HomeMy WebLinkAbout051302 CSC AgendaAGENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
TEMECULA CITY HALL
MONDAY, MAY t3, 2002
6:00 P.M.
CALLTO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLLCALL:
PRESENTATIONS:
Chairman Jack Henz
Commissioner Edwards
Edwards, Henz, Hogan, Yorke, Meyler,
Lorri Ann Amavisca - City of Temecula Employee
Fred Lamb - Temecula Valley Museum
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited
to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an
item no.~t listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled
out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and
address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Community Services Commission Secretary before the item is addressed by the
Commission. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
R:\CSCAGEND\051302.doc
DIVISION REPORTS
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Approval of Communitv Services Commission Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the Community Services Commission approves the
minutes of the April 8, 2002 meeting.
2. Teen Council Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file an
update on the Teen Program.
3. TCSD Proposed Rates and Char.qes for Fiscal Year 2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file this
report regarding the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for
Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
Capital Improvement Pro~lram Projects for FY2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 That the Community Services Commission approve in its
substantial form, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
projects proposed for the Temecula Community Services
Department (TCSD) for FY2002-2003.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Community Services Commission
will be held on Monday, June 10, 2002, 6:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\CSCAG END\051302.doc
ITEM NO. 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
APRIL 8, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Community Services Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 6:00 P.M., on Monday, April 8, 2002 in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Yorke.
Apprising the Commission, Chairman Henz noted that Commissioner Hogan would not
be present at tonight's meeting due to the loss of her husband yesterday, April 7, 2002.
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Edwards, Meyler, Yorke, and Chairman
Henz.
Absent: Commissioner Hogan.
Also Present: Director of Community Services Parker,
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse,
Maintenance Superintendent Harrington,
Development Services Administrator McCarthy,
Management Analyst Smith, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PRESENTATIONS
Plaque of Recoqnition to Mr. Fred Lamb, President of the Temecula Valley Museum
Board
In light of Mr. Lamb's absence, this presentation was continued.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
DIVISION REPORTS
Notin.q that Recreation Superintendent Pelletier was absent, Director of Community
Services Parker relaved the followinq information reqardincl recreational activities in the
Citv of Temecula:
Noted that the Spring Egg Hunts had been a success which were held at the
following three facilities: Paloma del Sol Park, Rancho California Sports Park, and
Temeku Hills Park; advised that there were an estimated 350-500 participants in
attendance at each site; and thanked Rancon Real Estate for their support
regarding these events.
· Apprising the Commission, advised that Recreation Supervisor McGavran has
moved on, leaving her position at the City, and that Mr. Jeff Lawrence would be
filling the position of Recreation Supervisor at the Community Recreation Center
(CRC).
Development Services Administrator McCarthy provided an overview of the proiects in
process, as follows:
With respect to the Chaparral Pool Project, noted with pleasure that there was
water in the pools at this time, relaying that the pools had been were plastered last
week; advised that there was a staff training session held this morning (April 8th)
regarding the operation and maintenance of the pool equipment; and noted that the
work on the buildings was continuing, and that construction was anticipated to be
completed by the end of April with a Grand Opening Ceremony being held in May,
relaying that when a specific date was determined for this ceremony, the
Commissioners would be notified.
· Relayed that the Master Plan for the Children's Museum was approved by the
TCSD Board on March 26, 2002 whereupon additional funding was appropriated
for completing construction of the entire facility; noted that revisions were being
made to the plans and specifications for the general tenant improvements, relaying
the' goal to have this work out to bid in the next 45 days, advising that the
consultant for the project will begin fabrication of the exhibits; and noted hopes of
having the facility completed by the year's end.
Regarding the Master Plan for the improvements at Vail Ranch Park Site C which
has been approved by the TCSD Board, advised that the landscape architect is
currently working on the construction documents; and additionally noted that staff
was soliciting input from the Vail Ranch community for suggestions for the names
of the three park sites that are currently in this area, advising that these
recommendations will be presented to the Commission at the May 13th meeting.
Noted that on Saturday, April 27th, the following events have been scheduled: Make
a Difference Day where participants will be meeting at Margarita Park, and the
Household Hazardous Waste Roundup Community Cleanup Day which will be held
at Temecula Valley High School.
For Commissioner Meyler, Development Services Administrator McCarthy confirmed
that the anticipated completion date for the Children's Museum was the end of 2002.
R:CSC/minutes/040802 2
Maintenance Superintendent Harrinqton provided a brief overview of various projects
that were completed by the Maintenance Division since the last Commission meetinq:
· At the Skate Park three concrete picnic table benches were replaced at the hockey
rink.
At City Hall eight light fixtures were installed to improve area lighting.
· At the CRC, in the meeting hall, floor-mounted corner guards were installed to
reduce damage to the walls caused by table and chair storage cads, additionally
noting that seven chair storage cads were rebuilt; and advised that new sink
faucets were installed in the restrooms, and the reception area was painted.
In'response to Chairman Henz, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington noted that the
likely cause of the vandalism damage to the concrete picnic table benches (which were
replaced) was from skate board and bicycle use; provided additional information
regarding vandalism incidents which were generally caused by youths and were at a
higher rate during spring break; and for Commissioner Yorke, relayed that the Citizen
Action Patrol (CAP) Program will ultimately be involved in organizing a Neighborhood
Watch Program. Director of Community Services Parker additionally noted that currently
the CAP volunteers were assigned to monitor specific areas of the City, including
specific park sites.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of the Community Services Commission Meetinq Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the February 11, 2002 Community Services
Commission meeting.
1.2 Approve the minutes of the March 11, 2002 Community Services
Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to approve the minutes of February 11, 2002,
as written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyler and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioner Hogan who was absent.
MOTION: Commissioner Yorke moved to approve the minutes of March 11, 2002, as
written. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Edwards and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioner Hogan who was absent.
2. General Plan Historic Preservation Element
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report
on the General Plan Update as it pertains to Historic Preservation.
R:CSC/minutes/040802 3
Presenting the staff report (of record), Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse
noted that the City's Cultural Arts Master Plan includes a Historic Preservation
Component, relaying the City's agreement with the Arts Council to implement this Master
Plan; noted that in order to address this particular component, the Arts Council hosted a
meeting of individuals interested in Historic Preservation, and subsequently the citizens
formed a group (the Temecula Valley Historic Society) which would specifically work
towards carrying out the goals and objectives pertaining to the preservation,
interpretation, and promotion of the region's historic resources; and advised that Senior
Planner Hogan would address the treatment of historic preservation within the City's
General Plan Document which was in the process of being updated.
Via overheads, Senior Planner Hogan provided an overview of the General Plan
document which included the goals and policies the City utilized to guide its activities,
and implementation plan, and a vision for the future; specified that Historic Preservation
was addressed in the Land Use Element portion of the General Plan, in particular under
Goal 6, which focuses on Old Town, noting that Historic Preservation was also
addressed in the Open Space and Conservation Elements; and advised that the General
Plan was in the process of being updated, noting that per discussions with the City
Council, the Planning Commission, and the Advisory Committee, it was his recollection
that no changes were being proposed for these particular goals (i.e., historic
preservation), noting that if the Community Services Commission had recommendations
regarding adding additional language to the document, he would forward that
information; and relayed that the goal was to have a Draft Updated Plan by late summer.
Addressing the queries of the Commission, for Commissioner Meyle~, Senior Planner
Hogan noted that the General Plan set the foundation for documents such as the Trails
Master Plan, and the Parks Master Plan, advising that during the update process these
specific plans will be added into the General Plan; for Commissioner Yorke, Director of
Community Services Parker provided additional information regarding the Vail Ranch
site, advising that it was the County's desire to keep and maintain this area, noting the
County's future plan to develop a retail area which would have historic significance,
advising that while the Vail Ranch site was within the sphere of influence of the City, it
would remain a County-operated and -maintained facility; for Commissioner Edwards,
relayed that when the Cultural Arts Master Plan was adopted, one of the goals included
was the preservation of historic locations.within the City, noting the charge of the Arts
Council to implement these particular goals, advising that the City provides funding to
aid in this implementation; and clarified the rationale for formation of the Temecula
Valley Historical Society.
Ms. Charolette Fox, 32800 Hupa Drive, relayed her condolences to Commissioner
Felicia Hogan due to the loss of her husband; provided additional information regarding
a General Plan document which she had obtained via multiple resources (providing a
resource list per supplemental agenda material), emphasizing that each element in a
General Plan had equal significance, noting that although it was optional, one of the
elements of the General Plan could be a Historic element, noting other avenues for a
General Plan to address Historic Preservation (i.e., via policies and goals pertaining to
historic preservation included in other portions of the General Plan); and recommended
that the City of Temecula do the following: 1) incorporate a Historic Element into the
General Plan, 2) that either a historical planner be hired or training be provided to
present staff (i.e., attending historical planning conferences), 3) that a historic
commission, committee, or board be formed, 4) that additional funding be sought for
R:CSC/rninutes/040802 4
historical preservation purposes via incremental raises in property taxes, and the pursuit
of commercial district grants.
Concurring with Ms. Fox's comments, Commissioner Yorke relayed that if the
opportunity to preserve the existing historical sites in this region was not pursued at this
time, the opportunity may be lost.
For Chairman Hertz, Ms. Fox reiterated that it would be her desire to have the General
Plan include a separate element for Historic Preservation; with respect to her previous
comments regarding hasty condemnation, specified the disappearance of the Knott's
Garage use, the current plan to demolish the Mr. Angel Ramirez dwelling (which was
constructed 83 years ago); and in response to Chairman Henz's query, additionally
recommended that a historian serve on the Community Services Commission.
Addressing Ms. Fox's comments, Senior Planner Hogan relayed that the Old Town
Specific Plan addressed the majority of Ms. Fox's expressed concerns; specified the
arduous process associated with the demolishment of the Knott's Garage use due to the
use being an unusable structure, noting effods to keep the style of new development in
Old Town in an era-appropriate design; advised that the Old Town Specific Plan was in
the process of consideration for an update, noting that input from the Commissioners or
the residents could be relayed to him and forwarded to the Director of Planning; relayed
various requirements and policies included in the Old Town Specific Plan; and provided
an overview of the improvements made to Old Town during the City's renovation project.
Commissioner Edwards recommended that buildings and persons of historic significance
be photographed in order to provide a type of historical record. In response, Senior
Planner Hogan relayed that he would forward the recommendation that photographic
records be made prior to demolition of a site.
For Ms. Fox, Commissioner Meyler relayed that if she had additional recommendations,
that he could present those comments at the next General Plan Advisory Committee
meeting.
Per visits to the City of Julian, Commissioner Meyler relayed that the majority of the
historical buildings in this particular town had plaques installed, which had been placed
by the historic society in that area.
For the record, Chairman Henz stated that the Community Services Commission and
Department staff strongly supports historical preservation and cultural resources.
It was noted that the Commission received and filed this report.
3. Crowne Hill Park Site "F" Conceptual Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file a report
on Park Site "F" in the Crowne Hill Development,
3.2 Approve a name to be recommended to the Board of Directors for
Park Site "F" in the Crowne Hill Development,
R:CSC/minutes/040802 5
Via overhead aerials, Development Services Administrator McCarthy presented the staff
report (of record), highlighting the location of Park Sites A and F in the Crowne Hill
Development; noted that construction began on Park Site F last Monday (April 11) and
was expected to be dedicated to the City in the fall; relayed the conceptual master plan
which included age appropriate play area, a half-court basketball court, a picnic shelter,
restroom, parking lot, benches, tables, walkways, and an open turf area; and requested
the Community Services Commission for input regarding recommendations for the
Board of Directors for a name for this park site, advising that two recommendations have
been forwarded to the Commission for consideration, as follows: 1) Crowne Hill Park,
and 2) Vineyard Park, noting that the Commission could consider these names as well
as others for this park site.
For Commissioner Edwards, Development Services Administrator McCarthy relayed that
there would be additional park sites within this development which would be private and
owned by the HOA; provi~led additional information regarding the surrounding
development; and confirmed that the parks in this development had not yet been named.
MOTION: Commissioner Meyler moved to recommend to the Board of Directors the
name of Crowne Hill Park for Park Site F in the Crowne Hill development. The motion
was seconded by Commissioner Yorke and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception Commissioner Hogan who was absent.
For Chairman Hertz, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that the Master
Plan for Park Site F in the Crowne Hill Development was approved by the Commission
approximately 2.5 years ago; and for informational purposes, relayed that staff was
currently in negotiations with the School District to utilize the grass/turf area at the school
site via a Joint Use Agreement.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. With respect to the recent California Parks and Recreation Society (CPRS)
Annual Conference which was held in Los Angeles this year, Director of
Community Services Parker relayed that the City had been the recipient of an
Award of Excellence (1st Place State Award) for the SMART Program video, and
two Awards of Achievement (2"d Place State awards) for the City's marketing
campaign (Tern E. Cula Duck), as well as for the maintenance of the Old Town
Streetscape.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
A. Per his attendance at the CPRS Conference, Commissioner Edwards noted that
his opinion was raised to an even higher level regarding the quality of staff the
City of Temecula has onboard; and relayed that the Conference had been
informative and educational.
B. With respect to the Teen Council Updates, for Chairman Hertz, Deputy Director
of Community Services Ruse relayed that the teens may provide an update at
the May 13, 2002 meeting.
R:CSC/minutes/040802 6
C. Referencing an article in the newspaper, Chairman Henz relayed that Ms. Mary
Williams had noted her pleasure with the newly expanded Senior Center, as well
as her displeasure regarding the seniors being restricted from eating snacks in
the new room. In response, Director of Community Services Parker advised that
after hearing Ms. Williams comments (which was 3-4 weeks ago) this issue had
been addressed, noting that coffee and doughnuts were now permitted in the
new area; and relayed that staff had been surprised that the article was printed in
the newspaper at this point in time; and confirmed that he would update the
Commission regarding Ms. Williams opinions regarding the center..
D. For Chairman Hertz, Director of Community Services Parker noted that a future
dog park had been listed in the CIP, but was recently removed from the
upcoming year's CIP, advising that if the Commissioners had specific areas
recommended for a dog I~ark, staff would take these recommendations under
consideration, noting that the original proposed location was deemed not feasible
due to the proximity to the library site; and clarified that the location of the park
was the difficulty with this particular issue.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:12 P.M. Chairman Hertz formally adjourned this meeting to May 13, 2002 at 6:00
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Jack Henz, Chairman
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
R:CSC/minutes/040802 7
ITEM NO. 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community Services Commission
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 13, 2002
SUBJECT: Teen Program
PREPARED BY: Julie Pelletier, Recreation Superintendent c~0
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission:
Receive and file this report regarding City sponsored teen programs in Temecula.
DISCUSSION: In January 2002, the Temecula Teen Council presented a report to the
Community Services Commission that provided current information regarding the primary
purpose of the Teen Council and their role in providing recreational programs for the teens of
Temecula. As a direct result of that meeting, the Community Services Commission has
requested a bi-monthly update regarding teen programs offered through the City.
This evening, staff will provide an updated teen report for the Commission.
ITEM NO. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community Services Commission ~
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: May 13, 2002
SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file this report
regarding the proposed TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2002-2003.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) operates under the
authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting, slope
maintenance, trash and recycling collection, and road maintenance services in the City of Temecula.
The boundaries of the TCSD are the same as those of the City, and the City Council serves as the
Board of Directors.
Property owners only pay for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate rates
and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service
Level A Rates and Charges previously levied bythe TCSD were replaced bythe City's Parks/Street
Lighting Tax, approved by the Voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. However, pursuant to a
cooperative agreement with the City, the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the City's
recreational facilities and programs. The levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the
City Council on June 11,2002.
As a result, the current services provided by the TCSD are divided into the following four (4) service
levels:
1. Service Level B - Residential Street Li(~htinq. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
2. Service Level C - Perimeter LandscapinG. Operations, maintenance, utility costs,
improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope protection
and maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
3. Service Level D - Trash/Recv¢lincl Collection. Operation and administration of the
refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for single family
residences.
4. Service Level R - Road Maintenance. Operations, construction, and maintenance of
streets and roads throughout the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that have street
lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last
fiscal year.
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving
TCSD maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The seven (7) rate levels for Service
Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows:
Rate C-1: $ 46.00
Rate C-2: $ 89.00
Rate C-3: $116.00
Rate C-4: $175.00
Rate C-5: $ 70.00
Rate C-6: $225.00
Rate C-7: $129.00
Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single-family
residential properties in the City of Temecula. For Fiscal Year 2002-2003, the rate and charge is
proposed to be $172,56. This rate did not increase from last fiscal year.
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels that receive benefit from the emergency maintenance
of certain unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service
level will not increase from last year. The'two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as
follows:
Residential Rate R-1: $115.26
Vacant Rate R-l: $ 57.63
Residential Rate R-2: $121.92
Vacant Rate R-2: $ 60.96
The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. In
summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will not see an
increase from last fiscal year.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from'the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges
are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
ATFAOHMENTS: 1. Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2002-2003
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD)
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
INTENT MEETING: April 23, 2002
PUBLIC HEARING: June 11, 2002
Corporate OJ~ce Regional Oj~ce~
28765 Single Oak Drive * San Diego, CA * Jacksonville, FL
Suite 200 * Anaheim, CA * Kansas City, MO
Temecula, CA 92590 * Lancaster, CA * Phoenix, AZ
Tel: (909) 699-3990 * Industry, CA * Seattle, WA
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864) * Oakland, CA * Washington, DC
Fax: (909) 699-3460
www.muni.com
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
City of Temecula
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the information contained therein reflect the proposed budget for each
of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to
those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District.
Datedthis /'14 dayof,2oo2.
MuniFinancial
District Engineer "
On Behalf of the City of Temecula and
The Temecula Community Services District
Jim ~lcGuire
Project Manager, District Administration Services
Richard Kopecky
R. C. E. # 16742
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ....................................................... 3
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ......................................... 3
B. BUDGETAND LEVY SUMMARY .............................. ; ............................................. ' ..... 3
C. DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES ..................................................................... 5
III. CHANGES TOTHE DISTRICT ........................................................
A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 2002/2003) ......................... 10
B. MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002/2003 ................... , ......... 10
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ...........................................................................
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT ..................................................
APPENDIX A -- 2002120003 COLLECTION ROLL .........................
l emecu~a ~ommun~n/~erv~ces u~s[r~c[
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
I. INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
Distdct is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges ("Charges") in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
Distdct was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services Distdct Law, T~tle 6, Division 3 of the California Government
Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
Distdct and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the Distdct and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well
as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Govemrnent Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the Distdct has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service Level B), perimeter landscaping (Service Level C), trash/recycling
(Service Level D), and road maintenance (Service Level R) services fumished by
the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by
Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
Level B, Service Level C, Service Level D and Service Level R Rates and
Charges for the parcels and territories within the District.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's ·
Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and
I
specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for Distdct
services.
MuniFinancial Page I
emecu~a ~;ommumty ~erv~ces u~stnc~
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
A Public Headng is held each year before the Board to allow the public an
opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Headng, and
review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 200212003. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County AuditodController, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 2002/2003.
MuniFinancial Page
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
II.PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. General Description of the District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The Distdct provides certain
property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged propodionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to .which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the Distdct include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope
protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
· Residential Street Lighting
· Perimeter Landscaping
· Trash/Recycling
· Road Maintenance
B. Budget and Levy Summary
Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various pamels within the District. Only the pamels that the
services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the
Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy
Unit" (shown in Table I),' reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the pamels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per pamel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Pamel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per pamel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
MuniFinanclal Page 3
!
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
C. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting -- includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2002/2003.
Service Level B Tracts
04153-00 19939-01 21067-00 22203-00 23101-03 23371-06 24184-F
04188-00 19939-02 21082-00 22204-00 23101-04 23371-07 24185-01
04457-00 20079-00 21082-01 22208-00 23101-05 23371-08 24185-02
06559-00 20079-0t 21082-02 22593-00 23101-06 23371-09 24186-01
07401-00 20079-02 21082-03 22593-01 23125-00 23371-10 24186-02
07402-00 20079-03 21082-04 22593-02 23125-01 23371-11 24186-03
08369-00 20139-00 21340-00 22627-00 23125-02 23371-14 24186-F
08369-01 20130-01 21340-01 22627-01 23125-03 23483-00 24187-01
08369-02 20130-02 21340-02 22715-00 23126-00 24131-00 24187-02
11087-01 20130-03 21340-03 22715-01 23128-00 24131-01 24188-01
11087~02 20130-04 21340-04 22715-02 23142-00 24131-02 24232-00
12189-01 20130-05 21340-05 22716-00 23143-02 24131-03 25004-01
12189-02 20130-06 21340-06 22716-01 23143-03 24132-00 27827-00
12189-03 20153-00 21340-07 22716-02 23143-04 24132-01 27827-01
12189-04 20154-00 21430-01 22716-03 23173-00 24133-00 27827-02
12189-05 20319-00 21561-00 22716-04 23173-01 24133-01 27827-03
12189-06 20643-00 21672-01 22761-00 23173-02 24133-02 28309-00
! 12189-07 20644-00 21672-02 22762-00 23173-03 24133.03 26480-00
~ 13060-01 20703-01 21672-03 22786-00 23173-04 24133-04 28482-00
13060-02 20703-02 21672-04 22915-00 23174-01 24133-05 28482-01
13060-03 20703.03 21673-00 22915-01 23174-02 24134-00 28482-02
13060-04 20735-01 21673-01 22915-02 23174-03 24134-01 26482-03
13060-05 20735-02 21673-02 22915-03 23174-04 24134-02 28503.00
13060-06 20735-03 21673.03 22916-00 23174-05 24134-03 28510-00
13060-07 20735-04 21674-00 22916-01 23174-06 24135-00 28510-01
13060-08 20735-05 21674-01 22916-02 23177-00 24135-01 28510-02
18518-00 20735-06 21674-02 22916-03 23220-00 24135-02 28510-03
18516-01 20735-07 21674-03 22962-00 23267-00 24135-03 28526-00
18518-02 20735-08 21675-00~ 23100-01 23267-01 24136-00 28553-01
18518-03 20735-09 21675-01 23100-02 23267-02 24136-01 28553-F
18583.00 20848-00 21675-02 23100-03 23267-03 24136-03 28810-00
19872-00 20879-00 21675-03 23100-04 23267-04 24182-01 29033-00
19872-01 20879-01 21675-04 23100-05 23371-00 24182-02 29036-00
~ 19872-02 20882-00 21675-05 23100-06 23371-01 24182-03 29286-00
~ 19872-03 20882-01 21675-06 23100-07 .23371-02 24182-04 PM 26488
19872-04 20882-02 21760-00 23100-08 23371-03 24183-00 PM 27493
19872-05 20882-03 21765-00 23101-01 23371-04 24183-01 PM 28122
19939-00 20987-00 22148-00 23101-02 23371-05 24184-01 Old Town
MuniFinanclal Page 5
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping -- includes all developed single
family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the District
provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter
landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated
easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The
level of maintenance required within these tracts and subdivisions vary
depending on operating costs, and therefore seven (7) rate levels have been
established within Service Level C. The rate and charges for each of the six
service levels in Service Level C are as follows:
· The approved rate for C-1 is $ 46,00 and is currently charged $46.00
· The approved rate for C-2 is $ 89.00 and ~s currently charged $89.00
· The approved rate for C-3 is $116.00 and ~s currently charged $116.00
· The approved rate for C-4 is $175.00 and ~s currently charged $175.00
· The approved rate for C-5 is $ 70.00 and is currently charged $70.00
· The approved rate for C-6 is $225.00 and ~s currently charged $225.00
· The approved rate for C-7 is $129.00 and is currently charged $129.00
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and
shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for
Fiscal Year 2002/2003.
Service Level C Tracts
Rate Level C-1
Tract Name Tract Numbem
PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01
26861-02 26861-03
RANCHO SOLANA 22593-00 ~593-01 22593-02
THE VINEYARDS 20879-00 20879-01
MONTE VISTA 283O9-00
MuniFinancial Page 6
emecu~a t.,ommum~y ~erwces ulstnc[
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Rate Level C-2
Tract Name Tract Numbers
MORRISON HOMES 22148-00
RIDGEVIEW 20735-07 20735~8 20735-09 21764-00 27493-PM
WINCHESTER CREEK 20130-00 20130-01 20136-02 2013003 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06
21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340~6
21340-07
WOODCREST COUNTRY 21561-00 2220800
Rate Level C-3
Tract Name Tract Numbers
MARTINIQUE 2312800
RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
SADDLEWOOD' 18510-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03
VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22910-01
22916-02 22916-03 28122-PM
LENNAR 29286-0O
Rate Level C-4
Tract Name Tract Numbers
BARCLEY ESTATES 25004-01
MEADOW VIEW 21765-00
SIGNET SERIES 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
TRADEWINDS 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
VILLAGE GROVE 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673~0 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 · 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
CROWNE HILL 23143-02 23143-03 23143-04
MuniFinancial Page 7
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Rate Level C-5
Tract Name Tract Numbers
TEMEKU HILLS 23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23371-04 23371-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 23371-15
28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00
Rate Level C-6
Tract Name Tract Numbers
WOODSIDE 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Rate Level C-7
Tract Name Tract Numbers
VAIL R,~,NCH 23173-00 2317301 2317302 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02
23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 28832-00
Service Level D, Trash/Recycling Collection -- provides for the operation
and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and
street sweeping services for all single family residential homes Within the
District. The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $172.56 per
single family residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be
applied to all pamels that have been identified as develoPed residential
homes. Pursuant to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and
charges for this service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the
matter. Mailed ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level
D rates and charges. For Fiscal Year 2001/2002, the Vail Ranch area initially
utilized a different Refuse provider than other areas of the City and properties
within Service Level D were identified as D-2 (Vail Ranch) and the remainder
of the City was identified as D-I. For Fiscal Year 2002/2003, a single service
provider will be utilized, and a single service level has been established.
MuniFinancial Page 8
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Service Level R, Road Maintenance -- provides funding for construction,
improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and reads
throughout the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited
to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control;
repairs and re-grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for
unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost
of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are
proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of
the Service Level R. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The
level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to
operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established.
Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for
the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in
the area.
· Rate Level R-1 --The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-six
(76) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road; Greenwood
Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068 miles of roads
are serviced and maintained in this area.
· Rate Level R-2 --The parcels within this rate level consists of sixty-five
(65) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road;
Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are
serviced and maintained in this area.
MuniFinancial Page 9
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of pamels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A.. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to 2002/2003)
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
· Community Services, Parks, and Recreation -- that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
services within the City.
· Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians -- that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and
landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
B. Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2002~2003
The most notable modification to the Distdct for Fiscal Year 2002/2003 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as
a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the
Distdct accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
-Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific
and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the Distdct accepts the improvements. Additionally,
individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new
single family residential unit is identified.
MuniFinancial Page 10
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include 906
residential parcels. The tracts have been divided into two sections to identifY
the tracts that are new developments for Fiscal Year 2002/03 and the existing
tracts that are subject to Service Level B but not previously charged. The
following tracts are the new developments for Fiscal Year 2002/03:
New Tracts
Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units
24136-00 87 84, 24163-00 79 76
24136-01 103 101 24187-01 92 87
24136-03 79 76 24187-02 82 77
Existin¢l Tracts
"Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units
04153-00 65 51 07402-00 36 30
04188-00 66 52 08369-00 38 38
04457-00 61 48 08369-O1 54 54
06559-00 38 38 08369-02 57 57
07401-00 27 21 Old Town 16 16
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level B represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, in some cases, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers
(APN's) for each of the individual residential parcels may not have been
established by the County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's
currently recognized by the County are assigned and charged for the number
of residential lots associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's
for each of the individual residential pamels and lots are expected to be
established by the time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the
existing APN's will be charged based on the number of residential lots
associated with each APN.
Service Level C
There are no new tracts to be included in Service Level C (Perimeter
Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal Year 2002/2003.
Service Level D
MuniFinancial Page 11
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
A total of 915 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and
added to Service Level D (Trash/Recycling) for Fiscal Year 2002/2003. New
single family residential units are identified each year and included in Service
Level D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and
the waste hauler's updated service records.
The actual cost per household last year for this service was $172.56. For
Fiscal Year 2002/2003, the proposed rate and charge is unchanged at
$172.56 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise
agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R).
Service Level R
There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance),
proposed for the current fiscal Year. However, due to development of two
properties within Service Level R-2, the total levy units increased from 44.50
(Fiscal Year 2001/02) to 45.50 (Fiscal Year 2002/03).
MuniFinancial Page 12
~ emecu~a t, ommumty ~erv~ces L~s[nct
Eng neer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
2002/2003.
200212003 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2003
No. t92 193 t~1 195 Dlsbtct
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Salades end Wages 5100 $3,542 $182,827 $28,249 $0 $214,618
Deferred Compen~a6on 5101 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0
State Unemployroent 5103 0 0 0 0 0
M~lica re FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0
Auto AIIowar~e 5106 0 0 0 0 0
Life insurance 5108 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0
DIsab~ity Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0
MuniFinanclal Page ~ 3
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
2002/2003 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2002
No, 192 193 194 District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Repair & Maint. - FaciIRies 5212 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $50,000
Rppa[r & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0 0
Maintenance Supplies 5218 0 0 0 0 0
Office Supplies 5220 3,250 0 0 0 3,250
PdnU/lg 5222 0 0 t0,600 0 10,600
Legal Documents/Maps 5224 0 0 0 0 0
Election Costs (Offset by developer deposes) 5225 3,000 3,000 0 0
Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 3.270 0 3.270
Publications 5228 0 0 0 0 0
Pc~tage and Packaging 5230 t2,250 0 0 0 12,250
Pmpprty Tax Admin Fees 5231 2,800 1 ~200 3,0OO 80 7,080
Rent - Facilities 5234 0 0 0 0 0
Rent - Equipment 5238 0 0 0 0 0
Equipment Lease 5239 0 0 0 0 0
Utililies . 5240 0 262,000 0 0 262,000
Small tools/Equipment 5242 0 0 0 0 0
Uniforms 5243 0 0 0 0 0
Signs 5244 0 0 0 0 0
Legal Se~ices 5246 0 0 0 0 0
Consulting Services 5248 0 40,000 0 0 40,000
Subtotal (5200's) $26,500 $359,5~0 $31.260 $80 $4t7,340
MuniFinanclal Page 14
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
2002/'2003 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services Distdct
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2003
Subtotals (5900's) SD $0 $0 $0
Subtotal S0 S0 $3,630 $0 $3,630
MuniFinanclal Page 15
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each eligible property.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel (residential lot) method.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Trash/Recycling):
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Service Level R (Roads):
Parcel Development Units = l.O for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped ParceJs
Total Balance to Levy/Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE EEVEL B
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 16
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 175.00 175.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-5 1.00 70.00 70.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-6 1.00 225.00 225.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-7 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Parcel X Charge per I Parcel I
Property Type Unit Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate D 1.00 $172.56 $172.56 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Parcel Charge Parcel
Property Type Unit X per Unit = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 115.26 57.64 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel
MuniFinanclal Page 17
I
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2002/2003
Appendix A m 2002~2003 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
MuniFinancial Page 18
ITEM NO. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Community Services Commission
BY: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Service~
DATE: May 13, 2002
SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program Projects for FY2002-2003
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission approve, in its
substantial form, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects proposed for the
Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) for FY2002-2003.
BACKGROUND: On an annual basis, the TCSD presents the proposed CIP
projects to the Community Services Commission for their review and approval. The
attached list of CIP projects is divided into four categories: projects completed, projects
under construction, projects in planning/design with construction funding for FY2002-
2003, and new proposed projects for future years.
Staff is recommending that the Community Services Commission approve 9 projects that
are currently in design or have construction funding for FY2002-2003. The TCSD has
selected these 9 projects as priority projects. They include the Children's Museum, the
Murrieta Creek Trail, North/South Ball Field Netting, Sports Park ADA Access, Sports
Complex, Vail Ranch Middle School Basketball Court Lighting, Vail Ranch Park Site "C"
Amenities, Vail Ranch Park Site "D" Master Plan and Play Structure Retrofit. Staff is
also recommending that the Community Services Commission approve the list of new
projects for inclusion in the 5-year CIP. With the Commission's approval,'the proposed
CIP projects will be forwarded to the City Council for final approval.
R:~ZIGLERGhREPORTx051302 CSC CIP for fy2002-2003.doc
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COMPLETED
Children's Museum Master Plan
Chaparral High School Pool
Multi-Use Trail and Bikeways Master Plan
Play Structure Retrofits at:
Margarita Community Park
Nicolas Road Park
Rancho California Sports Park
Senior Center Expansion
Vail Ranch Park Site "C" Master Plan
R:~ZIGLERG~LISTS\TCSD CIP UPDATE FOR FY2002 2003.doc
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Children's Museum
Crowne Hill Park
Meadows Park
Vail Ranch Park Site "C" Amenities
R:/ZIGLERG%ISTS\TCSD CIP UPDATE FOR FY2002 2003.doc
TCSD RATES AND CHARGES
pROJECTS IN PLANNING/DESIGN WITH CONSTRUCTION FUNDING
FY2002-2003
Proiect Cost Fundin.q
Children's Museum $3,247,500 Cap. Reserves,
RDA, Prop 12 Grant
Murrieta Creek Trail $'1,500,000 DIF, TEA Grant
North/South Ball Field Netting $ 79,200 DIF
Play Structure Retrofit $ 60,000 DIF
Sports Park ADA /Access $ 72,500 CDBG, DIF
Sports Complex $t3,963,370 DIF, Quimby, COP
Bond Proceeds,
CAP Reserves,
Prop 40,
Outside Financing
Vail Ranch Middle School $ 237,500 DIF, EDI Grant
Basketball Court Lighting
Vail Ranch Park Site (C) $ 321,500 DIF
Vail Ranch Park Site (D) $ 59,000 CSA t43
Master Plan DIF Transfer
R:~ZlGLERG~ISTS\TCSD CIP UPDATE FOR FY2002 2003.doc
TCSD CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
NEW PROPOSED PROJECTS/FUTURE YEARS
Project Cost Fundin.q
Old Town Gymnasium $2,487,500 CDBG, EDI Grant,
Boys & Girls Club,
Unspecified
Park & Recreation Master $ 66,000 DIF
Plan Update
Santiago Park Site $2,062,500 Unspecified
Definitions:
Unspecified No funding source at this time
D.I.F. Development Impact Fee
C.D.B.G. Community Development Block Grant
Cap. Res. Capital Reserves
COP Bond Proceeds Certificate of Participation Bond Proceeds
Quimby Park Land Dedication Fees
RDA Redevelopment Agency Fund
TEA Transportation Enhancement Activities
Park Bond Proposition t2, Park Bond Act
EDI Grant Economic Development Initiative Federal Grant
R:~ZIGLERG~ISTS\TCSD CIP UPDATE FOR FY2002 2003.doc