Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout051297 CSC AgendaAGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION TO BE HELD AT TEMECULA CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY 12, 1997 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: FLAG SALUTE: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS: Chairman Jack Henz Commissioner Edwards Comerchero, Edwards, Miller, Nimeshein, Henz Temecula's First Police Dog "Tango" and Tango's Handler Officer Joe Nardone PUBLIC COMMENTS: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an item not listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Community Services Commission Secretary before the item is addressed by the Commission. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. DIVISION REPORTS COMMISSION BUSINESS Ai~proval of the Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of the April 10, 1997 Community Services Commission meeting. TCSD Levy/Special Tax/Budget FY1997-1998 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file this report. Trail System Interl2retive Pla<;lues RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the Community Services Commission approve the inclusion of interpretive plaques in the City-wide Multi-Trail System Master Plan. Historical Preservation RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file this report. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER REPORTS ~:\CSCAGE~D~,0~I297. CSC 2 May 5, J 997 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING MAY 12, 1997 ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to the meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services Commission to be held on Monday, June 9, 1997, 7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. P~\CSCAGEND~051297.CSC 3 May 5, 1997 ITEM NO. MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMONITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT HELD MONDAY, APRIL 14, 1997 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services Commission was held on Monday, April 14, 1997, 7:00 P.M, at the Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jack Henz. Commissioner Comerchero led the flag salute. PRESENT: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Miller, Nimeshein, Henz ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None Also present were Community Services Deputy Director Herman Parker, Maintenance Superintendent Bruce Hartley, Development Services Administrator Phyllis Ruse and Administrative Secretary Gail Zigler, PRESENTATIONS The Community Services Commission presented a Certificate of Appreciation to the following individuals for their work on the Measure "C" campaign: Council Member Jeff Stone Commissioner Jeff Comerchero Darrell Connerton The CRC Foundation Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Chairman Henz declared a recess at 7:20 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:28 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS None DIVISION REPORTS Recreation Superintendent Julie Pelletier reported the following: The annual Spring Egg Hunt event was held at three locations this year. Approximately 2,000 residents participated at the Sports Park and Paloma Del Sol Park, and 100 at Rotary Park The Swing and Jitterbug Dance Contest and the Temecula Pizza Champ Contest was held this past Saturday. There were approximately 50 contestants participating in this years dance contest. There were six pizza R: \minutes\031097. csd restaurants participating in the pizza contest. The spring swimming program starts this weekend at the Community Recreation Center Pool. Development Services Administrator Phyllis Ruse reported the following: Staff is currently looking at some different roller hockey systems for the new roller hockey rink which will be built as a part of the overall master plan for Margarita Community Park. Staff is looking at a company out of Canada which has a better system which will be easier for staff to maintain. Additionally, staff will be asking the City Council to approve lighting the ballfields at Temecula Elementary School, as part of the construction project. The fire station grand opening is scheduled for the end of May, 1997. Commissioner Comerchero asked if the roller hockey rink at Margarita Community Park has been moved to Phase I. Phyllis Ruse explained that the roller hockey rink has been added to Phase I as an add alternate. This project will go out to bid sometime in June. Maintenance Superintendent Bruce Hartley reported the following: The landscaping at the Park View Fire Station is complete. Staff completed the landscape inspections during the construction of this project. The City of Temecula will be maintaining the perimeter landscaping around the Temeku Golf Course. Staff is currently working with a consultant to develop lighting plans and specs for a tree lighting system at the Temecula Duck Pond. Staff will be renovating the turf at the Temecula Duck Pond. Staff has been working on the water quality at the Temecula Duck Pond. They will continue to look at alternatives for improving the water quality. Commissioner Edwards asked if staff can stop the erosion of the dirt bank around the pond. Superintendent Hartley stated that staff just completed a soil test and as part of the Phase II improvements, staff is looking at a concrete wall around the perimeter of the pond's edge. Staff anticipates going out to bid sometime in June, 1997. R:\minutes\O31097.csd COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. Approval of the Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Edwards, seconded by Commissioner Comerchero to approve the minutes of the March 10, 1997 Community Services Commission as prepared. The motion carried as follows: AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Miller, Nimeshein, Henz None None 2 Temecula Valley Museum Deputy Director Herman Parker presented the staff report. Rick Busenkell, Temecula Valley Museum Board Member, provided the Commission with a history of the Museum and the plan for the operation of the new Museum currently under construction at Sam Hick's Monument Park. Tony Tobin, founder of the Temecula Valley Museum, provided additional background information on the formation of the museum, an update on the construction progress, and exhibit plans. Commissioner Comerchero asked if the museum foundation is willing to take an active role in preserving the history of the City or will their direction be with the operation of the museum itself. Commissioner Comerchero said the Commission as a whole is concerned about the preservation of historical sites in the City. Mr. Busenkell discussed preservation of the Louis Wolfe grave site. Mr. Busenkell said that the crypt is on private property and the status and ownership of that land would have to change in order for the museum to assist with the preservation of the crypt. Mr. Busenkell said he would personally like to see the Temecula Valley Museum Board take a more active role in preserving historical sites in the City of Temecula. He added that the museum foundation and the Board of Directors are all volunteers. Commissioner Nimeshein said that many cities have formed historical societies to address the preservation of history within their cities. He suggested that the museum should define their role in preserving the history of Temecula in writing. Tony Tobin said the museum's official role is in preserving historical artifacts. R:\minutes\031097.csd Commissioner Miller asked if there is anything the Museum Foundation can do to assist in the preservation of the Louis Wolf grave site. Tony Tobin said the Louis Wolf grave site will always be where it currently exists. Because of the Indians strong beliefs, and Indians are buried there, the crypt cannot be moved. Mr. Tobin said possibly the City and/or the family can have the land designated as a cemetery. Deputy Director Parker said staff has investigated this alternative with the County and they have stated the site must have a minimum of six people buried to be designated a cemetery. He added that the County has forwarded the proposal on to the State and the City is waiting to hear from the State on whether or not they will designate the property as a cemetery. This report was receive and file. Community Services District Levy Process Development Services Administrator Phyllis Ruse presented the staff report. This report was receive and file. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT In the Director's absence, no report was given. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER REPORTS Commissioner Edwards and Miller thanked the City for the opportunity to attend the League of California Cities Annual Community Services Conference held this year in San Diego, California. Commissioner Miller said he feels the Community Services Commission, the Temecula Valley Museum Foundation and the Museum Board of Directors need to sit down and collaborate, so they can all work together on preservation of historical sites in the City of Temecula. Deputy Director Herman Parker said he feels the Commission is on the right track by presenting this issue to the Temecula Valley Museum board, however due to the construction of the museum and the chapel, he feels the museum is not prepared to take on the issue of historical site preservation at this time. Commissioner Comerchero said he feels a committee should be established to address the issue of historical preservation in the community. R:\minutes\031097.csd Commissioner Nimeshein said he believes it is the responsibility of the Commission to recommend to the City Council the appointment and formation of a historical committee. Deputy Director Herman Parker suggested to the Commission that staff will bring this matter back to the Commission at the May meeting and contact some other cities and find out how their Historical Societies were founded and report back to the Commission at the May meeting. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Henz declared the meeting adjourned at 9:26 P.M. Chairman Jack Henz Secretary R:\minutes\031097.csd ITEM NO. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: Community Services Commission FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services DATE: May 12, 1997 SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-1998 PREPARED BY: (~ ~eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission: Receive and file this report regarding the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as those of the City of Temecula. Historically, the operations and maintenance of the City's parks and recreation programs and arterial street lighting were funded as separate service levels through the collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges. However, in accordance with Proposition 218, the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD will be replaced by the City of Temecula's special tax approved by voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. It is anticipated that the TCSD will enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Temecula to administer the parks and recreation and arterial street lighting programs. The Cooperative Agreement and the Temecula Parks/Lighting Service special tax levy budget will be considered by the City Council on June 10, 1997. As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels: Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of residential street lighting. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. Service Level D - Refuse Collection. Recycling and Street Sweeoing. Operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for single family residences. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City. Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street lighting services. The proposed rate of 925.68 per property owner has not been increased from last fiscal year. Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Rate C-1: $ 46.00 Rate C-2: $ 89.00 Rate C-3: 9116.00 Rate C-4: 9175.00 Also, the Rancho Highlands Community Association has submitted a written request for the TCSD to assume the maintenance of additional slope and landscaping within the Rancho Highlands development beginning FY 1997-98. The proposed dedication of the additional slope area will necessitate an increase in the existing maintenance charge of 946.00, to 9116.00 per parcel. Pursuant to Proposition 218, a majority of the affected property owners must approve the increase in fees pursuant to a mailed ballot election. If the proposed rate of $116.00 is rejected at the public hearing or pursuant to the results of the election, the Rancho Highlands Community Association will maintain the slope and charge the property owners through their monthly home owner association dues. However, the TCSD will continue to provide the current level of maintenance at the existing rate of $46.O0 per parcel. Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family residential properties in the City of Temecula. The proposed rate of $162.78 will not increase from last year. The cost for this service would actually have been 9168.48 in 1997/98. However, due to prudent administration of the franchise agreement, the City was able to save an additional 95.70 per single family residence, therefore, there will be no increase this year. Next year's rate, however, will be adjusted based on the $168.48 rate. Since the preparation of the Preliminary Levy Report, a reconciliation between the County tax rolls and CR&R's residential billing accounts has been completed. As a result, the Final Levy Report has been amended to include an additional 258 parcels within Service Level D. Public Hearing Notices were mailed to all affected property owners identifying the Service Level D rate and charge of $162.78. As of July 1, 1997, these parcels will be removed from CR&R's billing accounts and the charge for refuse and recycling services will be transferred to the property tax rolls. Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive benefit from the emergency maintenance of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. Twenty-seven (27) parcels were removed from Rate Level 1 for FY 1997-98 as the result of the City's paving of the Walcott Corridor. The remaining ninety-three (93) parcels in Rate Level 1 will continue to receive these services. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R will not increase from last year and are identified as follows: Residential Rate R-1: $157.08 Vacant Rate R-l: $ 78.54 Residential Rate R-2: $121.92 Vacant Rate R-2: $ 60.96 The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only those property owners who receive benefit from a particular service level pay for those services. In summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will receive no increases in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98 is $2,809,053. The revenue generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund slope maintenance; residential street lighting; recycling and refuse collection services; and streets and road maintenance in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 1997-1998. ANNUAL LEVY REPORT FOR THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD), FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 CITY OF TEMECULA FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 Final Report SUBMITTED: May 2, 1997 APPROVED: MuniFinancial Corporate Office 28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 Tel: (909) 699-3990 Fax: (909) 699-3460 San Francisco Bay Area Office One Donna Maria Way Orinda, CA 94563 Tel: (510) 376-1162 Fax: (510) 376-1162 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................1 A. Introduction .................................................................................................1 B. Description of the District and Services ...................................................2 C. Budget and Levy Summary ........................................................................2 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT .........................................................................4 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ...............................................................................7 A. Modifications of the District Structure ......................................................7 B. Inclusions ....................................................................................................8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS .............................................................................................9 V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ...........................................................................12 APPENDIX A -- 1997-98 COLLECTION ROLL ..........................................................14 OVERVIEW A. Introduction The Temecula Community Services District (District) was formed in 1989 upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (City), to continue services previously provided by the County of Riverside (County). The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the City. The District collects property related fees and charges (Charges) in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and the Charges are set and established pursuant to Community Services Dist/fct Law 61000, Section 61621, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code (the Code). The Annual Levy Report describes the District, any new inclusions, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. The Charges are based on the historical and estimated cost to maintain the improvements that service properties within the District. The improvements and services within the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures. deficits. surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services necessary to maintain and operate the improvements. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessors Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. A Public Hearing is held each year before the District Board of Directors (Board). to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing. and review of the Final Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 1997-98. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 1997-98. B. Description of the District and Services The District provides certain property related services and the maintenance of specific improvements within public right-of-ways and dedicated landscape easements throughout the City. The District consists of four (4) separate Service Levels, providing specific services and improvements to parcels within certain areas throughout the City. Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services and improvements applicable to the property. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the various services and improvements provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level, share in the cost of the services. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the services are provided. The Service Levels are identified as follows: · Residential Street Lighting · Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes · Citywide Recycling and Refuse · Road Improvement and Maintenance Services and improvements provided through the District include: residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance; slope protection; a recycling and refuse collection program; and road improvement construction and maintenance. C. Budget and Levy Summary Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the community. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment. 2 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting --includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels within specific residential tracts requiring servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting. Table II shows a listing of the tracts within Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting.) TABLE II Service Level B Tracts 11087-01 20079-02 20882-00 21674-02 22915.01 24131-03 11087-02 20079-03 20882-01 21674-03 2291~02 24132-00 12189-01 20130-00 20882-02 21675-00 22915-03 24132-01 12189-02 20130-01 20882-03 21675-01 22916-00 24133-00 12189-03 20130-02 20987-00 21675-02 22916-01 24133-01 12189-04 20130-03 21067-00 21675-03 22916-02 24133-02 12189-05 20130-04 21082-00 21675-04 22916-03 24133-03 12189-06 20130-05 21082-01 21675-05 22962-00 24133-04 12189-07 20130-06 21082-02 21675-06 23100-01 24133-05 13060-01 20153-00 21082-03 21760-00 23100-02 24134-00 13060-02 20154-00 21082-04 21765-00 23100-03 24134-01 13060-03 20319-00 21340-00 22148-00 23100-04 24134-02 13060-04 20643-00 21340-01 22203-00 23101-02 24134-03 13060-05 20644-00 21340-02 22204-00 23125-00 24135-00 13060-06 20703-01 21340-03 22208-00 23125-01 2413~01 13060-07 20703-02 21340-04 22593-00 23125-02 24135-02 13060-08 20703-03 21340-05 22593-01 23126-OO 24135-03 18518-00 20735.01 21340-06 22593-02 23128-00 25004-01 18518-01 20736-02 21340-07 22715-00 23177-00 27827-00 18518-02 20735-03 21561-00 22715-01 23267-00 27827-01 18518-03 20735-04 21672-01 22715-02 23267-01 27827-02 18583-00 20735-05 21672-02 22716-00 2326~02 27827-03 19872-00 20735-06 21672-03 22716-01 23267-03 19872-01 20735-07 21672-04 22716-02 23267-04 19872-02 20735-08 21673-00 22716-03 23371-01 19939-0O 20735-09 21673-01 22716-04 23371-02 19939-01 20848-0O 21673-02 22761-00 23483-00 19939-02 20879-00 21673-03 22762-00 24131-00 2O079-OO 20879-01 21674-O0 22786-00 24131-01 20079-01 20881-00 21674-01 22915-00 24131-02 4 Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes --includes servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated easements within certain tracts. The level of maintenance required within these tracts varies depending on operating costs, and therefore four (4) rate levels have been established within Service Level C. Table III shows a listing of the tracts in each of the four (4) rate levels within Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes.) TABLE III Service Level C Tracts Rate Level C-1 Rate Level C.2 Rate Level C-3 Rate Level TractName Tracttl TractName Tractfe TractName Tract# Tract Name Tracte 5 Service Level D, Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping --provides for the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program and street sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District. Service Level R, Roads --provides funding for construction, improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the City. The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved reads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services, are proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of ninety-three (93) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained threugh the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.821 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-seven (57) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained threugh the District. This rate level provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road; Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. 6 III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT For Fiscal Year 1997-98. changes within the District that affect the levy are outlined below. A. Modifications of the District Structure Modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels; or revisions in the method of apportionment. On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund Citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels. previously charged through the Community Services District. · Community Services, Parks, and Recreation --that provided for the maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. · Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians --that provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of street lighting and landscaped median along arterial streets. Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, these two Service Levels will no longer be charged through the District. The number of parcels included in Service Level R, Roads (specifically Rate Level Rol) has been reduced from one hundred twenty parcels to ninety- three parcels for Fiscal Year 1997-98. Five of the streets previously serviced and maintained by the District (Calle Girasol; Aussie Road; Calle Chapos; Walcott Road; and Tommy Lane) have been upgraded to paved roads. The parcels that were previously serviced by the maintenance of these streets have been removed from Service Level R. The only other modifications to the District are related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts that are being serviced are included into the appropriate Service Levels, and includes the addition of new single family residential units to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling, Refuse and Street Sweeping). 7 B. Inclusions The inclusion of specific tracts and the parcels within those tracts to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), and Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), for Fiscal Year 1997-98 are described in the following. Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting), include 426 parcels within Tracts: Tract Number of Tract Number of Number Parcels Number Parcels 23100-04 24 24131-00 127 23371-01 25 24131-03 90 23371-02 38 24133-05 122 Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes), include 234 parcels within the following tracts: Rate level #1 -- Tracts: 22761-00 (Rancho Highlands -- 80 parcels); 26861-00 (Presley Development -- 37 parcels); 26861-03 (Presley Development -- 41 parcels). · Rate level #2 -- No New Tracts. · Rate level # 3 -- No New Tracts. · Rate level # 4 -- Tract: 23125-03 (Tradewinds -- 76 pamels). Inclusions to Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Street Sweeping): A total of 1,042 parcels have been added to Service Level D for the 1997-98 Fiscal Year. This is an increase of 258 parcels over the number of parcels shown in the preliminary report. These parcels were added based on the waste hauler's updated service records of single family residential homes. All parcels identified in this report were noticed for the 1997-98 Service Level D charges. 8 IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS Table IV on the next three (3) pages show the District budget for Fiscal Year 1997-98. TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 BUDGET ITEM Account Level B Level C L~vel D Level R No. 192 193 194 Total Dlltltct PERSONNEl, SERVICES SilanesaedVVages 5100 $7.226 S90.212 $43.168 $0 $140,606 9 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30. 1998 BUDGET ITEM Accent LevelB LevelC I LevelD I LevelR TotalDistrict 10 TABLE IV 1997-98 DISTRICT BUDGET Temecula Community Services District Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 1998 Acct. Level B Level C Level D Level R ~ Total DtsUlct No. 192 103 194 105 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Reo'eabon SuDpiies 5301 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 Waste Hauling 5315 0 0 2,064.768 0 2,064,766 StreetLigh~ng 5319 291,800 0 0 0 291,800 Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0 Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0 InfolmaliOn Systems 5340 4,470 16,765 6,706 0 27,941 Support Serv~e$ 5345 0 0 0 0 0 Facilffie$ 5350 0 0 0 0 0 Assessment Engmeenng 5370 0 0 0 0 0 Refund of prior Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0 City Admjn Charges 5380 0 0 0 0 0 Subtolls (5300's) $296,270 $16.765 $2.071,474 $0 $2,364.509 O;erating Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0 EmergenceyRoadManlerlance 5402 0 0 0 16,135 16,135 LandscahaMaiNenance 5415 0 268,720 0 0 268.720 Landscape Reha0ilato~ 5416 0 0 0 0 0 Subtoils (5400's) $0 $268.720 $0 $16,135 $284,865 TOTAL DtSTRICT COSTS $307.996 $571,250 $2,120,942 $10.210 $3.019,308 EXPENDITURES RESERVE FOR CONT/NGENCY 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS 307.996 571,250 2,120,942 19.210 3.019,398 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $307.996 5571,250 $2.120,942 $19,210 $3.019,398 REVENUES OTHER REVENUE SOURCES 21,363 17.000 56,174 3,075 97,612 FUND BALANCE 18.945 25.354 68.434 O 112.733 BALANCE TO LEVY 267,688 528,8H 1,996,334 16,135 2,809,053 TOTAL REVENUES $307,996 $571,250 $2.120,942 $19,210 $3,019,398 11 ITEM NO. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Community Services Commission Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services May 12, 1997 SUBJECT: Trail System Interpretive Plaques PREPARED BY: Herman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission: Approve the inclusion of interpretive plaques in the City-Wide Multi-Trail System Master Plan. BACKGROUND: At the March 10, 1997 Community Services Commission meeting, staff and commission discussed at great length the possibility of naming trails, portions of trails, park amenities and other recreation facilities within the city, in an effort to provide special recognition of recreation amenities and recognition of individuals from Temecula's historic past. Concern has been expressed regarding naming park amenities, within park facilities, located at park sites. This can create public confusion when trying to locate a specific park amenity within a park site. In fact, Resolution No. CSD 92-08 entitled, A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District, Adopting a Policy for Naming Parks and Recreation Facilities, specifically states, "naming of specific areas within a park (garden, swimming pool, lake, ballfield, etc.) is acceptable but should be kept to a minimum to avoid confusion. In an attempt to alleviate this concern, provide this needed recognition of individuals from Temecula's historic past, and identify local historic places of interest, staff is recommending that the Community Services Commission approve the installation of interpretlye plaques throughout the City's Multi-Use Trail System. The plaques would serve to identify historic points of interest, local individuals of historic interest, and Temecula's historic past in general throughout Temecula's trail system. The installation of the interpretive plaques would be included in the master plan as it is developed. The Community Services Department is requesting funding through the Capital Improvement Program to begin the design process for the City-Wide Multi-Use Trail System Master Plan for fiscal year 1997-98. Once approved, staff will ensure that interpretlye plaques throughout Temecula's trail system will be included in the City-Wide Multi-Use Trail System Master Plan. ITEM NO. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: DATE: Community Services Commission Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services May 12, 1997 SUBJECT: Historical Preservation PREPARED BY: t-"~,erman D. Parker, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission: Receive and file this report. BACKGROUND: At the April 14, 1997 Community Services Commission meeting, the Commission and staff discussed the preservation of local historic sites and landmarks and the general need for an organization who's primary interest and focus is the preservation of historic sites and landmarks in the City. The Commission requested staff to contact neighboring municipalities to assess their method of preserving local history. Staff contacted the City of Moreno Valley, Hornet, Escondido and Riverside to inquire about the existence of non-profit historic preservation societies in their community. Each of these communities have established non-profit historic preservation organizations: The Moreno Valley Historical Society, The Hornet Museum Association, The Escondido Historic Society, etc. These organizations are non-profit organizations governed by a Board of Directors. Most of them are funded by grants, fundraisers and donations, however, one organization did receive annual funding from the City. The primary focus of these organizations varied. Some primarily focused on preservation of historic artifacts and memorabilia, some focused on historic structures and some focused on the preservation of both artifacts and structures. All of these groups appeared to be initially formed as a result of local citizens concerned about the preservation of local history in their area. After completing this review of historic preservation societies and associations in neighboring cities, it remains staff's recommendation that the Temecula Valley Museum is the most qualified, knowledgeable, and appropriate organization in Temecula to preserve and care for Temecula's colorful historic past. The care and preservation of historic artifacts, memorabilia, structures and landmarks is a time consuming, costly and specialized field. It requires specialized expertise and countless volunteer hours. A local non-profit volunteer group, with a sincere interest in historic preservation would be the most appropriate organization to take a leadership role in the preservation of Temecula's past.