Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout120693 PC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993, 6:00 PM VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 29915 Mira Loma Drive Temecula, CA 92390 CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Ford ROLL CALL: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland and Ford PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda 2.1 Approval of Minutes from the November 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. 3. Director'$ Hearing Update CONSENT ITEMS Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company Northwest corner of Rancho California Road ahd Meadows Parkway A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres. Planning Area No. 40 is Very High Density Residential (25 d.u./acre target density). Planning Area No. 41 is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). N/A Matthew Fagan Approve R:\WIMBERVG~PLANCOMM\AGENDAS~12-6-93 12/2/93 vgw 1 Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway A third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres. Planning Area No. 40 is Very High Density Residential (25 d.u./acre target density). Planning Area No. 41 is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). N/A Matthew Fagan Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kernper Real Estate Development Company Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 - a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Planning Area No. 38: Very High Density Residential 14.8 d.u./acre. Planning Area No. 39: Commercial 7.5 acres. N/A Matthew Fagan Approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway A third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. I - a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Planning Area No. 38: Very High Density Residential 14.8 d.u./acre. Planning Area No. 39: Commercial 7.5 acres. N/A Matthew Fagan Approve R:~WIMBERVG\PLANCOMM~AGENDAS~12-6-93 12/2/93 vgw 2 Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: PA93-0190 Stephen Cavadias West side of Business Park Drive, approximately 1600 feet north of Rancho California Road A one year extension of time for Plot Plan No. 232, a two-story office/warehouse/refuse truck maintenance facility totaling 6,900 square feet on a 6.04 acre site in the M-SC zone. Re-affirm the previously adopted negative declaration Craig Ruiz Approve PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Cese No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: N/A City of Temecula City Wide Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code regarding the term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits. Exempt per Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality Act Debbie Ubnoske Recommend Approval 10. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit Frank Liozu 28710 Las Haciendas, Suites 102 & 103 To locate a 48 child pre-school in an existing building in the Medium Manufacturing (M-M) zone. Exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 Craig Ruiz Deny 11. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: Recommendation: Plot Plan No. 244 Penfold Properties Approximately 500 feet west of Interstate 15, approximately 3500 feet south of the intersection of Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South To install a 120 foot high FM antenna and transmitter for the transmission of commercial radio broadcasts. Exempt from CEQA per Section 15270 Craig Ruiz Deny Next meeting: January 3, 1993, 6:00 p.m., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. PLANNING DIRECTOR'$ REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT R:~WIMBERVG~PLANCO~GENDAS~12-8-93 12/2/83 vgw 3 ITEM #2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 1993 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was held on Monday, November 1,1993, 6:05 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Steve Ford called the meeting to order. PRESENT: 4 ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff Also present were Planning Director Gary Thornhill, Assistant City Attorney Mary Jo SheIron, Principal Engineer Raymond Casey and Recording Secretary Gall Ziglet. PUBLIC COMMENT Former Planning Commissioner Dennis Chiniaeff announced his resignation effective Friday, October 29, 1993, due to a conflict of interest with his new employer. Mr. Chiniaeff thanked the Commission for the pleasure of serving with them for the past four years. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. ADoroyal of Aaenda It was moved by Commissioner Blair, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the agenda. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ADDrOVal Of Minutes of October 4, 1993 It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve the minutes of October 4, 1993. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford None PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 3. Director's Hearino Uodate No report. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. PA93-0163, First Extension of Time None NOVEMBER 1.1993 Proposed first extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1. East side of Ynez Road, approximately 200 feet south of Calle Halcon. Planning Assistant Craig Ruiz presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to R~- Affirm the previously adopted Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. I and Adoot Resolution No. 93-24 approving PA93-0163, First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and ADDrove PA93-0163, Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time subject to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Vestino Tentative Tract MaD No. 23372. Second Extension of Time Proposed second one (1) year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372. Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised the applicant is now called Margarita Village Retirement Communities, Inc. Planner Fagan said Conditions 23, 24 and 26 have been deleted by staff. Ray Casey explained these conditions originally were added to the project to bring about discussions with the applicant regarding certain underlying specific plan conditions, specifically the construction of Margarita Road. He said the developer is scheduled to meet with staff to discuss moving forward with the construction of Margarita Road. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 Commissioner Hoagland said he feels uncomfortable deleting these conditions. He said he does not believe the conditions hamper the developer of this project. He said previous erosion from this site resulted in in a lawsuit. Commissioner Hoagland said he felt the conditions were appropriate at this time. Commissioner Fahey asked if this development impacts Margarita Road. Ray Casey said the primary access to this development will be from Rancho California Road. He said this development is part of an underlying specific plan which has been conditioned for the construction of Margarita Road, however these two tracts will not directly benefit from the construction of Margarita Road. There are several other access points which serve as secondary access one of which leads to Margarita Road, although there is some distance between these tracts and Margarita Road. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels this entire development contributes to the erosion problems in this area. Commissioner Ford asked if there was a date certain for completion of the erosion control conditions. Ray Casey responded thirty (30) days from the approval of the extension would be appropriate. Commissioner Hoagland said he could agree to delete Conditions of Approval 23 and 26 with the understanding that staff would work with the developer to come up with a timing constraint for the Specific Plan as a whole. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve staff recommendation. Planning Director Gary Thornhill said there was a discrepancy in the park fees. Item 5, Condition of Approval 32 of Page 18, was a previously approved Condition and is not consistent with Condition of Approval 18 of Page 4 of the new Conditions. Mick Ratikin, architect for the developer, said the property has not been graded and asked if the developer was being conditioned for erosion control which is not part of this map. Additionally, Mr. Ratikin said the developer has a Development Agreement with the County for park fees and feels the appropriate acreage which the developer should dedicate in lieu of fees is zero acreage. Mr. Ratikin said this tract is approximately one mile from Margarita Road. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to withdraw the original motion and continue this item to allow staff to work with the developer on these unresolved issues. PCMIN 11/0/193 -3- 11 I15/93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1.1993 Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Commission recess to allow staff and the City Attorney to discuss the impact of a continuance on the time extension. Chairman Ford declared a recess at 6:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 6:45 P.M. Director Thornhill advised the Council the City Attorney has determined that because the application has been filed, it places a stay on the time frame and therefore recommends continuing this item and directing staff to bring it back with the 3rd Extension of Time. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Vestina Tentative Tract Mao No. 23373. Second Extension of Time Proposed second one (1) year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373. Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to continue this item to allow staff to work with the develol~er on unresolved issues relating to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PA93-0175, First Extension of Time Proposed First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 26845, Amendment No. 1. Located at the northeast corner of Ynez And Santiago Roads. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He stated staff has added Condition of Approval No. 32 as follows "The developer shall design and bond for Street A per the rural street development standards of the draft general plan". He said the NPDES condition has been added to this project. PCMIN 11/0/193 -4- 11 I15193 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to Adopt Resolution No. 93-25 Re-affirminQ the previously adopted Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. 26845, Amendment No. 1 subject to the Conditions of Approval with the modification to Condition No. 32 and the addition of the NPDES condition. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 8. PA93-0179, Second Unit Permit Proposal to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit. New unit will become the primary unit and the existing 1,536 square foot structure will become the secondary unit. Located at 31550 Calle Girasol. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised Condition No. 10 has been deleted by staff. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels the City should require for improvement of these roads at the time of development or the City will have to go back and do the permanent road improvement in the future. Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:10 P.M. Paul Toomey, attorney representing the Derobert family, 34664 County Line Road, Suite 6, Yucaipa, said the road improvement conditions would make this project "unaffordable". Mr. Toomey said he found a discrepancy in how the County fire agency applies the paving issue to the different types of projects. He explained in their schedule of maps, they extablish a sub-division with four or less parcels of the 2 1/2 acre size, they require a twenty-eight foot wide Class 2 base material road as an acceptable method of pavement. Mr. Toomey asked that permanent road improvements be applied to any development on this parcel. Mr. Toomey said the approval is for a temporary application and the owner would have to come back in five years and re-apply. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Blair seconded the motion for discussion. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 Director Thornhill asked if the Commission wants to leave determination of the base road material with the County fire agency. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels it is the City's obligation to bring areas up to urban standards. Commissioner Fahey said the City is an urban area however, there are several rural areas in the City that want to remain rural. Commissioner Fahey said she favors some leniency, however if it was to be an all weather road. If it is going to be a public right- of-way, the Commission should approve it with the appropriate conditions based on the ordinance. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the public hearing at 7:20 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 93-26 approving PA93- 0179, Amendment No. I based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition No. 10. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PA 93-0145 (Soecific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2) PA 93-0144 (Tentative Tract MaD No. 27827) A proposed request for Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Specific Plan No. 164 in order to Change the Zoning for Planning Areas 7 (22.5 acres) and 8 (10.1 acres) from Very High Density Residential (20 Dwelling Units Per Acre} to High Density Residential (12 Dwelling Units Per Acre}, to add a three (3) acre park and adjust the boundaries between Planning Areas 7, 8 and 9 and approval of Tentative Tract Tract Map No. 27827, a 162 single family lot subdivision plus a three (3) acre lot for a public park within Planning Area No. 7. Planner Saied Naaseh presented the staff report. He advised the Commission the applicant does not wish to form a Homeowners Association. He said staff has worked with the applicant to resolved many issues. Changes to the Conditions of Approval were distributed by memorandum dated November 1, 1993 from the Planning Department. Chairman Ford opened the public hearing at 7:40 P.M. Sanford Edward, 110 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, representing the applicant, provided an overview of the project's history. PCMIN 11101193 -6- 11 I15/93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1. 1993 Commissioner Fahey suggested the formation of a Homeowners Association would make maintenace of the block walls more cost-effective to the individual homeowner. Patrick Callahan, landscape architect for the project, explained his discussions with the Community Services Director regarding the wall materials and how to handle potential vandalism of the wall. Commissioner Hoagland said he agrees once the vegetation grows and covers,the wall, the wall will require very low maintenance however, it will take approximately 3 to 5 years for that plant material to grow and cover the walls. Commissioner Hoagland said a Homeowners Association would cost the individual property owners very little and allow them an avenue to resolve their problems without involving the City. Director Thornhill said the City now owns graffiti removal equipment and can appropriately remove graffiti from public view. Commissioner Blair said she does not recall the Planning Commission reviewing any other project this complex that did not have a Homeowners Association. Commissioner Blair said she is not pleased by the reduction in the parkway from 10' to 6' on one side of the street, and would like to see consistency on both sides of the street. She said she feels the City is giving up several qualities that are important to a Temecula project and she does not feel the project is at the appropriate stage for approval. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels that a Homeowners Association is important to the project. He said he feels the concept is good; however, he cannot support the project without the Homeowners Association. He said he is concerned with the berm outside the wall; however, he said he does not feel it is important to the approval. Director Thornhill explained the purpose of the berm was to reduce the apparent height of the wall as viewed from the street. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Blair to close the public hearing at 8:20 P.M. and Recommend Adootion of Resolution No. 93-27, recommending approval for: Planning Application Nos. 93-0144 and 93-0145 (Specific Plan No. 164, Amendment No. 2, and Tentative Tract Map No. 27827 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval as modified by staff and Recommend Adoorion of Negative Declaration for PA93-0144 and P93-0145 and direct staff to draft conditions necessary to require the applicant to provide a community or homeowners association. Sanford Edward, the applicant's representative, concurred with the addition of a condition requiring the formation of homeowners association. Ray Casey said because there was no homeowners association, staff included maintenance of the alleys in Zone R of the Community Services Facilities Districts. He PCMIN 11 I01193 -7- 11 I15/93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 suggested that maintenance of the alleys be placed under the homeowners association. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels the City is better equipped to make a determination on when maintenance should be done on the allays, therefore, the motion was not amended as Mr. Casey suggested. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director Thornhill advised the Commission a workshop on implementing the General Plan Village Concept is proposed for November 18, 1993. Mr. Thornhill advised the Commission of a proposal by Zav Buffman for the Old Town area. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION None OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be held on Monday, December 6, 1993, 6:00 P.M., at Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Steve Ford Secretary ITEM #3 MEMORANDUIVl TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning December 6, 1993 Director's Hearing Cases Update One Minor Public Use case was heard at Planning Director's Hearings during November, 1993. This case has been continued to December 16, 1993. Attachment: 1. Planning Director's Hearing - Action Agenda - Blue Page 2 R:~THOP, NHG\DIRECTOR.MTG\12~-93.DH 11/29/93 klb ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HT-ARING - ACTION AGENDA R:~THORNHG\DIRECTOR.MTGX12/o-93.DH 11/29/~3 klb ACTION AGENDA TE1VIECIYLA DIRECTOR'S I1F~ARING REGULAR MEETING November 18, 1993 1:30 TE1VIECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERFNCE ROOM 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92390 CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a p'mk "Request to Speak" form should be f~led out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner befor~ that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. PUBLIC HEARING Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: ACTION: Planning Application No. 93-0176, Minor Public Use Permit Don Coop 28753 Via Montezuma A request for approval to permit a church facility in an existing building located in the Medium-Manufacturing (M-M) zone. Also accompanying the MPUP is a reduction in the mount of on-site parking required under Ordinance No. 348 from 97 (ninety-seven) to 90 (ninety) parking spaces. The proposed church facility will include approximately 3,000 square feet of assembly (Sanctuary) area. Also proposed are classrooms, a conference room, multi- purpose activity rooms, a nursery, storage areas and offices. Categorically exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 (a) Matthew Fagan CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 16, 1993 ADJOURNMENT R:~WIMBERVG\DIRECTOR~AGENDAS~11-18-93.AGN 11123/93 Idb ACTION AGENDA TENIECULA DIRECTOR'S ~E,~RING REGULAR MEETING November 4, 1993 1:30 PM TE1VIECULA CITY tL~YJ. MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner lrU'BLIC COM]Vn;~rS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be Filled out and Filed with the Senior Planner. When you axe called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be fried with the Senior Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. PUBLIC FFF, ARING Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Planner: ACTION: Planning Application No. 93-0176, Minor Public Use Perink Don Coop 28753 Via Montezuma A request for approval to permit a church facffity in an existing building located in the Medium-Manufacturing (M-M) zone. Also accompanying the MPUP is a reduction in the amount of on-site parking required under Ordinance No. 348 from 97 (ninety-seven) to 90 (ninety) paTking Spaces. The proposed church facility will include approximately 3,1300 square feet of assembly (Sanctuary) area. Also proposed are classrooms, a conference room, multi- purpose activity rooms, a nursery, storage areas and offices. Categorically exempt from CEQA per Section 15301 (a) Matthew Fagan CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 18, 1993 ADJO~ R:\WIMBERVG\DIRECTORXAGENDASV 1-4.-93.AGN 11/4/93 klb ITEM #4 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning DATE: December 6, 1993 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time - A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres. Planning Area No. 40 is Very High Density Residential (25 d.u./acre target density). Planning Area No. 41 is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner BACKGROUND This project was continued from the November 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. At the meeting, the applicant opposed the conditions of approval that were added to the project for erosion control and Quimby fees. The Commission directed Staff to address these issues and then bring the item back before them for their consideration. ANALYSIS Planning, Public Works and Community Services Department Staff met with the applicant on November 8, 1993. Community Services staff stated that the Quimby requirements that were placed on the Second Extension of Time are the standard conditions that they place on all maps. The applicant did not concur with this; however, they believed that the matter would ultimately be resolved by the Planning Commission or City Council. The erosion control condition was discussed next and the Department of Public Works ultimately decided that the timeline would be necessary for this requirement and that the condition would stand as written. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 2 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 6 Draft Planning Commission Minutes: November 1, 1993 - Blue Page 13 Planning Commission Staff Report: November 1, 1993 - Blue Page 14 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF TFI~. PLANNING CO1VIIVIISSION OF TtW. CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMF-NDMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR 469 DWI?JJJNG UNITS ON 46.9 ACRES LOCATED AT ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MR~ADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060-007 WtIR. REAS, Kemper Real Estate Development Company in the name of Margaxita Village Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on November I, 1993; WltF..REAS, the Planning Commission continued said Extension of Time at the November 1, 1993 meeting; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on December 6, 1993; WItF..REAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts relating to the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1; NOW, THE~RF,,FORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THF, CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findin2s. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the foliowing findings, to wit: A. The fmdings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as mended heroin. R:\S\STAFFRFT\23372.PC2 12/2/93 kib 3 B. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (I~IR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. C. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. D. The project has been previously approved as a Vesting Tentative Map. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The density of this area that was approved through the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is 25 d.u./acre. This inconsistency with the subsequently adopted General Plan does not necessarily constitute grounds for denial of this extension. Planning Area No. 41 is consistent with the City' s General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 41 is Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) and the Specific Plan designation is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). E. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. F. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. G. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or weftare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. H. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony hi scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, because low-medium density residential uses exist to the east and are buffered by a gnff course to the north and west of the site. The General Plan Land Use designations are medium density residential for the parcels which are immediately adjacent to the north and west of the site. I. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. J. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Meadows Parkway which will be a publicly maintained street. K. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. R:\SXSTAFFRIrI'X23372.l~'2 1212193 klb 4 L. Said findings are supported by maps and envixonmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. M. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said FaR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Second One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres located at the northwest comer of Rancho Caiifomia Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor' s Parcel No. 953-060-007 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-IItJ. SECRETARY ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:',S\STAFFP, PT\23372.PC2 12/2/93 klb 6 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: Second one year extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.90 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, first Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasinQ plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Develooment Aareement No. 5. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372j~2 12/2193 Idb 7 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. A Mitkiation Monitoring Proclram shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 10. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development. 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13, The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map. B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: Construction landscaoe plans consistent with the City standards and the approved conceptual landscape plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: 15. 16. Be (1) (2) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s}. Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit, Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading including all structural setback measurements. plans D. The Model Home Comolex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. (2) Construction Landscape Plans. (3) Fencing Plans. (4) Building Elevations. (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual inspection. 18. 19. 20. lots shall be completed for Private common area landscaping shall be completed for insoection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or post a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:~S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC2 12/2/93 klb 9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the First Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. R:~S\STAFFR~T~23372,PC2 12/2/93 klb 10 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offered for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 5.96 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications, 34, Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff prior. OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.1~"2 12/2/93 klb ~,2 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE * H~d_Tl '2RVICE5 AGENCx, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 Al IN: Marthey Fagan: RECEIVED 0 C T 2 I 1993 RE: TRACT MAP NO. 23373: BEING PARC~L~ 123,4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP 21884 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 144. PAGE.S 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE O~PICE OF THE COUN'IT RECORDER OF .SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOGETI-IER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF TlIE UNITED .STATES OF.AMERICA TO LUIS VIGNES BY PATENT DATED I ANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE OI.t, ICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF .SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (6S Dear Gemlemon: The Depamnent of Environmental Flealth has revte%ved Tract Map No. 23373 and recommends: A water ~em shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Deparenent. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in mplicate. with a rmmmum scale not less than one meh equals 200 feet, along with the original dm%~ng to the Ci~ of Temecula's Office. The prints shall show the rotereal pipe diameter, location of valves and tim hydrants: p~pc and joint specifications, and the siz~ of the mum at the junction of the new system to the exxstmg system, The plans shall comply m all respects with Div. 5. Part 1, Chapter 7 of the Califorma Health and Safety. Cede, Califorma Administmuve Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Comxmssion of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a regastered e~ and water company with the following cemfication: "I certify that the design of the water system m Tract Map No. 23373 is m accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage. and distribution .system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not consmute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities. flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The nlans must be subtrotted to the City of Temecuh's Office to review at least weeks ~rior to the request for the recordatmn of the final ma~. Titis subdivision has a sutement from Rancho California Water Disxnct ag~mg to serve domesBe water to each and every. lot in the subdivision on demand providing sansfactory financial arrangements arc completed with the subdivider. It xvill be necessary. for financial arrangements to be made prior to the meordation of the final map. John M. Fanning. Director 4065 County Circle Drive * Riversicie, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Aclclress - P.O. Box 7600 * Riverside, CA 92513-7600) City. of Temecula Planning Dept. Page Two Arm: Matthew Fagan August 18, 1993 This subdivision is ~vitl~in the ~ Mumcipal Wa~- Disma and shall be connccrr. d w the sewers of the Disma. The sewer .sys?~-m shall be installed accordin~ to plans and specificanons as appwvcd by the Disma, the CiW of Tcmecula's Office and the Health Dcparuncnt Permanent pnnrs of the p!~n~ of the sewer system shall be submilled in mpiicazc, alor~ with the o~n~ drawing, to the City ofTemccula' s Office. The prints shall show the mr. emal pipe diameter, location Of m~hnleS, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new systan to the ~xisting systetn. A single pla~ indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage pl~e~ and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify. that the design of the server system in Tract Map No. 23373 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water Disma and thai the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to ~ the anticipated w~sms f~om the proposed Tract Map". The vlans must be submitted to the Ciw of Temecula's Office to review at least t~vo weeks vrior to the r~uest for the recordation of the final may. It will be necessary for financial arrangcracnts to be completely fin~liTe. d prior to recordalion of the final map. S' cer~l, SM:dr (909) 275-8980 Health Specialist IV RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTNIENT 210 Writ SAN JACIN'rO AVF. NL!E · PERI{IS. CAL~ORNIA 92570 * (909) 657-3183 TO: Planning Dept ~i'T~N: Matthew Fagan RE: October 18, 1993 Tract 23373 - 2nd Extension of Time. With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recon~aends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecuia Ordinances and/or recoFnized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be c~oable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be !500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (~"x4x2-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet ~=rcm a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a regisuered civil engineer, containing a Fire Depar~raent approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are si~ned by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agencyprior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The re_cuffed fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the pe_~tiz process to reflecu changes in design, construction type, area separauion or built-in fire protection measures. FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f)'. Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Departmenn for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire eaccinguishers with a minimum rating of 2AiOBC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Display Boards: Display boards required for apartments, commercial complexes, condominiums , RV parks and mobile home parks will be as follows. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout which shows the name of the complex, all streets, building designators, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. These directories shall be a minirmun 4'x4' in dimension and located next to the roadway access. Blue dot ref!eczors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire DeparTment prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 6 inches in height,' on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. All gated access shall be equipped with Knox Lock. The applicant shall contact the Fire Department for specifications and knox applications. Prior no recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written a~reement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to =he Fire Deparvanenn Planning a~d engineerinS section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Plummet Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist District Oc,*'c. obe.T 22, 1993 Hate. hew Fagan, Case Planner Clt~/of Temecula Plarx~in~ Depazwcment 43174 Business Park ~ve T~e~la, ~ 92590 B'DBa*K"T: v-k-~--t 2.3373 - 2rod Jx~ensiem of Ti~e Dear Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed the materials ~r~nsmitted by your office which describe the subject project. Our c~mments are outlined below: It ks c~tr understanding the subJ e~t ~uToj oct is a proposed condominium ~nd ccmmerc4al propert7 development located at the nor~hwect comer of ?.he i~tersection of Meadows Perkway and Ranthe Califol-nia Road. The subject project i~ located within the DisT. ric~c's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be ~l~derstcod =he available capabilities of the Disr_rict's syst-~ ere continually changing due to the cc~ul-rence of development within the Dis=ric~ and programs of systems Improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the status of the Distric='s permit to operate, and ~Jxe service agreement between the Dis=riot and VaJe develope~r of the subject project. The developer must arl-a~ge for the preparation of a de~alled pla~ of z~ica. ~e defiled phn of se~ce will ~dica=e location(s) ~d sizs(s~ of syst~ ~rov~ ~ ~ made by ~e Co ~de edUCe level~ of s~i~. To ~g~ f~ ~e prep~a=ion ~f a ~1~ of s~ice, ~e develop~ sho~d ~fo~stion des~tb~ng ~e s~Je~ ~oje~ ~0 ~ Dislikes ~er S~tCB Dep~=, (909) 925--7676, ~siun 409, as follows: Written re~uest for a "plan of servicen. Minimum $400.00 deposit (ler~er deposits may ~e required ~at~ew Fa~an VTTH 23373 October 20, 1993 Page 2 for sx~ensive development projects Or projects located ~ "difZi~lt to s~a" ~eo~a~c ~eas). 3. Pl~/~ps d~c~ ~s ~a~ lccn~i~ ~d hates of ~a s~j e~ pro~ ec~. Especiall~ helpful ~t~ials ~cl~a ~a~ plus ~d ~as~ pl~s. The Subject project is c~n~idered tribu*-Ty to ~he Distric~,2 Temecula Valley Re~i~nal Water Paclau~tion Facility (TV~WRF). The nearest existing TVRW~ system sani~ sewer facilities to The subject prOJect are as follows: Gravity-flow sewer aligned along Rancho California Road a~ Headowe Paxk~ay. The project representative must contact ~he District'e custumer Service Department to ~wkm s_--rangemen~s for plan check end field inspection of proposed District facilities and/or unsite pl, m~ing. ShOUld yOU have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact This office at (90S) 925-7676, ex-hemslon 468. Very V4-uly yours, nGC/cz A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: 3. Director's Hearino Uodate No report. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. PA93-0163. First Extension of Time None NOVEMBER 1.1993 Proposed first extension of time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1. East side of Ynez Road, approximately 200 feet south of Calle Halcon. Planning Assistant Craig Ruiz presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to Re- Affirm the previously adopted Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. I and Adoot Resolution No. 93-24 approving PA93-0163, First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the staff report and ADDrOVe PA93-0163, Tentative Tract Map No. 24172, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time subject to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Vestina Tentative Tract Mao No. 23372. Second Extension of Time Proposed second one (1) year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372. Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He advised the applicant is now called Margarita Village Retirement Communities, Inc. Planner Fagan said Conditions 23, 24 and 26 have been deleted by staff. Ray Casey explained these conditions originally were added to the project to bring about discussions with the applicant regarding certain underlying specific plan conditions, specifically the construction of Margarita Road. He said the developer is scheduled to meet with staff to discuss moving forward with the construction of Margarita Road. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 Commissioner Hoagland said he feels uncomfortable deleting these conditions. He said he does not believe the conditions hamper the developer of this project. He said previous erosion from this site resulted in in a lawsuit. Commissioner Hoagland said he felt the conditions were appropriate at this time. Commissioner Fahey asked if this development impacts Margarita Road. Ray Casey said the primary access to this development will be from Rancho California Road. He said this development is part of an underlying specific plan which has been conditioned for the construction of Margarita Road, however these two tracts will not directly benefit from the construction of Margarita Road. There are several other access points which serve as secondary access one of which leads to Margarita Road, although there is some distance between these tracts and Margarita Road. Commissioner Hoagland said he feels this entire development contributes to the erosion problems in this area. Commissioner Ford asked if there was a date certain for completion of the erosion control conditions. Ray Casey responded thirty (30) days from the approval of the extension would be appropriate. Commissioner Hoagland said he could agree to delete Conditions of Approval 23 and 26 with the understanding that staff would work with the developer to come up with a timing constraint for the Specific Plan as a whole. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to approve staff recommendation. Planning Director Gary Thornhill said there was a discrepancy in the park fees. Item 5, Condition of Approval 32 of Page 18, was a previously approved Condition and is not consistent with Condition of Approval 18 of Page 4 of the new Conditions. Mick Ratikin, architect for the developer, said the property has not been graded and asked if the developer was being conditioned for erosion control which is not part of this map. Additionally, Mr. Ratikin said the developer has a Development Agreement with the County for park fees and feels the appropriate acreage which the developer should dedicate in lieu of fees is zero acreage. Mr. Ratikin said this tract is approximately one mile from Margarita Road. It was moved by Commissioner Hoagland, seconded by Commissioner Fahey to withdraw the original motion and continue this item to allow staff to work with the developer on these unresolved issues. PCMIN 11/01193 -3- 11 I15/93 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Commission recess to allow staff and the City Attorney to discuss the impact of a continuance on the time extension. Chairman Ford declared a recess at 6:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 6:45 P.M. Director Thornhill advised the Council the City Attorney has determined that because the application has been filed, it places a stay on the time frame and therefore recommends continuing this item and directing staff to bring it back with the 3rd Extension of Time. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Vestino Tentative Tract Mao No. 23373. Second Extension of Time Proposed second one (1) year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373. Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to continue this item to allow staff to work with the developer on unresolved issues relating to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PA93-0175. First Extension of Time Proposed First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 26845, Amendment No. I. Located at the northeast corner of Ynez And Santiago Roads. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He stated staff has added Condition of Approval No. 32 as follows "The developer shall design and bond for Street A per the rural street develol~ment standards of the draft general plan". He said the NPDES condition has been added to this project. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 1993 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Prepared By: Matthew Fagan RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93-__, approving the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company REPRESENTATIVE: Mick Ratican, Rick Engineering PROPOSAL: A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres. Planning Area No. 40 is Very High Density Residential (25 d.u./acre target density). Planning Area No. 41 is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). LOCATION: Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-R (Rural-Residential), R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone-Residential Developments) Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PROPOSED ZONING: Not Requested R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 klb FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planning Area No. 40: Very High Density Residential (13- 20 d.u./acre) Planning Area No. 41: Medium High Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Vacant Vacant Rancho California Water District Tank Site, Park, and Single Family Residences Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area Number of Lots Project Density Planning Area No. 40 Planning Area No. 41 46.90 acres 66.00 10.66 d.u./acre 25.00 d.u./acre 6.20 d.u./acre BACKGROUND Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23372, Amendment No. I was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, The first Extension of Time was filed with the Planning Department on October 12, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the first Extension of Time on November 4, 1991 and the City Council approved the first Extension of Time on April 28, 1993. A second Extension of Time was formally submitted to the Planning Department on October 8, 1991. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 5, 1992. Staff contacted Kernper Real Estate Development Company (the present title holder of the property) in July, 1993, and was informed that they would ultimately be in receivership of the property within the next few months. Staff explained the status of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372 to Kemper and also expressed the necessity of taking action on the extension, because the map would expire on November 8, 1993. Although they did not currently hold title on the property at that time, they expressed that they did not want to see the map expire. Staff received notification from Kemper on October 26, 1993, stating that they had title for the land in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. Staff scheduled the item for the November 1,1993 Planning Commission meeting in order to avoid the expiration of the map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The current project is a request for a second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 (VT IM 23372). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372 is a portion of the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 40 and 41. According to the Specific Plan, Planning Area No. 40 is a proposal for a 237 unit congregate care and/or apartment facility on 9.6 acres. The R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372,pC 10/28193 klb 2 overall density of that project would be approximately 25 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 41 is a 66 lot, 232 unit condominium development on 37.3 acres. The overall density of Planning Area 41 is approximately 6.2 dwelling units per acre. Both Planning Areas are Retirement Community Housing. ANALYSIS Leaal Issues Reaardina V I I M 23372 The City Council approved the first Extension of Time for this project contingent upon an agreement being entered into by the applicant (Reference Attachment No. 5). This agreement contained timelines and responsibilities for removing all the sediments from the open channet and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humher Drive. The applicant is in the process of removing the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert. A condition of approval has been added to the project that assures that the applicant continues to remove the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert. Senate Bill 428 Senate Bill No. 428 went into effect on September 14, 1993. This Bill added Section 66542.11 to the Government Code and contains the following language: "The expiration date of any tentative subdivision map or a parcel map for which a tentative map has been approved that has not expired on the date that the act that adds this section becomes effective shall be extended by 24 months." The City Attorney has determined that the above referenced Senate Bill applies to V'I'FM 23372. The second extension was scheduled to expire on November 8, 1992. The approval of the current extension, along with the provisions contained in Senate Bill No. 428 extends the life of the map until November 8, 1994. New Conditions of ADoroyal New conditions of approval have been added to this project to ensure the public health, safety and welfare. The major ones pertain to requiring a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher; two conditions of approval (that are in effect immediately upon approval of the second extension of time) for the immediate removal of the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert for the Long Valley Wash; two conditions of approval added to insure completion of improvements to Margarita Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road; and a condition of approval that recreational trails and Class II bicycle lanes along Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreational Master Plan. Density for Plannina Area No. 40 The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The project proposes target densities of 25 d.u./acre. The City Attorney has determined that these densities are consistent with the overall density of the Specific Plan, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Development Agreement No. 5. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128193 idb 3 EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Existing zoning for the site is Specific Plan (S.P. 199 - Margarita Village). The Specific Plan land use designation for the site is Very High Density Residential - 25 d.u./acre target density for Planning Area No. 40 and Medium High Density Residential - 7.7 d.u./acre target density for Planning Area No. 41. The draft General Plan land use designation for the site is High Density Residential (13-20 d .u./acre) for Planning Area No. 40 and Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) for Planning Area No, 41. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village), Ordinance No. 348, and the draft General Plan, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions tothe previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The current project is a request for a second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I (V ~ E NI 23372), which is located in the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 40 and 41. According to the Specific Plan, Planning Area No. 40 is a proposal for a 237 unit congregate care and/or apartment facility on 9.6 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 25 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 41 is a 66 lot, 232 unit condominium development on 37.3 acres. The overall density of Planning Area 41 is approximately 6.2 dwelling units per acre. Both Planning Areas are Retirement Community Housing. Several new conditions of approval have been added to this project to ensure the public health, safety and welfare. The major ones pertain to requiring a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher; two conditions of approval (that are in effect immediately upon approval of the second extension of time) for the immediate removal of the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert for the Long Valley Wash; two conditions of approval added to insure completion of improvements to Margarita Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road; and a condition of approval that recreational trails and Class II bicycle lanes along Margarita Road and Meadows Parkway be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreational Master Plan. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village), Ordinance No. 348, and the draft General Plan. The approval of the current extension, along with the provisions contained in Senate Bill No. 428 extends the life of the map until November 8, 1994. R:\S%STAFFRPT~23372,pC 10/28/93 klb 4 FINDINGS The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. No subse~luent changes are proposed in the project which would recluire revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The project proposes target densities of 25 d.u./acre. These densities are consistent with the overall density of the Specific Plan, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Development Agreement No. 5. The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 41 is Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) and the Specific Plan designation is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density) . The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses.. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, because low-medium density residential uses exist to the east and are buffered by a golf course to the north and west of the site. The draft General Plan Land Use designations are medium density residential for the parcels which are immediately adjacent to the north and west of the site. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 10. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Meadows Parkway which will be a publicly maintained street. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.pC 10/28/93 klb 5 11. 12. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23372.pC 10/28193 klb 6 Attachments: Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 8 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 13 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time- Blue Page 20 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - Blue Page 21 Agreement: Stipulation and Order No. 91-14308-H11 - Blue Page 22 Exhibits - Blue Page 23 A. Vicinity Map B. Future General Plan Designation C. Zoning Designation D. Tentative Map R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128/93 klb 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28./93 Idb 8 ATFACHM NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMRN'DIMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR 469 DWELLING UNITS ON 46.9 ACRES LOCATED AT ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALWORNIA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCRIo NO. 953-060-007 WI~REAS, Kemper Real Estate Development Company in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WI~.REAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WttEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on November 1, 1993; WltEREAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts relating to the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1; NOW, TI~.REFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECISLA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months foliowing incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, ff all of the foliowing requirements are met: general plan. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the 2. The planning agency fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: R:\SXSTAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128/93 Idb 9 a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan ff the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest potion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission in approving the proposed Extension of Time, makes the foliowing findings, to wit: 1. The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. 2. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. 4. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time wffi be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State hw. The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The project proposes target densities of 25 d.u./acre. These densities are consistent with the overall density of the Specific Plan, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and Development Agreement No. 5. The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 41 is Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) and the Specific Plan designation is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). 5. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. B:\S~STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128/93 klb 10 6. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. 7. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. 8. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, because low-medium density residential uses exist to the east and are buffered by a golf course to the north and west of the site. The draft General Plan Land Use designations are medium density residential for the parcels which are immediately adjacent to the north and west of the site. 9. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 10. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be offof Meadows Parkway which will be a publicly maintained street. 11. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. 12. Said fmdings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. D. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Rel~ort. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Second One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres located at the northwest comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 953-060-007 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 Idb 11 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November. 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I Bl~!~.By CERTI/'Y that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of November, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: PI. ANNING COMMISSIONEIIS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIOn: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-r~ SECRETARY R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.pC 10/28193 klb 12 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372,PC 10/28193 Idb 13 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: Second one year extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.90 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, first Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a Dhasine plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Develooment AGreement No. 5. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 Idb 14 The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. A Mitiaation Monitorina Proaram shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the planning Director. 10. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development. 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development, Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map. B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: Construction landsceDe plans consistent with the City standards and the approved conceptual landscape plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 klb 15 (1) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s). (2) Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit, B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. C. Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. D. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. (2) Construction Landscape Plans. (3) Fencing Plans. (4) Building Elevations. (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board, 15. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. 16. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for insoection. 18. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. 19. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or oost a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. 20, The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128/93 klb 16 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All Questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humher Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the First Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.pC 10/28193 klb 17 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offerred for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 5.96 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 34. Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff prior. R:\$\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 klb 18 OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23372.pC 10/28/93 Idb 19 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTME'NT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 ATTN: Matthew Fagan: RECEIVED An 'd ..... . ..... RE: TRACI' MAP NO. 23372: BEING PARCI~LS 1,2,3,4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP 21884 AS SHOFIrlV ON A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 144. PAGES 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAI~' IN TIlE OFFICE OF DIE COIdTVTY RECORDER OF g41D RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOG~TItER 14rlDI A PORTION OF TIlE RANCHO TEMECUL4 GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF DIE UNITED STATES OFAMERICA TO LUIS FIGNES BY PATENT DATED JANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF DIE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUIV~, CALIFORNbI. (68 LOTS) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tract Map No. 23372 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health DeparUnent. Permanent prints of the plans of the %~tter sysiem shall be submitted m triplicate, with a minunum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original dra~ving to the City. of Temecula's Office. The prints shall show the rotereal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the rnam at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part l, Chapter 7 of the California Health and SafeW. Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Comnussion of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and ~vater company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the xvater system in Tract Map No. 23372 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide ~vater service to such Tract Map". This certification does not consmute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submiRed to the City of Temecula's Office to revie~v at least two weeks prior to the reauest for the reeordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary. for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive ,, Riverside, CA 92503, Phone (909) 358-5316, FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 * Riverside, CA 92513-7600) Ci~' of Temecula Planrang Dept. Page Txvo Arm: Matthexv Fagan August 18. 1993 This subdivision is within the Eastern Mumcipal Water District and shall be connected to the servers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City. of Temecula's Office and the Health Department. Perrranent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted m triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temeeula's Office. The pnnts shall sho~v the imemal pipe diameter, location of martholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint speci~cataons and the size of the servers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sexver lines and waredines shall be a portion of the s~vage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify. that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map No. 23372 is m accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water Dismet and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submined to the Citv of Temecula's Office to review at least two ~veeks nnor to the reauest for the mcordafion of the final man. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the final map. SM:dr (909) 275-8980 Specialist IV RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE · PEP,,RIS. CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183 October 18, 1993 TO: Planning Department ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: Tract 23372 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecu!a Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4ya-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. F'l RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 121h Sireel. Rive~ide. CA 92501 (909~ 2754777 * FAX (909) 369-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION t"l INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, lndio, CA 92201 (619) 863-8886 · FAX (619I 863-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Blue 'dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, th~ sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the. first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regardin9 the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Deparr~nent Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist Lster, M,nidpat ...er Dismet October 14, 1993 RECEIVED OCT 18 Matthew Fagan, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative TM No. 23372, 2rid Extension of Time Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed our file containing materials which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: General It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed 469 residential dwelling unit subdivision of 46.90 acres, located east of Margarita Road, between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way, in the Margarita Village Project. The subject project is located within the Distfict's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be understood the available capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to Lh.e occurrence of development within the District and programs of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the developer (or others), and which are considered necessapJ in order to provide adequate levels of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as follows: 1. Written request for a "plan of service". ,Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · Sanjacinto, California 92581-8300 · TeLephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 Maxn Office: 2045 S. SanJadnro Avenue, San Jacinro · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hemet, CA Matthew Fagan TTM 23372 October 14, 1993 Page 2 Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive development projects or projects located in "difficult to serve" geographic areas). Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project. Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. The subject project appears to sewer in two (2) different directions by gravity-flow (ie. Southwesterly towards South General Kea.rney Road and Rancho California Road, and northe~y towards La Serena Way). Other Issues The representative of the subject project must contact the District's Customer Service Department to arrange for plan check and field inspection of proposed District facilities and onsite plumbing. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, extension 468. Very truly yours, EAST/~;MU~CIt~AL WATER Customer Service Department DISTRICT DGC:cz AB 93-1124 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 1ST EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372,PC 10/28193 klb 20 A'rlACH1VIENT NO. 3 CITY OF TEIViECUI.A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372 Fixst Extension of Time City Council Approval Dat~: April 28, 1992 Expiration Date: November 8, 1991 PLANNING DEPAR~ Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. No building permits Shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundaxy until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lotJunlt shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library developmere. "The covenants, conditions and restrictions for the development shall require that each permanent resident in each dwelling unit shall be 55 years of age or over, including any apartments in planning Area 40 of the Specific Plan. The reference at pg. 144 of the Specific Plan that the apartments ar~ not subject to any age restriction is incorrect, and the Descriptive Svmmax~t at pg. 143 of the Specific Plan that the "planning area shall tenrain solely retirement community housing" is controlling." DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The following axe the Depaxtment of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review. SX~'TAFF'RPT~I:IIT2 q The Developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or mended and with the Conditions noted below. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessmere District must comply with the requirements of said section. Delete condition no. 24 of Riverside County Road Commissioner letter dated September 30, 1988 and replace it with the following: Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitiffation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter hiW a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. An erosion control and slope protection plan shall be submiRed to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The installation shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and site conditions shall be maintained to protect adjacem properties from damage due to runoff and erosion. Developer shall post a performance bond for erosion control and slope protection in an mount approved by the Department of :Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee ram multiplied by the axca of new developmere. The ch~ge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. As deemed necessary by the deparanent of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the fortowing agencies: Rancho California Water District; ~n~tem Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; planning Deps. rtment; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; and CATV Franchise. Community Services District Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notif3, the City' s CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shal/be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUTLr~ING PERM1T: Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property of project, including that for war-tic and public facility mitigation as required for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the mount in effect at the time of payment of fee. If an interhn or final public facility mitigation fee or disuict has not been finally established by the dam on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any ph~e thereof, the developer sh~ll execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing thi.~ A~Eement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The mount of the security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer undemands that said AF,,ement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit W the project in the mount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions from this Condition, of this A~'eement, the formation of any traffic impact fee disu-ict, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; vrovided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impant fee, and the mount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 10. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and mv, et lights on all hiterior public streets. 11. All street improvements striping, marking and signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 12. Prior to March 25, 1992, the Buie Corporation shall make arrangements to remove all the sediment from the open channel and box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and I-Iumber Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. s,sT~'m-num 3 TRANSPORTATION ENG~G PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHNIF_.NT PER1VIITS: 12. Delete Condition No. 36 of Riverside County Road Commissioner letter dated September 30, 1988, 13. Traffic striping, maxIcing and street name signing plans shall be designed as directed by the Department of Public Works. 14. A construction axea traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to tnffic circulation as required by the City Engineer. TENIECULA CONINIUN1TY SERVICES DISTRICT: 15. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay die fair market value of 5.49 acres of required parkland to comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid sh~ll be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992) 16. Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may bc dedicated shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application process. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992). A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372,pC 10128193 Idb 21 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF ~PROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23372 AIiERDED N0. I STANDARD CONDZTZONS The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, tts agents, officers, and employees from any clatm, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or lts agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, tts advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract 23372 Amended No. 1, which action is brought about wtthtn the time period provided for tn Collfornla Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside wtll promptly notify the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will coo erate full tn the defense. Zf the County fails to promptly notify the suCdtvtder oFany such claim, actton, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. 4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County $urveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety, The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site, If any grading is proposed, th~ subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. Condtt4ons of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 2 7. A grading pemtt shall be obtained from the Department of Bullding and f Sa ety prior to coownencement of any gradtrig outstde of county maintained road right of way. 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be patd prior to recorderton of the final map. 2m · The subdivider shall comply vrlth the street Improvement recommendations outltned tn the RIverside County Road !)epartment's letter dated 9-22-88 a copy of whtch is attached. Legal access as requtred by Ordinance 460 shall be provlded from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. .All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall conttnue tn force unit1 the overntng body accepts or abandons such dd offers. All e 1cartons shaY1 be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval the Road Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, uttllttes, etc., shall be shown on the final map tf they are located w~thin the land division boundary. All offers of dedication ant conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Mater and sewerage d]sposal facilities sha13 be Installed in accordance with the provisions set forth tn the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 9-7-88 a copy of which ts attached. The subdivider shall comply wtth the flood control recommendations outltned by the RIverside County Flood Control Dtstrtct's letter dated 7-22-88 a copy of which Is'attached. If the land dtvtston 11es vrlthtn an adopted flood control dratnage area pursuant tO Sectton 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees' for the construction of area drainage facilities h shall be collected by t · Road Commissioner. The subdivider shall comply wtth the fire improvement recommendations outlined tn the County Fire Harshal's letter dated 8-17-88 a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phastng, Including any proposed common open space area Improvement phastng, tf applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phastng shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots In each phase, and shall substantially confom to the tntent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 3 17. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3,8B of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots, Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan No, 199 Amendment No, 1 zone, When lots are crossed by mJor public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the uttltty easement, de Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained condition and shall t planted with interim be · ther provided with other erosion control measures as Director of Butldfng and Safety. in a weed-free landscaping or approved by the e. Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be located awe and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block w~ls and landscaping. Prior to RECORDATXON Of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. Prior to the recordatton of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met, bo County Fire Department County Health Department County Flood Control County Planning Department County Parks Department Rancho Water District Eastern Municipal Water Dtst. Prior to the recordatton of the ~tnal map, General Plan'Amendment 150, Specific Plan no. 199 Amendment No, 1, Development Agreement No, 5, and Change of Tnne No, 5107 shall be approved by the Board of h Supervisors and s all be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformante with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. 19. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to recordatton of the final map. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 4 The Con:non open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final map end shall be managed by a roster property owners association, Prior to recordatton of the ftnal subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the folloWrig docueents to the Planning Deparl~ent for revtew, which docmnents shall be subject to the approval of that depar~ent and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveyed tttle to the purchaser of an Individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ts incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for 'reytew shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or untt, (c) provide for ownership of the common and (d) contain to following provisions verbatim: "Nothwtthstandlng any provision in thts hclaratton to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall manage anu continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'III-17' of the specific plan attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owner's association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be .prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be (eminated, 'substantially' amended or reperty deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the ~lanntng Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest- A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' tf it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area'. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control.' Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 5 Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final map is recorded. Prior to recordatton of the final map, clearance shall be obtained from Netropolttan Water District relative to the protection of applicable easements affecting the subject property. Lot line adjustments shall also be completed. The developer shall comply with the requirements as shown in Specific Plan No. maintained by HOA or other public entity: 1D-5-BB) following parkway landsca ing 199 Amendment No. I unVess {Amended by Planning Comission 1) Prior to recordatton of the final mp the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a T parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative ract No. 23372 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape perromance bond which shall be released concurrent1 with the release of subdivision performnee bonds, quaranteeing ~e of all landscaping which will be viabtltty installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkwa landscaping maintenance unttl such time as maintenance ts taken overly the district, 24. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. 25. Street ltghts shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 6 2) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road s) 4) Oepartment's traffic engineer, the developer shall also ftle an appltcattem with LAFCO for the formation o a treat lighting district, or'annexation to an existing lighting ;istrt~t, unless the site ts ~thtn an extsttng ltghting district. Prtor to recordatton of the ftnal map, the developer Shall secure condtttomal approval of the street 11ghttng application from LAFCO, unless the stte ts within an existing 11ghttng district. All street 11ghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the De artmerit of Building and Safety for plan check approval and sha~l comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Prior to the issunace of GRADING PERMITS: the developer shall provide mitigation for removal of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat as follows: a. Nemorandum of Understanding between the developer and the Caltforinia Department of Fish and Game, or b. Compliance ~th an adopted County program for the mitigation of removal of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of gradtng permits, detailed'common open space area parking landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following. 1) Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. Landscape screening where requlred shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscapin and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by ~he Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed undergroumd. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 7 g · 4) S) 6) Parkways and landscaped butldtng setbacks shall be landscaped to Fovlde visual screening or a transition into the prtmary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth bermtng, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees tn conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amentries where appropriate as /pproved by the Planntng Department and Specific Plan No, 199 Amendment No, 1, Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of spectmen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. ~here Streets trees cannot be planted ~thtn right-of-way of interior to t.suffici.nt road ri,ht-of-.ay. the ~ad r(ght-of-~ay. 7) Landscaping plans shallIncorporate native and drought tolerant plants - where appropriate. s) All extsting specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained, 9) All trees shall be minimum double staked, Ueaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked, 10. Parking layouts shall comply with Ordinance 348, Section 18.12. All existtrig native s actmen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible, Uhere they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning 1 Director, Rap acement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans, If the project 4s to be phased, prior to the approval of grading pe~ntts, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall tnclude the following: ]) Techniques which w~11 be uttltz~d to prevent eroston and sedimentation durtng and after the grading process. 2) Approximate t~me frames for grading and Identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of ~anuary h throug 14arch. 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 8 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: A1 cut and/or ftll slopes, or individual combinations therof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benchtrig) plan, increase wt~Ketrrtgatton. t o fifteen percent grade. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding d ten (10) feet in verttcal heights shall be contour-grade incorporating the following grading techniques: The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. 3) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. ~) Nhere cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and coment on the proposed grading ~th respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redtrect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUZLDING PERH~TS the following conditions sha.ll be satisfied: a. In accordance ~th the written request of the developer to the county of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement between the developer and the county of Riverside, no building ermtts shall be Issued by the county of Riverside for any parcels w~thtn the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-Interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms of said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing of public facilities. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 9 Mtth the submittal of building plans to the Department of Butldtng and Safety the developer u 111 demonstrate compliance with the acoustical study prepared for Vesttn Tentative Tract 2337I Amended No. 1 which estebltshed appropriate mttVgatton eeasures to reduce amhtent tnterior noise levels to45 Ldn and exterior noise levels be]o~65 Ldn. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be pemttted withtn the subdhtston, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devtces shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. dam Building separation between all buildings Including fireplaces shall not be less than ten {10) feet unless approved by Department of Building and Safety and Ftre Department per Specific Plan No, 199 Amendment No. 1, (Amended by Planntng Commission 10-5-88) e.: Al1 street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet, f. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic Irrigation. Prior to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be sattsfied: Prior to the final bufldtng Inspection approval, by the Building and Safety Department, walls shall be constructed along Kaiser Parkway and Rancho California Road, La Serene Nay, Kaiser Park Way per the Design Hanual. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Otrector and may be phased with the project. (Amended by Planning Commission 10-5-88) b. Wall and/or fence locations shall conform to attached Figure ZZI-%7 of Specific Plan No, %99 Amendment No. 1. c. M1 landscaping and irrigation shall be installed tn accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupanc permits, If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim ~andscaptng erosion and control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Butldtng and Safety, All parktrig, landscaping and Irrigation shall be Installed in accordance wtth approved plans and shall be vertfted by a Planntng Department field Inspection. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 10 Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdlv]s~on tn accordance ~th the standards of. 0rdtnance 460 and Spectftc Plan No. Amendment No. 1 35. Development of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 shall comply with all provisions of Spectfic Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 and Development Agreement No. 5. KG:mcb:mp LeRoy D. Smoot OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER ~ COUHTY SURVEYOR Riverside County Planning Cemisslon 4080 Lemn $tret Riverside, CA 9250:1 September ZZ~ 1988 Re:.Trsct Hap 23372 - Amend #1 - Road Correction SChedule A - Tee SP Ladles and Gentlehen: Vtth respect to the conditions of approv·l for the referenced ~entative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street Improvement p]ans end/or road. dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 ~nd Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461), It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their mission or unacceptsb!lttymay require the mp to be resubmitted for furt er consideration, These Ordinances and the following h conditions are essential parts and · requirement occurring tn ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11.. They are Intended to be complemantanj and to describe the conditions for · complete design of the improvement, All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions she1] be referred to the Road ConnJssloner~s Office. The lenddtvlder shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, t.e,, concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by both. All drainage easements shell be shown on the final rap and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachme·is by land fills are allowed", The protection shall be as approved W the Road Department, The landdlvtder shall accept and property dispose of a11 offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. Zn the event the Road Connfssloner permits the use of streets for drainage pu oses, the provisions of Article XZ of Ordinance No. 460 wtlr~ apply, Should the quantities exceed the street cbpaclty or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department, Page 3. Na3or drainage is Involved on this laiddivision end Its resolution shall be es approved b~ the Road Department. 4. Streets "BBB' and 'KICK' shall be improved in accordance with Nodfried County Standard No. 103, Section A, {44'/44'), 5. Stmt "CCC" thru "~J~" shall be improved within the dedicated right of W in accordance with 14odlfted CountY Standard No. 105, Section A, {36'/36') 6. raiser Parkway shall be Improved within the dedicated Hght of way in accordance with CountY Standard No. 101, (38'/50'). 7o The landdivider shall provld~ utllit~ clearence from Rancho Calif. gater District prior to the rocordation of the final map, The maximum centerline gradient shall'not exceed 15L The mlntmmucenterltne radii shall be as approved b~ the Road Department. Prior to the filing of the final map with the County Recorder's Office, the developer shall provide evidence of continuous maintenance of all proposed private streets within the development as approved b~ the Road Commissioner, Sidewalks within the development shall be as approved b~ the Road Commissioner. -. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet unless otherwise specified tn the particular zoning classification. All driveways shall conform to the applicabh Riverside CountY Standards and shall be shown on the street !mprovenent plans, A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be c~nstructed between driveways. 14hen 'blockwalls are roqutred to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention yell shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved 'by the Road Commissioner," The ,tintmum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face ef curb. Should the developer provide evidence of roll up doors on the betlding plans, s reduction of 4' may be allowed but tn no use shall the garage be closer than Z0 feet from beck of sidewalk oP curb in the absence of sidewalk. 16. A secondar~ access roads to the nearest paved road maintained by the Country shall be constructed within the public right of ey in accordance with Country Standard RO. 106, Section B, (3Z'/60') at a grade and altg~nent U app~ved by the Road Con~!ssloner. 17. Prior to the recordation of the fins1 map, the developer shall deposit with t~e Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for tm Should traffic signal pacts. the developer choose to defer the time of pa.wnent, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of · building permit.. Zmprovement plans shall be based upon I centerline profile extending amtntmum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Comtssioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. L:lectrical and communications trenches shall be provtded tn accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 8Z7. Asphalttc enulston (fog seal) shall be applied not has than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall confom to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throghout the landdivision. Corner cutbacks tn conformance N1th County Standard No. 805 shall be shove on the final map and offered for dedication at the inter- section of raiser Parkway and Street "rJcr.,. 23. Lot access shall bare strict·don raiser Parkway and so noted on the final map. 24. -Landdivisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provtde erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 25. All centerline intersections shall be at The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coontinal~d with TR 23371 end TR 23373. $treet lighttrig shall be requiret in acconiance with O~dinence 460 and 46Z throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this p~oposal qualifies under en existing assessment district or not. If not, the lend owner $hall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of · "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000.- 6H:lh ~~on Engineer. 8-17-88 4080 tenon~ree. t.~e ill ~ CA 92501 (TI4) Zl,.xnz BL-'7ORD ~RAC': 23372 - A!4ZHDED 13., iOJU) C0g~ECTXOH 11 VXCh respect to the condttlonm of approval for the above referenced hud division, the Y~re Department reckends the foXloMln2 fire protection measures be provlded in mccordance with l~tverside County Ordinances mud/or recognized fire protection mtandarb: FZRX PROTECTION · he water mains shall be capable of providing · potential fire tiny of 2500 GPH and In actual fire floM available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GFH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Appraved super fire hydrants, (6'x4'x2Jx2J) shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction eith no portion of any lot frontage more than 163 feet fro~ · hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the racer system plans to the Fire Department for rayicy. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types,*lo~atlpn and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flov requirements. Plans shall. be stgned/approved by · registered civil engineer and the local rarer conpanyvith the foliovine certification: el certify that the design of the vater system is in accordance vith the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire ~epur. menf. om The required vatmr myatem, including f~re hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate Mater agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. All buildings shell be constructed vith fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any rood shingles or shakes mball have · Class Maw rating and shall be approvad by the Fire Depart~nsnt prior to Installation, NITICATION ?riot to the recordarSon of the final maps the developer shall deposit utth the Xiverside County Fire Department, · cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he/she may enter into a vritten agreementsfish the County deferring said psymenZ to the time of ~msuance of · butldiq perndto Sub_'Jecc: 'rz-act 23372 ~ll ques2ions reisrdiz~ the Beaufag of conditioas shall be referred to the F~re Depar~en~ ~a~ and ~ineer~Z s~aff. s~a R~V~S~DS ~U?~TY PI, A.,~TNZNG DSPT. DATE: September 7, 1988 Environmental Health SeTvices Envlror~enr~l Health Service has reviewed ~racz Map 23372, Amended No. I dated July 19, 1988. Our current comenzs will ~emaj~ as Itsted 4r, our letter ds*.ed June 20, 2988, RIVERSIDE C0ONTYPLAN~IN~ DEPT, 4080 Lemon Street R~vers~de, CA 92502 Kathy Girrord JUN 21 1988 RIVEH~IDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE; TRACT I~P 23372: That certain land situtated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside. State of California. being Parcels 1,2,3,4 and 5 of Parcel Map 21884 as shown on a map thereof filed in Book 144, Pages 24 through 33 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said Riverside County together with a portion of the Rancho Temecula granted by the Government of the United States of America to Lois Vignes by patent dated January 2860 and recorded in the Office or the County Recorder o~ San Diego Cotmay, California. (68 LoLs) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 23372 ~'~d reconunends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Mealth Department. Permanent prints or the plans or the water system shall be submitted in triplicate~, with a minimum scale not less than.one inch equals 200 reef, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The priers shall show the internal pipe diameter, location ef valves and rife hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects vith Div. 5, Part l, Chapter 7 of the California Mealth and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No, 1O3 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. Riverside Cotmay Planning Page Two Attn: Kathy Gifrord June 20, 1988 The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map 23372 is accordance with the water system expansion plans mf the Rancho California Water District and that the water service,storage.and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service'to such tract. This certification does not constitute a gumrantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose'. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. This Department has a statement from the Rancho California ~ater District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdividero It will be necessary f~r the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Eastern ~unicipal ~ater District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District. the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, almng with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe ddxmeter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new s~stem to the existing system. A single plat indicating location or ;sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by · registered engineer and the so~er district with the following certification{ 'I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map 23~72 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated~astes from the proposed tract.' ' Pa~e ~'hree ' ~"1"~: ~athy Girfor~ .,~e 20~ 198~ It viii be necessary for fin&nci&l &rr&ngements prior to the recordation of the final map. Sincerely, S~:tac LD be made RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS'TRICT Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Ve have reviewed this case and have the following co~nents: Except for nutsance nature local runoff whtch may traverse portions of the property the project ts considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, a storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should con~ly with all appHcable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There ts adequate area outside of the mature1 watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 38 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports.' Thts project ls tn the drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rGlesArea and regulations. The proposed zontng ts consistent with extsttng flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the 4mplled density. The Distrlct's report dated ::Tune~-~.,19~r ts st111 current for thts project. The District does not obJeCt to the proposed minor change. 7he attached comments appl~. ' Very truly yours, KENNETH L. ED~/ARDS HN H. KASHUBA entor Ctvtl Engineer : J,l~ Z~/i~eB DATE: June 1, 1988 TO: Assessor 8utldtng and Safety Surveyo~ - Dave Dude Road Departsent Health -'Rolph Luchs " Fire Protection Flood Control Dtstr~ct F~sh & rdme LAFCO, S Pa¶sleY L1,So Postal Service - Ruth Eo Dav?dson 1 . RIVERSi~_= COUNTy PLANNI~ZG DEZPARTMENT $hertfrs Depxrtment ASrports Department UCR, Life Sctenc..e .Dept., kT.I~. Hayhew GRDFIT Eastern 14unSc~al t~ater DSst. Rancho California ~ter D~st. Els~nore UnSon School D~st. Temecula UnSon School DSst. 5Serra Club, San Gorgon~o Chapter CALTRA~S 18 'VESTXNG TRACT 23372 - (Sp Pl)- E.A. 32547 - HargarSta VSllage Development - Robert Be$n, WEllSam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho cal(fornSa Area - First Supervisor(a1DSstrtct - N. of Rancho Cal¶fornta Road, W. of Kaiser - R-R Zone 44 Acres - (Concurrent Cases TR 23371 & 23373) - RELATED CASE SP 199 Nargartta VIllage -Nod - A.P. 9Z3-210-02 Please TeVSN the case described above, along w(th the attached case map. A Land DSvSsSon ComEttee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1988. I( St clears tt wtl) then 90 to publSc hearing. Your coct~ents and recoemendatSons are requested pdor to June 5, 1988 in order that we m ~nclude them tn the staff report for thls particular case. $hogld you have any questSons regarding this Item, please do not hosttote to contact Kathy G1fford at 787-6356 Planner The ElsSnore Unton HIgh School NstrSct fadlStSes are overcrowded and our educatSonal programs sedously ~mpacted by SncreasSng student popularSon caused by new resSdenttal, cormerda1 and Sndustdal construction. _ Therefore, pursuant to CalSfornSa Government Code SectSon 53080 of A8 2926 and S5 327, th~s dSstrict levies a fee against all new development projects NSthfn its boundaries. SIGN]WUR; 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE., CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, RO~,,4 3C INDIO, CALIFORNIA 922C (619) 342-82; ; PLAFI ,_, , DEPA::IEITIE~; DATE: June ~o Z988 TO: Assessor Building and Safety Surveyor -Oave Duda Mad Department Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection flood Control District '- Fish & Game I).FCO, S Patslay IJ.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson RiVERSiDE COUNTY pLANNiNG DEPARTMENT Sherifles Department grtcu ure m soner Airports Department UCR. Life Science .Oept.. W.tL Nayhew EROFZT ' ' Eastern Nunt¢tpal I/ater Nst. Rancho California kter Nst, £1s~nor~ Union School Dtst. Terecula Union School Dtst. Sierra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter CALTRNiS 18 VESTING TRACT 23372 - (Sp P1) - E.A. 32547 - Hargartta Village Development - Robert 8etn. William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho california Area - First Supervtsortal District - K. of Rancho California Road, W. of Kaiser - R-R Zone 44 Acres - {Concurrent Cases TR 23371 & 23373) - RELATED CASE SP 199 ~targartta Village - Hod - A,P. 923-210-02 Please review the case described above. along with the attached case map. A Land Ohislon Co~rntttee meeting has been tentathely scheduled for June 20. 1988. If tt c~ear= it will then go to public hearing. ~our comments and recoa~endattons are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we ~ include the~ in the staff report for this particular case. Shou3d you have any questions regarding this lte~, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gtfford at 787-6356 4080 LEMON STREET. 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 ("/14.) 787-6181 EASTEP~N INFORMATION C'ENTER Archaeological Research Unit Universiily of Cllifomia Riversial*, CA 92521 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 3! INDIO, CALIFORNIA 922' (619) 342-82' ATTACHMENT NO, 5 AGREEMENT: STIPULATION AND ORDER NO, 91-14308-Hll R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372.PC I0/28193 klb 22 1 2 · 9 10 11 12 14 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 SCOTT F. FI~'~ ---~ ~ CITY OF TEHEC=. and BURKE, ~/T.v.~MS & SOEENSEN =2~0 Br~l Su~ 640 Cos~ H~a, ~ifunia 92626 {2!3) 236-060Q UNITED STAT~S BAN~R=PTCY COURT SOUTw~R~ DZ='J~CT OF CALIyORNIA CASE NO. 91-14308-Hl! ST!PtTLATION FOR CO~ROHISE OF CIaA/NS AGAINST CH~_PTER 11 ESTATE Cmmpany WHEREAS, on ~r abou= Mar=h, 1989, MVDC signed an f~r ~uslon ~n~ml and ~n~ hprov~ f~r T=a~ W~ERF/S, said TracTs; bo~h of These Agreemen=s required tha~ W~DC 4 or :].tabor c~ons o= de:Csct.'l.vs matmrialm furnishe,~:t; B ~ ~ N~. 20735; 9 ~, BedZD~ 10 ~alo~r - ~ =ea'l pru~ cum~ris~g Palomar Village, 1~=~ a~ Ha~i~ 13 ~ ~cho ~li=omia ~ad$, ~m b~inus ~ociatiDn =Dr said 14 ~op~y was ~ ~=~ 15 said pr~pe~y, am do~m~t~ ~ ~e le~ from ~v~mide Co~ 1B ~lood ConSul and ~a~ Dis~i~ 18 ~, ~e Vill~g~ !9 respons~ility p~suan~ 20 Valley Wash a pan of said ~a~;.' 21 ~, un De~ ~,' 198~, ~e City of T~e~la ~ ~c~u~, muccmed~g %0 ~e riqn~ ~d dU=i~ of ~e Co~y ~ ~f ~verside, includ~g ~e per~umance ~nds r~fcwnced ~low; 24 ~, Seaion 6.14 . 0~2 (b) 27 op~a=~o~, ~va=ion, =ill or o~' alt~anion, tn~fcmm vi~ 4 ~de as ~ ~ inj~icus ~ p~Zic healS, sa~e~ a~ velfare 6 ~, ~n ur ~u= Hove, 1990, ~e ci=y c~ T~ecula 7 dire~ad ~ =o remove ~e Kil= deCEiVed ~ ~ng Valley ~ash. 8 ~d ~ =~cved said sil= a= a ~s= of approxima=el~ ~8O,O00.OO; ~ ~, ~ ~a~ed =or Soil Ta~, Inc., =o prep~e a 10 li~=md ~oeion-~d~ =ur ~n~ ~alle~ ~alh; 11 ~, said s~ ~di~=ms 12 ~ has con=i~ted 7S% of ~e 2cil deposited in ~ng Valley 14 ~, approx~ 3,SO0 1B been depasi=ed in ~e ~lv~ ~aa~en~ Palomar Village and in 18 ~n~ Valley ~ash s~ce ~e previous cl~nup, whi~ xil= Ms ~en 1~ d~ived a~cG= en=irely 18 ~, ~ty asser~ a claim a~ain~= ~C ~d Be~rd !9 p~suan= ~ ~e Cl=y Grading, Nuisance ~ S~vi~ion 20 Ordinances. ~d ~e ~a~ Map 21 ~ng Valley Wash and ~e culv~ ~d~ Pal~ Village; ~ ~, ~C s~ci=ically d~ies ea~ and 25 conrained h~e~above; 26 NO~, ~~. 27 F~W~: 2B 1 6 9 10 11 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 21 27 clays cf C~t-= _p~aTovl/Of ~axi2 Order, Fi ,en ~thousand ~11~, sil= h ~e ~lv¢ ~~ P~o~ Village, and =0 fut~e ma~n~ of ~e ~v~ ~d ~ng Valley ~ash. 2. ~c ~all, ~~ ~ la~c ~ July 1, 1992, and ~ Valley N~ ~ue~ x~n ~ad ~d H~ ~ive:, ~ ~ Beh, W~lli~ ~2= ~ ~socia~, da~d ~ce~r 1985, =~ ~e =o11~g A. Scope of york is to include ~e following: (1) ~inV ~d ~sp2eal o~ all ~eea, ~2h and {2) ~va=ion and -~o~ of ~ial ~ Fine r~ading of flowl~es and slo~ pli~e~ eleva=ic~ ~d l~es se= b~ a rqis~c~ ~li2omia civil e~ine~. mu~ally accep~le ~o ~e p~ie2, at e~nse. (4) If w~rk is no= uomple=ed by J~y 15, ~e~. (5) All s~rinkler= an~ irriga=i~n e~ipment s~ll upon c~mple=ion. (6) Undar~Tour~l flow pipe =hall be cleaned, repa!Ted and pU= in=o ~o~ working order upon tompie=ion. [~) ~ a~Ja~ l~ping shall ~ replaced :epairm~. (8) N~y ~ aE l~s= one ~e~ ~=ure work ~gins. ~C cr i~s cun=a~2r shall ~ respone~le for ~n=a~r m~l held ~ ~m~less of any pTeblems ~ing f:~ d~p si=a. provide all ~t, ~t~ial, and necess~ ~o ~fo~ said work a= i=s cos~, and ~all ind~i=y and hold ~, Ci=y and h~less from all cla~ for liabili~ based upon, cr da~ges ~ising =tom, ~crk per=omed h~eund~ ~r ~ea~ of a~ portion o= ~is Agesmen= ~C, i~ ccnm~ors, agen~ or ~ployees. responsibility ~ ~n~ Underground Alert and all o~ c~ncemed ag~cies for ~C and i=s con=a~ur shall be solely -5- 2 4 6 8 9 lO ll 12 15 14 16 17 19 20 22 2~ 25 27 28 sidawa]~, ~a]~d~Dln~, st , at and bet~ee job site a~d' d~ site. It shall also i~luda all . p~ i~ w~rk at i~ mole co~t. ~C or i~ ~=a~or-mh~l name ~, Ci=F and ~ca ~li~ ~d ~oviae a ce~ifi~=z p=oo= ~f appr~=a w~r~' e compensatl~ Cons~on wat~ ~d cons~c=ion wa~ me=er will ~ ~ovite~ by ~C or iU con~ac=or as ~C. or i~ succlors aM aresigns, ~all ~n=~ ~ ~in ~ng Valley Wash ~o ~e above a~cifica~ions in ~e mnn~ provi~ a~ve, i~ sole ~, up ~o ana un~l ~e C=~y of T~e~la relies Fai~=~l ~=o~nca Bond ~usiun ~n=~l and ~dscape ~prov~en~ ~a~ 2a371-1, Bond N~. 79005276~7, ~ Fai~ul P~o~nce Bond for ~osion Con=ol and ImproveenOs for Trac 23371-B, Bond 790Q529484. ~, no~ing herein may M cQnsL~ed as a waiver by ~e Ci=y of l~ righ=, any, =o require ~e s=ety or said bonds ~ ~fom ~ obliga=ion o= ~DC under ~il T~wnXrr~33T~ ~ --6-- 2 4 7 10 ll 15 15 25 Qr T. he A~TeementB ~hey sa ~a~ =h~ Ci=y *~11 use =~ rel~e of said ~ n~ lesm ~ s~y ~s. sai~ B~n~$, ~ng Valle~ Wash must ~ cleane~ an~ ~e ~m~ fl~ipe ~11 ~ r~r~ =o a work~g uric ~ veil as ~e a~Jace= t~ri~ler ~st~s. ~, if in ~e opinion of ~e city ~g~e~ a $i~ifi~= amour ~f lilt =---~ in ~e ~v~ ~~ Palo~r Village, a= ~e ef ~e ~ ~= ~is ~e~, ~e ~nds viII ~ =~us~, ~d ~C, i~ assi~s ~r s~ll clean'said Pal~ box uulv~ as well. ~, any d~age ~one ~ any con~e~e ~prDV~S ~ ~llS, shall M repa~ed. ~ ~y submit an hvolce up =o ~e ~oun= ~= $~, 000 f~r bulldog ~d comple=ing con~e=e ~aimage ~provemen~ ~end~g from Y~on ~o M~r in ~e ~ng ~alley Wa~ up ~nil 1, lse=. Upon e~s~i~n of sai~ invuiues ~ ~ in a ~ely =ashi~n, sai~ invoices ~hall ~ ~a~ 10 1 2 10 11 · 12 21 22 2~ 2~ 2~ ~=~, ~r~ any ~ all :tgA~, d~, a~ damages o~ any k~nd, ~o~ rela~d ~ ~e ~ ~evtously deposited, ~es~rly ~i~g ~r ~i~ may ~ depostUsd ~a~ 22371 in ~ng Valley Wa~ Gd ~e culv~= ~ea~ Pal~ V~la~e. In cuuid~ation of ~e promises confined h~ein, ~ ~nerls~ do hetty rel~se and ~s~l C1~, ~d Bedford, ~d ~e~ offices, agents, e~loye~ and ~ccessors-~-in=~= from ~y and all righ~,.~la~, ~---~, ~d daM~es ~d, ~o~ ur ~o~, ass~ed or r%sul=~ =tom ur related =o ~e sil~ prmvic~l~ deposited, pres~=.l~ exis=in~, cr whi~ deposited Z~om ~C cr o~ ups~aam ~develc~ hnd in ~n~ Valley we2 and ~e ~lv~ ~ea~ Palo~ Village. City, and i~ owners, ag~, assigns an~ successors in in~es~ dm h~xby rmlease and dls~ar~e ~e ~, ana Bedford, and 2 4 5 10 14 17 22 ~7 and dm~es ef ~y kind, ~o~n :r un~ewn, 0~ ~pS~m ~deve~oped ~d in ~n~ Valley Wash ~d ~a ~ulv~ ~ea~ Pal~ar Vi~la~a, ~edford, and i~ o~s, a~en~s, assigns ~d dis~e ~a C~y a~ ~, and ~tr agents, ~oymms and s~cc~mo~-in-~r~ any ~ all ri~nu, ~a~, ~mn~, a~ previously deposi%ad, pr~ly ~istin~, ~y be deposit~ rrcm ~C cr c~ ups~m ~evelcped land in ~ng Valley Wash and ~e ~lven ~n~ P=lo~ Village. In ccnsid~atien of ~e prumisee ~n=a~ed h~eh, ~C, and i~ o~erx, a~s. assi~s and su~essors ~ in=~ do h~y rel~se and disch~e Bed=crd, ~e City and ~, and cfflc~s. ~gen~. ~loyees ~d TB)~IIO~_IP~T? ~ 2 -and damages cf any Find, sown cr unknown, 3 asserted er unasserned, resulting from cr related 4 ~ ~he silt previously deposited, presently ~ eacistin~, or %rai~h may be depcsiUed from MVDC or 6 other ups=sam undevelcped land in Long Valley 7 Wash and the ~ulver~ beneath Palcrest Village. 8 4. The pal--ties hereto unders~d and age= t_ha= all 9 the~.T righv.~ under Sectzion 1542 of the Civil Code of CaliZor~a 10 or any s~--41ar law of any s~a=e cr tertiary of the United 11 ST.~as, are hereby ex~esaly waived. Said Sec~cion reads as 12 follows: 14 Ex*cin~uished. A general release does not 15 e~:end to claims which the creditor does not 16 know or suspe~-Z ~ exist in hie favor at the 1~ nime of executing the release, which if 18 by him, mus~ have materially affected his 19 set=lament wiUh the debtdr." 20 5. It is understood and agreed =ha= this Stipulation 21 represents set=lament of' disputed claims and is no= to be 2= c~nsr. z~aed as representing an admission of liability on behalf 2~ any parry =o this stipulation. The pax~cies, however, in=end ~4 buy V/~eir peace and to forever provide a/ull and complete 25 release.and discharge.from any and all liability arising 26 the taTaneactions, matters. and events more particularly identified 27 hereinakx~ve. 2S ~owl~a of any riQhU w~ ~ey have or ~y hav~ wi~ 4 ~ ~e o~, ~d ~n= ~ey ~ve re~i~d ~ep~dent legal 8 S=ipula~on, ~ ~i~ respe~ ~ ~e h~eina~vs rmferenced ? dispute. 8 ~e p~es h~e~ a~owl~e ~hat af~ en~in~ 9 ~is S=ipula~un, ~ey ~y ~sCov~ ~=f~=n= ur a~i~iu~l 1O conc~h~ ~e s~j~ ~ of ~ ~ip~lation or 11 ~d~ing nf ~se fa~s. The )flee h~e=u, Z2 ~r~Qly asses ~e risk o= SU~ {a~ ~g so ~f~t and 13 ages ~= ~ie Stipula~on, s~ll ~ all r~, ~ effe~ive 14 ~ not s~3e~ to rescission, ~ncellation ~ temnation 15 =euon of any such ad~tio~l Qr d~en= 16 7. Should ~y p~? br~g an a~i~n a~a~= ~e 17 ~e p~ose Qf enforcing ~e =~s of ~is S=ipulatiQn, or f~ 1S dmges arising from its ~uch, ~ ~ such event, ~e 19 p=evail~g pa~y ~all ~ en=i~ed ~ its reasonable 20 fees ~d costs in a~ition to ~y o~er avcd en~ 21 c~Z. 22 S. ~is Stipulation shall ~e =o ~e ~nmfi~ ~ p~ies and ~o ~eir respective =ucc~ssors, repres~u~ivee and ~ assigns, and shall ~ bind~g upon each o{ ~e =~ g. T~ls S=ip~ati~n ~hall, in all topers, ~ 26 ~t~re~ed, ~forced and gov~ed ~ ~d ~der ~e laws o{ ~e 2~ State uf ~li=unia. This A~eem~= conn~ns ~e en=~e 28 -11- 2 subject ~==e_ Acteel and supersedes a~d places el! pric= negoCiaT. lOns, ~roposea agre~ ~ agre~en=s, vhe~ ~i=cen 4 ~r Qral. This S=ipula~n ~y ~ ~i~ in 10. This. ~ip~a=iun ~all ~ e~Je~ =o a~p~ approval ~cause i~ ar~e~ ~e righ~ 'and/or obliga=i~n~ ~C. TMs ~ip~a=ion shall no= M binding cn ~y cf 8 parties h~e~ unl~s and ~=il su~ a~ruval is pr~sd 9 2~ipula=icn ~c~u e=fe~ive as =o ~C. ~C shall apply 10 au~ approval wi~ ~o (a) b~e2 days Gf ~C 11 co~el'e re~ivin~ ~i=~n no=ifi~=ion cf ~is S~ipulanicn's 12 eXe~=ion by ~, Bed=ord and ~C. No=wi~s=anding any !3 forsgo~ ~o ~e c~n~, ~e ~orc~= and ~=s~rena=icn 14 ~is 2~ip~la=isn s~!l no= ~ mubje~ ~ ~e J~isdicnicn B~=~ Co~, ~cep= =~ ~e e~en= such ~forc~= 18 in=e~rs~=iun af~e~s ~e righ~ or oblige=ions cf ~c ~d~ ~is S~ipula~on. IN ~ITN~S WH~OF, each o= ~e undosigned have !9 ~is Stip~a=ion on ~e date ~d ye~ indicted ~low. h~ 20 ~e below reed persons warran~ ~a~ ~ey ~e duly au~orized 2! si~ ~is agm~en= cn ~half of ~eir principal and ~e au~nrizad ~ bind ~air principal ~ ~is Stipulation. 2~ 26 28 1 2 4 6 7 8 - 10 11 13 :I.5 '1.6 .I,8 :I..9 2.,!. 22 21, 1l"7 2.8 U av, e~: DaM: d :1992 pAT2./c'T~, aiJD~r-T-, ~AYOR & Califurnia liml=ma · a Cali=ornia cor'para~ion, ~eneral PtT~/~er · ,, 1992 By: _ , 1992 By: By: NEVA~A-RA~CH~ C/LIle~RNIA, LTD. & Call=ornia limits4 ~shi~ NEVADA CAPITAL, LTD. · General Par',nea: ,.t-1992 1992 -13 - 3 5 6 8 10 11 '3,.2 · 16 17' 1B 20 22 23 25 2S 2? By: Sco~= F. Field, Ci=y A=~0rney C=TY OF TEX~C~,a DaCe~: Vi~or Vileplane, Zsq. By: . Dated: Dennis Klimme~, -14- , 1992 , 1992 , 1992 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 kJb 23 CITY OF TEMECULA ~oax~ I o San Deego CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: P" DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME A VICINITY MAP NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372.PC 10/25/93 klb CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: p A DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME D SITE PLAN NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRP'~23372.PC 10/25/93 klb CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: VERY HIGH/MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - MARGARITA VILLAGE CAS~: NO.: P.C. uATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372.PC 10/25/93 klb ITEM #5 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- , approving the Third Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kernper Real Estate Development Company REPRESENTATIVE: Mick Ratican, Rick Engineering PROPOSAL: A third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres. Planning Area No. 40 is Very High Density Residential (25 d.u./acre target density). Planning Area No. 41 is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). LOCATION: Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-R (Rural-Residential), R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone-Residential Developments) Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PROPOSED ZONING: Not Requested R:\S~STAFFRPT~23372-1.PC 12/2/93 klb GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planning Area No. 40: Very High Density Residential (13- 20 d.u./acre) Planning Area No. 41: Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: VBcBnt Vacant Rancho California Water District Tank Site, Park, and Single Family Residences Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area Number of Lots Overall Project Density Planning Area No. 40 Planning Area No. 41 46.90 acres 66.00 10.66 d.u./acre 25.00 d.u./acre 6.20 d.u./acre BACKGROUND Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. The First Extension of Time was filed with the City Planning Department on October 12, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the First Extension of Time on November 4, 1991 and the City Council approved the First Extension of Time on April 28, 1993. A Second Extension of Time was formally submitted to the Planning Department on October 8, 1991. The Second Extension of Time is currently before the Planning Commission for their consideration. The Third Extension of Time was filed with the Planning Department on October 6, 1992. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 5, 1992. At the Planning Commission meeting, the Second Extension of Time was continued because the applicant did not concur with conditions of approval for erosion control and the payment of Quimby Fees. Also at this meeting, the applicant requested Staff to place the Third Extension of Time on the next Planning Commission agenda. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The current project is a request for a third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 (VTTM 23372). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372 is a portion of the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 40 and 41. According to the Specific Plan, Planning Area No. 40 is a proposal for a 237 unit congregate care and/or apartment facility on 9.6 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 25 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 41 is a 66 lot, 232 unit condominium development on 37.3 acres. The overall density of Planning Area 41 is approximately 6.2 dwelling units per acre. Both Planning Areas are Retirement Community Housing. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1,PC 12/1/93 Idb 2 ANALYSIS Since this extension is being considered concurrently with the second extension of time, all issues have been addressed with the second extension of time. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Existing zoning for the site is Specific Plan (S.P. 199 - Margarita Village). The Specific Plan land use designation for the site is Very High Density Residential - 25 d.u./acre target density for Planning Area No. 40 and Medium High Density Residential - 7.7 d.u./acre target density for Planning Area No. 41. The General Plan land use designation for the site is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) for Planning Area No. 40 and Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) for Planning Area No. 41. Although the Planning Area No. 40 of the project is not consistent with the General Plan, approvals through the vesting tentative map and the Specific Plan supersede the authority of the Plan. Planning Area No. 41 of the project is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village), Ordinance No. 348, and the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The current project is a request for a third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 (V 1 I M 23372), which is located in the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 40 and 41. According to the Specific Plan, Planning Area No. 40 is a proposal for a 237 unit congregate care and/or apartment facility on 9.6 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 25 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 41 is a 66 lot, 232 unit condominium development on 37.3 acres. The overall density of Planning Area 41 is approximately 6.2 dwelling units per acre. Both Planning Areas are Retirement Community Housing. FINDINGS The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372-1.PC 12/2/93 kib 3 10. 11. 12. The project has been previously approved as a Vesting Tentative Map. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The density of this area that was approved through the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is 25 d.u./acre. This inconsistency with the subsequently adopted General Plan does not necessarily constitute grounds for denial of this extension. Planning Area No. 41 is consistent with the City's General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 41 is Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) and the Specific Plan designation is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, because low-medium density residential uses exist to the east and are buffered by a golf course to the north and west of the site. The General Plan Land Use designations are medium density residential for the parcels which are immediately adjacent to the north and west of the site. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Meadows Parkway which will be a publicly maintained street. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372~l.PC 12/2/93 klb 4 Attachments: 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 6 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 Draft Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No, 1, Second Extension of Time - Blue Page 13 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time - Blue Page 14 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 - Blue Page 15 Exhibits - Blue Page 16 A. Vicinity Map B. Future General Plan Designation C. Zoning Designation D. Tentative Map R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1,PC 12/2/93 klb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372-1.PC 12/1/93 klb 6 ATrACH]VIFaNT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A THIRD ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT ~ NO. 2~372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR 4~9 DWELLING UNITS ON 45.9 ACRES LOCATED AT ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CAI.rI~ORNIA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-050-007 WI~.REAS, Kemper Real ~state Development Company in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County 1.and Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WlcrF. REAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WItEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on December 6, 1993; WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts relating to the Third Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1; NOW, TR~.u~.FORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findin2s. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following fmdings, to wit: A. The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as mended herein. B. No subsequent changes axe proposed in the project which wouM require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (End) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. C. No new information of substantial impomance to the project has become available. R:\S%STAFFRPT%23372-1.PC 12/1/93 klb 7 D. The project has been previously approved as a Vesting Tentative Map. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 40 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre). The density of this area that was approved through the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is 25 d.u./acre. This inconsistency with the subsequently adopted General Plan does not necessarily constitute grounds for denial of this extension. Planning Area No. 41 is consistent with the City' s General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 41 is Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) and the Specific Plan designation is Medium High Density Residential (7.7 d.u./acre target density). E. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. F. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. G. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or weftare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. H. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical rehtionship with adjoining properties, because low-medium density residential uses exist to the east and are buffered by a goff course to the north and west of the site. The General Plan Land Use designations are medium density residential for the parcels which are immediately adjacent to the north and west of the site. I. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not rapresent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. J. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Meadows Parkway which will be a publicly maintained street. K. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. L. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incoxporated by reference. M. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1.PC 12/2193 klb 8 Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has detennined that said 1~, still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Third One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for 469 dwelling units on 46.9 acres located at the northwest comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor' s Parcel No. 953-060-007 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the followlug vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONF_J~: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-m SECRETARY R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1.PC 12/1/93 klb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372-1.PC 12/1/93 klb 10 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Project Description: Third one year extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Map No. 23372, Amendment No. I - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.90 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, second Extension of Time, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, first Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-l.PC 12/1/93 kib 11 An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval within thirty (30) days of approval of this Third Extension of Time, subsequent to the Second Extension of Time. Prior to Recordation of Final Map The Developer shall Construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8. 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the First Extension of Time, and subsequent to the Second Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated November 30, 1993, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated December 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1 .PC 12/1/93 klb 12 S~2';[ BY: TDfCLL~, ;12- December 1, 19~3 R.~\CHO ~ATER- CITY uF TE~,t~CLL.-~;~- a' a Mr. Saied N~h City Of Tcmccula Planninl~ Delmrtment 43174 Business Park Drive Temeeula, CA 92590-3606 STJ'!I~CT: Water Avafiability Tract Map 23372 Dear Mr. Naaseh: l'lcas~ be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the bounctaries of Rancho California. Waza Disu'lcl (RCWD). Wa~er service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arningcments between RC'%VD and the prol:~ny owner. Water avafiab~ity would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any queslions, please contact N!s. Senfin Doheny. Sincerely, RANCHO CAT -wORNiA WATER DIS'rRICF Steve Brannon, P.F_ Development En~neering Manner cc: Senta Dohcrty, Engincm'ing Technician t~VERSID;~ · , ~,~ .... ~. ~ C~, I M HAR.RIS · ~ CKI~F RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACIX'FO AVENUE · PERRIS, CALIFORNIA 92570 * (909)_657-3183 November 30,1993 T0: Planning Department ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: Tract 23372 Third Extension of Time With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4ya-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. r~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12:h Sleet, Riverside, CA 92501 ~,39) 275-4777 · FAX (909) 309-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION ~ INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201 {619) 863-8886 · FAX {619) 863-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The' post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineerin9 section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1.PC 12/1193 klb 1 ~ CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: SecondoneyearextensionofTimeforVestingTentativeMapNo. 23372, Amendment No. I - a residential subdivision of 469 dwelling units on 46.90 acres. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, first Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a Dhasinq plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Aereement No. 5. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372.PC 10/28/93 klb 14 7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. 8. A Mitklation Monitorina Proaram shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 9. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 10. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development. 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map. B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the City standards and the approved conceptual landscape plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 klb 15 ( 1 ) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s). (2) Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit. B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. C, Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. D, The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. (2) Construction Landscape Plans, (3) Fencing Plans, (4) Building Elevations, (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board. 15. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval, ' 16. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 18, Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. 19. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or Post a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. B:\S',STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10128193 klb 16 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the First Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372.PC 10/28/93 klb I 7 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offered for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area, 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 5.96 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff prior. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 ktb 18 OTHER AGENCIES 35, The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittel dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittel dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:~S~STAFFRPT~23372.PC 10/28/93 Idto 19 October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43 174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 ATTN: Matthew Fagan: RECEIVED ,-,p~ ,, Ans 'd .......... RE: TRACT MAP NO. 23372: BEING PARCELS 1,2,3,4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP 21884 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 144. PAGES 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOGt"7FI'IER TrVITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO LUIS V1GNES BY PA TENT DATED JANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE Olq'ICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (68 LOTS) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Environmental Health has reviex~d Tract Map No. 23372 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approvcd by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original dmx~ing to the City. of Temecula's Office. The prints shah sho~v the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the mare at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects ~vith Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety. Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certif3' that the design of the water system in Tract Map No. 23372 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it w~ll supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or anv other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final man. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every. lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It xvill be necessary. for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive. Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) City of Temeeula Planning Dept. Page Txvo Arm: Matthe~v Fagan August 18, 1993 This subdivision is within the Enstem Mumcipai Water District and shall be connected to the servers of the District. The server system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City ofTemeeula's O~ce and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula's Office. The prints flail sho~v the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the ne~v system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sexver lines and watefiines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the server district with the following certification: "I certify, that the design of the server system in Tract Map No, 23372 is in accordance with the sexvet system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated ~wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The olans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks offor to the request for the recordation of the final mao. It will be neeessm'y for financial arrangements to be completely finaiized prior to recordation of the final map. ~i~'~v~7'~n~enta/ ealth Specialist IV SM:dr ~ (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 ~T S~ JAC~O A~ P~S, (909) · C~O~ 9~70 * 657-3183 October 18, 1993 TO: Planning Department ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: Tract 23372 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPMand an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4x2-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are si~ned by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The re.quired fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. ~l RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 121h Slmet, Rive~ide, CA 92501 ~909', Z75~777 * FAX (909) 369-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION :'1 INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, [ndio, CA 92201 (619) 863-8886 * FAX (619) 863-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and 'fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarmsystem. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable 2A10BC. Contact placement. fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of a certified extinguisher company for proper Blue 'dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the-first building permit. Applicant/developershall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department P]~ning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist - ,jLastern jX unicipa[ ,,,er L)istrict 4L~# D F. C October 14, 1993 RECEIVED OCT 18 Matthew Fagan, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Alls'd ........ SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative TM No. 23372, 2nd Extension of Time Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed our file containing materials which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: General It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed 469 residential dwelling unit subdivision of 46.90 acres, located east of Margarita Road, between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way, in the Margarita Village Project. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be understood the available capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to ,h-, occurrence of do,,pl,',,',menr within the District and, ~, of systems imorovement. ........ ~, .... Droprams As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the stares of the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as follows: 1. Written request for a "plan of service". Mail To: Post Office Box 8300 · SanJacinco, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 -x,L'in Office: 2045 S. SanJacinto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 R Oakland Avenue, Hornet, CA Matthew Fagan TTM 23372 October 14, 1993 Page 2 Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive development projects or projects located in "difficult to serve" geographic areas). Plans/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project. Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. The subject project appears to sewer in two (2) different directions by gravity-flow (ie. Southwesterly towards South General Kearney Road and Rancho California Road, and northerly towards La Serena Way). Other Issues The representative of the subject project must contact the District's Customer Service Department to arrange for plan check and field inspection of proposed District facilities and onsite plumbing. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, extension 468. Very truly yours, Customer Se~ice Degment DGC:cz AB 93-1124 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372-1 .PC 12/1/93 klb 14 ATTACH1VEENT NO. 3 CITY OF TY_N~ECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23372 First Extension of Time City Council Approvnl Date: April 28, 1992 Expiration Date: November 8, 1991 PLAN'NING DEPART~4F, NT Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any resMential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. "The covenants, conditions and restrictions for the development shall require that each permanent resident in each dwelling unit shall be 55 yeaxs of age or over, including any apartments in Planning Area 40 of the Specific Plan. The reference at pg. 144 of the Specific Plan that the apartments are not subject to any age restfiction is incorrect, and the Descriptive Svmmal7 at pg. 143 of the Specific Plan that the "planning area shall c0nLain solely retirement community housing" is controlling." DEPARTIVIENT OF PUBLIC WO]RKR The following are the Depaxtment of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Depa~tuacnt of Public Works. tt is understood that the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review. S~TAFFR, F~3~ 1 The Developer shail comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or mended and with the Conditions noted below. PRIOR TO KECORDATION OF TIlE YINAL MAP: Pursuant to Section 66493 of the. Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision winch is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Delete condition no. 24 of Rivemide County Road Commissioner letter dated September 30, 1988 and r~place it with the following: Prior to recordation of the fmal map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffzc signai impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffzc signai mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a buffcling permit. An erosion control and slope protection plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for r~view and appwval. The installation shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and site conditions shall be maintained to protect adjacent properties from damage due to runoff and erosion. Developer shall post a performance bond for erosion control and slope protection in an mount approved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the preva~Hng Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the axea of new development. The charge is payable to the Mood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to tkis property, no new charge needs to be paid. As deemed necessary by the department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho CalLfomia Water District; lagtern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Mood Control District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; P)ann~ng Department; Department of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; and CATV Francinse. Cormnudity Services District swr,u='~"~2rc~n 2 Prior to fmai map, the subdivider shall notify the City' s CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed m CATV Standards at time of street improvements. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encmaclunent permit sh~ll be o. bt~ined from the City Engineer's Offxce, in addition to any other permits required. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUrr PING PERMIT: Developer shall pay any capital fee for mad improvements and public fac'aities imposed upon the property of project, including that for traffxc and public facility mitigation as required for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been fin~lly established by the date on winch developer mcluests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of winch has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to securo payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of th6 security shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to excgexi $10,000. Developer understands that said A~reement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions from this Condition, of thi~ Agreement, the formation of any trs/fic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for tins project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amoum thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 10. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 11. All street improvements striping, marking and signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 12. Prior to March 25, 1992, the Buie Corporation shall make arrangements to remove all the sediment from the open channel and box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Fiumber Road to the satisfaction of the City Eng~ineer. TRANSPORTATION ENG]NF,,ER]NG PRIOR TO TI-IE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACI-IlvH=NT PERIVIITS: 12. Delete Condition No. 36 of Riverside County Road Commissioner letter dated September 30, 1988. 13. Traffic striping, marking and street name siFning plans shall be designed as directed by the Department of Public Works. 14. A consauction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a re~stered Civil Engineer and appmved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City En~cineer. TEVrECULA COMMI/NTrY SERVICES DISTRICT: 15. Prior to recordafion of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 5.49 acres of required parkland to comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). The mount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992) 16. Exterior slopes bordering an arterial street may bc dedicated shah be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application process. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992). ATFACHMENT NO. 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, R:\S\STAFFRPT%23372-1 .PC 12/1/93 klb 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VE~I'ING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23372 A~ENDED NO. I STANDARD CONDITIONS The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold hamless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, votd, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract 23372 Amended No. 1, which'action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will coo erate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the sue such claim, action, or proceeding or divider of any fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. 2. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. 3. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. 4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County $urveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report Shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading is proposed, th~ subdivider shall submit one.print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 2 14. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior to c~a~encement of any grading outside of county mintained road fight of way. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement reconunendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Oepartment's letter dated 9-22-88 a copy of which is attached. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provlded from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall 'Continue in force until the overning body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Co~x~issioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Comissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication ai conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Counts Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 9-7-88 a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall compl~ with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 7-22-BB a copy of which is'attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant tO Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees' for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Con~nissioner. The subdivider shall comply with the fire "improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Narshal's letter dated 8-17-B8 a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 3 Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a. Corner lots and t~rough lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so is not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. b. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 zone. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,GDD square feet,. exclusive of the utility easement. d. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free "condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. e. Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be located awa and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block wX~ls and landscaping. Prior to RECORDATION Of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: am Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met. County Fire Department County Flood Control County Parks Department Eastern Nuntctpal Water Dtst. County Health Department County Planning Department Ranch, Water District Prior to the recordation of the]tnal map, General Plan Amendment 150, Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1, Development Agreement No. 5, and Change of Zone No. 5107 shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. 19. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to recordation of the final map. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 4 20. The Con~on open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final map and shall be managed by a master property owners association. 21. Prior to rec0rdation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveyed title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for 're~iew shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 6D years, {b} provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common and {d} contain to following provisions verbatim: 'Nothwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall manage ~ continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'III-17' of the specific plan attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common aream, or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owner's association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'con~on area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to aT1 other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating ~he assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be {ermineted, 'substantially' amended or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the lanntng Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'coa~on area'. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control.' Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 5 Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the Same time that the final map ts recorded. Prior to recordatton Of the final map, clearance shall be obtained from Hetropolttan Water District relative to the protection of applicable easements affecting the subject property. Lot line adjustments shall also be completed. The developer shall comply with the requirements as shown in Specific Plan No. maintained by BOA or other public entity: 10-5-BB) following parkway landsca ing 199 Amendment No. I unVess (Amended by Planning Commission 1) Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance. 2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be released concurrentl with the release of subdivision performance bonds, quaranteeing ~e of all landscaping which will be viability installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkwa landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over [y the district. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. Street lights shall be-provided within the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed d street light layout first from the Roa Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. Page 6 2) 3) Following approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Oepartment's traffic' engineer, the developer shall also file an application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting t r district, or annexation to an existing lighting d st ict, unless the site is within an existing lighting district. Prior to recordatton of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO, unless the site ts within an existing lighting district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be sho~m on electrical plans submitted to the De artment of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shaV1 comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County · ' Comprehensive General Plan. Prior to the tssunace of GRADING PERMITS: the developer shall provide mitigation for removal of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat as follows: Memorandum of Understanding between the developer and the Califorinia Department of Fish and Game, or Compliance with an adopted County program for the mitigation removal of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, detailed 'common open space area parking landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Deparment approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following. 1) z) Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. 3) All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view-' with landscapin and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by ~he Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 7 9 · Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to Forida visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering stdewalksm benches and other pedestrian amenittes where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department and Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. 5) Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Where streets trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. 7) Landscaping plans shallincorporate native and drought tolerant plants ' where appropriate. B) All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, telJeered and/or retained. 9} All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. 10. Parking layouts shall comply with Ordinance 348, Section 1B.12. All existing native s ecimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they be preserved they shall be cannot relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentatton during and after the grading process. 2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of january through 14arch. 3} Preliminary pad and roadway elevations· Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page B 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: A1 cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations therof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benchtrig) plan, increase slo ratio (t,e, 3:1), retainin walls, and/or slope planting combined witheirrigation, Ah driveways shaV1 not exceed a fifteen percent grade, All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten {1D) feet in vertical heights shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, th horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and coment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the pal eontologtst and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading 'activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: a. In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement between the developer and the County of Riverside, no building germlts shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms of said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing of public facilities. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 9 With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety the developer will demonstrate compliance with the acoustical study prepared for Vestin Tentative Tract 23371 Amended No. I which established appropriate mitVgation measures to reduce ambient interior noise levels to4S Ldn and exterior noise levels below6S Ldn. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10} feet unless approved by Department of Building and Safety and Fire Department per Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. (Amended by Planning Commission 10-5-88} e.: All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet. f. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the final building inspection approval, by the Building and Safety Department, walls shall be constructed along Kaiser Parkway and Rancho California Road, La Serena Way, Kaiser Park Way per the Design Manual. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Deparb~ent of Building and Safety and the Planning Director and may be phased with the project. (Amended by Planning Commission 10-5-88} b. Wall and/or fence locations shall conform to attached Figure III-17 of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. c. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupanc permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim ~andscaping erosion and control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All parking, landscaping and irrigation accordance with approved plans and shall be Department field inspection- shall be installed in verified by a Planning Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. 1 Page 1D Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of. Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I Development of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23372 Amended No. I shall comply with all provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I and Development Agreement No. 5. KB:mcb:mp OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER 6 COUNTY SURVEYOR Riverside Count.v Planning Comtsston 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 September 22~ 198~ Re:,Tract Nap 23372 - Amend ~1 - Road Correcttot Schedule A - Team SP Ladies and Gentlemen: Mtth respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land divisionimp, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road. dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 ind Riverside County Road Zmprovement Standards (Ordinance 461). Zt is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existtrig easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their mission or unacceptabilitymay require the rap to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts end a requirement occurring tn ONE Is as binding as though occurring in a11.. They are Intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Co~zntssloner~s Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, I.e,, concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by beth. All drainage easements shall be sho~n on the final rap and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no beildtng, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. 2, The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. Zn the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Artlcle XI of Ordinance No. 460 wtll apply, Should the quantities exceed the street c&pacttyor the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department, NaJor drainage is involved on this la~ddlvtsion and its resolution shall be is approved by the Road Department. Streets "888w and "YJ~" shall be improved in accordance with Modified County Standard No, 103, Section A, (44'/44'). Street "CCC" thrd "aJJ" shall be improved within the dedicated right Ot' bray in accordance with !~difled County Standard No, 105, Section A, {36'/36') raiser Parkway shall be improved within the dedicated ~'Jght of way in accordance with County Standard No. 101, (38'/50'}, l~e landdivider shall provid& utility clearance from Roncho Callf. later District prior to the recordation of the final map. The mxtmum centerline gradient shall *not exceed 15%. The mintram centerline radii shall be as approved bY the Road Department. Prior to the ftling of the final rap with the County Racorder's Office, the developer shall provide evidence of continuous maintenance of all proposed private streets within the develo~nent as approved by the Road Commissioner. Sidewalks within the development shall be as approved by the Road Commissioner, -. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet unless otherwise specified in the particular zoning classification. 13. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street Improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be c~nstructed between driveways, 14. When Blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved 'by the Road Commissioner, The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb, Should the developer provide evidence of roll up doors on the building planS, e reduction of 4' may be allowed but tn no case shall the garage be closer than 20 feet from back of sidewalk or curb in the absence of sidewalk. A secondary access roads to the nearest paved road maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public right of way in accordance with County Standard No, 106, Section B, (32'/60') at a grade and alignment as app~ved by the Raad Comisstoner. 17, Prior to the recordeaTon of the final map, the develope~ shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $15o.oo per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts, Should the developer choose to defer the time of pa~nent, he may enter into a ~rttten agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of I b, zildtng permit,. Zmprovement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Comisstoner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. 19. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Asphalttc enulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the 5tare Standard Specifications. 21. Standard cul-de-sacs and knuckles and offset cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throghout the landdivision. Corner cutbacks in confonnance with County Standard No. 805 shall be sho~n on the final map and offered for dedication at the inter- section of Kaiser Parkh~y and Street 23. Lot access shall be restricted on Kaiser Parkway and so noted on the final map, 24. -Landdlvtsions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets. shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 25. All centerline intersections shall be at The street design and Improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated w|th TR 23371 and TR 23373, Street 1 Ightfng shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout-the subdivision- The County Service A~ea (CSA) Administrator datemines whether this proposal qua1 files under an existing assessment district or not, Zf not, the land o~er $hall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of · "Lighting Assessment District" in accordance with Go.vernmental Code Section 56000.' GH:llt g~neer. ~XA ~PA~rT~EN'T 0~: F-(:~, AND ~ PRO~ RAY ]'~RARD 8-17-88 3~/CT 23372 - allENDED el, lOAD COEEECTZOH eZ With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Tire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with RIverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FZKE PROTECTION l'he water mains shell be capable of providing a potential fire flow mf 2500 GPH end an actmal fire flow available from any one hydrant shell be 1500 CTH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI realdual operating pressure, Approves super fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2Jx2|) shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lo~ frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the wat[r system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types,-lo~a~tpn and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shallbe signed/approved by a registered civil engineer end the local water company with the foliovinE certification: "l certify that the design of the water system is · n accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Xiverside County Fire Dcparr. men~,s The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being ~laced cn a~ individual lots All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described In Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall have a Class aS' ratlag and shall be approved by the Flre Department prior to installat~Dno ~ITICATION ?riot to the recordselma of the final map, the developer shall deposit v~th the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as ~tttgatton for flre protection 4~pects. Should the developer choose to defer the ~!ue of payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement wtr. h the County deferring said payment to ~he time of issuance of a buildinS peruit. Subject: 1'tact 23372 ~sge 2 1~1 questions regarding the eeanlng of conditions shall be referred to the Flre Department Planning and Z~lneering staff. Chief F/ze Depa~taen~ planner I~BrERSIDI~ COLI~rT~ P~ING Dl~Irr. _1~1~.~* ~P~I' ,v~p 23372. A~e~de~ No. I ])A~: SeDte~heT 7, 1988 Environmental Health Services !~nvtronmenl~l Health Services has reviewed Trace Map 23372, ~ended No. 1 dst~l July 19, 1988o O~r curr~n~ comments will re~inas s~ated in our letter da~edJune 20, 1988, June ~,0, 1988 RIVERSXDE COU~TrYPLAK~XNG DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street ~iverside, CA 92502 Attn: Kathy Gifrord JUN 21 1988 RIVEHsIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE; TRACT MAp 23372: That certain land sitorated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside, State of California, being Parcels 1,2,3,4 and 5 of Parcel Hap 21884 as shown on a map. thereof filed in Book ~44, Pages 24 through 33 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Re=order of said Riverside County together with a portion of the Rancho Temecula granted by the Government of the United States of America to Luis Vignes by patent dated January 1860 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder San Diego County, California. (68 Lo~s) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Map No. 23372 and recommends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate:, with a minimum scale not less than.one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the sims of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California ~ealth and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16. and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. Riverside County Planning Dept. Page Two Attn: Kathy Gifford June 20, 1988 The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: certify that the design of the water system in Tract Map 23372 is accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water service,sturage. and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service'to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose'. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. This Department has a statement from the Ranohm California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing- satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. ~t will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sevage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installe~ according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the ~ealth Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe ~iaaneter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of ~sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be si~ned by a registered engineer and the se~er district with the following certification: "l certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map 23372 is in accordance w~th the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipate~t~astes from the proposed tract.' ' Riverside County Planning Dept. Page Three ' A~N: Kathy Gifford J~e 20, 1988 3t will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. SincereIF, SM:tac RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIverside County Planning Department CountyAdministrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regtonal Tea~ No. 5,p. Area: Temec,!~ Re: Ve~]~ T.~-~ ~-~-~7~- · 4-vc,,;/cd'/Vo. / ie have reviewed this case and have the following co~ents: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project is considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, m storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area consists of well defined ridges and natural water- courses which traverse the property. There is adequate area outside of the natural watercourses for building sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobfie home supports.' This project ts tn the drainage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the applicable rilesArea and regulations. __ The proposed zoning is consistent with existing flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the implied density. ~/ The Dtstrict's report dated :7'une=-~,:le~ is still current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. The attached comments apply. Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EDWARDS C e{~~ HN H. KASHUBA enior Civil Engineer PL ,nnln DEP RCm-=n DAI'E: ~tune 1, 1988 'TO: Building and Safety Surveyor - Dave Dude Read Department Health -'Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control District Fish & Game LAFCO, S Paisley U J, Postal Service - Ruth E, Davidson RIVERSi.OE COUNTy PLANNING DEPAF, Tt,.IENT Sheriffms Depgrtment Parks pertinent - George B. Agriculture Commissioner Airports Department UCR, Life Science .Dept., W.W. ~ayhe~ GRDFIT " Eastern Nuntctpal Water Diet. Rancho California Water Diet. Elsinore Union School Dtst. Ten~cula Union School Diet. Sierra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter CAJ. TRN6 ~8 'VESTING TRACT 23372 - (Sp P1)'- E.A. 32547 - ~argartta Village Development - Robert Beth, ~tlltam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho california Area - First Supervisortel District - N, of Rancho California Road, W, of Kaiser - R-R Zon 44 Acres - (Concurrent Cases TR 23371 ~ 23373) - RELATED CASE SP 199 Hargartta Village - Hod - A,P. 923-210-0 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map, A Land Division Comittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1988. If it clear tt will then 90 to public hearing, Your co~nents and reco~nmendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we m: include thm in the staff rapor= for this particular case, Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Glfford at 787-635q Planner C0~jENT$: The Elstnore Union High School District facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously impacted by increasing student population caused by new residential, connercial and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 5308D of AB 2926 and S8 327, this district levies a'fee against all new development projects uithin its boundaries. SIGNATURE 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501 {714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET,. .)M 3 INDiO, CALIFORNIA 922 (619) 342-82 DATE: June 1, 1988 TO: ~sessor Building and Safety Surveyor - Dave Dude ~oad Department Health - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control District '- Fish & Game 1.AFCO, S Paisley tI.S. Postal Service - Ruth E, Davidson RIVERSIDE COUNTY pLANNiNG DEPARTMENT Sherlff's DepartJnent Parks pertinent - George B, Agric ~ture Comtssioner ut Airports Departn-nt UCR, Life Science .Dept., W.W. I~ayhew GRDFIT ' ' :' Eastern 14untctpal Water Otst. Rancho California Water Dist, Elstnor~ Union School Dtst. Temecula Union School Dtst. Sierra Club, San Gorgonio Chapter C~LTRAXS #B VESTING TRACT 23372 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 32547 - Hargartta Village Development - Robert Betn, William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho california Area - First Supervisortel District - N. of Rancho California Road, ~, of Kaiser - R-R Zon 44 Acres - (Concurrent Cases TR 23371 23373) - RELATED CASE SP 199 Margartta Village - Hod - A.P, 923-210-C Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Connittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1988. If it cleat it will then go to public hearing. Your conTnents and recor~nendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we ~ include thm in the staff report for this particular case, Should you have any questions regarding this lte~, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gifford at 7..B7-6356 Planner EASTElaN iNFORMATION ~ENTER Archaeotogica) Research Unit Universiily of Califorrda Riversid®, CA 92521 SIGNATURE l>lr~ n~4nt n.~ ~nd tt+te 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RD/ERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 {'/143 787-8181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM INDIC), CALIFORNIA -92. (619) 342-8 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372-1.PC 12/1/93 kJb 16 CITY OF TEMECULA Sin D~egu CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: F DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME A VICINITY MAP DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT~23372-1.pC 12/1/93 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: VERY HIGH/MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - MARGARITA VILLAGE CASE NO.: P )ATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372~l.PC 12/1/93 klb CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: F DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23372, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME D SITE PLAN DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23372-1.PC 12/1/93 klb ITEM #6 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning December 6, 1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time - A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 - a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Planning Area No. 38: Very High Density Residential 14.8 d.u./acre. Planning Area No. 39: Commercial 7.5 acres. Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner BACKGROUND This project was continued from the November 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting. At the meeting, the applicant opposed the conditions of approval that were added to the project for erosion control and Quimby fees. The Commission directed Staff to address these issues and then bring the item back before them for their consideration. ANALYSIS Planning, Public Works and Community Services Department Staff met with the applicant on November 8, 1993. Community Services staff stated that the Quimby requirements that were placed on the Second Extension of Time are the standard conditions that they place on all maps. The applicant did not concur with this; however, they believed that the matter would ultimately be resolved by the Planning Commission or City Council. The erosion control condition was discussed next and the Department of Public Works ultimately decided that the timeline would be necessary for this requirement and that the condition would stand as written. Attachments: 2. 3. 4. Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 2 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 6 Draft Planning Commission Minutes: November 1, 1993 - Blue Page 13 Planning Commission Staff Report: November 1, 1993 - Blue Page 14 R:\S~STAFFP,.FTL~3373.PC2 12/2/93 klb '1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A'ffACH:IV[E_N~F NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF THE, PLANNING COMMISSION OF TB~F- CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDiW~.NT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMIN1UM SUBDIVISION OF 348 DW~-LIJNG UNITS ON 23.5 ACRES AND 7.5 ACRES COMiM~-RCIAL LOCATI~X} AT ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060-009. WHF~REAS, Kemper Real Estate Development Company in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WtW~REAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WtlEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on November 1, 1993; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission continued said Extension of Time at the November 1, 1993 meeting; WtIEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on December 6, 1993; WFIEREAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts relating to the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. l; NOW, TITEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings, to wit: A. The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. B. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (B'I~) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. C. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. D. Vesting Tentative Paxeel Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time is consistent with the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margafita Village and the General Plan. E. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. F. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. G. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. H. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. Medium density residential uses are proposed to the west and are buffered by a golf course. Medium high residential uses are proposed to the north of the site and are buffered by a road. Existing low-medium density residential development is located across Rancho California Road. The commercial portion of the site is adjacent to Meadows Parkway (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane major road) and Rancho California Road (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane arterial). I. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. J. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, which are publicly maintained street. K. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. R:\S~STAFFILPT~23373.PC*2 12/2/93 klb 4 L. Said fmdings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and heroin incorporated by reference. M. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Vesting Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said F_JR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmi~gable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Second One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial located at the northwest comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 953-060-009 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEllERy CERI'IFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNttll J. SECRETARY R:\S\STAFFRPTX23373.PC2 1212193 Idb 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S~STAFFRPTL23373.PC2 12/2/93 klb 6 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: Second one year extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Map No. 23373, Amendment No. I - a Residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No, 1, First Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a Dhasina elan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No, 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Develoement Aareement No. 5. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.1~C2 1212193 klb 7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. 8. A Mitiaation Monitorincl Proclram shall be submitted and approved by the Planning - Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 9. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 10. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development. 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map. B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14, The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the City standards and the approved Conceptual Landscape Plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: ( 1 ) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s). (2) Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit, B, Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. C. Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. D. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. (2) Construction Landscape Plans. (3) Fencing Plans. (4) Building Elevations. (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board. 15. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. 16. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection, 18. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. 19. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or Post a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humher Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H 11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the first Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offered for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 4.73 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications, 34. Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff. OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 18, 1993, a · copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 19, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated October 22, 1993, a copy of which is attached. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE * HEAL', SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 ATTN: Matthew Fagan: RECEIVED "CT ,,,, Ans'd .......... .RE: I'RACT MAP NO. 23372: BEING PARCELS 1,23,4 AND N OF PARCEL MAP 21384 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF FIIJCD IN BOOK 144. PAGES 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF TIlE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOGETHER IrlTH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO LUIS FIGNES BY PATENT DA TED JANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (68 LOTS) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Environmental Health ha~ reviewed Tract Map No. 23372 and recommends: A ~vater system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approvcd by the water company and the Health Dcpanznent. Permanent prints of the plans of the x~ter system shall be subrmt~ed in triplicate, ~vith a mimraum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original dra~ing to the Ci~ of Temecula's Office. The prmB shall show the rotereal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrams: pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the mare at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects ~vith Div. 5. Pan 1. Chapter 7 of the Califonua Health and Safety. Code, Califorma Admim~ra~ve Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission oft he State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and ~rater company with the following certification: "I certify. flint the design of the water system m Tract Map No. 23372 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho Califorma Water District ~nd that the water sennces, storage, and distribution system will be adeqnate to provide water service to such Tract Map". TIUs certification does not constitute a g~araatee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantkies, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least t~vo weeks vrior to the request for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho Califorma Water District agreeing W serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary. for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recorda~on of the final map. John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503, Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 * Riverside, CA 92513-7600) Cin.' of Temccula Planning Dept. Page Two At'm: MaRhew Fagan August 18, 1993 This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer systm shall be installed according to plans and specificaUons as approved by the District, the Ci~ of Temccula's Office and the Health Deparm~at. Pcnna~cnt prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted ~n triplicate, along u~th the drawing, to the City of Temecula's Office. The prints ~ show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the cxisfin~ ~'stern. A smg|e plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portinn of the sewage plans and profiles. Tbe plans shall be sxgned by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer systera in Tract Map No. 23372 is in accordance with the sewer system cxpansinn plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". _The plans must bc submitted to the City of Tcmecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the rccordafion of the final mal~. It ~ill be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely fu-,~li:,ed prior to recordation of the final map. ~~nm'enml calth Specialist IV SM:dr ~ (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 9,zEST SAN JACINTO A'v'1~qUE" PER.RIS, CALIFORNIA 92.570 · (909) 657-3 183 October !8, 1993 TO: Planning Department ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: Tract 23372 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Deparr_ment recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4xa-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any !on frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Deparr, ment approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the pe_~nit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. "~ RIVERSIDE OffiCE FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SE~'rlON (619) 865-8886, FAX {6191 865-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A!0BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Blue 'dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 4 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. Prior to recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/uniz, as mitigation for fire protection impacts, Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the. first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. - I a at istrlc October 14, 1993 RECEIVED OCT 18 ES3 Matthew Fagan, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative T1VI No. 23372, 2nd Extension of Time Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed our ~e containing materials which describe the subject project. Our comments are outlined below: General It is our understanding the subject project is a proposed 469 residential dwelling unit subdivision of 46.90 acres, located east of Margarita Road, between Rancho California Road and La Serena Way, in the Margarita Village Project. The subject project is located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. However, it must be understood the available capabilities of the District's systems are continually changing due to the occurr,'nce of development withLn the District and programs of systems improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the status of the District's permit to operate, and the service agreement between the District and the developer of the subject project. The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system improvements to be made by the developer (or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should submit information describing the subject project to the District's Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as follows: 1. Written request for a "pla~ of service". M.~ii To: Post Office Box 8500 · SanJacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257 :.',;:n O//ice: 2~5 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jarinto · Customer Service/Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hernet, CA Matthew Fagan TTM 23372 October 14, 1993 Page 2 Minimum ,T~O0.O0 deposit (larger deposits may be required for extensive development projects or projects located in "difficult to serve" geographic areas). Plus/maps describing the exact location and nature of the subject project. Especially helpful materials include grading plans and phasing plans. Sanitary Sewer The subject project is considered tributary to the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility. The subject project appears to sewer in two (2) different directions by gravity-flow (ie. Southwesterly towards South General Keamey Road and Rancho California Road, and nonhefty towards La Serena Way). Other Issues The representative of the subject project must contact the District's Customer Service Department to arrange for plan check and field inspection of proposed District facilities and onsite plumbing. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 925-7676, extension 468. Very truly yours, EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Customer Service Department DGC:cz AB 93-1124 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 1. 1993 Planning Director Gary Thornhill suggested the Commission recess to allow staff and the City Attorney to discuss the impact of a continuance on the time extension. Chairman Ford declared a recess at 6:40 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 6:45 P.M. Director Thornhill advised the Council the City Attorney has determined that because the application has been filed, it places a stay on the time frame and therefore recommends continuing this item and directing staff to bring it back with the 3rd Extension of Time. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Vestincl Tentative Tract Mao No. 23373. Second Extension of Time Proposed second one (1) year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373. Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway. It was moved by Commissioner Fahey, seconded by Commissioner Hoagland to continue this item to allow staff to work with the developer on unresolved issues relating to the Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried as follows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Hoagland, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None PA93-0175. First Extension of Time Proposed First Extension of Time for Tentative Tract Map No. 26845, Amendment No. 1. Located at the northeast corner of Ynez And Santiago Roads. Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan presented the staff report. He stated staff has added Condition of Approval No. 32 as follows "The developer shall design and bond for Street A per the rural street development standards of the draft general plan". He said the NPDES condition has been added to this project. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 1, 1993 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION November 1, 1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Prepared By: Matthew Fagan RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- , approving the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. I based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company REPRESENTATIVE: Mick Ratican, Rick Engineering PROPOSAL: A second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 - a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Planning Area No. 38: Very High Density Residential 14.8 d.u./acre. Planning Area No. 39: Commercial 7.5 acres. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village R-1 (One Family Dwellings) Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PROPOSED ZONING: Not Requested FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planning Area No. 38: High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) Planning Area No. 39: Neighborhood Commercial EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.pC 10/28/93 mf 1 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Single Family Residences West: Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area: 31.0 gross acres Number of Lots: 8 Residential Density: 14.8 d.u./acre BACKGROUND Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. The first Extension of Time was filed with the Planning Department on October 12, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the first Extension of Time on November 4, 1991 and the City Council approved the first Extension of Time on April 28, 1993. A second Extension of Time was formally submitted to the Planning Department on October 8, 1991. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 5, 1992. Staff contacted Kernper Real Estate Development Company (the present title holder of the property) in July, 1993, and was informed that they would ultimately be in receivership of the property within the next few months. Staff explained the status of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373 to Kemper and also expressed the necessity of taking action on the extension, because the map would expire on November 8, 1993. Although they did not currently hold title on the property at that time, they expressed that they did not want to see the map expire. Staff received notification from Kemper on October 26, 1993, stating that they had title for the land in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. Staff scheduled the item for the November 1, 1993 Planning Commission meeting in order to avoid the expiration of the map. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The current project is a request for a second, one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 (V I 1M 23373). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 is a portion of the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 38 and 39. Planning Area No. 38 proposes a 348 unit retirement residential condominium project on approximately 23.5 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 14.8 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 39 is a 1 lot commercial site consisting of approximately 7.5 acres. ANALYSIS Leaal Issues Reaardine V l [M 23373 The City Council approved the first Extension of Time for this project contingent upon an agreement being entered into by the applicant (Reference Attachment No. 5). This agreement R:\S\STAFFRFT~23373.pC 10/28/93 mf 2 contained timelines and responsibilities for removing all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humher Drive. The applicant is in the process of removing the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert. A condition of approval has been added to the project that assures that the applicant continues to remove the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert. Senate Bill 428 Senate Bill No. 428 went into effect on September 14, 1993. This Bill added Section 66542.11 to the Government Code and contains the following language: "The expiration date of any tentative subdivision map or a parcel map for which a tentative map has been approved that has not expired on the date that the act that adds this section becomes effective shall be extended by 24 months." The City Attorney has determined that the above referenced Senate Bill applies to VTTM 23373. The second extension was scheduled to expire on November 8, 1992. The approval of the current extension, along with the provisions contained in Senate Bill No. 428 extends the life of the map until November 8, 1994. New Conditions of Aooroval New conditions of approval have been added to this project to ensure the public health, safety and welfare. The major ones pertain to requiring a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher; two conditions of approval {that are in effect immediately upon approval of the second extension of time) for the immediate removal of the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert for the Long Valley Wash; two conditions of approval added to insure completion of improvements to Margarita Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road; and a condition of approval that recreational trails and Class II bicycle lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreational Master Plan. EXISTING ZONING AND FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Existing zoning for the site is Specific Plan {S.P. 199 - Margarita Village). The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village, Ordinance No. 348, and the draft General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 3 SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The current project is a request for a second one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 (VTTM 23373), which is located in the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 38 and 39. Planning Area No. 38 proposes a 348 unit residential condominium project on approximately 23.5 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 14.8 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 39 is a I lot commercial site consisting of approximately 7.5 acres. Several new conditions of approval have been added to this project to ensure the public health, safety and welfare. The major ones pertain to requiring a biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher; two conditions of approval (that are in effect immediately upon approval of the second extension of time) for the immediate removal of the sediments from the channel and from the box culvert for the Long Valley Wash; two conditions of approval added to insure completion of improvements to Margarita Road between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road; and a condition of approval that recreational trails and Class II bicycle lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreational Master Plan. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village, Ordinance No. 348, and the draft General Plan. The approval of the current extension, along with the provisions contained in Senate Bill No. 428 extended the life of the map until November 8, 1994. FINDINGS The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village and the draft General Plan. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 4 10. 11. 12. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. Medium density residential uses are proposed to the west and are buffered by a golf course. Medium high residential uses are proposed to the north of the site and are buffered by a road. Existing low*medium density residential development is located across Rancho California Road. The commercial portion of the site is adjacent to Meadows Parkway (identified in the draft General Plan as a 4-lane major road) and Rancho California Road (identified in the draft General Plan as a 4-lane arterial). The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, which are publicly maintained street. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. R:~S\$TAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 5 Attachments: Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page ~ -Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 12 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time- Blue Page 19 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 - Blue Page 20 Agreement: Stipulation and Order No. 91-14308-H11 - Blue Page 21 Exhibits - Blue Page 22 A. Vicinity Map B. Future General Plan Designation C. Zoning Designation D. Tentative Map R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28/93 rnf 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 7 ATI'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RF-QOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AIMtWDMENT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION OF 348 DW~JJJNG UNITS ON 23.5 ACRES AND 7.5 ACRES COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT ~ NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANClIO CAL~ORNIA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060-009. WHEREAS, Kemper Real Estate Development Company in the name of Margarita ViLlage Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on November 1, 1993; WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts rehting to the Second Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1; NOW, T!:fE~REFORE, ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF TFIE~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findines. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: genera/plan. The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10128/93 mf ~ 2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission in approving the proposed Extension of Time, makes the following f'mdings, to wit: 1. The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. 2. No subsequent changes axe proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified l~nviroamental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, uamitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Pepon on the project. available. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become 4. There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Paxeel Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time will be consistent with the City' s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The draft General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./aere) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Vilhge and the draft General Plan. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373.pC 10128193 mf 9 5. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Sulxlivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. 6. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot cortfiguralion, circuhtion patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the pwposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. 7. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or weftare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. 8. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. Medium density residential uses are proposed to the west and are buffered by a goff course. Medium high residential uses are proposed to the north of the site and are buffered by a road. Existing low-medium density residential development is located across Rancho California Road. The commercial portion of the site is adjacent to Meadows Parkway (identified in the draft General Plan as a 4-lane major road) and Rancho California Road (identified in the draft General Plan as a 4-lane arterial). 9. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. 10. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Pancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, which are publicly maintained street. 11. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. 12. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. D. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report ,~hzIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. R:\S\STAFFRPTX23373.pC 10/28/93 mf 10 Section 4. Conditions, That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Second One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial located at the northwest comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 953-060-009 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of November, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I n'E. REBy CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 1st day of November, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-mL SECRETARY R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 11 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:~S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 12 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: SecondoneyearextensionofTimeforVestingTentativeMapNo. 23373, Amendment No. I - a Residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a Dhasine plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Aoreement No. 5. R:\S%STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28/93 mf I 3 7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 202. 8, A Mitioation Monitorina Proofare shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 9. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. 10. A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented, 11, The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development. 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. A copy of the Final Map. B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans, C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Painmar Observatory, All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Painmar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655, (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A. Construction landscape plans consistent with the City standards and the approved Conceptual Landscape Plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28193 mf 14 15, 16. (1) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s). (2) Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit. B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. C. Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. D. The Model Home Complex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. (2) Construction Landscape Plans. (3) Fencing Plans. (4) Building Elevations. (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping insoection. 18. 19. 20. within individual lots shall be completed for Private common area landscaping shall be completed for insoection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or oost a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 15 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November ,I-, 1991, for the first Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28193 mf 16 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offered for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the application process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 4.73 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 34. Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373,PC 10/28/93 mf 17 OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 18, 1993, a · copy of which is attached, 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal Water District transmittal dated October 22, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10128193 mf 18 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 ATFN: Manhmv Fagan: RECEIVED RE: TRACT MAP NO. 23373: BEING PARCELS 1,2,3,4 AND 5 OF PARCEL MAP 21884 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 144. PAGES 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANCHO TEMECULA GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO LUIS YIGNES BY PATENT DATED JANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (68 LOTS) Deer Gentlemen: The Department of Environmental Health has mviexved Tract Map No. 23373 and recommends: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along 9ath the original drawing to the Ci.W of Temecula's Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply m all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Heelth and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify. that the design of the water system m Tract Map No. 23373 is m accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least t~vo weeks vrior to the request for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water m eech and every lot m the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary, for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P,O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) City. ofTemeeula Plamung Dept. Page Two A~n: Matthew Fagan August 18, 1993 This subdivision is within the ~ Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be insulled according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula's Office and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted mtriplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Tomecub' s Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location ofr~anholes, COmplete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the servers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the s~,ver district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map No. 23373 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least txvo weeks prior to the request for the reCOrdation of the final map. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized prior to recordation of the Final map. S' cerel ~'ce~ental Health Specialist IV SM:dr (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 W~ST SAN JACINTO AVENU~ · P~S, CALIFORNIA 92570 · (909) 657-3183 TO: Planning Dept ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: October 18, 1993 Tract 23373 - 2nd Extension of Time. with respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x472-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in desigm, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. ~'1 RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12th Street, Rivetide, CA 92501 (909} 275-.;'/77 · FAX (90 9} 369-'/451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION '~ INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite F, Indio, CA 92201 (619) 865-8886 * FAX {619) 863-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot comparV~nents approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f}. Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Disolav Boards: Display boards required for apartments, commercial complexes, condominiuras , RV parks and mobile home parks will be as follows. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout which shows the name of the complex, all streets, building designators, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. These directories shall be a minimum4'x4' in dimension and located next to the roadway access. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location Of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 6 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. All gated access shall be equipped with Knox Lock. The applicant shall contact the Fire Department for specifications and knox applications. Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, th~ sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section. EAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist SEh, BY:E N W D -22-93; 9tSOAM; ~t49 I~ 90969464~;~ 2 octobez, 22 , 1993 Matthew Fagan, Case Planner City of T~a Platcling Department 43174 Business Perk Drive Temecula, CA 92590 23373 - 2rod Bxtenlion of The Dear Hr. Fagan: We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office which describe the sttbjec~ project. 0nr cornmonte ere outlined below: I~ is our understanding the subject project is a propaBed condominium and ~ommercial property development located at the northwePt corner of the intersection of Headowe Perkway and Ranabe California Road. The subject project i; located within the District's sanitary sewer service area. HOWever, it must be understood the available capabilities of the District Is systems ere continually changing due to the oc~ttrrance of development within the District and progr~ of eyetoms improvement. As such, the provision of service will be based an the detailed plen of service requirements, the timing of the subject project, the ;tatus of the Distric~'a permit to operate, arid the service agree.mant between the DisTarict alld ~he deve1Opejr of ~he Bubject project. The developer must arrange far the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(e) of system ~npravementa to be made by the developer (or others), and WILtCh are Considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels of service. To arrange for the preparation of a plan of service, the developer should s,,P~i= information describing the subJ eat proj eat to the Distric~ ' e Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extension 409, as fallows: Written request for a aplan of servlce". Minimum $400. 00 deposit (lerger deposits may be reqUired S~NT BY:E M W D -22-93; 9:51AM; 'F14.9: /-, 90969484'77;~ ,3 Matthew Fagan V~w/T4 23373 October 20, ~993 Page 2 for ex~eneive development projects Or projects located in "difficult to-serve" geoglTaphlo areas). 3. Plans/maps describing =he exact location and nature of the subject project. ~-specially heZpful mate=ia~s include grading plane and phasing plans. The subject project is considered tribu~ary to the District'S Temecula Valley Regional Water ]~eclamation ~acili~y (TVRWRF). The nearest existing T~RW]~F system sanitary se~ facilities to the subject project are as follows: Gravity-fl~w sewer aligned along Rancho California Road Meadows Parkway. o~heE zsmtaee The project representative must contact the District Je customer service Depaz~zmen~ to m~ke arrangements for plan check end field inspection of proposed District facilities and/or onsite pbmhing. Should you have any~ueetions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact this office at (909} 925-7676, extension 468. Very truly yours, DGC/cz A'I'I'ACHMENT NO. 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S~STAFFRPT~3373,PC 10/28/93 mf 19 ATxACHMEIqT NO. 3 cn'f OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373 Fint Extension of Time City Council Approval Date: April 28, 1992 Expiration Date: November 8, 1991 PLANNING DEPAR~ Unless previously paid, prior to the iss,,anc~ of a g~ding permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Oralnanc¢ NO. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in thlt OrdinanCe. ShOuld Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the pmvksions of a Itabitat Conservation Plan prior W'the'payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residevtlal lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. "The covenants, conditions and restrictions for the development shall require that each permanent resident in each dwelling unit shall be 55 years of age or over, including any apartments in planning Area 40 of the Specific Plan. The reference at pg. 144 of the Specific Plan that the apartments axe not subject to any age restriction is incorrect, and the Descriptive Summary at pg. 143 of the Specific Plan that the "planning a.ma shall COBrain solely retirement community housing" is controlling.' .... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORK,~ The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred w the appropriate stuff person of the Department of Public Work& s~rAm~,'rms~s 1 It is understood that the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing casements, traveled ways, and dmlnage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review. The Developer Shall comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or mended and with the Conditions noted below. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF TI-IE FINAL MAP: Pursuant to Seaion 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said Section. Delete condition no. 15 of Riverside County Road Commissioner letter dated September 22, 1988 and rephce it with the following: Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment w the time of issuance of a building permit. An erosion control and slope pwtection plan shall be submittal to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The insPallation shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and site conditions shall be wainrained to protect adjacent properties from damage due to runoff and erosion. Developer shall post a performance bond for erosion control and slope protection in an mount appwved by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevaillng Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. m As deemed necessary by the depaxtmeut of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water Diahlc~; l~a~teru Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control Distxict; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; P]avnlng I)ep~utuaent; Depa~u~ent of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; and s~-rAYnu,ru3Yrs 2 CATV Franchise. Community Services District Prior to final map, the subdivider Shnll notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit Shall be ObtMned from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF Bl.m .~ING PERMIT: 10. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property of project, including that for Waf~c and public facility mitigation as required for the project. The fee w be paid Sh~ll be in the mount in effect at the time of payment of fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been.finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agr~ment for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which.has been provided W developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security W secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The mount of the security sh~ll be $2.00 per square foot, not W exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may Patuim the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated {assuming benefit W the project in the mount of such fees). By execution of thi.~ Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions from this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any Waffic impact fee district, or.!_he process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or Waffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the mount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICA'i'~,S OF OCCUPANCY: 11. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway Uees and street lights on all interior public streets. 12. All street improvements striping, marking and signing Shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 13. Prior to March 25, 1992, the Buie Corporation shall make arrangements to remove all the sediment from the open channel and box culvert north of Raneho California Road between Margarita Road and Humbet Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. TRANSPORTATION ENGINRI~ING PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHIVIENT PERM/TS: 14. Traffic striping, marking and street name signing plans shah be designed as directed by the DcpaAm,ent of Public Works. 15. A construction area traffic comml plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer. TEMECULA COMMUN[~'~' SERVICES DISTRICT: 16. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 4.07 acres of xequired parkhnd to comply with City Ordlnnnc~ No. 460.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be d~t~rmined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to rw, ordation of said map. 17. Exterior slopes bordering an arterial meet may be dodicated shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application process. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992) vgw S~TAFFlU'T~3373 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO, 1, R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373,PC 10/28/93 mf 20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDZTIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23373 AI4ENDED NO. I STANDARD CONDXTIONS Riverside, its agents, o ~ from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract 23373 Amended No. 1, which action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 664gg.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will coo erate fully in the defense. If the County fails to promptly notify the su~divider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Hap Act and Ordinance 460. S. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the sotls stability and geological conditions of the site. 6. If any grading is proposed, t~e subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Oepartment of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of appreval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No, 1 Page 2 7. A grading permlt shall be obtatned from the Department of Butlding and f Sa ety prior to commencement of any gradtng outstde of county mlntained road right of~ay. Any deltaquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordatton of the final map. 12. The subdiwtder shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outltned In the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 9-22-88 a copy of w~tch is attached. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue tn force until the overnlng body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications sha~l be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road C~,,,wfsstoner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commlsstoner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor, Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 7-25-88 a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 7-22-88 · copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appro fiat, fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be coVlected by the Road Comtsstoner. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire ~rshal's letter dated B-17-BB a copy of which is attached. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Oepar~nent approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 knended No. 1 Page 3 17. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area putsbent to Section 3.8B of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in confonnance with the developnent standards of the Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 zone. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet. exclusive of the utility easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. e. Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be located awe and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of block w~ls and landscaping. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recorder, on of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outltned in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been mat. County Fire Department County Flood Control County Parks Department Eastern Municipal Water Otst. County Health Department County Planning Department Rancho Water District Prior to the recordatton of the final map, General Plan Amendment 150, Specific Plan No. 199 Amend~nt No. 1, Development Agreement No. 5, and Change of Zone No. 5107 shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors end shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applted to the property. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to recordatton of the final map. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. Page 4 The Coeenon open space area shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final map and shall be managed by a master property owners association, Prior to recordatton of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that deparl~ent and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveyed title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference, The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide fo~ the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common and (d) .contain to following provisions verbatim: 'Nothwtthstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall manage and continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit '1II-17' of the specific plan attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owner's association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'co6~non area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other 1tens recorded subsequent to the notice of assesmnt or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be t~rminated, 'substantially' amended or raparty deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the ~lanntng Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area'. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. ] Page 5 Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be ~ecorded at the same ttme that the ftnal mp ts recorded. Prior to recordatton of the final mp, clearance shall be obtained from Netropolitan Water District relative to the protection of applicable easements affecting the subject property. Lot line adjustments shall also be completed. The developer shall comply wtth the requirements as shown in Spectftc Plan No. maintained by H0A or other public anttry: 10-5-88) following parkway landscaping 199 Amendment No. 1 unless (Amended by Planning Commission s) Prior to recordatton of the final map the developer shall file an application wtth the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance dtstrtct for Vesttng Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 tn accordance with the Landscaping and Ltghttng Act of 1972, unless the project ts wtthtn an existing parkway maintenance. 2) 3) Prtor to the lssuance of butldlng permtts, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planntng Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared In a reproducible fomat suitable for permanent ftltng with the County Road Department. The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be ua e vtabtltty of all landscaping whtch will be Installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsib(ltty by the district. 4) The deveqoper, the developeras successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for ell parkwa landscaptn maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over ~y the distrIct. 24. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such ttme as those respo.s,bi,,ti.s'of .h.r perti.s..pp .v., b, t,e 25. Street lights shall be provtded within the subdivision in accordance wtth the standards of 0rdtnance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently wtth the filing of subdivision Improvement plans with the Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. Conditions af Approve] Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 6 2) Follmrlng approval of the street lighting layout by the Road Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an application ~dth LAFCO for the formation of a street lighttrig r district, or annexation to an existing lighting dtst tot, unless the site is within an extstlng lighttrig district. 3) Prior to rocordatton of the final map, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street ltghttng application from LAFCO, unless the site is w~thtn an existing ltghttng district. 4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be show~ on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive Generel Plan. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERHITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of grading penntts, detailed common open space area parking landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following. Permanent automatic Irrigation systems shall be Installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2) Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. 3) All uttltty service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatnents, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. 4) Parkways and landscaped butldtng setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the prtmar~ use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth bermtng, round cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amentries where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department and Spectftc Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. 5) Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 7 71 8. 9. 6) Where streets trees cannot be planted withtn right-of-way of interior streets end project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. 7) tandscaptng plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. 8) All extsttng specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the sub 'act property shall be shown on the pro~ect's grading plans and shatl note those to be removed, 1 and/or re ocated retained. 9) All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. 10.. Parking layouts shall comply with Ordinance 348, Section 18.12. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for a proval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detai~ed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. z) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through Narch. 3) Prellmtna~ pad and roadway elevations. 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: M cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thefor, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an a propriate combination o a special terracing (benchin } plan, increase s~ope ratio (i.e., 3:1), re~aining walls, and/or slope pVanting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended Page 8 32, All cut slopes located adjacent to un raded nature1 terratn and exceeding ten (lO) feet tn vertical hetghts shal~ be Incorporating contour-graded the following grading techniques: I) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to'the angle of the natural terratn, 2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded wtth curves N~th radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) ~ere cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet tn horizontal length, the · horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulattng lashton. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontologlcal impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERHITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Zn accordance with the written request of the developer to the County of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and tn furtherance of the agreement between the developer and the County of Riverside, no building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provided evidence of comp]iance with the terms of said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing of publtc facilities. -' Vtth the submittal of butldtng plans to the Department of Building and Safety the developer will demonstrate compliance with the acoustical study prepared for Vesttng Tentative Tract 2337~ Amended No. 1 which established appro rtate mitigation measures to reduce ambient interior notse levels to 4~ Ldn and exterior notse levels below 65 Ldn. Roof*mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energ~ saving devices shall be permitted with Planntng Department approval. Conditions of/~proval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 9 eo Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10} feet unless approved by the Department of Building and Safet and Fire Department per Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, ~A~nded by Planning C;ission 10-5-8B) No. 199 All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERHITS the following conditions be satisfied: shall Prior to the final building inspection approval, by the Building and Safety Department, walls shall be constructed along Kaiser Parkway and Rancho California Road, La Sarena Way, Kaiser Park Way per the Design ~nual. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director and may be phased with the project. (Amended by Planning Commission lO-5-BB} b. Wall and/or fence locations shall conform to attached Figure III-17 of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. c. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All parking, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Deparl~nt field inspection. e.--ConeFete-stdewe;ks-shal;-be-eenstrueted-tk~ougheu~-the-sebd4v4s~en--~ aeeerdanee--w+~h--the-e~andards-of-Brd~nance-46~-and-Spec~f~c-Ptan-No~ ~gg-AmeRdmeR~-Ns,-t, (Deleted by Planntng Commission 10-5-88) f. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 Development of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. I shall comply with all provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1 and Development Agreement No. 5. LeRoy D. Sm~ot OFFICE OF ROAD CONI41~31ONER ~ COUNTY ~URVEYOR September 2.2, 1988 Riverside County Planning Comtsslon 4080 Lemon Street . Riverside, CA gZSOZ Re: Tract Nap 23373 - Amend #Z - Road Correction Schedule A - Team $P Nap !Z Ladies and Gentlemen: itth respect to the conditions of approvll for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the landdivider provide the following street Improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Rhersfde County Road Zmprovement Standards (Ordinance 461). Zt is' understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate O's, and that their mission or unacceptability .may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring In ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Commtssioner's Office. The landdhtder shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities Including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as approve.d by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. in the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article X! of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the. quahtlties exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. ~r.act Nap 23373 - Amend 11 - September 22, 1988 Yage 2 Correction Hap #1 I~a]or drainage Is involved on t~!s landdivision and Its resolution shall be is approved by the Road I)eparl;nent, Al1 Interior streets sh~11 be Improved in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section A or greater as approved by the Road Cam. issioner (mdlfled no r/v), The landdivider shall profide uttllty clearance frm Rancho Calif. Idatar District prior to the recordatton of the final map. The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%. 7. The minimum centerline radii shaT1 be as approved by the Road Department, Rancho Cjl Ifornla Road shall be Improved wtth concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within e 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. 9, Kaiser Parkway shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfactng of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance wi:Ch County Standard No, 101. 10, Prior to the filing of the final map with the County Recorder's Office, the developer shall provide evidence of continuous mintchance of all proposed private streets within the development as approved by the Road Commissioner, Al1 driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shell be constructed at the street right of way line ~o prevent slltlng of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. Concrete sidewalks shall be' constructed on Rancho California Road .and Kaiser Parkway in accordance with County Standard No, 400 end 401 (curb sidewalk), September 2.2, 1988 Page 3 14. An access road to the nearest paved rood mintmined by the County shell be constructed within the public rt ht of way in accordance with County Standard Ro. 106, Section B, 132'/60') at a grade alignment as epproved by the Rood Cmm~isstoner. Prior to the recordatton of the final mp, the developer shall deposit with h the Riverside County Road I)eparl=ent, a cam sum of $140.00 per unit for Parcels 1-7 ms mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he my enter into · written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a Iwilding permit. hrcel 8 is not subject to signal mitigation at this time. it is postponed untll the time of development. Improvement plans shell be based upon a centerline profile extending · minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at s grade end alignment as approved by the RIverside County Road Comtssioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. Electrical end communications trenches shell be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Asphaltlc emulston (fog seal) shell be applied not less then fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rote of 0.05 gallon per.square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 end 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Corner cutbacks in conform·nee with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. Lot access shell be restricted on Rancho California Rood and Kaiser Parkway and so noted on the final map with the exception of one opening on Rancho California Road approximately 400' westerly of intersection with Kaiser Parkway, Londdlvisions creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 27~ All entrance gate facilities shall be located a minimum distance of 60' from gate to floWline.-- 23. A~I cent·tithe intersections shall be at 24. The street destg~ and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with TR 23371 end TR 23372. Tract I~ap 23373 - Amend IIZ . September 22, 1988 .Page 4 )ad Correct4on gap Street 11ghttng shall be requlr~ tn accordance with Ordinance 450 and 46% thoughout the subdivision. ~k:lmtnIitrator determines ~ether this proposal qualifies under an extsting mssesrdnent district or not. %f not, We land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of · 'Lt bring ~sessmnt District" in ·ccordance with ~ver~ntal Me ~ctlon 5~000. Prior to recordation of the final map, the landdivider'shall record CC & R's providing Ingress and egress for parcel % thru 7 and shall be subject to review and approval b.v Riverside County Counsel. GH:lh V trul.v .youre, .. - ughes 8-I?-88 40aOtmm~tmt~ ill ~ CA 92501 (rl4) TS?~S0~ TRACT YJ373 - AI~NDZD fl, 10AD C0aXEC'fl0H IX VlthTespecC to the conditions of approval for the ·hove referenced laud division, the Fire Department recow~ends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with P~tverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIXX PROTECTION The Mater mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPH and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant the11 be 1500 GP~for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants, (6'x&"xg|xg|) shall be located at each street L'Uersection and spaced not more than 330 feet ·part in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage mort than 165 feet from a hydrant. AppIicant/deveIoptr shall furnish one cop7 of the v·tmr ·ystem plans to the Fire D~ptrtment for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be migned/approvad by · registered civil engineer and the local Mater company with the foliosing certification: el certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire ~epartaent.w The required steer system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate Mater agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. All buildings shall he constructed vith fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 st the UniformSsliding Coda. Any rood shingles or shakes shall have · Class wgw rating and shall he approvtd by the Firs Department prior to ~natallation. Subject: TrRct 23373 MITIGATION Prior to the retardation of the final nap, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fire Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit ms mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to de~er the t~e of payment, he/she Bay enter fats I wTttteo agreement vlth the County de~errtni said payment to the time of 4-sunoct of · buildin2 pend=. All questions regardloS the moo=in2 of conditions shall be referred to the FlaxminK and ZnBineertn& staff. · AI~ONDR. lEGIS Chief Fire Departneat planner By Geor2e S. Tatum, Flannin2 Officer C~ ~nty of l~iversi ' ? RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLRNNtNG DEPA~THENTZ)A'ZT: July 25. 1988 Att~l~m~:rh~~Sr~.fanlterlan. Environmentel Health Services Trmct f~mD 2337]. Amended No. T The EnvTronmentml Health Services has revlet,ed Tract Hap 23373, Amended Hap No. I dated July tg, 1988. Our current cormheels w|ll remmin ms previously stated in our letter dated June 13, 1988. S~:bo RIVErSiDE ~,OUNTY PLAHN:N~ BEPAnT-uENT RIVE~SIDr COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATE;R CONSERVATION DISTRICT Rivers/des rs,4t.rve-n.;a l%e: Ves'Ma'~ Tract. 23373 Amera:ledNo. I Foll~dn~ are the rastr~ct*s recc~enda~_~cms: ~his tract ks l~_atea w~thin the lhnits of the Murrieta Creek/Te~-ula Valley Arm ETe/nage Plan f~r which dra/nage fees have tmen adopte~ by the m~rd. Ilrainage fees shall ha lm~d as set fu-th uraer the prov~- aicas of the 'Rules end F~ulaticns f~r A~a~/stra~.~cn of Are Dra/nage Plans", amend,,.q February 16, 1988: Drainage fees shall ~e paid to the l~ad a-,,,,~esioner u pert. of the f~/hN fur reccrd of the subdivisi~ ~ ~ cr parcel cr if the recording ~ a ffuml per~_~ mp t. ~aived, ch"airmge fees shall be l~d u a c~dit~m of the ~iver lx~or to rec~Mng a cer~cate of ~,~l~ce evidenci.~ the ~e/ver of the Nerce.1 nap= !~ At the ~UEm of the land ~4v~de~, W~n ~1~ a r~ ~ ~t r~ ~fm of ~ ~t of ~s, ~ ~ Of a ~ ~t ~ ~ld~g ~t ~ ~ a~v~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ r~ of ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~vity ~ve ~ ~s~ ~ ~t W~ ~ r~ ~, / '-. Riverside Cmmty lee: Vetaug ~ 23373 J~exSedm=ol -2- ~uly 22° ~ k,~3,~4,,,,:, perm.%ts '--- this lx~jec't ~ ,--.~ be issue] mr.:L1 ~ su:mn dr-4,', systan ~ IT Tract 23372 to the x~z'th has been L~stalled, Ot~e~e~ee. mqee~ ~ be ,,,~e 1D -,',~ect and mfely Offsite drainage ~ac~l~/es should be 1-~-~ed w~thin imblicly dsa~cat- ed drainage earn cL~-4qed r.~,~ the affec~d ~ert7 owners. The dc~a~e~ts should ~e recc=de~ ar~ a ~ submit*-a to the Dis~ric~ ~r/~r to z'ecc~da~ of the lira1 ~e 10 ~Bar storm ~c~ should be ~taine~ within ~ ~b ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ ~,~ ~ ~ ~et right of ~y. ~es ~a ~ ~. Drainage facilit/es o~tletting sump ~ditions should be designe~ ~o eonve~ t~e trib~ 100 year storm fi~w~. Mditicr~/e~ergency es- The property's street and lot grad/rig should be dexigned in a nanner that tmrpetuates the exis~_~ng ra%ural drsinage Iatterns with respec~ to tributary dra/nage are, outlet points and csraet c>tl"ez'~rise, a drainage eas~ne~t should be obtained from 'the affected ~roperty c~ners fr= ~e release of concentrated cr diver%ed flcss. A copy of the recorded chainage easement should be submitted 23373 -3- ~u/y 22, 1~88 GueP, ic~s am~cern/ng this totter my be referrsa to ~ Ch/eng of this office at 714/787-2333. 2~r-*Civil En!~"~l'~Agineer l~C:pln COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ' DEPARTMENTof HEALTH RIVe.e. SIDE COU~Tr~ PLM~IN; DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 Xttn: K&thy Gifford JUN 21 1988 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNIt~G DEPARTMENT RE; TRACT XA~ 23313: That certain land situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside. State of California, being Parcels I, 2,3,4 and 5 of Parcel Hap 21804 as shov~ on a map thereof f~led ~ Book 144, Pages 24 through 33 of Parcel ~aps ~n the Office c~ the Co~ty ~e~order cf sa~d ~vers~de County together v~th a portion the ~anchc Temecula granted by the ~cver~ment cf the ~n~ted States of ~er~a tc ~u~s V~gnes ~y patent dated 3anukr~ 1F 1860 and recorded ~n the O~[ice o~ the County Recorder o~ San Diego County, California (l Lots) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap No. 23373 and recommends that: X voter system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the voter company and the Health Department. Permanent prints Of the plans of the voter system shall be submitted in triplicate, vith a minimum scale not le$s than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves &rid fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. ~, Part l, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. Riverside County Planning Dope, PaRole ALan: Kathy Gifford · he pls~s shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the valor system ~n Tract Map 23373 is accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water D~str~ct and that the water service,storage and distribution system v~ll he adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose". This certification : shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. Z~-~_~!!u!_~a!_b!_a~i!!~_!~_!~!_~!I_ · his Department has a statement from the Ranthe California Water D~strict a~reeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot ~n the subdivision on demand provid~n~ satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to he made pr~or to the recordat~on of the final map. · h~s Department has a statement from the Eastern ~ater Distr~ct agreeinM to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sever system shall he installed according to plans specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor, The prints shall shDv the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the sise of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location cf sewer l~nes and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall he si~nsd by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the sever system in Tract ~ap 23373 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the Eastern ~un~cipal ~atsr Distr~ct and that the waste disposal system is adequate at · iverside County Plinning Dept. P,ge Three ATTN: Kathy Gifford this time to treat the inticip,tmd w, mte, from the proposed tract.' ~rb_e )t)D! must )! sukmXtted to the CegntX Survevor's Office It will be necessary for financial arrangements prior to the recmrdatimn of the final map. made COUFIC,u PLArlrlinG DEP K:ICiTIEFIC DATE: ,)use 1, 1988 JLssessor Butid~ng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Duds Road Department Health - Balpb Laths Fire Protection Flood Control DIstrict F~sh & Game LAFCO, S Palsle~ U.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davidson · JUN 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTy PLANNING DEPARTMENT Sher~ff's Department Airports I)epart~ent UCR, Life Science Dept., W.W. Nayhew GROFZT .... Easter~ 14untcipal Water Otst. Rancho California kter Dts~. Elslnore Union $chool Dtst. - Temcula Unlon School Dlst. Sierra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter rJd, TRAtiS Q8 VESTZN6 TRACT 23373 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 32548 - Nargsrita Village Development Co. - Robert Bein, Willtam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First 5upervtsortal District - N. of Rancho California Road, N. of Kaiser Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condominium unit. - (RELATED CASE TR 23371 i 23372) Nod - A,P, 923-210-023 Please revlew the case describe above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Com]ttee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1988. If tt dears it will then go to public hearing. Tour co~Tnfnts and reconu~endattons are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we ma include them ta the staff report for this particular case, Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gtfford at 787-6356 Planner The Elstnore Union High School Dtstrtct facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously 4mpacted b.y increasing student population caused b.y new residential, commercial and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, thts district levies a-fee against ali new development projects within its boundaries. name and tttle Joseph Enserro, Assistant Superintendent 4080 LEMON STREET. 9~ FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (6193 342-8277 DATE: 3sine 1, 1988 ASSeSSOr lu¶ldtng and Safety ~urve. yor - Dave Duda load Department NeaTth - RaTph Luchs Fire Protection flood Control DIstrict Fish & Game LAFCO, S Pagsle~ I].S. Postal Service - Itu~h £. Daybison RIVERSIDE COUNTy PLANNING DEPARTMENT $herlff's DepaTtment Airports 0apartment UCR, Ltfe Scten~ Dept., U.U. Ik~ev ~ROFET" ~s~ H~fctpal ~ater Dtst. hn~o h11fo~ta h~F Dtst. ~stno~ ~ton Sch~l Dfst. T~la Union Sch~l D?st. Sierra Club, SEn ~nto ~ap~r ~Tl f8 P~ESTING TRACT 23373 - (Sp P1) - E.A. 32548 - Norgarlta VIllage Development' Co. - Robert Bein, litlltam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First $upervtSorial District - N. of Rancho · California Road, V. of Kaiser Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condomtnlum units - (KELATED CASE TR 23371 & 23372) Nod - A.P. g23-210-023 olease revtew the case described above. along vfth the attached case map. A Land ivlslon Comtttee meettng has been tentatively scheduled for ~une 20, 19H. If It clears~ ~t v111 ~en ~ to public hearaug.. Tour con~ents and recommendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we my include tha~ in the st~ff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this 1tea, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gifford at 787-6356 Planner EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER Archaeotogical Research Unit Universiity of California Riverside, CA 92521 FLEA,~ prtnt name and title 080 LEMON STREET. 9'" FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 7876181 46-209 OAStS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 922P' (619) 342-82.. ER; iDE counc,u PLAnninG DEPARCiTER; DATE: Oune 1, 1988 TO: Assessor Building m~! Safety Surveyor - Dave I)uda .... Road Department Health - Ralph Luchs fire Protection Flood Control D!strtct fish & Game LAFCO, S Patsley O.S. Postal Service - Ruth E. Davtdson Sherifles Deparl=~ent Airports Department UCRo Ltfe $ctence Dept. o W.W. Nayhew EROFIT .... Easter~ NunSctpal Water Diet. RanchoCalSfornta Water lHst. Elsinor~ UnSon School Diet. Terecule Union School Diet. Sierra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter CJU. TP.A~ #8 JUN 13 lY 8 RIVERSI DE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT VESTING TRACT 23373 - (Sp Pl) - E,A, 32548 - Pargarlta Village Development Co - Robert Beth, William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Supervtsori81 Distrtct- N. of Rancho California Road, W. of Kaiser Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condomtnium unit - (RELATED CASE TR 23371 & 23372) Hod - A.Po 923-210-023 Please revtew the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Connittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, 1988, If it dears St wt13 then go to public hearSrig, Tour cmvnents and recommendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that~ ma Snclude them !n the staff report for this particular case. Should you have any questions regarding this tte, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy 81fford at 787-6356 Flanner r,.~UK /~ATE: SIGNATURE PLEASE prtnt name and tttle 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 AGREEMENT: STIPULATION AND ORDER NO. 91-14308-H11 R:%S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC '10/28/93 mf 21 1 2 & !0 . ~2 ~6 17 ~9 20 2~ 24 26 27 28 sCr~ZT F. FIELD 'ITY ATTOR~ CITY OF TE~ECU~ and 3200 Br~l ~- S~ 64Q (213) 236-0600 Ac~meys =or ~ OF T~ ~NITED STATE~ BAN3~J3PTCY COURT -~OUT~N DI~/CT OF CALII'ORNIA CASE NO. 91-14308-Hll STIPULATION FOR COH~ROH!SE 11 F~TATE WH~, ~he C~un=y o= P~Lverside approved Tentative Trac~ ~, on or ~u= Mar~, 198~, ~c si;n~ an for ~osion con=Dl and ~n~ lm~ov~ fGr Tra~ No. 23371-A; m~ fur ~oston ~n~ul and ~nds~pe Improv~en~s fQ= ~ No. 2~371-B~ said ~a~ e, bQ~ Of ~ese ~e~Cs re~uired ~a~ ~C 2 durincj' ~-h4s main~enancs peri~ "'~:~ ~ssCore, ~epair and 3 ~O ~,he sa~iSfacU~an of ~hs Building Official, &ny de~ec~lve uar~ 4 ~ lair dgne ~ deZe~ve a~ials 5 ~, ~ ~ve ~D~ o~ s~lt Ir~ ma~d ~a~ NDs. 6 23371-A and ~ ~s ~ de~s~ d~S~e~ ~ ~e ~lve~ 7 ~d~ Pal~ V~llage ~d ~n ~s ~n~ Valley ~ash ad~sc~c 11 ~, U a ~~ c~ ap~Dv~ ~a~ ~e ~el - ~ r~'l pr~ c~g Pal~ V~lla~e, 1D~C~ at Mar~ari~ 13 ~d ~o ~ll~a~la ~a~, ~e b~in~s ~o~aClon ~o= maid 18 Flood ConSul and Wa~ Dis~i~ ~ ~ Be~, Willi~ ~DSC 1~ ~d ~sOcia~ml, da=ed ~y li, 1989; 18 ~, ~e Villag~ Homeo~s A~ctanion ("~") 19 reepanlibili=y p~s~c ~ ~a~ No. 20735 =D ~tmtn ~e 20 Valley Wash a paZ of said ~a~;.' 21 ~, on Deu--~ ~,' 19S9, ~e Ci~ of ~ ~co~an~, 8~cmedin~ to ~e rtgn~ ~d d~i~ o~ ~e Co~Cy ~ of ~verside, includ~ ~e perfomnce ~nds fermented 24 ~, Se~loh 6.14.002[b) of ~e T~ecula Municipal ~ dest~atee as a nuinn~ nland, ~e =opogra~y aT conflea=ion 26 u~ whl~, In uy m~ade e=a=e, whaler as a resul= of 27 Cp~a=~o~, ~va=ion, =ill or o~* al~a~on, int~feree vi~ 2 aa~Qinin~ o= z~V, her proper=ice v~Lch does ~ston, s~st~anc~ ~ 4 ~de as ~ ~ ~i~m ~ p~lic healS, safe~ a~ welfare 6 {, ~n ~r ~u= N~{, 199~, ~e City uf T~e~la ~ ~e~ed ~ ~ r~e ~e eil~ de~si=ed ~ ~ng valley Wash. 8 ~d ~ r~ved said sil= 9 ~, ~ ~n~a~ed ~or 8~11 Tw~, Inc., =o prep~e a 10 li~=sd ~oeion. ~ 11 ~, said stay 12 ~C hs con=ibu~ed ~8~ of ~e ~il d~osi~ed in ~n~ Valley 13 wash, ~tch yes ~s~ently r~oved 14 ~, ap~r~=ely 3,SoO y~ds 15 been dsp~si~ed in ~e ~lv~ 18 ~ng Valley Wash s~ce 18 ~, C~F asses a ulaim ageins= !9 p~suan= ~ ~e ci=y Grading, Nuisance ~ S~tvision 20 ~inancss, an~ ~a ~ac Map cun~i~ions, ~ ~n~ Valley ~ash an~ ~e culv~ ~ Palo~ Village; 22 ~, ~C ~ci=ically ~ a~ve ~ci~ls, bu= a~ees ~o ~is S~ipula=ion in ~r~ ~ ~u~ ~ l=s peace ~d to ab~in an ~cable resolu=ion to ~e Reci~ls ~ con=ained 26 NOW, ~~. IT 1 6 8 9 l0 11 12 l& 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2~ 2~ 26 27 2~ days of C~u_--t al:q~toval of -,_his Order, FJJ. an T~cusand D~llarz sil~ ~ ~e ~lv~ ~d~ P~o~ Village, and to fUrOe ma~anu Qf ~ ~lv~ ~d ~n; Va!ley ~ash. 2. ~c ~11, ~; ~ la=~ ~ July 1, 1992, ~ple~ no h~ ~ ~ JUl~ 3~, 1992, repe~ and r~ade ~ Valley W~ ~twe~ M~ ~ad ~ H~ ~lve. alon~ ~o ~1~ ~, ~ ~a~ NO. 20735 =~ ~ned ~ ~ Be~, Willira ~oe= ~ ~aocia~M, ~d ~ce~r 11, 1985, tD ~e tollow~ A. Scope of work is ~ inulude ~e following: (1) Clgin; ~d ~spMal or all ~ees, ~ and (2) ~va~ion ~d ;Q~ of ~ial ~ ~el ~ plaM~ eleva~o~. (3) Fine re,fading of flDwl~o and alo~ pla~ eleva~iG~ ~d 1~ so= ~ a r~ia=~ ~lifQmia civil e~ine~. mu=ually ac~p~le ~ ~e parties, e~nee. (4) If wur~ is no~ uomple~ed b~ July 15, 1992, ~C ~ i~ cun~a~ors ~all use ~S tu ~iga~e ~e adjac~n gass (5) All sprinklers and irriea=iQn e~ipmen~ shall TBM~tOT~p.aTP ~ 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 upon crumple=ion. (S) Under;round flo~' pipe Tamll be cleaned, reported ~ pU~ ~o ~ w0r~ing crd~ upon c~le=ion. IT} ~ ~Ja~ l~pin~ shall ~ replaced or reposed. (S) Nc~y ~ a~ l~s= one we~ ~fur~ work ~C cr ~ ~n=a~c= shsll M respone~le for con~a~r s~-~l hold ~ ~-~less o= any problems ~V fr~ d~ mi=e. ~C, imlf, ~ ~2u~ i~ con=a~ur s~ll ~ovide all ~i~t, ~t~ial, and l~r nec~s~ ~o ~fo~ said work a= i=s cos=, and 2all ind~i=y and hold ~, City and ~dford h~l~s =tom all clai~ f~ liabili=~ ~s~ upon, or da~g~ ~ising from, work p~fomed h~eu~ cr ~ea~ of any pcnicn cZ ~is Ageement ~ ~C, i~ cun~a~urs, agen~ or ~ployees. I= ~ill ~ ~C's or l~ ccn=a~or's respons~ili~y ~ ~n=a~ Undoground S~i~ Ale~ ~d all c~ concerned ag~cies Zor ~e l~=ions of all ~is=ine u=ili=ies wl~in ~e d~ib~ ~k ar~. ~C and its con=a~or shall be sulel~ T~d/IiO~X~P_TIT 4R~sf~ 1 2 5 8 9 lO 12 14 16 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 28 sidewalk, landscaping, e~ , at and ~etwee~ ~b mite end dump mi~e. Zt m~ll also include all ~ffi~ ~n~ol ~ s~eet wash~g nec~s~ to ~C or i~ ~a~-/~ll name ~, City and hdZurd as ~oM1 ~e~ on i=s liablli~ ~~- ~ ~ i~ co=a~or will suppl~ Cuns~on va~ ~d co~ion ~at~ meter will ~ ~vi~d ~ ~C ur i~ cun~a~or as ~C, or iV suucmors and assigns, ~nt~ ~ M~in ~ng ~alley ~ash to ~e above i~ s~le ~, up to ~ un~l ~e Cl~ ~f T~w~Ia relmee Fai~ful Pc=~nce ~nd ~sion ~n~ol end ~ds~pe ~rov~V fur ~a~ 23371-1, Bond N~. 79~05276G7, ~ P~u~nce B~d =ur ~ueiun Con=a1 and =~v~ents f~ Tra~ 23371-B, B~d N~. 7900529404. ~, n~ing hcei~ ma~ M C~M~ed as a waiver by ~e Ci=~ of i~ right, a~, =o re~ire ~e sce=y ~[ said ~nds ~ ~rf~ an~ obliga=i~n of ~DC under 1 2 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 15 16 19 20 21 22 25 26 28 -~pula=lon, or as pruv~ ~.. .... . or ~ame Agreements they aec~a. ~e Ci=y ~ ~IeMe O~ ~ ~ ~ less ~ ~ys prior =~ ~e telroe Of said ~fo~nce ~s. ~1 p~i~ a~ ~aC ~ior to ~e r~lease said Bonds. ~n9 Valley Wash mus= ~ uleaned and vork~V ord~ as wall am ~e adJac~= s~ri~ler ~e~e. ~, IZ ~ ~e opinion or ~g~e~ a si~ift~t amos= of st1= r~iu in of ~e t~ of ~s ~e~c, ~e ~nds will not ~ r~us~, ~d ~C. iV aesi~s or s~ll clean' said Pal~ box ~1~ as well. ~, any d~ge done to any confers ~nage ~p~v~ts ~ iuMlls, shall M rep~ed. ~ ~y su~tt an hvoice u~ to ~e ~oun= $5,O0O for bui~ ~ c~pleCing ~n~eCe ~rainage ~pruvemen~ ~nd~ f=~ Y~on B,~r iD ~e ~ng Valley Wa~ up ~=11 1, 1992. ~pun E~s~ion of sai~ indigo in e C~ely =aehiGn, ut~ i~voi~es ~all by ~c up ~o ~e ~aun= or 55,0o0 ~ ~an 10 9 1O 11 17 18 20 Z6 ~ ~c~t do hc~ ~el~se ~nd d~s~a~e ~C, ~r~, ~r~ any ~d all rign~, cla~, d~, a~ damages uf ~y kind, ~o~ or ~, ass~ ~ ~s~ed, resul~ng rela~d ~ ~e eil~ ~evi~usly deposi=ed, pree~=ly ~g or vhi~ ~y ~ deposi=sd ~a~ 22371 h ~n~ ~alley Wa~ ~d ~e culv~ ~ Pal~ Vilhge. In ~id~a~un oZ ~e promises confined h~ein, ~ ~d i~ ~s, ag~, assi~s and su~n~ ~ ~=~t ~ her~ telass and ~m~g~ Ci~, ~d Beard, ~d ~ of Zic~e, ~l~e~ and ~u=~surs-~-in=~= ==ore ~y and all righ~, . ~la~, ~n~, ~d deigns ~d, ~o~ ur ~0~, ass~ed or r~ul~in~ =r~ or rela=ed =o ~e silt Wavi~ly deposi=sd, pres~t. ly ~istin~, or whi~ deposi=ed Z~m ~C or o~ ups~sam ~devel~ hnd in ~ng Valley wash and ~e ~lv~ ~ea~ Palo~ Village. I~ considera=ion of ~e prDmises cun~ined ci=y, and i~ ~ers. ag~, assigns and successors in ~=~es~ du h~sby r~lease and dis~ar~e ~e ~, and Bedrurd, and I 4 7 10 11 I2 15 14 !B 17 18 19 _nt. erast Zr~m any and all ~ ~hr.~, cls~m~, and damages of any kind, ~wn ~r unknown, asserted Dr unasserUed, rssultin~ ~rom cr rsla~d ~ the silo prsviettsly dapcsited, presently existing, ar vhir..h may be deposited ~rom MV~C or other ups~,Toam tindeveloped land in ~ng Valley Wash and ~hs culvex~ beneath PalGroat Viilags, at S~en In couid~ation QZ ~e ~omis~ cQn~inad Bedford, and i~ Mc2, agents, assigns dixie ~e ClOy a~ ~, aM ~s~ oZZi~s, ag~, ~loysM and suc~s~-in-~Mr~t any and Ill rights, cla~, deanS, ~ o~ any ~ind, ~ er ~0~, ass~ed or previously deposited, pr~Uly ~is~in~, ~y be dsposit~ fr~ ~C e: e~ upturn ~sve~eped ~and ~ ~n~ Va~lsy Wash and ~e ~vsn ~nea~ P~mr Village. In c~nsid~en ~f ~e promises ~n~a~sd ~DC, and l~ o~ers, a~en~s. assi~s and su~essors in in~u~ do h~ey re,ease and disch~e BedZ~rd. ~e City and ~, and off~s, agent, ep~oyess ~d succass~rs-~- T214,'IIO'm3p,TI'p 4JeL',F~ 2 and damages o~ any kind, ~n or unknown, 3 asserted ~r unaeeer~e~, resulting =r~a cr rela~ed 4 T.o ~he sil~ previously deposited, presently 6 c~ ~sUe~ ~develcped land in ~ Valley 7 Wash ~d ~e ~1~ ~ea~ Palter Village. 8 4. The ~es h~e~u ~d~d and a~ee 9 ~e~ rl~ ~der Se~on 1542 ~f ~e ~vll C~e of ~liZor~a 10 or ~y s~l~ law 2f ~y s~ ~ t~i~ u= ~e United ~ ~e, ere h~ ~sly ~aiV~. Said Se~icn reeds as 13 'Se~ion 1542. Ge~e~l ~eleas~Claim5 l& E~in~ished. A gen~al ~lease does ~ ~end to cla~s ~hi~ ~e ~editsr d~ 16 ~ow or su~e~ ~ ~is= in his favor a= 17 time of ~e~=ing ~e release, whi~ if 18 by h~, mus~ have u~rially a=fe~ his 19 sentiment wi~ ~e d~=cr.- 20 5. It Is und~=ood and a~eed ~a~ ~is Stipulation 21 represen~ se==l~n= of' disputed clai~ and is no~ ~ cons~ed as represen~g an a~issicn cf liablll~ ~ any ~ =o ~is S~ipula=ion. The p~ies, however, An=end ~ buy ~eir peace and to forever provide a =ull ~d ~ r~leaseand dis~a~e.Zrom an~ and all lia~ili~y 26 ~e ~ansa~ions, ma=t~s. and ev~ more pa~l~larly identified 2~ hereinsUre. 1 6. ~e ~-Zies here=o expr~sl~{ w- .no, represent, ~n~ 3 ~BWl~e of any r~gh~ w~ ~ey have or ~ ~ve w~ 4 ~ ~e o~r ~d +h=C ~e~ ~ve re~A~d ~ep~den~ legal 5 ~vice ~m ~ r~ve a~o~eys vi~ re~ to ~is 8 Stipula~cn, ~ wi~ reapa~ ~ ~e h~eina~ve referenced 7 dispute · ~ ~ p~s h~e~ a~cwl~e ~= af~ %n~ing 9 ~is S~ipula~un, ~ey ~ ~s~v~ ~fferen= or a~itiu~l 10 ccnc~ ~e s~j~ ~Ut~ of ~ ~ip~ation cr 1! ~d~ing cf ~ose =a~- ~e pZies h~eUu, ~erefcre, 12 e~ree&l~ asses ~e risk c~ su~ fa~ ~hg so dff=~= 13 ages ~a= ~i2 S~ipula=lon, ~11 ~ all r~, ~ effe~ive 14 ~ not s~3e~ ~ rescission, ~ncallanicn cr =em~=icn by 1D r~son of any su~ ad~io~ cr d~f~en= 16 7. Should ~y pzy br~g an a~ion a~a~= ~e o~er 17 ~e p~se of enforcing ~e =~a of ~is S=ipulaticn, or f~ 18 da~ges arising from its ~ch, ~ in su~ event, ~e 19 pravail~G pa~y ~all M enticed ~ i~ reasonable 20 ieae ~d ces~ in addition =~ ~ o~er awed en~ 21 CoZ. 22 2. ~is Stipulation shall ~e to ~e ~nefit cf ~ p~ies and =o ~eir respective successors, rapres~=ives and ~ assi~, and shall ~ bind~ upon each or ~e ~ 9. This ~ip~a=ion shall, in all r~pe~, M 26 ~=~ra~ed, ~forced and governed by ~d ~der ~e laws cf 27 S~e of ~li~2mia. This Ageement cormsins ~e en=~e 4 or oral. ~s 2tipula~on ~y ~ si;~ in counU~. 5 10. This. ~i~ation ~all ~ e~Je~ to B~pt~ 6 a~roval ~use it ar=e~ ~e ri~ 'and/~r obliga=icns ~c. T~S ~ip~a=io~ shall ~t M bindS; an a~y of S ~iee h~eto ~l~s and ~=il su~ a~r~val is pro~md ~d the 9 Stipulation ~u e~fe~ive as =o ~C. ~C shall aDpl~ f~= 10 su~ apprsval wl~ ~o (2) b~s days or ~C 11 cs~el ' s ~ivin~ ~l~n no=ifi~icn ~f ~is S=ipula=lcn 12 ~e~tion by ~, ~e~ord and ~C. Nu=wi~standing any 13 for~o~g t~ ~e ~on~, ~e ~rc~= and ~reta=ion 14 ~e ~ipula=ion sMll no~ ~ subJa~ ~ ~e ~isdic=icn 15 B~t~ ~, ~cept to ~e e~en~ such ~forc~t 16 inte~re~on a=fe~J ~e ri~h~ or obligations of ~C und~ ~is Stipula=ion. 18 IN ~S WH~OF, ~uh of ~e undc2i~ned have 19 ~ie Stip~a=ion on ~e date ~d yec i~i~ted ~lov. h~ of 20 ~e belov ~ persons wa~an= ~at ~ey ce duly au~orized 21 sl~ ~is age~en= on ~half or ~eir principal and ~e au~oriz~ to hind ~eir principal ~ ~is 26 DaCS(~: , 1992 DaT, S~: , 1992 ~ or :~XZcGT..X pATR/~ ~IRD~LL, MAYOR Name: Title: COS~a3qZ, & Cali:=Tnia i)oi~t: venture B~I~-RANCHO CALIFOPa4IX, LTd., · Calif~rni& limi=a4 p&r=n~rzhi~ · ~. Cali~omia General By: ]~EVJU~.-RA.~TCZHC~ C,~~, LTD. NEVADA C.a~ITAL, LTD. · Cali=ornia Gen~ral Partner -13 - 1 2 5 6 8 9 10 ll '12. 14, 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 28 Scott F. PXeI~, CZtlzy Attorney Dated: Dated: Vi~ur Vilaplana, ~sq. AZT~Tne~S By: By: . Dated: Dennis Klim~e~, Esq. Attorney for -14- , 1992 · 1992 , 1992 , 1992 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 22 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: "' DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME A VICINITY MAP NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/26/93 mf CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - FUTURE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: VERY HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - MARGARITA VILLAGE C/"" NO.: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME P.C. DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373.pC 10/26/93 mf CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME EXHIBIT: D SITE PLAN F DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 1993 R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373.pC 10/26/93 mf ITEM #7 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Prepared By: Matthew Fagan, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- , approving the Third Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc, c/o Kemper Real Estate Development Company REPRESENTATIVE: Mick Ratican, Rick Engineering PROPOSAL: A third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. I - a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Planning Area No. 38: Very High Density Residential 14.8 d.u./acre. Planning Area No. 39: Commercial 7.5 acres. LOCATION: Northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway EXISTING ZONING: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village R-1 (One Family Dwellings), R-R (Rural-Residential), R-5 (Open Area Combining Zone-Residential Developments) Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village PROPOSED ZONING: Not Requested R:\S%STAFFRPT%23373-1,PC 12/2/93 klb GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Planning Area No. 40: Very High Density Residential (13- 20 d,u./acre) Planning Area No, 41: Medium Density Residential (7-12 d.u./acre) EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: East: West: Vacant Vacant Rancho California Water District Tank Site, Park, and Single Family Residences Vacant PROJECT STATISTICS Total Area Number of Lots Overall Project Density Planning Area No. 40 Planning Area No. 41 46.90 acres 66.00 10.66 d.u./acre 25.00 d.u./acre 6.20 d.u./acre BACKGROUND Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988. The First Extension of Time was filed with the City Planning Department on October 12, 1990. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the First Extension of Time on November 4, 1991 and the City Council approved the First Extension of Time on April 28, 1993. A Second Extension of Time was formally submitted to the Planning Department on October 8, 1991. The Second Extension of Time is currently before the Planning Commission for their consideration. The Third Extension of Time was filed with the Planning Department on October 6, 1992. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 5, 1992. At the Planning Commission meeting, the Second Extension of Time was continued because the applicant did not concur with conditions of approval for erosion control and the payment of Quimby Fees. Also at this meeting, the applicant requested Staff to place the Third Extension of Time on the next Planning Commission agenda. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The current project is a request for a third, one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 (V'Iq'M 23373). Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 is a portion of the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 38 and 39. Planning Area No. 38 proposes a 348 unit retirement residential condominium project on approximately 23.5 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 14.8 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 39 is a 1 lot commercial site consisting of approximately 7.5 acres. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 2 ANALYSIS Since this extension is being considered concurrently with the second extension of time, all issues have been addressed with the second extension of time. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Existing zoning for the site is Specific Plan (S.P. 199 - Margarita Village). The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village, Ordinance No. 348, and the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The current project is a request for a third one year extension of time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 (V3'FM 23373), which is located in the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199. The Tentative Map encompasses Planning Areas 38 and 39. Planning Area No. 38 proposes a 348 unit residential condominium project on approximately 23.5 acres. The overall density of that project would be approximately 14.8 dwelling units per acre at buildout. Planning Area 39 is a 1 lot commercial site consisting of approximately 7.5 acres. FINDINGS The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project, 3. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time is consistent with the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1,PC 1212193 klb 3 10. 11. 12. commercial development The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village and the General Plan. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. Medium density residential uses are proposed to the west and are buffered by a golf course. Medium high residential uses are proposed to the north of the site and are buffered by a road. Existing low-medium density residential development is located across Rancho California Road. The commercial portion of the site is adjacent to Meadows Parkway (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane major road) and Rancho California Road (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane arterial), The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses, The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, which are publicly maintained street. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. R:~S\STAFFRPT~23373-1,PC 12/2/93 klb 4 Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6, Resolution No. 93- - Blue Page 6 Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10 Draft Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time - Blue Page 13 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time - Blue Page 14 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 - Blue Page 15 Exhibits - Blue Page 16 A. Vicinity Map B. Future General Plan Designation C. Zoning Designation D. Tentative Map R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373-1.pC 12/2/93 klb 5 AT'I'ACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1.PC 12/2193 Idb 6 ATTACHMENT N0. I PC RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA APEROVING A THIRD ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMEND~NT NO. 1, A PROPOSAL FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDO1VIIN1UM SUBDIVISION OF 348 DWELLING UNITS ON 23.5 ACRES AND 7.S ACRES COIVIM'ERCIAL LOCATED AT T~E NORTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 953-060-009. WHEREAS, Kemper Real Estate Development Company in the name of Margarita Village Retirement Community, Inc. fried an Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WtF~,REAS, said Extension of Time application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Extension of Time on December 6, 1993; WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Commission considered all facts relating to the Third Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1; NOW, TItEREFO RE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings, to wit: A. The findings for the original approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1 are found to remain valid except as amended herein. B. No subsequent changes are proposed in the project which would require revisions to the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. C. No new information of substantial importance to the project has become available. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 7 D. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time is consistent with the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 - Retirement Community is very high density residential (Density range 14-20 d.u./acre). The land use designation for Planning Area No. 39 is commercial development The General Plan land use designation for Planning Area No. 38 is High Density Residential (13-20 d.u./acre) and Neighborhood Commercial for Planning Area No. 39. The project as proposed is consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margafita Village and the General Plan. E. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning Laws. The proposed use complies with the Subdivision Map Act, and City of Temecula Ordinances No. 460 and 348. F. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circuhtion patterns, access, and intensity of use, due to the fact that the proposed residential development complies with the standards of Ordinances No. 460 and 348. G. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or weftare, due to the fact that the Conditions of Approval include mitigation measures. H. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, intensity, and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties. Medium density residential uses are proposed to the west and are buffered by a goff course. Medium high residential uses are proposed to the north of the site and are buffered by a road. Existing low-medium density residential development is located across Rancho California Road. The commercial portion of the site is adjacent to Meadows Parkway (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane major road) and Rancho California Road (identified in the General Plan as a 4-lane arterial). I. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding land uses. J. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated fight-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, because access will be off of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, which are publicly maintained street. K. The design of the project and the type of improvements are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. L. Said findings are supported by maps and environmental documents associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. M. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Tentative Tract Map is compatible with the health, safety and weftare of the community. R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 8 S~¢tion 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was previously adopted by Riverside County for Specific Plan No. 199. Staff has determined that said EIR still applies to this subdivision because no subsequent, unmitigable changes are proposed hi the project which would require revisions to the previous Certified Environmental Impact Report. The project does not include new significant, unmitigable environmental impacts that were not considered in the previously Certified Environmental Impact Report on the project. Section 4. ConditionS. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves the Third One Year Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, a proposal for a residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial located at the northwest comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 953-060-009 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIYY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNHILL SECRETARY R:\S\STAFFRPTX23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 9 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1.pC 12/2/93 klb 10 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time Project Description: Third one year extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Map No. 23373, Amendment No. I - a Residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Third Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, second Extension of Time, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, first Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H 11. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373*1 .PC 12/2/93 klb 11 An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval within thirty (30) days of approval of this Third Extension of Time, subsequent to the Second Extension of Time. Prior to Recordation of Final Map The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1998, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the First Extension of Time, and subsequent to the Second Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. OTHER AGENCIES The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated November 30, 1993, a copy of which is attached. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho California Water District transmittal dated December 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373-1 .PC 12/2/93 klb 12 S5h7 BY:TStECLL~ ;12-1-88: 14:0~; P-,.L:';CHO ~ATER- CITY OF TE.~IECLL~;~ 2' 8 December 1, 1993 Mr. Sated Naaseh City a~ Teme~ula 4~174 Bmi~,ss Park Temecula, CA ~25~3606 SUB~F, CT: Water Availability Trd~ Map 23373 Dear Mr. Naaseh: Please be advised that the above-r~ferenced property i, located within the boundarie~ of Rancho California Water Distria (R~). Wa~er ser,4c~ therefore, would be avmlable upon completion of financial arrangemenis between RCWD and the properly cMner. Water avmlabllily would be contbsgent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCVa). ff you hav~ any questions, please contact Ms. Senga Doherty. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT S~'c Brannen, P.F, D~w,]opment EnMinccdng Manager cc: Senna Doherty, En,oinccFing T~chnician JMHARRIS CHIEF RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE * PERKIS, CALI]:ORNIA 92570 * (909) November 30, 1993 T0: Planning Dept ATTEN: Matthew Fagan RE: Tract 23373 Third Extension of Time with respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4x2-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. r'l RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12lh Sireel, Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 2754777 · FAX (909) 369-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION f'l INDIO OFFICE 79-733 Country Club Dt~ve, Suitc F, Indio, CA 92201 (619) 863-ggg6 · FAX (619) g63-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that- the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. Display Boards: Display boards required for apartments, commercial complexes, condominiums , RV parks and mobile home parks will be as follows. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout which shows the name of the complex, all streets, building designators, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. These directories shall be a minimum 4'x4' in dimension and located next to the roadway access. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be ~osted, in a visible location, minimum 6 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. All gated access shall be equipped with Knox Lock. The applicant shall contact the Fire Department for specifications and knox applications. Prior to recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the' time of issuance of the. first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist ATTACHMENT NO. 3 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S~STAFFRPT\23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 13 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL · Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time Project Description: SecondoneyearextenaionofTimeforVestingTentativeMapNo. 23373, Amendment No. I - a Residential condominium subdivision of 348 dwelling units on 23.5 acres and 7.5 acres commercial. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 953-060-009 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, it agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, Second Extension of Time, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. The applicant shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, First Extension of Time, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373, Amendment No. 1, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a ohasinQ olan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 199 - Margarita Village. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development AQreement No. 5. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 13 7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No, 202. 8. A MitiQation MonitorinQ ProQram shall be submitted and approved by the Planning · Director prior to recordation of the Final Map or issuance of Grading Permits which ever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 9. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director, 10, A biological assessment of the Gnatcatcher shall be required. Necessary mitigation measures acceptable to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife and/or California Department of Fish and Game shall be implemented. 11. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report, compliance with the Conceptual Landscape Plans for this stage of the development, 12. The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A, A copy of the Final Map, B. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans. C. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: (1) This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. (2) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 202 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 14, The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director: A, Construction landscape plans consistent with the City standards and the approved Conceptual Landscape Plans including automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property for: R:\S~STAFFRPT~23373,pC 10/28/93 mf 14 ( 1 ) Front yards and slopes within individual lots prior to issuance of building permits for any lot(s). (2) Private common areas prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) building permit. B. Wall and fence plans consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans. C. Precise grading plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. D. The Model Home Comolex Plot Plan (if applicable) which includes the following: (1) Site Plan with off-street parking. {2) Construction Landscape Plans. (3) Fencing Plans. (4) Building Elevations. (5) Floor Plans. (6) Materials and Colors Board. 15. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. 16. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 18. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the twentieth (20th) occupancy permit. 19. The applicant shall sign an agreement and/or I)ost a bond with the City to insure the maintenance of all landscaping within private common areas for a period of one year. 20. The applicant shall demonstrate by a written report that all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this stage of the development. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373,PC 10/28/93 mf 15 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department of Public Works. General Requirements 21. The Developer shall remove all the sediments from the open channel and the box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humher Drive to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works, and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the stipulated judgment in Case No. 91-14308-H11. 22. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Within Thirty (30) Days of Approval of The Second Extension of Time 23. The Developer shall enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City providing that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall reimburse the City, the City's cost for completion of the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose to construct said improvements. 24. An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City Standards, by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Prior to Recordation of Final Map 25. The Developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the construction of the erosion control and slope protection improvements and all required offsite improvements, as specified in the Conditions of Approval as approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on November 8, 1988, and as modified by the Planning Commission on November 4, 1991, for the first Extension of Time, within 18 months, in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall complete the improvements to Margarita Road, between La Serena Way and Rancho California Road, should the City choose not to construct said improvements. R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 rnf 16 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 27. Exterior slopes contiguous to public streets that are adjacent to residential development shall be offered for dedication to the Community Services Department (TCSD) for maintenance purposes following compliance to existing City Standards and completion of the ap~olication process. All other slopes and open space shall be maintained by an established Home Owners' Association. 28. Recreational Trails and Class II Bicycle Lanes along Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway shall be designed and constructed to intercept.with the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. 29. All proposed slopes intended for dedication to the TCSD shall be identified on the final map as a proposed TCSD maintenance area. 30. Construction of proposed TCSD landscape maintenance areas shall commence pursuant to a pre-job meeting with the developer and the City Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance program. 31. The developer, or the developer's successors or assignees, shall maintain all landscaped areas until such time as those maintenance responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD. Prior to Recordation of Final Map(s) 32. The applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair market value of 4.73 acres of park land to comply with City Ordinance No. 469.93 (Quimby). The amount to be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to recordation of said map. 33. The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve all proposed TCSD maintenance areas in conformance with the City of Temecula Landscape Development Plan Guidelines and Specifications. 34. Landscape construction drawings identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and approved by TCSD staff. R:\S~STAFFRPT~23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 17 OTHER AGENCIES 35. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Health Department's transmittal dated October 18, 1993, a - copy of which is attached. 36. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the County of Riverside Fire Department's letter dated October 18, 1993, a copy of which is attached. 37. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Eastern Municipal water District transmittal dated October 22, 1993, a copy of which is attached. R:\S%STAFFRPT%23373.PC 10/28/93 mf 18 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE * HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH October 18, 1993 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43174 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 ATYN: Matthew Fagan: RECEIVED RE: TRACT MAP NO. 23373: BEING PARCELS 1~,3,4 AND 5 OF PARCEl. MAP 21884 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEPd?OF FILED IN BOOK 144. PAGe' 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY I~CORDER OF SAID RIVERSIDE COUNTY TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE RANClIO TEMECULA GRANTF_.D BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF ~ERICA TO LUIS F1GNES BY PA TENT DA TED JANUARY 18, 1860 AND RECORDED IN THE OI~tlCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. (6SLOTS) Dear Gentlemen: The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Treat Map No. 23373 and recommends: A water ~,stem shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate. with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along ~vith the original drax~g to the City. of Temecula's Office. The prints shall show the rotereal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrams; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the mare at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply m all respects ~vith Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, Califorma Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commassion of the State of Califomia, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify. that the design of the water system in Tmet Map No. 23373 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such Tract Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply ~vater to such Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. The Blans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the request for the recordation of the final map. This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. John M. Fanning, Director 4065 County Circle Drive * Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017 (Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) City. ofTemecula Plannmg Dept. Page Two Arm: Matthew Fagan August 18, 1993 This subdivision is within th~ Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the City of Temecula's Office and the Health DeparUnent. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the City of Temecula' s Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and wateflines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the sewer system in Tract Map No. 23373 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans oftbe Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal systgra is adequate at this timc to trcat the anticipated wastes from thc proposcd Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to thc Ciw of Temccula's Office to review at least t~vo weeks xxior to the request for the rccordation of thc final map. It will be necessa~, for financial arrangements to be completely ~nalized prior to mcordation of the final map. S' cerel ~'c~la~eamlHealthSpecialist SM:dr (909) 275-8980 RIVERSIDE C O UNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 ~VEST SA/q JAC~qTO AVEiqlJE , PERRIS, CALIFOR/qlA 99~70 · (909) 657-3183 TO: Planning Dept ATTEN: Matthew Fagan October 18, 1993 Tract 23373 - 2nd Extension of Time. With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 GPM and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be !500 GPM for 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operaZing pressure. Approved super fire hydrants (6"x4x2-2 1/2") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Departmenn for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the job site. The required fire flow may be adjusted at a later point in the permit process to reflect changes in design, construction type, area separation or built-in fire protection measures. ~ RIVERSIDE OFFICE 3760 12lh Street, Riverside, CA 92501 (999) 275-;777 · FAX (909~ 369-7451 FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION PLANNING SECTION 79-733 Cuunlry Club Dnvu, Suia¢ F, lndio, CA 92201 (619) 863-8886 · FAX (619) 863-7072 THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. Install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building plans. In lieu of fire sprinkler requirements, building(s) must be area separated into square foot compartments approved by the fire department, as per the Uniform Building Code Section 505(f). Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement. DiSDlaV BOards: Display boards required for apartments, commercial complexes, condominiums , RV parks and mobile home parks will be as follows. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic representation of the actual layout which shows the name of the complex, all streets, building designators, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. These directories shall be a minimum4'x4' in dimension and located next to the roadway access. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with fire hydrant. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the UniformBuilding Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating and shall be approved by the fire Department prior to installation. Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 6 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. All gated access shall be equipped with Knox Lock. The applicant shall contact the Fire Department for specifications and knox applications. Prior to recordation of the final map , the developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, the sum of $400.00 per lot/unit, as mitigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time od payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit. Applicant/developer shall be responsible to provide or show there exists conditions set forth by the Fire Department. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Pl~mning and engineering section. RAYMOND H. PEGIS Chief Fire Department Planner by~CJ~ Laura Cabral Fire Safety Specialist SENT a~]~ m W D -22-g3; g:5OAM; 7149 I~ 9096948477|= 2 ]E]a.em ]V un icii al VVra,er Di,trict ocd:obez- 22, 1993 Matt. hew Fagan, Case Plaitnet City of Teme~ula Planning Department 43174 Business Park D=ive Ternsouls, CA 92590 BUBa~CT: ~TTM 23373 - 2rod xx~ensiom of Time Dear Mr. Fagan: We have reviewed the mnteTials tramsmittsd by your office which describe the sttbjec~ project. Ottr comments ere outlined below: It is cur understanding the subject project is a proposed condomintum and commerclal property development located at the northwest corner of the i~terseotion of Neadowa Parkway and Rancho California Road. The subject project is located within the Die~ric~c's sanitary sewer service area. However, It must be understood the available capabilities of the Distrlct~s system~ are continually changing due to the occurrence of developman~ within the District and programs of eystem~ Janprovement. AS such, the provision of service will be based on the detailed plan of service reguirements, the t/a~g of the eubJect proJ act, the status of the District ' s permit to operate, a~d the service agreea~ent between the Dial;riot and the devel0~e~r of the Subject project. The developer must arrange for the preparation of a detailed plan of service. The detailed plan of service will indicate the location(s) and size(s) of system i~prOVements ~o be made by the developer (Or others), and which are considered necessary in order to provide adequate levels of eerq~ice. To siTsage for the preparation of a plea of service, the developer should s"h~it information describing the subject project to the Dis~rictss Customer Service Department, (909) 925-7676, extel~elon 409, as follows: Written request for m "plan of service". Minimum $400.00 deposit (larger deposits muy be required Mail To: PO/t 0/F,,.- Ik= 85~0 · ,SNmJsrinm, C. al~oruia 92581-8500 · Tclephoue (909) 92}-7676 · Pax (~09) 929-0257 Matthew Fagan VTTM 23373 0crobsr 20, 1993 Page 2 for ex~enstve development projects or projects located in "difficult ~o serve" geographic areas). 3. plans/maps describing =he exac~ locattcm and nature ~he eubjec~ project. Bspecta11~ helpful m~arials include gradJa~g plene and phasing The subject project is c~nsldered tributaz7 to the District'i oUh. subject proJet= are as follows: Cravity-fl~w sewer aligned along l~Ancho California Road a~ MeadOws parkway. The project representa=ive must contact the District's customer service Depar=men~ to m~ke arrangemenr~ for plan check and field inspection of proposed Distrio= facilir/es and/or onslte plumbing. should you have any ~uestions regarding these comments, please feel free to contac~ this Qffloe at (909) 925-7676, extension 468. Ver~ V_~uly yours, DGC/CZ ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME R:\S~STAFFRPT~23373-1.PC 12/2/93 klb 14 ATFACHMF_NT NO. 3 CITY OF TEMEC~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 23373 First Extension of Time City Council Appmvai Date: April 28, 1992 Expiration Date: November 8, 1991 PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordltmnce No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that o~inance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to 'the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residevtial lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library developmere. "The covenants, conditions and restrictions for the development shall require that each permanent resident in each dwelling unit shall be 55 years of age or over, including any apa~ents in plzmning Area 40 of the Specific Plan. The reference at pg. 144 of the Specific Plan that the apa~h.ents are not subject to any age restriction is incorrect, and the Descriptive Summary at pg. 143 of the Specific Plan that the "plmnnlng area shall contain solely retirement community housing" is controlling.' .... DEPARTIVFF:NT OF PUBLIC WORKS The foliowing are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the trae meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropmte staff person of.the Depa,lment of Public Works. It is understood that the Developer has correctly shown on the tentative map all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be msubmitted for fuxther review. The Developer Sh~11 comply with all Conditions of Approval as previously imposed or amended and with the Conditions noted below. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF TI-IE FINAL MAP: Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requh'~ments of said section. Delete condition no. 15 of Riverside County Road Commissioner letter dated September 22, 1988 and rcphce it with the following: Prior to recordation of the fmai map, the developer shall deposit with the D~partment of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation wwards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. An erosion control and slope pwtection plan shall be submitted to the I)gpa~haent of Public Works for review and appwval. The inst~lhtion shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and site conditions shall be maintained to protect adjacent properties from damage due to runoff and erosion. Developer shall post a performance bond for erosion control and slope protection in an amount appwved by the Depaxhx~ent of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. As deemed necessary by the dep~.iment of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Contwl District; City of Temecuh Fire Bureau; planning Department; I)ep~tment of Public Works; Riverside County Health Department; and 2 CATV Franchise. Community Services District Prior to fmai map, the subdivider Shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. l~ior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Bngineer's Office, in addition to any other pern~its required. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUrLDING PERMIT: 10. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property of project, including that for Uaffic and public facility mitigation as required for the project. The fee to be paid Shall be in the mount in effect at the time of payment of fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been.finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of whichhas been provided W developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post security to secure payment of the Public Facil/ty fee. The mount of the security Shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the mount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions from this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, o~_t_h.e process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the mount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 11. Construct full street impwvements inchding but not limited W, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public srxeets. 12. All street improvements swiping, marking and signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 13. Prior to March 25, 1992, the Buie Corporation shall make arrangements w remove all the sediment from the open channel and box culvert north of Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Humber Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S~TAFFRPI'a3~'/3 3 TRANSPORTATION ENG]NI~3~/NG PRIOR TO TI-IE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACH3PA'NT PERMITS: 14. Traffic striping, marking and street name signing plans shall be designed as directed by the Depatlment of Public Works. 15. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT: 16. Prior to recordation of the final map the applicant or his assignee shall pay the fair maxket value of 4.07 aezes of required parkland tO comply with City Ordinance No. 460.93 (Quimby). The amount tO be paid shall be determined by TCSD staff within thirty (30) days prior to reeordation of said map. 17. Exterior slopes bordering an arterial stre~ may be dedicated shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for malnWnance following compliance to TCSD standards and completion of the application proems. (Amended at City Council on April 28, 1992) vgw ATTACHMENT NO. 5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, R:\S\STAFFRPT\23373-1 .PC 12/2/93 klb 15 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDZVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23373 AMENDED NO. 1 STANOARD CONDITIONS The subdivider shall defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, 1is agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of RIverside or 1is agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, 1is advtsory agencies, appeaq boards or legislative body concerning Vesttng Tentative Tract 23373 Amended No. 1, whtch action is brought about within the time pertod provtded for tn California Government Code Sectton 66499.37. The County of Riverside wtll promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding against the County of en eC u e a such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. 4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance 460. S. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 6. Zf any *grading is proposed, t~ subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 2 7. A grading permlt shall be obtatned from the Department of Butlding and Safety prior to commencement of any gradtng outside of county malntained road right of my. Any deltequent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordorion of the ftnal map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 9-22-88 a copy of which is attached. 10. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provtded from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. A11 road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the overoing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications sha~l be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 7-25-BB a copy of which is attached. The subdtvlder shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 7-22-88 a copy of~htch is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance 460, appro rtate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be coVlected by t e Road Commissioner. h The subdivider shall comply with the fire Improvement recommendations outlined in the County Fire Harshal's letter dated 8-17-88 a copy of which is attached. 16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed Common open space area improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning n r Department approval, A y p oposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. Page 3 t7. Lots created by this subdhtston shall comply with the following: a. Comer lots and thrp. ugh lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3,88 of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots, b, Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the Specific Plan No, 199 Amendment No. 1 zone. When lots are crossed by major publtc utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained t with interim condition and shall be ether planted provided with other erosion control measures as Director of Building and Safety. in a weed-free landscaping or approved by the Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas shall be located and visually screened from surrounding areas with the use of blocka~wa~ls and landscaping. Prior to RECORDATION of the final mep the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met. County Fire Department County Rood Control County Parks Department Eastern Municipal Water Dist. County Health Department County Planning Department Rancho Water District Prior to the recordation of the final map, General Plan Amendment 150, Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1, Development Agreement No. 5, and Change of Zone No. 5107 shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. 19. All existing structures on the subject property shall be removed prior to recordatton of the ftnal map. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 4 21, The Con~on open space area shall be show~ as a numbered lot on the final map and shall be managed by a master property owners association, Prtor to recordatton of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveyed title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaretion of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a mtntmum term of 60 years, (b) provide fo~ the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common and (d) .contain to following provisions verbatim: "Nothwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall manage and continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'ZZZ-17' of the specific plan attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Otrector of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. The property owner's association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining the 'c~on area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the pa~nent of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other 1tens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be t~rmtnated, 'substantially' amended or ropetry deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered f 'substantial' if it afects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area'. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, tf an~, this Declaration shall control." Conditions of Rpproval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 5 2e Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded st the same time that the final map is recorded. Prior to recordatton of the final map, clearance shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water Otstrt~t relative to the protection of applicable easements affecting the subject property. Lot line adjustments shall also be completed. ~e developer shall c~ly with the requirements as shown in Specific Plan No. maintained by HDA or other public entity: 10-5-B8} following parkway landscaping 199 Amendment No. I unless (Amended by Planning Commission 1) Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. I in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 197Z, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance. 2) 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be ua e vtability of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assu~tton of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkwa landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over ~y the district. )e developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those Street lights shall be provtded within the subdivision in accordance wtth the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following: 1) Concurrently ~th the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the Road I)epari~nent, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer and then from the appropriate utility purveyor. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No, Page 6 26. 2) layout by Following approval of the street 11ghttng the Road Department~s trafftc engineer, the developer sha:l talsonftle an application tdth LAFCO for the formation of a s feet lighttrig district, or annexation to an extsttng lighttrig dtst tct, u less the Site Is wtthtn an extsttng ltghttng district. 3) Prior to recordatton of the ftnal rap, the developer shall secure conditional approval of the street 11ghttng application from LAFCO, unless the site ts wtthtn an extsttng 11ghttng dlstrtct. 4) All street l~ghts and other outdoor ltght~ng shall be shown on electrical plans sulxn~tted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply wtth the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the R~vers~de County : Comprehensive General Plan. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERHITS the following conditions she31 be satisfied: Prior to the tssuance of grading permtts, detailed common open space area parktrig landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following. Permanent automatic Irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2) Landscape screening where requtred shall be destgned to be opaque up to a minimum height of stx (6) feet at maturity. 3) All uttltty servtce areas and enclosures shall be screened from v~ew wtth landscaping and decorative barrters or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. 4) Parkways and landscaped butldtng setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition tnto the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth bermtng, round cover, shrubs and spectmen trees tn conjunction wtth meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenlttes where appropriate as approved by the Planntng Department and Spec~ftc Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key visual focal points wtthtn the project. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373/~ended No. 1 Page 7 28. g · 6) 7) 8) Where streets trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the sub 'oct property shall be shown on the project's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, telJeered and/or retained. g) All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow growing trees shall be steel staked. 10.. Parking layouts shall comply with Ordinance 348, Section 18.12. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading pemits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for a proval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detai~ed grading plans for phases of development and individual shall include the following: 1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentaLton during and after the grading process. z) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of january through )Latch. 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations. 4) Areas of temporary grading outs)de of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development Standards: A1 cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations therof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an a proprier, combination o a special terracing (benchin) plan, increase s~ope ratio 3:1), retainin 1 (i.e., ~g wal s, and/or slope pVanting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen percent grade. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No, 1 Page 8 0. 32, All cut slopes located adjacent to un faded natural terrain and exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical heights shal~ be Incorporating contour-graded the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to 'the angle of the natural terrain, 2) Angular form shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain, 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut Or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the · horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulattng fashion. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist shall be retained by the developer for consultation and conment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts. Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERNITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: In accordance with the written request of the developer to the County of Riverside, a copy of which is on file, and in furtherance of the agreement between the developer and the County of Riverside, no building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any parcels within the subject tract until the developer, or the developer's successors-in-interest provided evidence of compliance with the terms of said Development Agreement No. 5 for the financing of public facilities. -' With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety the developer will demonstrate compliance with the acoustical study prepared for Vesting Tentative Tract 23371 Amended No. 1 which established appro rtate mitigation measures to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 4~ Ldn and ex ertor noise levels below65 Ldn. t Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. 1 Page 9 33. Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10} feet unless approved by the Department of ,,tiding .nd Saf,Depa .nt per Sp,cific Plan. ,o. lgg 1. by Planning Commission 10-5-8B) Amendment No. d All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet. All front 3mrds shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERNITS the following conditions be satisfied: shall Prior to the final building inspection approval, by the Building and Safety Department, walls shall be constructed alan9 Kaiser Parkway and Rancho California Road, La Serena Way, Kaiser Park Way per the Design Hanual. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director and may be phased with the project. (Amended by Planning Commission 10-5-BB) b. Wall and/or fence locations shall conram to attached Figure III-17 of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. 1. c. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. All parking, landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance ~th approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field inspection. m.--ConGvete-stdewalks-shall-be-eonstPue(ed-(kreugheu(-the-subd4v4s~en--4~ aeeopdanee--w+th--the-standards-of-erd4nance-46)-end-Spec4f+c-P)en-No: ~gg-Amendmen~-Na,-t, (Deleted by Planning Commission 10-5-88) f. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No. I Development of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 23373 Amended No. I shall comply with all provisions of Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No, 1 and Development Agreement No, 5. bray D. SeReat OFFICE OF ROAD COAIMI~SlONER & COUNTY SURVEYOR September 22, 1988 Riverside County Plenntng Coautssion 4080 Lemon Street . Riverside, CA 92501 Re: Tract Hap 23373 - Amend !1 - Road Correction Schedule A - Teem SP Hap ll Ladies and Gentlemen: Vtth respect to the condltfons of approve1 for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recommends that the lenddivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 end Riverside County Road Zmprovement Standards (Ordinance 461). Zt is' understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easements, traveled ways, end drainage courses with appropriate Q's, end that their mission or unecceptabilit.v .ra~ require the rap to be resubmftted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and I requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11. They are Intended to be complementar~ and to describe the conditions for e complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions $hall be referred to the Road Commtssioner*s Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused b~ alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities inchding enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the final map and noted as follows: "Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments bl land fills are ellowed". The protection shall be as approve~ by the Road Department. The landdhlder shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. in the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XZ of Ordinance No. 460 will apply, Should the. quahtlties exceed the street cepaclt/or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved b~ the Road Department. Tract Map 23373 - .Amend September 2.2. 1988 Page Z ~ad Correction )lap #1 MaJor drainage !s Involved on this landdivision end its resolution shall be u approved by the Road Department. All Interior streets shill be Improved in accordance with County Standard No. 105, Section A or greater as approved by the Road C~mtssioner (Imdifled no r/w). The landdhtder shall provtde utiltty clearance irma Rancho Calif. Mater District prior to the recordalton of the final map. 6. The maximum centerline gradient shall not exceed 15%. 7, The minimum centerline radii shall be as approved by the Road Deparbnent, Rancho California Road shall be Improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfaclng of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within m 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. 9. Kaiser Parkway shall be improved with concrete curb end gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50 foot half width dedicated right of way In accordance wi:th County Standard No. 101. 10. Prior to the filing of the final nap with the County Rocorder's Office, the developer shall provide evidence of continuous maintenance of all proposed private streets within the development as approved by the Road Commissioner. All drlveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans, When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. Concrete sidewalks shall be' constructed on Rancho California Road .and Kaiser Parkway in accordance with County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). September 22, 191i8 . Page 3 An access road to the nearest paved road maintained by t~e County shall be constructed within the public rt ht of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B, 132'/60') ·t · grade and al ignment ms rapproved by the Road Cm~isstoner, Prior to the record·tlon of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, · cash sum of $140,00 per unit for parcels 1-7 Is mitigation for traffic signal tapacts, Should the developor choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into · written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of · INtldtng permit, Parcel 8 is not sub;Ject to signal mttlgstlon ·t this time. Xt Is postponed until the time of development, Improvement plans shall be based upon · centerline profile extending · minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as ·pproved by the Riverside County Road Conntssioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County, Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817, Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied ·t a rate of 0.05 gallon per-square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications, Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final nap and offered for dedication. Lot access shall be restricted on Rancho California Road and Kaiser Parkway and so noted on the final map with the exception of one opening on Rancho California Road approximately 400' westerly of intersection with Kaiser Parkway. tanddtvlslons creating cut or fill slopes adjacent to the streets shall provide erosion controlm sight distance control and slope easements as approved by the Road Department. 2?.. All entrance gate faclllttes shall be located · minimum distance of 60' from gate to flow'line,-- 23. Ail centerline Intersections shall be at 24. The street destg~ end Improvement concept of this project sha~l be coordinated with TR 23371 and TR 23372, if act I~a; 23373 - Amend #1 . September 22, 1988 .~·ge 4 )ad CorTectton Map !1 Street llghttng shall be required tn accordance with Ordinance 460 and 46% throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area Administrator determines ~hether this propose1 qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation · %1 hting Assessment District" in accordance with Government~l Code ~ction 56000. Prior to recordation of the.final mp, the landdivider'shall record CC & R's providing Ingress and egress for parcel 1 thru 7 and shall be subject to review and approval by RIverside County Counsel. GH:lh Ve truly yours, .. - ughes 8-X7-88 ~ Ca 92~01 GXFXmRD 23373 - J~DZD fX, tOAD CORY~CTZON fl Vlth Teepact to the conditions of approval for the ·hove referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with F~tvereide County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FI~E PROTECTION The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flov of 2500 GP~ mad an actual fire flov ·vailable from any one hydrant shall be 1500 GPH for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, Approved super fire hydrants, (6*'x4*'x2Jxlt) shell be located at each street intersection and spaced noC more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion Of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from · hydrant. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the Mater system plans to the Fire Department for rayicy. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flov requirements, Plans shall be aiSned/approved by · registered civil en2ineer and the local Mater company vith the foilDying certification: "I certify that the design of the Mater system is in accordance vith the requirements prescribed hy the Riverside County Fire Deparf. mentom Tfie required Mater system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate Mater a2ency prior to any combustible buildin2 material been2 ~lsced on an individual lot, All buildings shall he constructed vitb tire retardant roofing material as described in Section 3203 of the Uniform Building Code. Any Mood shingles mr shakes shall have · Class w~w racing and shall be ·pproved by the Fire Department prior to installation, Subject: Tract 23373 Page 2 NITIGATION Prior to the recordalton of the fin&l map, the developer shall deposit rich the Riverside County FIre Department, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit at mitigation for f~ire protection tapeeta. Should the developer choose to defer the t4-e of payment, he/she map enter into a vritten agreement ~lth the County deferring maid paysent to the the of issuance of a building persiC. A~I questions regarding the usaulna of conditions shale be referred Co the P~an~ng and Engineering Chia~ Fire Departssat planner By George S. Xatum, Planning Officer amm C~ '.nty of Riversi ' ? FROM: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTHENTDATI~: July 25. 1988 Attn: Kathy G1fford ~me~'"~"rar~11Ae~z'-~-~SrU"~',~anltarlan, Environmental Health Services Tract Nap 23373, Amended No, 1 The EnvTronmental Health Services has reviewed Tract Nap 23373, Amended Nap No. I dated July 19; 1988. Our current con~ents w111 remaln as previously stated in~ur letter dated June 13, 1988. ~.uG 3 l~a RIVErSiDE ~,OUNTY PLANN:N~ rIFD~,nTU;~T RIVERSIDr COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WAT[R CONS[RVAT|ON D]STR|CT Attent~-- ~eci~ic Iralens l~e: Vera. ng Tra~ 23373 Amendedit. 1 are ~ D&strict"m re~=~en~aticns: ~his tract ~s located within the limits of the F~rrieta Creek/T~-ula Valley Area l~eJ.nage Plan for ~,t~c.~ drainage f~es have ~een a~c~ted by t~e Board. Praina~e ~ees shall ~e paid as set ~ under the provi- aicns of ~ 'Rules a~a ~julat&cns ~ M~mis~rat&c~ o~ ~rea Drainage Flx--', a~ended Feb~-y 16, lge8, defer the ~ees ma~ n~t be exercised ~ sny parcel where gr,a~ng cr structures have been iui~/a~ed m the .~rcel within the ~r~or 3' year lueri~], or permits _~r either activity have l:een issued cn that Xmrcel Which r~ain a:~ive. / ~ ltiverside Clx~L= Plm,'ing ~t Vesting ~rBct 23373 July Cnsite drainage fmP414ties lc=at,] cutslde of r-~a right of be c~T~4-ed within dra~age ease~ts with mini~xn width 'of 20 ~eet h~g, 'l;Ira,,i,r~,age easements ~11 be kelcm, free of build/rigs ,e.~". year e+~m ~lc~w should be ~_~.tainNa within the street right of ~ay. ~ben e~ther of these criteria is exceeded, additicral dra/rmge facil~- ~j. es s~culd be installed. Drainage facilities outletting sump ~itions should be designed convey the tri~ 100 year storm fi~ws. Mdi~_icral exF. rgency es- The lr~mr~', s~reet and let grading should be designed in a manner that .-~_~etuates the existing ratural drainage patterns with resl~ct to tributary drairmge area, outlet points ar~ cutlet ~,~ticms, otherwise, a dra/nage easem~t shou/d be obtained fTan the affected property owners f~r the release of ~m~centrated cr ~/ver+-a ~to~n flows. A copy of the re~c=ded dra/nage easeve~t fhould be sutxnit~ed t~ the ~istrict frm review ~=lor to the recurclarion of t,be final map. Te~p~rat7 eroaicn ~ measles should be i~plem~ted immaturely following zough g, a4ng to lreve~t depoaitic~ of debris c~to stream properties cr dra/nage faci/lties. 13evelcimumt of this proF. r~ should be coor~irated with ~ d~ ~t of adj~t ~es ~ ~e ~t ~~s r~ ~ ~~ ~ ~rs ~e = div~ ~ ~e ~r~ ~ ~ ~. ~s mM ~e ~ ~~ of ~,r:,~ ~ge ~e, ~ o~si~ ~~ ~ ~4~ -3- Ju/y 22, l~Sa ~ues~ic~s ~erning this m~*-~ stay be referr-a ~ lq~.,~-~. Ch.~.ar~ of this office at 714/787-2333. Very truly ymEs, oHr° ~gineer E:pln COUNTY OF/ IVERSIDE DEPARTMENTof HEALTH 4080 LemOn Street ~iveraide, CA 92802 Attn: Kathy Oilford RIVERSIDE COUNTy PLANNING DEPARTMENT l~zl TRACT I4XP 23373: Th,t cert,in land situated in the unincorporated territory of the County Of Riverside, State of California, being Parcels 1, 2,3,4 and S of Parcel Hap 21884 as shown on a map thereof filed in ~ook 144, Pages 24 through 33 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County lqecorder of said ~iverllde County together with a portion of the IRahobo Temecula granted by the Government of the United States of America to Luil Vignes by patent dated January 1[ 1860 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, CalifornXa (8 Lots) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap Ho. 23373 and recommends that: A water system shall be installed according tO plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and Joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existinp system. The plans shall comply in all re,poets with Div. Z, Part l, Chapter ? of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 1S. and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of State of California, when applicable. Riverside County Page ~wo Attn: [athy Gifford June Z3, ~988 The plans shall he water company with the certify that the design Tract Map 233?3 is accordance with the water syste~ expansion plans or the Ranthe California Water District and that the water setrace,storage and distribution system v~ll be adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it veil supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other : shall be s~gned by a responsible official of the water company. This Department has a statement from the Ranthe California Water District agreeing to serve d~mestic water tc each and every lot ~n the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to he made pr~or to the recordation of the fina~ map. This Department has a statement from the Eastern Nunicipa3 Water D~strict agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall he installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted Sn triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal p~pe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the severs at the junction of the hey system to the existing system. ~ single plat ~ndicat~ng location of sever lines a~d water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plane and profiles. The plans shall he ,~gned by a registered engineer and the sever d~str~ct w~th the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the sever system in Tract Hap 233?3 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the ~astern Nunicipal Water District and that the waste d~sposal system is adequate at ~iverside Coz.xrsty Pls. nning Dept. Page Three ATTN: K&thy 6irford this time to treat the anticipated vastes from the proposed tract.' ~F~_! ~lans must ~! mu~mitte~ to the Ccunt~ Survevor's Office It viII be ~ecessary for financi&l arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the f~nal map. SM:tac :li', :biDE COU!lCu PLAnninG D-:PA CmEn: I~AT£: aune 1, 1988 10: Assessor Butidtng and Safety Surveyor - Dave Dude Road Departze. nt - 14ealth - Ralph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control District Fish ~ Game LAFCO, S Patslay .. U.S, Postal Service - Ruth E, Davtdson JUN RIVERSIDE COUNTy P~NNING DEPARTMENT Sherlff's Department Airports Deparment UCR, Life Science Dept., W.W. Na.yhew GROFZT .... Eastern Nunictpal Water Dist. Rancho Cal$fornia Water Dtst. Elstnore Unton School Dist. - Temecula Union $chool Oist, Sierra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter CALTRANS e8 VESTING TRACT 23373 - (Sp Pl) - E,A. 32548 - Pargartta Village Development Co. - Robert Beth, William Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Supervisortel District - N, of Rancho California Road, M. of ICetsar Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condomintum unit. -(RELATEO CASE TR 2337] & 23372) Mod - A,P, 923-210-023 Please review the case described above, along with the attached case map, A Land Division Comlttee meeting has been tentathely scheduled for June 20, 1988, If tt dears tt will then 9o to public hearing, Tour c~t~ents end recommendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 in order that we ma include ~hmn tn ~he staff report for this particular case, Should you have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gtfford at 787-6356 Planner COR~NTS: The [1sinore Unton High School Dtstrtct facilities are overcrowded and our educational programs seriously impacted by Increasing student population caused b,v new residential, commercial and industrial construction. Therefore, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53080 of AB 2926 and SB 327, this district levies a-fee against all new development pro_~ects ~tthin its boundaries. $~GtiATUR[ R.EASE prSfft name and title Joseph Enserro, Assistant Superintendent 4080 LEMON STREET, 9~" FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CAJJFDRNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO, CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 SLATE: ~une 1, 1988 Assessor luilding and Safety Survedmr - Dave I)uda load Department Health - R~lph Luchs Fire Protection Flood Control District Fish a ham LAICO, .~ Paisley g.S. Postal Service - Ruth tr. D~vtdson RIVERSIDE COUNTy PLANNfNG DEPARTMENT ~heHff's Department Airports Department UCR, LIfe Science Dept., W.W. Hayha GRDFTT" ' : Eastern M~nicipal Water Dist. hncho CaTaromas Hater Dist. Elsinore Union School Dtst. Terecula Union School Dist. Sierra Club, San Gorgonio C~apter CN.TRA~ #8 .;'VESTING TRACT 23373 - (Sp Pl) - E.A. 32548 - Hargartta Village Development' Co. - Robert Beth, Hilllam Frost & Assoc. - Rancho California Area - First Supervisoris1 District - N. of Rancho · California Road. V. of I(atser Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condominium units - (RELATED CASE TR 23371 & 2337Z) Nod - A.P. 923-210-023 olease review the case descrtbe~ above, a)on9 with the attached case rap. A Land avision Cor~ittee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for dune 20, 1988. If it clears. it viI1 then go to public hearing. Tour c~n~ents and recmendations are requested prior to dune S, 1988 in order that we my include the~ tn the staff report for this particular case. Should 3mu have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gifford at 787-6356 ~lanner EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER Archaeotogical Research Unit Universiity of California Riverside, CA 92521 PLEM,~E print name and title 080 LEMON STREET. 9v' FLOOR RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 9220' (619) 342*827', ::li ,=::I)iDE COUrlC.u PLArlrli~G DATE: June 1, 1988 11:): Assessor Building and Safet~ Surveyor - Dave i)uda .... Road Department ltealth - Ralph u,,chs FIre P~otectlon Flood Control District fish & Game LAFCO, S Patslly U.$. Postal Service - Ruth E. I)avtdson Shertff's Department Airports Depa~'cment UCR, LIfe Science Dept., N.~. lea~he~ GROFZT .... Eastern Nuntctpal ~ater Dtst. Rancho"Callfo~nta I~ter Elsinore Union $chool Temecula Unton S;hool Dtst. SIerra Club, San Gorgonto Chapter CALTRN6 #8 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT " VESTING TRACT 23373 - (Sp P1) - E.A. 32548 - Nargartta Village Development Co - Robert Betn, Milltam Frost & Assoc, - Rancho California Area - First Supervtsortal District - N. of Rancho California Road, M. of Kaiser Parkway - R-R Zone - 28 Acres 348 Condomtntum unit - (RELATED CASE TR 23371 & 23372) Nod - A,P, 923-210-023 Please revte~ the case described above, along with the attached case map. A Land Division Comtttee meeting has been tentatively scheduled for June 20, Zg88. If tt clears tt wtll then go to publlc hearing. Tour comments and recommendations are requested prior to June 5, 1988 tn order that tnclude then in the staff report for this particular case, Should you have any questions regarding thts item, please do not hesitate to contact Kathy Gtfford at 787-6356 Planner COP.~diTS: DATE: SIGNATURE PLBSE prtnt name and tttle 4080 LEMON STREET, 9TM FLOOR RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 787-6181 46-209 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 (619) 342-8277 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 EXHIBITS R:\S\STAFFRPT~23373-1.PC 12/2/93 Idb 16 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: ;. DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME A VICINITY MAP DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:\FAGANM\REPORTS\23373-1.pC 1212/93 mf CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: VERY HIGH/MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXHIBIT C - ZONING DESIGNATION: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 - MARGARITA VILLAGE CASE NO.: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO, 1, THIRD EXTENSION - OF TIME I DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:%FAGANM\REPORTS\23373~l.pC 12/2/93 mf CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: FXHIBIT: ;. DATE: VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 23373, AMENDMENT NO. 1, THIRD EXTENSION OF TIME D SITE PLAN DECEMBER 6, 1993 R:\FAGANM~REPORTS\23373-1,pC 12/2/93 mf ITEM #8 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993 Planning Application No.: PA93-0190 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: RE-AFFIRM the previously adopted Negative Declaration for Plot Plan No. 232; and ADOPT Resolution No. 93-_ approving PA93-0190, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 232, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report; and APPROVE Planning Application No. PA93-0190, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 232, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Stephen Cavadias REPRESENTATIVE: Tom Awbrey, KM&A Architects PROPOSAL: To construct a two-story office\warehouse\truck maintenance facility totaling 6,900 square feet. LOCATION: West side of Business Park Drive, approximately 900 feet north of Rancho California Road EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) Manufacturing Service Commercial (MoSC) Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC} Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) PROPOSED ZONING: None GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Business\Industrial South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Business\Industrial BACKGROUND Plot Plan No. 232 was a prior application approved by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1991. This time extension application was submitted to the Planning Department on September 27, 1993 and was deemed complete on November 4, 1993. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is the construction of a 6,900 square foot office\warehouse\refuse truck maintenance building in the M-SC zone. ANALYSIS When the application was originally heard by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1991, the Commissioners expressed concern that the project site could become a refuse disposal site. This approval only permits the servicing of trucks. The approval in no way permits the site to be used for refuse disposal. The project is unchanged from that which was approved by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1991. New conditions of approval have been added for erosion control and National Pollutant Discharge Emission System (NPDES). ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The site is currently zoned Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC). The land use designation Business Park. The project is consistent with both the zoning and General Plan designations due to the fact that the proposed use is allowed through the approval of a Plot Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved by the Planning Commission. Staff is recommending that the Commission re-affirm the previously adopted negative declaration prepared for this project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved by the Planning Commission. The previous environmental analysis prepared for this project remains valid. The project is consistent with the current zoning of M-SC and the General Plan designation of Business Park. R:\S\STAFFRPT~19OPA93,PC 12/1/93 tj~ 2 FINDINGS 1. The proposed project is consistent with the City' adopted general plan. The project conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances. 2. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning laws. 3. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking and landscaping are provided for this project. 4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare as determined in the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. 5. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations. 6. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project has access from Business Park Drive, a dedicated City maintained right-of-way. 7. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application. Attachments: 1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 4 2. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 8 3. Exhibits - Blue Page 11 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. Site Plan R:%S\STAFFRPT%19OPA93.pC 12/1/93 tj~ 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- ATTACHMF, NT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0190, FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLOT PLAN NO. 232 TO CONSTRUCT A 6,900 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE\WAREHOUSE\TRUCK SERVICING BUn.PING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 6.04 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 900 F~.~.T NORTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-020-067 WHEREAS, Stephen Cavadias fried Planning Application No. PA93-0190, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 232, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, the application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the application on December 6, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning Application No. PA93-0190; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA93-0190, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the City' adopted general plan. The project conforms with existing applicable city zoning ordinances. 2. The proposed use complies with State planning and zoning laws. R:\S\STAFFRPT~lg0PA93.PC 12/1193 tie 5 3. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. Adequate site circulation, parking and landscaping ate provided for this project. 4. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or weftare as determined in the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. 5. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use oflhe area. The project conforms with applicable land use and development regulations. 6. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic. The project has access from Business Park Drive, a dedicated City maintained right-of-way. 7. Said fmdings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with this application. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for the original approval of this project. The project is unchanged from that which was originally approved by the Temecula Planning Commission. Conditions in the surrounding area of the site have not changed which would necessitate further environmental review. Therefore, a re-affknnation of the previously adopted Negative Declaration is hereby granted; Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Planning Application No. PA93-0190, First Extension of Time for Plot Plan No. 232, to construct a two-story office\warehouse\refuse truck maintenance facility totaling 6,900 square feet. located and known as Assessor's Parcel No.921-020-067, subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. R:\S%STAFFRPT%19OPA93,PC 12/1/93 tja 6 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMM/SSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMM/SSIONERS: GARY THORNY/ILl, SECRETARY ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL B:\S~STAFFRPT\lg0PA93.FC 12/1/93 tie 8 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA93-0190, Plot Plan No. 232, First Extension of Time Project Description: First one-year extension of time for Plot Plan No. 232. proposed construction of a 6,900 square foot office\warehouse\refuse truck servicing building in the Manufacturing Service Commercial (M-SC) zone. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-020-067 Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements PA93-0190, Plot Plan No. 232, First Extension of Time shall comply with all Conditions of Approval for Plot Plan No. 232 (copies of which are attached) unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. The plot plan shall comply with the State of California Planning and Zoning Laws and to all the requirements of Ordinance 348, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Planning Law and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. The applicant shall submit for approval to the Planning Department construction landscape plans prior to the issuance of building permit or grading permit, which ever occurs first. 4. All wall materials shall be stucco/masonry to match the construction of the building. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits The applicant shall make application and pay the appropriate filing fee to the Department of Building and Safety Department for a Consistency Check. The applicant shall submit for approval to the Planning Department any proposed signage. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS The Department of Public Works recommends the following requirements and changes to be made to the original Conditions of Approval as approved by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1991. R:\S\STAFFRPT\19OPA93.PC 12/1/93 tj~ 9 General Requirements Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements and slopes protection in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. R:\S\STAFFRPT%19OPA93.PC 12/1/93 tj= 10 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Plot Plan No: 232 Project Description: Construction of a two-story office/warehouse/truck' servicina facilitv toteline 6,900+/- souare feet on a 6.04 acre site develooed portion of site = 1.9+/-acre. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-020-067 Plannine Department The use hereby permitted by this plot plan is for construction of a two-story office/warehouse/truck servicing facility totaling 6,900 +/- square feet on a 6.04 acre site; developed portion of site equals 1.9+/- acre. The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, an approval of the City of Temecuta, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Plot Plan No. 232. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. This approval shall expire on September 26, 1993. S\PLAN%S%PLAN%Z32PP.FIN 2 10. 11. The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on Plot Plan No. 232 marked Exhibit "D", or as amended by these conditions. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. The applicant shall comply with the Engineering Department's Conditions of Approval which are included herein. The applicant shall comply with the City Department of Building and Safety Conditions of Approval contained herein. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's Conditions of Approval contained herein. Hazardous materials and waste management plans/programs shall also be implemented as specified in the Health Departments attached conditions. Fire protection shall be provided in accordance with the appropriate section of Ordinance No. 546 and the County Fire Warden's Conditions of Approval contained herein. Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, three {3) copies of a Parking, Landscaping, Irrigation, and Shading Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department of approval. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. Plans shall meet all requirements of Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation, and shading plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, or within the time frame specified by the City Planning Director and City Building Official as referenced in Condition No. 27 below. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and all landscaped areas shall be maintained in a viable growth condition. Planting within ten (10) feet of an entry or exit driveway shall not be permitted to grow higher than thirty (30) inches. 12. A minimum of 50 parking spaces shall be provided as follows: 7 compact automobile spaces (8.5' x 16' each) 23 full size automobile spaces (9' x 18' each) 20 truck stalls (12' x 25' each) S~PLAN~S\PLAN\232PP,FIN 3 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Parking shall be in conformance with the design as shown on the approved Exhibit "D". Parking lot design shall also comply with the provisions of Section 18.12, Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The parking area shall be surfaced with asphaltic concrete paving to a minimum depth of 3 inches on 4 inches of Class II Base parking shall be provided. A minimum of one (1) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as shown on Exhibit "D". Each parking space reserved for the handical~ped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at __ or by telephone " In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the following additional plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval: Landscaping, irrigation, and Shading Plans. A Plot Plan application for a Sign Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit "F". Materials used in the construction of all buildings shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit 1.1 (color perspective) and Exhibit 1.2 (materials sample board). S~PLAN\S\PLAN~232PP,RN 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from ground view. Screening material shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, screen walls in the locations shown in Exhibits D (site plan) shall be constructed around the project site "refuse truck parking area". The required walls shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director. Screen walls shall aIso comply with the Architectural and Structural requirements of the Rancho California Business Park. Walls shall incorporate articulated facades and shall resemble exterior materials and finish of the primary facility. Additional landscape screening elements adjacent to the wall exterior shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. All trash enclosures shall be constructed prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. As a minimum, enclosures shall be six feet in height and shall be constructed of materials architecturally compatible with the primary facility and provided a solid steel gate which screens bins from external view. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen canopy trees along streets and within the parking areas. Streetscape shall be as per Rancho California Business Park Streetscape Plans for Parcel Map 19580. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. The primary facility is located adjacent to a potentially active fault zone (the Murrieta Creek Fault). Prior to issuance of any building permit by the Department of Building and Safety, a California Licensed Soils Engineer or Geologist shall submit a report to the Building and Safety Department identifying the potential for earthquake faulting and groundshaking. Where hazard of faulting or groundshaking is determined to exist, appropriate mitigation measures must be demonstrated. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance which is based on the gross acreage of the parcel proposed for development. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. S%PLAN~S%PLAN~232PP,FiN 5 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Two (2) Class II bicycle racks shall be provided in convenient locations as approved by the Planning Director to facilitate bicycle access to the project area. Prior to the issuance of building permits, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Building and Safety to guarantee the' installation of planrings, walls, and fences in accordance with the approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the planting for one year, shall be!filed with the Department of Building and Safety. Contingent upon availability of irrigation water, prior to the issuance of occupancy permits all required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Building and Safety. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. Alternatively, installation of landscaping may be by means of bonding as referenced in Condition No. 25 above, and installed at such times as irrigation water is in adequate supply as determined by RCWD and the City Planning Director. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. Weekday and weekend hours of operation of the proposed maintenance facility shall be limited to between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand, Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275.00), which includes the One Thousand, Two Hundred, Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee, in compliance with AB 3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty- Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. S~PLAN\S\PLAN\232PP.FIN 6 E~cljneerjna DeoarLment The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmK-ted for further consideration. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 32. As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and Parks and Recreation Department. 33. The developer shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code and Chapter 70 as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24"x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 34. The developer shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 35. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 36. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department prior to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of- way. S~PLAN\$~PLAN\Z32PP.FIN 7 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 45. No grading shall take place prior to the improvement plans being substantially complete, appropriate clearance letters and approval by the City Engineer. If grading is to take place between the months of October and April, erosion control plans will be required. Erosion control plans and notes shall be. submitted and approved by the Engineering Department. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with approved plans. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards. Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, and traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Landscaping (street and parks). Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines if needed. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of grading permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Drainage calculations shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. S~N_AN~S~PLAN\232PP.FIN 8 46. All concentrated drainage directed toward the public street shall be diverted through the under sidewalk drains. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT: 47. A precise grading plan and site improvement plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 48. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact. 49. Prior to building permit, the subdivider shall notify the City's C.A.T.V. Franchises of the intent to develop. Conduit shall be installed to C.A.T.V. Standards prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy. 50. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EtR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently, with executing this Agreement, developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that developer is not waiving its rightto protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: 51. A minimum flowline grade shall be 0.50 percent. S\PLAN\S~PLAN\232PP.FIN 9 52. Onsite improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer, 53. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County Standard 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). The primary access entry point shall be a minimum width of 35 feet, with commercial curb return approach. Riverside County Fire DeDartment With respect to the Conditions of Approval regarding the above referenced plot plan, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: 54. The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings using the procedure established in Ordinance 546. 55. Applicant/developer shall provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2000 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, which must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. 56. Applicant/developer shall provide a combination of on-site and offsite super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2~ x 2~), will be located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 57. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: "1 certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." S\PLAN\S%PLAN\232PP.FIN 10 58. Applicant/developer shall install a complete fire sprinkler system in all buildings. The post indicator valve and fire department connection shall be located to the front, within 50 feet of a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building (s) will be automatically fire sprinklered must be included on the title page of the building plans. 59. Applicant/developer shall install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation, as per UBC requirements. 60. Applicant/developer shall install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A-IOBC. Contact a certified extinguisher company for proper placement of equipment. 61. Applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining underground or above ground permits from both the County Health and Fire Department. 62. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall deposit, with the City of Temecula, a check or money order equaling the sum of 25C per square foot as mitigation for fire protection impacts. This amount must be submitted separateIv from the plan check review fees. 63. Crankcase drainings (Waste Oil) is classified as a Class I Flammable Liquid and any amount over 10 gallons must be stored in either an underground or 2 Hour Fire Rated aboveground tank with an appropriate storage permit issued by the Fire Department. 64. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and Safety Office. All questions regarding the meaning of conditions shall be referred to the Planning and Engineering Staff. Riverside Countv DePartment Of Health The environmental Health Services has reviewed Plot Plan No. 232 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services should be available in this area. Prior to any building plan review for Health clearance, the following items are required: 65. "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. S~PLAN~S\PLAN~232PP.FIN 11 66. A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (Jon Mohoroski, 358-5055), will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: Underground storage tanks Hazardous Waste Generator Services Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with AB 2185) Waste reduction management 67. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA approvals). Note: Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Environmental Health Service clearance. Citv of Temecula Department of Building and Safety 68. Request for street addressing must be made prior to submittal Building Plan Review. 69. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1988 editions of the Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, 1990 National Electrical Code, California State Administrative Code, Title 24 Handicapped and Energy Regulations and the Temecula City Code. 70. Lighting on site and located on structures shall comply with Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655. $~PLAN\S~PLAN\232PP .FIN 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 EXHIBITS R:%S\STAFFRPT\190PA93.PC 12/1193 tie 11 CITY OF TEMECULA TEMEC,rLI[ \SITE ~-,:-- ..---~ CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0190 EXHIBIT: A =C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 VICINITY MAP R:~S~,STAFFRPT',lg0PA93.PC 11129193 tit CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0190 EXHIBIT: B "C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 ZONING MAP R:~,S~STAFFRF'~lg0PAB3.PC 11129193 CITY OF TEMECULA ('~ P,~LOT PLAN CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0190 EXHIBIT: C "' C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 SITE PLAN ITEM #9 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning~'':>' December 6, 1993 Ordinance Amending the Land Use Code Regarding the Term of Plot Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and Public Use Permits Prepared by: Debbie Ubnoske RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMEND Adopting Resolution 93-__ adoption of an Ordinance entitled: recommending "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS." BACKGROUND At the April 5, 1993 Planning Commission Meeting, staff recommended that the Commission amend Ordinance 348 to allow for two additional one year extensions of time. Some concerns were expressed by the Commission at the meeting relative to extending the life of projects the Commission had never seen. Staff researched City approvals for the period from April 1990 to June 1990 which was the period of time the City Council acted solely to approve or deny projects. During this period, the City Council acted on eight County transferred plot plans. No conditional use or public use permits were acted on. Of the eight plot plans acted on, all have either been constructed or have expired. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare an Ordinance providing for two additional years to allow applicants additional time to construct their projects. Commissioner Hoagland was opposed to such an Ordinance. He felt giving applicants an additional two years was not in the City's best interests. DISCUSSION It is staff's opinion that the five year approval process would benefit businesses by providing them additional time in which to obtain funding and begin construction. It is further staff's opinion that there are no cases remaining from the County which would be able to avail themselves of this additional time. R:\S%STAFFRPT%LANDUSE.PC 11/29/93 Idb ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93-__ Section 4 of the attached Ordinance allows permittees to request reinstatement of expired City approved applications within six months of the date the Council adopts this Ordinance. The reinstatement hearing will be conducted by the Planning Director. For example, if the City had approved a conditional use permit on the date of incorporation, December 1, 1989, the permit would have expired on November 30, 1991. Under Section 4 of this Ordinance, the Planning Director could grant the permittee up to three one-year extensions of time. The effect of this would be to extend the permit to November 30, 1994. If the conditional use permit had been approved on December 1,1990 and had expired on November 30, 1992, the Planning Director could now grant one extension at this time to extend the permit to November 30, 1993, and then grant two additional extensions in the following-years to extend it up to November 30, 1995. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality Act, Attachments Resolution No. 93-__ - Blue Page 3 Ordinance No. 93- - Blue Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 93- RESOLUTION OF TB'F, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMM~,NDING TIIF, CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMF,,,NDING THE LAND USE CODE REGARDING ~ TERM OF PLOT PLANS, CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, AND PUBLIC USE PERMITS. WHR~REAS, City Ordinance No. 90-04 adopted by reference certain portions of the non- codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance N6. 348 ("Land Use Code"); and WI~E. REAS, such regulations provide for extensions of time for plot plans, conditional use permits, and public use permits; and W1TP. REAS, the City of Temecula wishes to provide for an additional period of time to allow for the development of approved projects; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on December 6, 1993, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library, Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and NOW, THEREFORE, THF. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that there are no County cases remaining that would be able to avail themselves of these additional extensions of time. Section 2. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby finds that the proposed Ordinance providing for two additional one year extensions of time will benefit businesses in the City of Temecula. Section 3. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby f'mds that this Ordinance is exempt through Section 21080 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. That the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends to the City Council adoption of the proposed additional extension of time Ordinance. The Ordinance is incorporated into this Resolution by this reference and marked Exhibit "A" and dated December 6, 1993, for identification. R:\S%STAFFRPT%LANDUSE,PC 11/30193 Idb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ORDINANCE NO. 93- R:%S%STAFFRPT%LANDUSE.PC 11/29193 klb 6 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. S'r~VEN F, FORD CHAIRMAN I l~RREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNI-nI L SECRETARY R:\S%STAFFRPT'~LANDUSE.PC H/29/93 Idb 5 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF TFrF, CITY COUNCIL OF TIFF, CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ~ LAND USE CODE REGARDING THE TERM OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS, PUBLIC USE PERMITS AND PLOT PLANS ~ CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF TE1V[ECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLI~WS: Section 1. Article XVIII, Section 18.30(f) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, and as amended pursuant to City Ordinance No. 91-09, is hereby amended to read as follows: "f. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the exp'wation of the plot plan, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be fried with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of thne may be granted by the Planning D'n?.ctor only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of exisfmg buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." R:~S\STAFFRFP, tANDUSE.PC 11/29/93 i 7 (30) days following the ~ing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Dh"gctor may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, winch construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a public use pennit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of tins Ordinance." Section 4. Notwithstanding the above, any plot plan, conditional use permit or public use permit winch the City approved since incoq~oration and winch has expired, may be reinstated pursuant to the procedure set forth above. In order to reinstate any such permit, the permittee must make an application to reinstate within 180 days of the effective date of tins Ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any provisions of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any period or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to tins end, the provisions of tins Ordinance are declared to be sevemble. R:\S\STAFFRPT%LANDUSE.PC 11/29/93 klb 9 Section 2. Article XVIII, Section 18.28(f) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City Ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: "e. APPROVED PERIOD. The appwval of a conditional use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. F. ach extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be fried with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate ffiing fee. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of an application for an extension of time, the Planning Director may approve, conditionally approve or deny the application. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Director only upon a determination that the property and use are consistent with the General Plan, Land Use Ordinance, and all other City Ordinances and regulations. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of five (5) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of a substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligen~y to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a conditional use permit shall be determined pursuant to Section 18.26 of this Ordinance." Section 3. Article XVtu, Section 18.29(e) of Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by reference pursuant to City ordinance No. 90-04, is hereby amended to read as follows: "e. APPROVED PERIOD. The approval of a public use permit shall be valid for a period of two years from its effective date within which time the construction authorized must be substantially begun or the occupancy authorized be in use; otherwise, the approval shall be void and of no further effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the public use permit, apply for up to three (3), one (1) year extensions of time in which to use the plot plan. Each extension of time shall be granted in one (1) year increments only. An application for an extension of time shall be made to the Planning Director, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be fried with the Planning Department, accompanied by the appropriate f'~ing fee. Within thirty R:%S\STAFFRPT'4j~NDUSE.PC 11/29193 klb 8 ITEM #10 Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law. ATrI~T: J. Sal Mu~oz, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMFJ2ULA ) SS I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 93-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its farst reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1993, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the __ day of , 1993, by the foilowing roll call vote: CO~CILIvmMBERS: NOES: CO~CILIViB~B~S: C OUNCILMEMBERS: R:%S\STAFFRPT%LANDUSE.PC 11;29/93 kJb STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993 Planning Application No.: PA93-0195 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution No. 93- denying Planning Application No, PA93-0195, Minor Conditional Use Permit, based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Frank Loizu REPRESENTATIVE: Brenda Alvarado PROPOSAL: To locate a 48 student pre-school in an existing building in the Manufacturing Medium (M-M) zone. LOCATION: 28710 Las Haciendas, Suites 103 and 104 EXISTING ZONING: M-M (Manufacturing Medium) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: South: East: West: M-M (Manufacturing Medium) M-M (Manufacturing Medium) M-M (Manufacturing Medium) M-M (Manufacturing Medium) PROPOSED ZONING: None GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park EXISTING LAND USE: Industrial R:\S~STAFFRPT~195PA93.PC 11130/93 Idb Proposed Development Code Currently, the City is working on a new development code. The new code will replace Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 which the City adopted as the interim zoning ordinance. It is staff's opinion that a pre-school in a manufacturing area is not only incompatible, but also an inappropriate land use decision. It will be staff's recommendation that the new development code prohibit pre-schools in industrial areas. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The site is currently zone Medium Manufacturing (M-M). The proposed use does not meet the requirements of Ordinance No. 348 which requires the project not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the community. The location of a pre-school in a manufacturing area poses a threat to the health, safety and welfare of those children attending the pre- school. The General Plan Land Use Designation is Business Park. As stated in the findings below, the proposed use is inconsistent with the Land Use, Public Safety and Noise elements of the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The proposed use is not compatible with the surrounding uses. The use would be inconsistent with the Land Use, Public Safety and Noise elements of the General Plan. Because of the incompatibility of the use and the inconsistency with the General Plan, staff is recommending that the proposed pre-school use be denied. FINDINGS PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with Goal 2 of the Public Safety element of the City's General Plan. Goal 2 is the protection of public and environmental resources from exposure to hazardous materials and waste. The location of a pre-school in close proximity to uses which use and store hazardous materials is inconsistent with the intent of this Goal. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with Section II of the Noise element of the City's General Plan. Section II requires the consideration of the compatibility of noise sensitive uses with existing and future land uses. The location of a noise sensitive pre-school in close proximity to noise generating uses is inconsistent with the intent of the noise element. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with the Land Use element of the City's General Plan. Section II(E) of the Land Use element requires the consideration of the compatibility between adjacent land uses. Due to the conflicts R:~S~STAFFRol~195PA93.PC 11130/93 Idb 3 SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Industrial South: Office Supply East: Dog Kennel West: Trophy Store BACKGROUND This application was submitted to the Planning Department on October 25, 1993. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on November 18, 1993 and the application was deemed complete on November 19, 1993. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project will allow the location of a 48 child pre-school in an existing building. The project would also provide for the conversion of a portion of an asphalt parking lot to an enclosed outside side play area. ANALYSIS Noise The City's General Plan deems schools to be noise sensitive uses. The existing and potential future manufacturing uses that are permitted in this area are typically noise generators. The children in the classrooms and outdoor play area would be susceptible to noise from the existing surrounding uses as well as any potential future industrial uses. In staff's opinion, the exposure to noise makes the pre-school incompatible with the surrounding land uses. Public Health and Safety Existing industrial uses in the area use and store hazardous materials. Because manufacturing uses are permitted by right in this area, the City is limited in its' review and regulation of future manufacturing uses that choose to locate in close proximity to the proposed pre-school. In staff's opinion, locating a pre-school in this area could expose children to potentially hazardous materials and thus create a public health and safety problem. Area Compatibility The proposed use would be located amongst various manufacturing uses. In addition to the surrounding uses listed above, three adjacent parcels contain numerous auto repair businesses, and uses which store and use hazardous materials. The proposed pre-school would operate during the same business hours as the auto and manufacturing uses in the area. In staff's opinion, the pre-school is incompatible with surrounding land uses because of noise and public safety concerns. It is also staff's opinion that the pre-school has the potential to be incompatible with permitted manufacturing uses that may locate in the area in the future. R:~S~STAFFIi~I'~195PA93.PC 11/30/93 klb 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- R:\S\STAFFRPT~lgBPA93,PC 11130/93 Idb 5 between the proposed pre-school end existing and future permitted manufacturing uses in the area relative to noise and public safety impacts stated in Findings No. 1 & 2, the pre-school is an incompatible use. The proposed project is inconsistent with Ordinance No. 348. The project does not meet the criteria prescribed under Section 18.29 (Public Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348 which states a public use permit cannot be granted if the use would be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the community. The location of a pre- school in a manufacturing area poses a threat to the health, safety and welfare of those children attending the pre-school. The proposed use may have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because the use represents a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project does not conform with applicable land use and development regulations. Surrounding development is manufacturing in nature and operate during the same weekday business hours as the proposed use. The proposed use would create an incompatibility of land uses in the area by permitting a concentration of children in an manufacturing area. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibits - Blue Page 9 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. Site Plan R:~S\STAFFRPT~195PA93.PC 11130/93 klb 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 R~SOLUTION NO. A RI~SOLUTION OF THF~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0195, MINOR PUBLIC USE PERMIT TO PERMIT OPERATION OF A 48 CH~-D PRE- SCHOOL LOCATED AT 28710 LAS HACII~rDAS, SUITES 102 AND 103, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 921.-05(M)09 WHEREAS, Frank Loizu filed Planning Application No. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, the Minor Public Use Permit application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHF~REAS, the Planning Commission considered the application on December 6, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon heating and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts relating to said application; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THF~ CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are flue and correct. Section 2. Findinns. The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Minor Public Use Permit, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with Goal 2 of the Public Safety element of the City's General Plan. Goal 2 seeks the protection of public and environmental resources from exposure to ba-~rdous materials and waste. The location of a pre- school in close proximity to uses which use and store hazardous materials is inconsistent with the intent of this Goal. 2. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with Section H of the Noise element of the City's General Plan. Section II requires the consideration of the compatibility of noise sensitive uses with existing and future land uses. The location of a noise sensitive pre-school in close proximity to noise generating uses is inconsistent with the intent of the noise element. R:%S%STAFFRPT~195PA93.PC 11130/93 Idb 6 Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIR1VIAN I I~.R~Ry CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THORNHILL SECRETARY R:\S%STAI:FRPl~185PA93.PC 11/30/93 klb 8 3. PA93-0195, Minor Public Use Permit is not consistent with the Land Use element of the City's General Plan. Section II(E) of the Land Use element requires the consideration of the compatibility between adjacent land uses. Due to the conflicts between the proposed pre-school and existing and future permitted manufacturing uses in the area relative to noise and public safety impacts stated in Findings No. 1 & 2, the pre-school is an incompatible use. 4. The proposed project is inconsistent with Ordinance No. 348. The project does not meet the criteria prescribed under Section 18.29 (Public Use Permit) of Ordinance No. 348 which states a public use permit cannot be granted if the use would be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the community. The location of a pre-school in a manufacturing area poses a threat to the health, safety and welfare of those children attending the pre-school. 5. The proposed use may have an adverse effect on surrounding property because the use represents a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project does not conform with applicable land use and development regulations. Surrounding development is manufacturing in nature and operates during the same weekday business hours as the proposed use. The proposed use would create an incompatibility of land uses in the area by permitting a concentration of children in an manufacturing area. A. As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, the Minor Public Use Permit proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project. R:\S~STAFFR~T~195PA93.PC 11130/93 Idb 7 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:%S%STAFFt~°T~195PA93.PC 11/30/93 Idb 9 CITY OF TEMECULA I'E CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0195 EXHIBIT: A "-C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 VICINITY MAP R:\S\STAFFRPT~195PA93.PC 11129/93 klb CITY OF TEMECULA 'R.R' CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93-0195 EXHIBIT: B ~'.C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 ZONING MAP R:\S\STAFFRPT%195PA93.PC 11/29/93 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA93..0195 EXHIBIT: C "' C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 SITE PLAN R:%S~STAFFRPT%195PA93.PC 11/29/93 Idb ITEM #11 RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION December 6, 1993 Plot Plan No. 244 Prepared By: Craig D. Ruiz, Assistant Planner The Planning Department Staff recommends Commission: 1. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: the Planning ADOPT Resolution No. 93- denying Plot Plan No. 244 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report Penfold Properties Elliot Ulrich To install a 120 foot FM antenna and transmitter Approximately 500 feet west of Interstate 15, approximately 3500 feet south of the intersection of Interstate 15 and Highway 79 South. Rural Residential North: South: East: West: PROPOSED ZONING: N/A GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Rural Residential Very Low Residential FINDINGS The proposed use or action does not comply with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances due to the fact that because the applicant failed to submit all required information in a timely manner the project could not be deemed complete in accordance with State and local law, The project does not have acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the site has no legal access to a dedicated right-of-way. Attachments: PC Resolution - Blue Page 4 Exhibits - Blue Page 7 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map BACKGROUND This application was submitted to the Planning Department on February 21, 1992. The first Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting for the project was held March 19, 1992. A second DRC meeting was scheduled for April 16, 1992 and was subsequently canceled by the applicant. The DRC meeting was re-scheduled for May 7, 1992 and was also canceled by the applicant. The DRC meeting was subsequently held on May 14, 1992. At the conclusion of the second DRC meeting, the applicant had not acquired legal access to the site. Planning staff has had numerous correspondence, both written and verbal, with the proponent regarding the resolution of the access issue. To date, the applicant has failed to respond to staffs' requests. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project would allow the construction of a 120 foot FM antenna and transmitter. The antenna would allow the applicant to transmit commercial radio broadcasts. ANALYSIS The applicant does not have legal access to the project site. The applicants failure to resolve the access issue has resulted in the application never being deemed complete by the Planning Department. Also, due to the lack of activity on the application by the applicant, staff gave the applicant the option of withdrawing the application or proceeding to public hearing with a recommendation of denial without prejudice. The applicant failed to respond to either request, EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The site is currently zoned Rural Residential (R-R), The General Plan Land Use Designation is Very Low Residential. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves, Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS Because the project does not have legal access to the project site, and the applicant has not responded to staff's requests to either resolve the access issue or withdraw the application, and the application has been incomplete for approximately 21 months, staff is recommending that the project be denied without prejudice. ATTACHMENT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 93- Ai-~ACHIVIENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 93- A RESOLUTION OF ~ PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLOT PLAN NO. 244 TO CONSTRUCT A 120 FOOT FM ANTENNA AND TRANSMITTER ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 10 ACRES LOCATI~.D APPROXIMATELY $00 FEET WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 AND APPROXIMATELY 3500 FEET SOUTH OF ~ INTERSECTION OF INTERSTATE 15 AND HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-220-027 WHEREAS, Penfold Properties fried Plot Plan No. 244 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Riverside County Land Use and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, the Plot Plan application was not processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WItF..REAS, the Planning Commission considered the Plot Plan on December 6, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition; WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, ff any, of all persons deserving to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Plot Plan No. 244; NOW, TFrEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are tree and correct. Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in denying the proposed Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: (1) The proposed use or action does not comply with all applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances due to the fact that because the applicant failed to submit all required information in a timely manner the project could not be deemed complete in accordance with State and local law. (2) The project does not have acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic due to the fact that the site has no legal access to a dedicated fight-of-way. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Per Section 15270 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. Therefore, no environmental determination was prepared for this project. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December. 1993. STEVEN F. FORD CHAIRMAN I l~EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of December, 1993 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: GARY THO~L SECRETARY ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\S%STAFFRFT\244PP.PC 12/1/93 tie 7 CITY OF TEMECULA II TEIV~ULA' ' \ >- ~" ./i S I T 'E~ CASE NO.: EXHIBIT: A P.C. DATE: PLOT PLAN NO. 244 DECEMBER 6, 1993 VICINITY MAP CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO.: PLOT PLAN NO. 244 EXHIBIT: B P.C. DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1993 ZONING MAP