Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout040517 PC Agenda Honoring Our Seniors: The Temecula Way 2017 Senior Services Master Plan Process Update BACKGROUND Initiated by a request from Council Member Rahn and the Human Services Subcommittee Steering committee formed with community stakeholders TCSD staff initiated surveys and community meetings Results used to identify top priorities for seniors C O OMMUNITYUTREACH Meeting #1: Atria Park at Vintage for community professionals, caregivers, advocates, elected officials, media, and community partners. Topics: Diversity of Aging, Healthcare, Transportation, and Housing. Meeting #2: FountainGlen at Temecula for residents of FountainGlen. Topics: Transportation and Housing. Meeting #3: Mary Phillips Senior for the seniors who frequent the facility, as well as seniors from the community. Topics discussed: Housing, Transportation, and Health & Wellness. Meeting #4: Temeku Hills Master Association for the residents of Temeku Hills, which includes a diverse age group. Topics discussed: Senior housing and Transportation issues. 2015 Health & Community Resource Fair: Volunteers distributed questionnaires in order to canvass participants. Faith-based Organizations Local faith-based organizations were contacted and encouraged to distribute questionnaires to congregants over the age of 55. N S EXTTEPS 1.Provide SSMPP summary to Human Services Subcommittee 2.Appoint a Working Group to oversee process to completion 3.Use results to inform relevant City policies 4.Consider Senior issues as part of a potential Community Services Master Plan VICINITY MAP City of Temecula PA15-0937 TM08m1 Alternative Candidate 2 TM08 Alternative Candidate 1 TM08m3 Primary Candidate 0250500 Feet N This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. PLAN REDUCTIONS SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION TM-08m3 T-1TITLE SHEET D-1DETAILS & NOTES PHASE II D-2DETAILS & NOTES CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. 142829 D-3DETAILS & NOTES D-4DETAILS & NOTES D-5DETAILS & NOTES CLIENT: TM-08M3 CROWN D-6DETAILS & NOTES CASTLE D-7DETAILS & NOTES S-1SITE PHOTOS NEW CONCRETE TEXTURED P-1SITE PLAN 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 P-2POLE PROFILE www.crowncastle.com STREET LIGHT STEEL POLE PREPARED BY: 40' NORTHWEST OF JEREZ LN. WEST SIDE OF MODENA DR CoastalCommunications Telecommunications Engineering TEMECULA, CA 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SHEET INDEX 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES:LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE PROJECT DESCRIPTION:PROJECT MANAGER: YOU DIG CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL INSTALL NEW 30' 0" HIGH CONCRETE TEXTURED 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PLANS AND EXISTING DIMENSIONS TICKET #______________________ IRVINE, CA 92618 AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE STREETLIGHT WITH MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE. DEIGO MONCADA AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY (909) 451-2108 THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS INSTALL (4) ML IONS-M17HP-19HP DIEGO.MONCADA@CROWNCASTLE.COM DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION WITH THE WORK OR RESPONSIBLE INSTALL (3) HTXCWW63111414Fx00 ANTENNAS. FIBER MANAGER: FOR SAME. CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC INSTALL (1) KATHREIN SCALA TRI SECTOR ANTENNA 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 #800-10270 ALFREDO ARZUBIAGA (818) 939-5579 INSTALL (1) DISCONNECT BOX. ALFREDO.ARZUBIAGA@CROWNCASTLE.COM INSTALL (1) 24" X 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: CROWN CASTLE NG WEST LLC INSTALL (1) 48" MYERS METER PEDESTAL. 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 SITE LOCATION IRVINE, CA 92618 INSTALL (3) GROUND TEST WELLS. CHRYS CHAMPLIN REVISION / ISSUEDATE INSTALL (3) GROUND RODS.(949)344-7788 CHRYS.CHAMPLIN@CROWNCASTLE.COM SITE NAME & ADRESS: NODE ENGINEER: TM-08m3 COASTAL COMMUNICATIONS 43523 MODENA DR 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 110 RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TODD THREW 33.494706 / -117.087739 (760) 929-0910 EXT. 101 TODD@COASTALCOMMINC.COM TITLE SHEET DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SHEET NO. N.T.S. T-1 VICINITY MAPPROJECT SUMMARYPROJECT TEAM LEGEND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES:NOTES:CALIFORNIA STATE CODE COMPLIANCE TM-08m3 : SYMBOLDESCRIPTION ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PREFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 1.CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS. TEMPORARY EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL, PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF FINAL IMPROVEMENTS, SHALL BE PROPOSED CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. PHASE II PERFORMED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR QUALIFIED PERSON AS INDICATED BELOW:2.CONTRACTOR TO PLACE SANDBAGS AROUND ANY/ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS TO PREVENT 2' X 3' VAULT NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. CONTAMINATED WATER. 142829 CODES: NEW STREET LIGHT 1.ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES ``LAND DEVELOPMENT MANUAL, STORM3.SPOILS PILE WILL BE COVERED AND CONTAINED AND STREET WILL BE SWEPT AND CLEANED WATER STANDARDS" MUST BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF THEAS NEEDED. PCC SIDEWALK CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & 25) 2010 4.CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR DAMAGED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTENT WITH THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND/OR WATER CLIENT: 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES WHICH ADOPTS THE 2010 UBC, 2010 UMC, 2010 UPC AND THE TRENCH AND FIBER CONDUIT (PVT) CITY ENGINEER. POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN (WPCP), IF APPLICABLE. CROWN 2010 NEC. 5.CURB & GUTTER TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. SIDEWALK TO BE REPLACED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIALS & CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA)CASTLE EXISTING2.FOR STORM DRAIN INLETS, PROVIDE A GRAVEL BAG SILT BASIN IMMEDIATELY UPSTREAM OF INLETSATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE THE ROADWAY BACK TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION AS INDICATED ON DETAILS. EXISTING STREET LIGHT ANSI/EIA-222-F LIFE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101 SATISFACTORY TO THE CITY ENGINEER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PAVING, STRIPING, EXISTING VAULT / HANDHOLE 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE BIKE LANES, PAVEMENT LEGENDS, SIGNS, AND TRAFFIC LOOP DETECTORS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR OR QUALIFIED PERSON SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP OF SILT AND MUD ON 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 EXISTING PEDESTAL 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODEIRVINE, CA 92618 7.SIDEWALK SHALL BE RESTORED/REPLACED PER CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES STANDARD ADJACENT STREET(S) AND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. www.crowncastle.com 2010 LOCAL BUILDING CODE DRAWINGS G7, G9, G10, G11 & SDG100. EXISTING TRANSFORMER CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SILT AND DEBRIS AFTER EACH MAJOR RAINFALL.8.PEDESTRIAN RAMP WILL NOT BE DISTURBED. PREPARED BY: STATION POINTS (100' INCREMENTS) ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS: 5.EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES EXISTING CURB RAMP FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS DURING THE RAINY SEASON. CoastalCommunications DO NOT APPLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. C&GEXISTING CURB & GUTTER ROW GROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Telecommunications Engineering 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER R/WEXISTING RIGHT OF WAY FCC NOTE: TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER OR RESIDENT ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN-OFF THIS WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY COMPLIES WITH FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR RADIO C 1.GROUND CONSTRUCTION TO REMOVE/CLEAN ALL DEBRIS, NAILS, STAPLES, OR NON-USED 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 PRODUCING RAINFALL. L EXISTING CENTER LINE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 FREQUENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TELECOMMUNICATION ACT OF 1996 AND SUBSEQUENT VERTICALS OFF THE POLE. PHONE: (760) 929-0910 P L EXISTING CENTER LINE AMENDMENTS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED BY STATE OR FEDERAL REGULATORY FAX: (760) 929-0936 2.ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, STATE, 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE AGENCIES. FEDERAL, GO95 AND GO128 STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. REQUIRED BY THE RESIDENT ENGINEER DUE TO UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES, WHICH MAY ARISE. 3.CALL USA 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATING AT (800) 227-2600 OR 811. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION 4.ALL LANDSCAPING TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONDITION OR BETTER. 8.ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES PROVIDED PER THE APPROVED IMPROVEMENT PLAN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS 5.ALL EQUIPMENT TO BE BONDED. SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREON. ALL EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL FOR INTERIM CONDITIONS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR 6.METERING CABINET REQUIRES 36" CLEARANCE AT DOOR OPENING. SHALL BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE RESIDENT ENGINEER. DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES 7.CAULK CABINET BASE AT PAD. TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 9.ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN RAIN IS IMMINENT. NORMAL LOCATION OF 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ARRANGE FOR WEEKLY MEETINGS DURING OCTOBER 1ST TO APRIL 30TH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: FOR PROJECT TEAM (GENERAL CONTRACTOR, QUALIFIED PERSON, EROSION CONTROL 1-800-227-2600 SUBCONTRACTOR IF ANY, ENGINEER OF WORK, OWNER/DEVELOPER AND THE RESIDENT ENGINEER) TO CALL AT EVALUATE THE ADEQUACY OF THE EROSION/SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND OTHER RELATED LEAST TWO 1. LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES MUST BE PROVIDED BY THE DAYS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. SUBDIVIDER AND SHOWN ON ANY PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS FOR YOU DIG APPROVAL. UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 2.CHANGES MAY BE PERMITTED BY THE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS IN CASES OF CONFLICTING TICKET #______________________ STORMDRAIN INLET PROTECTION FACILITIES. 3.CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITY COMPANIES FACILITIES, EXISTING AND PROPOSED, MUST BE 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS MUTUALLY RESOLVED BY THE UTILITY COMPANIES. 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION INLET EDGE OF PAVEMENT 4.FOR COMMERCIAL SIDEWALKS, THE FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK 1'-6" BEHIND FACE OF CURB. 5.MAXIMUM 2" DIAMETER GAS MAINS MAY BE PLACED IN JOINT UTILITIES TRENCH SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER (IN TRACTS). FLOW FLOW SPILLWAY, 1-BAG HIGH SANDBAG 2-BAGS HEIGHT TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH OPPOSING FLOW DIRECTIONS ABBREVIATIONS REVISION / ISSUEDATE EDGE OF A/C ASPHALT CURB SITE NAME & ADRESS: INLET PAVEMENT BACK OF CURB B.O.C. TM-08m3 FLOW BACK OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT B/EOP 43523 MODENA DR FLOW RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA CURB & GUTTER C&G 33.494706 / -117.087739 SPILLWAY, 1-BAG HIGH CLCENTERLINE SANDBAG 2-BAGS HEIGHT EX. EXISTING TYPICAL PROTECTION FOR INLET WITH SINGLE FLOW DIRECTION EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT F.O.C. FACE OF CURB NOTES:DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: F/EOP R.G.12/20/16TO FACE OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1.INTENDED FOR SHORT - TERM USE. 2.USE TO INHIBIT NON - STORM WATER FLOW. PLPROPERTY LINE SHEET NO. 3.ALLOW FOR PROPER MAINTENANCE AND CLEANUP. D-1 4.BAGS MUST BE REMOVED AFTER ADJACENT OPERATION IS COMPLETED. R/W RIGHT OF WAY 5.NOT APPLICABLE IN AREAS WITH HIGH SILTS AND CLAYS WITHOUT FILTER FABRIC. S/BSUBDIVISION BOUNDARY TM-08m3 ElectricalSystem Supervision and Control ANDREW ION-M17HP/19HP Adjacent chanel power, dBc.........................................-48 Power SupplyCommands...............................RF on/off Mains Power, Vac. ......................................85 to 264External control parts PHASE II DL output tolerance over frequency, dB............................MULTI-BAND, MULTI-OPERATOR ......................................115 or 230 CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. Alarms...............................Summary DL output tolerance over temperature, dB ..........................0.5*** Power consumption, watts ......................................1150 REMOTE OPTICAL SYSTEM 142829 ...............................Power Supply Input ICP3, dBm ...............................Optical UL and DL failure Optical ...............................Temperature ICP3 optimized..............................-12 Connectors .............................................................. Noise figure optimized..............................-18 CLIENT: Optical return loss, dB .............................................45 minimum Supervision...............................Output power on a per- CROWN Fiber type, mm ..........................................................Single mode E9/125channel and per-band Noise figure, dB Optical link budget, dB .............................................0 to 10basis (optional) CASTLE ICP3 optimized..............................7 Composite input power Mechanical**** ..............................11 max. @ OTRx master side, dBm Height, width, depth mm (in)...............................817 x 245 x 218 Noise figure optimized..............................4.5 1900 MHz .....................+5 composite (32.2 x 9.61 x 8.6) ..............................6 max. 1700 / 2100 MHz...........+5 composite Top Weight, kg (lb)...............................40 (88.2) 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 1900 MHz (AWS) Interface IRVINE, CA 92618 9.6" Environmental 8.6" www.crowncastle.com Frequency range, MHz BTS Side Operation temperature range.............................245mm Uplink............................1850 to 1915 218mm Number of connectors Ingress protectionRF part...................IP67 Downlink........................1930 to 1995 1900 MHz .....................4 PREPARED BY: Fan part.................IP55 1700/2100 MHz ............4 Output power per carrier, dBm* *Applicable to single modulation mode only System optimized for BTS power, dBm **3db power reduction @ < 5MHz carrier bandwith Number of Carriers1248 .......................................33 CoastalCommunications ***With active cooling GSM45423936 .......................................43 ****Spacing required 40 mm (1.58 in) around unit Telecommunications Engineering CDMA45423936 **** UMTS45423936 Antenna Port LTE4542**3936 Connector.......................................7/16 Female All figures are typical values. Output power.......................................See band specification 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 32.2"CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Spurious emission..............................................< -13 dBm / 1 MHz Return loss, dB.......................................15 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 817mm DL output tolerance over frequency, dB ............................ FAX: (760) 929-0936 1700/2100 MHz (AWS) DL output tolerance over temperature, dB ..........................0.5*** Frequency range, MHz Input ICP3, dBm Uplink............................1710 to 1755 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Downlink........................2110 to 2155 ICP3 optimized..............................-12 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS Noise figure optimized..............................-18 SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND Output power per carrier, dBm* CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR Noise figure, dB DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES Number of Carriers1248 TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. GSM45423936ICP3 optimized..............................7 ..............................11 max. CDMA45423936 Noise figure optimized..............................4.5 UMTS45423936 SideFrontSide ..............................6 max. LTE4542**3936 SCALE Spurious emission..............................................< -13 dBm / 1 MHz 1 N.T.S. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO AMPHENOL DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG TRI BAND FET PANEL ANTENNA UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ANTENNA MOUNTING FLANGE (Model #HTXCWW63111414Fxy0) TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-Point Mounting Bracket Mounting Options Kit 9 5/8" High Band #1 and #2: 1710-2170 MHz Electrical CharacteristicsLow Band 696-960 MHz 9 3/8" Frequency Bands (MHz) 696-806806-9601710-18801850-19901900-2170 CABLE FEEDER Model NumberMKS04P01 7 1/4" 1 1/8" Polarization (NOT ENGINEERED 6 3/4" Horizontal Beamwidth 3/8"3/8" THIS IS PART IS FROM Vertical Beamwidth ANTENNA MANUFACTURE Gain10.5 dBi11.0 dBi13.5 dBi14.0 dBi14.0 dBiFits Pipe Diameter40-115 mm (1.57-4.5 in) (x) 0, 5(y) 0, 2, 4, 6 7 1/8" Impedance 1/8 " 8 1/4" VSWR 3/8" Weight2.9 kg (6.4 lbs) Front-to-Back Ratio> 20 dB> 25 dB A-A REVISION / ISSUEDATE Isolation Between Ports> 25 dB> 25 dB IM3 (2x20W Carriers) < -150 dBc< -150 dBc SITE NAME & ADRESS: Input Power 500 W300 W 2-Point Mounting & Downtilt Mounting Options Lightning ProtectionBracket Kit Direct Ground TM-08m3 Connector(s)6 ports / 7 / 16-DIN / Female / Bottom 43523 MODENA DR Mechanical Characteristics RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA Dimensions (Height x Width x Diameter) 589 x 305 x 180 mm23.2 x 12.0 x 7.1 in Model NumberMKS04T03 Weight without Mounting Brackets5.9 kg 33.494706 / -117.087739 13 lbs Survival Wind Speed150 mph 241 km/hr Wind Area Fits Pipe Diameter40-115 mm (1.57-4.5 in) Front: 219 NFront: 43 lbf AA Wind Loads (160 km/hr or 100 mph) Side: 129 NSide: 29 Ibf Weight4.1 kg (9.0 lbs) DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SCALE SCALE 3 SHEET NO. 2 D-2 N.T.S. N.T.S. TM-08m3 ONEW UTILITY POLE DETAIL GROUND ROD DETAIL PHASE II (AMERON TYPE 15 CST SERIES) CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. 142829 CLIENT: CROWN CASTLE 12 X 14 CONCRETE UTILITY 3/16" B.C. BOX W/ COVER 1-1/2" R. 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 S IRVINE, CA 92618 1/8" www.crowncastle.com 12" SQUARE 1/4" PREPARED BY: 18" BASE PLATE ELEVATION 24" CoastalCommunications #2 AWG Telecommunications Engineering "H" DIMENSIONSMAXIMUM LOADING 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 DESIGNMOUNTINGBOTTOMTOP"S"BOLTANCHORAPPROXMAX.100 MPH80 MPH CARLSBAD, CA 92008 NUMBERHEIGHTDIADIABASECIRCLEBOLTSSHIPPINGFIXPROJ.PROJ. PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 "H"SIZE(4)WT.WEIGHTAREAAREA CADWELD TYPE CST-1515'5.03.010-1/2"11"3/4" X 24112300812 "GY" MOLD CST-18 18'6.43.510-1/2"11"3/4" X 36160450812 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION CST-2020'6.43.511"180450812 10-1/2"3/4" X 36 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS 1-5/8" COPPER CLAD CST-2222'7.13.811"200450812 10-1/2"3/4" X 36 SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND GROUND ROD CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR CST-2525'7.13.711"240450612 10-1/2"1 X 36 DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES CST-3030'8.13.811"27545068 11-1/2"1 X 36 TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CST-3535'8.53.530045048 11-1/2"11-1/2"1 X 36 CST-40'40'9.13.31313"40045048 1 X 36 SCALESCALE 45 N.T.S. N.T.S. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE NOT USED TYPICAL GROUND DETAIL YOU DIG SQUARE D BY SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC WITH STUB-UP UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ LOAD CENTER, 70A (MODEL #QO24L70RB) 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION TEXTURED STEEL POLE TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS GRND. AMPERE RATING70A TEST WELL MAXIMUM SINGLE POLE CIRCUITS4 STUB-UP WIDTH4.88 INCHES APPLICATIONDESIGNED TO MEET RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL REQUIREMENTS TO PROTECT ELECTRICAL 24" X 36" FIBER SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT AND PEOPLE. STUB-UP HAND HOLE SPACES2 WIRE SIZE#12 TO 3 AWG(AL) - #14 TO 4 AWG(CU) MAXIMUM TANDEM CIRCUIT BREAKERS2 GRADE LEVEL VOLTAGE RATING120/240VAC WIRING CONFIGURATION3-WIRE REVISION / ISSUEDATE PHASE1-PHASE DEPTH4.00 INCHES HEIGHT9.38 INCHES SITE NAME & ADRESS: BUS MATERIALTIN PLATED ALUMINUM COVER TYPESURFACE CATALOG REFERENCE NUMBER1100CT9901 TM-08m3 ENCLOSURE TYPEOUTDOOR/RAINPROOF 43523 MODENA DR ENCLOSURE RATINGNEMA 3R GROUNDING BARORDER SEPARATELY RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA APPROVALSUL LISTED 2" HDPE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT RATING10KA 33.494706 / -117.087739 FIBER MAIN TYPEFIXED - FACTORY INSTALLED MAIN LUGS 4" HDPE SHIPPING AND ORDERING 1-5/8" COPPER CLAD CATEGORY00101 - LOAD CENTERS, 1 PHASE, NEMA1 & 3R, 2 - 8 CIRCUIT, TYPE QO GROUND ROD DISCOUNT SCHEDULEDE3A ARTICLE NUMBER785901785132 1" SCH 40 TO ELECTRICAL PACKAGE QUANTITY1 METER PEDESTAL DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: WEIGHT5 LBS. R.G.12/20/16TO AVAILABILITY CODES RETURNABILITYY SHEET NO. SCALE SCALESCALE 8 67 D-3 N.T.S. N.T.S.N.T.S. TM-08m3 24" x 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM PHASE II CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. SCALE: N.T.S. KATHREIN 142829 PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL MODEL-800-10270 100A, 120/240V, 1 SECTOR: A,B, & C 42,000 AIC CLIENT: POLYMER CONCRETE ASSEMBLY M (MYERS POWER PRODUCT) CROWN STRAIGHT SIDES, NO FLOOR, WUC 3.6-"20K," 3/8" HEX BOLTS, CROWN CASTLE LOGO "EMBOSSED" (SPECIFY AT AIME OF CASTLE 100A100A ORDER) INSTALLED. 2P2P 3/4"C-1#2 GND LOAD RATINGS: 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 INCIDENTAL TRAFFIC-PARKING LOT, SIDEWALK 40A/2P IRVINE, CA 92618 CONFORMS TO: www.crowncastle.com WUC 3.6 GROUND ROD ASTM C 857 PREPARED BY: ANSI/SCTE 77 1 3"C UNDERGROUND TRENCH 3 6 " TO SCE VAULT PANEL "A" USDA/RUS APPROVED CoastalCommunications 20A DROP-IN Telecommunications Engineering SHIPPED ASSEMBLED 20A SKID RESISTANT COVER 3/4"C-1#2 GND 1 STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS8 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 20A " 2 3 CAST-IN FLOATING NUT BOX 8 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 " PHONE: (760) 929-0910 -INTEGRAL DRAIN HOLES FAX: (760) 929-0936 FIBER SPLICE BOX SHALL BE KEY NOTES: POLE GROUND ROD 333 SERVICE AREA LABELED CROWN CASTLE COMM. 2"C-3#4+1#8G EQUIPMENT WITH RACK CANISTER PROPRIETARY INFORMATION L=380', VD=1.7% WITH UNISTRUT FOR FIBER SPLICE MOUNTING SQUARE D LOAD CENTER #Q02-4L70RB THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS W/3-TANDEM BREAKERS #Q0T2020 OR EQUAL SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND 1/2"C-2#12+1#12G CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES L=5', VD=NEG 444 TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 3/4"C-1#2 GND TO POLE GROUND ROD 40W-RU SCALESCALESCALE 91011 N.T.S.N.T.S.N.T.S. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE 9.1 inches YOU DIG KATHREIN SCALA 7-16(230 mm) 7-16 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 1710-2170 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1710-2170 1710-2170 7-16 7-16 SPECIFICATIONS1710-1880 MHz1850-1990 MHz1920-2170 MHz 7-16 7-16 17.217.517.2dBi17.617.817.6dBi17.817.917.4dBi GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS GAIN TILT FREQUENCY RANGE 1710-2170 MHz VSWR < 1, 5:1 IMPEDANCE 50 ohms HORIZONTAL BEAMWIDTH 53.7 inches INTERMODULATION (2x20w) IM3: < -150 dBc (1365 mm) REVISION / ISSUEDATE VERTICAL BEAMWIDTH FRONT-TO-BACK RATIO >30 dB (co-polar) >25 dB (total power)SITE NAME & ADRESS: ELECTRICAL DOWNTILT (MANUAL OR OPTIONAL CONNECTOR 3 x 2 x 7/16 DIN female CONTINUOUSLY ADJUSTABLE TM-08m3 REMOTE CONTROL) MAXIMUM INPUT POWER 43523 MODENA DR WEIGHT 154.3 lb (70 kg) TTT RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA SIDELOBE SUPPRESSION FOR FIRST HEIGHT 90.4 inches (2296 mm) 33.494706 / -117.087739 SIDELOBE ABOVE HORIZON 37 inches RANDOME DIAMETER 9.1 inches (230 mm) 171515dB171515dB171515dB (940 mm) EQUIVALENT FLAT PLAT AREA 25 dB (TYPICAL20 dB (TYPICAL)20 dB (TYPICAL) WIND SURVIVAL RATING* 120 mph (200 kph) CROSS POLAR RATIO MAIN NATURAL FREQUENCY 17.5-19 Hz DIRECTION SECTOR >10 dB>10 dB>10 dB DAMPING RATIO 0.032 SHIPPING DIMENSIONS 98.4 x 13 x 12.4 inches ISOLATION INTRASYSTEM>30 dB>30 dB>30 dB DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO (2500 x 330 x 315 mm) INTERSYSTEM>45 dB>42 dB>42 dB 11 inches MOUNTING Flange connection 12 x 12M at a graduated SHEET NO. SCALE 12 (280 mm) D-4 N.T.S. TM-08m3 48" MYERS CABINET 3" MIN. SPECIFICATIONS: 12 GAUGE CORROSION RESISTANT ZINC COATED STEEL (MEUG20 CALTRANS TYPE III-BF WITH BASE ENCLOSURE) PHASE II CONSTRUCTION. HOOD AND COVERS 14 GAUGE. CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. RAINPROOF TYPE 3R ENCLOSURE 142829 COMPLIES WITH CALTRANS SPECIFICATION ES-2E. MEETS EUSERC 308 REQUIREMENTS. 20.25 ALL FACTORY WIRING IS 600 VOLT RATED COPPER. ACCEPTABLE CIRCUIT BREAKERS ARE GE, ITE, ASSEMBLY VIEW CLIENT: CROUSE-HINDS/MURRAY, CUTLER-HAMMER. 3" MIN.CROWN SUITABLE FOR USE WITHOUT WHEN NO MORE THAN SIX 17.25 12.25 REMOVABLE METER SERVICE DISCONNECTS ARE INSTALLED AND USED IN SIDE VIEW SOCKET COVER CASTLE ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 384 OF THE NEC. (BASE ENCLOSURE) 18.750 12.50 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 HINGED HOOD BOTTOM VIEW MINIMUM CLEARANCE IRVINE, CA 92618 WITH LIFT-UP 20.25 MOUNTING SLOT DETAIL REQUIRED PER NEC 110-16,www.crowncastle.com SIDES (BASE ENCLOSURE) TYPICAL FRONT AND BACK. DEMAND RESET REMOVABLE METER COVER, HINGED, PREPARED BY: SOCKET COVERRECOMMENDED SERVICE METER SAFETY PADLOCKABLE, ENTRANCE CONDUIT SOCKET AND SEALABLE. METER MANUAL BYPASS READING (TEST BLOCKS) 6" RECOMMENDED GROUND WINDOW3 W/SEALABLE COVER 14 "CoastalCommunications NEUTRAL 8 ROD LOCATION UTILITY LANDING 7" TEST POINT Telecommunications Engineering LUGS METER SECTION REMOVABLE UTILITY1 17"0.3757 4 ACCESS COVER SEALABLE PADLOCK 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 48.00 W/PADLOCK10" RECOMMENDED HASP NAME CARLSBAD, CA 92008 MAIN BREAKER SIDE CLEARANCE PLATE PHONE: (760) 929-0910 LOAD CENTER P.E. CELL PLAN VIEW FAX: (760) 929-0936 12 CIRCUIT WINDOW 20.00 (BASE ENCLOSURE) MAIN BREAKER PROPRIETARY INFORMATION 1/2" -13 OR 5/8" -18 BOLTS 3" MIN. SUPPLIED WITH BASE THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS HINGED SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND DOOR ALTERNATE ANCHOR CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR CUSTOMER SECTION 6.00 FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS BOLT INSTALLATION DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES PADLOCK HASP AND DEPTH PER JOB USE 1/2" - 13 BOLTS TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. SPECIFICATIONS 10.506.75 OR 5/8" -18 BOLTS 20.00 1/2" OR 5/8" ANCHOR BOLTS 17.25 AS REQUIRED FRONT VIEW FRONT VIEWSIDE VIEW SCALE FRONT VIEW 13 (BASE ENCLOSURE) N.T.S. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVISION / ISSUEDATE SITE NAME & ADRESS: TM-08m3 43523 MODENA DR RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 33.494706 / -117.087739 DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SHEET NO. D-5 TM-08m3 PHASE II CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. 142829 CLIENT: CROWN CASTLE 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 www.crowncastle.com PREPARED BY: CoastalCommunications Telecommunications Engineering 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVISION / ISSUEDATE SITE NAME & ADRESS: TM-08m3 43523 MODENA DR RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 33.494706 / -117.087739 DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SHEET NO. SCALE 14 D-6 N.T.S. TM-08m3 PHASE II CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. 142829 CLIENT: CROWN CASTLE 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 www.crowncastle.com PREPARED BY: CoastalCommunications Telecommunications Engineering 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVISION / ISSUEDATE SITE NAME & ADRESS: TM-08m3 43523 MODENA DR RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 33.494706 / -117.087739 DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SHEET NO. D-7 TM-08m3 PHASE II S U CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. N N Y 142829 M E A D O W S D R CLIENT: CROWN CASTLE 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 www.crowncastle.com M O D E N PREPARED BY: A D R CoastalCommunications SITE LOCATION Telecommunications Engineering 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. AKEY MAPB12 O'CLOCK VIEW- FROM THE WEST 1-800-227-2600 CALL AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVISION / ISSUEDATE SITE NAME & ADRESS: TM-08m3 43523 MODENA DR RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 33.494706 / -117.087739 SITE PHOTOS DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: R.G.12/20/16TO SHEET NO. S-1 C3 O'CLOCK VIEW- FROM THE NORTHD9 O'CLOCK VIEW- FROM THE SOUTH TM-08m3 NEW CONSTRUCTION INSTALL NEW 30' 0" HIGH CONCRETE TEXTURED STREETLIGHT WITH MAST ARM ANDINSTALL (1) 48" MYERS METER PEDESTAL. PHASE II LUMINAIRE.INSTALL (3) GROUND TEST WELLS. CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. 142829 INSTALL (4) ML IONS-M17HP-19HP INSTALL (3) GROUND RODS. INSTALL (3) HTXCWW63111414Fx00 ANTENNAS. INSTALL (1) KATHREIN SCALA TRI SECTOR ANTENNA #800-10270 CLIENT: CROWN INSTALL (1) DISCONNECT BOX. INSTALL (1) 24" X 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX. CASTLE EXISTING SIGN (2' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 57 INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL NODE COORDINATE 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 (8' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 55 SITE LOCATION www.crowncastle.com LATITUDE:33.756778 PLACE 30' CONCRETE TEXTURED STREET LIGHT PROPOSED 48" MYERS METER PEDESTAL LONGITUDE:-118.404964 (8' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 58 PREPARED BY: (7' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 50 (SEE DETAILS 5 & 6 ON SHEET D-3 CoastalCommunications Telecommunications Engineering INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL (8' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 47 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION R / W THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND 10' 10' C CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR & G#43502 3'DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES 70' TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL 50' C (8' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 61 5' L 101 3' 60' 6' INSTALL 24" X 36" FIBER SPLICE BOX 40' 6 ' 10' S (8' B.O.C.) STA. 99 + 64 3' I C D & E 8 G W(SEE DETAIL 10 ON SHEET D-4) "1-800-227-2600 S A E L CALL AT 3' WK R LEAST TWO E / W R R 99 DAYS BEFORE / W 13' YOU DIG #43481 8 " 10' P UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT . V . C TICKET #______________________ . 10' 6 77' ' 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS S I D #43522 E W 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION A L18' W K 117'121' INSTALL METER PEDESTAL 6 W ' S I D E W INSTALL GROUND A REVISION / ISSUEDATE L TEST WELL K JAREZ LN STA. 100 + 00 SITE NAME & ADRESS: INSTALL GROUND MODENA DR STA. 100 + 00 10' W 104' TEST WELL TM-08m3 48" 101 43523 MODENA DR 6 R ' S GROUND LINE / NORTH W I RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA D EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT E W 33.494706 / -117.087739 C A40' & (7' B.O.C.) STA. 100 + 29 L G K 60' C L SITE PLAN M 10' O 36" SWEEP D E C SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: & N DETAIL 'D' G R.G.12/20/16TO A SCALE: 1" = 40' R D / W #43523 SHEET NO. R P-1 TM-08m3 AANTENNA DETAILS (LOWER ARRAY)N.T.S.C12 O' CLOCK VIEWSCALE: 1:5 EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNA TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH POLE. STREETLIGHT #N/A PHASE II CROWN CASTLE PROJECT NO. TOP OF NEW POLE: 30' 0" 142829 TOP OF LOWER ANTENNA: 28' 6" M TOP OF TOP ANTENNA : 37' 6" O INSTALL KATHREIN SCALA TRI RAD CENTER: 27' 6" D CLIENT: C E SECTOR ANTENNA #800-10270 & CROWN N G (SEE DETAILS 11 & 12 ON SHEET D-4) A D CASTLE R 300 SPECTRUM CENTER DR STE. 1200 IRVINE, CA 92618 HTXCWW63111414Fxy0 www.crowncastle.com PREPARED BY: 4' 6" ANTENNA HTXCWW63111414Fxy0 C & 7' 6" G CoastalCommunications Telecommunications Engineering 3' 0" SERVICE AREA INSTALL MAST ARM AND LUMINAIRE NEW STREET LIGHT 5841 EDISON PLACE, SUITE 200 CARLSBAD, CA 92008 PHONE: (760) 929-0910 FAX: (760) 929-0936 INSTALL (3) 24" HTXCWW63111414Fx00 HTXCWW63111414Fxy0 PANEL ANTENNAS (SEE DETAIL 2 ON SHEET D-2)PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL TO AT&T. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO AT&T IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. TOP OF ANTENNA 37' 6" INSTALL NEW 30' STEEL TOP OF BANTENNA DETAILS (TOP ARRAY)N.T.S. 1-800-227-2600 CONCRETE TEXTURED POLE. POLE CALL AT LEAST TWO (SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET D-3) 30' 0" DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG TOP OF UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT TICKET #______________________ ANTENNA 28' 6" 11/04/16 ADD (4) IONS 12/20/16 UPDATED PROJECT DESCRIPTION RAD INSTALL (4) ML IONS-M17HP-19HP M CENTER (SEE DETAIL 1 ON SHEET D-2 & O 27' 6" D DETAIL 14 ON SHEET D-6) C E & N G A D R 18" 16' 7" INSTALL (1) DISCONNECT BOX (SEE DETAIL 7ON SHEET D-3) BOTTOM REVISION / ISSUEDATE OF ION KATHREIN SCALA TRI 9' 6" C 7' 0"SITE NAME & ADRESS: SECTOR ANTENNA #800-10270 & G TM-08m3 43523 MODENA DR RANCHO PALOS VERDES, CA 33.494706 / -117.087739 NEW STREET LIGHT C&G POLE PROFILE INSTALL FIBER SPLICE BOX DRAWN BY:DRAFT DATE:APPROVED BY: INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL R.G.12/20/16TO INSTALL GROUND TEST WELL SHEET NO. P-2 PC RESOLUTION TM-08M3 PRIMARY CANDIDATE PC RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA16-1698, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM-08M3) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE T-INTERSECTION OF JEREZ LANE AND MODENA DRIVE NEAR THE POCKET PARK/PASEO Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 22, 2016, Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 5, 2017, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA16-1698 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan, including expanding technology to provide a competitive advantage for economic development, while limiting visual impacts and encouraging a well-designed streetscape. Furthermore, this project is consistent with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of (DRC) process. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing Southern California Edison street lights already located in the City right-of- structures, and is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses and provide symmetrical spacing of other poles and traffic signals in the right-of-way. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code given that the entire network is located in City right-of-way. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Furthermore, the project is required to comply with all Federal Communication Commission (FCC) radio frequency (RF) emission safety standards. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application, PA16-1698: a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right of way at the T-intersection of Jerez Lane and Modena Drive near the pocket park/paseo. A. Pursu), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Conditional Use Permit Application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application are adequately addressed by the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation measures contained therein will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. No additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the intersection of Jerez Lane and Modena Drive near the pocket park/paseo subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED Section 5. by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of April 2017. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary \[SEAL\] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of April 2017, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA16-1698 (Primary Candidate) Project Description: A concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM-08M3) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the T-intersection of Jerez Lane and Modena Drive near the pocket park/paseo Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA (no grading) DIF Category: NA (no new square footage) TUMF Category: NA (no new square footage) QUIMBY: NA (non-residential) Approval Date: April 5, 2017 Expiration Date: April 5, 2019 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition \[Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)\]. General Requirements PL-2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. The Community Development Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray/Metal/Off-White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL-9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL-10. Development Code. PL-11. The City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL-12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL-13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right-of-Way Permits PL-14. during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Community Development Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Community Development Director PL-15. The maintenance/facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL-16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS-1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre-construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS-2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2016 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2016 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW-2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to start of work. PW-3. A Right-of-Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW-4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75-feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW-5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works Inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION TM-08 ALTERNATIVE CANDIDATE 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA16-1698, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM-08) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SUNNY MEADOWS DRIVE, NORTHWEST OF CENTERLINE OF JEREZ LANE Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 22, 2016 Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 5, 2017, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA16-1698 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan, including expanding technology to provide a competitive advantage for economic development, while limiting visual impacts and encouraging a well-designed streetscape. Furthermore, this project is consistent with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of (DRC) process. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing Southern California Edison street lights already located in the City right-of- structures, and is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses and provide symmetrical spacing of other poles and traffic signals in the right-of-way. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code given that the entire network is located in City right-of-way. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Furthermore, the project is required to comply with all Federal Communication Commission (FCC) radio frequency (RF) emission safety standards. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application, PA16-1698: a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right of way on the north side of Sunny . A. Pursu), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Conditional Use Permit Application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application are adequately addressed by the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation measures contained therein will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. No additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Sunny Meadows , subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED Section 5. by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of April 2017. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary \[SEAL\] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of April 2017, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA16-1698 (Alternative Candidate 1) Project Description: A concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM-08) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA (no grading) DIF Category: NA (no new square footage) TUMF Category: NA (no new square footage) QUIMBY: NA (non-residential) Approval Date: April 5, 2017 Expiration Date: April 5, 2019 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition \[Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)\]. General Requirements PL-2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. The Community Development Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray/Metal/Off-White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL-9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL-10. Development Code. PL-11. The City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL-12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL-13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right-of-Way Permits PL-14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment per during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Community Development Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Community Development Director PL-15. The maintenance/facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL-16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS-1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre-construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS-2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2016 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2016 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW-2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to start of work. PW-3. A Right-of-Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW-4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75-feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW-5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works Inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. PC RESOLUTION TM-08M1 ALTERNATIVE CANDIDATE 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 17- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA16-1698, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM-08M1) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MESSINA STREET, APPRF THE ASTI LANE INTERSECTION CENTERLINE Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 22, 2016, Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 5, 2017, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA16-1698 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan, including expanding technology to provide a competitive advantage for economic development, while limiting visual impacts and encouraging a well-designed streetscape. Furthermore, this project is consistent with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of (DRC) process. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing Southern California Edison street lights already located in the City right-of- structures, and is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses and provide symmetrical spacing of other poles and traffic signals in the right-of-way. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code given that the entire network is located in City right-of-way. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right-of-way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Furthermore, the project is required to comply with all Federal Communication Commission (FCC) radio frequency (RF) emission safety standards. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application, PA16-1698: a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right of way on the north side of Messina . A. Pursu), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, and the subsequent environmental reviews required as mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Conditional Use Permit Application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit Application are adequately addressed by the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation measures contained therein will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. No additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA16-1698, a Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right-of-way on the north side of Messina Street, , subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED Section 5. by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of April 2017. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary \[SEAL\] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 17- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of April 2017, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA16-1698 (Alternative Candidate 2) Project Description: A concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM-08M1) in the City of Temecula right-of-way east of the Asti Lane intersection centerline Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right-of-way MSHCP Category: NA (no grading) DIF Category: NA (no new square footage) TUMF Category: NA (no new square footage) QUIMBY: NA (non-residential) Approval Date: April 5, 2017 Expiration Date: April 5, 2019 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition \[Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)\]. General Requirements PL-2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. The Community Development Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three (3) one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right-of-way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray/Metal/Off-White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL-9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis/Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL-10. Development Code. PL-11. The City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Community Development Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL-12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL-13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right-of-Way Permits PL-14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachmen during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Community Development Director at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Community Development Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Community Development Director PL-15. The maintenance/facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Community Development Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL-16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS-1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre-construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS-2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2016 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2016 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B-4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW-2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department prior to start of work. PW-3. A Right-of-Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW-4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75-feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW-5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right-of-way. The number of active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works Inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. INITIAL STUDY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings Mitigation Measures New slim-line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right-of-way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim-line monopole with concrete street light base – minus the “cobra” light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don’t exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete “street light” type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of a building permit Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department AIR QUALITY General Impact: Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Mitigation Measures: Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) Minimize land disturbances · Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust · Cover trucks when hauling dirt · Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust · exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion G:\\PLANNING\\2010\\PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM-01 CUP\\Planning\\Planning Commission\\CEQA\\MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed · immediately Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if · there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible · Remove unused materials. · Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and grading plan/encroachment permit plan check process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of associated permits and during construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning and Public Works Departments HAZARDS General Impact: Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. Mitigation Measure: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department G:\\PLANNING\\2010\\PA10-0186 NewPath Networks TM-01 CUP\\Planning\\Planning Commission\\CEQA\\MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS 12/14/2016 TM-08m3 Alternative Site Analysis TM08m3 –DAS Node Installation Public ROW adjacent to 43523 Modena Drive, Temecula, CA Alternative Site Analysis –TM08m3, TM08 and TM08m1 Temecula, CA TM-08m3 Primary Candidate–New 37’-6” tapered concrete light pole in ROW adjacent to 43523 Modena Drive near pocket park. Proposed pole mounted equipment: (1) 7’-6” pole-atop omniantenna; (2) 23.2”H x 12” W x 7.1”D panel antennas side-mounted on the pole at 27’-6” AGL; (3) two 32.2”H x 9.61W x 8.6”D radio remove units (RRU) mounted at 16’-7”’ AGL and two RRU’s will be installed at 9’-6”AGL. 48”Hx20”Wx17.25”D Myers power meter will be installed in ROW adjacent to the pole. This candidate meets RF objectives and was approved by HOA with no expected public opposition. The new pole is well set back from residential homes and well- screened by existing trees and landscape improvements along the park perimeter which serves as a buffer between the proposed installation and the adjoining residential properties. TM-08 Alternate Candidate –New 39’-6” concrete textured light pole on north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, approx. 58’ northwest of centerline Jerez Lane. Proposed equipment configuration is a multi-carrier option with one pole top omniantenna, side-mounted panel antennas and four pole-mounted RRU’s. This candidate was well set back from residential properties but was relocated to address public concerns. TM-08m1 Alternate Candidate –New 39’-7” concrete light pole adjacent to pocket park along north side of Messina Street, approx. 41’ east of Asti Lane intersection centerline. Proposed equipment configuration is a multi-carrier option with one pole top omniantenna, side-mounted panel antennas and four pole-mounted RRU’s. This location met set back requirements from residential properties and was well-screened by the existing landscaping; however, it did not meet RF objectives. Proprietary & |2 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08 –Primary and Alternative Candidates TM08m3, TM08 and TM08m1 Original Candidate Proprietary & |3 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08m3 –Primary Candidate Public ROW adjacent to 43523 Modena Drive, Temecula, CA Proprietary & |4 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08 –Alternative Candidate N/S Sunny Meadows Drive, 58’ NW C/L Jerez Lane Proprietary & |5 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08m1 –Alternative Candidate N/S of Messina Street, 41’ E/O C/L Asti Lane Proprietary & |6 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08m1 –Coverage Prediction In-Building Signal Levels (minimum -85 dBmor better) beyond Butterfield Stage Road to the North, CorbieStreet to the South, San Marco Drive to the West and Sunny Meadows Drive to the East Proprietary & |7 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World TM08m3 Primary Candidate Proposed Design & Configuration Existing SiteProposed Candidate Proprietary & |8 Confidential The Foundation for a Wireless WorldThe Foundation for a Wireless World ATTACHMENT 4.12, 4.15, 4.33, 8.04 NARRATIVE SITE JUSTIFICATION STUDY SIGNIFICANT GAP IN COVERAGE, LEAST INTRUSIVE MEANS, COMPLIANCE WITH TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SEC. 15.04.080, ALTERNATIVE SITE ANALYSIS CROWN CASTLE INSTALLATION OF SMALL CELL COMMUNICATIONS NODE ON A NEW CONCRETE TEXTURED LIGHT POLE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW) TM08-m3 ROW adjacent to 43523 Modena Drive Temecula, CA 92592 Prepared for: City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: NewPath Networks LLC (Crown Castle) 300 Spectrum Center Drive, Ste. 1200 Irvine, CA 92618 Contact: Lena Hoffmeyer, Land Use Consultant 714-608-5052 lhoffmeyer@goaspectus.com 1. CROWN CASTLE DAS: A LOW-PROFILE COLLOCATION SYSTEM FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NewPath Networks LLC Λͻ/ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻͼΜ is a wireless telecommunications infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber-fed wireless distributed antenna systems (known in the industry and referred to herein ğƭ ͻ5!{ͼ) to provide wireless telecommunications and broadband services. With approximately 40,000 towers and 15,000 small cell nodes supported by approximately 16,000 miles of ŅźĬĻƩͲ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ źƭ ƷŷĻ ƓğƷźƚƓ͸ƭ ƌğƩŭĻƭƷ ƦƩƚǝźķĻƩ ƚŅ ƭŷğƩĻķ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ źƓŅƩğƭƷƩǒĭƷǒƩĻͲ ǞźƷŷ ğ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ presence in the top 100 US markets. /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ DAS network is a low-profile state-of-the-art in wireless telecommunications technology capable of delivering wireless telecommunications, broadband and data services to customers of multiple carriers such as AT&T, Verizon, Sprint and T-Mobile/MetroPCS. The elements of Crown Castle͸ƭ DAS network are unobtrusive and can be incorporated into slim-line poles that take up little space in the public rights-of-way Λͻwh‘ͼΜ or, where feasible, into existing elements in the ROW such as traffic signal poles, streetlights and wooden utility poles. Crown Castle͸s network therefore allows one aesthetically unobtrusive network to take the place of multiple antennas or macro-sites constructed by individual carriers Α a simple solution that avoids the prospect of multiple carrier-constructed antenna facilities servicing a single service area. Put another way, Crown Castle DAS is the equivalent of a collocation system, as it permits many carriers to transmit their signals over one antenna system with only a single series of vertical elements. 2. THE PROPOSED CROWN CASTLE DAS PROJECT. A. The Proposed Node TM08m3 and Alternative Candidate Analysis. Crown Castle proposes to install a new small cell DAS node TM08-m3 to be located in a public right-of-way (ROW) in the City of Temecula Λͻ/źƷǤͼΜ͵ The node is proposed in ROW near 43523 Modena Drive, on west side of Modena Drive, approx. 40' northwest of Jerez Lane. The subject node ΛƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ Ʒƚ ŷĻƩĻźƓ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ͻtƩƚƆĻĭƷͼΜ will be technically integrated as part of a larger Verizon network that will allow Verizon to provide wireless broadband and telecommunications services and the addition of critical network capacity to a larger area Λͻ{ĻƩǝźĭĻ !ƩĻğͼΜ within the City where this carrier currently experiences a significant gap in coverage and capacity (for a more detailed discussion of the significant gap in the City). The other nodes of the Verizon network are located outside of the jurisdictional boundaries of the City. For that reason, this analysis addresses only the existing and proposed nodes in the City that make up the Project. Each Project node receives an optical signal from a central hub and distributes the signal in the form of radio frequency (RF) transmissions. Distribution of signal from the hub and then to the low-power, low- profile antenna nodes, allows multiple carriers to provide wireless telecommunications and data services to areas otherwise difficult to reach with conventional wireless telecommunications facilities. For the subject node TM-08m3, Crown Castle is proposing to install a А͸-Џͼ omni antenna atop a new 30͸-Љͼ street light pole. Future antenna array will be side-ƒƚǒƓƷĻķ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ƦƚƌĻ ğƷ ЋБ͸-ЏͼğĬƚǝĻ ŭƩğķĻ (AGL). Associated fiber repeater units (RRUs) will ĬĻ ğƷƷğĭŷĻķ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ ƦƚƌĻ ĬĻƷǞĻĻƓ ƷŷĻ ŷĻźŭŷƷ ƚŅ В͸-Џͼ ğƓķ ЋА͸-Џͼ AGL. hƓĻ ƭƒğƌƌ ķźƭĭƚƓƓĻĭƷ Ĭƚǣ Ǟźƌƌ ĬĻ ğƷƷğĭŷĻķ ğƷ А͸-Љͼ !D\[͵ The project also includes ЍБͼI ǣ ЋЉͼ‘ ǣ 17.25D power meter to be installed 8 feet from the pole. This candidate meets ĭğƩƩźĻƩ͸ƭ RF objectives and was approved by the HOA with no expected public opposition. The new pole is well set back from residential homes and well-screened by existing trees and landscape improvements along the park perimeter which serves as a buffer between the proposed installation and the adjoining residential properties. The proposed facility is currently intended for one anchor tenant: Verizon Wireless. DAS facilities can be modified to accommodate additional carriers in the event Crown Castle enters into agreements with such ĭğƩƩźĻƩƭ źƓ ƷŷĻ ŅǒƷǒƩĻ͵ !ĭĭƚƩķźƓŭƌǤͲ Ļğĭŷ ƓƚķĻ źƭ ğ ͻĭƚƌƌƚĭğƷźƚƓͼ ŅğĭźƌźƷǤ ƷŷğƷ can allow multiple carriers to provide service without the need for building additional facilities or networks. As part of this project Crown Castle has also considered other candidates which are discussed below as Alternative options TM08 and TM08m1: TM-08 Alternate Candidate Α nĻǞ ЌВ͸-Џͼ ĭƚƓĭƩĻƷĻ ƷĻǣƷǒƩĻķ ƌźŭŷƷ ƦƚƌĻ ƚƓ ƓƚƩƷŷ ƭźķĻ ƚŅ {ǒƓƓǤ aĻğķƚǞƭ 5ƩźǝĻͲ ğƦƦƩƚǣ͵ ЎБ͸ ƓƚƩƷŷǞĻƭƷ ƚŅ ĭĻƓƷĻƩƌźƓĻ WĻƩĻǩ \[ğƓĻ͵ The proposed equipment configuration was a multi- carrier option with one pole top omni antenna, side-mounted panel antennas and four pole-mounted ww…͸ƭ͵ ŷźƭ ĭğƓķźķğƷĻ Ǟğƭ ǞĻƌƌ ƭĻƷ ĬğĭƉ ŅƩƚƒ ƩĻƭźķĻƓƷźğƌ ƦƩƚƦĻƩƷźĻƭ ĬǒƷ Ǟğƭ ƩĻƌƚĭğƷĻķ Ʒƚ ğķķƩĻƭƭ ƦǒĬƌźĭ concerns. TM-08m1 Alternate Candidate Α nĻǞ ЌВ͸-Аͼ ĭƚƓĭƩĻƷĻ ƌźŭŷƷ ƦƚƌĻ ğķƆğĭĻƓƷ Ʒƚ ƦƚĭƉĻƷ ƦğƩƉ ğƌƚƓŭ ƓƚƩƷŷ ƭźķĻ ƚŅ aĻƭƭźƓğ {ƷƩĻĻƷͲ ğƦƦƩƚǣ͵ ЍЊ͸ ĻğƭƷ ƚŅ !ƭƷź \[ğƓĻ źƓƷĻƩƭĻĭƷźƚƓ ĭĻƓƷĻƩƌźƓĻ͵ tƩƚƦƚƭĻķ ĻƨǒźƦƒĻƓƷ ĭƚƓŅźŭǒƩğƷźƚƓ źƭ ğ multi-carrier option with one pole top omni antenna, side-mounted panel antennas and four pole-mounted ww…͸ƭ͵ ŷźƭ ƌƚĭğƷźƚƓ ƒĻƷ ƭĻƷ ĬğĭƉ ƩĻƨǒźƩĻƒĻƓƷƭ ŅƩƚƒ the residential properties and was well-screened by the existing landscaping. This candidate was favorably received and approved by the City; however, due to subsequent public opposition this candidate had to be relocated. 3. The Applicable Legal Standard for Approval. A. Applicable State Law and Local Ordinance. /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ źƭ ğ ͻĭƚƒƦĻƷźƷźǝĻ ƌƚĭğƌ ĻǣĭŷğƓŭĻ ĭğƩƩźĻƩͼ Λͻ/\[9/ͼΜ͵ /\[9/ƭ ƨǒğƌźŅǤ ğƭ ğ ͻƦǒĬƌźĭ ǒƷźƌźƷǤͼ ğƓķ ƷŷĻƩĻŅƚƩĻ ŷğǝĻ ğ ƭƦĻĭźğƌ ƭƷğƷǒƭ ǒƓķĻƩ ƭƷğƷĻ ƌğǞ͵ .Ǥ ǝźƩƷǒĻ ƚŅ /ğƌźŅƚƩƓźğ tǒĬƌźĭ …ƷźƌźƷźĻƭ /ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓ Λͻ/t…/ͼΜ źƭƭǒğƓĭĻ ƚŅ ğ ͻĭĻƩƷźŅźĭğƷĻ ƚŅ ƦǒĬƌźĭ ĭƚƓǝĻƓźĻƓĭĻ ğƓķ ƓĻĭĻƭƭźƷǤͼ Λͻ/t/bͼΜͲ /\[9/ƭ ŷğǝĻ ğǒƷŷƚƩźƷǤ ǒƓķĻƩ ƭƷğƷĻ ƌğǞ Ʒƚ ͻĻƩĻĭƷ ƦƚƌĻƭͲ ƦƚƭƷƭͲ ƦźĻƩƭͲ ƚƩ ğĬǒƷƒĻƓƷƭͼ źƓ ƷŷĻ wh‘ ƭǒĬƆĻĭƷ ƚƓƌǤ Ʒƚ ƌƚĭğƌ ƒǒƓźĭźƦğƌ ĭƚƓƷƩƚƌ ƚǝĻƩ ƷŷĻ ͻƷźƒĻͲ ƦƌğĭĻ ğƓķ ƒğƓƓĻƩͼ ƚŅ ğĭĭĻƭƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ wh‘͵ ΛtǒĬ͵ …Ʒźƌ͵ /ƚķĻͲ ήή ЊЉЉЊͲ АВЉЊͳ 7901.1; see Williams Communication v. City of Riverside (2003) 114 Cal.App. 4th 642, 648 \[upon obtaining a CPCN, a telephone ĭƚƩƦƚƩğƷźƚƓ ŷğƭ ͻƷŷĻ ƩźŭŷƷ Ʒƚ ǒƭĻ ƷŷĻ ƦǒĬƌźĭ ŷźŭŷǞğǤƭ Ʒƚ źƓƭƷğƌƌ ΝźƷƭΞ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ͵ͼΞ͵Μ The CPUC has issued a CPCN which authorizes Crown Castle to construct the Network pursuant to its ƩĻŭǒƌğƷƚƩǤ ƭƷğƷǒƭ ǒƓķĻƩ ƭƷğƷĻ ƌğǞ͵ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ƭƦĻĭźğƌ ƩĻŭǒƌğƷƚƩǤ ƭƷğƷǒƭ ğƭ ğ /\[9/ ŭźǝĻƭ ƩźƭĻ Ʒƚ ğ ǝĻƭƷĻķ ƩźŭŷƷ Ʒƚ ǒƭĻ ƷŷĻ wh‘ źƓ ƷŷĻ /źƷǤ Ʒƚ ͻĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷ Ͷ ƷĻƌĻƦŷƚƓĻ ƌźƓĻƭ ğƌƚƓŭ ğƓķ ǒƦƚƓ ğƓǤ ƦǒĬƌźc road or highway, ğƌƚƓŭ ƚƩ ğĭƩƚƭƭ ğƓǤ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ǞğƷĻƩƭ ƚƩ ƌğƓķƭ ǞźƷŷźƓ Ʒŷźƭ {ƷğƷĻͼ ğƓķ Ʒƚ ͻĻƩĻĭƷ ƦƚƌĻƭͲ ƦƚƭƷƭͲ ƦźĻƩƭͲ ƚƩ ğĬǒƷƒĻƓƷƭ for supporting the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, in such manner and at such points as not to źƓĭƚƒƒƚķĻ ƷŷĻ ƦǒĬƌźĭ ǒƭĻ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ Ʃƚğķ ƚƩ ŷźŭŷǞğǤΝ͵Ξͼ ΛtǒĬ͵ …Ʒźƌ͵ /ƚķĻͲ ή АВЉЊ͵Μ ŷĻ ƓğƷǒƩĻ of the vested right was described by one court as follows: Ͷ ͻΝLΞƷ ŷğƭ ĬĻĻƓ ǒƓźŅƚƩƒƌǤ ŷĻƌķ ƷŷğƷ ΝƭĻĭƷźƚƓ АВЉЊΞ źƭ ğ ĭƚƓƷźƓǒźƓŭ ƚŅŅĻƩ extended to telephone and telegraph companies to use the highways, which offer when accepted by the construction and maintenance of lines constitutes a binding contract based on adequate consideration, and that the vested right established thereby cannot be impaired by subsequent acts ƚŅ ƷŷĻ \[ĻŭźƭƌğƷǒƩĻ͵ Ν/źƷğƷźƚƓƭ͵Ξͼ Ͷ ŷǒƭͲ ƷĻƌĻƦŷƚƓĻ ĭƚƒƦğƓźĻƭ ŷğǝĻ ƷŷĻ ƩźŭŷƷ to use the public highways to install their facilities. (Williams Communications v. City of Riverside, supra, 114 Cal.App.4th at p. 648 quoting County of L. A. v. Southern Cal. Tel. Co. (1948) 32 Cal.2d 378, 384 \[196 P.2d 773\].) ‘ŷźƌĻ tǒĬƌźĭ …ƷźƌźƷǤ /ƚķĻ ƭĻĭƷźƚƓ АВЉЊ͵Њ ŭƩğƓƷƭ ƌƚĭğƌ ƒǒƓźĭźƦğƌźƷźĻƭ ƷŷĻ ƌźƒźƷĻķ ͻƩźŭŷƷ Ʒƚ ĻǣĻƩĭźƭĻ ƩĻğƭƚƓğĬƌĻ control as to the time, place, and manner in which roads, highways, and waterways are accessed\[ͲΞͼ ƭǒĭŷ controls cannot have the effect of foreclosing use by Crown Castle of the ROW or otherwise prevent Crown /ğƭƷƌĻ ŅƩƚƒ ĻǣĻƩĭźƭźƓŭ źƷƭ ƩźŭŷƷ ǒƓķĻƩ ƭƷğƷĻ ƌğǞ Ʒƚ ͻĻƩĻĭƷ ƦƚƌĻƭͼ źƓ ƷŷĻ wh‘͵ ŷğƷ źƭ ĬĻĭğǒƭĻ ͻƷŷĻ construction and maintenance of telephone lines in the streets and other public places within the City is ƷƚķğǤ ğ ƒğƷƷĻƩ ƚŅ ƭƷğƷĻ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓ ğƓķ ƓƚƷ ğ ƒǒƓźĭźƦğƌ ğŅŅğźƩ͵ͼ Λ Williams Communication v. City of Riverside, supra, 114 Cal.App.4th at p. 653.) hƓ ƷŷĻ Ĭğƭźƭ ƚŅ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ƭƷğƷǒƭ ğƭ ğ /\[9/Ͳ ğƓķ źƷƭ ĭƚƓĭƚƒźƷğƓƷ ƩźŭŷƷƭ Ʒƚ ƷŷĻ wh‘Ͳ ƷŷĻ bĻƷǞƚƩƉ źƭ designed as an ROW system. With respect to the siting and configuration of the Network, the rights afforded under Public Utilities Code section 7901 and 7901.1 apply. Crown Castle reserves its rights under section 7901 and 7901.1, including, but not limited to, its right to challenge any approval process, that źƒƦĻķĻƭ ƚƩ źƓŅƩźƓŭĻƭ ƚƓ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ƩźŭŷƷƭ ğƭ ğ /\[9/͵ The proposed node will comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.04.080 with regard to applicable /źƷǤ͸ƭ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ğƓķ ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ƭƷğƓķğƩķƭ͵ B. Applicable Federal Law. The approval of the Network is also governed by the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No 104-104, 110 StaƷ͵ ЎЏ ΛĭƚķźŅźĻķ ğƭ ğƒĻƓķ źƓ ƭĭğƷƷĻƩĻķ ƭĻĭƷźƚƓƭ ƚŅ …͵{͵/͵Ͳ ğĬƭ ЊЎͲ ЊБͲ ЍАΜ ΛͻĻƌĻĭƚƒ !ĭƷͼΜ͵ ‘ŷĻƓ ĻƓğĭƷźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ĻƌĻĭƚƒ !ĭƷͲ /ƚƓŭƩĻƭƭ ĻǣƦƩĻƭƭĻķ źƷƭ źƓƷĻƓƷ ͻƷƚ ƦƩƚƒƚƷĻ ĭƚƒƦĻƷźƷźƚƓ ğƓķ ƩĻķǒĭĻ regulation in order to secure lower prices and higher quality services for American telecommunications ĭƚƓƭǒƒĻƩƭ ğƓķ ĻƓĭƚǒƩğŭĻ ƷŷĻ ƩğƦźķ ķĻƦƌƚǤƒĻƓƷ ƚŅ ƓĻǞ ƷĻƌĻĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƚƓƭ ƷĻĭŷƓƚƌƚŭźĻƭ͵ͼ ΛЊЊЉ {ƷğƷ͵ ğƷ 56.) As one court noted: Congress enacted the TCA to promote competition and higher quality in telecommunications services and to encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies. Congress intended to promote a national cellular network and to secure lower prices and better service for consumers by opening all telecommunications markets to competition. (T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government of Wyandotte, 528 F.Supp. 2d 1128, 1146-47 (D. Kan. 2007). One way in which the Telecom Act accomplishes these goals is by reducing impediments imposed by local governments upon the installation of wireless communications facilities, such as antenna facilities. (47 …͵{͵/͵ ή ЌЌЋΛĭΜΛАΜΛ!Μ͵Μ {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЌЌЋΛĭΜΛАΜΛ.Μ ƦƩƚǝźķĻƭ ƷŷĻ ƌźƒźƷğƷźƚƓƭ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ ŭĻƓĻƩğƌ ğǒƷŷƚƩźƷǤ ƩĻƭĻƩǝĻķ Ʒƚ state and local governments. Those limitations are set forth as follows: (a) State and local governments may not unreasonably discriminate among providers of ŅǒƓĭƷźƚƓğƌƌǤ ĻƨǒźǝğƌĻƓƷ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻƭ Λή ЌЌЋΛĭΜΛАΜΛ.ΜΛźΜΛLΜΜ͵ (b) State and local governments may not regulate the placement, construction or modification of wireless service facilities in a manner that prohibits, or has the effect of prohibiting, the ƦƩƚǝźƭźƚƓ ƚŅ ƦĻƩƭƚƓğƌ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻƭ ΛĬĻƷƷĻƩ ƉƓƚǞƓ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ͻĻŅŅĻĭƷźǝĻ ƦƩƚŷźĬźƷźƚƓ ĭƌğǒƭĻͼΜ Λή 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(II)). (c) State and local governments must act on requests for authorization to construct or modify ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ ǞźƷŷźƓ ğ ƩĻğƭƚƓğĬƌĻ ƦĻƩźƚķ ƚŅ ƷźƒĻ Λή 332(c)(7)(B)(ii)). (d) Any decision by a state or local government to deny a request for construction or modification of personal wireless service facilities must be in writing and supported by ƭǒĬƭƷğƓƷźğƌ ĻǝźķĻƓĭĻ ĭƚƓƷğźƓĻķ źƓ ğ ǞƩźƷƷĻƓ ƩĻĭƚƩķ Λή 332(c)(7)(B)(iii)). (e) Finally, no state or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction or modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the perceived environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ ĭƚƒƦƌǤ ǞźƷŷ ŅĻķĻƩğƌ ĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƚƓƭ ĭƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓ͸ƭ ƩĻŭǒƌğƷźƚƓƭ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓźƓŭ ƭǒĭŷ ĻƒźƭƭźƚƓƭ Λή ЌЌЋΛĭΜΛАΜΛ.ΜΛźǝΜΜ͵ In addition to the above, other federal enactments and policies also guide local governmental actions, including the following: (a) The Shot Clock Rule: On November 18, 2009, the Federal Communications Commission ΛͻC//ͼΜ ğķƚƦƷĻķ ƷŷĻ ͻ{ŷƚƷ /ƌƚĭƉͼ wǒƌĻͲ ƦƌğĭźƓŭ ƭƷƩźĭƷ ƷźƒĻ ƌźƒits on local governments to act on applications for the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities. The Shot Clock Rule Ǟğƭ źƓƷĻƓķĻķ Ʒƚ ͻƦƩƚƒƚƷĻΝΞ ķĻƦƌƚǤƒĻƓƷ ƚŅ ĬƩƚğķĬğƓķ ğƓķ ƚƷŷĻƩ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻƭͼ ĬǤ ͻƩĻķǒĭźƓŭ ķĻƌğǤƭ źƓ ĭƚƓƭƷƩǒĭƷźƚƓ ğƓķ źƒƦƩƚǝĻƒĻƓƷ ƚŅ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƓĻƷǞƚƩƉƭ͵ͼ (b) White House Broadband Initiative: On February 10, 2011, the White House called for a National Wireless Initiative to make available high-speed wireless services to at least 98 percent of Americans. The initiative would free up spectrum through incentive auctions, spurring innovation, and create a nationwide, interoperable wireless network for public safety with a fiscal goal of catalyzing private investment and innovation and reducing the ķĻŅźĭźƷ ĬǤ υВ͵Џ ĬźƌƌźƚƓͲ ͻŷĻƌƦ ƷŷĻ …Ɠźted States win the future and compete in the 21st ĭĻƓƷǒƩǤ ĻĭƚƓƚƒǤ͵ͼ (c) {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЏЍЉВʹ hƓ CĻĬƩǒğƩǤ ЊАͲ ЋЉЊЋͲ /ƚƓŭƩĻƭƭ ƦğƭƭĻķ ƷŷĻ ͻaźķķƌĻ /ƌğƭƭ ğǣ wĻƌźĻŅ ğƓķ WƚĬ /ƩĻğƷźƚƓ !ĭƷ ƚŅ ЋЉЊЋͼ Λͻw!ͼΜ͵ {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЏЍЉВ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ ğĭƷ źƭ ƦğƩƷ ƚŅ ğ ƭĻƩźĻƭ ƚŅ ƦƩƚǝźƭźƚƓƭ contğźƓĻķ źƓ ƷŷĻ w! ĭƚƒƒƚƓƌǤ ƩĻŅĻƩƩĻķ Ʒƚ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ͻ{ƦĻĭƷƩǒƒ !ĭƷ͵ͼ {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЏЍЉВ ğƌƌƚǞƭ ŅƚƩ ministerial approval of collocated wireless facilities, which is intended to facilitate rapid development of wireless infrastructure on a national basis. (See 47 U.S.C. ή ЊЍЎЎ͵Μ {ĻĭƷźƚƓ ЏЍЉВ ΛƓƚǞ ĭƚķźŅźĻķ ğƭ ЍА …͵{͵/͵ ή ЊЍЎЎΜ ƒğƓķğƷĻƭ ğķƒźƓźƭƷƩğƷźǝĻ -- not discretionary -- ğƦƦƩƚǝğƌƭ ƚŅ ͻƒƚķźŅźĭğƷźƚƓƭͼ Ʒƚ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƷĻƌĻĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƚƓƭ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭʹ \[A\] State or local government may not deny, and shall approve, any eligible facilities request for a modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. ΛЍА …͵{͵/͵ ή ЊЍЎЎΛğΜΛЊΜͲ ĻƒƦŷğƭźƭ ğķķĻķ͵Μ !Ɠ ͻĻƌźŭźĬƌĻ ŅğĭźƌźƷźĻƭ ƩĻƨǒĻƭƷ ͻaƚķźŅźĭğƷźƚƓƭͼ źƓĭƌǒķĻƭ ğ ƩĻƨǒĻƭƷ Ʒƚ ͻĭƚƌƌƚĭğƷĻͼ ğ ŅğĭźƌźƷǤ͵ ΛLķ͵ ğƷ ή ЊЍЎЎΛğΜΛЋΜΛ!Μ͵Μ !ƭ ķźƭĭǒƭƭĻķ ŅǒƩƷŷĻƩ below, because it is a qualifying collocation facility, an argument may be made that the Project qualifies for ministerial approval under the Spectrum Act. Further, the Federal Communications Commission recently provided clarification to the Spectrum Act in a recently published order. The FCC noted in its order: We take important steps in this Report and Order to promote the deployment of wireless infrastructure, recognizing that it is the physical foundation that supports all wireless communications. We do this by eliminating unnecessary reviews, thus reducing the costs and delays associated with facility siting and construction. Specifically, the order (dated October 17, 2014), makes provisions for the following: Clarifies key terms in the Act such as Base Station, Eligible Facility Request, what is deemed Existing, and Tower; What constitutes Substantial Change - For Towers and Base Stations sited within the public right-of-way, a change to an existing facility is less than substantial, and must be approved if the height increase is less than 10% increase or 10-feet, whichever is greater, or has a protrusion of less than 6-feet from the edge of the structure, or if the change would defeat concealment elements of the structure. Governing authority may only require documentation that is reasonably related to whether the request is covered under the rules; Governing authority may not require submission of any other documentation, including proof of need. 4. The Project is the Least Intrusive Means of Filling a Significant Gap in Coverage. A. bƚķĻ \[ƚĭğƷźƚƓƭ ğƓķ ƷŷĻ ͻ{źŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ DğƦͼ źƓ /ƚǝĻƩğŭĻ. The node of the Project is necessary to fill a significant gap in coverage in the City. The significant gap is graphically demonstrated in RF coverage maps provided as part of this submittal, which depict existing Verizon service in the area to be served by the Project. These maps also depict TM08m3 as a feature of the larger Network. The existing service map describes four levels of service: (i)Marginal (Dark Blue): -105 to -95 dBm; (ii)Okay (Yellow): -95 to -85 dBm; (iii)Good (Light Blue): -85 to -75 dBm; (iv)Best (Green): -75 to -0 dBm; Each level is characterized by a minimum signal level. As a general rule, a minimum signal level of -85 dBm is required for optimal In-Building coverage and a minimum signal level of -95 dBm is necessary for adequate In-Vehicle coverage. The proposed candidate will be provide a minimum for in-building signal levels beyond Butterfield Stage Road to the North, Corbie Street to the South, San Marco Drive to the West and Sunny Meadows Drive to the East. The key to coverage is having a signal level strong enough to allow multiple customers to make and maintain contact with the network. There is a direct correlation between the height of the antenna and the strength of the service. In this case, /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ķĻƭźŭƓ ƭĻĻƉƭ ğ ƒźƓźƒǒƒ ƚŅ wC ƦƩƚƦğŭğƷźƚƓ ƌĻǝĻƌͲ Ǟŷźĭŷ provides a sufficient level of service to address growing capacity demands and to reach indoor users, while avoiding poles that may be too obtrusive. The courts have upheld the use of in-building minimum standards as a proper benchmark for determining whether a significant gap in coverage exists. (See, e.g., MetroPCS Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco Λb͵5͵/ğƌ͵ ЋЉЉЏΜ ЋЉЉЏ …͵{͵ 5źƭƷ͵ \[9–L{ ЍЌВБЎ ΝͻĭğƩĻŅǒƌ ƩĻğķźƓŭ ƚŅ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ĭğƭĻƭ that contain a significant gap ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ƦĻƩƭǒğķĻƭ ƷŷĻ ĭƚǒƩƷ ƷŷğƷ ğƓǤ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ƭŷƚǒƌķ źƓĭƌǒķĻ ĭƚƓƭźķĻƩğƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ğ ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ĭğƩƩźĻƩ͸ƭ źƓ- ĬǒźƌķźƓŭ ĭƚǝĻƩğŭĻ͵ͼΞ͵Μ LƓ Ʒŷźƭ ĭğƭĻͲ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ ƌĻǝĻƌƭ źƓ ƷŷĻ {ĻƩǝźĭĻ !ƩĻğ Ņğƌƌ ĬĻƌƚǞ ƷŷĻ ƒźƓźƒǒƒ standard for adequate in-building coverage. (See RF propagation maps \[existing coverage area\].) The need to fill the existing significant coverage gap to a level that allows adequate in-building coverage and to address growing capacity demands is underscored by the greater numbers of customers dropping their landlines and relying solely on wireless telecommunications for their phone service. Additionally: (1)In a recent international study, the United States dropped to fifteenth in the world in 1 broadband penetration, well behind South Korea, Japan, the Netherlands and France. 2 (2)40 percent of all American homes are now wireless only. (3)More and more civic leaders and emergency response personnel cite lack of a robust wireless network as a growing public safety risk. The number of 911 calls placed by people using wireless phones has significantly increased in recent years. It is estimated that about 3 70 percent of 911 calls are placed from wireless phones, and that percentage is growing. (4)Data demand from new smartphones and tablets is leading to a critical deficit in spectrum, requiring more wireless antennas and infrastructure. According to a 2011 report, wireless data traffic was 110 percent higher than in the last half of 2010. Similarly, AT&T reports 4 that its wireless data volumes have increased 30-fold since the introduction of the iPhone. 5 (5)Wireless data traffic is expected to grow by a factor of 20 between 2010 and 2015. 1 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(OECD) Directorate for Science, Technology, and Industry, “Broadband Statistics,”(June 2010): <www.oecd.org/sti/ict/broadband>. 2 Federal Communications Commission(April 2013). 3 Federal Communications Commission (2013) http://www.fcc.gov/guides/wireless-911-services. 4 Executive Office of the President Council of Economic Advisors(White House, Feb. 2012) at 2-6. 5 Id. As more Americans depend on wireless communications technologies and smartphone, reliable network capacity and in-building coverage will be critical. These are some of the reasons courts now recognize that ğ ͻƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ ŭğƦͼ ĭğƓ ĻǣźƭƷ ƚƓ ƷŷĻ Ĭğƭźƭ ƚŅ źƓğķĻƨǒğƷĻ źƓ-building coverage. (See, e.g., MetroPCS Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, supra, U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43985; T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County (D.Kans. 2007) 528 F.Supp.2d 1128.) Crown Castle has developed a number of node designs which represent the latest achievement in reducing the profile of the facilities. A smaller antenna configuration would impede larger aesthetic objectives of facilitating collocation and minimizing the need for additional network facilities as demands on the Network grow. Put simply, the smaller the antenna result in a less robust the network. That equates to diminished capacity and coverage -- and a resultant need for more nodes in the future as more customers use the network. By contrast, the panel antennas proposed in the Network provide ample capacity for increased user demand (e.g., increased data needs). Users in the Service Area therefore would experience an intolerably high percentage of blocked and dropped calls for outside use, with a commensurate decline in signal strength as one moves toward the inside of existing buildings and homes. With this project Verizon seeks to provide sufficient signal strength to ensure not only adequate signal for mobile and outdoor users, but reliable in-building coverage for all those customers who may seek to abandon their home landlines and sufficient capacity to address new data demands from smartphones and tablets. Wireless customers must be able to count on a level of service commensurate with that provided by their landlines. Such considerations are relevant to a determination of significant gap. (See, e.g., T-Mobile Central LLC v. City of Fraser (E.D. Mich. 2009) 675 F. Supp. 2d 721 \[considering failure rate of 911 emergency calls.\]) By contrast, installation of the proposed node comprising the Project would result in adequate outdoor and in-building coverage for Verizon users and would be the least intrusive means relative to other previously reviewed and approved candidates. B. Visual Compatibility. As discussed more fully below, the Service Area described above currently experiences a significant gap in ǞźƩĻƌĻƭƭ ƷĻƌĻĭƚƒƒǒƓźĭğƷźƚƓƭ ĭƚǝĻƩğŭĻ͵ ƚ Ņźƌƌ ƷŷğƷ ŭğƦͲ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ ƦƩƚƦƚƭĻƭ ƷŷĻ ͻƌĻğƭƷ źƓƷƩǒƭźǝĻ ƒĻğƓƭͲͼ as articulated by the Ninth Circuit in T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. City of Anacortes, 572 F.3d 987, 995 (9th Cir. ЋЉЉВΜ͵ ŷĻ ƭƷğƓķğƩķͲ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ĭƚǒƩƷ ƓƚƷĻķ źƓ ƷŷğƷ ĭğƭĻͲ ͻƩĻƨǒźƩĻƭ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ ƦƩƚǝźķĻƩ ͷƭŷƚǞ ƷŷğƷ ƷŷĻ ƒğƓƓĻƩ źƓ which it proposes to fill the significant gap in service is the least intrusive on the values that the denial ƭƚǒŭŷƷ Ʒƚ ƭĻƩǝĻ͵͸ͼ Λ Ibid.) This allows \[F\]or a meaningful comparison of alternative sites before the siting application process is needlessly repeated. It also gives providers an incentive to choose the least intrusive site in their first siting applications, and it promises to ultimately identify the best solution for the community, not merely the least one remaining after a series of application denials. (Id. at 995.) In this case, because Crown Castle is a CLEC entitled to construct its systems in the ROW, its DAS networks are inherently ROW systems. On that basis, Crown Castle examined those alternatives theoretically ğǝğźƌğĬƌĻ Ʒƚ źƷ źƓ ƷŷĻ wh‘͵ ŷĻ ğƓğƌǤƭźƭ ĬĻƌƚǞ ķĻƒƚƓƭƷƩğƷĻƭ ǞŷǤ ƷŷĻ tƩƚƆĻĭƷ ƨǒğƌźŅźĻƭ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ͻƌĻğƭt intrusive ƒĻğƓƭͼ ƚŅ ŅźƌƌźƓŭ ƷŷĻ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ ŭğƦ źƓ ƭĻƩǝźĭĻ ķĻƭĭƩźĬĻķ ğĬƚǝĻ͵ (1) Height of the Proposed Facility. The antenna heights and locations of the DAS nodes were chosen to provide the minimum signal level needed to meet critical coverage and capacity needs in the Service Area. Despite the technical limitations of a low-profile system, Crown Castle seeks to maximize the coverage of each node location, since maximization of the node performance equates to a lower overall number of facilities for the Network and a less intrusive system. Accordingly, each location was chosen to provide an effective relay of signal from the adjacent node, so that ubiquitous coverage of the minimum signal level is provided throughout the Service Area with the minimum number of nodes. (2) Location of the Proposed Facilities. The selected node locations maximize the RF coverage of the node and minimize interference/overlap with the other nodes of the system, resulting in a lower overall number of facilities for the Network and a less intrusive system. Each node provides an effective relay of signal from the adjacent node, so that ubiquitous coverage is provided throughout the Service Area. Because each node is location-dependent on the other nodes of the Network, moving a node too far from its proposed location will result in an inability meet coverage objectives and thereby impair the Network. In selecting this node location, Crown Castle also sought out existing utility poles, street lights, and other existing structures in ROW that could serve as a potential host site for an alternative location. (3) DAS as Least Intrusive Means Technology. Even apart from the siting of the nodes, DAS itself is inherently minimally intrusive by design. DAS was developed as a smaller-scale solution to the larger macro-site or cell tower. It therefore represents a significant technological advance in the development of smaller profile wireless transmission devices. As devices shrink in size, they also, by definition, shrink in power. Accordingly, more facilities are needed and such facilities must be located closer to the user. The nodes are designed to be smaller scale and lower power to allow them to integrate more easily into their surroundings and thereby render them less aesthetically intrusive. The DAS node facilities proposed by Crown Castle combine a smaller scale product with state-of-the-art technology that allows for multiple carriers to provide service from the node. The nodes are designed to blend into the existing elements of the ROW as they feature narrow-profile poles and minimal equipment. Each facility is also designed Ʒƚ ĬƌĻƓķ ǞźƷŷ ĻǣźƭƷźƓŭ ŅĻğƷǒƩĻƭ źƓ ƷŷĻ Ʃƚğķ͵ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ 5!{ ƓĻƷǞƚƩƉ ƨǒğƌźŅźĻƭ ğƭ ƷŷĻ ͻƌĻğƭƷ źƓƷƩǒƭźǝĻ ƒĻğƓƭͼ ƚŅ ŅźƌƌźƓŭ ƷŷĻ źķĻƓƷźŅźĻķ ƭźŭƓźŅźĭğƓƷ ŭğƦ źƓ ĭƚǝĻƩğŭĻ ŅƚƩ ƷŷĻ ŅƚƌƌƚǞźƓŭ reasons, among others: (a) Crown Castle DAS utilizes the latest in wireless infrastructure technology, incorporating smaller, low-power facilities instead of using larger -- and sometimes more obtrusive -- cell towers; (b) Crown Castle DAS utilizes the ROW, thereby avoiding intrusions into private property; (c) Crown Castle DAS allows for collocation by multiple carriers, thereby avoiding antenna proliferation; (d) Crown Castle DAS strikes a balance between antenna height and coverage in order to minimize visual impacts; (e) Crown Castle DAS carefully spaces the nodes to effectively relay signal with a minimum of node locations; and (f) Crown Castle DAS seeks to utilize existing vertical elements in the ROW, such as traffic signal poles, streetlights and utility poles thereby minimizing the net number of vertical intrusions in the ROW. (4) Health and Safety/FCC Compliance. The FCC has preempted the field of compliance with RF emission standards. Moreover, section 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) preempts local and state governments from regulating the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities on the basis of the perceived health effects of RF emissions. Nevertheless, the Network, and all equipment associated with the Network, complies with all applicable FCC RF emission standards. A demonstration of ƷŷĻ bĻƷǞƚƩƉ͸ƭ ĭƚƒƦƌźğƓĭĻ ǞźƷŷ the applicable FCC RF emission standards is shown in RF exposure report provided as part of this submittal. (5) Safety and Monitoring Standards. The FCC has preempted the field of compliance with RF emission standards. Moreover, section 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7)(B)(iv) preempts local and state governments from regulating the siting of wireless telecommunications facilities on the basis of the perceived health effects of RF. Nevertheless, the Network, and all equipment associated with the Network, complies with all applicable FCC RF emission standards. A ķĻƒƚƓƭƷƩğƷźƚƓ ƚŅ ƷŷĻ bĻƷǞƚƩƉ͸ƭ ĭƚƒƦƌźğƓĭĻ ǞźƷŷ ƷŷĻ ğƦƦƌźĭğĬƌĻ C// wC ĻƒźƭƭźƚƓ ƭƷğƓķğƩķƭ źƭ ƭŷƚǞƓ źƓ wC exposure report provided as part of this submittal. (6) Design Standards and Selection Criteria for Each Node Site. Given the low profile of the nodes, and the resultant limitations of such a low-profile system, Crown Castle seeks to maximize the coverage of each node location, since maximization of the node coverage equates to a lower overall number of facilities for the network and a less intrusive system. Accordingly, each location was chosen to provide an effective relay of signal from the adjacent node, so that ubiquitous coverage is provided throughout the Service Area with the least number of nodes. Each node is locationally dependent on the other nodes of the Network. To move a node too far from its proposed location will result in an inability meet coverage objectives. Moving outside that proposed location will preclude the ability of the node to properly propagate its signal to the other nodes in the larger Network. Crown Castle also sought out existing utility pole and streetlight pole sites that could serve as a potential host site for an alternative location. The further a node is moved from its proposed location, the more the signal from that node will attenuate. In determining other viable locations for a node, moving more than 50 feet from the proposed location may materially impair the coverage objectives for the facility. While Crown Castle is able to install new poles to achieve its RF coverage objectives, Crown Castle made a strategic decision to minimize the installation of new poles Α where possible -- and locate the Network nodes at the site of existing vertical elements, such as street signs and wood utility poles. By approaching a network design in this matter, Crown Castle sought to avoid the risk of proliferation of ǝĻƩƷźĭğƌźƷǤ źƓ ƷŷĻ wh‘͵ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ğƦƦƩƚğĭŷ ĻƓƭǒƩĻƭ ƷŷğƷ źƷ ŷğƭ ĭŷƚƭĻƓ ƷŷĻ ͻƌĻğƭƷ źƓƷƩǒƭźǝĻ ƒĻğƓƭͼ ƚŅ providing service to the Service Area. In many cases, Crown Castle identified alternative locations that are technically feasible. Yet, in each instance, Crown Castle selected the proposed site on the basis of (a) Technical feasibility; (b) Ability to utilize existing vertical elements; (c) Ability to meet RF objectives; and (d) Minimization of visibility/aesthetic impacts. 5. Conclusion. Crown Castle respectfully submits this Site Justification Narrative for the /źƷǤ͸ƭ ĭƚƓƭźķĻƩğƷźƚƓ͵ /ƩƚǞƓ /ğƭƷƌĻ͸ƭ ƩĻƦƩĻƭĻƓƷğƷźǝĻƭ ğƩĻ ƚƓ ŷğƓķ Ʒƚ ğƓƭǞĻƩ ƨǒĻƭƷźƚƓƭ ğƓķ ğķķƩĻƭƭ ĭƚƓĭĻƩƓƭ͵ * * * NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA16-1698 Applicant: Carver Chiu, Crown Castle LLC Proposal: A Conditional Use Permit to install a new wireless telecommunication facility on a new high concrete street light pole as part of a Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM-08M3) in the City of Temecula right-of-way at the T- intersection of Jerez Lane and Modena Drive near the pocket park/paseo. Node TM-08M3 is the Primary Candidate, and Staff is recommending its approval to the Planning Commission. However, two Alternative Candidates are included as part of this proposal. Alternative Candidate 1 (Node TM-08) would be a similarly designed wireless telecommunication facility and light pole located on the north Lane. Alternative Candidate 2 (TM-08M1) would be a similarly designed wireless telecommunication facility and light pole located on the north side of Messina The Planning Commission will take action on one location only. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Case Planner: Matt Peters, (951) 694-6408 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: April 5, 2017 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, Supplemental Material TemeculaCA.gov. Any distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. In TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Community Development Department, (951) 694-6400.