HomeMy WebLinkAbout102198 PC Agenda In compliance with the Amerlans wlffi D~sabHIUes Act, ~ you need special assistance !o par~cipate In ~ls m6~,i, please
contact Ihl oilice of the Community Devdopment Depatenent at (i0g) 6944400. Notification 4~ hours pdor to · rneeUag will enable the
City t~ make mannaHe arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting pll CFR 35.t02.35,104 ADA TItle Ill
CALL TO ORDER:
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
October 2t, 1998, 6:00 PM
43200 Business Park Drive
Council Chambers
Temecu'la, CA 92390
Chairman Slaven
Reso Next In Order tt98-036
ROLLCALL:
Guerdero, Naggar, Slaven, Soltysiak and Webster
PUBUC COMMENTS
A total d 15 minutes is provided so members of the public oan address the mmmissioners on items that am not listed on
the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item
not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When'you am called to speak, please some forward and state yourname and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be rded with the Planning Secretary before Commission gets
to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMIBSION BUSINESS
t. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of Minutes from September 2, '1998
PUBUC HEA~NGITEMS
Case No.:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Environmental Action:
Planner.
Recommendation:
PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
James Hundley, Dekkon Development
Winchester Road northeast of Bostik Court within the Westside Business Center
The design, construction and operation of a 23,098 square foot office/industrial
building.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
Approval
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Envirenmental Action:
Case Planner:.
Resommendation:
Planning ApplicaUon No. PA98-0350 (CondiUonal Use Permit)
Paradise Chevrolet
Southeast comer of Ynez Road and Solana Way
To construct and operate a 53,541 -sq. ft., two-story Chevrolet auto dealership and
a 3,t26 sq. ft. Cadillac/Oldsmobile auto dealership with showrooms, offices, parts
inventory, 50~bay sewice building, paint booths and wash bays
Exemption
Carole K. Donahoe, AICP
Apprevai
PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting:
November 4, t998, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California
2
R:\V/1M~ERVG\PLANCOYf~IXAGENDA5%5,(~96 10114198 vllw
701-16
ITEM #2
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 2, 1998
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Ternecula Planning Commission convened in an adjoumed regular meeting at 6:00 P.M.,
on Wednesday, September 2, 1998, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Guerdero, Naggar, Soltysiak, Webster, and
ChainNoman Slaven.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Planning Manager Ubnoske,
Senior Planner Hogan,
Assistant Planner Anders,
Senior Engineer of Public Works Alegda,
Attorney Diaz, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. ADproval of AQenda
MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Guerdero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Plannincl Al~131ication No. PA98-0270 (Develol~ment Plan)
Request to construct a 16,656 square foot office/manufacturing/warehouse building
With associated parking and landscaping on a one acre parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission
approve the request as conditioned.
Assistant Planner Anders presented the staff report (of record) advising that the applicant is
requesting a minor exception permit for reduction of the minimum parking requirements by two (2)
parking spaces, clarifying that the Development Code requires a minimum of 29 parking spaces for
this particular project, and noting that pursuant to the Code, a credit of two (2) vehicle spaces may
be counted for the proposed six (6) additional bicycle spaces. Ms. Anders clarified, for Commissioner
Soltysiak, that fie parking requirements are not divided between office and visitor accommodations,
but viewed in its entirety, noting that this project, as proposed, will be short two (2) parking spaces;
however, because the proposed use will function as warehouse. the applicant's present parking
needs could be accommodated.
With regard to landscaping, Commissioner Webster commented on the inconsistency with the tree
size in the Design Guidelines which requires the planting of a certain percent of 15 gallon, 24-inch
boxed, and 36-inch boxed trees. Senior Planner Hogan clarified that although landscaping on this
particular project will meet the Development Code requirements, there is a difference between the
Design Guidelines and the Development Code, noting that the Development Code supersedes the
Design Guidelines.
With regard to Condition No. 57 (water entities), Planning Manager Ubnoske provided, for
Commissioner Webster, additional clarification.
Considering the size of the project, Assistant Planner Anders clarified, for Commissioner Webster,
that this project would not require the completion of any traffic studies and that it was determined
that AM and PM traffic impact would be insignificant. Planning Manager Ubnoske further advised
that as long as this project is consistent with the General Plan additional traffic studies would not be
required.
For Chairwoman Slaven, Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff is in the process of updating
the Circulation Element, noting that any modifications would forwarded to the Commission for review.
Mr. Scott Buckels, representing the applicant, clarified that the nature of this business will be
primarily manufacturing, noting that because the current business has no signage to encourage
walk-in business, parking will be primarily for employees; commented, for Commissioner Naggar,
on the zero lot line due to the size of the lot in order to maximize building space, meet safety
requirements, and to provide adequate turnaround space for the fire department.
For Commissioner Naggar. Assistant Planner Anders clarified that planning staff has dosely worked
with the architect to mitigate the view of a blank wall on the east elevation, noting that the applicant
was very accommodating. Senior Planner Hogan noted, for Mr. Naggar, that currently there is no
plan to develop the adjacent properly.
For Commissione~ Guen"iero, Mr. Raadeker advised that the business uses stains and lacquers in
compliance with AQMD regulations, which are stored in 55-gallon drums and that the application is
applied in a ventilated spray booth, previously approved by the City.
The Commissioners commended the applicant on the project.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerdero moved to close the public hearing; to adopt the Negative
Declaration for Planning Application No. PA98-027; to adopt the Mitigation Monitodng Program for
Planning Application No. PA98-0270; and to adopt Resolution No. 98-034 based upon the Analysis
and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval.
RESOLUTION NO. PC 98-034
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-027 TO CONSTRUCT AND
OPERATE A 16,656 SQUARE FOOT ONE-STORY OFFICE, WAREHOUSE AND
MANUFACTURING BUILDING, ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND LANDSCAPING ON
A PARCEL CONTAINING A 1.0 ACRES LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1100 FEET
SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF DIAZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER
ROAD AND KNOWN AS A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-310-009.
Amend
a minor exception permit to allow the reduction of the parking requirements by
two (2) spaces for the six (6) extra bicycle spaces provided
Commissioner Naggar further commended the mitigation efforts for projects that abut the property
line and praised Assistant Planner Anders on her efforts with regard to this issue, noting that such
efforts provide for a more efficient approval process.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
3. Planning Al~plication No. PA95-0079 (Tentative Parcel Mal~ No. 28257)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended by Staff that the Planning Commission deny the request.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that the applicant has requested a continuance, recommending
that the matter be postponed to the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, further
advising that the public headng be opened if there are public members who would like to speak.
Chairwoman Slaven opened the public hearing.
Ms. Jeannine Paul, 43315 Corte Rialto, read a letter into the record from Mr. Peruchetti, the
applicant, addressing his rationale for requesting the continuation to the Planning Commission, and
Ms. Paul provided copies of the letter to staff and the Commission.
Mr. Robert I. Backstrom, 30498 Colina Verde, owner of 2 parcels that back up to the Peruchetti
property, spoke in opposition to the project, stating that his primary concems are as follows:
drainage. access, and safety for fire department access. Mr. Backstrom stated he would like to
reserve further comments for the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting.
Planning Manager Ubnoske noted, for the record, that planning staff received three letters in
opposition to the Peruchetti project.
Chairwoman Slaven left the public hearing open.
The matter was continued to the October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT
Planning Manager Ubnoske presented the revised elevations on Mall Entry #2 due to
the concerns raised by the Commissioners at the August 19, 1998, Planning Commission
meeting; clarified that staff has determined that there is substantial conformance with the
current design to the original design, and the other mall entries; and displayed the revision,
by way of overheads, noting that in comparison to the original design, the height decreased
from 52' to 49' 9" and the width from 51' to 43'.
Ms. Ubnoske reported to the Commission that due to concern noted by the Commission, with
regard to Dial Automotive, a Code Enforcement Officer went out on August 27, 1998. and
determined that the property is in compliance with Code requirements as per conditions set
forth by the County which regulates this property.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Webster's concerns and comments were as follows:
With regard to inconsistencies between the Design Guidelines and the Development Code,
as to landscaping requirements on the approved project in tonight's meeting, Mr. Webster
suggested changing the Design Guidelines, making the requirements more cohesive.
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised staff would review for inconsistencies and Mr. Hogan
noted that in terms of substantial inconsistencies, the one noted may be the only one.
With regard to bike lanes, and since they are in the General Plan, and we give credit for
bicycle spaces for parking spaces, why are they not being implemented? Planning Manager
Ubnoske advised that bike lanes are required in residential areas. and noted she would
discuss this matter with TSCD and get back to the Commission with further information.
In regard to the General Plan, specifically the Land Use element (table 2:4 and 2:4), it was
suggested to provide an updated report to evaluate if the City is on track with what was
envisioned, between existing Land Use element and the projected general Land Use
conditions, since the last update was in 1991.
With regard to the General Plan, specifically the housing element, there's mention of an
annual report, regarding housing, as well as annual housing needs assessment, it was
suggested ~at this report be forwarded to the Commission. Senior Planner Hogan clarified
that although the State requires the Housing Element be updated approximately every 5
years, the State hasn't funded the regional housing need assessment, which allocates
funding to the communities; therefore the State has been deferring it, and the Planning
Department is antidpating it to occur next year, noting that once the report is completed, it
will be transmitted to the Commission for review.
4
Planning Manager Ubnoske advised that staff will attempt to address these concems
(items C. and D.) Although the Housing and Circulation Elements information may not be
currently available, staff can address the other issues, certainly the Land Use element,
and will make every effort to do that before the end of this year.
Commissioner Webster that he would not be able to attend the September 16. 1998,
Planning Commission Meeting.
Chairwoman Slaven's concems and comments were as follows:
With regard to the current Traffic Circulation questioned when that information will be
Forwarded to the Commission. Senior Planner Hogan advised that a draft study will be
Complete in a couple months and that the evaluation will be shared with the Commission.
Noted that although there has been improvement in other intersections, at the intersection
of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, making a left turn from W~nchester Road to go south
on Ynez Road, the signal is not efficiently facilitating traffic at this left-turn light. Planning
Manager Ubnoske clarified there is a new program to synchronize the signals, and since it
is still in the process of working out any problems, Ms. Ubnoske will pass on this helpful
input.
Commissioner Soltysiak's concerns and comments were as follows:
The intersection of Margarita Road and De Portola Road requires some type of mitigation
to ensure safety.
At the new Lucky's Shopping Center, the traffic control across the street was taken away
when the center opened up, allowing right-in and right-out turns only. So presently there are
left turns in and out being made. He suggested to review the demarcations in the street.
In regard to plot plans on current projects, he suggested to review AB Access more closely,
avoiding costly corrections later in the design phase of the development.
Concurred with Commissioner Webster that if the bike lanes were implemented, as per the
City's Master Plan, it would be a tremendous asset to the community.
Commissioner Guerriero concerns and comments were as follows:
In regard to Environmental concerns. specifically hazardous materials, more information is
needed in the staff report on the mitigation efforts on projects where there is known chemical
use and storage on the premises. Queded which Department of Environmental Health
reviews these issues in the City - the State, County, or City. Planning Manager
Ubnoske clarified that staff gets material data sheets, which the Fire Department reviews,
and suggested that the Commission be advised in more detail of the data that has been
obtained; noted that the City contracts with the County, and it is the County's Department of
Environmental Health that reviews these issues. Mr. Guerdero suggested that the County
doesn't have the personnel to facilitate a thorough review, and that the City take a closer
look at the kinds of hazardous materials that are coming into the City, and being transported
through the City. Ms, Ubnoske advised that she would relay these concerns to Mr.
Anthony EImo, Chief Building Official.
In regard to Front Street in Old Town Temecula, it was questioned whether the rolled curb
is being considered as part of the lane width. Senior Engineer of Public Works Alegria
advised that he would investigate this matter.
In regard to Old Town, when exiting the transportation hub, exiting the parking lot, making
a left turn onto Meroedes Street, there is no clear line of vision, and the condition is
worsened by the construction congestion. He suggested the installation of a temporary
stop, or another mitigating measure.
Questioned when the Commission will review the Mall's comer design at Winchester Road
and Ynez Road Planning Manager Ubnoske advised it will most likely be brought to the
October 7, 1998, Planning Commission meeting, or the meeting following, for review by the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner Naggar's concerns and comments were, as follows:
Concurred with the Commission's comments on the bike trails, noting they would be a great
asset to the City.
With regard to the Planning Commission meetings, to facilitate an immediate and accurate
account of the Commission's decisions and discussions, he suggested to televise the
Meetings. Senior Planner Hogan advised there may be limits on the City's franchising
agreement, or other obstacles prohibiting the use of this opportunity. Mr. Naggar suggested
to further investigate and advise the Commission as to the reasons, whether or not the
meetings may be televised.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:15 P,M. Chairwoman Slaven formally adjourned this meeting to the September 16, 1998,
Planning Commission meeting at 6:00 P.M.
Marcia Slaven, Chairwoman
Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager
ITEM #3
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 21, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
Prepared By: Patty Anders, Assistant Planner
The Planning Department Staff recommends
Commission:
1.
APPLICATIONINFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE:
the Planning
ADOPT the Negative Declaration for Planning Application
No. PA98-0353;
ADOPT the Mitigation Monitodng Program for Planning
Application No. PA98-0353; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 98- recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 based upon the
Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
James Hundley
Dekkon Development / Scott Buckles
The design, construction and operation of a two-
story 23,098 square foot office, warehouse and
manufacturing building on a 1.08 acre site.
On the west side of Winchester Road, northwest of Bostik
Court.
LI (Light Industrial)
North:
South:
East:
West:
LI (Light Industrial)
LI (Light Industrial)
LI (Light Industrial)
LI (Light Industrial)
BP (Business Park)
Vacant
R:\STAFFP, PT\353pa98pc..doe
1
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant
Existing Industrial/Warehouse/Office Buildings
Vacant
Vacant
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area: 1.08 acre (net); 1.08 acre (gross)
Total Area:
Total Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
Paved Area:
47,045 square feet
16,870 square feet
12,485 square feet
17,690 square feet
(1.08 acre)
37.4%
27.7%
34.9%
Parking Required:
Office= 6,835 sq. ft.: 23
Warehouse = 14,495 sO. ft.: 15
Total=21,330 sq. ft. 38
Parking Provided:
Standard Spaces: 30
Compact Spaces: 6
Bicycles 8'
38
*36, plus a credit of two spaces by providing 6 extra bicycle spaces for a total of 38
Building Height:
Twenty-Seven (27') feet
BACKGROUND
A pra-application meeting was held on June 3, 1998. A formal application was submitted on
August 17, 1998. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on September 2,
1998, with staff providing written comments on September 2, 1998. The project was deemed
complete on September 28, 1998.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of the design, construction and operation of a two-story, 23,098 sq. ft. office
and manufacturing building on an one (1.08) acre site with associated improvements, such as
hardscape, parking, landscaping and drive aisles. Landscape improvements include: parking lot,
planter areas, and streetscape. The applicant is also requesting the Planning Commission's
support on an increase to the permitted floor area ratio from 40% to 49% pursuant to Section
17,080.050 of the Development Code. The applicant proposes to expand and relocate his
business, Dekkon Development, from its existing location on Business Park Ddve to the Winchester
Business Park.
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc..doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Desicln
The proposed building is an "L-shape" structure along the nodh and east property lines. Parking
is located in the front (west) and on the south side of the site. The loading zones am located at the
front of the building and the Development Code requires loading areas in the front of buildings to
be screened. Staff has worked closely with the architect to screen the loading zones as much as
possible from Winchester Road. Rather than utilizing a solid wall along Winchester Road, the
architect is proposing to use a six foot landscape buffer comprised of berrning and shrubs. The
architect and staff both agree that this approach is aesthetically more pleasing, will be more
complementary to the building, and has an equal screening effect of a solid concrete wall. The
project is conditioned (No. 9b) to provide a six foot landscape wall combined of berming and
landscaping along Winchester Road to screen the front loading areas. In addition, intedor planters
and a six foot wall adjacent to the northwest loading zone, which is the most visible loading area,
have been installed to help screen this area from Winchester Road. Overall, the site design is
compatible with existing development in the area.
Access, Traffic and Circulation
The project takes access from one driveway off of Winchester Road. There is parking and
vehicular circulation on the southeast portion of the site. The Development Code requires a
minimum of 38 parking spaces for this size of building given the various square footages of office
and warehouse uses. The project has provided 30 standard spaces, 6 compact spaces and 6 extra
bicycle spaces. Pursuant to the Development Code Section 17.24.040 F(5), bicycle spaces can
be counted as fulfilling the off-street parking requirements at the rate of three bicycle spaces for
one vehicle space up to six bicycle parking spaces (in addition to the minimum bicycle space
requirements). The applicant is proposing six extra bicycle spaces which allows a credit of 2
vehicle parking spaces.
Architecture
The building is the corporate headquarters of Dekkon Development and Hunco Development, and
includes two small speculative lease spaces. The applicant has designed a special mix of black
exposed aggregate concrete for the building. The building is very well articulated by using varying
roof heights, column elements, reveals, windows, railings and accent colors. Although there are
several entries, the main entry is well defined by a raised, projected, covered entry with columns,
extensive glazing and landscaping.
Because the east elevation is on the property line, there will be no landscaping to help soften this
elevation which is visible from Winchester Road until the adjacent parcel is developed. Therefore,
the architect continued the design and articulation to this elevation with varying roof heights, heavy
reveals, false windows and accent painting which makes this elevation as architecturally pleasing
as the remainder of the building.
No signage is being approved with this building. As proposed, the structure is compatible with the
existing buildings in the area in terms of design, colors, materials, height, bulk and mass.
The applicant is proposing an increase in the floor area ratio of 9% for a maximum of 49%. Since,
the applicant is a construction company that develops numerous industrial/warehouse buildings in
R:\STAFFRFF\353pa98pc, .doc
3
Temecula which bring additional business and employment opportunities to the area. Staff feels
this project meets the necessary findings pursuant to Section 17.08.050 (Special Use Regulations
and Standards) of the Development Code to warrant the increase in floor area ratio by 9% to allow
a floor area ratio of 49%.
Landscapincl
Twenty-two percent (22%) of the site has been landscaped. The landscaping provided exceeds
the twenty percent minimum landscaping requirement in the LI (Light Industdal) zone and has been
distributed very effectively throughout the site. The 20' front yard setback area is fully landscaped
and the applicant is proposing a six (6') landscape wall consisting of berrning and shrubs to help
screen the loading area. There are landscaped planters throughout the parking area which will also
help screen the loading area and break up the parking lot paving.
The proposed street tree (London Plane) is consistent with the existing street trees in the
surrounding area. Moreover, trees have been provided along the south and west property lines
which will help to screen the loading zones and compliment the development. The Development
Code allows a zero side yard setback in the industrial zone; therefore no landscaping is proposed
on the north elevation. The City's Landscape Architect has reviewed the landscape plan and the
applicant has addressed comments on the plan.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is BP (Business Park). Existing zoning for the
site is LI (Light Industrial). Manufacturing/office/warehouse uses are permitted with the approval
of a development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as
proposed is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project. The Initial Study determined that although the
proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, these effects are not
considered to be significant due to mitigation measures contained in the project design and in the
Conditions of Approval for the project. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated to a level
of insignificance.
SUMMARWCONCLUSIONS
The project is the design and construction of a 23,098 square foot two-story, office and warehouse
building, associated parkin9 and landscaping on a 1.08 acre site. The applicant is also requestin9
consideration to exceed the floor area ratio by 9% for a total floor area ratio of 49% pursuant to
Section 17.080.050 of the Development Code. Staff feels there are conditions present that warrant
approval of the increase in floor area ratio. With the approval of the increase in floor area ratio, the
project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines.
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc doc
4
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No.
655 (Mt. Palemar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
provisions.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and meets
the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been previously
disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native species of
plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the
site serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this
project.
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 6
A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9
Initial Study - Blue Page 20
Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 37
Exhibits - Blue Page 44
A. Vicinity Map
B. General Plan Map
C Zoning Map
D. Site Plan
E. Landscape Plan
F. Elevations
G. Colors and Materials Board
H. Floor Plan
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc, .doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
R:\STAFFIH>T\353pa98pc..doc
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA98-0353 TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 23,098 SQUARE
FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE AND WAREHOUSE BUILDING, AND
TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN THE FLOOR AREA RATIO OF 9%
FOR A TOTAL OF 49% PURSUANT TO SECTION 17.080.050 OF
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING, AND
LANDSCAPING ON A PARCEL CONTAINING A 1.08 ACRES
LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD,
NORTHWEST OF BOSTIK COURT, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 909-370-006.
WHEREAS, Dekkon Development filed Planning Application No. PA98-0353 in accordance
with the City of Temecula Generel Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0353 was precessed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0353 on
October 21, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA98-0353;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in appreving Planning Application No.
PA98-0353 makes the following findings; to wit:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the Generel Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The preject is
consistent with all City Ordinances including: the City's Development Code, Ordinance No. 655
(Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the pretection of the
public health, safety and welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City Ordinances and
meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the pretection of the public
health, safety and welfare.
C. The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rere
species or their habitats, or to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The project site has been
previously disturbed and graded, and streetscape installed on site. There are no native species
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc .doc
7
of plants or vegetation at the site, nor any indication that any wildlife species exist, or that the site
serves as a migration corridor. A DeMinimus impact finding can be made for this project.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared forthis project indicate
that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there will
not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus
Findings, therefore, is hereby adopted.
Section 4. Conditions, That the City of Temecula Planning Commission heroby approves
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 to construct and operate a 23,098 square foot office and
warehouse building with associated parking and landscaping on a parcel containing 1.08 acres
located on the north side of Winchester Road, northwest of Bostik Court and known as Assessors
Parcel No. 909-370-006 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference and made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21't day of October, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thero of, held on the 21st day of October,
1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\STAFFRFF\353pa98pc..doc
8
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa981x:..doc
9
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
Project Description: The design and construction of a 23,098 square foot two-stoW,
office and manufacturing building with associated parking and landscaping on a 1.08
acre site.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-370-006
Approval Date: October 21, 1998
Expiration Date: October 21, 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money
order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00)
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination with a
DeMinimus Finding required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour pedod the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by mason of failure of condition, Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and agents from any
and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek
monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality
thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Plot Plan which action is brought within the appropriate
statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section
21000 et sea,, including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). City
shall promptly notify the developer/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought within
this time period. City shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. Should the
City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, developer/applicant shall not, thereafter
be responsible to indemnity, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa981x:..doc
10
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D, or as amended
by these conditions.
a. Eight (8) Class I lockers or Class II bicycle racks shall be provided.
b. A minimum of thirty-six (36) parking spaces shall be provided.
c. A minimum of two (2) handicapped parking spaces shall be provided.
Landscaping shall be provided in substantial conforrnance with Exhibit "E" (Landscape Plan),
or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall be
continuously maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. if it is determined that
the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to
require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved
landscape plan.
The maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer.
The landscaping along Winchester Road shall be six (6) feet of continuous
landscaping to serve as a screening to the loading zones in the front of the building.
Building elevations shall conform substantially to Exhibit F and Exhibit G (color elevations),
or as amended by these conditions.
8. Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit H, or as amended by these
conditions (color and material board).
Materials
Black Exposed Aggregate WalLs
Metal (roll-up doors)
Blue Reveals
Blue Railing
White Mullions
Blue Glass
Colors
Black Concrete (Vista 52A) and
Gray Aggregate (Vista 130)
Gray
Vista 67A
Vista 67A
Vista 67A
Vista 15
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation),
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc,.doc
11
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
10. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
11.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit 'E', or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total
square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
C=
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d=
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
12.
An Administrative Development application for signage shall be required if signage is
proposed. An application for signage shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Manager.
13. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
14. All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape and irrigation
plans.
15.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a condition
acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and flee of weeds, disease,
or pests. The irrigation system shall be propedy constructed and in good working order.
16.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identffied by a permanently affixed
refiectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the
International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in
area and shall be centered at the intedor end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80
inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a
minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A
sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking
facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, cleady and conspicuously stating the following:
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc..doe
"Unauthodzed vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces
not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owners expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-
3000".
17.
Performance secudties, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee
the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape
and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping
and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning
Manager, the bond shall be released.
18. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit,
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
19.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the Califomia Building, Plumbing and
Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electdcel Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24
Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
20.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete extedor site lighting plans showing compliance with
Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electdcel plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
21.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation
Fees.
22. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals pdor to commencement of any construction
work.
23. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-I/F-I,
24. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
25. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective Apdl 1, 1998).
26. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
27. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
28. Provide path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
29. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of extedor lighting, fire
alarm systems.
R:\STAFI:P, PT\353pa98pc..doc
30. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
31. Provide an approved automatic fire spdnkler system.
32. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with odginal signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
33. Provide electdcal plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
34. Truss calculations that am stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
35. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
36. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector pdor to the start of the
building construction.
37. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls require separate
approvals and permits.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review
and revision.
General Requirements
38.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
39. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
40.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard
24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
41.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98pC..dec
14
42.
The Developer shall post secudty and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
43.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study praparad by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
44. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
45. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
46. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and
the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
47. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
48.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
49.
Improvement plans and/or predse grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula
Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The
following design criteria shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pC..doc
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through
undersidewalk drains.
50.
The building pad shall be certffied to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall
issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
51.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required
by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
52.
The Developer shall record a wdtten offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the
formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in
accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of
the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
53. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive wdtten
clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water Distdct
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
54.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works,
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
55.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the
Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the Uniform
Building Cede (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in forco at the
time of building plan submittal.
56.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is raquirad to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of atl commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating prassura, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The requirad fire flow may be adjusted
dudng the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903.2, Appendix Ill.A)
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc..doc
16
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-I, A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 "outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads andadjacent public
streets, Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart and shall be located no more than 210
feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access read(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system, The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project
on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion
of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( UFC sec
902 and Ord 95-15)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet
six (6) inches. (UFC 902,2,2,1 and Ord 95-15)
Pdor to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. Plans shall be: signed
by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans
are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed
and accepted by the apprepdate water agency pdor to any combustible building materials
being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection
Association 24 1-4.1 )
Prior to issuance of a Cedi~cate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identity fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3)
Pdor to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commerdal buildings shall
display street numbere in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In stdp centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15)
Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire spdnkler system. Fire
sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15)
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc..doc
66,
Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the spdnkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. (UFC Article 10)
67.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the dght side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm
system. (UFC 902.4)
68.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902,4)
69.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire spdnkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions Uniform Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National
Fire Protection Association standards. (UFC Article 81)
70.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous matedais from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(UFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
OTHER AGENCIES
71.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated August 28, 1998. a copy of which is attached.
72.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control Distdct transmittal dated September 9, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
73.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Information
Center, University of California Riverside transmittal dated September 3, 1998, a copy of
which is attached.
74.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 27, 1998, a copy of which
is attached.
75.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations as set forth in the Police Department
transmittal dated September 1, 1998, a copy of which is attached, to the extent practical
and not in conflict with conditions contained herein.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..dec
18
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
R:\STA~FRPT\353pa98pc..doc
TO:
FROM
RE:
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A TN: Patty Anders c
~~nmental Health Specialist III
PLOT PLAN NO. PA98-0353
DATE: August 27, 1998
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA98-0353 and has no
objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022).
c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 6 17.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
· Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2.)
· Waste reduction management.
d) A letter from the Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
CH:dr
(909) 275-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance.
cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
r'
Itan
Water
August28,1998
Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO. 21 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28471-1
APN 909-360-021
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353
Dear Ms: Anders:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and
sewer service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
98/SB:mc194/F012-T6/FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Rancho California Water District
DAVID P. ZAPPE
General Manager-Chief Engineer
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/275-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
511g0.1
City of Temecula
Pla nin De rim nt
n ·
Pest 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Lad~es and Gent me Re: p~ c~ ~ _ 0 .:~
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in mcorpprated
cities. The District also does hot an check .c~ land use cases, or provide State Division Of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard re .pgfls for su~:gtcases. District comments/re~ommenclations for such cases am normally limited
to items of s.pqclfic interest to the District inciudin District Mastor Draina · Plan facilities, other ional flood
co. ot ..d dreina · faci,i,es ich co "d be co.si ,-- a cempo '.2or a nsion of a mastS"lien a
and District Area ~rainage Plan fees (developn~ent mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nsa~re is
provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement Of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
L,,/' This p.rgject WOuld not be irnpacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
r
egiona ~nterest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will acce ownerehi of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constrocted to District stan~at~s and ~is~ct plan check and
inspection will be requirGd for District acceptance. Plan check inspection and administrative fees will be
requ red.
This .p~oject proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be
conmdered regional in nature and/or a I ical extension of the adopted
be required Fr District acceptance. plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be requir~l.
permits, whichever comes ~r~. Fees to be paid should be at the rete in effect at the time of issuance Of the
actual perm't
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project rna uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Sys~_em (NPDES permit from the State Water
Resources ContYrolme~oard. Clearance for greding, reGoffiation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has I:~en granted a permit or is shown to be exempt
If this pro'ect involves a Federel Emerge .n.c.y. Management Ag.ency (FEMA mapRed flood plain, then the C' should
require ~. applicant to provide all studies clcol,~ons, Nan, and o~r information r_N_uired to m~ FEMA
requirements and ahou~d foyer ~quire ~ the a ~inant obtain a Conditional letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
p,or to grad ~. rec~daiton or other fina eppmVaegf the projeot. and a letter Of Map Revision ([OMR(~ p,or to
occupancy.
If a naturel watercourse Or mapped flood plain is im ed by this proj the City should require the a licant to
obtain a Section 160111603 Agreement from the Ca '~meia Departmenie~ Fish and Game and a Clean ~Ji}ater Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written cofTespondence from these a encies
indicating the prOject is exempt from these requ,rements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Ce~cation
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of ~eI Corps 404
permit.
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
,ate: q ' R - ~ ~
City of Temecula
Temecula Police Department
September 1, 1998
Planning Department
PA98-0353 (Construction of werehoueeloffice building)
Case Planner: Patty Andera
WIth respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced project, the Police Department
recommends the following 'Officer Safety' measures be provided in accordance with CITy of Tamecola
Ordinances end/or recognized police safety standards end training codes:
1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping currounding the building we maintained at · height no greater
than thlrty-aix (36) inches.
2. Applicant shall ensure all trees on the property ere maintained away from the building so st to dater
roof accessabiliTy for susPect(e).
3. Additionally, plants, shrubbery end trees will be maintained in areas not designated for foot traffic.
These ereas will be maintained so la to have dear visibility by patrons and prevent concealment by
suspect(s) to hide themselves both day/night time hours.
4. light fixtures shall be Installed to Illuminate all perking areas, driveways, and pedestrian walkways.
These areas shell be lit with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle 0f light at ground level, evenly
dispersed across the surface, dialnoting all shadows. AJl exterior light fixtures shall be vandal mlstant
and pealtinned so es not to produce glare. The installation of all exterior lighUng shall be in compliance
with MS. Palemar LIghting Ordinance.
5. Vandal resistant light fixtures shell be installed above ell exterior doors and loading dock areas around
the building. These light fixtures shall illuminate the door surface with · minimum maintained one (1) foot
candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed, All fights shall be In compliance with MS. Palemar
Lighting Ordinance.
6. All exterior lighting shall be cnntrolled by timers or other means that prevent the lights from being
turned off by unauthorized persons.
7. Upon completion of the building, · monitored alarm system shall be Installed to deter unauthorized
entry/burglary and to notify the Police Department ef unauthorized intrusion.
8. NI doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miecallsncous hardware shall be of
commercial or Institutional grade.
9. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the facility shall be placed In a wall-lighted, highly
visible area. and Installed with a 'Call-0ut Only' feature to deter loitering.
10. Street address shall be posted in e visible location. minimum 12 Inches in height, on the atret side
of the building with a contrasting background.
q 1. All roof hatches shell be painted "International Orange,'
12. The address for the IocaUon shall be painted on the roof using numbers no less then four (4) feet in
height, In n GOI0r which COntznGte the baGkgreund.
Any questions regarding these conditions can be refillTed to the Police Deperb,,ent Crime Preventton &
) 506-2626.
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
~SYSTEM
I~tern Informltion Center
Depam'nent of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0418
Phone (909) 787-57.45
Fax (909) 787-5409
September 3, 1998
Patty Anders
City of Temecula
Planning Department
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Case No.:
Applicant:
PA98-0358
Pacific Capital Investment/Marchand Dennis
Dear Ms. Anders
Please find enclosed our comments for the project transmithal as requested by the Planning
Department. If you have any questions, please contact the F~gtem Information Center at
(909) 787-5745.
PA98-0358 ........................................ Sept. 8,1998
Sincerely,
Martha Smith
Information Officer
Enclosure(s)
CALIFORNIA
HISTORICAL
RESOURCES
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
Eastern InformetJon Center
Department of Anthropology
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521.0418
Phone (909) 787-5745
Fax (909) 787-5409
CULTURAl, RESOURCE REVIEW
=,,;: ;~ .,, ,~
RE: case Transmittat Reference Designation:
Records at the Eastern Information Center of the Cat ifornia Historical Resources Information System have
been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources:
The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural
resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended.
.._~BBased upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study
is recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
)idcntified one or more cultural resources.
The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the
project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not
recommended.
A Phase I cultural resource study (MF #
) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended.
__ I f, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should bc halted or diverted in the immediate am while
a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations.
__ Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored by a professional
archaeologist.
.__V/~The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological
Resource Management Reports prepared by the California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin
4(a), December 1989,
Phase I
Phase II
Phase II1
Phase IV
Records search and field survey
Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for 'significant' sitcs.]
Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.]
Monitor earthmoving activities
C O M M E NTS:
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Eastern Information Center
A'R'ACHMENT NO. 2
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
R:\STAFFRIaTX353pa98pc..doe
20
CITY OF TEMECULA
Environmental Checklist
10.
Project Title:
Lead Agency Name and Address:
Temecula, CA 92589
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Project Location:
Project Sponsors Name and Address:
General Plan Designation:
Zoning:
Description of Project:
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Other public agencies whose
approval is required:
Planning Application No. PA98-0353 (Development
Plan)
City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Patty Anders, Assistant Planner (909) 694-6400
On the north side of Winchester Road, northwest
of Bostik Court
Dekkon Development, Scott Buckels, 42346 Rio
Nedo, Ste., Temecula, CA 92590
BP (Business Park)
LI (Light Industrial)
The design, construction and operation of a two-
story 23,098 square foot offica, warehouse and
manufacturing building on a 1.08 acre site.
The project is located in a area that has been
previously graded, street improvements have been
made and water and sewer are within vicinity of
the project. Land immediately to the east, west
and north is vacant, and the land to the south is
developed with five industdal/warehouse/offico
buildings.
Riverside County Fire Department, Riverside
County Health Department, Temecula Police
Department, Eastern Municipal Water District,
Rancho California Water District, Southern
California Gas Company, Southern Califomia
Edison Company, General Telephone Company,
and Riverside Transit Agency.
R:XSTAFFRPT~$3pa98pc..dO~
21
ENVIRONSIENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFI~'I;CTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Land Use and Planning [ ] Hazards
[ ] Population and Housing [ ] Noise
[X] Geologic Problems [ ] Public Services
[X] Water [ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality IX] Aesthetics
[ ] Transportation/Circulation [ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Biological Resources [ ] Recreation
[ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been
added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pC..dec
22
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(Source 1, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
b. Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project?
c. Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity?
(Sottree l, Figure 2-1, Page 2-17)
d. Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to
soils or farm lands, or impacts frour incompatible land uses)?
{Source l, Figure 5-4, Page 5-17)
e. Disruptordividethephysicalarrangementofanestablished
community (including low-income or minority community)?
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would be proposal:
a. Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population
projects?
b. Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through project in an undeveloped area
or extension of maj or infxastructure)?
c. Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing?
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result
in or expose people to potential impacts involving?
a. Fault rapture?
b. Seismic ground shaking?
c. Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d. Seiche, ISunarm, or volcanic hazard?
e. Landslides or mudflows?
f. Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions
form excavation, grading or fill?
g. Subsidence of the land?
h. Expansive soils?
i. Unique geologic or physical features?
4. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage paRems, or the
rate and mount of surface runoff?.
b. Exposureofpeopleorpropenytowa~rrelatedhazards
such as flooding? (Source 2, Figure 13, Page 95 and
Source 2, Figure 30, Page 190)
c. Dischargeintosurfacewatersorotheralterationofsurface
water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity)?
d. Changes in the mount of surface water in any water
body?
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water
movements?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Unless
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
ix]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
R:\STAFFRFrX353pa98pc..doc
23
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFOP, MAT1ON SOURCES
[ Change in the quantity of ground waters, either fixrough
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial
loss of groundwater recharge capability?
g. Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?.
h. Impacts to groundwater quality?
i. Substantial reduction in the mount of groundwater
otherwise available for pubtic water supplies?
AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a. Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b. Expose sensitive receptors to poHutants?
c. Alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause
any change in climate?
d. Create objectionable odors?
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
Would the proposal result in:
a. Increase vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b. Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves
or dangerous intersection or incompatible uses)?
c. Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses?
d. Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e. Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f. Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g. Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a. Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats
(including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals
and birds)?
b. Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c. Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest,
coastal habitat, etc.)?
d. Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)?
e. Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
8. ENERGY AND MlhrERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a. Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b. Use non-renewal resources in a wasteful and inefficiem
manner?
c. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents
of the State?
[1
[1
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[1
[l
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Unless
Mt~i~Itm
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[]
[]
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
ix]
[]
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98pc..doc
24
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOLrRCE~
9. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a. Ariskofaccidentalexplosionorreleaseofhn7~rdous
substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticicles,
chemical or radiation)?
b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation phn?
c. ThecreationofanyhealthhnTnrdorpotentialhealth
hazard?
d. Exposure ofpeople to existing sources ofpotential health
hazards?
e. Increase fife hazard in areas with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees?
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a. increase in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
ll.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e. Other governmental services?
12.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
Polemislly
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
Po~smlly
Significant
Unles
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[3
[]
[]
[]
[]
[ x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
NO
[]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[1
[3
[]
[]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
R:\STAFFRFT~353pa98pC..doc
25
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING IffFORI~{A. TION SOURCES
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste disposal?
g. Local or regional water supplies?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a. Affect a scenic vista or scemc highway?
b. Have a demouslxable negative aesthetic effect?
c. Create light or glare?
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a. Disturb paleontological resources?
b. Disturb archaeological resources?
c. Affect historical resources?
d. Have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e. Res~ct existing religious or sacred uses w~thin the potential
impact area?
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a. Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities?
b. Affect existing recreational opportumties?
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the
disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?
Does the project have impacts that area individnaHy
limited, but cumulatively considerable? CCumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects).
Pot~-mjally
[]
[]
[]
[]
[1
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Uulems
Mi~i~alion
Incorporated
[]
[1
[l
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
Le~s Than
Signi~can~
[]
ix]
[]
[]
[]
Ix]
[x]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
NO
[x]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[]
[]
[x]
[x]
[x]
Ix]
[x]
[x]
[x]
[x]
ix]
[x]
R:\STAFFP, F~353pa98pc..doc
26
ISSUES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION SOURCES
d. Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
17. EARLIER ANALYSES.
None.
Si~ificam
[]
!,mmimlly
Mili~lion
Inc, orporat~cl
[]
Less Than
[1
No
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Tcmecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook.
4. City of Temecula Development Code
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..doc
27
DISCUSSION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Land Use and Planning
1 .a,b
The project will not conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by
agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General
Plan Land Use Designation of BP (Business Park). Pursuant to the Development Code
section 17.08.050, Special Use Regulations and Standards, a project may be allowed to
increase the floor area ratio if the project provides outstanding and exceptional benefits to
the city with respect to employment, economic needs of the community and exceptional
architectural and landscape design amenities which reflect an attractive image and
character for the city. The proposed project is in compliance with these findings by providing
an outstanding architectural design, building colors and high quality materials. Moreover,
the applicant is maintaining their existing business in Temecula, as well as providing
additional employment and economic opportunities. The applicanrs business is a
construction and development company which is expanding. By expanding their business,
they will employee additional people and build more buildings which will generate additional
employment opportunities in Temecula. Therefore, staff has determined that the project
meets the necessary findings to warrant approval of the floor area ratio increase of .9% or
4,234 square feet.
Impacts from all General Plan Land Use Designations were analyzed in the Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City
commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would
impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied
to this project. Furthermore, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being
given the opportunity to comment on the project and it is anticipated that they will make the
appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans
or polices. The site has been previously graded and services within proximity of the project.
There will be limited, if any environmental effects on environmental plans or polices
adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. No significant effects on the land use
or environmental policies are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community
(including low-income or minodty community). The project is a manufacturing/warehouse/
office use in an area surrounded by land that is currently planned to be developed with
similar uses. There is no established residential community (including low-income or
minority community) at this site. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
Population and Housing
2.a.
The project will not cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections. The
project is an industrial/office/warehouse use which is consistent with the City's General Plan
Land Use Designation of Business Park. Since the project is consistent with the City's
General Plan, and does not exceed the floor area ratio for Business Park, it will not be a
significant contributor to population growth which will cumulatively exceed official regional
or local population projections. No significant effects are anticipated as a result of this
project.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pC..doc
28
2.b.
The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The
project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of BP (Business Park).
The project will cause people to relocate to or within Temecula; however, due to its limited
scale, it will not induce substantial growth in the area. No signfficant effects are antidpated
as a result of this project.
2.c.
The project will not displace housing, espedally affordable housing. The project site is
vacant; therefore no housing will be displaced. No significant effects are anticipated as a
result of this project.
Geologic Problems
3.a.
The project will result in a less than significant impact on people as a result of fault rupture.
The project is not located in a fault zone or within a fault setback area; therefore no
significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
c,g,h.
The project will have a tess than significant impact on people involving seismic ground
shaking; however, there may be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground failure,
liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. The project is located in Southern Califomia,
an area which is seismically active. Any potentially significant impacts will be mitigated
through building construction which is consistent with Uniform Building Code standards.
Further, preliminary soil reports have been submitted and reviewed as part of the
application submittal and recommendations contained in this report will be used to
determine appropriate conditions of approval. The soil reports will also contain
recommendations for the compaction of the soil which will serve to mitigate any potentially
significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction,
subsidence and expansive soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant
effects are anticipated as a result of this project.
3.d.
The project will not expose people to a seiche, tsunami or volcanic hazard. The project is
not located in an area where any of these hazards could occur. No significant effects are
anticipated as a result of this project.
3.e.
The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental
Impact for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or
mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
3.f.
The project will have a less than significant impact from erosion, changes in topography,
grading or fill. The site has been previously graded and the project does not propose
significant grading beyond that which has already occurred. Increased wind and water
erosion of soils both on and off-site may occur dudng the construction phase of the project
and the project may result in changes in siltation, deposition or erosion. Erosion control
techniques will be included as a condition of approval for the project. In the long-run,
hardscape and landscaping will serve as permanent erosion control for the project. Since
the amount of grading will be the minimum necessary for the realization of the project,
modification to topography and ground surface relief features will not be considered
significant. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be
R:\STAFFRP'B353pa98pc. ,dec
29
3.i.
Water
4.a.
4.b.
4.c.
4.d,e.
4.f-h.
mitigated through the use of landscaping and proper compaction of the soils. After
mitigation measures are performed, no impacts am anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not impact unique geologic or physical features. No unique geologic
features or physical features exist on the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and
amount of surface runoff; however, these changes are considered less than significant.
Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings,
accompanying hardscape and driveways, While absorption rates and surface runoff will
change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances
will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff which is created.
After mitigation measures are performed, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
The project will have a less than significant to people or property to water related hazards
such as flooding because the project site has been elevated outside of the 100 year
floodway as a result of grading performed pdor to project approval. However; the project
is located within a dam inundation area as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan
Final Environmental Impact Report. Impacts can be mitigated by utilizing existing
emergency response systems and by assuring that these systems continue to maintain
adequate service provision as the City develops. No significant impacts are anticipated as
a result of this project.
The project may have a potentially significant effect on discharges into surface waters and
alteration of surface water quality. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for the project, the
developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control
Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES raquirements, any potential
impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact in a change in the amount of surface
water in any waterbody or impact currents, or to the course or direction of water
movements. Additional surface runoff will occur because previously permeable ground will
be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and
driveways. Due to the limited scale of the project, the additional amount of drainage will not
considered significant. No significant impacts am anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant change in the quantity and quality of ground
waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability.
Limited changes will occur in the quantity and quality of ground waters; however, due to the
minor scale of the project, it will not be considered significant. Further, construction on the
R:\STAFFRPT\353pa98pc..doc
30
site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
4.i.
The project will not result in a substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater water
otherwise available for public water supplies. According to information contained in the
Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan, "Rancho
California Water Distdct indicate that they can accommodate additional water demands."
Water service currently exists in the immediate proximity to the project. Water service will
need to be provided by Rancho Califomia Water District (RCWD). This is typically provided
upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. No
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Air Quality
5.8.
The project will not violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected
air quality violation. The project (23,098 square feet of warehouse/office) is below the
threshold for potentially significant air quality impact (276,000 square feet) established by
South Coast Air Quality Management Distdct (Page 6-11, Table 6-2 of the South Coast Air
Quality Management CEQA Air Quality Handbook). No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
5.b.
The project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants. There are no significant
pollutants in proximity to the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of
this project.
5.c.
The project will not alter air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause any change in
climate. The limited scale of the project precludes it from creating any significant impacts
on the environment in this area. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
5.d. The project will create objectional odors dudng the construction phase of the project. These
impacts will be of short duration and are not considered significant.
Transportation/Circulation
6.a.
While the project may result in an incremental increase in traffic congestion it will result in
a less than significant increase in vehicle tdps. It is anticipated that this project will
contribute less than a less than signfficent increase in existing volumes dudng the AM peak
hour and PM peak hour time frames to the intersections of Winchester Road and Diaz Road
according to standard tdp calculation methodologies, even with the minor increase in the
floor area ratio. The proposed development is in compliance with the land use and
development standards of this zone which was analyzed in the EIR for the General Plan.
Therefore, it is determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect the LOS
for this area, but was included in the EIR analysis. The applicant will be required to pay
traffic signal mitigation fees and public facility fees as conditions of approval for the project.
After mitigation measures are performed and development impact fees paid, no impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa981X:..doc
31
6.b.
The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed
to current City standards and does not propose any hn7=rds to safety from design features.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.c.
The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The
project is a industrial/office use in an area with existing and planned similar uses. The
project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access. The
project does not provide direct access to nearby uses; therefore, it will not impact access
to nearby uses. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.d.
The project will have sufficient parking capacity on-site. Off-site parking will not be
impacted. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.e.
The project will not result in a less than significant impact from hazards or barriers for
pedestrians or bicyclists. Hazards or barriers to bicyclists have not been included as part
of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6.f.
The project will not result in conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation. The project was transmitted to the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and
based upon their response to similar projects in the area, it is not anticipated the project will
impact RTA facilities or services. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
6.g.
The project will not result in impacts to rail, waterborne or air traffic since none exists
currently in the immediate proximity of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
Biological Resources
7.a.
The project will not result in an impact to endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats, including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds. The project
site has been previously graded. Currently, there are no native species of plants, no
unique, rare, threatened or endangered species of plants, no native vegetation on or
adjacent to the site. Further, there is no indication that any wildlife species exist at this
location. The project will not reduce the number of species, provide a barrier to the
migration of animals or deteriorate existing habitat. The project site is located within the
Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required to
mitigate the effect of cumulative impacts to the species. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
7.b.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated species. Locally designated
species are protected in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan; however, they are not
protected elsewhere in the City. Since this project is not located in Old Town, and since
there are no locally designated species on site, no significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
7.c.
The project will not result in an impact to locally designated natural communities. Reference
response 7.b. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRYF\353pa98pe..do~
32
7.d.
The project will not result in an impact to wetland habitat. There is no wetland habitat on-
site or within proximity to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
7.e.
The project will not result in an impact to wildlife dispersal or migration corridors. The
project site does not serve as part of a migration corridor. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Energy and Mineral Resources
8.a.
The project will not impact and/or conflict with adopted energy conservation plans. The
project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable laws pertaining to energy
conservation dudng the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is
found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
8.b.
The project will result in a less than signfficant impact for the use of non-renewable
resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. While there will be an increase in the rate
of use of any natural resource and in the depletion of nonrenewable resource(s)
(construction matedais, fuels for the daily operation, asphalt, lumber) and the subsequent
depletion of these non-renewable natural resources. Due to the scale of the proposed
development, these impacts are not seen as significant.
8.c.
The project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would
be of future value to the region and the residents of the State. No known mineral resource
that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State are located at this
project site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Hazards
9.a.
The project will not result in a dsk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances
in the event of an accident or upset conditions since none are proposed in the request. The
same is true for the use, storage, transport or disposal of any hazardous or toxic materials,
Large quantities of these types of substances are not anticipated with this use. However,
the Department of Environmental Health regulates the use, storage and removal of
hazardous or toxic materials. Moreover, the Fire Department and the Department of
Environmental Health have reviewed the project and the applicant must receive their
clearances prior to any plan check submittal. This applies to storage and use of hazardous
materials. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
9.b.
The project will not interfere with an emergency response plan or an emergency evaluation
plan. The subject site is not located in an area which could impact an emergency response
plan. The project will take access from a maintained street and will therefore not impede
any emergency response or emergency evacuation plans. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
g.c.
The project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard.
The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..doc
33
9.d,
9.e.
Noise
lO.a.
lO.b.
Public
11.a,b.
11.c.
11.d.
check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with
these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards. No
health hazards are known to be within proximity of the project. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with ~ammable brush,
grass, or trees. The project is an industrial/warehouse development in an area of existing
and future similar uses. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area,
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The proposal will result in a less than significant increase to existing noise levels. The site
is currently vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise
levels dudrig construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long
run. Long-term noise generated by this project would be similar to existing and proposed
uses in the area. No significant noise impacts are anticipated as a result of this project in
either the short or long-term.
The project may expose people to severe noise levels during the development/construction
phase (shod run). Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of
100+ DBA at 100 feet which is considered very annoying and can cause hearing damage
from steady 8-hour exposure. This source of noise will be of shod duration and therefore
will not be considered significant. There will be no long-term exposure of people to noise.
No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Services
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered fire or police protection. The project will incrementally increase the need for fire and
police protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the maintenance of service
provision from these entities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate
within or to the City of Temecula and therefore will not result in a need for new or altered
school facilities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
The project will have a less than significant impact for the maintenance of public facilities,
including roads. Funding for maintenance of roads is dedved from the Gasoline Tax which
is distributed to the City of Temecula from the State of California. Impacts to current and
future needs for maintenance of roads as a result of development of the site will be
incremental, however, they will not be considered signfficant. The Gasoline Tax is sufficient
to cover any of the proposed expenses,
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..doc
34
11 .e. The project will not have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemmental
services. No signfficant impacts are antidpated as a result of this project.
Utilities and Service Systems
12.a.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to power or natural gas. These systems are currently being delivered in proximity to the
site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.b.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to communication systems (reference response No. 12.a.). No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.c.
The project will not result in the need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.d.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to sanitary sewer systems or septic tanks. While the project will have an incremental
impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's
General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much
water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR further states:
"implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater
services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. There are no septic tanks on site or
proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12.e.
The proposal will result in a less than significant need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alterations to storm water drainage. The project will need to provide some
additional on-site drainage systems. The drainage system will be required as a condition
of approval for the project and will tie into the existing system. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
12.f.
The proposal will not result in a need for new systems or substantial alterations to solid
waste disposal systems. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this
development can be mitigated through partidpation in any Source Reduction and Recycling
Programs which are implemented by the City. No significant impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
12.g.
The project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations
to local or regional water supplies. Reference response 12.d. No significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
Aesthetics
13.a.
The project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in a
area where there is a scenic vista. Further, the City does not have any designated scenic
highways. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..dec
13.b.
The project will not have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect. The applicant and
architect worked with City staff to ensure a design that complies with the City-Wide Design
Guidelines. The building is relatively consistent with other designs in the area. The
enhanced landscaping and additional architectural treatments will provide additional
aesthetic enhancement that will result in a quality designed building. Therefore, no adverse
visual impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
13.c.
The project will have a less that significant impact from light and glare. The project will
produce and result in a minimum amount of light or glare considering the scope of the
project. However, all light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar
Observatory; therefore the project will be conditioned to be consistent with Ordinance No.
655 (Ordinance Regulating Light Pollution). With the conditions of approval, no significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Cultural Resources
14.a-c. The project will not have an impact on paleontological, archaeological or historical
resources. The site has been disturbed from pdor grading activity and any impacts to these
resources would have been mitigated dudng the grading prccass. No significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
14.d.
The project will not have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values. Reference response 14.a-c. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
14.e.
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area.
No religious or sacred uses exist at the site or are proximate to the site. No significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
Recreation
15.a,b. The project will have a less than significant impact or increase in demand for neighborhood
or regional parks or other recreational facilities. The project will not cause significant
numbers of people to relocate within or to the City of Temecula. However, it will result in
an incremental impact or in an increase in demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities. The same is true for the quality or quantity of existing
recreational resources or opportunities. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
R:\STAFFRPTX353pa98pc..doc
36
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
R: \STAFFP-d~T\353pa98pC..doc
37
Geologic Problems
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitodng Party:
Mitigation Monitoring Program
Planning Application No. PA98-0353
(Development Plan, Dekkon Development)
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City Standards.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Depadment of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building and Safety Department.
Expose people to impacts from seismic ground shaking.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building and Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..doc
38
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measures:
Specific Processes:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill
Planting of slopes consistent with Ordinance No. 457.
Submit erosion control plans for approval by the Department of Public
Works.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
Erasion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from
excavation, grading or fill.
Planting of on-site landscaping that is consistent with the Development
Code.
Submit landscape plans that include planting of slope to the Planning
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Planning Department.
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic
ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake
hazards.
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards,
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.
Building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety Department.
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc..doc
39
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking, seismic
ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or earthquake
hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform
Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety Department for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
Water
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
The project will result in changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns
and the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Methods of controlling runoff, from site so that it will not negatively impact
adjacent properties, including drainage conveyances, have been
incorporated into site design and will be included on the grading plans.
Submit grading and drainage plan to the Department of Public Works for
approval.
Prior to the issuance of grading permit.
Department of Public Works.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality
(e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turpidity).
An erosion control plan shall be prepared in accordance with City
requirements and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
shall be prepared in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
The applicant shall submit a SWPPP to the San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) for their review and approval.
Pdor to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and SDRWQCB (for SWPPP).
R:\STAFFRPT~353pa98pc, .dec
40
Transportation/Circulation
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements and traffic
impacts.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
Increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for traffic signal mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building and Safety Department.
Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site.
Provide on-site parking spaces to accommodate the use.
Install on-site parking spaces pursuant to the City's minimum
Development Code parking standards.
Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits.
Department of Public Works, Planning Department and Building & Safety
Department.
R:\$TAFFRP~353pa98pc..doc
41
Biological Resources
General impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but
not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds).
Pay Mitigation Fee for impacts to Stephens Kangaroo Rat.
Pay $500.00 per acre of disturbed area of Stephens Kangaroo Rat
habitat.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Department of Public Works and Planning Department.
Public Services
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered governmental
services regarding fire protection. The project will incrementally increase
the need for fire protection; however, it will contribute its fair share to the
maintenance of service provision.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for Fire Mitigation.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code,
Prior to the issuance of building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for new/altered schools. No
significant impacts are anticipated.
Payment of School Fees.
Pay current mitigation fees with the Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department and Temecula Valley Unified School
District.
R:~STAFFRPT~353pa98pc. ,doc
42
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
AESTHETICS
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A substantial effect upon and a need for maintenance of public facilities,
including roads.
Payment of Development Impact Fee for road improvements, traffic
impacts, and public facilities.
Payment of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by,
and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building and Safety Department.
The creation of new light sources will result in increased light and glare
that could affect the Palomar Observatory.
Use lighting techniques that are consistent with Ordinance No. 655.
Submit lighting plan to the Building and Safety Department for approval
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Building & Safety Department.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
EXHIBITS
R:\STAFFRYF\353pa98pc..doc
44
CITY OF TEMECULA
VICINITY MAP
r,,I
~AL~: N.T.~.
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT- A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 21, 1998
VICINITY MAP
R:\STAFFRPTX270pA98,FC 10/9/98 pa
EXHIBIT B- ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
CITY OF TEMECULA
BP
BP H
H
CC
~P
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - BP (BUSINESS PARK)
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 21, 1998
'>
cC k
R:XSTAFFRPT',270PA98.FC 1019/98pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT- D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 21, 1998
SITE PLAN
R:\STAFFRPT\270PA98.R2 1019198 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PRELIMINARy PLAN~3NG PLAN
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 21, 1998
LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:XSTAFFPdq'X270PA98.PC 10/9/98 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
'u I
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- October 21, 1998
ELEVATIONS
R:~STAFFRPT~270PA98.PC 10/9/98 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
MATERIAL SAMPLE BOAI~
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - G
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 2t, 1998
COLORS & MATERIALS
R:\STAFFRFT~.70PA98 PC 10/I2/98 pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLAN
R:~STAFFRFr~70PA98.PC 10/9198pa
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0353 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT - H
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE- October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLAN
R:\STAFFRPTX270PA98.PC 10/9/98 pa
ITEM #4
RECOMMENDATION:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
October 21, 1998
Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
Prepared By: Carole K. Donahoe. AICP, Project Planner
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission:
1. ADOPT Resolution No. 98- , appmving Planning
Application No. PA98-0350 based upon the Analysis and
Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval
APPLICATIONINFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PROPOSAL:
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
Paradise Chevrolet
Tern/Gilmore, Executive General Manager & Vice President
To construct and operate a 47,970 square foot, two-story Chevrolet
dealership and a 3,126 square foot Cadillac/Oldsmobile auto
dealership with showrooms, offices, parts inventory, 50-bay service
center and body shop with paint booths and wash bays, on 8.42
acres
Southeast comer of Solana Way and Ynez Road
SC (Service Commercial)
North: SC (Service Commercial) & CC (Community Commercial)
South: SC (Service Commercial)
East: H (High Density Residential, 13-20 dwelling units/acre)
West: SC (Service Commercial)
PROPOSED ZONING: N/A
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant
SC (Service Commercial)
\\TEMEC_FS201~I)ATA'dDEFrS~PLANNING'~STAFFRP~350pa98.STAFFRFf,PC.doc
1
SURROUNDING LAND
USES:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial center that includes a Shell Service Station
and carwash
GM/Pontiac/Buick dealership under construction and the
Ynez Center Commercial Park
Apartments and condominiums
Temecula Auto Mall
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Area: 8.42 acres
Total Site Area:
Building Area:
Landscape Area:
Parking Area:
Harriscape Area:
Total:
Building Height: 28.5 feet
Floor Area Ratio: 13.9 %
Parking Required:
Parking Provided:
366,775 square feet
43,536 square feet 11.9%
16,885 square feet 4.6%
128,519 square feet 35.0%
177,886 square feet 48.5%
366,826 square feet
343 vehicles, 8 handicapped spaces, 17 bicycle, 3 motorcycle spaces
345 vehicles, 9 handicapped spaces, 0 bicycle, 2 motorcycle spaces
BACKGROUND
The subject site has been under consideration for development by auto dealerships for several
years. On June 17, 1998, the Planning Commission appreved Tentative Parcel Map No. 28809
covering this site, as well as Planning Application No. PA98-0143 (Conditional Use Permit) for a
General Motors dealership adjacent to the subject site. Before and after these approvals, staff met
with Teny Gilmore numerous times to discuss the design of this project. A formal application was
submitted on August 12, 1998 and a Development Review Committee Meeting was held on
September 3, 1998. Subsequent to issuing the DRC Comment letter dated September 9, 1998
staff held another meeting with the development team for Paradise Chevrolet on September 14,
1998. On October 8, 1998 the project was deemed complete.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION & ANALYSIS
Paradise Chevrolet of Temecula intends to relocate from their present site at 26845 Ynez Road.
This proposed project represents an expansion of their existing facilities which increases their
display area, employee parking area and service bays.
Site Design
The overall design of the project is similar and compatible with the GM/Pontiac/Buick dealership
to the south. Showrooms are located approximately the same distance from Ynez Road, with the
main inventory display fronting Ynez. However, Paradise Chevrolet has taken advantage of their
corner location, and added inventory display fronting Solana Way as well. The service center is
behind the showrooms, with a separate entrance from Solana Way. Service customers have dual
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPTX350pa98,STAFFRPT.PC.doc
2
stacking lanes that end up at the service centers cenopied reception area. Vehicles-in-repair are
located to the south and east of the service center building. The most eastady portion of the site
contains a secured employee parking area with a separate ddveway from the rear access road.
Access. Traffic and Circulation
The project takes access from both Ynez Road and Solana Way. There is a pdvate ddveway along
the east boundary which traverses all three auto dealerships proposed in this area, that joins up
with an existing pdvate street within the Ynez Center Cemmeroial Park. The overall design
effectively separates sales traffic, service traffic and employee traffic at the site. Site design also
provides circulation around all buildings. The applicant proposes to restdct entry to the site after
business hours with a three-foot high manual gate with Knox system at the entrances.
Interface with Multi-Family Residential Development
The project design utilizes buffering techniques similar to the adjacent General Motors project.
Paradise Chevrolet continues the 16-fcot landscape buffer on the east side of the access drive that
General Motors is providing at their dealership to the south. Similarly, all uses involving customer
activity - showrooms, outdoor vehicle displays, service reception and stacking area - are odented
away from the residential units and toward Ynez Road which is a major public street. Unloading
of inventory shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. by the Conditions of Approval. Service
activities are contained within the service building with no more than three extedor doors for
access.
Landscaping
Paradise Chevrolet has applied the standards contained in Section 17.08.050.S (Automobile,
Motorcycle and Truck Dealership Landscape Standards) that were adopted as an amendment to
the Development Code by the City Council on September 22, 1998. Street trees have been
clustered, a 12-foot landscape area is provided along both streets, a minimum five-foot wide
landscape island is provided at the ends of display rows along the main entry ddve lane, and
landscaping has been provided at the entrances to buildings. The applicant proposes three display
pads at the three corners of the project in accordance with Code.
Architecture
The building design utilizes an army of building canopies, over the outdoor display areas directly
in front of the showrooms, over office windows and over the service canter reception area. The
two showrooms have a curved line and entrances are articulated with extended archways. These
elements provide a vadety of vertical and hodzontal lines that break up the massing of the
buildings. The project provides landscape planters with vines along both sides of the service center
building. Additionally, the side and entry area that faces Solana Way will include palm trees within
these planters. The architecture complies with the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
Lighting
The applicant proposes to install low pressure sodium lighting in all areas east of the service center
building, except along the display area fronting Solana Way. All other parking lot and inventory
lighting shall be a combination metal halide and low pressure sodium fixture, fully-shielded, and
with timers to switch from metal halide to low pressure sodium dudng the hours after 11 p.m. and
R:\STAFFRPTX3,~0pa98.STAFFRF~.~C.doc
3
before sundse. Secudty wall packs along the rear of the Sen/ice Center are proposed to be heat-
sensitive only, in compliance with Ordinance No. 655 regarding light pollution.
Bicycle and Motorcycle Requirement
Mr. Gilmore has submitted a request for an exemption from the Development Code regarding the
requirement for bicycle and motorcycle parking spaces (See Attachment 3). Exemptions may be
considered in accordance with Section 17.24.040.F.4. Mr. Gilmore indicates that it has been
company policy to allow employees who dde cycles to work to park them indoors, near their work
stations. He further states that in the years he has been open for business, he has not seen
customers come to the dealership on bicycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The project site and proposed use were subject to environmental review under the Initial
Environmental Assessment dated May 26, 1998 conducted for Tentative Parcel Map No. 28809
(Planning Application No. PA98-0199) and Planning Application No. PA98-0143 (Conditional Use
Permit). A Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitodng Program for these applications were
adopted by the Planning Commission on June 17, 1998. Since the proposed project is within the
thresholds established by these documents, staff has determined that no further environmental
analysis is required at this time.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Automobile dealership uses are permitted within the General Plan designation and zoning of SC
Service Commercial with the approval of a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the
Development Code. Staff finds that the project is consistent and compatible with existing and
approved dealerships in the vicinity and within the Temecula Auto Mall. The project is consistent
with the General Plan, Development Cede and Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends
approval of Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit).
FINDINGS
The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan, Ordinances, the
Development Code and Design Guidelines of the City, The General Plan designation and
zoning of SC Service Commercial allow automobile dealerships with the approval of a
conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project,
as designed and conditioned, complies with the requirements of the Development Code.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely affect the
adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The project site is in proximity to the Temecula Auto
Mall where automobile dealerships already line Ynez Road. The project design has utilized
buffering techniques noted in the City's Design Guidelines to achieve compatibility with the
adjacent multi-family apartment complexes to the east.
The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls. fences, parking
and loading fadlities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed
in the Development Code and required in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA~DEPTS~PLANNING~qTAFFRPTX3.~pa98.STAFFRpT.pC.doc
4
Em
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. Service bays are within an endceed building with limited
accessways. Customer activities are odented to Ynez Road which is a major roadway.
That the derision to approve, conditional approve, or deny the application for a conditional
use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
Planning Commission. The site plan, landscape plan, floor plan, elevations and grading
plan are included in this staff report as exhibits. Furthermore, the Color and Mateddais
Board and colored elevations are on display at the public hearing before the Planning
Commission, and will be on file or a photograph of the document will be on die in the
Planning Department.
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA',DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRFI~t~c~98.STAFFRFr. PC.doc
Attachments:
PC Resolution - Blue Page 7
A. Development Plan Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11
B. Conditional Use Permit Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 23
Request for Exemption from Bicycle and Motorcycle Space Requirements - Blue Page 26
Exhibits - Blue Page 27
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C General Plan Map
D. Site Plan
E. Landscape Plan
F. Floor Plans
G. Elevations
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNINGXSTAFFRPT~350p~8.STAFFRPT.PC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
\\TEMEC_FS201XDATA\DEFTS~PLANNI~qG\STAFFRlrI~50p~98,STAFFRPT.PC.do~
7
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PC RESOLUTION NO. 98-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA98-0350 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A 47,970 SQUARE FOOT, 'RNO-STORY
DEALERSHIP AND A 3,126 SQUARE FOOT DEALERSHIP, WITH
SHOWROOMS, OFFICES, PARTS INVENTORY, 50-BAY
SERVICE CENTER WITH PAINT BOOTHS AND WASH BAYS ON
8.42 ACRES; AND (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) TO PERMIT
THE OPERATION OF AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP,
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF YNEZ ROAD AND
SOLANA WAY AND KNOWN AS LOT I OF PARCEL MAP NO.
28809
WHEREAS, Paradise Chevrolet filed Planning Application No. PA98-0350, in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Cede;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA98-0350 was processed including, but not limited
to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA98-0350, on
October 21, 1998, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff
and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this
matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA98-0350;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by
reference.
Section 2. Development Plan Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning
Application No. PA98-0350 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required
by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Cede:
A. The proposed use is in conformanca with the General Ran for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The project has been
reviewed for consistency with these documents and staff has determined that the project, as
conditioned, is consistent with the goals and policies contained within these documents.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA~DEFrS~PLANNINGtfFAFFRFI~0pa98.$TAFFl~T.pC.doc
8
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare. The project is consistent with the goals and policies contained
within the General Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines. These documents were
adopted by the City Council to assure that projects are not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community. Compliance with them assures that this end result is achieved.
C. The design of the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There
is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or
habitat off-site. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife
resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code.
Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findings. That the Temecula Planning Commission,
in approving Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the
following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan, Ordinances, the
Development Code and Design Guidelines of the City. The General Plan designation and zoning
of SC Service Commercial allow automobile dealerships with the approval of a conditional use
permit pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project, as designed and
conditioned, complies with the requirements of the Development Code.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The project site is in proximity to the Temecula
Auto Mall where automobile dealerships already line Ynez Road. The project design has utilized
buffedng techniques noted in the City's Design Guidelines to achieve compatibility with the adjacent
multi-family apartment complexes to the east.
C. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences,
parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed
in the Development Code and required in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety
and general welfare of the community. Service bays are within an enclosed building with limited
accessways. Customer activities are oriented to Ynez Road which is a major roadway.
E. That the decision to approve, condi~iona| approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
Planning Commission. The site plan, landscape plan, floor plan, elevations and grading plan are
included in this staff report as exhibits. Furthermore, the Color and Materials Board and colored
elevations are on display at the public hearing before the Planning Commission, and will be on file
or a photograph of the document will be on file in the Planning Department.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The project site and proposed use were subject to
environmental review under the Initial Environmental Assessment dated May 26, 1998 conducted
for Tentative Parcel Map No. 28809 (Planning Application No. PA98-0199) and Planning
Application No. PA98-0143 (Conditional Use Permit). A Negative Declaration and the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for these applications were adopted by the Planning Commission on June 17,
\\TEMEC_FS201'~E)ATA~DEFrS'~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~50pa98.STAFFRFr,PC.doc
9
1998. Since the proposed project is within the thresholds established by these documents, staff
has determined that no further environmental analysis is required at this time.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Development Plan) for the design and
construction of a 47,970 square foot, two-story dealership and a 3,126 square foot dealership, with
showrooms, offices, pads inventoW, 50-bay service center with paint booths and wash bays on
8.42 acres; and (Conditional Use Permit) to permit the oparetion of an automobile dealership,
located on the southeast comer of Ynez Road and Solaria Way and known as Lot 1 of Parcel No.
28809, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A (Development Plan), and
Exhibit B (Conditional Use Permit), attached hereto, and inoorporetad herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this twenty-first day of October, 1998.
Marcia Slaven, Chairperson
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at its regular meeting thereof, held on the twenty-first day of
October, 1998 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATAXDEPTSXPLANNING~TAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFRFF.PC.doc
10
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
V, TEMEC_FS201 ~I2) ATAXDEPTS',PLANNING\STAFFRPT~350pa98. STAFFRPT. PC. doc
11
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Development Plan)
Project Description: The design and construction of a 47,970 square foot, two-story
dealership and a 3,126 square foot dealership, with showrooms,
offices, parts inventory, 50-bay service center with paint booths
and wash bays on 8.42 acres; located on the southeast corner
of Ynez Road and Solana Way
Legal Description: Lot I of Parcel Map No. 28809
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
October 21, 1998
October 21, 2000
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and
Califomia Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour pedod the
applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department ? Planning Division
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of such failure of to satisfy this condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
beard or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its dght to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA'~E)EPTS\pLANNINGXSTAFFRia'T~3S0pa98,STAFFRPT.PC.doc
12
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the underlying Tentative Parcel Map No. 28809.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division, or as amended by these Conditions of Approval.
The private drive aisle shall be red curb painted to provide a clear 24-foot minimum
width for emergency vehicles.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Landscape Plan), or
as modified by these Conditions of Approval. Landscaping installed for the project shall be
continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager and the
Temecula Development Code. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Building Floor
Plans) and Exhibit "G" (Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development
Department - Planning Division, or as amended by these Conditions of Approval.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be screened from public view by
architectural features integrated into the design of the structure.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "l" (Color and Material Board), contained
on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation
from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Community
Development Director.
Material
Color
Stucco walls
Stucco screed
Aluminum storefront framing
Building band
Metal parapet cap
Glazing
Spandrel glazing
Rollup overhead doors
Smooth face concrete block walls
Split face concrete block wainscoting
La Habre x-40 "Dove Grey"
Painted to match La Habre X-40 "Dove Grey"
Kynar 736A336 "Regal Blue"
Painted to match "Regal Blue"
Painted to match La Habra x-40 "Dove Grey"
Clear
Clear
Painted to match La Habra x-40 "Dove Grey"
Painted to match La Habra x-40 "Dove Grey"
Painted to match La Habra x-40 "Dove Grey"
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTX350~a98.STAFFRPr. PC.doc
13
Steel canopy Painted to match 'Regal Blue"
Rolling metal gate Painted to match La Habra x-40 'Dove Grey"
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
10.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and retum one
signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
11.
The applicant shall submit two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color pdnts of approved
Exhibit "l" (Color and Materials Board) to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Matedais Board and Elevations
shall be readable on the photographic pdnts.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
12. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Drawings shall be submitted
to the Community Development Department o Planning Division for approval. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "E" Landscape Plans, or as amended
by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants
shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The
cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The
plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
C,
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
14.
An Administrative Development Plan application for a comprehensive sign program shall
be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Manager, A separate building permit
shall be required for all signage at the site pdor to installation.
15.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
\\TEMEC_FS201XDATAXDEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRFFX3.~pa98 .STAFFR.PT.PC.do~
14
16.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department
- Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Planning Manager, the bond shall be released.
17.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectodzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the intedor end of the parking space at a minimum
height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the
off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owners expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identffication sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
18.
The applicant shall comply with the Traffic Study recommendation to provide cress access
between dealerships proposed adjacent to the project, to prevent unnecessary trips on
public readways.
19.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan
all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision.
General Requirements
20.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all onsite flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained read right-of-way.
21.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works pdor to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS'~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFR.PT.PC.doc
15
22.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and
shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
23.
The vehicular movement for the proposed ddveway on Ynez Road is restricted to right
in/dght out/left in only.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
24.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include
all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
25.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
26.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and pavement sections.
27.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide spedtic recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
28.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
29.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
wdtten clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distdct
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
30.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATAXDEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~.S0pa98.$TAFFRPT.PC,doc
16
31. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
32. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for offsite
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
33. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashiers check
or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan
fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
34. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following
design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving,
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
35. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soils Engineer
shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
36. The Developer shall provide an easement for ingress and egress to Parcel 2.
37. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
38. The developer shall construct a 12 foot wide raised landscape median on Solana
Way along property frontage
39. Parcel Map 28809 shall be recorded.
40. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water Distdct
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
\\TEMECFS201\DATAXDEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTX3.50pa98.STAFFRPT.PC.do~
17
41. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
42. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
43. Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building, Plumbing
and Mechanical Cedes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title
24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code.
44. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building
and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
45. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
46. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals pdor to commencement of any construction
work.
47. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-I/H-4.
48. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
49. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
50. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
51, Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
52, Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
53. Provide house electrical meter provisions br power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
54. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be ~n accordance with the provisions of the 1994
edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C.
55. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
56. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with odginal signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrS~PLANNINGxSTAIq:RPT~,S0pa~8.STAFFKFf.PC.doc
18
57.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
58,
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
59. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
60.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
61.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls require separate
approvals and permits.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
62.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the Uniform
Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in force at the
time of building plan submittal.
63.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1562 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2412 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval procass to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic
fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (UFC 903°2, Appendix
Ill.A)
64.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill. B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6"
x 4" x 2-2 "outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent
to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 250 feet apart and shall be located no more
than 150 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to
an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix Ill-B)
65.
As required by the Uniform Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this
project on site fire hydrants are required. (UFC 903.2)
66.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS\PLANNINGXSTAFFRF~350pa98.STAFFRFf. PC,doc
19
67.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
70,000 Ibs GVVV. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
68.
Pdor to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an extedor wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 70,000 Ibs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
( UFC sec 902 and Ord 95-15)
69.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearenca of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15)
70,
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
71.
Pdor to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (UFC 902.2.1 )
72.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be:
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards,
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the odginats shall be presented to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire
hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropdate water agency pdor to any
combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2
and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
73.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3)
74.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The
numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for
suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the
suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15)
75.
Pdor to issuance of Certfficate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to
installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15)
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA'~DEPTS~PLANNING~ST~350p~8.STAFR~,Fr. PC.dOC
20
76.
Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the spdnkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval pdor to installation. (UFC
Article 10)
77.
Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by
the alarm system. (UFC 902.4)
78.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4)
79.
Pdor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from
both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(UFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The Temecuia Community Services Distdct has reviewed the aforementioned project and
conditions the project as follows:
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits,;
80.
If a landscaped median is required within Solana Way, construction plans for the landscape
improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent
prior to issuance of building permits.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy:
81.
Installation of any proposed median landscaping within Solana Way shall be completed per
the approved plans and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent.
82.
Upon satisfactory completion of any landscaped median improvements, the developer shall
provide the TCSD with a one-year warranty bond for the then existing improvements and
plant materials.
OTHER AGENCIES
83.
Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal dated September 9, 1998, a copy of which is attached. The fee is
made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District, by either a ceshier's
check or money order, pdor to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later
date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS~PLANN~NG\STAFFRPT~350pa98,STAFFRPT.PC.doc
21
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's tmnsmittal dated August 24, 1998, and the Health
Services Agency tmnsmittal dated August 25, 1998, copies of which are attached.
85.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Califomia
Water Distdct's transmittal dated August 19, 1998, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have mad, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrSXPLANNING~STAFFRPT~50pa98 .$TAFFKPT.PC .doc
22
DAVID P. ZAPPE
Genera/Maaagcr-ChiefEngin~t
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909/275-1200
909/788-9965 FAX
51180.1
City of Temecula
Plannin De artmerit
Post
Temecula, California 9258~-9033
A.ention: K.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Z)O t,,t~HOE
Re: 98-oa5o
The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not lan check Ci~ land use cases, or provide Site Division of Real Estte letters or
other flood hazard eports for sutc~ cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases am normally limited
to items of spedtic roterest to the District indudin District Master Draina e Plan radiities, other r ional flood
control and draina fadlilies which could be consi~nJgered a logical comporterror extension of a master peCan s era,
and Distdct Area ~rainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general ns-~utre is
provided.
The Disthct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed projC--ct with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such issue:
,..// This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other fadlilies of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan fadlilies. The District will acce ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Fadlities must be constructed to District sin~Patr~s, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administratNe fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a I ical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District wo[tio~ consider accepting ownership of such tac~hbes on written request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and Dtstrict pJ_an check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. plan check, inspection a.nd administrative fees will be required.
/ ' %%":
check or money order onl to me Flood Control Distdct or City pdor to issuance of building or grading
permits, whichever comes ~t. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the
actual permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project ma uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (N PDES permit from the State Water
Resoumes Con~orie~oard. Clearance for grading recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or s shown to be exempt.
If this pro'act involves a Federal Emergen.c.y Management Agency (FEMA map _l:~ flood plain then the C' should
require ~qe applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and o~1., information reqqi:tired to m~eit~ FEMA
requiraments and should further require that the a plicent oblin a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR)
pdor to grad ng, I~;ordation or other final approva~Pof the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR(~ pdor to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapbed flood plain is im acted by this project the City should require the a licent to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement fr6m the Ca~i~omia Department oi' Fish and Game and a Clean PVJ~ter Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S, Army Corps of Eng nears, or wdtten corTespondence from these a encies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quaff Cert~cetion
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Contro Board pdor to issuance of ~e Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
"""~TUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
ate:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Carote K. Donahoe. AICP
~REGOR DELLENBACH, Enviromnental Health Specialist IV
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA98-0350
DATE: August 24, 1998
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No. PA98-0350
and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance, the following items are
required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b)
Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted, including a fixture
schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food
Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022.
c) A clearm~ce letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055
will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
· Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4.
· Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3.
· Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2).
· Waste reduction management.
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA).
GD:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Bufiding
Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
cc: I)oug Thompson ,:.: ?
stand3b doc
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ONMENTAL HEALTH
25 August 1998
Ms. C. stole Donaho~
Te, mccul& plan~ Depatlmefit
43200 Business Paxk Dr,
Temecula, CA 92590
RE: Planning Application No. PAgg-0350
Dear Ms. Donshoe:
After reviewing the plans regard'ulg the above refcfcnoed project tbc following commems arc
givea: The applicant has contacted this Agcnoy and currently holds l'ptTardous wastc generator
and ba--rdous materials bandlet permits for the curtexit location. Application must be made for
these pennits at the new location prior to openlion.
fithere are any questions regarding this, ple. as~ contact me at (909) 694-5027.
Yarn Sappington
Bs~rdous Matedais
Management SpedMist
4065 County Cirde Drive, Riverside, CA 92503 - Phone (909) 358-5316 * FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 * Riverside, CA 92513-7600) ~,,..,.~.uat. e..
John F. Hennigar
PhiHip L. Forbe~
E. P. ~Bob' Lemons
Kenneth C. Dealv
Pen-y R. Louck
Linda ?,I. Fregoso
C. Michae~ Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
August19,1998
Ms. Carole Donahoe, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
PORTION OF LOT NO. 10 OF TRACT NO. 3334
APN 921-290-008
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0350
Dear Ms. Donahoe:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within
the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water
service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for
fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing
an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
///~A.,,J,~ X~
Steve Brannon, P.E
Development Engineering Manager
98/SB:mc178/F012-T3/FCF
;_,, : TOE_):2
C: Laurie Willjams, Engineering Services Supervisor
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA98-0350 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)
\\TEMEC_FS201~DATA\DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~350pe98.STAFFRFr,PC.doc
23
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
The use hereby permitted Is for an automobile dealership on Parcel 1 of Parcel Map
No. 28809
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
October 21, 1998
October 21, 2000
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek
monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner
of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all
action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such
defense.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA98-
0199 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 28809), unless superseded by these conditions of
approval. All these conditions shall be complied with pdor to any occupancy or use allowed
by this conditional use permit.
The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No, PA98-
0350 (Development Plan), unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these
conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional
use permit.
This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval
of this Conditional Use Permit.
\\TEMEC_FS201 ~I) ATA~DEPTS~PLANNING~rAFFRPT~3501~98. STAFFRFr. PC .doc
24
Ninety-four (94) onsite parking spaces shall be identified as 'Employee Parking Only" by
proper signage and stdping of spaces. No storage of inventory or vehicles under repair
shall be allowed in these spaces.
Outdoor lighting shall be hooded and in compliance with City Ordinance No. 655 regarding
light pollution.
Metal halide fixtures may be used where color rendition of vehicles is important, but shall
be installed with timers to go off between the hours of 11 p.m. to sundse.
Security wall pack lights affixed to the rear of the service center building shall be heat
sensor or motion sensor type fixtures.
10. Unloading of inventory shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 9 p.m.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Name
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP~350pa98.STAFFRFr. PC,doc
25
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM
BICYCLE AND MOTORCYCLE SPACE REQUIREMENTS
\',TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrS~PLANNINGXSTAFFRPTX3.~,pa98.STAFFRFf. PC .doc
October 7, 1998
TO: City of Temecula Planning Commission
RE: Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking Spaces
(18 bicycle and 4 motorcycle)
In regard to our planning application PA98-0350 1 reply to your request for bicycle and
motorcycle parking spaces. I would ask the commissioners for an exception for the
following reasons.
1~ All employees are allowed to park their bike in a safe covered area while at
work. We currently have one bike rider in our parts department and he brings
the bike inside during his work hours. He rides the bike from our employee
parking lot on Motor Car Parkway to the Parts Department daily. All
employees are aware of this company policy. This will not be the case when
we move to our new facility; employee parking will be on site.
2. We currently have two employees that ride motorcycles to work, weather
permitting. They park them either in their work area or in their assigned
parking space, which is a 9xl 8 regular parking space instead ofa 4xl 0
motorcycle space. Given a choice I am certain that our riders would prefer the
larger space.
3. In the past seven years we have sold 10,399 cars and have had only 5
motorcycles traded in. In most cases the motorcycles are not ridden in at the
time of the sale. Once again we have regular 9x18 parking spaces for those
customers while shopping at our facility, we feel this is sufficient.
I ask the commission to exclude these parking spaces in the application plan.
Thank You,
Terry A. Gilmore
VICE PRESIDENT
PARADISE CHEVROLET BUICK
MAILING ADDRESS: .PO. BOX 890366 · TEMECULA, CA 92589 · DELIVERY ADDRESS: 26845 YNEZ ROAD · TEMECULA, CA 92591
(909) 699-2699 · (800) 281-4412 · SERVICE DIRECT (909) 506-0058 · (888) 312-2110 · FAX (909) 695-2445
ATI'ACHMENT NO. 3
EXHIBITS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTX350pa98 .STAFFRPT.PC .doc
27
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0350
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFFS\PLANNING~STAFFRFf~50pa98.STAFFRPI'.PC.doc
12
SITE
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF TEMECULA
EXHIBIT B ZONING MAP
DESIGNATION - SC Service Commercial
LM
/ CC
EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION - SC Service Commercial
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
~\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEFrS\PLANNING\STAFFRFr\350pa98.STAFFRFr.PC.doc
28
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA98-0350
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
\ \ T EMEC_FS201\D A T A \D EPTS\]~LA NN~NG\ST AR:E3.50pa98,ST AFFRFI'.PC.dOC
]4
SITE PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
SOLANA WAY
· - \
()
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT E
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFRpT.pC.dOC 15
LANDSCAPE PLAN
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT FI - Chevrolet Showroom, First Floor
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLANS
R:',STAFFRPT~3.50pa98.STAFFP, PT.PC.dOC
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F2 - Chevrolet Showroom, Second Floor
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLANS
R:\STAFFRFF~3~0pa98.STAFFR~T.PC.doc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F3 - Service Center building
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLANS
R:\STAFFRPT\350pa98.STAFFRPT.PC.dOc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO, PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT F4 - Cadillac/Oldsmobile Showroom
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
FLOOR PLANS
R:\STAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFRPT.pC,dOC
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
m t ~n~ , l/
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G1 - Chevrolet Showroom
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October21, 1998
ELEVATIONS
R:\STAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFRl~.PC.doc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G2- Service Center building
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
ELEVATIONS
R: \STAFFRPT~350pa98.STAFFRFr. PC .doc
16
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 98-0350 (Conditional Use Permit)
EXHIBIT G3- Cadillac/Oldsmobile Showroom
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: October 21, 1998
ELEVATIONS
\\TEMEC_FS201\DATA\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRF~350pa98.STAFFRPT.PC.dcz
31