Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout010500 PC AgendareasondksearrsngementstoeneumaccendNleytothatmeding~gCFR3~t02,3~.t64ADATHlelq CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE: ROLL CALL: TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 2000 ~ 9:00 PM 43200 Business Perk Ddve Council Chambers Temecuil, CA 92590 Chaiq~erson Guerriem Resolution Next In Order #2000-00t Fahey, Guerriem, Mathewsen, and Webster PUBUC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the commissioners on items that am not listed on the Ageride. Speakers am limited to three (3) minutes each. if you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be f'dled out and flied with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come fortNard and state Your name and address. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be fled with the Ranning Secretary before Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of Agenda 2. Minutes from November 17, t999 PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Case No: Applicant: Location: Preposel: Environmental Action: Pmjed Planhen Recommendation: Ranning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) VCL Construction East side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho California Road Loortions of Parcels 1, 2, 3 & 6 of Pamei Map 23882) Construct a 137-room, 59,950 square fool 3-story Hdiday Inn Express Hotel on 3.37 acres planned and zoned for HT Highway/Tourist commercial use Exempt Steve Griffin Approval CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 15, 1999 4. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Case Planner. Recommendation: Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Condidonal Use Permit). Willing (Buck) & Lynne Rarnsey 787 Avocado CL, Del Mar, CA 29014 The south side of Winchester Road midway between Ynez Road and Mamarite Road, on Pad E at the Promenade MaJI (APN 910-320-028). Ranning Applicaticn No. PA99-0379 is a request to buid and operate a 5,000 square foot gas statjon/convenienco market (Ultrmar) with a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken). Exempt (Section Number 15332 In-fill Development Projects) Thomas Thomsley Appreval 5. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Ad. jon: Planner. Recommendation: 6. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Enviroonroental Action: Planner. Reoommendation: PLANNING MANAGERS REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Devdolx~ent I:~n to constrdct s t3,064 square foot speculative building within the Service Commercial Zone (SC) (Planning AppliceUon PA99-0277) Tim Shook Company, Inc. Generally east of the Jefferson Avenue/Buecking Drive intersedjon, on the northside of Bus:king Drive (41437 Bus:king Ddve), in the City of Teroecula To approve the Development Plan for the 13,064 square foot speculative building Adopt a Notice of Exeroption Denice Thomas, Associate Planner Recomroend approval of the Developroent Plan to the City Council Development Ran to construct a 13,064 square foot speculative building within · e Service Commercial Zone (SC) (Planning AppliceUon PA99-0278) Tim Shook Company, Inc. Generally east of the Jefferson AvenueJBuecking Drive intersedjon, on the nodhside of Buecking Drive (41397 Buecking Drive), in the City of Teroecula To approve the Development Ran for the 13.064 square foot speculative building Adopt a Notice of ExeroDtion Denice Thoroas, Associate Planner Re~oromend approval of the Development Plan to the City Council January t9, 2000, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590 F:~I~pIs\PLANNING~PLANCOMM\Agcndas~2000\I-5-00.doc 2 ITEM #2 CALL TO ORDER MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 17, 1999 The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:03 P.M., on Wednesday November 17, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Naggar. ROLL CALL Present: Absent: Also Present: Commissioners Fahey, Mathewson, Naggar, Webster, and Chairman Guerriere. None. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks, Senior Engineer Alegda, Attorney Cudey, Senior Planner Fagan, Associate Planner Donahoe, Project Planner DeGange, and Minute Clerk Hansen. PUBLIC COMMENTS The Public Comments portion of the meeting was considered out of order; see page 13. COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of A{3enda MOTION: Commissioner Naggar moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Fahey and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 2. APProval of Minutes-October 20, 1999 MOTION: Commissioner Webster moved to approve the minutes, as written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Naggar and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 3. Director's Hearin~l Update Senior Planner Fagan was available for questions from the Commission. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. Planning ADI}lication No. PA99-0296 (Tentative Tract Map No. 24136) Request to subdivide 99.8 acres into 397 residential lots and 22 open space lots. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission approve the request. By way of overhead maps, Associate Planner Donahoe presented the staff report (of record), highlighting location, access, densities, and landscaping; noted that staff had received expressed concam from the adjacent neighboring residents regarding the potential for the development of apartments; advised that when the residents were notified that this particular project was proposing a senior community, the residents concams were allayed, and there was no opposition to this particular project; for Commissioner Webster, noted that if in the future the applicant opted not to restdct occupancy to seniors only, that the applicant would have to revise the map, or not record it, clarifying that the proposed map was designed for a senior-occupied development. Mr. Bob Davis, representing the applicant, advised that there was a significant reduction in the traffic tdp generation associated with a senior housing development in comparison to regular residential dwellings, noting the additional vadant between retirement senior communities, encompassing non-working residents, and senior communities, encompassing working residents. In response to Commissioner Naggar's quedes with respect to the degree of sloping, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks provided clarification regarding the permitted 2/1 ratio for sloping in this particular area. For Commissioner Naggar, Senior Planner Fagan provided additional information regarding the controversial sloping at the Campos Verdes site; and noted that the slopes on this particular project were located on the pedmeter of the project. Via overhead grading maps, for Commissioner Naggar, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks further specified the location and degree of the proposed graded sloping at this particular site; and with respect to droulation, noted that Margadta Road would have two lanes of travel in each direction when the first phase of the project was completed; advised that the proposed Margadta Road Improvement Project (included in the CIP) had been funded for the design portion of the project, and would be inclusive of a center raised landscaped median with left-turn lan~, and two lanes of travel in each direction; relayed that although the City would reimburse the applicant, this particular project (as well as, the Home Depot Project) had been conditioned to install the signal at Margadta Road/De Portola Road pdor to occupancy; and advised that this project was not conditioned to construct additional road improvements due to the lack of a nexus between the impact of traffic generated from the particular proposal and the traffic generation on Margadta Road. Plancamm/min~eW111 ?gg By way of photographs, Commissioner Naggar relayed his concem with respect to the front setbacks in the garage area, and the negative pedestrian impact if the setback did not allow enough room for vehicles to park in the ddveway without blocking the sidewalk. Senior Planner Fagan advised that the ddveway setback standards were part of the cdteria specified in Specific Plan, which had already been adopted. In response to Commissioner Naggar's querying, after additional investigation of the previously approved exhibits, Assodate Planner Donahoe relayed that a minimum 18- foot ddveway setback (measured from the curb, or the sidewalk) would be permitted on the senior project. For informational purposes, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks noted that the sidewalk would be six feet wide, inclusive of a six-inch curb. Senior Planner Fagan noted that the vadant in the measuring of the setback (from the curb, or the sidewalk) was due to the streets in the subdivision solely installing sidewalks on one side of the street, and that the dwellings without sidewalks, therefore, would be measured from the street. For Commissioner Fahey, Associate Planner Donahoe confirmed that the standards associated with the sidewalks and setbacks had already been approved in the Specific Plan; and clarified that approval of this project would be based on the development providing a senior community, noting that if the applicant decided to allow non-senior residents, there would most likely be a required design change. Attomey Cudey specified that the Specific Plan cdteda for this particular project would be limited to accommodating senior residents, noting that if the applicant elected to allow non-senior occupancy, at that time the applicant would have to come back to the City to modify the approval; advised that the land use entitlements were enforceable; and noted that a Condition could be added requiring that any modifications in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) of the property be reviewed by the City Attorney pdor to becoming effectual. At this time Chairman Guerdero closed the public headng. Although the lot sizes were small, Commissioner Naggar relayed that he could support the reduced lot sizes since the project was designed as a senior community; and recommended that the ddveway setback standard be revised to maintain a minimum of 20 feet. For Commissioner Naggar, Attorney Cudey advised that the most appropriate time to have modified the setback standard would have been when the Specific Plan was presented and appreved; noted that the subdivision proposed at this time did not incorporate the design elements; relayed that it could be recommended that the applicant attempt to extend the length of the setback, if possible; and provided additional information regarding the adoption of a Specific Plan. Commissioner Naggar queried whether the Commission's purview was inclusive of regulating the densities within the specified range. PlenC~xlllNmiml~es/111111 Attomey Cudey advised that if the Commission could make a finding that this particular project was not in compliance with the approved Specific Plan, it would be within the purview of the Commission to deny, or Condition the project regarding that matter, and relayed that the finding in the staff report (of record) stated that fie project was within the parameters of the stipulated densities. For clarification, Senior Planner advised that the denoted density specified in the proposal was the minimum density proposed for the subdivision. Commissioner Webster, echoed by Commissioner Fahey, recommended that there be an additional Condition of Approval (COA), stating that the CC&R's could not be amended or otherwise modified without the review of the City Attorney, in order to regulate the restricted senior-only occupancy, Commissioner Mathewson relayed concurrence with the above-mentioned additional COA; and with respect to the setback distance, requested staff to direct the applicant to stdve to maintain a minimum 20-foot front setback. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to approve staff recommendation, and to add the following additional Condition: PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0296 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 24136, AMENDMENT NO. 2) TO SUBDIVIDE A 99.8 GROSS ACRE PARCEL INTO 396 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND 21 OPEN SPACE PARCELS LOCATED NORTH OF DE PORTOLA ROAD, EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARKWAY AND SOUTH OF MONTELEGRO AND LEENA WAYS, WITHIN PLANNING AREA 8 OF SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219 (PALOMA DEL SOL) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 950-471-001 THROUGH - 021 AND 950-4724)01 THROUGH -026 AND 950473- 001 THROUGH -017 AND 9504814)01 THROUGH -015 AND 950-482-001 THROUGH -024 AND 950-020-004, - 027 AND -029. Add · A Condition stating that the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) associated with this project shall not be amended or otherwise modified at any time without the review of the City Attorney. The motion was seconded by Commission Mathewson and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PlanComm/minutes~111799 5. Planning Application No. PA97-0376 (Development Plan) Request to design and construct 152,000 square foot wholesale retail warehouse and associated gasoline station situated on a 16.24-acre site. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning Department that the Planning Commission deny the request. Via overheads, Project Planner DeGange provided a detailed overview of the project (of record), noting that this pafficular project was being proposed in two phases; highlighted site design, location, access, the location of the tire canter, landscaping, and architecture (inclusive of the enhanced articulation designed for the purpose of breaking up the massing of the building); relayed that the applicant and staff had worked for approximately a year on the proposal for this particular project, noting the applicanrs willingness to cooperate with staffs recommendations; for Commissioner Webster, provided additional information regarding Condition No. 9 (associated with regulating the outdoor display area); for Commissioner Mathewson, relayed that the gasoline sales area would solely sell gasoline; and specified that the tires sales area would be inclusive of two service bays; and provided additional information regarding the landscape screening of the bay doors. V~r~th respect to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Mitigation Monitoring Program for area No. 2, Commissioner Webster relayed his quedes regarding the lack of provisions for a Park and Ride Facility; and noted that sinca each Development Plan was required to provide a supplemental traffic analysis, recommended that for future projects staff forward that data to the Commission. In response to Commissioner Webster's query, regarding the requirement for the City to provide a Transportation Systems Management Program, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that the program was not available for review, noting that it had not been completed at this time. For Commissioner Mathewson, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks provided clarification regarding the relocation of the signal dudng Phase II of the project; referenced Condition No. 44 (per supplemental agenda material), relaying that left*out movements would be restricted; and advised that the project would be conditioned to install a raised median (denoted in Condition Nos, 43, and 44). In response to Commissioner Mathewson's queries, Mr. Bob Davis, traffic engineer representing the applicant, relayed that the existing facility was approximately 120,000 square feet, noting that due to the increase ln square footage (to 152,000 square feet) the proposed facility would generate twenty-six percant (26%) additional trips; and advised that in conjunction with the additional tdps generated from the gas sales area, the total increase would be approximately thirty-five percent (35%). In response to Chairman Guerdero's comments regarding the proposed raised median, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that there would be left-turning lanes installed in the 14-foot median area, noting there would be an attempt to maintain a INanComnfmlnutes/111/'11 minimum four-foot width in that specific area; and specified the portion of the median that would potentially be landscaped. For Chairman Guerdero, Senior Engineer Alegda relayed that the distance from Ynez Road to the restricted ddveway entrance would be approximately 600 feet. Mr. Peter Clement. architect rePresentinG the applicant. provided an overview of the proiect, addressing the followina: · Introduced the development team for this particular project. · Presented the site planning of the building footprint, specifying the location of the perimeter road around the building, the loading area, and the tire sales area. · Noted the access provisions at the site. Noted that the applicant was in the process of negotiating with the Regional Water Quality Board in order to obtain clearance for the Phase II proposed plan to cover the channel, and implement an additional access point at the future mall access mad. Provided further specification regarding the shippingreceiving area, specifying the truck access; and noted the limited deliveries and receiving times which take place pdor to the store opening due to Cosco operating their own depot facility. Presented an overview of the gas station access, relaying the designed provisions for the associated traffic movements. Mr. Mike Graer, landsceDe architect rePresentinG the applicant. relayed the followinG: Noted the applicant's efforts to develop a landscape plan consistent with the Specific Plan and Cosco's standards which was to install a low maintenance landscape plan with an aesthetically pleasing appearance. · Relayed that the project had exceeded the landscape requirements. Provided additional information regarding the proposed caffi-type outdoor eating area, inclusive of colored paving, pedestrian-scale lights, canopy treatments on the building, and additional landscaped planters separating the outdoor eating area from the driveway. · W'~h respect to the receiving area, highlighted the screening, inclusive of an approximate 8-foot wall, and the installation of evergreen pines. Spedfled the driveway treatments, inclusive of accent planting, and hedging (with the addition of trees) proposed around the perimeter of the parking lot; and relayed the proposed plan to screen the tire sales area. · Relayed the comer design landscape elements, consistent with the mall treatments. Mr. Clement continued his Drasentation. addressing the followinG: 6 PlanComrNminuteN111799 Specified the enhanced architectural detail treatment, inclusive of the tile inlay, the smooth-faced and split-faced block, and the cornice elements, designed to add visual interest. · Noted the additional architectural enhancements located at the tire center, inclusive of the peaked roofs, and the trelliswork. W~h respect to Condition No. 20 (regarding application, fees, and recordation) requested that the condition be modified to be required pdor to a Certificate of Occupancy, in lieu of pdor to the Issuance of Building Permits, noting that the Condition, as stated, would constrict the permitting schedule process. With respect to Condition No. 31 (regarding the Tentative Parcel Map) requested that the condition be modified to be required pdor to a Certificate of Occupancy, rather than pdor to Issuance of a Grading Permit, as stated. · With respect to Condition No. 18 (regarding bicycle racks) requested that the number of bicycle racks required be reduced to a minimum of 10~12. For Chairman Guerdero, Mr. Clement confirmed that this particular project would be similar in design to the Santa Barbara Cosco site. In response to Commissioner Fahey, Mr. Clement further specified the parking provisions; and relayed that if the applicant was restricted from the implementing the proposed channel improvements. that there would still be adequate provisions for parking. With respect to Chairman Guerdero's comments regarding the area at Ynez Road between the new mall access and Overland Drive, Mr. Clement initially relayed that the applicant would be agreeable to adding a 2-3 foot berm in order to reduce the visual impact from Ynez Road. Regarding the above-mentioned additional landscaping, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that there might be existing restrictions regarding the blocking of the view corridor, restricting the applicant from adding a ben-n; and advised that the project could be conditioned to add the additional berm per staff recommendation in order to investigate the feasibility of the recommendation. After additional discussion with the applicant's civil engineer, Mr. Clement relayed the restfictions that could potentially restdct the installation of a berm (in the area of discussion). For Commissioner Webster, Mr. Clement furlher specified the landscape planters in the gasoline sales area; and for informational purposes, relayed that it would be an unmanned gas station, by which gasoline would be purchased via the use of a membership card, followed by the use of a debit or credit card; for Commissioner Fahey. specified the hours of operation of the gas station from approximately 6:30 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.; relayed that there would be increased queuing, and four pump islands to alleviate the traffic impact due to the vast number of patrons who utilize the gas sales area; with respect to Commissioner Websters comments regarding if in the future there was traffic 7 PllnCQnlNminute~111711 impacting the mall perimeter mad due to the gas sales area, noted that the applicant would most likely install an additional pump island to mitigate that impact; specif'~ed the matedal of the canopy and comica elements at the gas sales area; provided additional information, with respect to the pop-out wall elements, and the fascia elements; and relayed that although there would not be a pedestrian pass (denoted in the Design Guidelines of the Spedtic Plan) installed, there would be additional width in the ddve aisles. Mr. Edc Armstrona, civil ericlinear rePresentinG the aoDlicant, presented the following3: W'rth respect to the Chairman Guerriero's recommendation to install a berm along Ynez Road, relayed that there was a proposed grass filter swale for storm water run-off, which would conflict with the installation of a berm; and for Commissioner Mathewson, further specified the location of the filter swale. W~th respect to Commissioner Mathewson's quedes regarding the permitting for the proposed channel improvements, noted that the applicant had received clearance from the Army Corps of Engineers, relaying that the permit (401 Permit) requires clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Control Board, noting that this clearance was in the process of being negotiated, specifying the issues at hand; and relayed that within a three-month pedod the applicant would be appdsed of the Regional Board's final conditions; and noted that the existing condition of the channel was growth due to hydroseed. W~th respect to Commissioner Mathewson's concams, Project Planner DeGange relayed that the project had been conditioned to architecturally screen the air conditioning units if there was visibility from the line-of-sight at Ynez Road. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Greer further specified the landscape plan with resped to the loading dock area, noting the proposal to install 15-gallon pine trees. W~th respect to Commissioner Mathewson's concams regarding adequately screening the loading area, Mr. Clement relayed that the applicant would be willing to add additional trees or larger-sized trees, if that was the desire of the Commission. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Clement noted that all of the lettered signage would be illuminated. Project Planner DeGange relayed that there were no required motorcycle parking spaces for this proposed project due to the project exceeding the overell parking requirements. Mr. Clement further specified the provi~i6n for handicapped parking, noting the approximate five-foot walkway. In response to Commissioner Fahey's queries regarding an aimmate plan if the applicant was restricted from installing the additional perking dudng Phase II of the project, the applicant relayed that there would be additional analysis conducted; and noted that the applicant would be willing to have the project conditioned to submit an additional landscape plan if the proposed Phase II plan was not implemented, as proposed. PlanComn~minutes/111799 The Commission relayed their concluding remarks. as follows: > Commissioner Fahey relayed that she could support the request to reduce the number of bicycle racks required (denoted in Condition No. 18); and recommended conditioning the project to submit an additional landscape plan if the Phase tl plan was not implemented. > Commissioner Mathewson applauded staff and the applicant for the excellent work associated with the architectural articulation which effectively served to break up the mass of the building; and recommended that additional landscaping be added in the following areas: 1) the loading dock, 2) the gas station area, and 3) along the northern elevation adjacent to the perimeter road; concurTed with the request for a reduction in the bicycle racks requirement, and the request to revise Condition Nos. 20, and 31 (to revise the conditions to be required to Pdor to a Certificate of Occupancy); and relayed his support of the project. ,.- Regarding the Planning Application, Commissioner Webster relayed the following comm.ents: with respect to the gas station, relayed concern regarding the lack of parking prows~ons if this area was utilized dudng Phase I; with respect to the east elevation, recommended the addition of additional pop-out elements to improve the continuity; with respect to the west elevation, specifically, at the tire installation area, recommended replacing the vertical cimies with tile detail; requested that staff review the size of the tdm and fascia details in relation to the size of the building to ensure that the articulation was adequately substantial; and within the parking lot area, requested staff to ensure that there would be adequate shopping cart provisions. .- With respect to the CEQA portion of the project, Commissioner Webster relayed that he could not make a finding of consistency due to the outstanding issues with the Mitigation Monitoring Program; recommended continuing the project until these issues had been addressed; for Commissioner Naggar, relayed that there were specific Mitigation Measures required for the Specific Ran that had not been implemented; noted that the Mall, the Power Center, and the Cosco development projects compdse the majodty of the Specific Plan, advising that he could not make a finding of consistency due to the Mitigation Measures not being addressed at any of the aforementioned sites; for Senior Planner Fagan, specified his concerns, as follows: the lack of provisions for a Park and Ride facility, and a Trenspodation Systems Management Program. The following discussion ensued reaardincl Commissioner Webster's comments: With respect to the Transportation System Management Program, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that the standard procedure was for the employer to provide the alternate transportation program after the onset of operation; specified that the plan had been prepared for the Mall site, and the Power Center site, relaying that it would be prepared for the Cosco development at a future point in time; and recommended that the project be conditioned to submit a Transportation Management Program pdor to an Issuance of a Building Permit. For Commissioner Fahey, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that there was property located east of this site within the Specific Plan which could be utilized for a Park and Ride facility at a future point in time; relayed that a portion of the Mall site could 9 PtlnComnl/mlnuteW111711 be fenced off for provision of a Park and Ride fadlity; and confirmed that there were alternate project sites that could fulfill the provisions of a Park and Ride Facility within this Specific Plan. For information purposes, Attomey Cudey advised that while the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) did roterance the existence of a Park and Ride fadlity pending, it did not appear to require the fadlity as a mitigation measure; noted the lack of dadty with respect to requidng implementation of a Park and Ride Center, and relayed that the clear requirement was for a future Transit Transfer Station. Referencing Mitigation Measure No. 27, Commissioner Webster advised t~at the Transportation Management Program had been required to be submitted pdor to or concurring with development approval. W~h respect to the Park and Ride fadlity, Commissioner Webster relayed that the major tenants have filled the Specific Plan Area, noting the limited available options for resolving the traffic impact for the projects; and advised that while the language of the mitigation measures lacked specifidty, it was his interpretation of the document that there should be a Park and Ride fadlity implementation plan at this point in time. in response to Commissioner Fahey's comments, Commissioner Webster reiterated the requirement for a Transportation Management Program to be submitted pdor to or concurring with development approval. Referencing Mitigation Measure Nos. 27 and 27.3, regarding the specific process, Senior Planner Fagan relayed the language referencing review and approval of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plans, stating mitigation milestone prior to the Issuance of Building Permits, advising that the language would adequately address this issue. With respect to Commissioner Naggar's quedes regarding the Park and Ride Facility, Attorney Cudey relayed the vagueness of the language with respect to this pafficular issue; and advised that there was a requirement for the provision of a future development of a Transit Transfer Station, raitemting that the requirement states that provisions be made (i.e., a comprehensive plan). Commissioner Webster relayed that he had addressed the aforementioned EIR issues at the time the initial mall site plans were submitted; and, additionally, specified that the City was required to provide a Transportation Systems Management Program to be implemented. For Commissioner Webster, Associate Planner Donahoe relayed that per discussions with Senior Engineer Moghadam, it had been noted that the mall site was not a desirable location for the Park and Ride facility due to the mall site's existing attraction of traffic; and for informational purposes, relayed that there was an existing facility located at Winchester Road and Ynez Road. For Commissioner Naggar, Attorney Cudey relayed that he could not advise the Commission as to whether the Mitigation Measures had been met; and advised that the Commission could rely on the Public Works Department for that information. lo Plancomm/mlnutes/111791 With respect to the Park and Ride fadlity referenced (located on Winchester and Ynez Roads), Commissioner Webster relayed that this fadlity was not located within the Specific Plan Area. Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that staff would need to provided further investigation to address Commissioner Webster's concams; with respect to the Transportation Systems Management Program, advised that there was an existing bus system within the City, inclusive of a bus turnout at the mall site; noted that a separate consultent had been hired to address the mitigation issues for this project, relayed that staff could obtain additional information via additional investigation; and relayed that at this time Commissioner Webster's comments could not be specifically addressed. The Commission's concludina remarks continued. as follows: > Commissioner Webster recommended continuing the proposed project in order for staff to address the previously discussed concams. ,- Commissioner Naggar relayed that he could support continuing the project in order for staff to obtain additional information; commended the applicant for his cooperation in working with the City to develop the proposed project; and commented on the asset that this particular project would provide by reducing the vehicle trip generation on W~nchester Road by 6,000 trips. Attomey Cudey advised the Commission that if the projed was to be continued. that the Commission relay their comments regarding the request to revise the COA's in order for staff to bring back the amended conditions. ,.- Relaying all due respect to Commissioners Webster and Naggar, Commissioner Mathewson relayed his opposition to continuing this project due to the issues of concam not being specifically associated with this particular development; recommended that the issue of provision of a Transportation Systems Management Program be conditioned to be provided pdor to the Issuance of Permits; and with respect to the Park and Ride facility, recommended that staff address that matter, and then bdng back to the Commission the location and timing specification of the implementation of the development of the facility. > Relaying concurrence with Commissioner Mathewson's comments, Commissioner Fahey relayed that it was not appropriate to condition this particular project with respect to the Park and Ride fadlity; and concurred with conditioning the project with respect to the Transportation Management Plan. Mr. Clement relayed concurrence with Commissioner Mathewson's and Fahey's comments. - - > With respect to the revised Condition No. 43 (denoted on the supplemental agenda material) Chairman Guerriero recommended that the term landscapecf median be added back into the Condition, which had been deleted, noting the need for landscaping in that area; and requested that staff work with the applicant to stdve to install additional landscaping on Ynez Road, and the mall access road. 11 IqanCemm/mlnutes/111 For Commissioner Naggar, Attomey Cudey reiterated the requirement in the Monitoring Mitigation Program for orovision for development of a future Transit Transfer Station, which was identified i~ :~njunction with a future Park and Ride facility to be previded; and confirmed that st,s- .could address the issue at a future point in time in light of the remaining properties in this regional canter. MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to dose the public headng; approve staff recommendation, with the following modifications: additional landscaping (inclusive of trees) at the loading dock, additional screening around the gas sales area, decrease the bicycle rack requirement to a minimum of 12 bicycle racks, incorporate the revisions to Condition Nos. 20, 31, 43, and 44 (per supplemental agenda material), add an additional condition conditioning the project to submit a landscape plan if the Phase II proposal was not implemented, as pmposeq, and add an additional condition conditioning the project to submit a Transportation Systems Management Plan pdor to Certificate of Occupancy. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion. (This motion was revised in order to add additional conditions). Commissioner Mathewson recommended that the project be conditioned to screen the loading dock with the assurance that the area would be completely screened. With respect to the Planning Application, Commissioner Webster reiterated his recommendation that the east elevation be improved with additional pop-outs, and that the roof element above the tire installation area be modified per staff recommendation. Commissioner Webster relayed his opinion that this padicular project was not consistent with the EIR. AMENDED MOTION: Commissioner Fahey moved to close the public headng; and to approve staff recommendation, with the attached modifications. PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0376, DEVELOPMENT PLAN - THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 152, 000 SQUARE FOOT WHOLESALE RETAIL WAREHOUSE AND ASSOCIATED GASOLINE STATION SITUATED ON A 16,24 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910-130-047, 910-130-052, AND 921-090-048. Add · Additional landscaping (inclusive of additional of larger-sized trees) at the loading dock in order for the area to be completely screened. · Additional landscape screening at the gasoline sales area. 12 PlanComm/minutes/1117119 · Add an additional Condition with language stating that the project submit a landscape plan if the Phase II plan was not implemented, as proposed. · Add an additional Condition with language stating that the applicant he required to submit a Transportation Systems Management Plan prior to a Certificate of Occupancy. · Add additional pop-out elements on the east elevation in order to improve the continuity. Modify · Revise Condition No. 18 to reduce the number of required bicycle racks to from 38 to 12. · Revise Condition Nos. 20 and 31 to be required prior to Certificate of Occupancy (which would revise the Condition Nos. to reflect Condition Nos. 49, and 50 due to the conditions being re-categodzed) · Revise Condition Nos. 43, and 44 as stated in the supplemental agenda material (proposed by the Department of Public Works). · Modify the roof detail elements above the tire installation area per staff recommendation, The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Webster who voted n__o. At this time the Commission heard the Public Comments portion of the Agenda. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Edward Lindsey, 42375 Camino Mereno, representing the Vintage Hills Planned Community Association Board, relayed his concern regarding Parcel No. 27 within the Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan ( inclusive of 15 acres, zoned Neighborhood Commercial) with respect to the location of the two proposed entrances off of Pauba Road due to traffic impact associated the location of the entrances. For Mr. Lindsey, Senior Planner Fagan clarified that the proposed location for the driveways were solely conceptual at this point in time, noting that the City had not received a development plan for this site; advised that the Public Works Department would review the access and circulation 'aspects of the project at the time the development plan was submitted; and relayed that there may not be a Neighborhood Commercial Project proposed at that site. At this time the Commission continued with the regular order of the Agenda, and heard the Planning Manager's Report. 13 PtanCmnn'VminuteW111711 PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT Senior Planner Fagan relayed that the criteda for the Findings of Convenience or Necessity associated with alcohol establishments would be presented to the Commission at the end of December, and relayed that there would be provision of a GIS map, denoting the existing alcohol uses within the City. With respect to the elements associated with the Traditional Neighborhood Design, Senior Planner Fagan relayed that there would be a presentation brought forward to the Commission in December or January. Senior Planner Fagan relayed that staff was in the process of preparing a presentation regarding Development Agreements which would be presented to the Commission in the spdng of 2000. With respect to Commissioner Webster's request that the traffic reports be included in the agenda material, Senior Planner Fagan relayed the technicel nature of the documents; and advised that the executive summary attached to the repod be considered for inclusion on the agenda material. In response to Chairman Guerdero's recommendation that a traffic accident report from the Police Departments associated with the specific area be included in the provision of material for development projects, Senior Planner Fagan relayed that he would furlher address the matter with Planning Manager Ubnoske. With respect to Commissioner Webster's recommendation to resolve the Mitigation Monitoring Program measures for the previously discussed Specific Plan, Senior Planner Fagan advised that staff would resolve the issues, updating the Commission with respect to clarification of the language and provisions for the Regional Center. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Due to his recent election to the City Council, Commissioner Naggar relayed the effective work of the Planning Commission due to their extensive review and discussion of important issues associated with the projects; commended Chairman Guerdero for his dynamic work in chaidng the Commission; and relayed that it had been a pleasure to serve on the Planning Commission. W~h respect to County Supervisors Buster's and Venable's recent decision to postpone the approval of the Johnson Ranch EIR until further discussion with the City of Temecula, Commissioner N'a~]gar commended the Supervisors for their action. Commissioner Mathewson relayed best wishes to Commissioner Naggar with respect to his recent election to serve on the City Council; and relayed that he looked forward to working with him in that capacity. For Commissioner Mathewson, Senior Planer Fagan relayed that the Wolf Creek Project would be presented to the Commission in mid-February; and advised that 14 PlanCQmm/mtnutes~l 117~1 the Rodpaugh Ranch Project was still in the process of being analyzed by the Council-appointed Ad hoc Committee. Chairman Guen'iero commended staff for their diligent efforts associated with the Cosco Project. Chairman Guen'iero applauded Commissioner Naggar for his recent election to the City Council; and relayed that he would be missed on the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT At 8:47 P.M. Chairman Guerriero formally adjoumed this meeting to an adjoumed regular meeting on Wednesday. December 8, 1999 at 6:00 P.M.. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula. Ron Guerdero, Chairman Debbie Ubnoske, Planning Manager 15 ITEM #3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 1999 Planning Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) Project Name: Holiday Inn Case Planner: Steve Griffin, AICP RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT A motion to continue PA99-0345 to the Planning Commission meeting of January 19, 1999 DISCUSSION: The Holiday Inn proposal was continued by the Planning Commission from the meeting of December 15, 1999, with direction for the applicant to provide plans for a proposed first phase of the project, as well as to address various concerns of the Commission dealing with landscaping, building enhancements and details, the construction of a secondary access point, the availability of meeting space, and signage issues. Many of these concerns or issues are related to the applicant's request of the Commission to authorize an increase in the FAR. As was explained and understood by all concerned at the time the item was continued, in order for staff to review the applicant's proposals and prepare a report and recommendation for the Planning Commission, we would have needed to have all of the new and revised plans and information in hand by December 21% or less than one week after the December 15th meeting. That did not occur, and thus we are recommending that this item be further continued to the meeting of January 19, 1999. We have informed the applicant that in order for staff to properly prepare for the meeting of January 19, 1999, we will need everything in hand by the end of the day on December 30th' F:\DEPTSXPLANNING\GriffinS\345PA99.HOliday Inn 1-5 Staff Repon.doc ITEM #4 Prepared By: RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 2000 Planning Application PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) Thomas K. Thornsley, Project Planner The Community Development Department - Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission: APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Willing Ramsey Planning Application No. PA99-0379 is a proposal to construct and operate a 5,000 square foot gas station/convenience market (Ultrmar) with a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken), on a 1.2 acre lot. Located on the south side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road. Site CC (Community Commercial) Site SP-7 (Retail Commercial) North: CC (Community Commercial) South: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) East: SP-7-(Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) West: SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) Promenade Mall North: Commercial Center South: Promenade Mall East: Power Center West: Krauses Sofa Factory (under construction) F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar,doc 1 PROJECT STATISTICS Total Project Area Net: Total Building Area Landscape Area: Paved Area: Hardscape: Parking Required: Parking Provided: Building Height: 52,272 square feet 5,000 square fee-'. 16,727 square feet 27,000 square feet 3,545 square feet 3,000 s.f. retail 700 s.f. dinning 5 spaces/1000 s.f. 10 spaces/1000 s.f. Total Required Parking 18'-25' 1.2 acre 9.6 % 32.0 % 51.6 % 6.8% 15 spaces 7 spaces 22 spaces 22 spaces BACKGROUND The application was formally submitted to the Planning Department on September 17, 1999. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meetings was held on October 21, 1999, and the applicant was provided with direction from staff to resolve site issues and enhance the architecture for consistency with the mall. The project was deemed complete on December 23, 1999. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing to build and operate a gas station/convenience market (Ultramar) with a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken). The project is located on Winchester Road, at the western major entry into the Promenade Mall, between Margarita and Ynez Roads. The proposed building is 5,000 square feet and includes a market and restaurant with 700 square feet of dining area and an outdoor patio. ANALYSIS Site DesiGn and Circulation The overall site is 1.2 acres with the building on the north side of the site backing up to Winchester Road. Surrounding the building on three sides of the property are Winchester Road to the north, the entry drive to the eastTand the Mall Ring Road to the south. There are two points of access to the site from the Ring Road, one of which is shared with Krauses Sofa Factory to the west. The pumping islands are located between the building and the Ring Road. Vehicle parking is provided adjacent to the mall access road and in front of the store. The drive aisle serving the restaurant goes behind the building and parallel to Winchester Road. Although this site design places the drive-thru along the roadway, the building orientation blocks the view of vehicles at the fueling islands and half of the parking spaces, The length of the drive- thru aisle is sufficient to achieve the required six vehicle stacking distance behind the menu board. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'i~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 2 Parkinq Analysis This project falls under the parking standards of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, which requires restaurants to provide 10 parking spaces per 1000 square feet of dining area and five parking spaces per 1000 square feet of retail. With 700 square feet of dining and 3,000 square feet of retail this project will require 22 parking spaces. Twenty-two parking spaces are provided. Architecture & Colors The building design utilizes architectural features found on the elevations of the mall such as wall finishes, roof elements and similar colors. The building is rectangular with angled tower/entry features to accent the building's entry points. Exterior walls around the building will be approximately 18 feet high with tower reaching 25 feet. The finish color of the stucco wall will be "Aspin" (beige) with accent bands and cornice capping finished in "Nubian Brown" (beige/tan). Along the base of the entire building will be a three foot band of tan split face concrete block veneer. Over the drive-thru and the windows will be metal awnings finished in "Tourmaline" (aqua). The gas canopy will be finished to match the building's colors and materials. Landscaping Three sides of this site are along roadways with landscaping that contribute heavily to the sites thirty-two percent (32%) landscaping. Additional landscaping is provided around the building, the patio and leading up to the storefront. Most of the perimeter landscaping is part of the mall master landscape design. All of the roadways are tree lined. Along Winchester Road are Tulip, Calabrain Pine, and Crape Myrtle trees. The mall entry drive is lined with Holly Oak and the Ring Road has California Pepper trees. At the base of the building will be a mix of scrubs and flowering plants surrounded by ground cover and tuff. The drive-thru lane runs along side of Winchester Road and is being screened with landscaping. A berm will be installed in the landscape buffer to provide additional screening of cars in the drive-thru and to help shield oncoming traffic from the glare of headlights. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project is categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) and a Notice of Exemption has been prepared for Planning Applications No. PA99-0379. Section 15332 applies to in-fill development projects on sites that: are less than five (5) acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with.applicable zoning; have no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; and that can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The affected area of the site development meet all of the criteria noted above, and therefore the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultnnar,doc 3 GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CONSISTENCY The project is consistent with the Community Commercial (CC) land use designation and the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) zoning applicable to the property in the Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Upon approval of the Conditional Use Permit as conditioned, the project will meet all of the guidelines and standards for commercial development prescribed by the Development Code and Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with applicable City policies, standards and guidelines. We believe it is compatible with the nature and quality of surrounding development, and will represent an attractive, functional and economic addition to the City's commercial and employment base. FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN The proposal, a gas station/convenience store with drive-thru restaurant service, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan (SP-7) development contained in the City's Development Code and the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The proposal, a gas station/convenience store with drive-thru restaurant service, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan (SP-7) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirernents of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site F:\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRP~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 4 improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence, in view of the record as a whole, before the Planning Commission at the time of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Commission renders their decision. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrrnar.doc 5 Attachments: 1. PC Resolution - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 11 Exhibit B. Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 22 Exhibits - Blue Page 25 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan D. Site Plan E. Elevation F. Landscape Plan G. Floor Plan F:\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar,doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99- F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'I~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 99-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT OF A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON 1.2 ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE WITH DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT SERVICE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCELS NO. 910-320-028 AND LOT E OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98- 0495 AND PARCEL MERGER PA99-0007. WHEREAS, Willing Ramsey, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0379, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0379 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0379 on January 5, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Applications No. PA99-0379; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0236 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal, to build and operate a gas station/convenience market (Ultramar) with a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken} on a 1.2 acre site, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan (SP- 7) development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety F:\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultnnar,doc 8 of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health. safety and welfare. Section 3. Conditional Use Permit Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0379 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010. E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal, to build and operate a gas station/convenience market (Ultramar) with a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken), is cOnsistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Specific Plan (SP-7) development cOntained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as cOnditioned is also cOnsistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7), the City Wide Design Guidelines,, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and building codes. B. The overall design of the project, is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements and will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, C. The site of this proposed conditional use is an in-fill site of an approved development plan. The development of this site adequate in size and shape to accommodate the building while meeting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Base on the type of use as proposed and as conditioned, will not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community E. The decision to approve the application for a conditional use permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the recOrd as a whole before the Planning Commission at the time of their decision. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the community have had a opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Commission renders their decision. - * Section 4. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0379 was made per the Califomia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in-fill development projects that meet certain prescribed cdteda. The subject site complies with these cdteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project. Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0379 for a Development Plan for the design, construct and operation of a gas station/convenience market (Ultramar) on 1.2 acre and a F:~DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRPT%379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 9 Conditional Use Permit to operate a drive-thru restaurant (Kentucky Fried Chicken), located on the south side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road, and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-320-028, Lot Eof Lot Line Adjustment PA98-0495 and Parcel Merger PA99-0007, and subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A (Development Plan), and Exhibit B (Conditional Use PerTnit), attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 4th day of August, 1999 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary F:\bEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.cloc 10 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 11 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Development Plan - Retail building for Utramar Gas and Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant) Project Description: A proposal to build a 5,000 square foot commercial building for gas/convenience market and restaurant with drive-thru services located on Out-lot "E" of the Promenade Mall, on the south side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road. Development Impact Fee Category: $2,00 per square foot (pursuant to the Development Agreement for the Promenade Mall Project PA96-0333} Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 910-320-001 January5,2000 January5,2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (46) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counseF, =qnd agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, adviso~j agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. F:\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 12 = This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D" (Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view. Per the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan the double detector check assembly must be installed underground. A six car stacking distance shall be maintained between the menu board and the entrance to the drive-thru aisle. Mounding shall be provided in the landscaping adjacent to the drive-thru aisle to provide additional shielding of vehicles and their headlights. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the Planning Manager the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan). Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of approved colors and materials and with Exhibit "H" (Color and Material Board) contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning Manager. Material Stucco walls painted to match Stucco cornice & color band to match Aluminum Storefront System Windows Split Face Concrete Block Veneer Canopies & Roof Color Omega #90, Aspin Omega #64, Nubian Brown Sherwin Willjams #SW1320, Tasteful Tan Ford's Vision Glass, Clear Orco Block Co., Nu-Fad Sherwin Williams #SW1468, Tourmaline As per The Promenade Outlot Developer Guidelines the storefront windows shall be Ford Blue or comparable. F:\DEPTS~LANNING\STAFFRPTLt79pa99 Ultrmar.doc 13 10. Lighting installed under the fueling canopy shall be flush mounted and shielded to eliminate stray light and glare. The under canopy lights for the fueling islands shall be recessed mounted and shielded to eliminate stray light and glare beyond the project site, 11. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 13. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, and H", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan, Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and submit five (5) full size copies and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "D" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "C", the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "H" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 15. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 16. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 17. An Administrative Development Plan application for s~gnage shall be required for any signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "E", or as amended by these conditions. a, A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits "D" and "E", or as amended by these conditions. 18. Bicycle racks shall be installed pursuant to the requirements of the Development Code. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP'i~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 14 19. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 20. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released. 21. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectodzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the intedor end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade. or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 22. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 23. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existin9 and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 24. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outsTde of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way, F:\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ullnnar.doc 15 26. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of- way. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 27. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 28. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 29. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 30. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 31. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOl) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 32. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Planning Department Department of Public Works Caltrens 33. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 35. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 16 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 36. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No, 207A. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos, 400. 401and 402. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. 37. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 38. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 39. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works Caltrans 40. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 41. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 42. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public right's-of-way. 43. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. F:~DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 UIb'mar.doc 17 44. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 45. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-3/M. 46. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 47. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 48. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 49. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 50. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 51. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 52. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the Building Official, to implement in the building design. 53, Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, 54. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 55. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 56. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 57. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 58. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 59. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 60. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'I~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 18 61. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-I. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ili- A) 62. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spacad at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 63. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 64. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and f~re protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 65. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 66. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 67. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 68. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 69, Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans D the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards, After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) F:~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 19 70. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identifi/fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 71. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) 72. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 73. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 74. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4) 75. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 76. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developedapplicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, fiammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) OTHER AGENCIES 77. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittel dated September 29, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 78. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control's transmittal dated November 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 79. The applicant shall comply with the rec~Fnmendations set forth in the Temecula Police Department's transmittel dated October 19, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 4, 1999, a copy of which is attached. F:~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 20 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPTL379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 21 'l September 29, 1999 Thomas Thornsley, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Ddve Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SEP 3 0 By SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL NO. 12 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 APN 910-320-007 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-,~79 Dear Mr. Thornsley: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCVVD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 99XSB:mr162~012-T6~FCF DAVID P. ZAPPE Gcncral Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of Temecula Temecula, California 92589-9033 A.ent,on: Ladies and Gentlemen: 10aS M.\RKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX 51180.1 The Oistdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases n ncorporated cities. The Distdct also does not lan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or offer flood hazard reports for su~cl~ cases. Dis~ct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific Interest to the District including District Master Draina e Plan facilites offer re ional flood control and draina · facilities which could be considered a logical componen~or extension of a master ~3~l~n s stem, and Distdct Area ~reinage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nsa~'usre is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any offer such issue: ~//' This proiect would not Pe impacted by Distdct Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional ~nterest proposed. This project involves Distdct Master Plan facilities. The District will acce t ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standPards and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection a~'d adm n stratve fees w be required. This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a Io ical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District woul~ consider accepting ownership ot such facilities on wntten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Distdct standards, and District plan check and inspection will be requir~l for District acceptance Plan check inspection and administrative fees will be required. _ check or money order on y to ~e Flood Control Distdct prior [o~ issuance of bud or grad n permits whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of~he actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water Resources Con[roll goard. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergen..cy Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain. then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other ~nformation r_equired to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the a plicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR) pdor to grading, recordation or offer final approva~PoPf the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR(; pdor to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a licant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. An'ny Corps of Engineers, or wdtten correspondence from these a encies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Cer~cation may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board pdor to issuance of ~e Corps 404 permit. STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer °ate: City of Temecula Temecula Police Department OCTOBER 19. 1999 RE: PA99-0379 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMs I; rJ: ULTRA MAR GAS STATION CASE PLANNER: THOMAS THORNSLEY Wlffi respect to the congfitiona of NIIxovd for the above referenced Project Transmittel, the foliowig conditions are subniMed by the Ternsouls PalIce Depwtntent regarding 'office and public safety' measures: 1. Appicant shall ensure all hedge~ end shrubbery surrounding the building be maintained at z height no greater than M-six (36) inches. 2. Appgcant shall m any trees suffoundlng the buHin9 m kept at a dam so as to dew roof a~e___~qbllity by wad*be burgIn. 3. AI pa~king lots, chlveways, and pedestrian walkways dudl be iguminated with a minimum mlab~dAed otis (1) foot-cancge of light Id Found lard, evenly dipsreed, eliminating all shadows. All exl~dor fighting fixtures dell be vandid resistant. NI exterior gghdng shall be controlMd by photocela, timers, or other me~ts to prevent cleecttvatlon by tm'tauthodzed parsons. 4. All exterior doors d have their own vandid res';tant igM fixture in;taaed above. ~ dos ~ be Iluminatad wITh a minimum naintalned one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. Ag exterior llghtjng fixtures must conform tO the decat of the eradot buld;ng. Any pubic telephone located ~n the extedor of the bm'l~Eng In the complex dell be placed In a weD-lighted, hlghly visible m and installed wiffi s 'CglI-OuT Only' feature to deter loitering. G. M doom, wlrdawa, Iociitg mecharlbms, hinges, ~ other fnlsceHaneous hardware shah be of commerdal er jn~itutional grade, 7. Any graffitt pained or marked upon the premises shall be removed or painted over willln twenty- four (24) houn of being discovered. 8, Provide b~d'u~l edclress on roof-top by Ghalklng out a grid 9" on Center a~l a height of pMnlJng nunlards with · stamharcl 9w paint Idler using florastarK yelow pint on nereid baRd-up roofs, slngle 9' width betwest1 nuInN'ids. Address shal be parallid to and faring the primary street, 9. All roof hatches shall ha painted 'lntematlonid Orange', 10. 8treeteddreslshdlbepost~linsvllblelocatlon. mkdmm12iocheslnhelght, on the street side nt fhe build'rag with a contraztlng background. 11. UFateoftheupgradlngoftheintafi~r, amodtm, ddmmsystemghagbelnstelledand m~rit~fed24~hma~daYbyaided~natedwivatedarmc~mpam/~t~n~1~fy1hePdiCeDepae1~entefany In~ualoa. AJI que~eons regerd'q ~ese condemns shal be referred to l~e Police DeD!rmmnt Clime PreventJan & Ptans section (9091 506-2626. TO: FROM RE: County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DATE: October 4. 1999 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~iARENCE HAhnmental Health Specialist CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA99-0379 I. Department of Environmental Health request infonnation concerning purveyors of water and se~er. This information should be displayed on the exhibit(s). The Department of Enviro~waental Health is unable to submit tentative recommendations untii receipt of the requested supplemental information concerning water and sewer availability. CH:dr (909) 955-8980 standlgdoc EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar,doc 22 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit - To operate a gasoline service station and drive-thru facility for a Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant) Project Description: A proposal to build a 5,000 square foot commercial building for gas/convenience market and restaurant with drive-thru services located on Out-lot "E" of the Promenade Mall, on the south side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 9'10-320-001 January 5, 2000 January 5, 2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in fudherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA99- 0379, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 23 6. The installation of the landscaping along Winchester shall be in substantial conformance with the site and landscape plans (Exhibits D & F) for the purpose of screening the view of the ddve-thru from the public right-of-way. Prior to the release for occupancy staff will assess the installation of the screening materials to verity that they provide the intended screening. Should the screening be deficient the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the developer to provide additional screening to meet the intent of the City's Design Guidelines. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 7. At the end of the first year of occupancy, and prior to the release of the Landscape Security Bond, the landscaping will be inspected for conformance with the screening requirement. Should replacement landscaping be needed the owner will be required to make these improvements. 8. The use of window signs will be limited to those permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance No. 98-10 and in no case shall more than 20% of the window areas shall be used for signage. OTHER AGENCIES 9. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated September 29, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 10. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control's transmittal dated November 11, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 11. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Temecula Police Department's transmittal dated October 19, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 12. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 4, 1999, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformanca with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed F:~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar,doc 24 A'I'rACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS F:\DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 25 CITY OF TEMECULA Project PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 VICINITY MAP F:~Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRpT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 26 CITY OF TEMECULA ,O000000( OOOO< EXHIBIT B DESIGNATION - SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) ZONING MAP EXHIBIT C DESIGNATION - CC (Community Commercial) PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 GENERAL PLAN F:\Depts~PLANNING~STAFFRP~379pa99 Ulbrnar.doc 27 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) EXHIBIT D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 SITE PLAN F:\Depts\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 28 CITY OFTEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) EXHIBIT E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 ELEVATIONS F:~Depts%PLANNING%STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 29 CITY OF TEMECULA f/ CE MAGAZINE .... ""~t~'c; ROAD --~ ~ DI~-TNRU RESTAUR&NT WINCHESTER ROAD PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) EXHIBIT F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 LANDSCAPE PLAN F:\DeptS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~379pa99 Ultnnar.doc 30 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit) EXHIBIT G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - January 5, 2000 FLOOR PLAN F:~DeptS\pLANNING\STAFFRPT%379pa99 Ultrmar.doc 31 ITEM #5 RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 2000 Planning Application No. PA99-0277 (Development Plan) Case Planner: Denice Thomas, Associate Planner The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA99-0277 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and 2. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0277 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. APPLICATIONINFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN: ZONING: LAND USE: PUBLICINPUT: Tim Shook Company, Inc. Tim Shook Company, Inc. The design, construction and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative building on a 1.01 acre parcel. The north side of Buecking Drive (41437 Buecking Drive) SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site) SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site) Subject: Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant To date the staff has received no public input on this application. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area: Building Area: Landscaped Area: Parking/Paved/Hardscape: Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio: Parking Required: 44,075 sq. ft. (1.01 acres) 13,064 sq ft (30% of site) 9,247 sq. ft. (21% of site) 21,764 sq. ft. (49% of site) .30 13,064 sq. ~.: 20 Vehicles, 4 Bicycles, \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docpC 1 Parking Provided: 48 Vehicle Spaces, 4 Bicycles Building Height: 21' (single story) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is for a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 1.01 acres located on the on the north side of Buecking Drive (41437 Buecking Drive). The building tilt-up concrete building is stucco finished with maroon accents. BACKGROUND This project was originally submitted with planning application number PA99-0278 that proposed to build two identical buildings side by side (planning application number PA99-0278 is scheduled for this meeting for your consideration). The applicant expressed an interest to have identical buildings for identification and recognition purposes. After numerous meetings with Staff the applicant has revised the elevations with enhanced architectural elements that renders this building unique from the adjacent building yet complementary. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans for the project on August 12, 1999. The project was deemed complete on December 15, 1999. ANALYSIS Site Design The project is located on the north side of Buecking Drive. Access to the site is provided from a single driveway located at the southwestern corner of the site. Parking for the project is located on three sides of the building (south, the west, and the north side). Loading doors have been placed at the rear of the building (northern elevation). The loading area is not visible from the street or the front of the site. An employee patio area is being provided in front of the building within the eastem portion of the site. The design of the site is compatible with existing development in the area. Access, Traffic and Circulation The parking in the front will primarily be utilized for customer parking. Trucks will access the loading areas in the rear of the building. Emergency vehicles have access to all parts of each building from the parking areas along the front, side and rear of the building. Architecture The applicant is adding visual interest and articulation to the elevations in order to help break up the building's mass. The project consists of a gray tilt-up concrete building, with a band of sandblasting, window appliques and maroon color as an accent on all elevations. The front entry for the building is highlighted with the use of a slight entry pop-out, a maroon steel accent gdd patter, scodng and maroon accent tiles. The landscaping within the planters around the fronts and outsides of the buildings compliment the building and help break up their massing. As proposed, the structure is compatible with the existing buildings in the area in terms of colors, materials, height, bulk and mass. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT~O277PA99.pC.docPC 2 Landscaping Twenty percent (20%) of the site has been landscaped which is consistent with the 20% minimum landscaping requirement in the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides a landscape planter around the entire perimeter of the site. Interior planters frame the walkway in front of the building, which provides some separation between the parking lot and the building. The project proposes the relocation of existing, mature sycamore tress, which will serve as street trees and provide some screening of the site. Traffic Analysis The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed project and calculated the expected traffic impacts anticipated from it's development, they have concluded that daily trips generated will not exceed what the General Plan Circulation Element anticipated for this site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0277 will be made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332. The proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons: · The site is 1.01 acres which is less than the 5 acres required · Although the lots immediately adjacent to the site are vacant the general area is developed with service commercial businesses (i.e.: Napa Auto Parts and FedEx) · The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species · The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services · The speculative building is being approved pursuant to the zoning and general plan designations for the site. Once a tenant is identified, they will have to meet the zoning, general plan, and conditions of approval associated with this application. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is SC (Service Commercial). Existing zoning for the site is SC (Service Commercial). A variety of commercial/retail and office uses are permitted within this zone, with the approval of a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and the Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all applicable City ordinances, standards, guidelines and policies. It is staffs opinion that the project is compatible with surrounding developments in terms of design and quality. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~277PA99.PC.docPC 3 FINDINGS The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC) Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in~ll site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711,2 of the Fish and Game Code. Attachments PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Exhibits - Blue Page 19 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Elevations G. Floor Plans H. Landscape Plan \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~:)EPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0277PA99,pC.docpC 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0277PA99,PC.docPC 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99o0277, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 13,064 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPECULATIVE BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUECKING DRIVE (41437 BUECKING DRIVE) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-272-020-1 WHEREAS, The Tim Shook Company, Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA99-0277 (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application, on January 5, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,199__. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,199__ by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRp'i~0277pA99.pC,docpC 6 Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary WHEREAS, the Tim Shook Company, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0277, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0277 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0277 on January 5, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the contusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0277; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference, Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0277 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC) Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and founci to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overell design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a 'manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an infill site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not individually or cumutatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3. Environmental Compliance, A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0277 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in~ll development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project. ~\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS~,PLANNING~STAFFRpT~0277pA99.pC.docpC 7 Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecuia Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0277 (Development Plan) for the design, construction and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 1.01 acres located on the north side of Buecking Drive (41437 Buecking Drive) and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-272-020-1 subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of January, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Ternecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January, 2000, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FSI01~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRp'I~0277PA99.pC.docpC 8 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC EXHIBIT A CITY OFTEMECULA CONDITIONS OFAPPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0277 -(Development Plan) Project Description: Construct and operate a 13,064 sq. ft. commercial speculative buildings on a 1.01 acre parcel DIF Category: Service Commercial Assessor's Parcel No: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 910-272-020-1 January5,2000 January 5,2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnity, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notity the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to whieh this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1~DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT~0277pA99.pC.docpC 10 The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. 7. All compact parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY." The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Primary wall: Secondary wall colors: Secondary wall colors: Sandblasted bands: Accenting and trim: Glass: Store Front: Reveals: Steel Accent Grid: Dunn Edwards 3005-Boulder Gray Dunn Edwards 3006-Winter White Dunn Edwards 3008-1cy Orbit Sandblasted Finish Dunn Edwards 3008-1cy Orbit Clear Anodized aluminum AC128N-Rich Burgandy AC128N-Rich Burgandy Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 11. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 12, The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H and I", (Site Plan, Grading Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and shall submit five (7) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1" copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "F", the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Deparb'nent - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRp'i~0277pA99.pC.docpC 11 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 13. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 14. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: B. C. D. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. 16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be propedy constructed and in good working order. 17. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee the maintenance of the landscape ptantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released. 18. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed re~ectodzed sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the_interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRP'F~0277PA99.PC.doCPC 12 In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 19. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 20. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or predse grading, including all on-site fiat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works pdor to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 23. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 24. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 25. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and ]3avement sections. 26. In compliance with National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, accommodate conveyance of onsite runoff through the landscaped area prior to discharge to Buecking Drive via the proposed undersidewalk drain. 27. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District b. Planning Department \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0277pA99.pC.doCPC 13 28. c. Department of Public Works The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject properly. 29. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 30. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 31. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 32. A reciprocal access and parking agreement with the adjacent property shall be recorded. 33. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: 34. d. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. e. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. The building pad shall be cartitled to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 35. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 36. As deemed necessary by the Department-of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 37. Rancho California Water District 38. Eastern Municipal Water District 39. Department of Public Works 40. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLI\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAI=FRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC 14 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 41. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 42. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 43. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 44. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 45. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-I/F-1. 46. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 47. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required, The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 48. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 49. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 50. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 51. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 52. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 53, Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code ADp. endix 29. 54, Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 55, Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with odginal signature on plans submitted for plan review. 56. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 57. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOLl~DEPTS%PLANNING%STAFFRPT%0277PA99,PC,docPC 15 58. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 59. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 60. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 61. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 62. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-I. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ill- A) 63. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 64. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 65. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC_9_02.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460) 66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 68. Pdor to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC 16 portion of an extedor wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 70, Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 71. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) 72. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 73. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) 74. Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 75. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 76. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4) 77. All manGal and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 78. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage \\TEMEG_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRP'r~0277PA99.PC,dOcPC 17 arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, fiammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) OTHER AGENCIES 80. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated August 6, 1999, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water Districts transmittal dated July 22, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 82. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated July 28, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 83. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the City of Temecula Police Department transmittal dated July 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.dOcPC 18 General Manager-Chief Engineer City of Temecula Temecula, California 92589-9033 Artantic.: P frI Ladies and Gentlemen: 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909/955-1200 909/788-9965 FAX RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR.OI ::' ..77 AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRIC/E,i~ :, Re: P/:t ctct-OZ77 The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The Distdct also does not lan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for suchP cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific ~nterest to the District including District Master Drsina · Plan facilities, other re ional flood contro and draina · facilities which could be considered a logical componenPor extension of a master ~n s stem. and Distdct Area ~rainage Plan fees (develol~ment mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general ns~Lsre is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: This prgject would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional roterest proposed. This project involves Dist~ct Master Plan facilities. The District will acce t ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District stan~lPards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project proposes channels storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be conmdered regional in nature and/or a Io ical extension of the adopted Master Dre nage P an The District would] consider accepting ownership of such tac~llUes on written reque of the Cty Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and D~st~ct plan check and inspection v~[ be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. check or money order only to ~e Flood Control Distdct prior [~of issuance of b!~ing or gradin permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of?he actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water Resources Con~ol ~oard. Clearance for grading recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the Cih/has determined that the project has been granted a perrot or s shown to be exempt f th s project involves a Federal EmergenCy Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other reformation required to meet FEMA occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a lieant to obta n a Section 160111603 Agreement from the CaPi~omia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~atar Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these a ancies indicating the proiect is exampt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Oe~cation may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e Corps 404 permit. STUART E. MGKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Date: ~' ' ~- ' fiCl Wa r PhiHip L Forbes Kenneth C. Desly July 22, 1999 Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 4~2S? ~:siness Park Dr!',,s Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL NO. 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23561-2 APN 910-272-020 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0277 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representati~/e at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT non,~p.E''¢''''''''C~ Development Engineering Manager 99~SB:mc192~F012-T1/FCF c: Laurie Willjams. Engineering Services Supervisor JUL 2 3 1999 By TO: FROM RE: ( 2ounty of Riverside (' DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON~IENTAL HEALTH DATE: July 28, 1999 CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT !~/? '~ i 7; '- -= ~ N: Patw Anders, ssistant Planner ', , _ _ [:. = .2, 'd ,: :: ,:: o tecialiN E "' ' ' st III PLOT PLAN NO. PA99-0277 l. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA99-0277 and has no objections. SanitaD' sewer and water services may be availabIe in this area. 2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBNIITTAL tbr heahh clearance. the following items are required: a) "xJ, rill-serve'' letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets ofpkms for each food establishment (to include rending machines) will be submitted. including a fixture schedule. a finish schedule. and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific retbrence? please contact Food Facility. Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022). c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055 ~vill be required indicating that the project has been cleared ~br: · Under~ound storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. · Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. · Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance w4th Ordinance # 651.2.) · Waste reduction management. d) A letter from the Waste Regulation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA). CH:dr (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered, can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance. Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials st~d3bl ,doc City of Temecula Temecula Police Department July 26, 1999 Planning Department PA99-0277 (Construction, design and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial building) Case Planner: Patty Andere The following conditions for the above referenced project is submitted. "Officer Safety" measures provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized police safety standards and training codes: 1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are maintained at a height no greater than thirty-six (36} inches. 2. Applicant shall ensure all trees on the property are maintained away from the building so as to deter roof accessability for suspect(s). 3. Additionally, p[ants, shrubbery and trees will be maintained in areas not designated for foot traffic. These areas will be maintained so as to have clear visibility by patrons and prevent concealment by suspect(s) to hide themselves both day/night time hours. 4. Light fixtures shall be installed to illuminate all parking areas, driveways, and pedestrian walkways. These areas shall be lit with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed across the surface, eliminating all shadows. All exterior light fixtures shall be vandal resistant and positioned so as not to produce glare. The installation of all exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. 5. Vandal resistant light fixtures shall be installed above all exterior doors and loading dock areas around the building. These light fixtures shall illuminate the door surface with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle of light at ground level evenly dispersed. All lights shall be in compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. 6. All exterior lighting shall be controlled by timers or other means that prevent the lights from being turned off by unauthorized persons. 7. Upon completion of the building, a 24-hour monitored alarm system shall be installed to deter unauthorized entry/burglary and to notify the Police Department of unauthorized intrusion. 8. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be of commercial or institutional grade. 9. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the facility shall be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a 'Call-Out Only" feature to deter loitering. 10. Street address shall be posted in a visible Iocation,-minimum 12 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. 11. All roof hatches shall be painted 'International Orange.' 12. Provide building address on roof, 48" high numerals, 9" wide strokes, traffic paint, color to contrast with roof surface orientation as shown parallel to and facing primary street. Any questions regarding these conditions can be referred to the Police Department;~'rirr~ P~ev~entionr& ~- Plans Section (909) 506-2626. ~, "; -~ ' --' ~ ''' ~ i" ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC 19 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99..0277 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 VICINITY MAP \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS'~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC 20 CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK CASE NO. - PA99-0277 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 ~\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'R0277PA99.PC.docPC 21 CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0277 EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 SITE PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\pLANNING\STAFFRp'~0277pA99.pC.aocpC 22 CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR TIM SHOOK COMPANY,/NC. PARCEL 8 PARCEL MAP NO. 2356~-2, BOOK 8 PAGE IN THE CITY OF IEMECULA, COUNI'~ OF RIVERSIDE, STALE OF CALIFORNIA ....... .~.,~..-".,-- , :; .....: ..,. {-_ .. , IL ,. ..... BUECK/NG DRIVE CASE NO. - PA99-0277 EXHIBIT- E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 GRADING PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS'~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.docPC 23 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0277 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 ELEVATIONS \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~0277PA99.PC.docPC 24 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0277 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 FLOOR PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1',DEPTS'~PLANNING\STAFFRP'I~0277PA99.pC.docPC 25 CITY OFTEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0277 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 LANDSCAPE PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.doCPC 26 ITEM #6 RECOMMENDATION: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION January 5, 2000 Planning Application No. PA99-0278 (Development Plan) Case Planner: Denice Thomas, Associate Planner The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 99- approving Planning Application No. PA99-0278 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein; and 2. ADOPT a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0278 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. APPLICATIONINFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN: ZONING: LAND USE: PUBLICINPUT: Tim Shook Company, Inc. Tim Shook Company, Inc. The design, construction and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative building on a 1.01 acre parcel. The north side of Buecking Drive (41397 Buecking Drive) SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site) SC Service Commercial (subject site and surrounding the site) Subject: Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Vacant To date the staff has received no public input on this application. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area: Building Area: Landscaped Area: Parking/Paved/Hardscape: Lot Coverage/Floor Area Ratio: Parking Required: 44,075 sq. ft. (1.01 acres) 13,064 sq ft (30% of site) 8,810 sq. ft. (20% of site) 22,201 sq. ft. (49% of site) .30 13,064 sq. ft.: 20 Vehicles, 4 Bicycles, \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~O278PA99.pC.docPC 1 Parking Provided: 48 Vehicle Spaces, 4 Bicycles Building Height: 21' (single story) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposal is for a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 1.01 acres located on the on the north side of Buecking Drive (41397 Buecking Drive). The building tilt-up concrete building is stucco finished with spruce green accents. BACKGROUND This project was originally submitted with planning application number PA99-0277 that proposed to build two identical buildings side by side (planning application number PA99-0277 is scheduled for this meeting for your consideration). The applicant expressed an interest to have identical buildings for identification and recognition purposes. After numerous meetings with Staff the applicant has revised the elevations with enhanced architectural elements that renders this building unique from the adjacent building yet complementary. The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the plans for the project on August 12, 1999. The project was deemed complete on December 15, 1999. ANALYSIS Site Desian The project is located on the north side of Buecking Drive. Access to the site is provided from a single driveway located at the southwestern corner of the site. Parking for the project is located on three sides of the building (south, the west, and the north side). Loading doors have been placed at the rear of the building (northern elevation). The loading area is not visible from the street or the front of the site. An employee patio area is being provided in front of the building within the eastem portion of the site. The design of the site is compatible with existing development in the area. Access, Traffic and Circulation The parking in the front will primarily be utilized for customer parking. Trucks will access the loading areas in the rear of the building. Emergency vehicles have access to all parts of each building from the parking areas along the front, side and rear of the building. Architecture The applicant is adding visual interest and articulation to the elevations in order to help break up the building's mass. The project consists of a biege tilt-up concrete building, with a band of sandblasting, window appliques, with khaki and spruce green color as an accent on all elevations. The front entry for the building is highlighted with the use of a slight entry pop-out, a spruce steel accent grid patter, scoring and spruce green accent tiles. The landscaping within the planters around the fronts and outsides of the buildings compliment the building and help break up their massing. As proposed, the structure is compatible with the existing buildings in the area in terms of colors, materials, height, bulk and mass. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278PA99,pC.docPC 2 Landscapinq Twenty percent (20%) of the site has been landscaped which is consistent witb the 20% minimum landscaping requirement in the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides a landscape planter around the entire perimeter of the site. Interior planters flame the walkway in front of the building, which provides some separation between the parking lot and the building. The project proposes the relocation of existing, mature sycamore tress, which will serve as street trees and provide some screening of the site. Traffic Analysis The Public Works Department has reviewed the proposed project and calculated the expected traffic impacts anticipated from it's development, they have concluded that daily trips generated will not exceed what the General Plan Circulation Element anticipated for this site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0278 will be made pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15332. The proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons: · The site is 1.01 acres which is less than the 5 acres required · Although the lots immediately adjacent to the site are vacant the general area is developed with service commercial businesses (i.e.: Napa Auto Pads and FedEx) · The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species · The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services · The speculative building is being approved pursuant to the zoning and general plan designations for the site. Once a tenant is identified, they will have to meet the zoning, general plan, and conditions of approval associated with this application. EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is SC (Service Commercial). Existing zoning for the site is SC (Service Commercial). A variety of commercial/retail and office uses are permitted within this zone, with the approval of a Development Plan pursuant to Chapter 17.05 of the Development Code. The project as proposed, meets all minimum standards of and is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and the Design Guidelines. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS The project has been determined by staff to be consistent with all applicable City ordinances, standards, guidelines and policies. It is staffs opinion that the project is compatible with surrounding developments in terms of design and quality. \\TEMEC_FS101~VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP'R0278PA99.PC.docPC 3 FINDINGS The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC) Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no fish, wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in~ll site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park. The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Attachments PC Resolution - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 9 Exhibits - Blue Page 19 A. Vicinity Map B. Zoning Map C. General Plan Map D. Site Plan E. Grading Plan F. Elevations G. Floor Plans H. Landscape Plan F:',DEPTS~PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC.docPC 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC.docPC 5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0278, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 13,064 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPECULATIVE BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUECKING DRIVE (41397 BUECKING DRIVE) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-272-021-2 WHEREAS, The Tim Shook Company, Inc, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0278 (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application, on January 5, 2000, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this __. day of Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of ,199__ by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278pA99.PC.dOcpC 6 Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary WHEREAS, the Tim Shook Company, filed Planning Application No. PA99-0278, in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA99-0278 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA99-0278 on January 5, 2000, at a duly noticed public headng as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission headng and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99-0278; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. FindingS. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA99-0278 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for (SC) Service Commercial development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for (SC) Service Commercial development contained in the City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the CityWide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, drculation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There is no fish wildlife or habitat on the project site, and the project will not affect any fish wildlife or habitat off-site. The site is surrounded by development and is an in~ll site. Furthermore, grading has already occurred at the site, which is a portion of a larger industrial park, The project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0278 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332. This Section allows exemptions for in~ll development projects that meet certain prescribed criteria. The subject site complies with these criteria and therefore the exemption can be applied to this project. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1~DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC.docpC 7 Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA99-0278 (Development Plan) for the design, construction and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial speculative buildings on 1.01 acres located on the north side of Buecking Drive (41397 Buecking Drive) and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-272-021-2 subject to the project specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of January, 2000. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January, 2000, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary \\TEMEC_FS101~VOLl\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC.docPC 8 EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~0278PA99.PC.docPC 9 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No: PA99-0278 -(Development Plan} Project Description: Construct and operate a 13,064 sq. ft. commercial speculative buildings on a 1.01 acre parcel DIF Category: Service Commercial Assessor's Parcel No: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 910-272-021~ January5,2000 January5,2002 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of seventy-eight Dollars ($78.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgements, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting. directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to wl~ch this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRpT~0278pA99.pC,docPC 10 The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Elevations), G (Floor Plans), and H (Landscape Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. 7. All compact parking spaces will be marked for "COMPACT CARS ONLY." The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "1" (Color and Material Board), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Primary wall: Secondary wall colors: Secondary wall colore: Sandblasted bands: Accenting and trim: Glass: Store Front: Reveals: Steel Accent Grid: 8231W-Sawyer's Fence 8233M- Crisp Khaki 8234M-Daplin Sandblasted Finish 8595D-Elm Court Clear Anodized aluminum 8595D-Elm Court 8595D-Elm Court Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 10. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 11. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department ~ Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 12. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E, F, G, H and I", (Site Plan, Grading Plan, Elevations, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board) to reflect the final conditions of approval that will be provided-by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and shall submit five (7) full size copies, one (1) reduced 8.5"xl 1" copy of Exhibits D through H, and two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of approved Exhibit "1" (Color and Materials Board) and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "P, the colored architectural elevations, to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS~DLANNING\STAFFRpT~0278pA99.pC.docpC 11 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 13. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 14. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identif~ the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: B. C. D. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 15. An Administrative Development Plan application for signage shall be required for any signage not included on Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage identified on the approved Exhibits "D" and "F", or as amended by these conditions. 16. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 17. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager, to guarantee the maintenance of the landscape plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Manager, the bond shall be released. 18. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'r'~0278PA99.pC,dOCpC 12 In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 19. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with pdor to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 20. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way, 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 23. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 24. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 25, A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 26. In compliance with National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements, accommodate conveyance of onsite runoff through the landscaped area prior to discharge to Buecking Ddve via the proposed undersidewalk drain. 27. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Planning Department \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRP'~0278PA99.PC.docPC 13 28. c. Department of Public Works The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 29. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 30. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 31. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 32. A reciprocal access and parking agreement with the adjacent property shall be recorded. 33. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: 34. d. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C,C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. e. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. g. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 35. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 36. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: 37. Rancho California Water District 38. Eastern Municipal Water District 39. Department of Public Works 40, The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works, \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1'OEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%0278PA99.PC.docPC 14 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 41. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrica~ Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 42. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 43. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 44. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 45. The Occupancy classification of the proposed buildings shall be B/S-I/F-1. 46. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 47. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the Califomia Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 48. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 49. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 50. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 51. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 52. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 53. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance witit the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 54. Provide an appreved automatic fire sprinkler system. 55. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans submitted for plan review. 56. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 57. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS~oLANNING\STAFFRpT~0278pA99.pC.dOcpC 15 58. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 59. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 60. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 61. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 62. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix Ili- A) 63. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix Ill-B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B) 64. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the building(s) is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, on site fire hydrants are required. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 65. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC~9.02.2.2.2.3 and Ord 460) 66. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVVV. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 68. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC.dOCPC 16 portion of an extedor wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVVV with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. ( CFC sec 902) 69. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 70. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2,2.4) 71. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 ) 72. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identifi/fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 73. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building. The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6) inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (CFC 901.4.4) 74. Pdor to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 75. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 76. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Qccupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the dght side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised by the alarm system. (CFC 902.4) 77. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 78. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing' high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS~PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC,doCPC 17 arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81 ) 79. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, fiammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) OTHER AGENCIES 80. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated August 6, 1999, a copy of which is attached, The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 81. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water Districts transmittal dated July 22, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 82. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated July 28, 1999, a copy of which is attached. 83. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the City of Temecula Police Department transmiftal dated July 26, 1999, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant Name \\TEMEC_FS101WOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278pA99.PC.docpC 18 u~v tur. · Gener~ Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CgNTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRIC'I 1995 MARKET'STREET , ~ RIVERSIDE, CA 9250 I ll,7',' ~ ~ i~: ,' ~' ,90'p/955-1200 ~,.,., r, r..; _:, 2 ~ !- , City of Temecula Plannin De artment Post O~lce ~)Zx 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: eft 9 9 ' 0 'L,"7 ~' The Distdct does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in ~ncorporated cities. The District also does not lan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for suchp cases· Disthct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific ~nterest to the Disthct including District Master Draina e Plan facilities, other re ional flood control and draina · facilities which could be considered a I~:Jical componenPor extension of a master ~n s stem and Disthct .Area 15rainage Plan fees (development m tigation fees). n addition, information of a general ns-~/usre is provided· The Disthct has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply Disthct approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard public r health and safety o any other such issue: This prp~ect would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional ~nterest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will acce t ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Disthct standPards, and Disthct plan check and inspection will be required for Disthct acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that COuld be considered regional in nature and/or a Io ical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would] consider accepting ownership of such fac4ht~es on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and DIstrict plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of?he actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project ma re uire a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES permit from the State Water Resources ConSUl $oard. Clearance for grading, reCOrdation, or other final approva?should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this pro'oct involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require ~e applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other ~nformation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMRI prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is im acted by this project, the City should require the a licant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Ca~i~omia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean P~ater Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these a encies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quail Cert~cetion may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of ~e Corps 404 permit· STUART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer Wmr Linda ,M. Fre~oso July 22, 1999 Ms. Patty Anders, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL NO. 7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 23561-2 APN 910-272-02! PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0278 Dear Ms. Anders: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 99~S8:rncl 93'$012-TI/FCF c: Laude Witliams, Engineering Services Supervisor TO: FROM RE: dounty of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONI~IENTAL HEALTH CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLOT PLAN NO. PA99-0278 III The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA99-0278 and has no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services may be available iu this area. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance. the following items are required: a) "XVill-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include rending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule. and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 694-5022). c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 694-5055 ~ill be required indicating that the project has been cleared Ibr: · Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. · Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. · Emergency Response Plans Disclosure (in accordance x~dth Ordinance # 651.2.) · Waste reduction management. d) A letter from the Waste Re,relation Branch (Waste Collection/LEA). CH:dr (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered. can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health Clearance. CO: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials stsd3bl .doc City of Temecula Temecula Police Department July 26, 1999 Planning Department PA99-0278 (Construction. design and operation of a 13,064 square foot commercial building) Case Planner: Patty Anders The following conditions for the above referenced project is submitted. "Officer Safety" measures provided in accordance with City of Temecula Ordinances and/or recognized police safety standards and training codes: 1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are maintained at a height no greater than thirty-six (36) inches. 2. Applicant shall ensure all trees on the property are maintained away from the building so as to deter roof accessability for suspect(s). 3. Additionally, plants, shrubbery and trees will be maintained in areas not designated for foot traffic~ These areas will be maintained so as to have clear visibility by patrons and prevent concealment by suspect(s) to hide themselves both day/night time hours. 4. Light fixtures shall be installed to illuminate all parking areas, driveways, and pedestrian walkways. These areas shall be lit with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed across the surface, eliminating all shadows. All exterior light fixtures shall be vandal resistant and positioned so as not to produce glare. The installation of all exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Mr. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. 5. Vandal resistant light fixtures shall be installed above all exterior doors and loading dock areas around the building. These light fixtures shall illuminate the door surface with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. All lights shall be in compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. 6. All exterior lighting shall be controlled by timers or other means that prevent the lights from being turned off by unauthorized persons. 7. Upon completion of the building, a 24-hour monitored alarm system shall be installed to deter unauthorized entry/burglary and to notify the Police Department of unauthorized intrusion. 8. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be of commercial or institutional grade. 9. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the facility shall be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "Call-Out 0nly" feature to deter loitering. 10. Street address shall be posted in a visible location-. minimum 12 inches in height, on the street side of the building with a contrasting background. 11. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 12. Provide building address on roof, 48" high numerals, 9" wide strokes, traffic paint, color to contrast with roof surface orientation as shown parallel to and facing primary street. Any questions regarding these conditions can be referred to the Police Plans Section (909) 506-2626. L n ATTACHMENT NO. 2 EXHIBITS R:\STAFFRPT~0277PA99.PC.doCPC 19 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT - A PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 VICINITY MAP \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRpT~0278pA99.pC.dOCpC 20 CITY OF TEMECULA ,:,:,:,:,:,:,:-:-:*:-:*:*:-:-:*:*:*:-:-:, EXHIBIT B - ZONING MAP DESIGNATION - LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EXHIBIT C - GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION - BP BUSINESS PARK CASE NO. - PA99-0278 PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT%0278PA99.PC,docPC 21 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT- D PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 SITE PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING\STAFFRPT~0278PA99.PC,docPC 22 CiTY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR' TIM SHOOK COMPANY IN~. PAR'GEL 7 PAR'GEL MAP NO. 23561-2, ~OK 8 'AGE IN THE CI~' OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RlY['RSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA .......................... .__.T...~'~.,t ,,,~'~ '_"_' J !. ';:".L I.t,::'l 8UECKING DRIVE' CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT- E PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 GRADING PLAN \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\pLANNING\STAFFRpT~0278pA99.pC.dOCpC 23 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT - F PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 ELEVATIONS \\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING~STAFFRP"~0278PA99,PC.docPC 24 CITY OF TEMECULA CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT - G PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 FLOOR PLAN ~TEME C_F8101 ~VOL 1 ~DEPTS\PLANNI NG~STAF FRP'~0278PA99. PC.decPC 25 CITY OF TEMECULA BUECKING CASE NO. - PA99-0278 EXHIBIT - H PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - JANUARY 5, 2000 LANDSCAPE PLAN %\TEMEC_FS101\VOL1\DEPTS\PLANNING%STAFFRp"I~0278pA99.pC.docpC 26 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] In compliance with the Amedcans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 6946444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 5, 2000 - 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS Commissioner Fahey Fahey, Mathewson, Webster, Guerriero Next in Order: Resolution: No. 2000-01 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item no__t on the Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Approval of A.qenda - APPROVED 4-0 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of January 5, 2000. R:~PLANCOMM~Agendas~2000\I-5-O0 new.doc 1 2 Minutes - APPROVED with changes 4-0 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 17, 1999. COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. 3 Plannin~ Application No. PA99-0345 (Development Plan) - VCL Construction (located at the east side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho Califomia Road - portions of Parcels 1.2, 3, & 6 of Parcel Map 23882, to construct a 137 room, 59,950 square foot, 3-story Holiday Inn Express Hotel - Project Planner Steve Griffin) - Continued from the December 15, 1999, Planning Commission meetinQ - APPROVED FOR CONTINUANCE TO JANUARY 19, 2000 (4-0) RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Continue to this item to the Planning Commission meeting of January 19, 2000. 4 Plannine Application No. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan) - Willing (Buck) & Lynne Ramsey (located at the south side of Winchester Road, midway between Ynez Road and Marearita Road, on Pad E at the Promenade Mall - APN910- 320-028 - Project Planner Thomas Thornsley) - CONTINUED TO JANUARY 19, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA0379 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A 5,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON 1.2 ACRE AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE WITH DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT SERVICE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-320-028 AND LOT E OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT PA98-0495 AND PARCEL MERGER PA99- 0007 R:\PLANCOMM~Agendas%2000\1-5-00 new,doc 2 4.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0379 (Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Plannina Application No. PA99-0277 (Development Plan) - Tim Shook Company, Inc. (located qenerallv east of the Jefferson Avenue/Bueckinq Drive intersection on the north side of BueckinQ Drive - 41437 Bueckin¢~ Drive - in the City of Temecula) - Associate Planner Denice Thomas - APPROVED 4-0 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0277, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF A 13,064 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPECULATIVE BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUECKING DRIVE (41437 BUECKING DRIVE) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-272-020-1 5.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0277 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines; 5.3 Approve the Development Plan. Planning Application No. PA99-0278 (Development Plan) - Tim Shook Company, Inc. (located Qenerallv east of Jefferson Avenue/Bueckincl Ddve intersection, on the north side of Bueckincl Drive - 41397 Bueckincl Drive - in the City of Temecula) - Associate Planner Denice Thomas - APPROVED 4-0 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2000-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA99-0278, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND OPERATION OF A 13,064 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL SPECULATIVE BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BUECKING DRIVE (41397 BUECKING DRIVE) AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-272-021-2 6.2 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA99-0278 pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines; R:\PLANCOMM%Agendas~2000\I-5-00 new.doc 3 6.3 Approve the Development Plan. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS PLANNING MANAGER'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: January 19, 2000, 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Ddve, Temecula, California. R:%PLANCOMM%Agendas~000\I-5~)0 new.doc 4