HomeMy WebLinkAbout061200 CSC Agenda
AGENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
TEMECULA CITY HALL
MONDAY, JUNE 12, 2000
7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Henry Miller
FLAG SALUTE:
ROLL CALL:
Commissioner Edwards
Edwards, Henz, Meyler, Nimeshein, Miller
PRESENTATIONS:
Ruth Munoz
Amy Cramer
Cor & Bep Vanderhout
The Choral Group
Richard & Barbara Conchola
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the
Commissioners on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited
to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commissioners about an
item not listed on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled
out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state YOUr name and
address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Community Services Commission Secretary before the item is addressed by the
Commission. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all
will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items
unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
DIVISION REPORTS
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes of Mav 8.2000 Commission Meetina
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of the May 8, 2000 Community Services
Commission meeting.
2. Chaparral Hiah School Swimmina Pool Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Community Services Commission approve in its
substantial form the conceptual master plan for the Chaparral
High School Swimming Pool complex.
3. TCSD Proposed Rates and Charaes for Fiscal Year 2000-20001
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission receive and file the
report for the TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal
Year 2000-2001.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Community Services Commission
will be held on Monday, July 10,2000,7:00 P.M., at Temecula City Hall Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ITEM NO.1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
MAY 8, 2000
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Community Services Commission convened in a regular meeting
at 7:00 P.M., on Monday, May 8, 2000 in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Commissioner Nimeshein.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Edwards, Henz, Meyler, Nimeshein, and
Chairman Miller.
Absent:
None.
Also Present:
Director of Community Services Parker,
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse,
Recreation Superintendent Pelletier,
Maintenance Superintendent Harrington,
Development Services Administrator McCarthy,
Administrative Secretary Zigler, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PRESENTATIONS
Plaque of RecoQnition - Bervl Yasinosky
Chairman Miller presented a plague to Development Services Analyst Yasinosky in
recognition of her dedicated and noteworthy service for the citizens of Temecula.
Relaying that Ms. Beryl Yasinosky had been working for the Community Services
Department since 1991, Director of Community Services Parker enumerated the projects
and tasks that she had overseen; and expressed gratitude for her diligent efforts in the
Community Services Department.
Commenting on additional achievements of Ms. Yasinosky, Chairman Miller relayed that
she would be greatly missed which would was echoed by Director of Community
Services Parker.
With thanks, Ms. Yasinosky accepted the award.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
R:\CSCminutes\050800
DIVISION REPORTS
Maintenance Superintendent Harrinoton provided a brief overview of various proiects
that were completed bv the Maintenance Division durin~ the month of April. relayinQ the
followinQ:
. That the floors at City Hall, the Maintenance Facility, the Museum, the Temecula
Community Center (TCC), and the gymnasium at the CRC were refinished.
. That the walls of the gymnasium were repainted.
. That the vent fan in the kitchen at the TCC was repaired which would assist in the
removal of the heat generated from the appliances.
. That the vandalized trellis was repaired at Pala Community Park.
. That the erosion and washout areas were repaired at the La Serena Park site.
. That a temporary parking lot was constructed adjacent to Kent Hindergardt Park
which would be utilized by the soccer leagues, noting that the project was inclusive
of weed removal, striping, and the construction of a perimeter berm around the
parking lot.
. That at the CRC pool site, new lane line cables were installed in lieu of purchasing
new lane lines.
. That burned out ball field lamps were replaced at the north/south fields at Paloma
Del Sol Park.
. That approximately 65 abandoned shopping carts were collected at Margarita
Community Park, noting the plan to collect the carts once a month in order to keep
the park cart-free.
In response to Commissioner Nimeshein, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington
relayed that the Target store had relayed thanks to the City staff for the return of the
shopping carts, noting that there was no financial remuneration for the task.
For Chairman Miller, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington provided an update on the
lighting and fencing project at Margarita Community Park, noting that the fencing had
been completed and that the lighting portion of the project was almost complete. Director
of Community Services Parker advised that there had been a light test approximately
two weeks ago, relaying that there were some adjustments that needed to be made.
In response to Chairman Miller, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington advised that the
lighting at the north/south soccer field at Rancho Sports Park had been retrofitted in
1993, clarifying that Musco fixtures had been utilized for those fields.
2
R:\CSCmlnutes\050800
NotinQ that last month an overview of the CIP proiects was presented. Development
Services Administrator McCarthy updated the Commission. relavino the followino:
.
That the contract for The Rancho California Sports Park Tot Lot Proiect would be
on the City Council agenda for the May 9, 2000 meeting, noting that after approval,
construction would begin in approximately 30 days.
.
That The Calle AraQon DrainaQe Proiect would go out for bid on Thursday, May 11,
2000.
.
With respect to The Trails Master Plan, that staff had met with the firm involved with
the preliminary organization and data, noting that a project committee would soon
be formed; and advised that the first public workshop associated with this project
would most likely be scheduled for mid to late June.
.
With respect to The Sports Field LiQhtinQ Proiect at Rancho California Sports Park,
that this project was currently in design, noting that the scheduled date to begin
construction was December of 2000.
.
With respect to the master design of The Northwest Sports Complex Proiect, that
the award for the design of the project would be on the May 23, 2000 City Council
agenda; and noted that subsequent to the award of the design, a project committee
would be formed.
For Chairman Miller, staff provided additional information regarding the annual field
renovation project. .
Recreation Superintendent Pelletier relaved the followinQ information reQardinQ recent
and upcominQ events and activities:
.
That the Egg Hunt Events which were held on April 22"d at four park sites had been
a success.
.
That on Saturday, May 6, 2000, the Cinco de Mayo Event was held, noting that
there were approximately 250 participants, noting staff's recommendation to
expand the program for next year.
That on Sunday, May 7th the High Hopes Program participants took their first City-
sponsored excursion to Disneyland, noting that there were 42 special-needs adults
and their chaperones bussed to Disneyland, spending from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M.
enjoying this successful activity.
That May 21s1 would be this year's Annual Kite Day Event which would be held at
Paloma Del Sol from 1 :00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M.
.
.
.
That staff anticipated that the Community Brochure would be coming out at the end
of May, possibly the beginning of June.
.
With respect to the 41h of July festivities, that staff was in the process of preparing
for this event.
3
R:\CSCminutes\050800
For Commissioner Edwards, Recreation Superintendent Pelletier relayed that the Cinco
de Mayo Event had been held at Rotary Park, noting that this was the third annual event;
and relayed that the City had served 150 Ibs. of cooked carne asada, along with beans,
rice and tortillas.
In response to Commissioner Nimeshein, Recreation Superintendent Pelletier advised
that there had been approximately 3000 participants at the four Egg Hunt Events,
clarifying that the Rotary Park Egg Hunt was not widely publicized since this was
primarily a neighborhood event; for Commissioner Edwards, confirmed that this year's
event had the greatest turnout, additionally noting the success of the neighboring cities
scheduling Egg Hunt Events simultaneously.
For Commissioner Nimeshein, Recreation Superintendent Pelletier advised that the 4th
of July parade would start at 10:00 A.M. this year. Director of Community Services
Parker relayed gratitude to Rancon Real Estate for their sponsorship of this activity.
Chairman Miller thanked staff for the opportunity for him to aid in the event held at the
Sports Park. In response Recreation Superintendent Pelletier expressed gratitude for his
help.
With respect to the annual Kite Day, for Chairman Miller, Recreation Superintendent
Pelletier relayed that the City was seeking sponsorship in the form of aid for the children
in the construction of the kites, and the flying of the kites; and advised that after this
year's event, staff would investigate as to whether next year's event should be expanded
and be held at two locations.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. Minutes of April 10. 2000 Commission Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 That the Commission approve the minutes of the April 10, 2000
Community Services Commission meeting.
MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to approve the minutes, as written. The motion
was seconded by Chairman Miller and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
2. Senior Center Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 That the Community Services Commission approves the conceptual
design of the expansion of the Mary Phillips Senior Center.
Development Services Administrator McCarthy presented the staff report (of record),
relaying that the City had awarded a design services agreement to Davidson & Allen
Architects for the Senior Center Expansion Project, noting that this firm was the original
designer for the center; highlighted the community workshop and the Senior Center
Design Committee meetings; advised that the expansion was inclusive of approximately
4
R:\CSCmlnutell\050800
3300 square feet of new space which encompassed meeting rooms, a pool room,
restrooms, and storage areas, noting the modifications to the existing areas which
encompassed a meeting room, library, craft room, office space, reception area, and
installation of commercial equipment in the kitchen; and introduced Mr. Dean Davidson,
who represented Davidson & Allen Architects firm.
Via overheads, Mr. Davidson provided an overview of the project, specifying the
courtyard area, noting that the shuffleboard would be removed, and the trelliswork and
columns would be removed and then subsequently reused; noted the location of the
expansion; presented the preliminary site plan, highlighting the proposed billiard room,
two meeting rooms (inclusive of a removable partition in one room), storage area, multi-
purpose area, the relocation of the office, kitchen revision inclusive of a new range and
vent, a dishwasher, a sink, a new ramp with handicapped access provisions; and
specified the building articulation designed to create consistency with the existing
building.
For Commissioner Nimeshein, Mr. Davidson clarified the location of the removable
partition in the one meeting room, specifying the range of meeting room sizes; noted the
location of the existing billiards room, relaying that it was proposed to be a craft room; for
Commissioner Edwards, noted that there would be a commercial dishwashing system in
the kitchen; in response to Chairman Miller, relayed that there would be a stove
installed; with respect to the gabled roof area, advised that, as proposed, this would not
be use able space, but was provided for visual interest; specified the location of the
screened air conditioners; relayed the benefits of locating the air conditioning units on
the roof (i.e., lack of available space), noting that the existing equipment was located on
the roof.
After additional queries from Chairman Miller and comments regarding a more efficiently
run air conditioning unit on the ground level, Mr. Davidson relayed that although the
recommended location for the air conditioner units at this site was on the roof, that
additional investigation could be conducted with the consultant. Director of Community
Services Parker reiterated that the availability of ground space would be a restrictive.
MOTION: Commissioner Henz moved to approve the conceptual design of the
expansion project. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Meyler. (This motion
ultimately passed; see below.)
Commissioner Nimeshein commented on the proposed location of the air conditioning
units, recommending that additional funds not be spent to investigate the feasibility of
locating the units on the ground; and noted that in the past, additional investigation had
revealed that air conditioner units were most appropriately located on the roof.
Director of Community Services Parker relayed that staff would work with Mr. Davidson
to evaluate the location of the air conditioning units, and move forward with the
recommendation, noting that with respect to locating the units on the ground, staff was
concerned with vandalism and available space.
At this time voice vote was taken reflecting unanimous approval.
Director of Community Services Parker relayed that this item would be on the May 23'd
City Council agenda.
5
R:\CSCmlnutes\050800
3. CaDitallmprovement ProQram Proiects for Fiscal Year 2000-2001
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 That the Community Services Commission approves in its
substantial form, the Capital Improvement Program Projects for the
Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
Via overheads, Director of Community Services Parker provided an overview of the staff
report (of record), reviewing the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the
next five years; enumerated the completed projects, the projects under construction, the
projects in design, the new projects for the fiscal year 2000-2001, and the proposed
future projects (as outlined per agenda material), providing additional information
regarding each entity; with respect to the proposed future project regarding access from
the CRC to the library, for Commissioners Nimeshein and Meyler, provided additional
information regarding the costs associated with grading and the installation of ADA
access provisions, confirming that lighting would be included in this project, advising that
currently this project was not funded, noting that the denotation stating unspecified
relayed that those particular projects had not been funded; clarified the DIF, and Park &
Rec denotations; for Chairman Miller, specified the location of the proposed shed
storage area at the Community Center; and for Commissioner Meyler, provided
additional information regarding the cost estimation for obtaining public art, noting the
data from Sedona, Arizona.
In response to Commissioner Meyler's queries, Director of Community Services Parker
clarified that construction costs were not included in the CIP for the Northwest Sports
Complex, the Library, and the Children's Museum, due to the fact that these projects had
already been funded or partially funded.
For Commissioner Nimeshein, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that the
standard cost factor qualifying a project to be denoted in the CIP was a cost above
$25,000; and provided additional information regarding staff's investigation with respect
to the potential annexation.
For Commissioner Edwards, Director of Community Services Parker provided additional
information regarding new parks (i.e., included in proposed Specific Plans), noting that
the Long Canyon Creek Park was currently being developed (developer driven), relaying
that it could potentially be dedicated in August or September; and advised that there was
an additional park site in the Crown Hill Development in the southeast portion of the City.
With respect to the school site project which encompassed ADA improvements, for
Chairman Muller, Director of Community Services Parker relayed that the City would be
funding this project, noting that the City would be utilizing the facilities as a joint use.
MOTION: Commissioner Edwards moved to approve staff's recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Henz and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
6
R:\CSCminutea\050800
COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. Director of Community Services Parker relayed that due to Ms Beryl Yasinosky
leaving the Community Services Department, the City was in the process of
recruiting for the Management Analyst position.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
A. For informational purposes, Commissioner Meyler clarified that he had not been
appointed to the Aquatic Committee, noting the confusion; and requested
provision of a list of the committees that the Commissioners had been appointed
to serve on.
In response to Commissioner Meyler's comments, Director of Community
Services Parker advised that Commissioner Meyler could continue to attend the
meetings associated with the pool project, noting that the next meeting was
scheduled for May 18th at 10:00 A.M.
B. Commissioner Meyler provided additional information regarding Design House
2000, relaying that this year's event was spectacular; and noted that the annual
Arts in the County Festival was also being held in May.
C. Commissioner Nimeshein congratulated Chairman Miler on his recent attainment
of the qualifications for his BA degree, noting the upcoming ceremony.
D. With respect to the League of California Cities Conference, for Commissioner
Nimeshein, Director of Community Services Director of Community Services
Parker relayed that he would forward any data received regarding the
conference.
E. Chairman Miller thanked staff for the opportunity to help with the Egg Hunt Event;
and reiterated that the Aquatic Committee meeting would be held on May 18,
2000, noting that he would update the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:18 P.M. Chairman Miller formally adjourned this meeting to June 12. 2000 at 7:00
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Henry Miller, Chairman
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
7
ITEM NO.2
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
FROM:
Community Services Commission
Herman Parker, Director of Community servi@
June 12, 2000
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Chaparral High School Swimming Pool Master Plan
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission approve in its substantial
form the conceptual master plan for the Chaparral High School Swimming Pool complex.
BACKGROUND: Earlier this fiscal year, the Board of Directors awarded a design
services contract to RJM Design Group, to work in conjunction with the Community Services
Department and the community to develop a conceptual master plan for the Chaparral High School
Swimming Pool complex. The development of this aquatic facility was a joint venture between the
City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The goal was to develop a facility
that could serve the aquatic needs of Chaparral High School as well as the community at large.
In January 2000, the consultant began meeting with staff and the design team to develop the master
plan for the swim complex. Members of the design team included Mayor Jeff Stone, Councilman
Ron Roberts, Commissioner Henry Miller, Commissioner Jim Meyler, members from the Temecula
Valley Unified School District, representatives from the Temecula Swim Club and staff. The design
team met on several occasions and a work shop was also held on a Saturday morning to provide
the community with an opportunity to provide their input on design features and amenities.
The design you will see tonight is a representation of what the design team and community has
mutually developed. The facility includes a 25 yard x 25 meter competitive swimming pool, which
can also accommodate water polo use. It also includes a shallow recreational pool for swimming
lessons and learn to swim programs. It offers 2 add alternates; the development of a zero depth
water spray area, and a one meter diving board. Tonight, representatives from RJM Design Group
are here to present the Master Plan to the Commission for their approval.
R:\ZIGLERG\REPORT\061200 Chaparral Pool Master Plan.doc
CANOPY-N.I.C.
BLEACHER
SEATING
OPEN FENCE
TUJl>'
~F.c;nON A
CONC. TERRACE
SEATING
< '
MASTER.PLAN
TEMECULA AQUATICS FACILITY
City of Temecula
rtJt..iI
w
~RJM
DESIGN GROU!daJNC.
~~U'~-
--
05"0"5'20' <4(1'
iff
J
~
e
~i
;
L
~
~
~
U
-<
~
00.
U
~
E-l
~
~~ =
-
=
~-< (j
~S ~
e
~
r.l U E-l
E-l~ ~
! oo.~ 0
~~ E
E-lU
ITEM NO.3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Community Services Commission
Herman D. Parker, Director of Community service~
DATE:
June 12, 2000
SUBJECT:
TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2000-2001
PREPARED BY:
Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the Community Services Commission receive and file the report
for the TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2000-2001
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary
community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD
operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same
as those of the City of Temecula.
Property owners pay only for the TCSD services that they actually receive through separate rates
and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service
Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Street
Lighting Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4,1997. Although the TCSD continues
to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative agreement with
the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax will be considered by the City Council on June 13,
2000.
As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels:
1. Service Level B - Residential Street LiQhts. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscapino and Slope Maintenance. Operations,.
maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter
landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
3. Service Level D - Refuse Collection. RecvclinQ and Street SweepinQ. Operation and
administration of the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for
single family residences.
4. Service Level R - Streets and Roads. Operations, construction, and maintenance of
streets and roads throughout the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions that receive
street lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased
from last fiscal year.
R:\yuinobk.\TCSDLEVY.2000bod
061300
Service Level "C" includes only those property owners within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD
maintenance of slopes and perimeter landscaping. The four (4) existing rate levels (C-1, C-2, C-3,
and C-4) for Service Level "C" will not increase from last year and are identified as follows:
Rate C-1:
Rate C-2:
Rate C-3:
Rate C-4:
$ 46.00
$ 89.00
$116.00
$175.00
Two new rate levels, C-5 and C-6, are being established in FY 2000/01 pursuant to Proposition 218
elections in the Temeku Hills and Woodside Chantemar developments respectively, as follows:
Rate C-5:
Rate C-6:
$ 70.00
$225.00
Due to construction delays, the acceptance of the slopes and landscaping have been deferred to
Fiscal Year 2001-02. Therefore, the approved rates and charges will not be collected for FY 2000-01
and the respective developers will maintain the subject areas during the next fiscal year.
Service Level "D" provides refuse, recycling and street sweeping services to all single family
residential properties in the City of Temecula. For Fiscal Year 2000-2001, the rate and charge is
proposed to be $175.68, an increase of $3.12 from last year. This is due to an increase in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI).
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels which receive services for the maintenance of certain
unpaved roads that are washed out during rainstorms. The proposed rates for this service level will
not increase from last year. The two (2) rate levels for Service Level R are identified as follows:
Residential Rate R-1:
Vacant Rate R-1:
$115.26
$ 57.64
$121.92
$ 60.96
Residential Rate R-2:
Vacant Rate R-2:
The levy fonnula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only those
property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those services. In
summary, the average single family residence receiving benefit from all service levels will receive
an increase of $3.12 in the TCSD Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2000-2001.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the
Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the Califomia Public
Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are
necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
R:\yuinobk\TCSDlEVY.2000bod
061300
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD)
Fiscal Year 2000/2001
INTENT MEETING:
PUBLIC HEARING:
May 09, 2000
June 13, 2000
II !V!~~i~i~~~~i~~
Corporate Office
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (909) 699-3990
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864)
Fax: (909) 699-3460
www.muni.com
Regional Offices
. Jacksonville, FL
. Kansas City, MO
. Oakland, CA
. Phoenix, AZ
. Sacramento, CA
. Seattle, WA
. Washington, DC
. Whittier, CA
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
City of Temecula
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the information contained therein, reflect the proposed budget for each
of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to
those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District.
Dated this
--f~
:J--
day of r
,2000.
MuniFinancial
District Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Temecula and
The Temecula Community Services District
~ rrJi .
By: . ~
Jim McGu e
Project Manager, Special District Services
By:
Richard Kopecky
R. C. E. # 16742
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS .............................;...............................................3
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES ........................................... 3
B. BUDGET AND LEVY SUMMARy...................................................................................3
C. DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES...........................................................................5
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT ..............................................................................1 0
A. RECENT MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT (PRIOR TO 2000/2001) ..................... ...... 1 0
B. MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001............................... 10
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS ............................................................................................14
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT..................................;....................................... 17
APPENDIX A - 2000/2001 COLLECTION ROLL ..............................~........................19
Temecul. Community Services District
Engineer'. Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
I. INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
District is coterminous with the City boundary, and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property-related fees and charges (Charges) in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District was fonmed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government
Code ("CSD law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
District and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
the Annual levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as
well as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has
prescribed, revised andc011ected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service level B), perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance (Service level
C), refuse collection (Service level D), and road improvement and maintenance
(Service level R) services furnished by the District, and has elected to have
these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the
same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from,
its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections
61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
level B, Service level C, Service level 0 and Service level R Rates and
Charges for the parcels and territories within the District.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number by the Riverside County Assessor's
MuniFirulncial
Page 1
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessment Numbers and
specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax roll, properties charged for District
services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the pUblic an
opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and
review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2000/2001. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 2000/2001. . .
MuniFinancial
Page 2
Temecul. Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. General Description of the District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain
properly related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope
protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
. Residential Street Lighting
. Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance
. Refuse Collection
. Road Improvement and Maintenance
B. Budget and Levy Summary
Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the
services and improvements are provided for are included in each of the
Service Levels. The "Total Leyy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy
Unit" (shown in Table I), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels 8, C, and D is based on a per parcel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
MuniFinanciaJ
Page 3
Ol
e
'C
(ll
a.
E
0
u
if
'C
-
U)
is
QI
J:::
....
e
J:::
-
';:
U)
QI
>
QI
...J
QI
U
.~
QI
CI)
U)
::J
0 CI)
'C ...: ...J
(ll (ll w
> QI >
QI >- W
J::: ...J
- (ll
"- u w
.E U) ()
e u: ii:
0 U)
"" ::J W
(ll 0
E 'S: CI)
"- l!:!
.E a.
.5 QI
~:5
QI 0
--
- ..-
~o
QlO
eN
QI-
Olg
mO
QlN
'0 "-
.s;: 11I
o QI
"->-
0._
QI (ll
.c u
U)
(ll'-
I-Li.
"-
Ol.E
e
.- -
:;: QI
OOl
= '0
.E::J
CO
QI
J:::QI
1-:5
I I
'C It) ~ 0 ~ N 0 0 <Xl It) '"
III 0 V '" It) '" <Xl .... It)
j3 Qj " ":. o. o. "'- N. ....
e>
0 ~ cu 0') ~ ~ ~ ~ <i
I- cu -" ~ ~
a.. u
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 It)
~~ Lri ~ ci ~ N <i <i a;j N r-.:
0 v '" It) '" v v <Xl '" 0')
~ e .... o. o. "'. N.. "< N ....
::J M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <i
~ ~
D:: I-
<(
w - 0 0
>- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
" .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0
.J Ole ci ci ci ci ci ci ci M ci ci
<( e::J
() cu ~ .,. .,.
U) -"
() "
u: - .J
I- " ..
Z "
Z a..
w
D::
D:: .. co 0 0 0 0 0 0 co '" N
::J - '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" N "!
() " '2 ...; <<i en <<i ...; ci ci ...; ...;
a.. ....
,,:::> N v co .... ... ... .... N
E'~ .,. .... .... .... .... ....
.,.
cu "
-".J
()
v '" 0 '" 0 0 0 '" '" N
~- v <Xl V ~ 0 It) v ....
"'. <Xl 0') It). ~ '" ~ It)
" " ,..: <i cO ,..: ,..: <i
.J 01 ~ ~
j3 'C It) v '" '" N '" .,.
" 0') ~ N It)
{? m .,. N
.. <Xl 0 0 0 0 0 0 '" '" N
" - '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 It) N ~
D:: a.. '2 on u:i cri u:i on ci ci N Lri ~
<( ",:::> N v co ~ .... .... ~ N
W E'~ .,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>- .,.
.J cu "
-".J
<( ()
()
Ul
u: 0') '" 0 '" 0 0 0 <Xl '" ~
D:: ~-g It) <Xl .... ~ 0 0 v ~
0 '" <Xl 0') It). ~ 0') ~ It)
iii: .J .- M ..... <i ~ cO ,..: ,..: <i
-e. N v '" '" N ~ .,.
a.. J!e. 0') ~ N 0')
o <( .,. N
I-
01 ~ N M l' iO <D ~ N
.5 'tl ~ 'C ~
, , , , ~ . .
E " 8 8 8 8 8 " !!:. !!:.
'" '"
01 01 ~ N '" .... III CD '" ~ N
~ e 'It 'It 'It 'It 'It 'It e 'It 'It
a; 'Q. Qj Qj Qj Qj Qj Qj '5 OIl Qj Qj
l!! ~ > > > > > > ~ 'C > >
.J Ci5 OIl " ~ " " " " " '" ~ "
W 'C .J .J .J .J .J D:: 0 .J
e D::
> ]i '" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
w 'E .J OIl iii iii iii iii iii iii :g CI,) D:: iii iii
.J .. - .. D:: D:: D:: a: a: a: l,.2 Qj a: a:
w 'C ~ e. >
() 'in 0.52 .- .. ..
~ .. ....'" ua: ....
a: u 0 B
w CO Qj Qj .~
'" Qj ii >
> ~ ..
.. .J '"
.J .. B
.. CJ
CJ .~ .~
'2: .. "
.. I'" '"
'"
.! .!
e f!
~
"
..
;S
..
.2
'"
~~
'Cg
-IlC!
'-0
"0
(o~
.. ..
8m
..,.
11m
~~
'OIL
" ..
g.oe
~j
5~
,s"
<~
.,.; "i
8:g
~e>
0'"
0'5.
"'0
l;; "
~-g
_cu
110
~~
"I-
-"
u,s
0;>0
>'"
.!!i!
8e.
H
.. '"
.. "
.2"
-"
"",
>-
" 0
-"
$"
I!!ii;
;o.c
"..
"'C
.."
..E
"i!!
ie
.cD.
.~ E
:0=
....
ii-n
" ..
" "
".c
",-
CI'IC
~.~
~~
Qj-;:
i;8.
""0
"0
Rid
a:....
e
S'ii
0>
Z.!!
;0
"
"
..
;S
..
.2
i!.
!eo
i~
"'0
-0
I!! 0
..~
..'"
8~
~1i
o.!a
<=IL
'0...
8.2
..'"
J: .91
01>
" "
00;
,s",
;;:'"
;0
o~
oe>
~..
g"fi
",0
.. "
"",
~;
'iii0
"""
.~u
IL>-
""
.- .c
u-
4i~
6ii
81i.
'd
" ..
.. "
.e ~
-'"
,,-
> 0
" c
~~
'" ..
".c
;0 ..
~i
.. E
.. "
'" >
",e
"a.
]1.5
D(i
.. "
1ii'll
" ..
c "
".c
,,-
'" .
11)9'
~5
'I'~
u-
~8.
.5g
.!!lli
~l:l
e
.!'i)
0>
Z.!!
v
~
~
Ql
01
'"
"
lD
!
'iii
~
"
,s
E
,g
C
i!!
:11
'C
"
'"
>0
..
E
-
'2
::>
ij
a..
"
e>
..
.c
U
"
,s
>0
'"
'"
.!!!
~
:;
E
"
:c
S
..
;S
.5
"
;0
o
.c.
.!e,
l!l
'2
:::>
!:'
"
....
g
t=
"
,s
'"
c
'0
"
"
e
g
"
"
o
:a
Ie
l!
f!;
"
~
~
z
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
c. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting - includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant parcels for which the
District provides on-going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential parcel and shall be applied to parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
Service Level B Tracts
11087-01 20130-00 21082-01 22148-00 23100-07 23483-00 27827-01
11087-02 20130-01 21082-02 22203-00 23101-01 24131-00 27827-02
12189-01 20130-02 21082-03 22204-00 23101-02 24131-01 27827-03
12189-02 20130-03 21082-04 22208-00 23101-03 24131-02 28309-00
12189-03 20130-04 21340-00 22593-00 23101-04 24131-03 28503-00
12189-04 20130-05 21340-01 22593-01 23101-05 24132-00 28510-00
12189-05 20130-06 21340-02 22593-02 23101-06 24132-01 28510-01
12189-06 20153-00 21340-03 . 22627-00 23125-00 24133-00 28510-02
12189-07 20154-00 21340-04 22627-01 23125-01 24133-01 28510-03
13060-01 20319-00 21340-05 22715-00 23125-02 24133-02 28526-00
13060-02 20643-00 21340-06 22715-01 23125-03 24133-03 28553-00
13060-03 20644-00 21340-07 22715-02 23126-00 24133-04 28553-01
13060-04 20703-01 21430-01 22716-00 23128-00 24133-05 29033-00
13060-05 20703-02 21561-00 22716-01 23142-00 24134-00
13060-06 20703-03 21672-01 22716-02 23143-02 24134-01
13060-07 20735-01 21672-02 22716-03 23143-03 24134-02
13060-08 20735-02 21672-03 22716-04 23143-04 24134-03
18518-00 20735-03 21672-04 22761,00 23177-00 24135-00
18518-01 20735-04 21673-00 22762-00 23220-00 24135-01
18518-02 20735-05 21673-01 22786-00 23267-00 24135-02
18518-03 20735-06 21673-02 22915-00 23267-01 24135-03
18583-00 20735-07 21673-03 22915-01 23267-02 24182-01
19872-00 20735-08 21674-00 22915-02 23267-03 24182-02
19872-01 20735-09 21674-01 22915-03 23267-04 24184-00
19872-02 20848-00 21674-02 22916-00 23371-01 24184-01
19872-03 20879-00 21674-03 22916-01 23371-02 24185-01
19872-04 20879-01 21675-00 22916-02 23371-03 24185-02
19872-05 20881-00 21675-01 22916-03 23371-04 24186-00
19939-00 20882-00 21675-02 22962-00 23371-05 24186-01
19939-01 20882-01 21675-03 23100-01 23371-06 24186-02
19939-02 20882-02 21675-04 231 00-02 23371-07 24186-03
20079-00 20882-03 21675-05 231 00-03 23371-09 24232-00
20079-01 20987-00 21675-06 231 00-04 23371-10 25004-01
20079-02 21067-00 21760-00 231 00-05 23371-11 26488-PM
20079-03 21082-00 21765-00 23100-06 23371-14 27827-00
MuniFinancia/
Page 5
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance -
includes all developed single family residential parcels and residential vacant
parcels for which the District provides on-going servicing, operation, and
maintenance of perimeter 'Iandscaped areas and slopes within the public
right-of-ways and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with
certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required within
these tracts and subdivisions vary depending on operating costs, and
therefore six (6) rate levels have been established within Service Level C.
The rate and charges for each of the six service levels in Service Level Care
as follows:
. The approved rate for C-1 is $ 46.00 and is currently charged $46.00
. The approved rate for C-2 is $ 8g.00 and is currently charged $89.00
. The approved rate for C-3 is $116.00 and is currently charged $116.00
. The approved rate for C-4 is $175.00 and is currently charged $175.00
. The approved rate for C-5 is $ 70.00 and is currently charged $0.00
. The approved rate for C-6 is $225.00 and is currently charged $0.00
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential parcel and
. shall be applied to parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for
Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
Service Level C Tracts
Tract Name
Rate level C-1
Tract Numbers
PRESLEY DEVELOPMENT 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01
26861-02 26861-03
RANCHO SOLANA
22593-00 22593-01 22593-02
THE VINEYARDS
20879-00 20879-01
MONTE VISTA
28309-00
MuniFinancial
Page 6
Tract Name
MORRISON HOMES
RIDGEVIEW
WINCHESTER CREEK
WOODCREST COUNTRY
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Rate Level C-2
Tract Numbers
22148~0
20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06
21340~0 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06
21340-07
21561-00 22208-00
Rate Level C-3
Tract Name Tract Numbers
MARTINIQUE 23128-00
RANCHO HIGHLANDS 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
SADDLEWOOD 18518-00 18518-01 18S18-o2 18518-03
VINTAGE HILLS 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22716~4 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01
22916~2 22916-03
Tract Name
BARCLEY ESTATES
MEADOW VIEW
SIGNET SERIES
TRADEWINDS
VILLAGE GROVE
Rate Level C-4
Tract Numbers
25004~1
21765-00
20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03
23125~0 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03
21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06
MuniFinancia/
Page 7
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Tract Name
Rate Level C-5
Tract Numbers
TEMEKU HILLS
23371-01
23371-08
23371-F
23371-02 23371-03 23371-04
23371-09 23371-10 23371-11
28482-01 28482-02 28482-03
23371-05 23371-06
23371-13 23371-14
28482-04 28526-00
23371-07
23371-15
29033-00
Tract Name
Rate Level C-6
Tract Numbers
WOODSIDE
28510-00 28510-01 .28510-02 28510-03
Service Level 0, Refuse Collection - provides for the operation and
administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and street
sweeping services for all single family residential homes within the District.
The current rate and charges for Service Level D is $175.68 per single family
residential home (developed residential parcel) and will be applied to all
parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Pursuant
to Proposition 218, the District may increase the rate and charges for this
service after conducting an additional protest hearing on the matter. Mailed
ballot proceedings are not required to establish Service Level D rates and
charges.
Service Level R, Roads - provides funding for construction, improvement,
service and maintenance of public streets and roads throughout the District.
The services provided may include, but are not limited to: renovation or
restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control; repairs and re-
grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads.
All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost of the services
provided. The costs associated with the services are proportionately spread
among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of the Service Level R.
Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The level of maintenance
required within these two (2) areas vary due to operating costs, and therefore
separate rate levels have been established. Only the parcels within each of
MuniFinancia/
Page 8
T emecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for the costs associated with
servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area.
. Rate Level R-1 -The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-
five (75) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets
that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level
provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Nicolas Road;
Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.068
miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
. Rate Level R-2 -The parcels within this rate level consists of fifty-six (56)
assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are
serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of: Ormsby Road; Santiago Road;
Lolita Road; and John Warner Road. A total of 1.003 miles of roads are
serviced and maintained in this area.
MuniFinancial
Page 9
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A. Recent Modifications to the District (Prior to 2000/2001)
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
. Community Services, Parks, and Recreation - that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
services within the City.
. Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians - that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and
landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and no longer charged through the District.
B. Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2000/2001
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as
a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the
District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels Band C are typically tract or development specific
and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally,
individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new
single family residential unit is identified.
MuniFinancia/
Page 1 0
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include the 1,195
residential parcels within the fOllowing Tracts:
Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units
23100-06 32 31 23100-07 30 29 23101-03 8 8
23101-05 27 27 23101-06 37 37 23143-02 72 64
23143-03 114 105 23143-04 87 80 24182-02 63 61
24185-02 260 242 24186-03 58 56 26488-PM 4 4
28503-00 44 33 28510-00 . 42 39 28510-01 82 79
28510-02 76 76 28510-03 50 50 28526-00 47 44
28553-00 30 30 28553-01 30 30 29033-00 71 70
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion.
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level B represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residential lots associated with each APN.
Service Level C
Inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes) for Fiscal
Year 2000/2001 are identified in the following.
Rate Level #1 - No New Tracts
Rate Level #2 - No New Tracts
Rate Level # 3 - No New Tracts
Rate Level # 4 - No New Tracts
MuniFinancial
Page 11
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Rate Level # 5 -
Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units
23371-01 34 27 23371-02 44 36 23371-03 169 147
23371-04 123 119 23371-05 79 74 23371-06 30 28
23371-07 48 45 23371-08 2 84 23371-09 69 67
23371-10 27 25 23371-11 116 112 23371-13 1 0
23371-14 24 24 23371-15 13 0 23371-F 1 74
28482-1&2 1 1 28482-3&4 1 194 28526-00 47 44
29033-00 71 70
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $70.00 per parcel (residential lot), however no charges will be
applied for this Rate Level in Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
Rate Level # 6 -
Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of Tract Total Number of
Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units Number Parcels Units
28510-00 42 39 28510-01 82 79 28510-02 76 76
28510-03 50 50
The rates and charges to be applied to the above referenced tracts and
subdivision were previously approved by the property owners and adopted by
. the Board for inclusion. Properties within these tracts are subject to a rate
and charge of $225.00 per parcel (residential lot), however no charges will be
applied for this Rate Level in Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level C represent the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN's) for each of
the individual residential parcels may not have been established by the
County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's currently recognized by
the County are assigned and charged for the number of residential lots
associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's for each of the
individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be established by the
time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the existing APN's will be
charged based on the number of residehtiallots associated with each APN.
MuniPinancia/
Page 12
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
Service Level D
A total of 1,359 new developed residential parcels have been added to
Service Level D (Refuse Collection) for Fiscal Year 2000/2001. New single
family residential units are identified each year and included in Service Level
D based on updated County Assessor's data, City building permits and the
waste hauler's updated service records.
The actual cost per household last year for this service was $172.56. For
Fiscal Year 2000/2001, the rate and charge is proposed to be $175.68, an
increase of $3.12 for actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise
agreement with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R).
Service Level R
There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Roads), proposed for the
current fiscal year.
MuniFinancia/
Page 13
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next three (3) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
2000/2001.
2000/2001 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2001
BUDGET ITEM Account levelS LevelC Level 0 Level R Total
No. 192 193 194 195 District
PERSONNEL SERVICES
Salaries and Wages 5100 $3.150 $111,013 $24,990 $0 $139,153
Deferred Compensation 5101 0 0 0 0 0
PERS Retirement 5102 0 0 0 0 0
State Unemployment 5103 0 0 0 0 0
Medicare FICA 5104 0 0 0 0 0
Auto Allowance 5106 0 0 0 0 0
Life Insurance 510B 0 0 0 0 0
Unemployment Training Tax 5109 0 0 0 0 0
Disability Insurance 5110 0 0 0 0 0
Workers" Compensation 5112 0 0 0 0 0
Health Insurance 5113 0 0 0 0 0
Dental Insurance 5114 0 0 0 0 0
Medical Reimbursement 5115 0 0 0 0 0
Vision Insurance 5116 0 0 0 0 0
Chid Care Reimbursement 5117 0 0 0 0 0
Temporary Help 5118 0 0 0 0 0
Part~Time (Project) 5119 . 0 6.907 0 0 6,907
Part-T1me Retirement 5120 0 0 0 0 0
Overtime Wages 5121 0 900 0 0 900
Compensated Absences 5126 0 0 0 0 0
life & Accident Insurance 5190 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (Personnel Services) $3,150 $120,620 $24,990 $0 $148,960
MuniFinancia/
Page 14
Temecula Community SelVices District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
2000/2001 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2001
BUDGET ITEM Account Levele Level C level 0 LevelR Total
No. 192 193 194 195 District
OPERA nONS AND MAINTENANCE
Repair & Maint. . Facilities 5212 $0 $53,230 $0 $0 $53,230
Repair & Maintenance-Vehicles 5214 0 0 0 0 0
Maintenance Supplies 5218 0 0 0 0 0
Office Supplies 5220 0 0 0 0 0
Printing 5222 0 0 0 0 0
Legal DocumentsIMaps 5224 0 0 0 0 0
Election Costs (Offset by developer deposits) 5225 12,000 12,000 0 0 24.000
Dues and Memberships 5226 0 0 2.610 0 2,610
Publications 5229 0 0 0 0 0
Postage and Packaging 5230 0 0 0 0 0
Property Tax Admin Fees 5231 2.500 1,200 2,700 50 6,750
Rent - FaclllUes 5234 0 0 0 0 0
Rent - Equipment 5236 0 0 0 0 0
Equipment lease 5239 0 0 0 0 0
Utilities 5240 0 140,600 0 0 140,600
Small tools/Equlpment 5242 0 0 0 0 0
Uniforms 5243 0 0 0 0 0
Signs 5244 0 0 0 0 0
Legal Services 5246 0 0 0 0 0
Consulting Services 5245 0 25,000 0 0 25,000
Other Outside Services 5250 0 0 0 0 0
Advertising 5254 0 0 4,000 0 4.000
Public Notices 5256 4,900 2,400 5,600 0 12.900
Conferences 5258 0 0 0 0 0
Professional Meetings 5260 0 0 0 0 0
Staff TrainlnglEducation 5261 0 0 0 0 0
Mileage 5262 0 0 0 0 0
FU51 Expense-City Vehicles 5263 0 0 0 0 0
Council Discretionary 5267 0 0 0 0 0
Blueprints 5258 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal (5200'8) $19,700 $234,430 $14,910 $80 $269,120
MuniFinancia/
Page 15
T emecul. Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Repon
Fiscal Year 2000/01
2000/2001 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2001
Aoct. level 8 Lev_Ie Level 0 LevelR Total
No. 192 193 194 195 District
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
Waste Hauling 5315 $0 $0 $2.597,956 $0 $2,597.956
Street Ughting 5319 345,000 0 0 0 345.000
Insurance 5330 0 0 0 0 0
Vehicles 5335 0 0 0 0 0
Information Systems 5340 0 0 0 0 0
Support Services 5345 0 0 0 0 0
Facilities 5350 0 0 0 0 0
Assessment Engineering 5370 0 0 0 0 0
Refund of Prior Year Assessments 5375 0 0 0 0 0
City Admin Charges I (Sports 190.183) 5380 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotals (5300's) $345,000 $0 $2,597,956 $0 52.942.956
Operating Expenses 5400 0 0 0 0 0
Emergencey Road Maintenance 5402 0 0 0 17.080 17,080
Landscape Maintenance 5415 0 307,900 0 0 307.900
Landscape Rehabilitation 5418 0 42,000 0 0 42,000
Subtotals (5400'6) $0 $349,900 $0 $17,080 $366,980
Other Expedltures 5900 0 0 0 0 0
Operating Transfers Out 5901 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotals (5900's) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0
Debt Service 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total Direct District Costs $367,850 $705,150 $2,637,856 $17,160 $3,728,018
EXPENDITURES
Reserve Collection (Contingency) 0 0 0 0 0
Total Direct Distrid Costs 367,850 705,150 2,637,858 17,160 3,728,016
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $367,850 $705,150 $2,837,856 $17,160 $3,728,016
REVENUES
Reserve Reduction (Contribution) 0 0 0 0 0
Other Revenue Sources 12,813 51,004 14,000 500 78.118
General Fund 0 0 0 0 0
Fund Balance 3,293 94,304 25,900 4,942 128,439
Rates and Charges (Balance to Levey) 351,944 559,842 2.597,956 11,718 3.521.480
TOTAL REVENUES $367,850 $705,160 $2,637,856 $17,160 $3,728,018
MuniFinancial
Page 16
I .
T emecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
v.
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each eligible property.
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel (residential lot) method.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Citywide Recycling and Refuse):
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcels (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
The Rate Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Service Level R (Roads):
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The fOllowing tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL 8
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant 1.00 $25.68 $25.68 Per Parcel
MuniFinandal
Page 17
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000/01
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate C-1 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-2 1.00 89.00 89.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-3 1.00 116.00 116.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-4 1.00 175.00 175.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-5 1.00 70.00 70.00 Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Rate C-6 1.00 $225.00 $225.00 Per Parcel
Note: Although Rate Levels C-5 and C-6 have been established at $70.00 and $225.00 respectively,
properties within these two Service Levels are not being charged for Fiscal Year 2000/2001.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Parcel Charge per Parcel
Property Type Unit X Parcel = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 $175.68 $175.68 Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Parcel Charge Parcel
Property Type Unit X per Unit = Charge Multiplier
Single Family Residential Rate R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-1 0.50 115.26 57.64 Per Parcel.
Single Family Residential Rate R-2 1.00 121.92 121.92 Per Parcel
Single Family Vacant Rate R-2 0.50 $121.92 $60.96 Per Parcel
MuniFinancia/
Page 18
Temecul. Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2000101
Appendix A - 2000/2001 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or. parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
MuniFinancial
Page 19