HomeMy WebLinkAbout081897 PC AgendaTEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
August 18, 1997, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Drive
Council Chambers
Temecula, CA 92390
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Fahey
ROLL CALL:
Fahey, Guerriero, Miller, Slaven and Soltysiak
PUBLIC COMIVIENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on
items that are not lismd on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Planning Secretary
be. fore Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Approval of Agenda
2. Minutes from July 21, 1997
3. Old Town Entertainment Project Workshop
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
Mark P. Esbensen
Approximately 400 feet southwest of the intersection of
Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive (Assessor's
Parcel Number 940-310-34).
The design and construction of two (2) office and
manufacturing buildings totaling 13,108 square feet.
Negative Declaration
Patty Anders
Approval
R:XW~vlBERVO\PLANCO~GENDAS~8-18-97.WPD 8113197 vgw 1
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA97.0129 & PA 97-0224
Mark P. Esbensen ' '
29760 - 29766 Rancho California Road
A Tentative Parcel Map request to allow an existing
commercial center of 4.59 acres to be subdivided into four
(4) lots, and a Variance request to allow two (2) of the
parcels to be smaller than the minimum lot size requirement
of the 30,000 sq. ft.
Negative Declaration
Patty Anders
Approval
Case No.:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA97-0266
City of Temecula
NE corner of Front and 6th Street
A request for approval of a Variance to construct a 9 foot
high monument sign which exceeds the maximum height
requirement of 6 feet.
Exempt pursuant to Section 1506(b)(3) of CEQA
Sated Naaseh
Approval
Case No.:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA97-0221 and PA97-0267
City of Temecula
Old Town Specific Plan
An Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan for
Establishing the Park in Lieu Program Incentives for the 6th
Street Parking Lot
Exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3)of CEQA
Saied Naaseh
Approval
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner:
Recommendation:
PA95-0127
City of Temecula
Citywide
Adoption of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Exempt from the Requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) PursUant to Section
15061(b)(3).
Sated Naaseh
Recommend the City Council to Approve
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
OTHER BUSlNESS
Next meeting: August 25, 1997 - Regular Planning Comraission meeting
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM #2
INDEX
CITY OF Tt~VIECULA PLANNING COM3~RSION
JULY 21, 1997-
SUBJECT PAGE#
CALL TO ORDER .............................................. 1
ROLL CALL .................................................. 1
PUBLIC CONIMENTS ........................................... 1
COMMISSION BUSINESS
APPROVAL OF AGENDA .................................... 1
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - July 7, 1997 ......................... 2
BEST WESTERN SIGNAGE ............................... 2 - 3
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
5.
6.
7.
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0089 ..................... 4 - 6
(Development Plan -- Spanos Corporation)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0151 ..................... 6 - 8
(Conditional Use Permit -- America's Tire)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0221 ...................... 1, 8
(Old Town Specific Plan)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0127 ...................... 1, 8
(Sign Ordinance)
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT .................................. 9
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION .............................. 9
OTHER BUSINESS ........................................ 7 .... 9
ADJOURNMENT '; 10
R:~PLANCOES\1997~7-21-97.WPD g/13/97vgw
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF ~ CITY OF TESIECLTLA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 21, 1997
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular session at 6:02
P.M., on Monday, July 21, 1997, in the City Council: Chambers of Temecula City Hail,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, Caiifomia.
ROLLCALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Soltysiak, and Acting
Chairman Miller.
Absent:
Commissioner Slaven and Chairwoman Fahey.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Principai Engineer Parks,
Attorney Estrada,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Project Planner De Gange,
Project Planner Donahoe,
Assistant Planner Anders, and
Minute Clerk Bailreich.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Acting Chairman Miller cailed for public comments with regard to non-agenda items.
There were no requests to speak.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Planning Manager Ubnoske requested that Agenda Item No. 6 (Old Toxin Specific
Plan) be continued to a date uncertain and that Agenda Item No. 7 (Adoption of a
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance) be continued to the August 4, 1997, Planning Commission
meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved for the approval of the Agenda as
amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote of those
present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioners Fahey and Slaven absenO.
R:XPLANCO~S\I997XT-21-97.WPD g/13/97vgw
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES-Jffiy7.1997
Acting Chairman Miller requested that page 7, pm'agraph 1, be amended as follows:
"... entrances to the entertainment ... 24" box perimeter trees will be spaced ....
Acting Chairman Miller requested that page 11, last paragraph, be amended as follows:
Planning Manager Ubnoske being absent, Community ....
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved for the approval of the July 7, 1997,
Planning Commission minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Soltysiak and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioners Fahey
and Slaven absent).
3. BEST WESTERN SIGNAGE
Planning Application No. PA97-0065 - a freestanding freeway-oriented sign for Best
Western County Inn, measuring 137 square feet in area and 45 feet in height, located on the
west side of Interstate 15, south of Winchester Road (27706 Jefferson Avenue).
RECOMMENDATION
To approve the request as conditioned.
Project Planner Donahoe reviewed the request as per staff report (of record), noting
that the visibility of the existing freeway-oriented sign is being impaired because of the height
of the existing trees (located in Caltrans right-of-way); that because of the view impairment,
the applicant has requested that the sign be increased in height from 33' to 45'; that the
proposed sign would be higher than already existing signs in the general area but that it would
not exceed the allowable height as per Ordinance No. 348; that the proposed sign will be
intemaily illuminated; and that it will be, compared to the already existing signs, the smallest
sign with regard to size but the tallest with regard to height.
Project Planner Donahoe informed the Commissioners that Caltrans would permit the
topping of the existing Eucalyptus trees (approximately 10') as long as the applicant can show
just cause that this action will benefit the visibility of the sign. Ms. Donahoe also noted that
the slight bend on the freeway makes it difficult for southbound traffic to see the existing sign.
Project Planner Donahoe recommended that the following addition be made to the
recommended conditions of approval:
that 2.c. be added: The existing AAA sign, (located below the existing
sign) be removed and not be considered a part of this application.
Project Planner Donahoe advised that the replacement sign will be a pole sign to which
Commissioner Soltysiak relayed concern with regard to how this sign will comply with
Ordinance No. 348 once it is amended.
Acting Chairman Miller noted that the proposed sign would be similar to the existing
McDonald's pole sign.
Because neither the City Council nor the Planning Commission has taken any action as
to amending Ordinance No. 348, Planning Manager Ubnoske recommended that the proposed
sign be reviewed under the existing standards of Ordinance No. 348 (maximum allowable
height of 45 ').
Although he has not favored, in the past, signs in excess of 40' high, Acting Chairman
Miller spoke in support of the requested 45' sign because of the reduction in elevation which
occurs at the freeway which creates a sight visibility problem.
Attorney Estrada clarified that because this request has never been discussed as a public
hearing, Commissioner Guerriero may vote on the matter.
At this time, Acting Chairman Miller opened the public hearing.
Ms. Patti Skoglund, Superior Electrical Advertising, representing the applicant, advised
that she was present to address any questions/concerns and requested the Commission's
approval of the sign.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Clarifying that he has no objection with the proposed sign, Commissioner Soltysiak
noted that his only concern pertained to the compliance issue is with regard to the proposed
sign once Ordinance No. 348 is amended.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the request as conditioned by
staff, including the addition of Condition No. 2c.(as noted above). The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Soltysiak and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval
(Commissioners Fahey and Slaven absent).
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0089 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
Planning Commission consideration of a request to construct and operate the Tuscany
Ridge Apartments, a 220-unit apartment complex on 13.8 acres with associated
recreation amenities including a pool, weight room, a volleyball court, tot lot, and
barbeque areas within the High-Density Residential District.
RECOMMENDATION
To adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. PA97-0089; to adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PA97-0089; and to
adopt Resolution No. 97- __ recommending approval of Planning
Application No. PA97-0089 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained in the
staff report and subject to Conditions of Approval.
Project Planner De Gange reviewed the proposed request as per staff report (of record);
advised that the applicant, as per staffs request, has included additional trees/plantings long
Margarita Road, serving as a buffer to the existing single-family residential units across the
street; and recommended that Condition No. 83 be amended as follows:
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay
$400.00 per unit or the development impact fee whichever is in
effect at the time of the issuance of building permits as mitigation
for fire protection impacts.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Project Planner De Gange advised that in light of staff
discussion with the applicant, the following plan revisions were proposed:
creating a buffer, for the existing single-family units, along
Margarita Road;
altering full access from the eastern-most driveway;
placing the active recreational area within an easily accessible
and centrally located area;
redesigning pedestrian access ways to ensure easy accessibility -
handicapped access.
In response to Acting Chairman Miller, Principal Engineer Parks advised that the
installation of a traffic signal at Solana and Margarita Roads has been designated as a capital
improvement budget for this year.
In light of Commissioner Guerriero's concern with regard m uncontrolled in and out
left-turning movements at the southerly driveway, Principal Engineer Parks advised that
several improvements have been proposed, including the construction of raised landscaped
medians. Commissioner Guerriero suggested that the proposed raised median be extended
further south then what is currently reflected on the plans.
Commissioner Guerriero as well expressed concern with regard to the omission of a
left-turn lane for exiting purposes at the main entrance, noting that a left-turn lane has been
proposed for westbound traffic. He noted that landscaped medians may present a sight
distance problem. It was noted that staff would readdress the issue.
For Commissioner Soltysiak, Principal Engineer Parks advised that staff would concur
that the median should be extended to the Moraga Road intersection but noted that it would not
be fair to place this extra cost on the developer.
Mr. Dave Jeffers, Rick Engineering Company, representing the applicant, commended
staff on the presentation. In response to Mr. Jeffers' comment, Planning Manager Ubnoske
noted that Condition No. 77 (arterial street lighting on Margarita Road shall be dedicated to
the City prior to installation of the street lights or issuance of the first building permit,
whichever occurs first) will be readdressed for clarification with the Community Services
Department. Mr. Jeffers noted that the proposed 220-unit project was approved in 1988 but
that the approval had expired, advising that only minor layout modifications have been made
from the previously approved plan. Mr. Jeffers stated that once approved, grading permits
would be immediately pulled and that construction would begin as soon as possible.
In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Mr. Jeffers provided additional clarification
with regard to the location of the proposed courtyard and advised that the wall to the south is
an existing retaining wall to which Commissioner Soltysiak requested that all measures be
taken to ensure that this wall will be able to withstand the weight of the slope once completed.
Although he would prefer that no apartments be constructed in the immediate area, Mr.
Michael Naggar, 43034 Agena Street, owner of property in Rancho Del Sol, advised that after
reviewing the staff report, he would concur that the proposed project will be in accordance
with the City's General Plan. Therefore, Mr. Naggar stated that the applicant should be
permitted to construct the project but requested that the following issues be taken into
consideration:
that in light of the recent approval of the Mall and the development of
a future community park in the area, the increased traffic/
pedestrian impact this project would have on Margarita Road,
Moraga Road, Rancho California Road, and the school be addressed;
that the only access to the school and to the future community park
from Rancho Del Sol would be by way of an uncontrolled crosswalk;
that this particular area may become a major thoroughfare as a
result of the approved Mall;
that the proposed project may further impact already decreasing
property values;
that the construction of apartments may create an undesirable
transitory situation;
that the General Plan be amended with regard to the property to
the east, noting that another project of this size and magnitude
could not be sustained in the immediate area considering the
construction of the Mall, the existing school, the future
community park, etc.
In response to Mr. Naggar, Mr. Jeffers advised that because of the distance of the
proposed project to the neighboring homeowner associations and because of the limited written
and verbal responses to the proposed project, the applicant opted to address any
concerns/issues at this evening's Planning Commission meeting versus individually meeting
with the homeowner associations.
In light of Mr. Naggar's concems with regard to traffic impact, Mr. Jeffers advised
that traffic studies were completed and that these studies support the proposed project, noting
that the level of service at Moraga/Margarita Roads intersection and MoragaJ Rancho
California Roads intersection currently operates at level C which is within standards.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Jeffers reviewed rental fees which ranged from $700
to $1,000 per month.
R:XPLANCOMIVIXMINUTES\I997X7-21-97.WPD $//13/97vgw 5
Acting Chairman Miller referenced the letter of objection from Robert and Christine
Martinelli.
Principal Engineer Parks, advised Acting Chairman Miller, that a traffic analysis was
prepared, by the applicant, for the subject site; noted that Margarita Road would be widened
and that raised landscaped medians are being required; and stated that the level of service at
the Moraga/Margarita Roads intersection will increase from
level B to level C but that the level of service at the Moraga/Rancho Caiifomia Roads
intersection will remain the same (level C).
Advising that the project was posted on June 8, 1997, Project Planner De Gange
informed the Commissioners that staff received nominal calls were received with regard to the
project, noting those received pertained to traffic congestion and impact on the schools.
Planner De Gange noted that the School Board had been apprised of the proposed project and
that no concerns were voiced by the Board.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Commenting on the similarities of this project and the one which was previously
approved, Commissioner Soltysiak relayed his support of the request.
In light of Mrs. Martinelli's concerns (as per the article in the newspaper),
Commissioner Guerriero suggested that staff contact Mrs. Martinelli and apprise her of
specific improvements which are being proposed in order to mitigate such concerns including
the construction of additional schools, etc. In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Mr.
Jeffers expressed no concern with regard to security as it relates to the back portion of the
project near the existing retaining wall.
Attorney Estrada requested that the following amendments be made to the Resolution:
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial ... to the project, and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby approved.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission
hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as
Exhibit B. and approves Planning ...
MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to approve Planning Application
No. PA97-0089 as conditioned, including findings of fact set forth by staff, and amending
Condition No. 83 (as previously noted), clarifying Condition No. 77, and amending Sections 3
and 4 of the Resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote
of those present reflected unanimous approval (Commissioners Fabey and Slaven absent).
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0151(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT}
To construct and operate a 7,510 square foot retail tire sales and
installation for America's Tire.
R:~aLANCOMIxlXIv~NUTES\I997W-21-97. WPD 8/13/97vlgw 6
RF, COMM~,NDATION
To adopt the Negative Declaration for Planning Application No. 97-0151; adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. 97-0151; and adopt
Resolution No. 97- approving Planning Application No. 97-0151 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
Planning Manager Ubnoske introduced newly hired Assistant Planner Anders to the
Commissioners, who, in turn, proceeded with an overview of the request (as per written
material of record), advising that because the newly revised landscaping plan adequately
addresses the west elevation, staff would recommend the deletion of Condition No. 9
(additional trees shall be added to the planter on the southwest property line to better soften the
building elevations along this portion of the project, subject to the review and approval of the
City's Landscape Architect. This requirement shall be added to the project's landscape plan
and become part of the approve record).
Acting Chairman Miller expressed concem with regard to the visual aesthetics of the
roll-up doors located closest to Winchester Road. Assistant Planner Anders noted that the
temporary asphalt driveway will serve the subject site; that the applicant has secured a
reciprocal access agreement from the site to the west; that all Caltrans concerns (as noted in
letter dated July 7, 1997) have been or will be addressed by way of the recommended
conditions of approval; and that the applicant has provided additional landscaping near the well
site.
At this time, Acting Chairman Miller opened the public hearing.
Mr. Daniel Waynewright, representing America's Tire Company, requested the
Commission's approval of the project and briefly reviewed the operations of the business,
clarifying that no mechanical work would be performed at the site and that the business would
strictly be limited to the sale and replacement of tires.
Although a separate lighting plan for the site has not been submitted, Assistant Planner
Anders, for Commissioner Guerriero, advised that the exterior lighting above the service bays
will comply with the standards of Ordinance No. 655.
In response to Commissioner Guerriero's concern, Mr. Waynewright expressed no
objection to providing additional plantings along the east side in order to properly screen visual
view of the service bays and as well noted no objection in attempting to coordinate landscaping
plans with the parcels to the east and west.
At this time, Acting Chairman Miller closed the public hearing.
Assistant Planner Anders noted that the project to the east would only be reviewed by
the Planning Commission if it is larger than 10,000 square feet.
R:~PLANCOMMMMlNUTES\1997~7-21-97. WPD g/13/97vgw 7
Commissioner Soltysiak echoed Acting Chairman Miller's earlier comment that
additional landscaping be provided near the well site.
Principal Engineer Parks recommended that Condition Nos. 49 and 59 (pertaining to
written clearance) be amended to include Caltrans as one of the agencies.
With regard to Condition No. 9, Assistant Planner Arttiers recommended the following
amendment:
Additional trees and shrubs shall be added to the planter on the west side of the
Rancho California Water District well site. This requirement shall be added
to the project's landscape plan and become part of the approved record.
In response to Commissioner Soltysiak, Principal Engineer Parks advised that the
purpose of the existing ditch (to the west) will be addressed during the Plan Check process.
Attorney Estrada requested that the following amendments be made to the Resolution:
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial ... to the project, and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration is hereby approved.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission
hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto as
Exhibit B. and approves Planning ...
MOTION: Commissioner Soltysiak moved to adopt the Negative Declaration, the
Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Resolution No. 97-016 (amended; as noted above),
approving Planning Application No. 97-0151 based upon the Analysis and Findings contained
in the staff report, including the conditions of approval and amending Condition Nos. 9, 49,
and 59. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote of those present
reflected unanimous approval (Commissioners Fahey and Slaven absent).
6. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0221
A request for approval of an amendment to the Old TownSpecific Plan to allow for the
payment of the parking in-lieu fee in place of the required parking spaces.
This Agenda Item has been continued to a date uncertain.
7. PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA95-0127 (SIGN ORDINANCE)"
Adoption of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
This Agenda Item has been continued to the August 4, 1997, Planning Commission
meeting.
RAPLANCOMMMVIINLr~S\I997X7-21-97. WPD 8/13/97vgw R
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Advising that because the first Monday in September fails on Labor Day (September 1,
1997), Planning Manager Ubnoske stated the meeting would have to be rescheduled.
Following some discussion, it was the consensus of those Commissioners present that the
meeting be mscheduled to September 8, 1997. It was noted that the Planning Commission
would be meeting September 8 and 15, 1997.
In response to a concern noted by Commissioner Slaven at the July 7, 1997, Planning
Commission meeting, with regard to a Director's hearing approvai of a project aiong
Winchester Road Corridor, staff noted that the appeai period has not closed.
With regard to this project, Acting Chairman Miller noted opposition to the proposed
roof materiais (copper or painted sheet metai), noting that the Architecturai Committee may
not permit the use of metal roofs.
Commissioner Soltysiak voiced no objection to the project and expressed no desire in
appeaiing it.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Guerriero advised that an Ad Hoc Committee of the Traffic Commission
had favorably reviewed the concept of raised medians with left-turn cut outs such as on
Jefferson Road (heading toward the City of Murrietta) in an effort to control traffic darting
across the left-turn lane but noted that no such medians could be constructed until the
completion of the Overland Bridge. Principal Engineer Parks noted that this particular area
has been identified as a major area of concern and that the study/review of these medians has
been reflected in the Capitai Improvement Plan for this year.
In order to accurately determine the colors/materiais/etc. for a project, Commissioner
Guerriero requested that the sample charts presented to the Commission be increased in size.
Planning Manager Ubnoske noted that the request would be agendized for the next Planning
Commission meeting.
In response to Acting Chairman Miller, Attorney Estrada advised that because it is not
a Zoning or General Plan issue, it would not be within the Planning Commission's purview to
review or determine whether or not an art object placed on someone's property is appropriate
or llot.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the Planning Commission has more control of
such issues as it relates to new developments (as per the site plan) but that it would be difficult
to control on existing developments/uses.
OTHER BUSINESS
None.
R:~PLiLNCOMiVI~MlNUTES\I99~7-21-97.WpD 8/11/97 v~v 9
At 7:45 P.M., Acting Chairman Miller formally-adjourned the Planning Commission
meeting to Monday, August 4, 1997, at 6:00 P.M.
Linda Fahey, Chairperson
Planning Manager Ubnoske
R:~PLANCO~S\I997X7-21-97.WPD g/13/97vgw 10
ITEM #3
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Prepared by:
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske,~Pl~t~ning Manager
August 18, 1997
Planning Commission Workshop for Zev Buffman's Proposal ("Westside
Specific Plan/Old Town Entertainment Project/Rogersdale, U.S.A." )
Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
Receive the Staff Report and Provide Direction and
Comments Regarding the Attached EIR Consistency
Report, Specific Plan Consistency Report, Traffic
Analysis and Exhibits for Zev Buffman's Proposal
("Westside Specific Plan/Old Town Entertainment
Project/Rogersdale, U.S.A." )
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Listed below are the components and their respective square footage for the project which is
before the Planning Commission. A detailed description of the previously approved project
approved ("The Old Town Redevelopment Project") is described in Attachment 3 (Westside
Specific Plan Consistency Report).
Project Component
Square Footage
Cabaret Theater (Western Dinner Theater)
Western Saloon (Rockin Rodeo)
Opera House/Celebrity Auditorium
Wild West Arena
Virtual Reality Experience
Hotel
Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Exhibition
Temecula Wine & Food Exhibition
Chapel
Hotel Retail Commercial
. 20,000 sq. ft.
12,000 sq. ft.
50,000 sq. ft.
105,000 sq. ft.
7,200 sq. ft.
125,000 sq. ft.
23,000 sq. ft.
30,000 sq. ft.
1,600 square feet
69,600 square feet
R:XSTAFFRIrfXBUFFI~L~I.PCW 8/12/97mf
Project Component
Square Foot~ge
Visitor Center
Administrative Space
Festival Square
2,500 square feet
20,000 square feet
1,000 square feet
TOTAL PROJECT SQUARE FOOTAGE
459,700 square feet
BACKGROUND
On June 5, 1995 the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the
Old Town Redevelopmerit Project ("Project") and certify the Environmental Impact Report for
the Project. The Project included: a Master Conditional Use Permit, the Westside Specific
Plan, Tentative Parcel Map No. 28011 and a Development Agreement. The City Council
approved the Project at their June 13, 1995 meeting.
Subsequent to this approval, the applicant proposed some revisions to the original conditions of
approval. At the March 4, 1996 Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission deferred the
timing of recordation of the final map from prior to the issuance of a grading permit to prior to
the issuance of a building permit. In addition, the Commission approved a modification to the
timing for interim improvements to the Rancho California/Interstate 15 interchange at their
March 18, 1996 meeting. Both items were approved by a unanimous vote of the Commission.
The City Council upheld the Planning Commission's actions at their March 26, 1996 meeting.
The pre-application submittal for the Planning Commission Workshop was on Monday,
August, 4, 1997. Staff held a pre-application meeting with the applicant and his design
professionals on Thursday, August 7, 1997. All items were re-submitted for the Planning
Commission Workshop on Tuesday, August 12, 1997.
It is anticipated the formal application submittal will be on August 25, 1997, with the item
potentially going before the Planning Commission at their first meeting in October.
ANALYSIS
Location of Project
The proposed project described above will occur primarily in Planning Area A Of the Westside
Specific Plan (see Exhibit B). As described in the Westside Specific Plan, Planning Area A is
located west of Pujol Street between First Street and the prolongation of Sixth Street up to the
proposed Western Bypass Corridor. No components of the project are proposed in Old Town
Temecula.
R:\STAFFRPT~BUFFMAN,FCW 8/12/97 mf 2
The site plan for the project has been modified slightly from the Conceptual Site Plan
contained in the Westside Specific Plan. The arena is in the same general location; however,
its overall scale has been reduced. The location of the commercial area is generally in the
same location; however, there are additional buildings in the area. The hotel has been
relocated to the west, away from the slope behind the residences along Pujol Street. Parking is
generally consistent with the Conceptual Site Plan, with some parking proposed where the
hotel site was originally to be located.
The project will take access from the Western Bypass Corridor, First Street, and Vincent
Moraga Drive. The applicant is proposing to relocate Vincent Moraga to the north of its
current location. According to the Traffic Analysis prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates:
"The proposed intersection spacing along the Vincent Moraga Drive extension is more
favorable than in the Conceptual Master Plan and fewer potential turning movement conflicts
would result."
The applicant is proposing the project be developed in two (2) phases. These phases are
clearly demarcated on the Site Plan. Phase 1 would include the arena, associated required
parking and installation of the Western Bypass Corridor from SR79 South to Vincent Moraga.
Phase 2 would include all other development and associated improvements.
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the site plan, provide comments and direction
regarding the design and determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
Lowering the Height of the Western Bypass Corridor (WBC)
The applicant is proposing to lower the height of the Western Bypass Corridor by an average
of fifteen (15) feet. They contend this will allow better site access. In addition, they state this
will provide the appearance of the project looking lower in elevation from the Old Town area.
Grading Plan
The applicant has submitted a conceptual grading plan for the project. This grading plan
differs from the approved grading plan concept in the Westside Specific Plan. The changes
have occurred because of modifications to the project, as well as, the lowering of the Western
Bypass Corridor. Staff has directed the applicant to pay close attention to the original grading
concept as it pertains to the slope behind the residences on Pujol Street.
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the grading plan, provide comments and
direction regarding the design and determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
R:'~iTAFFP, IrC~LrFFMA~.PCW 8/12/97 mf 3
Laudsca,oe Plan
The applicant has submitted a landscape plan for the project. This landscape plan has been
reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect and Staff has provided preliminary comments to
the applicant. Items of particular concern are: re-vegetation of the cut slopes from the
Western Bypass Corridor and the re-vegetation of slope behind the residences on Pujol Street
for aesthetic enhancement and buffering from the proposed uses. Staff has directed the
applicant to play close attention to theses areas.
Upon formal submittal, Staff will again forward the landscape plans to the City' s Landscape
Architect for review.
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the landscape plan, provide comments and
direction regarding the design and determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
The applicant has submitted conceptual elevations for the project components. The arena has
been decreased in size and this has been reflected in the scale and shape of the arena. The
Westside Specific Plan states: "It is anticipated that the Wild West Arena will be a large, tent-
like structure in design and appearance. Other types of designs are acceptable.'
The other components of the plan incorporate design elements contained in the Design
Guidelines of the Westside Specific Plan. No elevations have been provided for the hotel at
this time.
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the elevations, provide comments and direction
regarding the design and determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
Traffic Analysis
A draft Traffic Analysis, dated August 4, 1997, was prepared for this project by Wilbur Smith
Associates (WSA). The Analysis is included as Attachment No. 1 to this Staff Report. This
Analysis was performed to determine the amount of traffic generated by the proposed project
and describes how the traffic compares to the traffic for the previously approved Old Town
Redevelopment Project.
The Analysis states: "Current event/show programming for the project generally schedule most
weekday events and shows commencing at 7:30, 8:00 or 8:30 p.m. On weekends, the
events/shows would be scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m., 3:00-3:30 p.m., or 7:30-8:30 p.m. If
the event/show schedule times are implemented, related traffic impacts would be nominal
during the typical traffic peak-hours on the study area street system."
R:~,STAFFRPT',BUFFMAN.PCV~ 8/12197 mf 4
The analysis concludes: "The results of the WSA traffic 'update demonstrate that, the currenfiy
defined Phase 1 and 2 project would have significantly lower traffic impacts than the previous
study estimated. Modifications to the project land uses, location of uses, and the programmed
schedule of events/shows have cumulatively contributed to the reduction in traffic impacts.'
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the attached Traffic Analysis and determine if
any further analysis is required for the project.
Environmental Impact Report (lilR) Consistency Report
Staff requested the applicant perform an analysis which would determine if the project, as
proposed, is within the scope of the EIR certified for the Old Town Entertainment Project.
An Analysis, entitled "Current Project Consistency With the Certified Environmental Impact
Report" (FIR Consistency Report) was prepared by Tom Dodson and Associates. This is the
same firm which prepared the EIR for the Old Town Re. development Project. This EIR
Consistency Report has been included as Attachment No. 2 to this Staff Report.
The EIR Consistency Report concludes that based upon the evaluation of the new design
concept, implementation of the proposed project would not alter the EIR findings. The EIR
Consistency Report further states: "The only issue of real concern is the change in the cut
slopes which will be lengthened, not increased in height, due to lowering the elevation of the
Western Bypass Corridor. The visual simulation and the required mitigation illustrate how the
aesthetic impacts remain as depicted in the EIR and the cut slope impacts can be reduced to a
nonsignificant level by implementing the rapid and effective re-vegetation of these slopes in
accordance with the mitigation requirements in the EIR.' The applicant has stated that the
visual simulations will be available the night of the workshop.
It is anticipated an Addendum to the previously Certified EIR will be required for this project
and will be brought before the Planning Commission for approval with the Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan for the project.
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the attached EIR Consistency Report and
determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
Westside Specific Plan Consistency Document
Staff requested the applicant also perform an analysis which would determine if:the project as
proposed is consistent with the Westside Specific Plan. An Analysis, entitled "Westside
Specific Plan Project Description and Consistency Evaluation" ('vVestside Specific Plan
Consistency Report) was prepared by Tom Dodson and Associates. This is the same firm that
prepared the EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project and the EIR Consistency Report
above. The Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report has been included as Attachment No. 3
to this Staff Report.
R:~STA]PFRPTXBUFFMAN.I~'W 8/12/97 mf 5
Table 1 of the Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report compares the originally approved
project and the currently proposed project. According to the Westside Specific Plan
Consistency Report, 1,045,500 square feet of development was approved in the Old Town
Redevelopment Project. The Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report states: 'Of these
1,045,500 square feet, the total square footage permitted within the Westside Specific Plan
area in the original concept design is estimated to be about 695,000 square feet, including the
full 100,000 square feet of commercial area allocated in Phases 1 and 2 of the hotel and the
20,000 square feet administrative area. The proposed concept encompasses approximately
459,700 square feet, including 69,960 square feet of commercial support uses. The total
square footage of all proposed facilities falls well within the total square footage originally
proposed and is approximately 235,300 square feet less than originally authorized by the City
when it granted approvals in 1995."
Staff requests the Planning Commission review the attached Westside Specific Plan
Consistency Report and determine if any further analysis is required for the project.
Attachments
2.
3.
4.
Traffic Analysis - Blue Page 7
EIR Consistency Report - Blue Page 8
Westside Specific Plan Consistency Report - Blue Page 9
Exhibits - Blue Page 10
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Vicinity Map
Westside Specific Plan Land Use Map
Site Plan
Grading Plan
Westside Specific Plan Grading Plan
Landscape Plan
Elevations
Color Elevations - Arena
R:XSTAFFRPTXBIJFFMAN.PCW 8/12/97mf 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
August 12, 1997 1:23;xn -- Page 31
8--1~-15~7 1: 1~ ~
~J~l 1~ UI:Sq rfi N~ ~nJ ln ~ ~
rrlA i~
WILBUR '
SMITH
ASSOCIATES
2330 E. KATEtLA AVE. · SL~'~ 275 - ANAH6i4, CA 9'2806-~D47 * (714) 9786110 · FAX (7 14) 978'1109
P. 3
Angler 11, 1997
Zev~
l~,e~aent
41934 M, in Slreet
T~mecula, CA 9259O
Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) is pleased 1o submR this Finn! Report which documents the
key findhgs of the u~fflc study update we hav~ wmpletea for the Old Town Entertainment
Cen~ef project local! in Temeada California. The perpose of ~is study is re-evahm~e waffi~
impa~ of the project based on vadovs r~visio~s whi;h bare been made to ~ Old Town
of t~ Uaffic study updat~ is to assess hnpa~s of the proposed project r~wisions on traffic
gen~,-afion, ana traffic distribution,
The ~ scope of WSA's ~vork is designed to E:Spood to the City of Temecuh's request
to wview the cun~ntly !aopo.~d project plan and verify th~ net ohang~ in tt'~t~ impacts from
lhe original F_,IR study, which would result fxom the revised
A mm'e detailed cle~pfion of work tasks w~cix ~ hvolved bx time FeparaHon of a &lrafi]c
~-ddy upS" for the Old Towu Eutc~ainrueut Ceat~ (OTEC) is provided below:.
1)
Review land use components of the cun'ently defined O'I'EC a~ z~,~ cliffa~nc~s which
wlil reqube a re-evaluation of lzip generation. Any ahangc in the sestlng capacities an~Vor
pl^,ne~ "showa' schedules for the: major project veuu~ will require adjusunems in trip
generation, ~
2)
T~ traitlc gcuecaxion assc~.eut genc~ally applies ~io~ly a~ mi~l~ (~
hte ~on-~ ~y) W ~-~ vehiou~ tc g~on for ~ pmje~ ~
~M for ~ k ~y ev~ ~ S,h,~ ~d~y ~-ho~ m~. ~
~-~ ~s ~t ~e ~d~ ~ d o~on for ~ ~ ~ h ~
~c~' of ~c ~j~ It ~ d~hg ~ ~ ~ ~do~ ~c g~ by ~
Zev Buffman
August 11, 1997
Pagc 2
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES.
project could potentially have the most significant impact on area l~affic operation. A
comparative analysis is presented of the updated project tree generation study findings
and the previous study traffic generation estimates~
3)
Vehicle trip distribution characteristics for the project were re-evaluated and adjusted based
on the current spaeial distribution of activity nodes within the project as well as planned
parking facilities.
4)
Based on the updated project traffic generation (estimated in Task 2) and revised trip
distribution characteristics (evaluated in Task 3), updated traffic assignments of project-
related traffic were developed for the study area street network. Updated project traffic
assignments were developed for both the weekday evening and Saturday midday peak-hour
condition. A comparative analysis was made of the updated project traffic assignments
and the previous study traffic assignments.
5) WSA reviewed the proposed northerly relocation of the Vincent Moraga connection with
the Western Bypass concerning traffic operations and parking accessibility.
Updated Project Land Use
Current project land use, as defined by Temeeula Entertainment, is summarized in Table I.
It should be noted that Phase II uses include one theater (refered to as the "Palace Theater")
which is actually anticipated to be implemented in a third development phase. For purposes
of the cummulative project trifle generation analysis, it is conservatively assumed that this
entertainment venue occurs in Phase IL Based on discussions with Temecula Entertainment,
it is our understanding that Phase I and Phase II are expected to be completed by the fourth
quarter of 1998 and fourth quarter of 1999 repectively.
Project Trip Generation
WSA has carefully reviewed the principal land use components of the revised project including
seating capacities, floor areus, and event sehedulas. It was also important to gain a good
understanding of the planned operations and interrelationships of the various project uses.
d ~ d o,o ~
Zev Buffman
August 1 I, 1997
Page 3
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES,-
One critical refinement which has been made since the last study, relates to the pined
scheduling of shows and events which would occur at the arena and various theaters within the
project. These schedules, which we understand Would be controlled by the project
operator/manager, have a direct affect on the magnitude of project-related traffic impacts which
would be experienced during the normal weekday evening (5:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and Saturday
midday (I :00 to 2:00 p;m. peak-hour periods. Current event/show programming for the project
generally schedule most weekday events and shows commencing at 7:30, 8:00 or g:30 p.m.
On weekends, the events/shows would be scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m., 3:00-3:30 p.m., or
7:30-8:30 p.m. If these event/show schedule times are implemented, related t~afIic impacts
would be nominal during the typical traffic peak-hours on the study area street system.
WSA has taken a very conservative approach in the methodology used to derive project-related
traffic during the highway peak-hour periods. In the case of the arena and theaters, it is
assumed that all venues are operating at maximum seating capacities that a minimum of 10
percent of the generated trips for the event/show would occur during the preceding highway
peak-hour regardless of the time differential. Typically, all attendees arrive well within a 90
minute period preceding "show time." The trip generation analysis also includes the
conservative assumption that the "Food and Wine Court" would at the same layel as featured
dining establishment in terms of its ability to draw public to the project. In reality, most food
court facilities typically operate as an "amenity" to the major attractors such as retail and
principal event/show venues and rarely draw public to a project on their own.
it should be noted that some of the land uses within the project were assessed to be incidental
or passive in nature and are not expected to contribute significantly to the primary attxaction
of vehicle trips to the project. These include the chapel, Roy Rogers Experienee/Mnseum (and
down-sized virtual reality venue), and informal/incidental entertainment components of the
dining and retail core. As described to us, the chapel located on the central courtyard portion
of the project site, would serve as an informal place of rest and self-reflection/medltation for
visitors. The Roy Rogers Experience/museum and virtual reality ride as well as qther general
entenalrmaent components of the project are considered as a secondary-level attractions
available to visitors attending the primary events/shows, dining establishments and retail
shopping attractions. Based on similar entertaiament--oriented projects, these secondroT-level
uses become incidental to the primary attractions. Traffic generation for these uses is
considered insignificant relative to traffic generation for the primmy attractions.
Z~v Buffman
August l I, 1997
Page 4
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES.-
Assumptions used in the derivation of traffic generation for each of the primary project land
uses (which are expected to generate traffic) have been summarized by project phase and are
attached. A summary of gross vehicle trips estkmated to be gen~rate, d by project Phase I and
Phase II during the weekday and Saturday peak-hour periods is presented in Tables 2 and 3
respectively.
A comparison of the gross vehicle trip generation for the currendy defined project Phase I with
the earlier Barton Asehnum study indicates a substantial reduction in gross weekday peak-hour
trips (170 vs. 1,825 inbound vehicles and 50 vs. 780 outbound vehicles). The reduction in
gross Saturday peak-hour vehicle trips is also significant (170 vs. 2,425 inbound vehicles and
170 vs. 850 outbound vehicles).
A similar comparison of cummulative gross vehicle trip generation for the currently defined
project Phase I and II with the earlier Barton Aschraan study of Phase I indicates a smaller but
still significant reduction in weekday peak-hour trips (841 vs. 1,825 inbound vehicles and 435
vs. 780 outbound vehicles). For the Saturday peak hour, the current estimate of cumulative
Phase I and It gross peak-hour vehicle trips is again substantially lower than that estimated
for Phase I in the earlier Barton Aschman study (996 vs. 2,425 inbound vehicles and 660 vs.
850 outbound vehicles).
Gross trip estimates developed for the project are adjusted to reflect the interaction of trips
between individual uses on the project site and Old Town Temecula. This trip interaction is
referred to as "internal lril>-making" and occurs in the pedestrian mode of travel. For Phase
I of the project, the analysis conservatively assumes that no internal trip-making occurs. In
reality, there would be opportunity for trip interactions between the arena and Old Town. For
Phase lI, it is assumed that up to 65 percent of the hotel trips would be internal to the project
and Old Town. It in also assumed that up to 50 percent of the dining and retail trips would
be internal to the project and Old Town. These are basically the same internal trip-making
assumptions applied in the previous study.
Illustrated summaries of the final "adjusted" trip generation assessment for Project Phase II
(Weekday Evening and Saturday Midday Peak-Hour) conditions are provided in Figures la and
2a. Also provided, for comparison, are the previous traffic study trip generation summaries
Table 2
Phase I Trip Generation
Old Town Entertainment Center
WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR (5:00 P.M. TO 5:00 P.M.)
LAND USE COMPONENTS INBOUND
Wild West Arena
Administration/Back of House
160
10
170
VEHICLE TRIPS
OUTBOUND
0
50
50
TOTAL
160
60
220
SATURDAY PEAK HOUR (1:00 P,M. TO 2:00 P.M.)
LAND USE COMPONENTS
Wild West Arena
Administration/Back of House
INBOUND
160
10
170
VEHICLE TRIPS
OUTBOUND
160
10
170
TOTAL
320
20
340
Table 3a -' '
Phase II Trip GeneraUon I~)
WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR (5:00 P.M. TO 6:00 P.M.)
Old Town Entertainment Center
LAND USE COMPONENTS
GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS
INBOUND OUTBOUND
TOTAL
I a Wild West Arena 200 0 200
2 Celibrity 73 0 73
3 Studio Theater 25 25 50
4 Western Dinner Theater 17 0 17
7 Palace Theater 73 0 73
Sub-Total 388 25 413
5 Food and Wine Court 60 30 90
6a Dining 80 20 80
6b Retail 220 220 440
Sub-Total 340 270 610
8 Hotel 103 90 193
I b Administration/Back of House 10 50 60
Total 841 435 1,276
(1) Trip generation represents gross vehicle tdps without adjuslment for intemal trip-making,
Table 3b *
Phase II Trip Generation (~}
SATURDAY PEAK HOUR (1:00 P,M, TO 2:00 P,M,)
old Town Entertainment Center
LAND USECOMPONENTS
GROSS VEHICLE TRIPS
INBOUND OUTBOUND
TOTAL
I a Wild West Arena 200 200 400
2 Celibdty 73 0 73
3 Studio Theater 75 10 85
4 Western Dinner Theater 42 0 42
7 Palace Theater 73 0 73
Sub-Total 463 210 673
5 Food and Wine Court 60 30 90
6a Dining 60 20 80
6b Retail 300 300 600
Sub-Total 420 350 · 770
8 Hotel 103 90 193
1 b Administration/Back of House 10 10 20
Total 996 660 1,656
(1) Tdp generation represents gross vehicle tdps without adjustment for internal trip-making.
Zev Buffman
August 11, 1997
Page 5
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES
for the same analysis periods. These are shown in Figure Ib and 2b for the weekday and
Saturday peak-hours respectively.
Findings of the updated trip generation analysis are as follows:
Net vehicle trip generation for the revised project Phase I land use is 170 inbound and 50
outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 170 inbound and 170 outbound
vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour.
Net cumulative vehicle trip generation for the revised project Phase I and H land use is
539 inbound and 216 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and 672
inbound and 322 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour.
For comparison, the net vehicle trip generation for the earlier defined project Phase I land
use wus 995 inbound and 325 outbound vehicle trips during the weekday peak hour and
1,475 inbound and 330 outbound vehicle trips during the Saturday peak hour.
Trip generation for the currently proposed Project Phase I represents less than 17 peteera
of the total weekday peak hour trip generation es~.imated in the EIR traffic study. In this
case the reduction in peak hour trips is fairly evenly distributed between inbound and
outbound traffic.
Saturday midday peak hour trip generation for the revised Project Phase I represents less
than 19 percent of the total trip generation estimated in the EIR traffic study. For the
Saturday peak hour, the greatest reduction in trips occurs in the inbound traffic direction.
The new outbound traffic estimate represents approximately 52 percent of the outbound
traffic given in the EIR study.
Cumulative weekday peak hour trip generation for the currently proposed Project Phase
I and 1I represents approximately 54 percent of the total Phase I EIR study trip generation
with dose to equal trip reduction in both the inbound and outhound directions.
o<~
rn
,,,o~c
LEGEND
OLD TOWN SPECIRC PLAN
ENTERTAINMENT ' CORE'
ENTERTAINMEifr 'CORE" TRIP DISTRIBUllON
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
CiTY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN FIEDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
r
PHASE
PROJECT WEEKDAY EVENING PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I ~arton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVeLOPRENT PROJECT
PROJECT SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
[ Barton-Aschman Associates. Inc; Flck
CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
[ Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
CITY OF TSMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMSNT PROJSCT
N.T.~.
PROJEGT WEEKDAY EVENINe PEAK-HOUR TRAFFIO VOLUME8
14.T.~
/'74- .
~ ~4~ 7T I'~c~rcr T~F~tC j
1996 PROJECT SATURDAY MIDDAY PEAK;HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
I Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. RIot
CITY OF TEMECULA - OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT U
Zev Buffman
August I1, 1997
Page 7
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES- ·
Fincent Moraga Drive F~tension Realignment
The specific issue which was requested to be addressed involves the proposed realignanent of
Vincent Moraga Drive extension to the Western Bypass at the north end of the project site.
In the Conceptual Master Plan, the proposed alignment of the Vincent Momga Drive extension
resulted in a bisection of the parking area located at the north end of the site. This presented
a situation which required access drives to three separate parking lots formed by the road
alignment. This parking access layout would have resulted in a relatively high potential for
turning movement conflicts, related accidents, and traffic congestion.
As currently proposed, the alignment of the Vincent Moraga Drive extension is shifted north
in a manner which would essentially place all parking on the south side. With this
configuration, only two parking lots would be formed with a collector-type street serving as
access to both lots. The proposed intersection spacing along the Vincent Moraga Drive
extension is more favorable than in the Conceptual Master Plan and fewer potential turning
movement conflicts would result. With the current street alignment and parking layout WSA
recommends parking access locations as depicted in Figure 6.
Conclusions
The results of the WSA traffic update demonstrate that, the currently defined Phase I and
combined Phase I and II project would have signi~can~y lower Waffle impacts than the
previous study estimated. This is evident by the comparative f'mdings of both the trip
generation analysis as well as the trip assignment evaluation. Modifications to the project land
uses, location of uses, and the programmed schedule of events/shows have cumulatively
contributed the reduction in traffic impacts.
~,t,~ ,~, ~ Cr
Zev Buffman
August 11, 1997
WILBUR
SMITH
ASSOCIATES-
Should you have any questions concerning our findings, please contact me (714) 97g-g110.
Sincerely,
WILBUR SM1TH ASSOCIATES
Robert A. Davis
Principal Transportation Planner
RAD:rad
Attachments
pH~sL _~ T,q~p C=r~ur,~7~t]
~B()D + 3 = I~0D v~tazs
Ib
I~GOO X O. tO = 74;0 'VDfiCz~ ¢oTSouuD
A-I
Z
X, o. 10= Z~vr,,NrJ. A~
200 v~f leS~e.e
ovr,,oura~w~
IooX 0.7.5 -' ZS yXT~I:,/,i~ INaDU~D
30 + I- Z PPV = ZS"' i/r_~/gz-i~' OuT8~
5":oo ~ & :~o PH
(,C) ."5 '-' Z~ vEmczrj
~b
226 yF~nx< D~
P~t~cz, THT,47x~ - Z/22)D Pf~$md& -,' 3 PPr = '73~
-- 2/~vzHtczl.,f X O, IO= ~OOvgN.
= Xo. IO--2OOITN
2,.:00 PN
5'
A-+
~.b Rrralt. Cs~tatr (44, SaoF'rz) POt ~ l~.r~_ ~:~t~-r~2.:~o pt.4--
PatAcS: 'FBSd(7~ - Z / Zbo Pz~.ro~s,~ .--' 3 Pl'v = P/ ~..~ YS..HlCt:ES
"733 X' O.l~ --, "/3 Yrt..Bttd..[5 INSo~AID
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EIR CONSISTENCY REPORT
R:\STAFFRPTXBUFFMAN.PC'W 8112197 mf 8
CURRENT PROJECT CONSISTENCY
WITH THE
CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Introduction
In 1995 the City of Temecula certified as final the "Old Town Redevelopment Project Environmental
Impact Report" (EIR). This EIR evaluated the potentially significant impacts fi'om developing a
number of entertainment venues, hotels, support commercial uses, and residential uses within Old
Town Temecula and an area to the southwest termed the Westside Specific Plan (WSP) area. The
WSP was also evaluated in the EIR. The approvals and the facilities contained in the original design
concept are described in Enclosure 1 to this document, i.e. the Westside Specific Plan Project
Description and Consistency Evaluation..
The applicant is requesting the City of Temecula approve specific development plans to implement
a portion of the Old Town Redevelopment Project, and the City has requested that the applicant
submit an evaluation of the consistency of the current design concept, as depicted in the specific
development plans, with the findings and conclusions contained in the certified EIR. Copies of the
specific development plans (revised site and grading plans) are being submitted under separate cover
and the current project description is provided in Enclosure 1.
Determimng consistency with the certified EIR actually emails a reevaluation of the current specific
development plans with all of the environmental issues addressed in the ELR, including the Initial
Study which the City utilized to narrow the focus of the EIR An analysis of each of the
environmental issues is presented below which compares the current project with the findings in the
Initial Study and EIR for the original design concept. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines
indicates that "no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless that lead agency
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record. one or more of the
following:"
Substantial changes are proposed in the project that may cause new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
2
Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken and which may result in new significant environmental effects or the severity of
previously identified significant effects; or
3
New information of substantial importance shows the project will have one or more
significant effects not previously discussed.
Each issue will be evaluated in the context of the above thresholds. The issues are presented in the
same order that they occur within the original Initial Study which can be found at Appendix 8, 1 in
the certified Final EIR. The Initial Study prepared to support the findings presented below is
presented on the City's new Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form which is consistent with the
current State CEQA Guidelines.
Specific Environmental Issue Evaluation
I. Earth Resource Issues
The earth resource issues were addressed in the linUal Study and after identifying nutigation measures to reduce
potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant
adverse impact. Detailed geotechnical studies were available for the project site and none of the earth resource
circumstances has changed since the approval in 1995. Allhough the current design concept envisions more structures.
the total square footage proposed in the current design concept encompasses 459,700 square feet (ft2) which is less than
could have been built under the City's 1995 approvals (695,000 ft: )as smnmanzed in Enclosure 1. All mitigaUon
measures identified for the project in the Initial Study were adopted by the City and all of these measures can and will
be Implemented by the applicant. The basic footprint of grading activity for the project remains essentially the same
(encompassing WSP areas A. B and C, as proposed in the original EIR. with proposed cut slopes identified for the
Westem By-pass being unplemented at a 1.5/1 slope ratio (horizontal to vertical). This is consistent with the original
topographic modifications. but with shghfly longer slopes (20 feet ma~mum) due to the elevation at which the Western
By-pass Road will be oonsffucted. Such slopes require certification as sintable by a qualified gootechnical professional
before they can be constructed and the modifications are consis~nt with the discussion in the EIR. With certification
by the geotechnical engineer, the earth resource impacts can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level.
Based on ttus review. unplementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. s~gm~cant earth resource effects: no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new.
s~gm~cant earth resource effects: and no new informanon shows the project will have new, significant earth resource
effects not previously discussed. Therefore, earth resource impacts from implementing the current design concept
remmn nons~gntficunt and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
2 Air Quaht?,.
Air quainy was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant. and it was, therefore. evaluated in the EIR
Both short- and long-term air quality impacts were quantified as being sigm~cant. A review of construenon ermssinns
znchcates that fugtuve dust enussions calculaUon was based on a total of 87 acres of construction at a g~ven time, The
proposed project will encompass approximately 80 acres of area (47 acres in Area A). ten acres of adjacent area for
mass grading, and about 23 acres in the First Street and Western By-pass corndurs. Thus. construction emassions,
including fugmve dust are forecast to be less than identified in the EIR and. even though significant. the current design
concept will not cause greater constmcuon emissions, Project operation, or long-term enussions. were based on traffic
flows assocmted with a total of 1,045.500 square feet (ft2 ) of facilities and the proposed project envisions only 459,700
fl: offacdines. Eznlssions from these facilities will be less, both because facilities will utilize less eneFgy and because
overall traffic flow will be reduced due to fewer square feet of entertmnment venue destinations. All mitigauon
measures tdenttlied in the EIR will be Implemented as required, but both short- and long-term air qualit>.' impacts will
remain significant. but well within the forecast contained in the ELF,.
Based on this re,aew, unplementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, sigmficant air quality_ effects: no substantial changes ui circumstances have occurred which may cause new.
significant mr quality effects; and no new information shows the project will have new. significant air quality effects
not prexqously dig. Therefore. air quality impacts from implementing the current design concept reinran within
the scope of analysis contained in the certified ErR.
3. ~zter
The water issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigauon measures to reduce potential
adverse impacts, it was concluded that the ongthal project would not cause or experience any significant adverse
impact. Three issues were addressed under this topic: surface nmoff and flood hazards; water quality; and water
consumption. The evaluanon in the Imtial Study showed that surface runoff/flood haTard impacts would be controlled
by retaining added surface nmoff from development on Area A and delivenng it to Mumeta Creek wzthout caasmg
increased flooding downstream or erosion, This circumstance has not changed with the current design concept. The
uses and area affected by the projea have not changed and the water quality mitigation will apply equally to the current
pro. lea. Finally, everall water consumption will be reduced due to the overall reduction in square footage of uses, With
mxplemenlation of the identified nUtiganon measures. the cun~nt design concept impacts will continue to be nutagated
tea nonsignificant level.
Based on this review, unplementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. significant water resource effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
significant water resource effects~ and no new information shows the project will have new, significant water resource
effects not previously discussed. Therefore. water resource impacts from implementing the current design concept
remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EER.
4 Biological Resource Issues
Biological resources were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was, therefore, evaluated
in the EIR All biological resource impacts, including endangered species, habitat and weftand issues. were deternuned
to be potentially significant, but mittgable to a nonsignificant level after application of extensive mitigation, A review
of the footpnnt of the proposed current design concept footpnnt indicates that the same amount of acreage will be
di~ m the WSP area. in the bridge comaors, and in the First Street areas of disturbance as projected in the EIP,.
Within the WSP and along the Western By-pass the E1R evaluation assumed that all 87.9 acres would be disturbed.
including the area required for cuts and fills along the corndot. No specific definition of the boundaries of the cuts
and fills was possible when the EIR was completed, but an accurate estimate of distmbance was possible based on the
footprint of the total area of disturbance. Subsequently, negotiauons with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)
identified mitigation that was accepted for the area to be disturbed as defined in the Eli. anderstandlng that exact
acreage could not be precisely dotonmned until final engineenng was completed. As a result, extra mitigation for
disturbance was proposed and accepted by FWS and full mitigation has been provided for endangered species and
habitat losses. All mitigation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented and based on negotiated regalatory
permits. the impacts will remain within the forecast conhuned in the EIR.
Based on this revaew, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant biological resource effects: no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause
new. sigmficant biological resource effects: and no new information shows the project will have new, significant
biological resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore. biological resource impacts from implementing the
current design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the cenilied EIK
6 Noise
Noise was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and it was. therefore. evaluated in the EIR. Both
short- and long-term noise impacts were quantified and deternuned to be potentially significant. but miUgable to a
noaslgntficant level. A mew of the proposed current design concept footpnnt indicates that the same general mount
of acreage will be disturbed during construction, the noise impacts can be reduced to a nonsignificant level through
the mitigation measures identified in the EIR. The noise impacts from operating the facilities in Old Town becomes
a moot point since no facilities are imtially proposed in this area. The noise impacts from the arena and other facilities
3
in Area A will be reduced even further than proposed mitigation because the arena will be a solid, insulatoJ structure
that will contain noise from operations much better than the original tent. All pertinent natigaUon measures identified
in the EIR will be implemented and based on implementalion of these measures. the impacts will reinran within the
forecast contained in the EIR.
Based on this rewew, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new~ s~gnificant noise efteels; no substantial changes in circumstances have occuned which may cause new, sigmficant
noise effects: and no new information shows the project will have new, significant noise effects not previously
discussed. In fact, the current design concept will reduce overall operational nosie impacts. Therefore. noise impacts
from tmplemenung the currant design concept remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained th the
certified EIR.
7 LIght and Glare
The light and glare issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying rmtiigation measures to reduce
potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant
adverse napact Light and glare impacts are controlled by meeting requirements (absolute thresholds) established by
Cal Tech for the Mt. Palomar Observatory. These same measures must be applied to current design concept and the
net result is no additional hght and glare impacts. With implementation of the required mitigauon measurel the light
and glare impacts can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level.
Based on this rewew, Implementation of the cunent design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant hght and glare effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new.
significant hght and glare effects: and no new informaUon shows the project will have new, significant light and glare
effects not previously discussed. Therefore, light and glare impacts from implementing the current design concept
remain nouslgm~cant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
8 Land Use
Land use was one of the issues identified as being potentially significant. and it was, therefore, evaluated in the EIR.
All land use impacts, including land use conflicts and consistency. with existing General Plan land use designations.
are nungable to a nousigmficant level alter application of mitigation. Land uses within Area A remain consistent with
the onganal uses as outlined in Enclosure 1. A review of the proposed current design concept indicates that the same
nutigauon will ensure that all land use impacts are mitigated to a nonsignificant level. The designation of the open
space area remains as originally envisioned tall property west of the Western By-pass Road), and other potential land
use conflicts are reduced even further than envisioned in the EIR by inclusion of the additional noise attenuation in
the design All miUgation measures identified in the EIR will be implemented and land use impacts will be reduced
to a nous~gmficant level.
Based on this rewew, implementa~on of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project vv~th
new. significant land use effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new.
signdicant land use effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant land use effects not
prewously discussed. Therefore, land use impacts from implementing the current design concept remain within the
scope of analysis continned in the certified EIR.
9. Natural Resources
The natural resource, mineral, issues were addressed in the Initial Study. and it was concluded that the original project
would not cause or experience any significant adverse impact because no mineral resources will be affected by the
project. The proposed current design concept has not potential to alter this conclusion since no such resources occur
witlun the area of potential effect. Thus. natural resource impacts remain nonsignificant.
4
Based on this review, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant natural resource effects; no subslantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
significant natural resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant natural
resource effects not previously discussed. Therefore, natural resource impacts from implementing the current design
concept remain nousigniticant and within the scope of analysis contained in the conflied EIR.
10. Risk of Upset
The nsk of upset issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not
cause or expenence any significant adverse impact because policies and measures included in the City's General Plan
guide management and control of such upsets. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this
conclusion since the sa~ne policies and measures apply to the new project. Thus, risk of upset impacts remain
nonsigniticant.
Based on this review, unplementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. significant risk of upset effects; no substantial changes in circumsmces have occurred which may cause new.
significant risk of upset effects; and no new information shows the project will have new. significant risk of upset
effects not previously discussed. Therefore, risk of upset trapacts from implementing the current design concept remain
nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified El?,.
l l. Populanon
The population issues were addressed in the Imtial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause
or experience any significant adverse impact because population increases associated with the original project were
not forecast to exceed growth thresholds. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion
since the total development proposed andsr this concept is less than haft of the scope of development envisioned in the
original project. Popalauon increases should be comparably decreaseck thus, population impacts reinran nonsignificant.
Based on this review, unplemenlation of the current design concept does not pose subslantial change in the project with
new, significant population effects: no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
s~gnkficant pepulauon effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant population effects
not previously discussed. The development proposed is likely to reduce overall potential population impacts of the
project because a lower demand will be created for new employees. Therefore, population impacts from implementing
the current design concept remain nonsigniticant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
12. Housing
The housing issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause
or exlJenence any significant adverse impact because housing demands associated with the original project were not
forecast to exceed housing development capacity. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this
conclusion since the total development proposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development
envxsloned in the original project. Housing demand increases should be comparably decreased, thus, housing impacts
remain nonsignificant.
Based on this renew, implementation of the current desitm concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant housing effects; no subslantiai changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
significant housing effects: and no new information shows the project will have new, significant housing effects not
previously discussed. The development proposed is likely to reduce overall potential housing demand impacts of the
project because a lower demand will be genemtod by new employees. Therefore, housing impacts from implementing
the current design concept reinran nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
5
]3, Transportation/Circulation
Transportation/circulation issues were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant, and they were,
therefore, evaluated in the EIR. All uansportaUon/circulanon impacts are mitigable to a nonsignificant level afU:r
application of mitigation, including the construction of major infrastroctun improvements such as two bridges.
fleeway interchange unpmvements, and the Western By-pass road to Vincent Moraga Road. A review of the proposed
current design concept indicates that traffic will be redirected from Old Town to Area A, and the mitigation for access
to Area A. as identi:~ed in the rewsed traffic report will ensure that all transportation/circulation impacts are nutigated
to a nons~gni~cant level. All nutigation measures identified in the EIR and the revised traffic study will be
implemented and traffic/circulation impacts will be reduced to a nonsiguificant level. The traffic study is attached as
Enclosure 2.
Based on this rexnew, implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. sigxfi~cant transportation/circulation effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may
cause new, significant transportation/circulation effects; and no new information shows the project will have new.
sigm~cant transportation/circulation effects not previously discussed, The bottom line with the
transportation/circulation impacts for the current design concept is that impacts can be fully mitigated as outlined in
the attached traffic study. Therefore, transportanon/circulation impacts from implementing the current design concept
remain within the scope of analysis continned in the certified
14. Public Ser~,ices
The public service issues were addressed in the Initial Study and after identifying mitigation measures to reduce
potential adverse impacts, it was concluded that the original project would not cause or experience any significant
adverse unpact Pubhc service impacts will be nutigated by providing resources (infrastructure and capacity increases)
to address those service impacts where demand requires mitigation, and through no effect for other impacts, like
recreation facilities. These same measures must be applied to current design concept and, as a result of reduced
demand because of the reduced size of the project, the net result is that there will be no increase in public service
demand impacts. With implementation of the required mitigation measure, the public service impacts either remain
nonsignificant. or can be mitigated to a nonsignificant level.
Based on this review, implementation of the currein desig~ concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. significant public service effects: no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
significant public service effects: and no new information shows the project will have new. significant public service
effects not previously discussed. Therefore, public service impacts from implemenung the current design concept
remain nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
15. Energy
The energy issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause
or experience any significant adverse energy mipact because adequate energy resources were available to meet forecast
demand. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the total development
pmposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development envisioned in the original project. Energy.
demand increases should be comparably decreased, thus, energy impacts mmmn nonsignificant.
Based on has mew, Implementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. signfficant energy effects: no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
s~gm~cant energy effects: and no new informanon shows the project will have new, significant energy effects not
prewously discussed. Therefore, energy artpacts from implementing the current design concept remain nonsignificant
and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
16. Utilities
The utility issues were addressed in the Initial Study. It was concluded that the original project would not cause or
experience any significant adverse utility impacts because adequate infrastructure connections are available at the
property's periphery. As a result of reduced demand because of the reduced size of the project, the net result is that
there will be no increase in overall utility demand impacts. With implementation of the required mitigation measure.
the utility impacts either remain nonsignificant.
Based on tins mew, nnplementation of the current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project witit
new. significant mility effects; no substantial changes in circummnces have occurred which my cause new. significant
utility effects: and no new information shows the project will have new, significant utility effects not previously
discussed. Therefore, utility impacts from implementing the current design concept remmn nonsignificant and within
the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
17 Health Risk
The health risk issues were addreSSed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original project would not cause
or experience any significant adverse health risk impact because the proposed uses do not entml activities that create
health risks. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since the uses reinran the
same and total development proposed under this concept is less than half of the scope of development envisioned in
the original project. Health risk impacts should be comparably decreased. thus. health risk impacts remain
nonsignificant.
Based on this rmaew, nnplementat~on of the cun-ent desig~ concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new. significant health risk effects; no substantial changes in circttmsta.ncos have occurred which may cause new,
significant health risk efteels; and no new information shows the project will have new. sigm~cant health risk effects
not previously discussed. Therefore, health risk impacts from implementing the current design concept remain
nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
]8..4esthetics
Aesthetic/visual impacts were one of the issues identified as being potentially significant. and they were, ~erefore,
evalualed in the ElK All aeslhetic trapacts were detenmned to be mitigable to a nonsignificant level after applicatton
ofe.'cteusive antigauon, nicludmg rapid revege~aon offfie cut dopes along the Western By-pass Road and on ~e berm
adjacent to reddents on Pujol Slreet A review of the proposed cttrmnt design concept indicates that the original pad
elevation will be lower than shown in visual simulations: that the large mass of the hotel will be divided into several
structures: and the tent-like arena will be replaced wiffi a smaller, building. Cut slope length will be increased relative
to that prevtonsly shown, but revegetation identified to antigate this impact will be implemented as envisioned in the
certi~ed EHt.. This is shown in the new visual simulation of the project developed to illustrate the changes from the
original design concept. The large scale visual simulation is being submitted separately, but copies of ~ese gmphies
am attached as Enclosure 3 to substantiate this conclusion. Implementation of all proposed nutigation measures can
ensure that all aesthetic impacls wilJ be mitigated to a nonsignificant level. All mitigation measures identified in the
EIR will be implemented and aesthetic impacts will be reduced to a nonsignificant level.
Based on this mwew, implementation of die curmat design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant aesthetic effects; no substantial changes in circumstances have occurred which may cause new,
significant aesthetic effects: and no new information shows the project will have new, significant aesthetic effects not
previously discussed. The net effect with the aesthetic impacts for the current design concept is that impacts can be
fully mitigated in the same manner as for the ongnial design concept by utilizing the same intensive cut slope
revegetation program. Therefore, aesthetic impacts from implementing the current design concept remain within ate
scope of analysis contained in the certified Ell.
7
19, Recreation
The recreanon issues were ~ddref~ ill file Illilia] Stndy and it was concluded that the onginal project would not cause
or experience any significant adverse recreation impact because the proposed uses provide recreation and do not affect
any existing or future recreation uses. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion
since the uses remain the same. Recreation impacts remain nonsignificant under the current design concept.
Based on this review, tmplementa~on of file current design concept does not pose substantial change in the project with
new, significant recreation effects: no subslantial changes in circumslances have occurred which may cause new,
sxgm~cant recreation effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant recreation effects
not previously discussed. Therefore. recreation impacts from implementing the current design concept remain
nonsignificant and within the scope of analysis contained in the certified EIR.
20. Cultural Resources
The cultural resource issues were addressed in the Initial Study and it was concluded that the original projecl would
not cause or experience any significant adverse cultural resource impact because no cultural resources occur within
Area A based on site specific surveys and because no facilities will be placed within Old Town at this time where
lUstorical stxucturos exist. The proposed current design concept has no potential to alter this conclusion since file uses
remain file same and file area affected remmns file same, Cultural resource impacts remain nonsignificant under the
current design concept.
Based on this renew. implementalion of the current desig~ concept does not pose substantial change in file project with
new, significant cultural resource effects: no substantial changes in circumslances have occurred which may cause new,
significant cultural resource effects; and no new information shows the project will have new, significant cultural
resource effects not prev~oasly discussed. Therefore, cultural resource impacts from implementing the current design
concept remain nonsignificant and within file scope of analysis continned in file certified EIR.
Conclusion
The purpose of this analysis has been to determine whether the current design concept, which
represents two years of design evolution and facility selection for Area A of the WSP, will cause
additional or different significant effects than those forecast in the EIR certified by the City in 1995.
Fundamentally, the current design concept remains relatively close to the original in terms of focus
and types of uses. As discussed in Enclosure 1, the original structures in Area A of the WSP have
been separated to support uses that were originally envisioned to be contained within one facility,
such as the auditorium/opera house being separated from the hotel and the museum being separated
from the wild west arena, Based on the evaluation of the new design concept as presented above,
implementation the current project would not alter the EIR findings. The only issue of real concern
is the change in the cut slopes which will be lengthened, not increased in height, due to lowering the
elevation of the Western By-pass road The visual simulation and the required mitigation illustrate
how the aesthetic impacts remain as depicted in the EIR and the cut slope impacts can be reduced to
a nonsignificant level by implementing the rapid and effective revegetation of these slopes in
accordance with mitigation requirements in the EIR,
8
ENCLOSURE 1
WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND
CONSISTENCY EVALUATION
SEE ATTACHMENT NO. 3
ENCLOSURE 2
TRAFFIC STUDY
SEE ATTACHMENT NO. I
ENCLOSURE3
AESTHETIC DATA
INCLUDING
VISUAL SIMULATIONS
TO BE SUBMITTED
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
WESTSIDE SPECI]~IC PLAN
CONSISTENCY REPORT
R:\STAFFRPT~BUFFMAN.PCW 8/12/9'Traf 9
WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND
CONSISTENCY EVALUATION
lntrodnction
As oriOnally envisioned, the Temecula entertainment venue was to develop simultaneously in the Old
Town portion of the City and within the Westside Specific Plan area located northeast of the Western
Bypass corridor, southwest &Old Town. These two development areas (Old Town and Westside
Specific Plan) were approved for a mixture of commercial entertainment facilities, hotels, support
(ancillary) facilities, and residential uses by the City in 1995. The approved land uses were perhapg
best summarized in the "Facts, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations" adopted by the
City of Temecula when it approved the whole project and certified Environmental Impact Report in
1995. Attachment A contains a list of project components approved for development as summarized
in the "Facts,"which can be developed, with appropriate subsequent review, in the two phases of the
project. See Attachment A.
As the City is aware, the actual construction of the entertainment venue has been delayed for a variety
of reasons, including delays due to legal challenges to the project and the efforts to justify funding
of the extensive infrastructure that must be installed when the project is developed. A few of the
major infrastructure components include: the Western By-pass and First Street bridges over Murrieta
Creek; installation of the required paved section of the Western By-pass from the Front
Street/Highway 79 South/Interstate 15 interchange to Vincent Moraga Drive; and all of the water,
sewer, and other utility infrastructure systems required to support the facilities permitted by the
Westside Specific Plan In order to obtain the significant funding commitments required to construct
tile entertainment venue in the City in conformance with the City's 1995 approvals, the project has
evolved from the original concept as outlined in Attachment A, to a current concept that has been
designed to be consistent with the Westside Specific Plan, yet reflect the fundamental project
components that are necessary to attract the substantial funds required to build all facilities, including
the extensive infrastructure required to support the project.
-ru demonstrate consistency of the current design concept for the entertainment venue with the
original approvals, particularly the Westside Specific Plan, a comparison of the original and proposed
design components is presented below. Note that certain uses have been transferred from Old Town
to Area "A" of the Westside Specific Plan (WSP) as "ancillary" uses to the hotel and wild wes~ arena.
This has been necessary to support the costs of the required infrastructure improvements defined in
the original approvals. It also overcomes the lack of economically viable sites in Old Town where
no specific sites were shown in the original applications because of the difficulty of consolidating
adequate building and parking areas. Keep in mind that Phase I, as defined in the original certified
EIR and in the approvals referenced in Attachment A, encompassed almost all of the proposed
emei~ainment facilities summarized in Attachment B Phase 2 was proposed to consist of support
conm~ercial and residential uses as required to support the overall success of the entertainment venue.
As is demonstrated below, the proposed conceptual design now being presented to the City is fully
consistent with the total scope of facilities envisioned and approved in the project original approvals,
and even thoughthe current focus has shifted from Old Town to the WSP area, additional facilities
remain to be sited in Old Town as demand for additional entertainment facilities evolves in the future.
A time line (schedule) for the project as currently proposed is provided as Attachment C to this
document.
Table 1 summarizes the square footage for each proposed entertainment venue facility and other
facilities approved by the City of Temecula, such as the hotel. The square footage of facilities as
envisioned in the original design concept and the current design concept are presented below. Where
a facility is not shown in the current design concept side of Table 1, it is being deferred to the future
as discussed above.
Original Desi~.n Concept
Cabaret Theatre (2)
27,000 ft2/45,000
Location: Old Town
2 Western Saloon (2)
lifO00 fi2 each
Location: Old Town
Opera House
75.000 ~: building footprint
Location; Old Town
4. Showboat
21,000 ft2
Location: Old Town
Wild West Arena
175,000 ~?, 85-90 feet height
Location: WSP area
Table I
Square Footage Summary
of
Entertainment Facilities
Current Design Concept
Cabaret Theater/Western Music Dinner Theatre (1)
20,000 ft2
Location: ancillary to hotel in the WSP area
Western Saloon/Rockin Rodeo( 1 )
12,000 ft2
Location: ancillary to hotel in the WSP area
Opera House/Celebrity Auditorium
50,000 fi2 building footprint
Location: ancillary to Hotel in the WSP area
Showboat (deferred to future)
No change at this time
No change at this time
Wild West Arena
105,000 ft2,75 feet height
Location WSP area
2
l0
ll
13¸
14
15.
Virtual Reality Pavilion (3)
19,000 It2, total 57,000 fi2
Location: Old Town
"Quick Draw" Competition Area
8,000 ft2
Location: Old Town
Hotel
300,000 It2 initial; additional
100,000 It2 for additional 150
rooms when justified in future
Location: WSP area
Hotel Retail Commercial
50,000 ~2/50,000 ft2
Location: WSP area, ancillary
to hotel
Retail Commercial
50,000-100,000 ft2
Location: Old Town
Visitor Center/Ticket Office (1+)
5,500 fi2
Location: Old Town
Administrative Space
20,000 ft2
Location: open
Virtual RealityExperience
7,200 It2
Location: WSP, a pan of the Roy Rogers/Dale Evans
Museum, ancillary to Wild West Arena
"Quick Draw" Competition Area (deferred to future)
No change at this time
No change at this time
Hotel
125,000 It2,275 rooms
Location: WSP area
Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Exhibition
-23,000 It2, including Virtual Reality Experience
Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena
Temecula Wine & Food Exhibition
30,000 It2
Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena
Chapel
1,600 It2
Location: WSP area, ancillary to the Wild West Arena
Hotel Retail Commercial
69,600 It2, kiosks, shops, restaurants
Location: WSP area, ancillary to hotel
Deferred to the Future
Visitor Center
2,500 It2
Location: WSP area, ancillary to Wild West Arena
Administrative Space
Same
Location: WSP area, part of Arena or Theatre
3
16
Festival Square
20,000 ft2
Location: Old Town
Arena Plaza/ions of the Pioneers Music Plaza
Small gazebo stage/~500-1,000 fF
Location: WSP area, ancillary to Wild West Arena
Based on the summary provided above, the total square footage of building space under the original
design concept is 1,045,500 fi2, excluding the outdoor facilities such as the "Quick Draw" and
Festival Square areas. Of this 1,045,500 fi2, the total square footage permitted within the WSP area
in the original concept design and with City approvals is estimated to be about 695,000 fi2, including
the fall 100,000 f? of commercial area allocated in Phases 1 and 2 of the hotel and the 20,000 ft2
administrative area. The current design concept encompasses approximately 459,700 ~2, including
69,960 ft2 of commercial support uses. Thus, the total square footage of all proposed facilities falls
well within the total square footage and is approximately 235,300 ~2 less than originally authorized
by the City when it granted approvals in 1995.
What are the major diflirences between the current and original design concept? Perhaps the greatest
change is a decision to disaggregate the massing of square footage originally allocated to the hotel
and Wild West Arena into several structures. All of the facilities proposed in the current conceptual
design are ancillary or supportive to the two primary facilities (hotel and Wild West Arena) that were
approved for Area A of the WSP. Some uses have been transferred from the Old Town area, but it
is our interpretation that comparable facilities were envisioned in the WSP authorization, such as the
auditorium (opera house), wine and food exhibition hall (exhibition uses), and cabaret theatre (dinner
theatre) in support of the hotel, and the museum (Roy Rogers/Dale Evans Museum/Exhibition
facility) in support of, or as part of the Wild West Arena. Similarly, the approximately 69,600 fF
of commercial area is consistent with the Phase 1 and 2 allocations of commercial square footage
allocated as part of the hotel.
Although the original footprints of buildings have been altered, the focus on the western theme for
the entertainment venue has not changed and by disaggregating the facilities through redesign, the
visual impacts of the large hotel and arena structures will be reduced, enhancing the visual setting
coinpared to the original design concept. In particular, the original design concept of the hotel
showed a very large massed visual feature and the arena was envisioned as circus/tent-like structure
with stripes in the design concept presently under consideration by to the City, both of these
facilities have been redesigned by creating several structures, thereby reducing the overall visual
lrnpacl of the project In addition, by enclosing the arena structures and providing for insulation and
climate control, potential noise impacts to residences along Pujol have been substantially reduced.
For these reasons, we believe that the proposed, i.e. current, design concept is fully consistent with
the WSP requirements and overall approvals granted to the project in 1995.
ATTACHMENT A
Entertainment Venue
Summary of Project Components
Summary of Approvals
The City ofTemecula approved Master Conditional User Permit (Planning Application No. 94-0061),
the Westside Specific Plan (Planning Application No. 95-0003), Tentative Tract Map No. 28011
(Planning Application No 95-0004) and Development Agreement No. DV95-0001). These approvals
were granted by the City Planning Commission and City Council in June, 1995 to facilitate
development of a variety of entertainment facilities, hotel, commercial and residential uses.
Summary of Project Components
Cabaret Theaters: Two cabaret theaters are proposed to be located in the OTSP core area.
Both cabaret theaters would be constructed during Phase I of the project. One cabaret is
proposed to contain about 27,000 square feet (ft2) and 40 feet high and the second theater is
proposed to contain about 45,000 iF. These cabarets are designed to entertain a maximum
of about 600 and 900 people per event, respectively. Each show is expected to last for
approximately two hours and it is initially anticipated that the theater will hold 13 shows per
week
Western Saloons: Two saloons are proposed to be located in the OSTP core area. Both
saloons would be constructed during Phase 1 of the project and each saloon is proposed to
contain approximately 10,000 fi2 in a one-two story structure. Each saloon will be designed
to entertain approximately 350 persons, 250 at tables and about 100 at or adjacent to the bar.
A small stage will be provided for typical bar entertainment, such as dancing girls. Staged bar
fights, shootouts and other entertainment will be provided The saloons will operate every
day of the week
Opera House: An opera house is proposed to be located in the OTSP. It would be
constructed during Phase I of the project. The opera house is proposed to be a two story
structure with the proscenium approximately 50 feet high. The opera house is expected to
encompass 85,000 t~2 of space with a building footprint of approximately 75,000:. Estimated
seating capacity will be 1,400 persons on the first floor and 800 seats in th~ balcony. A
television and radio studio will occupy approximately 2,500 ft2 within or adjacent to the opera
house It is anticipated that the opera house will have 13 performances per week.
Showboat: A western showboat facility with a shoWrOom is proposed to be located in the
OTSP core area. This facility would be implemented during Phase 2 of the project when
adequate demand for additional entertainment spacejusti~es its construction. Theshowboat
will be a two-story structure, with the smokestacks approximately 30 feet high. It is proposed
to be approximately 21,000 ft2 and it would have the capacity to entertain an estimated 600
persons per event, seven days per week.
Wild West Arena: A 4,800 seat tent designed wild west arena that will be similar to Buffalo
Bill's touting western tent show is proposed to be located just west of OTSP core area within
the Westside Specific Plan area. It would be constructed during Phase 1 of the projecL This
is an outdoor/indoor facility that will operate all year but have a 16 week summer "high"
season. The arena will encompass approximately 175,000 square feet and the tent poles will
raise the height of the facility to approximately 85-90 feet above the ground surface. During
the 36 week regular season two shows per week are expected to be performed, primarily on
the weekends. During the arena high season it is estimated that several shows will be
performed per day, primarily on Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
Virtual Reality Pavilion(s): Three virtual reality pavilions with two theaters in each are
proposed for development within the OTSP. One pavilion with two theaters will be
constructed as pan of Phase 1 of the project. The other two pavilions will be implemented
as part of Phase 2 when sufficient demand justifies their construction. The theaters will be
constructed in the Plan core area. Each theater will seat about 50 persons. Maximum
occupancy of these two-story structures (height about 25-30 feet) is estimated to be about
200 persons Each pavilion will encompass about 19,000 ft2 for a total of -57,000 ~2 if all
three pavilions are implemented Each show requires about five to six minutes with the
theater portion running about three to four minutes. Performances would be continuous after
the facility opens each day.
"Quick Draw" Competition Area: In the Old Town core area a plaza or town square will be
constructed which is proposed to contain a quick draw competition area. This facility will
be constructed as pan of Phase 1 and is proposed to encompass approximately 8,000 ft2
outdoors in or adjacent to the plaza. This will be a westemized "police academy" type of
facility where an individual will walk through an outdoor maze of targets. Ten people can
participate in each five minute trip and scores will be posted on a large electronic board.
Hotel One major hotel is proposed for construction in the vicinity of the wild west arena
within the Westside Specific Plan The initial configuration of the hotel is proposed to be four
stories in height and provide a total of 350 rooms. It is proposed to be constructed during
Phase 1 of the project. A 5,7 acre pad will be provided for this facility and it is proposed to
contain approximately 300,000 ft2 of building space. The hotel may be expanded with 150
additional rooms during Phase 2' if sufficient demand justifies such an expansion. The hotel
is proposed to include approximately 50,000 t~2 of related retail space when constructed in
Phase 1 and the range of retail uses includes restaurants, service commercial uses, and retail
2
12.
13
14
15
commercial uses. An additional 50,000 fi2 of retail si3ace may be constructed during Phase
2 if demand for the commercial capacity is sufficient.
Retail Commercial: The City anticipates 50,000 to 100,000 R2 of the retail commercial area
identified in the OTSP will ultimately be developed in Old Town to support the entertainment
facilities/activities. It is estimated that 30,000 t~a will be developed during Phase 1 as a
component of this project. No specific locations have been selected for these retail activities.
Visitors Center/Ticket Office: One or more visitors centers/ticket office facilities will be
located in the downtown area for ticket purchases and to provide information. This
facility/facilities may encompass up to 5,500 t~2 of area. It will be open during normal
business hours and during evenings when events are scheduled at the entertainment complex.
Administrative Space: An additional 20,000 square feet of space for administrative offices
and back-of-house areas may be constructed to support the project. Some of this space may
be located within the opera house facility and others on the second floor of other structures
or within independent structures.
Area A: This area encompasses 47.7 acres and the Plan designates it for Special Event
Commercial (SEC). The SEC designation is designed to be an extension of the OTSP and
it will allow for tourist and hotel commercial uses. Allowable uses include wild west type
facilities, shows, and support uses, including a variety of public assembly activities. Hotel and
supporting retail activities, such as restaurants, service commercial operations, and retail
shops would be allowed under this designation.
Area B: Area B comprises 5.4 acres of land that is designated Community
Commercial/Tourist Support (CCTS). The CCTS designation is designed to meet the need
for commercial facilities to support SEC uses within the Westside Specific Plan.
Area C: Area C contains 181 acres of land that is designated High Density Residential
(HDR) The HDR designations provide multiple family housing to meet the needs of future
employees of the proposed project. According to the City, the HDR designation would allow
a range of 13 to 20 units per acre in the Westside Specific Plan. Assuming 15.1 net acres
(excluding road rights-of-way), the number of residential units that can be constructed
assuming 16 units per acre is 241
Area D: Area D contains 12.7 acres of land that is designated High Density Residential
(HDR) The HDR designations provide multiple family housing to meet the needs of future
employees of the proposed project. A range of 13 to 20 units per acre is allowed. Assuming
11 8 net acres (excluding road rights-of-way), 16 residential units per acre a total of 188 units
can be constructed.
Area E: Area E consists of 2.8 acres that is designated Mixed Use (MU). This use provides
3
office, commercial, light industrial and overflow parking that will serve the local residents and
the commercial uses associated with the Arena and hotel.
17.
Area F: Area F encompasses approximately 67.4 acres of land that is designated Open Space
(OS). This area includes the steeper hillsides to the west of the Western By-Pass which will
not be developed. The intent is to preserve this area as potential habitat mitigation and visual
open space. About 57.7 acres are forecast to remain undisturbed with the remainder being
affected by the footprint of the Western By-Pass.
4
ATTACItM~NT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRFY~UFFMAN.PCW 8/12/97mf
CITY OF TEMECULA
PROJECT SITE
CASE NO.: N/A
EXmBIT A VICINITY MAP
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: N/A
EXIHRIT B WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP '~
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA
~CASE NO.: N/A ~XtHBIT C
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
SITE PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
TO BE PROVIDED
UNDER SEPARATE COVER
CASE NO.: N/A
Exarnrr D GRADING PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA
L CASE NO.: N/A
~XmBIT E WESTSIDE SPECIFIC PLAN GRADING PLAN
II PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA
NO REDUCTIONS AVAILABLE
AT THIS TIME
CASE NO.: N/A
EXtIIBIT F LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
I[
CITY OF TEMECULA
SOUTH ELEVATION
L CASE NO.: N/A
v, XHIBIT G
I' PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
ELEVATIONS
CITY OF TE1VIECULA
NORTH ELEVATION "' ..........
wEST ELEVATION
CASE NO.: N/A
EXHIBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
ELEVATIONS
CITY OF TEMECULA
CASE NO.: N/A
~XI-HBIT G
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP DATE: AUGUST 18, 1997
ELEVATIONS
ITEM #4
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 180 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0174 - Development Plan
(Mark P. Esbensen)
Prepared By: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. 97-0174;
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. 97-0174;
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- approving Planning
Application No. 97-0174 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Mark P. Esbensen / Costar
REPRESENTATIVE:
DLS Builders
PROPOSAL:
To construct and operate two office buildings totaling 13,108
square feet on a one acre site.
LOCATION:
Approximately 400 feet southwest of the intersection of Rancho
California and Ridge Park Drive.
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
BP (Business Park)
BP (Business Park)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
BP (Business Park) and LI (Light Industrial)
BP (Business Park)
LI (Light Industrial)
LI (Light industrial)
PROPOSED ZONING:
Not requested
R:~STAFFRFl~I74PA~7.PC 8/6/97 Idb 1
EXISTING LAND USE:
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North: Vacant
South: Office Buildings
East: Office Buildings
West: Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
Building Height:
I acre
9,856 square foot office and warehouse building, and a
3,252 square foot office building, totalling 13, 108 square
feet of building area
10,516 square feet
19,936 square feet
40 spaces
42 spaces
24 feet
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held for this project on March 12, 1997. The application was
formally submitted to the Planning Department on May 20, 1997. A Development Review
Committee (DRC) meeting was held on June 12, 1997. The project was deemed complete
on July 21, 1997.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of a Development Plan application for the design, construction, associated
landscaping and parking for two office buildings on a one acre parcel. Building 'A' is 9,856
square feet with 1,103 square feet of shipping and receiving area, and 8,753 square feet of
office space. Building 'B' is a 3,252 square foot shell office building. Both buildings total
13, 108 square feet.
The subject parcel is a pie shaped lot with the wider portion of the parcel along Ridge Park
Drive. Therefore, the larger building ('A') is located at the front or east side of the parcel, and
the smaller building ('B') is located at the rear or western portion of the site.
ANALYSIS
Site Design
The project is designed with access being taken from an existing 40 foot shared access
easement off of Ridge Park Drive. 20 feet of the easement is located on the southern portion
of the subject site, and 20 feet is located on the adjacent parcel. The site is designed with good
internal circulation with easy, safe access to both buildings, and complies with the necessary
setback and parking requirements, handicap accessibility and fire truck turn around. Therefore,
the site design is consistent with the provisions of the Development Code and the Design
Guidelines in reference to building location, parking and site circulation.
Architecture & Colors
The buildings were designed as contemporary style office buildings, both with an off-white
("Arizona White") color and blue reflective glass with red horizontal trim. Building 'A' is
proposed as a painted, concrete tilt-up building, and Building 'B' is proposed to be off-white
("Arizona White") stucco exterior finish. The proposed signage for both buildings is "Lapis Blue"
which also adds to the overall contemporary design.
The site was designed with Building 'A' close to the street, with the parking in the center of
the site. As a result, the parking area is screened by the building, and is not highly visible from
the Ridge Park Drive. The east elevation of Building 'A' is very architiculated with curved, blue
reflective glass, a red horizontal trim and two curved patio areas that will have blue umbrellas
and will be screened with landscaping. The design, materials, trim and heavy use of windows
creates a very visually appealing elevation along Ridge Park Drive.
Building #A' has defined the main entry on the west elevation by utilizing a similar blue
reflective glass (spandrel) around the main entry doors. Building 'B' only has one set of entry
doors which are defined by using blue reflective glass. The blue reflective glass, red horizontal
trim and blue signage create contemporary structures that add interest and depth to the
building. The two buildings work welt together by utilizing the same color, materials, similar
design and signage.
The subject site is located in the Business Park zoning classification and is surrounded by Light
Industrial and Business Park zoning classifications. The various zoning classifications have
resulted in a variety of architectural styles in the immediate area. The subject's proposed
contemporary architecture is determined to be an appropriate and compatible design for the
Business Park zoning classification in terms of overall design, color, materials, site design and
bulk and mass.
Landscaping
The project proposes to landscape 24.16 percent of the site which is just under the minimum
requirement of 25 percent in the BP (Business Park) zone; however, the landscaping that is
proposed is considered adequate to help screen the necessary elements of the elevations such
as the patio walls facing Ridge Park Drive and the parking area. The site meets the
requirement of a minimum five foot wide landscape planter around its perimeter. There is an
existing landscaped area along the frontage of Ridge Park Drive; however, the applicant will be
required to install sidewalks along Ridge Park Drive. The applicant is proposing to save as much
of the existing landscaping as possible. Landscaping in the form of berming and plantings has
been included along the front of the project.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation and the zoning classification for the site is BP (Business
Park). Business offices with associated warehouse uses are permitted with the approval of a
Development Plan, pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as
proposed is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although
the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in
the Conditions of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The project is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The architecture complements the
existing development to the south and is the appropriate type of architectural design for the
Business Park (BP) zoning district. The proposed contemporary design contributes to an
aesthetically appealing presence along Ridge Park Road. Therefore, it is staff's opinion that
the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code and Design
Guidelines.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance
No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are
not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project
design and in the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project
site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There
are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of
plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no i.ndication
that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A
DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
R:\STAFFRFrXI74PA97.PC 8/6/97 kJb 4
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 10
Initial Study - Blue Page 20
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 38
Exhibits - Blue Page 45
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation
F. Landscape Plan
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:\STAFFRF~174PA97.1~C 8/6/97 Idb 6
ATFACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF TF/E PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 97-0174 (DEVFJOPM!~.NT PLAN) TO
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS
TOTALING 13,108 SQUARE FEET ON A ONE ACRE SITE,
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY FOUR HUNDi~k'~ (400) FEET
SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO
CALWORNIA AND RIDGE PARK DRIVE KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR*S PARCEL NO. 940-310-034
WltEREAS, Mark P. F_,sbensen filed Planning Application No. 97-0174 (for Development
Plan) in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning App~cafion No. 97-0174 (Development Plan) was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Manning Commission considered Planning Application No. 97-0174
(Development Plan) on August 18, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. 97-0174 (Development Plan);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. ~ The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
97-0174 (Development Plan) makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temeeula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
C. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and it has determined that
although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are
not considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in
the Conditions of Approval added to the project.
D. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The
project site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are
no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native
vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist,
or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this
project.
Section 3. Environmental Conlpliance. An Initial Study was prepared for this project and
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the
Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration,
therefore, is hereby adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. 97-0174 to construct and operate two office buildings totaling 13,108
square feet on a one acre parcel located on Ridge Park Drive, approximately four hundred (400)
feet northeast of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Ridge Park Drive known as
Assessor' s Parcel No. 940-310-034 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section $. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the lgth day of August,
1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAPFRPTXI74PA97.1'C 8/6/97 klb 9
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~STAFFRPT~I74PA~7.PC 816197 kjb 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA97-0174 (Development Plan * Mark P. Esbensen)
Project Description: A Development Plan for the design, construction and associated
paring for two office buildings totaling 13, 108 square feet
Assessor's Parcel No.: 940-310-034
Approval Date: August 18, 1997
Expiration Date: August 18, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination with a DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section
21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. 97-0174
(Development Plan) is for the operation, design and construction of two office buildings
totalling 13, 108 square feet.
The primary use of the proposed structures is office with limited shipping and receiving
(1,103 square feet of Building 'A').
4. All activities shall be within enclosed buildings, and no outdoor storage is permitted.
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application
No. 97-0174 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of
any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
R:\STAFFRF~I74pA97.PC g/6/97 klb 11
10.
11.
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 97-0174, or as amended by these conditions.
a. A minimum of forty (40) parking spaces shall be provided.
b. A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
c. Two (2) Class I lockers or Class II bicycle racks shall be provided.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with the approved landscape plan, or as
amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be
continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined
that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the
authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with
the approved landscape plan.
Building elevations shall conform substantially with the approved plans (Color
elevations), or as amended by these conditions.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be screened from public view.
The applicant shall submit the actual colors (Frazee manufacturer and number) to be
used for the project. The colors and materials used shall conform substantially with the
approved color and material board, or as amended by these conditions.
Building 'A'- Concrete Tilt-Up Panel
Building 'B' - Exterior Stucco Finish
Horizontal Trim on Glass
Reflective Glass
Reflective Glass
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
12.
13.
Color
Arizona White No.5830W
Arizona White No. 5830W
SafetyRed
Blue Reflective Glass
Spandel Glass to match Blue Reflective Glass
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
14. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
R:~STAFFRFI'q74PA97.PC 8/6/97 k~ 12
15.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecuia Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Planning Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation
Fees.
16.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. The location, number, genus, species, and
container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans shall be consistent with the
Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the
landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan).
17.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
18. An application for signage shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Manager.
19. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
20.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation,
and shading plans.
21.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
22.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed refiectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text .or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place,
at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches,
clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
23.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the
approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Department of Planning.
24.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
25.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
26.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building,
Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula
Municipal Code.
27.
Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with
Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
28. Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
29. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
30.
The occupancy classification of the proposed use shall be determined at time of plan
review.
31.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1994|.
32. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
33. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
34. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
R:x, STAI~qIFI~I74PA~7,PC 8/6/cf7 [r~b 14
35. Provide house electrical meter provisions for per for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
36.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the
1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
37. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system as needed by occupancy.
38.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
39.
Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and
mechanical plan for plan review.
40.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturers engineer are required for plan review submittal, if used for the
construction.
41.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
Show all ramps, sidewalks, walks, grades, handrails, etc.
42.
Provide an accessible path of egress, away from the building, from northern door of
building.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site
plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision.
General Requirements
43.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
44.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site
and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
45.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
R:\STAFFRPT~I74pAg'/.PC 8/6/97 Idb 15
46.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
47.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
48.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
49.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
50.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
51.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
52.
An Area Drainage Plan fee shall be paid to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District prior to issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee
or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs
to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of · Building Permit
53.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be
observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under sidewalk drains.
R:'~STAPPP, FI'%I74PAg'7.PC 8/6/97 klb 16
54.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Ran standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Department of Public Works:
Improve Ridge Park Drive (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, and drainage facilities.
55.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils
Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
56.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
57.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and wave all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
58.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
59.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
60.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public
Works.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Prior to installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever
comes first, the applicant, or his assignee, shall pay the appropriate fees for
the dedication of arterial street lights into the TCSD maintenance program
FIRE DEPARTMENT
62.
The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial building using the procedures established in City of
Temecula Ordinances and recognized fire protection standards. A fire flow of 1500
GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSi residual operating pressure must be available before
any combustible material is placed on the job site.
63.
A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"x4"x2-2 1/1"), will be
located no less than 25 feet or more than 165 feet from any portion of the building as
measured along approved vehicular travelways. The required fire flow shall be available
from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system.
64.
Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water plans to the Fire Department for
review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, containing a Fire Department
approval signature block, and shall conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow. Once the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals
shall be presented to the Fire Department for Signature.
65.
The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by
the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed
on the job site.
66.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall pay $.25 per square foot
as mitigation for fire protection impacts.
67.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant/developer shall be responsible to
submit a plan check fee of $582.00 to the City of Temeculao
THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS MUST BE MET PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY.
68.
Install a complete fire sprinkler system in building A. The post indicator valve and fire
department connection shall be located to the front of the building, within 50 feet of
a hydrant, and a minimum of 25 feet from the building(s). A statement that the building
will be automatically fire sprinkled must be included on the title page of the building
plans.
69.
Install a supervised waterflow monitoring fire alarm system in building A. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
70.
Knox Key lock boxes shall be installed on all buildings/suites. If building/suite requires
Hazardous Material Reporting (Material Safety Data Sheets) the Knox HAZ MAT Data
and key storage cabinets shall be installed. If building/suites are protected by a fire or
burglar alarm system, the boxes will require "Tamper" monitoring. Plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation.
71. All exit doors shall be openable without the use of key or special knowledge or effort.
72.
Occupancy separation walls will be required as per the Uniform Building Code, Section
302.4.
73.
Install portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A10BC. Contact a certified
extinguisher company for proper placement.
74.
It is prohibited to use/process or store any materials in this occupancy that would
classify it as an "H" occupancy per Chapter 3 of the Uniform Building Code.
R:',STAFFRFI~174PAg~.PC 8/6/97klb 18
75.
76.
77,
78.
79.
80.
Blue dot reflectors shall be mounted in private streets and driveways to indicate location
of fire hydrants. They shall be mounted in the middle of the street directly in line with
fire hydrant.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating required fire lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
Street address shall be posted, in a visible location, minimum 12 inches in height, on the
street side of the building with a contrasting background.
All buildings shall be constructed with fire retardant roofing materials as described in
The Uniform Building Code. Any wood shingles or shakes shall be a Class "B" rating
and shall be approved by the fire department prior to installation.
Final conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed in the Building and
Safety Office.
Please contact the Fire Department for a final inspection prior to occupancy.
OTHER AGENCIES
81.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control transmittal dated June 24, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
82.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated June 16, 1997, a
copy of which is attached.
83.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated June 4, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
84.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in teh City of Temecula
Police Department transmittal dated June 2, 1997 that are not in conflict with the City
of Temecula Conditions of Approval.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STA~174pA97.PC 8/6/97 kJb 19
DAVID P. ZAPPE
Gcncral Managcr*ChicfEnginccr
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/275-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
.... 7829.1
City of Temecula
Plannin Department
43200 ~usiness Park Ddve
Temecula, Califomia 92590
Ladies and Ge.t,emen:.e: q ' t q
The D strict does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities.
The District also does not p an check city and use cases, or provide State Division of Reel Estate letters or other flood
hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are no~Tnally limited to items of
specific nterest to the District including District Master Draina e Plan facilities, other ional flood control and
draina e facllitjes wh ch could be considered a ogical componen~or extension of a maste~pp an system, and District
Area ~r%nage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the reposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in an wa
constitute or imply District apprev~}or endorsement of the proposed project v/r{h respect to flood hazard, public ~;al~
and safety or any other such issue:
t/This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional
interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will acce t ownership of such facilities on
wdtten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct sten~3alrds and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted f ch ?'F~ H
Master Dra nage Plan. The District woulbl consider acceptin ownership o su facilities on written request
of the Ci . Facilities must be constructed to District standar~qs, and Dist~-t plan check and inspection will be
requiredt~r District acceptenca. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
V//Th s project s ocated within the limits of the Districrs NtJ~'r,q ~_,I~GC'J~-A V',q
Drsi.ae Plan fo, .ich drainage have edop ;a__.ld the
Distric?or Ci dor to final ap roval of the pro'oct. or in t~e case of a arcel ma or subdivision pdo o
recordation ;~tge final map. ~Pe~s to be paid s~ould be at the rate in e~s~ at the ~'ms of recordation, o;if
deferred, at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S stem (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for orading, recordation, or other ~Yr~al approval should not be oiven the City
until
has determined that the project has beefi granted a permit or is shown to be exempt
If this pro'ect involves a Federal Emergen.cy Management Agency (FEMA mapped flood plain, then the City should
require ~{~e applicant to rovide all studies, calculations. plans and o~er ~nformation required to meet FEMA
requirements and should ~rther require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) pdor
to grading, recordation or other final approva of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a licant to
obta n a Section 1601/1603 A reement from the Ca~ifomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.~. Army Corps of En ineers, or wdtten correspondence from these agencies indicating
the project is exempt from these requirements. A~lean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be
required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours,
· MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ~, - Z4 -
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: June 16, 1997
TO: CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Patty Anders
FROM: C'/GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist IV
RE: PLOT PLAN NO. PA97-174 (Development Plan)
Department of Environmental Health has received and reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA97-174
(Development Plan) and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be
available in this area.
PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL, "will-serve" letters from the water and sewering
agencies will be required.
GD:dr
(909) 275-8980
tanch
Water
June 4,1997
Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 23968
APN 940-310-034
PLANNING APPL!CAT!ON NO. PA97-!74
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD
for fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any,
to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~,~
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
97/SB:eb100IF012/FEF
c: Laurie Williarns, Engineering Services Supervisor
~Monday June 2, 1997 10:11am -- From '9095062838' -- Page
06/02/1997 10:59 9095062838 TE]4E(]IJLA POLICE PAGE 82
City of Temecula ,
Ternecula Police Department
June 2, 1997
Planning Department
PA97-174 (Construct 2 offices and manufacturing buildings)
Case Planner: Patty Andera
With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the Poice Department
recommends the following 'Officer Safety' measures be provided In accordance with City of
Temecula Ordinances end/or recognized police safety standards and training codes:
1. Applicant shall ensure al landscaping surrounding the building are maintained at a hdght no
greater than thbty-elx {36) Inches.
2. Applicant shall ensure all tree on the property are maIntained away from aU buildings as to
deter root eccess~birKy for suspect{s).
3. Additiormiy, plants, shmbbep/end trees will be nmIntained b ares not designated for foot
traffic or areas to create any dead spots for suspects to hide or conceal Themselves both day/night
time hours.
4, Ught fixtures shall be installed to illuminate ag parking'areas, driveways, end pedestrian
walkways. These ares shall be fit with a minimum maIntained one (1) foot candle of light at
ground level, evenly dispersed across the surface, ellminatIng aII shadows. All exist'mr fight fixtures
shall be vandal resistant and positioned so as not to produce glare. The installation of al exterior
lightlag shall be In compliance with Mr. Painmar Lighting Ordinance.
5. Vandal resistant light facturea shall be Installed above all exterior doors on each building, These
light fixtures shaft illuminate the door surface with a minimum maintained one (1 } foot candle of
light at ground level, evenly dispersed.
6. All extedor fighting shall be controlled by timers or other means that prevent the lights from
being turned off by unauthorized persons.
7. Upon completion of each building, a monitored alarm system shaft be Installed to deter:
unauthorized enb'yrourgleiry and to notify the Police Dopartrnent of unauthorized intrusion.
8. /UI doors, windOWS, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be of
commercial or institutional grade.
9. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the feelEly abel be placed In e well-llghted,
highly visible area, and Insteled with a 'Call-0ut 0nly* feature to deter loitering.
10. The address for the location Shall be paInted on the roof u~in9 numbers no lea than four (4}
feet in height, in a color which contrasts the background end is highly visible during the day and
night-time hours.
11, RoOf hatches shall be painted 'International Orange.'
12. Street address shall be posted In e vLeibla location, mInlmum 14 inches in height, on the street
side ol; the building with a coatreal=lag background.
!Nonday June 2, 1997 10:11am -- Frce '96950628~8' -- Page ]l
e6/Ia2/1997 10:59 98950f~2838 TEIE:~I A PQ_TC~: PAGE: 03
Any questions regarding these cond'~ions can be referred tQ the Porte Department Cdme
Prevention & !~ans Section {909) 506-2626.
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\STAPPI~T~I?4PA~/.PC 8/6/97 ]db 20
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Project Tifie:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose approval
is required:
Planning Application No. PA97-0174
(Development Plan) Mark P. Esbeusen
City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive
Tamecula, CA 92590
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner, (909) 694-6400
Approximately 400 fe~t southwest of the intersection of
Rancho California and Ridge Park Drive.
BP (Business Park)
BP (Business Park)
To construct and operate two office buildings totaling
13,108 square feet on a one acre site.
Vacant land is to the north and escarpment is to the west.
Office and warehouse buildings are to the east and south.
Fire Depa~hnent, Health Department, Temecula Police
Department, Eastern Mumcipal Water District, Rancho
California Water District, Riverside County Flood Conlxol,
Southern California Edison, Southern Califorma Gas
Company, General Telephone
R:XSTAFFRPT~I74PA97.PC 816197
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicat~l by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
IX] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services
[X] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality [X] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Signature Date: July 25. 1997
Printed Name: Patty Anders For: City of Temecula
R:XSTAFFRFI'XI74PA97.1~C 8/~/9711~ 22
pol~mially
Signitkant
Imp~t
SiSni~c,~nt No
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source l, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies withjeriadi~tion over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land us~ in the vicinity?
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farmlands, or impa~ts from inenmpatible land uses)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
e. Disruptordividethephysicalarrangementofanestablished
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AN]) HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or lceal population
projects? (Soorce 1, Page 2-23)
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either direc~y or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major infraslrucmm)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose penpie to potential impacts InvolvIng."
a. Fault rupture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6)
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8)
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic bATnrd?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
from excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 2, Figure 7, Page 68)
R:~STAFFRPT~I74PA~7.PC 816197 k~ 23
[] [] []
[] [] []
[] [] []
[] [1 [1 [~
[1 [l [] [x]
[] [1 [1 [~
[] [1 [1 [~
[1 [1 [] [~
[1 [1 [] [~
[1 Ix] [] []
[1 [1 [] [~
[] [1 '. [] [~
[1 [1 [] [~
[] [1 [~ []
[] Ix] [] []
P~leufially
NO
h. Expansivc soils?
i. Umque geologic or physical fcauues?
4. WATER. Would the proposal resuR in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patteras, or the
rate and mount of surfme runoff?
Exposure of people or property to water relaled hazards
such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3, Page 7-10
and Figure 7-4, Page 7-12; Source 5)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in c~ts, or the course or direction of water
movements?
Change in the quantity of Found waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g Altereddirectionorrateof~owofgroundwater?
h. Impacts to grotmdwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
(Source 2, Page 263)
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
(Source 3, Page 6-10 and 6-11, Table 6-2)
b. Expose sensitive rec~tors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[x]
[]
[1
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[1
R:XSTAPPRFFXI74pA97.PC 8/6/97 frdb 24
Pot~ti~lly
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or tra~c congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
(Source 4. Table 17.24(a), Page 17-24-9)
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
trar~sportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
(Source 4, Chapter 17.24, Page 12)
g. Rail, waterborne or air ~afiic impacts?
7. BIOLOClCAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result hi impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, ammals
and birds)? (Source 1, Page 5-15, Figure 5-3)
b. Locally designated species (e,g. heritage trees)?
<Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)? (Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripacian and vernal pool)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
g. ENERC¥ AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energ~j conservation plans?
[]
[]
[]
1]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]:
[]
[]
[x]
[x']
[x]
R:~TAFFRPT~I74PA97.PC 8/6/97
Potmi~y
$ignifie~,m No
b. Use non-renewal resources in a westeful and me~icient
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future v~lue m the region and the residents
of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. Ariskofaccidentalexplosionurreleaseofhazardous
subsUmces (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chenncal or radiation)? (Source 1, Figure 7-5, Page %14)
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard?
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazard?
e. increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
10. NOISE. Would lhe proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
I1. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or re, nit in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following ore~:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Mamtenance ofpublicfacilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental senaces?
[] [] Ix] []
[] [] []
[] [] [] [x]
[] [] [] [x]
[] [] [] [x]
[] [] [] [x]
[] [] []
[] [] [x] []
[] [] [~ []
[)
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x] []
pc]. []
[x] []
[x] []
[] pcl
R:~STAFFRPT~I74pA97.PC 8/6/97
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFOP,.MATION SOURCES
Potentially
Peulatially
NO
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a, Power or natural gas?
b. Commumcations systems?
c. Local or regional water treatmcnt or dlstrlbution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks? (Source 2, Page 39-40)
e. Storm water drainage?
£ Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a seeroe vista or scemc highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontologlcal resources? (Source 2, Figure 55,
Page 280; Source 6)
b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 2, Figure 56,
Page 283)
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
R:\STAPPRP~I74pA97.PC 8/6/97 klb 27
ISSUE,q AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCE~
l't~ntidly
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportunities?
16. MANDATORY FINDI]qGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the onvironmont, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incgmental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed m connection with
the effects ofpnst projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
17. EARLIF, R ANALYSES. None.
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. City of Temecula Development Cede
R:~TAFFRPTXI74PA97.PC 8/6/97klb 28
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1.b.
The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's
General Plan Land Use Designation of BP (Business Park). Impacts from all General Plan
Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
General Ran. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the
analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular
agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project.
Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the
opportunity to comment on the project and it is anticipated that they will make the
appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans
or polices. The project site has been previously graded and services have been
extended into the area. There will be limited, if any environmental effects on
environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project.
No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
1.C.
The proposed office buildings will not be incompatible with existing land use, and will
not to be considered incompatible or impact the existing adjacent office and industrial
buildings in the vicinity. The project has been designed to comply with the City-Wide
Design Guidelines as well as the Development Code regulations in terms of size, bulk
and mass, architectural design, landscaping, etc.; therefore the project will be
compatible with the surrounding area. No significant effects are anticipated as a result
of this project.
1.e.
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established
community (including low-income or minority community). The project is proposed on
a vacant parcel that is zone BP (Business Park) which does not allow residential
development of any kind. Therefore, there is not an established residential community
(including low-income or minority community) at this site, and significant effects are not
anticipated as a result of this project.
Population and Housing
2.a,
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections.
The project is two office buildings is consistent with the City's General Plan Land Use
Designation of BP (Business Park). Since the project is consistent with the City's
General Plan, and does not exceed the floor area ratio for the BP zoning district, it will
not be a significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively exceed
official regional or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated
as a result of this project.
2.b.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly.
The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Business Park.
The project will cause people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its
limited scale, it will not induce substantial growth in the area. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAI~RPT~I~PA~LI~C 8/6/97 klb 29
2.c.
The project will not displace housing, especially affordable housing as the site is a
vacant lot zoned for Business Park uses and ~)rohibits residential development. No
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
Geologic Problems
3.b,f,
h.
The project may have a significant impact on people involving seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure (including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or
unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils. The project
is located in Southern California, an area which is seismically active. Any potentially
significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction which is consistent
with Uniform Building Code standards. Further, preliminary soil reports have been
submitted and reviewed as part of the application submittal and recommendations
contained in this report will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval.
The soils reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil
which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground
shaking, seismic ground failure (including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography
or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils.
Increased wind and water erosion of soils both on and off-site may occur during the
construction phase of the project and the project may result in changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of
approval for the project. In the long-run, hardscape and landscaping will serve as
permanent erosion control for the project. Modification to topography and ground
surface relief features will not be considered significant since modifications will be
consistent with the surrounding development. Potential unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper
compaction of the soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d.
The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The project
is not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No significant effects
are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental
Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known
landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.i.
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic
features or physical features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
4.8.
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and
amount of surface runoff; however, these changes are considered less than significant.
Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings,
accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will
R:\STAFFRFB174PA97.PC 8/6/97 k~ 30
change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances
will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff which is created.
After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
4.c.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters
and alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the
project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources
Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been
filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements,
any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. After mitigation
measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
4.d,e.
The project will have a less than significant impact in a change in the amount of surface
water in any water body or impact currents, or to the course or direction of water
movements. Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable ground
will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and
driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the additional amount of drainage
into the City's drainage system will not considered significant. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.f-h.
The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground
waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability. Limited changes will occur in the quantity and quality of ground waters;
however, due to the minor scale of the project, it will not be considered significant.
Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant
impact on ground waters. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
4.i.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies. According to information contained in the
Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho
California Water District indicate that they can accommodate additional water
demands." Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to the project.
Water service will need to be provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD).
This is typically provided upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD
and the property owner. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project. :
Air Quality
5.8.
The project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation. The project is below the threshold for potentially
significant air quality impact established by South Coast Air Quality Management
District (Page 6-11, Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air Quality Management CEQA Air
Quality Handbook). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:~TAFFRF'~I74pA97.I,C 8/6/97klb 31
5.b.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant
pollutants nor sensitive receptors in proximity to the project. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
5.c.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change
in climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant
impacts on the environment in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
5.d.
The project will create objectional odors during the construction phase of the project.
These impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant. No other
odors are anticipated as a result of this project.
Transoortation/Circulation
6.a.
The project will result in a less than significant increase in vehicle trips; however it will
add to traffic congestion. It is anticipated that this project will contribute less than a
five percent (5%) increase in existing volumes during the AM peak hour and PM peak
hour time frames to the intersections of Ridge Park Drive/Rancho California Road and
the Rancho California freeway interchange. The applicant will be required to pay traffic
signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as conditions of approval for the project.
After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
6.b.
The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is
designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards to safety from
design features. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c.
The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses.
The project is two office buildings in an area with existing similar type of uses and
structures in the Business Park (BP) and Light Industrial (LI) zoning districts. The project
is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.d.
The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. The applicant has completed
a parking needs analysis based upon the uses proposed by this project. Based upon this
analysis, there will be sufficient on-site parking spaces provided. Off-site parking will
not be impacted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.e.
The project will not result in hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists. Hazards
or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part of the project. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.f.
The project will not result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation. The project was transmitted to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and
their response states: "The proposed project does not impact RTA facilities or services."
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:',STAFFRPT~I74PA~7.PC 816197k~b 32
6.g.
The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists
currently in the immediate proximity of the'project. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Biological Resources
7.a.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or
their habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The
project site has been previously disturbed and graded. Currently, there are no native
species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no
native vegetation on the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species
exist at this location. The project will not reduce the number of species, provide a
barrier to the migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat. The project site is
located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees
will be required to mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.b.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated
species are protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not
protected elsewhere in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and
since there are no locally designated species on site, no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities.
Reference response 7.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
7.d.
The project will not result in an impact to wetland habitat. There is no wetland habitat
on-site and the wetland adjacent to the site will not be disturbed. Reference response
7.a. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7.e.
The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The
project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Energy and Mineral Resources
8.a.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project
is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
8.b.
The project will result in a less than significant impact for the use of non-renewable
resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the
rate of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s)
(construction materials, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the
subsequent depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the
proposed development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
R:k~TAI~Rlfl~I?4pA~7.PC S/~,~7 klb 33
8.c.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known
mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the
State are located at this project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
9.a.
The project will result in a less than significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the
release of any hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions
since none are proposed in the request. There will be used tires stored in an enclosed
structure which are removed from the site on a regular basis for recycling. The
proposed use is regulated by both the Fire Department and the Department of
Environmental Health. Both entities have reviewed the project. The applicant must
receive clearance from the Department of Environmental Health prior to any plan check
submittal. The applicant must receive clearance from the Fire Department prior to the
issuance of a building permit. This applies to storage and use of hazardous materials.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.b.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency
evaluation plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an
emergency response plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and
will therefore not impede any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.c,
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws
during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to
be consistent with these applicable laws. Reference response 9.a. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.d.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No
health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project is two office buildings in an area of existing type uses and
structures located in the Business Park and Light Industrial zoning districts. The project
is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Noise
10.a.
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The
site is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to
noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the
long run. Long-term noise generated by this project would be similar to existing and
proposed uses in the area. No significant noise impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project in either the short or long-term.
R:\STAFFRFrXI74PA97.PC 816197 klb 34
lO.b.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the
development/construction phase (short run). 'Construction machinery is capable of
producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very
annoying and can cause hearing damage from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of
noise will be of short duration and therefore will not be considered significant. There
will be no long-term exposure of people to noise. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Public Services
11.a,
b.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire
and police protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of
service provision from these entities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
11.c.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to
relocate within or to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new
or altered school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
11.d.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public
facilities, including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is derived from the
Gasoline Tax which is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California.
Impacts to current and future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of
development of the site will be incremental, however, they will not be considered
significant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient to cover any of the proposed expenses.
11 .e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in
proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. .
12.c.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d. The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an
R:\STAFFRPT~174pA97.PC g/6/97 k~a 35
incremental impact upon existing systems, the Fina! Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)
for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability
to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further
states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact
wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General
Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no
septic tanks on site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
12.e.
The proposal will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The project will need to provide some
additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition
of approval for the project and will tie into the existing system. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid
waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this
development can be mitigated through participation in any Source Reduction and
Recycling Programs which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
13.a.
The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located
in a area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated
scenic highways. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.b.
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The project is two
office buildings in an area of existing similar type uses and structures in the Business
Park and Light Industrial zoning districts.. The building are relatively consistent with
other designs in the area, and the proposed landscaping and added architectural
treatments will provide additional aesthetic enhancement. After mitigation measures
are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c.
The project will have a potentially significant impact from light and glare. The project
will produce and result in light/glare, as all development of this nature results in new
light sources. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount: Palomar
Observatory. The project will be conditioned to be consistent with Ord!nance No. 655
(Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
Cultural Resources
R:\STAFFRPT~I74PA97.l~C 8/6/~7 klb 36
14.a,b
The Eastern Information Center of the University of California at Riverside has reviewed
the project and a Phase I cultural resource stud~/identified no cultural resources within
the project site. The site has been previously graded and resources would have been
disturbed at that time; therefore, it is determined that no significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not have an impact on historical resources. No historic resources exist
at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values. Reference response 14.b,c. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
14.e.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact
area. No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
15.a,
b.
The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for
neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause
significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula. However,
it will result in an incremental impact or in an increase in demand for neighborhood or
regional parks or other recreational facilities. The same is true for the quality or
quantity of existing recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~174pA97.pC 8/6/97 klb 37
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R:~TAFFRFI~I74PA97.1~C 8/6/97 klb 38
Mitigation Monitoring Program
planning Application No. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Expose people to impacts from seismic Found shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitled
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Depal~haent of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Cede.
Submit construelion plans to the Building and Safety Deparunent for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Patty:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, Fading or fill
Hanting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Deparlment of Public
Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRFBI74PA97.PC 8/6/97 klb 39
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topograpliy or unstable soft conditions from
excavation, grading or fill
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development
Cede.
Submit landscape plans that include planling of slope to the Planning
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
Expose people to the impacts from subsidence of land.
Ensure that soil compacfion is to City standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Department.
Expose people to the impacts from subsidence of land.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Deparunent of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Deparwaent for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
R:XSTAFFRFB174PA97.PC 8/6/9'7 klb 40
~neral ]tripact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patlerns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively
impact adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been
incorporated into site design and will be included on the Fading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of Fading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Departrnent of Public Works and SDRWQCB for SWPPP).
Transportation/Circulation
General Impact:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Mitigation Measure:
Payment of Development Impact Fee for read ~mprovements and traffic
impacts. ~
Specific Process:
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to issuance of building permits.
Responsible Monitoring Party: Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT~I74pA97.PC 8/6/97
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for Signal Mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Building and Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site.
Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use.
Install on-site parking spaces.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Deparlment of Public Works, Harming Department and Building &
Safety DeparUnent.
Biologic31 Resources
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not
limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 par acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a Fading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department
R:\STAFFRPTXI74pA97.PC 8/6/97 lifo 42
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental
services regarding fire protection. The project will incrementally
increase the need for fire protection; however, it will contribute its fair
share to die maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for Fire Mitigation.
Payment of die Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of ~he Temecula Municipal Cede.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Deparunent
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecuia Valley Unified School
District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecuia Valley Unified School
District.
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities,
including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic
impacts, and public facilities.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRFBI74PA97.1}C 8/6/97 k~ 43
AESTHETICS
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare
that could affect the Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655.
Submit lighling plan to ~he Building and Safety Departmere for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare
that could affect ~ae Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655.
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Depa~ hnent.
R:\STAPPILPTXI74pA97,pC 8/6/97 klb 44
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:',STAFFRFI~174pA97.PC 8/6/97 Idb 45
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECUUA -
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A
ILANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
R:\STAFFRPTXI74pA97.PC 815197 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)
¢C
.M
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA974)174 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
R:~STAFFRF~I74PA97.PC 8/6/97
CITY OF TEMECULA
B~J]LDIN,:, A ~-
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
;XHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRFI~I74PA97.PC 8/6/97 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
WEST BUILOING ELEVATXO.
SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION i ..... .--.~-~2
EAST BUILDING ELEVATION~ .... ,--,~- 1~
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
ELEVATIONS
Building "A"
R:\STAFFRPT~I74PAgZPC 8111197 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
~Xm1~IT E ELEVATIONS
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997 Building "Ba
R:\STAFFRF~I74PA97.PC 8/11/97 klb
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0174 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F LANDSCAPE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
R:X3TAPFRPT~I74PA~7.PC 8/5~q
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 18, 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0129 & PA 97-0224 - Tentative Parcel Map & Variance
(Mark P. Esbensen, Inc.)
Prepared By: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. 97-0129 and No. 97-0224;
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- approving Planning
Application No. 97-0129 and No. 97-0224 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of A~pproval.
Mark P. Esbensen, Inc.
A.J. Terich Engineering, Inc.
A Tentative Parcel Map request to allow an existing commercial
center of 4.59 acres to be subdivided into four (4) parcels, and a
Variance request to allow two (2) of the parcels to be smaller than
the minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 square feet.
North side of Rancho California Road, between Lyndie Lane and
Moraga Road.
CC (Community Commercial)
CC (Community Commercial)
North:
South:
East:
West:
HD/PI (High Density and Public Institutional)
PO (Professional Office)
HD/PI (High Density and Public Institutional)
CC Community Commercial)
Not requested
The subject parcel ~s an existing commercial center with various
retail and commercial uses and one vacant lot.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Day Care/Multi-Residential
Vacant and Multi-Residential
Multi-Residential
Gas Station and Mini-Mart
4.59 acres
An existing commercial center. No new building are being
proposed.
No new landscaping is being proposed.
BACKGROUND
A pre-application meeting was held for this project on March 27, 1997. The application was
formally submitted to the Planning Department on April 28, 1997. A Development Review
Committee (DRC) meeting was held on May 22, 1997. The project was deemed complete on
June 23, 1997. The project was scheduled for the August 4, 1997 Planning Commission
hearing; however the meeting was canceled so the project was rescheduled to the next hearing
date of August 18, 1997.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is a request for a four lot Tentative Parcel Map for an existing commercial center
and a variance request because two of the parcels do not meet the minimum lot size of 30,000
square feet. The subject site had a previously approved Tentative Parcel Map for four (4) lots
(TPM No,27867). but the map expired on December 9, 1995, prior to the final map veing
recorded. The original map was subject to the County's zoning of General Commercial (CI/CP
zone) which permitted a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. The map was consistent with
Ordinances 460 and 348 which were in effect at the time of approval in 1993. However, the
City of Temecula has since adopted the Development Code which changed the zoning of the
subject site to Community Commercial which now requires a minimum lot size of 30,000
square feet.
As a result of the zone change, the subject site has two parcels which do not meet the new
minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 square feet. The parcel sizes are as follows: Parcel 1:
57,934 square feet; Parcel 2:24,829 square feet; Parcel 3:15,681 square feet; and .Parcel 4:
57,934.
Parcels 4, 3, and possible 2, when developed, may not have sufficient parking for each
individual parcel. However, all the parcels will have reciprocal parking agreements so that the
existing and proposed development will have adequate parking for the entire center.
R:\STAFFRPTXI29PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 2
ANALYSIS
Site Design
The project is designed so that access is taken from Lyndie Lane and from Rancho California
Road. The project will be conditioned for a landscaped median which will permit a left turn into
the center from Rancho California Road, but will not allow a left turn out onto Rancho California
Road.
Staff has determined that the necessary findings for a variance can be made because there are
practical difficulties and hardships created by the strict application of the City of Temecula
Development Code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property. The
subject site is an unusual, pie-shaped, corner lot that has frontage along three public roads:
Rancho California Road, Lyndie Lane and a small portion of Moraga Road. As a result, the site
has a disportionate amount of square footage allocated to public right-of-way. The total gross
lot area is 4.59 acres, whereas the net lot area is 3.59 acres--a net loss of one (1) acre or
43,560 square feet. The subject site, therefore, loses a significant amount of developable
square footage to public right-of-way, which reduces the existing net lot acreage.
The site is restricted because it has an in-fill development situation that other properties in the
identical zoning classification are not subject to. Moreover, the circumstances and
characteristics for the variance were not created by the applicant. The owner allowed the
previously approved Tentative Parcel Map 27867 to expire. By approving the variance, it does
not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties, and it
will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the
vicinity. The applicant is simply requesting to enjoy the same development privileges as other
property owners in the same zoning classification by creating individual parcels that can be sold
separately.
The subject parcel has a special circumstance in that the subdivision did comply with the
development standards of Ordinances 460 and 348 when it was originally approved (TPM
27867), but the final map expired, and the adoption of the City of Temecula Development Code
changed the zoning which resulted in a larger minimum lot size requirement for the subject site.
Although the project does not meet the minimum lot size of the current zoning classification
of Community Commercial (CC), staff determines that the findings for a variance, as stated
above, can be made, and that the site design, as proposed and previously approved, is a safe
and logical design.
LandscaDing
The applicant has agreed to submit a landscape plan to revitalize the existing landscaping
throughout and enhance the existing landscaping along Rancho California Road to help improve
the visual quality of the center.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation and the zoning classification for the site is CC
R:\STAFFRlq~129pAg'7.P(2 818197 lab 3
(Community Commercial). The subject site is an existing commercial center with various retail
and commercial uses that are permitted in the CC zoning classification. Pursuant to Chapters
17.03 and 17.04 of the Development Code, a Tentative Parcel Map and Variance may be
approved if the necessary findings can be made. Staff finds that the proposed project
complies with the necessary findings and is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies
of the General Plan and Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Tentative Parcel Map (No. 27867) was originally approved and exempt from CEQA pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines Section 15315, but the Tentative Map was never recorded. A new
Tentative Parcel Map (No. 28544) is under review; however, due to a zone change and larger
minimum lot size requirement, Map No. 28544 requires a variance to the minimum lot size
requirement which precludes it from being exempt from CEQA Guidelines Section 15315. Staff
has reviewed the Environmental Assessments (No. 33436 and No. 32984) for the original
commercial Parcel Map (No. 24169) and development for the subject site. The previous
Environmental Assessments and mitigation measures were utilized as a baseline. This
Environmental Initial Study will analyze only those impacts that are in excess of the original
Environmental Assessments and mitigation measures.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The proposed project is a safe and logical subdivision, and there are practical difficulties created
by the strict application of the Development Code that warrant approval of the variance
request. Approval of the variance will not create a public nuisance, will not be detrimental to
the public welfare, and will not grant special privileges which other properties in the same
zoning classification currently enjoy. The applicant is requesting to have similar development
opportunities as other property owners in the same zoning classification. Therefore, it is staff's
opinion that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the intent of the goals and policies of
the City's General Plan and Development Code.
FINDINGS
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
The proposed land division and design is consistent with the intent of the goals and
policies of the General Plan, adopted Ordinances and the Development Code of the City.
The site is designated as Community Commercial and is an existing commercial center
with various commercial/retail uses. '.
The design of the proposed tentative parcel map is compatible with the nature,
condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The map was
reviewed by interested agencies, and their comments and conditions are referenced
within the Conditions of Approval.
The design of the proposed land division will not conflict with easements, acquired by
the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land
R:\STAFFRPTXI29pA97.pC g/g/r/k~b 4
division. Parcels will take access from Lyndie Lane (left turn in only) and Rancho
California Road.
The nature of the proposed tentative parcel map is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. The map is consistent with the goals and
policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in
the Development Code. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure
that projects are not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. Compliance with these documents will assure this is achieved.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project
site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There
are no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of
plants, no native vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication
that any wildlife species exist, or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A
DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
VARIANCE FINDINGS
There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by the strict application
of the Code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that
are not shared by other properties in the same zone. The subject parcel is not physically
able to meet the minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 square feet per parcel required
by the Community Commercial (CC) zone as the subject site is an unusual, pie-shaped,
corner lot that has frontage along three public roads: Rancho California Road, Lyndie
Lane and a small portion of Moraga Road. As a result, the site has a disproportionate
amount of square footage allocated to public right-of-way. The total gross lot area is
4.59 acres, whereas the net lot area is 3.59 acres--a net loss of one (1) acre or 43,560
square feet. The subject site, therefore, loses a significant amount of developable
square footage to public right-of-way, which reduces the existing net lot acreage. The
site has a further restriction in that it is a developed commercial center with an in-fill
development situation that other properties in the identical zoning classification are not
subject to.
The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by the applicant
but the owner. A similar Tentative Parcel Map (No. 27867} was previously approved;
however, the owner allowed the map to expire in December of 1995 prior to recording
the final map. Therefore, it is staff's determination the applicant should' not be
penalized for the owner failing to record the previously approved map aS the applicant
has modified the proposed map to comply with the City of Temecula Development Code
requirements of the Community Commercial zoning district as much as physically
possible given the inherent constraints of the site.
The variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to
surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the
property of other persons located in the vicinity. The applicant is simply requesting the
opportunity to enjoy the same development privileges as other property owners in the
same zoning classification that do not have the inherent site constraints of an irregular,
R:~STAFFRPT~I29PA97.PC 8/8/97 k~b 5
pie-shaped lot, a disproportionate amount of square footage allocated to public right-of-
way and an in-fill development situation.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project, and the previous Environmental
Assessments ( E. A. Nos. 33436 and No. 32984) were analyzed. It has been
determined that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the
environment.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 12
initial Study - Blue Page 21
Exhibits - Blue Page
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
R:'~STAFFRPT~129PA97.PC 8112197
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:XSTA~FRPT~I2~PAgV,PC 8/8/97 klb 7
ATrACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMlvH~SION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 97-0129 FOR A FOUR (4) LOT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP OF AN EXISTING
COMMERCIAL CENTER AND PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 97-0224 FOR A VARIANCE REQUEST TO ALLOW
TWO OF THE PROPOSED PARCELS TO BE SMALLER
THAN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIRF_AMF~NT OF
30,000 SQUARE FEET, LOCATFJ) ON RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD BETWEEN LYNDIE LANE AND
MORAGA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NO. 921-310-019.
WHEREAS, Mark P. Esbensen filed Planning Application No. 97-0129 (Tentative
Parcel Map) and Planning Application No. 97-0224 (Variance) in accordance with the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning
Application No. 97-0224 (Variance) was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State
and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. 97-0129
(Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning Application No. 97-0224 (Variance) on August 18, 1997,
at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an
opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. 97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning Application No. 97-
0224 (Variance);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. F_ixKliag~ The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No.
97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) makes the following findings; to wit:
R:\STAFFRFI~I29PA97.PC 818197 kib ~
A. The proposed land division and design is consistent with the intent of the
goals and policies of the General Plan, adopted Ordinances and the Development Code of the
City. The site is designated as Community Commercial and is an existing commercial center with
various commercial/retail uses.
B. The design of the proposed tentative parcel map is compatible with the
nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The map was reviewed
by interested agencies, and their comments and conditions are referenced within the Conditions
of Approval.
C. The design of the proposed land division will not conflict with easements,
acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of, property within the proposed land
division. Parcels will take access from Lyndie Lane (left turn in only) and Rancho California
Road.
D. The nature of the proposed tentative parcel map is not detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the community. The map is consistent with the goals and
policies contained within the General Plan and the development standards contained in the
Development Code. These documents were adopted by the City Council to assure that projects
are not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Compliance with
these documents will assure this is achieved.
E. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare
species or their habitats, including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The
project site has been previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are
no native species of plants, no unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native
vegetation on or adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist,
or that the site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this
project.
The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 97-0224 (Variance) makes
the following findings; to wit:
F. There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by ~he strict
application of the Code due to the physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that
are not shared by other properties in the same zone. The subject parcel is not physically able to
meet the minimum lot size requirement of 30,000 square feet per parcel required by the
Community Commercial (CC) zone as the subject site is an unusual, pie-shaped, comer lot that
has frontage along three public roads: Rancho California Road, Lyndie Lane and a small portion
of Moraga Road. As a result, the site has a disporportionate amount of square footage allocated
to public right-of-way. The total gross lot area is 4.59 acres, whereas the net lot area is 3.59
acres--a net loss of one (1) acre or 43,560 square feet. The subject site, therefore, loses a
significant amount of developable square footage to public right-of-way, and reduces the existing
net lot acreage. The site has a further restriction in that it is a developed commercial center with
R:~STAFFRI~XI29pA97,pC g/8/97 lab 9
an in-fill development situation that other properties in the identical zoning classification are not
subject to.
G. The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by
the applicant but the owner. A similar Tentative Parcel Map ('No. 27867) was previously
approved; however, the owner allowed the map to expire prior to recordation of the final map.
Therefore, it is staffs determination the applicant should not be penalized for the owner falling
to record the previously approved map as the applicant as modified the proposed map to comply
with the City of Temecula Development Cede requirements of the Community Commercial zoning
district as much as physically possible given the inherent constraints of the site.
H. The variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise
available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the
property of other persons located in the vicinity. The applicant is simply requesting the
opportunity to enjoy the same development privileges as other property owners in the same zoning
classification that do not have the inherent site constraints of an irregular, pie-shaped lot, a
disproportionate amount of square footage allocated to public right-of-way and an in-fill
development situation.
Section 3. F, nvironmentnl Compliance. The original Environmental Assessment Analysis
(E.A. No. 33436 dated April 10, 1989) for the underlying commercial parcel map and
Environmental Assessment Analysis No. 32984 and Negative Declaration dated September 26,
1988, which analyzed all potential impacts of the proposed commercial center was utilized and
reviewed, in part, for the proposed subdivision and variance request. Both original Environmental
Assessments indicated that the original subdivision and commercial center development would not
result in a significant impact on the environment. An Initial Study was prepared for the proposed
Tentative Parcel Map (PA 97-0129) and Variance (PA 97-0224) which analyzed only those
impacts that were in excess of the original Environmental Assessments and mitigation measures.
The current Initial Study for the proposed subdivision and variance request indicates that the
proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case, and the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and
a Negative Declaration, therefore, is hereby adopted.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves
Planning Application No. 97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) to allow a four (4) lot subdivision of
an existing commercial center on a parcel containing 4.59 acres and Planning Application: No. 97-
0224 (Variance) to allow two (2) of the parcels to be less than the minimum lot si:ze requirement
of 30,000 square feet. The subject property is located on Rancho California Road, between
Lyndie Lane and Moraga Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 921-310-019 subject to Exhibit
A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
R:',STAFFR.PT',129PAg'/.PC 8/8/97 Idb 10
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I IIEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:XSTAFFRPT~129PA97.PC 818197 klb 11
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:~STAFFRP'BI29pAg'7.1~C 818197 k~o 12
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) and PA97-0224
(Variance) for Mark P. Esbensen
Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map request to allow an existing commercial
center of 4.59 acres to be subdivided into four (4) lots, and a Variance request to
allow two (2) of the parcels to be smaller than the minimum lot size requirement of
the 30,000 sq. ft.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-310-019
Approval Date: August 18, 1997
Expiration Date: August 18, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination with a DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section
21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The use hereby permitted by the approval of Planning Application No. 97-0129
(Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning Application No. 97-01224 (Variance) is for an
existing commercial center of 4.59 acres to be subdivided into four (4)lots, and a
Variance request to allow two (2) of the parcels to be smaller than the minimum lot size
requirement of the 30,000 square feet.
The owner shall submit a revised landscape plan to revitalize the existing landscaping
in the center and to enhance the landscaping along Rancho California Road. Within
ninety (90) days of recordation of the Final Map, the landscape plan shall be submitted,
approved by the Planning Manager and all landscaping installed. Landscaping shall
conform substantially with the approved landscape plan, or as amended by these
conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not
being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property
owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or
R:\STAFFRPT~129pA9'/.FC 818197klb 13
any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application
No. 97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning Application No. 97-0224 (Variance).
City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding for
which indemnification is sought and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the
action.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by this approval.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan),
approved with Planning Application No. 97-0129 (Tentative Parcel Map) and Planning
Application NO. 97-0224 (Variance), or as amended by these conditions.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this
project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost
to any Government Agency.
General Requirements
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and
their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
9. The Developer shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval.
10.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained .from the
Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the
City-maintained road fight-of-way.
11.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City fight-of-way.
12.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
R:\STAFFRPTXI29PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 14
Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
13. Submit a Final Parcel Map in accordance with Public Works standards.
14.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
City of Temecnla Fire Bureau
Harming Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Cable TV Franchise
Caltrans
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
15.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Department of Public Works:
The Developer shall install or provide a cash deposit for half- width raised
landscape median on Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 1
R/W) from Moraga Road to Lyndie Lane. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Department of Public Works. A left turn in movement from Rancho
Califomia Road to the existing driveway will be allowed upon construction of the
raised median. A left turn out movement onto Rancho California Road will not be
allowed with the installation of the raised median.
The developer shall submit landscape plans for the median in Rancho California
Road to the Temecula Community Services District for review and approval.
16.
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design
of the street improvement plans:
Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum
over A.C. paving.
R:\STAFFRPTXI29pA97.1~C 8/8/97 k.lb
17.
18.
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV
shall be provided for underground, with ea~ments provided as required, and
designed and constructed in accordance with City Cedes and the utility provider.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho Caiifomia Road on the Parcel
Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel
Map.
Comer property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian
facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County
Standard No. 805.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
All easements and/or fight-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public
or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons
such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of
an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior
to City Council approval of the parcel map, the Developer shall make an application for
reappertionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
parcel map to delineate identified environmental concerns. A copy of the ECS shall be
transmitted to the Planning Department and Public Works Department for review and
approval.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subjec~
property.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated
and noted on the final map.
An easement for a joint use driveway for ingress and egress shall be provided over the
property prior to approval of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever
occurs first.
R:~STAFFRIrFXI29PA97,PC 818197 Idb 16
27.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division
boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and
recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities
located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and
shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating 'drainage
easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. '
28.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided underground. Fa~ements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-
way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with City Cedes and the utility prorider.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
29.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Caltrans
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
30.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
31.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all sols conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections.
32.
A Gcotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist
and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and identify any gcotechnical hazards for the site
including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
R:~STAFFRPTXI29PA97.PC 818197 klb 17
33.
A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of
the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private,
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an
adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or
private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all
facilities. Any upgrading or up sizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm
water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for
analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
34.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOD has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
35.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformante with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
36.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable
to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to issuance
of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been
credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Should the Developer choose
to defer the time of payment of the Area Drainage Plan fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
37. Parcel Map\Final Map shall be approved and recorded.
38.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
39.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Cede,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
40.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Cede and
R:\STAFFRPTX129PA97.PC 8/8/97klb
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
41.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
42.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
43.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
44.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due
to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Prior to Recordation:
45.
Landscape construction drawings for the median on Rancho California Road shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services.
46.
The subdivider shall post security and enter into an agreement to improve the median island
landscaping.
OTHER AGENCIES
47.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control transmittal dated May 9, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
48.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittals dated April 9, 1997 and
May 7, 1997, copies of which are attached.
49.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated May 8, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
50.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated April 1, 1997.
R:\STAFFRPT~I29PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 19
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STAl~'I=P-FI'~129PA~7.PC 8/8/~7 Idb 20
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Managcr-Chicf Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
999J275,42~O~'--
909r788-9965~FAX ~
7829.1:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Plannin Department
,3200 usi..s Pa, D,v.
Temecula, California 92590
A.e.tio.: P Try ',, ,'
~e Dis~ d~s not no~l~ ~mmend ~ndifions for land divis~ns or o~er ~nd use ~ses in in~mt~ ~es.
~e Dis~ al~ d~s not plan ~k c~ land
h~a~ m~ ~r su~ ~ses. Dis~ ~mmen~mmenda~ons ~r such ~8~ am nosily lim~ ~ Rem~ of
sp~ific interest to ~e Disffict including Diana Master Dmina · Plan hcil~es o~er r~ional ~ ~n~l end
dmina e ~1~ ~i~ ~uld ~ ~nsider~ a I~i~l ~m~nen~or e~ension of a roster plan ~stem, and Dis~
~a ~&inage Plan fees (developrant m~gafion ~s), In add~on, inaction of ~ general na~m is provide.
~e Dis~a has not reviewed the m~s~ project in devil and ~ ~ll~in9 ch~ ~mmn~ do not in an wa
~nsfitute or imp~ Dis~a appmv~or endo~.nt of ~e p~ pmj. ~ .~. fi~ h~a~, public ~dal~
and safe~ or any o~er such issue:
L/~i~pr~j~w~u~dn~t~impaa~byDis~aMasterDmina~eP~n~ifiesn~ram~erhci~i~es~f~i~na~
interest proposed.
This project involves Dis~ct Master Plan ~cilities. ~e Dis~ will a~pt ~nemhip of such ~li~es on
wd~en request of the Ci~. Facilities must ~ ~ns~ to Disffi~ 8~nda~s and Dis~a plan ~k and
inspection will be r~uired ~r Distdct a~p~n~. Plan check, ns~on and administm~ve fees will
required.
This pmj~ pm~ses ~annels, sto~ drains 36 inches or larger in dia~ter, or other hcilities that ~uld
~ns~e~ ~ional in nature an~or a I~i~l e~ens~n of ~e adopted
Master Drainage Plan. ~e Dis~ would ~nsider a~pfin o~e~hip of such ~cili~es on w~en ~u~t
of ~e C' . Fa~li~ must
r~uir~r Dis~ a~p~n~. Plan check, ins~on and adminis~ve f~s will ~ r~uimd.
/is projm is l~t. wiffiin ffie limi. of ffie Di,~,~O
DistricP or C' dor to final ap mval of ~e pro'~ or in ~e ~se of a a~ or subdMsion prior to
recordat on ~t~e fina map. ~es to ~ pad s~ould ~ at ~e rote in e~ at ~e ~me of reardamon or if
defeffed, at the time of issuan~ of the a~ual ~it '
GENE~L INFORMATION
This project may require a Na~onal Pollu~nt Discharge Elimina~on S stem (NPDES) ~ ~m ~e S~te Water
Resour~s Con~l Boaffi. Cleamn~ ~r grading, ~a~n, or o~er ~dal approval should not
h~s dete~ined ~hat ~he projs~ has been granted a ~it or is sh~n to be exempt
If ~is pro'~ involves a Federal Eme~en~ Management Agen~ (FEMA mapp~ fi~ plain ~en ~e CiW should
require ~e appli~nt to mvide all studies, ~lculations, plans and o~her ~nfo~a~on r~ui~ to m~t FE~
r~uire~nts, and should ~er r~uire ~at ~e appli~nt ob~in a Conditional Le~er of Map Revi~on (CLOMR) prior
to grading, r~rdation or o~er final approval of ~e project, and a Le~er of Map Revision (LOMR) p~r to O~upan~.
If a natural water~ume or mapped fi~d plain is im acted by this proj~, the Ci~ should mqui~e ~e a li~nt to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 A reement ~om the Ca~fomia Depaament of Fish and Game and a Clean ~ater A~
S~ion 4~ Petit ~m ~e U.g. ~y Co~s of En in~m or w~en ~es~nden~ ~m ~e~ agencies indicting
the pro ect is exempt from ~ese r~uirements. A~lean Water A~ Section 401 Water Quali~ Ceffifi~tion may
required from the Io~1Cali~mia Regional Water Quali~ Control Board pdor to issuan~ of the Co~s 4~ ~it.
Very truly yours,
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Date: ~
COUN',.. O!t RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES A _.NCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
PARCELS/I~SI~: c?~
:7:. Z
ED
OTHER:
DATE: /~/°'~/k c7/gq 7 /
RE: SUBDIVISION NO.
PARCEL MAP NO. c'2 S ~' q ~/ (C /T~ ~; ?~gC "~ )
MOBILEHOME, T.T., ~V., PA~
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH APPROVES:
DOMESTIC WATER:
/'~c~ ,~'C [,:{ t i~c'P/2 .~-/~ WATER DISTRICT HAS AGREED IN WRITING TO FURNISH DOMESTIC
[~ THE I ~t(
WATER TO EACH AND EVERY LOT WITHIN THIS SUBDMSION AS PER LETTER DATED ,~/,~ ,~'(H 5///'~97 .
~] AN ACCEPTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT APPLICATION IS ON FILE WITH THIS DEPARTMENT TO FORM THE
WATER COMPANY.
NO WATER SYSTEM IS PROVIDED FOR THIS LAND DIVISION.
(CLASS C. CLASS D, OTHER SUBDIVISION .)
INDIVIDUAL WELL(S)
2. DOMESTIC SEWAGE DISPOSAL:
CONNECTION TO E~,~zZ, L,~,///'d4,,C'/}':dc
SEWER SYSTEM AS PER LETTER DATED A~-,~/
A. SEPTIC TANKS WITH: SOILS FEASIBILITY TEST BY
JOB/PROJECT # DATED
7l B. SEPTIC TANKS WITH: WESTERN/EASTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY AREA SOIL SURVEY MAP BOOK.
1. LEACH LINES WITH
SQ. FEET OF BOTTOM AREAJl00 GALLONS OF SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY.
2. SEEPAGE PITS WITH GAL/SQ. FT/DAY OR
PER 100 GALLONS OF SEPTIC TANK CAPACITY.
__ VERT. FT. (5' DIA.)
VERT. FT. (6' DIA.)
F'I c. DRY SEWERS SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR THIS PROJECT (SEC. 12.1, ART XII, ORD. 460.105)
7] D. APPROVED RECLAIMED WATER WILL BE UTILIZED AT THIS DEVELOPMENT.
3. CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
REGION: APPROVAL LETTER DATED INITIAL/FINAL CLEARANCE.
4. SUPPLEMENTAL WATER]SEWER DATA
O REQUIRED
REMARKS:
BY ;7' c'j c
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SPECIALIST
DOH-SAN-053 (Rev 9/93)
Distribution: WHITE--Applicant; CANARY--File; PINK--Water Quality Control Board
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HFALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF E1W, qI, RONMENTAL _ TH
May 7, 1997
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
ATTN: Patty Anders:
RE: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 28544 - PA97-0129: BEING A SUBDIVISION 6F
PARCEL 2 & LOTS "A', "B', & "C" OF PARCEL MAP NO. 24169 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON
FILE IN BOOK 164 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGES 67-68 TBEREOF, RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. IN RANCHO TEMECULA.
(4 LOTS)
Dear Gentlemen:
1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Parcel Map No. 28544-PA97-
0129 and recommends:
A water system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the water
company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be
submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the
original drawing to the City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location
of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of
the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1,
Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11,
Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of
Califomia, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company
with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Parcel Map No.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 28544, PA97-0129 is in accordance with the water system expansion
plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to such Parcel Map". This certification does not
constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Parcel Map at any specific quantities, flows
or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. This certification shall: be signed by a
responsible official of the water company. The plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula's
Office to review at least TWO WEEKS PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the final map.
John M. Fanning, Director
4065 County Circle Drive · Riverside, CA 92503 · Phone (909) 358-5316 · FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 · Riverside, CA 92513-7600) ~,,~,~.t ....... ~l,,jp,,~,., :~
City of Temecula Planning Dep~
Page Two
Arm: Patty Anders
May 7, 1997
This subdivision has a statement from Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic
water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial
arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to
be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final map.
This subdivision is within the Eastern Municipal Water District and shall be connected to the
sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as
approved by the District, the City of Temecula and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the
plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the
City of Temecula. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete
profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to
the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a
portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the
sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sewer system in
Tentative Parcel Map No. 28544, PA97-0129 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion
plans of the Eastern Municipal Water District and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this
time to treat the anticipated wastes from the proposed Parcel Map". The plans must be submitted
to the City of Temecula's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the
recordation of the final map.
5. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be completely finalized PRIOR to recordation of
the final map.
6. It will be necessary for the annexation proceedings to be completely finalized PRIOR to the
recordation of the final map.
Sincerely.
), ///~..
, /,
Gregor Deltenbach, Environmental Health Specialist IV
GD:dr
(909) 275-8980
ancho
Wmr
May 8, 1997
Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
JI)I .TpJBUTF, Q
;'%,
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL MAP 28554
APN 921-310-019
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0129
Dear Ms. Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD
for fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any,
to RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
97/SB:eb085/F012/FEF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Eas,rern Municipalx: ater District
John B. Brudin
April 1. 1997
,}
Riverside County Health Department
A.J. Tcr!ch Engineenng,
41934 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Gentlemen:
RE: Availability of Sanitary Sewer Service for Parcel Map 285d4 We hereby advise you relative to the
availability of sanitary sewer service for the above referenced proposed development as follows:
The property to be occupied by the subject proposed development IS PRESENTLY LOCATED within the
boundary lines of this District's Improvement District No. U-8 and is eligible to receive sanitary sewer service,
Upon submittal of plans for review the District will determine the following:
1 ) Major off-site facilities may be required to serve this project.
SanitaP/sewer service will be made available to the subject property provided:
1) The developer completes all necessary financial and other arrangements therefore, as
determined by the District, with the District by Septernber 1998;
2) That no LIMITING CONDITIONS exist which ARE BEYOND this DISTRICTS CONTROL or
CANNOT BE COST-EFFECTIVELY anti/or reasonably satisfied by the District, which
conditions may include but are not limited to, acts of God, REGULATORY AGENCY
REQU!REMENTS jr decisions, c~7 ;aga~ actions initiated vy
If you have any questions or comments regarding the foregoing, do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Eastern Municipal Water District
Robert h'. 'Spradli~?/
Assistant Director of Customer Service
Mail to: Post Ofrice Box 8300 San Jacinto. California 92581-8300 Telephone (909) 925-7676 Fax {909) 929-0257
Main Office: 204~; S. San [a¢ln~o Avenue, San Jaclnto Customer Service / Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hornet. CA
Operanon~ & Maintenance CcnEer: 2270 Trumble Road, Pertie, CA 92571 Telephone (909) 928-3777 Fax ~cllr)')~ O1R-/~TT'7
INVOLVEMENT
Owner of Property
NAME
HWGA California
ADDRESS
31784 Casino Drive
Lake Etsinore, CA 92531
Joel BurnstOne
Applicant
Mark P. Esbensen, Inc.
(9091676-7177
27311 Jefferson Avenue
Suite 103
Temecula, CA 92590
5.
6.
7.
Developer's Engineer
A.J. Terich Engineering
Fax (9091676-6306
General Location of the involved property:
North side Rancho California Road, west of Malaga Road.
Brief legal description of the involved property:
Parcel Map 28544, Assessor's Parcel No. 921-310-019
Number of proposed lots/parcels:
4 parcels
Estimated number of dwelling units (or equivalent):
Other pe~nent information:
Small scale map of the subject proposed development:
41934 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(909;I 676-5715
AREA
(In Acres)
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRPTXI29PA97,PC 8/8/97 kJb 2 ]
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
1. Project Title:
Planning Application Nos. PA97-0129 & PA97-0224
(Tentative Parcel Map & Variance ) Mark P. Esbensen
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner, (909) 694-6400
4. Project Location:
North side of Rancho California Road between Lyndie Lane
and Moraga Road, 29760 - 29766 Rancho California Road.
Project Spousor's Name and Address:
Mark P. Esbensen, Inc., 27311 Jefferson Ave., #103,
Temecula, CA 92590.
6. General Plan Designation:
CC (Community Commercial)
7. Zoning:
CC (Community Commercial)
Description of Project:
A Tentative Parcel Map request to allow an existing
commercial center of 4.59 acres to be subdivided into four
(4) lots, and a Variance request to allow two (2) of the
parcels to be smaller than the minimum lot size requirement
of the 30,000 sq. ft.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
To the north of the subject parcel are apartments and a day
care center, apartments are to the east, vacant lend and
additional apartments are to the east, and vacant property
to the west.
10.
Other public agencies whose approval is required: Fire Department, Health Department, Temecula
Police Department, Eastern Mtmicipal Water District, Rancho California Water District, Riverside
County Flood Control, Southern Califomia Edison, Southern California Gas Company, General
Telephone. ~.
11.
Tentative Parcel Map (No. 27867) was originally approved and exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA
GUIDELINES Section 153 15, but the Tentative Map was never recorded. A new Tentative Parcel Map
(No. 28544) is under review; however, due to a zone change, Map No. 28544 requires a variance to the
minimum lot size requirement winch precludes it from being exempt from CEQA C_midelmes Section
15315. Staff has reviewed the Environmental Assessments (No. 33436 and No. 32984) for the
original commercial Parcel Map (No. 24169) and development for the subject site. The previous
R:\STAFFRFBI29PA97.PC 818197 klb 22
Environmental Assessments and mitigation measures were utilized as a baselme. This Environmental
Assessment will analyze only those impacts that are in excess of the original Enviromental
Assessments and mitigation measures.
R:XSTAFFRI~BI29PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 23
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTEp:
The environmental factors ch~cked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checldist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [
[ ] Population and Housing [
[ ] Geologic Problems [
[ ] Water [
[ ] Air Quality [
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [
[ ] Biological Resources [ ]
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ]
Hazards
Noise
Public Services
Utilities and Service Systems
Aesthetics
Cultural Resources
Recreation
MandatoW Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment based on the original
environmental assessment analysis (EA. No. 33436) dated April 10, 1989 which concluded the underlying
commercial parcel map would not result in a significant impact on the environment, and the original
environmental assessment 0E.A. No.32984) and Neg~ve Declaration dated September 26, 1988 which analyzed
all potential impacts (noise, ~xaf~c, site circulation, seismic, etc.) of the proposed commercial center with a car
w~sh, mini-mart, retail uses and oil lube facility. Both environmental analysis concluded that the subdivision and
commercial development would not result in a significant effect on the environment.
The subject parcel was previously approved for a four lot commercial subdivision (Tentative Parcel Map No.
27867) under Planrang Application No. 93-0198 in 1993. The subdivision was found exempt per CEQA
Guidelines Section 15315, as the map (27867) did not require a variance because it complied with the
development standards at that time of application submittal. However, the map expired prior to recordation and
the zoning for the property has since changed with the adoption of the City of Temecula Development Cede. As
a result of the zone change, die new map (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28544) is requesting a variance because two
of the parcels do not meet the new miramum lot size requirement of the current zomng classification. If the
variance request was not a part of this application, this map would have been exempt per CEQA Guidelines
Section 15315.
Signature
Date: August 4. 1997
Printed Name: Party Anders For: City of Temecula
R:~STAFFRPT~I29PA97.PC 818197 kIb 24
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-l, Page 2-17)
b. Contlict with applieable environmental plans or polieies
~lopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts ~
soils or farmlands, or impacts fi'om incompatible land uses)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
e. Disrupt or divide the physical m'rangement ofan estnblished
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSI~N'G. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects? (Source 1, Page 2-23)
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of major intastrucmre)7
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Faultrapture? (Source 1, Figure 7-1, Page 7-6)
b. Seismic ground shaking?
(Source 1, Figure %1, Page 7-6, Sources 3 and 4)
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
(Source 1, Figure 7-2, Page 7-8, Sources 3 and 4)
d. Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land? (Source 2, Figure 7, Page 68)
h. Expansive soils7 (Sources 3 and 4)
Ii. Unique geologic or physical features?
[1
[1
[1
[1
[1
[]
[1
[1
[l
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[l
[l
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1:
[]
[]
[1
[]
Ix]
Ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
Ix]
[x]
[:x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x] -
[x]
R:~STAFFRFrX129PA97.PC 818197 klb 25
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage pattea, as, or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?
Exposure of people or property to water relatexl hazards
such as flooding? (Source 1, Figure 7-3, Page 7-10
and Figure 7-4, Page 7-12)
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface
water quality (e.g. t~rnperamre, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
dire~t additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquffer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g Altereddirectionorrateof~owofgroundwater?
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
(Source 2, Page 263)
5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
(Sources 3 and 4)
b, Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
(Sources 3 and 4)
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[ ]~
[]
[]
[x]
Ix]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[xq
Ix]
ix]
[xq
[x]
[xl
R:\STAFFRPTU29PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 26
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous imersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
(Source 4)
e, Hazards or bamers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
(Sources 3 and 4)
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, msocts, animals
and birds)? (Sources 2, 3 and 4)
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
c. Locally designated namral commumties (e.g. oakforest,
coastal habitat, etc.)? (Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, ripman and vernal pool)?
(Source 1, Figure 5-3, Page 5-15)
8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficient
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. Ariskofaccidentalexplosionorreleaseofhazardous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides,
chemical or radiation)? (Source 1, Figure 7-5, Page 7-14)
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation plan?
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[J
[]
[]
[]
1]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]:
[1
[]
[x]
Ix]
ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
Ix]
R:~STAFFRIri~I29PA97.PC 818197 klb 27
10.
11.
12.
c. The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazard7 (Sources 3 and 4)
d. Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health
hazards? (Sottrees 3 and 4)
e. Increase fire hazard in areas with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees?
NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase in existing noise levels?
(Sources 3 and 4)
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
(Sources 3 and 4)
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the followIng areas:
a. Fire protection? (Sources 3 and 4)
b. Police protection? (Sottrees 3 and 4)
c. Schools? (Sources 3 and 4)
d. Maintenance ofpublie facilities, including roads?
(Sources 3 and 4)
e. Other goverrtraental services?
(Sources 3 and 4)
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies~
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d. Sewer or septic tanks? (Source 2, Page 39-40)
e. Storm water drainage?
Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
fx]
R:\STAFFKPT~I29PA97.~C 818197 klb 28
13. AESTI'IETICS. Would the proposal:
a. A~ect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b. Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare? (Sources 3 and 4)
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources? (Source 2, Figure 55,
Page 280)
b. Disturb archaeological resources? (Source 2, Figure 56,
Page 283)
c. Affect historical resources? (Sources 3 and 4)
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e. Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential
impact area?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportumties?
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below serf-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or eodsogered plant or aremat or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individually
limited, but cnmulatively considerable? CCnmulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[1
[1
[]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
R:XSTAFFRPT',129PA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 29
projects, and the effects ofprobable future projects). [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
[l [1 [] [xl
17.
18.
EARLIRR ANALYSES. None~
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:
The original assessment included the ultimate build out of the site, and a previously approved commercial Parcel Map.
This analysis indicates that no additional impacts on the environment, beyond those identified when the project was
first proposed, are expected to occur.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. Environmental Assessment No. 33436 dated April 10, 1989
4. Environmental Assessment No. 32984 and Negative Declaration dated September 26, 1988
R:XSTAFFRPTH29pA97.PC 8/8/97 klb 30
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0129 & PA97-0224 (Tentative Parcel Map & Variance )
EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP
'LANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
R:\STAFFRPTX129PA97.PC 8fil97 lab
C~TY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B ' ZONING MAP
DES|GNATI~ON ~CC (,COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL)
,OS
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL pLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
/
/
/
/
/
/
~LANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0129 & PA97-0224 (Tentative Parcel Map & Variance )
~XH~BIT D SITE PLAN
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - August 18, 1997
R:~STAFFRPTX129PA97.PC 8/12/97 klb
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August18,1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0266,
Variance, McDonald's Monument Sign
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Redevelopment Agency Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- approving Planning
Application No. PA97-0266 (Variance for McDonald's
Monument Sign) based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
McDonald's
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of a Variance to allow for construction of
a nine (9) foot high monument sign where the Old Town Specific
Plan allows a maximum height of six (6) feet for monument signs.
LOCATION:
Old Town, NE corner of 6th and Front
BACKGROUND
The proposed McDonald's will be located in the Temecula Stage Stop building on 6th and Front
Streets. The proposed monument sign is nine (9) feet high which exceeds the permitted
maximum height of six (6) feet. The applicant is requesting an approval of a Variance to permit
the construction of this sign.
DISCUSSION
Staff supports this request since the proposed sign at six (6) feet will be blocke'd by the
handicap ramp and its railings when traveling north bound on Front Street. The applicant has
agreed to continue the stone finish at the base of the sign to the end of the panels identifying
the tenants. The Development Code requires the Planning Commission to make certain Findings
in order to approve Variance requests. In staff's opinion, these Findings are appropriate for this
project. These Findings are included in the Findings Section of the Staff Report.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan since it implements the Old Town
Specific Plan and its goals and policies because it promotes the economic vitality of Old Town
and preserves the historic character of Old Town.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section
15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates that CEQA
applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. It also states that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is
not subject to CEQA. This project complies with the requirements for this section as there is
no possibility that the adoption of this amendment may have a significant effect on the
environment.
FINDINGS
That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application
of the Code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are
not shared by other properties in the zone.
The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by the
applicant.
The Variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to
surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the
property of other persons located in the vicinity.
The Variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding
properties.
5. The Variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 97-__- Blue Page 3
Exhibits - Blue Page 6
A. Monument Sign Elevation
B. Site Plan
R:\OLDTOWNXMACDNPC.VAR g/1~97 an 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
RFSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A VARIANCE TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MONUMENT SIGN
AT NINE (9) FEET WHICH EXCEEDS THE PERMITFED
HEIGHT OF SIX (6) FEET (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA97-0266)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Harming Commission held a noticed public hearing on August 18, 1997,
on the issue of recommending approval or denial of this amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMIRSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That in adoption of this Resolution approving this project, the Planning
Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict
application of the Code due to physical circumstances and characteristics of the property that are not
shared by other properties in the zone.
applicant.
The circumstances and characteristics for the variance were not created by the
C. The Variance does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to
surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other
persons located in the vicinity.
properties.
The Variance places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding
E. The Variance does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone.
Section 2. This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant
to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates
that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the
environment. It also states, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject
to CEQA. This project complies with the requirements for this section as there is no possibility
R:\OLDTOWN~MACDNPC.VAR 8/12/97 m 4
that the adoption of this amendment may have a significant effect on the environment.
Section 3. That the Planning Commission by adopting this Resolution approves
Planning Application No. PA 97-0266.
Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be
transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
EXHIBITS
CITY OF TEMECULA
; .............................. SIGN 4
~ i, ,, NON-ILLUMINATED DOUBLE
MONUMENT SIGN
NI~.~ SCALE: ~' · I',0"
SIGN 3
n
SIGN 5- 0 UNIT REQUIRED)
NON-ILLUMINATED DOUBLE FACE SAND*
BLASTED PROJECTING SIGN
SCALE: 1° ·
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. - 97-0266
EXHIBIT - A MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 18, 1997
CITY OF TEMECULA
SITE PLAN
SIGN 4-
MONUMENTSIGN
SIGN 3- IY't
I '-6" HIGH LOGO
SIGN 5-
PROJECtiNG SIGN
NOT TO SCALE
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. - PA97-0266
EXHIBIT - s
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - AUGUST 18, 1997
SITE PLAN
ITEM #7
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
DATE:
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner,~,/
August 18, 1997
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No. PA97-0221 An Amendment to the Old Town
Specific Plan Establishing the In-Lieu Parking Fee Program and Revising the
Parking Requirements, and Planning Application No. PA 97-0267 Establishing
the Parking Incentives for the 6th Street Parking Lot
RECOMMENDATION:
The Redevelopment Agency Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendment Establishing the
Parking in-Lieu Fee Program and Revising the Parking
Requirements) based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0267
(Establishing the Parking Incentives for the 6th Street
Parking Lot} based upon the Analysis and Findings
contained in the Staff Report.
BACKGROUND
Staff requested the Planning Commission continue this item off-calendar from the July 21,
1997 agenda. This request was based on staff's further consultation with the City Attorney.
As a result, the proposed Parking In-Lieu Fee Program has been amended, the parking
requirements in Old Town are being revised, and a new parking incentive program is also being
offered.
DISCUSSION
This item contains two separate elements which are designed to induce development while
preserving the historic character of Old Town. The first element contains two parts which are
proposed as amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan. They include the establishment of the
In-Lieu Parking Fee Program and a new standard for calculating parking requirements in 01d
Town. The second element is the 6th Street Parking Lot Incentive Program.
Parking In-Lieu Fee Program
R:\OLDTOWN~AMDSPPRK.PC3 8/12/97 m i
This program gives developers in the Tourist Retail Commercial (TRC) zone in Old Town a
choice between providing the required number of on-site parking spaces or paying the Parking
In-Lieu Fee. Payment of the Parking In-Lieu Fee is voluntary and does not constitute an
ownership interest of parking spaces developed by the City. Rather, the payment of an in-lieu
fee grants the developer the right to develop property with fewer on-site parking spaces than
would otherwise be required. The amount of the fee will be set by the City Council. This fee
is paid prior to the issuance of the Building Permits. The Director of Redevelopment determines
the whether a project can pay the in-lieu fee for all the required parking spaces or some on-site
parking should be provided.
Parking Requirements in Old Town
Currently, the Old Town Specific Plan references the Development Code for the calculation of
the required number of parking spaces. Since the physical development in Old Town is very
unique and unlike conventional commercial development, staff is proposing a new standard for
parking requirements in Old Town. The proposed language establishes a single standard of one
space per 300 square feet of gross floor area and replaces the different standards for different
uses currently included in the Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC), Civic (OTC), Community
Commercial (CC), Tourist Retail Core (TRC), and Community Commercial and Tourist Support
(CCTS) unless the Development Code requires a fewer number of parking spaces for the same
use (Refer to Attachment No. 4 for the Development Code Parking Requirements).
The proposed standard will result in a fewer number of required parking spaces from uses such
as restaurants, hotels, theaters, and cinemas. This reduction in the number of required parking
spaces is essential to induce development in Old Town and to preserve the pedestrian and
historic character of Old Town. Furthermore, this single standard will eliminate the necessity
of recalculating the number of required parking spaces and calculating the Parking In-Lieu Fee
every time a new businesses moves into a building or suite.
6th Street Parking Lot Incentive Program
This incentive program allows the property owners in the Tourist Retail Commercial (TRC) zone
to develop their property without having to provide on-site parking spaces or pay the Parking
in-Lieu Fee. This incentive extends to both new construction and expansion of existing
buildings. Initially, staff is proposing this incentive to be for 50 parking spaces. The City will
establish a priority list for these parking spaces and will offer them on a first come first served
bases at the time of issuance of Building Permits. The Program requires an the applicant to
keep an active Building Permit in order to be kept on the priority list. The City Council may, at
its discretion, offer the balance of the 80 parking spaces in the 6th Street Parking Lot for the
incentive program.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed amendment and incentive program are consistent with the General Plan since it
implements the Old Town Specific Plan and its goals and policies.
R:\OLDTOWNL~MDSppRK.pC3 8/12/97 an 2
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the environment. Any
potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included in the previous
Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact
Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs.
FINDINGS
SVecific Plan Amendment
1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Old
Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
2. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing
public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
3. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable character
which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old
Town.
Parking Incentive Program
1. The incentive program is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town Specific
Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
2. The proposed incentive program would not be detrimental to the public interest, health,
safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public
parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
3. The proposed incentive program induces the development and redevelopmerit in Old
Town because it provides a catalyst for development and redevelopment.
Attachments:
2.
3.
4.
Resolution No. 97-__- Blue Page 4
Exhibit A (Ordinance No. 97-B) - Blue Page 7
Resolution No. 97-B- Blue Page 13
Planning Commission Staff Report, July 21, 1997 - Blue Page 17
Development Code Parking Requirements - Blue Page 18
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:~OLDTOWN~MDSppRK.PC3 8112197 an Jr
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF ~ PL.,LNNING COMMISSION OF
~ CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
BY TFm. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING SECTION HI. F. 2. PARKING, OF THE Ol,n
TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO ESTARI .t~ff THE PARKING IN-
LIeU FEE PROGRAM AND REVISE THE PARKING
REQUIR MENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-
0221)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TFfE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Old Town Specific Plan that requires on-site
parking spaces for developments and encourages adoption of a Parking In-Lieu Fee Program; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend the Old Town Specific Plan to provide a choice for
developers in Old Town to either provide on-site parking as required by the Old Town Specific
Plan or pay the Parking In-Lieu Fee to preserve the historic character of Old Town; and,
~AS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on July 7, 1997 and
July 21, 1997, and August 18, 1997 on the issue of recommending approval or denial of this
amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of an Ordinance approving
this amendment, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the
Old Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing
public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
Section 2. This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the
environmere. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included
in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final
Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs.
Section 3. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Ordinance approving the Amendment, Exhibit "A" , substantially in the form attached
herere.
Section 4. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be
transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I EREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:XOLDTOWNXAMDSppRK.FC3 8/12/97 an 6
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
EXHIBIT A
OPJ)INANCE NO. 9'/-
AN ORDINANCE OF TIm. CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY
OF TEMECUIA AMENDING SECTION Ill. F. 2. PARKING,
OF ~ OLD TOWN SPECWIC PLAN TO ESTABLISH THE
PARKING IN-LIEU FEE PROGRAM AND REVISE THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA97-0221)
TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES HI~REBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section III. F. 2., Parking, of the Old Town Specific Plan is hereby
amended to read as follows:
2. Parking
All parking requirements in the Specific Plan area shall be as delineated in Chapter 17.24
of the Development Code with the following exceptions:
The parking requirements for all uses in the Highway Tourist Commercial (HTC),
Civic (OTC), Community Commercial (CC), Tourist Retail Core (TRC), and
Community Commercial and Tourist Support (CCTS) shall be 1 space per 300
gross floor area unless the Development Code requires a fewer number of parking
spaces for the same use.
In lieu of the required number of on-site parking spaces, the
developer/owner/operator may choose to pay the Parking In-Lieu Fee for a portion
or all the required on-site parking spaces pursuant to all the requirements of the
Parking In-Lieu Fee Program established by this Chapter. Any commercial use or
property in the Old Town Specific Plan Tourist Retail Core (TRC) Zone which
complies with all of the requirements of the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program as
established in this Chapter may participate in the program and be permitted to
satisfy all or part of their parking space requirements. The Parking In-Lieu Fee
shall be established by Resolution of the City Council.
R:XOLDTOWNXAMDSppRK.PC3 8112197 ~u 8
1)
2)
Existing Uses - Parking Deficiencies
Any use which pre-exists the effective date of this ordinance and which is
presently operating under the authority of a discretionary land use
entitlement from the City shall have no further obligations to provide
additional parking spaces pursuant to the parking requirements of the Old
Town Specific Plan.
Review of Parking In-Lieu Fee Program Applications
(a)
Persons or businesses desiring to participate in the Parking In-Lieu
Fee Program established herein shall submit a written application
for participation to the Director of the Redevelopment Department
on a form prescribed by the City. The Director shall, within thirty
(30) days of the completion of the application, calculate the
applicable in-lieu fee and grant permission to participate in the
program, if the Director makes the following findings:
(D
Participation in the Parking In-Lieu Program will not create
any significant adverse traffic safety impacts, pedestrian-
vehicle conflicts, or parking impacts.
(2)
Participation in the Parking In-Lieu Program will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
(b)
The Director's decision shall be in writing, and shall be served upon
the applicant by certified mail, return receipt requested.
(C)
The Director may, in his or her discretion, restrict the applicant's
participation in the program, if the Director determines that such
restriction is necessary to make the foregoing findings.
Appeals
The decision of the Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission
by any aggrieved person, in the time and manner provided in Section
17.03.090 of the Development Code.
Payments and Deposits
(a)
Payments of Parking In-Lieu Program Fees shall be made pursuant
to the schedule adopted by Resolution of the City Council. In no
event shall a Building Permit be issued for any participating use in
the Old Town Specific Plan TRC Zone prior to the receipt by the
City of the full payment of the Parking In-Lieu Fee.
R:\OLDTOWNXAMDSPPRK.PC3 8/12/97 an 9
(b)
Funds collected from the Parking In-Lieu Fee Program shall be
deposited in a segregated City Parking In-Lieu Program fund,
which is hereby established. Such fund shall be used exclusively
for the purpose of land acquisition, design, construction,
promotion, management, operation, maintenance, and availability
of parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of Front Street.
5. Waiver of Fees
By Resolution, the City Council may waive the Parking In-Lieu Fee at their
discretion.
6. Transferability
Parking In-Lieu Fee payments paid for pursuant to the provisions of this
ordinance shall be credited only to building or property for which
participation was granted, and shall not be assigned or otherwise transferred
for use on any other properoJ.
7. Acceptance of Conditions
An applicant's participation in the program shall not become effective, and
a Building Permit shall not be issued, unless and until the participant first
executes and submits for recording on the title to the property a covenant
accepting the terms of the approval, in a form to be provided by the City
Attorney. The covenant shall be recorded in the office of the Riverside
County Recorder and shall also be maintained in the office of the City
Clerk.
Section 2.
findings:
In adopting this Ordinance, the City Council hereby makes the following
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the
Old Town Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing
public parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment ensures the development of desirable
character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in, the surrounding
neighborhood because it promotes the preservation of the historic character of Old Town.
R:XOLDTOV.'lqXAMDSPpRK.PC3 8112197 sn 10
Section 3. Environmental Determination This project does not have the potential to
cause a significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old
Town Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town
Specific Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the
City and its environs.
Section 4. Severability The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or Section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City
Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this
Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption
of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish
a summary of this Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and
against the Ordinance, and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
R:\OLDTOWN~AMDSppP, X.PC3 8112/97
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED thk __~ day of , 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June S. Greek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 97- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ,1997, and that thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Temecula on the ~ day of , by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS
June S. Greek, City Clerk
R:\OLDTOWN~MDSPpRK.PC3 8/12/97
ATTACIIMENT NO.
PC RESOLUTION NO.
R:~OLDTOWNXAMDSppRK.PC3 8112197 sa 13
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
RESOLUTION OF TIIE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY
~ CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TEMECULA THE 6TH
PARKING LOT INCENTIVE PROGRAM (PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0221)
TH'E PIANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WltEREAS, the City Council adopted the Old Town Specific Plan that requires on-site
parking spaces for developments and encourages adoption of a Parking In-Lieu Fee; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council will adopt an Ordinance establishing the Parking In-Lieu
Program; and,
WllEREAS, the City Council will adopt a resolution creating the Parking in-Lieu Fee;
and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to encourage development and redevelopment in Old Town
by providing incentives; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing on July 7, 1997 and
July 21, 1997, and August 18, 1997 on the issue of recommending approval or denial of this
amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES FIND AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That in recommending adoption by the City Council of a Resolution approving
this Incentive Program, the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings:
A. The incentive program is consistent with the General Plan and the Old Town
Specific Plan because it promotes the revitalization of Old Town.
B. The proposed incentive program would not be detrimental to the:public interest,
health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the City will be providing public
parking spaces that may be used by all visitors to Old Town.
C. The proposed incentive program induces the development and redevelopment in Old
Town because it provides a catalyst for development and redevelopment.
Section 2. The Incentive Program includes the following standards:
R:XOLDTOWNXAMDSppRK.pC3 8/12/97 ~n
A. Fifty (50) spaces in the 6th Street Parking Lot shall be made available to the
landowners/developers of expanding existing buildings or new construction within the Tourist
Retail Commercial Zone (TRC) in Old Town to satisfy their parking requirements. These spaces
shall not be designated to any particular business or property and shall be permitted to be used by
the public.
B. The City shall establish a priority list for the 50 parking spaces on a first come first
served bases at the time a Building Permit is issued for each project.
C. Projects which allow their Building Permit to expire shall be removed from the
priority list. At the time these projects receive their Building Permits upon re-application, they
shall be placed at the bottom of the priority list.
D. Projects that are under construction but do not receive a Certificate of Occupancy
within 360 days of the issuance of the original Building Permit shall be removed from the priority
list and shall be placed on the bottom of the priority list unless the Director approves a one time
180 day extension.
E. The City Council may, at its discretion by Resolution, include the remaining
parking spaces within the 6th Street Parking Lot in the Incentive Program.
F. The Incentive Program shall be administered by the Director of Redevelopment
Department.
Section 3. This project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on the
environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town Specific Plan were included
in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the Final
Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and its environs.
Section 4. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt and
approve the Resolution approving the Incentive Program.
Section 5. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall cause this Resolution to be
transmitted to the City Council for further proceedings in accordance with State law.
R:',OLDTOWNXAIVIDSppILK.PC3 8/12/97 an 15
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I ~REBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\OLDTOWN~AMI)SFPRK.PC3 8/12/97 m 16
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING CO1VIMISSION STAFF REPORT
JULY ~1, 1997
R:~OLDTOWI~xAMDSPPRK.PC3 8/12/97 tm 17
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 70 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0221,
Old Town Specific Ran Amendment,
Parking In Lieu Fee
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
ADOPT Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning Application No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendment) based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
A request for approval of an amendment to the Old Town Specific
Plan to allow for the payment of the parking in-lieu fee in place of
the required parking spaces.
LOCATION: Old Town
BACKGROUND
By adopting Old Town Specific Plan, the City Council committed to provide public parking lots
to attract tourists and residents to Old Town. The studies in the Specific Plan identified a
short-fall of 360 parking spaces at the build-out of the Tourist Retail Core. The purchase,
design, and construction of the Sixth Street Parking Lot/Restrooms with 78 parking spaces was
the first step towards providing the needed parking spaces in Old Town. The 1997-98 Capital
improvement Program includes approximately $875,000 for acquisition, design, and
construction of future parking spaces in Old Town. The Specific Plan also encourages the
adoption of an in-lieu I~arking fee to help the City pay for the construction of these parking lots.
DISCUSSION
The proposed amendment adds the language necessary to give developers in Old Town a choice
between providing the required number of on-site parking spaces or paying the in-lieu parking
fee. It should be noted that the payment of this fee is voluntary and does not constitute an
ownership interest of parking spaces developed by the City. Rather, the payment of an in-lieu
fee grants the developer the right to develop property with fewer on-site parking spaces than
would otherwise be revised. The amount of the fee will be set by the City Council.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Saled Naaseh, Associate Planner~
July 21, 1997
Planning Application No. PA97-0221, Parking In Lieu Fee
ORIGINAL
RECOMM~NDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission:
BACKGROUND
ADO~ Resolution No. 97- recommending approval by
the City Council of Planning AppLication No. PA97-0221
(Old Town Specific Plan Amendmen0 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report.
The Planning Commission continued this item from the July 7, 1997 agenda to the July 21, 1997
meeting.
DISCUSSION
The following Findings have replaced the Findings in the previous Staff Report's Resolution:
1. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
The proposed Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience or welfare of the City.
The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the
anticipated land use developments.
The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be
compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 2
Planning Commission Staff Report, July 7, 1997 - Blue Page 5
R:~OLDTOWNXAMD$PPRK.IaCl 7116197 m 1
This amendment deletes the following language in Section III. F. 2., Parking, of the Old Town
Specific Plan:
All parking requirements in the Specific Plan area shall be
delineated in Chapter 9.24, Parking and Loading, of the
Development Code unless specifically regulated differently in this
Specific Plan. See section on Public Parking Program.
This amendment proposes the following language forthis Section:
All parking requirements in the Specific Plan area shall be
delineated in Chapter 17.24, Parking and Loading, of the
Development Code. However, instead of the required number of
on-site parking spaces, the developer/owner/operator may choose
to pay the parking in-lieu fee for a portion or all the required on-
site parking spaces.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan since it implements the Old Town
Specific Plan and its goals and policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan does not have the potential to cause a
significant impact on the environment. Any potential impacts associated with the Old Town
Specific Plan were included in the previous Negative Declarations for the Old Town Specific
Plan, as well as the Final Environmental Impact Report of the City General Plan for the City and
its environs. Further, this project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant
to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. This section of the CEQA Guidelines indicates
that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on
the environment. It also states that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the
activity is not subject to CEQA. This amendment complies with the requirements for this
section as there is no possibility that the adoption of this amendment may have a significant
effect on the environment.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 3
Exhibit A (Ordinance No. 97-__) - Blue Page 6
R:\OLDTOWNLtsMDSPPRICFC 7/16/97 cad 2
ATTACItMENT NO. 4
DEVELOPMENT CODE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
R:\OLDTOWN~AIvlDSPPRK.PC3 8/12/97 m 1~]
CITY OF TEMECULA Develovment Code
Educallmaal Facilities
Table 17o24(a)
Parking Spac_es Required
Required Number of Spaces
I space/; employees. plus I space/5 children. based on faciliw capacity
1.5 mpacedclan~oom, plus ! space/5 fix=d seats in auditorium, gymnasium
or similar public assembly fie/lilY (35 SF~5 fixed seats)
I space/350 SF~FA
I ¢pac~/4(X} SF of/manufacturing or industrial, plus 1 space/300SF of
of~ce use, plus 1 space/1.OOO SF of warehouse area
! space/I,000 SF of warehouse arts, plus I space/300 SF of office use
I spacer25 units or cubicles, plus 2 spaces for e. nch caretakers urat.
1 space/30O SF-GFA
I space/30O $F-GFA
1 .'pace per 200 SF of GFA
I space/250 SF-GFA
I space/7 gross SF dance floor sPA '
6 spacedhole, with other uses calculate~ separately
I space/IO00 SF of lot are-e, plus I spece/2 employees
Abbrev~adons:
May 7, ]996
Chapter 17.24 s Off-street ParIcing & Loading
CITY OF TEMECULA DeveloPment Code
Table 17.24(a)
Parking Spaces Required
Required Number of Spaces
Union Hails. Lodses, Clubs
Automotive Uses
Service and Repair
Car Wash
Car Washing Facility - Self Service
Commercial Uses -Retail and Service
Furmrure Stores, Bul~ Goods, Floor Coyanna, Home
General Retail with less than 2,5,000 $F-GFA
General ReLsll with 25.000 SF or greater
Hotels and Motels
1 s~ace/500 SF of GFA
i spsce/I00 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 spaces in all cases
I space175 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 spaces in all cases
I spaces/300 SF-GFA with the following additions:
1 space/5 suets
I space/100 GFA
Abbreviations:
May 7, 1996
Chapter 17.24 · Off-street Parking & Loading · 8
ITEM #8
2. The following Section needs to be amended as follows:
Section 7. Ordinance 93-09, except as set forth in Section 6 of this Ordinance, Article
XIX of Riverside County Ordinance 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and
Section 6 of Ordinance No. 593 are hereby repealed.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan implementation program
requires the City to adopt sign standards for residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
Through the adoption of this Ordinance, General Plan goals relating to the urban design and
community character are being fulfilled.
FINDINGS
Adoption of the Ordinance will:
1. Provide for effective business signage;
2. Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings and the
community as a whole;
3. Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do
business and visit;
4. Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
5. Assure that signs are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain;
6. Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused
by distracting signage;
7. Recognize that the eventual elimination of existing signs that are not in Conformity with
the provisions of this Chapter requires further analysis of the existing signs in the City.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 97- , Blue Page 3
2. Planning Commission Staff Report, July 21, 1997 - Blue Page 7
R:/STAFFRFTXI27PA95.PCC 8/7/97 klb 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Saied Naa~h, Associate Planner
August 18, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127, Sign Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT PC Resolution No. 97- entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE
ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTER 17.28
OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA95-0127)
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission continued this item from the July 21, 1997 meeting to the August 4,
1997 meeting which was subsequently cancelled.
Following are recommended medi~cations to the July 21, 1997 Staff Report to clarify that Section
6 of Ordinance No. 593 is being repleaded. Deletions are shown as ~ and additions are
shown as ~:
1. Page 35 of the Sign Ordinance
The following Section is deleted:
R:\STAFFRPT~I27PA95.PCC 8/'7/97 k~ 1
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO.
R:\STAFFRP'BI27PAg$.PCC 8f7/97 klb 3
WHEREAS, staff met with this group (Comment Group) on November 4, 12, 18, 19, and
20, 1996 and December 18, 1996; and,
WH~'~_,AS, staff met again with the Sign Committee on January 22, 1997 to address the
concerns of the Comment Group; and,
~, staff met with the Comment Group on February 19, 1997 and discussed the
Sign Committee's compromises; and,
WHEREAS, staff held additional meetings with the Auto Dealers Association, the
Apartment Owners Association, and the Chamber of Commerce to inform them about the
proposed Ordinance and obtain their input; and,
~, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on February
24, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition, and provided direction to staff; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on April
21, 1997, May 5, 1997, May 29, 1997, July 7, 1997, July 21, 1997 and August 18, 1997 at
which lime interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and,
WHF~REAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho Califomia Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMIVIEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTERS 17.28 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, A
COMPREHENSIVE REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER ADVERTISING
DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
(PLANNING APPLICATION PA95-0127}" THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM
ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT A.
R:\STAFFRPTXI27PA95.PCC 81'71~7 klb 5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOlVlMF-NDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITI.!~ AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMEaNT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPlVm~NT CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA95-0127)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's first General
Plan on November 9, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan identified the need for the City Council to adopt an
enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council appointed a representative committee of local citizens and
business persons to assist City staff in developing an enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee met with City staff on April 2, 1996, April
30, 1996, May 7, 1996, May 21, 1996, June 4, 1996, June 18, 1996, July 16, 1996, July 30,
1996, August 20, 1996, September 3, 1996, September 9, 1996, and October 1, 1996 to address
the issue of signage with the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, a Community Workshop was held on October 14, 1996, a notice of this
meeting was sent to all registered business owners in Temecula and was published in the local
newspaper; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee considered the comments received and
recommended a new enhanced sign ordinance to the Planning Commission; and
WHFREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on October
21, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission took public testimony on October 21, 1996,
continued the item off-calendar, and directed staff to meet with a group who spoke at the hearing;
and,
R:~STAFFRFI~127PA95.PCC 8/7/97klb 4
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of August,
1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:x~TAFFRPT~I27PA95.PCC 8/"/197 ~1b 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
.JULY 21, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT~127PA95.PCC 8/7/97kFo 7
recommends to amend Section 17.28.420 (b) for Freestanding On-Site Directional Signs
for Individual Sites in Industrial Districts to state the following:
For buildings larger than 100,000 square feet, the following standards shall be used
in lieu of the standards set forth in Sections 17.28.280 Co) (1) and (2):
Maximum area of sign shall be 12 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet.
The Environmental Determination Section is revised to read as follows:
The provisions of this Ordinance will have no effect on the environment and the proposed
Ordinance is therefore exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act pursuant to Section 15061 Co) (3). This section indicates that, where it can be seen
with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant
effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to the provisions of CEQA. This
Ordinance regulates signage for existing and new buildings. The future signage for
existing buildings will be evaluated at the time of sign permit approval. The future
signage for future building will evaluated as a part of the proposed projects, and the
environmental impacts from these projects will be determined when they are proposed.
Def'mitions
The following are recommended modifications to clarify some of the terms in the Definitions
Section. Deletions are shown as redtinea and additions are shown as ~:
1. Alteration
Any change or rearrangement in the supporting members of an existing building, such as
bearing walls, columns, beams, girders, or interior partitions, as well as any change in
doors or windows, or any enlargement to or diminution of a building or structure, whether
h0rizontally mL:verticallyl or the moving of a building or structure from one location to
another. Alteration for signs includes any change of face, color, material, size, shape,
illumination, position, location, construction, or support of any sign or advertising device.
2. Building Official
The Building Official of the City of Temecula or ~e authorized representative.
3. Corporate Flag
A flag of a nationally recognized corporation or company. Individual businesses with
franchise agreements or individually operated businesses that are part of a larger company
are not ~ included in this definition.
R:\STAFFRP'BI27PA95,~CB 8/6/971db 2
lVlEIvlORANDUI~
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission
Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
July 21, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127, Sign Ordinance
ADOPT PC Resolution No. 97- enti~ed:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97°
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMIRSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA95-0127)
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission continued this item from the July 7, 1997 agenda to the July 21, 1997
meeting.
DISCUSSION
Upon further review and consultation with the City Attorney, staff recommends the following to
clarify certain portions of the Sign Ordinance:
Staff Report
A major portion of the On-site Directional Signs in Industrial Districts section of the July
7, 1997 Staff Report was inadvertently deleted. The Planning Commission had expressed
concern that the 3 square foot directional signs for large industrial uses may not be large
enough to adequately direct traffic to appropriate areas of the site. Therefore, staff
R:\STAFFRP'BI27PA95.1~CB 816197 klb i
Ordinance
The following are recommended modifications to clarify some of the terms in the Ordinance.
Deletions are shown as ~ and additions are shown as ~:
1. Page 2
17.28.020 Applicability
This Chapter shall apply to all areas of the City, except that the provisions of this Chapter shall
apply to the Old Town Specific Plan area only to the extent the specific plan does not address a
particular i~ signage issue.
2. Page 4
(r) Signs Within the Public Right-of-Way or Attached to Any Public Property
Signs in any public right-of-way or signs which project over or into a public right-of-way, or
which are attached to ~ public property, are prohibited.
3. Page 5
(b) Employment Opportunity Signs
( 1 ) Freestanding signs shall only be allowed in Office and Industrial Districts for single tenant
buildings, where no other tenants are located on the parcels
4. Page 8
(s) Time and Temperature Signs
(2) Maximum sig~::S~ctttreiheight Shalli:be:~6:mifeet~::fffreestanding~
(5) Wall mounted slgn!:~::~ted as; ,~::~f'thepermltteXt~gn::i~:::~f!!h~el~Va~Oh5 :they ~are
placed on: :Frees~dingsignsS~shall be
shall be:eounted,!:~::~::6f;the~r~tt~,~iign::~!i~fi;th~!freii~d~giyS!gn:i;
(5) The area for wall mounted time and temperature signs are included in the permitted sign
area for the building. Freestanding time and temperature signs shall be an integral part of
a permitted freestanding sign and the area shall be included in the permitted sign area of
the freestanding sign.
5. Page 11
(a) Standards for Permanent Freestanding Signs
R:~STAFFRPT'XI27pA95.PCB 8/6/97klb 4
4. Employment Opportunity Signs
A sign that advertises the availability of ~ employment
Major Entrance
An automobile entrance to a shopping, office, or business center used primarily by
customers. with either full or restricted access. Entrances used solely for loading and
unloading are not considered major entrances.
Sign Area
Sign area for all signs, except multi-tenant signs, is computed by including the entire area
within a single, continuous, rectilinear perimeter of not more than eight straight lines,
enclosing the extreme edge of the writing, representation, emblem, or other display. It
does not generally include any background, supporting framework, or bracing that is
incidental to the display itself. In case of two sided signs, the area ~5!~!~~
iii~ti~i~g!:i~:ii is equal to the sign area for a single display surface.
For multi tenant signs, the total sign area shall include the area which surrounds the
lettering and the logos for all tenants (i.e., sign area for each tenant is not computed
individually).
Sign Placement Area
The area f6~ of the building elevation surface which the sign is directly placed on.
Temporary Business Advertising Sign
A temporary sign which is made of cloth, bunting, plastic, wood, vinyl, poster board,
painted windows, or other similar materials, and which is located on site of the business
use or activity, and is erected or placed for a prescribed period of time to promote,
advertise, announce, or provide the following information:
(1)
Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business, owner, or occupant
of the premises where the sign is located; or,
(2)
Advertises the business conducted, the services available or rendered, or goods
produced. sold, or available for sale upon the ~ premises where the sign
is located.
R:\STAFFRFI~I27pA95.PCB 816197 I~ 3
10. Page 32
(d) Abandoned Signs
Signs shall be considered abandoned and subject to abatement pursuant to Chapter 8.12 under any
of the following circumstances:
(1) A sign other than Off;~ off-premises sign, which for a period of ninety (90) days,
no longer advertises or identifies an ongoing business, product, or service available on the
premises where the sign is located.
11. Page 34
The following Section is amended as follows:
Section $. Section 17.34.010(a) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by deleting the definition for "Alteration", "Sign", and "Outdoor Advertising Structure", and
adding the following definitions set forth in Exhibit 'A" to this Ordinance:
12. Page 35
The following Section is amended as follows:
Section 6. Article XIX of Ordinance 348, Advertising Regulations;!~OrCli~ance. S:~:~l-26i
~d~CrtiSingii:Disl~L~Tsi:.:~:!91~0 Directi~ ~Sig~:;! and Section 6 of Ordinance 593 are
hereby repealed.
13. The following Sections need to bc added to accurately reflect the codified Ordinances:
(1) Location
(a)
(b)
(c)
All freestanding signs shall be setback at least 5 feet from the right of way or property line
or 17 feet from the face of the curb, whichever is less.
All freeslanding signs shall be located outside the site visibility area as defined by Section
17.06.050 (1) of the Development Cede.
All freestanding signs shall be located ~ at least 3 feet from buildings.
6. Page 18
17.28.130 Subdivision Signs
(a)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per subdivision if 5 acres or less, or tw~i~per
subdivision ff more than 5 acres. If several builders are building on a tract, each builder
is entitled to its own subdivision sign(s) located within the property they own, provided
~!~;ii~ the total does not exceed the ~ $ number of subdivision signs
7. P~e21
Co)
Requirements for Freestanding Building or Single Tenant Identification Signs in
Commercial Districts
Freestanding building or business identification signs are intended to identify single tenants
whether or not in a center, or buildings in commercial districts.
(5)
The maximum area for all single tenant identification signs or building identification signs
shall be 25 square feet, except that:
(a)
Co)
Maximum area for theater signs shall be 150 square feet, including the area for
identification of ~ the shows and the theater name.
Maximum area for service stations shall be 50 square feet, including the area for ~ fuel
types, prices, and the service station name.
8. Page 29
17.28.400 Signs in Industrial Districts
All signs within Industrial Districts must comply with the standards for Industrial Districts
contained in Sections 17.28.400 through 17.28.499, and with the standards contained in Section
17.28.070. In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28.400 through 17.28.499, Office
buildings in Industrial Districts must comply with the standards for Office District contained in
Section 17.28.300 through 399.
9. P~e30 and31
R:\STAFFRF~I27PA95.FCB 816197 kl~ 5
Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused
by distracting signage;
Recognize that the eventual elimination of existing signs that are not in conformity with
the provisions of this Chapter requires further analysis of the existing signs in the City.
Attachments:
1. Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 9
2. Planning Commission Staff Report, July 7, 1997 - Blue Page 13
Section 6. The City's existing r~gulations relating to temporary signs can be found in
Sections 19.9 and 19.10 of Article XIX of Pdverside County Ordinance No. 348, as adopted by
Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04, and as mended by Ordinances 92-16, 93-12, 94-05, and 94-23.
The codi~er is hereby directed to codify those regulations as part of Chapter 17.28 of the
Development Code at Section 17.28.(~0, to be entitled "Temporary Business Advertising Signs
in Commercial, Office, and Industrial Districts".
Section 7. Ordinance 93-09 and, except as set forth in Section 6 of this Ordinance,
Article XIX of Riverside County Ordinance 348, as adopted by Temecula Ordinance No. 90-04,
axe hereby repealed.
Section 8. The eodi~er is hereby directed to codify Ordinance 91-26, relating to
Ambient Balloons, as part of the Development Code at Section 17.28.700, to be entitled
"Requirements for Temporary Ambient Air Balloons in Commercial, Office, and Industrial
Districts".
Section 9. The codi~er is hereby directed to codify Ordinance 91-40, relating to
directional signs, as pan of the Development Code at Section 1.17.28.800, to be enti~ed "Kiosk
Signs in all Districts". The definitions in Ordinance 91-40 are to be eodified at Section
17.34.010. To the extent them is any conflict or overlap between the definitions in Ordinance 91-
40 and the definitions in Section 17.34.010, the definitions in Section 17.34.010 shall control.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan implementation program
requires the City to adopt sign standards for residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
Through the adoption of this Ordinance, General Plan goals relating to the urban design and
community character axe being fulfilled.
FINDINGS
Adoption of the Ordinance would:
1. Provide for effective business signage;
Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings' and the
community as a whole;
Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do
business and visit;
Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
5. Assure that signs axe appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain;
R:XSTAFFRFI~I27PA95.PCB 816197 lab 7
ATTACHMF-NT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:~,~TAFFRFI~I27PA95.PCB 8/6/97 klb 9
~, staff met with this group (Comment Group) on November 4, 12, 18, 19, and
20, 1996 and December 18, 1996; and,
~, staff met again with the Sign Committen on January 22, 1997 to address the
concerns of the Comment Group; and,
WltBIEAS, staff met with the Comment Group on February 19, 1997 and discussed the
Sign Committee's compromises; and,
WHEREAS, staff held additional meetings with the Auto Dealers Association, the
Apartment Owners Association, and the Chamber of Commerce to inform them about the
proposed Ordinance and obtain their input; and,
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on February
24, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition, and provided direction to staff; and,
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on April
21, 1997, May 5, 1997, May 29, 1997, July 7, 1997, and July 21, 1997 at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and,
WImRF_,AS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOM3/IF~ND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTERS 17.28 AND 17.30 OF THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED CHANGES TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA95-0127)" THAT IS
SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT
A.
R:~STAFFRPT'xI27pA95.PCB 8/6/9'7klb 11
PC RF-QOLUTION NO. 97-__
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMF, CULA RECOMMI~NDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLi~D AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAFFER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR 'SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA95-0127)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's first GeneraJ
Plan on November 9, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan identified the need for the City Council to adopt an
enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council appointed a representative committee of local citizens and
business persons to assist City staff in developing an enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee met with City staff on April 2, 1996, April
30, 1996, May 7, 1996, May 21, 1996, June 4, 1996, June 18, 1996, July 16, 1996, July 30,
1996, August 20, 1996, September 3, 1996, September 9, 1996, and October 1, 1996 to address
the issue of signage with the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, a community workshop was held on October 14, 1996, a notice of this
meeting was sent to all registered business owners in Temecula and was published in the local
newspaper; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee considered the comments received and
recommended a new enhanced sign ordinance to the Planning Commission; and'
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on October
21, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission took public testimony on October 21, 1996,
continued the item off-calendar, and directed staff to meet with a group who spoke at the hearing;
and,
R:\STAFFRPT~I27PA95.PCB 816197 klO 10
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPT~.D this 21st day of July, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 21st day of July,
1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRP'B127PA95,PCB 8/6/97klb 12
ATTACHMI~NT NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
JULY 7, 1~)7
R:~STAFFRPT~I27PA95.PCB 8/6/~7 klb 13
DISCUSSION
The Planning Commission has made several changes to the original Ordinance presented to the
Planning Commission on April 21, 1997. In addition to the redlined copy included in
Attachment No. 2, the following represents the major changes the Planning Commission has
made to the April 21, 1997 Ordinance.
Vehicle Signs
The Planning Commission directed staff to recommend an Ordinance that further restricts the
display of vehicles with signs.
Freeway Signs
Several portions of the freeway signs section was changed by the Planning Commission. The
following provides a summary:
In Commercial Districts an incentive has been added to encourage three (3) or more
parcels to propose one multi tenant free standing freeway sign instead of three or more
freestanding signs. The incentive for these uses is an extra freestanding tenant
identification sign along their street frontage which other wise will not be permitted.
This provision should help reduce the number of freestanding signs along the freeway.
The flag test provision to identify the optimum height of freeway oriented freestanding
signs was eliminated by the Planning Commission and was replaced with a 30 foot
maximum sign height. This provision will eliminate the controversies in regard with the
height of freestanding signs and the growing trees along the freeway,
Freeway oriented wall mounted signs for multi- tenant building in Commercial, Office,
and Industrial Districts are now allowed to make the Ordinance internally consistent.
A great deal on discussion was spend on the size of centers which should be allowed
to have multi-tenant freestanding freeway oriented signs. The Planning Commission
agreed with staff that the minimum center size for permitting these signs should be 7
acres. However, some members of the Comment Group still thought that 3 acres was
a more reasonable size. Staff is recommending the following language for Section
17.28.210 (a) (1) b. which is acceptable to the Comment Group and staff:
One multi-tenant identification sign per shopping center if the
shopping center is larger than 7 acres. If the total number of
signs and the square footage permitted by this Chapter is reduced
through the approval of a sign program, the 7 acre requirement
may be reduced to 3 acres or larger centers.
Number of Tenants for Each Panel
The number of tenants allowed to be identified on each panel for multi-tenant signs in
Commercial Districts was changed by the Planning Commission from one to two. The intent
of this provision was to reduce the number of tenants that may be identified on each sign;
therefore, increasing the readability of the sign.
R:\STAFFRPT\127PA95A.pC9 6/30/97 sn 2
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 7, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
ADOPT PC Resolution No. 97- entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTER
17.28 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER ADVERTISING
DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED CHANGES TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA95-0127)
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
A Request to Recommend Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
This item was continued by the Planning Commission from the May 29, 1997 meeting. At that
meeting, Planning Commission closed the public hearing and directed staff to include all
changes recommended by the Planning Commission to the Sign Ordinance. Consequently, this
item was continued to the July 7, 1997 meeting. Attachment No. 2 includes a redline copy
of the Ordinance which includes all the changes the Planning Commission has made to the
Ordinance since the April 21, 1997 meeting. This copy shows the deleted language as redlined
and new language as underlined. Exhibit A is a clean copy of the Ordinance.
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A.PC9 6130/97 an
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan implementation program
requires the City to adopt sign standards for residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
Through the adoption of this Ordinance, General Plan goals relating to the urban design and
community character are being fulfilled.
FINDINGS
Adoption of the Ordinance would:
1. Provide for effective business signage;
Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings and the
community as a whole;
Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do
business and visit;
Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
5. Assure that signs are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain;
Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused
by distracting signage;
Recognize that the eventual elimination of existing signs that are not in conformity with
the provisions of this Chapter requires further analysis of the existing signs in the City.
Attachments:
3.
4.
5.
PC Resolution No. 97- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Ordinance 97-__ - Blue Page 9
Redlined Copy of Ordinance 97- - Blue Page 10
May 19, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 11
May 5, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 12
April 21, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 13
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A.pC9 6/30/97 sa 4
On-Site Directional signs in Industrial Districts
The Planning Commission requested staff
Multiple-Tenant Industrial Signs
These signs were added by the Planning Commission to provide more visibility to the tenants
in multi-tenant buildings in Industrial Districts; however, these sign are not permitted to be used
in conjunction with single tenant signs.
Existing City Ordinances
Staff had incorporated four existing Ordinances adopted by the City which dealt with signs into
the Sign Ordinance to create a comprehensive Sign Ordinance. These Ordinances include the
Temporary Sign, Kiosk Program, Ambient Air Balloon, and the Billboard Ordinances. The
Planning Commission did not agree with many provisions of the Temporary Sign Ordinance;
therefore directed staff to remove all Ordinances from the Sign Ordinance. Staff has removed
all these Ordinances from the Sign Ordinance with the exception of the Bill Board Ordinance.
The Billboard Ordinance has been modified by the City Attorney and staff is recommending
keeping this portion in the Sign Ordinance. All other Ordinances have been removed from the
Ordinance and are onty being codified by the Sign Ordinance. No changes are proposed for
these Ordinances that are being codified. Staff had proposed the following changes to these
Ordinances.
One of the major additions by staff to the Temporary Sign Ordinance and the Kiosk Program
was allowing apartments to use banners, flags, and the Citywide Kiosks to advertise and
identify themselves. These added provisions were results of meetings with the Temecula
Apartment Owners Association.
The other major change by staff to the Temporary Sign Ordinance was the Window Signs
provisions. The adopted Ordinance exempts window signs which are less than 10 percent from
obtaining a permit. In addition, this Ordinance permits window signs between 10 percent and
75 percent with a permit and prohibits window signs over 75 percent. Staff has proposed a
simpler and easier to enforce standard. This provision exempted window signs with less than
25 percent area from obtaining a permit and prohibited them if they were greater than 25
percent,
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Planning Commission hereby determines that the provisions of this Ordinance will have no
effect on the environment and the proposed Ordinance is therefore exempt from requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3). This section
indicates that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity
in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to the
provisions of CEQA. This Ordinance regulates signage which are either for existing buildings
or new buildings. The future signage for existing buildings will not cause a significant on the
environment since existing building have already disturbed the land and their environmental
impacts have been mitigated. The future signage for future building will not cause a significant
on the environment the signage will be a part of the proposed projects and the environmental
impacts from these projects will be determined when they are proposed.
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A.pC9 6/30/97 an 3
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 97-
R:\STAFFRPT\127pA95A.PC9 6/30/97 sn 5
WHEREAS, staff met with this group (Comment Group) on November 4, 12, 18, 19, and
20, 1996 and December 18, 1996; and,
WHEREAS, staff met again with the Sign Committee on January 22, 1997 to address the
concerns of the Comment Group; and,
WHEREAS, staff met with the Comment Group on February 19, 1997 and discussed the
Sign Committee's compromises; and,
WHEREAS, staff held additional meetings with the Auto Dealers Association, the
Apartment Owners Association, and the Chamber of Commerce to inform them about the
proposed Ordinance and obtain their input; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public heating on February
24, 1997, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition, and provided direction to staff; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on April
21, 1997, May 5, 1997, May 29, 1997, and July 7, 1997 at which time interested persons had an
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, County Library,
Rancho California Branch, the U.S. Post Office and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE COUNCIL APPROVE AN
ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTERS 17.28 AND 17.30 OF THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED CHANGES TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING APPLICATION PA95-0127)" THAT IS
SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM ATTACHED TO THIS RESOLUTION AS EXHIBIT
A.
R:\STAFFRPT\I27F'A95A .PC9 6/30/97 sn 7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 97-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAPTER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR 'SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA95-0127)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's first General
Plan on November 9, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement general
plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan identified the need for the City Council to adopt an
enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council appointed a representative committee of local citizens and
business persons to assist City staff in developing an enhanced sign ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee met with City staff on April 2, 1996, April
30, 1996, May 7, 1996, May 21, 1996, June 4, 1996, June 18, 1996, July 16, 1996, July 30,
1996, August 20, 1996, September 3, 1996, September 9, 1996, and October 1, 1996 to address
the issue of signage with the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, a community workshop was held on October 14, 1996, a notice of this
meeting was sent to all registered business owners in Temecula and was published in the local
newspaper; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Ordinance Committee considered the comments received and
recommended a new enhanced sign ordinance to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly noticed public hearing on October
21, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission took public testimony on October 21, 1996,
continued the item off-calendar, and directed staff to meet with a group who spoke at the hearing;
and,
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A,pC9 6/30/97 m 6
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 1997.
Linda Fahey, Chairman
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ResOlution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of July,
1997 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A.PC9 6/30/97 an 8
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
R:\STAFFRPT\127pA95A.PC9 6;30197 sn 9
(d) Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
(e) Assure that signs are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertran:
(f) Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused
by distracting signage.
17.28.020 Applicability
This Chapter shall apply to all areas of the City, except that the provisions of this Chapter shall
apply to the Old Town Specific Plan area only to the extent the specific plan does not address a
particular issue signage issue.
17.28.030 Sign Pertnits
(a) Sign Permit Required
Except as provided in Section 17.28.050 a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting,
moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign in the City.
(b) Findings
No sign permit shall be issued unless the Director finds that the application tbr a sign permit
satisfies, or with conditions can satisfy, all of the following requirements:
(1) The sign is consistent with the General Plan, complies with the requirements of this
Chapter, and complies with all other applicable laws and regulations',
(2) The size, shape, color, visual elements, illumination and placement of the sign is
compatible with the surrounding area and with other lawful signs and does not to detract
from the character or quality of surrounding properties.
(c) Basis for Denial; Appeal
Any decision of the Director denying a sign permit shall be in writing, and shall identify which
of the findings set forth in subsection Co) of Section 17.28.030 could not be made, and the reasons
therefor. Any decision of the Director regarding a sign permit may be appealed, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17.03.090 of this Development Code.
17.28.040 Prohibited Signs
All signs not expressly permitted by this Chapter are prohibited, including but not limited to the
following. No application for sign pernut, development plan, or other application for a prohibited
sign shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved.
R:MNAASEHS\SIGN'DRAVi'23FORD 6/27/~7 sn 2
ORDINANCE NO. 97-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOFFING CHAFFER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 17.28 of the Development Code of the City of Temecula is hereby
adopted to read as follows:
"Chapter 17.28
SIGN STANDARDS
17.28.010 Purpose and Intent
It is the goal of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that new
development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that accessory
facilities be compatible with the overall theme. The quality of signage plays a very distinctive role
in achieving this goal. When abused, signs can cream a visual blight which detracts from the
quality of the environment and an individual's visual perception of the City.
The intent of this Chapter is to implement the Temecula General Plan, and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare through the design, use of quality materials, construction, illumination,
location, number, and maintenance of all signs. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the
development standards for the installation and maintenance of signs within the City and to ensure
that the design and location of outdoor advertising displays are consistent with the health, safety,
and aesthetic objectives of the City. :
The purposes of this Chapter, in addition to those expressed in the General Plan, are as follows:
(a) Provide for effective business signage;
(b)
Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings and the
community as a whole;
(C)
Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do
business and visit;
RLNAASEHS\SIGNn. DRAFT23F.ORD 6127197 sn
No permit shall be issued for any sign, and no sign shall be constructed or maintained, which has less
horizontal or vertical clearance from authorized communication or energized electrical power lines
than that prescribed by laws of the state or duly promulgated rules and regulations.
(P)
Signs Located Above the Eave Line and Roof Signs (signs integrated into an
architectural feature are not considered to be above the cave line).
(q) Signs on Doors, Windows or Fire Escapes
No sign structure shall be installed, relocated or maintained so as to prevent free ingress to or
egress from any door, window or fire escape. No sign of any kind shall be attached to a stand
pipe or fire escape, except those signs as required by other adopted Codes or Ordinances.
(r) Signs Within the Public Right-of-Way or Attached to Any Public Propert),
Signs in any public right-of-way or signs which project over or into a public right-of-way. or
which are attached to the public property, are prohibited.
(s) Vehicle Signs
Signs located on or affixed to a motor vehicle or trailer (as those terms are defined in the
California Vehicle Code), whether parked on private property or public right of way, for the
purpose of advertising products or services or directing people to a business or activity. This
paragraph does not apply to standard advertising or identification practice where such signs are
painted on or permanently attached to a business or commercial vehicle, so long as such vehicle
is licenced and fully operable, and the signs on such vehicle are not in violation of the Vehicle
Code.
17.28.050 Exempt Signs
The following signs are exempt from the requirement to obtain a sign permit if they meet these
specified requirements:
Construction, Contractor, Financing, or Remodeling Signs
(i) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
Six (6) square feet in single family districts.
Sixteen (16) square feet in all other districts.
(2)
(3)
(4)
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
Maximum number of freestanding signs shall not exceed one construction, contractor, or
remodeling sign per street frontage for each parcel or shopping center plus, one financing
sign per street frontage for each parcel or shopping center.
They are permitted for sites with an active building permit and shall be removed 5 days after
R:\NAASEHS\SfGI~DRAFT23F.ORD 6~27~97 sn 4
(a) Abandoned Signs (as defined in Section 17.28.900 (d)).
(b) Amenity Signs (signs which identify the amenities provided in a multi family complex that
are visible from public street)s.
(c) Animated or Moving Signs (except for time and temperature displays pursuant to Sections
17.28.050 (s)).
(d) Bunting (unless approved by a sign program).
{e) Cabinet or Can Signs (wall mounted)
{f) Commercial Off-Premise Signs (except as expressly permitted by this Chapter)
(g) Commercial Signs next to Residential Areas
When commercial and industrial developments are facing residential uses and are located on the same
local street (60 foot fight-of-way or less) as the residential uses, freestanding signs associated with
these developments are prohibited. Wall signs which provide identification for businesses to
pedestrians may be authorized by a sign program, provided that the illumination of the signs does not
negatively impact residential uses.
(h) Day-Glow Colors for Window Signs
(i) Decorative Flags (unless approved through a sign program and then only if limited to focal
points within the project)
(j) Loud Speakers or Signs Which Emit Sound, Odor, or Visible Matter, Except as
Authorized by this Chapter.
(k) Off-Site Subdivision Signs (except as otherwise permitted in Section 17.28.800, Kiosk
Signs or Section 17.28. 130, Subdivision Signs)
(I) Pennants and Streamers
(m) Portable Signs on Private Property
(n) Signs Constituting a Traffic Hazard
No person shall install or maintain or cause to be installed or maintained any sign which simulates or
imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of words
"stop, danger", or any other words, phrases, symbols or characters in such a manner as to interfere
with, mislead or confuse vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(o) Signs in Proximity to Utility Lines
(4)
(5)
(6)
The sign may not be erected more than 5 days prior to the sale.
The signs shall be removed before the end of the day of the sale.
The sign shall not be illuminated.
(f) Government Signs
Any official government sign, public notice or warning required by an applicable federal. state.
or local law, regulation, or ordinance.
(g) Helium Balloons
(1)
(2)
(3)
No balloon shall be larger than three feet in diameter.
They shall not be higher than 10 feet from the ground.
They shall not be displayed for more than three days for each calendar month and in no
case for more than three consecutive days at a time.
Atl balloons shall be anchored, and shall not block vehicular or pedestrian movement.
(h) Holiday Decorations within Conunercial, Office and Industrial Districts
Seasonal window displays that contain holiday characters and messages and which are intended
to create or enhance holiday character of an area. The displays are commonly associated with
national. state, local, or religious holidays (and which do not reference or display services
available or rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale). They may be displayed for
a period not exceeding 45 consecutive calendar days and a maximum of 60 cumulative days per
calendar year.
(i)
Incidental Signs, i.e., Name of Business, Name Plates, Street Address, Telephone
Numbers, Open, Close, Hours of Operation, Credit Cards, etc.
(1)
(3)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be a total of 4 square feet.
They shall be located adjacent to major customer entrances.
They shall be located on doors or near doors.
(j) Interior Signs
(1)
(2)
They shall be entirely located inside the building.
They shall not be closer than 18 inches to a window or door.
(k) Memorial Signs on Tablets or Plaques
(1)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, if freestanding.
(I) Model Home and Multiple Family Rental Complex Flags
R:\NAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFr23F.ORD 6/27/97 sn 6
construction completion, as evidenced by a certificate of occupancy or final sign-off by the
Building Official, or termination of the building permit.
(b) Employment Opportunity Signs
(2)
(4)
(5)
Freestanding signs shall only be allowed in Office and Industrial Districts for single tenant
buildings, where no other tenants are located on the parcels that occupy an entire parcel
Window mounted signs shall only be allowed in Commercial Districts.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, iffreestanding.
Maximum number oi' signs shall not exceed one per business per major street frontage.
(c) Flags
(2)
A flag pole shall not exceed the zoning district height limits set forth in the Development
Code, or 50 feet if no height limit is provided by the Development Code.
A single flag of the United States of America and two (2) of the following flags shall be
permitted per parcel or center:
The State of California, or another State of the United States
A County
A Municipality
Official Flags of Other Countries
Flags of Nationally or Internationally Recognized Organizations
A Corporate Flag.
(3) The maximum area for a corporate flag may not exceed 50 square feet
(d) Future Tenant Identification Signs
fl)
(2)
(4)
Maximum area for each sign for all freestanding pads and shopping centers with 5 acres or
more in area shall be 32 square feet. Shopping centers with more than 10 acres in area shall
be allowed a 100 square foot sign for the purpose of identifying multiple tenants.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet for 32 square foot signs and 12 feet for 100
square foot signs.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per street frontage for each center or parcel
at any given time.
They shall be removed 5 days after the tenant occupies the building.
They shall be permitted for sites with an active building permit.
(e) Garage Sale Signs
(1)
(2)
(3)
One sign per garage sale is permitted. The sign must be located on the same property that
the garage sale is held.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet, if freestanding.
R:h'qAASEItS\SIGNXDRAFT23FORD 6/27/97 sn 5
(2)
(4)
(5)
~6)
They shall be attached to the building or associated entry structure.
Maximum of signs shall be 1 per restaurant entrance.
They shall not be intended to be used for advertisement and will only serve as information to
customers who have found the restaurant and are standing by the front door
They shall be located at or near the major customer entrance.
They shall not be counted as permissible area for window signs
(q) Real Estate Signs, Subject to 17.12.060
(r) Public Convenience and Warning Signs
(1)
(3)
~4)
(5)
{6)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed 3 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall not exceed 3 feet, iffreestanding
Maximum number shall be as necessary.
They may identify restrooms, public telephones, walkways, no parking, no trespassing and
similar signs.
They shall be located on private property.
They shall contain no advertising messages.
(s) Time and Temperature Signs
(1)
(2)
(3)
(5)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 16 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet, iffreestanding.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per building or parcel
No advertising shall be permitted.
Wall mounted signs are counted as part of the permitted sign area of the elevation they are
placed on. Freestanding signs shall be an integral part of a permitted freestanding sign and
shall be counted as part of the permitted sign area of the freestanding sign.
(t) Vacancy/No Vacancy Signs
(1)
(3)
(4)
They are used for motels, hotels, and other similar uses.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, if freestanding.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per street frontage.
(u) Works of Art That Do Not Convey a Commercial Message
They are exempt from the provisions of this Chapter; however, they may be subject to the
provisions of Section 17.05.020.
17.28.060 Real Estate Signs
Real estate signs that comply with the provisions of this Section are exempt from the requirement
to obtain a sign permit.
Rr\NAASEHS\SIGN\DIIAFT23F.ORD 6~27~97 sa 8
(1) Flag poles shall not exceed the zoning district height limits set forth in the Development Code
or 50 feet if no height limit is provided by the Development Code.
(2) Maximum number shall not exceed 2 per each model home or 4 per multiple family rental
complex.
(3) Shall be located on the model home lots, the parking lot, or the sales office or the multiple
family rental complex.
(4) They may only identi~ the builder and the subdivision name or the name of the multiple
family rental complex.
(5) Multiple family rental complex flags shall only be displayed in the third quarter of the year
(m) Model Home Signs
(2)
All such signs shall only be located on the model home parcels, the parking lot or the sales
office and are intended to provide information on each model.
Model Home signs do not include On-Site Subdivision Signs, refer to Section 17.28.130.
(n) Name Plates and Street Address Signs
(1)
These signs are intended for single family residences and shall be located entirely on the
premises.
The sign shall contain no advertising message.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 3 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 3 feet, iffreestanding.
(o) Non-Commercial Off-Premises Signs
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Maximum area of the sign board shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet
Maximum number of signs per parcel shall be one However, there shall be no limit on the
number of signs during the ninety (90) days prior to a state, federal, or local election and
fourteen (14) days after the election. A sign erected or placed for a candidate who prevails
in a primary election may be maintained until 10 days after the final election.
The maximum height of a ground-mounted sign shall not exceed six (6) feet measured from
grade
The signs shall not be illuminated
The signs shall not be erected, placed, or maintained:
Upon any private property without the consent of the owner, lessee, or person on
lawful possession of such property.
On any public property or upon any portion of a public right of way.
To obscure the view of any fire hydrant, traffic sign. traffic signal, street sign, or
public information sign.
To block lines of sight to areas of vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(p) On Wall or Window Menu Signs for Restaurants
(l) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
R:\NAASEHS\SIGN\DRAFT23F.ORD 6~27~97 ,n 7
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Property with existing residential units for sale, resale, lease or rent shall be permitted one
sign per street frontage.
They shall only be posted on the subject private property,
Open house signs shall only be displayed between the hours of 8:00 am and dusk.
The angle of v-shaped signs shall not to exceed 90 degrees. The back side of a v-shaped sign
shall not be visible from the public fight of way.
R:'uNAASEHS\S|GN~DRAFT23F.ORD 6/27/97 $n ~0
(a)
On-Site Real Estate Signs (For Sale, For Rent, For Lease, Sold, etc.) in Commercial,
Office, and Industrial Districts. *'
They shall not be permanent in nature and may only be permitted at such time as the property
or structure is available for sale, lease, or rent.
Sign area for each sign shall not exceed:
Thirty two (32) square feet for freestanding signs.
3 square feet for window signs.
(3) The sign structure height for freestanding signs shall not exceed 8 feet measured from grade.
(4) Maximum number permitted is one sign per street frontage for each parcel or center. Plus,
one window sign is permitted per available suite. In addition, one freeway oriented sign is
permitted per parcel or center with freeway frontage.
(5) They shall only be posted on private property.
(6) They shall not be closer than 5 feet to the property line or 17 feet from the face of the curb,
whichever is less.
(7) They shall be a minimum of 150 linear feet from all other freestanding signs including real
estate signs.
(8) They shall not be located within 75 feet of an intersection or an access driveway, except that
nothing in this Chapter shall preclude a parcel or center from having at least one freestanding
real estate sign.
(9) The angle of v-shaped signs shah not to exceed 90 degrees. The back side of a v-shaped sign
shall not be visible from the public right of way.
(10) Appropriate materials are wood, metal, and stucco Other materials are subject to Director
approval.
(11) Illumination is not permitted.
(12) They shall be maintained in a clean, orderly fashion at all times and shall be removed 10
days after the close of escrow or after a rental agreement or lease has been entered into,
whichever occurs first.
(bl
(2)
(3)
On-Site Real Estate Signs (For Sale, For Rent, For Lease, Sold, Open House, etc.) in
all Residential, Public Institutional and Open Space Districts.
They shall not be permanent in nature and may only be permitted at such time as property or
structure is available for sale, lease, or rent.
Sign area for each sign shall not exceed:
6 square feet in single family districts and multi family districts for 4 units or less
32 square feet for complexes in multi family districts of 5 units or more
Sign structure height shall not exceed:
6 feet in single family districts.
8 feet in multi family residential districts.
R:\NAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT'23FORD 6/27/97 sn 9
building identification signs. Sign panels or background shall be of material
commonly used in the buildings or the center. Logo boxes are not subject to this
requirement.
Center identification signs shall use a background material commonly used in the
center buildings. Can-type box signs are not permitted. Flood lighting is strongly
encouraged when consistent with Riverside County Ordinance 655, Palomar Light
Pollution Ordinance: however, internal illumination of the individual letters are
only permitted if reverse channel lettering is used.
Multi tenant signs shall be uniform in background color for all tenants.
All fi-eestanding signs shall be limited in size to the width of the architectural features
of the sign.
All freestanding signs shall use architectural elements at the top, base. and sides of the
signs.
If a tenant, building, or center identification sign is proposed within 75 feet of a major
intersection, it shall incorporate, or be located as pan of, a community feature (i.e.
water features, public art, unique landscape designs, public spaces)
Sign colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast between the
background colors and the letters.
All freestanding signs may be permitted a maximum of two sides except that center
identification signs shall be one sided.
Center identification signs shall not advertise tenants; however, if the center is named
after a major tenant, it is permissible to mention that tenant's name as part of the
center name
Center identification signs shall be incorporated into the entry. statement
architecture and landscaping area.
Freestanding single tenant signs or service station signs with a height of six (6) feet
or less shall be constructed as monument signs.
Freestanding multi-tenant signs, theater signs, or freewav oriented signs shall be
constructed as either monument or pylon signs.
Landscaping
All freestanding tenant identification signs and building identification signs shall be
required to be located within a planted landscaped area which extends on all four sides
of the sign. The landscaping area shall be provided according to the following:
Single tenant and building identification signs shall include a '100 square foot
landscaped area.
Multi-tenant identification signs shallinclude a 200 square foot landscaped
area.
Freeway oriented signs and off-site center identification signs shall include a
300 square foot landscaped area.
b
The landscaping for pylon signs shall include shrubs and small trees to hide the
lower portion of the pylon sign if visible from public view.
R:I.N,~ASEHSI, SIGI~DRAFT23F ORD 6/27/97 sn 12
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
17.28.070 General Requirements for Permanent Signs
Permanent signs shall be subject to the following standards to insure the quality of signage in the
City.
(a) Standards for Permanent Freestanding Signs
( 1 ) Location
g.
All fi'eestanding signs shall be setback at least 5 feet from the right of way or property
line or 17 feet from the face of the curb, whichever is less.
All freestanding signs shall be located outside the site visibility area as defined by
Section 17.06.050 (1) of the Development Code.
All freestanding signs shall located be at least 3 feet from buildings.
The face of any freestanding sign shall not be oriented parallel to the street, except
when the sign is located at the end of cul-de-sacs, knuckles, or other appropriate
locations as approved by the Director.
The minimum distance between freestanding signs located on the same side of the
street and under 6 in height shall not be less than 150 feet, except center identification
signs located on the same driveway.
The minimum distance between freestanding signs located on the same side of the
street and over 6 feet shall not be less than 250 feet.
The Director shall have the authority to reduce the distance requirements in
subparagraphs e. and f. by 20% in case of unusual circumstances such as presence
of driveways, landscaping, utility poles, etc.
(2) Height
Sign structure height is measured from the extreme top portion of a freestanding
sign to the sidewalk. If there is no sidewalk, the elevation of the finished surface
of the road shall be used.
The height of sign structures located on slopes shall be measured from the highest
point of the sign to the highest point of slope where the sign structure meets ground
Berming of up to 2 feet may be allowed in addition to the maximum height allowed
for the sign structure.
Berming height shall be measured from the lowest portion of the base of the sign
structure to the sidewalk elevation.
(3) Design
Except for the changeable portions of movie signs for theaters and changeable
portions of price signs for gas stations, which may use plastic backgrounds, the use
of can-type box signs with plastic panels or background are prohibited for tenant and
R:XNAASEHSXSIGN\DRAFT23F.ORD 6127197 sn I I
12.1-15 08
15.1-25 0.6
25.1-40 0.4
40.1 + 0.35
For instance, if sign structure height is 4 feet, the applicable Sign Width Coefficient from the above
table is 20 Therefore, the width of the sign structure shall not exceed 8 feet (4 X 2.0)
(b)
Standards for Permanent Wall Mounted Signs for Buildings with Two (2) Stories or
Less
( 1 ) Location
a. Wall signs shall not be located on windows or doors.
(2) Number
For multi tenant buildings, only major tenant within the suite is permitted to have a
wall sign. Sub-leasing tenants are not permitted to have wall signs.
Maximum of four signs per business shall be allowed including all wall mounted
business identification signs, freestanding signs, and freeway signs (if any permitted).
(3) Area
b
C
For businesses with more than one permitted wall mounted sign, the second sign shall
not exceed 80%, third 70%, and fourth 60% of the maximum allowable for the
corresponding frontages. This standard shall not apply to a permitted wall mounted
freeway oriented signs
Wall signs shall not cover more than 75% of the surface of the building face that the
sign is located on excluding window and door areas. This provision shall not apply
to primary tenant signs
Wall signs shall not extend more than 75% of the suite length for multi tenant
buildings or building frontage for single tenant buildings. This provision shall not
apply to primary tenant signs.
(4) Letter Height
Minimum letter height shall be 8 inches. For wall signs in two lines or more the second line may have
a minimum letter height of 6 inches.
(5) Design
a. A diversity of letter types and colors shall be encouraged for wall signs within centers
R:~'4AASEHS\SiGN\DRAFr23F ORD 6/2719'1 an 14
The landscaping for freestanding tenant identification signs, building identification
signs , and multi-tenant identification signs shall include flowering perennials.
annual plants, or other plants which provide additional color. They shall be
planted and replanted seasonally to maintain year round color.
(5) Addresses
All freestanding signs, except those oriented toward the freeway, shall include the street
address(es) or range(s) for the businesses or centers assigned by the Building Official.
address shall not be counted in the total permitted sign area.
The
(6) Illumination
a. Illumination for tenant or building identification signs may be internal or external
When internally illuminated signs are used, only the lettering and logos shall
appear to be lighted. Conventional channel lettering or reverse channel
lettering are acceptable.
When externally illuminated signs are used, only flood lighting is acceptable
if consistent with Riverside County Ordinance 655, Palomar Light Pollution
Ordinance. External illumination shall not be used for multi tenant signs.
b Illumination for center identification signs may be imernal or external:
When internally illuminated, only reverse channel lettenng is acceptable. For
freeway oriented center identification signs conventional channel lettering is
acceptable.
When externally illuminated signs are used, only flood lighting is acceptable
if consistent with the Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance.
(7) Width
The width of sign structure can be calculated by multiplying the proposed sign structure height by the
sign width coefficient as provided in Table 17.28 (b). In no case shall the width of a sign structure
exceed the width calculated by the sign width coefficient.
Table 17.28 (b)
Sign Width Coefficient
Sign Structure Height in Feet
0-6
6.1-12
Sign Width Coefficient
2.0
1.0
R:'uNAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23F.ORD 6/27/97 sn 13
The following findings must be made by the approval body prior to approving a sign program:
The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related
to:
All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors.
illumination, sign type, or sign shape;
The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or
design motifs included in the building being identified; and.
Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved signs;
(2)
The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in
building tenants; and,
(3)
The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign program
complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard
to sign area, number, location, and height. Further. to the extent the sign program does not
comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number. location, and height,
the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the
objectives of this Chapter,
R:~IAASEHS\SIGl~DRAFT23F,ORD 6/27/97 s~
to create interest.
The use of graphics consistent with the nature of the product to be advertised shall
is encouraged, i.e., hammer symbol for a hardware store, mortar and pestle for a drug
store.
Sign colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast between the
background colors and the letters.
(6) Illumination
a. Internal illumination for wall signs is acceptable in the following forms:
Internally illuminated channel letters;
Internally illuminated reverse channel letters; or,
Exposed neon if used in channel letters with transparent face or no face with
the inside of channel lettering colored the same color as the neon;
Other exposed neon applications.
b. External illumination is not permitted unless approved through a sign program.
(c) Number
Maximum of four signs per business shall be allowed including all wall mounted, freestanding signs
and any freeway signs (if any permitted) However, businesses with freestanding freeway signs
shall only be permitted a maximum of three signs, or four signs as permitted by Section 17.18.210
(a) (I) (a).
17.28,080 Sign Programs
(a) Sign Program Required
In addition to the si!m permits required by Section 17.28.030, certain types of developments require
a sign program to ensure that all proposed signs are in harmony with other on-site signs, buildings
and surrounding developments. Other provisions of this Chapter require a sign program for certain
type of signs. In addition, in new developments where any of the following circumstances exist, a
sign program in accordance with this Section shall also be concurrently filed and considered for
approval with the Development Plan:
(1) Whenever five (5) or more temporary and/or permanent signs (not including signs exempt
from permits) are proposed for a single tenant development occupying an entire parcel:
(2) Whenever two (2) or more businesses are proposed in a multi-tenant developmenti
(3) Whenever wall signs are proposed on buildings with three (3) stones or more, or on
buildings with heights greater than 32 feet; or,
(4) Whenever the development contains a historic structure.
(b) Findings
R:\NAASEHS~SIGN~DRAFT23F.ORD 6127197 ~ 15
(h)
Illumination shall only be by external flood light, and only when consistent with Riverside
County Ordinance 655, Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance, or by internal reverse channel
letters.
17.28.130 Subdivision Signs
(a)
(b)
{d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per subdivision if 5 acres or less . or two per
subdivision if more than 5 acres. If several builders are building on a tracL each builder is
entitled to its own subdivision sign(s) located within the property they own, provided that
they do not exceed the permitted number of subdivision signs as specified in this Chapter.
Shall not exceed one sign per street frontage.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed 100 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall not exceed 12 feet.
They shall be removed immediately at~er the final sale.
They shall have a 10 foot setback.
They shall be located within the boundaries of the subdivision.
R:\NMSEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23FORD 6/27/97 sn 18
SIGNS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.100 Signs in Residential Districts
All signs within Residential Districts that require a sign permit must comply with the standards
contained in Section 17.28.070 and Sections 17.28. 100 through 17.28. 199
17.28.110
Signs for Institutional Uses and Other Permitted Uses in Residential
Districts
(a)
Wall Mounted Business or Institution Identification Signs for Institutional Uses and
Other Permitted Uses in Residential Districts
(l)
(2)
(3)
Maximum number permitted is one per frontage.
Maximum permitted sign area for each sign is ~A square foot for each lineal foot of building
frontage, or 50 square feet, whichever is less.
Illumination may be permitted if it is determined by the Director that it does not adversely
impact the surrounding residential uses.
(b)
Freestanding Business or Institution Identification Signs for Institutional Uses and
Other Permitted Uses in Residential Districts
(I)
(2)
13)
(4)
Maximum number permitted shall be one per street frontage
Maximum permitted sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet.
Illumination may be permitted if it does not adversely impact the surrounding residential uses.
17.28.120
Neighborhood and Community Identification Signs for Subdivisions and
Multi Family Complexes
(a)
(b)
Maximum number permitted shall be two per each vehicular access or entrance
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be.
(1)
(2)
20 square feet for neighborhood identification signs
30 square feet for community identification signs
(c) Maximum sign structure height shall be:
(1)
8 feet for neighborhood identification signs.
10 feet community identification signs.
(d)
(e)
(fi
(g)
They shall be built into the landscaping or project walls.
They shall be one sided, except when installed in a median or other applications where two
sided signs are more appropriate than one sided signs.
Sign area is measured by the area surrounding and including the letters.
Sign background shall be of materials used in the subdivision or project.
R:XNAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23F,ORD 6/27197 sn 17
Commercial Districts
Same as Section 17.28.240.
17.28.220
Requirements for Freestanding Shopping Center Identification Signs in
Commercial Districts
Freestanding shopping center identification signs are iraended to identify shopping centers. Different
standards have been included for shopping centers with 7 acres or less and more than 7 acres,
(a)
Two signs per major entrance shall be permitted and one additional sign shall be permitted
at each major intersection.
(b) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
(2)
20 square feet per sign face for centers 7 acres or less.
30 square feet per sign face for centers more than 7 acres.
(c) Maximum sign structure height shall be:
(1)
~2)
4 feet for centers 7 acres or less.
6 feet for centers more than 7 acres
17.28.230 Freestanding Tenant Identification Signs in Commercial Districts
Tenant Identification signs are intended to identify tenants whether or not located in shopping centers
These signs may be single tenant or multi-tenant identification signs.
(a) Requirements for Multi-tenant Signs in Commercial Districts
Freestanding multiple tenant identification signs are intended to identi.fy tenants in centers or multi-
tenant buildings.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(6)
{7)
(8)
Maximum number of freestanding tenant identification signs (multi or single tenant sign)
is one per 300 lineal feet of street frontage for the center. At least half of the tenant
identification signs shall be single tenant identification signs.
Each center shall be allowed at least one multi-tenant sign. However, if the center has
more than one street frontage, one multi-tenant sign on each street frontage shall be
allowed.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 12 feet.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 100 square feet.
The center name may be added to multi-tenant signs but the total sign area for each sign
including the center name shall not exceed 100 square feet.
The maximum number of signs per panel shall be two.
The minimum panel height shall be 10 inches.
The minimum letter size shall be 5 inches.
R:\NAASEHS\SIGNn~DRAFT23F ORD 6/27/97 an 20
SIGNS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.200 Signs in Commercial Districts
All signs within Commercial Districts that require a permit must comply with the sign standards for
Commercial Districts contained in Sections 17.28.200 through 17.28.299 and with the standards
contained in Section 17.28.070. In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28.200 through
17.28.299, office buildings in commercial districts must comply with the standards for Office
District contained in Section 17.28.300 through 17.28.399.
17.28.210 Freeway Oriented Signs in Contmercial Districts
Freeway oriented signs are only permitted for parcels or shopping centers with freeway frontage.
They are permitted as freestanding or wall mounted signs. Freestanding signs may identify
centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. Wall mounted signs may identify single tenants
occupying an entire building and located on a parcel.
(a) Requirements for Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
(1) Number of signs permitted:
One single tenant identification sign per parcel that is occupied entirely by one
business, not located in a shopping center. These businesses are not permitted a
single tenant identification monument sign along their street frontage. However,
if three or more parcels join together to erect a multi-tenant freeway oriented sign,
they each shall also be allowed a single tenant identification monument sign along
their street frontage.
One multi-tenant identification sign per shopping center if the shopping center is
larger than 7 acres.
Two multi-tenant identification signs per shopping center if the center has greater
than 1330 feet of frontage.
(2) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
50 square feet for single tenant identification signs.
100 square feet for multi-tenant identification signs.
(3) Maximum sign structure height shall be 30 feet.
(4)
A freestanding freeway oriented sign shall only be allowed as a pylon sign. Pole signs are
not permitted.
(5) A maximum of three tenants may be on a multi-tenant sign.
(b) Requirements for Wall Mounted Freeway Oriented Business Identification Signs in
R:XI~AASEHS\SIGNXDRAFT23F.ORD 6127/97 sn 19
Districts
(a)
Requirements for Wall Mounted Primary Tenant or Building Identification Signs for
Buildings with 3 Stories or More in Commercial Districts
Wall mounted building identification signs are intended to provide identification for buildings with
3 Stories or more. This type ofsignage is usually used by the primary tenant in an office building.
(D
(z)
(3)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per building.
Maximum letter height and sign area shall be determined by Section 17.28.250 (c), Size
Requirements.
General Requirements
The two permitted signs shall be placed on different building elevations.
Both signs shall have the same copy, and only a single line of copy.
The elevation plans for the Development Plan shall show the locations and dimensions
of the signs.
(4) Design Requirements
They shall complement and add to the aesthetics of the materials of the building.
They may be illuminated. However, in order to reduce the visual impact of
illuminated signs on surrounding residential districts, lighting of signs to produce a
silhouette effect is encouraged. Signs internally illuminated are preferred over
exterior illumination.
To avoid the appearance of crowding a sign into a sign placement area, the sign copy
shall:
Occupy no more than sixty (60) percent of the height of the sign placement
area: and,
No more than eighty (80) percent of the width of the sign placement area,
and,
No pan of the sign can be located within the extreme left or right ten
percent of the width of the sign placement area.
( 5 ) Location Requirements
a
In high-rise buildings, signs shall be placed between the windows of the highest floor
of the building and the cave line
In designs with articulated roofs, signs shall be integrated visually with the
architectural features such as windows, projections, and articulating elements.
(b)
Requirements for Wall Mounted Secondary Tenant Business Identification Signs for
Buildings with 3 Stories or More in Commercial Districts
Wall mounted secondary tenant business identification signs are intended to provide identification for
R:~NAASEHS\SIGN\DRAFT23FORD 6/27/97 sn 22
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding Building or Single Tenant Identification Signs in
Commercial Districts
Freestanding building or business identification signs are intended to identify single tenants whether
or not in a center, or buildings in commercial districts.
(1)
(2)
r3)
{4)
Maximum number of freestanding tenant identification signs (multi or single tenant sign) is
one per 300 lineal feet of street frontage for the center. At least half of the tenant
identification signs shall be single tenant identification signs.
The maximum number of signs for single tenants not located in a center shall be one sign per
tenant.
Each center shall be allowed at least one multi-tenant sign. However, if the center has more
than one street frontage, one multi-tenant sign per street frontage shall be allowed.
Theater and gas station signs are counted as single tenant signs in the formula calculations for
determining the maximum number of permitted tenant signs for a center. These signs shall
meet all the requirements for single tenant signs except for size and height requirements as
specified in Subsection (5) a. and b. below.
The maximum area for all single tenant identification signs or building identification signs shall
be 25 square feet, except that:
Maximum area for theater signs shall be 150 square feet, including the area for
identification of all the shows and the theater name.
Maximum area for service stations shall be 50 square feet, including the area for all
fuel types, prices, and the service station name.
(6)
(7)
Maximum sign structure height for all single tenant signs and gas station signs shall be 6 feet,
except theaters which shall be 15 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
If the frontage of a center is less than 300 feet, no single tenant identification is permitted
Automotive service stations shall be allowed one price sign per frontage to include all fuel
types and/or prices.
17.28.240
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs for
Buildings with 2 stories or less in Commercial Districts
Wall mounted business identification signs are intended to provide identification for the individual
businesses located in buildings with 2 stories or less in Commercial Districts.
(a)
(b)
(C)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per frontage for each tenant.
Maximum area of signs shall be 1 square foot of sign area for each sign per lineal foot of
building frontage.
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identification signs are placed on
the building.
17.28.250 Wall Mounted Signs for Buildings with 5 Stories or More in Commercial
R:/NAASEHS\SIGI~DR~FT23F.ORD 6/27/97 sn
Table 17.28 (f)
Area, Maximum Letter, and Symbol Height for Secondary Tenant Signs for Buildings 3
Stories or Higher
Number of
Building Stories
Maximum
Letter Height
Maximum Symbol
Height
Square Footage Area of
Sign Per Elevation
3 -4 10" 16" 30
5- 6 12" 19" 35
7 + 14" 22" 40
17.28.260
(1)
Requirements for Special Signs in Commercial Districts
Miscellaneous Service Station Signs
Special Service Signs on Pump Islands
They shall be illuminated only by the canopy lighting.
(2) Logo Boxes on Canopies
Two logo boxes located on the canopy shall be allowed per gas station
exceed 4 square feet.
(b) Fast Food Menu Signs
ll)
(2)
13)
(4)
(c) Institutional Uses
(1)
(2)
Maximum number of signs shall be 2 signs per tenant.
Maximum area shall be 32 square feet per sign.
Maximum structure height shall be 6 feet
They may be internally illuminated
They may utilize changeable copy
Each logo box shall not
Maximum number of signs shall be one freestanding or one wall sign per street frontage.
The standards for freestanding single tenant and wall mounted business identification signs
in Sections 17.28.230 (b) and 17.28.240, respectively shall be followed.
17.28.265 Requirements for Projecting Signs in Commercial Districts
Projecting signs are an alternative form of signage for identification of businesses
They are only
permitted for a shopping center if uniformly used in the shopping center and if approved through a
sign program.
R/NAASEItS/SIGN\DRAFT23F.ORD 6/27/97 ~ 24
the secondary tenants in office buildings with 3 stories or more.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per building elevation.
Maximum letter height and sign area shall be determined by Section 17.28.250 (c).
They shall be permitted below the second floor, except that if the building has a two-story
lobby, the signs are permitted only between the second and third floors above such lobby.
Maximum of four (4) secondary tenant signs shall be permitted per building.
Maximum of one secondary tenant per elevation is permitted. Buildings between 3 and 5
stories are permitted two such signs per elevation, provided that the signs:
are not located on any elevation in vertical (stacked) alignment.
are separated by at least 40 percent of the width of the subject elevation
(6)
(7)
They shall be located at or adjacent to the entrance of the building or in a position to be seen
by pedestrians and by those in nearby parking areas and on-site circulation drives
If retail shops with exterior doors are located on the ground level of an office building, the
sign regulations for wall mounted business identification signs in commercial districts (Section
17.28.240) shall apply to the ground level shops.
(c) Size Requirements
(1)
The Recommended sign area, maximum letter and symbol height for building
Identification signs for buildings 3 stones or higher is summarized in Table 17.28 (e).
(2)
Table 17.28 (e)
Sign Area, Maximum Letter and Symbol Height for Building Identification Signs for
Buildings 3 Stories or Higher
Number of Maximum Letter Maximum Symbol Square Footage Area of
Building Stories Height Height Sign Per Elevation
3 2' 10" 4' 6" 175
4 3' 0" 4' 10" 200
5 Y 4" 5' 4" 225
6 Y 9" 6' 0" 250
7+ 4' 2" 6' 8" 275
Recommended sign area, maximum letter, and symbol height for secondary tenant signs for
buildings 3 stories or higher is summarized in Table 17.28 (f).
R:x/qAASEHS~SIGN~DRAFF23F.ORD 6/27/97 an 23
(2)
(3)
(s)
(6)
Maximum area of signs shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum height of sign shall be 7 feet, if freestanding.
They shall be located in pedestrian activity and movement areas.
They shall contain only the name and address of the activities/businesses on-site.
They may be illuminated.
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding On-Site Directional Signs for Individual Sites in
Commercial Districts
These signs are intended to provide direction to automobiles once they have arrived at the site
(3)
(4)
(5)
16)
Maximum area of sign shall be 3 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 3 feet.
They shall only include letters and arrows.
They shall be screened from view from the public right of way and private driveways of a
center where practical.
They shall only be visible from the site they are intended to identify.
They may be illuminated.
(C)
Requirements for Freestanding On-Site Directional Signs for Centers in Commercial
Districts
These signs are intended to provide directions to automobiles to the different businesses on the site
(1)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Maximum area of sign shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 7 feet.
They shall be screened from view from the public right of way and private driveways of a
center where practical.
They shall only be visible from the site they are intended to identify
They may be illuminated
R:XNAASEHS\SlON~DRAFF23FORD 6120197 sn
26
(a)
(b)
(d)
(e)
(~
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per tenant.
Maximum area of signs shall be 4 square feet.
Minimum clearance for signs shall be 20 feet.
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
Projection shall be a maximum of 4 feet and shall not encroach into the public right of way.
Must be attached to a permanent canopy or building.
17.28.270 Requirements for Under Canopy Signs in Commercial Districts
Under canopy signs are primarily pedestrian oriented and provide additional identification for
businesses in commercial centers.
(a)
(b)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per customer entrance.
Maximum area of signs shall be 4 square feet.
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
Must be attached to a permanent canopy or building.
They shall be illuminated only with the lighting from the canopy.
17.28.275 Requirements for Awning Signs in Commercial Districts
Awning signs are intended to provide identification to individual businesses, and can be pedestrian
or automobile oriented. They are only permitted for a shopping center if uniformly used in the
shopping center or for a single tenant if the tenant is occupying an entire site and is not located in a
shopping center.
(a)
Cb)
(c)
/e)
The area of the sign shall not exceed 75% of the area of the awning that the sign is placed on
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
The total area of signage permitted for the face of the building shall not be exceeded for the
combination of the wall sign(s) and awning(s).
The area of the sign on awnings is calculated by multiplying the height of the highest letter
by the length of the lettering on the awning.
Awning signs shall be located on the bottom 12 inches of the flap Iralance) or on end panels
of angled, curved, or box awnings.
Letter height shall not exceed 8 inches
17.28.280 On-Site Directional and Directory Signs in Commercial Districts
The purpose of directory and directional signs are to guide the movement of vehicles and pedestrians
once they are on the site or center. They are not intended to advertise the tenants or products
(a) Requirements for Pedestrian On-Site Directory Signs in Commercial Districts
On-site directory signs are intended to provide information to the patrons of a building once they have
arrived near the entrance of the building
(1) Maximum number of signs shall be one per multi-tenant building per frontage.
R:XNAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23FORD 6127197 sn 25
Freestanding single tenant identification signs are intended to provide identification for any tenant
occupying an entire office building. In multi-tenant office buildings, a freestanding building
identification sign is permitted to identify the building.
(a)
(b)
tc)
(d)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per street frontage, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum signs area shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure shall be 6 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
17.28.350
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs
for Single and Multi-Tenant Buildings with 2 Stories or Less in Professional
Office District
Wall mounted business identification signs are intended to provide identification for individual
businesses in single or multi-tenant office buildings with two stories or less. However, only multi-
tenant buildings with exterior entrances for their tenants are permitted to have wall mounted business
identification signs.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Maximum number of signs shall be one sign per frontage for each tenant.
Maximum area of signs shall not exceed V2 square feet per lineal feet of frontage However,
the sign area for each sign shall not exceed 50 square feet.
For multi-tenant buildings wall mounted business identification signs shall be permitted only
if the main entrance to each suite is from the exterior of the building as opposed to a lobby
or court yard design.
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identifications are placed.
External Illumination is not permitted.
R \NAASEHS/SIGN',DRAFT23F,ORD 6t27/97 sn 28
SIGNS IN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT
17.28.300 Signs in Professional Office District
All signs within the Professional Office District must comply with the standards for set forth in
Sections 17.28.300 through 17.28.399, as well as with the standards contained in Section 17.28.070
In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28.300 through 17.28.399, wall mounted business
identification signs for retail uses on the first floor of an office building with exterior entrances shall
comply with the standards for Commercial Districts contained in Section 17.28.240. If retail uses
have interior entrances only, no wall mounted business identification signs are permitted.
17.28.310 Sign Types Prohibited in Professional Office District
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Freestanding Multiple Tenant Identification
Projecting Signs
Under Canopy Signs
Awning Signs
17.28.320
Sign Types Permitted in the Professional Office District with the Same
Standards as Commercial District
(a)
(b)
Requirements for wall mounted signs for buildings with 3 stories or more are the same as
Section 17.28.250.
Requirements for on-site directional and directory signs are the same as Section 17.28.280
17.28.325 Freeway Oriented Signs in Professional Office District
Only travel oriented commercial uses such as gas stations, restaurants, fast food establishments, and
hotels/motels with freeway frontage are permitted, through approval of a sign program, to have
freeway oriented signs. Freeway oriented signs are permitted as freestanding and wall mounted
signs. Freestanding signs may identify centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. The
provisions included in Section 17.28.210 shall apply to all signs permitted by this subsection.
17.28.330
Requirements for Freestanding Office Center Identification Signs in
Professional Office District
Freestanding office center identification signs are intended to identify office centers.
(a)
(b)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per major entrance, plus one additional at each major
intersection.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
17.28.340
Requirements for Freestanding Building or Single Tenant Identification Signs
for Single Tenant Office Buildings in Professional Office District
R:\NAASEHS\SIGNXDRAFT23FORD 6/27197 sa 27
(a)
Requirements for Freestanding Tenant or Building Identification Signs in Industrial
Districts
Freestanding business or building identification signs are intended to provide identification for a
tenant occupying an entire industrial building. They are also used to identify a multi-tenant
industrial building.
(1)
{2)
(4)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per street frontage, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding Multiple Tenant Identification Signs in Industrial
Districts
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Each center shah be a//owed one multi-tenant sign. However, if the center has more than
one street frontage, one multi-tenant sign per street frontage shall be allowed.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
The center name may be added to multi-tenant signs but the total sign area for each sign
including the center name shall not exceed 20 square feet.
The maximum number of signs per panel shall be one.
The minimum panel width shall be 5 inches.
The minimum letter size shall be 3 inches.
17.28.450
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs
for Buildings with 2 Stories or Less in Industrial Districts
Wall mounted business or building identification signs are intended to provide identification for
individual businesses in single or multi-tenant industrial buildings.
(a)
(b)
(C)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per frontage for each tenant
Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed I/i square feet per lineal feet of building
frontage
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identifications ~re permitted by
this Chapter.
1 ~.28.600
Temporary Business Advertising Signs in Commercial, Office, and Industrial
Districts
Hereby Adopted by Reference.
17.28.700
Requirements for Temporary Ambient Air Balloons in Commercial, Office, and
Industrial Districts
t, ASEI'lS\SIG/~/XDRAFT23F ORD 6/27/97 an 30
SIGNS IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.400 Signs in Industrial Districts
All signs within Industrial Districts must comply with the standards for Industrial Districts contained
in Sections 17.28.400 through 17.28.499, and with the standards contained in Section 17.28.070
In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28.400 through 17.28499, Office buildings must
comply with the standards for Office District contained in Section 17.28.300 through 399.
17.28.410 Sign Types Prohibited in Industrial Districts
The following sign types are prohibited in the Industrial Districts.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs
Projecting Signs
Under Canopy
Awning Signs
17.28.420 Sign Types Permitted in Industrial Districts
In addition to the signs other,vise permitted by this Chapter for Industrial Districts. the following
sign types are permitted in these Districts provided that they meet the following specified
standards:
(a)
Co)
Wall mounted signs for buildings with 3 stories or more, if they comply with the
provisions of Section 17.28.250.
On-site directory signs, on-site directional signs for individual sites, and on-site directional
signs for centers, if they comply with the provisions of Section 17.28.280 (a). (b), and (c),
respectively.
17.28.430
Requirements for Freestanding Business Center Identification Signs in
Industrial Districts
Freestanding business center identification signs are intended to identify business centers.
(a)
(c)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per major entrance, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum signs area shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
17.28.440 Freestanding Tenant Identification Signs in Industrial Districts
Tenant Identification signs are intended to identify tenants whether or not located in shopping
centers. These signs may be single tenant or multi-tenant identification signs. However, these
two types of signs are not permitted together at any time.
R:xdqAASEHS\SIG[~DRAFT'23F.ORD 6/27/97 an 29
pursuant to this paragraph (b) of Section 17.28.900, but in no case later than forty-eight
(48) hours after removal, a notice of violation shall be sent to the owner of the sign(s) via
regular mail. The sign(s) will be returned to the owner only upon payment of removal and
storage costs pursuant to Section 8.12.140. If the sign(s) is not claimed within thirty (30)
days after the receipt of Notice of Violation the sign(s) may be destroyed.
(c) Unauthorized Removal of Signs
No person shall remove, destroy, relocate, or otherwise disturb any sign without the permission
of the party who caused the sign to be erected. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit the owner
of a piece of property, or his or her authorized representative, from removing a sign from his or
her property that was erected without his or her consent. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent
the Building Official from taking action to abate sign violations pursuant to the provisions of this
Code.
(d) Abandoned Signs
Signs shall be considered abandoned and subject to abatement pursuant to Chapter 8.12 under any
of the following circumstances:
(1)
A sign other than off-premisses sign, which for a period of ninety (90) days, no longer
advertises or identifies an ongoing business, product, or service available on the premises
where the sign is located.
(2)
Where a sign penrot for a temporary sign has expired and the sign has not been removed
within one day after the date of expiration.
(3)
Where the sign concerns a specific event and five (5) days have elapsed since the
occurrence of the event.
17.28.910 Maintenance Responsibility of Signs
(a)
All signs shall be kept in good condition, be legible, adequately repaired, maintained, and
painted by the owner thereof at all times. The standard for adequate repairs is that the
repairs shall be at least equal in quality and design to the original work such as the paint,
finish, materials, landscaping, illumination, structure, and any required surrounding
landscaping.
(b)
Signs not prope~y maintained shall be issued a notice to maintain, alter, or repair by the
Building Official. Upon a written notice from the Building Official, the maintenance.
alterations, or repairs specified in the notice shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days
after the date of receipt of such notice.
(C)
Appropriate easements for access and maintenance shill be secured for centers that contain
more than one parcel and include center identification signs, multi-tenant signs, single
R:\NAASEHSXSIGN~DRAFT23F.ORD 6/27/97 ~n 32
Hereby Adopted by Reference.
17.28.800 Kiosk Signs in all Districts
Hereby Adopted by Reference.
17.28.900 Enforcement, Legal Procedures, and Penalties
The following signs are hereby declared a public nuisance, subject to abatement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 8.12 of this Code:
(a) Declaration of Public Nuisance
(1)
(2)
(3)
Any sign that is erected or installed in violation of this Chapter, after the effective date of
the ordinance adopting this Chapter;
Any sign that is abandoned as defined in paragraph (d) of this Section 17.28.900;
Any sign the owner of which has received a written notice from the Building Official
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Section 17.28.910, and the maintenance, alterations, or
repairs specified in the notice are not made within thirty (30) calendar days after the date
of receipt of such notice.
(b) Removal
(I) Removal Without Notice of signs within the Right-of-Way
All signs in the public fight-of-way may be removed by the City without issuing a notice
of violation.
(2) Emergency Removal
Where the Building Official determines that the sign in question poses an imminent safety
haT~nrd or dangerous condition, such sign may be removed immediately and stored by the
City.
(3) Removal of Temporary Signs
Any temporary sign erected, placed or maintained in violation of any provisions of this
Section may be removed by the City five (5) days after issuance of a notice of violation
to the person or party who caused the sign to be erected, if known, and to the owner,
lessee, or person in lawful possession of the property on which the sign is located.
(4)
The owners of signs removed pursuant to subparagraphs (1), (2), or (3) of this paragraph
Co) of Section 17.28.900 shall be liable to the City for all costs and expenses incurred by
the City in removing and storing the signs, in accordance with the provisions and
procedures of Section 8.12.140 of this Code. As soon as practicable following removal
R:XNAASEHS\SIGN\DRAFT23F.OILD 6/27/97 an 3 1
"(2) Actions by the Director of planning on the approval of sign permits."
Section 5. Section 17.34.010(a) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by deleting the definition for "Alteration", "Sign", and "Outdoor Advertising Structure" and adding
the following definitions:
R:IaNAASEHS\S|GN~DRAFT23F ORD 6/27/97 sn 34
tenant identification signs, etcetera.
(d)
CC & Rs or other acceptable maintenance mechanism shall be established for centers with
center identification signs, multi-tenant signs, single tenant identification signs, etcetera,
in order to identify the responsible party for appropriate maintenance of the signs in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
17.28.920 Non-conforming Signs
(a) Continued Use of Non-Conforming Signs
A non-conforming sign, if legal at the time of installation, may continue to be used and must be
properly maintained in accordance with Section 17.28.910. With the exception of the auto mall
center identification sign, non-conforming signs may not be:
(l)
(2)
(6)
Changed to another non-conforming sign For the purpose of this Section, changing the
tenant signs on a freestanding multi-tenant identification sign is not considered a change
to another non-conforming sign.
Improved or stmcturally altered so as to extend its useful life.
Expanded.
Reestablished after discontinuance for 90 days or more.
Reestablished after damage or destruction of more than 50 percent of its value
Moved or relocated.
Section 2. Table 17.03(a) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended by
adding the following approval categories:
Annroyal
Sign Permits
Sign Programs (Approved by the
body approving the
Development Plan)
Modification to Sign Programs
Administrative
ADDroyal
X
Planning
Director
Planning
Commission
X X
City
Council
Section 3. Section 17.03.060(b) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by adding the following:
"(4) Increases in the allowable size, height. number, or location of new or existing signs by less
than ten percent (10%) of the standards within Chapter 17.28."
Section 4. Section 17.03.090 (b) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by adding the following:
R:hNAASEHS/SIGN~DRAFT23F.ORD 6/27/97 an 33
day of ., 1997, and that therea~er, the Ordinance was duly adopted and passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1997, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCiLMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
R'/NAASEHS\SIGI~DRAFT23F ORD 6/27/97 sB 36
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
"A-Frame Sign
Alteration
Ambient Air
Balloons
Animated
Sign
Architectural
Elements
Attached
Temporary Sign
Auto Mall
Center
Identification
Sign
Awning Sign
A portable temporary advertising device which is commonly in the shape
of an 'A", or some variation thereof, is located on the ground. is easily
moveable, and is usually two-sided.
Any change or rearrangemere in the supporting members of an existing
building such as beating walls, colunms, beams, girders, or interior partitions,
as well as any change in doors or windows, or any enlargement to or
diminution of a building or structure, whether horizontally or vertically, or the
moving ofa building or structum fi-om one location to another. Alteration for
signs include any change of face, color, material, size, shape, illumination,
position, location, construction, or support of any sign or advertising device
Ambient air balloons mean a balloon, supported by forced air (non-helium),
constructed of fabric materials, affixed to the ground or roof top using steel
cable anchoring systems, and often containing advertising messages
See Flashing Sign.
An integrated component of the design of a building, including walls,
windows, entryways rafters, roofs, and other typical components.
Attached temporary sign means a temporary sign which is mounted. placed,
or attached only to the permanent building where the business activity is
conducted.
The existing fleeway oriented auto mall center identification sign including the
electronic message board, located on 2663 1 Ynez Road.
A painted or silkscreened, non-electric sign attached to an awning or canopy
attached to the exterior of a building.
t S it NIk: ·
Awning Sign
CITY OF TEMECULA Sign Ordinance
Banner, Flag,
Pennant
Building
Official
Building
Frontage
Business Center
Can Sign
Center
Identification
Sign
Channel
Letters
Commercial
Districts
Commercial
Off-Premise Sign
Corporate Flag
Director
Any bunting, plastic, paper, or similar material used for advertising purposes
that is attached to any structure, staff, pole, line, framing, vehicles or anv
other similar object.
The Building Official of the City of Temecula or the authorized representative
The length of the building elevation(s) which fronts on a public street, public
parking lot, or major pedestrian walkway.
A group of three (3) or more industrial establishments planned. constructed
and managed as a total entity with customer and employee parking provided
on-site, provision for goods delivery separated from customer access.
aesthetic considerations and protection from the elements.
Sometimes referred to as cabinet signs, a sign that is shaped like a box to
enclose the source of illumination (internally illuminated) so that the light
shines through the translucent portions of the signs copy panel(s). Logo
boxes are not considered can signs
A sign that identifies the name of a center and is located at a center
entrance.
Individual three dimensional letters or figures that are affixed to a building or
a freestanding sign structure
Commercial districts include Neighborhood, Community, Highway/Tourist,
and Service Commercial zoning designations or their equivalent Specific Plan
zoning designation
Means any sign structure advertising an establishment, merchandise, or
entertainment, which is not sold, produced, manufactured, or furnished at the
property on which the sign is located. Commercial off-premise signs are
commonly known or referred to as billboards
A flag of a nationally recognized corporation or company. Individual
businesses with franchise agreements or individually operated business of a
larger company are not be included in this definition.
The Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula or
authorized representative.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sten Ordinance
Community
Feature
Community/
Neighborhood
Identification
Sign
Construction,
Contractor,
Financing. or
Remodeling Sign
Customer
Entrance
A design feature combining landscaping, hardscaping, architectural features,
public art, signs, or any other creative feature that can be considered a special
and unique design for locations that are considered major intersections or
highly visible locations within the City.
A community identification sign identifies the name and/or logo of a specific
plan. A neighborhood identification sign identifies the name and/or logo of
a subdivision, mobile home park, or multi family complex.
Temporary signs which states the name of the individual(s) and/or firms
connected with the construction or financing of a project.
An entrance used by customers and patrons excluding loading entrances.
Day-Glow Colors
Decorative Flag
Detached
Temporary Sign
Directional
Kiosk Sign
Eave Line
Employment
Opportunity Sign
Flashing Sign
Bright torescent appearing colors, excluding signs illuminated by neon
A flag or banner attached to light poles or other objects in a shopping center
that provides a festive atmosphere to the center by colors, graphics, etc. and
does not provide advertising space.
Detached temporary sign means a temporary sign which is partially
attached to a permanent building, or is attached to a temporary structure
such as a pole or pipe, or any combination of the above. Detached
temporary signs do not include portable or vehicle mounted signs.
Means a free standing, multiple-sided, sign structure whose main purpose is
to display signs or information
Part of the roof which projects over or meets the wall.
A sign that advertises the availability of an employment position within
commercial, industrial, office. or residential districts where non-residential
uses are permitted.
Any sign, except time and temperature displays that do not include
advertising, which contains or is illuminated by lights which are intermittently
on and off, which change intensity or color, or which create the illusion of
motion in any manner, including animated signs which manifest a physical
movement or rotation in one or more planes or the optical illusion of action
or motion.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sit. n Ordinance
For Rent Signs
Freestanding
Sign
Freeway Frontage
Freeway Oriented
Sign
Frontage
Future Tenant
Identification
Sign
Incidental
Sign
Industrial
Districts
Interior Sign
Logo
Major Entrance
Major Street or
Intersection
Memorial Sign
Permanent signs in multi family complexes to identify availability of rental
units.
A sign permanently supported by one or more uprights. braces, poles, or other
similar structural components, and attached to the ground or foundation set
in the ground.
Boundary of a parcel abutting an interstate fleeway
A sign located on a parcel with freeway frontage that is oriented toward the
freeway.
Boundary. of a budding, parcel, or site along public streets including freeways.
parking lots, or pedestrian mails.
A temporary sign which identifies a future use of a site or building(s).
A small sign. emblem, or decal informing the public of incidental information
relating to the buildings on premises (i.e., name of business, telephone
numbers, open, closed, hours of operation, credit cards, etcetera)
Industrial districts include Business Park and Light Industrial Zoning Districts
or any equivalent Specific Plan zoning designation
A sign inside any business that is not intended to be seen from outside the
building in which the business is located,
A trademark or symbol used to identify a business
An automobile entrance to a shopping, office, or business center used
primarily by customers with either full or restricted access, Entrances used
solely for loading and unloading are not considered major entrances,
A street or intersection of two streets which have an ultimate General Plan or
Specific Plan right-of-way of 78 feet or more.
Signs usually located on tablets, plaques, or are cut into the facade of the
building. They can include religious symbols, the names of the building or
site, dates of erection. and other important historical facts.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Menu Sign
Monument Sign
A sign located adjacent to a drive-through lane of a fast food service facility,
which lists the products available and the prices, and is designed to be read by
the occupant of a vehicle.
A freestanding low profile sign supported by a
solid base (as opposed to poles or open
braces).
SIGN
SIGN
SIGN
Moving Sign
Non-Commercial
Off-Premise Sign
Office Building
Office Center
Office District
Off-Premise Sign
On-Premise Sign
Monument Sign
A sign whose entirety or components rotate, move, and swing in any manner
to attract attention and signs consisting of any flashing, blinking, indexing,
fluctuating or otherwise animated lights and components including search
lights and electric message boards.
Any sign exhibiting non-commercial speech or message; signage unrelated to
the buying or selling of commodities or services.
A building whose primary function is to provide office space for professional,
medical, and administrative purposes. Office buildings may include secondary.
and supporting retail uses that are generally located on the first floor
A group of three (3) or more office establishments planned. constructed and
managed as a total entity with customer and employee parking provided on-
site, provision for goods delivery separated from customer access;aesthetic
considerations and protection from the elements.
Office district refers to the Professional Office zoning designation or any
equivalent Specific Plan zoning designation..
Any sign which advertises businesses, services, goods, persons, places, or
events at a location other than that upon which the sign is located.
Any sign which advertises businesses, services, good ' persons, places, or
events at a location upon which the sign is located.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sign Ordinance
Open Space
District
Permanent Sign
Pole Sign
Open Space district refers to the Open Space, Public Park and Recreation, and
Conservation zoning designations or any equivalent Specific Plan zoning
designation.
A sign entirely constructed of durable materials and intended to exist for the
duration of the time that the use or the occupant is located on the premises
A high profile sign supported by one or more poles or similar structures and
is permanently attached directly into or upon the ground
Pole Sign
Portable Sign
Primary. Tenant
Projecting Sign
A sign that is not attached to a building or structure, vehicle or trailer.
Examples of portable signs include, but are not limited to: A-Frames and
T-Frames.
A tenant who occupies more than 50% of the total floor area of a building
A horizontally extending sign which protrudes from a building or structure
below the parapet wall or cave line,
,/
/
/
SIGN
Projecting Sign
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Public
Convenience and
Warning Sign
Pylon Sign
An on-premise sign that contains words such as Entrance, Enter, In, Out,
Restrooms, No Parking, or other similar words, and/or contains arrows or
characters indicating traffic directions. Temporary Real Estate signs are not
included in this group of signs.
A high pro~e sign having a solid base and permanently attached directly into
or upon the ground.
Residential
District
Roof Sign
Pylon Sign
Residential districts include Hillside, Very Low, Low, Low Medium, Medium,
and High Density Residential zoning designations or any equivalent Specific
Plan zoning designation.
A sign, together with all its parts and supports, which is erected, constructed,
placed on or above, or extends above the roof, the cave line or above the top
of the parapet wall of a building.
Prohibited Roof Signs
Permitted Signs on the Roof
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Secondary
Tenant
A tenant, other than the primary tenant, that shares an office building of three
(3) stories or more with at least one other tenant.
Sign
Any object, device, display or structure, or part thereof, situated outdoors or
indoors, made of any material, which is used to identify, display, direct or
attract attention to an object, person, institution, organization, business,
product, service, idea, event or location by any means, including words.
letters, figures, designs, symbols, fixtures, colors, illumination or projected
images.
Sign Area
Sign area for all signs, except multi-tenant signs, is computed by including the
entire area within a single, continuous, rectilinear perimeter of not more than
eight straight lines, enclosing the extreme edge of the writing, representation,
emblem, or other display. It does not generally include any background,
supporting framework, or bracing that is incidental to the display itsel£ In
case of two sided signs, the area shall be computed as including the maximum
single display surface.
For multi tenant signs, the total sign area shall include the area which
surrounds the lettering and the logos for all tenants (i.e., sign area for each
tenant is not computed individually).
SIGN
Sign Area
SINGLE TENANT AND MULTI TENANT
MONUMENT SIGN AREAS
CITY OF TEMECULA Sitm Ordinance
Sign Copy
Sign Structure
Height
Sign Placement
Area
Street Frontage
Subdivision Sign
Tempora~
Business
Advertising Sign
TemporaN' Sign
Tenant
Identification
Sign
Time and
Temperature
Any words, letters, numbers, figures, characters, designs, or other symbolic
representations incorporated into a sign.
The greatest vertical distance measured from the finished grade to the
uppermost part of the sign.
The area for the building elevation surface which the sign is directly placed on.
The boundary of a parcel or a building which froms a public street.
A sign used to identi~] residential subdivisions that comain project name, unit
square feet, price, developer's name, address, and telephone number. and
other pertinent information about the project.
A temporary sign which is made of cloth, burning, plastic, wood, vinyl, poster
board, painted windows, or other similar materials, and which is located on
site of the business use or activity, and is erected or placed for a prescribed
period of time to promote, advertise, announce, or provide the following
information:
(1) Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business, owner, or
occupant of the premises where the sign is located; or,
(2)
Advertises the business conducted, the services available or rendered, or
goods produced sold, or available for sale upon the premisses where the
sign is located.
Temporary signs can include temporary business advertising signs, real estate
signs, political signs, construction, contractor, financing, and remodeling
signs, employment opportunity signs, future tenant identification signs,
garage sale signs, helium balloons, ambient air balloons, model home signs
and flags. Seasonal window displays that contain traditional: holiday
characters and messages and which are intended to create or enhance holiday
character of an area and not reference or display service available or rendered,
or goods produced, sold or available for sale are not considered temporary
signs.
Tenant identification signs may identifi/businesses or buildings. They may be
either a single tenant identification sign, multi tenant identification sign, or a
building identification sign.
An electronically controlled changeable copy sign which conveys only
information such as time, date, temperature, or atmospheric conditions, where
CITY OF TEMECULA Si~,n Ordinance
Sign
Under Canopy
Sign
Vacancy Sign
Wall Mounted
Sign
Window Sign
different alternating copy changes are shown on the same copy area. Each
message remains displayed for a specific minimum period of time with a total
blackout between message changes. The copy shall not travei in any
direction. Time and temperature signs shall be included in the permitted wall
or freestanding sign area and shall not include any advertising.
A sign which is perpendicular to and suspended below the ceiling or roof of
a canopy or permanent awning.
Under Canopy Signs
They are used for motels, hotels, and other similar uses to identify the
availability of rooms.
A permanent sign mounted on the wall of a building
Window Sign means any sign which is painted. attached, glued, or affixed
to a window or is otherwise easily visible from the exterior of the building
where the advertised product or service is available."
ATTACHMENT N0.2
REDLINED COPY OF ORDINANCE 97-
R:\STAFFRPT~127PA95A.PC9 6/30/97 sa
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING CHAFFER 17.28 OF THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE, A COMPREHENSIVE
REGULATORY SCHEME FOR SIGNS AND OTHER
ADVERTISING DEVICES, AND MAKING RELATED
CHANGES TO THE DEVELOPNrF-NT CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter 17.28 of the Development Code of the City of Temecula is hereby
adopted to read as follows:
"Chapter 17.28
SIGN STANDARDS
17.28.010 Purpose and Intent
It is a desire ~ of the City that the design of this community be of the highest quality, that
new development be architecturally distinctive as well as homogeneous in design, and that
accessory facilities be compatible with the overall theme. The quality of signage plays a very
distinctive role in achieving this goal. When abused, signs can create a visual blight which
detracts from the quality of the environment and an individual's visual perception of the City.
The intent of this Chapter is to implement the Temecula General Plan, and to protect the public
health, safety and welfare through the design, use of quality materials, construction, illumination,
location, number, and maintenance of all signs. The purpose of this Chapter is to set forth the
development standards for the installation and maintenance of commercial and non-commercial
off-premise signs within the City and to ensure that the design and location of outdoor advertising
displays are consistent with the health, safety, and aesthetic objectives of the City.
The purposes of this Chapter, in addition to those expressed in the General Plan, are as follows:
(a) Provide for effective business signage;
(b)
Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings and the community
as a whole;
(C)
Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do business
and visit;
R:h'qAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFI?3,0RD 6127/~7 sn I
(d)
Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
(e) Assure that signs are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain;
Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused bv
distracting signage.
17.28.020 Applicability.
This Chapter shall apply to all a~eas of the City~ ~TI~;. except that the provisions of this Chapter shall
apply to the Old Town Specific Plan area only to the extent the specific plan does not specifically
address a particular issue regarding signage issue.
17.28.030 Sign Permits
(a} Sign Permit Required
A Except as provided in Section 17.28.050 a sign permit is required prior to the placing, erecting,
moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying of any sign in the City except as provided in Section
t 7.28.050, Exempt Signs.: A sign permit is also requii~ for aH signs approved through a sign
program.
(b) Findings
No sign permit shall be issued unless the Director finds that the application for a sign permit satisfies,
or with conditions can satisfy, all of the following requirements:
(1)
The sign is consistent with the General Plan, complies with the requirements of this Chapter.
and complies with all other applicable laws and regulations;
The visual elements of the proposed sign, including but not limited to, the size, shape,
illumination, decorative motifs, letters, figures, words (without regard to language), symbols,
spacing, uniformity and proportions of such visual elements comply with generally accepted
standards of quality:for professional graphic artists highest standards of quality.
(3)
The size. shape, color, visual elements. illumination and placement of the sign is compatible
with the surrounding area and with other lawful signs so as and does not to detract from the
character or quality of surrounding properties.
(c) Basis for Denial; Appeal
Any decision of the Director denying a sign permit shall be in writing, and shall identify which of the
findings set forth in subsection (b) of this Section 17,28.030 could not be made, and the reasons
therefor. Any decision of the Director regarding a sign permit may be appealed, pursuant to the
provisions of Section 17.03.090 of this Development Code.
R:/NAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23 ORD 6/27/97 ~n 2
17.28.040 Prohibited Signs
All signs not expressly permitted by this Chapter are prohibited, including but not limited to the
following. No ~pplication for sign permit. development plan. or other application for a prohibited
sign shall be accepted. acted upon. or approved
(a) Abandoned Signs (as defined in Section 17.28.900 (d)).
(b)
Amenity Signs (signs which identify the amenities provided in a multi family complex that
are visible from public street)s.
(C)
Animated or Moving Signs (except for time and temperature displays pursuant to Sections
17.28.050 (s)).
(d) Bunting (unless approved by a sign program).
(e) Cabinet or Can Signs (wall mounted)
(0 Commercial Off-Premise Signs (except as expressly permitted by this Chapter,
commercial off-prem~:!;i;~ignS::!:~e::ihereb~;:;~prol~ibit~ and: !::n~:::;ii~pp!icati0n:for:sign permit,
development plan,:or other:appli~tion~:for aeommerCi~r off-prerni~:sign shall:be aceepted~aeted
upon, or approved.
(g) Commercial Signs next to Residential Areas
When commercial and industrial developments are facing residential uses and are located on the same
local street (60 foot right-of-way or less) as the residential uses, freestanding signs associated with
these developments are prohibited. Wall signs which provide identification for businesses to
pedestrians are permitted may be authorized by a sign program, provided that the illumination of the
signs does not negatively impact residential uses.
(h) Day-Glow Colors for Window Signs
(i)
Decorative Flags (unless approved through a sign program. They Shall be and then only if
limited to focal points within the project)
0)
Loud Speakers or Signs Which Emit Sound, Odor, or Visible Mailer, Except as
Authorized by this Chapter.
(k)
Off-Site Subdivision Signs (except as otherwise permitted in Section 17.28.800, Kiosk
Signs or Section 17.28. 130, Subdivision Signs).
(I) Pennants and Streamers
(m) Portable Signs on Private Property
(n) Signs Constituting a Traffic Hazard
No person shall install or maintain or cause to be installed or maintained any sign which simulates or
imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of words
"stop, danger", or any other words, phrases, symbols or characters in such a manner as to interfere
with, mislead or confuse vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(o) Signs in Proximity to Utility Lines
No permit shall be issued for any sign, and no sign shall be constructed or maintained, which has less
horizontal or vertical clearance from authorized communication or energized electrical power lines
than that prescribed by laws of the state or duly promulgated rules and regulations.
(P)
Signs Located Above the Eave Line and Roof Signs (signs integrated into an architectural
feature are not considered to be above the cave line).
(q) Signs on Doors, Windows or Fire Escapes
No sign structure shall be installed, relocated or maintained so as to prevent free ingress to or egress
from any door, window or fire escape. No sign of any kind shall be attached to a stand pipe or fire
escape, except those signs as required by other adopted Codes or Ordinances.
(r) Signs Within the Public Right-of-Way or Attached to Any Public Property
No person, except a public officerfin performanCe':6fpUblic duty, Shall affix, by any means, any form
of sign on any public propetiyo~vithin the public right~o~way. Signs in any public right-of-way
(street, median is]and, paXkway,:sidewalks; ~C C~ntrol sign posts, utilityposts, trees, future street,
etc.) are prohibited. In addition, Signs are prohibited on any utility:pole, traffic signal, or any other
official traffic control device On accordance ~ith Section 21465 of the California Vehicle:Code) or
signs which project over or into a public right-of-way, or which are attached to the public property.
are prohibited
(s) Vehicle Signs
Signs located on or affixed to a motor vehicle or trailer (as those terms are defined in the California
Vehicle Code), whether parked on private property or public right of way, for'the purpose of
advertising products or services or directing people to a business or activity This paragraph does
not apply to standard advertising or identification practice where such signs are painted on or
permanently attached to a business or commercial vehicle. so long as such vehicle is liceneed and f~lly
operable. and the signs on such vehicle are not in violation of the Vehicle Code.
(t) Window signs
Window signs occupying more than twenty five percent (25%)=:ofthe nonedoor window area,
17.28.050 Exempt Signs
The following signs are exempt from the requirement to obtain a sign permit if they meet these
specified requirements:
(a) Construction, Contractor, Financing, or Remodeling Signs
(1) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
(2)
(4)
(b)
(4)
(c)
(1)
(3)
(d)
Six (6) square feet in single family districts.
Sixteen (16) square feet in all other districts.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
Maximum number of freestanding signs shall not exceed one construction. contractor, or
remodeling sign per street frontage for each parcel or shopping center: !:!~!In addition:lz[u3,
one financing sign per street frontage for each parcel or shopping center iS:permitted.
They are permitted for sites with an active building permit and shall be removed 5 days after
the construction completion. as evidenced by a certificate of occupancy or final sign-off by
the Building Official. or termination of the building permit.
Employment Opportunity Signs
Freestanding signs shall only be allowed in Office and Industrial Districts for single tenant
buildings. where no other tenants are located on the parcels that occupy an entire parcel.
Window mounted signs shall only be allowed in Commercial Districts.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, if freestanding.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per business per major street frontage.
Flags
A flag pole shall not exceed the zoning district height limits set forth in the Development
Code. or 50 feet if no height limit is provided by the Development Code.
A single official flag of the United States of America and two (2) flags of the following flags
shall be permitted per parcel or center:
a. The State of California, or another State of the United States
b. A County :
c. A Municipality
d, Official Flags of Other Countries
e. Flags of Nationally or Internationally Recognized Organizations
£ A Corporate Flag.
The maximum area for a corporate flag may not exceed 50 square feet
Future Tenant Identification Signs
R:XNA~SEHS\SIGN',DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 5
(2)
(3)
(4)
(s)
Maximum area for each sign for all freestanding pads and shopping centers with 5 acres or
more in area shall be 32 square feet. Shopping centers with more than 10 acres in area shall
be allowed a I00 square foot sign for the purpose of identifying multiple tenants.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet for 32 square foot signs and 12 feet for 100
square foot signs.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per street frontage for each center or parcel
at any given time.
They shall be removed 5 days after the tenant occupies the building.
They shall be permitted for sites with an active building permit.
(e) Garage Sale Signs
(D
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
One sign per garage sale is permitted The sign must be located on the same property that
the garage sale is held ~tml!~:be permitte.,d.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet, iffreestanding.
The sign may not be erected more than 5 days prior to the sale.
The signs shall be removed before the end of the day of the sale.
The sign shall not be illuminated.
(0 Government Signs
Any official government sign, public notice or warning required by an applicable federal, state, or
local law, regulation, or ordinance.
(g) Helium Balloons
(I)
{2)
(4)
No balloon shall be larger than three feet in diameter.
They shall not be higher than 10 feet from the ground.
They shall not be displayed for more than three consecutive days for each calendar month and
in no case for more than three consecutive days at a time.
All balloons shall be anchored, and shall not block vehicular or pedestrian movement,
(h) Holiday Decorations within Commercial, Office and Industrial Districts
Seasonal window displays that contain holiday characters and messages and which are intended to
create or enhance holiday character of an area. The displays are commonly associated with national,
state, local, or religious holidays (and which do not reference or display services available or
rendered, or goods produced, sold or available for sale). They may be displayed for a period not
exceeding 45 consecutive calendar days and a maximum of 60 cumulative days per calendar year
(i)
Incidental Signs, i.e., Name of Business, Name Plates. Street Address, Telephone
Numbers. Open, Close, Hours of Operation, Credit Cards, etc.
(l) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be a total of 4 square feet.
(2)
(3)
They shall be located adjacent to major customer entrances.
They shall be located on doors or near doors.
(j) Interior Signs
(1)
(2)
They shall be entirely located inside the building.
They shall not be closer than 18 inches to a window or door.
(k) Memorial Signs on Tablets or Plaques
(1) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
(2) Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, iffreestanding
(I) Model Home and Multiple Family Rental Complex Flags
( 1 ) Hag poles shall not exceed the zoning district height limits set forth in the Development Code
or 50 feet if no height limit is provided by the Development Code.
(2) Maximum number shall not exceed 2 per each model home or 4 per multiple family rental
complex.
(3) Shall be located on the model home lots, the parking lot, or the sales office or the multiple
family rental complex.
(4) They may only identify the builder and the subdivision name or the name of the multiple
family rental complex.
(5) Multiple family rental complex flags shall only be displayed in the third quarter of the year
(m) Model Home Signs
(1)
All such signs shall only be located on the model home parcels, the parking lot or the sales
office and are intended to provide information on each model.
Model Home signs do not include On-Site Subdivision Signs, refer to Section 17.28 130.
(n) Name Plates and Street Address Signs
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
These signs are intended for single family residences and shall be located entirely on the
premises.
The sign shall contain no advertising message.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 3 square feet
Maximum sign structure height shall be 3 feet, iffreestanding
(o) Non-Commercial Off-Premises Signs
(1)
Maximum area of the sign board shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet
Maximum number of signs per parcel shall be one. However, there shall be no limit on the
number of signs during the ninety (90) days prior to a state, federal, or local election and
fourteen (14) days after the election. A sign erected or placed for a candidate who prevails
in a primary election may be maintained until 10 days after the final election.
R:h'qAASEHS\SIGNn, DRAFT23.ORD 6/27197 sn 7
(3)
The maximum height of a ground-mourned sign shall not exceed six (6) feet measured from
grade.
The signs shall not be illuminated.
The signs shall not be erected, placed, or maintained:
Upon any private property without the consent of the owner, lessee, or person on
lawful possession of such property.
On any publiCly0Wnedbtiilding:~:'::~trU¢t~ei:treeoriahrub public property or upon
any portion of a public street:or::hi~tiiViy fight of way.
To obscure the view of any fire hydrant; traffic sign, traffic signal, street sign, or
public information sign.
To block lines of sight to areas of vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
(p) On Wall or Window Menu Signs for Restaurants
/2)
(3)
(4)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
They shall be attached to the building or associated entry structure.
Maximum of signs shall be 1 per restaurant entrance.
They shall not be intended to be used for advertisement and will only serve as information to
customers who have found the restaurant and are standing by the front door.
They shall be located at or near the major customer entrance.
They shall not be counted as permissible area for window signs
Lq~ Real Estate Signs, Subject to 17,12.060
Public Convenience and Warning Signs
( 1 ) Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed 3 square feet.
(2) Maximum sign structure height shall not exceed 3 feet, iffreestanding
(3) Maximum number shall be as necessary
(4) They may identify restrooms, public telephones, walkways, no parking, no trespassing and
similar signs
(5) They shall be located on private property.
(6) They shall contain no advertising messages.
(s) Time and Temperature Signs
(2)
(3)
f4)
(5)
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 16 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall:be '6 feet;::if'freestand!ng,
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per building or parcel.
No other advertisement advertising shall be permitted.
Wall mounted signs are counted as part of the permitted sign area of the elevation they are
placed on. Freestanding signs shall be an integral pan of a permitted freestanding sign and
shall be counted as part of the permitted sign area of the freestanding sign.
(t) Vacancy/No Vacancy Signs
R:XNAASEHSI,SIGN~DRAFT23.ORD 6127/97 an 8
{2)
(3)
(4)
They are used for motels, hotels, and other similar uses.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet, iffreestanding.
Maximum number of signs shall not exceed one per street frontage.
(u) Window:i:Signs
Window sips 6ccup>ing equal or less than twenty five percent (25%) of the non-door:window area.
Window sip do not include menu signs and holiday decorations pursuant to Sections~ 172g 050 (p)
and :(h) respectively;
(v) Works of Art That Do Not Convey a Commercial Message
They are exempt from the provisions of this Chapter; however, they may be subject to the provisions
9_f Section 17.05020, Adnilni~ve.Approvai O~l~eVel0pment,.Plan.
17.28.060 Real Estate Signs
Real estate signs that comply with the provisions of this Section are exempt from the requirement to
obtain a sign permit.
(a)
On-Site Real Estate Signs (For Sale, For Rent, For Lease, Sold, etc.) in Commercial,
Office, and Industrial Districts.
c)
They shall not be permanent in nature and may only be permitted at such time as the property
or structure is available for sale, lease, or rent
Sign area for each sign shall not exceed:
Thirty two (32) square feet for fleestanding signs.
3 square feet for window signs.
(3)
The sign structure height for fleestanding signs shall not exceed 8 feet measured from grade
Maximum number permitted is one sign per street frontage for each parcel or center. Plus,
one window sign is permitted per available suite. In addition, one freeway oriented sign is
permitted per parcel or center with freeway frontage. :
(5) They shall only be posted on private property.
(6)
They shall not be closer than 5 feet to the property line or 17 feet from the face of the curb.
whichever is less.
(7)
(8)
They shall be a minimum of 150 linear feet from all other freestanding signs including real
estate signs.
They shall not be located within 75 feet of an intersection or an access driveway, except that
nothing in this Chapter shall preclude a parcel or center from having at least one freestanding
real estate sign.
(9) The angle of v-shaped signs shall not to exceed 90 degrees. The back side of a v-shaped sign
shall not be visible from the public fight of way.
(10) Appropriate materials are wood, metal, and stucco. Other materials are subject to Director
approval.
(11 ) Illumination Shall is not be permitted.
(12) They shall be maintained in a clean, orde~y fashion at all times and shall be removed 10
days after the close of escrow or after a rental agreement or lease has been entered into.
whichever occurs first.
(b)
(l)
~2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
On-Site Real Estate Signs (For Sale, For Rent, For Lease, Sold, Open House, etc.) in
all Residential, Public Institutional and Open Space Districts.
They shall not be permanent in nature and may only be permitted at such time as property or
structure is available for sale, lease, or rent.
Sign area for each sign shall not exceed:
6 square feet in single family districts and multi family districts for 4 units or less.
32 square feet for complexes in multi family districts of 5 units or more.
Sign structure height shall not exceed:
a
6 feet in single family districts.
8 feet in multi family residential districts
Property with existing residential units for sale, resale. lease or rent shall be permitted one
sign per street frontage.
They shall only be posted on the subject private property
Open house signs shall only be displayed between the hours of 8.00 am and dusk
The an~e of v-shaped signs shall not to exceed 90 degees The back side of a v-shaped sign
shall not be visible from the public right of way.
R:hNAASEHS\SIGN~DRAI;T23,ORD 6/27/97 an 10
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
17.28.070 General Requirements for Permanent Signs
~:foHo~: standa/d~i~il~if6110Wed;b~Per~t;!:.!~ Permanent signs shall be subject to the
following standards to insure the quality of signage in the City. Additi6nal requh-ements ~e in the
other p~s ofY~s Chap~e~
(a) Standards for Permanent Freestanding Signs
( 1 ) Location
g.
All freestanding signs shah be setback at least 5 feet from the right of way or proper~y
line or 17 feet from the face of the curb, whichever is less.
All freestanding signs shall be located outside the site visibility area as defined by
Section 17.06.050 (1) of the Development Code.
All freestanding signs shall located be at least 3 feet from buildings'.
The face of any freestanding sign shall not be oriented parallel to the street, except
when the sign is located at the end of cut-de-sacs, knucldes, or other appropriate
locations as approved by the Director.
The minimum distance between freestanding signs located on the same side of the
street and under 6 in height shall not be less than 150 feet, except center identification
signs located on the same driveway.
The minimum distance between freestanding signs located on the same side of the
street and over 6 feet shall not be less than 250 feet.
The Director shall have the authority to reduce the distance requirements in
subparagraphs e. and f by 20% in case of unusual circumstances such as presence of
driveways, landscaping, utility poles, etc.
(2) Number
Maximum of four signs per bUsiness shall be allowed inclUding::atl wall: mounted;freestanding Signs
and any freeway signs (if any permitted),
(3)
Height
a.
Sign structure height is measured from the extreme top portion ofa f~reestanding sign
to the sidewalk. If there is no sidewalk, the elevation of the finished surface of the
road shall be used.
The height of sign structures located on slopes shall be measured from the highest
point of the sign to the highest point of slope where the sign structure meets ground
adjaeent:tOih~hig!~eSt po~on ofth~::ba~:!~fthe~sig~::.~re
Berming of up to 2 feet may be allowed in addition to the maximum height allowed
for the sign structure.
Berming height shall be measured from the lowest portion of the base of the sign
structure to the sidewalk elevation.
R:XNAASEHS\SIGNXDRAFT23.ORD 6/27197 sn ] 1
(4)
(5)
o determini:ffi~ maximum:permiss~ble~:~height for freely !aigns=~ =!flag ie~t ihaH1}e
erform~ :Tho!fl~g~i~:~e~es~ihls ~mum p~s~jble heiSht~:by~suring~!~he
viSibility of~his ~$ign ,~ =from 3/10 mile i~ before ,apprOaching the off-rampS
directions of~:freeWay fromihe::riglit~il~e~
Design
g
h
k,
L
Except for the changeable portions of movie signs for theaters and changeable
portions of price signs for gas stations, which may use plastic backgrounds. the use
ofcan-B, pe box signs with plastic panels or background are prohibited for tenant and
building identification signs. Sign panels or background shall be of material
commonly used in the buildings or the center. Logo boxes are not subject to this
requirement.
Center identification signs shall use a background material commonly used in the
center buildings. Can-type box signs are S~ not ~ permitted. Flood lighting is
strongly encouraged when consistent with Riverside County Ordinance 655,
Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance; however, internal illumination of the
individual letters are only permitted if reverse channel lettering is used.
Multi tenant signs shall be uniform in background color for all tenants.
All freestanding signs shall be limited in size to the width of the architectural features
of the sign.
All freestanding signs shall use architectural elements at the top, base, and sides of the
signs
IT a tenant, building, or center identification sign is proposed within 75 feet of a major
intersection, it shall incorporate, or be located as pan of, a community feature (i.e
water features, public art, unique landscape designs. public spaces).
Sign colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast between the
background colors and the letters.
All freestanding signs may be permitted a maximum of two sides except that center
identification signs shall be one sided.
Center identification signs shall not advertise tenants: however, if the center is named
after a major tenant, it is permissible to mention that tenant's name as part of the
center name.
Center identification signs shall be incorporated into the entry statement
architecture and landscaping area.
Freestanding single tenant signs or service station signs with a height of six (6) feet
or less shall be constructed as monument signs.
Freestanding multi-tenant signs, theater signs. or freeway oriented signs shall be
constructed as either monument or pylon signs.
Landscaping
All freestanding tenant identification signs and building identification signs shall be
required to be located within a planted landscaped area which extends on all four sides
of the sign. The landscaping area shall be provided according to the following:
R,~qAASEHS\SIGN',DRAFT23.ORD 6/2719q sn 12
Single tenant and building identification signs shall include a 100 square foot
landscaped area.
Multi-tenant identification signs shall include a 200 square foot landscaped
area,
Freeway oriented signs and off-site center identification signs shall include a
300 square foot landscaped area.
The landscaping for pylon signs shall include shrubs and small trees to hide the
lower portion of the pylon sign if visible from public view.
The landscaping for freestanding tent identification signs, building identification
signs , and multi-tenant identification signs shall include flowering perennials.
annual plants, or other plants which provide additional color, :in ~similar proportiOns
Within!;~!~the~i~ir~qnired~i~;~;lands~;:::i:~::~. They shall be planted and replanted
seasonallyi;i~fi~by:!ihe;.Dir~x:tOt;;;~to maintain year round color.
(6) Addresses
All freestanding signs, except those oriented toward the freeway, shall include the street
address(es) or range(s) for the businesses or centers assigned by the Building Official The address
shall not be counted in the total permitted sign area.
(7) Illumination
Illumination for tenant or building identification signs may be internal or external.
When internally illuminated signs are used, only the lettering and logos shall
appear to be lighted. Conventional channel lettering or reverse channel
lettering are acceptable.
When externally illuminated signs are used, only flood [ighting is acceptable
if consistent with Riverside County Ordinance 655. Palomar Light Pollution
Ordinance. External illumination shall not be used for multi tenant signs.
b. Illumination for center identification signs may be internal or external:
When internally illuminated, only reverse channel lettering is acceptable. For
freeway oriented center identification signs conventional channel lettering is
acceptable.
When externally illuminated signs are used, only flood lighting is acceptable
if consistent with the Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance.
(8) Width
Table 17.28 (b) sh0Uld be iii:i;ri!~iiteliiie.iO':ca!~!ate the Width of a Sign ~tmcture The width of
sign structure can be calculated by multiplying the proposed sign structure height by the sign width
coefficient as provided in th~labl~jY!ii~HOwever;:!~'Table 17.28 (b). In no case shall the width of a sign
structure exceed the width calculated by the sign width coefficient.
Table 17.28 (b)
Sign Width Coefficient
Sign Structure Height in Feet Sign Width Coefficient
0-6 20
6.1-12 1.0
12.1-15
15.1-25 0.6
25.1-40 0.4
40.1 + 0.35
For instance, if sign structure height is 4 feet, the applicable Sign Width Coefficient from the above
table is 20. Therefore, the width of the sign structure shall not exceed 8 feet (4 X 2.0).
(b)
Standards for Permanent Wall Mounted Signs for Buildings with Two (2} Stories or
Less
( I ) Location
Each business shad only install a wall sign on the outer walls of their suite.
Signs shall not extend above the cave line.
Wall signs shall not be located on windows or doors
(2) Number
a
For multi tenant buildings, only major tenant within the suite is permitted to have a
wall sign. Sub-leasing tenants are not permitted to have wall signs
Maximum of four signs per business shall be allowed including all wall mounted
business identification signs, freestanding signs, and freeway signs (if any permitted)
(3) Area
For businesses with more than one permitted wall mounted sign, the second sign shall
be not exceed 80%, third 70%, and fourth 60% of the maximum allowable for the
corresponding frontages. This standard shall not apply to a permitted wall mounted
freeway oriented signs.
Wall signs shall be in scale Wlth the building and not cover more than 75% of the
surface of the building face that the sign is located on excluding glass wipetow and
door areas. This provision shall not apply to primary tenant signs
R:LNA~,SEHS\SIGI~DR~F'F23ORD 6/27/97 sn 14
Wall signs shall be in.::Sc-ale;with.:~he.!:build~ng, not extend more than 75% of the sute
length for multi tenant buildings or building frontage for single tenant buildings. This
provision shall not apply to primary tenant signs.
(4) Letter Height
Minimum letter height shall be 8 inches. For wall signs in two lines or more the second line may have
a minimum letter height of 6 inches.
(5) Design
A diversity of letter types and colors shall be encouraged for wall signs within centers
to create interest.
The use of graphics consistent with the nature of the product to be advertised shall
be is encouraged, i.e., hammer symbol for a hardware store, mortar and pestle for a
drug store.
Sign colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast between the
background colors and the letters.
(6) Illumination
a Internal illumination for wall signs is acceptable in the following forms:
Internally illuminated channel letters;
Internally illuminated reverse channel letters; or,
Exposed neon if used in channel letters with transparent face or no face with
the inside of channel lettering colored the same color as the neon;
Other exposed neon applications.
b. External illumination is not permitted unless approved through a sign program
(c~ Number
Maximum of four signs per business shall be allowed including all wall mounted. freestanding signs
and any freeway signs (if any permitted). However, businesses with freestanding freeway signs
shall only be permitted a maximum of three signs. or four signs as permitted by Section 17.18.210
17.28.080 Sign Programs
(a) Purpose andlnt~it;iSign Program Required
A In addition to the sign pr0g~::is permits required fo~ by Section 17.28.030. certain types of
developments require a sign program to ensure that all proposed signs are in harmony with other on-
R:hNAASEI-IS\SIGI~DRAVr23,ORD 6127/9'7 an 15
site signs buildings and surrounding developments. o~he!- pr0y!S!gns of this Chapter require a sign
program for cenmn type of signs. In addition. in Sign programs are required to c0mplywith:all:the
regulations of this Chapter Flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and/or
height; and to the extent it does not comply with these regulations. the proposed sign program
enhances the development and more full)' accomplishes lhe objectives of this C, hapter.
(b) Sign Program ReqUired
In accordance with:Seetion~t:7.28~.030, Sign Pe~ili;:~l:i=~:~llii~Uiuire=a sign permit (excepf for
signs exempt from obtaining peimiiiin'~cordanC~i;~if~!5!;S~tiOn~!:i~:2g:iOSO&E~inlpt SignS)-:In new
developments where any of the following circumstances exist, a sign program in accordance with this
Section shall also be concurrently filed and appmv~ considered for approval with the Development
Plan:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Whenever five (5) or more temporary and/or permanent signs (not including signs exempt
from permits) are proposed for a single tenant development occupying an entire parcel;
Whenever two (2) or more businesses are proposed in a multi-tenant development;
Whenever wall signs are proposed on buildings with three (3) stories or more, or on
~ with heights are greater than 32 feet; or,
Whenever the development contains a historic structure.
(c) Findings
The following findings shall must be made by the approval body prior to approving a sign program:
(1)
The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related
to'
All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by
incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors.
illumination, sign type, or sign shape;
The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or
design motifs included in the building being identified; and,
Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or
obscuring adjacent approved signs~
(2)
The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in
building tenants; and,
(3)
The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the proposed sign
program will comply Complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility
is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, ~!nd('~!7 and height;and. Further. to the
extent it the sign program does not comply with these regulations the requirements of this
Chapter as to sign area. number. location. and height, the proposed sign program enhances
the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter.
R.\NAASEI'tS\SIGNxDRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 16
SIGNS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.100 Signs in Residential Districts
All Ui~ ~jl within Residential Districts that require a sign permit must comply with the standards
contained in Section 17.28.070~i~ene~/iii!Requlx~d~nt~ and Sections 17.28.100 through 17.28.199
17.28.110 Signs for Institutional Uses and Other Permitted Uses in Residential
Districts
(a)
Wall Mounted Business or Institution Identification Signs for Institutional Uses and
Other Permitted Uses in Residential Districts
(1)
/2)
(3)
Maximum number permitted ihalii:bi is one per frontage.
Mayamum permitted sign area for each sign is ½ square foot for each lineal foot of building
frontage; ho~veve~,'if~!Sh~ii!i~ieX~. or 50 square feet. whichever is less.
Illumination may be permitted if it is determined by the Director that it does not adversely
impact the surrounding residential uses.
(b)
Freestanding Business or Institution Identification Signs for Institutional Uses and
Other Permitted Uses in Residential Districts
(1)
(3)
Maximum number permitted shall be one per street frontage
Maximum permitted sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 4 feet.
Illumination may be permitted if it does not adversely impact the surrounding residential uses
17.28.120
Neighborhood and Community Identification Signs for Subdivisions and
Multi Family Complexes
(a)
(b)
Maximum number permitted shall be two per each vehicular access or entrance
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
(l)
(2)
20 square feet for neighborhood identification signs
30 square feet for community identification signs
(c) Maximum sign structure height shall be:
(2)
8 feet for neighborhood identification signs.
10 feet community identification signs.
(d)
(e)
(~)
(g)
They shall be built into the landscaping or project walls.
They shall be one sided, except when installed in a median or other applications where two
sided signs are more appropriate than one sided signs.
Sign area is measured by the area surrounding and including the letters.
Sign background shall be of materials used in the subdivision or project.
R:',IqAASEBS\SIGN\DRAFT23.OILD 6/27/97 ,n 17
(h)
Illumination shall only be by external flood light, and only when consistent with Riverside
County Ordiance 655, Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance, or by internal reverse channel
letters
17.28.130 Subdivision Signs
(a) Maximum number of signs shall bei One
One per subdivision if 5 acres or less. or two.
Two per subdivision if more than 5 acres. If several builders are building on a tract. each
builder is entitled to its own subdivision sign(s) located within the property they own.
provided that they do not exceed the permitted number of subdivision signs as specified in this
ChaDtot
(b)
¢c)
(d)
(e)
(~
(g)
Shall not exceed one sign per street fromage.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed 100 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall not exceed 12 feet.
They shall be removed immediately actor the final sale.
They shall have a 10 foot setback.
They shall be located within the boundaries of the subdivision. ]fZSeveral:builders are building
on a traCt~ each builderi iS ~n~iied t0:~ts 6wn~bdi~Si~ig~6):!16eated within the property
they own.
R:\NAASEHS/SIGN\DRAFI'23.ORD 6/27/97 sn ] 8
SIGNS IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.200 Signs in Commercial Districts
All !a~eS $ within Commercial Districts that require a permit must comply with the sign standards
for Commercial Districts contained in Sections 17.28,200 through 17.28.299 and with the standards
contained in Section 17.2s.070i:.i~R~l~t~. ~:~!~a~iti0n;:i::In lieu of the standards provided
in Sections 17,28,200 through 17.28.299, office buildings in commercial districts must comply with
the standards for Office District contained in Section 17.28.300 through 17.28.399
17.28.210 Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
Freeway oriented signs are only permitted for parcels or shopping centers with freeway frontage
They are permitted as freestanding or wall mounted signs. Freestanding signs may identify centers,
multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. Wall mounted signs may identify single tenants occupying an
entire building and located on a parcel. W~i;;~a:S~i:"~ali!fi0t~beZpermitt~ia:formulti tenant
buildings.
(a) Requirements for Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
( 1 ) Number of signs permitted:
One single tenant identification sign per parcel not located :in a shoppihg center that
is occupied entirely by one business, not located in a shopping center. These
businesses are not permitted a single tenant identification monument sign along
their street frontage. However, if three or more parcels join together to erect a
multi-tenant freeway oriented sign. they each shall also be allowed a single tenant
identification monument sign along their street frontage.
One multi-tenant identification sign per shopping center if the shopping center is
larger than 7 acres.
Two multi-tenant identification signs per shopping center if the center has greater
than 1330 feet of frontage.
(2) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
50 square feet for single tenant identification signs.
100 square feet for multi-tenant identification signs.
include the :Center~S:name.
The permitted sign area may
(3)
Maximum sign structure height shall be 25 30 feet,. except that higher signs:may be
justified through':th~;:~:0f ~flag:~i ~. HOwever, these Signs shah never: exceed :45:'feet
in height. Fot:flag;~st p/rocedures refer to Secti6n 17~28 070 (a) (3) e.
(4) A freestanding freeway oriented sign shall only be allowed as a pylon sign. Pole signs
R:\NAASEHS\SIGN~DP, AFT23.ORD 6/27/97 m 19
(5)
(6)
(b)
shall are not b~'i~lO~ed:permitted.
Mu!fi lenant S!gns Shall:identify a A maximum of three tenants may be on a multi-tenant
BUsineSses With fridingifree~i/i~y::.Sign~;~i~alli:'0n!y~beiipennitteda:maximum of three
signs, ~or four Signs aq permitted by Se~tiO~!~i]7~lgi210:fa'l ::fl:)(a)- which may include a
freeStanding Treeway. Sigl~:;a~:all mounteXl;;i~ whj~h!!shal[:inotg:be ,ViSible from :the freeway.
and a monu~enf:slg~:id~tifyingthelmsina~ii~n:~i:}:ifi:e~i~iXie~tediingleor muiti tenant sign,
Requirements for Wall Mounted Freeway Oriented Business Identification Signs in
Commercial Districts
Same as Section 17.28.240.
17.28.220 Requirements for Freestanding Shopping Center Identification
Commercial Districts
Signs in
Freestanding shopping center identification signs are intended to identify shopping centers. Different
standards have been included for shopping centers with 7 acres or less and more than 7 acres.
(a) Two signs per major entrance shall be permitted and one additional sign shall be permitted
at each major intersection.
(b) Maximum sign area for each sign shall be:
( 1 ) 20 square feet per sign face for centers 7 acres or less.
(2) 30 square feet per sign face for centers more than 7 acres.
(c) Maximum sign structure height shall be:
( 1 ) 4 feet for centers 7 acres or less
(2) 6 feet for centers more than 7 acres
17.28.230 Freestanding Tenant Identification Signs in Commercial Districts
Tenant Identification signs are intended to identify tenants whether or not located in shopping centers
These signs may be single tenant or multi-tenant identification signs.
(a) Requirements for Multi-tenant Signs in Commercial Districts
Freestanding multiple tenant identification signs are intended to identify tenants in centers or multi-
tenant buildings.
(1) Maximum number offreestanding tenant identification signs (multi or single tenant sign) is
one per 300 lineal feet of total street frontage for the center. At least half of the tenant
R:XNAASEHS\SIGI~D1LAFT23.ORD 6~27~97 an 20
(2)
(3)
(4)
(6)
17)
(8)
identification signs shall be single tenant identification signs.
Each center shall be allowed at least one multi-tenant sign. However, if the center has more
than one street frontage, one multi-tenant sign per on each street frontage shall be allowed.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 12 feet.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 100 square feet.
The center name may be added to multi-tenant signs but the total sign area for each sign
including the center name shall not exceed 100 square feet.
The maximum number of signs per panel shall beone twO.
The minimum panel height shall be 10 inches.
The minimum letter size shall be 5 inches.
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding Building or Single Tenant Identification Signs in
Commercial Districts
Freestanding building or business identification signs are intended to identi~ single tenants in a center.
single tenants whether or not in a center, or buildings in commercial districts.
(l)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Maximum number offreestanding tenant identification signs (multi or single tenant sign) is
one per 300 lineal feet of totS[ street frontage for the center. At least half of the tenant
identification signs shall be single tenant identification signs.
The maximum number of signs for single tenants not located in a center shall be one sign per
tenant.
Each center shall be allowed at least one multi-tenant sign. However, if the center has more
than one street frontage, one multi-tenant sign per street frontage shall be allowed
Theater and gas station signs are counted as single tenant signs in the formula calculations for
determining the maximum number of permitted tenant signs for a center. These signs shall
meet all the requirements for single tenant signs except for size and height requirements as
specified in Subsection (5) a. and b below.
The maximum area for all single tenant identification signs or building identification signs shall
be 25 square feet, except that:
Maximum area for theater signs shall be 150 square feet which may include. including
the area for identification of all the shows and the theater name.
Maximum area for service stations shall be 50 square feet which may indude~
including the area for all fuel types, prices, and the service station name.
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Maximum sign structure height for all single tenant signs and gas station signs shall be 6 feet,
except theaters which shall be 15 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
If the frontage of a center is less than 300 feet, no single tenant identification is permitted~
Automotive service stations shall be allowed one price sign per frontage to include all fuel
types and/or prices.
17.28.240
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs for
Buildings with 2 stories or less in Commercial Districts
R:hNAASEHS\SIGN',DKAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 21
Wall mounted business identification signs are intended to provide identification for the individual
businesses located in buildings with 2 stories or less in Commercial Districts.
(a)
(b)
~ C)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per frontage for each tenant.
Maximum area of signs shall be 1 square foot of sign area for each sign per lineal foot of
building frontage,
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identification signs are permitted
placed on the building.
17.28.250
Wall Mounted Signs for Buildings with 3 Stories or More in Commercial
Districts
(a)
Requirements for Wall Mounted Primary Tenant or Building Identification Signs for
Buildings with 3 Stories or More in Commercial Districts
Wall mounted building identification signs are intended to provide identification for buildings with
3 Stories or more. This type ofsignage is usually used by the primary tenant in an office building
(3)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per building,
Maximum letter height and sign area shall be determined by Section 1728250 (c), Size
Requirements
General Requirements
The two pern~ined signs shall be placed on different building elevations.
Both signs shall have the same copy. and only.
Shall consistof a single line of copy.
The elevation plans for the Development Plan shah show the locations and dimensions
of the signs
(4) Design Requirements
They shall complement and add to the aesthetics of the materials of the building.
They may be illuminated. However, in order to reduce the visual impact of
illuminated signs on surrounding residential districts, lighting of signs to produce a
silhouette effect is encouraged. Signs internally illuminated are preferred over
exterior illumination.
The sign copyi~hall be surrounded with sufficient space tobe visually plea~ing,
To avoid the appearance of crowding a sign into a sign placement area, the sign copy
shall:
Occupy no more than sixty (60) percent of the height of the sign placement
area; and,
No more than eighty (80) percent of the width of the sign placement area;
and,
No pan of the sign can be located within the extreme left or right ten (10)
percent of the width of the sign placement area.
R:x, NAAS?HSXSIGN\DRAFT2.30RD 6127197 sn 22
(5) Location Requirements
in. ~6n~nfi6fi~ high-rise buildings, signs shall be placed above between the vision
~as~i:~vindows of the highest floor of the building and b~k>w the cave line
In cOu~onal designs with articulated roofs, signs shall be integrated visually with
the architectural features such as windows, projections, and articulating elements.
(b)
Requirements for Wall Mounted Secondary Tenant Business Identification Signs for
Buildings with 3 Stories or More in Commereial Districts
Wall mounted secondary tenant business identification signs are intended to provide identification for
the secondary tenants in office buildings with 3 stories or more.
(l)
~2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per building elevation.
Maximum letter height and sign area shall be determined by Section 17.28.250 (c).
They shall be permitted below the second floor, except that if the building has a two-story
lobby, the signs are permitted only between the second and third floors above such lobby.
Maximum of four (4) secondary tenant signs shall be permitted per building.
Maximum ofone secondary tenant per elevation is permitted ~ept:,tha~ buildings Buildings
between 3 and 5 stories are permitted two such signs S~i'iE;!b~::pe~ per elevation,
provided that ~:
Shall are not be located on any elevation in vertical (stacked) alignment~
Shall be are separated by at least 40 percent of the width of the subject elevation.
(6)
(7)
They shall be located at or adjacent to the entrance of the building or in a position to be seen
by pedestrians and by those in nearby parking areas and on-site circulation drives.
If retail shops with exterior doors are located on the ground level of an office building, the
sign regulations for wall mounted business identification signs in commercial districts (Section
1728240) shall apply to the ground level shops.
(c) Size Requirements
The following sectionS; ~r0Videthe leiter height, iytnb61 h~ight;and sign are;a fo~;identificaiion of
buildings and secondary tenants for office bUildings:with 3 sto~ei or more
The Recommended sign area, maximum letter and symbol height for building IdentificatiOn
signs for buildings 3 stories or higher is summarized in Table 17.28 (e).
R:hNAASEHS\SlGNr~DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 an 23
Table 17.28 (e)
Sign Area, Maximum Letter and Symbol Height for Building Identification Signs for
(2)
Buildings 3 Stories or Higher
Number of Maximum Letter Maximum Symbol Square Footage Area of
Building Stories Height Height Sign Per Elevation
3 2110" 4' 6" 175
4 Y 0" 4' 10" 200
5 3' 4" 5' 4" 225
6 Y 9" 6' 0" 250
7+ 4' 2" 6' 8" 275
Recommended sign area, maximum letter, and symbol height for secondary. tenant signs for
buildings 3 stories or higher is summarized in Table 17.28 (f),
Table 17.28 (i)
Area. Maximum Letter, and Symbol Height for Secondary Tenant Signs for Buildings 3
Stories or Higher
Number of
Building Stories
Maximum
Letter Height
Maximum Symbol
Height
Square Footage Area of
Sign Per Elevation
3 -4 10" 16" 30
5- 6 12" 19" 35
7 + 14" 22" 40
17.28.260 Requirements for Special Signs in Commercial Districts
The lottowing provides standards for special signs in Commercial Districts.
(a) Miscellaneous Service Station Signs
( 1 ) Special Service Signs on Pump Islands
The>' shall be illuminated only by the canopy lighting
(2) Logo Boxes on Canopies
Two logo boxes located on the canopy shall be allowed per gas station Each logo box shall not
exceed 4 square feet
R:~NAASEIqSI, SIGNXDRAFT23 ORD 6/27/97 sa 24
(b) Fast Food Menu Signs
(2)
(3)
(4)
(S)
Maximum number of signs shall be 2 signs per tenant.
Maximum area shall be 32 square feet per sign.
Maximum structure height shall be 6 feet.
They may be internally illuminated.
They may utilize changeable copy.
(c) Institutional Uses
(2)
Maximum number of signs shall be one freestanding or one wall sign per street frontage.
The standards for freestanding single tenant and wall mounted business identification signs
in Sections 17.28.230 (b) and 17.28.240, respectively shall be followed
17.28.265 Requirements for Projecting Signs in Commercial Districts
Projecting signs are an alternative form of signage for identification of businesses They are only
permitted for a shopping center if uniformly used in a the shopping center and Lf approved through
a sign program, or forza Silag[~z:te~ant~iZifthezt~ZiS:oe~pyinganientire site and is not located in a
shoppingcent~L
(a)
(b)
(e)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per tenant.
Maximum area of signs shall be 4 square feet.
Maximum height 6f:SiF)shatlnot exc~ed Minimum clearance for signs shall be 20 feet or
ext end above the cave !ine;!z ,~hichey~Z is tess.
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
Projection shall be a maximum of 4 feet and shall not encroach into the public right of way.
Must be attached to a permanent canopy or building.
17.28.270 Requirements for Under Canopy Signs in Commercial Districts
Under canopy signs are primarily pedestrian oriented and provide additional identification for
businesses in commercial centers.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
{e)
Maximum number of signs shall be 1 per customer entrance
Maximum area of signs shall be 4 square feet.
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
Must be attached to a permanent canopy or building.
They shall be illuminated only with the lighting from the canopy.
17.28.275 Requirements for Awning Signs in Commercial Districts
Awning signs are intended to provide identification to individual businesses, and can be pedestrian
or automobile oriented. They are only permitted for a shopping center if uniformly used in the
shopping center or for a single tenant if the tenant is occupying an entire site and is not located in a
shopping center.
R:~/AASEHSXSIGNXDRAFT~3.ORD 612719/an 25
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(0
(g)
(h)
No maXi~um numb~i!ofsig~:iS::e~abllshed.
The area of the sign shall not exceed 75% of the area of the awning that the sign is placed on.
Ground clearance shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
PrQiecfion shall not ex~end into the public right of~ay~!~th6rwlse an eneroaChmem!p~rmit
shall be obtained from Public Works Depanm~nl
The total area of signage permitted for the face of the building shall not be exceeded for the
combination of the wall sign(s) and awning(s).
The area of the sign on awnings is calculated by multiplying the height of the highest letter
by the length of the lettering on the awning.
Awning signs shall be located on the bottom 12 inches of the flap (valance) or to on end
panels of angled, curved, or box awnings.
Awnings si~ns :sh~;~ !p~d: ~n~;~n:~h~:b~tt~m::~ 2 :ineh~ ~f the: awning: and let~er Letter
height shall not exceed 8 inches.
17.28.280 On-Site Directional and Directory Signs in Commercial Districts
The purpose of directory and directtonal signs are to guide the movement of vehicles and pedestrians
once they are on the site or center. They are not intended to advertise the tenants or products.
(a) Requirements for Pedestrian On-Site Directory Signs in Commercial Districts
On-site directory signs are intended to provide information to the patrons of a building once they have
arrived near the entrance of the building.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per multi-tenant building per frontage
Maximum area of signs shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum height of sign shall be 7 feet, if ffeestanding
They shall be located in pedestrian activity and movement areas
They shall contain only the name and address of the activities/businesses on-site
They may be illuminated
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding On-Site Directtonal Signs for Individual Sites in
Commercial Districts
These signs are intended to provide direction to automobiles to the different areas of the Cite, once
they have arrived at the site the signs are located on.
These signs are intended to provide direction to automobiles once they have arrived at the site.
O)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(s)
(6)
No maximum number of signs is established.
Maximum area of sign shall be 3 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 3 feet
They shall only include letters and arrows.
They shall be screened from view from the public right of way and private driveways of a
center where practical.
They shall only be visible from the site they are intended to identi_fy be used for.
'~ NAASEHS/SIGN'xDRAFT23 ORD 6/27/97 sn 26
(7) They may be illuminated.
(c)
Requirements for Freestanding On-Site Directionai Signs for Centers in Commercial
Districts
These signs are intended to provide directions to automobiles to the different businesses on the site.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Maximum area of sign shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 7 feet.
They shall be screened from view from the public right of way and private driveways of a
center where practical.
They shall only be visible from the site they are intended to identi_fy be used for
They may be illuminated.
R:\NAASEHS\SIGNn, DRAPT23ORD 6/27197 sn 27
SIGNS IN THE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT
17.28.300 Signs in Professional Office District
M1 Ui~s a within the Professional Office District must comply with the standards for set forth in
Sections 17.28.300 through 17.28.399, as well as with the standards contained in Section 17.28 070,
General Requirements In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28300 through 17.28.30q.
wall mounted business identification signs for retail uses on the first floor of an office building with
exterior entrances Which must also shall comply with the standards for Commercial Districts
contained in Section 17.28.240. If retail uses have interior entrances only, no wall mounted business
identification signs are permitted. All;:-s!g~S wit~:i~::~rfessi0na|ii~ffi~::Di~triet:must:~also comply
with the standards contained Lin:Section 17~28~070, General:Requirements
17.28.310 Sign Types Prohibited in Professional Office District
(a)
(b)
Freestanding Multiple Tenant Identification
Projecting Signs
Under Canopy Signs
Awning Signs
17.28.320
Sign Types Permitted in the Professional Office District with the Same
Standards as Commercial District
(a)
(b'~
Requirements for wall mounted signs for buildings with 3 stories or more are the same as
Section 1728.250.
Requirements for on-site directional and directory signs are the same as Section 1728280
(a), Co), and (c)
17.28.325 Freeway Oriented Signs in Professional Office District
Only travel oriented commercial uses such as gas stations, restaurants, fast food establishments, and
hotels/motels with freeway frontage are permitted, through approval of a sign program, to have
freeway oriented signs Freeway oriented signs are permitted as freestanding and wall mounted signs.
Freestanding signs may identify centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. Wall mounted signs
shall not be permitted for multi tenant buildings. The provisions included in Section 1728 210 shall
apply to all signs permitted by this subsection.
17.28.330
Requirements for Freestanding Office Center Identification Signs in
Professional Office District
Freestanding office center identification signs are intended to identify office centers.
(a)
(c)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per major entrance, plus one additional at each major
intersection.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
R~NAASEHS\SIGNXDRAFT23 ORD 6127t97 sn 28
17.28.340
Requirements for Freeslanding Building or Single Tenant Identification Signs
for Single Tenant Office BuDrings in Professional Office District
Freestanding single tenant identification signs are intended to provide identification for any tenant
in ~ an entire office bUitding'i~pg!:~e::enti~e building. In multi-tenant office
buildings, a freestanding building identification sign is permitted to identify the building.
(a)
(b)
{c)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per street frontage, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum signs area shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure shall be 6 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
17.28.350
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs
for Single and Multi-Tenant Buildings with 2 Stories or Less in Professional
Office District
Wall mounted business identification signs are intended to provide identification for individual
businesses in single or multi-tenant office buildings with two stories or less. However, only multi-
tenant buildings with exterior entrances for their tenants are permitted to have wall mounted business
identification signs.
(a)
{b)
(C)
{e)
Maximum number of signs shall be one sign per frontage for each tenant.
Maxanum area of signs shall not exceed ~A square feet per lineal feet of frontage. However,
the sign area for each sign shall not exceed 50 square feet.
For multi-tenant buildings wall mounted business identification signs shall be permitted only
if the main entrance to each suite is from the exterior of the building as opposed to a lobby
or court yard design.
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identifications are permitted
placed.
External illumination shall is not be permitted.
R:'aqAASE.qS\SIGNXDRAFF23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 29
SIGNS IN INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
17.28.400 Signs in Industrial Districts
All uS~ ~ within Industrial Districts must comply with the standards for Industrial Districts
contained in Sections 17.28.400 through 17.28.499, and with the standards contained in Section
t7.28070, General:Requlrera~nts. In lieu of the standards provided in Sections 17.28.400 through
17 "8 499 Office buildings must comply with the standards for Office District contained in Section
17.28.300 through 399. ~l:;signs::within the!ndu~!i!~!~fiC[i~mst:?comp[ywiththe;standards
contained in S ecfion 17,28.0 ~0, General Re~U!~n~..~!~!
17.28,410 Sign Types Prohibited in Industrial Districts
The following sign types are prohibited in the Industrial Districts.
(a) Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs
(b) FreestandingOff-Site~;Cemer Identification:SignS for CenterS::I~arger Than 60 Acres
(c) Freestanding MukipleTenant Identification Signs
(d) Projecting Signs
(e) Under Canopy
(0 Awning Signs
17.28.420 Sign Types Permitted in Industrial Districts
In addition to the signs otherwise permitted by this Chapter for Industrial Districts, the following sign
types are permitted in these Districts provided that they meet the following specified standards:
(a)
(b)
Wall mounted signs for buildings with 3 stories or more Shall, if they comply with the
provisions of Section 17.28.250.
On-site directory signs. on-site directional signs for individual sites, and on-site directional
signs for centers shall: if they comply ~vith the provisions of Section 1728.280 (a), (b), and
(c), respectively
17.28.430
Requirements for Freestanding Business Center Identification Signs in
Industrial Districts
Freestanding business center identification signs are intended to identify business centers. Different
standards have been included for business centers with 7 acres or less and more than 7 acres.
(a)
(b)
{c)
Maximum number of signs shall be two per major entrance, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum signs area shall be 30 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
R:~NAASEHS\SIGI~DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 30
17.28.440 Freestanding Tenant Identification Signs in Industrial Districts
Tenant Identification signs are intended to identify tenants whether or not located in shopping centers.
These signs may be single tenant or multi-tenant identification signs. However. these two types of
signs are not permitted together at any time.
(a)
Requirements for Freestanding Tenant or Building Identification Signs in Industrial
Districts
Freestanding business or building identification signs are intended to provide identification for a
tenant occupying an entire industrial building. They are also used to identify a multi-tenant industrial
building.
(1)
(2)
(3)
14)
Maximum number of signs shall be one per street frontage, plus one additional per major
intersection.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
No more than one tenant shall be identified.
(b)
Requirements for Freestanding Multiple Tenant Identification Signs in Industrial
Districts
Each center shall be allowed one multi-tenant sign. However. if the center has more than
one street frontage. one multi-tenant sign per street frontage shall be allowed.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall be 20 square feet.
The center name may be added to multi-tenant signs but the total sign area for each sign
including the center name shall not exceed 20 square feet.
The maximum number of signs per panel shall be one.
The minimum panel width shall be 5 inches.
The minimum letter size shall be 3 inches.
17.28.450
Requirements for Wall Mounted Business or Building Identification Signs
for Buildings with 2 Stories or Less in Industrial Districts
Wall mounted business or building identification signs are intended to provide identification for
individual businesses in single or multi-tenant industrial buildings.
(a)
Cb)
(C)
Maximum number of signs shall be I per frontage for each tenant.
Maximum sign area for each sign shall not exceed 1/2 square feet per lineal feet of building
frontage.
Building identification signs are only permitted if no tenant identifications are permitted by_
this Chapter.
17.28.600
Temp0ra~:iB~in~ii~:Adv;~iii~i;;~igii: iiComraerch!, ~cei and Industrial
Districts
R:\NAASEHS\SIGNXDRAFF23ORD 6127/97 !n 31
(a) PurpoSe
TIt purpose of this S~'tion is to set standards for temporary' business advenising signs (CommerCial,
Professional Office, and Industrial) in the CiW. Temporaw, business advenismg signs include
promotional signs. grand opening signs. interim signs, special event signs. and ozher signs made up
of temporary ,natesials or used in a tempo,~ry lhshion
(b)
Promotional signs in commerdai 0ffi ! :a a!;:!!Medi iDensity ReSidential, and
High :DenSi~gesidentia~DiStriets
Promotional Signs are lemporary business advertising signs intended to attract attention to a use or
activity fo~ a limited number of events as identified in Otis Section In residential distr,cts. these signs
are only permitted fbr rental multi family complexes in the Mediun~ Density Residentia! and I !igh
Density Res,demial Districts The two types of promotional sitms include attached and detached
signs. Only attached prom0tio~f:7:signS :are permi~t~d:foFih~ Medifirn'D enSit.v ReSidential and
Denai.t.t.ty Residential DiStricts; Attaeh'ed ~;detached promotional signs that require a perran may
be used in combination ctu~ng any quarter.
O)
(2)
Roqulremems for Attached Promotional Signs
For each ug or business activky UP to one (i) sign may be allowed. For a use or
business activity withfr0ntage on two or more major streets, 2 signs may be allowed.
Maximum area shall be I00 square leek
The vertical dimensi6n'ofthe sign shall not exceed 5 feet. Shall not exceed the top of
the cave line or parapet watl.
The width (horizontal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%) of the business
or store frontage for businesses, whichever is smaller, or building frontage for rental
multiple family complexes.
The maximum duration for attached promotional signs is one thirty (30) day period
per quarter provided that signs shall be erected at least 60 days apart. Except that
attached promotional signs in Commercial, Office, and Industrial Districts may be
used for two thirty (30) day periods in the 4th quarter of each year and in Medium
and High Density Residential Districts may be used for two thirty 00)day p~riods in
the third quarter of each year.
All promotional signs shall be located on the site where the use Or activity is located.
Requirements for Detached PromotiOnal signs
For each use or. business activityup to one (!) :Sign may:be allowed. Except for a use
0r: bUsin:e~:S:'~!~y with frontagi:o~:!~W00~ ~6r~majbr streeti2 signs may be
allowed.
Maximum area shall not exceed 32 sqU~r~ feet,
The vertical:dimenSi6n Shah :n6i ~ed 3feet:miit shail not exceed 6 feet' above the
RzLNAASEHS\SIGN~DRAFT23ORD 612W97 sn 32
ground.
They shall be mourned to a frame. The frame shall becOnZ~ruCteci :of~attraCdve
permanent materials and shall be construaed so that no additional sUpports or bracing
is required.
They shall not block, restrict or impair any ofthe following:
The public's view of another business or activity.
The public's view' of the signage for another business:or~activity.
The view or visibility of the operator of any motor vehicle
The movemenl of any pedestrian or motor vehicle
E
The ii:dUitm!ford!edS~;prtmOiitnii ~ig~i!iS:two thirty :(30) day periods
l~riiyear;
(c) Grand Op~ihgSipi!;~'i~Commercii!,Olli~ilna~t~Zi:~:iM~iimi!lellilyResidenfial,
and !tigh Denli~ReSidi~'tia!DistrktS
Grand opemng signs are temporary business advertising signs. bearing the wordS:"Grand~Opening',
or some similar message to announce the opening of a new business or for mUltiple family rental
complexes.
(t)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
For use, bUsine i::act ty, 0r multipl -:family,::renial:. m iexes:,up,to one(1) Sign may he
allowed. Fora Use, buSiness activityliiormuttip!e:rfanily:rentilcomplexeswith~-ontageon
two or mo re maj or! Streetsi:Z(two)i2 si~::rn ay:be: all owed ~
Maximum area shall not exceed 60 square feet.
The vertical flin,ension shall not exceed 3 feet T~e~:Siha!i,,~0ti:ieed the :tbp ofthe eave line
or parapet wall.
They shall be attached tothe building Where the use, a~fiv~ty, Or multiple family rental
complexes is located~
The width (horizomal dimension) shall not exceed sixty percent (60%)of the business, store
frontage, whichever is smaller, or building fr0ntage for rental:mUttip!e family complexes.
They may be::alloWed fo~! any ped0d of time during:the :first 0ne:!hUndred and twenty (120)
days ofbusine. ss or multi family rental complex operation.
(d) Interim Signs
Interim signs are tempotar~ buieSS advertising signs intended to provlde:ihterim Signage while ihe
permanent signage is behig fab~Cated, repaired,-::0r:prepared ~forilSiiihtion:=
(1) The maximum r~umberofsigns Shallbe:the:same:numberofp~rmanenl signs permined by this
Chapter.
(2) They shall beth~e!~th~ size :of~erm~n{::=gi~nS~i~di~!~::tiiis Chaptel'
(3) They mayi:~0main6~ the:bUSlsSi~and apiir0priat~:lOg~2 :!~h~i:Shallbe attached tothe
building i, Vhe~e::!~he:~:~!~tivityi:iS:it~itd~
(4) Theymlybeall0W~d~Sfor:,~:~!adS~p:;~i:in~!fg0)rZdi~i!!'~Z~i~ec~i:may al ow O~e time
R:'xNAASEHS\SIGN\DRAFT23,ORD 6~27~97 an 33
extension, for any pi~0d up m th!rty:(30)i:iiays, i~itlig~d ~SuSe:' :It:~:~the responsibility: for
the proponem of:th~!:~xtensian:,ti~i~i~i~hyEZ~he extension is appropriate.
(e) $PliiiEven~:~i~i!inSC61mer~i~i~i:~OffiC~;i~d:/!ndUstriaiDistricts
Sp~,~ial~::event signs are temporaW business advertising signs for specml community activities or
seasonal events. By way of example only, such activities or events may include charitable and
c, omrmmiW fund raising events, Christmas tree sales, the tractor races. or the annual Ternecula Wine
and Balloon Festival. In addition to the on-site sips permitted by this Sect~c;n. community events
sponsored by Ihe City or ~, a non-profit organization may be allowed one off=site sign Two types
of special event signs include attached and detached special event signs.
(I) Attached Special':Event Si$1:in c~imer~iii, :office )and induStrial:Districts
Special event sig~i~f~iii~i~i~he~d~in~btii~di~i~;~ii~i~;;~ihi~!!~i~attaehedt6 :the: :building or
st ruetufa where the use ~ir ifi~iy: iSloCaied2
The mniimUm area shall nor exceed 32 Squarelfeet:
The vertical dimension shall not exceed 3 feet. ::they:Shall:not exceed the topof the
cave tineO~:paiapet wall ofth~Sbuilding:
They shall:beil61:ated~0n:the site:of the speCial event or activity being advertised.
The width:(horizontal dimension) shali: not exceed sixW percem (60%) of the business
or store:?frontagei:i~chever. is SmallerZ
Special:eventsignsmaybeailowedf0~!:~yperioduptoforty-five(45)days. The
Director mayallow a one-timeextenSi0n, for any period up to an additional forty-five
(45) days, :with good cause:! !t : iS ifii~:iSpohsibility of the proponent of the extension
to justify why:the extension is appropriate.
(2) Detached Special Event Signs in COmmercial, Office, and Industrial Districts
Special event signs which are not loeated in buildings or structures shah be securely attached to poles
or a structure on the Site where the use or activity is located.
The maximum area shall be 32 square feet.
The vertical dimension shall not exceed 3 feet. The maximum height t0 the top of the
sign shall n0texceed 6 feet.
The WidthZ(hotizonial: dimension) shall not exceed 15 feet
SpeCial ZS~vei~,::ii~i::may be allowed for any period up to forty;fiVe (45)days. The
Director may allow a one-time extensiort, for any period up to an additional thirty (30)
days; wlthgood ~ause. It is the resp6nsibility ofth6 proponent o/the extension to
justify why thaiextension is appropriate,
Special: ~i~t~ZSi~ for special ~gmmhnlnj~d~:eVent~sU'cih as the TractOr Races and
V~i and ~i~n F~al,' ~y)li~::~i~ iddki~SUp~i~i~iind/O~': direCtiOnaI
temporary sienagear;the discretiOnO~h~:Di~oi2 ':Suppl~meniai dlreetional signage
should ni~t':i,~:~i;~rty-fW0:i0~2y~qli:,ife~t ?'0~imitj6~:'roadways and tw~nt~-f0ur
R:~NAASEHS\SIGbrDL~FT23.ORD 6/27/9';' sn 34
(24) square feet on other roadways The appropriate sizes and locations fbr all
supplemented and:or directional temporary. signs shall be determined by the Director.
A temp0rary:amble~i ~!b~ii~:~il; ~g~i~:-~i~ :i~i i!i~e~aw~!stm~e! :supported ~by ror dcold
~chO~g~e~] :~e~:Slg~i~:~mte~d~ib~;~:~a~fi~[:~e~e~::~the:buSi~sesin the
City proV~d~d:Ce~in~O~S~em~
(a)
The ~mUm imm~be~Z~fbalto~ni~li~lli!nO~?iXCeed ::~hre~:s~y~n any on~ ~tei during any time
(2)
building developm~nt:~:~;:ib~n!iappLro~Sdil~:.i:.0~
A: build ing ~ :lhat ii :containS: c:two':i[!io~ :.,:~re~:!~tei:!, iidepend~n~y Owned :! or operated
commerci31~ ;Of~cei.OrZ. ihdU~al!~li~in~ieS~
(d)
(e)
(~
(j)
(k)
(D
The maximum display time shall not exceed a total of fifteen (15) calendar days within anT,'
nint~ (90) calendar day period. In lied of the fifteen (15) calendar day period herein. a thirty
1'30) calendar day permit may be issued by the Director during the month of the Temecula
Annual Balloon and Wine Festival. if such event is held.
Spacing qhall be a minimum ofthree hundred filly (350'} feet between the balloons.
The requirements for maximum allowable three (3) signs on any one site and minimum three
hundred fi~..- (350') foot spacing between balloons may be waived by the Dire~ur during the
month oflhe Temecula .annual Balloon and Wine Festival. if such evenl is held
The maximum cross section ofthe baUoon shall not exceed 1500 square feet
The maximum ',height'~:~!'.~n0t, r'~eed !:thirty ~(30) :feet; as: m~ :from i:{he pOint.of anchor
to the highestportion 0~ithe balloon:
They may be illuminated at night using e!ectrical lighting s) ,stems.
Balloons shall be ground mounted or roof mounted using ste~!icable':mchoring:systems.
Balloons shall be tethered and not be free-floating nor constructed in i!ihape5 different from
the "hot. air:ballOOn:' Shape" Wp~Caily depicted:z i~fiii Ci~,v:'6r~i~la'L~nnUal::Ball0~n!and
Wine Festival. For example, ~ach balloons in the shape ofblimps or cano~h:::~haraCte, rs Sha[t
not bepermitted~ '.
All' such signs i, shaiiS:!b~:X;emoVed nO later !than:5!:.th~::li~t~diyi;.ipenni~i~d in: the a~prOVed
application;
No temporary a~ientZ:i~;balloon or Similar inflatable i~all be ereCted~:iplaced or maintained
so thatjtdoeSanyofthefollowing:
(l)
(2)
Mars, defaces. disfigures or damaaes any!fiUbii~;Zbbiiding;Z St~r~ 0t'6fher property': Or
Endangers the safety o/parson or property!
17.28.800 KioskSi~i~i::i~iii~istri~ts
R:~'4A. ASEHS\SIGNXDKAFT23.ORD 6/27197 m 35
(a) PUrpose
The purpose of this .section is to provide a uniform, coordinated method of offering deVelopers and
apartment owners a means of providing directional sip to their projects. whiie minimizing confusion
among prospective purchasers and remers who wish to inspect development prqjects and apartments,
while promoting traffic safer, and reducing the visual blight of the proliferation ofTsips. !Directional
kiosk signs, including travel direction sign~ other than those on-si~e, are prohibited except as
provided in this Section.
(b) Authority to Grant License
The Csty Council may. by duly executed license agreement, grant to a qualified person The exclusive
right t{: design, erect and maintain dirccfional kiosk signs within the entire Cit~', or any designated
peruon thereof Licensees shall be ~elected by soliciting request for proposals. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, any person erecting or placing direcfional kiosk signs on-site shall not be required to
obtain a iicenle.; The:term;i~'~ifil!ii~:~h~!iZifO~h~!ili}ihe~,ii~e~ieagreement.
(c) Directi~inalSignsStr~!~Sii:Op~ii~n
Licensee(s) shall make directional sign panels available to all persons or entities selling subdivisions
or renting apartments fhereina~er referred to as "Subdivider/Land Lord') on a first:come, first-
service basis No shim panels shall be granted to any subdivider for a period ofT excess oftwe years.
However, a subdMder who is soliciting sales of more than two subdi~,isions willtin a single planned
community or a speci~c:pfani~.~ea~shall:.~0t~ibe~bjeCi:::to!::i~:~wo-year:!imitation during such
solicitation. Land Lords may indefinitely diSPlaY theirpr0ject 'name .on the kiosk signs.: Lieensee(s)
shah maintain aseparate Waiting list for .each Sign structure.. 'Altemati;vely, a subdivider/Land Lord
may apply to ticensee fora::sign~panel pr0gram consisting:ofaSsingteisignpanelZon each of a series
of sign structureSas neededt~:~ide ptapeetive :purChaSerS i6E:hi~e~:suMivision/rental project.
A subdivider whose timeof use for a sigrt:panel~or:sign space:::program has expired, may :reapply
and shall be placed on the waiting list in the same manneras:anew applicant.
(d) General Requirements
(D
(3)
(5)
For purposes of this Section, street intersection; shall;mean';where :two or more streets or
roads cross at the ~'~i~rade. Sheet or:road i~l;indude all SlXeets:and :roads With a fight
of way of 88 feet
Maximum height'Lilmll'!~ia0t exceed I2feet.
Di~ectional signs stxall:~t obstruct the use of SideWalks, walkways; ,bike and hiking Wails;
shall not ;obstruct tlie,iib'tlity of:vehiCles, pedeSmins:~traf~ COntrol :signS; shah ~ where
feasible, be combined;with advance street name~ignS;:2shall:not:!be::installed in the
immediate vicinity:of street intersection; ::and::shall be:i!!rnited to not more than three (3)
structures between!S~reet lntersecti0~i;;
Direcfional signs shall notbe plaCed:on l~:residential ~itreeti~
Sign structures shall be ladder type withindividual :Signpanels:of uniform design and color
throughout the City limits.
SignL~etsshall:f~0~f!b~:iffiumi~
(8) Sjgn structure::instal!~tionashatl!iifi~!Ud~.~breakaway'°~esignfeatureswh~re required in
(9) No:i'Si~7~iinafi~:~!~;:i~fli~?~6e, i~!f0rvi~:)~on!~other appurtenances shall
(t0) The~Sigfi:pane!!!!le~ffaig'~foruac[iii~fification~:S~/alt~:~iiniform.
(11) All::~:erected~n:privateP~!i~USt:~::~!Written:~!~0nsent:fromthe:propeny owner
Mth!!the~tyim:ih~ve:!a:.xight!:::t~::ente~.:t~i:i~em~:!:~y.!:.~gnsn~t:ini!c~nf~rmance.
(12) All signs~with~'~::~UbliC~iifight~y!m,Sfl~i~:::.~:::~toachmentpermit.
(13) The:li~en~t~h6~i:~f~an::~1~:!~.:~lia~i;~6~dii~e::eity~:an~i:its~cers and
employee~;:~Iess!Ofialli~tSi:i:.~l~ims~:~d);~es:!le~,i~!!~iinS~:Fthern~::and the license
or encroaehmenLpermi~:.i~l~all: ~!~r0vide~!
17.28.900 Enforcement, Legal Procedures, and Penalties
The following signs axe hereby declared a public nuisance, subject to abatement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 8.12 of this Code:
(a) Declaration of Public Nuisance
(1)
(3)
Any sign that is erected or installed in violation of this Chapter. after the effective date of
the ordinance adopting this Chapter;
Any sign that is abandoned as defined in paragraph (d) of this Section 17.28.900;
Any sign the owner of which has received a written notice from the Building Official
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Section 17.28,910, and the maintenance. alterations, or
repairs specified in the notice are not made within thirty (30) calendar days after the date
of receipt of such notice.
(b) Removal
( 1 ) Removal Without Notice of signs within the Right-of-Way
All signs in the public right-of-way may be removed by the City without issuing a notice
of violation.
(2)
(3)
Emergency Removal
Where the Building Official determines that the sign in question poses an imminent safety
h~7~rd or dangerous condition, such sign may be removed immediately and stored by the
City.
Removal of Temporary Signs
Any temporary sign erected, placed or maintained in violation of any provisions of this
R:MblAASEHS~SIGl~DRAF'F23ORD 6/27197 ~n 37
Section may be removed by the City five (5) days after issuance of a notice of violation
to the person or party who caused the sign to be erected, if ~own. and to the owner,
lessee, or person in lawful possession of the property on which the sign is located.
(4)
The owners of signs removed pursuant to subparagraphs (1), (2), or (3) of this paragraph
Co) of Section 17.28.900 shall be liable to the City for all costs and expenses incurred by
the City in removing and storing the signs, in accordance with the provisions and
procedures of Section 8.12.140 of this Code. As soon as practicable following removal
pursuant to sUbparagraphs(!~!~(~)i:~:O~!i'0f this paragraph (b) of Section 17.28.900, but
in no case later than forty-eight (48) hours after removal, a notice of violation shall be sent
to the owner of the sign(s) via regular mail. The sign(s) will be returned to the owner only
upon payment of removal and storage costs pursuant to Section 8.12. 140. If the sign(s)
is not claimed within thirty (30) days after the receipt of Notice of Violation the sign(s)
may be destroyed.
(c) Unauthorized Removal of Signs
No person shall remove, destroy, relocate, or otherwise disturb any sign without the permission
of the party who caused the sign to be erected. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit the owner
of a piece of property, or his or her authorized representative, from removing a sign from his or
her property. that was erected without his or her consent. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent
the Building Official from taking action to abate sign violations pursuant to the provisions of this
Code.
(d) Abandoned Signs
Signs shall be considered abandoned and subject to abatement pursuant to Chapter 8.12 under any
of the following circumstances:
(1)
A sign other than off-premisses sign. which for a period of ninety (90) days. no longer
advertises or identifies an ongoing business. product, or service available on the premises
where the sign is located.
(2~
Where a sign pernut for a temporary sign has expired and the sign has not been removed
within one day after the date of expiration.
Where the sign concerns a specific event and five (5) days have elapsed since the
occurrence of the event.
17.28.910 Maintenance Responsibility of Signs
(a)
All signs shall be kept in good condition, be legible, adequately repaired. maintained, and
painted by the owner thereof at all times. The standard for adequate repairs is that the
repairs shall be at least equal in quality and design to the original work such as the paint.
finish, materials, landscaping, illumination, structure. and any required surrounding
R:~AASEHS~,SIGl~DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 ~a 38
landscaping.
Signs not properly maintained shall be issued a notice to maintain, alter, or repair by the
Building Official. Upon a written notice from the Building Official, the maintenance,
alterations, or repairs specified in the notice shall be made within thirty (30) calendar days
after the date of receipt of such notice.
(C)
Appropriate easements for access and maintenance shall be secured for centers that contain
more than one parcel and include center identification signs, multi-tenant signs, single
tenant identification signs, etcetera.
(d)
CC & Rs or other acceptable maintenance mechanism shall be established for centers with
center identif'tcation signs, multi-tenant signs, single tenant identification signs, etcetera,
in order to identify the responsible party for appropriate maintenance of the signs in
accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.
17.28.920 Non-conforming Signs
(a) Purposeand Intent
It is the intent of this :i~On:!to recognize that theeVentual elimination of exiSting:Signs that are
not in conformity with the provisions of this Chapter requires further analysis of the existing signs
in the City.
(b) Continued Use of Non-Conforming Signs
A non-conforming sign..if legal at the time of installation, may continue to be used and must be
properly maintained in accordance with Section 17.28.910. With the exception of the auto mall
center identification sign, non-conforming signs may not be:
(2)
(3)
{4)
(5)
(6>
Changed to another non-conforming sign. For the purpose of this Section, changing the
tenant signs on a freestanding multi-tenant identification sign shall is not be considered a
change to another non-conforming sign.
Improved or structurally altered so as to extend its useful life.
Expanded.
Reestablished after discontinuance for 90 days or more.
Reestablished after damage or destruction or D..f' more than 50 percent of its value.
Moved or relocated
Section 2. Table 17.03(a) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended by
adding the following approval categories:
Approval
Administrative
Annroval
Planning
Director
Planning
Commission
City
Council
RM'qAASEHSXSIGN\DRAFT23.ORD 6F27/97 sn 39
Sign Permits X
Sign Programs (Approved by the
body approving the
Development Plan)
X X
Modification to Sign Programs X
Section 3. Section 17.03.060(b) of the Teme~ula Development Code is hereby amended
by adding the following
"(4) Increases in the allowable size, height, number, or location of new' or existing signs by less
than ten percent (10%) of the standards within Chapter 17.28."
Section 4. Section 17.03.090 (b) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by adding the following:
"(2) Actions by the Director of Planning on the approval of sign permits"
Section 5. Section 17.34.010(a) of the Temecula Development Code is hereby amended
by deleting the definition for "Alteration", "Sign", and "Outdoor Advertising Structure" and adding
the following definitions:
R:~NAASEHS\SIGN\DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 sn 40
Section 6. Article XIX of Ordinance 348, Advertising Regulations. Ordinances 91-26,
Ambient Balloons, Ordinances 92-16, 93-12, 94-23, Temporary Signs. Ordinance 93-09, Outdoor
Advertising Displays, Ordinance 91-40 Directional Signs, and Section 6 of Ordinance 593 are
hereby repealed.
Section 7. Eni~tal!,!E~ifi!~:i The City Council hereby determines that the
provisions of this .OrdinanceZ!.W6Uld have:no effect' on:theZenvironment and are therefore exempt
This sec~i~nindica~esi~C~QA~:app!ies ~n~y~t~j~ti!~i~!ihayei ~h~p~ten~a~;:f~r~icausi~g for
the reaqons set forth in the Stuff Report. it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that this ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. It.alsoi~tales;!that ~here it
can be seen~with. c~:)!lhat::i;th~!is;in0,:l!oS~i~!~tY':~hat. Zffi~!i!activitY; inquestion,may have a
significant effectS:~zon:iiitlie~!enViironment;;:~'~h~!i!:'~a~iiVity Accordingly. the City Council hereby
determines that the adoption of this Ordinance is not subject to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA ~.
Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full fome and effect thirty (30) days after its passage.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Ihe City Clerk shall publish a summary
of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office
of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance. Within 15 days from
adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this Ordinance, together with
the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, and post the same in the
office of the City Clerk.
Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __ day of , 1997
ATTEST
Patricia H Birdsall, Mayor
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
R:\NAASEHS\SIGN~DI~FT23.ORD 6127197
41
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. __ was duly introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of ,1997, and that thereafter, the Ordinance was duly adopted and passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1997, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
June S. Greek, CMC, City Clerk
R:hNAASEI'IS\SIGI~DRAFT23.ORD 6/27/97 ~a 42
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
"A-Frame Sign
Alteration
Ambient Air
Balloons
Animated
Sign
Architectural
Elements
Attached
Temporary Sign
Auto Mall
Center
Identification
Sign
Awning Sign
A portable temporary advertising device which is commonly in the shape
of an "A', or some variation thereof, is located on the ground, is easily
moveable, and is usually two-sided.
Any change or rearrangemerit in the supporting members of an existing
building, such as bearing walls, columns, beams, girders, or interior partitions.
as well as any change in doors or windows, or any enlargement to or
diminution of a building or structure, whether horizontally or vertically, or the
moving of a building or structure from one location to another Alteration for
signs include any change of face, color, material, size, shape, illumination,
position, location, construction, or support of any sign or advertising device
Ambient air balloons mean a balloon, supported by forced air (non-helium).
constructed of fabric materials, affixed to the ground or roof top using steel
cable anchoring systems, and often containing advertising messages.
See Flashing Sign.
An integrated component of the design of a building. including walls,
windows, entryways, rafters, roofs, and other typical components
Attached temporary sign means a temporary sign which is mounted, placed,
or attached only to the permanent building where the business activity is
conducted.
The existing freeway oriented auto mall center identification sign including the
electronic message board, located on 2663 1 Ynez Road
A painted or silkscreened, non-electric sign attached to an awning or canopy
attached to the exterior of a building.
Awning Sign
CITY OF TEMECULA Sign Ordinance
Banner, Flag,
Pennant
Building
Official
Building
Frontage
Business Center
Can Sign
Center
Identification
Sign
Channel
Letters
Commercial
Districts
Commercial
Off-Premise Sign
Corporate Flag
Director
Any bunting, plastic, paper, or similar material used for advertising purposes
that is attached to any structure, staff, pole, line, framing, vehicles or any
other similar object.
The Building Official of the City of Temecula or the authorized representative
The length of the building elevation(s) which fronts on a public street, public
parking lot, or major pedestrian walkway.
A group of three (3) or more industrial establishments planned. constructed
and managed as a total entity with customer and employee parking provided
on-site, provision for goods delivery separated from customer access.
aesthetic considerations and protection from the elements.
Sometimes referred to as cabinet signs, a sign that is shaped like a box to
enclose the source of illumination (internally illuminated) so that the light
shines through the translucent portions of the signs copy panel(s). Logo
boxes are not considered can signs.
A sign that identifies the name of a center and is located at a center
entrance.
Individual three dimensional letters or figures that are affixed to a building or
a freestanding sign structure.
Commercial districts include Neighborhood, Community, Highway/Tourist,
and Service Commercial zoning designations or their equivalent Specific Plan
zoning designation
Means any sign structure advertising an establishment, merchandise, or
entertainment, which is not sold, produced, manufactured, or furnished at the
property on which the sign is located. Commercial off-premise signs are
commonly known or referred to as billboards.
A flag of a nationally recognized corporation or company. Individual
businesses with franchise agreements or individually operated business of a
larger company are not be included in this definition.
The Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula or
authorized representative.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sign Ordinance
Community
Feature
Community/
Neighborhood
Identification
Sign
Construction,
Contractor,
Financing, or
Remodeling Sign
Customer
Entrance
Day-Glow Colon
Decorative Flag
Detached
Temporary Sign
Directional
Kiosk Sign
Eave Line
Employment
Opportunity Sign
Flashing Sign
A design feature combining landscaping, hardscaping, architectural features,
public art, signs, or any other creative feature that can be considered a special
and unique design for locations that are considered major intersections or
highly visible locations within the City.
A community identification sign identifies the name and/or logo of a specific
plan. A neighborhood identification sign identifies the name and/or logo of
a subdivision, mobile home park, or multi family complex.
Temporary signs which states the name of the individual(s) and/or firms
connected with the construction or financing of a project.
An entrance used by customers and patrons excluding loading entrances.
Bright ~orescent appearing colors :excluding:signs illuminated by neon.
A flag or banner artached to light poles or other objects in a shopping center
that provides a festive atmosphere to the center by colors, graphics, etc. and
does not provide advertising space.
Detached temporary sign means a temporary sign which is partially
attached to a permanent building, or is attached to a temporary structure
such as a pole or pipe. or any combination of the above. Detached
temporary signs do not include portable or vehicle mounted signs.
Means a free standing, multiple-sided, sign structure whose main purpose is
to display signs or information.
Part of the roof which projects over or meets the wall.
A sign that advertises the availability of an employment position within
commercial, industrial, office, or residential districts where non-residential
uses are permitted.
Any sign, except time and temperature displays that do not include
advertising, which contains or is illuminated by lights which are intermittently
on and off, which change intensity or color, or which create the illusion of
motion in any manner, including animated signs which manifest a physical
movement or rotation in one or more planes or the optical illusion of action
or motion.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sitm Ordinance
For Rent Signs
Freestanding
Sign
Freeway Frontage
Freeway Oriented
Sign
Frontage
Future Tenant
Identification
Sign
Incidental
Sign
Industrial
Districts
Interior Sign
Logo
Major Entrance
Major Street or
Intersection
Memorial Sign
Permanent signs in multi family complexes to identify availability of rental
units.
A sign permanently supported by one or more uprights, braces, poles. or other
similar structural components, and attached to the ground or foundation set
in the ground.
Boundary of a parcel abutting an interstate freeway.
A sign located on a parcel with freeway frontage that is oriented toward the
freeway.
Boundary of a building, parcel, or site along public streets including freeways.
parking lots, or pedestrian malls.
A temporary sign which identifies a future use of a site or building(s).
A small sign, emblem, or decaI informing the public of incidental information
relating to the buildings on premises (Le., name of business, telephone
numbers, open, closed, hours of operation, credit cards, etcetera)
Industrial districts include Business Park and Light Industrial Zoning Districts
or any equivalent Specific Plan zoning designation.
A sign inside any business that is not intended to be seen from outside the
building in which the business is located.
A trademark or symbol used to identify a business.
An automobile entrance to a shopping, office, or business center used
primarily by customers with either full or restricted access. Entrances used
solely for loading and unloading are not considered major entrances.
A street or intersection of two streets which have an ultimate General Plan or
Specific Plan right-of-way of 78 feet or more.
Signs usually located on tablets, plaques, or are cut into the facade of the
building. They can include religious symbols, the names of the building or
site, dates of erection, and other important historical facts.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sten Ordinance
Menu Sign
Monument Sign
A sign located adjacent to a drive-through lane of a fast food service facility,
which lists the products available and the prices, and is designed to be read by
the occupant of a vehicle.
A fleestanding low profile sign supported by a
solid base (as opposed to poles or open
braces).
SIGN
SIGN
Moving Sign
Non-Commercial
Off-Premise Sign
Office Building
Office Center
Office District
Off-Premise Sign
On-Premise Sign
Monument Sign
A sign whose entirety or components rotate, move, and swing in any manner
to attract attention and signs consisting of any flashing, blinking, indexing,
fluctuating or otherwise animated lights and components including search
lights and electric message boards.
Any sign exhibiting non-commercial speech or message; signage unrelated to
the buying or selling of commodities or services.
A building whose primary function is to provide office space for professional.
medical, and administrative purposes Office buildings may include secondary
and supporting retail uses that are generally located on the first floor.
A group of three (3) or more office establishments planned, constructed and
managed as a total entity with customer and employee parking provided on-
site, provision for goods delivery separated from customer access, aesthetic
considerations and protection from the elements.
Office district refers to the Professional Office zoning designation or any
equivalent Specific Plan zoning designation..
Any sign which advertises businesses, services, goods, persons, places, or
events at a location other than that upon which the sign is located.
Any sign which advertises businesses, services, goods, persons, places, or
events at a location upon which the sign is located.
CITY OF TEMECULA Sitm Ordinance
Open Space
District
Permanent Sign
Pole Sign
Open Space district refers to the Open Space, Public Park and Recreation, and
Conservation zoning designations or any equivalent Specific Plan zoning
designation.
A sign entirely constructed of durable materials and intended to exist for the
duration of the time that the use or the occupant is located on the premises,
A high profile sign supported by one or more poles or similar structures and
is permanently attached directly into or upon the ground.
SIGN
Pole Sign
Portable Sign
Primary. Tenant
Projecting Sign
A sign that is not attached to a building or structure, vehicle or trailer.
Examples of portable signs include, but are not limited to: A-Frames and
T-Frames.
A tenant who occupies more than 50% of the total floor area of a building.
A horizontally extending sign which protrudes from a building or structure
below the parapet wall or cave line.
/
I
sxo~
Projecting Sign
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Public
Convenience and
Warning Sign
Pylon Sign
An on-premise sign that comains words such as Entrance, Enter, In, Out,
Restrooms, No Parking, or other similar words, and/or contains arrows or
characters indicating traffic directions. Temporary. Real Estate signs are not
included in this group of signs.
A high profile sign having a solid base and permanently attached directly into
or upon the ground.
Residential
District
Roof Sign
Pylon Sign
Residential districts include Frillside, Very Low, Low, Low Medium, Medium,
and High Density Residential zoning designations or any equivalent Specific
Plan zoning designation.
A sign, together with all its parts and supports, which is erected, constructed,
placed on or above, or extends above the roof, the cave line or above the top
of the parapet wall of a building.
Prohibited Roof Signs
Permitted Signs on the Roof
CITY OF TEMECULA Si~,n Ordinance
Secondary
Tenant
A tenant, other than the primary tenant, that shares an office building of three
(3) stories or more with at least one other tenant.
Sign
Any object, device, display or structure, or part thereof, situated outdoors or
indoors, made of any material, which is used to identify, display, direct or
attract attention to an object, person, institution, organization, business,
product, service, idea, event or location by any means, including words,
letters, figures, designs, symbols, fixtures, colors, illumination or projected
images.
Sign Area
Sign area for all signs, except multi-tenant signs, is computed by including the
entire area within a single, continuous, rectilinear perimeter of not more than
eight straight lines, enclosing the extreme edge of the writing, representation.
emblem, or other display. It does not generally include any background.
supporting framework, or bracing that is incidental to the display itself. In
case of two sided signs, the area shall be computed as including the maximum
single display surface.
For multi tenant signs, the total sign area shall include the area which
surrounds the lettering and the logos for all tenants (i.e., sign area for each
tenant is not computed individually).
SIGN
Sign Area
SINGLETENANTAND MULTITENANT
MONUMENT SIGN AREAS
Y
Y
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Sign Copy
Sign Structure
Height
Any words, letters, numbers, figures, characters, designs, or other symbolic
representations incorporated into a sign.
The greatest vertical distance measured from the finished grade to the
uppermost part of the sign
Sign Structure Heights
Sign
Sign
' Height
Sign at Sidewalk Level
Sign Height
Sign ]
Slructurc
Sign
Sign on Slope
Sign on Berming
Betruing - 2 feet maximum
Sign Placement
Area
Street Frontage
Subdivision Sign
Temporary
Business
Advertising Sign
The area for the building elevation surface which the sign is directly placed on
The boundary of a parcel or a building which fronts a public .street.
A sign used to identify residential subdivisions that contain project name, unit
square feet, price, developer's name, address, and telephone number, and
other pertinent information about the project,
A temporary sign which is made of cloth, bunting, plastic, wood, vinyl, poster
board, painted windows, or other similar materials, and which is located on
site of the business use or activity, and is erected or placed for a prescribed
period of time to promote, advertise, announce, or provide the following
information:
CITY OF TEMECULA Sien Ordinance
Temporary Sign
Tenant
Identification
Sign
Time and
Temperature
Sign
Under Canopy
Sign
Vacancy Sign
(1) Designates, identifies, or indicates the name of the business, owner, or
occupant of the premises where the sign is located;
(2)
Advertises the business conducted, the services available or rendered, or
goods produced sold, or available for sale upon the premisses where the
sign is located.
Temporary signs can include temporary business advertising signs, real estate
signs, political signs, construction, contractor, financing, and remodeling
signs, employment opportunity signs, future tenant identification signs,
garage sale signs, helium balloons, ambient air balloons, model home signs
and flags. Seasonal window displays that contain traditional holiday
characters and messages and which are intended to create or enhance holiday
character of an area and not reference or display service available or rendered,
or goods produced, sold or available for sale are not considered temporary
signs.
Tenant identification signs may identify businesses or buildings They may be
either a single tenant identification sign, multi tenant identification sign, or a
building identification sign.
An electronically controlled changeable copy sign which conveys only
information such as time, date, temperature, or atmospheric conditions, where
different alternating copy changes are shown on the same copy area. Each
message remains displayed for a specific minimum period of time with a total
blackout between message changes. Ihe copy shall not travel in any
direction. Time and temperature signs shall be included in the permitted wall
or freestanding sign area and shall not include any advertising
A sign which is perpendicular to and suspended below the ceiling or roof of
a canopy or permanent awning.
Under Canopy Signs
They are used for motels, hotels, and other similar uses to identify the
availability of rooms.
irITY OF TEMECULA Sten Ordinance
Wall Mounted
Sign
Window Sign
A permanent sign mounted on the wall of a building
W all Mounted Sign
Window Sign means any sign which is painted, attached, glued, or affixed
to a window or is otherwise easily visible from the exterior of the building
where the advertised product or service is available."
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MAY 19, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95A.PC9 6/30/97 an I ~,
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 19, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission continue the discussion of the Sign Ordinance.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
A Request to Recommend Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
This item was continued by the Planning Commission from the May 5, 1997 meeting. At that
meeting, Planning Commission continued the discussion of the Sign Ordinance and
recommended a number of changes to the Ordinance. The only change at that meeting which
required further staff analysis was the percentage of window sign coverage. Other changes
recommended by the Commission will ultimately be incorporated into a redlined Ordinance prior
to the final action by the Commission.
DISCUSSION
At the last meeting, the Commission stopped their discussion on Page 27, Section 17.28.300.
This Staff Report includes all the issues that needed to be researched by staff at two previous
Planning Commission meetings. These issues include prohibiting painted window signs,
reducing the permitted area for window signs to less than 10% of the window area, and the
height of freeway signs in relation to the landscaping along the freeway.
Window Signs
Window signs are considered temporary signs which were the center of great controversy when
the City Council adopted the Temporary Sign Ordinance in 1993. Through the process of
drafting the new ordinance, Staff directed the Sign Committee not to recommend changes to
the Temporary Sign Ordinance. Staff has made only minor clarifications to this part of the
ordinance with the exception of modifications to the provisions for window signs and adding
provisions for temporary banners for apartment complexes. The following discussion provides
staff's recommendation on window signs. The detailed provisions for the apartment complex
banners is included in Sections 17.28.700 (b) and (c).
R:\STAFFRFT\127PA95.PI0 6/30/97 sn
The changes to the existing window signs section included in the proposed Ordinance are
recommended by staff and the Sign Committee for easier enforcement of the Ordinance. The
existing temporary sign ordinance exempts window signs including painted signs with less than
10% coverage from obtaining a permit and prohibits window signs with over 75% coverage.
In addition, it allows window signs between 10% and 75% for a 90 day period annually with
a permit. The enforcement of these provisions has been difficult, since it is necessary to keep
track of three different sizes for window signs, less than 10%, more then 10% but less than
75%, and more than 75%. In addition, it is necessary to keep track of number of days the
window signs are displayed. Therefore, staff has recommended language in the proposed
ordinance which exempts window signs with less than 25% coverage from obtaining a permit
and prohibits window signs with more than 25% coverage. The down side of this provision
is that it potentially turns temporary window signs to a more "permanent" signs. Furthermore,
the Sign Committee added a provision to prohibit "day glow" colors for window signs. Staff
believes these provisions are reasonable and allow the business owners to place advertisements
on windows, including painted window signs, without obtaining a permit as long as the signs
are less than 25% coverage and are not "day glow" colors. Further restriction of window signs
as proposed by the Planning Commission will probably cause further controversy once staff
attempts to enforce these provisions.
Height of Freestanding Freeway Signs
The Planning Commission expressed a concern regarding the height of freeway signs as the
height seems to be dictated by the height of the trees within the Cal-Trans right-of-way. Staff
proposes two solutions to resolve this issue. One solution involves re-vegetation of the Cal-
Trans right-of-way along 1-15 to remove the eucalyptus trees and replace them with trees
having a broader canopy and less height at maturity. This solution could take a long time to
develop and will have substantial cost to the City. The other solution is placing a maximum
height for the sign regardless of the visibility of the sign and eliminating the flag test procedure.
if the sign is not visible at the maximum permitted height, the applicant needs to work with Cab
Trans to trim the trees, remove the trees and re-plant them as required by Cal-Trans, lace the
trees, or raise the skirt of the trees. Staff recommends a maximum height of thirty (30) feet
for freestanding freeway oriented signs. This recommendation is based on the height of the
following existing freeway signs:
In and Out Burgers
30'-00"
Jan Weilert/
Hungry Hunter 25'-00"
Texaco 55'-00"
Wendy's 28'-04"
Denny's 41'-06"
Midas 30'-00"
Palm Plaza 36'-00"
Arby's 28'-00"
The down side for a 30 foot maximum is that the owners of existing freeway oriented signs
R:/STAFFu: .... PA95.PI0 6/30/~7 sn
with heights less than 30 feet could apply to raise the height of their signs to 30 feet.
Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
The Planning Commission has not discussed the freeway signs section for commercial districts,
Section 17.28.210 (a). The following is a modified version of this section which incorporates
some new ideas. New text is shown in bold and deleted language is shown in redlined text.
Staff would like to receive Planning Commission input on these ideas. After staff receives
direction from the Planning Commission these changes will be incorporated into the Ordinance,
including clarifications to other parts of the Ordinance.
The following is staff's recommendation for Section 17.28.210, Freeway Oriented Signs in
Commercial Districts:
Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
Freeway oriented signs are only permitted for parcels or shopping centers with freeway
frontage. They are permitted as freestanding or wall mounted signs. Freestanding signs may
identify centers, multiple tenants, and/or single tenants. Wall mounted signs may identify
single tenants occupying an entire building and located on a parcel. ~:a!!:::mounted:signs Shall
not be permitted for:mult!!:~e:~nt::building~i
(a) Requirements for Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs in Commercial Districts
(1) Number of signs permitted:
One single tenant identification sign per parcel not located in a shopping center
that is occupied entirely by one business. These business shall not be permitted
a single tenant identification monument sign along their street frontage.
However, if three or more parcels join together to erect a multi tenant freeway
oriented sign, they all shall be allowed single tenant identification monument sign
along their street frontage and shall be permitted a total of four signs including
the freestanding freeway sign, wall mounted signs, and freestanding tenant
identification signs.
One multi tenant identification sign per shopping center if the shopping center
is larger than 7 acres.
Two multi tenant identification signs per shopping center if the center has
greater than 1330 feet of frontage.
(2) Maximum sign area shall be:
50 square feet for single tenant identification signs.
100 square feet for multi tenant identification signs.
may include the center's name.
The permitted sign area
(3)
Maximum sign structure height shall be 25 30 feet~i:;i:~pt:;;:~hat higher:signs!:may:sbe
justified throUgh:::the:::USe::0f!a flag :test~iHdWe~/er :tti~ gn~.~:~h~f ;~ve~ ~Xcee~ ~5:feet
in height.:: FOr~g:~e~t::~pmcedureS:~r~;t~E:~eC~i~n~;~3:~;~;~Q~)~:~(3) ~e.
(4) A freestanding freeway oriented sign shall only be allowed as a pylon sign. Pole signs
R:/STAFFRFrF\I27PA95PIO 6/30/97 sn
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MAY 5, 1997
R:\STAFFRPT\127PAgSA.PC9 6/30/97 sn 12
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 5, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Department Staff recommends the Planning
Commission continue the discussion of the Sign Ordinance.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
City of Temecula
PROPOSAL:
A Request to Recommend Approval of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
LOCATION: Citywide
BACKGROUND
This item was continued by the Planning Commission from the April 21, 1997 meeting. At
that meeting, Planning Commission took public testimony, initiated the discussion of the Sign
Ordinance and recommended a number of changes to the Ordinance. Some of these changes
will require further staff analysis and will be presented to the Commission as soon as the
analysis by staff is complete. The items to be researched by staff include: stricter requirements
for vehicle signs and the height of freeway signs in relation to ever growing landscaping. The
changes recommended by the Commission will ultimately be incorporated into a redlined
Ordinance prior to the final action by the Commission.
DISCUSSION
At the last meeting, the Commission stopped their discussion on Page 12, Section 17.28.070
(a) (4). The discussion of the Planning Commission included prohibiting painted window signs,
exploring other means than the Sign Ordinance to prohibit certain vehicle signs, reducing the
permitted area for Window Signs to less than 10% of the window area, and the height of
freeway signs in relation to the ever growing landscaping. The members of the public
requested the Planning Commission to ensure adequate signage for multi tenant office buildings
and adequate freeway signage for small commercial centers along the freeway. In addition,
creating an aesthetically pleasing community through appropriate sign regulations will make
Temecula an inviting place for businesses to relocate.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the discussion of the Ordinance, until the
entire Ordinance is discussed by the Commission.
Attachments: 1. April 21, 1997 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 2
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
APRIL 21, 1997
R:\STAFFRPTXI27PA95A.I?C9 6/30/97 an 13
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
April 21, 1997
Planning Application No. PA95-0127
Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Department Staff recommends
Commission adopt PC Resolution No. 97-__.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
BACKGROUND
This item was continued off-calendar from the February 12, 1997.
the Planning
City of Temecula
A Request to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Sign Ordinance
Citywide
At that meeting staff
requested Planning Commission's direction on six issues regarding the Sign Ordinance. The
following summarizes the Planning Commission's direction on these issues:
Non-Conforming Signs
The Planning Commission determined that all legal non-conforming signs should be permitted
to exist without starting any amortization period until a sign inventory has been completed.
After the inventory, the Ordinance will be amended to add provisions relating to the removal
of non-conforming signs, refer to Section 17.28.960.
Uniform Real Estate Signs
The Planning Commission determined that real estate signs do not need to follow a' uniform
design standard. As a result, this provision has been deleted from the Ordinance.
Placement of Freestanding Signs either Parallel or PerOendicular to Streets
The Planning Commission determined that most signs should be placed perpendicular to the
street; but that the Ordinance needs to be flexible to permit other orientations. As a result,
changes have been made to Section 17.28.070 (a) (1) d.
R:~STAFFRIrfX127PA95.PC7 6/30/97klb
Minimum Size of Centers for Permitting Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs
The Planning Commission was split on this issue and requested staff to provide information
regarding undeveloped parcels along the freeway. This information is discussed in more detail
later in the Staff Report in the Discussion Section.
Minimum Letter Sizes for Multi Tenant Signs
The Planning Commission determined that five inch (5") minimum letter sizes with ten inch
(10") panels and one panel per line should ensure the visibility of the tenants on multi tenant
signs. This has been addressed in Sections 17.28.230 (a) (5), (6), and (7).
Multi Tenant Signs in Industrial Districts
The Planning Commission determined that multi tenant signs are appropriate for industrial
districts and directed staff to bring back the standards for these signs for the Commission's
review. This is also discussed later in the Staff Report in the Discussion Section.
DISCUSSION
The first time the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Sign Ordinance was in October
21, 1996. Since that time, the ordinance has been modified substantially as a result of Sign
Committee, Comment Group, and City Attorney recommendations. As a result, staff has
included a redline/strike out version of the current Ordinance in Attachment 2. This version
shows only the major changes to the original ordinance and does not include minor grammatical
modifications. In this Ordinance, the new language is shown as underlined and deleted
language as i:~:~tii~: (shadow). In addition, Attachment 1, Exhibit A includes the most up to
date version of the Ordinance that is being recommended for approval by the Sign Committee
and staff.
Permitting Multi-Tenant Signs in Industrial Districts
At the previous meeting, the Commission stated that multi tenant signs in industrial districts
should be allowed and requested that staff develop standards for these signs. Staff has
evaluated some of the existing signage and recommends the following standards:
Each center shall be allowed one multi tenant sign. However, if the center has more
than one street frontage, one multi tenant sign per street frontage shall be allowed.
Maximum sign structure height shall be 6 feet.
Maximum sign area shall be 20 square feet.
The center name may be added to multi tenant signs but the total sign area including
the center name shall not exceed 20 square feet.
The maximum number of signs per panel shall be one.
The minimum panel width shall be 5 inches.
The minimum letter size shall be 3 inches.
Minimum Size of Centers for Permitting Freestanding Freeway Oriented Signs
The Planing Commission requested staff to provide vacant parcel and existing center sizes along
the freeway. This information is provided in Attachment 3 along with the frontage for each
R:\STAFFRPT\I27PA95.PC7 6/30/97 klb 2
parcel. Staff continues to recommend a minimum 7 acres for centers in order to permit multi
tenant signs. The following represents the acreage of the existing centers adjacent to the
freeway that are between 3 and 7 acres:
#5 Carl's Jr. and Kragen Center
#36 Tony Romas
#72 Mini Mart, Around a Buck
Winchester and Ynez 3.52 Acres
Jefferson south of Winchester 4,56 Acres
South Front Street 4.48 Acres
The following represents the individual vacant parcels between 3 and 7 acres that could be
developed as centers:
#3
#16
West of Ynez north of Gold's Gym 6.5 Acres
West of Ynez between the car dealers and Tower Plaza 4.5 Acres
Attachment 4 includes correspondence from the Chamber of Commerce supporting Mr. Fred
Grimes's position on the six remaining issues discussed in the previous Planning Commission
hearing. Mr. Grimes was a member of the Comment Group and the Chamber of Commerce had
a representative on the Sign Committee to represent the interests of the Chamber.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The Planning Commission hereby determines that the provisions of this Ordinance will have no
effect on the environment and the proposed Ordinance is therefore exempt from requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3). This section
indicates that, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity
in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to the
provisions of CEQA.
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
This project is consistent with the General Plan since the General Plan implementation program
requires the City to adopt sign standards for residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
Through the adoption of this Ordinance, General Plan goals relating to the urban design and
community character are being fulfilled.
FINDINGS
Adoption of the Ordinance would:
1. Provide for effective business signage;
Assure that signs are compatible with the character of their surroundings and the
community as a whole;
Preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do
business and visit;
m
Protect the City from the blighting influence of excessive signage so as to preserve and
enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City;
R:\STAFFRPT\127PA95 .PC7 6/30/97 Idb 3
Assure that signs are appropriate to the type of activity to which they pertain;
Regulate signs so as to avoid increasing the hazards to motorists and pedestrians caused
by distracting signage;
Recognize that the eventual elimination of existing signs that are not in conformity with
the provisions of this Chapter requires further analysis of the existing signs in the City.
Attachments:
PC Resolution No, 97- - Blue Page 5
Exhibit A - Ordinance No. 97- - Blue Page 9
Redlined Copy of the Sign Ordinance - Blue Page 10
Inventory of Vacant Parcels and Existing Center Sizes - Blue Page 11
Chamber of Commerce Correspondence - Blue Page 12
R:\STAFFRPTXI2?PA95.PC? 6/30/9'7 Idb 4