HomeMy WebLinkAbout040797 PC AgendaTEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
April 7, 1997, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Drive
Council Chambffs
Teraecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER:
Chaitm~n Fairy
ROLL CALL:
Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Solty~akandWebster
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can adcl~ess the commissioners on items :hat are
not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minitieS each. If you desire to speak to the
Comn~L~oners about an item twt listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out
and ~ed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary before
Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Minutes from the March 17, 1997
3. Direetor's Hearing Update Report Debbie Ubnoske
4. Best West Freeway Signage PA97-0065 Carole Donahoe
5. Forest City Workshop (Mall Projeet-Winchester/Ynez/Margarita) Matthew Fagan
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
Recommendation:
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
S&LOiI, JV
Southwest comer of Margarita Road and Yukon, in the
Palomar Village Shopping Center
To construct and operate a Shell automobile service station
with a 648 square foot automated carwash, a 875 square foot
convenience mar~ (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a
Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant
with drive-through service.
Negative Declaration
Carole Donahoe
Larry Cooley
Approval
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
OTIH~R BUSINESS
Next meeting: April 21, 1997 - Regular Planning Commission meeting
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in
this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk {909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior
to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that
meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title HI
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
APRIL 8, 1997- 7:00 PM
5:30 PM ~ Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections:
1. §54956.9(b), Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, two matters.
2. §54956.8, Conference with Real Property Negotiator, Property: Approximately 4.5 acres
located north east of Margarita Road and Rustic Glen (Winchester Creek Park); Negotiating
parties: Winchester LLC, Steve Bieri and City of Temecula; Under negotiation: Price and terms
of acquisition.
At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining
agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may
continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting.
All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 97-05
Resolution: No. 97-32
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Patricia H. Birdsall presiding
Prelude Music: Jordan Bellino
Invocation:
Minister Doug Cole, Church of Christ
Flag Salute:
Councilmember Stone
ROLL CALL:
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Presentation to the City from United Way - Karl Hollis Spencer
Certificate of Appreciation to City of Temecula and the Community
Services Department * Temecula Valley Pop Warner
Certificate of Appreciation to Steve Sander
Proclamation - Crime Victims' Rights Week
Presentation to Police Dog "Tango"
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an
item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five
(5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of
the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of March 18, 1997.
2.2 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997.
R:\Agenda/040897 2
4
5
6
7
Resolution Annroving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING
CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 1997.
Records Destruction Annroval
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
Sale of Police Canine
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Authorize sale of Temecula Police Department canine "Tango" to Charles Mungle for
the sum of one dollar.
Accent Public Imnrovements in Parcel Map 28122 (Located east of Meadows Parkway,
between Rancho California Road and Rancho Vista Road)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Accept the public improvements;
7.2 Authorize reduction of the Faithful Performance Bond amount, initiation of the one-
year warranty period and release of the Monument Bond for Parcel Map 28122;
7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
R:%Agenda/040897 3
8 Acceptance of Public Street into the City-Maintained Street System (Within Tract No.
268611) (Located Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79S)
9
10
11
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACCEPTING
CERTAIN PUBLIC STREET INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN
TRACT NO. 26861-1)
Accept Public Improvements and Acknowledge Private improvements in Tract No. 26861-1
(Located Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79S)
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Accept the public improvements and acknowledge private improvements;
9.2
Authorize reduction of the faithful performance bond amounts for streets, drainage,
and water improvements, initiation of the one-year warranty period, and release of
the subdivision monument bond for Tract No. 26861-1;
9.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Acknowledae Completion of Certain Improvements in Tract No. 26861-F (Located
Southwesterly of intersection of Margarita Road at Highway 79 S)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Acknowledge completion of certain improvements in Tract No. 26867-F;
10.2
Authorize reduction in Faithful Performance Bond amounts for the improvement of
private street, water, and sewer system improvements, initiation of the one-year
warranty period, and release of the subdivision monument bond;
10.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the developer and surety.
Temecula Creek Channel - Camoanula Wav Storm Drain Project No. 7-0~Q047 Tracts No.
24182 through 24186 and 24188 Cooperative Aareement
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1
Approve Temecula Creek Channel - Campanula Way Storm Drain Project No. 7-0-
0047 Tracts No. 24182 through 24186 and 24188 Cooperative Agreement with the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the Newland
Associates, Inc.;
R:\Agenda\040897 4
11.2 Authorize the execution and attestation of such agreement in its final form by the
City Manager and City Clerk.
12
13
14
Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of FY96-97 Slurry Seal Proaram, Proiect
No. PW96-11
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Accept the construction of the FY96-97 Slurry Seal Program, Project No. PW96-11.
12.2 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year
Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract;
12.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of
completion if no liens have been filed.
Walker Basin Specific Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DETERMINING THAT THE NEED FOR A CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT IS NECESSARY TO ASSESS THE IMPACTS OF THE WALKER BASIN
SPECIFIC PLAN
Extension of City Manaaer's Employment Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve the "First Amendment to Employment Agreement" between the City and
City Manager Ronald Bradley.
R:/Agenda/040897 5
15 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 97-04
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO 97-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
SECTION 2.08.060 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A
VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPENDITURE CEILING FOR ELECTIONS TO CITY
OFFICES AND PROVIDING FOR AN INCREASE IN THE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION
LIMITS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLITICAL REFORM ACT OF 1996
(PROPOSITION 208)
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOR TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING.
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT MEETING.
OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING
AND THE OLD TOWN/WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY MEETING
R:/Agenda/040897 6
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 97-01
Resolution: No, C~D 97-03
CALL TO ORDER:
President Jeffrey E. Stone
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Ford, Lindemans, Roberrs, Stone
PUBLIC COMMENT:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an
item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form
should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
b~for~ the Board of Directors gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for
individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to
Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your
name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minul;es
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson
GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT o Bradley
BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT: Next meeting: April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda/040897 7
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Chairperson Steven J. Ford presiding
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 97-01
Resolution: No. RDA 97-01
AGENCY MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Ford
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment
Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers
are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item no__t
listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "'Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997.
AGENCY BUSINESS
2 Consideration of Sponsorship Reauests
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Consider the sponsorship requests for the Frontier Days PRCA Rodeo and the Great
Temecula Tractor Race events to be held in 1997.
R~/Agenda/040897 8
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
~:/Agenda1040897 9
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE COMMUNITY FAC~ITIES DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Resolution No.: No. FA 97-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans
ROLL CALL:
Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the agenda a pink "Request
to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:/Agenda\040997 10
OLD TOWN WESTSIDE IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
Next in Order:
Resolution No.: No. IA 97-01
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel F. Lindemans
ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on
items that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on the Agenda a pink "Request
To Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of March 25, 1997.
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
F{:%Agenda/040897 11
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of
the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
16
Development linDact Fees
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1
Review the options provided for the adoption of Development Impact Fees to be
effective in the City of Temecula, and select the appropriate option for which a
resolution will be presented.
16.2 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER
ENTITLED "PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE"
16.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEM ECULA
ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S PUBLIC FACILITY DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEES TO BE ADMINISTERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 97-
· AND ESTABLISHING THE CRITERIA AND FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED IN
NEGOTIATING FEE REDUCTIONS THROUGH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
R:lAgenda/040897 12
COUNCIL BUSINESS
17
18
Disposition of Surplus Comouter Inventorv
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Provide direction to staff as to the disposition of surplus computers in the City's
Inventory.
Consideration of an Ordinance Prohibitina the Consumption of Alcoholic Beveraoes and
Possession of Open Containers of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Places and Prohibiting
Engaging in Certain Bodily Functions in Public Places
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 97~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING
CHAPTER 9.14 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE
CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND POSSESSION OF OPEN
CONTAINERS OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN PUBLIC PLACES, AND SECTION
9.02,010, PROHIBITING ENGAGING IN CERTAIN BODILY FUNCTIONS IN CERTAIN
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLACES, AND AMENDING SECTION 12.04.210 OF THE
TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGES IN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 22, 1997, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
R:%Agenda/040897 13
ITEM #2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMtqSION
MARCH 17, 1997
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order on Monday, March 17,
1997,6:04 P.M., at the City of Temecula Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Fahey presiding.
PRESENT: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster
ABSENT: None
Also present were Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske, Senior Planner Dave Hogan, Assistant Engineer Annie
Bostre-Le, Associate Planner Matthew Fagan, and Minute Clerk Kelli BeaL
PLrBLIC COMMENTS
Chairman Fahey called for public comments on non-agenda items. Two requests to speak forms were submitted
regarding the development plan approved at the March 13 Director's Hearing. Chairman Fahey stated she would
call on the speakers after heating Item No. 3, Director's Hearing Case Update Report.
COMMISSION BUSINFerS
Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner Slaven to approve the agenda.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Slaven, Soltysiak, Webster
COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONERS: None
Approval of Febnmry 24, 1997 Minutes
It was moved by Commissioner Miller and seconded by Commissioner Webster to approve the minutes
of March 3, 1997, with the following amendments:
Commissioner Miller requested an addition to page 5 ... the two front podocarpus trees be 36" box
instead of 24" box be added as a Condition of Approval.
Commissioner Miller and Chairman Fahey requested clarification to page 3, paragraph 6 - Chairman
Fahey stated it is important to clarify that aithough the project ~s a littic ovel the floor zue,t a~o, the
ald~itcctute and landscaping ale ,,all desig,xed which ,ne~ts the addifie.ai icqu~reu,~ats. the staff report
states the target Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the LI (Light Industrial) designation is .4. The project
proposes a FAR of .46. An increase to the FAR can be accomplished per Section 17.08.050(a) of
R:\PLANCO~e4\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WpD 4/1/97 klb i
PLANNING COMMI,~SION MARCH 17, lqg~
the Development Code if the project provides exceptional architectural and landscape design
amenities which reflect an attractive image and character for the City. It is staff's opinion that this
criteria has been met with the project as proposed.
The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey, Miller, Soltysiak, Webster
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Slaven
3. Director's Hearing Ca~e Update
Senior Planner Dave Hogan presented the staff report for PA96-0345 for a development plan a gas
station, car wash, KFC restaurant with drive through on the comer of Yukon and Margarita. The project
was approved at the March 13, 1997 Director's Hearing.
Chairman Fahey opened the public comment section.
Ron Beasley, 30605 Hollyberry Ln., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with concerns about
traffic, parking, environmental impacts from the gas station fumes and chemicals from the car wa,
David Micheal, 30300 Churchill Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with concerns about
traffic congestion and decrease in property values. He stated he was unable to obtain a copy of the traffic
study and environmental impact report. He is requested a new traffic study and environmental impact
report be prepared. He also expressed concern with noise and pollutants.
Chairman Fahey closed the public comment section.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan explained the appeal process for the public and Planning Commission.
4. Appoint Commissioner to Southside Specific Plan Selection Panel
Senior Planner Dave Hogan provided information and requested the appointment of a Harming
Commissioner to the Southside Specific Han Selection Panel.
Chairman Fahey volunteered to serve on the panel.
5. Provide Direction to the Applicant and Staff of Proposed Revisions m the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan
Chairman Fahey stated this item is not an action item and is for information only to provide direction to
the applicant and staff of proposed revisions to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan presented the staff report requesting the Planning Commission provide
direction to the applicant and staff. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan project is located on 790 acres
R:\PLANCOPM\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WPD 4/1/97 klb 2
PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 1997
northeast of the City of Temecula. Approximately 150 acres of the project site are located in the City,
with the remaining 640 acres located in the County. The project consists of a Specific Plan,
Environmental Impact Report, Prezoning and Annexation. The current project is down to 2.2 units per
gross acre. The Commission have conducted two previous workshops with the applicant in 1995.
Tom Nievez, Keith Companies in Moreno Valley, CA representing the applicant GRC Development,
provided information to the Planning Commission. The dwelling units have been reduced from 2,365
to 1,768.
Chairman Fahey requested a general overview on the project for Planning Commissioners who where not
on the Commission when this was previously brought before the Commission.
Mr. Nievez stated the Roripaugh Ranches is approximately 800 gross acres in the eastern portion of the
City, with 150 acres within the City and 640 acres outside the City limits. The City's General Plan calls
this area Roripaugh 800 and identifies three units per gross acre as a maximum. An application was
submitted in August 1994 that pursued the three units per gross acre with 2,365 units. Workshops were
conducted with Planning Commission, staff and residents in the area to discuss the project. Areas of
concern were density/total number of dwelling units, circulation, topography and grading, and
compatibility.
Mr. Nievez clarified for Commissioner Slaven that Planning Area 5 the density is 1.9 units per acre,
approximately '/~ acre lots.
Commissioner Slaven expressed concern on having the elementary school in the panhandle. Mr. Nievez
stated the School District has said there will be two districts; one north of Murrieta and one south of
Mumeta.
Commissioner Slaven expressed frustration regarding traffic and asked the developer to show how the
roads will connect and how the project will impact each connection next time.
Commissioner Soltysiak asked for clarification on how the City will assist with the infrastructure. Mr.
Nievez stated Butterfield Stage Road is slated to be an urban arterial with six lanes between Nicolas and
Murrieta Hots Springs Road. Muraleta Hot Springs Road and Nicolas Road are slated to be a four lane
urban arterials as well. The developer is asking that the City take a look at participation by means of a
Fee Program that the City is considering now. Some of these facilities may be improved with the
assistance of those fees, some of which will come by the Roripaugh Ranch. We are looking for additional
sources of funding from the Federal Government on down to take some of the heat off the developer and
future home owner. City staff indicated the CIP where the new fee schedule is to be allocated and it
looks like some of that will be refunneled back into some improvements that are needed in this area.
R:\PLANCOM~\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WPD 4/1/97 klb 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17,
Chairman Fahey stated the Commission should start at the beginning of the Issues Analysis and Status
Report provided by the applicant. The first issues are Density/Total Number of Dwelling Units and
Minimum Lot Sizes. Chairman Fabey had expressed previously the Planning Commission, due to the
topography, that in addition to the reduced number of dwelling units, the Planning Commission had also
asked for increase in square footage of lots and that this is not what is proposed here.
Commissioner Slaven expressed concern about the minimum lot size of 3,750 due to a decrease in
property value when people live so close together.
Commissioner Soltysiak expressed concern about the small lot sizes and park sizes in the area near the
school site. Due to the small lot sizes, children will need places to play.
Mr. Nievez stated they do not feel apartments and condos are compatible with the area. They feel small
lot single family detached homes do lend to pride in ownership and would be happy to show the Planning
Commission healthy examples of this.
Chairman Fahey stated they would need to see these examples as is will be a hard sell due to the
consensus of the Planning Commission.
On the issue of Location of Schools, Chairman Fahey expressed concerns on the phasing and rio'
school location and asked the developer to have one option for phasing and have the school site set
the project is brought forward.
Commissioner Slaven stated it is hard to respond to the school issue due to the variables. It is good to
place a school in an area where activities can be extended. She expressed concern about placing a school
at the end of a road (in a valley) due to only one way out in emergency situations.
Mr. Nievez stated they are addressing this issue. A second access to Butterfield Stage through Area B
has been addressed but this involves heavy grading.
Commissioner Miller a~laxl if the school was in the flight pattern of French Valley Airport. Mr. Nievez
stated it is not in a flight pattern.
Chairman Fahey opened discussion of the issue of Compatibility and Buffering from Neighboring
Residential Development. Chairman Fabey stated the buffer area being approximately one acre parcels,
that this could be impacted by public comments during a public hearing. She asked the developer to
provide photographs, renderings, and drawings of the buffer areas when this is brought forward to a
public hearing.
Chairman Fabey opened discussion on the issue of Circulation. She stated the Planning Commission will
be looking for a traffic study and what the impacts are to major intersections.
Commissioner Slaven stated the traffic is becoming increasingly frustrating and dumping three streets into
Butterfield Stage Road will create another traffic problem.
R:\PLANCO~M\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WPD 4/1/97 klb 4
PLANNING COMMIgSION MARCH 17, 1997
Chairman Fahey opened discussion on the issue of Grading. She mentioned we are already trying to get
the lot size down and the grading is an impact.
COmmissioner Soltysiak stated he would like to the proposed grading in Planning Areas 1 and 2.
Mr. Nlevez stated the site is not flat and areas in the south areas (with lower density) is a more forgiving
broad valley. The areas in the north are more rolling hills that have been farmed. Development in some
situations is going to lake earthwork. The developer will demonstrated to the Planning Commission more
clearly how those small lots will work. Chairman Fahey stated the developer needs to concentrate on the
Design Guidelines and the General Plan on what the Planning Commission is looking for in topography
and grading.
Chairman Fahey opened discussion on Proposed Commercial Land Uses in the Panhandle, North Project
Area. She suggested for guidance and expectations in this area, that the developer go over recent project
minutes on similar commercial projects in sensitive areas.
Mr. Nievez clarified the commercial area is an 11 acre area that would handle a large grocery store with
supporting commercial uses.
Chairman Fahey asked for other discussion. Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske stated staff will revisit
this last submittal and also expressed concern about circulation and about the separation between the north
and south project areas with lot sizes and intensity of uses.
Chairman Fahey stated there was one request to speak form.
William VaTaria, 39605 Avertida Lanell, Temecula stated he is the Chairman of CSA 149 and expressed
concerns about the density and he does not want Calle Contento to go through to Roripaugh. He feels
there are problems with the proximity of the project next to his home. He does not feel a 1200 to 2000
sq. ft. home should be next to his home. There should be a better transition/buffer and wants more open
space.
Chairman Fahey stated this is a workshop item and the Planning Commission is looking at the map in
order to provide direction to staff and the developer.
PI,ANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Debbie Ubnoske stated the Planning Institute Conference she attended in Monterrey
was interesting and informative and she wffi provide copies of the material to the Planning Commission.
Ms. Ubnoske stated the Planning Commission have been provided copies of Tower Plaza Theater
elevations and is looking for feedback from the Planning Commission.
PLANNING COMMISSION DtqCUSSION
R:\PLANCO~\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WpD 4/1/97 klb 5
PI,ANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 1~9,7
Commissioner Slaven stated that with the newspaper coverage of the Old Town Project she would like
to see this item gain. Also, due to the change in the use of arena, she would like to see what the impacts
will be on traffic, etc. Chairman Fahey stated that on higldy visible projects the Planning Commission
should see these gain.
It was moved by Commissioner Slaven, and seconded by Commissioner Webster, to adjourn the meeting at 7:52
PM. The motion was unanimously carried.
The next meeting will be held April 7, 1997, at 6:00 P.M. at the Temecula City Hall Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\PLANC0~M\MINUTES\1997\3-17-97.WPD 4/1/97 klb 6
ITEM #3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning CommiSsion/
Debbie Ubnosl~f Planning Manager
DATE: April 7, 1997
SUBJECT: Director' s Hearing Case Update
Following are the Planning Director's Agenda items for March, 1997.
Date
March 6
March 6
March 13
Case No. Proposal
PA96-0268
Conditional Use Permit for
Jack-in-the-Box located near
Winchester Road/Nicolas
Road
PA97-0022 Tentative Parcel Map
27987-1
PA97-0028 Development Plan for a
9,928 sq. ft. industrial
warehouse office building
for ICruse Microwave
Enterprises
March 13 PA96-0345
March 20 PA97-0028
March 27 PA96-0174
Development Plan for a
Shell service station with
carwash and a KFC fast
food restaurant with drive
thru
Development Plan for a
9,928 sq. ft. industrial
warehouse office building
for Kruse Microwave
Enterprises
Conditional Use Permit for
wireless communication
antenna
!Applicant Action
John Emmanuelle Approved
Vail Ranch, Limited
Partnership
Temecula One Properties
Approved
Continued to
March 20
S&L Oil, JV Approved
Temecula One Properties Approved
Attachments: 1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
PLANCOMM, Inc. Approved
R:\DIIIHEAR\MEMO\6-3-96.DH 3/27/97 klb 1
ATTACItMI~NT NO. 1
ACTION AGENDAS
R:\DIRI'IEAR\MEMO\6-3-96,DH 3/2r7/97 lob 2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 6, 1997 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner on items
that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak
to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should
be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and
state your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with
the Senior Planner befor~ that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA96-0268 (Conditional Use
Permit)
John Emmanuelle
Southeasterly of Winchester Road (State Highway 79 North) and
Nicolas Road
To construct and operate a single-story, 2,627 square foot Jack-
in-the-Box restaurant with drive through service on 1.1 acres,
within the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Carole IC Donahoe
Annie Bostre-Le
Approval
APPROVED
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA97-0022
Vail Ranch, Limited Partnership
South of State Highway 79 (South), between Country Glen Drive
and Redhawk Parkway, in the Vail Ranch Shopping Center
To subdivide 2.33 acres into four commercial parcels (formerly
two lots within Tentative Parcel Map No. 27987-1)
Categorical Exemption, Class 5, Section 15305
Carole Donahoe
Annie Bostre-Le
Approval
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
AC~ON AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 13, 1997 1::50 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA97-0028 (Development Plan)
Temecula One Properties
North side ofPdo Nedo, west of Calle Empleado
To construct and operate a single sto~y, 9,928 square foot
industrial warehouse/office building for Kruse Microwave
Enterprises
Negative Declaration
Carole Donahoe
Approval
CONTINUED TO MARCH 20, 1997
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
S & L Oil, JV
Southwest comer of Margarita Road and Yukon, in the Palomar
Village Shopping Center
To construct and operate a Shell automobile service station with
a 648 square foot automated carwash, a 875 square foot
convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a
Kentucky Fried Ckicken 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant
with drive-through service.
Negative Declaration
Carole Donahoe
Larry Cooley
Approval
APPROVED
R:\DllLtlEAR',AGENDA',3-13-97.AGN 3/27/97 lab
AC~ON AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 20, 1997 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA97-0028 (Development Plan)
Temecula One Properties
North side of Rio Nedo, west of Calle Empleado
To construct and operate a single story, 9,928 square foot
industrial warehouse/office building for Kruse Microwave
Enterprises
Negative Declaration
Carole Donahoe
Approval
APPROVED
ADJOURNMENT
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 27, 1997 1:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER:
Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Senior
Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior
Planner before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
PUBLIC HEARING
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Recommendation:
ACTION:
Planning Application No. PA96-0174 (Conditional Use Permit)
PLANCOMM, Inc.
Approximately one hundred fifty (150) feet east of Interstate 15 on
the Temecula Creek Inn property
Permanent construction of a fifty (50) foot nigh structure to house
wireless communication antenna, ground mounted equipment boxes,
with associated fencing and landscaping
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
Approval
APPROVE/)
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM #4
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
/ ? /
Debbie Ubnosk'e, Planning Manager
April 7, 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0065 o A Freestanding Freeway-Oriented Sign for
Best Western Country Inn, measuring 137 square feet in area and 45 feet in
height, located on the west side of Interstate 15, south of Winchester Road
(27706 Jefferson Avenue)
Prepared by:
Carole K. Donahoe, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to approve Planning Application No. PA97-0065 for
a freestanding freeway-oriented sign for Best Western Country
Inn, measuring 137 square feet in area and 45 feet in height,
located on the west side of Interstate 15, south of Winchester
Road (27706 Jefferson Avenue)
BACKGROUND:
Planning Application No. PA97-0065 was submitted to the Planning Department on March 10,
1997. The proposal is to replace existing copy on signage at the site with new colors and logo.
However, the applicant has indicated that his existing freestanding freeway-oriented sign is no
longer visible due to the height of trees within the CaI-Trans right-of-way. He is, therefore,
requesting that the sign structure be raised to 45 feet, from its current height of 33 feet. The
applicant's representative, Superior Electrical Advertising, has submitted several photographs
precluding the need to conduct a flag test. This case is now before the Planning Commission
because current policy requires the Commission to direct staff with respect to the height of all
freeway oriented sign applications.
ANALYSIS:
The proposed sign is an internally illuminated cabinet sign, using yellow and white letters and
a red logo on blue background. The sign cabinet is proposed to remain on an extension of the
monopole already existing within the rear parking area. The small "AAA" sign affixed to the
pole will be conditioned to be removed.
R:\STAFFRIr~65PA97.PC 4/2/9'/[ib
Surrounding Signage
There are other freeway-oriented signs in close proximity to this site:
Business Year Approved Size
Height
Burger King County 40 feet _+_
In 'N' Out County 30 feet
Tony Roma's 1990
150 square feet 27 feet
Hungry Hunter/Weilert 1992
144 square feet 25 feet
Wendy's 1994
142 square feet 28 feet 4 inches
Norm Reeves Super Used 1997
Cars
150 square feet 30 feet
The applicant's proposal is higher than existing signs, but does not exceed the maximum
allowable under Section 19.4 of Ordinance No. 348.
Northbound Visibility
The existing Best Western sign, at 33 feet in height, is partially visible to northbound traffic
on Interstate 15 at a distance that would enable travelers wishing to frequent the motel time
to exit on Winchester Road (see Exhibit C, Photograph//1 ). Staff estimates that 1/3 to ~
of the actual sign is covered today by the trees within the CalTrans right-of-way. Normal
growth of the trees will likely cover the 14-foot sign face in less than 5 years.
Southbound Visibility
The existing sign is hidden to southbound traffic, (see Exhibit C, Photograph #2). Staff
estimates that raising the sign another 12 feet to the maximum allowable by Ordinance No. 348
will make approximately 2/3 of the sign visible. Ultimately, this sign will be hidden within 5
years.
Freeway Landscaping
The height and density of trees planted in the highway right-of-way serve several purposes.
They can screen the rear portions of adjacent properties that generally do not front the
freeway. They can assist in shielding properties against freeway noise, exhaust and litter.
They provide the motorist and the adjacent community a scenic vista. For these reasons, staff
does not want to encourage the removal or cutting of mature trees.
CalTrans Response
The applicant's representative has explained their inability to obtain relief from CalTrans in
correspondence dated April 2, 1997 which is attached. In two telephone conversations by staff
to both the Public Affairs District 9 Office in San Bernardino and the Maintenance Field Office
that serves this area, staff confirms the unlikelihood of relief. CalTrans does not have the
manpower nor funds to trim trees other than for motorist safety requests. If the applicant were
to apply for an Encroachment Permit, he may or may not receive approval. CalTrans' policy is
to permit, after investigation, "lacing" (thinning) of trees where appropriate, but not "topping"
(decreasing the height) of trees.
Attachments:
Exhibits - Blue Page 4
a. Site Plan
b. Elevations
c. Photographs
Correspondence dated April 2, 1997 from Patti Skoglund - Blue Page 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
EXHIBITS
R:~STAFFRPT~65pAg~.]?C 4/2/9*7
CITY OF TEMECULA
JEFFERSON AVENUE
CASE NO. - PA97-0065 BEST WESTERN COUNTRY INN
.,_EXHIBIT- A
.ANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 7, 1997
SITE PLAN
R:~TAFFRPT~65PA97.FC 4/2/97 klb
CASE NO. - PA97-0065 BEST WESTERN COUNTRY INN
EXHIBIT- B
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - APRIL 7, 1997
ELEVATIONS
0~
EXHIBIT C
TEMECULA
27706 Jefferson
"Best Western" s_~gn has minimal visibility.
North or Southbound at point of Pole sign location.
EXHIBIT C
- ~ - TEME CULA
-~..
"' "" ·
.......... ~:: ~ . ~.,.....~~
.' ,,. ,_- ~.?~, ~ ... ....
Hungry Hunte~ ' ' Southbound on
visible"to cars on freeway
, NyOut oles . .
But, "Best Western? sign is bidden by trees in front
of blue pickup truck.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CORRESPONDENCE DATED APRIL 2, 1997 FROM PATTI SKOGLUND
R:\STAFFRPTx,65PA97.PC 4/2/97 klb 5
Via Courier
April 2, 1997
MS. CAROL DONAHOE
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
REF: Best Western
27706 Jefferson
Temecula, CA
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Based on the recent communications between you and I you will find enclosec~
the six sets of photographs which have travel direction notations as you
requested. It is fairly clear that visibility is poor either way.
Also, both the Best Western franchisee and myself have communicated with
Cal Trans in an effort to get permission to have the trees trimmed, There has
been no success. In fact, the last communication stated that if any tree
trimming was going to take place it would be on the bottoms of the trees - as
you can clearly see, that is no help at all.
If there is other information which we need to provide for your use in the review
process, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
PATFI SKOGLUND ~'
w/attachments:as noted
SIGNAGE
CORPORATE
IDENTITY
PROGRAMMED
MAINTENANCE
$62.495.3808
800.995.9099
562.435.1867. FAX
1700 West
Anaheirn Street
Long Beach
CA 90813-1195
superiorsigns.corn
ITEM #5
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
DATE: April 7, 1997
SUBJECT:
Preliminary Plans for Forest City Development (Mall and Power Center), generally
located south of Winchester Road, west of Margarita Road, north of the future
extension of Overland Road and east of Ynez Road
Prepared by: Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
Receive Report and Provide Direction and Comments to the
Applicant Regarding the Attached Exhibits for a Proposed
Regional Mall and Power Center
BACKGROUND
Forest City Development entered into a Development Agreement with the City of Temecula on
December 16, 1997 for the development of a regional mall and power center in the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan area. Subsequent to this Development Agreement, the applicant
has provided preliminary development plans for the project. The exhibits provided at this time
are listed below:
1. Exhibit B: Site Plan
2. Exhibit B: Site Plan (Initial Development)
3. Exhibit X: Site Plan Ultimate Development
4. Exhibit A-SD: Preliminary Typical Mall Sections
5, Exhibit SL-I: Sight Line Studies (Section A)
6, Exhibit SL-2: Sight Line Studies (Section B)
7. Exhibit A-LP-01: Preliminary Leasing Plan (Lower Level)
8. Exhibit A-LP-02: Preliminary Leasing Plan (Upper Level)
9. Composite Mass Grading Plan
10. Tentative Parcel Map 28530
11. Exhibit A-SD-01: Exterior Elevations
12. Exhibit LA-I: Overall Landscape Plan
13. I.A 1: Landscape Enlargements
A. Typical Major Entry Monumentation Plan
B. Typical Minor Entry Monumentation Plan
C. Regional Center Monumentation Plan
D. Typical Mall Entry Plan
E. Winchester Road 37' LDZ Section
1" = 200'
1"=100'
1"=100'
3/32" = 1 '
1"=20'
1"=50'
1/32"=1'
1/32"=1'
1"=100'
1"=100'
1/16"=1'
1"=100'
Varies
1"=40'
1" =40'
1" =40'
1" =40'
1/8"=1'
R: \STAFFRPTXPORP, ST.PCl 4/3/~ mf
14.
15.
16.
17.
E. Winchester Road 37' LDZ Plan
F. Ynez Road Section
F. Ynez Road Plan
G. Cinema Plaza Plan
Exhibits P-1 through P-4: Photos of Model
Exhibit R-l: Mall & Entertainment Plaza Renderings
Exhibit R-2: Mall Main Entry
Color and Material Board
1"=40'
1/8"=1'
1" =40'
1" =40'
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Staff met with the applicant on April 2, 1997 to provide comments and discuss concerns
regarding the project. Staff's concerns will be presented to the Commission at the meeting.
The applicant will be bringing additional materials and exhibits to the meeting to help with the
visual depiction of the project.
ITEM #6
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Debbie Ubnoskd'~'~lanning Manager
April 7, 1997
Appeal of Planning Director's Approval of Planning Application No. PA96-0345
(Development Plan) - Shell automobile service station, car wash, convenience
mart, and a Kentucky Fried Chicken fast food restaurant with drive through
service, at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the
Palomar Village Shopping Center
Prepared by: Carole K. Donahoe, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and consider the issues of concern raised by Commissioner Slaven, determine whether
the Planning Director's approval was appropriate, and if necessary, make any needed
modifications to the Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND
This project is the construction and operation of an automobile service station with a 648
square foot automated car wash, an 675 square foot convenience mart (without alcoholic
beverage sales) and a 1,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service on
0,794 acres located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar
Village Shopping Center. All uses are expected to operate seven (7) days per week. The
service station is proposed to operate on a 24-hour basis; the car wash operation shall be
limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and the fast food restaurant will operate 6:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. This application was approved by the Planning Director on March 13, 1997.
This appeal was filed March 25, 1997 by Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven (see
Attachment 1 ). Commissioner Slaven stated that she had a number of concerns with the
design of the project. Her major concerns included the 24-hour operation of the service station,
the off-site illumination of the canopy lighting, and the need for an adequate landscape buffer
on the north side of the project site.
ANALYSIS
North side landscaping -rid wall plans
During the Planning Director's hearing for Planning Application No. PA96-0345, the applicant's
representative agreed to add Condition #4.b. requiring a block wall on the north side of the
project. It is anticipated that the block wall will be constructed of decorative block, and located
on the interior, down side of the proposed berm. Additionally, the applicant agreed to cluster
R:~stalftpt',345pat~.ape 4/2/97
landscaping along the street side of the wall to discourage graffiti. The applicant's
representative is in the process of preparing the revised plans showing these changes. While
the revised plans were not available for distribution to the Commission at the time this staff
report was prepared, the representative will have them available to the Commission prior to or
at the Commission's April 7, 1997 hearing.
Project lighting
The approved project requires the use of recessed lighting fixtures in the canopy to minimize
off-site illumination. The applicant's proposal for canopy lighting was reviewed by the City's
Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO. His comments are noted in a February 11, 1997
letter to the applicant, which is included as Attachment 2. Additionally, the applicant's
representative is preparing a supplemental lighting analysis in response to the appeal. The
analysis will be distributed to the Commissioners at the April 7, 1997 hearing.
Project's 24-hour Automobile Service Station oDeration
The original project proposal listed the following hours of operation:
Gas station
Car wash
Fast food
24-hours per day
6a.m. to 11 p.m.
6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
7 days per week
7 days per week
7 days per week
The City's Development Code discusses car washes in Section 17.08.050 (d), Special Use
Regulations and Standards, and hours of operation are specifically limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10
p.m. The applicant accepted these hours for the car wash. However, he did not wish to
decrease the hours of operation for the service station.
The issues discussed herein were considered by staff during the processing of the applicant's
proposal. Much of the redesign of the project and the revised Conditions of Approval that were
ultimately approved by the Planning Director, are a direct result of these discussions.
Attachments:
Correspondence from Planning Commissioner Marcia Slaven dated March 25, 1997- Blue
Page 3
Correspondence from Chief Building Official Anthony J. Elmo, CBO dated February 11,
1997- Blue Page 4
Minutes of the March 13, 1997 Planning Director's Hearing - Blue Page 5
Staff Report and Conditions of Approval Revised March 13, 1997 - Blue Page 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
CORRESPONDENCE FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONER MARCIA SLAVEN
DATED MARCH 25, 1997
ITuesday Hatch 25, 19~7 12:24pm -- From ,~097652337' -- Page 1l
SENT BY:CZTY HALL ; 3-25-9~/;12:11PM; CZTY 0F=HENET~ 9096g484'/~/;# 1
March 25, 1997
Marce Shaven
30110 La Primeveto St.
Temecula, CA 92592
(909) 676 2507
Gary Thomhill
Community Development Director
City of Temecuha
Transmitted by FAX (909) 694 6477
Dear Gray.
This letter formally appeals the Shell station project on the comer of Margarita and
Yukon for the following masons:
24 hour operation of gas station
Lighting requirements
Density of buffer landscape on norffi side of buffer well
All of the above am deb'imental to the neighboring residences and their health, safety
and welfare,
Sincerely,
Marcia Shaven
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CORRESPONDENCE FROM CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL ANTHONY J. ELMO
DATED FEBRUARY 11, 1997
R:\mff~tLM5!~tg~.~ 4/2/97 ~ 4
"[ :City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula, California 92589-9033
(909) 694..6439
FAX (909) 694-6478
February 11, 1997
Mr. Nick Goyal
S &LOilJV
28456 Century St.
Hayward, CA 94545
Re: Palomar Plaza Shell Station
Dear Mr. Goyal:
I have reviewed the lighting information you provided me. I have also been able to observe a
similar installation of the recessed lighting fixtures at an existing station. It is my opinion that
with the recessed lighting, along with the ceiling of the canopy being recessed above the canopy
surround, the lighting spread beyond the canopy will be negligible. The height of your canopy
will have an affect on the nuisance lighting effecting the adjacent neighbors, but I feel that the
thirteen to thirteen foot six inch canopy height, along with the recessed light fixtures and the
dropped surround will work very well in unison to provide a substantial mitigation of excessive
nuisance lighting to the adjacent property.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 694-6439.
Very truly yours,
Anthony J. Elmo, CBO
Chief Building Official
cc: Carole Donahoe/'
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MINUTES OF THE MARCH 13, 1997 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF ~ CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DIRECTOR
MARCH 1~, 1997
A regular meeting of the City of Temeeula Planning Director was called to order on Thursday,
March 13, 1997 at 1:30 PM, at the City of Temecula Main Conference Room, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California. Senior Planner Dave Hogan presiding.
Also present were Project Planner Carole Donahee, Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley and Minute
Clerk Kelli Beat.
1. Planning Application No. PA97-0028 (Development PlatO
Senior Planner Dave Hogan continued Planning Application No. PA97-0028 a
Development Plan to construct and operate a single story, 9,928 square foot induslxial
warehouse/office building for Kruse Microwave Enterprises to the March 20, 1997
Director' s Hearing.
2. Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
Carole Donahoe presented the staff report for a Development Plan to construct and operate
a She21 automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated carwash, a 875 square
foot convenience man (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken
t ,645 square foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan opened the public hearing.
Larry Markham, Markham and Associates, 41750 Winchester Road, Temecula,
representing the applicant S&L Oil,/V, concurred with the Conditions of Approval except
that the service stalioo was proposed for 24-hour operation. He also felt that KFC wanted
their corporate logo in red and white.
David Maybetry, 42055 Kaffirboom Ct., Tamecula spoke in opposition of the project due
to increased traffic. He stated the Village Grove HOA board was unanimously opposed.
Richmond Jackson, 30450 Anaconda Ct., Temecuh spoke in opposition of the project due
to noise issues and safety concerns with the gas station and gas tanks so close to
residential.
Audrey Modonia, 30486 Danube, Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to
health and safety concerns, specifically related to gas, emissions, and vapors.
Jim Catapolis, 42075 Humbet Dr., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project due to
concerns with pedestrians and increased traffic.
Ron Beasley, 30605 Hollyberry, Ternecula ~ok in oppo~tion of the project due to traffic
and acce~ i~ues. He inquired if a traffic ~tudy has been done. He also expres~J concern
with safety issues with gas and leaicy gas tanks and environmental issues.
Marilyn Sawyer, 30443 Danube Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with
concerns with traffic and the lack of a traffic signal at Yukon and Margarita. She
expressed concerns with parking.
David Michaels, 30300 Churchill Ct., Temecula spoke in opposition of the project with
concerns about traffic, safety and health issues.
Frank Wagnon, 42180 Sweet Shade, Temecula requested a wall the same height as the
trash enclosures and a berm with fast growing landscape along Yukon Street. He
expressed concern with safety, health and traffic issues.
Semor Planner Dave Hogan closed the public comments section.
Assistant Engineer Larry Cooley stated a traffic study had been done in 1988 when the
center was proposed. Project Planner Carole Donahoe stated an Environmental Impact
Report was prepared for the General Plan in 1993.
The applicant' s representative Larry Markham responded to concerns:
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
He stated that tanker truck deliveries would be as needed, probably one or two
deliveries per week.
The gas lanks are double walled with monitors with leak alert going directly to the
Fire Department.
Mr. Markham stated the car wash recycles the water and the recycling unit is
underground.
He statexi the car wash would not be operating 24 hours.
Mr. Markham stated the applicant would not be opposed to building a wall with
landscape clustered to prevent graffiti.
He stated the Traffic Study was prepared in 1988 and the EIR was prepared in
1993 and they anticipated future buildout.
He stated this is not a Light Industrial use.
He stated the herruing addresses the noise issue.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan stated the traffic should reduce when the centors at Hwy 79
South and Margarita Road open for business. Lighting will be recessed lighting and will
comply with the Mr. Palomar Lighting requirements. He stated a condition is to be added
to require the location of trash cans be approved. Representative Mr. Markham
concurred. Senior Planner Dave Hogan stated a condition is to be added that would add
the wall to the south side of the berm along Yukon Street. He stated the red and white
stripe on the top of KFC building would not be approved and he stated that the service
station operation would be 24-hours.
Senior Planner Dave Hogan adopw~i the Negative Declaration prepared for Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) and approved the project subject to the Findings and
Conditions of Approval.
The meeting was adjourn~ at '3:15 P.M.
The next meeting will be held on March 20, 1997 at 1:30 PM at the City of Temecula Main
Conference Room, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Dave Hogan, Senior PI
R:XDIRH~AR~dlN'tr~ES~3-13-97M]~ 3131/~r/csd
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
STAFF REPORT AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVISED MARCH 13, 1997
4/2/9'7 cad (~
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan) is a request to construct and operate a
Shell automobile service station with a 648 square foot automated car wash, a 875 square foot
convenience mart (without alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square
foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service. The project is proposed on a 0.794 acre site
at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Yukon, within the Palomar Village Shopping Center.
The proposed site is located in the CC Community Commercial zone. According to the City's
Development Code Schedule of Permitted Uses automobile service stations with or without an
automated car wash are permitted in the Community Commercial zone. Grecery stores are also a
permitted use, which would allow the convenience mart without the sale of alcoholic beverages.
The Planning Director has determined that the KFC fast food restaurant with drive-through service
is incidental to the main use of the site as an automobile service station, and is therefore also a
permitted use. Because the development proposes construction less than 10,000 square feet,
this case has been agendized for Director's Hearing.
The applicant has made major revisions to the site plan that was originally submitted to comply with
the requirements of the Development Code and to address staff concerns about compatibility with
surrounding uses.
The applicant has reduced the size of the car wash and changed its location to the
southernmost portion of the site, more than 200 feet from any residential district.
The applicant has provided landscaping adjacent to the car wash, along both sides of the
drive-through aisle and within the parking areas. He has also agreed to enhance the
existing 50 foot wide landscaped easement along Margarita Road, and to provide an
approximately 33 foot wide bermed landscaped area with dense shrubbery along the
northern perimeter. These measures will effectively screen the trash enclosure, catch any
debris prior to routine cleanup, and buffer the project from residential uses across both
Yukon and Margarita Road.
The applicant modified the aisle widths to address concerns regarding internal circulation.
Conditions of approval insure compliance with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution,
Americans with Disabilities Act requirements for handicapped accessibility, and compliance
with the City's Sign Ordinance.
The project is conditioned to use colors compatible with existing colors within the Palomar
Village Shopping Center.
The Planning Director has determined that the project, with reciprocal use of parking spaces and
drive aisles with the other tenants within the shopping center, meets parking requirements of the
Development Code. The Planning Director has also determined that adequate stacking spaces are
provided for the modified "express" menu offered by KFC.
An Initial Environmental Study was performed for the project which determined that the project as
designed and mitigated would not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation
measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project are on file with the Planning
Department.
This project complied with supplemental noticing of intent to file a project application, as well as
project noticing requirements in accordance with State law. Staff received inquiries from five
interested citizens, two of which were written and are attached as exhibits. A resident in Starlight
Ridge was in favor of the project, citing the need for the services proposed in the area. The
remaining inquiries were either neutral or opposed, citing the need for other types of services, such
as professional offices or sit-down restaurants or more parking for the shopping center. Concerns
R:\STAFFRPT~345pA96.DH 3/31/97ckd
that were voiced include: traffic and congestion caused by the project, safety concerns with toxic
fumes, noise, smell, and litter. Staff feels that these items have been addressed through the project
design and the conditions of approval.
Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Director approve Planning Application No. PA96-0345
(Development Plan) and adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for Planning Application No.
PA96-0345, based upon the findings and the attached Conditions of Approval.
This concludes Staff's presentation. Staff is available to answer any questions.
R:~STAFFRFI~345PA96.DH 3/31/97 ckd
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan)
FINDINGS
The proposed land use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The
site has a General Plan designation and is zoned CC (Community Commercial). The project
has been reviewed for consistency with these documents. Staff has determined that the
project is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan and the
development standards contained in the Development Code.
The proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent
uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjacent
uses, buildings, or structures. The project proposes commercial uses in an already
developed shopping center. Because of residential districts across both Yukon and
Margarita Road, the project has been designed to locate and face noise generatom away
from these streets. The project also includes large, enhanced landscaped buffers adjacent
to both Yukon and Margarita Road.
The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the project.
Staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the project is consistent with the
standards of the Development Code and the Specific Plan.
The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare
of the community. The project is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the
General Plan and the development standards contained in the Development Code and
Specific Plan. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure that projects
are is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community.
Compliance with these documents will assure this is achieved.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has been determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and
in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously
disturbed and rough graded in the past, and street improvements installed on site. The site
is an infill area, with development already constructed in all directions. There are none of the
standard indicators (obligate species) that might suggest that there are wetlands on site.
The site does not serve as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made
for this project.
R:/,STAFFRPTX345PA96. DH 3/31/97 ckd
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Revised Marcl~ 13, 1997
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan}
Project Description: To construct and operate a Shell automobile service station with
a 648 square foot automated car wash, a 875 square foot convenience mart {without
alcoholic beverage sales) and a Kentucky Fried Chicken 1,645 square foot fast food
restaurant with drive-through service. All uses shall operate seven (7) days per week.
The service station is proposed to operate f,u.. C ~..,. [u ..;dn;gP, t 24-hours; the car
wash operallen shall be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.; and the fast-food restaurant shall
operate 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.
(Amended by the Planning Director. March 13, 1997/
Assessor's Parcel No.
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
921-700-017
March 13, 1997
March 13, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (481 Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration with a DeMinimus Finding
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application
No. PA96-0345 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant
of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
R:~STAFI~RPTL145pA~.DH 3/17/r/ckd 2
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by the approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit "A" Site Plan
approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345, or as amended by these conditions.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shaft submit a site plan
showing the location of trash receptacles for all uses, subject to review and
approval by the Planning Manager.
(Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997)
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shaft submit a site p/an
showing the location, materials and elevation of a waft at the north side of the
project, subject to review and approval by the Planning Manager.
(Added by the Planning Director, March 13, 1997)
The building shall conform substantially with Exhibit "B1 ," "B2," and "B3" Elevations;
Exhibit "C1 ," "C2," and "C3" Color Elevations; and Exhibit "D" Floor Plan, approved with
Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by these conditions.
Material Color
Building walls Cement plaster to match shopping center
Roof Metal to match shopping center
Decorative stonework To match shopping center
Accent stripe for building, car wash, canopy Cement plaster in Shell yellow
Cupola To match building roof and shopping center
A. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from public view.
A lighting plan shall be submitted for review and approval that indicates fixture
type, dimensions, color and materials. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and
directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-
way. Service canopy light fl~<tures shall be recessed. Lighting shall comply with
Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution.
The applicant shall use colors that are compatible with the color palette existing
for the Palomar Village Shopping Center. If the color white is used, it shall be
for accent only.
Landscaping shall be installed in substantial conformance with Exhibit "E" Conceptual
Landscape Plan approved with Planning Application No. PA96-0345 or as amended by
these conditions,
A. All utilities on site shall be appropriately screened.
B. Root barriers shall be provided for all trees within five feet of hardscape.
R:\STAFFIL~crI'~345PA96.DH 3117/97 ckd 3
The applicant shall ensure that mature trees do not interfere with driveway sight
lines or overhead power lines.
A final grading plan shall be submitted along with final landscape construction
plans so that cross checking for erosion control can be performed.
E. The applicant shall comply with Ordinance No. 94-22 regarding water
conservation.
Additional shrubs shall be planted on the northern berm to create a dense barrier
to catch debris prior to routine cleanup of the site.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
9. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
10.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation
Fees.
11.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing
fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. These plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover
page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site.
12.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development,
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
13.
Sign approvals are not part of this development plan. An application for signage shall
be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager. No sign shall be affixed on, above
or over the roof of any building, including service station canopies.
14.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation,
and shading plans.
15.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
16.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place,
at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches,
clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
17.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the
approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Planning.
18.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mjtigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
20.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building,
Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code Title 24 Energy and Disabled access regulations and the Temecuta
Municipal Code.
21.
Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with
Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
22. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
23. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
R:XSTAFFRFT\345PA96.D~ 3/17197 el~d 5
24.
The Occupancy Classification of the proposed use shall be B/M/S-3 (KFC/Sales/Fuel
Dispensing, Carwash).
25.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations and
must be fullv detailed for plan check submittal. (California Disabled Access Regulations
effective April I, 1994).
26.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide
dimensions (space 1'10).
27.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting
and fire alarm systems.
28.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the
1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
29.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
30.
Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and
mechanical plan for plan review.
31.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record, the truss manufacturer's
engineer, and that have been plan checked and stamped by the plan check agency and
the City, are required before sheet and shear inspection.
32.
Provide an approved Precise Grading Plan with plan check submittal to check for
handicap accessibility.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
33.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
34.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
35.
All grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency
with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site.
36. All plans shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits:
37,
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
45.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Eastern Municipal Water District
Rancho California Water District
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
A Precise Grading Ran shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by
the Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
City Standards and as additionally required in these Conditions of Approval.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of
engineered structures and pavement sections.
An Erosion Control Plan in accordance with City Standards shall be designed by a
registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review.
Graded but undeve}oped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable
R:',STAFFRYFL345PA96.DH 3/17/97 ckd 7
to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance of
any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
46.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval for offsite work performed
on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
47.
Concentrated onsite runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground
storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public
Works.
48.
Letter of approval or a drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property
owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent
property. A copy of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works for review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall
be delineated on the precise grading plan.
49,
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto or
through the site.
50.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
51.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans and/or
precise grading plans to be submitted to the Department of Public Works:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
All drive areas shall be designed for two-way, 24-foot travelways with
unobstructed access across the proposed multi-use site.
All driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permlt:
52.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
53.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
54.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established
per acre as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
R:%STAFFRPT\345PA96,DH 3117197 ckd 8
55.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the intent to develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards prior to issuance of Certificate of
Occupancy.
56.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to be
paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or
final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date
on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase thereof,
the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee, a copy of
which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing this
Agreement. the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public Facility fee.
The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000. The
Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess
of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees).
By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any right to protest the
provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee
district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee
for this project; provided that the Developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
57.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
58.
The Developer shall confirm that reciprocal access and parking easement agreements
are in place for all shared private facilities.
59.
All onsite improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk,
drive approaches, and landscaping, as directed by the Department of Public Works.
60.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
61.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
OTHER AGENCIES
62.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Rancho California
Water District transmittel dated December 24, 1996, a copy of which is attached.
R:~STAFFPj~345PA96,DFI 3117197 ckd 9
63.
64.
65.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated February 4, 1997, a
copy of which is attached.
The apl~licant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated December 26, 1996, a copy of
which is attached.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Fire Department
transmittal dated February 4, 1997.
R:XSTAFPP, PTx345PA96.DI~ 3117197
December 24,' 1996
Ms. Carole Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Dnve
Temecula, CA 92590-3606
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL 7 OF PARCEL MAP 23472
APN 921-700-017
FLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 96-0345
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced properly is located within
the boundanes of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any,
to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Represental/ve at this office.
Sincerely.
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
a
Development Engineering Manager
~/SE] mc216/F01~FEG
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services SuDervisor
City of Temecula
Plannin Depanmenl
43200 ~usiness Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attenhon: C.-~ i~,OL~;~
Ladles and GenUemen:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MARKET STREET
By ~
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The Distact also does not plan chec~ aty land use cases~ or m'ovlde Slate Division of Real Estate letters or other flood
hazard reports for such cases. District ccmmentslrecommendations for such cases are normally limited to items ot
specific interest to the District including Distact Master Drainage Plan factlilies, other regional flood control and
draina e facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan ayslem and District
Area ~alnage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The Disthct has not reviewed the roposed protect ~n detail and the foliowiocJ checked comments do not in any wa
Constitute of imply Dismet approvaPor endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, puDlic healt~
and safely or any other such issue:
~/This pro)oct would not be ~mpacted by Oisthct Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regfonal
interest proposed.
This project involves Distact Master Plan facilities. The Distnct will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facdities must be constructed to Dismot standards, and DIsthct plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This pro~ect proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a iogr,,al extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The Disthct would consider accept' Ownership ot suod lacdities on written request
of the Ci . Facilities must be constructed to District stand~s and Disthct plan check and inspet:lion will be
reduiredtT~r D strict acceplance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
/ This project is located within the limits of the Distrtct's fIUf~fil 'T'A E.P, Eg ~'£H~CJ,/L,q- ~ILLE, Area
:" Drama e Plan for whlch dralnage fees have been adopted; a phca~efeessh~l~'~)Z/:~paidtotheFtood~c;ntrol
DistricPor Ci dot to final ap royal of the pro ect, or in ~e case of a rcal map or subdivision pncr to
recordalton ~lTt~e final map. ~P;es to be pa~d s~;ould be at the rate in eftP~t at the time of recordation, or if
aleJotted, at the time of issuance of the actual perm~t.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S stem (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or orner ~Y~al approval should not the City
be gwen until
has determined that the project has Deen granted a permit or ~s shown to be exempt.
If this pro ect involves a Federal EmergenCy Management Agency (PEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
recluire t~e applicant to rovide all studies, calculations, plans and other informalion required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should ~rdlef require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior
to grading, recordalton or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Rewsion (LOMR) pnor to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain }s ~moacted hy th~S prolOci, the City should reclu~re the a ticant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 A redmerit from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean ~/~;ter Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.8. An'ny CorDs of En meets, or whiten con'espondence from these a~encies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A ~Jean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required from the local California RegronaJ Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Cor~s 404 permit.
Very truly yours.
STUART E- MCKIBBIN
Sen~or Civil Engineer
Date:
FROM:
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA96-0345
IDevelopment Plan) and has no objections. Saratary sewer and water services may be
available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PZAN CHECK SUB~IITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
"Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submined, including a
fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance
~vith the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference. please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022).
A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-
5022 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
a~ Underground storage tanks. Ordinance # 617.4.
b) Hazardous Waste Generator Services. Ordinance # 615.3.
c l Hazardous Waste Disclosure l in accordance with Ordinance # 65 1.2).
Waste reduction management.
Waste Regulation Branch (Waste CollectiowLEA).
GD:dr
(90% 275-8980
NOTE:
Any current additional reqmrements not covered, can be applicable at time of
Building Plan review for tinal Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Febmany 4, 1997
TO:
Manning Department
Carole Donahoe
RE: PA96-0345
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced development plan, the Fire
Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with
Temecula Ordinances and/or recognhe~ fire protection standards:
The fire Department is required to s~t a minimum fire flow for the remodel or consauction
of all commercial building using the proc, edur~ established in Ordinance 546. A fire flow
of 2500 GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure must be available
before any combustible material is placed on the job site.
The required ftre flow shall be available from a super fire hydrant (6"x4"x2-2 1/2,, ),
located not less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as
measured along vehicular travelways.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for
review. Phns shall be signed by a registend civil engineer, containing a Fire Department
approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals
shall be presented to the Fire Department for signature.
The reqmred water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the
appwpnar,. water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on the
job site.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per square foot as
mitigation for fire protecUon impacts.
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicantJdeveloper shall be responsible. to
submit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the Ci~ of Temecula.
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
7. Knox Key locie boxes shall be installed on all buildings/suites. If building/suite requires
Hazardous Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the Knox HAZ MAT Data
and key storage cabinets shall be installed. If building/suites are protected by a fire or
burglar alarm system, the boxes will require 'Tamper" monitoring. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
8. All exit doors shall be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort.
9. Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum raling of 2A10BC. Contact a certified
extinguisher company for proper placement.
10. Applicant/developer shall be responsible for obtaining underground and aboveground tank
permits from both the County Health and Fire Departments.
11. Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location
of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with
ftre hydrant.
12. Prior to final inspeaWn of any buLlcling, the appticam shall provide fife lanes with
appropriate lane pam~ng and or signs.
13. Sffee~ address shall be posted, in a visible location, miramum 12 inches in height, on the
s~reet side of the building with a contras~Lng background.
1,~. Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and
Safeq~ Office.
15. Please contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy.
All ques~ons regarding the meamng of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Depa~ment
Planning and engineering section (909)693-3974.
Laura Cabral
Fire Safety Specialist