Staff
recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project as proposed meets all the requirements of Ordinance No. 348. All environmental
impacts have been reduced to insignificant levels by the mitigation measures contained in the
conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it is a
recreational use and the Draft General Plan designates the site as Public Institutional
which allows recreational uses.
The proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as those listed
for uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the M-SC zone.
This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which designates it
as Light Industrial on the plan. This designation is applied to areas that have been
committed to the M-SC.
This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since all the impacts
have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the necessary
parking and circulation for the site.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Resolution - Blue Page 5
Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Initial Study - Blue Page 16
Exhibits - Blue Page 30
Lease Agreement- Blue Page 31
Proposal for the Temecula Motorsports Park - Blue Page 32
M-SC Permitted Uses and Conditionally Permitted Uses - Blue Page 33
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 93-
R:\S~,STAFFP-PT~I2~PA93.PC 7/14/93
ATrACHIvlF~NT NO. I
PC RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. PA93-0125 TO ALLOW ~ USE OF
TtIF~ TEMECULA SHOWGROUNDS FOR MOTOCROSS
AND OFF-ROAD EVENTS INCLUDING PRACTICE AND
RACES ON A PARCEL LOCATED ON WEST SH)E OF
DIAZ ROAD AND SOUTH OF TEMECULA CITY LIMITS
AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-120-049
WHEREAS, Shoemaker Productions Incorporated fried Conditional Use Permit No.
PA93-0125 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WItEREAS, said application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WltEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said
application on July 19, 1993, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either
in support or opposition to said application and;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission heming, the Commission
recommended approval of said application;
NOW, THEREFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findines. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the
following fmdings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
general plan.
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
R:\S\STAFFRPT\125pA93.FC 7/14/93 klb 6
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. The proposed application is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements
set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit:
General Plan.
The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the
2. The Planning Commission fmds, in recommending approval of projects
and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each
of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the application will be
consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied
within a reasonable time since the project is consistent with the existing SWAP and zoning
designation.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan since the project is compatible with surrounding development.
c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances since it complies with Ordinance No. 348.
D. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed application,
makes the following findings, to wit:
1. This project will likely be consistent with the future General Plan since it
is a recreational use and the Draf~ General Plan designates the site as Public Institutional which
allows recreational uses.
2. The proposed use is substantially the same in character and intensity as
those listed for uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit in the M-SC zone.
3. This project is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan (SWAP) which
designates it as Light Industrial on the plan. This designation is applied to areas that have been
committed to the M-SC.
4. This project will not have a significant impact on the environment since
all the impacts have been mitigated to a level of insignificance.
5. The proposed project is suitable for the site since it accommodates all the
necessary parking and circulation for the site.
E. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the application proposed conforms to the
logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Adoption of the Negative Declaration for
Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125 is recommended.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125 to allow the use of the Temecula Showgrounds
for motocross and off-road events including practice and races and known as Assessor' s Parcel
No. 909-120-049 subject to the following conditions:
A. Attachment No. 2, attached hereto.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOFrED this 19th day of July, 1993.
LINDA L. FAHEY
CHAIRMAN
II:\S\STAFFP, PT~125PA93.PC 7/14/93 kib ~
I FrF, REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 19th day of July,
1993 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
GARY THORNI~J~
SECRETARY
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I25PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 9
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I2$PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb ~ 0
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
Project Description: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing the use of the
Temecula Showgrounds for motocross and off-road events including practice and
races.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-120-049
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125. The City of Temecula will
promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify
the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the
defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or
hold harmless the City of Temecula.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization
contemplated by this approval.
3. This approval shall be valid as long as the lease with the City is valid.
Races with associated practice, riding schools, and factory test days shall be allowed
once or twice a month. Practice sessions shall be allowed every week.
All events shall take place within the parcels delineated on the site plan and no
activities shall take place in the 100 foot buffer area.
6. No lights shall be allowed on the site.
For events where over 5,000 people are anticipated to be in attendance, the applicant
shall hire one security officer per 1,000 people over 5,000.
R:\S~STAFFRPT\12jPA93.PC 7115193 klb 11
-8. The applicant shall provide one of the following two options for each event:
Two Ambulances, or
One Ambulance and one E.M.T. staffed first aid tent.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125 marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these
conditions.
10.
An adequate number of parking spaces shall be provided as shown on the Approved
Exhibit A.
11.
The Planning Director shall have the authority to approve any modifications to this
application and shall conduct a Public Hearing at his discretion.
12.
A six (6) foot high chain link fence shall be installed on the project boundary including
the 100 foot buffer line to the east of the 1030 foot contour line.
13.
The project shall comply with all the provisions of the lease agreement with the City
dated May 3, 1993 or any amendments of thereafter.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
General ReQuirements
14. Prior to any event, all Emergency Departments shall be notified.
15.
Vehicular access to the site shall be restricted along Diaz Road, Cherry Street, and
Winchester Road other than the accesses along Winchester Road as shown on the site
plan.
16.
A traffic circulation and control plan indicating the access routes to the site, when
events are taking place, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review.
17.
Access to the site is obtained through dirt roads. The Applicant is responsible to
maintain the dirt roads providing access and provide for adequate dust control when
events are taking place.
18.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
R:IS\STAFFRPT\125PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 12
19. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any work within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
20.
The Applicant must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
21.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Applicant shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
Community Services District;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company.
22.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. The plan
shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Standards, and as
required herein to be additionally provided,
23.
The project site shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site as approved by the Department of Public Works.
24.
The Applicant shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
25.
An erosion control plan shall be designed by a registered civil engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works.
26.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
27.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior
to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has
been already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
13
28. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public
Works for review and approval.
The impact to the site from any flood zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard
map and any necessary mitigation to protect the site should be identified.
B. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any adjacent floodway.
29.
The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is
subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, this
project shall comply with Ordinance 91-12 of the City of Temecula and with the rules
and regulations of FEMA for development within a Flood Zone "A" which may include
obtaining a letter of map revision from FEMA.
30.
The Applicant shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
31.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works,
32.
A Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared, Where construction on existing City streets
is required, traffic shall remain open at all times and the traffic control plan shall
provide for adequate detour during construction.
33. All required fees shall be paid.
34.
The Applicant shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee, If an interim
or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Applicant requests its permit for the project or any phase thereof,
the applicant shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy
of which has been provided to the Applicant. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement, the Applicant shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility
fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed 910,000.
The Applicant understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in
excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such
fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Applicant will waive any right to protest
the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact
fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact
fee for this project; provided that the Applicant is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
R:\S\STAFFRFI'H25pA93,PC 7/14/93 klb 14
OTHER AGENCIES
35.
Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated July
8, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
36.
Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of
Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's transmittal dated June 29, 1993,
a copy of which is attached.
37.
Police protection shall be provided in accordance with the recommendations set forth
in the Riverside County Sheriff Station's transmittal dated July 8, 1993, a copy of
which is attached.
R:\S\STAFFRPT\I25PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 15
lThursday Jury 8, 1~3 10:08w -* Page
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl, lEgAl
DATE: July 8, 199'3
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT_
Saied Naaseh
~.R. Luchs, Supervisor, Land Development, Department of Environmental
Health
MINOR OUTDOOR EVENTS I PROJECT PA93-O125 MOTORCROSS I
FINAL CONDITIONS (FEE WANED)
The following issuu shall be addfused by the applicant:
L rOIZET&
· Based on the estimated daily arteadanc= and hours of opuatioa, th¢ number of
approvcd c, hcmic~ toilets required shall be in accordanc~ with 9jver~e
Coun~ Resolution No. 91=474, pe~tinevt copies attached, For example, if the
expected peak total personnel attendance is 12000 and the average time of the daily
event is I0 hours, the number of chemical to'dcts would be appwximatdy 44 traits
for men and 57 for women or a total of l Ol chemical loBeta for Ihe event. (Peak
t~.imale att~xlanc~ for this project was 12000 people)
Z REFU.~IE DI, VI~Y,4L:
A. *The gotaBe,, collection, transportation and disposal ofrefusdtrash sludl be ~o
conducted as to prevent odor, insect, rodent and other nuisance conditions.
B_ ,One approved 50 I~llon leak proof, insect/rodent proof refuse conuiter or its
equivalent shall be provided for each 1 O0 pergons anticipated. P, ufu~e containers shall
be readily ncc~t~lble.
C. -Coll~ion: All rduse shall b~ collected from the refuse containus at lust once each
day.
]ThUrSday July 8, 199~ lO:08am -- Page
City orfemecula
Pa~e Two
Attn: Saicd Nauch
July 7, 1993
3. WATF-8 SUPPLY:
,An adequate, satc supply ofapproved (Id,,,t;gal to public) potabln water, easily
~__~sible9 shall be provided. Walcf provided for drinlcin~ and hand washin~ shall be
supplied at a rat~ of five (5) 8a31ons/person/day. Ideatiry the soutr~ ofpotablc waicr
and provid~ to D~ of F~m~ntal I!ea]th Water Resinram EnSinftrin8 th~
method of i~ismigion &nd t:),pc of Rxttarc units being utiliTaL Any costs involved
with tcstin~ thc watc~ for bactcrioloSical and ~cal comistency shall be at the
expen~ of the owner. Water Engineering my be contncted at (909) 275-8980.
4, FOOD:
A. -App|icanl/ownerlproj~,t sponsors rrmst contact Department ofEavinmmeamd Healt
Surveillancc for permits, dcarancc, and approvals for all packaged food/bevernges
and/or food/bevetnge handling or preparation. Copies of the project tmswnittal have
been provided to Departmeal of Environmental Health Surveillance. District
Supen, isor, Lynne Wilder, Hemel Offu~ (909) 654-8948 and Soheila Ich-qlqi--edetlt,
Tenmcula Offu:e, (909) 694-5022_
RL:dr
(9O9) 275-8980
~Thursday Jury 8, 1993 lO:08am -- Page
2.
5
6
.7
8
10
:]_5
,1.7
19
£0
24
250: 2
SOOz 2
2000!
30OD~ 9'
4000~
6000:
7000!
6000; 23 '
lo00ox
12500=
15000; 44
Z7~O0;
2000~: 57
~0OOOi
500002 144
lOo000e 288
10
2 2 2 a 3 3 3 3
3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 ~ 7 7 8 I 8 8
lO ~2 a3 ~4 14 14 :2.2 AS
28 34 38 40 42 4~ 42 44 44
32 4~ 44 46 ~8 50 50 SO 50,
3B 46 50 54 57 57 57 ~7 57
4e 57 03 ~6 69 69 7Z 7~ 72
69 a4 ~6 ~00 105 10~ 10~ 2~0 110
60 1O0 110 115 120 125 125 125
92 215 ll3 132 13a 138 144 144 t44
115 144 1~4 ace 175 17~ 175 Z76 184
131 168 lt2 200 207 20? 226 211 216
184 225 250 264 275 276 2es 2el
225 288 312 332 350 )DO. 350 320
350 425 4?5 500 525 525- 525 ~28 550
450 575 62S 675 675 ?OO 700 7~
1
5
TA;L~ 3. LADLES
A~C, ~'IM~ BETWEEN USE: 2.0 (MRS)
P
CROWD 1 ~ 3 4 ~ 6 ? 8
6
250: 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
7 500: 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
1000: 5 ? 3 9 9 10 10' 10 10 10
8 2000: 8 13 15 17 1~ 19 lg 29 19 19
9 4000: 16 24 ~0 34 35 38 38 38 38
5000: 19 32 ~8 42 44 4~ 46 48 4S 48
!0 6000: 23 ]a 46 50 ~4 57 57 57 57 57
7000: 23 42 54 60 63 63 66 66
11 6000: 32 49 GO 66 72 72 ~5 75 75 75
10000: 38 GO 7~ 84 88 92 92 ~6 ~6 96
]~ 12~00: 4a 75 ~2 105 110 115 115 120 120 120
15000: 57 92 115 125 1~2 128 IiS 144 !44 144
15 17500: ~6 105 132 144 !54 161 161 1G8
20000: ~5 120 150 16a 175 184 lS4 192
14 25~00: ~6 150 1~4 207 225 225 220 240 240 140
30000:115 184 225 250 ;~4 2?5 2?5 2~a
15 40000:1~0 240 ]00 336 ~50 360 375 375 3?5 375
50000| 1~2 300 375 425 450 450 4?5 475 475 475
15 75000:2E8 450 550 6~5 650 6?5 700 700 ?25 725
1000001 375 600 7~0 825 8~5 ~00 923 950 950 950
18 Under normal conditions mcst peop!e will ~se tol!et facilities once
every four hours. Z~ch pcrtable toilet facility should &cco~modate
19 a ~axim,ua cf 200 persons. Weather conditions and the consumption
o~ foode l!.c~Jl~s, be~ a~ ot~;= alcoholic bevera;ss ~ill increase
~O ~sege b~ 3G% to 40%.
(The a~ove stander~s weze adapted frc~ the ~erlc=n M=tionel
standard Institutes [~Sl] ahd ~ortable Sanitation Association
[PSA] standards.)
24
25
26
28 G3:lp-S/05/91
~ J M H~.RRIS
· ~CI-ffEF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183
June 29, 1993
TO:
ATTN:
RE:
With
City of Temecula
Saied Saaseh
PA 93-0125
RECEIVED
I'N30
,, u 1993
Ans'd ............
respect to the conditions of approval regarding the above
referenced plan~ the Fire Department recommends the following
fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside
County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards:
The fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow
for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings
using the procedure established in Ordinance 546.
Provide or show there exists a water system capable of
delivering 1500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual
operating pressure, which must be available before any
combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required fire flow shall be available from a super fire
hydrant (6"x4"x2 1/2"x2 1/2"), located at the front
entrance.
Applicant/Developer shall be responsible to submit written
Certification from the water company noting the location of
the existing fire hydrant and that the existing water
system is capable of delivering 1500 GPM fire flow for a 2
hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. If a
water system currently does not exist, the applicant/de-
veloper shall be responsible to provide written certifica-
tion that financial arrangements have been made to provide
them.
FIRE LANES
The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Depart-
ment for approval, a site plan designating required fire
lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs.
II RIVERSIDE OFFICE
3760 12lh Sireel, Riverside, CA 92501
(909) 275-4777 · FAX (909) 369-7451
FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION
PLANNING SECTION
Q INDIO OFFICE
79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, lndio, CA 92201
(619) 863-8886 · FAX (619) 863-7072
RE: PA 95-0125 Page 2
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of
2A-IOBC and signage. Fire Extinguishers located in public
areas shall be in recessed cabinets mounted 48" (inches) to
center above floor level with maximum 4" (inch) projection
from the wall. Contact FAre Departmen~ for proper placement
of equipment prior to installation.
If you
contact
should have any further questions,please feel free to
the Riverside County fire Department Planning Division.
RAYMOND H. REGIS
Chief Fire epartment Planner
B~~~
Fire Safety Specialist
MA:ma
Byrd, Sheriff
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF
TEMECULA STATION
FM:
RE:
Date: 07-08-S3
8aled Neesob
Den Feltenberger
Final Conditions of Approval for PA93-021 B, Motocroaa
Maintain en adequate number of oneIts security during events to effectively
control crowds end insure public safety. The number of Hcurity personnel
oneits shall be up to the event organizers unleM Continuous problems occur.
In This event, en adequate number shall be determined by the Chief of Police
or hie scent. Public safety is the foremost concern,
If continual public safety problame arias, that adversely tax the Police
Department service levels, The Chief of Police may cause the organizers of the
event to be billed for services rendered at the current law enforcement
rate of cost.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
INITIAL STUDY
R:\S\STAFFRPT\I2$PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 'S 6
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Initial Environmental Study
II.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. Name of Project: Mowcross
2. Case Number: PA93-0125
3. Location of Project:
4. Description of Project:
5. Date of Environmental
Assessment:
6. Name of Proponent:
7. Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMI~ACTS
West of Diaz, South of Temecula City limits at the Temecula
Showgrounds
R:\S\$TAFFR]~F\125PA93.l~C 7/14/93 klb
A Conditional Use Permit allowing the use of the Temecula
Showgrounds for motucross and off-road events including practice
and races.
June 22, 1993
Donald Shoemaker
34 Brookhollow Drive, Santa Ana, CA 92705
(Explanations to all the answers are provided in Section III)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction, or over covering
of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
Changes in siltation, deposition or erosion?
The modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake?
~7
Yes Maybe No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
h. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, liquefaction, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
i. Any development within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone?
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, temperature, or moisture or any
change in climate, whether locally or regionally?
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and
amount of surface tunoff?.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not limited to, temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct
additions, withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations?
h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such
as flooding?
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any native
species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and
aquatic plants)?
Yes Maybe N_..9.o
X
X
X
X
X
X
_ X
_ x__
_ X
_ X
R:\S~STAFFRPT\I25PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 'l ~
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area of native
vegetation, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in the acreage of any agricultural crop?
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals (animals includes all land animals, birds, reptiles, fish,
amphibians, shellfish, benthic organisms, and/or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or
endangered species of animals?
c. The introduction of new wildlife species into an area?
d. A barrier to the migration or movement of animals?
e. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat?
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
c. Exposure of people to severe vibrations?
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce or result in light or glare?
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of the present land use of an area?
b. Alteration to the future planned land use of an area: as described
in a community or general plan?
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. An increase in the rate of use of any natural resources?
b. The depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource?
Yes Maybe
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:\S\STAFFRPTX125PA93.11~C 7/14/93 klb ] ~
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal result in:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions (hazardous
substances includes, but is not limited to, pesticides, chemicals,
oil or radiation)7
b. The use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic
materials (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
or radiation)?
c. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population of an area7
12. Homing. Will the proposal affect existing housing or create a demand
for additional housing?
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement7
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems, including
public transportation7
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods7
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic7
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have substantial effect upon, or
result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
Yes Maybe N__o
X
X
X
X
X
X
R:~S\STAFFRPT\125PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 20
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services:
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? __
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new sources of energy? __
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to any of the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? __
b. Communications systems? __
c. Water systems? __
d. Sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks? _
e. Storm water drainage systems? __
f. Solid waste disposal systems? __
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of
utility delivery system improvements for any of the above? __
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? __
b. The exposure of people to potential health hazards, including
the exposure of sensitive reoeptors (such as hospitals and
schools) to toxic pollutant emissions? __
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? __
b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? _
c. Detrimental visual impacts on the surrounding area? __
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities? __X
Yes
Maybe
N__o
X
X
X
__x
X
__x
__x
__x
__x
__x
R:\S\STAFFRPTH25PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb
Yes Maybe N._9.o
20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
The alteration or destruction of any paleontologic, prehistoric,
archaeological or historic site?
X
Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure, or object?
Any potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values?
X
Restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
X
R:\S\STAFFRFr\125PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 22
HI. DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Earth
1 .a.d.
No. The project will notresuit in unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures;
or result in the destruction, covering on modification of any unique geologic or physical features.
Significant impacts are not anticipated since the project Fading is minimal for the construction of
the tracks.
1.b.
Yes. The project will cause disruptions, displacements, compaction, or overcovering of soil;
however, the impacts are considered insignificant since the project requires minimal grading for
the construction of the tracks.
l.h.i.
No. The project will not result in exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, Found failure, liquefaction and even though the site is located
within an Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone as specified in the General Plan EIR. The impacts are
not considered significant since no penanent structures are proposed with the project.
1 .c.g.
No. The project will not result in change in topography or ground surface relief features, or
modification of any wash, channel, creek, river or lake since the project requires minimal Fading
for the construction of the tracks and there are no significant topographic features on the site.
Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
1 .e.f.
No. The project will not result in an increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off
the site or in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion since the project requires minimal grading
(less than 50 cubic yards) for the construction of tracks. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Air
2.3.
Yes. The operation of the project will result in air emissions and will result in the local
deterioration of air quality. These impacts are from emissions from cars traveling to and from the
site and the racing vehicles. Additionally, impacts are associated from dust generated as a result
of using dirt access roads, parking and the track. The air emissions are not considered significant
since the project is temporary in nature and the prevailing winds in the area assist in dispersing the
air pollutants. Moreever, the AQMD handbook does not provide for a specific threshold for this
type of project. Staff has demonstrated that by comparing this project to an industrial project the
threshold levels for significance are not exceeded. The AQMD handbook sets the threshold level
for light industrial at 276,000 square feet which could generate 528,871 daily trips annually. The
proposed project is anticipawxl to attract 3,000 to 12,000 visitors to each of the events. There will
be twelve events per year with each producing approximately 8100 trips (7,500 trips for the visitors
and 600 trips for racers) for a total of 97,200 trips annually. Staff added twenty percent for
additional trips that might be generated from the secondary impacts of the project for a Wtal of
116,640 trips annually. As it has been demonstrated from the above calculations, the traffic
generated from this project does not reach the traffic generated from a 276,000 square foot light
industrial building which is the size that has been set for threshold for air quality impacts by
AQMD.
R:\S\STAFFRPTX125PA93.PC 7/14/93 Idb 23
Moreover, dust control measures including watering will reduce the particulate matter impacts to
insignificant levels. The project has been conditioned to water the parking lot and the track at least
twice a day on event and practice dates. No significant impacts are anticipated.
2.b.c.
No. The project will not cream objectionable odors or cause alteration of air movement,
temperature or moisture or any change in climate, whether locally or regionally because of the
nature and location of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Water
3.a.b.c.
d.e.f.g.
h.i.
No. The project will not cause changes in currents or the course or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters; absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff; alterations to the course or flow of flood waters; change in the amount of surface
water in any waterbody; discharge into surface waters or in any alterations of surface water quality;
alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters; change in the quantity of ground
waters; reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies; or exposure
of people or property to water relamd hazards such as flooding because of minimal disturbance of
the site and the absence of bodies of water on site. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Plant Life
4. a.b.c.d. No. This project will not change the diversity of species, or number of any native species of plant;
reduce the numbers of any unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants; or reduce the
acreage of any agricultural crop; or introduce new species of plants or place a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species since the biological study for the underlying map did not identify
any impacts and the site will be minimally disturbed. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Animal Life
5.a.b.c.
d.e.
Noise
No. The project will not cause a change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of
animals; a reduction in numbers of any unique, rare, threatened, or endangered species of animals;
introduction of new wildlife species into the area, a barrier to the mitigation or movement of
animals ;or deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat since the biological study for the
underlying map did not identify any impacts and the site will be minimally disturbed. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
6.a.
Yes. The project will result in increases in existing noise levels; however, the impact is not
considered significant since the site is in a remote location away from noise sensitive uses such as
residential and is located within a planned industrial complex. Furthermore, the project area has
been moved approximately 300 feet from it's previous location away from the existing residences
on the hillsides. The project has been conditioned to meet the 65 dBA requirement for the nearest
residence. A noise analysis will be required to ensure compliance prior to commencement of the
events. If the study determines that the 65 dBA threshold has been exceeded at the nearest
R:\S\STAFFRPT\125PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 24
residence, mitigation measures will be mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project.
No significant impacts are anticipated.
6.b.c.
No. The project will not expose people to severe noise or vibrations because of the remoteness and
location of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Light and Glare
No. The project will not cause an increase in light and glare since no lights will be used and the
events conclude before dark. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Land Use
8.a.
Yes. The project will cause an alteration of the present land use of the area since it will change
it from vacant to a Motorsports Park. This change is not anticipated to have a significant impact
since the use is temporary and the site will ultimately be developed as an industrial park and the
City property will probably be used as a recreational facility. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
8.b.
No. The proposed project will not cause alteration to the future planned land use of this area as
described in the draft General Plan which designates the site as Business Park. Since this project
is temporary in nature and the project site is proposed to be developed as an industrial park as
established by Tentative Parcel Map 25139. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Natural Resources
9.a.b.
Maybe. The project may result in an increase in the rate of use of any natural resources and the
depletion of any nonrenewable natural resources, since it will use petroleum for racing. However,
since these materials are commercially available, no significant impacts are anticipated.
Risk of Upset
lO.a.b.
Maybe. The project may result in a risk of explosion or the release of hazardous substances since
gasoline engines will be used for the races. Explosions and/or release of hazardous materials may
result from the races. However, they are not anticipated to be significant since emergency crews
are present and are trained to assist in any of these accidents. As a result, no significant impacts
are anticipated from this project.
lO.c.
No. The project will not result in any interference with an emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan. The project is approximately 3000 feet from Winchester Road which
provides access to existing roads. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Population
11.
No. The project is of a commercial nature and will not cause an alteration to the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of this area. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPTH25PA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 25
Ho~in~
12.
No. The project will not affect existing housing or create a demand for new housing because of
the temporary and commercial nature of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Transportation/Circulation
13.a.c.
Yes. The project will result in generation of additional vehicular movement and will have impact
upon existing transportation systems since it will attract 3,000 to 12,000 visitors for each event.
However, this impact is not considered significant, since traffic control will be provided on-site and
off-site as deemed necessary by the Police Department and the Public Works Department.
Moreover, the project is located on the west side of 1-15 which is predominately industrial
development and the streets have very little traffic on them on weekends when all the events are
scheduled. Furthermore, the spectators will not arrive at the site at the same time. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
13.b.
Yes. The project will result in demand for new parking. However, the project provides sufficient
on-site parking. No significant impacts are anticipated.
13.d.c.
No. The project will not result in alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of
people and/or goods and cause alteration to waterborne, rail or air traffic because of the location
and nature of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
13.f.
Maybe. The project may increase traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians;
however, the on-site and off-site traffic control will reduce the impacts to insignificant levels.
Public Services
14.a.c.
d.e.f.
No. The project will not have substantial effect on fire protection, schools, parks and other
governmental services because of the temporary nature of the project. Moreover, because of the
commercial nature of the project, no impacts are anticipated to parks and schools. Fire protection
will be available on site as a part of an emergency crew. No significant impacts are anticipated.
14.b.
Yes. As per the transmittal from the Police Department the project will have an impact on police
protection; however, this impact is not anticipated to be significant since the applicant will provide
private security and will also contract and pay for uniformed officers from the Riverside County
Sheriffs Department.
Energy
15.a.b.
No. The project will not result in substantial use of fuel or energy or substantial increase in
demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy
because of the nature of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRFI~125PA93.PC 7/14/93 Itlb 26
Utilities
16.a.b.c.
d.e.f.g.
No. The project will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations m any of the
following: power or natural gas, communication systems, water systems, sanitary sewer systems
or septic tanks, storm water drainage systems, solid waste disposal systems and will not result in
a disjointed or inefficient pattern of utility delivery system improvements for any of the above since
all necessary utilities are already available. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Human Health
17.a.b.
No. The project will not create any health hazard or potential health hazard, or expose people to
potential health hazards because of the nature of the project and the location of the project which
is in an vacant industrial area away from sensitive recepwrs. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
Aesthetics
18.a.b.c. No. The project will not result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public;
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open m public view; or in a detrimental visual impact
on the surrounding area since the project is not proposing any structures that would block any
views or be aesthetically offensive to the public. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Recreation
19.
Yes. The project will result in a positive impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational resources or opportunities since the project is recreational in nature. Betwean 3,000
to 12,000 people will attend these events. No significant negative impacts are anticipated.
Cultural Resources
20.a.b.c.
d.
No. The project will not result in alteration or destruction of prehistoric, archaeological or historic
site or cause adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or
object and will not result in a potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic
cultural values or result in restrictions to existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area. The project has bean modified to avoid the archaeologically sensitive areas as
determined by Mr. Drover's phase II analysis of the site. The track has been rerouted by the
applicant to avoid all sensitive areas which are mostly located within Mr. Dendy's property to the
west. Therefore, all significant impacts have been eliminated by avoidance to a level of
insignificance.
The project will not result in alteration or destruction of paleontological resources since the project
area is covered with Alluvium which according to Mr. Principe's paleontologic Report update does
not contain paleontological resources. Therefore, the archaeologically sensitive areas have been
avoided and the paleontological resources are not present on site. No significant impacts are
anticipated.
R:\S\STAFFRPT'x12~PA93.PC 7114193 lab 27
IV. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNII~'ICANCE
Does the project have the potential to either: degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish, wildlife or bird species, cause a fish,
wildlife or bird population to drop below self sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant, bird or animal
species, or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory?
Ye__s Maybe N._q
_ _ x
Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental
goals? (A short term impact on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long term impacts will endure well into the
future. )
Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project's
impact on two or more separate resources may be
relatively small, but where the effect of the total of
those impacts on the environment is significant.)
x_X_
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
X
V. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME *'DE M1NI~IUS" IMPACT FINDINGS
Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect,
either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife resources?
Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish,
amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the .
habitat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued
viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code).
Yes
N__o
X
R:\S\STAFFRIri~I~SPA93.1~C 7/14/93 klb 28
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect
on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because the Mitigation Measures described on the attached sheets and
in the Conditions of Approval that have been added to the project will
mitigate any potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Prepared by:
Signature
~ _ :Saied Naaseh. Associate Planner
Name and Title
July 19, 1993
Date
R:\S\STAFFRPT~I25PA93.PC 7114193 lab 29
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:~S\STAFFRP~I25pA93.PC 7/14/93 klb 30
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
EXHIBIT: A
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
VICINITY MAP
R:\S\STAFFRFF~I25PA93.FC 7/13/93 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
l>
n
:x II
II
II
tl
CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
EXHIBIT: B ZONING MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE
CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
EXHIBIT: C SWAP MAP
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
R:\S\STAFFRPT~125PA93,F'C 7113/93 Idb
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
CHERRY STREET ~'Fut, uPe)
Vi]NCHESTER ROAD {FuLuPe )
\ '-~. ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,.,.,,,,.,,,,, . .L--~,~,,Z,.~,~,~.~;~~
~,.,,,,~ ................ ,,.. ,, ,
CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. PA93-0125
EXHIBIT: D
P.C. DATE: July 19, 1993
SITE PLAN
R:\S\STAFFRPT~12~PA93.PC 7/13/93
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
LEASE AGREEMENT
BURKE, ~VILLIA_NES ~ SORENSEN
May 3, 1993
Mr. Donald Shoemaker
Temecula Motorsports Park
S4 Brookhollow Drive
Santa Ana, California 92705
Re: Temecula Motorsports Park Lease
Agreement
Dear Mr. Shoemaker:
Enclosed for your review is a draft Lease Agreement between
Donald Shoemaker dba Temecula Motorsports Park and the City of
Temecula for leasing the Northwest Sports Facility in Temecula.
The lease agreement includes those provisions which were
previously agreed to by you and approved by the City Council of
Temecula.
Please review the agreement and return a signed copy of it
to our office. If you have any questions regarding the
agreement, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yourS,
BURKE, .WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
encl.
cc: Scott F. Field, City Attorney
Woody Edvalson, Assistant City Manager
LEASE AGREEMENT
This lease is made and entered into on this __ day of
1993, by and between Donald Shoemaker elba
TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS PARK, as Tenant, (hereinafter referred to as
"Shoemaker"), and THE CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation,
as Landlord, (hereinafter referred to as "the City").
WITNESSETH
The City, for and in consideration of the rent to be paid by
Shoemaker and of the covenants and provisions to be kept and
performed by Shoemaker under this lease, hereby leases to
Shoemaker, and Shoemaker agrees to lease from the City, the
following: the real property commonly known as the Northwest
Sports Facility (,,NWP") in Temecula, California, the legal
description of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a
part hereof by this reference, together with all existing
improvements located on NWP. The term "Premises" as used in this
lease shall mean beth the real property and the improvements
located on NWP.
Section 1.01. Original Term.
This lease shall be for a term of two (2) years, commencing
at 12:01 a.m. on March 9, 1993, and ending at 12:01 a.m. On March
9, 1995, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions of
this lease. Shoemaker shall not lease the Premises between the
dates of September 15, 1993, and November 1, 1993.
Section 1.02. Extended Term.
In the event Shoemaker is not then in default under this
lease, Shoemaker shall have the option to extend the Original
Term of this lease for two (2) periods of one (1) year each,
commencing on the expiration of the Original Term, subject to the
approval of the City. If Shoemaker elects to extend the term of
this lease, Shoemaker must give the City written notice of his
election to extend at least thirty (30) days before expiration of
the Original Term. City shall have thirty (30) days within
receipt of Shoemaker's written notice of his election to extend
during which to accept Shoemaker's extension.
During the Extended Term of this lease, if any, the City and
Shoemaker shall be bound by all of the obligations, covenants,
and agreements of this lease except that Shoemaker shall have no
right to further extend the term of this lease beyond or after
expiration of the two (2) one (1) year periods granted under this
section. References throughout this lease to "the term of this
lease" shall include both the Original Term and the Extended
Term, if any, unless otherwise indicated.
1
Either party shall have the right to not extend the term of
this lease. If any party elects to not extend the term of this
lease, that party must give the other party written notice of its
election to not extend at least thirty (30) days before the
expiration of the then current term.
Section 1.03. Lease Week Defined.
Shoemaker shall lease the Premises on a weekly basis during
the weeks of scheduled events. The term "Lease Week" as used in
this lease shall mean the period beginning the Tuesday prior to
the weekend event through the Monday following the event.
Section 1.04. Minimum Rent.
Shoemaker shall pay to the City One Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00) Minimum Rent per lease week. The Minimum Rent shall
be due and payable at least one (1) week prior to the lease week,
at the offices of the City at 43174 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92630.
Section 1.05. Additional Rent.
In addition to the Minimum Rent provided for in Section 1.05
of this lease, Shoemaker agrees to pay to the City as Additional
Rent for the use and occupancy of the Premises, a sum equal to
One Dollar ($1.00) per paid Spectator in attendance at all of
Shoemaker's events on Premises. The Additional Rent shall be due
and payable one (1) week following each lease week at the same
location described in Section 1.05 of this lease for the payment
of Minimum Rent.
Section 1.06. Permitted UseS.
During the term of this lease (including the Original Term
and the Extended Term, if any), the Premises shall be used for
the exclusive purposes of operating and conducting motorsports
events during lease weeks, and for uses normally incident to that
purpose, and for no other purpose. Shoemaker shall not use or
permit the Premises to be used for any other purpose, without the
prior written consent of the City. In conducting the business
specified in this section in and on the Premises, Shoemaker shall
sell any merchandise and render any services that are customarily
sold and rendered by other operators of the same type of
business.
During the term of this lease (including the Original Term
and the Extended Term, if any), the City may lease the Premises
for non-motorsports events for any weeks during which the
Premises are not being used by Shoemaker (non-lease weeks). The
City shall not have the right to lease the Premises to any other
organization for motorsports use without the permission of
Shoemaker.
Shoemaker shall submit to the City all race dates for City
Manager approval at least thirty (30) days prior to inclusion on
Shoemaker's schedule. Pre-approval by the City is hereby granted
for the following race dates for 1993: March 30 - April 5; April
20 - 26; May 11 - 17; and July 6 - 12.
Section 1.07. Fees and Concessions,
During the term of this lease (including the Original Term
and the Extended Term, if any), Shoemaker shall retain all rights
to competitor fees, spectator fees, tract signage, and all beer,
food, soft drinks, souvenir and novelty concessions.
Shoemaker shall surrender forty percent (40%) of all net
profits from the beer concession on Premises during the term of
this lease to the Temecula Valley Film Commission ("TVFC") in
exchange for TVFC'S providing at least twenty (20) volunteer
personnel for staffing the beer concession, and the parking and
spectator entrances for each event.
Shoemaker shall give local non-profit organizations at least
two (2) food, beverage or souvenir concessions per event. Should
more than two (2) organizations apply for concessions per event,
Shoemaker shall determine which two (2) organizations may operate
concessions, with the advice of the City Manager.
In the event that the Rancho California Water District
{RCWD) extends irrigation water rates to Shoemaker, then at least
four (4) concessions shall be made available to local non-profit
organizations.
Shoemaker agrees to renegotiate the terms of this section
within six (6) months from the date of this lease if it is shown
that the revenues generated by the events will support more than
two (2) non-profit concessions per event.
Section 1.08. condition. Alterations. Maintenance and
Restoration of Premises.
Shoemaker accepts the Premises, as well as any improvements
thereon, in their present condition and stipulates with the City
that the Premises and improvements are in good, clean, safe and
tenantable condition as of the date of this lease.
Shoemaker shall, at his own cost and expense, be responsible
for the construction and maintenance of all race courses and
spectator accommodations, and for the productionof race events
on Premises.
3
Shoemaker shall secure the motocross track on Premises with
fencing during non-event periods to discourage unauthorized use.
Shoemaker shall post the motocross track area with "No
Trespassing" signs in beth English and Spanish.
After the motocross race on September 12, 1993, the entire
site of Premises shall be returned to its original configuration
by Shoemaker, at his own cost and expense. The existing exterior
fencing on Premises shall be kept intact. The interior fencing
on Premises may be removed by Shoemaker on the condition that it
is returned to its original location after the raceon September
12, 1993.
Shoemaker shall be responsible for returning the "tractor
race" course and surrounding area on Premises to its original, or
otherwise acceptable, design prior to the Golden Harvest events
which occur during the month of October of each year.
Shoemaker shall not make or permit any other person to make
any alterations to the Premises or to any improvements on the
Premises, except as otherwise permitted by this lease, without
the prior written consent of the City. The City shall not
unreasonably withhold this consent. Shoemaker shall keep the
Premises free and clear from any and all liens, claims, and
demands for work performed, materials furnished, or operations
conducted on the Premises at the instance or request of
Shoemaker.
Any and all alterations, additions, improvements, and
fixtures, except furniture and trade fixtures, made or placed in
or on the Premises by Shoemaker or any other person shall, on the
expiration or earlier termination of this lease, become the
property of the City and remain on the Premises, except as
otherwise provided herein. The City shall have the option,
however, on expiration or termination of this lease, of requiring
Shoemaker,.at Shoemaker's Sole cost and expense to remove any or
all such alterations, additions, improvements, or fixtures from
the Premises.
Section 1.09. Inspection by The City.
Shoemaker shall permit the City's agents, representatives,
or employees to enter the Premises at all reasonable times for
the purpose of inspecting the Premises to determine whether
Shoemaker is complying with the terms of this lease, for the
purpose of doing other lawful acts that may be necessary to
protect the City's interest in the Premises, or for the purpose
of performing the City's duties under this lease.
4
Section 1.10. Surrender of Premises.
On expiration or earlier termination of this lease,
Shoemaker shall promptly surrender and deliver the Premises to
the City in as good condition as they are now at the date of this
lease, excluding reasonable wear and tear.
Section 1.11. Installation and Removal of Trade Fixtures.
Shoemaker shall have the right at any time and from time to
time during the term of this lease, at Shoemaker's sole cost and
expense, to install and affix in, to, or on the Premises any
items, herein called "trade fixtures," fur use in Shoemaker's
business that Shoemaker may, in his sole discretion, deem
advisable. Any and all trade fixtures that can be removed
without structural damage to the Premises or any improvements on
the Premises shall, subject to Section 1.13 of this lease, remain
the property of Shoemaker and may be removed by Shoemaker at any
time before the expiration or earlier termination of this lease,
provided Shoemaker repairs any damage caused by the removal.
Shoemaker shall provide all concession area facilities
(tents, tables, etc.), except for those non-profit organizations
selected pursuant to Section 1.08. of this lease.
Telephone service is currently extended throughout the
Premises. Shoemaker may use the existing telephone lines,
provided, however, that Shoemaker shall pay for the telephone
service.
Shoemaker shall pay, and hold the City and the property of
the City free and harmless from, all charges for the furnishing
of gas, water, sewer, electricity, telephone service, garbage
pickup and disposal, and other public utilities to the Premises
during the term of this lease. All such charges shall be paid by
Shoemaker directly to the provider of the service and shall be
paid as they become due and payable, but in any event, before
delinquency.
Permanent water supply is stubbed out throughout the
Premises, including a hydrant available for a water truck outlet.
Shoemaker shall pay for RCWD to install a water meter so that
water can be apportioned back to Shoemaker's events. Shoemaker
shall also pay for RCWD to install a water meter for the water
truck outlet.
Shoemaker may install a permanent on-site trailer or storage
container during the term of this lease.
5
Section 1.12. Unremoved Trade Fixtures.
Any trade fixtures that are not removed from the Premises by
Shoemaker within thirty (30) days after the expiration or earlier
termination, regardless of cause, of this lease, shall be deemed
abandoned by Shoemaker and shall automatically become the
property of the City as owner of the real property to which they
are affixed.
Section 1.13. Off-Site Parking.
Shoemaker shall be responsible for all off-Site parking
needed for his events. Shoemaker must obtain permission from the
adjacent property owners for off-site parking.
Section 1.14. Advertising and Signs.
Shoemaker shall include the name "Temecula" in all print and
radio advertising and public relations material regarding any
past, present or future events on Premises. Shoemaker may use
the name "Temecula" on any signage advertising and promotional
material.
Shoemaker may erect, maintain, permit, and from time to
time, remove any signs in or about the Premises that Shoemaker
may deem necessary or desirable, provided that any signs erected
or maintained by Shoemaker shall comply with all requirements of
the City.
Shoemaker shall produce a minimum of two (2) one-half (1/2)
hour television shows during each year of the Original Term of
this lease. These programs shall feature motorsports competition
of a national interest. Each program shall contain highlights
featuring the City of Temecula.
Section 1.15. Conditions of the Lease.
Prior to conducting any event, Shoemaker shall obtain such
land use and environmental approvals as may be required by the
Planning Director of the City.
Shoemaker shall meet all City requirements for fire
protection, safety, sanitation, first aid/medical facilities and
any police personnel required to manage traffic control to and
from the event site on the Premises. Shoemaker shall request and
obtain all necessary City Department Head approvals regarding
traffic, fire protection, sanitation, first aid/medical
facilities and public safety.
6
Section 1.16. Insurance Requirements.
Shoemaker shall, at his own cost and expense, procure and
maintain during the entire term of this lease, public liability
insurance and property damage insurance issued by an insurance
company acceptable to the City and insuring the City against loss
or liability caused by or connected with Shoemaker's occupation
and use of the Premises under this lease in amounts not less
than: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two
Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate liability coverage, for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, and naming
the City of Temecula, TVFC, and the Temecula Town Association as
additional insureds.
The insurance shall meet all the specifications for
insurance contained in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a
part hereof by this reference.
The insurance required under this section shall be issued by
a responsible insurance company or companies authorized to do
business in California and shall be in a form reasonably
satisfactory to the City. Shoemaker shall, within ten (10) days
of the date of this lease, deposit with the City, a certificate
showing that insurance to be in full force and effect.
Each of the insurance policies shall carry an endorsement
that, before changing or canceling any policy, the issuing
insurance company shall give the City at least thirty (30) days
prior written notice. Duplicate originals or certificates of all
such insurance policies shall be delivered to the City.
Section 1.17. Indemnification.
Shoemaker agrees to protect, indemnify, and hold the City
harmless from and against any and all liability to third parties
resulting from Shoemaker's occupation and use of the Premises,
specifically including, without limitation, any claim, liability,
loss, or damage arising by reason of:
(a) The death or injury of any person or persons, including
Shoemaker or any person who is an employee or agent of Shoemaker,
or by reason of the damage to or destruction of any property,
including property owned by Shoemaker or any person who is an
employee or agent of Shoemaker, and caused or allegedly caused by
either the condition of the Premises, or some act or omission of
Shoemaker or of some agent, contractor, employe, servant,
subtenant, or concessionaire of Shoemaker on the Premises;
(b) Any work performed on the Premises or materials
furnished to the Premises at the instance or request of Shoemaker
or any agent or employee of Shoemaker; and
7
(c) Shoemaker's failure to perform any provision of this
lease or to comply with any requirement of law or any requirement
imposed by the City on the leased Premises.
Section 1.18. Restriction Aaainst Subletting or Assignment.
Shoemaker shall not encumber, assign, or otherwise transfer
this lease, any right or interest in this lease, or any right or
interest in the Premises or any of the improvements that may now
or hereafter be constructed or installed on the Premises without
first obtaining the express written consent of the City.
Shoemaker shall not sublet the Premises or any part of the
Premises or allow any other person, other than City's agents,
servants, and employees, to occupy the Premises or any part of
the Premises without the prior written consent of the City.
A consent by the City to one assignment, one subletting, or
one occupation of the Premises by another person shall not be
deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment, subletting
or occupation of the Premises by another person. Any
encumbrance, assignment, transfer, or subletting without the
prior written consent of the City, whether voluntary or
involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, is void and shall,
at the option of the City, terminate this lease. The consent of
the City to any assignment of Shoemaker's interest in this lease
or the subletting by Shoemaker of the Premises or parts of the
Premises shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Section 1.19. Default Defined.
The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a
material default and breach of this lease by Shoemaker:
(a) Any failure by Shoemaker to pay the rent or to make any
other payment required to be made by Shoemaker under this lease
when that failure continues for ten (10) days after written
notice of the failure is given by the City to Shoemaker.
(b) The abandonment or vacation of the Premises by
Shoemaker. The absence of Shoemaker from or the failure by
Shoemaker to conduct business on the Premises for a period in
excess of fourteen (14) consecutive days, with the exception of
non-lease weeks or as otherwise provided herein, shall constitute
an abandonment or vacation by Shoemaker for purposes of this
lease.
(c) A failure by Shoemaker to observe and perform any other
provision of this lease to be observed or performed by Shoemaker,
when that failure continues for ten (10) days after written
notice of Shoemaker's failure is given by the City to Shoemaker;
provided, however,.that if the nature of that default is such
that it cannot reasonably be cured within the ten (10) day
8
period, Shoemaker shall not be deemed to be in default if
Shoemaker commences that cure within the ten (10) day period and
thereafter diligently prosecutes it to completion.
(d) The making by Shoemaker of any general assignment for
the benefit of creditors; the filing by or against Shoemaker of a
petition to have Shoemaker adjudged a bankrupt or of a petition
for reorganization or arrangement under any law relating to
bankruptcy (unless, in the case of a petition filed against
Shoemaker, it is dismissed within sixty (60) days); the
appointment of a trustee or receiver to take possession of
substantially all of Shoemaker's assets located at the Premises
or of Shoemaker's interest in this lease, when possession is not
restored to Shoemaker within thirty (30) days; or the attachment,
execution, or other judicial seizure of substantially all of
Shoemaker's assets located at the Premises or of Shoemaker's
interest in this lease, when that seizure is not discharged
within thirty (30) days.
Section 1.20. Termination of Lease and Recovery of Damages.
In the event of any default by Shoemaker under this lease,
in addition to any other remedies available to the City at law or
in equity, the City shall have the right to terminate this lease
and all rights of Shoemaker hereunder by giving written notice of
the termination. No act of the City shall be construed as
terminating this lease except written notice given by the City to
Shoemaker advising Shoemaker that the City elects to terminate
the lease. In the event the City elects to terminate this lease,
the City may recover from Shoemaker:
(a) The worth at the time of award of any unpaid rent that
had been earned at the time of termination of the lease;
(b) The worth at the time of award of the amount by which
the unpaid rent that would have been earned after termination of
the lease until the time of award exceeds the amount of rental
loss that Shoemaker proves could have been reasonably avoided;
(c) The worth at the time of award of the amount by which
the unpaid rent for the balance of the term of this lease after
the time of award exceeds the amount of rental loss that
Shoemaker proves could be reasonably avoided; and
(d) Any other amount necessary to compensate the City for
all detriment proximately caused by Shoemaker's failure to
perform its obligations under this lease.
The term "rent" as used in this section shall mean the
Minimum Rent, the Additional Rent, and all other sums required to
be paid by Shoemaker pursuant to the terms of this lease.
9
Section 1.21. City's Right to Continue Lease in Effect.
If Shoemaker breaches this lease and abandons the Premises
before the natural expiration of the term of this lease, the City
may continue this lease in effect by not terminating Shoemaker's
right to possession of the Premises, in which event, the City
shall be entitled to enforce all its rights and remedies under
this lease, including the right to recover the rent specified in
this lease as it becomes due under this lease. For as long as
the City does not terminate this lease, Shoemaker shall have the
right to assign or sublease the Premises with the City's prior
written consent which shall not be unreasonably withheld.
No act of the City, including but not limited to the City's
entry on the Premises, efforts to relet the Premises, or
maintenance of the Premises, shall be construed as an election to
terminate this lease unless a written notice of that intention is
given to Shoemaker or unless the termination of this lease is
decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction.
Section 1.22. City's Right to Relet.
In the event Shoemaker breaches this lease, the City may
enter on and relet the Premises or any part of the Premises to a
third party or third parties for any term, at any rental, and on
any other terms and conditions that the City, in its sole
discretion, may deem advisable, and shall have the right to make
alterations and repairs to the Premises.
Shoemaker shall be liable for all of the City's costs in
reletting, including but not limited to remodeling costs required
for the reletting. In the event the City relets the Premises,
Shoemaker shall pay all rent due under and at the time specified
in this lease, less any amount or amounts actually received by
the City from the reletting.
Section 1.23. City's Riaht to Cure Shoemaker's Defaults.
If Shoemaker breaches or fails to perform any of the
covenants or provisions of this lease, the City may, but shall
not be required to, cure Shoemaker's breach. Any sum expended by
the City, with the then maximum legal rate of interest, shall be
reimbursed by Shoemaker to the City with the next due rent
payment under this lease.
Section 1.24. Cumulative Remedies.
The remedies granted to the City in this lease shall not be
exclusive but shall be cumulative and in addition to all remedies
now or hereafter allowed by law.
10
Section 1.25. Waiver of Breach.
The waiver by the City of any breach by Shoemaker of any of
the provisions of this lease shall not constitute a continuing
waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach by Shoemaker either
of the same or another provision of this lease.
Section 1.26. Force Majeure - Unavoidable Delays.
If the performance of any act required by this lease to be
performed by either the City or Shoemaker is prevented or delayed
by reason of an act of God, strike, lockout, labor troubles,
inability to secure materials, restrictive governmental laws or
regulations, or any other cause except financial inability that
is not the fault of the party required to perform the act, the
time for performance of the act will be extended for a period
equivalent to the period of delay, and performance of the act
during the period of delay will be excused. However, nothing
contained in this section shall excuse the prompt payment of rent
by Shoemaker as required by this lease or the performance of any
act rendered difficult solely because of the financial condition
of the party required to perform the act.
Section 1.27. Attorneys' Fees.
If any litigation is commenced between the parties to this
lease concerning the Premises, this lease, or the rights and
duties of either in relation to the Premises or to this lease,
the party prevailing in that litigation shall be entitled to, in
addition to any other relief that may be granted in the
litigation, a reasonable sum as and for its attorneys' fees in
that litigation that are determined by the court in that
litigation or in a separate action brought for that purpose.
Section 1.28. Compliance with Laws.
Shoemaker shall, at Shoemaker's own cost and expense, comply
with all statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of
all governmental entities, including federal, state, county and
the City, relating to Shoemaker's use and occupancy of the
Premises, whether those statutes, ordinances, regulations, and
requirements are now in force or are subsequently enacted. The
judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or the admission
by Shoemaker in a proceedings brought against Shoemaker by any
governmental entity, that Shoemaker has violated any such
statute, ordinance, regulation, or requirements shall be
conclusive as between Shoemaker and the City and shall constitute
grounds for termination of this lease by the City.
11
Section 1.29. Waste or Nuisance-
Shoemaker shall not commit or permit the commission by
others of any waste on the Premises; Shoemaker shall not
maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any
nuisance as defined in Civil Code Section 3479 on the Premises;
and Shoemaker shall not use or permit the use of the Premises for
any unlawful purpose.
Section 1.30. Partial Invalidity.
If any provision of this lease is held by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be either invalid, void, or
unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this lease shall
remain in full force and effect unimpaired by the holding.
Section 1.31. Sole and Only Agreement.
This instrument constitutes the sole and only agreement
between the City and Shoemaker respecting the Premises, the
leasing of the Premises to Shoemaker, or the lease term created
under this lease, and correctly sets forth the obligations of the
City and Shoemaker to each other as of its date. Any agreements
or representations respecting the Premises or their leasing by
the City to Shoemaker not expressly set forth in this instrument
are null and void.
Section 1.32. NoticeS.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by law, any and all
notices or other communications required or permitted by this
lease or by law to be served on or given to either party to this
lease by the other party to this lease shall be in writing and
shall be deemed duly served and given when personally delivered
to the party to whom they are directed, or in lieu of personal
service, when deposited in the United States mail, first-class
postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
CITY:
City of Temecula
43174 Business Park Drive
TemeCula, California 92630
Attention: City Clerk
SHOEMAKER:
Donald Shoemaker
Temecula Motorsports Park
34 Brookhollow Drive
Santa Ana, California 92705
Either party may change its address for the purpose of this
section by giving written notice of that change to the other
party in the manner provided in this section.
12
Executed on
California.
SHOEMAKER:
1993, at
CITY:
By:
Title
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
J. Sal Munoz
Mayor
Scott F. Field
City Attorney
ATTEST:
June S. Greek
City Clerk
13
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR LESSEES (NO AUTO RISKS)
L-,-e= shall procure md maintain for lhe dm6~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ or ~aga ~ ~.
w~ may
Minimum S~pe of Insumn~
~{nlmum ~mlts o{ Insumn~
~ ~ploy~'s~l,~,~d~tf~y~~
D~u~ibles and SelNnsured Retentions
Offier Insumn~ Provisions
:5.
A~ep~biliW of Insure~
Verifi~tion of ~vemge
f~ ~c ~'s
_ PROD U CER POU~ INFOR~ON:
L~ ~TM~ ~PENS~ ~ ~ h L~
NAMED INSURED m~, ~ ~ ~ pff~ (~)
TYPE OF INSURANCE .,:,
G:-NERAL LIA,SLITY
COMM. ERCIAL GEI~RAL LIA~LITY
CO~pREI~NS,'VE GENERA~ LIABILITY
O~'RS & CONTRACTORS PROTECTW~
COVERAGES '~'*::*~ .,,>~i'~j~:--
OTHER PROVISIONS
CLAIMS: u.<:kw,~e~ mpmsa'~ b' d,~ms pursu~ ~o this
Tdephcme:,( )
Tek~phor~: ( } Dale Signed
OTHER PROVISIONS
Telephone
NAMED INSURED
e~o.e: {
EMPLOYERS UABILITY UMITS
$ F.--:h~
$ . (Oi~se--P~rqLi~
$ (D~me--EachEa1~oy~)
~NDORSEMENTHOLDER :-~'!~;':. :- ~'-'" '"-": "'
Nilif
AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE I"1 BtokeflAgen~ r'j~ef ["1
(p~nMype name]. ~ Iha~ I there
auffio~ieyloblndl~e~ins~ranoecompanya/K~bymyr, ignalunehereon
dosobkgSlhisoompanytothisendocsefmmL
Tdephone: ( ) O~e Signed
CERTIFICATE-OF.:!NSURANCE
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
~. D
~R E
COVERAGES
rile FOLLOWING PROVISIONS APPLY:
ERTIFICATE HOLDER/ADDITIONAL INSURED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
PROPOSAL FOR THE TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS PARK
R:\S~STA~c~cP-PT\I2~PA93.l~C 7/14/93 klb 32
t
i
I
I
t
I
I
PRODUCTIONS
PROPOSAL FOR THE
TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS PARK
PRESENTED
TO:
Mr. Dave Dixon
City Manager
THE CITY OF TEMECULA
I'
I
I
[
I
I
!
11
]
1
i
INTRODUCTION
Since January of this year, Shoemaker Productions has worked successfully with
the City of Temecula to bring about a first class, motorsports facility -- The
Temecula Motorsports Park.
Despite many obstacles, Shoemaker Productions built the facility in a professional
manner and did it on schedule! As a result, the City of Temecula has gained wide
respect and recognition in the motorsports community. After our very first race,
a national motorcycle publication (with a weekly circulation of 38,000), Cycle
N6ws, expressed great enthusiasm for our facility. The name of Temecula' is now
associated with a well-organized, first-ela~s motorsports facility. It is upon this
base that Shoemaker Productions is presenting this request for approval of the
racing schedule for the 1993 and 1994 seasons.
Due to some unforeseen and unfortunate events, none caused by Shoemaker
Productions, the Temecula Motorsports Park has not received the number of
participants originally projected. The season started out strong, but due to the
discovery of Indian artifacts, and bad publicity right before the last two events,
attendance fell off. In spite of the hardships, Shoemaker Productions weathered
the storm, designed and constructed a new track in two days, and was open for
racing as promised.
In a show Of cooperation, Shoemaker Productions has financed the fencing and
water for the archaeological Indian "digs".
Shoemaker Productions has a well-earned reputation for doing things on tithe and
correctly.
OVERVIEW
Since opening day of the Temecula Motorsports Park, Shoemaker Productions
have been asking participants how the faci/ity could be improved. As a result,
after formally surveying 434 riders (247 from within a 30-mile range and 187
outside the 30-mile range) at the May 6 event, these are our findings of what the
riders want:
1. An expanded race schedule.
2. A practice day one day each week.
3. A racing school.
4. A test track for factory race teams (Honda, Yamaha, Kawasaki, etc.).
All of the above would bring added revenue to Temecula merchants. Each rider
spends approximately $20.00 in Temecula in addition to admittance. With 500
riders on race day (not counting family and friends), the financial impact on the
area merchants is very significant. A stay in a motel, a tank of gas, food, etc., all
adds up to a lot of money for area merchants.
The addition Of practice days, a racing school and factory test days, all contribute
to a significant financial windfall for merchants, as well as, name recognition to
the City of Temecula.
It is the intent of Shoemaker Productions to cream an ongoing, attractive
motorsports facility. We have worked hard to make the area attractive by cutting
the grass and providing eating and shaded rest areas. It is our desire to
continually upgrade the park in future months and years. This is a "team." effort
between the City of Temecula and Shoemaker Productions to provide the finest
Motorsports Park in Southern Califomia.
THE PROPOSAL
Shoemaker Productions is requesting permission to schedule race events
throughout the 1993 and 1994 season, with an option at the end of 1994 for the
1995 and 1996 season.
Shoemaker Productions is proposing an expanded schedule for 1993 to include the
following:
1. Five additional race dates
2. Ten days of open practice
3. Five factory test days
z$. Three racing school days
For the 1994 season we propose the following:
1. Fifteen race events
2. Twenty days of open practice
3. Ten factory test days
4. Six racing school dates
All race weekends would include practice on Friday and Saturday with the race
on Sunday, except September 6, Labor Day on Monday.
Open practice would be held on the Saturdays when there are no races.
Factory test days would be held on the Monday following a race event. Factory
testing would be restricted to 2-4 motorcycles for no more than six hours.
Riding schools would be held on Thursday of race weekend with no more than ten
riders in a class, taught by a professional rider.
Shoemaker Productions proposes the inclusion of off-mad vehicles in the 1993
and 1994 race schedule. We have met with the major sanctioning bodies and
manufacturers with overwhelming success. All involved are very excited about
the possibility of staging major events of this nature in Southern California. The
spectator draw of events of this kind runs in the thousands.
The following are the proposed schedules of racing events for 1993 and 1994:
< TEMECULA
1993 MOTOCROSS/OFF-ROAD SCHEDULE!
April 25
May 16
June 6
July I 1
August 15
September 5
September 6
November 28
CMC Spring Classic
CMC Temecula Grand Opening Race
CMC Summer Series Round
CMC Summer Series Round//vlotocross Series/
Temeeula Sunrise Off-Road Challenge
CMC Summer Series Round
CMC Trans Cat Series National
Temecula Sunrise Off-Road Challenge
CMC Manufacturers Series Team Final
December 19
Santa Claus Grand Prix (Tentative)
27225 Di~z Road, P.O. Box 89038 * Temecula, Califomia 92589., TEL: (909) 698-4800 FAX: (909) 698-4804
< TEMECULA
1994 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE
January 16 Sunday
February 27 Sunday
March 14 Sunday
March 20 Sunday
April 10 Sunday
April 17 Sunday
May 15 Sunday
June 5 Sunday
June 26 Sunday
July l0 Sunday
August 14 Sunday
August 28 Sunday
September 11 Sunday
November 27 Sunday
December 18 Sunday
CMC Golden State Nationals Round #2
US Amateur National Round #1
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
US Amateur National Round #4
CMC Spring Classic Round #2
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
California Summer Series Round #1
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
California Summer Series Round #5
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
Temecula Off-Road Grand Prix
Trans-Cal Nationals Round
Manufactumrs/Dealer/Aftermarket challenge
Multi-National Round#3
27225 Diaz Road, P O Box 89038, Temecula, Califomia 92589 * TEL: (909) 698-4800 FAX: (909) 698-4804
The following are examples of preparation and hours of operation of the proposed
events:
Race Weekend Schedule
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Prepare facility
Prepare facility
Prepare facility
Practice 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Practice 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
Practice 8 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
Racing 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Practice Days
Saturday
8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Factory Test Days
Monday Following race weekend 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
Riding School
Thursday
Before Race Weekend 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
- Three schools in 1993
- Six schools in 1994
li
I!
I
I
1
i
I
MOTO-X AND OFF ROAD SCHOOLS
Moto-X and off-road schools are similar .to any other school format. Novice
riders and drivers artend the school, taught by a professional, with techniques of
how to fide/drive faster, mice jumps better and generally learn the secrets of
riding/driving to win.
FACTORY TEST DAYS
The need by manufacturers to test new equipment under race conditions is very
important. Factory Moto-X Teams (e.g., Honda, Kawasald, Yamaha) pay to rent
the track for test purposes. The same is true for factory off-road vehicle teams
such as Toyota, Ford, Chevrolet, etc. The Moto-X teams consist of four
motorcycles and off-wad teams have no more than two cars. Present also would
be the race crews and professional rider/drivers.
SUMMARY
Shoemaker Productions, to date, have invested a large sum of money to develop
the previous site into the Temecula Motorsports Park -- a safe, attractive family
recreational facility. This includes construction of a first-class track, erection of
grandstands, a concession stand, complete fencing and design and construetion of
an entire second race track because of the Indian artifact issue. The cost for the
second track alone was over $6,300.
In conclusion, I want to personally thank The City of Temecula for the incredible
support it has provided to us since the inception of this project.
A'FI'ACHMENT NO. 7
M-SC PERMITrED USES AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITrED USES
ARTICLE XI
M-SC ZONE (MANUFACTURING - SERVICE COHHERCIAL)
SECTION 11.1. INTENT. It is the intent of the Board of Supervisors in
amending this article to: (1) promote and attract industrial and manufacturing
activities which will provide Jobs to loc~ residents and strengthen the
County's economic base; (2) provide the necessary improvements to support
adjacent lands, and protect industrial areas from encroac)ent by
incompatible uses that may Jeopardize industry.
SECTION 11.2. USES PER)IITI'ED.
a. Agricultural uses of the soils for crops, including the grazing of not
more than 2 mature farm animals per acre and their immature offspring.
The followtng uses are permitted provided a plot plan is approved
pursuant to the provisions Of Section 1B.3D of this ordnance.
{1) The following industrial and manufacturing uses:
a. Food Products:
{1) Meat and poul try products, not including meat packing or
slaughtering.
(2) Dairy products, not including dairies.
(5) Sugar and confectlonary products.
I /Nonalcoholic verages.
Ice.
b. Textile Products:
I)l Cotton, wood, and synthetic weaving and finishing mills.
Wearing apparel and accessory products.
{3) Knitting mills.
Yarn and thread mills.
c.' Lomber and Wood Products:
()l Saw and planning mills.
1!Manufacture of containers and crates.
Fabrication of wood bull dt ngs and structures.
Lomber yards.
Manufacture of furniture and fixtures including
cabinets, partitions and similar items.
(6) Fabrication of manufactured housing and mobilehome.
d. Paper Products:
(1) Paper and paperboard mills.
I~l Manufacture of containers and boxes.
Paper shredSrig.
(4) (Deleted)
(5) Printing and publishing of newspapers, periodicals,
books, forms, cards, and similar ttms.
(6) Bin~ng of books and other publications.
9O
e. Chentcals and related products:
(1) Manufacture or organtc and tnorganlc campounds, not
including those of a hazardous nature.
1321Manufacture of drugs and pharmaceuticals.
Soaps, cleaners, and toiletties.
(4) Manufacture of agricultural chmtcals, not including
pesttci~es end fertilizers.
f. Leather Products:
* (1) Tanning and finishing of leather.
(2) Manufacture of handbags, luggage, footwear, and other
personal leather ~oods.
g. Stone, Clay, Glass, and Concrete Products:
(1) Stone cutting and related acUvtttes.
(2) Pottery and similar items.
(3) Glass blowing, pressing and cutting.
Manufacture of concrete, gypsum, plaster and mfneral
products.
h. 'Hetal Products:
(1) Manufacture of cans and containers.
(2) Cutlery, tableware, hand tools, and hardware.
Wrought iron fabrication.
(5) Manufacture and assembly of fencing.
I67) Machine, welding, and blacksmith shops.
Metal stamps and forged metal products.
{8) Fabrication of metal buildings.
{9} Manufacture of ordinance and firearms, not including
expl os ives.
(10} Jewelry.
i. Machinery:
{1) Engines, turbines, and parts.
(2) Farm, garden construction, and industrial machinery.
I~l Office and c~puting machines.
Refri gerati on and heating equipment.
(5} Equipment sales, rental, and storage.
J. Electrical Equipment:
{1} Electrical and electronic apparatus and components.
I!Appliances.
Lighting and wt.ring.
Radi o, tel evt st on, and camnuni cati ons equipment.
(5) Musical and recording equipment.
k. Transportation and Related Industries:
(1} Vehicles, aircraft, boats and parts manufacture.
Railroad equipment.
Motorcycles, bicycles, and arts manufacture.
Travel trailers and recreational vehicles manufacture.
Dra ing, fretghting, and trucking operations.
Railroad yards and stations.
Vehicle storage and tmpounctnent.
Trailer and boat storage.
91
(2}
1. Engtneeri n~' and Sctentl fic Instruments: (1) Neasurtng devices, watches, clocks, and related items.
(2) Optical goods, medical instrume. nts, supplies, and
equi ent and photography equipment.
m. Indus tri a~mUses:
Public utility substations and storage yards.
(3) Hellports.
(4) Building movers storage yard.
Warehousing and distribution.
(7} Communication and microwave installations.
Contractors storage yards.
The following service and commercial uses:
a. Banks and financial institutions.
b. Blueprint and duplicating services.
c. Gasoline and diesel service stations, not including the
concurrent sale of beer and wine for off-premises
consumption.
d. Laboratories, film, medical, research, or testing centers.
e. Office equipment sales and service.
f. Offices, professional sales and service, including business,
law, medical, dental, chiropractic, architectural, and
engi neeri ng.
g. Parking lots and parking structures.
h. Restaurants and other eating establishments.
i. Vehicle and motorcycle repair shops.
j. Barber and Beauty shops.
k. Body and fender shops, and spray painting.
1. Building materials sales yard.
m. Day care centers.
n. Health and exercise centers.
o. Hardware and home improvement center.
p. Mobilehomes, provided they are kept mobile and licensed
pursuant to State law, when used for: sales offices on
mobilehome sales lots; construction offices and caretakers
quarters on construction sites for the duration of a valid
building permit; agricultural worker enploJ~nent offices for a
maximum of 90 days in any calendar ~ar; caretaker's quarters
and office, in lieu of any other one-femtly dwelling located
on the same parcel as a permitted industrial use.
q. One-family dwellings on the seine parcel as the industrial or
c,,,~erctal use provided such dwellings are occupied
exclusively by the proprietor or caretaker of the use and
thetr tmmedi ate faint 1 y.
r. Nurseries and garden supply stores.
s. Car and truck washes.
t. Signs, on-site advertising.
u. Feed and grain sales.
v. Truck and trailer sales and rental.
g2
w. Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity.
x. Mobilehome sales lots.
x. Recycling collection facilities.
The following uses are permitted provided a conditional use permit has
been granted pursuant to Section 18.28 of this ordinance:
(1) Meat packing plants, not including slaughtering or rendering of
animal s.
(2) Caneteries, cre~atortes, and mausolems.
l~l Paper storage and recycling, not within a building.
Brewery, distillery, or winery.
(5) Acid and abrasives manufacturing.
I~ Fertilizer production, organic or inorganic.
Petrolera and bulk fuel storage, above ground, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 546.
(~) Paints and varnishes manufacturing and incidental storage.
Concrete batch plants and asphalt plants.
(10) Recyclin processing facilities
(Deleteall
{13) Poultry and egg processing.
Ill/Recycling of wood, metal, and construction wastes. Natural gas storage, above ground.
{16} Drive-in theaters.
{17) Disposal service operations, not including transfer stations.
Any mining operation that is subject to the California Surface Mining
and Reclamation Act of 1975 provided a valid surface mining permit has
been granted pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No. 555.
e. Kennels and catteries are permitted provided they are approved pursuant
to the provisions of Section 18.45 of this ordinance.
Any use that is not specifically listed in Subsections (b) and (c) may
be considered a permitted or conditionally permitted use provided that
the Planning Director finds that the proposed use is substantially the
same in character and intensity as those listed in the designated
subsections. Such a use is subject to the permit process which governs
the category in which it falls.
Amended
02-28-85
07-16-85
04-04-87
05-04-89
07-20-89
08-10-89
Effective:
(Ord. 348.2443)
i00; : 3 .2496>
348.2669)
SECTION 11.3. PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS. Planned industrial
developments are permitted provided a land dt vision has been approved pursuant
to Riverside County Ordinance No. 460.