HomeMy WebLinkAbout051401 CSC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
TEMECULA CITY HALL
MONDAY, MAY 14, 2001
6:00 P.M.
CALLTO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLLCALL:
Chairman Jim Meyler
Commissioner Edwards
Edwards, Henz, Hogan, Yorke, Meyler,
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited
to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an
item no~t listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled
out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and
address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Community Services Commission Secretary before the item is addressed by the
Commission. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
DIVISION REPORTS
COMMISSION BUSINESS
R:\CSCAGEND\051401 .doc
Approval of Community Services Commission Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the Community Services Commission approves the
minutes of the April 9, 2001 meeting.
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file this
report regarding the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for
Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
Namin.q of the Children's Museum
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission recommend to the
Board of Directors that the new Children's Museum be named
Imagination Workshop, the Temecula Children's Museum.
Water Park Feasibility Study
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file the
findings of the Water Park Feasibility Study.
Ener.qy Crisis Update
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file the
report on the Energy Crisis Update.
Capital Improvement Pro.qram Proiects for FY200t-2002
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 That the Community Services Commission approve in its
substantial form, the Capital Improvement Program (ClP)
projects proposed for the Temecula Community Services
Department (TCSD) for FY2001-2002.
R:\CSCAGEND\051401 .doc
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Community Services Commission
will be held on Monday, June 11, 2001, 6:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\CSCAGEND\051401 .doc
ITEM NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
APRIL 9, 2001
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Community Services Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 P.M., on Monday, April 9, 2001 in the City Council Chambers of Temeeula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Yorke.
ROLLCALL
Present: Commissioners Edwards, Henz, Hogan, Yorke, and
Chairman Meyler.
Absent: None.
Also Present:
Director of Community Services Parker,
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse,
Recreation Superintendent Pelletier,
Maintenance Superintendent Harrington,
Development Services Administrator McCarthy,
Management Analyst Smith,
Administrative Secretary Zig[er, and
Minute Clerk DeEmers.
PRESENTATIONS
Plaque of Recoqnition - Temecula Valley Museum Staff - Maq.qie Allen
Accepting the award with gratitude, Ms. Maggie Allen noted what an honor and privilege
it is to work at the museum.
Plaque of Appreciation - Community Services Department - Ms. Cathy McCarthy
A plaque of appreciation was presented to Ms. Cathy McCarthy for her outstanding
work, expressing gratitude for the services she has performed.
Plaque of Recognition - TCSD Maintenance Division Staff - Mr. Anthony Martinez
Chairman Meyler presented Mr. Anthony Martinez, from the Maintenance Division Staff,
with a plaque of recognition for his diligent efforts in working for the City.
(It was noted that an additional presentation was made at a later point in the
meeting; see page 11.)
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
DIVISION REPORTS
Maintenance Superintendent Harrinqton provided a brief overview of various proiects
that were completed by the Maintenance Division durinq the month of March 2001,
relaying the followinq:
The City Hall's parking lots were sealed and re-striped.
At Rancho California Sports Park the Padre Field home run fence was installed.
All the sports parks within the City had the ball field fences and backstops repaired in
preparation for Little League season.
At Margarita Community Park the channel fencing was repaired.
At Margarita Community Park and Temecula Elementary School the excess
vegetation throughout the drainage channel was removed.
The interiors of the restrooms at Rancho California Sports Park, Rancho Vista Fields,
Paloma Del Sol Park, Kent Hindergardt Memorial Park, and the Temecula Duck
Pond were painted.
Approximately 2500 linear feet of deteriorated split-rail fencing along Rancho
California Road was removed in preparation for the installation of the plastic split-rail
fencing system at the Villages tract.
Maintenance Supervisor Harrington noted that there was a minor accident at Rancho
California Sports Park, relaying that a man-lift fell over, taking out a light pole, noting that
while the electrical contractor suffered a broken nose and broken leg, he was recovering.
Commissioner Yorke relayed that the lights at the parks look wonderful.
Development Services Administrator McCarthy provided the followinq information
re.qardinq current Community Services proiects:
Advised that on Saturday, April 21, 2001 the Community Services Department would
be hosting a Make a Difference Day, and Household Hazardous Waste Round-up
and Community Clean-up; relayed that T-shirts and hats had been provided to Staff
and the Commissioners, noting that these are two separate events that would be
held on the same day; specified that Make a Difference Day involves the clean up of
a selected site in the City by volunteers, noting that the creek bed adjacent to Old
Town was the area that had been selected; and relayed that the Household
Hazardous Waste and Community Cleanup would be held from 8:00 A.M. to 2:00
P.M. at Temecula Valley High School in the upper parking lot adjacent to the tennis
COUrtS.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 2
Relayed the Children's Museum Subcommittee met on March 19, 2001 and had
preliminary discussions regarding a potential theme, and space allocation for the
facility, noting that a Community Workshop was scheduled for April 23, 2001 at 6:00
P.M. in the Council Chambers.
Noted that a Community Workshop was held for the 40-acre Sports Complex on
Saturday, April 7, 2001, with approximately 30 participants in attendance; relayed
that although it rained, the participants toured the site via bus transportation, and
upon returning to City Hall everyone completed an individual assessment of the site
and project itself; and noted that those attending the workshop were divided into
three groups and each group sketched a preliminary design indicating what type of
amenities were needed for the Sports Complex, which varied slightly.
Advised that plan check comments for the Senior Center Expansion have been
returned to the consultant, relaying that the Economic Development Agency, who
administers the funds for CDGB to be used for this project, would be reviewing the
specifications and would potentially be returned next week; and noted the project
would be going out to bid approximately one week after receiving final approval,
specifying that it would be an approximate 30-day process.
Noted that the Chaparral Pool plans are currently being reviewed by Environmental
Health; and relayed that DSA had begun the plan check process.
Recreation Superintendent Pelletier provided the followinq information reqardinfl
upcominq events and activities:
Noted that several Staff members attended the California Parks and Recreation
Society Conference (CPRS) held in Sacramento, noting that several awards were
received by the City of Temecula, listed as follows: two Awards of Excellence, one
for the High Hopes Video and the other for the Recreation Brochure; and two Awards
of Merit, one for the High Hopes Program, and one for the marketing that had been
done through the Museum; and relayed that these awards would be displayed in City
Hall or at the associated facility.
The Annual Spring Egg Hunt, co-sponsored by Rancon Real Estate, would be held
on April 14, 2001, at four different park sites listed as follows: Temeku Hills Park,
North South Sports Park, Rotary Park and Paloma Del Sol Park, noting all egg hunts
would begin at 10:00 A.M.
On May 1, 2001 the Community Services Department will once again host the
Annual Volunteer Recognition Event, noting that it will be held at the Community
Recreation Center.
Staff is preparing a special event to welcome the Vail Ranch Community to the City
of Temecula, which would be held on July 1,2001; noted that the Commission will be
updated at the next meeting.
Preparation for the 4~h of July festivities are underway, relaying that the day will begin
with the annual parade, advising that there will be food, fun, and entertainment at the
Sports Park, noting that the evening would conclude with the firework show.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 3
Advised that the next Recreational Brochure to be sent to the public is on schedule,
and will be distributed at the end of May.
For Commissioner Henz, Recreation Superintendent Pelletier relayed that for the Egg
Hunt Events, the City has four bunny characters and one duck character.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes of March 12, 2001 Commission Meetin.q
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the minutes of the March 12, 2001 Community Services
Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to approve the minutes, as written. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Edwards and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
2. Paseo Del Sol Conceptual Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file a report on a five-acre neighborhood park in the Paseo
Del Sol development
Director of Community Services Parker introduced Mr. Dean Meyer, who provided
information regarding the park plan, noting that the Commission was being requested to
select a name for the park.
Via overheads, Mr. Meyer presented the Master Plan for the five-acre passive open
space park, noting that it was part of the Paseo Del Sol/Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan
and the Development Agreement with the City, relaying the park's location on Meadows
Parkway; and advised that this park would include 21 parking spaces, two tot lot
facilities, a vast open turf area, providing additional information regarding the park.
Director of Community Services Parker noted that the plan would encompass the
following, a sidewalk that would traverse the entire park, noting that this is a
neighborhood facility and there would not be any lights for any type of organized sports,
relaying that to the south of the park is an open natural space area that would be
maintained by the Paseo Del Sol Homeowners Association; noted that there would be
security lighting at the rear of the park; for Commissioner Yorke, reiterated that the fields
were not designed as practice fields for organized sports, but could be utilized for
sporting activities; for Commissioner Hogan, noted that there were no plans to upgrade
the fields in the future; for Chairman Meyler, relayed that there would be age appropriate
equipment in the tot lots; and for Commissioner Edwards, confirmed that there would not
be any restroom facilities, due to the small size of the park.
Clarifying the specific location of the park, Mr. Meyer provided additional information for
Commissioner Edwards.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 4
Since no formal action was required regarding this item, the Community Services
Commission now considered Agenda Item Number 2.2.
2.2 Approve a name to be recommended to the Board of Directors for a
five-acre park site located on Meadows Parkway in the Paseo Del Sol
Development.
Director of Community Services Parker requested the Commission to select a name for
the park site; relayed that the recommendation would be subsequently presented to City
Council, noting that the following names had been suggested: Meadows Park and
Vineyard Park, relaying that an additional list of suggested names from the community
was supplied to the Commission.
MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to recommend that the park be named Meadows
Park. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hogan. (Ultimately this motion
passed; see below).
Commissioner Henz, echoed by Commissioner Hogan, relayed that the name Meadows
Parkway was most appropriate due to its location on Meadows Parkway.
At this time voice vote was taken, reflecting unanimous approval.
3. Arts Council Cultural Arts Master Plan Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file the update
on the Cultural Arts Master Plan.
Introducing Ms. Martha Minkler, Director of Community Services Parker noted that she
would update the Commission regarding the Arts Council's activities.
Ms. Minkler, Executive Director of the Arts Council, provided an overview of the goals
and objectives for the Cultural Arts Master Plan from December 2000 through April 9,
2001; relayed that the Arts Council is ready to implement the Cultural Arts Master Plan,
pending available funding, noting that there had been wonderful press coverage and
support from the local newspaper and magazines; and advised that funding had been
received for the whole program from Southern California Edison, but due to their recent
financial problems that funding is no longer available; and noted that she was currently
in the process of writing grant requests.
With respect to the Arts in Education Proqram, Ms. Minkler relayed that the Arts Council
participated in the following:
Organized a four-week Summer Youth Art Institute at Temecula Valley High School
and Temecula Middle School.
Conducted, with coordination by Temecula Valley Middle School, a contest for
artwork to serve as official artwork for the 12th Annual Arts in the Country Festival
brochure; noted that the contest was won by Jessica Baker from Margarita Middle
School.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 5
With respect to the Arts in Public Places Proqram, Ms. Minkler relayed that the Arts
Council participated in the following:
Interfaced with local residents interested in erecting a bronze statue to honor Mr.
John Moramarco Senior.
Interfaced with Marian Van Ruiten, owner of a gallery in Sister City Voorburg,
Holland to coordinate second annual cultural arts exchange.
Director of Community Services Parker noted that an Arts and Open Spaces component
had been established as part of the Development Impact Fee, which would potentially be
part of Development Agreements in the future; and advised that a component of that has
already been established in the Wolf Creek Development Specific Plan.
With respect to the Collaboration & Support Service Proqram, Ms. Minkler relayed that
the Arts Council participated in the following:
Assisted City of Temecula's Old Town promotional effort by promoting their Dixieland
Jazz Festival.
Collaborated with Promenade Mall in Temecula to promote the arts by scheduling a
week of the Visual Expressions Art Show in the mall.
Co-produced the Temecula Street Painting Festival.
Assisted Temecula Ballet by providing funding resources for their grant writer.
Assisted West Coast Festival Ballet Theatre by providing volunteers.
Assisted Temecula Valley Teacher's Music Association with publicizing group and
event information.
Assisted the Musician's Workshop with reorganization and promoting their chorus,
orchestra, and youth jazz ensemble.
Assisted Fine Arts Network/Applause Children's Theatre with announcing audition
information.
Assisted Temecula Vintage Singers with publicizing April concert.
Assisted Temecula Valley Players by announcing audition and event information for
"The Music Man".
Assisted Dorland Mountain Arts Colony in gaining a wider public recognition by
publicizing their Open Studios Program.
Assisted Temecula Valley Rose Society by promoting their annual Rose Show during
the Arts in the Country Festival.
Assisted West Coast Ballet Theatre with promoting their group through the Arts in
the Country Festival 2000.
Assisted Gentle Spirit Ranch in publicizing their need for art teacher donations and
art supplies for their facility.
With respect to the Historic Preservation Proqram, Ms. Minkler relayed that the Arts
Council participated in the following:
Presided at the meeting where the name, officers and mission statement were
determined for the Temecula Valley Historical Society.
Assisted with preparation of the goals and objectives for the Temecula Valley
Historical Society.
Prepared grant requests.
Assisted with recommendation for potential funding sources for Temecula Valley
Historical Society.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 6
Provided mailing label and data base information for TemeculaJMurrieta area for
membership campaign.
With respect to the Performing Arts Facilities/Community Theatre, Ms. Minkler relayed
that the Arts Council participated in the following:
Served on Board of Theatre Foundation.
Promoted support of Theatre Foundation through newsletters.
Supported Theatre Foundation fund-raising events.
With respect to the Public Involvement Program, Ms. Minkler relayed that the Arts
Council participated in the following:
Redesigned the Arts Council's website and included a resource directory
Produced the seven-week 12th Annual Arts in the Country Festival showcasing over
700 visual and performing artists
Participated in Familiarization tours of Temecula; attended lunch with representatives
of State Department of Tourism/International.
Spoke on Arts in the City/Arts in the Country Festival 2001 to concierges from San
Diego and Orange Counties.
Provided information to the Chamber for inclusion in Celebrations California 2001
(published by California Tourism).
Regarding the Visual Expressions Art Show for Commissioner Yorke, Ms. Minkler
reiterated that the first week of display would be held at the Temecula Museum, and the
second week could be at the Promenade Mall.
Commissioner Yorke recommended that an area in City Hall be designated for a
permanent display area of children's artwork, noting that this would have a significant
positive effect when the public visited City Hall, advising that contest art could be
displayed; additionally, recommended investigating the local hotels in order to see if
there was interest in displaying children's artwork; with respect to funding issues,
recommended that the City sponsored events (i.e., The Balloon and Wine Festival) have
children's artwork displayed on their programs, and that the programs be sold to raise
money for the Arts Council's children's art programs, noting that it could be written on
the program that the money raised from the sale of these programs would be utilized for
children's artwork in the City of Temecula.
In response, Director of Community Services Parker noted that he would forward the
recommendation to display children's artwork in City Hall.
In response to Commissioner Hogan queries, Ms. Minkler noted that the Visual
Expression Art Show would be for local artists; and noted that the International Taste of
the World Event, sponsored by the Sister Cities, would bring artwork from the Sister
Cities, which is where the international component came from; relayed that one of the
goals of the Arts Council at the Arts in the Country Festival is to partner with numerous
other cultural arts organizations, additionally noting that the goal for the Chalk Painting
Festival is to build it into an annual event that draws artists from other areas; for
Chairman Meyler, clarified that at this year's Visual Art Show, the flute, dance, and
piano competitions would be restricted to Temecula residents only; for Commissioner
R:CSC/minutes/040901 7
Yorke, relayed that there have been many scholarships presented, noting that the
scholarship program would continue.
Ms. Minkler relayed that the website address is available for updates, noting that the
address is: www.artsinthevalley.or.q.
4. Namin.q of the Temecula Children's Museum
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Community Services Commission approve a name to be
recommended to the Board of directors for the new Temecula
Children's Museum.
Presenting the Staff report (of record), Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse
relayed that Staff has been working with the design consultant and the project
Subcommittee in developing the theme and exhibit designs for the Children's Museum;
requested the Commission to select a recommendation for a name for this facility;
relayed that one of the groups working on the project Subcommittee was Kid's Voice,
noting that one of their goals was to provide sponsorship and donations within the
community for the museum, advising that having a name for the facility was
recommended for these fundraising efforts in order to provide an identity for the facility,
and to enliven additional enthusiasm within the community; updated the Commission
regarding the discussions within the Subcommittee with respect to recommendations for
naming the museum, noting the desire to not include the term, "Museum," in the name,
advising that the consultant had suggested the name, 'q'he Imagination Workshop,"
relaying the bverall support for this name within the Subcommittee; and noted that the
Commissioner's recommendation would be presented to the Community Services
District Board of Directors for final approval.
Noting that Ms. Mercedes Pujol was a historical figure, Commissioner Yorke
recommended naming the facility, 'q'he Mercedes Pujol Children's Art Workshop;"
relayed that the location of the museum proximate to Mercedes and Pujol Streets
additionally contributed to the appropriateness of this name, and opined that historical
aspects should be taken into consideration when selecting a name for the museum.
Clarifying that he would prefer to not utilize the name, 'q'he Imagination Workshop,"
Commissioner Edwards recommended the name, 'q'he Temecula Children's Museum,"
noting that as a subtitle, "An Imagination Workshop," could be added, reiterating that he
did not support naming the facility solely, "The Imagination Workshop," which was
echoed by Commissioner Yorke.
In order to be able to easily obtain information from directory assistance regarding the
location of a children's museum in Temecula, Commissioner Hogan recommended
having the word, "Children" included in the name for the facility (preferably at the
beginning of the name), advising that additionally this would most likely engender the
public to make donations to the facility.
Commissioner Henz relayed that he strongly supported the recommendation to name
the museum, 'q'he Imagination Workshop," advising that he had served on the
Subcommittee which favored this recommendation to the Commission; opined that this
R:CSC/minutes/040901 8
name represented the pizzazz and creativity planned for this facility, advising that the
goal had been to amplify these aspects of the museum, and to avoid selecting a stodgy
name; with respect to Commissioner Hogan's comments regarding easily attaining
information regarding the facility, advised that the facility could become well known; and
requested Staff to apprise the Commission of the Subcommittee's discussions regarding
selecting a name for the facility.
Updating the Commission regarding past discussions with respect to recommending a
name for the facility, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that with the name,
"The Children's Museum," individuals would not know what to expect in the facility,
noting the goal to plan an interactive, attention-grabbing, upbeat facility that could attract
children and hold their attention; reiterated that while the consultant had recommended
the name "The Imagination Workshop," the Subcommittee and Staff wholeheartedly
supported this name; noted that there were discussions regarding adding a subtitle,
recommending "The Imagination Workshop - A Children's Experience," at a future point;
and for informational purposes, advised that the plan was for the museum to be science-
oriented with a historical western theme.
MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to recommend naming the facility, 'q'he
Imagination Workshop." Chairman Meyler seconded the motion for discussion.
(Ultimately this motion failed, see below.)
Chairman Meyler recommended adding a subtitle, naming the museum, 'q'he
Imagination Workshop - the Temecula Children's Museum," in order to better identify
the facility.
Concurring with Commissioner Hogan's previous recommendation to utilize the word,
"Children," Commissioner Yorke recommended naming the facility, 'q'he Children's
imagination Workshop," which would further designate the facility.
In response to Commissioner Yorke's comments, Development Services Administrator
McCarthy relayed that per the Subcommittee discussions, it was noted that the word
"Children" included in the name could potentially detract young adults (i.e., children from
the ages 11-13 years of age) from frequenting the facility. In response, Commissioner
Hogan advised that children this age were actually children.
Commissioner Henz relayed that the Subcommittee discussions did include utilizing the
word "Children," in the subtitle of the museum's name.
For Commissioner Edwards, Development Services Administrator McCarthy noted that it
was her recollection that the facility in Palm Desert was named, "The Discovery Museum
of the Deserf' confirming that the word, "Children" was not utilized.
Commissioner Yorke, echoed by Director of Community Services Parker, noted the
overuse of the word "Discovery" in naming numerous other types of uses.
Commissioner Hogan queried whether having a contest to name the facility had been
considered. In response, Commissioner Henz noted the desire to name the museum
expeditiously due to the upcoming fundraising efforts.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 9
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting denial of the motion due to Commissioners
Hertz, Hogan, and Yorke voting no.
Chairman Meyler, echoed by Commissioner Henz, did not support the term "Museum"
being in the name of the facility, while not opposing the term being in a subtitle.
MOTION: Commissioner Yorke moved to recommend naming the facility, "The
Children's Imagination Workshop." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Hogan
and voice vote reflected denial of the motion due to Commissioner Edwards, Henz, and
Meyler voting no.
Reiterating the importance to him of utilizing the word, "Temecula" in naming the facility,
Commissioner Edwards noted that he strongly supported the inclusion of the City's
name.
Commissioner Yorke suggested the name, 'q'he Temecula Children's Imagination
Workshop," Chairman Meyler suggesting, "The Imagination Workshop of Temecula".
For the Commission, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that this matter
could be forwarded back to the Subcommittee.
Clarifying his position, Commissioner Edwards relayed that he would not support any
name without the use of the word "Temecula," while noting that the fact that the
Subcommittee recommended the name, "An Imagination Workshop," was significant in
his opinion.
For Commissioner Hogan, Commissioner Henz and Staff apprised the Commission of
other names the Subcommittee considered, listed as follows: "The Children's Museum,"
"The Temecula Children's Museum" (noting the ultimate determination to not utilize the
words "Museum," or "Children's"), 'q'emecula's Children's Experience," and "imagination
Workshop of Temecula - A Children's Experience;" and provided additional information
regarding the unique features planned for the museum.
Relaying that he could support not including the word "Children" in the name of the
museum, Commissioner Edwards advised that the name should identify the use in order
for information regarding the facility to be easily attained.
Chairman Meyler noted that the word "Youth" could be utilized in lieu of the term
"Children."
Noting that he had visited an alternate children's museum, Commissioner Edwards
relayed that although he was not a child, that he had been intrigued with the exhibits,
enjoying the experience.
Chairman Meyler suggested the name, "Imagination Workshop of Temecula," querying
the Commission for input, Commissioner Yorke suggesting, "Temecula Imagination
Workshop."
MOTION: Commissioner Hogan moved that this matter be forwarded to the
Subcommittee. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Edwards and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 10
Commissioner Edwards recommended that in considering the name, that special
attention be paid to the first letters of the first few words of the name since the museum
may be referenced by these letters.
It was noted that Mr. Herrera presented an award to Ms. Gall Zigler at this time.
Certificate of Recoqnition - Community Services - Ms. Gall Ziqler
Mr. Raul Herrera, of The Friends of Temecula Library, presented a certificate to Gall
Zigler, Administrative Secretary for the Community Services Department, in recognition
of the outstanding job she has performed for The Friends of Temecula Library; and
relayed that the reason the books drives had been such a success was due to Ms.
Zigler's leadership, enthusiasm, innovation, and the that time she gives to The Friends of
Temecula Library.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Community Services Parker relayed that the workshop for the 40-acre
Sports Complex held on April 7, 2001 was successful, updating the Commission
regarding the topics of discussion.
With response to the Temecula Valley Museum, Director of Community Services
Parker advised that Mr. Huell Howser, Host of the California Gold Program on
PBS, was interested in reporting on a story regarding the Mr. Erie Stanley
Gardner Ranch and memorabilia; relayed that he would be at the museum on
April 10th potentially interviewing Museum Services Manager Ott, and taking
photographs.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
With respect to the 40-acre Sports Complex Workshop, Commissioner Yorke
relayed that the event had been great fun; and noted the tremendous input from
all participants, apprised the Commission of the issues of concern (i.e., traffic)
and items of discussion; and expressed gratitude for the opportunity to serve on
this Subcommittee. Commissioner Edwards congratulated Staff on their choice of
workshop facilitators, noting how well-organized and enjoyable it was to attend
the workshop.
Commissioner Hogan presented a brochure from the Temecula Valley Garden
Club for the 16th Annual Flower Show and Plant Sale will be held on April 28,
2001, inviting all to attend; and relayed that this is a non-profit organization,
noting that all monies raised would be utilized for student scholarships.
Commissioner Hertz noted that the Bluegrass Festival organized by the
Redevelopment Department was outstanding, noting that he had a wonderful
time at the event.
In light of the current power crisis, Commissioner Henz requested that the issue
be agendized, specifically regarding a plan to accommodate the potential power
outages this summer, querying the impacts related to the energy shortage.
R:CSC/minutes/040901 11
Director of Community Services Parker updated the Commission regarding the
programs the City has implemented that address the energy issue (i.e., sprinkler
and light timers).
Providing additional clarification, Maintenance Supervisor Harrington noted that
the majority of the irrigation systems in the City have a battery back-up system;
relayed additional information regarding the provision of water, noting that the
water was pumped into the tanks in the evening hours when energy use is lower;
and advised that the Duck Pond would not significantly be impacted by the
potential energy shortage.
Concurring with Commissioner Henz's recommendation, Director of Community
Services Parker relayed that Staff would further address this energy issue with
the Commission in order to familiarize the Commissioners with the City's existing
energy conservation programs.
For Commissioner Edwards, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that
the Economic Development and Community Service Conference would most
likely be he~d in August, advising that when Staff obtains additional information it
would be forwarded to the Commission; and relayed that if it was the
Commission's desire to attend the CRPS Conference in lieu of the Economic
Development and Community Service Conference, the issue could be addressed
at a later date.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:29 P.M. Chairman Meyler formally adjourned this meeting to May 14, 2001 at 6:00
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
James. A. Meyler, Chairman
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
R:OSC/minutes/040901 12
ITEM NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Community Services Commission
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~
May 14, 2001
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002
PREPARED BY:
Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file this report
regarding the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2001-2002.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, slope
maintenance, recycling and refuse collection, and street and road maintenance services in the City
of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are the same as those of the City, and the City Council
serves as the Board of Directors.
Property owners only pay for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate rates
and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service
Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Street
Lighting Tax, approved by the Voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. However, pursuant to a
cooperative agreement with the City, the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the City's
recreational facilities and programs. The levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the
City Council on June 12, 2001.
As a result, the current services provided by the TCSD are divided into the following four (4) service
levels:
Service Level B - Residential Street Liqhtinq. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapinq and Slope Maintenance. Operations,
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
Service Level D - Refuse Collection, Recyclinq and Street Sweepin.q. Operation and
administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for
single family residences.
Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of
streets and roads throughout the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street
lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last
fiscal year.
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving
TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The six (6) rate levels for Service Level
"C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows:
Rate C-1: $ 46.00
Rate C-2: $ 89.00
Rate C-3: $116.00
Rate C-4: $175.00
Rate C-5: $ 70.00
Rate C-6: $225.00
Rate C-7: $129.00
While the Rates C-5 and C-6 were established last fiscal year, the maintenance areas are being
accepted into the TCSD maintained system effective fiscal year 2001-2002. This is the first year
that the City will be charging parcels at these rates. Rate C-7 was established for the Vail Ranch
area, which is to be annexed into the City of Temecula effective July 1,2001.
Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family
residential properties in the City of Temecula. For Fiscal Year 2001-2002, the rate and charge is
proposed to be $172.56. This rate did not increase from last fiscal year.
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels that receive benefit from the emergency maintenance
of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service
level will not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as
follows:
Residential Rate R-1: $115.26
Vacant Rate R-1: $ 57.64
Residential Rate R-2: $121.92
Vacant Rate R-2: $ 60.96
The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. In
summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will not see an
increase from last fiscal year.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges
are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2001-2002
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD)
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
INTENT MEETING:
PUBLIC HEARING:
April 24, 2001
June 12, 2001
MuniFinancial
Corporate Offce Regional Offices
28765 Single Oak Drive · San Diego, CA , Jacksonville, FL
Suite 200 · Anaheim, CA · Kansas CitT, MO
Temecula, CA 92590 · Lancaster, CA · Phoenix, AZ
Tek (909) 699-3990 · Industry, CA · Seattle, WA
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) · Oakland, CA · Washington, DC
Fax: (909) 699-3460
www.muni.com
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
City of Temecula
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the information contained therein reflect the proposed budget for each
of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to
those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District.
Dated this day of ,2001.
MuniFinancial
District Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Temecula and
The Temecula Community Services District
By:
Jim McGuire
Project Manager, District Administration Services
By:
Richard Kopecky
R. C. E. # 16742
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
I1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .............................................................................. 3
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ........................................... 3
B. BUDGETAND LEVY SUMMARY ................................................................................... 3
C. DISTRICT SERVlCESAND CHARGES ........................................................................... 5
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT .............................................................................. 10
A. 'RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 2001/2002) ........................... 10
B. MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 ............................... 10
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ............................................................................................ 15
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT .......................................................................... 18
APPENDIX A -- 200112002 COLLECTION ROLL ....................................................... 20
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges") in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government
Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
District and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as
well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service Level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service Level
C), refuse collection (Service Level D), and road improvement and maintenance
(Service Level R) services furnished by the District,.and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the
same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from,
its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections
61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
Level B, Service Level C, Service Level D and Service Level R Rates and
Charges for the parcels and territories within the District.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's
Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and
MuniFinancial Page 1
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District
services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an
opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and
review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County AuditodController, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
MuniFinancial Page 2
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
I1.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
General Description of the District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all pamels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain
property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing ~;osts depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope
protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
· Residential Street Lighting
Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
· Refuse Collection
· Road Improvement and Maintenance
B. Budget and Levy Summary
Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the
services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the
Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy
Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
MuniFinancial Page 3
0 O)
O~
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
C. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Service Level B Tracts
11087-01 20130-01 21082-04 22593-00 23101-04 23371-05 24185-01
11087-02 20130-02 21340-00 22593-01 23101-05 23371-06 24185-02
12189-01 20130-03 21340-01 22593-02 23101-06 23371-07 24186-01
12189-02 20130-04 21340-02 22627-00 23125-00 23371-08 24186-02
12189-03 20130-05 21340-03 22627-01 23125-01 23371-09 24186-03
12189-04 20130-06 21340-04 22715-00 23125-02 23371-10 24186-F
12189-05 20153-00 21340-05 22715-01 23125-03 23371-11 24188-01
12189-06 20154-00 21340-06 22715-02 2312600 23371-14 24232-00
12189-07 20319-00 21340-07 22716-00 23128-00 23483-00 25004-01
13060-01 20643-00 21430-01 22716-01 23142-00 24131-00 27827-00
13060-02 20644-00 21561-00 22716-02 23143-02 24131-01 27827-01
13060-03 20703-01 21672-01 22716-03 23143-03 24131-02 27827-02
13060-04 20703-02 21672-02 22716-04 23143-04 24131-03 27827-03
13060-05 20703-03 21672-03 22761-00 23173-00 24132-00 28309-00
13060-06 20735-01 21672-04 22762-00 23173-01 24132-01 28480-00
13060-07 20735-02 21673-00 22786-00 23173-02 24133-00 28482-00
13060-08 20735-03 21673-01 22915-00 23173-03 24133-01 28482-01
18518-00 20735-04 21673-02 22915-01 23173-04 24133-02 28482-02
18518-01 20735-05 21673-03 22915-02 23174-01 24133-03 28482-03
18518-02 20735-06 21674-00 2291~03 23174-02 24133-04 28503-00
18518-03 20735-07 21674-01 22916-00 23174-03 24133-05 28510-00
18583-00 20735-08 21674-02 22916-01 23174-04 24134-00 28510-01
19872-00 20735-09 21674-03 22916-02 23174-05 24134-01 28510-02
19872-01 20848-00 2167~00 22916-03 23174-06 24134-02 28510-03
19872-02 20879-00 21675-01 22962-00 23177-00 24134-03 28526-00
19872-03 20879-01 21675-02 23100-01 23220-00 24135-00 28553-01
19872-04 20882-00 21675-03 23100-02 23267-00 24135-01 28553-F
19872-05 20882-01 21675-04 23100-03 23267-01 24135-02 28810-00
19939-00 20882-02 21675-05 23100-04 23267-02 2413~03 29033-00
19939-01 20882-03 21675-06 23100-05 23267-03 24182-01 29036-00
19939-02 20987-00 21760-00 23100-06 23267-04 24182-02 29286-00
20079-00 21067-00 21765-00 23100-07 23371-00 24182-03 PM 26488
20079-01 21082-00 22148-00 23100-08 23371-01 24182-04 PM 27493
20079-02 21082-01 22203-00 23101-01 23371-02 24183-01 PM28122
20079-03 21082-02 22204-00 23101-02 23371-03 24184-01
20130-00 21082-03 22208-00 23101-03 23371-04 24184-F
MuniFinancial Page 5
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance --
includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant
parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and
maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public
right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with
certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within
these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and
therefore six (6) rate levels have been established within Service Level C.
The rate and charges for each of the six service levels in Service Level C are
as follows:
· The approved rate for C-1 is $ 46.00 and is currently charged $46.00
· The approved rate for C-2 is $ 89.00 and is currently charged $89.00
· The approved rate for C-3 is $116.00 and is currently charged $116.00
· The approved rate for C-4 is $175.00 and is currently charged $175.00
· The approved rate for C-5 is $ 70.00 and is currently charged $70.00
· The approved rate for C-6 is $225.00 and is currently charged $225.00
· The approved rate for C-7 is $129.00 and is currently charged $129.00
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and
shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for
Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Service Level C Tracts
Tract Name
PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00
26861-02
RANCHO SOLANA 22593-00
THE VINEYARDS 20879-00
MONTE VISTA 28309-00
Rate Level C-'I
Tract Numbers
23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04
26861-03
22593-01 22593-02
20879-01
26861-00 26861-01
MuniFinancial Page 6
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Tract Name
MORRISON HOMES 22148-00
RIDGEVIEW 20735-07
WINCHESTER CREEK 20130-00
21340-00
21340-07
WOODCREST COUNTRY 21561-00
Rate Level C-2
Tract Numbers
20735-08 20735-09 21764-00 27493-PM
20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04
21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04
22208-00
20130-05 20130-06
21340-05 21340-06
Tract Name
MARTINIQUE 23128-00
RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20644-00
SADDLEWOOD 18518-00 18518-01
VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 22715-01
22716-04 22915-00
22916-02 22916-03
LENNAR 29286-00
Rate Level C-3
Tract Numbers
21760-00 22203-00 22204-00
18518-02 18518-03
22715-02 22716-00 22716-01
22915-01 22915-02 22915-03
28122-PM
22761-00 22762-00
22716-02 22716-03
22916-00 22916-01
Rate Level C-4
Tract Numbers
Tract Name
BARCLEY ESTATES 25004-01
MEADOW V~EW 21765-00
SIGNET SERIES 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
TRADEWINDS 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
VILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
CROWNE HILL 23143-02 23143-03 23143-04
MuniFinancial Page 7
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Tract Name
TEMEKU HILLS
Rate Level C-5
Tract Numbers
23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23371-04 23371-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 23371-15
28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00
Tract Name
WOODSIDE
Rate Level C-6
Tract Numbers
28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Tract Name
VAIL RANCH
Rate Level C-7
Tract Numbers
23173-00 23173.01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174.02
23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 28832-00
Service Level D, Refuse Collection -- provides for the operation and
administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District.
The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $172.56 per single family
residential home (developed residential pamel) and will be applied to all
parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant
to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and charges for this
service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed
ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and
charges. The Vail Ranch area currently utilizes a different Refuse provider
than other areas of the City. With the recent inclussion of Vail Ranch to the
TCSD, properties within Service Level D are identified as D-2 (Vail Ranch)
and D-1 (the remainder of the City) although the rates and charges are the
same.
MuniFinancial Page 8
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level R, Roads -- provides funding for construction, improvement,
service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District.
The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or
restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-
grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads.
All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services
provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread
among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R.
Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance
required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore
separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of
the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with
servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-six
(76) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood
Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068 miles of roads
are serviced and maintained in this area.
Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of sixty-five
(65) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road;
Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are
serviced and maintained in this area.
MuniFinancial Page 9
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to 2001/2002)
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
· Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
services within the City.
Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and
landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2001/2002
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as
a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the
District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific
and therefore, all pamels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally,
individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new
single family residential unit is identified.
MuniFinancial Page 10
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include the 2,783
residential parcels within the following Tracts:
Tract Total Numberof
Number Parcels Units
23100-08 30 21
23173-00 132 130
23173-01 170 164
23173-02 178 175
23173-03 83 81
23173-04 146 144
23174-01 191 189
23174-02 119 114
23174-03 80 75
23174-04 134 130
Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units
23174-05 129 125
23174-06 229 220
23371-00 74 74
23371-08 88 84
24182-03 121 115
24182-04 109 103
24183-01 82 76
24188-01 78 67
28480-00 72 70
28482-00 87 87
Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units
28482-01 92 90
28482-02 86 84
28482-03 115 109
28526-00 47 44
28810-00 81 80
29033-00 71 70
29036-00 24 24
29286-00 38 38
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion.
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level B represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County' are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN.
Service Level C
Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal
Year 2001/2002 are identified in the following.
Rate Level #1 -- No New Tracts
Rate Level #2 -- No New Tracts
MuniFinancial Page 11
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Rate Level # 3 -- Lennar Homes
Tract Number of
Number Total Parcels Units
29286-00 38
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tract and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within this tract are subject to a rate and
charge of $116.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this Rate
Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate Level # 4 -- Crowne Hill (Richmond America)
Tract N Tract
Number Total Pan:els Number Total Parcels Units Nt~ber
23143q)2 72 23143-03 114 105 23143-04
Nut. her of
Total Farceis Units
87 80
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $175.00 per pamel (residential lot) and will be charged this
Rate Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate
Tract
Number 'rotal Pan:eLs
23371-06 1~9
23371~4 124
23371-05 79
Level # 5 -- Temeku Hills
Units N~,;.,~,
74 23371~7
27 23371-08
36 23371~39
147 23371-10
119 23371-11
74 23371-14
28 23371-15
T~tal ~=~s Units
48 45
88 84
69 67
27 25
116 112
24 24
12 0
Tract Number of
N~]ber Total Pacels Units
284824;30 87 87
28482-01 92 90
28482-03 115 109
285~0 47 44
29G:G-00 71 70
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $70.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this Rate
Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
MuniFinancial Page 12
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Rate Level # 6 -- Campos Verde (Woodside)
Tract NL~ber ~ Tract N~t~erl~76~ J
The rates and charges to be applied, to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $225.00 per parcel (residential lot) and will be charged this
Rate Level beginning Fiscal Year 2001/2002.
Rate Level # 7 -- Vail Ranch
N~t~r o~ Tract
Tol~l Pamels Urits Number
132 130 2317401
170 164 2317402
178 175 23174-03
83 81 2317404
146 144 23174-05
Number of
Total Parce!s Units
191 189
119 114
80 75
134 130
129 125
Tract Number of
N~f~er Total Parcels Urits
2317406 229 220
2848000 72 7O
28832-00 94 152
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners of Vail Ranch
and adopted by the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are
subject to a rate and charge of $129.00 per parcel (residential lot).
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level C represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN.
MuniFinancial Page 1 3
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Service Level D
A total of 2,781 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and
added to Service Level D (Refuse Collection) for Fiscal Year 2001/2002. Of
the total 2,781 newly developed residential parcels, 1,150 are being included
in Rate D-1. The remaining 1,631 newly developed residential parcels are
from the Vail Ranch area and are identified as Rate Level D-2. New single
family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level
D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the
waste hauler's updated service records.
The actual cost per household last year for this service was $172.56. For
Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the proposed rate and charge is unchanged at
$172.56 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise
agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R). Waste Management
Inland Valley was previously contracted as the waste hauler for the Vail
Ranch area and will continue to provide the contracted services for the area
at the same rate of $172.56.
Service Level R
Thero are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Roads), proposed for the
current fiscal year.
MuniFinancial Page 14
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
IV.
DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
2001/2002.
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
No. 192 193 t94 t95 D~strict
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Salaries aed Wa~es 5100 $3,373 $174~121 $26,904 $0 $204~398
Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0
State Unemployment 5103 0 0 0 0 0
Medicare FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0
Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0
Life Insurance 5108 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment Traininf~ Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0
Disability Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0
Workers Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0
Hea~th Insurance 5113 0 0 O 0 0
Dental Insurance 5114 0 0 0 0 0
Medical Reimbursement 5115 0 0 0 0 0
Vision Insurance 5116 0 0 0 0 0
Chid Care Reimbursement 5117 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0
Pad-Time (Proiect) 5119 0 9,860 0 0 9,860
Pad-Time Retirement 5120 0 0 0 0 0
Overtime Wa~es 5121 0 900 0 0 900
Compensated Absences 5126 0 0 O~ 0 0
Life & Accident Insurance 5190 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (Personnel Services) $3,373. $t84,881 $26,904 $0 $215,158
MuniFinancial Page 15
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
I
I
BUDGET ITEM AcCOunt Level B Level C Level D I Level R I Total
No. 192 193 194I t95I District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Repair & Maint. - FaciliSes 5212 ~0 $92,915~ $0 $0 $92,915
Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0 0
Mair~enence Supplies 5218 0 0 0 0 0
Office Supplies 5220 0 0 0 0 0
Pdntinq 5222 0 0 15~471~ ." 0 15r471
Leqal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0 0
Election Costs (Offset by developer deposits) 5225 12,000v 12,000~ 0 0 24,000
Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 2~610, / 0 2~610
Public.dons 5228 0 0 0 0 0
Pos age and Peckaqing 5230 0 0 0 0 0
Proberty Tax Admin Fees 5231 2,800 1,200' 3,000, 80 7,080
Rent - FacDities 5234 0 0 0 0 i 0
Rent - Equipment 5238 0 0 0 01 0
Equipmer~ Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 ~ 0
Utilities 5240 0 260,000~ 0 0 260,000
Small tools/Equipment 5242 0 0 6 0 0
Uniforms 5243 0 0 0 0 0
Siflns 5244 0 0 0 0 0
Legal Services 5246 0 0 0 0 0
ConsultinR Services 5248 0 40,000' 0 0 40,000
Other Outside Sen. ices 5250 0 0 5,000 /' 0 5r000
Advertisin9 5254 0 0 0 0 0
Public Notices 5256 5,200 3,300- 6,000. 0 14,500
Conferences 5258 0 0 0 0 0
Professional Meetinds 5260 0 0 0 0 0
Staff Training/Education 5261 0 0 0 0 0
Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0 0
Fuel Expense~:ity Vehicles 5263 0 0 0 0 0
_Council Oiscretionary 5267 0 0 0 0 0
Blueprints 5268 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (5200's) $20,0~}0 $409,4t8 $32,081 $80 $46t,576
MuniFinancial Page 16
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Le~y Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
2001/2002 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
I
Acct. J Level B J Level C Level D Level R J Total
No.~ 192~ t93 t94 195~ District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Waste Hauitnit 5315 $0 $0 $3,030,326 $0 $3,030,326
Street Lighting 5319 596,100 0 0 0 596,100
Insurance 5330 0 8 0 0
Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0
Information Systems 5340 0 0 0 0 0
Suppert Services 5345 0 0 0 0 0
Facilities 5350 0 0 0 0 0
Assessment Engineering 5370 0 0 0 0 0
Refund of Pdor Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0
City Admin Charqes / (Sports 190-153) 5380 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotals (5300's) $596,t00 $5 $3,030,326 $0 $3,626,426
Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0
Emerqence¥ Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 17,080 17,080
Landscape Maintenance 5415 0 546,000 0 0 548,000
Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 0 135,50it 0 0 135,500
Subtotals (5400's) $0 $681.500 $0 $17,080 $698,880
Other Exped5ures 5900 0 0 0 0 0
OperatinR Transfers Out 5901 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotals (5900's) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay 0 8 5~000 0 5,000
Debt Service 0 0 0
Subtotal $9 $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000
Total Direct District Costs $619,473 $1~75,796 $3,094,311 $17,160 $5,006,740
EXPENDITURES
Reserve Collection (Contir~ency} 0 0 0 0 0
Tctal Direct Distdct Costs 61g~473 1,275,796 3,094,311 17~160 5,006,740
TOTAL EXPENDITDRES $619,473 $1,215,796 $3,094,3tl $17,160 $5,006,740
REVENUES
Reserve Reduction (Contribution) 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue Sources 44,730 72,000 40,471 300 157,501
General Fund 124,515 149,100 0 0 273,615
Fund Balance 30,000 70,000 23,514 4,173 127,687
Rates and Char~es (Balance to Levy) 420,228 984,696 3,030,326 12,687 4,447,g37
TOTALREVENUES $619,473 ' $1~75,796 $3,094,3tl $17,160 $5,006,740
MuniFinancial Page 17
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each eligible property.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel (residential lot) method.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse):
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Pamel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Service Level R (Roads):
Parcel Development Units -- 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 18
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 200t/2002
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel -- Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 175.00 175.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-5 1.00 70.00 70.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-6 1.00 225.00 225.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-7 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel
Note: Rate Level C-7 has been established for Fiscal Year 2001/2002 due to the additon of the Vail
Ranch annexation to the City.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Sin~lle Family Residential Rate D-1 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate D-2 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Parcel Charge Parcel
Property Type Unit X per Unit [] Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 115.26 57.64 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 19
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2001/2002
Appendix A -- 2001/2002 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
MuniFinancial Page 20
ITEM NO. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Community Services Commission
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
May 14, 2001
Naming of the Children's Museum
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission recommend to
the Board of Directors that the new Children's Museum be named Imagination
Workshop, The Temecula Children's Museum.
BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2001, TCSD staff brought forward to the
Community Services Commission an item recommending the name for the new
children's museum be "The Imagination Workshop". The Children's Museum sub-
committee recommended this name to the Commission. The Commission expressed
reservations regarding the name of the facility and directed staff to reconvene the
children's museum sub-committee for further consideration of the facility name. Based
on comments and discussion by the sub-committee at the April 23, 2001 Children's
Museum Community Workshop and sub-committee meeting, the sub-committee is now
recommending to the Commission that the name for the facility be "Imagination
Workshop, The Temecula Children's Museum". The sub-committee feels strongly that
the "imagination Workshop" name truly depicts the creative, imaginative, progressive
and interactive facility that the steering committee is trying to develop.
If approved, the Commission's recommendation will be forwarded to the Board of
Directors at their June 12, 2001 Board meeting for their consideration. The Commission
may recommend this name as suggested by the Children's Museum sub-committee or
select another name of your choice.
R:~ZIGLERG~REPORT~051401 CSC Naming of thc Childrens Museum.doc
ITEM NO. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Community Services Commission
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services'~[~:~_
May 14, 2001
Water Park Feasibility Study
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file
the findings of the Water Park Feasibility Study.
BACKGROUND: Through the 2000-2001 ClP approval process, the City
Council authorized staff to begin the process of developing a feasibility study regarding
the development of a water park in the City of Temecula. Through a request for
qualifications process that the Community Services Department selected the Natelson
Company to prepare the feasibility study. Through a series of steering committee
meetings, a community workshop, and intercept survey process, the attached document
has been prepared for your review.
The document is proposing three (3) water park concepts for our consideration. Each
concept includes a specific number of water slide features, a swimming pool, which is
either 25 meters x 25 yards or 50 meters by 50 yards. Also included are options for
operations, which include public operations by the City, a public private partnership or
private operation by an outside firm. The study provides estimated costs for
construction, operations costs and revenue projections, and compares profit and loss of
each water park concept. In addition, the study analyzes the operations of other water
parks.
Mr. Roger Dale of the Natelson Company is here tonight to present the findings and
concepts of the water park feasibility study.
R:~ZIGLERG~.EPORTx051401 CSC Water Park Feasibility STudy.doc
ITEM NO. 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Community Services Commission
~d Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
May 14, 2001
Energy Crisis Update
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file the report
on the Energy Crisis Update.
DISCUSSION: As you are all aware the state of California is experiencing an energy
crisis. The Temecula Community Services Department has been working very closely with
Southern California Edison and our area representatives to stay as informed as possible with this
ever changing issue. Staff has attended numerous informational workshops and training sessions
to become moro knowledgeable and look for solutions to this problem. At this time energy
conservation is the most effective measure we can take to do our part to help with this crisis.
The Community Services Department has implemented numerous measures to conserve energy at
all of our City facilities. To follow is an overview of some of the measures taken.
· Installation of occupancy sensors to control lighting in offices, meeting rooms, restrooms,
storage rooms and hallways.
· Installations of override timers and occupancy timers to control heating, ventilation and air
conditioning in offices, meeting rooms, restrooms and the CRC gymnasium.
· Installation of timers to cut back unnecessary street lighting throughout the old town area.
Every other streetlight is shut down at 11:00 P.M.
· Cut back the freeway monument sign lighting system hours of operation.
· Cut back the hours of operation of the water circulation system and the oxygenation system
at the Temecula Duck Pond.
· Shut down the decorative tree lighting at the Temecula Duck Pond.
· Development and implementation of a program to effectively monitor and manage the usage
of our ball field lighting systems.
· Educate staff about the importance of energy conservation.
The Maintenance Division is currently working with various companies to complete energy use
audits at City facilities. These audits will determine the most cost effective and efficient
modifications to implement to further our energy conservation efforts.
The Community Services Department is confident that we can work through this crisis with minimal
disruption to our recreation programs and maintenance operations. The possibility of rolling
blackouts is an issue that we have looked at in great detail. Southern California Edison has advised
the City that blackouts are possible, however they should not last more than one to two hours at a
R:~LM{RINGK~AGENDA.RPT~CSC Energ3' Crisis Update.doc
time. The potential for rolling blackouts is greatest during the hours of peak power usage, which can
vary due many factors.
The Community Recreation Center is equipped with an emergency generator system that
automatically starts up upon a power failure and provides sufficient electricity to run the entire
facility. The Temecula Community Center, Mary Phillips Senior Center, Temecula Valley Museum
and the Temecula Wedding Chapel programs may be impacted by the rolling black outs. These will
be handled on a case-by-case basis.
The maintenance operations of City parks and facilities should not be negatively impacted by short-
term blackouts. Most of our irrigation is completed during non peak hours, in addition our irrigation
controllers are equipped with back up batteries to retain the irrigation system programming in the
event of a short term power failure.
The Community Services Department will continue to monitor this very important issue. Staff will
work closely with Southern California Edison, Rancho California Water District, The Gas Company
and other utility providers to take steps to minimize the impacts to the City of Temecula as well as
doing our part to assist with this crisis.
R:~HARRINGKL~GENDA.RPT~CSC Energy Crisis Update.doc
ITEM NO. 6
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Community Services Commission
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
May 14, 2001
Capital Improvement Program Projects for FY2001-2002
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission approve, in its
substantial form, the Capital Improvement Program (ClP) projects proposed for the
Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) for FY2001-2002.
BACKGROUND: On an annual basis, the TCSD presents the proposed CIP
projects to the Community Services Commission for their review and approval. The
attached list of CIP projects is divided into four categories: projects completed, projects
under construction, projects in planning/design with construction funding for FY2001-
2002, and new proposed projects for future years.
Staff is recommending that the Community Services Commission approve 10 projects
that are currently in design or have construction funding for FY2001-2002. Six of these
projects are either in design or will soon be under construction. The TCSD has selected
these 10 projects as priority projects. They include the Chaparral High School Pool, the
Children's Museum, Murrieta Creek Trail project, play structure retrofit, sports park ADA
accessibility and shade structure improvements, school site ADA improvements, Mary
Phillips Senior Center expansion, sports complex, Trails Master Plan and Vail Ranch
Park B improvements. Staff is also recommending that the Community Services
Commission approve the list of new projects for inclusion in the 5-year ClP. With the
Commission's approval the proposed ClP projects will be forwarded to the City Council
for final approval.
R:kZIGLERG~REPORT~051401 CSC CIP for fy2001-2002.doc
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMPLETED
· Children's Museum Acquisition
· Long Canyon Creek Park
· Desiltation Pond Rehabilitation
· Chaparral High School Pool Master Plan
· Calle Aragon Park Drainage Structure
· Rancho California Sports Park Parking Lot Reconstruction
· Rancho California Sports Park Tot Lot Replacement
· Rancho California Sports Park Ballfield Lighting Project
· Library Master Plan
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
· Senior Center Expansion
· Chaparral High School Pool
· Rancho California Sports Park Culvert Re-design
· Trails Master Plan
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
PROJECTS IN PLANNING/DESIGN WITH CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
FY2001-2002
Project Cost
· Children's Museum $2,490,000
· Murrieta CreekTrail
· Chaparral High School Pool
$1,500,000
$2,916,730
· Play Structure Retrofit $ 50,000
· Sports Park ADA/Shade $ 156,300
· School Site ADA Improvements $ 250,000
· Senior Center Expansion $ 682,300
· Sports Complex $7,690,000
· Trails Master Plan $ 76,000
· Vail Ranch Park (B) $ 250,000
FundinR
Cap. Reserves,
RDA, Donations
DIF, TEA Grant
Cap. Reserves,
Quimby, TVUSD
DIF
CDBG, DIF
CDBG
DIF, CDBG
DIF, Quimby
AB2766, DIF
DIF
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NEW PROPOSED PROJECTS/FUTURE YEARS
Proiect Cost
· Southside Community Center $3,562,500
· Equestrian Facility $ 350,000
· Long Canyon Creek Park $ 150,000
· Pala Community ParkTennis $ 75,000
Court Lights
Paloma Del Sol Park Landscaping $ 100,000
Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail
Reseal and Restripe
Vail Ranch Park (D) Swim/Tennis
$ 36,000
$1,125,000
· Vail Ranch Paseo Park $ 210,000
Improvements
· Water Park $7,355,000
Definitions:
Unspecified - No funding source at this time
D.I.F. - Development Impact Fees
C.D.B.G. - Community Development Block Grant
Cap. Res. - Capital Reserves
Quimby - Park land dedication fees
AB2766 - State Fund - Assembly Bill 2766
RDA - Redevelopment Agency Fund
TEA - Transportation Enhancement Activities
Park Bond - Proposition 12, Park Bond Act
Funding
Unspecified
Unspecified
Unspecified
DIF
Unspecified
DIF
DIF-Transfer
Unspecified
Unspecified
Unspecified